00:00:09.000Very excited to be back with you here tonight on Tuesday.
00:00:14.000We have a lot to talk about and a lot to get into.
00:00:17.000Tonight, our featured story is about the Florida Big Tech Censorship Bill.
00:00:23.000This is another story like last night, which we covered earlier this year.
00:00:29.000And I have to tell you, if you remember the show, I was very excited about the bill.
00:00:34.000It's a bill that's being proposed by Republican state legislators in the Florida House of Representatives, and it targets big tech companies that deplatform, specifically people that are running for statewide office.
00:00:49.000So, for example, if somebody runs for governor in Florida or state representative or something like that, big tech companies face severe penalties for censoring those people from their platforms.
00:01:04.000But, Now that the bill is being debated in the legislature and it's working its way to approval very quickly, some people have pointed out that there are a lot of flaws with the bill, including Laura Loomer, who testified in the Florida State House, as well as our friend, a friend of the show, Michelle Malkin.
00:01:23.000So we'll talk all about the Florida bill.
00:01:25.000It seems like there are some pretty gaping flaws in the bill.
00:01:31.000For example, it does not protect people that already hold office, it does nothing for people that have already been banned.
00:02:03.000We want big tech to stop censoring us.
00:02:07.000And if that's going to happen, The legislation that is passed in states like Florida or Texas or on a national level, they have to have teeth and they have to encompass the whole problem, which is not just deplatforming statewide officials on the biggest social media platforms in Florida.
00:02:26.000It's much more comprehensive than that.
00:02:30.000There's some good stuff in there, but it's not where it needs to be.
00:02:33.000We'll also be talking tonight about an article that was published in Big League Politics.
00:02:39.000This afternoon, and I retweeted it on my timeline so you could see it, and we'll be going over it tonight.
00:02:46.000It turns out that Megan Squire, the SPLC worker and the professor at Elon University, who was cited as an expert in a hit piece about me recently by ABC, it turns out that she is linked to a violent left wing terrorist group that was responsible for a bombing back in 2019.
00:03:30.000But she is an activist working with the SPLC to de platform people like me.
00:03:37.000And she is cited by the mainstream media as an expert on right wing extremism.
00:03:44.000While she is a left wing extremist that works with literal terrorist groups, literal violent left wing militia groups, it's very concerning.
00:03:55.000It's very concerning and it's deeply troubling and disturbing that she still has a platform to spew her extremist and violent content, which is what it is.
00:04:06.000So, we'll be going over that article tonight.
00:04:09.000And please, you know, I'm going to put out a content warning here.
00:04:13.000This is deeply troubling and disturbing stuff.
00:04:17.000So, I want everybody to be totally prepared.
00:04:20.000We are about to peel back the layers and take a look into the grimy, disgusting underworld of.
00:05:32.000Had a big announcement about the show yesterday that both of our websites that were down for maintenance are back online.
00:05:42.000So it was, I think, in mid January, we took down NicholasJFuentes.com and the merch website, which is merch.nicholasjfuentes.com for maintenance.
00:05:55.000So if you want to resubscribe to my archive site where I have all of my past episodes, basically all the content that I produced for the past four years.
00:06:06.000Gaming streams, commentary, debates, speeches, interviews, and every episode of the show that is all available at NicholasJFuentes.com.
00:06:15.000It is $6 per month if you subscribe annually.
00:06:19.000It is closer to $10 per month if you subscribe by month.
00:06:22.000So we're encouraging people to buy yearly subscriptions because we only right now have a Litecoin server as a payment option.
00:06:32.000So the only way you could subscribe is if you have Litecoin, and I encourage people to check that out and get into crypto because we'll be using it.
00:06:39.000For more things in the future, we also have our merch store back up.
00:06:46.000We have, for example, the America First mugs in stock, sweatshirts, t shirts, hats, all that kind of stuff.
00:06:53.000That is available at merch.nicholasjfuentes.com with Litecoin as well.
00:06:59.000And this is another development which I didn't announce yesterday.
00:07:03.000AFPAC 2 is once again streaming on our AFPAC website.
00:07:08.000Initially, and I don't know why we did this, I got to go back and I got to give Assistant Groyper a spanking or something, some kind of corporal punishment.
00:07:19.000I don't know how we got to punish this guy.
00:07:25.000But we had it originally hosted on YouTube.
00:07:29.000We uploaded the full video of the AFPAC 2 conference in 4K in high definition for our AFPAC website, but we had it hosted on YouTube, which has deplatformed us in the past.
00:07:46.000And so that's back up at aftpack.events.
00:07:49.000So if you're looking for the full Aftpack conference, my speech, the other speeches that were there, like I said, we have got the color corrected 4K, the most high definition, the best quality version that exists on the internet of the Aftpack 2 stream.
00:08:05.000It is now on aftpack.events if you want to check that out.
00:08:21.000I hate hearing the same thing twice and I hate saying the same thing twice.
00:08:24.000I don't know why, but it just irritates me.
00:08:27.000That's what I have to do, though, on this show because we have to shill it so that people subscribe to these things and they check it out because some people don't watch the show every night.
00:09:09.000And if you don't know who Megan Squire is, she has been a thorn in the side of this show for a while with her futile attempts, futile attempts at deplatforming me and getting the streaming platform shut down.
00:09:47.000She is a left wing activist who is often cited in the mainstream media as an expert on so called right wing extremism.
00:09:56.000She is a left wing extremist activist, okay, get this, that is cited as the expert on right wing extremism, which is, I'm sure, very objective, totally unbiased.
00:10:12.000How could there be a conflict of interest there?
00:10:15.000Most recently, she was cited in an ABC article, a hit piece really, about me, and she was cited as an expert, giving her expert opinion that I should be banned from Twitter.
00:10:27.000Because Twitter enables me to spread my political message.
00:10:34.000Now, we recently went over some things about Meghan Squire, which I found to be quite unsettling.
00:10:40.000I went into detail about how a Wired article, a profile about her from a couple of years ago, showed that she supports left wing violence.
00:10:50.000She was quoted in that article as refusing to condemn political violence, and she described violent political tactics and political violence.
00:11:02.000As, quote, an last resort in a wide variety of tactics.
00:11:10.000And I thought that that was troubling.
00:11:12.000This is a person who potentially wants to do me harm.
00:11:15.000And certainly she wants to do harm to any right wing person.
00:11:19.000The work that she does is to gather doxes and other personal private information of American conservatives.
00:11:27.000And then she turns that information over to violent extremist groups.
00:11:32.000Like Antifa, among others, so that they can weaponize it.
00:11:36.000And when I say weaponize, I mean they could take that information and use it to go out there and do targeted political violence, which is what they often engage in.
00:11:46.000And she knows what they're about, and she doesn't condemn it.
00:11:49.000In fact, she tacitly supports it, I'm sure.
00:11:56.000And that's where we stood on this subject last week.
00:11:58.000But there has been new information that has come to light thanks to big league politics.
00:12:03.000And I'll read this article to you, we'll go through it and show.
00:12:07.000The background of this very deranged, twisted extremist known as Megan Squire from Elon University.
00:12:15.000And I think it's, by the way, before we get into this, as I go through this article, it's going to be some pretty messed up stuff.
00:12:23.000The question is worth asking should this person have a job at a major university?
00:12:30.000Because I don't think that's appropriate and I don't think that's acceptable.
00:12:34.000Students go to Elon University to study, they go there to learn.
00:12:39.000And this person is somebody who is engaging in violent, potentially violent political activism.
00:12:46.000I don't think that that's appropriate.
00:12:47.000And I think it's a question worth asking Elon University why they would employ somebody like this.
00:12:53.000And what does that say about the values of Elon University?
00:12:56.000How does that reflect on the reputation of Elon University if somebody like this is gainfully employed and allowed to spread their violent extremist message on campus to their students?
00:13:08.000With that in mind, we'll go through the article and I'll show you what I mean.
00:13:14.000It says, A computer science professor at Elon University has become widely quoted by the mainstream media as an expert on far right extremism.
00:13:23.000However, it turns out that she is quite the extremist herself.
00:13:27.000She collects personal data indiscriminately and sends it to Antifa groups and militias known for their eagerness to engage in political violence.
00:13:37.000Her Elon University bio says that her main research area is applying data science techniques to understand niche and extremist online communities.
00:13:46.000Particularly radical right wing groups on social media.
00:13:51.000Outside academia, she serves as a senior fellow for data analytics at the Southern Poverty Law Center and leads the technical research team for the UK based Center for Analysis of the Radical Right.
00:14:05.000Squire is beloved by the mainstream media for her quote, expertise.
00:14:10.000Almost five and a half pages of her CV consist of bullet point listings of all the times that she has been quoted by the mainstream media.
00:14:18.000A significant number of them occurred either this year or last year.
00:14:22.000As the media and elite class ramp up their smears and attacks on right wing patriots, Squire appears to be getting quoted more and more often.
00:14:32.000Increasing appearances in the media, notwithstanding, Squire has been a public figure for several years.
00:14:38.000In January 2018, Wired favorably profiled her as Antifa's secret weapon against far right extremists.
00:15:06.000It's not like this is new information, it's not like this is a smear.
00:15:11.000These are favorable left wing profiles describing her as a weapon of a violent left wing terrorist group.
00:15:20.000It says, quote, Megan Squire is an intelligence operative of sorts, passing along information to those who might put it to real world use, like Antifa, who can weaponize it.
00:15:33.000They are talking about political violence.
00:15:36.000She gathers indiscriminately intelligence and secret private information of people and their families, and then she sends it to terrorist groups so that they could use it to go out and commit acts of violence.
00:15:51.000It says the tech magazine then boasted of her massive database, dehumanizingly called Whack a Mole, of some 400,000 people that she considers white nationalists or far right extremists.
00:16:07.000And her penchant for leaking names to Antifa activists, knowing full well that they would post photos and information about their targets online to harass them and get them fired from their jobs.
00:16:19.000Squire says that she is peaceful and, quote, doesn't consider herself to be Antifa.
00:16:24.000She only works directly with them and is their secret weapon.
00:16:28.000But she makes no bones about being, quote, sympathetic to Antifa and unwilling to disavow Antifa violence, which she describes as a, quote, last resort of a diversity of tactics.
00:16:40.000Former President Donald Trump has referred to Antifa as a domestic terrorist organization on several occasions and called for its official designation as such.
00:16:49.000Squire sends data to these groups, groups in which violence and intimidation are central to their entire modus operandi.
00:16:56.000Doesn't the very definition of terrorism go something like this the unlawful use of violence and intimidation, especially against civilians in the pursuit of political aims?
00:17:07.000Wired even comes right out and says that, in the digital age, doxing is a particularly blunt tool.
00:17:13.000One meant to terrorize and threaten people in their most private spaces.
00:17:18.000Therefore, as the article implies, I think it's pretty obvious.
00:17:22.000And if you know the definition of terrorism, it was obvious before.
00:17:26.000What she is engaged in can accurately be described as terrorism.
00:18:21.000So one could say that Meghan Squire is using unlawful intimidation and violent tactics against civilians in order to intimidate and terrorize them in the pursuit of political aims.
00:18:35.000I think that meets the textbook definition, which means that at the minimum, Meghan Squire is a collaborator with terrorists who would be Antifa, because these are the activities that Antifa engages in.
00:18:49.000So, you could say that she is a collaborator, or you could say that her involvement is direct enough that she could be lumped in with Antifa herself.
00:19:02.000This is the definition of the activities that she is engaged in, and I'll leave it to you to decide how closely those things align.
00:19:09.000Either way, it's like I said, it's pretty disturbing.
00:19:14.000The article goes on it says, Thus, Squire is not really an academic who does activism on the side, but a full Fledged activist who uses her academic career to assist violent left wing groups.
00:19:25.000Squire has been involved in left wing activism since the age of 15.
00:19:31.000Research and data collection may be her primary vehicles now, but she has been spotted before at in person gatherings and protests as well.
00:19:39.000In August 2017, the Raleigh Durham chapter of Industrial Workers of the World described Squire as a quote, fellow worker.
00:19:48.000She participated as a counter protester at the Unite the Right rally in Charlottesville, Virginia, and told of her experience to the Times News.
00:19:58.000Squire is also known to leak data to the far left militia group Redneck Revolt.
00:20:04.000Also known as the John Brown Gun Club.1.00
00:20:08.000She's linked to the John Brown Gun Club.
00:20:11.000This is the part that I didn't know about.
00:20:14.000It says In 2017, Far Left Watch exposed the resources the group had once provided on their website, such as a 36 page quote, mini manual of the urban guerrilla that included sections on sabotage, kidnapping, executions, armed propaganda, and terrorism.
00:20:35.000Far Left Watch reporting led Redneck Revolt to remove the mini manual from their site altogether.
00:20:41.000For what it's worth, redneckrevolt.org domain no longer exists, and the group has not posted to Twitter since February 2019.
00:20:50.000The group last made headlines in July 2019 when Willem Van Spronsen of the John Brown Gun Club, his local John Brown Gun Club, a now independent organization that had been affiliated with the Redneck Revolt until January 2019, Firebombed an ICE facility in Tacoma, Washington, and was shot dead by police after they saw him trying to set fire to a propane tank.
00:21:18.000In a since deleted Facebook post, the Seattle Anti Fascist Action had praised Vance Bronson, calling him a good friend and comrade who took action against a fascist detention center.
00:21:31.000It says Throughout history, we idolize figures like John Brown for their courage to take the ultimate stand against oppression.
00:21:38.000And today, we stand strong in our support for yet another martyr in the struggle against fascism.
00:21:44.000May his death serve as a call to protest and direct action, they said.
00:21:49.000The John Brown Gun Club held the vigil for Vance Bronson and commemorated him and his decision to take direct action to protect traditionally marginalized and threatened communities.
00:21:59.000There was no apology for their members' firebombing of a government facility.
00:22:04.000This is who Megan Squire is involved with.
00:22:08.000Now, with all of that in mind, Remember that Meghan Squire is cited as an expert, an expert in deplatforming far right, allegedly far right individuals from Twitter.
00:22:35.000She is doxing hundreds of thousands of families, children, conservatives, Trump voters.
00:22:43.000And she is giving their personal information to known terrorist groups, which she does not disavow.
00:22:51.000She says that violence is the last resort in a diversity of tactics before she gives your personal information to the John Brown Gun Club, which goes out with firearms to blow up federal buildings.
00:23:10.000And that was as recent as 2019 that the attack in Tacoma took place.
00:23:15.000This is a violent terrorist militia, and she is involved with them, she's praised by them, and she is giving them personal information of civilians.
00:23:26.000That to me sounds like the definition of terrorism.
00:23:30.000And she's working for a major university and the SPLC.
00:23:36.000And I don't know if the author of the ABC hit piece will issue a retraction, but this is some pretty messed up stuff, even for the standards of the media.
00:23:45.000And I wonder what the red flag laws would look like in the state that she lives in.
00:23:56.000Because the John Brown Gun Club is big on firearm ownership.
00:24:01.000And, you know, I have to tell you, it is very disturbing to think that there is this radical, deranged individual working at a school, no less, who assuredly possesses firearms and is directly linked to organizations that commit terrorism.
00:24:17.000She herself has said that terrorism is an acceptable political tactic, or political violence is an acceptable political tactic.
00:25:50.000The keywords that she used to denote some of the 12 ideologies are, as Far Left Watch pointed out, quite vague.
00:25:57.000Some of them include anti SJW, anti Obama, rebel, patriot, anti Sharia law, and so on.
00:26:07.000This betrays the increasingly popular attitude that anyone who does not To mainstream leftist narrative is liable to be branded as an extremist.
00:26:16.000There are significant differences between these 12 different far right ideologies.
00:26:22.000Squire is lumping into her database of extremists people that don't like President Barack Obama, people that describe themselves as patriots, people that describe themselves as against social justice warriors.
00:26:36.000How many people watching this show describe themselves that way?
00:26:39.000How many of your boomer uncles, parents, grandparents, neighbors?
00:26:45.000Your barber, how many people like that would describe themselves this way?
00:26:49.000She is doxing their information and turning it over to violent far left extremists.
00:26:55.000The article goes on Megan Squire's employer, Elon University, has a mission statement that says it, quote, embraces its founder's vision of an academic community that transforms mind, body, and spirit and encourages freedom of thought and liberty of conscience.
00:27:10.000Elon would do well to tell us how Squire's research and activism upholds this mission in any way.
00:27:16.000It doesn't take too keen of an observer to determine that left wing extremists are profoundly anti free thought and anti liberty of conscience.
00:27:26.000Does Elon University truly believe that Squire's research and activism are examples of, quote, putting knowledge into practice and are motivated by concern for the common good?
00:27:41.000And then finally, it says incidentally, Squire's likability as a professor has been found wanting.
00:27:46.000According to RateMyProfessors.com, without taking into account the multiple negative ratings that have been left for her in March 2021, likely a trolling effort, she nevertheless had a subpar rating even before that.
00:27:59.000Eight reviews written through December 2020 combined to total a quality rating of 25, which equals an average quality rating of 3.1 out of 5 per reviewer, 62 out of 100.
00:28:13.000The students who left these reviews seem to agree that she is bland, detached, and appears to be much more interested in research than in teaching.
00:28:20.000On December 16, 2020, a student wrote, Enjoyed the class overall.
00:28:24.000She's a good enough teacher, but her personality isn't winning anyone over.
00:28:28.000She has some interesting research, but wasn't approachable when I wanted to learn more.
00:29:08.000I don't want to belabor and go through every single review on the Rape My Professors.
00:29:14.000Needless to say, she's a bad professor.
00:29:17.000Needless to say, not a very winning personality, not really a likable person.
00:29:22.000All of this is to say she is an imminent danger to society.
00:29:26.000And taking all this together, we have created a profile through investigation, you know, based on the facts that this is somebody who is basically a menace to society.
00:29:37.000And I'll leave you with this parting thought before we move on.
00:29:41.000She said that violence is a viable last resort of a diversity of tactics.
00:29:49.000She also has been quoted recently as saying that she doesn't know what to do with my platform.
00:29:55.000She said that the new tools that we're using, which they obviously subvert and they circumvent the normal means of social media communication, baffle her.
00:30:07.000She said that she cannot figure out a way to take my platform down and to stop me from spreading my message.
00:30:15.000And that her usual tricks of going to the mainstream media and publishing her reports isn't doing the job.
00:30:21.000So, what are we supposed to believe here?
00:30:24.000Because what she tells us is that violence is.
00:30:28.000Is a last resort, which she doesn't condemn.
00:30:32.000Is it safe to say that she has potentially exhausted the other diversity of tactics?
00:30:39.000And can we surmise, can we conjecture that violence is next on the menu for Meghan Squire?
00:30:48.000Because she said herself in recent publications that she does not know how to take down this platform.
00:30:54.000She has exhausted all of her so called hacking tools and other online activist techniques.
00:31:04.000Could you say that Megan Squire is approaching or in last resort territory?
00:31:11.000I'm going to have a conversation with my lawyer this week about filing a restraining order against Megan Squire because, to tell you the truth, I fear for my life at this point that left wing extremists are going to use violent means against me because all their nonviolent tactics aren't working.
00:31:30.000We go and put on peaceful political conferences.
00:31:33.000I create this platform to send out a message that people should engage in peaceful political activism.
00:31:42.000I get people doxing me, people trying to take down my platform.
00:31:45.000She sends it to all our back end services to try to get me kicked off, and so on.
00:31:50.000And it's clear that these people who are unhinged, they don't disavow violence, and she's connected to people that engage in violence.
00:31:59.000It's clear that they are looking into probably extraordinary last resort measures, which she said was violence.
00:32:06.000So I'm going to have a conversation with my lawyers about a restraining order and to see what we could do to mitigate her potential to create violence or havoc in the world because.
00:32:16.000You know, you say all those words on the internet, and those words are forever.
00:32:20.000And we have to take them at face value.
00:32:22.000It's a very bad political climate right now.
00:32:30.000And, you know, I'm put under the microscope.
00:32:32.000People scrutinize every word I say, and they couldn't come up with a profile like this.
00:32:37.000But we took a cursory look at public statements that Megan Squire has put together.
00:32:42.000And I think you can basically justify, I think you could come up with a rational.
00:32:48.000Irrational theory that she may be on the precipice, she may be on the cusp of going out there and being an accessory to violence or committing violence herself.
00:32:59.000The link to the John Brown Gun Club is very disturbing and very troubling.
00:33:05.000As the article described, they were engaged in violent terrorism against the U.S. government as recently as July 2019.
00:33:12.000And you would never know that because that was totally memory-holed by the media.
00:33:15.000But that guy was a card-carrying member of the John Brown Gun Club.
00:33:20.000They put out a Facebook statement in Seattle, Antifa, saying that he was a comrade and a martyr and that he's going to inspire more of this, more so called direct action.
00:33:30.000She's linked to the John Brown Gun Club.
00:34:00.000Her words and her activism are creating violence in the real world.
00:34:06.000And honestly, as a patriot who just wants America to prosper, as a Christian conservative patriot that just wants to engage in peaceful political activism, it is a real threat to people like me.
00:34:18.000So I just hope that we can explore legal means to stop her reign of terror.
00:34:28.000And honestly, it's a terrifying prospect that there are extremist left wing groups like this that are emboldened and radicalized these days by the media and by the Biden administration.
00:34:40.000So we're going to be keeping a very close eye.
00:34:42.000Like I said, I'm going to be talking to my many lawyers and exploring all of my options because somebody like that is dangerous and a menace.
00:34:51.000People say a lot of things about me, but I'm not connected to the John Brown Gun Club, I'm not connected to any militias or anything like that, anything unsavory.
00:35:00.000And I've never said that violence is a last resort.
00:35:02.000I've never said anything close to that.
00:35:09.000And we're also going to be putting a formal inquiry in with Elon University and ask them how they think that that's acceptable, especially with the mass shooting that took place in Atlanta today and the history of school shootings in the past few years.
00:35:23.000You just can't be too careful about these extremist political actors armed to the teeth, linked to terrorist groups on the campus.
00:35:59.000Washington Post reports that Nick Fuentes should be banned from Twitter, according to Al Qaeda, according to ISIS, according to Azov Battalion.
00:37:18.000Like a little bit of a black pill in a sense, because we were so excited about Ron DeSantis' tech censorship bill in Florida.
00:37:30.000I remember when it was first announced, and I did a whole show about it, and I went on and on about how it attacks tech censorship from a number of different angles, and it's sophisticated.
00:37:41.000It came up with a lot of things that I hadn't even thought of.
00:37:44.000And it wasn't your conventional Section 230 antitrust approach, which is what What Republicans have gone with for the past four or five years.
00:37:54.000There are a lot of novel approaches to addressing tech censorship in the bill.
00:38:00.000To me, this elevated Ron DeSantis above any other Republican in the country because I thought to date it was the most serious effort to address tech censorship put forward by any Republican, elected or otherwise for that matter.
00:38:18.000I think it's maybe the most serious effort, but.
00:38:22.000Laura Loomer came out and testified this week in the Florida State House, and Michelle Malkin put on her telegram too that there are a lot of problems in the bill.
00:38:32.000The bill is not sufficient to cover everything, there's a lot of holes in it.
00:38:37.000And I know a lot of people who watch the show might be skeptical of Laura Loomer.
00:38:41.000We know that Laura Loomer is friends with the Zionist Organization of America, which called for me to be deplatformed.
00:38:46.000And, you know, we don't agree on everything.
00:38:48.000But the thing about Laura Loomer is that she is a fighter against tech censorship.
00:39:17.000And she, in my opinion, has been one of the most effective fighters against tech censorship, one of the most effective voices against tech censorship.
00:39:25.000And I think there's a lot of overlap there.
00:39:27.000So, you know, some people were critical that she was at AFPAC or whatever.
00:39:31.000And I'm sure she got a lot of scrutiny from her friends for being at AFPAC.
00:39:35.000But Politics is about working with coalitions.
00:39:39.000And in any case, she's putting forward criticisms which are valid of the bill, the same criticisms that Michelle Malkin is putting out.
00:39:46.000So, in any case, I want to go through this article that puts them succinctly.
00:39:51.000It describes the issues with the bill.
00:39:53.000Chief among them is that this tech censorship bill does not protect current office holders from tech censorship, which is a pretty major flaw considering what happened in January.
00:40:45.000It says, Governor Ron DeSantis has gone all in on a legislative measure filed by Florida House Republican Blaise Ngolia to penalize big tech companies like Twitter and Facebook if they deplatform a candidate for statewide office.
00:40:59.000But the bill doesn't appear to protect potential federal candidates like President Donald Trump, Senator Marco Rubio, and Representatives Matt Gaetz and Byron Donalds.
00:41:10.000When Governor DeSantis first announced his support for the legislative effort to impose a $100,000 a day fine against companies until they reinstate a deplatformed candidate's account, it was the news that many Republicans wanted to hear after President Trump was completely deplatformed by social media companies that deemed his behavior and rhetoric dangerous, yet refused to ban the accounts of world leaders and organizations that promote global terrorism.
00:41:40.000DeSantis said, Under our proposal, if a technology company deplatforms a Candidate for elected office in Florida during the election, a company will face a daily fine of $100,000 until the candidate's access to the platform is restored again.
00:41:54.000When our legislature convenes next month, it will pass and I will sign the most ambitious reforms yet proposed for combating political censorship and deplatforming, for preventing big tech from interfering in our elections, and for safeguarding the privacy of your personal data.
00:42:11.000The way Representative Ngolia's 21 page bill, Transparency and Technology Act, is worded.
00:42:17.000It appears as if all candidates, federal and state, would be covered under the bill.
00:42:22.000But can a Florida state law protect a federal candidate who, for all intents and purposes, has to adhere to rules and regulations imposed by the FEC?
00:42:33.000The Floridian spoke to Angolia a few weeks back about his bill, ensuring that if President Trump ran in 2024, he would be covered.
00:42:41.000The Floridian also spoke to Governor DeSantis briefly before he addressed the CPAC gathering in Orlando, where he said that he wasn't sure.
00:42:49.000If the measure covered all past and present candidates for elected office.
00:42:54.000Now, in an in depth post about Angolia's bill by conservative journalist and congressional candidate Laura Loomer, who writes that the bill has major issues and warned that if those issues are not addressed, DeSantis would be putting himself out there over an empty bill.
00:43:10.000Loomer, who is arguably the most banned woman on social media, contends that the legislation focuses on candidates but needs to be extended to elected officials as well to ensure that big tech cannot deplatform the people's chosen elected representatives.
00:43:33.000As it is written now, Senator Rubio and any other federal candidates that have not already officially announced their reelection to federal office could be deplatformed.
00:43:43.000And like Loomer, if they are deplatformed, they will not be eligible to be reinstated, at least not by Facebook.
00:43:49.000Through a spokesman, Facebook told Breitbart News that individuals who have been banned, regardless of if they are running for office, would not be eligible to set up a new account.
00:44:00.000Including Loomer and President Donald Trump.
00:44:03.000The spokesman said people who have been banned from our services are not able to set up a new account even if they're running for office.
00:44:10.000And Michelle Malkin wrote a post as well.
00:44:15.000I think I thought I had that in my notes, but let me pull it up real quick.
00:44:22.000Michelle Malkin wrote basically the exact same thing on Telegram that Laura Loomer wrote.
00:44:50.000Michelle Malkin writes The DeSantis bill to stop tech censorship is weak on enforcement and penalties, doesn't apply to already deplatformed candidates like former President Trump and Laura Loomer, and only covers a very narrow group of Silicon Valley social media companies, completely excluding banks, rideshare companies, payment processors, telecom companies.
00:45:15.000If DeSantis does not address this and other GOP governor state legislators pass copycat legislation without fixing the loopholes and shortcomings, it will be just one more exercise in con ink free speech kabuki theater.
00:45:32.000Haven't we had enough of that indeed, Michelle Malkin, as always, right on the money.
00:45:37.000And I think that's a pretty good summary of the problems that Loomer and Michelle Malkin have put out there collectively.
00:45:43.000If the legislation does nothing to reinstate people that have been banned, and if it doesn't cover all the other forms of tech censorship that are occurring, honestly, what good is the bill?
00:45:56.000It's going to keep prospective candidates on Twitter and Facebook.
00:46:02.000But that by no means comes close to addressing the whole of the problem, which, as Malkin described, I think this is maybe the more important issue, is that it doesn't address all the other forms of sanction and deplatforming that are occurring.
00:46:19.000Okay, you're able to have a Twitter account and a Facebook account.
00:46:22.000But what happens if you're banned from PayPal and you're banned from credit card processing and you're banned from Uber and Airbnb and banks won't allow you to open checking accounts and banks won't underwrite your check or credit card processing?
00:46:39.000What happens when email services ban you from their platforms?
00:46:44.000All of this and more has happened to people like Laura Loomer and myself and many others.
00:46:50.000If the bill doesn't address all of that, It's not addressing tech censorship.
00:46:54.000And this is the problem that the politicians and the legislation seem to lag far behind the problem itself, which is advancing at a breakneck pace.
00:47:04.000It also seems that the understanding of the problem lags behind the problem itself.
00:47:08.000I wonder how many Republican elected officials even understand the scope and the scale of the tech censorship.
00:47:15.000Does Donald Trump know what a lethal blow it is to be banned from PayPal and Stripe?
00:47:23.000Do they know that people are being banned from credit card processing?
00:47:26.000Do they know that Visa and MasterCard, as a cartel, have a chokehold, a stranglehold over all e commerce on the internet?
00:47:35.000I doubt they even know about these things, much less have policy prescriptions or legislative fixes for those things.
00:47:44.000So the point is this we're not against the bill, we're not against Ron DeSantis, but the bill has got to get better.
00:47:51.000They have a Republican state legislature, they have a Republican governor.
00:47:55.000And it seems that Ron DeSantis is willing to work with conservatives on this.
00:48:00.000It seems to me that he is open minded and he is pragmatic.
00:48:03.000And I think that he wants to boldly take leadership on this issue and put forward something that is visionary and is maybe the best attempt so far to fix these problems.
00:48:17.000But we have got to call on him to improve the bill before it passes.
00:48:23.000We have to have amendments onto the bill.
00:48:25.000We have to have more provisions in the bill, more protections, and more teeth.
00:48:30.000Because the worst case scenario is if a bill gets passed and it has no teeth, it doesn't address the full scope of the problem, and that would be bad enough because then it's on to the next thing.
00:49:36.000And then we wanted to inspire a ripple effect across the country.
00:49:40.000And if 25 states pass similar legislation, we could have a real solution to big tech censorship.
00:49:49.000For example, if this legislation had a clause that said that the First Amendment must be protected on the platforms and that they have to reinstate people's accounts, that would mean that all of you can come back to Twitter, all of us can come back onto the platforms.
00:50:05.000We can all come back onto all the tech services that we've all used before.
00:50:11.000And do you know what a game changer that would be if right wing people could access as much as anybody else all the digital tools that are out there, all the digital platforms?
00:50:24.000We would win this thing in like a matter of a few years, probably, if we had full, unmitigated access to social media companies, online pay processors, PayPal, Stripe.
00:50:36.000If we had access to TikTok and Reddit and Discord and everything else.
00:51:07.000In Israel, they told big tech, they said, look, you either protect free speech or we'll ban you from this country and we'll create a clone and have a national Israeli Facebook.
00:51:17.000What do you think all the big tech companies did?
00:51:19.000They said, we will respect freedom of expression in Israel.
00:51:26.000Russia is now doing that to Twitter with child pornography.
00:51:30.000We can do it too because the United States is one of the biggest economies, if not the biggest economy, on the internet.
00:51:36.000These are American based companies and we have jurisdiction over them.
00:51:41.000So, if 25 Republican states or more pass hard hitting legislation which has teeth, which is strong, which addresses the problem, we can fix tech censorship.
00:51:54.000Now, I don't know how easy that will be because, of course, we will get resistance from the courts and from the federal government and from big tech themselves.
00:52:13.000So, we need to reach out to Ron DeSantis, reach out to the state legislators, reach out to Blaze and Golia, call, email, send letters, and we need to demand that the whole of big tech censorship is addressed.
00:52:29.000They must address the financial sanctions, they must address the reinstating of previously banned accounts, they must address the First Amendment and equal protection.
00:52:43.000All of this has to be enshrined into the state laws.
00:52:46.000And to tell you the truth, I have a strong conviction that we can influence the direction of the legislation in Florida.
00:52:54.000And if the legislation passes in Florida, that will lead all the legislation in all the other states.
00:53:02.000If we can alter the bill in Florida, we are in effect altering the bills in Texas and probably South Dakota and many other states.
00:53:12.000Because all other states, other governors and legislatures are going to be looking to Florida and they're going to pull provisions and clauses, and we'll probably have to.
00:53:20.000We'll have to advocate in those states for similar changes or similar amendments.
00:53:24.000But if it originates in Florida, that gives it legs, it gives it credibility so that it can spread across the country.
00:53:32.000And if enough states say that we're going to fine you $100,000 or more every day that you ban candidates or people for things that are protected by the First Amendment, we can bring big tech to its knees.
00:53:46.000And at the very least, the ball will be put back in their court.
00:53:49.000They'll be on the defensive for the first time in history.
00:54:40.000If we could use Twitter, if we could use Facebook, Instagram, PayPal, if all of that were accessible to us, we could not be stopped.
00:54:49.000Imagine if America first came back to YouTube for a minute.
00:54:53.000Imagine if America first came to Twitch.
00:54:56.000If I was multi streaming on YouTube, Twitch, Facebook Live, And I was accepting payments from PayPal, and I was able to be hosted by any back end services.
00:55:09.000Now, don't get me wrong, we've got a good thing going.
00:55:29.000But that's what we should be fighting for every day.
00:55:32.000Because if we were ever able to achieve that, and that would be the dream, if we were ever able to achieve that, our fortunes would change overnight politically and in every other way.
00:56:05.000I'm not saying that just for me and my show.
00:56:07.000I'm saying, think about the ability, think about the potential for dissidents to make change if we did not have to worry about being deplatformed, if we had access to platforms with billions or hundreds of millions of active users, you know, and if we were able to use all the other platforms that make businesses and other political entities competitive.
00:56:31.000We would be in such good shape if that were possible because that's, I think, what's holding everybody back right now in a huge way.
00:56:38.000It's been detrimental, and we've survived, but we could be.
00:56:42.000We would be doing so much better if we had access to those things.
01:00:08.000We've got Shark Tank Groyper who says, Yeah, it's a nice something, but you've demonstrated little market enthusiasm with only $3K in domestic sales quarter two, 2020.
01:01:04.000You know, when you were a kid and you were sick, you get to stay home from school.
01:01:08.000You get to hang out all day on the couch, watching TV, watching movies.
01:01:14.000I remember one day I faked being sick.
01:01:17.000This is back when I was in like middle school.
01:01:20.000I faked being sick, and I rode my bike to Blockbuster, which was still around at the time.
01:01:27.000Maybe I was even younger, maybe even like sixth grade or something.
01:01:31.000I was, this is back when social media wasn't big yet.
01:01:35.000This is before smartphones were big yet.
01:01:38.000I must have been 10, 11, 12 years old.
01:01:40.000So, you know, mobile smartphones, mobile smartphones, and social media really started to take off around 2010, really like 2010 through 2012.
01:01:53.000And so, right around there or before there, that wasn't the main form of media.
01:01:57.000Back then, TV was still the main form of media.
01:02:00.000It's totally alien now because now you're on your phone all day, you're on your computer all day.
01:02:05.000But when I was growing up, TV was the medium.
01:02:11.000I loved having the TV on all the time.
01:02:13.000Even if I wasn't watching it, I liked the noise of it, and I would just sit there and, you know, just have it on.
01:02:18.000And that's what you would do when you were sick.
01:02:21.000Well, you know, I don't know if you were a tech guy, maybe you were on the computer, but me as a young guy, as a youngster, I would just watch TV all day.
01:02:29.000So, anyway, so I stayed home from school.
01:02:33.000I rode my bike to Blockbuster, which was kind of far away, and I rented like four movies.
01:02:39.000And I went home and I watched Taxi Driver for the first time, I watched Lawrence of Arabia.
01:02:46.000And I watched, I think, Bridge on the River Kwai and Network.
01:03:53.000We had these, oh man, there was this perfect strip mall near me.
01:03:58.000It had a blockbuster, and then there was this great store across on the other side of it.
01:04:04.000It was like an old school candy store, and they would have all these boxes of snacks and candy, and you would go with a paper bag or little plastic bags and fill it up, and you would pay by the pound.
01:04:37.000You'd go on the weekend or on a Friday night with the family, pick out a few movies to watch, you know, and then go and get snacks and come home, put it on the big TV in the family room.
01:05:42.000And is it even really so much about watching the movie itself?
01:05:45.000Or is it more about having a destination so that you could get in the car on a cool night, go and browse movies and maybe see people you know and, you know.
01:05:58.000You go out, pick up something to eat, come home, and then you get to spend time together.
01:07:25.000Anyway, so I'm jealous of your sick day.
01:07:28.000I wish I could take a sick day like that.
01:07:31.000Fed Groypers is my trans, Muslim, black GF, and I really love your show, but we were just concerned about your white nationalistic rhetoric.
01:08:17.000My mom yells at me whenever I point out racial stuff, but today she called me and said she isn't going to Walmart anymore because of all the brothers.0.85
01:09:11.000I mean, they know the score through experience more than me, more than I ever could, more than most people ever could.
01:09:17.000I remember when I went to the American Renaissance Conference back in 2018.
01:09:25.000I remember, I forget who it was, but somebody came up because in my speech I said, boomers are probably sympathetic to anti racism because they lived through race riots and they lived through anti black discrimination and so on.
01:09:42.000And this southern guy came up and asked a question, and he said, well, you know, that's not true.
01:09:47.000Racism never happened, there was no racial conflict.
01:09:50.000Whites and blacks never saw each other.
01:09:52.000And I'm like, yeah, maybe not where you're from.
01:09:55.000But in Chicago, believe me, there was a lot of racial conflict.
01:10:09.000My grandmother, she grew up in the projects in the 30s and 40s, and she could tell you all kinds of stories with guns and all kinds of things going on.
01:10:19.000So, my family's been in the city for generations, and they have seen in Chicago what multiracialism really means.
01:10:27.000And, you know, my parents, because they're not hyper political people, they're really not that political, they more or less kind of accept.
01:10:36.000Casually, the political correctness type stuff about race.
01:10:40.000They, like everybody else, they put on this social performance, even privately, of being anti racist and, you know, being in favor of equality and everything.
01:10:51.000And I've kind of had to, like, tell them, no, it's okay.
01:11:16.000But then, you know, they go to a certain target in a certain neighborhood and they come home and complain about how the employees don't understand how coupons work, you know?
01:11:25.000And my mom has a very funny story about that.
01:11:29.000Maybe she could tell it on the show sometime.
01:11:32.000Once my parents retire, maybe they could tell some of these stories.
01:15:16.000Anti social groypers, as well as its exclusivity may be temporary, I think introducing crypto transactions to the AF audience is great and shows how easy something like Litecoin is to use and it avoids the blacklists.0.53
01:15:30.000Yeah, no, people need to start learning how to use crypto.
01:15:33.000If you're not familiar with crypto, this is a great opportunity to get familiar.
01:15:38.000Because if everybody that watches this show knew how to use crypto, we would be airtight for a long time.
01:15:46.000Because they can't do anything about crypto.
01:15:49.000So we all have to start getting more experience with it, getting more knowledgeable, learning skills.
01:15:55.000And, you know, I was talking to Assistant Groyper.
01:15:58.000We actually have thought about putting out resources for you to learn from America First, putting together step by step instructions and sort of guidebooks and manuals.
01:16:08.000Because people are going to need to start learning more about this stuff.
01:16:24.000So, we may put out some materials on that.
01:16:27.000I think there's some on the AF Updates Telegram channel already, if you check that out.
01:16:33.000Midwest Alex says, Hey, Nick, if you ever make yourself Oreo pancakes, the secret is to break the Oreos into bite sized pieces, then lightly mix them into the batter.
01:17:50.000I prefer it because sometimes I do forget.
01:17:53.000And I can't always remember everybody's names, and sometimes I forget faces, but for the most part, if I've seen you, I tend to remember people.
01:20:15.000Airfryers are small ovens with a highly concentrated heat source and powerful fan that moves the hot air around to crisp up wings, fries, veggies, and more with little oil.
01:20:29.000They create a nice fried finish that your oven range can't compete with, as well as reheating results that blow away the average microwave.
01:20:38.000Plus, an airfryer requires only a small amount of oil to make foods crispy with a fraction of the Calories and fat of traditional cooking methods like deep frying.
01:21:44.000The air fryer, like the Instant Pot, does make quicker work of cooking in general, thanks to the fact that air fryers reach high temperatures in minutes.
01:22:22.000Some avowed air fryer fans admit that the taste and texture of air fried foods aren't exactly like what you'd get with eight inches of oil in a metal basket.
01:22:32.000Okay, so it tastes funky, is what they're saying.
01:24:26.000Prince Harry says, Did you hear about the anti Asian mass shooting that happened right before the show where seven Asians were killed by a white supremacist near Atlanta?
01:25:01.000It's not like cops have never killed people unjustifiably, but in almost every case, Trayvon, Ahmaud Arbery, Michael Brown, George Floyd, it's like, what do you think is going to happen?
01:25:12.000Jacob Blake, the guy's reaching for a knife.
01:25:15.000He's getting chased around his car by the police.
01:25:44.000Raul says, I thought the feds honeypotting someone with the hot chick was just a meme, but they literally just did that to Lauren Whitsky's brother.
01:27:45.000Says Groyper is about to be posted up outside Nick's house to protect him, like it's that scene from The Godfather when Vito is in the hospital and Michael is standing guard with the baker.
01:28:20.000I'm switching to the Barry Bubbly or the Barry LaCroix.
01:28:23.000Never, never buy me orange Bubbly ever again.
01:28:29.000Morton Trump says locally Elon is considered on the lower end of the totem pole in North Carolina, especially for computer science, down there with Meredith College, NC, AT, and ECU.
01:30:18.000Washington State Groyper says, I know you're not a tech guy, but do you recommend an app like Robinhood or an app like Coinbase for investing in crypto so that we can buy your merch?
01:32:28.000You've got to be comfortable with it before you're ready for that.
01:32:30.000I mean, the guy's like a radical visionary.
01:32:34.000You know, I mean, he's one of these like mad scientist kind of guys where it's a little bit off the rails in some places, but you can't deny that the guy's like a mastermind.
01:32:43.000You know, he's like a political mastermind.
01:34:06.000Xander Stones says, What are the top bullet points Groypers need to address in calls and emails to Ron DeSantis, asking so we can consistently hit the same points home?
01:34:16.000I'll put something out later on Telegram or on Twitter, outlining sort of like bullet points.
01:34:22.000He can't call until tomorrow anyway, but I'll put some bullet points out this week.
01:34:28.000Prodigy says, Oh, sevens in chat for Milo's conversion.
01:35:20.000Hercules of Gaines says, I remember hearing Ben Shapiro say he didn't care about the Browning of America, but as soon as the country around him began Browning, he took off to another state.
01:35:30.000Yeah, didn't want to stick around for the Browning of LA, so then he moves to Florida.
01:35:36.000Space Friend says, Hey, Nick, have you seen The Handmaid's Tale?0.93
01:35:39.000It's feminist garbage, but the bad guys in the film, The Republic of Gilead, Is very based.0.76
01:35:45.000Keep up the great work, King, and God bless.0.91
01:35:50.000Diligence is if you look outside the window, you can see the cars are going approximately 999, what is that, quintillion, 999, quadrillion, 999 billion, million miles per hour.
01:36:08.000Also, very happy to get my AF mug in the mail today.
01:36:41.000Jostra Movers says, Instead of making us get the vaccine at work, they're trying to bribe us by paying us up to two hours of pay for each round.
01:36:49.000Yeah, I don't think I'm going to sacrifice my biological integrity for $48.
01:42:17.000My grandma, she always tells a story about how, she could tell it far better than I can, but she always tells a story about how one time she went out late at night.
01:42:34.000She needed something for a school project late at night, and she told my grandma late.
01:42:40.000So my grandma had to go out in the city late at night to go grab, and she packed, I think, a snub nosed revolver in her purse or something.
01:42:51.000And the story goes that my grandma goes in to get whatever it is that she needs to get.
01:42:55.000She comes back outside, and a couple of black guys come up to her and go, Looky, looky, what we have here.
01:44:20.000Well, I mean, even saying something like that is just a stupid criticism and it shows that you don't understand what we're doing and you don't really understand nationalism.
01:44:28.000When people do this, Sivnat, Sivnat, I mean, it shows you don't understand what you're talking about.
01:44:35.000See, for instance, I was red pilled on how people are when I got a job as a lifeguard years ago.1.00
01:44:39.000A lot of Indian people swim at the pool and they have a hard time following directions, and whenever they gave me a hard time, I had to yell to get through to them.1.00
01:44:47.000Great show as always, Nick, and have a good night.1.00
01:45:52.000I mean, we've got it going on, I think, better than anybody.
01:45:56.000And, um, the there's some truth to the idea that obviously Europe has a more concrete sense of identity because they're older than America.
01:46:09.000And there is such a thing as something that is German and French and Italian that goes back hundreds or thousands of years, whereas America is a little bit more ambiguous, you know.
01:46:20.000Not that there isn't an American identity, but it's trickier.
01:47:16.000You know, AIM was doing flare rallies.
01:47:18.000You know, and they would set up, and this was letting banner drops.
01:47:22.000Okay, so you took Identity Europa, you took alt right activism, and then you just switched out all the stuff, which is what people were critical for me of doing.
01:51:40.000Optics Respectress says, I think I told you this months ago, but I would really appreciate an audio only format on replays for the archive site if it's really easy to do.
01:51:49.000Really helps for commutes, listening at work, etc.
01:52:00.000We got stickers, emotes, super chats, check and credit card processing, replays, and all of that in the works, but let's throw audio only first.
01:52:22.000Hi there, says all vitamin C is a chemical derivative of GMOs, but taking a whole food vitamin C like Camu capsules in large doses will clear up your allergies almost instantly.
01:56:05.000Charlie Fash says, Speaking of Patrick, I actually had a personal experience with him myself where he revealed his scumbag disposition, brought it up at the Amran conference he gave a speech at in 2018.
01:56:16.000I wasn't a fan of your show then, but for the past year or so, I've been listening daily.
01:56:24.000That conference, he also did something totally scummy.0.99
01:56:28.000Because I gave a speech at Amran, and it was very, very heavy focus on Christianity.
01:56:35.000I said, Look, we're only going to make this work if we're Christian.0.79
01:56:39.000And so the speech was, compared to all the other speeches, it was very Christian.
01:56:45.000And it had a strong Christian focus, even irrespective of that.
01:56:49.000So I give my speech, and it's like, it's strongly Christian.
01:56:54.000Jared Taylor gives his speech, it's his conference.
01:56:57.000And Patrick goes up during the QA and says something like Jared, should we be focusing on any particular religion, like Christianity, to the exclusion of other religions?
01:57:07.000Or should we be more focused on white identity than anything?
01:57:11.000And he might as well have been looking at me while he said it.
01:57:14.000He might as well have been saying, like, Jared, should we be like Nick?
01:57:17.000Should we be like Nick and focus on Christianity?
01:59:38.000And it was on 4chan because somebody made a thread on 4chan about me on poll about how I'm a scumbag and America First isn't going anywhere and blah, blah, blah.
02:02:21.000So, whether it was Jaden, Jake, Patrick, Matt, I mean, Simon, any one of these guys had a story about here's why he's not really, you know, I don't really care for this guy.
02:02:34.000Just not, uh, the guy's just, uh, you know, he's got problems.
02:03:31.000I wouldn't put any personal information on there, but I don't think that's a bad idea.
02:03:36.000Massachusetts Sucks says, Hey, Nick, after the audio only AF collection is done, could we get the episodes on a DVD box set?
02:03:44.000Yeah, yeah, we're also going to come out with a slate of infomercials to sell it.
02:03:48.000The America First DVD box set, relive classic moments such as the Too Who. Selection stream and Nick Foyntz's rendition, the classic of Frank Sinatra's That's Life.
02:04:06.000All for the low price of three payments of $39.99.
02:05:18.000I'd watch O'Reilly and then Hannity and then whatever came on after that.
02:05:26.000And I would stay up all night to watch Red Eye with Greg Gutfeld.
02:05:30.000Before he did the Greg Gutfeld show, he did this Monday through Friday show.
02:05:34.000I think it was at 2 a.m. Called Red Eye with Andy Levy and Gavin McInnes was a frequent guest, and even Dave Smith was a guest, and Michael Malice was a guest.
02:05:51.000Lots of these people were guests on the show.
02:06:04.000It was one of the best things on TV, in my opinion.
02:06:06.000I loved Red Eye, I would watch it every night.
02:06:09.000And then after Red Eye was over, this infomercial would come on for the NutriBullet with David Wolfe.
02:06:15.000And it's like a 30 minute infomercial, and I would watch it every night.
02:06:19.000There was something that was like, kind of funny about it because they had this focus group, and the reactions they gave were so dramatic.
02:06:31.000And I had all the classic tropes of an infomercial.
02:06:35.000They would compare the NutriBullet with a blender.
02:06:38.000And there's a scene where he puts a bunch of fruit in a blender and he goes, This, ladies and gentlemen, is what we call a smoothie.
02:06:45.000And this is after he pours the blended smoothie into a cup through a strainer, and the strainer has all these chunks in it, all these particles.
02:06:54.000Then he puts all the ingredients in the Nutribullet, and he goes, This is a Nutriblast.
02:07:00.000And they come up with all this, like, this science.
02:07:04.000I don't know if it's true or not, but it says that the Nutribullet's pulverizing action breaks down the cell walls and unlocks all the nutrients in fruits and vegetables.
02:07:16.000And there's something about that infomercial and like the way that they talk and like the lingo and everything.
02:09:19.000Says, Nick, did you see the Vatican statement on civil unions?
02:09:22.000The official language in the catechism is intrinsically disordered.
02:09:26.000Well, that's always how it's been.0.94
02:09:28.000But yeah, I did see that, which is good because a lot of people look to the church and they say, oh, Pope Francis is totally okay with same sex marriage.
02:09:53.000Big Boy Allen says the Rolling Stones are the spokesman of Boomers, Kurt Cobain is the spokesman of Gen X. MGMT are the spokesman of Millennials, and Nick Fuentes is the spokesman of Zoomers.