America First - Nicholas J. Fuentes - February 03, 2020


folkloreAmericana - MIAMIuncensored (2020)


Episode Stats


Length

1 hour and 16 minutes

Words per minute

165.74593

Word count

12,721

Sentence count

989


Summary

Summaries generated with gmurro/bart-large-finetuned-filtered-spotify-podcast-summ .

Transcript

Transcripts from "America First - Nicholas J. Fuentes" are sourced from the Knowledge Fight Interactive Search Tool. Explore them interactively here.
00:00:02.000 Dive control
00:02:31.000 by Nick Fenton.
00:02:32.000 That was like two years ago.
00:02:34.000 And now he's turned into a really, really good friend.
00:02:36.000 And Jacob Woolwell, you know, we went to Minnesota, we wore some bulletproof vests, and now we got a couple of people after us that want to put us in jail.
00:02:42.000 So that's awesome.
00:02:43.000 I want to go ahead and introduce the first two ladies for our first two debates.
00:02:46.000 We're going to talk about family, freedom, and order.
00:02:50.000 We first have Kathy Zhu.
00:02:52.000 Woo!
00:02:53.000 Woo!
00:02:55.000 I was going to be all joking.
00:03:00.000 And we have representing the trads, Bernadine Barber.
00:03:03.000 Woo!
00:03:03.000 Woo!
00:03:11.000 So here's the format.
00:03:12.000 I actually asked the speakers if they wanted you guys to be silent, but they said no.
00:03:17.000 So you guys can hoop, you can holler, but be aware that that does cut into our time.
00:03:21.000 We definitely, definitely, definitely want you to know that the bar is going to stay open, so feel free to get up, grab as many drinks, get lit.
00:03:28.000 And again, freespeech.tv.
00:03:30.000 A huge shout out to Gavin and Joe Biggs for streaming us.
00:03:33.000 Give them a round of applause.
00:03:40.000 All right.
00:03:41.000 So, ladies, we're first going to introduce you guys.
00:03:43.000 So go ahead and.
00:03:44.000 In relation to the topic, go ahead and work your bio into this topic.
00:03:48.000 And let's start with Bernadine.
00:03:51.000 My name is Bernadine Barber.
00:03:53.000 My husband's Lawson Barber.
00:03:55.000 We are parents of three children.
00:03:59.000 We've been married for eight years.
00:04:01.000 We're Christians, traditionalists, conservatives, and we're not politically correct.
00:04:07.000 Woohoo!
00:04:09.000 And where can people find you online?
00:04:11.000 Instagram is my favorite.
00:04:12.000 So if you go to Instagram, you can find me, search my name, Bernadine Barber.
00:04:18.000 I'm also on YouTube, but I haven't been posting videos there recently, but I'm going to start doing so again.
00:04:24.000 So find me on YouTube as well.
00:04:26.000 Thank you.
00:04:27.000 Kathy, so you made national headlines a month ago or something like that, and then since then we've kind of watched you evolve or regress, depending on people's definition of conservatism here.
00:04:37.000 Do you want to go ahead and introduce yourself?
00:04:39.000 Yeah, so my name is Kathy Zhu.
00:04:41.000 You can find me on Twitter or Instagram at PoliticalKathy.
00:04:44.000 I'm 21 years old.
00:04:46.000 I go to the University of Michigan.
00:04:47.000 I'm a senior political science major.
00:04:50.000 I am pro LGBT.
00:04:52.000 I am pro personal rights, personal freedoms, personal liberty.
00:05:00.000 Round of applause for both of them, they're good sports, right?
00:05:09.000 So let's jump right into it.
00:05:17.000 What is your definition of conservatism?
00:05:20.000 And how does that apply to family and marriage?
00:05:22.000 Let's start with you, Kathy, and then Bernadine, if you wrap that one up.
00:05:26.000 Yeah, like I said, conservatism to me means just, I'm a pro constitutionalist, so I believe that, you know, as long as you align your values with the Constitution, you have, you know, for me, like LGBT, for example, you are allowed to get married to the person you love.
00:05:42.000 And that goes both ways straight, gay, lesbian, whatever.
00:05:47.000 As long as you follow, you know, everything else, yeah, conservatism.
00:06:00.000 Thank you very much.
00:06:15.000 I think what has happened, this is going to be my second point, spoiler.
00:06:20.000 Liberal democracy failed.
00:06:21.000 The constitutional republic failed.
00:06:23.000 And I think that the two kinds of, not culprits, but the two sides of these coins is it is corporate media.
00:06:36.000 I'm not actually sure that I want to live in a country where giant corporations get to tell us what to believe about our money and our politicians and our thoughts and our money.
00:06:48.000 And it's generally Marxism because Marxism slipped to the crack of democracy.
00:06:54.000 So, fuck democracy.
00:06:55.000 And believe that.
00:06:58.000 And then if we have pastors who can rile up militias, then this government will get back in order.
00:07:04.000 So, I actually think that church, you know, the media was supposed to be the fourth estate.
00:07:09.000 These founders were geniuses.
00:07:11.000 They said if we were moral people and educated people, we could keep this republic.
00:07:14.000 We are not moral, we are not educated, and we don't even have a fourth estate.
00:07:18.000 So, I think that I really do think there's going to have to be a revival.
00:07:21.000 It's going to get a little tense.
00:07:23.000 I don't think we're going to vulcanize by race.
00:07:25.000 I do think China is a problem, but I think we're going to fight this with pastors and priests, and that's where I'm aiming from.
00:07:32.000 And the last thing I want to say is I actually think people ask me, my viewers ask me, you know, Ali, is there a silver bullet?
00:07:38.000 I actually think there is.
00:07:40.000 Read Neil Postman's Amusing Ourselves to Death.
00:07:43.000 If you understand that the message is the medium, then the medium's a problem.
00:07:48.000 The internet's a problem.
00:07:49.000 TV's a problem.
00:07:50.000 These chirons and the psychological.
00:07:53.000 Hacking that they're doing of our biochemical reactions is a problem.
00:07:56.000 So the pace that they can keep us confused means we can never settle on it.
00:08:01.000 And so we have to abolish pace and acknowledge that we are limited humans and fucked up.
00:08:07.000 And as long as we live in this little techno-centric, whatever world, then we can't even get together to form a militia, to worship God, to hold our politicians accountable.
00:08:17.000 It's not the money, it's not a certain race in the media, it is just the pace.
00:08:37.000 Completely irrelevant because the word conservatism is not subjective, it's objective.
00:08:42.000 So, by definition, conservatism means to preserve traditionally held values.
00:08:47.000 So, what are traditionally held values?
00:08:51.000 So, why does something become a traditionally held value?
00:08:54.000 It's because it is a habit or a behavior or a lifestyle that has been proven to be beneficial.
00:09:01.000 Okay, it's been tried, it's been tested, and it has proven to be true.
00:09:05.000 So, you preserve something because it helps you.
00:09:09.000 Right?
00:09:10.000 You don't preserve something if it hurts you.
00:09:12.000 So, the whole point of traditionalism why does something get passed down generation after generation is because it is something that is helpful.
00:09:22.000 It is something that is beneficial to individuals, to family units, and to society at large.
00:09:30.000 That's what conservatism is.
00:09:32.000 Yeah, for me, it's just like how is it helpful that you don't allow someone to love someone else and get married to them?
00:09:42.000 Like why do they have to be not a part of society because they love someone that you don't agree with?
00:09:49.000 So you're referring to the LGBT propaganda.
00:09:53.000 So I would say that I have to say this because we live in a very sensitive society.
00:10:01.000 I don't hate gay people.
00:10:04.000 Gay people know me, they've interacted with me.
00:10:08.000 I don't call them names, I don't threaten to harm them.
00:10:11.000 I mean really?
00:10:13.000 Oh, but they know me and they know that I am firm on my stance that I don't condone homosexuality.
00:10:23.000 Okay, so your question is why?
00:10:26.000 Why do I not condone it?
00:10:27.000 On marriage specifically, so like that's your faith, how does that interact with how you deal with politics?
00:10:34.000 Well, I'm speaking as a conservative.
00:10:38.000 If you're a liberal or a libertarian, you are free to say what you believe and to say, this is what I believe, this is my stance on that.
00:10:46.000 That's fine, nobody's telling you to shut up.
00:10:48.000 But if you claim to be a conservative, you should align with conservative values.
00:10:54.000 And the conservative value is to preserve the family unit.
00:10:59.000 And if you are condoning LGBT, if your goal is to expand this propaganda to where most of society is, homosexual, for example, then what exactly are you preserving?
00:11:13.000 Because homosexuals cannot biologically have children.
00:11:17.000 This is just one aspect of it.
00:11:19.000 If they cannot have children, What are they preserving anything for?
00:11:24.000 Okay, so is your stance for marriage?
00:11:28.000 I mean, are they preserving it for the cats and dogs?
00:11:31.000 Is your stance for marriage between a male and a female only because they could reproduce?
00:11:35.000 Is that what you're saying?
00:11:37.000 No, that's one part of it.
00:11:38.000 Okay, so what if a woman cannot reproduce because she just can't?
00:11:42.000 That is something she cannot choose.
00:11:44.000 So, okay then.
00:11:46.000 So, gay people, you don't choose who you marry, and if you choose someone who can't procreate with you, that was your choice.
00:11:51.000 You can't choose to be infertile.
00:11:54.000 Okay, for example, so I'm sure by your values, conservative values, you're pro life, correct?
00:12:00.000 Absolutely.
00:12:01.000 So am I. I'm pro life.
00:12:02.000 But we say pro life, and yet we don't allow gay couples to get married and then adopt children.
00:12:09.000 Why would you be pro life?
00:12:11.000 Hey, you're not the baby.
00:12:12.000 Shut up.
00:12:14.000 Why would you be pro life yet not allow gay couples to adopt kids?
00:12:21.000 My question first is are you really pro life?
00:12:25.000 Because I have seen your tweets and everyone has seen your tweets, and he says, You say you don't have to be pro life to be a conservative, right?
00:12:31.000 Yeah, I'm pro life, but you don't have to be pro life so you can serve me.
00:12:35.000 If you support pro choice, correct?
00:12:39.000 I support, for me personally, I will never.
00:12:41.000 Yeah, so if you support pro choice, who are you to ask me?
00:12:44.000 Come on, let her give a full answer on it.
00:12:47.000 Okay, yeah, so I am pro life personally for myself, but I do not think that the government will ever come to the point where they will ban or make abortion illegal.
00:12:59.000 That's just never going to happen.
00:13:00.000 Okay, but rhetorically, who are you to ask me if I'm for or against?
00:13:05.000 Homosexuals adopting when you are for massacring unborn babies.
00:13:09.000 You have no right ground on this issue.
00:13:11.000 You cannot tell me by the title you're against adoption when you're for abortion.
00:13:17.000 But I'm not.
00:13:18.000 Did I not just say pro life?
00:13:19.000 Oh, do I have to share the tweet?
00:13:21.000 What's the tweet?
00:13:22.000 Did I just say that you could be pro life and be conservative?
00:13:25.000 So I think what she's saying.
00:13:26.000 So I think what's happening is, I think she's saying, Kathy is trying to say that I am personally pro life.
00:13:33.000 I believe conservatism is pro life.
00:13:35.000 But if you happen to be pro choice and conservatism, Still be a conservative, even though you don't check those boxes, and you think that that's just incompatible with conservatism as a whole.
00:13:43.000 The pro choice, pro life thing?
00:13:46.000 Yeah, because literally, if you're pro life, you are literally preserving a human life.
00:13:53.000 If you cannot preserve an innocent, unborn human life, then you are not a conservative by definition.
00:14:00.000 If you're not conserving life, what else are you conserving?
00:14:02.000 You can't even serve that person's life, you can't serve anything else in that person's life.
00:14:06.000 If you align with every conservative belief, except you're pro choice, are you not a conservative?
00:14:12.000 By definition.
00:14:13.000 So why don't we do this?
00:14:14.000 I got a question for both of you.
00:14:15.000 I got a question for you.
00:14:17.000 Why don't you each define what you think is a requirement to be a conservative?
00:14:22.000 Kathy?
00:14:23.000 No, you go first because you have this list of requirements and guidelines.
00:14:25.000 I said, Kathy, what is your guideline?
00:14:28.000 I don't have specific guidelines or rules.
00:14:30.000 You don't have to give an attitude right now.
00:14:32.000 I'm being partial with you.
00:14:34.000 No, I like it.
00:14:35.000 Kathy, just give us your litmus test of what you think it takes to be, you know.
00:14:38.000 Yeah.
00:14:39.000 Like I said before.
00:14:41.000 Pro constitutionalist, okay?
00:14:42.000 You have to be aligned with the Constitution.
00:14:44.000 You have to believe in personal freedoms, personal liberty.
00:14:47.000 Very, you have to conserve what America was founded on.
00:14:50.000 And that's what I believe it is.
00:14:51.000 Liberty, pursuit of happiness.
00:14:54.000 So you're placing a bookmark at America's founding in Bernardine.
00:14:56.000 I have a feeling that you're going to give us a different answer.
00:14:59.000 How would you define the litmus test as conservative or not?
00:15:04.000 So basically, you're a libertarian, though, by definition.
00:15:07.000 So are you going to answer the question then?
00:15:10.000 What's your litmus test?
00:15:10.000 What is your guideline to be conservative?
00:15:13.000 To conserve life.
00:15:15.000 Okay, so talk more.
00:15:16.000 You're just saying that.
00:15:17.000 I'm a person of happiness.
00:15:19.000 I'm a person of happiness if you're not alive.
00:15:21.000 It sounds like you both agree then.
00:15:23.000 So, America's founding, so not Edmund Burke or English common law or anything like that.
00:15:29.000 None of that has anything to do with conservatism.
00:15:31.000 You both actually agree?
00:15:32.000 My whole thing about how you're not calling me a conservative only because I believe that people, like the government will never ban abortion, that doesn't prove anything.
00:15:43.000 My point is that just because we're going to call it an abortion, it's just never going to happen.
00:15:47.000 Why not?
00:15:48.000 It just never is.
00:15:49.000 Are you God or Papa?
00:15:52.000 Why do you have this attitude like before?
00:15:55.000 Why do you have this attitude now?
00:15:56.000 I love it.
00:15:56.000 Is everybody having a good time?
00:16:03.000 We know that Nick and Jacob is going to be a love fest.
00:16:07.000 Woo!
00:16:19.000 I'm Sensor with Demand Free Speech.
00:16:21.000 My name is Adriana.
00:16:23.000 I put this event on and I also want to say my wonderful team did as well.
00:16:31.000 I don't know if I would be standing here if they didn't help.
00:16:36.000 But we're here and guess what?
00:16:39.000 We came and we found a venue even though we got kicked after like five different places.
00:16:46.000 We even got kicked through a venue this morning but we're here and I'm just super excited to see these debates, to see these panels and I just want to hear all these crazy opinions because I love free speech.
00:17:10.000 Woo!
00:17:10.000 I don't care!
00:17:11.000 This is kind of interesting.
00:17:13.000 We're actually going to be debating Trump's foreign policy.
00:17:17.000 So that means China.
00:17:18.000 That means Saudi Arabia.
00:17:19.000 And I have a feeling, you know, that means Israel.
00:17:21.000 Woo Jacob to this more interventionalist wing of the thought spectrum, and you got Nick.
00:17:21.000 Woo!
00:17:21.000 Woo!
00:17:27.000 He's a paleocon and wants to pull out of everything.
00:17:30.000 We're going to run a clean debate, so Jacob will let Nick quit.
00:17:45.000 And of course, many of you know I'm a lot more interventionist when it comes to foreign policy because I think that there's nothing more America first than imposing our will on other countries.
00:17:55.000 You look around the world, and you know, people that are more on the non interventionist side, they might say, oh, stay out of Greenland, don't buy Greenland.
00:18:03.000 I say that Denmark is a baby country, as Nick would call it, and we should impose ourselves on the world and really push the idea that we're the best, if we are the best country on earth, we should show that.
00:18:15.000 And where do people find you online?
00:18:17.000 Instagram at JacobA.Wold is the best place to find me, jacobwoold.org.
00:18:22.000 And we got Nick the Knight Quintus.
00:18:24.000 Yes.
00:18:25.000 Whoa.
00:18:26.000 Is this loud enough here?
00:18:28.000 Woo!
00:18:28.000 I think they said it, okay.
00:18:30.000 Well, yeah, I'm Nicholas J. Quintus, of course.
00:18:33.000 I host America First.
00:18:35.000 And that basically sums up my position on foreign policy.
00:18:47.000 America First.
00:18:49.000 Woo!
00:18:50.000 Wo If you watch my show, a lot of people don't really care for my foreign policy taste.
00:18:56.000 I'll take heat from both sides.
00:18:58.000 I'll take heat from these MAGA brain people who say, you know, Iran is the number one state sponsor of terrorism.
00:19:05.000 We have to go in.
00:19:06.000 And I'll hear from isolationists, and they say, Nick Pointers is getting money from Israel.
00:19:11.000 He's in danger of war in Iran.
00:19:13.000 I can never please anybody.
00:19:15.000 But here's the thing I'm not ideologically opposed to intervention.
00:19:20.000 I'm not ideologically in favor of any position other than that which puts American people.
00:19:25.000 And their interests first.
00:19:26.000 And I think that anything under that umbrella is acceptable.
00:19:31.000 And that is a good summary of my views.
00:19:35.000 I have to also just interject.
00:19:37.000 I know this is not exactly an optical outfit.
00:19:39.000 I don't look like a top owner over here.
00:19:42.000 I was going to wear a suit.
00:19:44.000 I brought a suit, but we had some complications, so I just want to get that out there.
00:19:49.000 Jacob Owl's winning in the optics department.
00:19:52.000 America first was the position.
00:19:55.000 The complicated business, as you said.
00:19:56.000 That's right, right?
00:19:57.000 All right, so let's just jump right into it.
00:19:59.000 Give Trump a grade from A to F, a letter grade on foreign policy and why.
00:20:04.000 And let's start with you, Jacob.
00:20:06.000 Well, when I look at Trump's foreign policy, if I'm as candid as I'd like to be, I'd say it's a mixed bag.
00:20:12.000 And that's just grading him against his own promises.
00:20:14.000 You know, he said we pull out of Afghanistan.
00:20:16.000 Well, here we are.
00:20:17.000 It's not two months into his presidency, it's three years.
00:20:20.000 And there are more, not fewer troops in Afghanistan 14,000 the last time I checked.
00:20:25.000 When you look at Iran, it's not clear what the position is on Iran.
00:20:29.000 One day we'll say that we don't want regime change, and meanwhile, Bolton and Giuliani are running around in Albania, you know, calling for Tehran to be crushed and the White House to be erected in the town square.
00:20:42.000 So I would give the Trump administration overall, they've done a lot of good things.
00:20:46.000 They've taken on China, they have just imposed crushing pain on the Chinese.
00:20:51.000 That is wonderful.
00:20:53.000 So there's been a lot of good things.
00:20:54.000 We've worked with Latin America to stop third world peasants from crashing over our border.
00:21:00.000 I think we can all love that.
00:21:01.000 So overall, I give them a B.
00:21:04.000 I give the Trump administration, I give Trump a B. On foreign policy.
00:21:07.000 So you give the president a B.
00:21:09.000 And what about you, Nick?
00:21:11.000 Yeah, well, it's a complicated picture.
00:21:12.000 Because, of course, as Jacob indicated, I think thoughtfully, there are a lot of different areas of foreign policy.
00:21:18.000 You know, there are a lot of problems that he inherited coming into this administration.
00:21:24.000 You know, if you look at Europe, we had NATO countries that weren't paying their fair share.
00:21:27.000 We had a situation with Russia.
00:21:29.000 I don't know if you paid attention, but a couple of months prior to the 2016 election, there was a very serious allegation that Russia was launching cyber attacks on the United States.
00:21:39.000 And there was the big concern, I think it was in October 2016, that we were going to retaliate militarily against Russia.
00:21:44.000 So you've got this situation.
00:21:46.000 You've got the Middle East, of course, the Persian Gulf, the civil war in Syria, regime change pending in Iran.
00:21:52.000 You have North Korea.
00:21:53.000 You have, of course, the border crisis.
00:21:55.000 And so I think taking a comprehensive look requires a comprehensive perspective.
00:21:59.000 And what I mean by that is has the Trump administration, paradigmatically, in terms of the paradigm, changed the way that we look at foreign policy?
00:22:08.000 And I don't think that's true.
00:22:09.000 While things have been getting marginally better in some areas, You know, are we as hawkish with Russia as we would have been in the Clinton administration?
00:22:17.000 Probably not.
00:22:18.000 And that's an improvement.
00:22:19.000 Are we marginally better on border security, maybe, than Barack Obama?
00:22:22.000 Certainly a lot of the numbers don't reflect that, but some of the recent treaties this month and last month show that we're moving in the right direction.
00:22:30.000 But I look at our posture against Iran.
00:22:32.000 I look at our posture against North Korea.
00:22:34.000 I look at our posture against Russia.
00:22:36.000 And I say that in 2020, if a Democrat gets in office, or if in 2024 a Democrat gets in office, the foreign policy will revert back and it will be exactly the same.
00:22:45.000 And so for me, I have to say that things are better, and they're better than the alternative, but things are not paradigmatically different.
00:22:51.000 Are we really America first?
00:22:53.000 Is it truly a nationalistic posture that is focused primarily inwardly towards our own people as opposed to outwardly towards, you know, people in Iran who are fighting for freedom or Israeli money or things like this?
00:23:06.000 I would say have to give them a C for that.
00:23:08.000 I think it's just about out.
00:23:11.000 I did a video where I read children's books that are leftist children's books.
00:23:16.000 Yeah, it's, uh, One of the most disgusting things you've ever seen in your life.
00:23:20.000 Feminist Baby was one of the books, and the other one was A is for activists, and T was for trans, and Z was for Zapatista, which is like basically a terrorist group in Mexico, something along those lines.
00:23:36.000 It's like telling children that this is what they should be looking to.
00:23:40.000 It's disgusting.
00:23:41.000 So it's the biggest change in culture?
00:23:43.000 Yeah, like the biggest change.
00:23:46.000 I would say, I mean, the most obvious change to me is the demographic change.
00:23:50.000 I think that's what I said.
00:23:52.000 And so, you know, the country went from 90% white in the middle of the 1960s to today, I think it's just under 60.
00:24:02.000 I think it's 59%.
00:24:04.000 And the question that we have to ask ourselves is a question that Sam Francis posed at, I think, the premier American Renaissance conference 25, 30 years ago, which is can a country that is no longer occupied by European people perpetuate Western civilization?
00:24:22.000 And people that are not European perpetuate Western civilization or Western culture?
00:24:27.000 I think we're finding out the answer is clearly no.
00:24:30.000 I think we've seen that the demographic, and this guy's shaking his head, he doesn't care for this.
00:24:34.000 But I'll give you a little brief example just related to this.
00:24:37.000 I took a lift here with my friend Zoomer Clips.
00:24:41.000 I don't know if you can hear.
00:24:49.000 And we had to literally pull over because our Uber driver didn't speak any English.
00:24:54.000 He's in America!
00:24:54.000 English!
00:24:56.000 Speak fucking English!
00:25:00.000 In the same way, if you're a conservative, what are your guidelines for conservatism?
00:25:11.000 Tell me right now, one for a time.
00:25:13.000 My guidelines?
00:25:14.000 Yes, like what do you think?
00:25:16.000 She said life, liberty, and freedom.
00:25:18.000 Pro life?
00:25:18.000 You say you have, like for example, if you love everything, you're just pro choice, you can be conservative.
00:25:24.000 That's it?
00:25:25.000 Yes.
00:25:26.000 Well, they're liking both of them.
00:25:27.000 I don't care about votes.
00:25:28.000 Okay.
00:25:28.000 You're afraid of that.
00:25:32.000 God is going to vote.
00:25:33.000 Do you know what?
00:25:34.000 Let the Lord come at us.
00:25:35.000 For all the people like that.
00:25:36.000 Okay, ladies.
00:25:37.000 So, I want to ask just two questions.
00:25:40.000 How did each of you guys come to conservatism?
00:25:43.000 And then, who is the standard bearer or the original thought leader that you match your values against to say that this is conservative or not?
00:25:50.000 And which one do you want to start?
00:25:53.000 Constitution.
00:25:54.000 How did you become a conservative?
00:25:58.000 I looked at Democrats and I looked at liberalism and I said, no, thanks.
00:26:02.000 Hell yeah!
00:26:03.000 When she looked at feminist before, right?
00:26:06.000 Yep.
00:26:06.000 Okay, so when did you become a conservative?
00:26:09.000 I've always been a conservative.
00:26:11.000 I've grown up in a religious background.
00:26:14.000 I was a feminist in part.
00:26:17.000 I was never a pink hat wearing, women's religion, whatever.
00:26:23.000 Now I've got to inject myself.
00:26:25.000 I'd love to get into that.
00:26:26.000 It kind of sounds like Kathy is saying you can be pro choice or pro life and be conservative, and you're saying, well, I was conservative the whole time, even though I was a feminist.
00:26:35.000 Right, because feminism has been.
00:26:40.000 Careful.
00:26:41.000 Feminism is in every part of our society.
00:26:44.000 If you don't see that, equal rights.
00:26:45.000 Not feminism.
00:26:46.000 Equal rights.
00:26:48.000 So basically, feminism, the propaganda is your purpose in life.
00:26:56.000 Okay, listen, if you're a woman, your purpose in life is to get a career, your purpose in life is to change the world out there.
00:27:05.000 Don't have children.
00:27:06.000 Don't get married.
00:27:08.000 That's going to change.
00:27:09.000 That's a ball and chain.
00:27:11.000 They're going to hold you down.
00:27:12.000 They're going to mess up your life.
00:27:14.000 You're not going to get to live your potential and you're going to waste your life.
00:27:19.000 I believe that.
00:27:20.000 I believe that lie as a Christian.
00:27:24.000 I believe that lie as a conservative.
00:27:27.000 I believe that lie as a wife and as a mother.
00:27:31.000 You don't have to be a political, democrat, liberal, whatever, to have feminism influence your mind and your life.
00:27:31.000 Okay?
00:27:39.000 So I was liberated from feminism about two years ago.
00:27:44.000 All right?
00:27:44.000 And I know now that my priority is my family.
00:27:48.000 And that's why I stand for traditional values because family is everything.
00:27:51.000 If you don't have a strong family, if your society is not built with strong family, your society will not thrive and it will not continue.
00:28:02.000 And that's why I proudly put it on my bio on Instagram that I'm an ex feminist saved by biblical womanhood.
00:28:08.000 All right?
00:28:09.000 Make your bio.
00:28:10.000 My priorities have been set straight.
00:28:10.000 Make your bio.
00:28:13.000 I'm no longer pining over a career or something I can do out there, and my kids are holding me back because I've To change diapers and all this stuff.
00:28:21.000 I love my kids and I don't care if I ever go on stage ever again.
00:28:25.000 My kids are my first priority.
00:28:27.000 My highest being is my first priority.
00:28:30.000 Round of applause for reproducing.
00:28:37.000 Hey, you're passionate about this.
00:28:40.000 Go ahead.
00:28:41.000 Hey, come back.
00:28:42.000 So, who is the standard bearer of conservatism and how did you become a conservative?
00:28:46.000 I want to answer her aspects first, right?
00:28:49.000 She said, your whole purpose as a woman is to reproduce.
00:28:53.000 I said that?
00:28:54.000 You said it isn't.
00:28:55.000 Did I say that?
00:28:56.000 Right?
00:28:57.000 Quote me.
00:28:57.000 When did I say that?
00:28:58.000 What time was it when I said that?
00:28:59.000 So, do you not agree with that?
00:29:00.000 Do you not agree with that?
00:29:01.000 But do you agree with that?
00:29:02.000 The whole purpose is to have children.
00:29:05.000 Do you agree with that?
00:29:08.000 No, I don't do.
00:29:09.000 You just said that women should.
00:29:11.000 Alright, so we're going to face the audience again and we're going to answer the question Who is the standard bearer for conservatism and when did you become a conservative?
00:29:18.000 It's just like when you made that post that.
00:29:19.000 Oh, come on.
00:29:20.000 Can I talk?
00:29:21.000 Brittany, you're filibustering at this point.
00:29:23.000 Can I talk?
00:29:23.000 Wait, wait, wait.
00:29:25.000 Can I talk?
00:29:26.000 Can I talk?
00:29:27.000 Please talk.
00:29:27.000 She's still talking.
00:29:28.000 Thank you.
00:29:29.000 Okay, so what I was saying.
00:29:31.000 Yeah, so I was a junior in high school when I became a conservative.
00:29:31.000 I'll cut us short.
00:29:36.000 I was in a liberal arts school for high school.
00:29:38.000 I played four instruments.
00:29:40.000 I'm very in tune with arts and stuff like that.
00:29:43.000 So I saw in my school a lot of feminists and a lot of LGBT people.
00:29:50.000 And at first, I was like, yeah, sure, I love Obama.
00:29:54.000 That's what my friends say.
00:29:55.000 Obama, join the bandwagon.
00:29:57.000 Let's be Obama lovers.
00:29:58.000 I did that without doing my research.
00:30:01.000 After about a year, I started doing my own research and found out that my leanings are actually conservative and not liberal.
00:30:09.000 But right now I'm really confused because apparently I'm not a conservative.
00:30:11.000 So what am I?
00:30:20.000 Has there been anyone in the administration that has surprised you from a report of what their position you thought may have been and what it actually is?
00:30:29.000 Or, you know, who's good and who's bad within this administration?
00:30:32.000 Let's start with you, Nick.
00:30:34.000 Sure.
00:30:34.000 So, of course, you know, obviously the most high profile mistake that Trump made in selecting personnel was probably John Bolton.
00:30:41.000 And I understand why he did that.
00:30:43.000 I think I explained this on America First, when it happened, April 2018.
00:30:48.000 The context of this was the North Korea negotiations.
00:30:51.000 And I think that played a very critical role.
00:30:52.000 You've seen my takes on this before.
00:30:54.000 But that said, we knew from the beginning that John Bolton is a hawk that loves war and wants to bomb other countries.
00:31:00.000 And that is diametrically opposed to America First.
00:31:04.000 And so I think he's obviously the worst one in the whole administration.
00:31:06.000 I'll say, well, he just left, obviously.
00:31:09.000 His replacement is a little bit better.
00:31:11.000 But I'll say that probably the best person, unfortunately, would be somebody like Nick Mulvaney.
00:31:14.000 This is a conversation I have with a lot of people in Washington, D.C.
00:31:18.000 That Mick Mulvaney is a Koch brother sellout.
00:31:20.000 He's terrible on border security and everything.
00:31:23.000 And so somebody like that, who's a libertarian on foreign policy issues, could have been a great national security advisor.
00:31:29.000 He is opposed to intervention.
00:31:31.000 Somebody like him would be cheering on engagement with North Korea, engagement with Iran, things like this.
00:31:37.000 But instead, he's stuck at the chief of staff where he's pulling in people that are opposed to the president on immigration.
00:31:42.000 So the whole thing, all right, we can relax over there.
00:31:45.000 I'm sorry.
00:31:46.000 Full impulse control.
00:31:57.000 So, anyway, I know I'm rambling a little bit.
00:32:00.000 So John Bolton, worst, but he just left.
00:32:01.000 Well, maybe surprisingly, I think it would have been good, but he's not in a foreign policy position.
00:32:07.000 Rex Tillerson, Pompeo.
00:32:08.000 Oh, yeah, Tillerson was based.
00:32:10.000 Tillerson, obviously, is BNR.
00:32:11.000 He came out against Israel recently.
00:32:13.000 Yay!
00:32:13.000 Yay!
00:32:15.000 That's all we can do.
00:32:18.000 But, yeah, he was all right, but he's gone now.
00:32:21.000 And Pompeo?
00:32:22.000 And Pompeo is, you know, he's one of these people.
00:32:25.000 He gave a speech recently, or I think it was actually prior to him getting to have to be Secretary of State, he has these evangelical, apocalyptic beliefs about this confrontation between Israel and Iran.
00:32:37.000 It's very disturbing stuff.
00:32:38.000 A lot of these evangelical types.
00:32:40.000 Not anything wrong with evangelicals, but they do have these views about Zionism and the biblical interpretation of the showdown, so that's a little tough.
00:32:48.000 So, Jacob, personnel as policy is an axiom that we've used in politics for, you know, been part of probably 100 years in America.
00:32:56.000 What do you think about some of the names that get thrown out there?
00:32:58.000 Are any of them missing?
00:33:00.000 Well, I would first say Nick brings up this point that if a Democrat gets into office, maybe not next term, I think probably not next term, but maybe the term after that or whenever they come in, there's this issue of reversion.
00:33:11.000 And we keep seeing this, where everything in Washington just sort of reverts to the mean and gets back to the status quo.
00:33:18.000 And so there is this issue of putting points on the board.
00:33:23.000 Now, if you take a standoffish approach with Iran, you're not going to put any points on the board.
00:33:28.000 You're going to get back into the Iran deal.
00:33:30.000 In a couple of years, whenever that happens, and you're going to be back to Obama foreign policy.
00:33:35.000 So I think what Trump understands is you have to do hard things.
00:33:38.000 You have to build a wall that's actually there, it's physical.
00:33:40.000 Build a wall!
00:33:41.000 You have to crush Iran in a material way.
00:33:43.000 You can't just put pressure and maximum pressure, but next week something else is maximum pressure.
00:33:48.000 And so when you look at the administration and the staffing, the worst person by far was Jim Mattis.
00:33:55.000 And, you know, there was a lot of rhetoric when Mattis came in Mad Dog Mattis, he's a real bulldog.
00:34:00.000 He's real tough.
00:34:02.000 Mattis.
00:34:03.000 Is a supporter of the Iran deal.
00:34:05.000 Mattis is cucked by Iran.
00:34:07.000 What Mattis wanted to do was be in the administration for a couple of months, get a book deal, and go work in a think tank for a million dollars a year and a no show job.
00:34:16.000 So Mattis was a complete disaster, and I hope that he never crosses into official Washington again.
00:34:23.000 And when we look at the best fix, the most surprisingly positive fix, Bolton was seditious and he caused problems.
00:34:35.000 In terms of staffing, I think everyone understands that now in terms of setting things up.
00:34:39.000 And real disaster.
00:34:41.000 I mean, Bolton, you know, trying to set up the president, leaking, that stuff's not acceptable.
00:34:46.000 He served his purpose and now he's gone.
00:34:48.000 The best person overall would probably be Pompeo.
00:34:52.000 I've got to tell you, Pompeo is the sort of prototypical spook du jour of Washington.
00:34:59.000 He's CIA through and through, but he's carried out the president's agenda.
00:35:03.000 He hasn't been seditious like Bolton, he hasn't sabotaged things.
00:35:07.000 When the president tells, Pompeo to do something, he does it.
00:35:11.000 And so I'd say he was on the positive side.
00:35:14.000 One of my favorites.
00:35:16.000 Two names that went missed by both of you.
00:35:20.000 Javanka.
00:35:21.000 Disaster.
00:35:22.000 Yeah, terrible.
00:35:27.000 So China.
00:35:28.000 I want to get away from Trump for a second and then I want to bring it back to Trump.
00:35:32.000 So maybe I just got to couple it into two questions.
00:35:34.000 How big of a threat is China to America?
00:35:40.000 And is Trump handling that situation?
00:35:43.000 You refer to it.
00:35:43.000 How?
00:35:46.000 So I wish you'd be more aggressive as it relates to trade.
00:35:49.000 On the military side, you've got a big problem because, at the rate that China is going versus the rate that we're going, China is set to be the biggest military on earth.
00:35:58.000 They're going to be bigger than us if things continue the way they are.
00:36:01.000 And we spend more money.
00:36:02.000 The reason that is is because we have private defense contractors and China has state owned industry.
00:36:07.000 Also, China doesn't waste time with studies on how to integrate transgenders into combat units.
00:36:16.000 So they get rid of a lot of these sort of trivial side projects.
00:36:20.000 On China, If Trump were to take his foot off of the gas and drop a brick on it instead, I think we'd be better off.
00:36:33.000 Thank you.
00:36:34.000 You kind of just know how well behaved the audience is.
00:36:35.000 Round of applause for yourselves.
00:36:36.000 Round of applause for the unwashed masses.
00:36:42.000 Go watch for yourselves.
00:36:44.000 So, you know, I hear everybody talking about China.
00:36:47.000 And, you know, my brief stint when I was in college for one year, I studied international relations, and you read a lot of John Mearsheimer.
00:36:56.000 Okay, I was in college for one year.
00:36:58.000 That's a big deal.
00:37:01.000 Well, they always talked about China.
00:37:02.000 China is the big threat.
00:37:03.000 China is going to destroy us.
00:37:05.000 We have to be worried about China.
00:37:06.000 China does not keep me up at night, multiracialism keeps me up at night.
00:37:11.000 I think the greatest.
00:37:20.000 Look, our problems clearly, the most existential threat to our country is internal.
00:37:26.000 And I think that America can be any enemy.
00:37:28.000 We look at the greatness of America in all these wars, whatever, you know, regardless of whether or not we agree with how we got into these wars or to what end they were directed, you know, there's certain documentaries you can watch about what really happened.
00:37:42.000 I don't know.
00:37:43.000 Maybe it's a little long.
00:37:44.000 Maybe it'll, you know, stretch the patience.
00:37:46.000 But the will of the American people, the greatness of our people is unmatched.
00:37:51.000 And so I don't fear China.
00:37:53.000 People fear Japan in the 1990s.
00:37:55.000 What I fear is that we are weak at home.
00:37:56.000 And so I will say, you know, to redirect back towards the actual question with China, the threat of China is very much overrated.
00:38:03.000 Everybody talked about for a long time how China's going to overtake us and China owns us and China owns all our debt and something like this.
00:38:11.000 But you look at the structure of the Chinese economy, they have a 200% debt to GDP ratio.
00:38:16.000 Nobody talks about that.
00:38:17.000 People talk about how their GDP is growing at 10, 15%, whatever.
00:38:21.000 Their GDP growth is down to like 6.3%.
00:38:23.000 This year and revising it down every year.
00:38:25.000 These numbers are already inflated.
00:38:27.000 They fudge all their numbers GDP, debt, everything.
00:38:30.000 You know, we look at our, or rather their national debt as a percentage of GDP.
00:38:35.000 That doesn't even factor in shadow banking.
00:38:37.000 It doesn't factor in the fact that, again, they're fudging all the numbers.
00:38:40.000 So to me, the threat of China's economic might is overblown.
00:38:43.000 The threat of their military is overblown.
00:38:46.000 And also, I think that our interests are not even so much over in China.
00:38:49.000 Let China have a reasonable sphere of influence.
00:38:51.000 They got a billion people.
00:38:52.000 To me, my concern is much more at home.
00:38:54.000 I'm much more concerned about.
00:38:56.000 Fertility rates, I'm much more concerned about marriages, drug abuse, things like this.
00:39:00.000 If you fix that, you don't have to worry about it.
00:39:09.000 So, Jacob, what is one country that Trump is going too easy on and one that he should crack down on?
00:39:19.000 Hey!
00:39:22.000 All that!
00:39:23.000 If we're going to be honest about what country he's going too easy on, the obvious answer is Mexico.
00:39:30.000 I mean, Mexico's problems have been our problems for the better part of the last century.
00:39:38.000 And we continue to pretend that Mexico's our ally.
00:39:41.000 Drug cartels, they're not coming from Greenwich, Connecticut.
00:39:46.000 They're coming from Mexico City.
00:39:48.000 And that is where really the problems, much of the problems that this country is facing, are emanating from.
00:39:53.000 And so I would take a much more aggressive stance on Mexico if I were Trump.
00:39:58.000 I know that the Chamber of Commerce doesn't like it.
00:40:00.000 I know that GM wants to ship all the factories and stop paying people $63 an hour and start paying them paint and move them to Mexico.
00:40:07.000 But man, just really a country that is going.
00:40:12.000 Far too easy on.
00:40:13.000 When you talk about a country that Trump is going too hard on, geez, it's a tough question because for so long America has just been really quite submissive to the rest of the world, to the rest of the world's interests.
00:40:30.000 So a country that we're going too easy on, that's a tough question.
00:40:34.000 I'd go a lot harder on it.
00:40:36.000 I'm going to go back down to this.
00:40:38.000 No, exactly.
00:40:39.000 If I were Trump, I'd make a concerted effort.
00:40:44.000 Jacob, let's be honest.
00:40:45.000 Your Instagram says, That if Trump declares war with Iran, you're enlisting.
00:40:50.000 So, when did you crack down on Iran?
00:40:52.000 No, I mean, we're going hard on Iran.
00:40:55.000 We're talking about who he's going to be accommodated to.
00:40:59.000 He's being accommodated to Mexico.
00:41:01.000 There's no question.
00:41:02.000 He's not being accommodated to Iran.
00:41:04.000 I don't think anybody would argue that.
00:41:06.000 So, you know, he's going.
00:41:08.000 If I were Trump, I'd make a concerted effort through the media to just tell him to leave Saudi Arabia alone.
00:41:13.000 Really.
00:41:14.000 I think that this, you know, Khashoggi, who cares?
00:41:16.000 I don't care about Khashoggi.
00:41:17.000 He's a Saudi citizen.
00:41:19.000 And we keep having to hear about how we can't trust the Saudis, how the Saudis are the bad guys.
00:41:23.000 And certainly the Saudis are rough characters.
00:41:27.000 But there are rough characters in that part of the world.
00:41:33.000 And I think we should continue to use them as a tool to exercise our will in the Middle East.
00:41:39.000 So, Nick, it might actually, in hearing it now out loud, it might be the same scripture, but it might not.
00:41:44.000 So, who is Trump going too easy on, and who does he need to crack down on?
00:41:49.000 Ah, yeah, so.
00:41:51.000 Behave yourselves.
00:41:55.000 I think maybe people have a sneaking suspicion about this.
00:42:00.000 Maybe I'm going to play into that for a fact.
00:42:02.000 Maybe it's not even totally correct.
00:42:04.000 Well, here's what I'll say about Mexico.
00:42:07.000 In June, the president threatened to put a 5% or a 10% tariff on all goods coming from Mexico to the United States.
00:42:14.000 Now, it never went into place, but they were able to write up an agreement, and the Mexican foreign minister came to the United States, I think in September, and said that illegal crossings were down 56%.
00:42:23.000 And said that if you looked at the apprehensions at the border, that was down 20%.
00:42:27.000 You know, it was 120,000 in the month of May, it was 100,000 in June, it was 70 some thousand in July.
00:42:36.000 I don't know the exact figures, but it's been going down.
00:42:39.000 Now, what's the country that Donald Trump has not been going hard on at all?
00:42:42.000 What's the country that Donald Trump, if anything, has been bending over backwards to please and to satisfy a country that, by the way, is not exactly helping us?
00:42:51.000 I think we all know the answer.
00:42:53.000 I think we all know which country. is driving our foreign policy in the wrong direction.
00:43:11.000 I'm going to tell you why.
00:43:13.000 I'm going to tell you why.
00:43:14.000 Here's why.
00:43:15.000 You look at what Israel's been doing.
00:43:17.000 It's not just the foreign aid.
00:43:19.000 You look at what happened just last week.
00:43:20.000 And there was a spy caught red-handed putting these cellular devices near the White House and in the Capitol that intelligence officials attributed to the Israeli government.
00:43:30.000 Now, did we go to Trump on Twitter and say, very disrespectful, we give everything to these people, and this is how they treat us?
00:43:38.000 Was there a private admonition?
00:43:40.000 Or did it come out that he quietly swept it under the rug and said, oh, it wasn't them, I'm sure it wasn't them, it's okay?
00:43:45.000 You know, I remember the first, one of the first press conferences that Trump did after he got inaugurated was with the Prime Minister of Israel, Benjamin Netanyahu.
00:43:54.000 And Trump said at the conference, you know, hey, if you could take it easy on the settlements, that would be great.
00:43:58.000 Because it's been the official position of the United States government since the 1967 war that we oppose civilian settlements.
00:44:06.000 Me and Jacob debated about this a long time ago.
00:44:08.000 But that's the official United States position.
00:44:10.000 And so Trump said, you know, look, if you could really take it easy, because when the Israelis are annexing parts of Palestine, Or they're occupied with civilian settlements or things like that.
00:44:20.000 That makes it a lot harder for us to do diplomacy with countries like Iran and with other countries in the Middle East.
00:44:25.000 It's very difficult.
00:44:26.000 You know, we just had the 18th anniversary of 9 11 recently.
00:44:31.000 What was the number one grievance of Osama bin Laden in his fatwa against the United States in 1999?
00:44:36.000 It was his support for the state, or rather the United States' support, unconditional for Israel.
00:44:42.000 And so things like that make it very hard for us to conduct our foreign policy.
00:44:46.000 How did Netanyahu respond to President Trump's reasonable request?
00:44:49.000 Take it easy on the settlements.
00:44:51.000 He approved one of the largest expansions of the civilian settlements in Israeli history.
00:44:56.000 A slap in the face.
00:44:57.000 We've done nothing but nice things.
00:44:58.000 We moved the embassy.
00:45:00.000 We labeled the IRGC a terrorist group.
00:45:02.000 That was unheard of.
00:45:03.000 Maximum pressure campaign.
00:45:05.000 We recognized their annexation of the Golan Heights.
00:45:07.000 The list goes on and on of areas where we've met Israel in the middle, and they've done nothing.
00:45:12.000 And so to me, it's like we've gone after Mexico.
00:45:14.000 We threatened Central America.
00:45:16.000 We have done nothing to go after the problem that we all know about, but nobody talks about in Washington, D.C.
00:45:21.000 So I would say this.
00:45:23.000 Just one moment.
00:45:24.000 You know, it makes it tougher to do diplomacy with Iran.
00:45:34.000 They don't seem very receptive, anyhow.
00:45:36.000 I'm missing where you talk about the spy ring, if you will.
00:45:41.000 I have to take issue with some of the facts there.
00:45:44.000 What they did is they didn't catch a spy red-handed planting a listening device or something like that.
00:45:48.000 They found some devices around the White House.
00:45:50.000 These stingray devices are all over Washington.
00:45:52.000 The intel community, you know, those people we can trust, those great patriots in the intel community, said, We believe it's Israel.
00:45:59.000 And then two years later, told the reporter at a very trustworthy publication that we all know is Politico.
00:46:04.000 So I take issue with the facts there.
00:46:06.000 I would really, you know, if true, disturbing, but I really have a hard time believing that, you know, Israel has to use listening devices.
00:46:13.000 I think they have better things than, you know, taking apart a Springboard and someone's a weird device.
00:46:18.000 Nick, they made Waze.
00:46:19.000 Waze, the app, right, yeah.
00:46:22.000 Well, that's a great question.
00:46:23.000 That's a great and a fair question.
00:46:25.000 You know, why is it such a problem that Israel?
00:46:27.000 This is a question I'm asked all the time.
00:46:28.000 Why do you care so much?
00:46:30.000 It's just a little country the size of New Jersey.
00:46:32.000 What do you got in front of it?
00:46:33.000 We're just trying to do our thing.
00:46:34.000 We just want our own country.
00:46:36.000 You know, the Arabs have all these countries.
00:46:38.000 We just want one little country.
00:46:39.000 You know, they don't tell you how big they want to be, though.
00:46:41.000 They don't want to tell you from here to there.
00:46:44.000 You know, it's like, it's not going to be the size of New Jersey in 50 years.
00:46:48.000 I don't think that's the plan.
00:46:50.000 You know, Third Temple is going up.
00:46:53.000 From here to there.
00:46:54.000 Maybe.
00:46:55.000 I don't know.
00:46:56.000 In any case.
00:46:56.000 Why?
00:46:57.000 On a more serious note, I'll give you a perfect example of this.
00:47:00.000 Is.
00:47:01.000 We look at the situation in Syria.
00:47:03.000 I happen to be a strong supporter of Bashar al Assad.
00:47:13.000 But in the case of the Syrian civil war, it is the America first position, in my opinion, that we seek stability in the region above all else.
00:47:21.000 We want to stabilize the region, reassert American hegemony through soft or smart power.
00:47:26.000 I don't care for these terms, but it's economics, it's sanctions, it's things like this.
00:47:31.000 And we are trying to stabilize Syria.
00:47:32.000 We want a strong centralized government.
00:47:34.000 That's cooperative with the United States.
00:47:36.000 Now, prior to the Arab Spring, prior to Barack Obama giving material support to the so called moderate opposition in Syria, Bashar al Assad was completely cooperative with the United States.
00:47:47.000 They tortured our terrorists because we couldn't do it because our gay humanitarian law.
00:47:51.000 We sent them over there and they tortured them.
00:47:55.000 And they took down their nuclear weapons program after 2003.
00:47:59.000 And so they were cooperative.
00:48:00.000 Now, Israel, instead of assisting us in this, they've done the opposite.
00:48:04.000 They do these airstrikes.
00:48:05.000 So we've pleaded with them.
00:48:07.000 Stop with the airstrikes.
00:48:08.000 We're trying to strike a deal.
00:48:09.000 They're trying to stabilize the country.
00:48:11.000 And they keep doing airstrikes in Damascus all over the place.
00:48:14.000 They're hitting the Syrian government.
00:48:16.000 Beyond that, you've heard there's multiple quotes from the Israeli defense minister, from the top Israeli intelligence chief, that they would prefer ISIS on their borders as opposed to Bashar al Assad, as opposed to Syria.
00:48:28.000 That's not America's position.
00:48:29.000 I don't think we would prefer ISIS as opposed to, well, maybe we wouldn't, our government might, based on who they get funded by.
00:48:36.000 And so to me, that's one crystal clear, perfect example of how.
00:48:39.000 Our material support for Israel is undermining our interests, and we have to talk about that and crack down on it.
00:48:44.000 Let me just get into one thing, and it actually sets up perfectly for this point.
00:48:48.000 And let me ask you you support Assad, and you want a strong central government.
00:48:52.000 Would you want Assad to have nuclear weapons?
00:48:54.000 Is that.
00:48:55.000 No, of course not.
00:48:56.000 Okay, so in 2006, Assad was building nuclear weapons.
00:48:59.000 He was building a nuclear reactor with the help of North Korea.
00:49:01.000 This is well documented.
00:49:03.000 Now, speaking of North Korea, Israel is kind of like our North Korea in the region.
00:49:07.000 Sometimes they're a bit of a Tasmanian devil.
00:49:09.000 But they tend to do our bidding on the whole.
00:49:12.000 And so when Syria was building a nuclear reactor with the help of North Korea, Israel went right in and bombed the hell out of the thing and finished it off.
00:49:20.000 There was no more nuclear reactor, there was no environmental disaster, it was finished off.
00:49:25.000 And that's just one example of Israel sort of doing our bidding.
00:49:29.000 And now I'm going to be an honest Zionist here, which is rare.
00:49:35.000 No, no, no, but there are these Zionists who say, we just want to have.
00:49:41.000 A small little state, just our own little state, you know, it's basically just like New Jersey, like you said.
00:49:50.000 That's not true.
00:49:51.000 Of course, Israel projects their power throughout the world.
00:49:53.000 Nobody, I mean, come on, is anybody going to question that?
00:49:56.000 But if you look around the world how Israel's projecting their power, I think it basically comports with everybody's ideas here in the room.
00:50:03.000 In Hungary, they supported Orban.
00:50:05.000 In Italy, they support far right parties.
00:50:08.000 In Brazil, they supported Bolsonaro.
00:50:10.000 In Ukraine, they supported Zelensky.
00:50:12.000 Over and over and over again, We're seeing that Israel's support of political movements, their support of sort of extra political movements, judicial movements around the world, tends to be what we would think of as nationalist, you know, kind of isolationist, even.
00:50:29.000 It's not like, you know, what many people say they're just trying to start wars all over the place.
00:50:34.000 Orban's not a guy who's looking to start a war.
00:50:36.000 I don't think Bolsonaro's a guy who's looking to start a war.
00:50:38.000 So when you look at Israeli power projection, it tends to comport with what I think most people, at least in this room, would agree with.
00:50:46.000 Yeah, so to answer.
00:50:48.000 A couple of parts here.
00:50:49.000 I would say about the Syrian nuclear plants, you know, I was tempted to interrupt, but, you know, I'm trying to be respectful.
00:50:54.000 But, you know, they went into Syria and they blew up all those nuclear reactors.
00:50:58.000 Sounds kind of familiar, you know?
00:51:00.000 Feel like when we went into Iraq and we blew up all the nuclear reactors?
00:51:03.000 Well, they did it in Iraq too in the 80s.
00:51:04.000 Yeah, I know that.
00:51:05.000 But I'm just saying that, you know, if you deny the intelligence of, well, you know, we have these cell phone devices in Washington and we don't know they're from Israel, I don't know if we're going to really take Israel's word for it that they were going and destroying nuclear infrastructure.
00:51:16.000 In any case, the facts are irrelevant.
00:51:18.000 It's not 2006 anymore.
00:51:20.000 And Assad is not trying to build a nuclear reactor.
00:51:22.000 He's trying to stabilize his country and protect Christians.
00:51:26.000 And to me, that's in America's interest.
00:51:28.000 And so I think that example is just sort of negated because, you know, maybe.
00:51:32.000 10 years ago, 15 years ago, you might have had a point, but in 2019, it's obviously a very different dynamic in the Middle East.
00:51:39.000 On the second point about Israel sponsoring all these different nationalist groups, I mean, you're right.
00:51:43.000 You can see Bolsonaro, Salvini, Orban, all these leaders somewhat regrettably going over, and they're going to take their trip and go to the Western Wall, and I'm sure you love that, you know, and that's great.
00:51:52.000 Absolutely.
00:51:53.000 And I'll say that there's some truth in that.
00:51:55.000 I've talked about this on my show.
00:51:56.000 I think it's relatively benign when a Bolsonaro goes and does Salvini.
00:52:00.000 It's not something I'm in love with, but it's not something that's the end of the world.
00:52:03.000 Now, the United States is a different story because Italy does not project power on a global scale.
00:52:09.000 Brazil does not project power on a global scale.
00:52:11.000 Neither of these countries have hegemony in the Middle East.
00:52:13.000 America does.
00:52:14.000 And so maybe Bolsonaro's cost, you know, his cost of admission for gaining the support of the Zionists is relatively small or doable.
00:52:22.000 But for America, we can see that cost borne out time and again.
00:52:25.000 We can see very clearly the prioritization of the Israel agenda over the American agenda.
00:52:31.000 And so, you know, look, I would maybe even be more congenial to this if other things were being accomplished.
00:52:37.000 But that's not happening.
00:52:38.000 Well, it is in America, too.
00:52:39.000 It's not just in these places.
00:52:40.000 I mean, if I were Israel and I just really were dying to have some wars right in my backyard in the Middle East, I can't imagine why I would.
00:52:48.000 But if I were Israel and that's what I wanted, I think I might get on the phone with Sheldon Adelson, if I were Bibi Netanyahu, and I'd say, you know what, Sheldon, please throw your weight and your money behind Hillary Clinton.
00:53:00.000 You know, we just need some wars.
00:53:01.000 She's a war hawk.
00:53:02.000 Please support Hillary Clinton.
00:53:04.000 I certainly wouldn't approve of Sheldon Adelson supporting Trump.
00:53:08.000 And what you're seeing over and over again is.
00:53:10.000 That really Israel was pro Trump, they continue to be pro Trump.
00:53:13.000 I think that the sort of support that Trump has given to Bibi will be reciprocal in the 2020 election.
00:53:19.000 So I'm not seeing it here.
00:53:20.000 I'm not seeing the sort of Israeli effort to undermine right wing politics.
00:53:23.000 Let me jump in here.
00:53:24.000 So, Saudi Arabia, do you think that Trump has gotten too close with the Saudis, or how do you think he's handling that?
00:53:31.000 Does that mean?
00:53:32.000 Yeah.
00:53:33.000 Yeah, I think so.
00:53:33.000 I think, you know, look, it's sort of this tag team in the Middle East.
00:53:36.000 We're getting tag teamed by Saudis and the Arab countries, the Gulf countries.
00:53:41.000 And Israel together.
00:53:42.000 You know, increasingly Saudi Arabia is getting in bed with Israel, you know, regrettably.
00:53:46.000 So I'll say that.
00:53:47.000 But aside from this, to address your point about Clinton, I will say a rare defense of Barack Obama.
00:53:52.000 Do not consider Barack Obama a legitimate president.
00:53:55.000 But he did stand up to Israel.
00:53:57.000 You know, right before he left office, I don't know if you remember this, but there was a UN Security Council resolution condemning Israel.
00:54:03.000 Instead of vetoing it like we were obligated to do, slavishly, veto any resolution that opposes Israel, the president of the United States says, We're going to abstain from the vote.
00:54:14.000 We're going to allow it to go through.
00:54:15.000 There are many documented cases where the Obama administration, under which Hillary Clinton served as Secretary of State, stood up to the Israeli lobby.
00:54:23.000 You know, the Iranian nuclear deal, which you oppose, which the hardcore Zionists like Hud Party opposed, that took place under the Obama administration.
00:54:31.000 So I don't know if it's exactly true that Hillary Clinton would be starting a war with Iran necessarily.
00:54:37.000 I think, if anything, maybe they placed their bet that Trump would be the one who would help the Zionist interest.
00:54:42.000 And so far, they basically have.
00:54:44.000 Now, has it meant full scale?
00:54:46.000 Ground war by the United States and Iran?
00:54:48.000 Of course not.
00:54:48.000 But Trump has dutifully recognized the annexation of the Golan Heights.
00:54:52.000 Trump has dutifully moved the embassy to Jerusalem, recognized officially Jerusalem as the eternal capital of Israel.
00:54:58.000 You know, Trump, under this Congress, greenlit the $3.8 billion per year.
00:55:03.000 It was actually passed in 2016, but he reaffirmed it in the Congress.
00:55:06.000 You know, we've seen these, like, insane anti Semitism laws where it's like if you're not signing a loyalty pledge to Israel, you can't get a government contract.
00:55:14.000 The list just goes on and on and on.
00:55:15.000 And, like I said, you know, I understand.
00:55:18.000 I'm a pragmatist.
00:55:19.000 I believe in politics, choices, things like this.
00:55:22.000 You know, maybe it would be worth it to get money from Sheldon Adelson.
00:55:25.000 Do these concessions, and in exchange, we'd be getting a hardcore, full throated, nationalistic president.
00:55:31.000 I mean, we just haven't seen our end of the bargain of hell.
00:55:34.000 It seems like Netanyahu is respected, Israel is respected, they get their share, and the voters aren't really seeing it.
00:55:41.000 Your question is on your aid, man.
00:55:43.000 I mean, you're not saying it's one.
00:55:44.000 I would only respond to kind of one thing there, and that was just the point of Obama and why Obama was sort of so anti Israel.
00:55:53.000 I think we kind of know where Obama's motivations were on that issue.
00:55:58.000 The Middle East kind of falls along very basic lines of Jew and Muslim.
00:56:03.000 And we know where Obama is coming from on that issue and on which side of the country they're coming.
00:56:10.000 Maybe he's right about Israel.
00:56:12.000 I don't think so.
00:56:13.000 I don't think they are.
00:56:15.000 But on the question of Saudi Arabia, it's a tough thing.
00:56:18.000 In Saudi Arabia, you have a situation where the king is geriatric, demented, some say, and you have the son coming in, and the son certainly wields a lot of influence.
00:56:30.000 Now, is Trump too close or not too close?
00:56:35.000 I think he's not influential enough, is the way I would put it.
00:56:39.000 Because when you have an issue of Saudi facilities getting bombed by Iran, allegedly, we sell Saudi Arabia a whole lot of weapons, $110 billion worth in the last couple of years.
00:56:52.000 Why isn't Saudi Arabia using their military?
00:56:54.000 I mean, why is this always, you know, we have to call up our uncle in America and have America handle everything?
00:57:00.000 So, whatever Trump's ties are to Saudi Arabia, it's really hard to get a grasp on because it seems that it's kind of hugs and kisses and everybody goes along and gets along, but when the time comes for action, Trump doesn't seem to be able to get what we need out of Saudi Arabia.
00:57:29.000 You guys have heard about my story, my passion story.
00:57:31.000 I got disgruntled because of a Muslim tweet saying that I went to school one day and they wanted to put a hijab on me, a try on hijab day.
00:57:39.000 And I said no.
00:57:41.000 And they claimed me as long COVID just for saying no.
00:57:46.000 I told people, like, you know, Muslims here are great because we have religious freedoms.
00:57:51.000 In Muslim countries, people, I mean, women are being stoned because they don't wear a hijab.
00:57:57.000 The government is under Sharia law.
00:57:59.000 Like, it's not okay, you know?
00:58:02.000 And.
00:58:03.000 So, I think that Muslims here in the United States should focus more on what's happening in other countries instead of just focusing on what's happening in America.
00:58:13.000 Because in America, every religion is great.
00:58:15.000 Like, I mean, every religion here is free to say whatever they want.
00:58:22.000 Jesus is changed!
00:58:31.000 Jesus!
00:58:32.000 Jesus!
00:58:41.000 Spine skins.
00:58:42.000 Spine skins.
00:58:45.000 You see, we find this weird relationship with our closest ally where they bomb our ships and they get us involved in all these things that we don't directly in the moment have any interest in, but we become interested in.
00:59:00.000 When are we ever going to be able to stop going to war?
00:59:04.000 When are we just going to be able to.
00:59:06.000 Never.
00:59:07.000 Never.
00:59:08.000 War is a natural state of being as a human.
00:59:11.000 It's always been here.
00:59:13.000 It's always going to be here.
00:59:16.000 And you mentioned, I just have to correct you because I just can't allow the kind of fallacy.
00:59:21.000 The United States government report that was done by the waspiest people you've ever met said that the USS Liberty incident was an accident.
00:59:31.000 Nonetheless, I have to say it.
00:59:34.000 I have to say it.
00:59:35.000 The US government's own report, and Israel's report, but the US government's own report.
00:59:41.000 Even so, Israel paid not one, not two, but three settlements.
00:59:46.000 To the United States or the USS Liberty.
00:59:48.000 So I think you can make fair points about Israel's influence, but the USS Liberty is just debunked, it's off the table, it's in the press.
01:00:01.000 So, why am I liking this?
01:00:03.000 Brennanine, what is something that you like about Kathy or one of her positions?
01:00:09.000 Honestly, she reminds me of my best friends in middle school.
01:00:15.000 I used to go to school in California, and my two best friends were Chinese.
01:00:19.000 You remind me of them.
01:00:21.000 She's very pretty.
01:00:22.000 Those are nice.
01:00:22.000 She's.
01:00:28.000 She's bold about what she believes in.
01:00:31.000 And we need more people like that, honestly, on the right.
01:00:33.000 We need more people like that.
01:00:34.000 A round of applause for Tom.
01:00:40.000 Cassie, what about you, Diverty?
01:00:41.000 What is something that you like about her or her positions?
01:00:45.000 She actually gave you a plethora, so my vote will return it.
01:00:47.000 I was going to say she's a very nice and mature person, but only when she's not in front of an audience.
01:00:52.000 She became a completely different person up here.
01:00:55.000 We were really talking.
01:00:57.000 No, I don't have any, sorry.
01:01:01.000 Round of applause for the truth.
01:01:09.000 Okay, so.
01:01:10.000 I'm not surprised.
01:01:11.000 I'm going to read this question again, given to me by the organizers.
01:01:14.000 I disavow everything that's happening at this event.
01:01:18.000 According to Mental Health, the World Health Organization now recognizes porn addiction as a behavioral disorder.
01:01:24.000 A study on pornography by Covenant Eyes states that 56% of divorce cases involve a partner's obsessive interest in porn sites.
01:01:33.000 If it were up to you, would you ban pornography from society, or do you think it's something that can be managed healthily among adults?
01:01:41.000 We'll start with you, Bernadine.
01:01:46.000 If it were up to me, I would ban it.
01:01:55.000 Nobody's benefiting from it except those sex traffickers who are filming these people.
01:02:01.000 Also, of course, adults can manage it, but it is an addiction, so you will need help and you will need God's help.
01:02:12.000 Adults don't have to be partaking in it.
01:02:14.000 Lawson and I don't partake in that.
01:02:16.000 The glory of God is what I can give credit to.
01:02:22.000 But the problem is that most people, when they're exposed to pornography, they're not adults.
01:02:29.000 They're underage.
01:02:31.000 Studies show that they are between the ages of 8 and 11.
01:02:36.000 And that's horrifying.
01:02:39.000 Imagine an 8 year old being exposed to pornography.
01:02:42.000 Okay?
01:02:43.000 All right, so, Bernadine, what do you think about, you know, there's this new movement, especially in this crowd, repealing the 19th Amendment?
01:03:09.000 If you are married, then your husband's vote.
01:03:13.000 I mean, if you're married, and I'm saying this as a Christian, you know, as a wife, you submit to your husband, and that doesn't mean he walks all over you and you're a yes woman, whatever, but you submit to him because you know that he loves you and that he's leading you out of love for you.
01:03:28.000 He's leading you into safety, into security, because he is, I mean, I can say he's a man of God and he's pursuing what's right and what's good.
01:03:39.000 So, anyways, if you're a wife, And your role, I'm saying this as a Christian, as a traditionalist, is to submit to your husband, your husband's vote covers the household.
01:03:50.000 So if your husband votes pro gun rights, et cetera, then that covers the household.
01:03:58.000 Thank you.
01:04:03.000 Kathy, you know, very new to this audience.
01:04:06.000 What do you think about repealing the 19th Amendment, which gave women suffrage?
01:04:19.000 I don't agree with her on the fact that men should vote for the women.
01:04:27.000 My boyfriend and I, we agree, we align with a lot of things, but there are some subjects and topics where we disagree on, and I wouldn't want him voting for me.
01:04:35.000 I think as a woman, I am responsible for my own actions, I'm responsible for how I think, how I feel, and I believe that I am just.
01:04:43.000 As strong and willing and emotionally put together as he is.
01:04:48.000 So I think it's fine.
01:04:49.000 I mean, I wouldn't.
01:04:51.000 All right, so I want you guys to take each 60 seconds to kind of give your closing, your wrap up, not really addressing each other, but addressing what are your positions as we approach these issues?
01:05:01.000 Again, of family, of freedom, of order.
01:05:04.000 What would you tell a young girl out there or a lot of young men?
01:05:08.000 And Kathy, we'll start with you.
01:05:11.000 60 seconds.
01:05:12.000 Go.
01:05:14.000 What I would tell young women and men, do whatever makes you happy, man.
01:05:19.000 Like, we are in America.
01:05:20.000 Pleasure, finish.
01:05:24.000 Everything isn't about pleasure.
01:05:27.000 Go ahead.
01:05:29.000 Do whatever makes you happy, whatever pleases you, whatever your life mission is.
01:05:32.000 Find some motivation in yourself.
01:05:34.000 Don't just sit around and do nothing.
01:05:38.000 But yeah.
01:05:39.000 Fuck nothing.
01:05:41.000 You got 60 seconds.
01:05:41.000 Very neat.
01:05:42.000 How would you do that?
01:05:43.000 Sure.
01:05:44.000 Real quick, I want to say I have nothing against you personally, I don't know you personally, but I'm addressing these things, the issues.
01:05:51.000 So I want you to walk away knowing that.
01:05:53.000 I don't know you, I don't hate you, I can't hate you, I don't know.
01:05:57.000 So, anyways, what I would say is that for me, my drive is the fact that I have children.
01:06:04.000 And, ugh, I'm fine.
01:06:07.000 So, I'm overly emotional, women.
01:06:10.000 Motherfucker.
01:06:11.000 Dear Grey, a round of applause for you!
01:06:13.000 Yeah!
01:06:14.000 All right, 30 more seconds.
01:06:20.000 So, my drive is not my lifetime or my pleasure or what feels good or instant gratification.
01:06:26.000 My drive is my children.
01:06:29.000 Because after my lifetime, they're going to live in this world after me.
01:06:33.000 Okay?
01:06:33.000 And I'm going to be with my family to make sure that they have something better, that they have something that is worth living in.
01:06:33.000 Yeah.
01:06:46.000 I'm not going to sit here and do nothing.
01:06:46.000 Okay?
01:06:51.000 And if they asked me in the future if you knew what was going on in society, what did you do about it, Mom?
01:07:09.000 Who else is going to be dealing with a bunch of incels and niggas and f-cells?
01:07:17.000 This issue of free speed, how they're coming after us, and it's more than us, us.
01:07:50.000 Yeah, well, I mean, there's some obvious.
01:07:52.000 Here's the thing I mean, look, everybody cries about the big e celebrities, and I have to tell you, you know, I get the sort of anti e celebrity resentment, all right, I understand it.
01:08:01.000 And so people will weep for a big verified account, people will weep for a huge account, but to me, it's sort of like the Tomb of the Unknown Soldier, you know, it's like that small account with 5,000 followers, you know.
01:08:12.000 Something like that that gets banned, nobody knows about it, people forget over time, like teardrops in the rain, you know, these the greatest non accounts that just go away.
01:08:20.000 So, I would have to say, it's I really have to hand it to these smaller accounts, uh, but maybe the bigger ones, I probably say, like Sam Hyde, you know, he's obviously back on there now, but Night of Fire was one of the best ever, we all know that.
01:08:31.000 Um, I would say that he's he's going to be missed, honestly.
01:08:34.000 This might be not very optical, but frankly, Andrew Anglin, hate to say it, look, and for no other reason, for no other reason, other than that he was first.
01:08:43.000 You know, everybody wants to complain now.
01:08:45.000 Everybody and their brothers getting banned and demonetized and everything.
01:08:48.000 And now everybody wants to make a big stink.
01:08:50.000 Now everybody wants to protest and sue and everything.
01:08:53.000 But for what it's worth, nobody had much of a beef when Andrew Anglin got banned because he was a Nazi.
01:08:58.000 And nobody cared when all the Charlottesville people got banned and deplatformed and, you know, ostracized and everything because they were Nazis.
01:09:06.000 They were white nationalists.
01:09:07.000 And now all of a sudden, the Overton window has shifted, or I don't know, I guess the censorship has creeped up.
01:09:12.000 It's getting uncomfortable for a lot of these, you know, Shapiro types and Shapiro funded types.
01:09:17.000 And now they want to make this everybody's crusade.
01:09:19.000 Now I've got to be fist fighting in the streets of Antifa so Ben Shapiro can sell advertisements or something.
01:09:24.000 It's a tough answer.
01:09:25.000 It's a tough answer.
01:09:26.000 You got banned first.
01:09:28.000 So I would say it's people like that.
01:09:31.000 Well, everyone misses Milo and we miss Alex Jones and we miss a lot of these people.
01:09:37.000 Certainly, Gavin McGinnis, of course, we miss on Twitter.
01:09:41.000 But we're dealing with sort of a unique problem that I think could use some precision.
01:09:48.000 Twitter censorship and YouTube censorship are two very different things.
01:09:51.000 Twitter is a small company that has outsized influence because it's sort of the thought platform, it's the news platform, and it is the platform.
01:09:59.000 There is nothing else.
01:10:00.000 There's nothing else like Twitter.
01:10:02.000 And when Twitter bans somebody, they ban them because they felt like it.
01:10:06.000 Because they tell us.
01:10:06.000 And how do we know this?
01:10:07.000 We've seen Jack Dorsey go on to the Joe Rogan podcast and tell us exactly why, and it's very political, and nobody would ever doubt that that's the case.
01:10:16.000 Now, when we look at YouTube, that's all about advertisers.
01:10:19.000 YouTube has to be ad safe.
01:10:20.000 YouTube's ad revenue for one quarter makes Twitter's annual earnings look like a drop in the bucket.
01:10:27.000 And so, YouTube is all about the advertiser.
01:10:30.000 The advertiser is king.
01:10:32.000 And if your content on YouTube is not ad safe, then they're going to get rid of you.
01:10:36.000 Ad safe is makeup videos, it's clickbait vloggers that are prancing around LA dressed in God knows what.
01:10:36.000 What is ad safe?
01:10:44.000 I mean, this is ad safe content.
01:10:46.000 They don't want Trump, they don't want conservative.
01:10:48.000 That's not ad safe.
01:10:49.000 Clorox has got to be able to write the check and know that they're going to be advertised on something that's.
01:10:53.000 Very straightforward.
01:10:54.000 The other thing I would say on the issue is that I think this issue of saying conservatives are being censored, conservatives are being censored, conservatives are being censored, I think it's a problem.
01:11:03.000 I think we need to start saying Republicans are being censored.
01:11:06.000 And a lot of people say, oh, I'm not a Republican, whatever.
01:11:09.000 The reality is, we live in a two party state.
01:11:12.000 And if you want the support of the big boys, the Republican Party, I think that we need to make this an issue of Republicans being banned.
01:11:18.000 Make them feel like the cuts, like they're the people that are being banned, even though largely the establishment is not.
01:11:23.000 And I think that's how you're going to build the support because.
01:11:26.000 There is no conservative party in this country.
01:11:27.000 There's a Republican party.
01:11:30.000 There's something that you like about the guy sitting next to you.
01:11:33.000 Oh, man, there's so much.
01:11:35.000 I've debated Nick so many times, and we always have a good time.
01:11:38.000 He's lively and well spoken and articulate.
01:11:42.000 Clean.
01:11:45.000 Clean, articulate.
01:11:46.000 You don't see that very often.
01:11:50.000 He's a clean, articulate Afro Latino commentator.
01:11:52.000 Campus conservative.
01:11:59.000 Thank you very much.
01:12:00.000 I agree.
01:12:01.000 I think this is a very civil debate.
01:12:02.000 I like debating with Jacob Wall because, I mean, really, my problem.
01:12:06.000 Is the deception.
01:12:07.000 It's the dishonesty.
01:12:09.000 And this is contrasted with Jacob Wall because he's right up and honest and tells you what he is and he is what he is.
01:12:14.000 And that's great.
01:12:15.000 Because our big problem, I think, is not each other.
01:12:17.000 It's not that we have disagreements.
01:12:20.000 It's this gatekeeping mentality.
01:12:21.000 We are essentially all in this together.
01:12:23.000 You know, obviously we have significant disagreements, but on a lot of the fundamentals, I think we are together.
01:12:28.000 There's more to be gained by fighting together than separately.
01:12:31.000 People like me in particular, you know, people that are a little bit more woke, maybe higher in power levels.
01:12:35.000 We ran a lie.
01:12:39.000 On a big tent movement where everybody's protected.
01:12:43.000 And by the way, everybody benefits from this because, you know, like I said about Andrew Englund, I don't, I know I'm, oh, I just, oh, he's terrible, whatever, but like, people like me are first to go, right?
01:12:53.000 Or maybe second or third or fourth to go.
01:12:55.000 But ultimately, then it's people like Jacob, and you get all the way up until the only acceptable dissent in opposition is John McCain and Mitt Romney.
01:13:03.000 And so everybody stands to gain.
01:13:05.000 Everybody stands to gain from a big tent movement where everybody's got each other's back.
01:13:09.000 And so when they try and say white nationalist, neo Nazi, Nobody says, oh, well, it's them.
01:13:12.000 We'll cleave them off.
01:13:14.000 Because then they'll find themselves on the edge too eventually.
01:13:16.000 We are all in this together.
01:13:18.000 So to me, I have to, and I don't want to grandstand, but I really do just want to commend Jacob because he's honest.
01:13:24.000 He was willing to share the stage on my show even when it wasn't even that big, when nobody else was.
01:13:28.000 And, you know, he came into a hostile crowd that obviously I say Israel and people, oh, yeah.
01:13:32.000 Yeah.
01:13:33.000 I don't have a problem with that.
01:13:35.000 But he's straightforward.
01:13:36.000 He's tough and he's smart and he gets it.
01:13:38.000 You know, he trolls even my audience sometimes.
01:13:40.000 So I respect him a lot.
01:13:41.000 Yeah.
01:13:41.000 Yeah.
01:13:49.000 us to fight silently and hate each other silently, but if we disagree publicly, well, then, you know, we're not allowed to do that.
01:13:57.000 Last question before I can find Will Witts asks, talk Trump 2020.
01:14:04.000 Do you guys think that he's going to get reelected?
01:14:06.000 If you were talking in the campaign, what are some issues that he needs to highlight, you know, facing 2020?
01:14:11.000 Obviously be pragmatic.
01:14:14.000 Sure.
01:14:15.000 Yeah, I have to tell you that, like, you know, we had our gang gang collective phase where for a time, you know, we put on the pink head and we were going to Secure the bag and all that.
01:14:25.000 Turned out not to work out.
01:14:27.000 He's cringe.
01:14:29.000 The guy's like, I don't know why we ever bought into that, honestly.
01:14:31.000 I mean, the guy literally browses Reddit.
01:14:36.000 He's saying, We should eat bugs and stop eating meat.
01:14:38.000 Everyone's like, What?
01:14:39.000 I thought you were based in Redville.
01:14:42.000 So, you know, admittedly, like six months ago, I was not enthusiastic about voting for Trump.
01:14:47.000 I have to say that in the last three weeks, if you've been watching my show, good things have been happening.
01:14:51.000 Immigration's been turning around a little bit.
01:14:53.000 Foreign policy has been restrained.
01:14:56.000 You know, and so I have to say that.
01:14:58.000 Even looking at the Democratic opposition, which is not good, Joe Biden's obviously crashing and burning.
01:15:03.000 Elizabeth Warren is ascending.
01:15:05.000 Trump is raising, he raised $5 million in the 24 hours after they announced the impeachment inquiry this last week.
01:15:12.000 And so to me, it just looks like this is an unstoppable machine.
01:15:15.000 People forget Trump may not be the best at governing the country, being the president, but he's like the greatest campaigner in history.
01:15:22.000 And I know the substance matters more, but in terms of winning elections, that matters.
01:15:25.000 So I think he's got a really great chance.
01:15:28.000 My money's on him, absolutely.
01:15:30.000 Yeah, I think that I tend to agree that we're in very good shape.
01:15:42.000 I was a bit worried about Biden before learning of his dementia and everything else.
01:15:50.000 Yeah, Warren is that.
01:15:51.000 Warren, come on.
01:15:52.000 I mean, that's ridiculous.
01:15:53.000 Warren can host a yoga class, perhaps, but not run the country.
01:15:59.000 So I'm feeling very good.
01:16:00.000 But what makes me more optimistic, you talked about campaigning.
01:16:04.000 You know, one of the greatest things about the 2016 campaign is that we can get together, people can wear a shirt that says America First, they're no longer afraid like they used to be to wear a shirt that says America First, to say that they believe in making America great again, to say, build the wall.
01:16:20.000 And I just think, I say, wow, that campaign, however long it was, two and a half years or something, that really did a lot for us.
01:16:27.000 Imagine one more.
01:16:28.000 I mean, just one more run, Trump making six stops in the airplane and just saying, screw China.
01:16:35.000 Screw Mexico, it's America first.
01:16:36.000 I mean, it's going to be wonderful.
01:16:38.000 And the liberals will be angrier than ever, but what can you do?
01:16:42.000 Round of applause for the Jews.