In this episode of America First, host Nicholas J. Fuentes talks about the Texas Supreme Court case, the National Defense Authorization Act, and the new guest on the show, Fat Ian Kaczynski. Plus, we talk about the new nickname for Fat Ian, Vosh.
00:00:14.000We've got a lot to talk about, lots to get into.
00:00:17.000Today was a very big day in our continued fight against election fraud.
00:00:22.000I'm sure everybody knows what we're talking about tonight.
00:00:26.000It is the state of Texas, which has filed the lawsuit for the Supreme Court against.
00:00:33.000Four swing states Georgia, Wisconsin, Michigan, and Pennsylvania.
00:00:38.000And we'll see what's going to happen with this.
00:00:41.000A number of Republican states have joined onto the lawsuit as well, including Alabama, Arkansas, and Louisiana.
00:00:49.000So we'll talk all about the lawsuit, what's in it, what the prospects are here that this is going to succeed.
00:00:54.000That's going to be our featured story.
00:00:56.000We'll also be talking tonight about the National Defense Authorization Act, which passed in the House of Representatives today with a Veto proof majority, and more than 100 Republicans voted for it, too.
00:01:10.000We talked a little bit about this last week when President Trump tweeted that he wanted contained in the National Defense Authorization Act a provision that would repeal Section 230.
00:01:22.000It turns out that not only is that not in this bill, but there's also a ton of other bad things in the bill, too, including, and we haven't talked about this yet, a provision that would prevent.
00:01:34.000The Trump administration from pulling troops out of Afghanistan as well as other countries.
00:02:05.000And today I go on Twitter and I'm looking around.
00:02:09.000And I see that Tim Pool is having on Will Chamberlain tonight.
00:02:13.000And he announced that he's having on Hunter Avalon next week.
00:02:18.000And if you're not familiar with the backstory here, we tried to get on the Tim Pool show after Fat Ian, sometimes called Vosh, after he was on the Tim Pool, the Tim Cast live podcast about a month ago.
00:02:33.000I said, look, you're going to have a literal pedophile on the show.
00:03:40.000I think probably a third of all the replies under Tim Pool's.
00:03:44.000Producers tweet today asking for suggestions for guests where people are suggesting Nick Fuentes, but no communication, no message, no reply, no follow back, no nothing.
00:03:58.000So, I don't know if it's going to happen, but it's not cool.
00:04:04.000I guess I'm too edgy to be on the Tim Pool podcast.
00:04:07.000You know, I mean, that's what it means to truly be an outsider.
00:04:11.000That's what it means to truly be somebody that's telling the truth you're not kosher enough to be on Dave Rubin or Rogan or Tim Pool or I guess anybody for that matter.0.67
00:04:25.000I thought of a new nickname, by the way, for Vosh.0.93
00:05:34.000I like FGR because it truly encapsulates what we're dealing with.
00:05:37.000Because, you know, like I said, everybody talks about it like, oh, he's this intellectual and, oh, he's got sources and this kind of thing.
00:06:07.000The fat gay retard with the ball sacks hanging from his earlobes?1.00
00:06:10.000Anyway, so I just want to throw that one out there.1.00
00:06:14.000But so Tim Pool, I don't know what's going on there.
00:06:18.000I guess his female producer doesn't like me or something because it was about a month ago that I said that I wanted to go on the show, and she was like, oh, we'll get Nick on the show.
00:06:31.000Believe me, I'm looking forward to it.
00:07:53.000So, it's like the people that you bring on are neither relevant or interesting, nor are they actually controversial or censored.
00:08:01.000The people that you bring on are completely platformed, completely immune, apparently, from censorship, and they're not even really relevant to the conversation.
00:08:10.000I mean, Hunter Avalon just did a show the other day, or a video the other day, saying, Well, I'm losing all of my subscribers, but I'd rather become totally irrelevant sticking to my beliefs than sell out and have an audience.
00:08:25.000You know, I understand on the one hand it's your show, you can invite who you want, but then don't go out and pretend like you're trying to provide this platform for people that are censored.
00:08:35.000Don't go out there and lie and say that you're something you're not.
00:08:39.000I don't have an issue with people who disagree with me, I don't have an issue with people who don't want to associate with me or something like that.
00:08:46.000But time and again, for the past however many years, whether it's Charlie Kirk or Tim Pool, I mean, you name it, it's people that will say, on the one hand, oh, we want to amplify censored voices, we'll debate anybody.
00:08:59.000This kind of thing, and they fall short of their own principle because the real principle is we want to serve the system in some capacity.
00:09:34.000Our first story is the National Defense Authorization Act, which I covered last week.
00:09:39.000And last week it was in the news because the president demanded that there was a repeal of Section 230 in the National Defense Authorization Act when it was being discussed in the Senate.
00:09:51.000And so the NDAA, what this is, is it's one of these must pass appropriations bills.
00:09:58.000And this gives the green light for the government to basically spend money on the military.
00:10:05.000And like other appropriations bills, this is one of these things that has to pass.
00:10:40.000So they might say, well, the senator in Pennsylvania, we're going to give you this contract, we're going to give you this project, and it'll create this many jobs in the state of Pennsylvania so that we could have your support or make a deal on something else.
00:11:10.000He can threaten to veto legislation, specifically legislation that must pass, like this NDAA, like this appropriations bill, and say that he won't allow that to become law unless Congress puts something that he wants in it, even if both Republicans and Democrats are resisting him.
00:11:28.000He wanted Section 230 repealed, and we've talked at length about this.
00:11:36.000Section 230 are special legal protections given to social media platforms.
00:11:43.000This has become really the main strategy that conservatives are using to fight back against tax censorship.
00:11:50.000They're using that as leverage against big tech companies, saying that insofar as they are banning conservatives and they're acting in a biased way, then Republicans will work to get rid of their legal protections that they get from this special provision in the law.
00:12:06.000So the president was demanding last week that Republicans put that in the bill, that Republicans put a repeal of Section 230 in the bill, and then the president would sign it, you know, part of this large bill, and Republicans resisted.
00:12:21.000We said, You know, Republicans are asking for our vote in the Senate runoff on January 5th, but yet they're resisting the president on inserting a repeal of Section 230, which is a huge deal.
00:12:33.000That's, you know, the main strategy of fighting big tech.
00:12:36.000They refuse to put that in legislation.
00:12:39.000Well, today, the National Defense Authorization Act was passed in the House of Representatives.
00:12:45.000It did not include a repeal of Section 230, like the president requested.
00:12:49.000And what's more, it also included a lot of other bad things, including, and I just discovered this today.
00:12:55.000It includes a provision that will make it more difficult for the president to pull our troops out of Afghanistan.
00:13:02.000The president wants to halve the number of troops in Afghanistan by January 15th, and this bill effectively defunds that move.
00:13:11.000So I will read you a report here about this from The Hill.
00:13:15.000It says The compromise defense policy bill released on Thursday includes language aimed at preventing a withdrawal from Afghanistan amid President Trump's order to cut U.S. forces there to 2,500 by mid January.
00:13:30.000The NDAA would block funding to reduce the number of troops in Afghanistan until the Pentagon, State Department, and Director of National Intelligence assess how a drawdown would affect threats to the United States, among other criteria.
00:13:44.000The assessment would be required before troops can drop below the number there when the bill becomes law, and again before troops can drop below 2,000.
00:13:54.000It says The conference reaffirms that it is in the national security interest of the United States.
00:14:00.000To deny terrorists safe haven in Afghanistan, protect the U.S. homeland, uphold the U.S. partnership with the government of Afghanistan, and protect the hard fought gains for the rights of women, girls, and other vulnerable populations in Afghanistan, said the Compromise.
00:14:17.000The administration has a constitutional obligation to provide the Congress and the American people with regular, timely, and comprehensive information on the status of security operations and diplomatic efforts in Afghanistan and across the globe.
00:14:33.000In November, President Trump ordered the military to cut the number of troops in Afghanistan from 4,500 to 2,500 by January 15th, days before he is set to leave office.
00:14:47.000So, this is where we are with the bill that, by the way, Republicans gave the Democrats a veto proof majority on this in the House of Representatives today.
00:14:58.000It passed with a veto proof majority, thanks to House Republicans.
00:15:03.000Not only does it not have a repeal of Section 230, which the president specifically requested and threatened to veto if it didn't have that in it, but also there's language in the bill, endorsed by Dick Cheney, I should add, that specifically obstructs the Pentagon, obstructs the White House from pulling troops out of Afghanistan.
00:15:25.000Now, keep in mind, Republicans said that they were in favor of repealing Section 230.
00:15:32.000They said, but this is not the time or the place to do it because this.
00:15:36.000Is an appropriations bill that has nothing to do with technology.
00:15:41.000And the provisions in the bill are totally unrelated to Section 230.
00:15:45.000And if they want to get rid of the Section 230 protections, they're not going to pass that in the NDAA.
00:15:51.000They're going to pass that in a reform or a repeal of the Communications Decency Act.
00:15:59.000But then at the same time, they're going to go back, and in this bill, they're going to put in a special clause that defunds the president's ability to pull troops out of Afghanistan.
00:16:08.000Well, what does one have to do with the other?
00:16:10.000This has nothing to do, or should have nothing to do, with the war in Afghanistan.
00:16:14.000What is supposed to be in this bill is a pay raise and compensation for.
00:16:22.000Not anything to do with troop deployments in Afghanistan, specifically things that are going to change what the commander in chief is able to do with appropriations in Afghanistan.
00:16:34.000But yet, this found its way into the bill.
00:16:37.000And it's pretty amazing because, you know, I hear this all the time from Democrats and liberals that the president is this warmonger and he's erratic and he's going to cause conflicts with other countries.
00:16:53.000Where the president wants to end wars.
00:16:56.000The president wants to pull troops out of the Middle East or out of Europe.
00:17:01.000The president wants to avoid engagement with Iran or North Korea.
00:17:05.000And it is always Congress, or it's the Pentagon, or it's the military leadership which prevent him from doing so.
00:17:13.000We found this out three weeks ago that the Secretary of Defense, Mark Esper, was lying to President Trump about how many troops that we had in Syria and how many troops that we had in Afghanistan.
00:17:27.000The president has been trying to end our engagement in Syria for years.
00:17:31.000The president has been trying to draw down the number of troops in Afghanistan since he was inaugurated.
00:17:37.000And all throughout that time, at least Mark Gesper and probably other defense secretaries and other Pentagon officials were just straight up lying to the president about how many troops were in either country.
00:17:49.000And at the same time, obstructing him from removing them.
00:17:52.000This is what goes on in the White House.
00:17:55.000People have it in their head for whatever reason that the president gets in and he just pushes buttons, you know?
00:18:02.000That Donald Trump gets into office and he says, I want troops out of Afghanistan.
00:18:18.000That's not actually how government works on any level because at every level of government and every branch of government, the people that are actually carrying out the policy are people with their own political agenda and people with their own autonomy.
00:18:34.000And unless the president is sticking with issues like this in a consistent manner for a long period of time, then it really is up to the discretion of these bureaucrats in the executive branch, or it's up to legislators ultimately putting things like this in appropriations bills or other bills that are actually creating or enforcing the policy decisions.0.96
00:18:59.000If the president were to focus on pulling troops out of Afghanistan every day for 20 months, maybe he could achieve that.
00:19:07.000But the president, of course, has a number of different things that he has to focus on.
00:19:11.000There's daily responsibilities, but then there's also legislative demands, there's national security demands, he's got other agenda priorities.
00:19:21.000So it's not so simple as, well, he gets into office and he pulls the troops out.
00:19:26.000Well, keep in mind, he's got to put that order out to the Pentagon that definitely does not want to end the war in Afghanistan.
00:19:32.000He's got to put that order out to the Defense Department that definitely does not want to pull the troops out of Afghanistan.
00:19:38.000Ultimately, even Congress has somewhat of a say, as you could see in this bill.
00:19:43.000So, the president for four years has been trying to end this war, and what they've been doing is lying, delaying, and then when all that fails, they will just straight up subvert the agenda.
00:19:54.000Because a lot of what's been going on for years has been that they're just wasting his time.
00:20:00.000You know, if you look at what's been going on with foreign policy in particular for the past few years, what they do is they create this charade where they say, well, President Trump, you know, what we really have to do is a temporary troop surge.
00:20:15.000And then we can end the war with honor, you know, sort of like a Vietnamization strategy.
00:20:46.000So, the president began these negotiations with the Taliban.
00:20:49.000And I don't know if you remember, but last August, they called off a very big peace conference at Camp David with the Taliban because the Taliban wasn't adhering to a ceasefire agreement.
00:21:00.000So, they went through this charade where they said, Well, we could pull out troops from Afghanistan, but we have to do it the right way through a peace process with the Taliban and the Afghan government and so on.
00:21:11.000And finally, President Trump, towards the end of this presidential election year, said, You know what?
00:21:23.000We're four years into this first term, nearly four complete years into the first term, and we're no better off now than we were in the beginning.
00:21:32.000So he said, I'm just going to pull the plug.
00:21:34.000And after all that delay, after all these charades and lies about troop totals, the president says, I just want to pull the troops out by January 15th.
00:21:43.000And when all those strategies didn't work, now Congress comes to him and says, No, we're not going to let you.
00:21:52.000All those other, you know, shenanigans weren't working to distract Trump.
00:21:56.000So, in the closing months of this lame duck first term, you know, effectively a lame duck first term, Congress simply tells him straight up, no, we won't let you pull out from Afghanistan.
00:22:09.000You're not allowed to do that because there's contractors that have money on the line and there are other interests that have money on the line.
00:22:16.000So, no, if you want to pull the troops out, well, first, you're going to have to complete this extensive report that's going to take way too long.
00:22:24.000And you're not going to get the funding to pull the troops out until you complete that.
00:22:28.000And then, if you want to draw the troops down further, you have to complete another extensive report about women's voting rights and about national security assessment and where we're at with regional actors before you could draw troops down even further.
00:22:42.000We'll defund it until that report's completed.
00:23:13.000And now, even though the president came in saying that he wanted to end the endless wars in the Middle East, we're no better off than we were before he got started four years ago.
00:23:26.000And I also want to add that this is, by the way, how Republicans work.
00:23:30.000You know, a lot of people thought that.
00:23:32.000Donald Trump got elected, and not only was policy going to turn around, not only would the wars end and everything was going to change, but also that the Republican Party would change.
00:23:42.000But you see that both things are not true.
00:23:44.000Not only did policy not change, we still had a lot of these deep state policies in place, and they'll remain in place before, during, and after he's gone.
00:23:54.000But at the same time, the Republican Party also hasn't changed.
00:23:57.000The Republican Party, I'm sure, put this provision in there.
00:24:01.000The Republican Party voted for this bill with this provision.
00:24:54.000It says, The Afghanistan language is among several rebukes of Trump that made it into the bipartisan NDAA.
00:25:02.000The bill includes language aimed at constraining Trump's ability to withdraw thousands of U.S. troops from Germany.
00:25:09.000And it also includes a requirement for the Pentagon to rename Confederate named bases and excludes a repeal of a tech liability shield, both areas over which Trump has threatened to veto the bill.
00:25:21.000So this is just a giant slap in the face to the president.
00:25:27.000Denies him a withdrawal of troops from Afghanistan, denies him a withdrawal of troops from Germany, and it also forces the Pentagon to rename military bases named after Confederate generals.
00:25:41.00040 Republicans voted for this in the House of Representatives.
00:25:45.000Do you understand why I've been saying so strongly for the past week that nobody in Georgia should vote in the Senate runoff for Republicans?
00:25:55.000You know, and people want to talk about the consequences of what would happen if Democrats were in control of the government, but you've seen time and time again, just in the last one week, what you get no matter who's in charge Republicans or Democrats.
00:26:10.000This bill passed the House of Representatives with a veto proof majority.
00:26:15.000That means more than two thirds of the House voted for this bill.
00:26:18.000Democrats do not have a two thirds majority in the House.
00:26:22.000And they got far and away above a two thirds majority.
00:26:26.000And they could not have done that without a massive amount of Republicans voting for it.
00:26:32.000This was not passed by unanimous consent either, like the bill we talked about yesterday or the country cap that was eliminated in the Senate last week.
00:26:44.000And still, even though Republican representatives have their vote on this bill on record, They were happily willing to go along with it.
00:26:52.000And they went along with voting against Section 230.
00:26:56.000And they went along with voting in favor of the rename of the Confederate bases.
00:27:00.000They went in favor of voting to stop Trump from withdrawing troops from Germany and from Afghanistan.
00:27:05.000And just think about those three issues together Republicans won't take a stand on big tech.
00:27:10.000And if they wouldn't take a stand on it in this bill, they will never take a stand on it.
00:27:15.000Republicans wouldn't take a stand on Confederate monuments, which is broadly the cultural.
00:27:21.000Of the United States and the identity of the United States wouldn't take a stand on something as simple as Confederate bases, which they have leverage over, by the way.
00:27:32.000There's no reason that we should have to capitulate to something like this in a bill that has to pass both chambers of Congress.
00:27:39.000And at the same time, Republicans won't take a stand on pulling troops out of the Middle East or even out of Europe.
00:27:47.000And so, you know, you look at three issues like that and you combine that with immigration because Republicans passed by unanimous consent yesterday a terrible bill on immigration, the TPS for Hong Kongers.
00:28:00.000And last week in the Senate, They passed by unanimous consent this elimination of country caps for H 1B visas.
00:28:08.000So, if you think about just these four issues big tech, immigration, America First foreign policy, and cultural heritage in just one week, Republicans, it's almost like this is a referendum.
00:28:21.000Republicans have said on each of these four issues we will not stand with the American people.
00:28:27.000We will not stand up for American workers and for American identity on immigration.
00:28:32.000We will not stand up for Americans and conservatives.
00:28:35.000And their right to free speech on big tech platforms.
00:28:37.000We will not stand up for our constituents protecting the heritage, culture, and identity of America.
00:28:43.000And we will not stand up for Americans and an American first foreign policy when it comes to not just the Middle East, but even NATO countries, which is completely anachronistic in the 21st century.
00:28:55.000Ask yourself this if Republicans won't take a stand on issues like that for the positions that their constituents support, why should we have them in office?
00:29:16.000Republicans will not support our policy preferences on maybe the four most important issues that exist right now immigration, foreign policy, big tech, and the culture and identity of America.
00:29:37.000But these are four of the most important issues.
00:29:41.000That are currently happening in the United States.
00:29:43.000And Republicans are not representing us on any of them.
00:29:47.000And they have actually betrayed us on all of them in just the last one week.
00:29:52.000And they have betrayed us on all these issues at a time when they're asking for our vote for them to keep the Senate majority in just three weeks.
00:30:02.000So, in other words, if they're going to betray us so consistently in such a short amount of time, when they need our vote, maybe more than other times when they're asking for our vote, For an election which is coming up, how are they going to betray us after they don't need our vote for another two years?
00:30:23.000If they're governing in this way before the election when they need the vote, how are they going to govern after the election when they don't need our vote for another two years?
00:30:32.000They're willing to betray us on no fewer than four major issues in the span of one week.
00:30:38.000Even when Republicans are activated and paying attention and pissed off and threatening to withhold their vote, how will they then govern?
00:30:45.000After the election, when there's not much recourse that we have, not until 2022.
00:30:51.000Well, you know, I think the rest of this century speaks for itself.
00:30:55.000How have Republicans governed for the past 20 years?
00:32:43.000And yet, for whatever reason, there's this disconnect where, because of I guess maybe years of brainwashing or years of conditioning, muscle memory, you know, years of people just going out and voting no matter what, voting regardless every two years because of this tug of war between Republicans and Democrats.
00:33:01.000They know that we're getting betrayed every year, but then they vote for that to continue every year.
00:33:07.000And there's this reluctance to give up the vote, reluctance to let go of the Republican Party.
00:33:12.000I've been beating this drum and I've been going on this issue really hard for the past week because people need to internalize this is not our party.
00:33:35.000Now, that doesn't mean that we're never going to vote ever again.
00:33:39.000And it doesn't mean that we're not going to vote Republican, but it does mean that we must withhold our vote from Republicans that are not going to do their job.
00:33:47.000What good are Republicans that we vote for who go to Washington, D.C., and they pass the same policies as the Democrats?
00:33:54.000Or even when they have majorities, they'll pass policies that the Democrats like, or they refrain from passing policies that are good for conservatives and for Republicans.
00:34:23.000I will never vote for Marco Rubio ever.
00:34:26.000If I lived in Florida, if he was running for national office, I would never vote for Marco Rubio because I know that Marco Rubio will never do anything for me.
00:34:35.000He will never do anything for conservatives or Christians or patriots.
00:34:39.000And so, no matter who he's up against, I will never vote for him.
00:34:43.000And unless and until the Republican Party begins to run candidates who will do something for me, then I will not vote for Republicans.
00:34:52.000And that is a way that we, as Republican voters, can have some leverage over the party and we could put the ball in their court.
00:34:59.000And if we can say to them that we're going to protest the party, we will protest these elections, withhold our votes, we don't care how bad it gets, then it will be on the Republican leadership to begin representing the constituents that they purport to represent.
00:35:57.000We want to give Mitch McConnell two more years of Senate control so that we could have two more years of this.
00:36:02.000We could have two more years of doing nothing about big tech, working with Joe Biden on amnesty, keeping our troops abroad in not just the Middle East, but in Eastern Europe too, and Central Europe, and so that we could help the left accelerate the destruction of American culture.
00:36:54.000Where were you when the Democrats and the globalists in the Republican establishment forced through a bill?
00:37:01.000That denied our president pulling our troops out of the Middle East, that denied our president fighting big tech, denied our president trying to protect Southern heritage.
00:37:58.000In 2018, the Koch brothers began supporting Democratic opponents of Republicans who were in favor of a border wall and immigration restriction.
00:38:08.000If you go against the Koch brothers, they'll try to primary you.
00:38:11.000And if they can't primary you, they will try to put a Democrat in your seat.
00:38:15.000There's consequences for politicians if they go against their donors.
00:42:43.000It says, The state of Texas filed a lawsuit directly with the U.S. Supreme Court shortly before midnight on Monday, challenging the election procedures in Georgia, Michigan, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin on the grounds that they violate the Constitution.
00:43:01.000Texas argues that these states violated the Elector's Clause of the Constitution.
00:43:06.000Because they made changes to voting rules and procedures through the courts or through executive actions, but not through the state legislatures.
00:43:14.000Additionally, Texas argues that there were differences in voting rules and procedures in different counties within the states, violating the Constitution's Equal Protection Clause.
00:43:24.000Finally, Texas argues that there were voting irregularities in these states as a result of the above.
00:43:30.000Texas is asking the Supreme Court to order the states to allow their legislatures to appoint their electors.
00:43:37.000The lawsuit says Certain officials in the defendant states presented the pandemic as the justification for ignoring state laws regarding absentee and mail in voting.
00:43:47.000The defendant states flooded their citizenry with tens of millions of ballot applications and ballots in derogation of statutory controls as to how they are lawfully received, evaluated, and counted.
00:44:01.000Whether well intentioned or not, these unconstitutional acts had the same uniform effect.
00:44:07.000They made the 2020 election less secure in the defendant states.
00:44:11.000Those changes are inconsistent with relevant state laws and were made by non legislative entities without any consent by the state legislatures.
00:44:19.000The acts of these officials thus directly violated the Constitution.
00:44:26.000Did the defendant states violate the Elector's Clause by taking non legislative actions to change the election rules that would govern the appointment of presidential electors?
00:44:36.000These non legislative changes to the defendant states' election laws facilitated the casting and counting of ballots in violation of state law, which in turn violated the Elector's Clause of Article II, Section 1, Clause 2 of the U.S. Constitution.
00:44:51.000By these unlawful acts, the defendant states have not only tainted the integrity of their own citizens' vote, but their actions have also debased the votes of citizens in plaintiff states and other states that remained loyal to the Constitution.
00:45:05.000Texas approached the Supreme Court directly because Article III provides that it is the court of first impression on subjects where it has original jurisdiction, such as disputes between two or more states.
00:45:18.000So, this is a case by the state of Texas.
00:45:22.000Against the states, Michigan, Wisconsin, Georgia, and Pennsylvania.
00:45:27.000And it can only be heard in the Supreme Court.
00:45:30.000It must originate in and it is exclusive to the Supreme Court because under Section 3, or rather Article 3 of the Constitution, it says that disputes between states have to be handled in the Supreme Court.
00:45:43.000So the Supreme Court, it's on the docket right now, which means that they are going to hear this case.
00:45:49.000I think it was a 6 3 vote to put it on the docket, meaning that they're going to handle this one.
00:45:56.000These four states have violated the Constitution because, in the Constitution, it creates the rules under which the presidential election must be governed.
00:46:08.000It says that state legislatures appoint their electors, state legislatures govern the appointment of the electors.
00:46:17.000And Texas is saying that in these four different states, it was not the state legislatures that came up with the process for appointing the electors, state supreme courts, And other non legislative institutions in the state were creating the rules.
00:46:34.000And therefore, if it was courts and if it was election commissions and non legislative entities creating the rules, then that would violate the Constitution because the Constitution says it has to be the legislature which creates the rules.
00:46:48.000And Texas is saying that if these states violated the Constitution by having their state Supreme Court come up with rules or having their state election officials come up with the rules, Then this is, of course, going to have an impact on every state.
00:47:02.000It's going to violate, in some sense, the voting rights of Texans and of every other state that followed the Constitution.
00:47:11.000And what they want to make happen is they want to allow these states to have their state legislatures take back their constitutional authority to appoint their own electors.
00:47:21.000Texas is essentially suing so that Pennsylvania, Michigan, Wisconsin, and Georgia, the state legislatures can appoint their electors as opposed to the electors being decided by these unconstitutional elections that were held on November 3rd.
00:47:40.000And I don't know, actually, if this will go anywhere.
00:47:42.000I'm not a lawyer, I'm not a legal expert.
00:47:44.000From what I've heard, It may have a good shot at winning here.
00:47:49.000And what is encouraging to me is that other states are joining the lawsuit.
00:47:53.000Like I said, Alabama, Arkansas, Louisiana, and Florida have joined the lawsuit.
00:47:59.000And it seems to me that if their secretaries of state, their attorney generals, and their governors are on board with this lawsuit, then maybe it means there's something to this.
00:48:10.000I would also add that there have been a lot of lawsuits about election fraud from the Trump campaign or from Republicans or Trump supporters that have failed so far.
00:48:19.000But in each case, if you look at every single lawsuit that has failed or been dismissed, it has never failed or been dismissed on the basis of the evidence presented.
00:48:31.000In each case, in each of these lawsuits so far, the lawsuit will be dismissed or the lawsuit will be lost because of procedural matters.
00:48:40.000For example, there was an injunction in Pennsylvania that was denied, which you might have seen that made the news today.
00:48:48.000And it was not denied because there wasn't any evidence.
00:48:52.000It was denied because the case was not brought forward in a quote unquote timely manner.
00:48:57.000And they didn't even dismiss the suit.
00:48:58.000They did not allow for the injunction.
00:49:01.000But in that case, some are saying, well, the lawsuit was lost.
00:49:03.000It technically wasn't lost, the injunction was denied.
00:49:06.000And in this case, it was only denied because of a procedural matter.
00:49:11.000And this is how all the cases have been so far.
00:49:14.000In no court has an election fraud case been dismissed or lost because of evidence, because of a lack of evidence or the evidence is not permissible or anything like that.
00:49:24.000It's because of these procedural matters.
00:49:26.000And even today in the Pennsylvania case, I may go into more detail about this tomorrow when I have more time.
00:49:32.000But even in the Pennsylvania decision today, when the Democrats responded to the petition, they said that they didn't say anything about the evidence.
00:49:42.000They simply said that for the court to nullify an election would cause chaos.
00:49:47.000And so essentially what they're saying is whether the evidence is true or not, whether the election was legitimate or not, the court should not even make A decision because if they were to nullify the election, if they were to nullify votes, it would just cause problems and it would create bad consequences.
00:50:05.000You know, maybe there would be chaos in the streets.
00:50:08.000Maybe people would lose faith in the political system.
00:50:11.000In other words, do not look at the evidence because if you did, the consequences might be bad.
00:50:18.000So, in all these cases, I haven't really been blackpilled so much because there's no evidence.
00:50:25.000I've been blackpilled because it seems that the system is just rigged.
00:50:29.000You know, it's not like we're not able to gather the evidence or there is no evidence, and it's on that basis that a lot of these cases are failing or losing.
00:50:38.000It's because the cases that are being brought forward are being dismissed because of seemingly arbitrary matters of process rather than substance.
00:50:48.000And so, you know, it's kind of in that sense, it really doesn't matter what reason it's failing, right?
00:50:54.000I mean, whether it fails because there's no evidence or it fails because they're just rigging the system.
00:51:00.000If it's not going to succeed in court, it's not going to succeed.
00:51:03.000But still, you know, I remain hopeful that maybe if they can find a way, if they just get the procedure right and they get that to the Supreme Court, that maybe on the merits of the evidence, we still have a shot at winning, right?
00:51:16.000In other words, if we could find a way to beat the system, if we meet all their arbitrary rules, if we get all the procedure right, then maybe if we could finally get the evidence into a court and potentially the Supreme Court, maybe they could still make the right call.
00:51:31.000So I saw this case today in Texas and.
00:51:49.000It's encouraging that other states are joining on, but where we are right now is we're just counting on a lot of people that I don't have a lot of faith in.
00:51:58.000I don't have a lot of faith in the Supreme Court.
00:52:00.000I don't have a lot of faith in the court system.
00:52:02.000I don't have a lot of faith in state legislators and others.
00:52:05.000So, On the one hand, I'm happy that the case is being made.
00:52:08.000It's encouraging that other states are joining on to it.
00:52:13.000You know, and the grounds are legitimate.
00:52:15.000And all this stuff about the Constitution is legitimate.
00:52:18.000You know, everything that we've said about the Constitution favors us in the governing of this election process.
00:52:23.000But it's just a matter of is the system going to screw us or is the system going to work?
00:52:29.000What's more is we're running out of time.
00:52:31.000You know, all the time we're running out of time.
00:52:34.000We have now six days before the Electoral College votes.
00:52:38.000And Congress is sworn in and counts the Electoral College votes on January 6th.
00:52:43.000So the hard deadline and the late deadline is less than a month.
00:52:47.000A softer deadline, but still a deadline, is less than a week.
00:52:51.000And we have that window of time for the Supreme Court potentially to intervene in an unprecedented way, and in a way which frankly would be surprising to me, or for state legislatures to do something, or for the vice president to do something, for some wild card to present itself.
00:53:07.000So running out of time, running out of options.
00:53:11.000This looks to me like sort of a Hail Mary, and I hope it succeeds.
00:53:14.000It seems like it will, but then again, you know, we've heard how many hours of hearings where that should have worked, you know, and that should have convinced Republican controlled state legislatures to claw back their electors.
00:53:45.000Closed off one by one because of an unwillingness of the system to work in the way that it's intended to work, and also because we're just simply running out of time.
00:53:56.000You know, if we had more time, we probably could put more pressure on legislatures.
00:54:01.000If we had more time, they could probably put together better lawsuits and be more organized, and maybe the procedure would be cleaner.
00:54:07.000But I mean, we're talking about a very limited window of time from November 3rd to December 14th, right?
00:54:14.000From election night to the deadline for the electors to vote.
00:54:21.000That's about eight weeks that you have time to gather all this evidence, mobilize all these resources, get lawyers, write briefs, petitions, things of that nature.
00:54:33.000I think that's why they took a huge risk in rigging an election in six swing states.
00:54:41.000It's because they knew that the system is broken, they knew that the system is disorganized, they knew that the system is biased against doing the things that we need the system to do.
00:54:51.000They knew all of that, and they knew that once the votes were counted on election night, it would be nearly impossible at the time that we have and the resources we have and the system we're up against to get those votes uncounted or thrown out.
00:55:11.000We still have a chance here, and it's encouraging that there seem to be new strategies presenting themselves, and the different forces involved in this are.
00:55:21.000Reorganizing themselves and launching different kinds of strategies.
00:55:24.000But at a certain point, you got to recognize that the time is finite and that the deadline is a reality that we're up against here.
00:55:33.000We got six days now before the electors vote, and it's not soon after that that Congress begins to count the votes.
00:55:39.000And that's what we are working with right now.
00:55:42.000So we will follow this lawsuit through the Supreme Court.
00:55:56.000We got to keep turning out to these rallies.
00:55:58.000But, you know, right now it's not looking good.
00:56:01.000This thing made me feel a little bit better because it seems like the state legislatures won't do their job.
00:56:06.000It doesn't seem like that's going to do much.
00:56:09.000So it seems like now our fate rests in the hands of the Supreme Court, rests in the hands of Amy Coney Barrett, Brett Kavanaugh, and Gorsuch.
00:57:37.000So there was no reason why three state legislatures controlled by Republicans couldn't say, we're going to take our rightful constitutional authority to appoint our electors back and appoint electors for Trump in Michigan, Pennsylvania, and Georgia.
00:57:51.000There's no reason that couldn't have happened.
00:57:53.000There's no reason that a governor couldn't have called a special session, a Republican governor could not have called a special session of a Republican controlled state legislature, and the state legislature passes a resolution saying that, and the electors are changed.
00:58:07.000And the electors vote on December 14th for Trump.
00:58:09.000There's no reason that that shouldn't have happened.
00:58:11.000There's no reason that the Supreme Court shouldn't have intervened in an election contest suit already.
00:58:17.000And, you know, the list goes on and on.
00:58:22.000So, that's to me the most frustrating thing is it's, although it was unlikely and it was difficult, theoretically and legally it was totally possible and it should have happened.
00:58:34.000But this is what entrenchment looks like.
00:58:37.000This is what a centuries long screw job.
00:58:42.000In other words, we have worked, the voters have voted for years to create this political power in the country, for years to create this sort of infrastructure.
00:58:54.000We have Republican governors and state legislatures and majority in the Senate and a Republican White House.
00:59:00.000And think about all the judicial appointments that Trump approved in the federal judiciary and in the Supreme Court three Supreme Court appointees from Trump.
00:59:23.000When all is said and done, we build up this huge base of political power so that we could forfeit the presidency, so that we could use all that power to forfeit the presidency when we could have actually needed all that political power.
01:01:02.000We have thousands of votes that we know are from dead people, people with physically impossible addresses, addresses that are at UPS facilities, people from out of state.
01:01:42.000What good did any of that do when we actually needed them, right?
01:01:46.000When we actually needed them to do something?
01:01:49.000You know, they're going to cut ribbons and they're going to take checks from donors and they're going to take checks from the taxpayer and they're going to get a fancy corner office and all that.
01:02:00.000And they're going to get the prestige and the pomp and the fanfare of being an elected official and they're going to participate in the government and They're going to get taken care of.
01:02:11.000But when we needed them the most, they could do nothing for us.
01:02:14.000And if they can't do anything for us when we need them, why do you have them around?
01:02:19.000This is what you get when you vote for Republicans.
01:02:45.000And then to add insult to injury, you've got Republican influencers and Republican politicians admonishing us for withholding our vote, admonishing us for suggesting that we withhold our vote.
01:03:01.000You know, they're going to admonish you for withholding your vote while they stab you in the back at the same time, in every way, on every level, from the state legislatures.
01:03:10.000Up through the governors and the secretaries of each state, all the way up through the U.S. House of Representatives and the Senate and the federal courts and the U.S. Supreme Court.
01:03:29.000R.A. says When Trump was doing 15 rallies in three days leading up to the election, I thought he was the only man in the world with the energy for something like that.0.96
01:03:38.000Seeing you marshaling us at all these rallies, no matter how many gay service workers, pagans, or lunatics get in your way.0.86
01:03:44.000I can see now that Trump is not alone.0.92
01:03:57.000If Middle East countries have undemocratic elections, we can send young Americans across the world for decades to protect freedom and endless wars.0.99
01:04:06.000But if our elections are compromised, then suddenly we're at the mercy of deformed BLM Antifa mongrels threatening to burn our cities down.
01:04:17.000We have to keep fighting in Afghanistan so that women and girls have the right to vote.
01:04:21.000But in this country, you have third world voter fraud being committed.
01:04:24.000I mean, literally, send home the poll workers and then whip out suitcases full of ballots.
01:04:29.000We got people on camera changing ballots from Trump to Biden, machines that flip votes from Trump to Biden, statistical data analysis that shows that the vote for Biden is impossible.
01:04:41.000They said it's one in one quadrillion that Joe Biden could have won that election fair and square.
01:04:46.000And when that happens, they say, well, nothing we could do about that.
01:05:54.000And, you know, you could very easily tell who is a slave and who isn't by whether or not they're in favor of or will take the COVID vaccine.
01:06:31.000Or rather, why would they be anti anti vax so strongly?
01:06:35.000It's not like there was a pandemic going on two years ago.
01:06:38.000I mean, they were just talking about the flu shot.
01:06:41.000You know, I remember it was probably about a year or two ago, maybe, yeah, something like that, that they made this big push against anti vaxxers, ridiculed them in the media.
01:06:53.000There was this talk about public policy and censoring people like that from the internet, conspiracies about vaccines.
01:07:02.000And now the government is telling you you won't be able to fly on a plane, you won't be able to leave your house, you won't be able to go to a concert or go to a restaurant.
01:07:13.000Doesn't anybody see a problem with that?
01:07:15.000I mean, you don't have to be right wing.
01:07:17.000You don't have to be a conspiracy theorist to say maybe there's something fishy with the government telling you that they're going to inject you in the arm with something and you don't have freedom unless you do that.
01:07:31.000I know we all get that on some level, but how did normies not understand this?0.99
01:07:36.000You have normies out there that are saying, oh, you couldn't possibly be so ignorant to be anti vax.0.96
01:07:43.000It's like you don't see an issue with the fact that the federal government, you know, the federal government, the CIA, the FBI, the DOD, I mean, all these corrupt people.0.99
01:08:53.000Look up all these different declassified reports from the intelligence community where they write out that they planned false flag attacks.
01:09:01.000They have experimented on Americans many times on blacks, on whites, MKUltra, on the military.
01:09:10.000You know, and I don't want to sound crazy or anything, but seriously, I mean, what they put in the water, what they put in the vaccines, what they put in the air or the food.
01:09:19.000I mean, you have to be a right wing conspiracy theorist to maybe be a little bit skeptical about what is being put in our bodies, what's being put in the air we breathe, the water we drink, the food we eat, and in the vaccines that we're injected with.
01:09:33.000And increasingly now, by a mandate from the federal government, you know, we're losing everything and people are going right along with it.
01:09:50.000You could look at what's going on in the world and look at what's going on in the country.
01:09:53.000To me, the real red pill is looking at all the people who will be affected that are militantly in favor of it.
01:10:00.000You know, you've got people that are enthusiastic and enforcers of the enslavement of humanity.
01:10:08.000You know, I think about that flight attendant that kicked me off that plane.
01:10:11.000I think about liberals I know, and they are cheerleaders for their own enslavement, cheerleaders for their own, the rape of their biological integrity.0.93
01:12:40.000And if something does not go the way that I want it to go or it's against what I'm expecting, The way that it should go, I get very angry very quickly.
01:12:48.000But my default mood, barring any contingency like that, is very positive.
01:12:56.000But lately, man, it's like that movie falling down.
01:13:01.000I feel like the protagonist and falling down.
01:13:04.000Everywhere I go, everything I do, nothing works anymore.
01:13:23.000Like, you know, there was that story with the flight attendant where I get kicked off the plane because I wasn't smiling with the mask over my face.
01:13:32.000And then, you know, I got to book another flight and go over there.
01:13:36.000And then they're going to charge me a fee, a no show fee.
01:13:39.000I go to the hotel a little bit late, and they're going to charge me a fee for not using the hotel room that I paid for.
01:13:46.000And then I'm leaving the parking garage.
01:13:49.000And the pass that I'm giving them won't scan, and they're saying, Well, you're just going to have to go back in and get another pass.
01:13:55.000I'm going to have to back up, park, go all the way back in the hotel, get another pass, go all the way back out, drive in.
01:14:01.000I said, I am not leaving until you open this gate.
01:14:06.000And eventually they sent somebody out.
01:14:09.000They're like, Well, sir, you're going to have to go back and get another pass.
01:14:45.000Hater Time says, What's up with this gay copypasta about you pooping your pants and giving away over 1,400 hours of content for just $5 a month?0.97
01:14:56.000Well, you know, one of those things is true.
01:14:58.000I am giving away 1,400 hours of content for just $5 a month on NicholasJFuentes.com.
01:15:06.000So I know it sounds unbelievable, but that part is true.
01:15:11.000What I love about that copypasta is, you know, they probably could have gotten away with a little bit of it, you know, and people might have believed it, but they just go so far out of their way into so many things that are provably untrue or just.0.92
01:15:27.000They're like, oh, well, in that copypasta, these like Vosh pedophile supporters, most of them transsexual, are posting this copypasta screenshot from Discord that says, like, oh, Nick Fuentes did all these weird things back in high school.0.98
01:15:43.000And one of the things that they say is that I bought a bunch of weed and offered to smoke people out, which I don't even know what that means.0.86
01:15:50.000I think that means like you let people smoke your weed, I think.
01:15:55.000They said, like, oh, one time he lost all his friends after he became.
01:16:00.000Political, and in an effort to gain his friends back, he offered to smoke them all out over Christmas break.
01:16:05.000And then he went on a Twitter thread about it.
01:16:08.000And it says, Oh, there's all these screenshots of him texting people.0.86
01:16:12.000And, like, number one, this story is ridiculous on its face.
01:16:15.000I've never done drugs in my entire life.0.87
01:16:32.000Untrue on its face, but what's more is, when there be evidence of this, where are these screenshots of text messages?
01:16:39.000Where's a screenshot of the Twitter rant?
01:16:40.000You know, things that are provably untrue.
01:16:43.000Later on in the screenshot, it says he's been waging this fight against the church across the street to remove a gay pride flag.
01:16:53.000There isn't a church across my street, never has been.
01:16:56.000What's more, I've never even talked about anything like that.
01:16:59.000I mean, there are churches in my neck of the woods that have gay pride flags.0.94
01:17:03.000I think I've said in the past that I don't care for that, obviously, but wouldn't there be something on Twitter, on the show about that?0.87
01:17:11.000I mean, I do a show every day for three years.
01:17:14.000You'd think that would come up at one point during the show.
01:17:18.000And there's a million things in there like that, but, you know, I don't want to dignify that with like a complete response, but, you know, I read through that thing and it's like these people don't even know what they're doing.
01:17:27.000I mean, if they wanted to make it stick, what they're really doing is ruining their credibility.
01:17:31.000I mean, imagine if something came out ever that was like, Actually, true about me?
01:17:39.000What if I, like, killed somebody five years ago and people were, like, talking about it or something?
01:17:44.000If I actually did something terrible, nobody would ever believe it because whenever anybody accuses me of something, they just destroy their credibility.
01:17:51.000And the kinds of claims that they make are so outlandish, provably untrue.0.94
01:17:57.000You know, so they kind of just look retarded in the process.1.00
01:18:00.000But what do you expect from people that are trans?1.00
01:18:04.000What do you expect from people that are mentally ill?1.00
01:19:26.000If you went back and looked at posts from Yik Yak or Street Chat, which were prominent in my school at the time, you will find the most popular posts on that app were saying, I have a crush on Nick Fuentes.
01:19:39.000Nick Fuentes is going to be president one day.
01:19:45.000And that's the grand irony it was the same people in high school who were fucking trannies or fat or retarded or like total losers then who were hating on me who now are trying to create this revisionist history.0.98
01:19:59.000So, anyway, so it is somewhat amusing to read this.0.98
01:20:03.000And then I go back and I look at some of the things from high school, and it's like I was like a legend, you know?
01:21:25.000Oh, here's this guy who is going to a selective university with a political science degree, beloved in his community, well known, et cetera, who's now, you know, become right wing and is winning people over to the message every day.
01:23:23.000Russian Jewish Zumer says, Galactic Federation, Nibbuz, can you invade the planet already and send all the globalists to the space gulag?0.96
01:23:32.000Yeah, I don't know what's up with that Galactic Federation business from that Israeli space chief, but the aliens, what I'm told is that aliens are demons.0.69
01:23:42.000I've consulted with my Catholic friends, and they tell me that the aliens are actually demons.
01:30:02.000This poll will determine whether or not.
01:30:07.000Anyway, Fresh Princess Amunda says, I used to think you were the funniest political streamer, but then I heard Tim Pool's Joe Biden impression for the 50th time.0.68
01:31:26.000You know, some of my favorite content on TikTok is they'll do, you know, a day by day, they'll remodel a building or they'll gut a car or, you know, something like that.
01:32:18.000There's something to me about that which is very satisfying to watch or to learn about, to listen to when people, you know, they'll come up with, you know, some kind of contraption and they'll conduct an experiment and see what went wrong.
01:32:32.000And, you know, there's something about that systematic way of thinking which appeals to me because I think I'm a systematic thinker.
01:32:40.000Not exactly in the same way because I'm obviously, I suck when it comes to science.
01:34:34.000That's what I see all the time is women acting like white women, acting like black women, liberal men acting like black women, faggots acting like black women.1.00
01:40:54.000I'll make some kind of like offhand remark to Jaden, and then he's like, well, apparently I'm, you know, Big Ranch, or, you know, whatever.
01:41:01.000And so you, if only you knew, if only you knew the kind of trouble I get into for the things I say on this show.
01:41:08.000I'm having a good time, I'm in the moment, I'm in my element, I'm doing my thing, and then the lights go off, the show goes off, and then.
01:41:17.000Then I'm out into the world and I get text messages.
01:41:20.000I heard you said this about me on the show, not necessarily always from Jaden, but from other people.
01:41:25.000I heard you said this about me on the show, explain this one, blah, blah, blah.
01:41:29.000Remember what I said about like trad girls and that Bernadette girl?0.99
01:45:09.000You know, if not for any other reason, if you're an atheist, you should read the Bible because if you're an atheist, at minimum, it is something that you have to investigate and have to get to the bottom of.
01:45:21.000You know, I was driving around today and thinking about the crucifixion.
01:45:26.000And I was thinking about it in these terms.
01:45:28.000You think about the world, and the world is actually a very boring place.
01:45:32.000It's actually a very boring and basically sad place.
01:45:35.000And even the best things in the world, I mean, when you imagine your biggest ambitions, your biggest goals, I mean, what is it really?0.96
01:45:44.000For a lot of you, probably it's starting a family or something like that, but I'm talking about you individually, or maybe for an atheist, materially.
01:46:13.000After the show, everybody goes home and the lights go off and he gets in a car and he drives back home and he brushes his teeth and he goes to bed.
01:46:30.000Now, you think about the fact that God, the creator of the world, became a human being, and atheists aren't interested in investigating this.
01:46:41.000I mean, even if they don't believe it's true, there are reports that the creator of heaven and earth became man, was crucified, and then rose from the dead.
01:46:52.000Now, we know in life that everyone dies and it's final, but there's a rumor.
01:46:58.000You know, and that you could say, if you're an atheist, you could say it's a rumor.
01:47:01.000It's persisted for thousands of years that somebody rose from the dead.
01:47:06.000God became man, was crucified on a cross, and fulfilling his prophecy, fulfilling his prophecy.
01:49:02.000I don't really watch the Tim cast that much.0.96
01:49:06.000I've been watching it a little bit lately because I've been trying to get on there, but I can't really confirm or deny if their cast sucks.
01:49:16.000I have to say, I like Tim Poole in the sense that I like him as a presenter.
01:49:21.000I think he's an entertaining presenter.
01:49:24.000And, uh, You know, he's a smart enough guy.
01:50:13.000I watched a little bit of him on Tim Pool, and it was the funniest thing in the world because Tim Pool was like, you know, Trump is trying to stop these wars.
01:51:58.000It is that collection of thousands of bureaucrats, tens, hundreds of thousands of bureaucrats that work in these positions long term.
01:52:08.000And presidents come and go, and it's the bureaucrats that enforce and interpret and carry out the policy that ultimately are making the policy decisions.
01:52:17.000This is why between Bush, Obama, And Trump, you have war in Iraq and Afghanistan, and drone strikes, and a presence in West Africa and Somalia and Pakistan and the Gulf.
01:52:29.000This is why, for 30 years, we have been battling rogue states like North Korea and Iran and Iraq.
01:52:39.000This is why, for decades, we have not had a reconciliation with Russia.
01:53:06.000You know, I mean, this has been going on for half of a century, probably longer.1.00
01:53:10.000Subversion by the CIA, subversion by the FBI, the intelligence apparatus, subversion by the military industrial complex, which is very real.
01:53:20.000The generals, the Pentagon, defense contractors.
01:53:23.000You think Lockheed Martin and Raytheon don't exert control over the process?
01:53:28.000You think that all these people just serve at the pleasure of the president?
01:54:05.000No, the president is not in charge.1.00
01:54:08.000BlackRock, the Federal Reserve, the interests, the donors, the deep state, the intelligence apparatus, they all exert control over the process.
01:54:17.000Now, that doesn't mean that the president has no control or no say.
01:54:22.000But in some sense, the president is less powerful than the people outside or around the presidency.
01:54:28.000The president is contained in the White House.
01:54:31.000It's almost like he's imprisoned there.
01:54:33.000And the information that the president gets is filtered through his chief of staff.
01:54:38.000And a lot of the decisions he has to delegate to trusted cabinet officials who are all political sharks and have their own agenda.
01:54:44.000I mean, they're all climbers, they all have a personal political agenda, and they have an ideological agenda.
01:54:50.000And he can't handle it, I mean, he's one man.
01:54:53.000The executive branch is a massive bureaucracy, the military is a massive bureaucracy.
01:54:58.000The U.S. military and defense department is one of the biggest organizations on planet Earth.
01:55:04.000And that's just one aspect that the president controls.
01:56:12.000And he was telling me, you know, people like Vosh and Destiny, I mean, you break down the methodology, you actually look at the data in these reports, and you need degrees on top of degrees to even understand and interpret these things.
01:56:24.000He said, people like Destiny and Vosh, they read the abstract, whatever, they're pretending to understand this stuff.
01:59:36.000I don't know who they are, but thanks.
01:59:39.000Orange Pilled says, I have been around since the Groyper War and going under different Super Chat aliases, most recently Anderson, but now I'd like to settle on one name.
01:59:48.000Which do you like better, Orange Pilled or Anakin Skye Groyper?
01:59:52.000I met you in DC and we'll see you again.
02:02:11.000I mean, if you look at the position of Afghanistan on a map, strategically it may be important because it's right up against the border of China.0.76
02:02:58.000We're there to flank China and Iran, which is fine.
02:03:02.000I mean, I am not totally liberal on foreign policy.0.98
02:03:05.000I'm not against a global American military footprint, but not in the form of endless warfare, not in the form of nation building or things like that.
02:03:25.000You know, and maybe we reduce it, maybe we shrink it in size, but the waste that goes on in these wars is unbelievable.
02:03:33.000We read a report about it earlier this week.
02:03:35.000They said that they've left tens of thousands of vehicles idling constantly for decades.
02:03:42.000I mean, they'll put trucks and Humvees on the ground in Afghanistan and just idle them.
02:03:47.000For decades, never turning them off, not using them, but just leaving them there to idle because it's going to cost money.
02:03:54.000And the more money that they can pay, the more that they can ask for from Congress.
02:03:58.000So they're literally spending money to justify the continued expense of the war in Afghanistan.
02:04:04.000And this is one of the things that they do they'll literally just burn money, let the cars run.
02:04:10.000And we read a big, extensive report about this, I think, back in like April or something.
02:04:17.000That's the kind of waste that has to stop.0.99
02:04:19.000Put a fucking military base there and let that be the end of it.0.99
02:04:23.000Highlight Central says Why is Earlobe Ian, well known for grooming underage girls on Discord, allowed to have a YouTube channel but not you?0.99
02:04:30.000Additionally, why does a self proclaimed Irish person have the last name Kaczynski?
02:07:23.000How about rewind the video 60 minutes?0.96
02:07:27.000Daniel says, I saw one of Tim Pool's thumbnails today, and it said that the Dems have been infiltrated by the Chinese, which implies that they were once uncompromised and acted in the country's interest.0.96
02:07:37.000I think to myself, how can you be this blue pill despite constantly witnessing the corruption and condescension of the elites?0.98
02:08:00.000It's been going on for a long time.0.95
02:08:02.000You know, there was one race, I believe, in Georgia.
02:08:05.000I'm trying to think what book this was in.
02:08:08.000I think this was in Who Are We by Sam Huntington, I believe.
02:08:14.000And he talked about how there was one race in the South, I think it was a Senate race, that basically turned into a proxy race between India and Pakistan because one of the candidates was.
02:08:23.000Pro India, one was pro Pakistan, one was getting money from Indian groups, one was getting money from Paki groups or Pakistani groups.
02:08:31.000And, you know, so a lot of people in the dissident right, it's Israel, Israel, Israel.
02:08:37.000And don't get me wrong, Israel is the one that they won't talk about because they're probably, you know, on the take from Israel or they're afraid of Israel.
02:08:43.000But every country Saudi Arabia, Qatar, the Emirates, India, Pakistan, China, I'm sure Russia to some extent, the European Union.
02:08:54.000I'm sure they're all involved, and I know for a fact that China is involved.
02:09:49.000Coda says, One common protest from Catholics I hear against withholding our votes for the Senate is our duty to vote for people against abortion.
02:09:57.000The problem with this view is its short sightedness.
02:10:00.000The only way issues like abortion can be resolved in our favor is for the senators in charge to be held to account.
02:10:08.000And additionally, The Catholic rule on that is not that you have to vote for certain candidates, it's that you cannot vote for candidates that support abortion.
02:10:21.000You cannot vote for a candidate that is pro abortion or would pass policies that further abortion.
02:10:28.000But as far as I know, there's nothing in the Catholic dogma, there's nothing from popes or anything like that that says that Catholics have to vote for any candidate that is running up against somebody that's pro abortion.
02:10:41.000And that might seem like a dumb distinction, but for the reason that you just mentioned, that's probably why.
02:11:28.000Kevin Brough says, the schism between conservatives and their elected class was deafening but necessary.
02:11:38.000In the face of a coup, we arrived at the Million MAGA March in record numbers and showed the entire world that conservatives stand by our president.
02:11:46.000When Trump was under attack, where were you?
02:12:06.000A lot of these conservatives won't have an answer Republicans, senators, governors, presidential hopefuls, conservative influencers, but that's got to be the litmus test.
02:12:16.000Elected Groypers is happy belated Saint Day at the Council of Nicaea, St. Nicholas slapped Arius, who denied Jesus' divinity.0.51
02:12:26.000What you are doing with modern day heretics in the GOP is of similar importance.0.87
02:12:33.000I don't know if I want to compare myself to saints and church fathers and things like that, but certainly it's a similar battle that we're having with Republicans.
02:12:47.000In other words, we have to take it seriously.
02:12:50.000Mango says the Minnesota GOP released a statement about voter fraud in the state.
02:12:55.000Maybe it's worth it to put some pressure on them to act if they seem to be open to it while the Texas lawsuit is taking on the swing states.
02:13:06.000No, because I don't think Minnesota is likely to flip.
02:13:43.000Lunar Prospect says, I joined late and not trying to sound like a cube boomer, but at what point do we stop ignoring China after what's happened?
02:13:51.000Did you see the video of Brian Kemp selling Georgia out to China?
02:13:55.000Or the female spy making her rounds sleeping with California politicians?
02:14:43.000About an American regime that keeps going down the path that it's going down.0.86
02:14:48.000I'm concerned about a Kamala Harris presidency where she's got a hit list and she's going to weaponize the IRS and the ATF and the FBI and the CIA and the NSA against Trump supporters and conservatives.
02:15:00.000I'm concerned about what's going on in the United States, big tech, Mark Zuckerberg, Jack Dorsey, Google.
02:15:07.000These things are a much more imminent and existential threat to what we're doing than any foreign country, China or anybody else.
02:15:12.000That doesn't mean that China's not a threat, but We have to prioritize here.
02:15:17.000And people that are doing this anti China thing and trying to make it sort of analogous to the Cold War, oh, it's China, Beijing, Biden.
02:15:25.000I mean, is that really the most salient thing going on right now?
02:15:29.000Was it Beijing that destroyed all of our cities six months ago?
02:15:33.000Was it Beijing that put us all under a lockdown?
02:15:36.000I mean, ostensibly the virus came from China, but the lockdown didn't.
02:15:39.000Was it Beijing that's doing all this anti racism stuff in the private sector and in the schools and the universities?0.66
02:15:47.000Is it Beijing, the past affirmative action?0.59
02:15:52.000Now, you know, Beijing is a threat and a rival, lots of problems with them, but, you know, I'm tired of hearing about foreign countries.0.63
02:16:00.000Anybody can grandstand about a foreign threat.
02:16:02.000When are they going to do something about what's going on in this country?1.00
02:16:07.000I've always been of the position that no matter who you're talking about, there's no greater threat to the American people than the American regime, not China.0.92
02:16:16.000And once we set things straight in America, then we can deal with China.0.94
02:16:20.000You know, then I will be concerned about China.0.90
02:16:23.000And I will be concerned about Iran and Russia and, you know, whatever else, North Korea.
02:16:28.000But right now, we face a much more severe threat from our own regime.
02:16:32.000And I think everybody who is conservative knows that.
02:18:47.000This is your female dog brain on estrogen.1.00
02:18:51.000You know, people are, I don't know, they're taking their estrogen injection and they're coloring in their bald spot.1.00
02:19:02.000They're putting on their programmer socks and then they're thinking, oh man, this fucking fascist is going to get so owned when I give him $10.0.99
02:19:11.000That I got from OnlyFans or whatever.1.00
02:20:57.000You know, you say that these accusations have no credibility because they were tweeted recently, but they were actually tweeted when you started your show a year after you graduated from high school.
02:22:19.000Although, I don't know that we're living in the end times.
02:22:22.000People always say that we're living in the end times, and you have to think about the whole of human history in the sense that, think about everything that's gone on in the past like 2 or 3 or 4,000 years.
02:22:37.000Plagues and wars, and I mean, you name it.
02:22:42.000And you know, whenever anything bad happens, people say, Oh, this is it.
02:22:47.000I mean, if it wasn't it after World War I or World War II or the Cold War or the Black Plague, or if it wasn't it after the Siege of Vienna or you know, whatever, I mean, you know, you have to think about in the Bible, it says, Nobody will know the hour, nobody will know the day or the hour when the Son of Man will return.
02:23:20.000To me, I've never looked into that question, but I don't think we can have any, we could ever have any confidence that we're seeing the true end of days.
02:23:29.000I think things are going to get much worse before we could say it's the end of days.
02:23:33.000So, we don't have to worry about that.
02:23:35.000We have to worry about is fighting the fight whenever it is, whether it's.
02:23:40.000A million years before the end times, or it's a year before the end times, the playbook is the same.
02:24:46.000I couldn't get along with a lot of people.
02:24:48.000That's one of the reasons why I wasn't really in that group because they would go to parties and I wouldn't drink and they didn't like that.
02:24:56.000They'd hang out and smoke and I wouldn't and they didn't like that.
02:26:15.000He says, Love the show, and you have our support at LT, despite our communist administrators refusing to allow any clubs and sports and forcing me to wear a mask to LT to replace my MAGA mask.
02:26:41.000I mean, really, people can say whatever they want, but everybody knows the truth.
02:26:47.000And, you know, I was at that school and everybody loved me.
02:26:51.000You know, the principal was very liberal, he did not love me, but the teachers liked me, the students liked me, the security guards, the sort of like pages that worked in the school, they loved me.
02:27:02.000I don't know exactly what you would call them.
02:27:04.000They had these guys in like blue shirts, and I don't know what I think they were like security.
02:29:56.000It was more like, huh, wow, you know, that's really interesting.
02:30:01.000You know, it's a totally different mentality because I know a lot of people, they start to lose their friends or they lose their job or something like that, and then they want to claw it all back.
02:30:10.000No, look, look, I'll disavow, I'll say what I want, you know, I'll say what I need to say to get it all back.
02:30:16.000With me, it was more like, wow, you know, I never looked back.
02:30:20.000I always said, like, well, I mean, I guess people just aren't who they said they were, you know, people who they said were my friends.
02:30:27.000Weren't really my friends, people that said they cared about me or liked me.
02:30:30.000They weren't really telling the truth.
02:30:32.000I don't need people like that, you know?
02:30:37.000Have I ever been like, oh, you know, I mean, in some sense, I regret that other people have done that.
02:30:44.000I don't regret the path that I've chosen.
02:30:46.000But, so it's nice, in other words, so it's nice that the hometown Groyper, give me a little message of support from LT. I get such a kick, though, out of thinking about how the school must be.
02:30:59.000I imagine my name being brought up in my old high school with the teachers and with the students, and I like to imagine what that conversation must be.
02:31:07.000People tell me, apparently, that teachers that taught me give like a disclaimer and they say, Well, I taught him, but he wasn't like this, and we didn't make him this way, and so on, which is kind of amusing to me.
02:31:18.000They have a very liberal principle.0.98
02:31:20.000I go on his Twitter sometimes, and he's like recommending these like black power books, and he's a total cuck, total goof.0.98
02:31:29.000Anyway, so I appreciate the message of support from the hometown.1.00
02:33:53.000Some people think, like, oh, if we just had a different system, things would be better.
02:33:56.000Parliamentary as opposed to bicameral legislature.
02:34:01.000Two party as opposed to, you know, multi party or whatever.
02:34:07.000Is it really that we just haven't gotten the institutions right?
02:34:09.000Or is it that no matter what the institution is, the concentrated power would find a way to corrupt it?
02:34:15.000The corrupt people in politics would find a way to corrupt it.
02:34:20.000That, to me, is the right way to look at it, you know.
02:34:22.000Well, what if the system were just different rules and, like, a different title and, like, Is the UK any less corrupt than the United States with a parliamentary system?
02:34:33.000Is in any of these countries, Russia with their Duma and their, what is the upper chamber?
02:34:38.000I think it's like a House of Delegates or something.
02:38:35.000You can watch all of our episodes of this show.
02:38:38.000Every episode of the show, all 728 episodes for just five bucks a month, plus every speech I've ever done, debates, interviews, gaming streams, commentary streams.