00:00:27.000I mean, the main stories people are talking about is the Trump thing that he calls the soldiers who fell in Niger last week, and that's been a huge controversy.
00:00:39.000There's the ongoing Harvey Weinstein scandal.
00:00:41.000But other than that, not a whole lot of major developments.
00:00:45.000Besides that, there are many things to talk about.
00:00:50.000I was on 4chan, do a little browsing last night, and I saw there was a lot of controversy.
00:00:55.000There's still a lot of conflict about the optics debate.
00:01:00.000I've been seeing, I've been hearing a lot regarding the optics debate that has resulted since the Gainesville rally, since Richard Spencer's Gainesville rally last Wednesday.
00:01:11.000And of course, the new development of the three men who were arrested for attempted homicide, arrested and charged, actually, for attempted homicide, that has sort of reignited this debate, pushed it back into the spotlight.
00:01:24.000And we had another really great example, I think another really great piece of this puzzle here to talk about.
00:01:30.000I know maybe people are tired of hearing about it, people are tired of talking about it.
00:01:34.000I think it's a very important discussion to be had.
00:01:37.000And I take a lot of flack for it, admittedly.
00:01:40.000I know it generates a lot of divisiveness.
00:01:43.000It generates some hostilities towards myself and others.
00:01:47.000But regardless of that, I think it's positive.
00:01:49.000I think it's a good thing that if you go on 4chan, if you go on poll, if you go on Twitter, if you go in any of these circles, people are now talking about optics.
00:01:57.000People are now talking very seriously about how we could take this movement to the next level now that we are in this post election phase, now that we're in this limbo and we're not really sure what to do.
00:02:09.000I think it's 100% positive that people are now making serious decisions.
00:02:14.000Discussions and having serious thoughts about this, how we can move forward.
00:02:19.000But this is the last night that I'll really dedicate a significant amount of time to it because it has been talked about a lot.
00:02:25.000But I did see something tonight, or today rather, that contributes to this discussion.
00:02:29.000And I think we could tie it up very nicely here.
00:02:31.000So, I'm going to pull up a picture here, and this is from Generation Identity, which, if you know, that is like a European, obviously an identitarian organization.
00:02:43.000They're prominent in Italy and Germany.
00:02:46.000I believe in Scandinavia, and they just launched their United Kingdom division today.
00:02:51.000And I want to share with you a picture from that activism.
00:02:54.000We'll do our boomer tech here, and I'll upload this.
00:02:59.000And here, let me, I don't know why it always defaults to the wrong folder when I open these pictures, but here we go.
00:03:06.000This is their activism from today when they unveiled their United Kingdom branch, so to speak.
00:03:13.000And let me resize it there so it fits.
00:03:16.000And so you can see here, and I want to give some notes on why this is basically flawless activism.
00:03:22.000This big unveil, this big launch for United Kingdom generation identity.
00:03:28.000I want to say why this is so important and so good here.
00:03:32.000If you look at this picture, and I don't know, I think that's big enough, right?
00:03:36.000What's so crucial and what's so good about this, what I loved about this when I saw this, is right off the bat, the message is simple, the message is appealing, the message is in big letters, it's short, it's concise, it's straightforward.
00:04:00.000If you know anything about marketing, if you know anything about politics, about any of these things, you know that it is so important that people know the name of your organization, they know the logo, and they know what it stands for.
00:04:11.000I mean, obviously, this should be obvious to anybody thinking about activism.
00:05:23.000Maybe the guys that are in there know what they're about, but they need to make it more accessible if they want to pull it off like Generation Identity did.
00:05:32.000Anybody who sees this banner, who is walking down the street, who's driving in their car, walking down the sidewalk, anybody who sees this picture, they see the symbol, they see the name, And it's defend London, stop Islamization.
00:05:53.000Whereas a lot of the things with the alt right and IE are offensive, and I don't mean offensive like abrasive, although they are abrasive as well, but I mean they are taking the offensive position.
00:06:06.000And some of these super right wing organizations in America sometimes advocate for violence.
00:06:12.000Hunter Wallace has talked about bringing guns to rallies.
00:06:16.000And very offensive stuff where they want to take the city, they want to take the town square, they want to have a big rally, big rally, and they want to talk about how we're going to take our country back.
00:06:25.000You will not replace us, et cetera, et cetera.
00:06:28.000This is purely defensive, and obviously because it says defend London, stop Islamization.
00:06:36.000Anybody who lives in London, I'm sure, anybody who lives in London who is not one of these cosmopolitan, feely, like, sympathy kind of guys for the refugees, They're going to be sympathetic to this message.
00:06:49.000They will empathize with this message.
00:06:52.000Whatever they've heard about Generation Identity, whatever they've heard about the fringe right, whatever they think of UKIP, whatever they think of Brexit, for the people that walk down the streets in London and they see the terror attacks, they see the rape gangs, they see the Muslim migrant gangs, they hear the Muslim call to prayer in their neighborhoods, they see the mosques going up, they see the mosques replacing the churches, and they see this banner, which is so appealing to them, which says it doesn't say.
00:07:56.000When I say simple, I don't mean simple as in people didn't put thought into it.
00:08:00.000It's simple as in it's concise and it's straightforward.
00:08:03.000There has been tremendous thought put into the rhetoric of the message.
00:08:08.000Because although it's concise, although it's straightforward, although it's only four words and it's pretty simple, the rhetoric is so appealing.
00:08:15.000The rhetoric has been constructed both in the syntax of it, in terms of the use of verbs and nouns, et cetera, but in addition, the political message that it's sending, that this could appeal to a mass audience.
00:08:27.000This will appeal to people in the Conservative Party in Britain.
00:08:33.000I'm sure this would appeal to some people in the Labour Party, some of the cultural conservatives in the Labour Party in the United Kingdom.
00:09:31.000It's a small group, a small group probably of connected people who were briefed beforehand, who knew the plan going in, who knew the rules, who organized on a particular date and they set it up.
00:10:34.000I mean, that's one of the biggest things the optics of the people.
00:10:37.000That separates the fringe from the mainstream.
00:10:40.000Because the mainstream has regular people that vote up and down for one party or the other, whether it's Labor and Conservative in the UK, or Republican or Democrat.
00:10:50.000You can use these labels, you can use these terms at any kind of neighborhood gathering.
00:10:56.000You could use them when you're talking in polite company with your friends.
00:11:53.000This is what's so important about the optics.
00:11:55.000The appearance of these people is the banner, the message, and the people.
00:11:59.000Beyond this, we look at this operation in terms of the tactics compared to a rally, compared to a Charlottesville, compared to a Gainesville or an Auburn.
00:12:21.000It looked like it went off without a hitch.
00:12:23.000And look at the benefits of an operation like this.
00:12:26.000When you have a small group of people, A small group that is highly coordinated.
00:12:31.000And it's not, I mean, notice there's not dozens of people here.
00:12:34.000I don't think there's more than 10 people in this picture.
00:12:37.000Maybe they had more than 10 people plan this, but there's not more than 10 people here.
00:12:41.000And with a small coordinated group of people like this, where they have a concerted effort, they know what they're going to do, they know the plan, they're sticking to it, they get in, they put their message out, they get out, look at the benefit of this.
00:12:53.000There's no chaos, there's no hijacking of the event by CIA agents or fads or liberals who show up with Nazi tattoos.
00:13:02.000They have extreme and tight control of the optics, of the message, of the behavior.
00:13:07.000I'm sure if you talk to these guys, they weren't wearing like Nazi shirts and saying F, you know, minorities.
00:13:13.000They weren't like the people they got arrested at Gainesville who tried to kill somebody with a gun, who were throwing up casual Roman salutes.
00:13:20.000Because it was a small, concerted, coordinated group of people, they knew the rules, they knew the optics, they knew the tactics, they knew the operation.
00:13:28.000They went in, they did it, they got out.
00:13:31.000So, I mean, that's number one is the size of it and the type of tactic that we're talking about.
00:13:35.000When you compare this to a Charlottesville or a Gainesville, when you have this open invite, let's have as many people as possible and we'll do speeches and we'll do this and that, think of all the chaos you open yourself up to.
00:13:49.000And people must necessarily accept this.
00:13:51.000They can blame the police, they can blame Antifa, they can blame whoever they want for the chaos, but it is necessarily one component of the rally type of activism that you have chaos, that you have a very open and unstable event, that you introduce.
00:14:09.000These unpredictable elements, when you have it in a public place, when it's anybody can come, when you're trying to maximize attendance, and on and on, is there's chaos.
00:15:31.000I certainly understand what they're doing, and I respect what they're doing.
00:15:34.000I mean, that's a real diversity of tactics when they have a vision of what they want and I disagree with it, as opposed to some people who have no vision and they don't know what they're doing.
00:15:44.000Generation Identity, I respectfully disagree that that was totally the best move in the United Kingdom, altogether in the United States.
00:15:51.000But that said, I respect the activism.
00:15:54.000Small tweaks in the United Kingdom, they could have used some kind of royal monarchical symbol, maybe a lion.
00:16:00.000I know people on Twitter were saying this.
00:16:02.000Small tweaks that would drop connotations with the United Kingdom, the English national character.
00:16:09.000And look, I understand that their generation identity organization is supposed to be an international European organization.
00:16:18.000So I understand what they're trying to do.
00:16:20.000I would have done it differently, but that's not to say that there's anything wrong with that.
00:16:26.000A difference of opinion in terms of what I would have done, but I think they have a good brand.
00:16:29.000I think they have a good message for Europe.
00:16:31.000In America, we could totally pull this off.
00:16:35.000A banner like this, tight coordination, tight optics like this, a tightly knit, succinct, concise, straightforward operation instead with American optics, with an American flag.
00:16:47.000Maybe the slogan is put America first, resist multiculturalism, something like that.
00:17:02.000That would be a perfect kind of activism to do.
00:17:05.000And the takeaway from this, the takeaway from Generation Identity, what they did so well more than anything else, because, I mean, really, we can disagree about the small things, and these are really small things.
00:17:15.000When you talk about basically a flawless presentation here, I am nitpicking when I say it could have been a lion or whatever.
00:17:23.000But what makes this flawless is the messaging, it's clear, it's easily identifiable, it's straightforward, anybody knows what they're about.
00:17:32.000I mean, that's what's really missing with our brand.
00:17:35.000Is every question I got after Charlottesville was, why did you go?
00:19:30.000She's a degenerate, feminist, modern woman.
00:19:33.000He's getting harassed by his professors and by his peers for being white, and white people are evil, and maybe he leans conservative, but he can't really be open about it.
00:19:43.000And he sees this banner and he says, Defend London, stop Islamization.
00:19:48.000In the 10 second video clip that he watches, from I don't know what he'd be watching.
00:19:52.000Maybe he catches it on John Oliver or a video somebody shares with him, or he sees it on YouTube briefly, or he sees it trending on Twitter.
00:20:30.000Now, imagine similarly, you have a young, the same young, disaffected college student, and he brings up the Unite the Right coverage or the Gainesville coverage, even better.
00:20:38.000He brings up the Gainesville coverage and he sees these three psychopaths, these three insane lunatics, the one guy who's got crazy eyes.
00:20:48.000You see him in the mugshot where he's got crazy eyes, and the headline is, Three charged after Gainesville's speech for attempted homicide.
00:21:24.000I don't believe in killing protesters.
00:21:26.000He sees the video of Richard Spencer getting heckled by, and they're yelling at him, and he's yelling back and pointing at them, and then he's dancing around, and people are saying, and he just says, Oh my God, this is a headache.
00:22:04.000They say, You're just doing a show or whatever.
00:22:06.000You're just, you're only churning out 10 hours of content a week on this stuff, providing analysis and thoughtful suggestions and turning, but you're only doing that.
00:22:33.000We really have to start going forward with this and start thinking practically about our goals, start thinking practically about how we're going to right these wrongs in our country.
00:22:43.000And I see examples like this, and you get pissed off a little bit because this is perfect.
00:22:50.000And if we had banners going up like this in every major city in the country, like Atlanta, Chicago, New York, Seattle, LA, we'd be far and away.
00:23:38.000You know, for example, I saw American Renaissance.
00:23:40.000Somebody posted, they did some kind of a poster at B.C., at Boston College, which was like 10 minutes from where I was in Boston University.
00:23:50.000And the pamphlet that they posted, or some flyer they posted on one of the bulletin boards, said, Don't be ashamed for being white.
00:23:58.000And it was a picture of George Washington, an American flag, and it said, No, no, I'm sorry.
00:24:04.000It was the Uncle Sam poster where he says, I want you to not be ashamed of who you are.
00:24:14.000Is something that gets people asking questions.
00:24:17.000That is something that gets people interested.
00:24:19.000Because the college student I'm talking about, which is me, which is you, which is everybody who came onto this movement, who doesn't necessarily know the finer points, who hasn't read the literature, they're walking down their hallway, they're walking down, and they see this bulletin board.
00:24:34.000They see a poster, and it says, I want you to not be ashamed for being white.
00:25:24.000I love when people spend money and time doing things only to have them make everyone look bad because you didn't think through some small details.
00:26:40.000And, like, people are, I'm not, like, just injecting that into the dialogue.
00:26:44.000Like, if you saw some of the posts on poll, people are saying this.
00:26:47.000I'm not vying for control of the movement.
00:26:49.000I am not making a bid for control of the movement.
00:26:52.000For all the people that are out there and everybody's suggesting, like, Nick and James are the future, Nick's, you know, they're going to lead this, and they're comparing me to Spencer.
00:27:00.000I'm not trying to compare myself to Spencer.
00:27:03.000I'm not trying to compare myself to anybody.
00:27:06.000I am not making a bid for leadership of anything.
00:27:35.000I know that's sort of an asinine tautology, but the purpose of my criticism of bad optics is to criticize bad optics, is to get better optics.
00:27:45.000I'm not saying I'm the next, I'm not saying that.
00:27:48.000And I wish people would stop comparing me to him and stop trying to create this false dichotomy between me and the alt right or me and the alt light.
00:29:31.000I always say that, which I think is fair.
00:29:33.000You got to be fair to me that when I launch into my criticisms, I always say I submit this humbly.
00:29:39.000I submit this with the utmost respect.
00:29:41.000I respect their sacrifices, I respect what they're doing.
00:29:45.000But if they thought these things through just a little bit, if they tweaked these things a little bit, all that work, all that sacrifice would go a long way.
00:30:18.000Richard Spencer did a long thread about Steve Bannon.
00:30:21.000Because if you notice today, it was reported that Steve Bannon says that Milo Yiannopoulos is dead to him.
00:30:27.000Since that BuzzFeed expose came out, where Milo was shown in a video doing Roman salutes, or rather, he was singing America the Beautiful to a crowd full of alt right guys giving Roman salutes, Richard Spencer included.
00:30:43.000And after Steve Bannon saw that, apparently, he said Milo Yiannopoulos is dead to him.
00:30:48.000He has no place at bright parties, cutting off all ties.
00:30:52.000And then Richard Spencer launched into this whole thread about how Steve Bannon is not our guy.
00:31:32.000He's going to full scale war with the GOP.
00:31:35.000Massive resources in media, massive resources in politics, massive economic resources to give to primary challengers in safe Republican seats.
00:31:47.000And he's going to war with the GOP establishment.
00:32:11.000But he's dedicating massive resources, motivating a massive civil war to oust a party which is pro amnesty, pro globalization, pro global government.
00:32:21.000And we have people in our movement who are saying that's not good enough.
00:32:25.000We have people in our movement saying he's a cuck because he doesn't like Richard Spencer, because he doesn't like the alt right.
00:32:42.000You have people in the alt light who are willing to fight for the RAISE Act, who are willing to fight for an end to illegal immigration, and they have massive support.
00:34:14.000He shot down a deal to repeal, or rather, he shot down a deal where he would have to legalize DACA, but he would get all kinds of other concessions because it didn't include wall funding, because it didn't include an end to chain migration.
00:34:29.000Donald Trump is the president of the United States.
00:34:37.000He wants to make change, it's important to him.
00:34:40.000His ally, Steve Bannon, is running a civil war against the GOP.
00:34:45.000So that the GOP, an enormous party, that's 50% of the country, so that, or 50% of the voters, but that's what matters, so that they will support Donald Trump on his crusade for less immigration, for building a wall.
00:35:01.000They support the candidates running against the establishment candidates, the ones that want less immigration, the ones, and you're seeing an entire power structure, an entire power structure, infrastructure that will get things done,
00:35:16.000that will get the border wall built, that will get immigration suspended, that will get chain migration ended, that will get tax reform, that will get trade reform, reforms that will boost the economy, that will allow us to start having kids again, that will get the entitlement reform, the immigration reform, the employment reform, that'll make immigrants self deport.
00:35:36.000And our guys look at this, this beautiful, well oiled machine, this amazing, spontaneous organization that has been constructed in a matter of 15 months.
00:37:19.000And unless these criticisms are internalized, unless somebody does something about this, unless somebody takes this into consideration, say goodbye to your movement, say goodbye to your country.
00:37:31.000If that's not good enough, I don't know what is.
00:38:34.000Because I recognize that Spencer has done a lot for this movement.
00:38:37.000Well, he's founded the movement and he's been working at it for his whole life in terms of getting educated, in terms of building the NPI, the Radix Journal, the Taki Magazine, and now altright.com.
00:38:49.000And he's been instrumental with IE, and Mosley has as well.
00:38:53.000And Enoch has done well with the right stuff.
00:38:55.000And they've done a tremendous job of getting this stuff out there, getting this stuff to that 10%, getting people to show up to these rallies and express these messages and getting the word out there.
00:39:07.000But moving forward, moving over to the next phase of this movement so that we can grow, so that we can expand, we have to start thinking more practically.
00:39:16.000I'm not taking a dump on anything they've done previously.
00:40:21.000We have to put pressure on him so he does.
00:40:23.000We can throw analysis out the window when we criticize President Trump because it's about the criticism in and of itself, which motivates him.
00:40:58.000Short, or a long story short, rather, Ellie Wiesel, who has written the book, About his experience during the Holocaust, which, by the way, there's a lot of lies in that book, which is not disputed by historians.
00:41:13.000In his book, Night, like I'm not denying the Holocaust, I believe the Holocaust happened, but in Ellie Wiesel's book, Night, he says that at his concentration camp, people were being shoveled into pits of fire, which every historian says that's a lie.
00:41:30.000Every historian said that did not happen.
00:41:33.000As opposed to the gas chambers, which, well, most historians accept.
00:42:18.000But anyway, there was a story that came out this week from Jennifer, Jenny Listman from Medium.com, where she has come out since the Harvey Weinstein thing broke.
00:42:28.000And she said that Ellie Wiesel groped her in 1989.
00:42:33.000When she was a 19 year old girl, Ellie Wiesel grabbed her butt when they were taking a picture together.
00:42:40.000She said that they got together for a picture at this charity like benefit dinner.
00:42:45.000And Ellie Wiesel, the sly dog, while he's holding the back of her shoulder, whatever, makes his way down the Casanova himself, down to the butt.
00:42:54.000And he gave it a nice little grab, and then he skirted off into a crowd of 1,000 people.
00:44:39.000Midwest, New England, that's demographically, politically, where we need to focus on.
00:44:44.000And another thing you look at what's going to happen in the next 20 years with demographics Texas, Arizona, New Mexico, Colorado, and this sounds like I'm just going to list them off.
00:44:55.000But the following states will turn blue in the next 20 years Nevada, Georgia.
00:45:03.000New Mexico, Arizona, Colorado, Texas, Florida, probably North Carolina, and Virginia.
00:45:12.000And when I say blue, I mean they will remain blue.
00:45:16.000This will all happen in the next 20 years.
00:45:18.000Anything we could hope to achieve through politics, through elections, goes out the window when these states go blue.
00:45:24.000I mean, you think of all the electoral votes that are offered up by every swing state, every Southwest state, and Texas, impossible for Republicans to win the Senate.
00:45:34.000Impossible for Republicans to win the presidency.
00:45:37.000Arguably impossible for Republicans to win the House.
00:45:55.000What we should focus on doing is shoring up in the short term to counteract this.
00:46:00.000In the short term, I stress the short term, if we were to shore up a pro white Anti immigration vote or a voting block in Wisconsin, Michigan, Pennsylvania, New Hampshire, maybe even in some of the mid Atlantic states, maybe even in Ohio, in Iowa, Minnesota.
00:46:21.000If we could turn these states red, if we could turn Washington and Oregon red, we could counteract for a short time the demographic takeover of the Southwest.
00:46:30.000I think that's what we should be focusing on right now.
00:46:32.000That would be a wise thing to do because we broke the blue wall in 2016.
00:46:36.000And if we got the Midwest and the Rust Belt to be reliably red in the next 20 years, we could stave off this electoral winter.
00:46:44.000To your point, with the optics, with the New England Midwest middle class aesthetic, that would serve that goal.
00:47:25.000People who push this idea that Christianity caused the decline of the West don't know their history.
00:47:32.000I mean, they know a lot of buzzwords, they know a lot of talking points.
00:47:36.000They read a little blurb about Nietzsche, right?
00:47:38.000They read what someone else had to say about Nietzsche.
00:47:41.000But they don't understand Christianity.
00:47:44.000Anybody who makes that criticism has never read the Bible.
00:47:46.000You know this because in the Bible it directly undermines that idea of egalitarianism, of the nationless globalist world order, and of the quote unquote Jewish roots of Christianity.
00:48:02.000For people that have read the Bible, you don't even have to get very far.
00:48:06.000In Genesis, you have the story of the Tower of Babel.
00:48:09.000In Revelations, they say that the nations of the earth will exist.
00:48:13.000Until the end times, until the end of the world, nations will exist.
00:48:17.000Jesus Christ himself says, Render unto Caesar what belongs to Caesar and what to God belongs to God.
00:48:23.000In other words, there is a distinction between the kingdom of God, which is egalitarian, you do have the equality of souls, and the temporal kingdom of Caesar, which you have nations and governments, and these affairs are separate.
00:48:36.000Moreover, with the Jewish element of it, number one, it's funny because the same people that criticize Christianity, i.e., Richard Spencer, Richard Spencer was mentored by Paul Gottfried, who was Jewish.
00:48:50.000So, anybody that's skeptical of Christianity because it originated from Jesus, who was Jewish, Richard Spencer was mentored by Paul Gottfried, who was Jewish.
00:48:59.000He was the one that coined the term alt right.
00:49:35.000And additionally, the Talmud is contrary to the Old Testament.
00:49:39.000People say, oh, well, someone commented on one of my videos and they said, oh, well, I think what they mean is that the Old Testament was the religion of the Jews, that's the Torah, and Jesus was Jewish.
00:49:54.000The supposed scripture that they adhere to, that they did in biblical times, they do not anymore.
00:49:59.000Because in the Talmud, which was written in 200 AD and 400 AD, the two versions of it, in the Talmud it says that the rabbis correct God on scripture.
00:50:11.000There's multiple stories in the Talmud where God says it should be this way and the rabbis say, no, According to rabbinical teaching, it says this and they correct God.
00:50:21.000Does that sound like the Old Testament to you?
00:50:23.000Does that sound consistent with scripture?
00:50:26.000Additionally, the very idea of a Talmud, the very idea of an oral tradition, is contrary to the Old Testament because the Old Testament does not make any mention of an oral tradition handed down to Moses on Mount Sinai by God.
00:50:42.000You know, the rabbis have it that in addition to the Ten Commandments, God gave the Jews a secret oral law, which was to become the Talmud, which is eventually culminated and aggregated into the Talmud in 200 and then 400 AD.
00:51:00.000So there's all these things to consider where it's just not true.
00:51:04.000Anybody who knows the first thing about this religion knows that's not the case.
00:51:07.000And moreover, the whole idea I don't think people know this, Testament means covenant.
00:51:14.000Testament is almost a synonym for covenant in the biblical sense, where the Old Testament means the three covenants between first Noah, and then Abraham, and then Moses.
00:51:26.000That was the Old Covenant, where first God made a covenant with Noah, he would never flood the world again.
00:51:31.000Then he made a covenant with Abraham where he said, I will bless your nation if you go forth and multiply.
00:51:36.000And then the covenant with Moses where he said, I will save your people, or he fulfilled his promise to save his people and said, You know, if you follow my laws, everything will work out.
00:51:49.000And then the New Testament, the new covenant, was that God sent his son, and it's both man and God, to come and save the world.
00:51:58.000And that was supposed to abrogate the idea of Judaism because.
00:52:02.000Christianity was meant to replace that.
00:52:04.000Jesus was the prophesied Messiah in the Old Testament, and he fulfilled that.
00:52:39.000And so that's why, you know, to say that he's some Jewish conspiracy, it's absurd.
00:52:44.000And somebody was referring me to some essay where it's like, you can talk about the Rothschilds and you can talk about all this other stuff, but the real conspiracy, you can say protocols of elders of Zion is true, whatever, because the real conspiracy is Christianity.
00:53:27.000Woke Tree, did you see any of Julian Assange's tweets today about the Schofield Bible and how it was what injected Zionism into evangelic Christian churches?
00:53:37.000I didn't read that, but I did see that tweet.
00:54:01.000Like, hi, I believe that God sent his son to save the world, and he's my savior, and the perfect, ideal man is him.
00:54:13.000And then they say, no, we're the same.
00:54:14.000We're on the same team as the people that rejected him, as the people that say that he's boiling in hell and his followers will go there too, and we're glad about that, and who were partly responsible for being crucified in the first place.
00:54:28.000I don't know how, you know, maybe you can have tolerance, and sure, you know, you can have a peace, you can have like a detente between these two people, but I don't know how Christians take it a step further and say, actually, we're the same.
00:54:40.000We're of the same tradition, and we love each other, and we could spend billions of dollars on this rogue country.
00:55:08.000And it's unfortunate how distracted we have become with the bread and circus that people care more about the sports game, people care more about the television than they do about their race.
00:55:28.000People like my own parents, taxes are getting higher.
00:55:33.000The property taxes in Cook County, which is where Chicago is, it's like twice a month or twice a month, twice a year, the property taxes rise.
00:56:36.000There's degeneracy on television for our children.
00:56:39.000Our kids are getting raped by their teachers, and when they're not getting mind raped from what's in school, in the curriculum, they're getting raped by the teachers, actually, like physically.
00:56:49.000Then they go to college and they get swamped with that.
00:56:51.000I mean, it's just this crushing, broken system that is coming down on the common man in this country.
00:56:57.000And they can't get off the couch for five minutes to give a damn about it.
00:57:02.000They can't turn off the big football match.
00:57:04.000They can't turn off the big sitcom for long enough to read about this stuff or to get mad about this stuff or, I don't know, cause a little trouble.
00:57:13.000I don't know, maybe flip over some cars.
00:57:20.000I don't know what you do when your kids are getting raped, your jobs are being taken, there's terrorists in your country, illegal immigrants who should never be in here are killing our children.
00:58:13.000I'm sure we can all agree that when we see our children being exploded at children's concerts, we understand that the politicians that continue to let these people in, that let terrorists into our country, should face no consequences other than a soft dismissal from their position, right?
00:58:48.000You know, it's always the television, it's always the sports, always the big, you know, whatever.
00:58:53.000And then for the youngsters, it's drinking.
00:58:55.000For the youngsters, it's drugs, alcohol, sex.
00:58:58.000I look at my friends and I'm up on my Friday night and I'm watching like Oswald Mosley speeches, I'm watching like documentaries, I'm reading.
00:59:07.000And not to be like Big Nibba posting here, but in other words, on my Friday night, I'm trying to perfect my craft, I'm trying to get better with my business, trying to learn things for my show.
00:59:17.000And every weekend, every weekend, and most weekdays, to be frank, I look on Snapchat, I look on Twitter, Facebook, and my friends, you know, they're drinking, they're doing cocaine, they're smoking pot, they're smoking cigarettes, they're having sex.
00:59:34.000And all the while, they're in school, you know, learning nothing, wasting money.
00:59:53.000I have read some of the NRX literature, and it's influenced my thinking.
00:59:59.000It's made me a lot less libertarian politically and economically because I saw, and this has sort of been, I had always been kind of like going in this direction when I read Hop, when I read, even when you get into Pinochet and that historical example, and you look at some other nationalists from back in the day, you say, wait a minute, liberalism is flawed.
01:00:25.000Libertarianism is flawed, both in its political manifestation, economic, and social manifestations.
01:00:30.000I would read, like, John Stuart Mill, and I would say, something not quite right here.
01:00:33.000I'd read Milton Friedman, and I'd say, there's something off here.
01:00:36.000I don't know if I necessarily agree with this.
01:00:38.000And I think NRX gave shape to an ideology which harnesses that skepticism of liberalism.
01:00:47.000I wouldn't say, like, I am not a socialist.
01:00:50.000I am not a big government kind of a guy.
01:00:53.000In fact, because I'm an American traditionalist, I believe that this country requires.
01:01:22.000There's all the difference in the world between recognizing that liberalism should be for this country because it is the tradition of this country and Liberalism is the highest thing that we can aspire to and should be pursued for the sake of itself.
01:01:42.000I agree we should have liberalism in this country because our founding culture was one of liberalism, whether it was the Constitution, the Declaration, the Transcendentalists, sort of an Anglo Saxon liberal Western European culture.
01:01:56.000You know, that is perfectly, I think, what should be done in this country.
01:02:01.000Although there should be more vertical hierarchy in government, you need to restore the Constitution in its original form.
01:02:08.000But to say that we should have all these freedoms and rights and liberties and everything for the sake of itself, because freedoms are always good.
01:02:17.000Freedoms are always good, and we should always be expanding them and should always be more liberal, more democratic, because that's good and rights are good.
01:03:39.000Number three would probably be Kennedy.
01:03:43.000Because I think Trump, if he gets this right, he'll have saved the country.
01:03:46.000Andrew Jackson, because he created the country with.
01:03:50.000Manifest Destiny, destroying the second national bank, fighting against the establishment, and then Kennedy because he knew what was going on.
01:07:15.000I really do, because religion offers answers.
01:07:18.000Religion offers meaning in a place where there is none anymore.
01:07:22.000I mean, that's if you read Evola, if you read Spengler, if you read even Huntington on these issues, Jung, any of the German authors, any of the kind of like the pessimists of the past 100 years, they talk about how this nihilism has pervaded our civilization.
01:07:41.000Nietzsche's Is the progenitor of this idea that nihilism and Dostoevsky too has like taken out everything that matters in life from an epistemological sense, or that's the right, that's how you pronounce it, right?
01:07:55.000Epistemological sense, from an ontological sense, from an existential sense.
01:08:00.000It's taken out the meaning of life for individuals.
01:08:02.000You subtract that, you know, you don't have anything.
01:08:05.000So I think the religious is so key, so crucial for that reason.
01:08:56.000All the details down below Twitter at NickJFuentes.
01:08:59.000You got the PayPal, the Hatreon, the Patreon.
01:09:02.000All that good stuff is down below in the description.
01:09:05.000Remember, we have another episode of Nationalist Review on Wednesday.
01:09:09.000So if you didn't miss it or if you didn't catch it on Saturday, we have two episodes a week now because we are in a good position on our Patreon.