Another day where it feels like the noose is tightening around our necks, another day where our days are numbered. The government shutdown is reaching crisis point, and as a result, so is the threat to ban white nationalist and white separatist content on social media. Who is responsible for all the illegal immigration coming across the southern border? And what is the truth about the situation in El Paso, Texas? And who's responsible for the surge in apprehensions at the border? Who's causing all the problems? And why are they coming across our southern border at a rate never before seen before? All that and much more on this episode of America First with Nicholas J. Fuentes. America First is a show about Americanism, not globalism. Americanism will be our credo. It will be only America First. America First, not Globalism. The American people will come first once again. America, not the world, America First! America, First! - Nick J. Fucentes is a podcaster, writer, podcaster and podcaster. He has been with me for over 20 years and is a regular contributor to many publications and media outlets. His work has been featured in the New York Times, CNN, NPR, and many other publications. He is an avid reader and supporter of conservative causes, including The Weekly Standard, The Nation, and The Nation. . He is a fellow podcaster on the radio show and radio host on SiriusXM Radio and radio station on the Morning Mashup as well-known on the airwaves, and he is a frequent guest on Fox News Radio. and Sirius XM radio station, and a frequent contributor on the Breakfast Club radio station in Los Angeles radio station. , and he also hosts a podcast and radio show on the podcast America First and the Morning Drive, and is an author, and the host of the Morning Call among other things. ...and he's a good friend of many other media outlets, too! and a very good friend and a great friend of the late great John McCain. Thank you for listening to this show, John McCain, John is a lot of good stuff, John and John is an even better than you, too, John, and you should listen to this podcast, John's work is very good, John does not need to know what you're going to like it, you're not going to want to miss it.
Transcript
Transcripts from "America First - Nicholas J. Fuentes" are sourced from the Knowledge Fight Interactive Search Tool. You can also explore and interact with the transcripts here.
00:10:32.000That's why you have to do Super Chats, all right?
00:10:35.000That's why you have to do the Premium Membership, because I fear we're not long for this world on this show, unfortunately.
00:10:43.000You know, for a long time people would always tell me, it's only a matter of time before you get kicked off, only a matter of time before you get banned from Twitter, Facebook, YouTube, and, you know, typically I agree, but in the back of my head I always thought, you know, maybe we'll be able to hang on, maybe we'll be able to stick around for longer than most, if not, you know, for a long time, right?
00:11:07.000But we see this announcement today, and that's the title of the show, that Facebook is moving to ban
00:11:13.000So called white nationalist, white separatist content on both Facebook and Instagram.
00:11:20.000And they say they'll be implementing that policy in the next week.
00:11:23.000And this is why you see some of the accusations are so damaging.
00:11:27.000I don't know if I'll have to actually look into doing some kind of lawsuit after this takes place because you know, as well as anybody, people who watch this show, that I don't identify as a white nationalist.
00:12:55.000What was the term that they used last week?
00:12:57.000It was some kind of surge or something, but they were seeing apprehensions, arrests like they'd never seen before, people being released into the interior at a rate that's never been seen before.
00:13:06.000And now we have a statement from the Customs and Border Protection Commissioner, Kevin McAleenan?
00:13:32.000After the funding bill, after what was discussed in the government shutdown, Central American families, minors, people accompanying minors.
00:13:41.000That's who constitutes all the new immigration.
00:14:22.000I don't know what it is, but I feel like the visual just doesn't look so much the same, but that's alright.
00:14:28.000I don't really have an extended anecdote to talk to you about today, other than that it's just getting rough out there.
00:14:33.000Just getting very difficult, you know, with the censorship that goes on.
00:14:39.000And you wonder how it could be this way.
00:14:40.000I feel like people read about this kind of stuff in the dystopian novels.
00:14:44.000They read about it in 1984, or Fahrenheit 451, or Brave New World, and they don't realize that that's kind of exactly what's happening right now.
00:14:54.000You know, I had somebody who came over a year ago.
00:14:57.000Over a year ago now to shoot a documentary which was never released by the way.
00:15:02.000Journalists have this awesome habit of coming around my house and doing these long extended interviews and camera work and then they just never publish it.
00:15:11.000All right there was this one example which I can't talk about because of an NDA but this went on for a week.
00:15:17.000Filming here for a week never got released.
00:15:57.000It's because they come here expecting me to say, I'm not racist, I just don't like them, you know, or something like that.
00:16:03.000You know, they expect to come around and film me saying some really incriminating things, really hateful.
00:16:09.000But they come around and they say, oh yeah, this is just a normal, really, this is just a really smart, handsome guy who knows the score about what's happening in the country, has a reasonable opinion.
00:16:18.000This will make us look bad, this will make him and his allies look good, so we can't publish it.
00:16:53.000So, 1984, Brave New World, Fahrenheit 451, and we're driving somewhere, I forget where, we're shooting this documentary, and what had been happening at the time was
00:17:02.000Somebody's book was removed from Amazon, just like we saw with Culture of Critique a few weeks ago.
00:17:07.000I forget whose book it was, but it was taken offline, or maybe it was a website, or some kind of censorship happened.
00:17:13.000And I said, you know, the more that I think about it, the more I realize that we really are living in a totalitarian state if they control the press, if they control what's printed, and they can simply decide what is allowed to be published and what isn't.
00:17:27.000You know, if they could simply decide that, for example, the Daily Stormer
00:17:32.000Or they can decide that Kevin Macdonald, this was a little anachronistic because this happened recently, but you know, this is sort of what I was getting at.
00:17:40.000If they could just say Kevin Macdonald can't publish his book on Amazon, then really, in principle, what's happening is that you're allowing this small collection of oligarchs to decide what you can and can't listen to.
00:18:35.000And he controls more than 50% of market share for printed books, and Barnes & Noble's going out of business, and he can decide by himself or with a collection of trusted flaggers, you know, the SPLC and the ADL, what you can and can't listen to.
00:18:51.000You know, I'm sure in North Korea they're probably saying the same thing.
00:18:55.000You know, maybe they're interviewing some dissident for a propaganda film, and he's saying,
00:18:59.000You know, basically, if you can't publish any books that criticize Kim Jong-un, we're kind of living in a totalitarian country.
00:19:06.000And maybe you get somebody from Pyongyang, some cosmopolitan city guy, some party apparatchik, says, oh really?
00:19:13.000So you're saying that, what, if you can't criticize the government, you know, who's basically God and everything, that we're living in a police state?
00:19:29.000We have to discuss this in greater depth here to really bring the point home.
00:19:35.000So this was in a blog post Facebook said that any quote praise support and representation of white nationalism and separatism would be banned when their new policy goes into effect next week.
00:19:46.000This is from the blog quote it's clear that these concepts are deeply linked to organized hate groups and have no place on our services.
00:19:54.000This is a little excerpt from The Verge.
00:19:57.000It says, Facebook has prohibited white supremacist content for a while now, but hasn't included white nationalism or separatism until today.
00:20:04.000Racist and hateful content based on race, ethnicity, and religion have been banned under the former policy, but under Facebook's new rules, phrases like, check this out, phrases like, quote, immigration is tearing this country apart, white separatism is the only answer, will also be prohibited.
00:20:22.000Statements, oh you know, like immigration is tearing the country apart and the only solution is white separatism, whites separating from other racial groups.
00:21:06.000This Senegalese migrant sets a bus of 50 children, school children, on fire and says that this is a statement to the Salvini government about the migrant crisis in the Mediterranean Sea.
00:21:32.000And actually now in the future this is part of the new policy.
00:21:36.000Anybody who looks up highlighted phrases which are white nationalist or neo-nazi or white separatist, they will now be redirected to a charity like Life After Hate where they'll get educational information about how they can unlearn these things, how they can unthink these problematic thoughts.
00:21:56.000I don't understand how people can look at that and not understand exactly what's going on here.
00:22:02.000How can people look at this and not see the writing on the walls?
00:22:06.000That Facebook is banning this kind of stuff?
00:22:08.000This isn't even racism anymore, right?
00:22:11.000We've talked about what racism is and isn't, how this is a partisan rhetorical tool, but in a word, this isn't discrimination.
00:22:57.000I think things like that are distasteful.
00:22:59.000I happen to think that social media should just simply be for everybody, right?
00:23:03.000But I could see where a reasonable person could understand that.
00:23:05.000But this is not what we're talking about here.
00:23:07.000We're not even talking about so-called hate speech.
00:23:10.000We're not even talking about, and this is basically how it operated before anyway on all the platforms, but now we're talking about explicitly
00:23:18.000Targeting one specific political ideology.
00:23:23.000They said that the reason we're changing it is because basically groups like the SPLC and the ADL and the Southern Poverty, or that is the SPLC, you know, these kinds of groups, they got into our ear and they said, you know what, before maybe you thought that this was innocuous, before maybe you thought that this was just, you know, just a regular political ideology, actually it's associated with violence.
00:23:48.000This guy who shot up that mosque in New Zealand, he was a white nationalist, and now you see how this kind of political ideology, it is not neutral.
00:23:58.000It has, by its very definition, sort of this implicit violence about it.
00:24:02.000Implicit in the ideology is a prescription
00:24:05.000Is white nationalist violence the only kind of targeted political or ideological violence that happens in the world?
00:26:46.000So if they start to say that, well, this ideology, because of the actions of one person, one person, I don't think we've ever seen anything on the scope or scale like this ever before with this ideology.
00:26:57.000But because of this one person, now the whole thing, anybody who suggests anything that comes close to this,
00:27:04.000White people should have their own nation.
00:27:05.000White people should separate from other races.
00:27:08.000This is an intrinsic call to violence.
00:27:11.000That standard is not applied anywhere else.
00:27:14.000And beyond that, I think, and I hinted at this a moment ago, the problem is not simply that this is a double standard.
00:27:19.000That obviously white nationalism is not the problem of violent extremism.
00:27:23.000That there's other ideologies that people just simply ignore when it's convenient.
00:27:28.000But beyond that, what is the definition of these things?
00:27:31.000Is there a precise definition that was offered on this blog when they say that you cannot access the number one social media platform in the world and the number two social media platform in the world?
00:27:43.000Was there a precise, concise, clean definition, clear demarcation of what constitutes so-called white nationalism and white separatism?
00:28:43.000And you could see how that will become a problem in the future.
00:28:45.000And you know that this is only the beginning.
00:28:46.000That's, I guess, the other problem with it.
00:28:48.000It's not simply that the definition is not precise, and therefore people that are adjacent to that ideology could be banned, or people that know the same problems but don't have the same prescriptions might be banned, which might be myself, but you could see where this might expand even further to the right.
00:29:04.000Maybe it's white nationalists today, and maybe tomorrow it's people like Charlie Kirk.
00:29:09.000Probably not people like Charlie Kirk, because they benefit Google.
00:29:11.000But it might be even people that are further along, further away on the periphery, who could get banned.
00:29:18.000And anyway, this brings home the fundamental question, which is, you know, we're not living in a free society anymore.
00:29:23.000This kind of stuff is technically illegal.
00:29:25.000You look at the Communication Decency Act of 1996, and what this does is basically says that social media companies
00:29:52.000Because according to Section 230 of the Communication Decency Act in 1996, it says that insofar as Facebook is not actually acting as a publisher, they're just an unbiased, indifferent, nonpartisan, third-party platform for content.
00:30:07.000You know, they have no culpability for this.
00:30:12.000But we see that, obviously, they're no longer meeting that definition.
00:30:16.000Maybe you could argue that banning hate speech... I think that was a stretch in itself, to say that banning hate speech
00:30:22.000Um, would constitute not being biased, being indifferent, still being not a publisher.
00:30:27.000But at this point, when they're saying it's not even hate speech, it's not even violence, it's simply promoting this particular ideology that we don't like, aren't you then in that sense acting as a publisher, and therefore not indifferent, not third party, and culpable therefore in anything that's published on the platform?
00:30:44.000I would think that this is basically illegal now.
00:30:46.000You know imagine if for example they took up a number of ideologies that were offensive or violent or whatever and they said you can't post that on the platform.
00:30:57.000Are they not then in a de facto way giving a green light to everything that's posted?
00:31:02.000Are they then not acting as a partisan actor and saying, you know, something that's democratic or something that's liberal or something that's Islamic or whatever?
00:31:51.000The dollar value of the lawsuits that would be waged against Facebook and Instagram if you didn't have the statute, if you didn't have the government cooperating with them with this particular law.
00:32:00.000Of course they're not a private company.
00:32:02.000They're working with the government on this.
00:32:04.000So it's time for the government to step up.
00:32:06.000And this is probably the biggest disappointment of this administration.
00:32:09.000Because you know, and we've talked about this before,
00:32:13.000Once we get shut down on social media, and it's looking inevitable at this point, and I got kicked off Discord the other week, I get kicked off Streamlabs, I'm kicked off Stripe, I'm kicked off like everything at this point, except for a few different services.
00:32:24.000Patreon, I mean, you name it, basically all the payment processors.
00:34:11.000And so I imagine that they set out, I don't know if this is a real memo or anything, but I'm sure they set out and they said that by 2020, we want to make it such that on Twitter, Facebook, YouTube, you cannot promote content that will lead to this kind of thing happening ever again.
00:34:27.000And they've seen that it works, and they're going to keep doing it because it works.
00:34:31.000And we see that this administration, in spite of using all these tools to get elected, could you imagine Trump without Twitter in the 2016 election?
00:34:38.000In spite of this being directly connected, their destiny and fate being tied with ours, they refuse to do anything to help us.
00:35:06.000But beyond that, why do you think the New Zealand shooter did what he did?
00:35:10.000Why do you think mosque shooters, you know, when white nationalist terrorism does happen, why do you think it happens?
00:35:16.000It happens because they look at the system, and the system is the government, the system is media, the system is Wall Street and the private sector, and they see that there is simply no peaceful or legitimate way for them to express their grievances.
00:35:30.000You look at government policy, it's government policy to bring in a million and some immigrants per year.
00:35:36.000We brought in like 10 million immigrants
00:35:43.000They oppose that for politically incorrect reasons.
00:35:46.000There is no legitimate means for them, again, within the system and all the institutions that the system represents, for them to get those ideas out there, for them to change policy, for them to have some stake in this so-called democracy, liberal democracy that we have.
00:37:27.000I saw somebody like, I forget her name, but I saw some girl who's affiliated with Jared Holt, some woman, and she said something to the effect, I think it was her, it might have been Christopher Mathias or somebody else, but she said basically, I'm more comfortable talking to you directly.
00:37:43.000I'm more comfortable when you're online because we can see what you guys are up to.
00:37:47.000And I think that's, you know, I'm not somebody who's out there planning anything bad, but I think that's basically the right idea.
00:37:52.000Isn't it better to have people with ideas you don't agree with online, where they're on the same playing field as you, when they can share the same ideas as you, instead of doing these kinds of violent attacks?
00:38:04.000I would think that if you were interested in actually stopping violence, if you were interested in making multiracialism work, then you would be.
00:38:11.000And that's really what it comes down to.
00:38:12.000I think that's the fundamental premise here.
00:38:25.000They don't want to stop these attacks.
00:38:27.000They don't want to have this multiracialism thing work.
00:38:31.000Every time a white nationalist pops off and does an attack, Silicon Valley loves that stuff.
00:38:35.000Washington DC, Wall Street, they love that stuff.
00:38:39.000That gives them a pretext to shut down all legitimate dissent.
00:38:43.000That gives them an excuse to go after anybody who opposes immigration.
00:38:47.000And great, the more people that are pushed outside,
00:38:51.000The more anybody who looks like they oppose immigration is on the side of radicals and mosque shooters and everybody else.
00:38:57.000So basically they force this division where you're either on the side of the New Zealand shooter and people like that or you're on our side.
00:39:50.000You know, if you're trying to tie all this together using this theory that Mark Zuckerberg, Jeff Bezos, George Soros, the SPLC, the ADL, they just don't like racism.
00:40:41.000But that's not what they're trying to do.
00:40:43.000If they were trying to do that, they wouldn't be forcing this divide.
00:40:46.000They would be trying to probably empower people like me.
00:40:49.000Trying to empower people who have a voice that is sensible, that is not extreme, that is trying to preach compromise, that is trying to preach some kind of peaceful settlement, trying to voice some of the problems we see down the pike without preaching reactionary or alarmist prescriptions.
00:41:05.000They would be trying to empower voices like that, or at least maybe sort of
00:42:17.000And so it's getting harder and harder to justify the former worldview, where these people, these technocrats, in charge of these policies, legitimately want these things to happen.
00:42:25.000Because I'll tell you, I know a lot of people in Washington DC who are not sympathetic to my views at all.
00:42:42.000In short, they think that my views are maybe atrocious or hateful.
00:42:46.000But they do acknowledge, they do acknowledge that I'm basically right about my prescriptions, about what's happening with diversity, about mass immigration, about ethnic conflict.
00:42:55.000They acknowledge that I've got the problems right.
00:42:57.000And moreover, they acknowledge that people like myself do need to be heard.
00:43:01.000People like myself do need to have a platform.
00:43:03.000Even though they might share the political ideology of Mark Zuckerberg, and they might fit with his ideology more than mine, they're more sympathetic to my view of what's happening with tech censorship because they know, because they want all of this to basically work out in the end, that these kinds of policies do nothing but hurt everybody involved.
00:43:22.000But Bezos, Zuckerberg, they're not on board with even the people in the middle.
00:43:44.000I think multiracialism is the best thing ever!
00:43:47.000Having all kinds of people with different opinions and different histories and cultures which are mutually exclusive, living in the same country, living in close proximity, enough rehab friction, I think that's a good thing!
00:43:59.000Through shared ethnic and racial conflict, we will have shared strife.
00:44:04.000And through shared strife, you know, that'll make us stronger.
00:44:07.000I think becoming more like Brazil, becoming more like the rich, multiracial democracy that is Iraq, that is the Democratic Republic of the Congo, I think that will make America better.
00:44:24.000They're building hyper fast trains and they're building infrastructure and they've got this brutal authoritarian government which is regulating behavior making sure everyone's behaving and they've got one ethnic core the Han Chinese in the middle and you know they're using genetic modification to make their children smarter and faster and taller and better.
00:44:45.000But, you know, we've got one trick up our sleeves that they just don't know about.
00:45:17.000So, I just want to reiterate for Jared Holt, anybody who might be watching, Zuckerberg, Facebook, Instagram, Google, trust me, I am not any of those bad things.
00:46:29.000We had the statement from ICE last week that we've never seen immigration like we have this year.
00:46:35.000And now I've got a statement from Customs and Border Protection Commissioner McAleenan who calls on Congress for help.
00:46:42.000He says he's reassigning 750 federal agents who are currently stationed at the country's busiest international bridges and trade zones to help U.S.
00:47:39.000You mean to tell me that Donald Trump signs a funding bill that says that people who are the sponsors or potential sponsors of unaccompanied migrant children from across the border get total legal immunity, total immunity, total protection from deportation or even the initiation of deportation proceedings.
00:47:57.000You're telling me that after you sign that bill you're gonna get a hundred thousand migrants a year and all of them are Central American families and minors?
00:49:43.000So after the omnibus spending bill last year, I said, you know, it doesn't allocate any money for the wall, any meaningful money for the wall, but that's okay.
00:49:52.000They'll have another opportunity to do that in September or in December or I guess in January, you know, and we saw every
00:50:01.000Continuing resolution being passed every successive CR that was passed.
00:50:05.000But with this bill, this was totally different.
00:50:07.000This wasn't just not money for the wall.
00:50:09.000This was immunity for unaccompanied migrants and their sponsors, which is wholly different.
00:51:22.000Shortly after the press conference, the Border Patrol's Del Rio sector announced that it has begun releasing migrants on their own recognizance because it has, quote, experienced a significant rise in the number of family units arrested through the sector.
00:51:36.000He said the agency needs the ability to detain families together for four to eight weeks, enough time for a judge to evaluate their asylum claims and decide whether to deport them or let them stay in the U.S.
00:51:47.000So basically, and this is, again, what we said from the beginning, the real problem here is not even necessarily the wall.
00:52:00.000You know, that sucks, but we understand what you're up against.
00:52:03.000But not only did we not change the law in the right direction, we made the law worse.
00:52:07.000The problem with the law is that anybody shows up at the border, they say I'm an asylum seeker, they get detained, and then they get released because it's overflowing.
00:52:17.000It's like the flash mobs that you used to see.
00:52:20.000You remember this happened a lot in Chicago, where a gang of young individuals, of young thugs, they go into a store on Mag Mile or whatever, they go into a luxury store, CVS I think in some cases, and there would be just so many coming in, just a bum rush, that you just couldn't stop them all!
00:52:40.000Not enough personnel, you can't get the police fast enough, so you'd run in, get all the stuff, run out.
00:52:44.000They're not really running out at the border, but it's basically the same premise.
00:52:48.000If some people come across the border, well, you can detain them, and maybe some get away.
00:52:52.000But if 100,000 come across the border, even if you apprehend all of them, even if they're approaching the point of entry, you just simply can't hold all these people.
00:53:00.000We don't have the facilities, we don't have the resources, the infrastructure.
00:53:03.000So what they do is they try their best to accommodate, but at a certain point they have to say, look,
00:53:11.000This is something that takes, like, nine weeks.
00:53:13.000We can't detain 100,000 people for nine weeks, so we're just gonna gradually start releasing people in.
00:53:19.000And you could take an ankle bracelet, you know, or you just go out and you're allowed to stay in the interior and just come back when your application is finished being processed.
00:53:27.000Well, they never come back, and that's how you get more illegal immigration than you get under Barack Obama.
00:53:32.000So, look, the administration is failing.
00:56:00.000Uh, yeah, I don't really know a whole lot about that.
00:56:02.000I've talked to Faith, haven't really talked to James so much about that in particular.
00:56:06.000You'll have to ask her, you'll have to ask James.
00:56:09.000I don't think she was replaced by James.
00:56:11.000I think she dropped out, and then I think James just was brought on board.
00:56:15.000Cause if you remember, when they announced the initial lineup, Jared Taylor said that the list was subject to change, so I don't think it was like,
00:56:22.000We're gonna take out Faith, and we're gonna put in James.
00:56:26.000If you're still one of those wackadoos who are on the Nealon campaign like last year, you probably believe that I was behind it all, right?
00:56:32.000Remember last year when Paul Nealon got kicked out of AmRen, and everyone said it was because I control AmRen secretly behind closed doors?
00:57:13.000So you're probably right on the edge there.
00:57:16.000Cassie, Queen of Spades Dillons, has ever watched YouTube prank videos and seen how blacks are much more likely to react aggressively and or violently?
00:57:45.000I don't I don't know what you're talking about Are you talking about like a 13 for 50 deal and one of my favorite corporations like Starbucks remember?
00:57:54.000I'm a Latino campus conservative So is that like the 13 for 50 deal at Amazon or the 13 for 50 deal at Goldman Sachs or something?
00:58:31.000You want me to... Well, you figured it out.
00:58:33.000You started an alt account, so, you know, maybe I encouraged you to take a little initiative there.
00:58:40.000You're not banned on my live chat, I don't believe.
00:58:43.000I recall specifically going in and unbanning you.
00:58:46.000And, you know, maybe it's on your end, okay?
00:58:50.000This guy's always busting my balls in the live chat of... Sometimes I'm in the live chat of the Weekly Sweat and he's like, oh Nick, you gotta unban me, you're being a real jerk, blah blah blah.
00:59:00.000Well, you figured it out, so I think we're all good.
00:59:03.000Cassie, Queen of Spades Dillons says, uh, boot one ethnic group from the white race, which, um, excuse me, as a Afro-Latino campus conservative, I have to tell you, there's no such thing as white, okay?
00:59:15.000White nationalist, white separatist, I don't even consider myself white.
00:59:19.000I consider myself, uh, Hispanic and African, okay?
00:59:23.000You add up my Hispanic and African DNA, it's like 99%.
01:01:45.000Spencer Skirt Skirts has opinions on CJ Pearson.
01:01:50.000uh cj pearson he's he's young i don't want to attack him you know i don't want to attack him because he's a young kid basically what is he like 16
01:02:01.000So I'm not going to attack him too viciously, but I don't know.
01:02:05.000I just look at him and I think, how can people look at that as anything more than a novelty at that point?
01:02:10.000You know, look, I was doing a show when I was 17 and I wasn't black, all right?
01:03:26.000They're better than our country at this point, I would say.
01:03:28.000At least they have a coherent sense of self.
01:03:31.000They know what they're doing economically in terms of promoting political order.
01:03:37.000I'd prefer that kind of authoritarian country over just, you know, freewheeling, libertine, police state liberalism, which is what we have.
01:03:46.000You know, look, if it was between those two bad options, I don't know.
01:03:49.000I mean, do I do I pick a country that embraces and affirms their cultural and ethnic heritage or one that rejects it and wants to see it destroyed?
01:03:56.000It's kind of a boomer, you know, boomer framework there.
01:04:00.000Cloud Ninja says, I just don't care anymore.
01:05:55.000I understand people that say, well, the male form, the physical form, but it, you know, people can definitely say at some point it maybe crosses a line into the erotic, into the sexual, so I don't know.
01:06:09.000You know, that's the thing with Bronze Age pervert, I don't really like to see that kind of thing on the timeline, but he's not an idiot, you know, he does, there's a lot of good content on there also.
01:07:53.000probably the election I would say probably the election maybe six months before the election I would say so May next year I would say is about if it doesn't really start to happen by then it's probably not gonna happen so douchebag says you see Ollie's tweet he gets it quote every or rather either every group should advocate for itself and their shared values or none of us can exactly and I think that's all anybody's saying you know to be to be not ironic for a moment here
01:08:51.000And at this point, the question simply becomes, how are we going to hold this country together of 330 million people?
01:08:58.000How are you going to govern a country with all these different groups that have all these competing interests?
01:09:04.000And the only way to do it, and I think that's a good observation about Ali being on the money here, is that either everybody gets to play that game or nobody does because it's not fair that one group just kind of has to sit it out and they have to play this, you know, it's for everybody and everybody's a participant and we're all one race, the human race, but other people seem to have no problem advocating for ethnic self-interest.
01:09:26.000So I think that's really kind of the issue we're trying to force here is a little bit of fairness, a little bit of
01:09:33.000An appropriate accommodation for these competing tribal interests that are inevitable, you know?
01:09:40.000KCM says, my parents let me buy prizes with my good boy points.
01:09:43.000How many points will it take for them to save the white race?
01:09:47.000I don't know what you're talking about, my friend.
01:15:12.000Every time I have guests over at the house, I try and... I like when she drinks, I like to, you know, piss her off a little bit, try and bring that old Taylor Street
01:15:24.000Dago out of her is that I can say that cuz I'm Italian.
01:15:29.000This is parlance I don't say that to offend I am Italian myself But I try to bring out that American Italian spirit because she tries to assimilate, you know She grew up in an all Italian neighborhood She comes over to a whiter neighborhood and I think she tries to sort of fit in tries to you know bake cookies do the usual Anglo kind of thing
01:15:51.000But every once in a while I try to get under her skin and then you see the real, you know, the real mad spirit present and that's what we like.
01:15:57.000That's what we're trying to recapture here.
01:16:00.000David Sperner says, Nick I'm sorry but on behalf of all the low IQ super chatters officially provoke trial by combat by way of Minecraft hunger games.
01:16:09.000For real big guy keep up the great work and stop calling me a retard.
01:16:14.000Well look, okay, you're not a retard you just post retarded things sometimes.
01:16:59.000But remember to check us out on nicholasjfuences.com slash membership to get your premium membership only five bucks a month and you get one additional show every week on Sunday.
01:17:08.000Remember to subscribe to the channel, give us a big thumbs up, leave a comment below, click the notification bell to get notified every time I go live.
01:17:16.000Remember we're on the air Monday through Friday at 7 p.m.