00:00:19.000And it actually happened yesterday, but didn't get a chance to cover it because of the major triple threat stream with Lawrence Southern and Destiny.
00:00:27.000But tonight we're going to cover the attack on the FBI office in Ohio.
00:00:32.000By one of the Capitol riders and a Proud Boy, which many are already calling a false flag attack, meant to frame Trump supporters to give a pretext for a civil war and a new inquisition against the American people.
00:00:50.000And so, if you didn't see this yesterday, there was a major shootout at an FBI office in Ohio.
00:00:58.000It led to a police chase and then a showdown between law enforcement.
00:01:04.000And the shooter, who turned out to be a 42 year old man who was a conservative, and he did the attack because of the raid on Mar a Lago.
00:01:14.000And so they were unsuccessful in negotiating with him.
00:01:17.000He reached for a gun and they shot him and they killed him.
00:01:21.000And then they went out and they found all of his social media, and he had been on Truth Social this week talking about killing the FBI.
00:01:30.000And then he went out and did this big attack and they killed him.
00:02:06.000And you know that they overstepped when even people like Mitch McConnell and Ronald McDaniel and Fox News are forced to come out and defend the president.
00:02:19.000And you also know that because even Democrats don't like it.
00:02:22.000Even Democrats are saying it's unpopular.
00:02:26.000People in the New York Times and elsewhere are saying they just gave Trump the presidency because nobody likes this and nobody likes the FBI.
00:02:34.000This is a way bigger overreach than what's been going on since January 6th, or at least symbolically it is.
00:03:16.000We'll talk about the shootout and everything.
00:03:20.000We'll also be talking tonight about the warrant.
00:03:24.000And if you saw this week, Merrick Garland, the attorney general, came out and gave a statement on the FBI raid at Mar a Lago.
00:03:31.000And they also released a warrant, which includes three charges, three suspected transgressions, three suspected things that Trump may have violated.
00:03:43.000And they're all pertaining to the Illicit transfer of classified documents from the White House to the residence of the president.
00:03:51.000And so we'll talk about the warrant and the charges and the press conference and some other things.
00:03:56.000Really interestingly enough, the same judge, I think it's a judge, it's the same person in the Department of Justice that authorized this raid on Mar a Lago, refused to authorize a raid on Hillary Clinton for the same thing six years ago.
00:04:24.000The person at the DOJ that authorized it, well, he didn't do the same thing to Hillary Clinton.
00:04:30.000And of course, the whole DOJ is loaded up, FBI and DOJ loaded up with anti Trump, anti Republican people, Merrick Garland, Christopher Wray.
00:04:40.000So the whole thing stinks, and it's totally obvious.
00:04:43.000And I think they know it, and we know it.
00:06:05.000And then I'd like to be there when Laura Loomer wins in Florida's 11th district.
00:06:10.000Her primary is coming up not this Tuesday, but the following Tuesday, August 23rd.
00:06:14.000Which, by the way, just a reminder, in case you forgot, if you're in Florida's 11th district, make sure to get out there and vote for Laura Loomer.
00:06:23.000She's, I think, Disney World's in her district, and she's right around Orlando.
00:10:11.000And then my life became filled with problems.
00:10:15.000And then my easy life became filled with problems the moment I decided to start criticizing our ally and the people of the book and those other people of the book, those Jews.
00:12:05.000I don't think people even realize that.
00:12:08.000And it's just another reminder, by the way, it's just another reminder of what we are trying to do at the end of the day, which is this is the current state of affairs.
00:12:18.000The country has all these problems, and you can't really talk about the problems without getting in trouble.
00:12:26.000I mean, you can complain about gas prices, but you start talking about who's causing this.
00:12:32.000You start talking about why things are the way that they are on a deep level, and then they just come for you.
00:12:39.000And then people are paid to just come for you, and they attack you, and they target you, and they take away your platform, and they take away your money, and they go after your family, and they go after your safety.
00:12:52.000And your transportation and your business and your employees, and they just come for everything.
00:13:03.000I know it's easy to forget sometimes because I'm so adaptable, but I am the most targeted man in the world.
00:13:08.000I literally am among, maybe not the number one, certainly in contention, but if not number one, I am among the most targeted people in the entire world.
00:13:20.000I would say it's probably Snowden, Assange, Angling me.
00:13:25.000I would say I'm maybe first or fourth.
00:13:27.000Definitely Snowden is a little bit more targeted.
00:14:21.000Easy to forget that because a lot of people attack me and it's like, hold up, you're attacking the number one most banned person in the world.
00:14:30.000I'm the most hated, banned person in America right now.
00:14:34.000So, you know, nobody could really say, everybody likes to be a martyr for free speech or whatever, but I'm the most banned one in the world.
00:14:42.000I have the most street cred out of everybody.
00:18:18.000I want to dive into it here, and let's talk about this FBI shooting at Ohio.
00:18:25.000And so, like I said, this guy goes out there after the FBI raid on Mar a Lago, which we talked about on Monday.
00:18:31.000In case you missed it, DOJ authorized an FBI raid on the former President Donald Trump's residence, which is Mar a Lago, his golf estate down in Palm Beach, Florida.
00:18:47.000And so the FBI came in there with trucks and vans and 50 FBI agents.
00:18:52.000They kicked everybody out, they locked the doors.
00:18:55.000And they went through unsupervised Trump's office, his bedroom, Melania's wardrobe, went through everything, and they took boxes and boxes of documents out of the residence, threw it in a truck, and drove away.
00:19:08.000Totally outrageous, totally unprecedented, that's never happened before in American history.
00:19:14.000A former president has never had that kind of contact with federal law enforcement before, ever in American history.
00:20:24.000It says, An armed man suspected of trying to breach the FBI's Cincinnati field office Thursday was killed after a vehicle chase and hours long standoff with law enforcement.
00:20:35.000The suspect was believed to be armed with an AR 15 rifle and a nail gun.
00:20:43.000He was Ricky W. Schiffer, 42 years old, of Columbus.
00:20:48.000Authorities have not announced a motive, but Schiffer had been known to the FBI because he had an unspecified connection to the January 6th riot at the U.S. Capitol and because he had associates within a far right extremist group.
00:21:03.000A social media account bearing Schiffer's name appears to have referenced an attempt to storm an FBI office that day.
00:21:24.000A lockdown was in effect within a one mile radius of the standoff location.
00:21:28.000The standoff stretched for several hours as law enforcement tried to negotiate with the suspect.
00:21:34.000Once negotiations failed, officers attempted to take the suspect into custody by utilizing less lethal tactics.
00:21:41.000At approximately 3 42 p.m., the suspect raised a firearm and shots were fired by law enforcement.
00:21:46.000The suspect was shot and died from his wounds on the scene.
00:21:50.000On the social media platform founded by Trump, True Social, an account bearing Schiffer's name made a post on Thursday morning that appeared to reference an attempt to storm an FBI office.
00:22:02.000The post was made minutes after the Ohio State Highway Patrol said the incident at the office began shortly after 9 15 a.m.
00:22:10.000The user posted at 9 29 a.m. on Thursday, quote, Well, I thought I had a way through bulletproof glass and I didn't.
00:22:18.000If you don't hear from me, it is true.
00:22:19.000I tried attacking the FBI, and it'll mean either I was taken off the internet, the FBI got me, or they sent the regular cops.
00:22:27.000It is unclear whether the user intended to write more as the post stops after he wrote the word while.
00:22:33.000People, this is it, the user wrote on Monday.
00:22:36.000I hope a call to arms comes from someone better qualified, but if not, this is your call to arms from me.
00:22:42.000In that post, the user encouraged people to go to gun and pawn shops to get whatever you need to be ready for combat.
00:22:48.000When another person responded to the user saying they would be sending his photo and information to the FBI, the Schiffer account responded by saying, Bring them on.
00:22:58.000It's unclear whether that information was forwarded to the FBI.
00:23:02.000On Tuesday, the user wrote people were heading to gather in Palm Beach and said if the FBI broke up the group, he said, To kill them.
00:23:11.000The account's user also claimed he was in Washington, D.C. on January 6th, but did not say whether he entered the Capitol.
00:23:18.000The FBI was aware of Schiffer himself due to a connection to the January 2021 riot and because he had associates within the Proud Boys, according to two law enforcement sources.
00:23:30.000Schiffer served in the U.S. Navy from 1998 until June 2003, curiously.
00:23:39.000And that's according to his military records.
00:23:42.000Aboard a U.S. Navy submarine, he was a fire control technician responsible for weapons systems.
00:24:05.000We found out that the shooter at Uvalde was known to law enforcement.
00:24:09.000We found out that the Buffalo shooter was known to law enforcement.
00:24:13.000And one of his six closest confidants was a retired FBI agent.
00:24:20.000And those were the two most sensational recent mass shootings.
00:24:25.000Now, here we are, a few days after the FBI raid on Trump's residence, and you get some guy on True Social who was connected to the Proud Boys, which we know is crawling with federal informants.
00:24:36.000He was tied to January 6th, although curiously not charged, which is conspicuous because, as far as I know, all the Proud Boys that were there on January 6th got charged.
00:24:49.000Even if they didn't breach, even if they didn't fight with the cops, Enrique Tario wasn't even there.
00:24:57.000He got detained at Reagan Airport the morning before it happened and he got charged.
00:25:04.000But this guy, connected to the Proud Boys, full of federal informants, was at January 6th.
00:25:10.000Connected to the Proud Boys, not charged.
00:25:15.000Add to that, this fact was known to law enforcement.
00:25:23.000And if none of that is convincing enough, he was in the Navy.
00:25:28.000You have to ask yourself why is it that every time there's a mass shooting, it's a former military, former police, or they're connected in some way to the military and the police?
00:25:40.000And the thing is, not everybody is former military.
00:25:44.000Not everybody is connected to law enforcement.
00:25:48.000Because it would be easy to say, so what?
00:25:51.000What does that have to do with anything?
00:25:53.000Well, you know, I'm not connected to law enforcement at all.
00:25:59.000I'm not connected to the military at all.
00:26:01.000I don't talk to anybody in law enforcement.
00:26:03.000I don't talk to anybody in the military.
00:26:55.000Out of all the people in America, out of all of the people in the world, this was the guy that took up arms and posted about it after Trump was raided by the FBI.
00:27:17.000But here's why I think it's conspicuous.
00:27:19.000There's not only the connections to the military and law enforcement, but there's also the circumstances surrounding the shooting.
00:27:27.000And I said this on Tuesday, it would be the biggest mistake.
00:27:32.000If you're a Trump supporter, if you're a Christian, if you're a nationalist, it would be the biggest mistake from a tactical point of view to go out there and do something violent.
00:27:46.000Speaking from a purely pragmatic point of view, before we get into the obvious, the obvious being that it's wrong to kill people, the obvious that it goes against our religion to kill people.
00:27:58.000And the obvious that it doesn't achieve anything, purely from a pragmatic point of view, this is the last thing that Trump supporters would want or need after what happened at Mar a Lago on Monday.
00:28:12.000And I said this on Tuesday that the FBI raid on Mar a Lago, although it is egregious and shocking and offensive and wrong, it is politically a grand slam for the president.
00:28:25.000If he doesn't get indicted or if there's any kind of pushback against a possible indictment, This does nothing other than increase the chances that Trump wins.
00:28:35.000And here's why because it activates his base.
00:28:39.000If there were any doubts, if there were any concerns about Trump before, what this raid on his residence did on Monday, by virtue of it being unprecedented, by virtue of it stinking to high heaven as being politically motivated and corrupt, that has elevated Trump to the status of a martyr.
00:28:58.000And it's made him more even than what he is, which is the leader of the party.
00:29:03.000Who carries a very powerful endorsement and the former president and extremely popular?
00:29:08.000This elevates him to the level of a myth and a symbol of opposition to the regime.
00:29:15.000And even people like Mike Pence and Mitch McConnell and Ronald McDaniel and some Democrats are forced to defend him.
00:29:23.000And Yang is liberal, he ran for the Democratic nomination.
00:29:28.000And even he has to come out and say this is a gift to Republicans.
00:29:31.000The media says almost uniformly it's a gift to Trump, it makes it more likely he'll be president.
00:29:36.000In fact, in the betting markets, Trump's odds for becoming president went up after the raid.
00:29:42.000And there's a couple of ways to look at it.
00:29:44.000On a technical level, if Trump gets indicted, that makes it more difficult for him to run.
00:29:49.000Because if he gets charged and if he gets convicted, there's a chance, there's a question as to whether or not that prevents him from running.
00:29:58.000But purely in terms of public opinion, unequivocally, this helps him.
00:30:03.000This animates the base, it makes the base pissed off, and it makes them want to vote.
00:30:08.000It rallies conservatives in the country around Trump and it unifies the party.
00:30:15.000And if anything, it suppresses the Democrat base to some extent because you can't help but think that they're not a huge fan of this either, except for their radical left people.
00:30:29.000You would have to say that people in the middle, if the people in the middle don't like high inflation and high gas prices, they also don't like corrupt FBI, which is what this is.
00:30:41.000The worst thing that you could do in the aftermath of this, when it's almost universally agreed that this is something that is good for Trump in a counterintuitive way, is to go out there and spoil it with violence.
00:31:15.000Against the Ten Commandments, and it's illegal.
00:31:19.000And there are lots of obvious problems with terrorism.
00:31:22.000But aside from the obvious, from a public opinion point of view, it's the worst thing possible because that may be the only thing less popular than a completely corrupt government.
00:31:33.000Maybe people are willing to rally around Trump if they think he's a martyr targeted by federal law enforcement.
00:31:38.000They're not if he's perceived as leading a group of terrorists.
00:31:42.000They're not if he's perceived as leading a bunch of nut jobs that are going out with guns and killing people randomly.
00:32:00.000The answer is for Trump to announce and run and then fire 100,000 people in the government and replace them with Groypers or Trump supporters and then change the American government forever, which would have a way bigger impact, obviously.
00:32:16.000So that is why the whole thing is very suspicious because one, the guy's got all these connections to the military and law enforcement, and two, This is the worst possible thing after the FBI raid because that just makes it easy for the left to say, oh, well, look at all these crazy people going out and killing people.
00:32:34.000It's just like the Sixth, it's just like Gretchen Whitmer.
00:32:38.000And federal law enforcement is always looking for these types.
00:32:47.000Maybe you remember this so called plot to kidnap the governor of Michigan, Gretchen Whitmer, shortly before the 2020 election.
00:32:56.000Huge bombshell story a month before the last presidential election.
00:33:00.000It came out that a group of oath keepers was planning to kidnap the governor of Michigan because they didn't like the COVID response from the state government.
00:33:10.000And so they put this gang together and they were going to kidnap her and blow up a bridge and do all this crazy stuff.
00:33:16.000And it was a really wacky story right before the election.
00:33:20.000And then it comes out a year later that half the people involved and all the leadership were federal informants.
00:33:29.000And down to the lowest levels and up to the highest levels, you had federal informants that created the entire thing.
00:33:39.000The group was formed in Wisconsin because a federal informant rented a hotel, invited local militia groups, ordered pizzas for everybody, arranged transportation.
00:33:50.000Federal law enforcement did all of that.
00:33:55.000And then federal law enforcement provided the funds for explosives.
00:33:59.000And then federal law enforcement took on the role of head of security.
00:34:02.000And the head of transportation in the group.
00:34:04.000And then federal law enforcement came up with the plan.
00:34:09.000And they lured into it a bunch of poor, broke people that were homeless who got drunk and talked about doing these things and entrapped them essentially.
00:34:22.000And when they charged these people with terrorism and all these other things connected to the plot, all of the people that were charged wound up being acquitted, and not one of them was convicted.
00:34:35.000Because according to the judge, they were entrapped.
00:34:40.000And so, in many cases, they were acquitted.
00:34:43.000In some of them, there was a hung jury or the jury didn't make a decision.
00:34:47.000But nobody was convicted because of the role of federal law enforcement.
00:34:51.000The same guy that headed up that operation is now running the DOJ investigation into January 6th.
00:34:59.000And so, that happened in October 2020.
00:35:02.000And then in January 2021, All the people charged with conspiracy, oath keepers, proud boys, three percenters, they were filled up with confidential informants too.
00:35:13.000And if you look at the unindicted co conspirators, and if you look at recent litigation, there were as many as at least 50 or maybe more people who were connected to law enforcement on the ground on January 6th.
00:35:29.000So fast forward a year later to 2022, and I would not be surprised if this was the same story.
00:35:38.000Federal law enforcement poisoning the well by either sending someone themselves.
00:35:44.000Or entrapping somebody, luring somebody in and egging them on, right?
00:35:51.000Telling them, you know, you got to go and do something, and maybe even giving them the means and the tools to do so in order to carry out something that is going to sabotage the image in public opinion of the opposition movement.
00:36:16.000We call them feds because anybody that's suggesting violence, anybody that's plotting violence or telling people to do violence, is always either federal law enforcement themselves or informant for law enforcement, or there's somebody that's talking to federal law enforcement almost every single time without exception.
00:37:22.000Even if it wasn't, even if you do have by some chance a guy that's just genuinely crazy, you know, it's still just, in that case, then he's just an idiot.
00:37:32.000Because there is no solution to our current problems that involves random acts of violence.
00:37:40.000You know, and you see this kind of stuff.
00:37:42.000What he posted on True Social is not something that we haven't seen before on the internet, where people say, time to take up arms and time, okay, now it's time, there's no political solution and this kind of thing.
00:37:54.000And ask yourself, this guy getting a gun and failing to even breach the office and then getting shot, tell me how that step leads to civilizational change on planet Earth.
00:38:10.000Tell me how you go from some moron, some former jarhead moron, getting a gun from a pawn shop and going out and getting killed by cops.
00:38:22.000Tell me how that step by step leads to getting the kind of society that we want because it just doesn't.
00:38:29.000That is not how any revolution in the history of the world has happened.
00:38:34.000If you look at any revolution, whether it was peaceful or whether, even if it was violent, it has never started that way.
00:38:40.000Not that I'm in favor of a violent revolution, but the point being is if you're in favor of massive reform, massive sweeping reform, which you might call a revolution, which have happened bloodlessly in the past, either way, it's never started that way.
00:38:59.000It almost always comes from a foreign government.
00:39:02.000It almost always comes from the elites.
00:39:04.000It almost always comes from the higher ups in the military or a faction in the military.
00:39:10.000It never comes from poor, crazy people acting alone.
00:39:47.000And after that happened back in 2018, the telecom companies and the tech companies and the social media companies all got together and created a global protocol to censor extremism.
00:40:00.000And as a direct result of that, Facebook banned white identity from their entire platform.
00:40:05.000How much did that accelerate censorship by itself?
00:40:09.000And the same goes for every successive.
00:40:15.000So, if anything, you have to look at these people as a tool, unwittingly or wittingly, of the opposition.
00:40:23.000If they're not directly being told to do this by our enemies, they're working for our enemies indirectly, and they're useful idiots for our enemies.
00:40:33.000So, I see this thing on, was this yesterday or the day before?
00:40:37.000There's literally nothing worse for us at this point than violence.
00:40:44.000Because we have a very clear pathway to victory right now.
00:40:47.000It's not an easy path and it's not a guarantee, but for the first time in a very, very long time, you've got a very clear path and it is possible and it is extremely concrete.
00:41:03.000Well, the plan is that Trump becomes a nominee, which is almost a certainty if he runs, and then Trump wins the presidency, which is extremely likely to happen as well.
00:41:14.000So, becomes a nominee, that's like a 95% chance.
00:41:18.000Becomes the president, that's like a 60% chance.
00:41:21.000And then he gets in there, and this is where it gets tricky.
00:41:25.000He fires tens of thousands of people from the federal bureaucracy and replaces them with Trump supporters.
00:41:33.000And with a Republican House, Senate, a conservative Supreme Court, and an executive branch full of America First loyalists, we will be able to reform this country in a way that has never been done since FDA.
00:41:53.000And we could do the kinds of things that Ron DeSantis is doing in Florida now.
00:41:58.000This is a way, and this is maybe our last chance that we could do that on the scale and on the level of the federal government.
00:42:08.000And so, if you thought banning abortion was good because Trump came in with his half assed first term and replaced three Supreme Court judges, if you thought that Ron DeSantis was good for shutting down Sanctuary cities in Florida and shutting down BLM in Florida and shutting down transgender surgeries for minors and preventing education of minors in LGBT curriculum.
00:42:31.000If you thought that was good, wait until you get 50,000 America First bureaucrats in the federal bureaucracy with a Republican House and a Republican Senate and the Supreme Court on side.
00:42:44.000And again, it's not a guarantee because people may be skeptical, rightfully so, and say, well, he didn't do it the first time.
00:42:50.000We had a personnel problem the first term.
00:42:53.000But certainly, that is something that becomes possible.
00:43:00.000And if you're interested in civilization wide reform, that's the trench run.
00:43:05.000That's the Death Star trench run that we're going to need to do within our lifetimes, within the foreseeable future, in order to turn things around.
00:43:15.000And this kind of stuff does nothing but stand in the way of that.
00:43:20.000And violence and terrorism does nothing but make it less likely that that will happen.
00:43:24.000Because that, I mean, that is a very realistic white pill that we're talking about here.
00:43:30.000Because you look at the state of the economy, you look at Biden, who's probably the worst candidate ever.
00:43:46.000You go down the list, and if he gets in there, we're talking about an end to tech censorship.
00:43:50.000We're talking about finishing the wall, an end to illegal immigration, an immigration moratorium, a moratorium on foreign aid.
00:43:58.000We're talking about ending the wars, bringing the troops home.
00:44:01.000This is the kind of stuff that was in contention.
00:44:04.000And Trump unfortunately just didn't get a grip until the final year of his presidency.
00:44:09.000But he signed off on orders in the last few months of his presidency saying to pull troops not just from Iraq and Syria, but from South Korea and Germany.
00:44:19.000And this came out recently, the generals simply disobeyed him.
00:44:23.000But if you fire everybody and replace everybody, there's a chance that we could end it all in the next two years.
00:44:29.000But that has nothing to do with violence, it's going to have nothing to do with that.
00:44:35.000So, people say there's no political solution.
00:44:37.000There's a political solution right there.
00:44:39.000Tell me what's a better upside than taking over the federal bureaucracy, taking over the lawmaking, law enforcing, and law interpreting institutions of the biggest government in the world.
00:44:51.000Tell me what's a better outcome than that.
00:44:55.000Taking over the lawmakers, the law enforcers, and the law interpreters of the biggest government in the world, the federal government.
00:45:04.000And the only thing that people could say is well, that's less likely.
00:45:08.000But they can't say that that's not the best thing that could happen politically right now.
00:45:15.000Unless you engage in fantasy and say a bunch of people are going to go out there and they're going to overthrow the government and then some Napoleon is going to.
00:45:24.000Unless you're talking about fantasy, unless you're talking about role play, that's the only thing.
00:45:31.000That is the most optimal, that is the highest chance of success, of the most success that we have right now.
00:45:45.000It wasn't even open a little bit before Trump announced it.
00:45:49.000That's a pathway that just simply didn't exist eight years ago.
00:45:53.000Six years ago, it's something that nobody really thought of and was very unclear.
00:45:58.000Here we are in 2022, seven years into the Trump era, and we're like this close to fulfilling the promise of the 16 MAGA election.
00:46:09.000We're like this close to fulfilling the mandate.
00:46:13.000Nobody could tell you in 2014 how we were going to win.
00:46:16.000Nobody could tell you in 2008 how we were going to win.
00:46:19.000In 2015, people said, well, let's elect Trump, but there really wasn't a good idea.
00:46:23.000Here we are in 2022, and with the teal moves, and with, to his credit, Saurabh Shwarma, with the, I forget what his thing is called, American moment, and with everything that's going on, with the Tucker Carlson show, and with the January 6th investigation, and with the PPO crew surrounding Trump.
00:46:45.000The stars can align, a constellation can form where we can take charge and reshape the society in a way that's never been done in a hundred years.
00:47:09.000Terrible idea, and the guy's probably a fad.
00:47:12.000But I want to move on and get into our other story here about the raid on Mar a Lago itself, which we now have a little bit more information.
00:47:20.000And so, there's a couple of parts to this.
00:47:23.000We got a statement from Mira Garland and didn't learn too much.
00:47:31.000For the raid on Mar-a-Lago, which tells us what Trump is under investigation for.
00:47:37.000And we got a statement from the GSA, which is the General Services Administration, which talks a little bit about the transition from Trump to Biden and the documents.
00:47:49.000So, and I've been saying this all week: the most mysterious thing about the raid is that this has nothing to do nominally with January 6th.
00:48:02.000Everybody saw the raid on Monday, and I think I and everybody else assumed that the FBI raided Trump's house because of the 6th.
00:48:11.000And that would only make sense because that's the DOJ investigation that's been going on for a year and a half.
00:48:17.000That has been the subject of these congressional hearings over the past two months, which have been televised.
00:48:24.000And that is the thing that the Democrats are really still campaigning on.
00:48:27.000So you would think if the DOJ is going after Mar a Lago, you'd think it would have to do with.
00:48:33.000This thing that's been in Congress and the thing which the DOJ just disclosed there's a criminal investigation and these 850 people that have been charged, and you'd think it would have to do with that.
00:48:44.000But it had nothing to do with that, allegedly.
00:48:47.000They say that it had to do with improper transfer of confidential documents.
00:48:52.000That Trump, when he left the White House in 21, took a bunch of classified documents to his house, which was illegal.
00:48:59.000And there's even a debate about whether that is illegal or not.
00:49:03.000But that's what they say the cause for the raid was.
00:49:06.000Well, this week they released a warrant, which they got from a judge, which showed what they suspected Trump, what crimes they suspected Trump of committing in order to execute the search.
00:49:19.000And then we also got a statement from the General Services Administration, which facilitates the transition of Trump out of the White House.
00:49:29.000It says The search warrant used by the FBI during their raid of former President Trump's Florida residence was unsealed today.
00:49:37.000The warrant includes a list of seized property.
00:49:39.000It states that the 45 office, all storage rooms, and all other rooms used by Trump and all of his staff were searched.
00:49:49.000The unsealed warrant also states All physical documents and records constituting evidence, contraband, fruits of crime, or other items illegally possessed in violation of 18 U.S.C. 793, 2071, or 1519, including the following.
00:50:08.000And these are the statutes that they believe were violated.
00:50:15.000Documents pertaining to the violation of these statutes were seized.
00:50:19.000It's 18 U.S.C. 793, which is gathering, transmitting, or losing defense information, 18 U.S.C. 2071, which is concealment, removal, or mutilation, and 18 U.S.C. 1519, which is destruction, alteration, or falsification of records and federal investigations.
00:50:45.000Defense information, concealing information, and destroying or falsifying records in federal investigations, which raises questions.
00:50:54.000Maybe this did actually have something to do with January 6th.
00:50:58.000Because it sounds like 18 USC 793 is defense information, and that sounds like classified documents that Trump may have taken from the White House.
00:51:12.000But 1519, 18 USC 1519, which is destruction, alteration, or falsification of records in federal investigations, that seems to suggest maybe it has something to do, actually, as it turns out.
00:51:27.000With federal investigations against Trump.
00:51:29.000I mean, what else would that pertain to?
00:51:50.000It says a spokesperson for the GSA told Fox News that the Trump administration was responsible for deciding which documents were taken to Florida.
00:51:59.000And the spokesperson said, As part of the services and support the GSA provides to all outgoing presidents, GSA typically contracts for the transportation of items identified by the outgoing president as necessary to wind down the affairs of their office.
00:52:14.000The responsibility for making decisions about which materials are moved rests entirely with the outgoing president and their supporting staff.
00:52:23.000Any questions about the contents of any items that were delivered, for example, documents, are the responsibility of the former president and his supporting staff and should be directed to their office.
00:52:35.000Which I don't know that that necessarily clears Trump, but it does say that he made that decision.
00:52:41.000And the question about the legality of having those documents comes from the fact that the president is the commander in chief.
00:52:53.000And so the ultimate classification authority rests with the president.
00:53:02.000If a defense document is classified as.
00:53:07.000Highly confidential or whatever, if it's given the highest level security designation, who would outrank Trump and say, hey, you, I mean, those documents are for him.
00:53:24.000So, what they're saying is that Trump took documents in an unauthorized way from the government.
00:53:33.000Well, the GSA says that as the sitting president, he decided which documents to take.
00:53:39.000And so he's making a decision as president, acting as commander in chief by taking the documents.
00:53:47.000He is, in effect, although not formally, but in effect, designating them in whatever classification is necessary for them to have them.
00:53:57.000You know, it's like if the owner of a company takes a document and then leaves as owner of the company, they can't go after the owner and say, hey, well, you know, that's a classified document.
00:54:08.000It's like, well, Who would outrank the owner of the company when they decided to effectively declassify it by taking it?
00:54:17.000That's not a perfect analogy because the private world is a little bit different than the public world.
00:54:23.000But if the president with the GSA takes the document and by that act declassifies it, then who is going to come after him later and say, actually, you know, you can't have that document?
00:54:43.000And so that's where the legal question arises.
00:54:45.000He improperly or illegally took classified documents.
00:54:50.000Well, the argument goes that by the act of taking them, he declassified them.
00:54:54.000And he's the final authority because he's the commander in chief.
00:54:58.000And so if he took the documents in the White House, that means it had to have happened before January 20th.
00:55:06.000The president gets in a helicopter after the inauguration and leaves D.C. and goes somewhere else.
00:55:12.000He doesn't live in the White House after January 20th.
00:55:15.000He's the president until January 20th, until the swearing in, and then he leaves.
00:55:20.000Then he moves out and goes somewhere else.
00:55:23.000So if he took documents out of D.C. and took them somewhere else, that would necessarily mean that he took them as president, meaning that he effectively declassified them.
00:55:34.000And then by going somewhere else, I mean, he didn't have access to them after January 20th, so that means it would have been impossible for him to take them as a civilian, which means that if he took them as the president, he took them.
00:55:48.000And if he took them while acting as a commander in chief, he effectively declassified them, and therefore, then you can't charge him later and say, you illegally took the documents.
00:55:59.000That's why this doesn't make any sense.
00:56:04.000We found out today that the guy that works at the DOJ that authorized this whole process did not pursue the same charge against Hillary Clinton, who is the Secretary of State.
00:56:19.000Because, as you know, Hillary Clinton, she acted under the Obama administration as a Secretary of State in the first term and was then replaced by John Kerry.
00:56:30.000And the big problem with her, to summarize briefly, is that she was handling all of her official communications in an official formal capacity as the Secretary of State for the U.S.
00:56:44.000She handled those communications on a private email server, which was stored in her private residence.
00:56:51.000And so, when she was relieved as the Secretary of State, she still had the email server in her house, which contained all of her official classified correspondence as the Secretary of State.
00:57:04.000And now, here's the difference the Secretary of State is not the highest ranking official.
00:57:10.000And so, you could say that if the President takes a document, it effectively becomes declassified.
00:57:16.000If the Secretary of State takes a document, it does not become declassified because the Secretary of State is not the Commander in Chief.
00:57:23.000So, she doesn't have that same privilege.
00:57:25.000So, Hillary Clinton is the Secretary of State, handles all of her communications, which are classified as well as documents on her private server, leaves a position, keeps the documents illegally in her private server at home.
00:57:40.000So, she did the same thing that they accused Trump of doing, except there is no question about the legality of that.
00:57:47.000There's no question because she doesn't have that authority to declassify formally or effectively.
00:57:58.000And the same guy, it's the same guy in the DOJ, whose name is Ferreira or something like that, he did not pursue these charges against Clinton, but he did against Trump.
00:58:29.000If you do not comply with a federal subpoena from the Congress or subpoena from the federal government, they can hold you in contempt of Congress.
00:58:38.000That's what they just did to Steve Bannon.
00:59:56.000She broke the same laws that Trump did at the minimum.
00:59:59.000There's no question that she broke the law.
01:00:02.000And then because she destroyed them under investigation, under the subpoena, she broke additional laws on several levels.
01:00:10.000And the same guy that executed the search warrant against Trump for those things did not do it against Clinton years ago.
01:00:18.000And she was the Secretary of State, and he was the President.
01:00:23.000Additionally, and you could even add on top of that, this is just the icing on top Clinton was not cooperating with the government.
01:00:34.000She acid washed the email server, she deleted the emails.
01:00:38.000The Trump team is in full cooperation with the National Archives, who are requesting the documents.
01:00:46.000They're the ones that tipped off the DOJ that the documents were there, allegedly.
01:00:51.000So, the Trump administration or the Trump team in Mar a Lago has been cooperating with the government for over a year and saying, you know, we've got the documents, we'll give them over if you want them, and so on.
01:01:03.000So, the point is, they have put all this information out there for the sake of transparency.
01:01:12.000And all that it's shown is that there's a complete double standard.
01:01:15.000There are political actors operating from top to bottom in the DOJ and the FBI, and that there's a clear double standard based on partisanship.
01:01:35.000They did way worse and they didn't get the same treatment.
01:01:39.000And that's what we've learned based on the warrant, the statement from the Attorney General, from the GSA, and from other information that's been made public since the raid.
01:01:48.000And so if this is true, then this is a huge problem for the federal government, huge problem for the DOJ.
01:01:56.000Because what's going to happen, and this is the white pill.
01:01:59.000Is that based on this, Republicans are going to get in in November, and I hope, and there's no guarantee because Republicans suck, but I hope that Republicans use their power in the House to impeach Mayor Garland because you can impeach anybody that's appointed, not just the president, but you can impeach the cabinet.
01:02:18.000So that means that the House can impeach Mayor Garland, the attorney general, and then they'll have to get another attorney general through the Senate confirmation, which Republicans may have a majority.
01:02:28.000And then Republicans can appoint their own subcommittee and investigate the DOJ.
01:02:32.000And then they can use their subpoena power and they can use their oversight power, and this could create a lot of legal liability for the Biden administration.
01:02:41.000And the hope is that this just makes it a lot easier for Trump to get in in 24 and arrest these people, indict these people, get our own DOJ, and really liquidate everybody in federal law enforcement.
01:03:33.000The feds build their case, and if they have a case, they bring you in.
01:03:37.000The second that the feds have a case, and you know when they have a case, because that's when they bring you in and they give you a deal, or they're ready to throw the book at you.
01:03:49.000If the feds question you, that means they still need something.
01:03:53.000If the feds show up in your house, or they give you a call, or they want you to answer questions, that means they don't have something and they need something from you.
01:04:01.000They need to trick you into perjuring yourself, or they need to trick you into confessing, or give them something.
01:04:09.000And the same goes for a raid or a search.
01:04:12.000They wouldn't raid Trump if they had him dead to rights on anything.
01:04:16.000But you know as well as I do that the DOJ and the special counsel or the investigation that was appointed after the 6th set out from that day, a year and a half ago, to build a case against Trump.
01:04:30.000That's why they've charged 850 people in connection with 1 6.
01:04:34.000That's why they're looking into his taxes and his assets and the other behavior in 2020.
01:04:39.000And January is approaching, the primary is approaching, the midterms are approaching, and they know that once he announces it's off to the races and they don't have their case.
01:04:50.000They still can't charge because they don't have their case.
01:04:53.000So, in a desperate bid, they storm Mar a Lago, lock the doors, unsupervised, they send 50 guys in there, they just take a bunch of stuff from the office in the hopes that they're going to find something.
01:05:08.000It was a fishing expedition, plain and simple.
01:05:11.000They didn't have anything with the Russia special counsel.
01:05:14.000They had nothing in the abuse of power investigation with the Ukraine call.
01:05:21.000So they had to appoint 50 guys to just bum rush the house and take all his stuff in the hopes that they're going to drag all that to Washington and find something so they can complete their case, charge the president, and prevent him from running.
01:05:43.000It's galvanized and activated the Trump base.
01:05:46.000But this was their only play because what's the alternative?
01:05:50.000Trump announces in January, the DOJ turns up nothing, he sails to the nomination, sails to the presidency, and then he liquidates everybody, and it's the thousand year Trump and Reich.
01:06:17.000They know we could see, and then therefore understand.
01:06:21.000But it's a desperate, ugly play because they know that Trump inevitably is going to get the nomination and the Democrats are not going to have anybody that can beat Trump.
01:07:59.000And now that it's out in the open, it's going to make it a lot harder for them to do it because now the DOJ is under scrutiny.
01:08:04.000And I said this on Tuesday this is just raw power against power because now the DOJ, if they want to charge Trump, I mean, they could do it, but in November, there's going to be a new House, and in January, they're going to be sworn in, and then the House is going to oversee the DOJ.
01:10:26.000When the procedure is agreed upon and clear, there's no question.
01:10:30.000When everybody agrees basically that the DOJ is acting appropriately, when everybody basically agrees in the rules of being president and the president's not being indicted and things like that, there's not really a question.
01:10:44.000But when people throw around words like civil war and constitutional crisis, it's questions of legitimacy.
01:10:50.000And so there may come a time when the House and the Republican nominee for president and the Senate is going to be pitted against the Department of Justice.
01:11:00.000And there's going to be a question of can Trump run?
01:13:08.000And how much will Republicans go along with it?
01:13:11.000If they do charge and convict Trump, will Republicans go along with it?
01:13:14.000Or will the Speaker of the House go along with it?
01:13:17.000Because if it's the Speaker of the House versus the Attorney General, you got to fight.
01:13:21.000If it's the Attorney General and the Speaker of the House and the President and the media against some guy running, totally different story.
01:13:28.000So that's where it's like Republicans finding their institutional support and their legitimacy and their power versus a left doing the same.
01:13:37.000That's what it's going to come down to.
01:14:12.000They didn't like that just as much as they didn't like the sixth.
01:14:15.000The sixth was when the Capitol was breached and the counting of the votes was halted and everything.
01:14:21.000But they were just as alarmed about everything that happened up until that point, which is the sitting president refusing to concede and protests and 80% of the opposition doubting the legitimacy of the election and that kind of narrative becoming mainstream.
01:14:40.000And the sixth, in my opinion, the way they played it up, the way that they may have catalyzed that.
01:14:45.000Was to shock, that was shock and awe, plain and simple, against the Trump supporters to force Trump to capitulate.
01:14:52.000And even though Trump never conceded, he said, All right, uncle.
01:14:56.000Because they impeached him and they sent in, they built a fence around the Capitol and they locked down the city.
01:15:02.000And there was this threat of like martial law.
01:15:04.000And Trump was trapped in the White House and he was like, All right, uncle, I'll tell him to go home and we'll just end this, even though I don't concede.
01:15:17.000It was like, Okay, well, It came down to the same constitutional process that I'm talking about now.
01:15:23.000It came down to the election certification in a handful of states and recounts.
01:15:28.000And people got to know much better the technicalities of how the president is formally transferred from one to the next and all of the important dates the election certification, the appointment of the electors, the electors being sent to D.C., the electors voting, the vice president counting the electors.
01:15:45.000Everybody became very intimately familiar because it was like, okay, we don't believe the election.
01:15:50.000So now it's down to the letter of the law.
01:16:38.000And people beating the drums about January 6th defendants and saying these are political prisoners, the election is still BS and blah, blah, it shows that that was never resolved.
01:17:11.000They did what they had to to keep him out of the White House.
01:17:13.000They're doing the same thing now, indicting him, trying to keep him out of the White House again.
01:17:18.000And it's going to be another question about legitimacy.
01:17:20.000Just like it came down to state legislators and Mike Pence and January 6th, it's going to come down to, and by January 6th, I mean the date which is on the calendar in the Constitution.
01:17:33.000That the vice president counts the votes the day after the Congress is sworn in.
01:18:24.000Because if they don't, it will have the same outcome as 2020, which is Trump will get screwed over because McConnell and McCarthy and Ted Cruz and the rest of them, they let that happen.
01:18:37.000They let the election, and then the GOP let the election be stolen, and then the GOP let.
01:18:46.000But if Trump has them on his side, and I don't know, I don't know what that looks like.
01:18:50.000If Trump has them on his side, if he's got Fox on his side, if Tucker's going to go out to bed for us this time, if he's got the House and Senate this time, if he's got the Supreme Court, you know, because you remember in 2020, Tucker and nobody on Fox News supported Stop the Steal.
01:22:31.000I'm talking about the sort of implicit violence that underlies all politics the threat of violence, the existence of power, which is the foundation of politics.
01:22:43.000It gets into really theoretical stuff.
01:22:45.000And a lot of people, and here's the thing a lot of people can't comprehend it on this level.
01:22:51.000Because they look at, like, as an example, people don't really understand warfare.
01:22:57.000People will look at nuclear weapons and they'll say, why do we have nukes?
01:23:02.000Because if one side uses nukes, then the other side will use them and then we all just lose.
01:23:07.000And it's like, okay, but there's different kinds of nukes.
01:23:11.000And there's different ways of delivering nukes.
01:23:13.000And the existence of nukes changes the dynamics.
01:23:54.000And if you don't know this, in the 1970s, I think in 1971, the United States and the Soviet Union came together and formed an anti-anti-ballistic missile treaty.
01:24:04.000Because with the development of nuclear weapons in the 1940s, 1950s, and 1960s, you go from an atomic bomb that could be dropped from a plane to intercontinental ballistic missiles, where a nuclear warhead could be miniaturized and put on a missile, and the missile can be launched from one continent and sent to another continent, and nothing can stop it.
01:24:26.000And this creates a dynamic of absolute insecurity, where if that capability exists, that means that the Soviet Union's enemies could destroy it at will.
01:24:38.000If the United States has ICBMs, then that means that the United States can kill and destroy the entire Soviet Union at will, and there's nothing they could do to stop it, which is absolute, and that's a level of insecurity that cannot be changed.
01:24:58.000There's no defensive capability against that.
01:25:01.000So the Soviet Union has to create ICBMs of its own and ensure a balance.
01:25:05.000If there's no defensive capability and there's this vulnerability, then both sides have to have it.
01:25:12.000Because if the United States sees the Soviet Union as a powerful conventional military adversary and we have ICBMs, we have to kill everyone in the Soviet Union.
01:25:22.000Because we have to, if they have the power to invade the United States, if they have the power to destroy the United States, We have to assume that they will.
01:25:30.000So we have to kill them all with ICBMs.
01:25:33.000And the Soviet Union has to say that if the United States has that capability, they have to assume they'll use it.
01:25:39.000So they have to build up their ICBMs of their own and create a very delicate balance that is not based on defense, but is based on deterrence.
01:25:47.000If we can't stop ICBMs, we have to match ICBMs and create mutually assured destruction.
01:25:55.000Well, in the course of the development of the technology, then they develop.
01:25:59.000Anti ballistic missiles, which are missiles that shoot down ICBMs.
01:26:05.000And this totally disrupts that mutually assured destruction, which is the foundation of security.
01:26:12.000Mutually assured destruction, which is the guarantee that both sides will be destroyed, that's the foundation of security.
01:26:18.000And if one side is developing a technology where they can defend against ICBMs rather than deter them with mutual destruction, it completely disrupts MAD, and that completely undermines security in the nuclear age.
01:26:33.000So the Soviet Union and America get together and say, We're not going to defend ourselves.
01:26:39.000Counterintuitive, but revolutionary, they say we're not going to develop defensive technology.
01:26:45.000We're not going to develop an anti ballistic missile shield.
01:26:49.000Because we don't, and here's the reason why.
01:26:53.000Well, you understand, I explained that.
01:26:57.000So in the 70s, we get together and say, no ABM.
01:26:59.000We just are going to maintain ICBMs, mutually assured destruction, because if one side even thinks the other side is capable of defense, Then the first side that's capable of defending against a nuclear strike has a first strike capability.
01:27:14.000If the United States has a defensive shield, that means that it could use its nuclear weapons without fearing reprisal.
01:27:22.000And if the United States adversaries even perceive the United States as having a defensive capability, then that means that the United States adversaries perceive that the United States has a first strike capability.
01:27:35.000And if the adversaries of the United States perceive that the U.S. has a first strike capability, they have to assume that the U.S. will use it.
01:27:42.000And that means that they have to launch a preemptive first strike of their own before the U.S. perfects its defensive shield.
01:27:56.000So we agree to forswear the development of that technology.
01:28:00.000So in 2001, we pull out of the ABM Treaty and we begin to develop an anti ballistic missile shield, which again creates all these problems.
01:28:12.000And so what Russia does, what the Russian Federation does in response, Is Russia develops a hypersonic missile, which is a missile that can penetrate any ABM shield.
01:28:23.000And Russia has to do this to keep the balance.
01:28:28.000If the US builds a defensive shield, then the Russians have to build the missile that can penetrate that shield.
01:28:35.000Otherwise, the US has a theoretical first strike capability, a perceived theoretical first strike capability.
01:28:44.000Now, all of that happens on a theoretical and abstract level.
01:28:50.000And it is all about hypotheticals, and it's all about game theory, and it's all about perception and that kind of thing.
01:28:58.000And I'm explaining this to Destiny, and he's like, Well, but anti ballistic missile shield doesn't work.
01:29:04.000So, and anyway, nukes would just kill everybody.
01:29:10.000And this is analogous to what's happening now warfare is all about game theory, it is all about insecurity and security.
01:29:25.000It is all about the insecurity that power creates and the imbalance in power, the imbalance in force capability that creates insecurity, and the way that insecurity creates conflict.
01:29:42.000And if you don't understand that concept, if you don't understand the role that legitimacy plays in that, you will never understand conflict.
01:29:50.000And that's why Stephen Bonnell. Can't understand nuclear weapons.
01:29:55.000And that's why a lot of people cannot understand why everything that's being said in the past three years are extremely unnerving and extremely unprecedented and problematic.
01:30:09.000It's not the same thing, but it's analogous.
01:30:12.000The way that it's really going to play out is not in the way that people think it's going to play out.
01:30:16.000People think that a civil war will play out where, like, the right wing people and the left wing people are going to get out of their house and fight each other.
01:30:25.000Just like nuclear weapons come down strictly to delivery and yield, and come down to where these things are stationed and the secrecy of submarines and the logistics of surveillance and that kind of thing, this conflict is going to come down to who is in the room and who's got the bodies and who's got the guns and who wears the uniforms and the letter of the law and who's got the judges and that kind of thing.
01:30:54.000It's going to come down to the particulars and logistics and it's going to concern the armies.
01:31:00.000Not the civilians, not the ideas, and not the people.
01:31:04.000It's going to come down to force and legitimacy.
01:31:09.000And it's going to come down to the Capitol and the White House and Mar-a-Lago, and it's going to come down to the Speaker of the House and those things, the Pentagon.
01:31:21.000So that's where civil conflict will erupt: in the palace, not in the streets.
01:31:30.000And that's why all these things are so problematic because if they're going to say Trump can't run, but he does, and the DOJ investigates him, it's like, again, it gets down to who's legitimate.
01:31:42.000Well, if the legitimacy comes from the law and comes from the media, then we got to have the law and the media on our side.
01:31:50.000That's why it's important to have Fox.
01:31:51.000That's why it's important to have social media.
01:31:53.000That's why it's important to have Twitter.
01:31:55.000That's why it's important to have the Speaker of the House and the Senate when the time comes.
01:32:03.000Because if we don't have media, then, you know, we can't assert legitimacy.
01:32:08.000If we don't have the Speaker and if we don't have the Senate and if we don't have the courts, then we don't have legitimacy, which we need to marshal force, to marshal power, to marshal an army.
01:42:45.000So it turns into this weird, like, I need you to know that, like, and it's like, what, you know, okay, we're friends, we work together, now we're not.
01:42:58.000Like, and I would understand, like, there being animus, like, you know, you hate me, I hate you kind of thing, but, like, what's with the obsession?
01:43:41.000So, I got to go through some legal stuff first.
01:43:43.000And then, you know, pending the outcome of that, I'll tell my side of the story at some point because there's a lot of weird shit like that.
01:53:02.000You would follow a million people and 500,000 would follow you back, and you'd unfollow 750,000 of them, and then you'd have a 2 to 1 ratio with 500,000 followers.
01:54:53.000Well, and then you got a lot of crazy people.
01:54:55.000There's a lot of crazy people in the military as well.
01:54:57.000People go to the military, they go to war, they get fucked up in the head, and then they lose their mind and they go out on a killing spree.
01:55:07.000Or they were subject to experiments, or they were abused, you know, like they were in the military and maybe they were messed up in the military.
01:55:15.000Takes advantage of them by telling them, hey, go kill people, you know?
01:57:28.000What I like to do is get into politics eventually, you know, and run for office or something, if that's ever possible.
01:57:36.000And that's going to be a tricky transition.
01:57:39.000That's going to be the biggest thing I ever pull off if I ever transition into politics if I ever do it.
01:57:45.000So hopefully I won't be, you know, maybe I'll be doing it in a different form or I guess I could probably still keep doing it as a politician.
01:57:52.000But yeah, I've got bigger ambitions than being a live streamer.
01:57:58.000You know, I don't know how much longer I'll do this, you know.
01:58:03.000Probably for the next four years at least, you know, maybe less than that, a couple of years, a few years.
01:58:34.000You know, most people my age just got out of college.
01:58:37.000And they're working their stupid job and they just move downtown or whatever.
01:58:41.000I'm 24 and I did a conference with 1,200 people and two sitting congressmen.
01:58:46.000And like it would be difficult to do that, period, but I did that being a dissident, being canceled by everything and everyone and blacklisted and saying the things I say and creating this like notable faction in the right wing, this like notable force pulling the national conversation.
01:59:06.000You know, so I'm kind of like a precocious genius.
01:59:09.000And, you know, I'm already so ahead of the game, so it's true.
02:00:13.000In my position, they become cynical and jaded and just very like it messes them up.
02:00:19.000And understandable, I understand how that could happen to a person.
02:00:24.000But my real strength, aside from the fact that I'm a genius, aside from the fact that I'm extremely competent, aside from the fact that I'm a visionary, is that what my real advantage is that I have love, is that I have more belief and more love.
02:01:36.000You have to be in love with the process.
02:01:37.000You have to be in love with waking up and going to work and doing it day after day.
02:01:42.000Because otherwise, you're going to blow up and die and explode and blood everywhere and get raped, get raped everywhere, get raped and slapped around.
02:01:57.000It's just going to be an ugly picture.
02:02:03.000You just got to keep your foot on the gas all the time, almost to an irrational degree, an irrational level of conviction in yourself and in what you're doing.
02:03:57.000You may have talked about this, but Hunter is going around talking trash about you, saying that he already debated and destroyed you during that crowded panel.
02:04:05.000I was wondering what her take is on this.
02:04:17.000So, I mean, there are people that I respect and that, you know, like when Destiny was going around and calling me a Nazi, it's like, bro, like you're better than that.