America First - Nicholas J. Fuentes - Egalitarianism vs Science feat. JF Gariepy | America First Ep. 143

00:00:00.000 Good evening, everybody.

00:00:01.000 We're watching America First.

00:00:02.000 My name is Nicholas J. Fuentes, and we have a great show for you tonight.

00:00:07.000 We have a very special guest who I'm surprised to announce.

00:00:12.000 I think we actually announced it on Friday, but we have a very special guest for you tonight.

00:00:17.000 At about the half hour mark, he'll be dropping in at about 7 30 CST Central Time, and that is J.F. Gripe from the Blood Sports Series with Andy Worski.

00:00:27.000 We're excited to have him.

00:00:29.000 He's a biologist, he's a smart guy, and I'll give him the whole introduction once he joins us.

00:00:35.000 But I have some very interesting questions to ask him from a right wing perspective about egalitarianism, about where we are in the West, about ideology.

00:00:46.000 But we'll get into all of that later.

00:00:47.000 Also, I have a very pressing question about fruit.

00:00:52.000 I know that may seem like a goofy joke question, but really I do.

00:00:57.000 Because I'm, you know, you know me.

00:00:59.000 I'm walking around the house, I'm fiending for some kind of a snack.

00:01:02.000 I find a banana, and I'm sitting there thinking, you know, Here you have a banana.

00:01:07.000 Here you have it that this grows on a tree.

00:01:09.000 It's this perfect little snack made for primates or people, you know, whatever it is.

00:01:15.000 And I wonder, how do you get there?

00:01:17.000 How do you go from amoeba to banana?

00:01:20.000 How does that work?

00:01:21.000 And it's not even a question of like, people are like, Nick is going to get destroyed in the banana religion debate.

00:01:27.000 It's got nothing to do with that.

00:01:28.000 I just, I thought, who better to ask than a biologist?

00:01:32.000 So he'll be coming on at 7 30.

00:01:33.000 Should be a fun time.

00:01:35.000 He's a funny guy, a very intelligent guy.

00:01:38.000 And actually, we were just talking last night.

00:01:40.000 We spoke last night during the gun control debate.

00:01:45.000 If you caught it on the Andy Worski live stream last night, it was a very fun time.

00:01:50.000 It was me versus Devin Tracy, whose name is Atheism is Unstoppable.

00:01:56.000 I think after the performance last night, he's got to change it to Atheism Has Been Stopped by Nick Fuentes.

00:02:04.000 It was a bloodbath.

00:02:05.000 I predicted it going in.

00:02:06.000 I said it would be pretty much an easy win.

00:02:09.000 I said that.

00:02:10.000 On Tuesday, I said that.

00:02:11.000 On Monday, I tweeted it out.

00:02:13.000 I said, you know, here's this your usual lefty on guns, usual non arguments, somebody who hasn't looked at the facts.

00:02:21.000 Came in, I cleaned him up on guns.

00:02:23.000 And then, as a bonus, I cleaned his clock on religion as well. 0.74

00:02:27.000 And it was really, I almost even felt a little bit embarrassed.

00:02:31.000 I got to be honest, because right out of the gate, the arguments that he was making, I was like, this is not when the unstoppable atheists are sending their people.

00:02:41.000 They're not sending their best. 0.69

00:02:42.000 I mean, it was a lot of this.

00:02:44.000 The whole argument was essentially, wow, okay, wow. 0.97

00:02:47.000 You know, it was this kind of like shit-libbed-tier argument: I'm just really exasperated. 0.95

00:02:52.000 I guess people will come and rally to my side. 0.74

00:02:56.000 And towards the end, he got into this weird place where he was just throwing out these very petty, like non-arguments that I'm sure even he didn't think would stick.

00:03:05.000 But he was just trying to do anything at that point to save face.

00:03:08.000 He was saying, Oh, you don't believe the polls for 2018, but you believe gun crime statistics.

00:03:15.000 Yeah. 0.56

00:03:16.000 Yeah, I actually think you can have both of those at the same time.

00:03:19.000 And then, towards the very end, when it got into religion, first he started out with this vindictive, like 20 questions.

00:03:26.000 I'm going to try and trap you.

00:03:27.000 You know, I'm mocking you from my, me and the liberalists.

00:03:30.000 We're so intelligent.

00:03:32.000 But then he just stopped talking for about 40 minutes.

00:03:35.000 The last 40 minutes, I was able to just go on and on about morality and these kinds of things.

00:03:41.000 And he didn't really have anything to say.

00:03:42.000 So it was pretty much uncontested by anybody.

00:03:45.000 If you look at the comments, the live stream, Twitter, bloodbath.

00:03:48.000 But it was fun, but it was a fun time, and I appreciate that he came on.

00:03:53.000 I guess he was kind of a good sport, and it always was great to be back on Worski.

00:03:58.000 They really do it right on Worski.

00:03:59.000 I have to say it's a great combination between JF and Andy because you got JF who's able to reason through it.

00:04:06.000 And not like, you know, I know that was a big source of division between Andy and JF, the intelligence question.

00:04:13.000 But JF is able, I think, uniquely better than most people, is able to assess arguments, restate them, and interrogate their core premise better than most.

00:04:25.000 And I think he does it fairly and I think he does it well.

00:04:28.000 Andy, on the other hand, I think he comes at it from more of a layperson's perspective.

00:04:31.000 I don't think he's an expert.

00:04:32.000 Expert on politics, but he comes into it just as a funny personality kind of a guy, but also I think he's able to provide understanding for people that are not totally into politics.

00:04:45.000 I remember in some of the debates about atheism or some of the other ones where it's more technical, there's more finer points, and he's able to provide that element as well.

00:04:54.000 So it's great.

00:04:55.000 But, anyways, why are we spending so much time on something that happened yesterday when we got a big episode going on in Syria?

00:05:04.000 I gotta say, it's kind of boring.

00:05:07.000 Boring, sorry.

00:05:08.000 I know people, how could you make a joke like that?

00:05:11.000 It's World War III.

00:05:13.000 We were promised. 0.95

00:05:15.000 I think we were all looking forward to last night World War III. 0.92

00:05:19.000 I think we were all a little bit looking forward to it just to see what would happen. 0.89

00:05:23.000 You know, you're going to lie to me and say you didn't at least want to see what would have happened where you saw the chemical weapons attack in Syria over the weekend on Saturday, you saw a strike by Israel in Syria on Sunday.

00:05:36.000 President Trump that night vowed a strong response.

00:05:39.000 He said he would make a decision in the next 48 to 72 hours.

00:05:43.000 That was on Monday morning.

00:05:45.000 And so we expected a strike either Monday night.

00:05:48.000 Night fell in Syria, no strike. 0.82

00:05:50.000 We expected a strike yesterday.

00:05:52.000 Remember during the show, during this show yesterday, from the Pentagon.

00:05:55.000 Imminent announcement on Syria soon.

00:05:59.000 No announcement comes from the Pentagon.

00:06:00.000 No strike, no nothing. 1.00

00:06:02.000 And we were promised the Black Pillars, who apparently are so much smarter than me, they said, you know, whoa, Trump's a cock. 1.00

00:06:10.000 He sold us out. 0.99

00:06:11.000 We're going to war in Syria with Russia.

00:06:14.000 And I think as this drags out, we haven't seen any.

00:06:17.000 I mean, we've heard some unconfirmed reports about movements of submarines and carriers and planes, but we haven't really seen anything except for the strike by Israel on Sunday.

00:06:29.000 We haven't really seen anything unless something just happened a moment ago.

00:06:34.000 Any concrete action by the United States or anybody else?

00:06:36.000 It looks like Theresa May is still undecided as to what she wants to do.

00:06:41.000 President Trump is still undecided.

00:06:43.000 Macron is on board with the response.

00:06:45.000 Unclear what that's going to look like.

00:06:47.000 Saudi Arabia, I don't know if they're all the way on board with the alliance, or rather the coalition.

00:06:52.000 So we're at kind of this weird point.

00:06:54.000 And I will say that the longer that this drags out, I think the more that that communicates.

00:06:59.000 It really says something about what the strategy is here, right?

00:07:03.000 And I'll be the first to say, as always, I came on very strongly on Monday. 0.75

00:07:07.000 If you watch the show on Monday, it was strongly about how the chemical attack was a sham.

00:07:15.000 That was an attempt by the deep state to lie us into war.

00:07:18.000 The hypocrisy of the deep state that they support.

00:07:21.000 In a legal and horrible, tragic war in Yemen. 0.84

00:07:25.000 They refuel Saudi planes that are conducting this horrible war.

00:07:29.000 And yet, at the same time, we're going to go to war against Assad because of similar atrocities, right?

00:07:34.000 And so I went very hard and I said, look, we can't have war in Syria.

00:07:38.000 That was not part of the deal.

00:07:39.000 That was not part of the campaign promises.

00:07:41.000 That's not part of our ideology.

00:07:44.000 You know, we see America not as the world's policeman, but America first, name of the show, right?

00:07:50.000 But then as I saw this response, just none of it adds up.

00:07:54.000 And as we see more developments today, where still no strike, no strike yesterday, so far no strike.

00:08:00.000 If it's going to happen, it would happen around in the next two to three hours.

00:08:04.000 This is typically when it happens.

00:08:05.000 This is when it happened last year on April 7th.

00:08:08.000 I think it was about 9 o'clock Eastern time, if I recall.

00:08:12.000 I'm not really sure the details, but it was around this time.

00:08:15.000 This is when it's nighttime in Syria.

00:08:17.000 That's when it would happen.

00:08:19.000 So no strike on Sunday, Monday, Tuesday, and so far nothing tonight.

00:08:25.000 And it's interesting because President Trump has said explicitly throughout his campaign and throughout his public life that if you're going to go to war against a country, if the plan is we're going to war against Syria, what did he say about ISIS?

00:08:38.000 You don't telegraph your moves to the other side.

00:08:42.000 He said this throughout the campaign.

00:08:44.000 If you're Barack Obama and you say we're going to pull out at this state and we're going to do this, we're going to attack this city at this time with this many troops, he said you can't do that.

00:08:53.000 He said Douglas MacArthur would be rolling over in his grave.

00:08:56.000 And yet, here we are.

00:08:57.000 We have a chemical weapons attack, and then you have President Trump making continuous, consistent, overt, and explicit warnings directly to Putin and to Bashar al Assad that there's going to be a strike coming.

00:09:13.000 And just think about the praxis here. 0.57

00:09:16.000 If your objective is we want to destroy as many of Assad's military assets as possible, if you're considering going to war, we want to make it so that we can attack Assad at his weakest points. 0.54

00:09:30.000 Where he doesn't know where we're coming from, how we're coming, that we're coming at all. 0.60

00:09:34.000 If this is your objective, and this is a reasonable way to conduct a war or to conduct a serious airstrike, right?

00:09:40.000 If you want to go to war, you want the element of surprise.

00:09:42.000 If you want an airstrike, you want the element of surprise because you want to attack as many military assets as possible.

00:09:48.000 Does it facilitate either of these two objectives to warn the enemy repeatedly for 72 hours the nature, the scope of the attack, the timing of the attack?

00:10:01.000 It'll be soon.

00:10:02.000 It's going to be in 48 or 72 hours.

00:10:04.000 We have to take strong action.

00:10:05.000 And through other various means, Trump cancels his trip to Colombia and to Peru.

00:10:12.000 You have the commander of Middle Eastern forces for the United States in the Middle East.

00:10:17.000 He cancels a public appearance in New York tomorrow.

00:10:21.000 You have the European flight control system saying, don't fly over Syria.

00:10:25.000 You have Lebanon telling people, don't fly over Syria.

00:10:29.000 I think it was the Emirates or Kuwait who said the same thing.

00:10:31.000 So you have all these very indirect ways.

00:10:34.000 The president this morning tweets out, Hey, Putin, we're sending missiles into Syria. 0.51

00:10:38.000 This is what you get for supporting the animal, what do you call them?

00:10:43.000 The gassing animal, Assad, something to that effect. 0.69

00:10:47.000 And so you look at the past three days. 0.64

00:10:50.000 This is not congruent.

00:10:51.000 The rhetoric is not congruent with an administration that wants to go to war.

00:10:55.000 If we were going to have a large scale ground invasion, U.S. led coalition war in Syria, it wouldn't look like this.

00:11:02.000 It would not start like this.

00:11:03.000 That's number one.

00:11:04.000 Number two, the closer we look at the timeline here, We went from last week saying we're going to pull out of Syria in six months to allegedly now there's going to be this big war.

00:11:15.000 There's going to be an escalation with Russia.

00:11:19.000 And here's, I think, a problem with the way people interpret President Trump.

00:11:24.000 If you already distrust the president, if you already have a problem with him, you've already invested in this narrative that Trump is just a buffoon, he doesn't strategize, he just kind of tumbles through these situations.

00:11:37.000 You're willing to believe things.

00:11:39.000 You wouldn't normally be willing to believe if it were just based on logic and reason.

00:11:44.000 And I'll tell you what I mean by this.

00:11:46.000 We're expected to believe that President Trump has been a non interventionist his entire adult life.

00:11:53.000 From the Iraq War in 2003, which he opposed, the Libyan intervention, which he opposed, Barack Obama doing strikes in Syria in 2013, which he opposed.

00:12:02.000 He campaigned on getting out of Syria and Iraq and vociferously, I think, not even pandering to the crowd, but these have been his beliefs for a long time.

00:12:12.000 He said if you want to think like George Bush and you want to go in, you can't fight.

00:12:17.000 Two wars at once.

00:12:18.000 You can't fight Assad and ISIS at the same time.

00:12:21.000 He said, thinking like that is why we've been in the Middle East for 15 years.

00:12:24.000 He said that at the South Carolina debate.

00:12:26.000 He campaigns on this.

00:12:27.000 He knows his base wants this. 0.97

00:12:29.000 And just one week ago, he triples down in very public statements I want to get out of Syria. 0.79

00:12:36.000 Three separate times, we get reports that he's doing it in private, telling his generals, congressional leadership, I want Assad to Syria.

00:12:43.000 And we're expected to believe we see the same chemical attack that he does. 0.55

00:12:47.000 By the way, we see the same thing.

00:12:49.000 And we're doubtful of it, but President Trump is not.

00:12:52.000 He sees this highly dubious chemical attack, knowing full well the rhetoric that he's been spewing for the past week.

00:12:58.000 He sees it with no evidence.

00:13:00.000 He sees it in a place encircled by Assad.

00:13:02.000 He knows ISIS has chemical weapons.

00:13:04.000 He knows the situation better than we do. 0.77

00:13:06.000 But we're expected to believe he saw the situation last year at the same time for the same reason.

00:13:12.000 But this one attack, this one chemical weapons attack, this caused his entire worldview to turn on a dime.

00:13:19.000 I was a non interventionist last week.

00:13:22.000 Now, I'm not.

00:13:23.000 Chemical weapons.

00:13:24.000 I campaigned on getting rid of our engagement in Syria and in Iraq. 0.66

00:13:29.000 Now, I'm not. 0.95

00:13:30.000 Now, I'm in favor of full scale ground war because of the chemical attack. 0.76

00:13:34.000 I wanted to win re election and to have a solid turnout in the midterms. 0.89

00:13:38.000 I don't care about any of that. 0.88

00:13:39.000 Now, I'm a neocon because I saw a chemical attack.

00:13:42.000 If you already don't like Trump, you're willing to believe that.

00:13:46.000 If you already say, I distrust Trump, he's a bad guy, you're already willing to say, Yeah, that's a logical explanation.

00:13:53.000 But if you're, I think, A more objective person, you would say that coupled with the warnings, coupled with some of these other things, makes it a little bit uncertain.

00:14:03.000 So that's where we're at in Syria.

00:14:05.000 We have a lot of troop movements being reported.

00:14:08.000 There's reports that the UK has sent their submarines within firing range of Syria.

00:14:12.000 There's reports that France has sent their fighter jets into the region.

00:14:15.000 Reports that the Italians have sent refueling planes into Iraq.

00:14:20.000 Allegedly, Saudi Arabia and the Emirates have joined this coalition.

00:14:24.000 There's all kinds of other Unconfirmed reports also about troop movements within Syria.

00:14:29.000 They say that Russia has evacuated the TARDIS naval base in Syria.

00:14:34.000 They had 11 battleships there.

00:14:36.000 They say that according to satellite imagery, all the ships are no longer there.

00:14:40.000 Hezbollah has allegedly pulled out of Syria.

00:14:43.000 They say, and this is totally unconfirmed, but you see these kinds of things pop up on your timeline.

00:14:48.000 They say that Assad has fled the country in a plane, and I think they said he went over to Lebanon.

00:14:55.000 And so we don't know where Assad is.

00:14:58.000 They say the royal family or the presidential family packed up and left because they understand that the United States is coming.

00:15:05.000 They've abandoned a lot of their Air Force military assets.

00:15:09.000 They've relocated a lot of their people, a lot of their machinery.

00:15:13.000 And so we'll see what happens.

00:15:15.000 I maintain my position that if this escalates into a ground war, if this escalates into further involvement in Syria, I'm totally against that. 0.85

00:15:23.000 You know, people say, oh, Trump could totally go to war in Syria for Israel and Nick would be in favor of it.

00:15:29.000 And I've never said that.

00:15:30.000 That has never been my position.

00:15:32.000 The position has always been Trump, he makes gestures that make it look like something is coming, and then it never happens.

00:15:41.000 And people act as though it did anyway, right?

00:15:43.000 Like with the missile strike last year, they said war in Syria, 100,000 ground troops by June 1st.

00:15:49.000 And the way people talk about Trump now, it's almost as if it didn't matter that that prediction didn't come true.

00:15:55.000 They say, oh, Trump's a neocon with his foreign policy.

00:15:57.000 How?

00:15:57.000 Really?

00:15:58.000 Right?

00:15:59.000 So the position has always been if Trump goes into Syria, if it escalates, I'm against that.

00:16:04.000 There's no justifying it. 1.00

00:16:06.000 We should not be in Syria. 1.00

00:16:08.000 Don't think that's going to happen. 1.00

00:16:10.000 I don't believe, I strongly am of the opinion that that will not happen.

00:16:14.000 And I think it's really a shame because. 0.55

00:16:16.000 I think if you had any one of these people on the show, any one of these black pillars on the show who are saying it's the end of the world, and ask them point blank, do you really think a ground invasion of Syria is imminent? 0.78

00:16:27.000 I don't think any of them could tell you with a straight face that the answer is yes. 1.00

00:16:31.000 But they play it up.

00:16:32.000 It's an easy dopamine rush.

00:16:34.000 It's fear mongering.

00:16:36.000 And trust me, it would be much easier for me to come on the air every night.

00:16:39.000 It would be much easier for me to log into Twitter every day and say what people want to hear, which is, and trust me, Folks, it's so easy.

00:16:48.000 I've seen it about a million times.

00:16:49.000 It's a rerun of my favorite show every time Trump says something we don't like.

00:16:53.000 I could so easily pull up Trump's old tweets from 2013.

00:16:57.000 Remember when you said this about Syria?

00:17:00.000 Bing, bing, bong.

00:17:01.000 Remember when you said this about Syria?

00:17:03.000 I wish this guy was president.

00:17:05.000 You know, I love those epic takes.

00:17:06.000 Those never get old.

00:17:08.000 I could so easily say, We didn't elect you to go to war in Syria.

00:17:12.000 No more wars for Israel.

00:17:13.000 Half term president. 0.54

00:17:15.000 It's the easiest thing in the world, folks.

00:17:17.000 But it simply does not conform to the facts.

00:17:19.000 People say, He says this to Pander to a base.

00:17:23.000 He says this to pander to people who are pro Trump.

00:17:25.000 No chance.

00:17:27.000 The omnibus bill, I was brutally honest.

00:17:30.000 I said this was a loss.

00:17:31.000 This was a big loss.

00:17:32.000 He didn't see it coming.

00:17:34.000 He should have done better.

00:17:35.000 In this case, I'm actually alienating people.

00:17:38.000 I'd be getting dopamine like you wouldn't believe if I were out there vocally, oh, I'm against Trump.

00:17:45.000 I'm burning my MAGA hat.

00:17:47.000 And I'm the white pillar and I'm saying it's bad.

00:17:50.000 But I have to tell you the truth. 0.99

00:17:51.000 I only tell the truth, black pillars.

00:17:54.000 And none of the Indicators that we've seen over the past three days would inform any reasonable person to believe that a ground war is imminent.

00:18:03.000 Does that mean it's totally not possible?

00:18:05.000 Of course not.

00:18:06.000 It's still possible.

00:18:07.000 And that's why I leave room to say we're in trouble if that happens and we're off the Trump train if that happens.

00:18:12.000 But I think the odds are that it won't happen. 0.63

00:18:16.000 So that's Syria. 0.99

00:18:17.000 We'll keep an eye on it tonight after JF takes off at around 8 and we jump into the Super Chats and the Stream Labs.

00:18:25.000 I think we'll do a little live coverage.

00:18:27.000 We'll see if anything.

00:18:28.000 Has happened, if there's any new strikes.

00:18:30.000 I heard some reports that there would be a coalition strike on 70 targets in Syria.

00:18:35.000 Somebody told me this.

00:18:36.000 I don't know how true that is.

00:18:37.000 I don't know if that's legitimate or not, but something worth considering.

00:18:40.000 I don't think that would constitute a full scale war in Syria.

00:18:44.000 You know, again, I think people have this conflation of if there's any kind of military, if there's any kind of violence, that means war.

00:18:51.000 I'm against war.

00:18:52.000 I'm not against a limited tactical strike like last year.

00:18:56.000 You know, last year was not war.

00:18:58.000 If we did a strike on 70 targets and that was it, it was a one off, there was no retaliation, that does not constitute a war, right?

00:19:07.000 These are gestures. 0.95

00:19:08.000 I'm against Iraq, where we sent 200,000 of our best and bravest to die for Israel. 0.90

00:19:15.000 I'm against Iraq because it cost $6 trillion, or Afghanistan, where the numbers are similar. 0.93

00:19:20.000 But a small airstrike once a year, that does not a war make. 0.66

00:19:24.000 But that's Syria.

00:19:26.000 The other big thing we got to get into, which we didn't talk about the other day, which we didn't talk about this week, is.

00:19:32.000 Robert Mueller and the FBI.

00:19:35.000 It was weird because I tweeted about this briefly, and I'll talk about it briefly on the show.

00:19:39.000 But I tweeted about it.

00:19:40.000 People are like, boo, only talk about Syria.

00:19:44.000 How could you even tweet about this when things are going on in Syria?

00:19:47.000 It's like, you have no idea how upset people get when these things happen.

00:19:51.000 And I simply don't understand it.

00:19:53.000 There's nothing you can do about it.

00:19:55.000 Call the White House, tweet, I'm really mad, F Donald Trump.

00:20:00.000 There is nothing you can do at this point in the conversation about Syria that will stop what's been put into motion.

00:20:08.000 Right?

00:20:09.000 You can freak out, you can fight, you can be really angry.

00:20:12.000 None of that's going to change.

00:20:13.000 What the president decides to do in Syria. 0.94

00:20:16.000 If it's the end of the world, nothing you can do about it. 0.80

00:20:18.000 Relax, take a deep breath, call your mom, go to confession, go to church, and let's prepare to meet God.

00:20:27.000 If it's not the end of the world, then what the hell are you complaining about?

00:20:30.000 So people just get, you have no idea the kind of heat that I get.

00:20:34.000 And that's why it's really taxing on me.

00:20:36.000 Every time the president says or does something that deviates slightly from his campaign, it's like, you know, here we go again.

00:20:44.000 Here, I'm going to.

00:20:45.000 Be subject to this mental abuse for this verbal abuse online for a week.

00:20:51.000 I always get proven right, but it is tough when it happens.

00:20:53.000 But to get to the Michael Cohen thing, President Trump's lawyer, Michael Cohen, his office, his private lawyer's office was raided by the FBI over the weekend, and nobody really knew what this was about.

00:21:05.000 It was actually somewhat concerning because you have this whole Stormy Daniels situation where it's alleged that Michael Cohen had Stormy Daniels sign a non disclosure agreement and paid her $130,000 before the election not to release her story.

00:21:20.000 Which is bogus because a non disclosure agreement is not illegal.

00:21:23.000 You know, I don't think President Trump is the first person in American history to try and suppress a bad story in an election year, right?

00:21:31.000 But so, Robert Mueller, he sacked Michael Cohen's office.

00:21:36.000 He went in, he busted in, he stole all kinds of documents and things.

00:21:40.000 And it turned out today, it came out that the reason for that raid on Michael Cohen's office, where I guess it's just a lawless country, the FBI can do whatever it wants, they can raid the president's private lawyer's office.

00:21:51.000 The reason they raided the office was to find things in relation to the Hollywood Axis tape.

00:21:57.000 Remember the Pussygate tape from October 2016?

00:22:01.000 They went in to find documents related to that.

00:22:03.000 So, reminder, remember folks, Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein appointed the special counsel to look into collusion between Russia and the Trump campaign in the 2016 election, or just broadly Russian interference in the election.

00:22:21.000 What does the Axis Hollywood tape have?

00:22:24.000 Anything to do with Russia, with Russia and the Trump campaign?

00:22:28.000 So far, the indictments that have been brought down by the Mueller investigation after what has it been, a year and a half?

00:22:35.000 The indictments brought down have had to do with financial crimes committed by Paul Manafort four years ago, as with regards to his business dealings in Ukraine.

00:22:47.000 So you have Paul Manafort, who served as a campaign manager for about 30 seconds, and his alleged financial crimes from Six years ago, that were actually shelved because it wasn't a big deal, and with Ukraine, not with Russia.

00:23:00.000 You have a number of other people who were simply caught perjuring themselves.

00:23:04.000 They said something that wasn't totally accurate to the FBI, and so they're basically getting thrown in jail for lying to the FBI, which is just such a goofy thing.

00:23:14.000 That's because they didn't speak to the FBI with a lawyer.

00:23:18.000 And now, what they're pursuing after they find that we can't find any collusion, we can't find Russia in 2016, the House Intelligence Committee concludes there's no.

00:23:27.000 There's no collusion between Russia and President Trump.

00:23:30.000 So now they're looking into Access, Hollywood, and Stormy Daniels.

00:23:34.000 And at this point, you know, people are saying Trump should just fire Mueller.

00:23:38.000 I think Mueller's doing a great job discrediting his own investigation because after a year and a half, the Democrats are amped up.

00:23:45.000 They're excited any day now.

00:23:47.000 We've got sealed indictments prepared.

00:23:49.000 President Trump's going away anytime soon.

00:23:51.000 Clinton can still be president.

00:23:53.000 And they're all gassed up about it, and they have been for a year and a half.

00:23:56.000 And every day, nothing comes out no smoking gun, there's no evidence.

00:24:01.000 He keeps digging and digging into, you know, everywhere, digging tunnels across the entire planet, trying to find something.

00:24:08.000 And I think it's actually discrediting his own investigation because if Trump fired Mueller, Mueller would look like a martyr.

00:24:15.000 That would look like a cover up.

00:24:16.000 The only reason Mueller didn't find anything was you were obstructing and you fired him because he was getting close to the truth. 0.98

00:24:23.000 But if Trump allows him to keep digging and he continues to find nothing, then people eventually say, oh, all right, you know, this guy's a clown. 0.93

00:24:30.000 And if the Democrats don't say that, the voters do. 0.96

00:24:32.000 So that's Michael Cohen. 0.98

00:24:33.000 It is now 7 30, so we're going to bring on the Frenchman. 0.96

00:24:40.000 The Frenchman, my friend, J.F.

00:24:45.000 And we're going to do it from Google Hangouts today instead of Skype.

00:24:49.000 I didn't even ask him about Skype. 0.97

00:24:51.000 It felt a little bit like pleb tier to ask him about Skype. 0.99

00:24:55.000 So let's see if I could get my deal set up here.

00:24:58.000 So we'll be doing our Google Hangouts.

00:25:01.000 That's the standard thing that we use for the Bloodsport.

00:25:05.000 So it looks like he is here.

00:25:09.000 Hello.

00:25:10.000 Hello.

00:25:11.000 Can you just give me a test so I can make sure that you're coming through?

00:25:15.000 Test, test, this is JF.

00:25:18.000 Excellent.

00:25:19.000 You are coming through clear.

00:25:21.000 So let me just, the audio is all set up.

00:25:22.000 Let me just put you up on the screen here.

00:25:25.000 It's all me doing the text.

00:25:27.000 So it's not as good as YouTube works.

00:25:31.000 That's right.

00:25:32.000 And so let me get my display capture going.

00:25:34.000 Whoops.

00:25:36.000 And all right.

00:25:39.000 Let me pull you up here, put you up in full screen.

00:25:42.000 And so, JF, welcome to the show.

00:25:45.000 We're excited to have you.

00:25:47.000 I gave a little bit of an introduction before the show.

00:25:49.000 You are the co founder, the co host of Andy Worski Blood Sports.

00:25:56.000 I don't know if we're still in dispute like who's really, we had some controversy earlier, but you're in Canada now.

00:26:02.000 You're a former biologist, or I guess you're still a biologist.

00:26:05.000 You were in school.

00:26:06.000 Absolutely.

00:26:07.000 You jumped out.

00:26:08.000 But tell us a little bit about yourself for those that don't totally know.

00:26:11.000 Who is J.F. Garaipi?

00:26:14.000 Oh, well, I think I'm born like a biologist because when I was very young, I was cutting.

00:26:18.000 I was collecting butterflies.

00:26:20.000 I was watching them reproduce.

00:26:24.000 I was collecting them in aquariums.

00:26:26.000 I even watched a lot of fish reproduction.

00:26:29.000 So I really was always fascinated by life.

00:26:32.000 And so I decided to study biology and I became a researcher.

00:26:37.000 I did brain surgery on monkeys, I did brain electrophysiology on fish.

00:26:43.000 And I'm interested in how life emerges also.

00:26:47.000 So that's a branch that I've started exploring as I was leaving my research career.

00:26:53.000 Because I was not interested in working in academia.

00:26:56.000 I found it boring and I found that there was too much social connections that you needed to make.

00:27:02.000 And I'm really in it for the knowledge and for the understanding of nature.

00:27:07.000 So I was more happy to leave academia and to become a teacher on YouTube.

00:27:12.000 So I spread my knowledge on YouTube to a much bigger audience than what I would have if I was a professor.

00:27:21.000 Yeah, that's great.

00:27:21.000 Well, very good.

00:27:22.000 That's a great answer.

00:27:23.000 I like that.

00:27:25.000 I think you and I share the same attitude about academia.

00:27:28.000 I was the same way.

00:27:30.000 Maybe I didn't get up to the level that you were.

00:27:32.000 I dropped out in my undergrad, so a little bit different.

00:27:36.000 But I understand where you're coming from that the university system, I think, so often in a lot of pursuits, becomes a little bit more about the politics, about the social climbing than about.

00:27:46.000 So I respect that you're all about the knowledge, all about the pursuit of truth.

00:27:50.000 And so you're talking essentially about the question of biogenesis, right?

00:27:55.000 The origin of how life got on Earth.

00:27:58.000 And you hinted you have a book coming out about that.

00:28:00.000 Could you give us like a synopsis?

00:28:02.000 What's your take on that?

00:28:03.000 Because that is a pretty interesting question.

00:28:06.000 So, my coming book is The Revolutionary Phenotype, and I consider it an unauthorized sequel of Richard Dawkins' Selfish Gene.

00:28:06.000 Absolutely.

00:28:16.000 I add a theory to biology.

00:28:18.000 I add a new concept to biology, which is the idea that life forms can be created by previous life forms.

00:28:25.000 And I explain the process by which this can happen and by which it happened four billion years ago.

00:28:33.000 This process that I discovered, I've been working on this theoretically for the last seven years.

00:28:39.000 Approximately.

00:28:41.000 And it's the process by which the first replicator shows up in a branch of life.

00:28:47.000 And it's nothing like we thought it was.

00:28:49.000 It's not a bunch of molecules collecting randomly into a sort of pond of water.

00:28:55.000 It's not random.

00:28:57.000 The process that leads to life is an act of creation by a previous life form.

00:29:05.000 Well, yeah, that's a great.

00:29:07.000 I mean, that's interesting only because when I've looked into this question from.

00:29:11.000 From a theistic point of view, obviously, you know, what you say about how life originates, whereas I guess the standard position is that you had to have this soup, essentially, the primordial soup, and things are supposed to randomly form.

00:29:24.000 And that to me was always inadequate because I'm sure, as you know, the odds that that kind of a thing would happen would be so extraordinary.

00:29:32.000 It's almost difficult to say that that kind of a thing could happen.

00:29:35.000 But if it was, as you say, then that would probably solve some of those problems.

00:29:39.000 But I think the bigger question I wanted to ask you because this is something.

00:29:43.000 And this is something I talked about when we first met on Bloodsports a comment that you made during one of the debates, which was that you are concerned with human organization at the level above, but also below the individual, meaning you're concerned with the organization of family and tribe and race, but also of genes and all of that kind of stuff.

00:30:03.000 So could you tell us a little bit what you mean by that in terms of the sub individual level?

00:30:08.000 Yeah, so a lot of libertarians tend to think of the individual as a unit that.

00:30:15.000 And every freedom belongs to the individual.

00:30:18.000 But someone who looks at reality sees a lot of cases where this doesn't apply.

00:30:25.000 For example, to me, the parent child relationship is very important.

00:30:29.000 And to me, the parent child relationship, for example, is subject to protection by some concepts of freedom.

00:30:38.000 And so to me, the state should not invade the liberty of the child, the liberty of the parent, but also the liberty of the ensemble.

00:30:47.000 The parent wanting some stuff for his children.

00:30:51.000 And so, the way I would say that I have a holistic approach to freedom, where I don't only recognize individual freedoms, because I think that we are suffering from an illusion when we think of freedom only as what we can do as individuals.

00:31:10.000 It's also the kind of organizations that we can form, it's also the kind of relations that we can form.

00:31:17.000 And once you have a holistic view of the world, Complex and subtle view of the world, you understand that the individual is an envelope, but it's just a physical envelope.

00:31:27.000 The reality is that our brains are adapted to grab information from outside, let some people control us, let other people not control us, or fight against them when they control us.

00:31:40.000 Once you adopt that view, you realize that the per libertarian view of individual freedom is insufficient.

00:31:49.000 That's actually interesting to hear you say that because I think many libertarians can relate to that idea.

00:31:55.000 And certainly in my own experience, that sounds a lot like how I came around to be a lot more of a conservative in terms of.

00:32:03.000 Classical conservatism, in the sense that, like you said, the individual really is kind of this abstraction.

00:32:09.000 It really doesn't have, I think, utility and lived reality to understand society based on just the individual.

00:32:16.000 Because you're right, there is, it's not so much we're all these atomized, separate people, but we all come from parents.

00:32:22.000 We all had to get raised.

00:32:23.000 We all had, you know, kind of a continuity, a continuum from parents to children and then on to other children.

00:32:30.000 So I think that's really kind of the basis for.

00:32:33.000 A much more conservative, family oriented society, something that's much more pragmatic as opposed to kind of this libertarian, constitutionalist, autistic stuff about, you know, we have to protect the individual.

00:32:45.000 And you get this crazy stuff about selling heroin to kids at the, you know, libertarian conventions.

00:32:50.000 So, but, and so I guess I want to ask you this is one of the bigger questions because you and Worski obviously have come onto the scene.

00:32:58.000 You're kind of glorified by the alt right.

00:33:01.000 I see you guys as kind of reinvigorating that like dissident right online culture.

00:33:06.000 It went away after the election.

00:33:07.000 It got very nasty.

00:33:08.000 It got very, like, ghettoized.

00:33:10.000 Whether you guys came back and it got fun, it got energetic, it was memetic again.

00:33:15.000 And what's interesting is, I don't think, and correct me if I'm wrong, I know Andy is not, like, a right wing conservative person.

00:33:22.000 I don't think, like, 10 or 15 years ago, probably would you describe yourself as conservative, or how would you describe where you fit yourself today and how it's changed over the past 10 years?

00:33:34.000 So I've been brought up in the French culture of colleges, and so I've been highly influenced by left.

00:33:42.000 Writings, I've read Marx, and at some point I would qualify myself as a Marxist at some point in my life.

00:33:51.000 I was really raised into this environment, and there was not much other options for me to grab because I think I've been the victim of a propaganda that would make me hate the right.

00:34:06.000 It would make me think that the right is authoritarian in nature.

00:34:11.000 And it's not necessarily authoritarian.

00:34:14.000 And in my revolt as a teenager, the only solution I was seeing is okay, we have to fight conservatism, we have to combat this.

00:34:24.000 And the only proposed solution was a sort of socialist slash Marxism.

00:34:31.000 Now, it's really when I started understanding the true fundamentals of biology that I realized the Marxist world is impossible.

00:34:42.000 We are evolving constantly to drain from society all of the energy we can to produce our babies.

00:34:49.000 So, society is a constant fight.

00:34:53.000 And if you don't recognize that fight, you're part of those who will be exploited.

00:34:57.000 If you do recognize that fight, there's a way we can make the world peaceful and loving and caring.

00:35:04.000 But it's the conservative mindset that will lead you there because you should never deny that we are all in a race for.

00:35:13.000 An exploitation of the environment, and even those who don't know it are doing it.

00:35:19.000 Yeah, I think that's kind of weird how there is this overlap between, because you would say that you're an atheist, and you come at it obviously from a very scientific point of view.

00:35:28.000 You've described, which I find fascinating, you've described a very conservative case for families, for kind of like a Hobbesian and conservative worldview, but not from where a traditionalist conservative would usually come from, which is from a religious place or from some kind of a perennialist place.

00:35:47.000 You come at it from a very scientific point of view.

00:35:49.000 And I think it's very interesting.

00:35:51.000 In the context of the debate last night with atheism is unstoppable, kind of the contrast between you and him, where a person like yourself who is secular, who is atheist, who believes in science, you can acknowledge human nature and the limits of humanity in the same way that a religious person does, even though from another place.

00:36:10.000 Whereas on the other side of the equation, you have someone like AIU who is an atheist but has kind of these weird ideas, these utopian ideas about how we could design society, how we could make it so that everybody's happy and safe all the time.

00:36:25.000 And so tell me, I don't understand how that divide comes from.

00:36:30.000 Could you tell me a little bit where you arrived?

00:36:32.000 Is it singularly biology that you came at that idea?

00:36:37.000 Oh, no.

00:36:37.000 I think that my entire involvement in YouTube is rooted in this difference that I have with Richard Dawkins on militant atheism.

00:36:47.000 Even if I've not talked publicly to Richard Dawkins, I've had dinner with him and I've always admired his will and his passion that he puts into his work.

00:36:59.000 However, I don't think that militant atheism is the way to go.

00:37:03.000 I've always had a difference of opinion there.

00:37:06.000 First, because the true atheist and even someone like Richard Dawkins, if you take him when he's the most honest about it, will tell you that he's an agnostic atheist.

00:37:18.000 He cannot ultimately say that the universe is not wrapped into some system that was created by some intelligence.

00:37:26.000 He would recognize the possibility that the universe is a simulation as a possibility.

00:37:31.000 Not as something he wants to believe in right now because he has no evidence for it, but he has to recognize that he's what he would call a level six atheist and not a level seven.

00:37:41.000 Level seven being a complete denial of God, level six being a recognition of the possibility that the universe could be implemented in some sort of God controlled system.

00:37:53.000 And so that's the first reason why.

00:37:56.000 Why would I fight to convince people of atheism when I'm ultimately unable to say it's impossible that a God exists?

00:38:05.000 That's the first reason.

00:38:06.000 The second reason is the nature of humans, and we see it.

00:38:11.000 People who turn to atheism make less babies, and they are bound to be reduced in their representation of the populations for the next few, within the next few hundred years.

00:38:22.000 We will see atheists, if not disappear, at least reduce their representation in the populations because they make about 1.7 babies per couple.

00:38:31.000 And so, even if the fact that God doesn't exist was true, It's not necessarily the case that we should teach that to everyone. 0.91

00:38:42.000 Not everyone is able to handle it.

00:38:44.000 The brain has evolved in a certain environment, and it turns out that religion has brought many of the good ingredients that the brain needed to form proper family structure.

00:38:54.000 And by removing that, we're removing a normal part of the environment.

00:39:00.000 And I'm afraid that we're doing it without informed consent because those young people who listen to Richard Dawkins' videos on YouTube or to people like AIU get convinced by the idea of atheism.

00:39:13.000 But have they been properly informed that their life will not be the same?

00:39:18.000 That maybe there is some utility to religion that atheism is not able to compensate for at the moment?

00:39:26.000 That's my problem with militant atheism.

00:39:28.000 Yeah, that's a great point.

00:39:30.000 I think that's one of the biggest problems that the atheists have. 0.69

00:39:34.000 You know, I always try to come at it from the perspective that religion is truth because, you know, people get really on my case. 0.99

00:39:40.000 You'd be surprised if you try to argue Christianity from a pragmatic perspective.

00:39:45.000 You know, they're going to, how could you say that? 1.00

00:39:45.000 God help you. 1.00

00:39:47.000 We believe, you know, but I do.

00:39:50.000 I think there is something to be said for this conservative, pragmatic approach that, you know, we have gotten to this place where we are an advanced society.

00:40:00.000 We have it pretty good where we are.

00:40:02.000 And to start pulling out fundamental pillars of that society without regard for how that might affect, Our day to day lives or standard of living to go back and say, yeah, you know, one of these things that is the bedrock on which this civilization is built, it's kind of arbitrary if that is there or not.

00:40:19.000 I think that strikes at the core of the difference between the real left and the real right, which is this idea of tradition.

00:40:26.000 And so the last thing I want to get into this is the fun one, this is the controversial one, which we talk about on the show a lot.

00:40:33.000 I talk about the difference between liberalism and conservatism in the sense that so much of Mass migration policy and so much of social policy in the United States is built on the premise of egalitarianism.

00:40:47.000 And I've often said that if you demonstrate that egalitarianism isn't true, it's not real, that the whole system falls apart because the idea that you could replace this population with a different one, you know, whereas if you believe we're all equal, then you would get the same outcomes.

00:41:02.000 If you believe they're different, you'd naturally get different outcomes.

00:41:05.000 And so, as a biologist, as a man of science, a man of the data, and not a man of, you know, ideas like me, Tell me, what is the case for racial egalitarianism? 0.64

00:41:14.000 Is it real?

00:41:15.000 Is it a myth?

00:41:16.000 What are the facts?

00:41:18.000 Oh my God, it is a myth.

00:41:20.000 And it's stunning because you can read papers from 1940 where they have a better grasp of the reality of race differences than today.

00:41:32.000 So we are engaging currently in self deception about the facts.

00:41:37.000 The facts of IQ differences between race are true, they are uncontestable. 0.57

00:41:43.000 We've controlled for everything. 0.79

00:41:44.000 We've designed tests that were not reliant on words so that it wouldn't be unfair to people of different cultures.

00:41:52.000 They have been repeated on hundreds of thousands of subjects.

00:41:56.000 There's no question, there's no doubt to the question of people being different genetically.

00:42:04.000 And these genetic differences inducing physical differences, health related differences, behavioral differences, criminal differences.

00:42:15.000 Criminality level differences, violence tendencies differences, and intelligence differences.

00:42:22.000 All of this is unquestionable.

00:42:25.000 And the very idea that there are races is also unquestionable.

00:42:31.000 And the fact that the races that we can recognize can be questioned to be unperfect. 0.97

00:42:37.000 Okay, yes, there are some Indians that are very dark skinned and they wouldn't qualify as African black, and maybe you will.

00:42:45.000 You will misclassify some of them.

00:42:48.000 However, it's unquestionable that more than 95% of our recognition of race subjectively refers to an actual observable genetic reality, too.

00:43:00.000 Yeah, and I think very well stated.

00:43:02.000 I mean, there it is.

00:43:03.000 I think that's the biggest problem.

00:43:05.000 And it's one of these things where it's fascinating to me how we've unlearned so much.

00:43:09.000 You talk about how in the 1940s, they basically understood this.

00:43:13.000 And we've come to this weird place in history where we think we just know better, right?

00:43:19.000 Like everybody understood this for.

00:43:20.000 Thousands of years, and it's observable.

00:43:22.000 I think anybody with eyes and ears and who lives in this world understands that this is the case, but we've been so indoctrinated from school, from media, from culture that this is not the case, and I think it almost requires that kind of indoctrination because it is so observable.

00:43:38.000 And so, and this is one I think one of the most often heard criticisms of this claim, which, and I'm sure you've heard this before, I'm sure you've answered it many times, I have as well, which is you go out there and you start saying race is real, race exists, race matters, there's differences between the races.

00:43:55.000 Inevitably, because people have been programmed to connotate the two, you get the question so you believe that whites are superior, or you believe that one race is better than the other.

00:44:08.000 How would you go about addressing that kind of a question?

00:44:12.000 Well, whenever we talk about superiority, that's where my strength comes out as a moral nihilist.

00:44:17.000 Because as a moral nihilist, I can talk of superiority within local domains.

00:44:24.000 I don't deny that use and bolt is superior at running quick in a very small amount of time.

00:44:30.000 Time.

00:44:30.000 But that's what moral nihilism leads you to.

00:44:34.000 It's to have a kind of objective view at all moral systems.

00:44:38.000 And so, to whoever says superior, I ask superior with respect to what measure?

00:44:45.000 And there are some measures where some races are superior. 0.86

00:44:50.000 Just the darkness of the skin. 0.71

00:44:51.000 I mean, if you reduce it to a number, of course, you will find out that white people have less dark skin and that black people have darker skin. 0.92

00:45:01.000 So, there you go. 0.79

00:45:02.000 You have a criteria, then you can say, yes, superior in terms of the number representation of that.

00:45:08.000 Superior in terms of IQ, undoubtedly.

00:45:12.000 The Asians in America and the Asians also in Asia tend to be, on average, stronger in terms of performing at intelligence tests.

00:45:23.000 That's unquestionable.

00:45:25.000 To me, these little differences that science can detect is just the tip of the iceberg.

00:45:33.000 It doesn't really matter.

00:45:35.000 And you want You won't build a better society just by caring about IQ.

00:45:40.000 And so, also to these people, what I try to convince them of is don't try to social engineer your society based on IQ.

00:45:50.000 You don't know what you will cause.

00:45:52.000 The systems that we're talking about are so complex that even if you were to try to do it, try to engineer a society increasing IQ, you're probably going to cause all sorts of things that you didn't expect.

00:46:05.000 But the reality is, We can say things about complex systems from a more distant perspective, a more global perspective. 0.53

00:46:15.000 For example, we can say it's true that most white people come from ancestors who have evolved in places where they live together with almost all white people around them. 0.73

00:46:28.000 And that will be a true reality that will invade all sorts of local phenomena, including intelligence, including the way they transmit culture, including the expectations they have with. 0.76

00:46:41.000 From the behavior that they expect from their neighbor.

00:46:44.000 And so, if you make more global statements like this, I think you come to things that cannot be denied even by the left.

00:46:52.000 Well, yeah, and that's, I think that's what really kills me about this question is that here is something, like you said, that superior in terms of what?

00:47:00.000 If you really get down to the question of that, I think it's really unfortunate that otherwise reasonable people can look at the wealth of evidence, which should be obvious, I think, in anybody's experience or anybody who looks at the data, but they reject it because they don't like.

00:47:14.000 They don't like hypothetically the outcomes.

00:47:16.000 They don't like the conclusions that they would have to draw about their fellow man, about policy, about other things.

00:47:22.000 When in reality, like you said, they're very complicated systems.

00:47:25.000 It's much more complicated than this one's good, this one's bad, this one's superior, this one's not.

00:47:31.000 And I just really hate that there's not a national conversation on this because if what you're saying is true and the empirical evidence is there that it is, what we're doing in this country is a travesty.

00:47:42.000 The idea that we would replace the native population With a completely alien population, you talk about how complicated these systems are, how different they've evolved, and so on, then that's a really big thing to happen.

00:47:56.000 Your college Republicans will tell you, oh, black, white, red, brown, as long as they believe in the Constitution, you know, what difference does it make? 0.99

00:48:03.000 But if what you're saying is true, it makes all the difference in the world.

00:48:06.000 And so I guess the next question that was kind of a lob for you to defend against it, but you'd say, oh, you know, this guy's terrible. 0.86

00:48:14.000 This guy's literally Hitler.

00:48:16.000 The symptoms that we observe right now, the people denying this, This is the effect of a new thing in society, which is social engineering by the state.

00:48:28.000 And people have to realize that we are humans.

00:48:31.000 We have an evolutionary history as humans of about 100,000 years, as like Homo sapiens, white Homo sapiens in Europe, let's say from Africa.

00:48:43.000 And you can say plus or minus 50,000 years. 0.93

00:48:47.000 Okay, I don't care.

00:48:48.000 But it is the first time in this whole history.

00:48:52.000 That we create the systems that we've created, which is a system of state education, of paid teachers, where the parent is playing a lesser and lesser role in educating children.

00:49:05.000 And this system is not necessarily good.

00:49:08.000 It's not necessarily going to lead to good outcomes all the time.

00:49:12.000 And I wish that people were more trusting of things that have shown that they worked for much longer than the things that we're experimenting with right now.

00:49:23.000 The things we're experimenting with right now.

00:49:25.000 It is to take a set of human beings who have gone through the university, college, education system to be the main teachers of knowledge to our children.

00:49:36.000 And you should resist to that if you can.

00:49:38.000 I'm not saying everyone should raise their kids at home, but if you can, you should at least attempt to do part of it.

00:49:48.000 Right.

00:49:48.000 Well, it's pure hubris.

00:49:50.000 I think at a certain point, it's the arrogance of the modern world, which says that these things which have worked forever. 0.94

00:49:57.000 We're going to throw them out because it's ignorant or it's bigoted or it's whatever.

00:50:01.000 And I think that's the heart of a real right wing person. 0.98

00:50:05.000 It's not about capitalism.

00:50:06.000 It's about saying, let's do what's always worked and we can refine it.

00:50:11.000 We can attempt to fix here and there things that could be improved.

00:50:14.000 But these kinds of designs of, like you said, state education, paid teachers, men and women in the workforce, kids are in daycare.

00:50:22.000 I mean, this kind of radical change, I think it'll bring nothing but ruin.

00:50:26.000 It's an experiment, it's a roll of the dice.

00:50:28.000 And I guess the question, the next question I would have, because I'm sure, and people want to hear this, is so if we establish that you have these different groups, we have these different identifiable races, I'm sure people would say, how does this kind of a thing happen?

00:50:42.000 How does this happen that you have such vastly different people?

00:50:45.000 I've read different theories, like, you know, white people evolved in a colder climate, so they had to survive in different ways. 0.62

00:50:52.000 Could you explain the genesis of these different races, the origin of them? 0.55

00:50:57.000 Yeah, so, I mean, there were lots of.

00:50:58.000 Migrations in human populations. 0.99

00:51:02.000 And so there's not a simple story.

00:51:04.000 The simplest story we've thought of is the out of Africa theory, which many people say has been debunked, but it's been debunked in the sense that we've added waves of migration.

00:51:14.000 There are people coming out of Africa over the last hundred thousand years and people coming back in and people mingling in the Caucasus region.

00:51:25.000 And there are even probably sexual acts with.

00:51:29.000 Homo Neanderthals in Europe, or at least outside of Africa, which probably white people have inherited a good part, a good chunk of genes of Neanderthals, which don't seem to be present in African populations.

00:51:47.000 And so there's lots of complexity there, but the basic idea is every time, every generation, your genome mutates.

00:51:56.000 It doesn't make perfect copies of itself, and it mutates at about 64.

00:52:02.000 Bases per generation, and you have about 3 billion bases in your DNA genome.

00:52:09.000 And so, of course, the mutations, because they happen at random, because it's literally an error of the systems that aims at printing your DNA and copying it to your children.

00:52:21.000 Of course, the people, these mutations will happen at random in Africa, at random in Europe, at random in Asia, and it's not going to be the same mutations for all the groups.

00:52:33.000 And that's the seed of the difference.

00:52:37.000 Now, you can have these systems, these little differences that develop between populations, be amplified by natural selection.

00:52:47.000 So, because of course, natural selection keeps going on these groups and they don't really reproduce together.

00:52:53.000 Well, someone in Europe will have gene ABC be modified in some way, but someone in Africa may not have gene ABC modified, but he may have genes DEF modified in another way.

00:53:06.000 And the whole question is that the genes that will survive and that will thrive in that local population are those that help people survive and reproduce.

00:53:18.000 And the more they help people survive and reproduce, the more they will spread fast.

00:53:25.000 And you can have genes emerging in a single person due to a mutation, invade an entire village and eventually an entire country in ridiculously small amounts of time, something like.

00:53:39.000 Less than a thousand years, if the gene really makes you superior for your country, for your environment, it will work.

00:53:47.000 Now, the thing, the winter theory that you brought up, the idea is what are the conditions that were different in Europe that made people become different from selection?

00:54:01.000 So people have thought, well, what's the difference between Europe, Asia, and Africa?

00:54:06.000 One of the differences that comes up is the fact that it's colder, it has a colder climate.

00:54:11.000 And it has a winter. 0.60

00:54:13.000 And the winter theory of the evolution of high IQ in the white population and Asian population stipulates that okay, there was a winter, therefore, people had to plan in advance. 0.87

00:54:27.000 They had to plan a strategy for survival for four or five months without being able to grow plants. 0.74

00:54:34.000 And when you think about what IQ is, when you look at the test, what they do, they test logical processes, the kind of logical processes that we use when we think about the future, when we try to.

00:54:45.000 Plan.

00:54:46.000 And so the reason people in Europe might be better at IQ tests may be that it may be that their ancestors were selected for being able to plan ahead, plan ahead for the winter.

00:55:00.000 Personally, I'm not satisfied from the winter theory of IQ selection as a complete explanation.

00:55:09.000 I believe there's more, but it's a good start.

00:55:12.000 Right, right.

00:55:13.000 Well, I think that's kind of the trick with a lot of the Stuff is a lot of it is a little bit uncertain, but I think we basically have the overall points there, which is, like you said, the genetic variability between these different continents separated and under different conditions, geographically, topographically, and so on.

00:55:32.000 So we really appreciate all the knowledge, the insight, because you know me, I'm not a scientific kind of a person.

00:55:40.000 I come on and I do the politics thing.

00:55:42.000 So it's great to have you to introduce that.

00:55:45.000 The last question I have to ask, and you know what it is, it's not political at all.

00:55:49.000 But it is something that I've been wondering about, and this is not a religious argument. 0.87

00:55:54.000 I'm not trying to bust your balls and say, explain this to me, atheist, but you've got to explain to me. 0.98

00:56:00.000 Is a canine becoming a non canine? 0.99

00:56:02.000 Yeah, you've got to.

00:56:03.000 Am I going to evolve?

00:56:04.000 Is a monkey going to evolve into a person?

00:56:07.000 Huh?

00:56:08.000 All right. 0.99

00:56:09.000 No, but yeah, can you explain this banana, atheist? 1.00

00:56:13.000 But really, tell me where.

00:56:14.000 Because I know we've domesticated bananas and fruits over a long time.

00:56:19.000 I know they haven't always looked like they do today because we cultivate them in a certain way.

00:56:24.000 But where does it come from?

00:56:25.000 How do we get this little protein snack, this great, you know, nutritious snack growing on trees?

00:56:31.000 Where does it come from?

00:56:32.000 How do we get there?

00:56:34.000 All right.

00:56:35.000 So, yeah, the first to realize is that the beautiful fruits that we have, we selected them.

00:56:40.000 But there's still the question of why were there fruits to start with?

00:56:44.000 Because we didn't select them out of nothing.

00:56:47.000 We started with trees that were providing some sort of fruit.

00:56:51.000 The fruit would probably have been disgusting by today's standard.

00:56:55.000 And then we kept saying, okay, we're going to select the tree that Produces the best bananas and the best looking and the best tasting.

00:57:03.000 And by this selection process, we've made these incredible fruits that today are literally snacks just growing out of trees.

00:57:14.000 So, the story of how fruits became what they are goes back to I'm looking at the tree of life here.

00:57:25.000 It goes back to events that probably date more than.

00:57:31.000 Two billion years ago.

00:57:34.000 It goes back to the first sexual act between two beings on planet Earth, my Adam and Eve, Nick.

00:57:45.000 And my Adam and Eve were not humans.

00:57:48.000 They were single cell organisms that we call single cell eukaryotes.

00:57:54.000 So we call them eukaryotes because they have the nuclei.

00:57:57.000 So, they add this little pocket that we also have where it contains the nucleus, which is mostly DNA.

00:58:06.000 It's a storage place for DNA.

00:58:08.000 And then the rest of the cell is where the operations occur.

00:58:12.000 Now, these single cell organisms look like bacteria, but they wouldn't be classified necessarily as bacteria.

00:58:20.000 So, these old organisms, at some point, and this one is one of the mysteries of biology, but at some point, One of them started splitting its genome in two, started producing haploid cells.

00:58:34.000 And so an haploid cell is simply a cell that has only half of the genome of the parent cell.

00:58:42.000 Now, it's probably the case that these haploid cells at first didn't have much roles, they couldn't really do anything.

00:58:51.000 But they probably, in my view, and that's my theory of the evolution of sex, they were probably shielding the main.

00:58:59.000 Cells that were making actual copies of themselves.

00:59:02.000 They were making full copies of their genome.

00:59:05.000 And when they were failing at making a full copy, they were just making half copies of themselves.

00:59:12.000 It led to non functional cells, which later became the sperm and egg cells.

00:59:17.000 But that's a long story.

00:59:19.000 Now, at some point, for some reason, the non functional cells, those that had only 50% of the genome, they started recombining to each other.

00:59:30.000 And this was the first sexual act, the first time.

00:59:34.000 A male cell.

00:59:35.000 It didn't look like a male.

00:59:36.000 It was just a cell at that point.

00:59:39.000 And today we have descendants of these cells and we call them plus cells and minus cells because we don't see any characteristics that they have that differ.

00:59:47.000 So we wouldn't call them male versus female.

00:59:50.000 So these cells, they combine themselves and they reform a complete genome out of the two halves that had been produced.

00:59:59.000 We don't know if this act was between two cells of the same organism or the same cell.

01:00:05.000 So maybe it was actually.

01:00:08.000 A brother mixing with a sister, if you will.

01:00:11.000 Or maybe it was one organism that produced the plus cell and the other organism produced the minus cell and they got together.

01:00:18.000 But this launched a whole branch of life that gave rise, this first act of mixing two cells gave rise to all of the meiotic eukaryote single cell bacteria, all of the mushrooms, all of the plants, and all of the animals that we know today.

01:00:38.000 So essentially, every life form that you can see with the naked eye today are the descendants of this first Adam and Eve single cells.

01:00:50.000 There you go.

01:00:51.000 Oh, he's still.

01:00:52.000 Okay, okay.

01:00:53.000 I thought I was like, okay.

01:00:54.000 You want me to reach the fruits?

01:00:56.000 Yeah.

01:00:57.000 So let's ignore the mushrooms and what became of them.

01:01:01.000 But it's quite fascinating, actually, because in mushrooms, you have stages of life that are diploid and stages of life that are haploid.

01:01:10.000 So, unlike us, For us, we have sperm and egg, but we're mostly a diploid organism, which means that all of my body has the genome in full.

01:01:22.000 And it's just the sperm and egg that have half of the genome.

01:01:25.000 I've heard mushrooms don't work like this.

01:01:28.000 They have stages of their life where the mushroom is constituted by diploid cells, but there's also stages of life where they form big ensembles of cells that are just like the sperm and egg.

01:01:42.000 From half of their genome.

01:01:43.000 So they really just contain half of their genome.

01:01:46.000 And unlike us, where it only serves reproduction, for them, it's really a stage of life where the sperm and egg are, if you will, part of the body of the mushroom.

01:01:57.000 Now, let's see what happened with trees.

01:02:02.000 So, the cells that were reproducing like this were single cells, and one of them had a chloroplast.

01:02:11.000 So, it ate another bacteria, and that other bacteria was capable of producing.

01:02:19.000 Energy from sunlight.

01:02:22.000 But instead of eating it and digesting it, it ate it and it kept it inside of it such that the chloroplast would just live inside the cells.

01:02:33.000 And this allowed this ancestor, this little cell, to gain the property that we know of plants, which is to capture sunlight and transform it into energy.

01:02:45.000 Now, this led to lichens, it led to the small plants like I have the tree of life here.

01:02:52.000 Let me look at it.

01:02:53.000 The mosses, the homeworts, the carols, the cicadas.

01:02:59.000 So, these little plants that exist, the ninufars also, the water lilies.

01:03:11.000 And then it led to a particular branch of plants that had seeds.

01:03:17.000 And so, this particular branch of plants, unlike the lichens, they were still participating in reproduction, but they were not covering their seeds.

01:03:26.000 With sugar, you know.

01:03:29.000 But one of these plants had a mutation that started just wrapping seeds in systems like coniferous trees.

01:03:41.000 And these seeds, they have equipments, for example, helicopter seeds, you know, they can be carried by wind.

01:03:49.000 There were some plants that were carried by water, so they would eject their seed and be carried by water.

01:03:54.000 And of course, they needed to equip the seed with all of the energy.

01:03:59.000 That was needed to create a new plant elsewhere.

01:04:03.000 And so, those plants that were wrapping their seeds with sugar got selected over the plants that did not do that.

01:04:13.000 And this led to all of the coniferous plants, the Christmas trees like this.

01:04:21.000 Now, from that branch of life emerged the flower plants, one of the greatest innovations.

01:04:29.000 The history of plant evolution.

01:04:32.000 This one had literally a part emerge, which is the flower with colors.

01:04:40.000 And what was the function of these colors?

01:04:42.000 It was to attract some insects and some bees and to signal, my seeds are here.

01:04:48.000 I'm going to give you sugar because there's sugar around the seeds and there's sugar in the seed.

01:04:53.000 But I'm also going to attach some of my seed to your body.

01:04:56.000 And as you go get the sugar from other plants, you're going to carry my.

01:05:02.000 My pollen to these other plants.

01:05:05.000 And so, bees, just out of being interested in sucking the sugar out of flowers, they were participating in the male female or plus minus system of reproduction by being the physical carrier of the sperm to the egg.

01:05:21.000 And fruits are just an expansion of a part of the flower, which is aimed at providing sweetness and sugar and energy.

01:05:33.000 To the newly formed zygote, the cell that constitutes the meeting of the sperm and egg in plants.

01:05:43.000 So there you have it.

01:05:44.000 There it is.

01:05:45.000 From Adam and Eve all the way down to the humble apple.

01:05:50.000 The humble.

01:05:52.000 We really went back.

01:05:55.000 That was highly.

01:05:56.000 But it was good.

01:05:56.000 There it is.

01:05:59.000 I thought I could have stumped you.

01:06:00.000 I was thinking, you know, not even from like a debate, but just like, is he really going to be able to tell me?

01:06:05.000 Where was this fanatic?

01:06:06.000 Come on.

01:06:07.000 Where does this come from?

01:06:08.000 Who put this there?

01:06:09.000 But you did it.

01:06:10.000 There it is.

01:06:10.000 It's fascinating stuff.

01:06:12.000 Very complicated.

01:06:13.000 But nonetheless, now you know when you bite into.

01:06:17.000 And you better be eating your fruits and your vegetables.

01:06:19.000 Now you know.

01:06:20.000 But that was my last question.

01:06:22.000 We're over our time here a little bit.

01:06:24.000 But thanks so much for coming on, for talking about all fruits and race and tradition and families and all that.

01:06:31.000 Great to have you on.

01:06:33.000 Any closing thoughts, any closing words from the premier biologist of the alt right?

01:06:40.000 Well, it's always a pleasure.

01:06:42.000 And closing word well, my mission on YouTube, I continue to try to develop a System of philosophical thought that is independent from the existence of God, but that still seeks what were these good things about religion? 0.97

01:06:56.000 That there has to be some good things because religious people, they produce more babies and they cover the planet Earth right now because non religious people have disappeared. 0.95

01:07:07.000 And so there's something fit about the religious lifestyle. 1.00

01:07:11.000 And I think that the emphasis on reproduction and existence and maintenance of existing structure.

01:07:19.000 Is what we need to focus on.

01:07:22.000 Well, great.

01:07:23.000 All great questions, all great points.

01:07:26.000 And just tell us where my audience can find you on Twitter or YouTube or whatever.

01:07:31.000 A lot of people frown me through you, so maybe that's, but we still want to let you know.

01:07:35.000 You can just type JF or Jean Francois Gary Epier on YouTube and you'll find my main channel or JFJ Live Streams if you want to hear me sing.

01:07:44.000 All right, very good.

01:07:45.000 Well, thank you so much for coming on.

01:07:46.000 We appreciate it and we hope to talk to you again.

01:07:49.000 Bye bye.

01:07:50.000 Take it easy, big guy.

01:07:50.000 All right.

01:07:52.000 All right.

01:07:54.000 What a great stream.

01:07:55.000 A great and a fun guest, Mr. JF.

01:07:59.000 Always a pleasure with him.

01:08:00.000 Smart guy.

01:08:01.000 You can tell he knows his stuff about science.

01:08:04.000 We went from, I can't even begin to imagine that kind of knowledge.

01:08:08.000 You know, people tell me all the time, how do you know about dates and things?

01:08:12.000 To me, the scientific knowledge, that's just, I can't even begin.

01:08:16.000 I got an F in school on my only science class because it just was beyond me.

01:08:22.000 You know, they're telling me about.

01:08:23.000 Planets and insects and rocks.

01:08:26.000 And I'm like, yeah, okay, but like, where is the universe?

01:08:30.000 What is a rock?

01:08:31.000 You know, all these other things.

01:08:32.000 I can't really, I could never really get into it.

01:08:34.000 But we appreciate JF coming on and explaining some of these things and where we find a basis for political theory in biology.

01:08:43.000 I think that's a very interesting bridge to gap there.

01:08:47.000 I think a lot of people may come at it that when we come on and we talk about politics, it's speculative, it's a lot of this kind of stuff.

01:08:54.000 In fact, and I think JF does this very well, you'll find that political theory has a very strong basis in the way that the world works, biologically, scientifically, and all the rest.

01:09:05.000 So, very great to have him on and share a little bit of a different insight.

01:09:08.000 You guys know I come at it from an extremely Catholic, from an extremely spiritual, theoretical point of view.

01:09:15.000 And JF grounded in zygotes and eukaryotic cells and this kind of thing.

01:09:21.000 So, it was great to have him on.

01:09:23.000 The Frenchman and a great sense of humor on him.

01:09:26.000 And we'll go in and we will check your super chats and also your stream labs.

01:09:30.000 We will see what people are saying.

01:09:33.000 And it's telling me my stream isn't available.

01:09:35.000 Is that because I just got to reload the page or what?

01:09:38.000 But let me pull up my super chats here and we'll see what we have going on.

01:09:44.000 I hope nobody was asking questions for JF.

01:09:46.000 I have the display capture so I can't change the screen in the middle of it, which is kind of a hassle.

01:09:51.000 Let's go in and we'll look at our super chats here.

01:09:53.000 We'll see what the people are saying.

01:09:56.000 Eric Gordon on the Syria question says hashtag no more wars for Israel. 0.98

01:10:00.000 That's very true. 0.94

01:10:02.000 Errol Cota says the war would create refugees that would be sent to Europe and perpetuate white genocide. 0.99

01:10:09.000 Also true. 1.00

01:10:11.000 And something that's not often talked about, I think, is the consequence of our foreign policy in those kinds of ways.

01:10:17.000 I think everybody understands we get into a war, it costs money, people die, you cause instability.

01:10:23.000 But I think few people recognize the kind of effect in terms of migration.

01:10:27.000 You know, nobody talked about how the intervention in the Syrian civil war on the part of the CIA and the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia directly led to the migrant crisis in Europe, with a million in Europe in one year in 2015.

01:10:40.000 So. 0.99

01:10:41.000 Very true.

01:10:42.000 Butt Mountain.

01:10:43.000 I like that name.

01:10:44.000 Butt Mountain says, Nick, I'd say good job on the debate last night, but it doesn't feel right. 0.93

01:10:49.000 Congratulating a boxing champion for beating up a quadriplegic infant.

01:10:53.000 Oof. 0.69

01:10:54.000 Brutal neg on the old Devin Tracy, the old egg man, but I'll take it. 1.00

01:11:00.000 Yvonne Mercado with a couple of dollar dues.

01:11:02.000 Thank you.

01:11:03.000 Osser says, a great performance in the debate last night.

01:11:07.000 You're winning me over to your side.

01:11:08.000 Keep it up, Fuentes.

01:11:09.000 I'm watching.

01:11:10.000 Much appreciated, big guy.

01:11:12.000 Glad to hear it.

01:11:13.000 At the end of the day, we're trying to expand the movement.

01:11:15.000 We're trying to bring people in.

01:11:17.000 So I'm glad.

01:11:18.000 Sometimes I know people disagree with how I bring people in.

01:11:21.000 They say, you're too smug.

01:11:22.000 You're too whatever.

01:11:24.000 Showmanship.

01:11:25.000 We want to bring people in by creating spectacle.

01:11:27.000 And then they hear the ideas and they come in.

01:11:29.000 And we cherish them and we love them.

01:11:31.000 So we appreciate it.

01:11:32.000 Never Alone Forever says, Hello again, Senor Fuentes.

01:11:36.000 Hola.

01:11:37.000 Not bad last night.

01:11:38.000 Now that AIU isn't on our soil, he need not concern with how we do.

01:11:42.000 Can America ever go Catholic orthodox? 0.99

01:11:45.000 Also, can a Negro Caesar? 1.00

01:11:47.000 Colonize our cities. 1.00

01:11:50.000 With regard to America going Catholic or Orthodox, I think anything's possible. 0.96

01:11:54.000 Is it likely in the near future? 0.70

01:11:57.000 No, probably not.

01:11:58.000 I will say it is the single biggest denomination in the country right now, which I was surprised to learn.

01:12:04.000 And of course, there are more Protestants, but if you look at single denominations, Catholics are the largest group.

01:12:10.000 A large part of that is because of Hispanics.

01:12:13.000 If you keep seeing Hispanic immigration, if you see this revanchism in the Catholic Church, I think if people re embrace traditionalism, I think they will eventually find the Catholic Church or the Orthodox Church. 0.90

01:12:24.000 Probably more the Catholic Church because, of course, the Catholic Church, as we know from Rome, descends from the Western Roman Empire. 0.76

01:12:31.000 The Byzantine Church, the Eastern Orthodox, descends from the East.

01:12:35.000 I think that's a cultural split. 0.87

01:12:37.000 So I think if we were going to go to an Orthodox Church, meaning an Apostolic Church, I think we would go back to Catholic. 0.75

01:12:43.000 But do I think it's likely? 0.60

01:12:44.000 Probably not.

01:12:46.000 But I would not rule it definitely out of possibility.

01:12:49.000 And I'm the Negro Caesar.

01:12:51.000 That's one way to phrase it.

01:12:52.000 I think if you mean. 0.86

01:12:55.000 That we would have some kind of a non white tyrant rise up, something similar to what's happening in South Africa, where once you had a white ruling class, then you have a non white ruling class rise up. 0.87

01:13:07.000 Or maybe that's what you mean. 0.82

01:13:08.000 I don't really know.

01:13:09.000 You'd have to be more specific what you mean by Negro Caesar. 0.96

01:13:11.000 That's a little choice.

01:13:13.000 We're going to have to unpack that.

01:13:14.000 That's problematic language.

01:13:16.000 Ezra Klein would probably say I think it's certainly possible that the ruling class will be replaced, and I think it already has been replaced.

01:13:26.000 I think the faces of the ruling class will change.

01:13:28.000 Let's put it that way in the next 50 years.

01:13:31.000 Spoiler alert says he'll be joining us at 7 30 CST.

01:13:34.000 Actually, the central time zone is currently designated as CDT as the U.S. is in daylight savings.

01:13:41.000 Is that true?

01:13:43.000 Is that true?

01:13:44.000 I never knew that.

01:13:47.000 I didn't know that.

01:13:47.000 Interesting.

01:13:48.000 Logical conclusion of tolerance says congrats on winning the debate with Sam Harris.

01:13:52.000 That's a little disrespectful to Sam Harris.

01:13:54.000 Sam Harris is a smart person.

01:13:56.000 Valentine says, I'm loving it.

01:13:58.000 Glad to hear it, big guy.

01:14:00.000 Spoiler alert says, poll theory Trump is behind the stormy story and the raid of his lawyer.

01:14:05.000 To set a precedent for defeating attorney client privilege for the Clintons.

01:14:10.000 Could be.

01:14:11.000 I don't know.

01:14:11.000 I don't really invest in those.

01:14:13.000 For all the people say I think about 4D chess, for all the people say I think about these grand strategies, these very complicated theories, I really don't.

01:14:23.000 I believe in very simple tactical stratagems.

01:14:27.000 I don't know if I could get behind that one.

01:14:30.000 I wouldn't rule it out.

01:14:31.000 I wouldn't rule anything out.

01:14:32.000 I think he's a very smart guy, but I don't think that's likely.

01:14:35.000 It's a little bit too complicated for me.

01:14:38.000 Spoiler alert says the primordial soup, more like the primordial meme.

01:14:42.000 Yeah, very true.

01:14:43.000 Very true.

01:14:44.000 I watched some documentary about the probability that a single protein chain could form in a primordial soup.

01:14:55.000 And they did this very great visual representation of just the outstanding odds that in a primordial soup you would get.

01:15:03.000 And I'm really struggling.

01:15:05.000 I really am handicapped when it comes to the scientific talk.

01:15:08.000 What do they call them?

01:15:10.000 That constitutes a protein chain.

01:15:14.000 They come together.

01:15:14.000 I don't know.

01:15:17.000 It's nucleic acid.

01:15:19.000 It's some kind of acid or something.

01:15:21.000 I don't know, folks.

01:15:22.000 Whatever.

01:15:23.000 Protein chain comes together very hard.

01:15:26.000 Takes a long time.

01:15:27.000 Probably couldn't have happened.

01:15:28.000 All right?

01:15:29.000 We'll simplify it that way.

01:15:31.000 I don't know.

01:15:31.000 Look, I got like a C in biology in high school.

01:15:34.000 I got killed on it in college.

01:15:35.000 Very hard to get a life form out of a primordial soup.

01:15:39.000 That's what I mean to say.

01:15:40.000 And I watched a documentary about it.

01:15:43.000 Very tough, very tough.

01:15:44.000 You know, you can see me, I'm so challenged.

01:15:47.000 I'm free and loose when it's politics because I have the vocabulary and the facts.

01:15:52.000 When it comes to science, it's like I don't have arms or legs.

01:15:56.000 And we'll see.

01:15:57.000 I'm Bend Oregon says, What is JF's take on E.O. Wilson and youth social societies?

01:16:02.000 And given that it applies to humans, if it explains differences in the advancement in civilization in addition to IQ?

01:16:08.000 Very complicated.

01:16:09.000 That's a wordy question.

01:16:11.000 Unfortunately, he just left.

01:16:14.000 You'll have to throw it up on the next.

01:16:16.000 We'll throw it up on the next time he's here.

01:16:18.000 How's that?

01:16:19.000 Queen of Bands says, Nick, for the real MMA, check my Twitter poll.

01:16:24.000 I will check it after the show.

01:16:26.000 Valentine, question for both of you. 0.88

01:16:28.000 I have heard that it's much easier for Islam to get a foothold into Western and Eastern Europe if Christianity declines. 0.94

01:16:34.000 Can secularism slash atheism withstand the onslaught of Islam? 0.99

01:16:39.000 Answer is no. 0.99

01:16:40.000 If there is, you know, and here's the problem. 0.68

01:16:44.000 People who believe that Christianity is the truth, They see Islam not just one in many religions.

01:16:51.000 Like, here's a friendly religion.

01:16:52.000 We see that as a heresy. 0.78

01:16:53.000 We see that as something that is non neutral.

01:16:57.000 I think that's the difference.

01:16:58.000 Christians see that society is not neutral. 0.57

01:17:01.000 It's either Christian or it's something else.

01:17:03.000 We don't live in the state of a vacuum where it's like, you know, we can entertain all kinds of religious thoughts and whatever.

01:17:10.000 I think Christians understand that it's got to be going, it has to have directionality to it.

01:17:15.000 And secularism has a directionality to it.

01:17:17.000 I think it's very weak.

01:17:19.000 It allows these other influences in, it doesn't compete with them.

01:17:22.000 And so, definitely, I don't think secularism can withstand the onslaught.

01:17:27.000 Because, you know, and you look at the kind of atheists that we have, atheists don't tend to be very militant against barbarism or these kinds of things.

01:17:36.000 The very fact that they don't have a moral code precludes them from making moral judgments about comparative religion.

01:17:42.000 They can't say, well, Christianity is objectively better than Islam because they don't have better. 0.91

01:17:47.000 They don't have objective anything. 0.99

01:17:48.000 They just live in this, you know.

01:17:51.000 So it's a problem.

01:17:52.000 Logical conclusion of tolerance says, What is JF's opinion of pre Columbian civilization?

01:17:58.000 It's a challenge.

01:17:59.000 We just got him off.

01:18:00.000 People are asking questions for him.

01:18:02.000 Spoiler alert says saying that race is real is anti Semitic. 1.00

01:18:05.000 True.

01:18:06.000 I disavow.

01:18:07.000 Solomon says, Nick, you should read the 10,000 year explosion.

01:18:11.000 I am familiar with that book.

01:18:12.000 I haven't read it.

01:18:14.000 Bill the Butcher says, banana nationalism. 1.00

01:18:16.000 You heard it here first. 0.96

01:18:18.000 Matthew Kitchen, Quebec should separate so I don't have to share a nationality with JF.

01:18:23.000 Brutal.

01:18:24.000 Why would you not want to share a nationality with someone as charming as JF? 1.00

01:18:24.000 Brutal. 1.00

01:18:29.000 Spoiler alert, you're going to carry my pollen, says JF. 0.61

01:18:33.000 Yeah, that's true.

01:18:35.000 Logical conclusion of tolerance. 0.98

01:18:37.000 Science is, in fact, gay. 1.00

01:18:39.000 True. 0.99

01:18:39.000 Confirmed. 0.99

01:18:40.000 Science is gay. 0.97

01:18:42.000 Ian Weber. 0.94

01:18:42.000 Wake up, respect women, eat lunch, respect women, eat dinner, respect women, go to sleep, respect women, have a dream, respect a woman, in it, repeat. 0.94

01:18:50.000 That's what I do all day, every day. 0.56

01:18:53.000 Interwoven throughout the daily activities and functions. 1.00

01:18:57.000 You got to have that respect for the female race. 1.00

01:18:59.000 Otherwise, you're a virgin, MGTOW irony, bro. 0.99

01:19:03.000 And you have, I bet you haven't even had degenerate, hedonistic sex with all kinds of women that you met online. 0.99

01:19:03.000 Okay. 0.99

01:19:09.000 Hmm.

01:19:10.000 Yeah, so think on that.

01:19:12.000 Kaima says, and that's of course a parody of someone we know.

01:19:15.000 Kaima says, fight assault weapons ban in Oregon.

01:19:19.000 Yeah, go for it.

01:19:20.000 Problem with a lot of these states is you'll have urban, you'll have an urban area which is opposed to guns.

01:19:27.000 You'll have a big city that's opposed to guns.

01:19:29.000 This is where the population center is.

01:19:31.000 But in the countryside, in the rural part, they're very pro gun. 0.59

01:19:35.000 Oregon's a good example.

01:19:36.000 Washington's a good example.

01:19:38.000 Even if you get up into the Northeast, Great example.

01:19:41.000 This is like New York.

01:19:43.000 In upstate New York, I believe they have a pretty strong gun culture, but obviously very different than New York City.

01:19:49.000 In Massachusetts, they're liberal across the board, but it's different.

01:19:53.000 Like in Boston, it's very progressive, very liberal.

01:19:56.000 In Western Massachusetts, it's a weird kind of liberal.

01:19:58.000 It's like proto Marxist liberal.

01:20:00.000 But you get the point, though, that there is this difference between, and that's kind of the electoral challenge with a lot of these states a city like Portland will drag the country, rather, drag the state left.

01:20:12.000 Even though you got a lot of conservative Republican people in it, California is a good example, too.

01:20:16.000 You got the most Republicans in any state, I believe, are in California.

01:20:20.000 But because of the demographics, because it happens to be the most populous state, that's why that is.

01:20:25.000 They're just outnumbered by the left.

01:20:27.000 And we'll check in on our Streamlabs donations.

01:20:30.000 We'll see what we got working over here.

01:20:33.000 And we'll call it a night.

01:20:34.000 It's been about an hour and a half.

01:20:35.000 I haven't slept in a while, like a couple of days.

01:20:39.000 And I'm really hungry.

01:20:41.000 So you're asking so much of me.

01:20:44.000 But I do it.

01:20:44.000 But I do it for the fans.

01:20:45.000 I do it because I love making content.

01:20:48.000 Let's see.

01:20:49.000 Constantine says, Plot twist Trump is actually positioning to retake Jerusalem, Antioch, and Constantinople.

01:20:56.000 That's got to be the trick.

01:20:58.000 I wish that would happen, right?

01:21:00.000 That would be the only intervention I would support to liberate some of the early churches. 0.99

01:21:05.000 Baron's parents say, Fuentes 2036. 0.99

01:21:08.000 True.

01:21:09.000 True.

01:21:09.000 Let's do it.

01:21:10.000 Maybe we'll wait a little bit longer.

01:21:12.000 I wouldn't want to serve at 35.

01:21:13.000 Got to wait.

01:21:14.000 You know, I conduct myself now.

01:21:17.000 With the idea that if I ever were to run for office, and I don't want to, but I would never completely rule it out.

01:21:23.000 But I conduct myself now expecting that there'll be a 50 year gap between the crazy, wacky stuff that I do now and any time I run for office, right?

01:21:33.000 Because you can't be saying the things I say on my show about race, about people, about, you know, even silly things.

01:21:40.000 You know, playing Fortnite, talking about, you know, memetic type stuff.

01:21:44.000 So in the future.

01:21:44.000 Can't do it.

01:21:46.000 Beard Ninja says, God bless America.

01:21:48.000 Hey, God bless you, big guy.

01:21:50.000 And it looks like these are all of our Super Chats, all of our Streamlabs.

01:21:54.000 We're going to call it a night.

01:21:56.000 Audiences packing it up.

01:21:57.000 They're going home.

01:21:58.000 We had a pretty big audience tonight, pretty big support for our man JF.

01:22:02.000 But like I said, I got to take off.

01:22:03.000 Got to eat some turkey chili.

01:22:06.000 All right.

01:22:06.000 I got to have some homemade, delicious turkey chili.

01:22:10.000 I'm getting my stomach's growling just thinking about it.

01:22:12.000 But that's our show for tonight.

01:22:14.000 Remember, tomorrow we have 2018 Election HQ coming back for our premium members on Maker Support.

01:22:21.000 So if you want to get that exclusive podcast about the 2018 election, we're entering our third installment tomorrow.

01:22:27.000 You've got to check us out on makersupport.com slash Nick J. Fuentes.

01:22:31.000 The link is in the description.

01:22:32.000 You sign up for the premium membership for five bucks a month.

01:22:36.000 It gets you America First World Report, our international relations podcast, 2018 Election HQ, our electoral podcast, as well as this show in podcast form on SoundCloud, a special role in the Discord, and priority on our call in show.

01:22:52.000 So it's really a lot of stuff.

01:22:53.000 So that's coming tomorrow.

01:22:54.000 Friday, we have another guest.

01:22:56.000 We have Yusuf, who is. 0.89

01:22:58.000 Completely destroyed Steven Crowder's life, ended his career. 0.98

01:23:02.000 It's over for him.

01:23:03.000 I don't think he'll ever recover.

01:23:04.000 He'll never work in this town again after what Yusuf did to him, the famed socialistslash nationalist.

01:23:11.000 So he'll be coming on the show on Friday.

01:23:13.000 We'll be doing a little call in action.

01:23:15.000 Yusuf will be on.

01:23:16.000 It should be a fun time.

01:23:18.000 But that's going to do it for us tonight.

01:23:19.000 Remember to subscribe to the channel, give us a big thumbs up, leave a comment, click the notification bell to get notified every time we go live.

01:23:26.000 If you're on Twitch or Periscope or whatever it is, Give us a like, give us a follow.

01:23:32.000 You know how it goes.

01:23:33.000 We're on the air Monday through Friday, 7 p.m. Central, 8 p.m. Eastern Standard Time.

01:23:38.000 I'm Nicholas J. Fuentes.

01:23:39.000 This was America First.

01:23:41.000 As always, thank you for watching.

01:23:43.000 Thank you for choosing us.

01:23:44.000 Thank you for choosing Am First.

01:23:47.000 Thanks to the Streamlabs donors, the Super Chatters, the Twitch Bit people, and the premium members.

01:23:52.000 We could not put the show on without you folks.

01:23:55.000 Couldn't do it.

01:23:56.000 So we appreciate you, we like you, and we thank you.

01:23:58.000 And we'll see you tomorrow for another great show and another great podcast.

01:24:02.000 Lots more content coming your way.

01:24:03.000 Until then, have a great day.

01:24:05.000 Rest of your evening.

01:24:12.000 Americanism, not globalism, will be our credo.

01:24:18.000 It's going to be only America first.

01:24:21.000 America first. 0.99

01:24:23.000 The American people will come first once again.

01:24:29.000 With respect

America First - Nicholas J. Fuentes - April 11, 2018

Egalitarianism vs Science feat. JF Gariepy | America First Ep. 143

Episode Stats

Summary

Transcript