America First - Nicholas J. Fuentes - Generation Identity Does It Right | America First Ep. 37

00:00:06.000 Good evening, everybody.

00:00:06.000 You are watching America First.

00:00:08.000 My name is Nicholas J. Fuentes, and we have a great show for you tonight.

00:00:12.000 Lots to talk about, lots of things to get into.

00:00:15.000 Not a lot of news, though.

00:00:17.000 I noticed that this weekend and today, if you go on BBC, if you go on Fox News, even on Twitter, there's nothing new really going on.

00:00:25.000 Not a lot of big stories.

00:00:27.000 I mean, the main stories people are talking about is the Trump thing that he calls the soldiers who fell in Niger last week, and that's been a huge controversy.

00:00:39.000 There's the ongoing Harvey Weinstein scandal.

00:00:41.000 But other than that, not a whole lot of major developments.

00:00:45.000 Besides that, there are many things to talk about.

00:00:48.000 I was on poll the other day.

00:00:50.000 I was on 4chan, do a little browsing last night, and I saw there was a lot of controversy.

00:00:55.000 There's still a lot of conflict about the optics debate.

00:01:00.000 I've been seeing, I've been hearing a lot regarding the optics debate that has resulted since the Gainesville rally, since Richard Spencer's Gainesville rally last Wednesday.

00:01:11.000 And of course, the new development of the three men who were arrested for attempted homicide, arrested and charged, actually, for attempted homicide, that has sort of reignited this debate, pushed it back into the spotlight.

00:01:24.000 And we had another really great example, I think another really great piece of this puzzle here to talk about.

00:01:30.000 I know maybe people are tired of hearing about it, people are tired of talking about it.

00:01:34.000 I think it's a very important discussion to be had.

00:01:37.000 And I take a lot of flack for it, admittedly.

00:01:40.000 I know it generates a lot of divisiveness.

00:01:42.000 I know.

00:01:43.000 It generates some hostilities towards myself and others.

00:01:47.000 But regardless of that, I think it's positive.

00:01:49.000 I think it's a good thing that if you go on 4chan, if you go on poll, if you go on Twitter, if you go in any of these circles, people are now talking about optics.

00:01:57.000 People are now talking very seriously about how we could take this movement to the next level now that we are in this post election phase, now that we're in this limbo and we're not really sure what to do.

00:02:09.000 I think it's 100% positive that people are now making serious decisions.

00:02:14.000 Discussions and having serious thoughts about this, how we can move forward.

00:02:17.000 So, I think that's a positive.

00:02:19.000 But this is the last night that I'll really dedicate a significant amount of time to it because it has been talked about a lot.

00:02:25.000 But I did see something tonight, or today rather, that contributes to this discussion.

00:02:29.000 And I think we could tie it up very nicely here.

00:02:31.000 So, I'm going to pull up a picture here, and this is from Generation Identity, which, if you know, that is like a European, obviously an identitarian organization.

00:02:43.000 They're prominent in Italy and Germany.

00:02:46.000 I believe in Scandinavia, and they just launched their United Kingdom division today.

00:02:51.000 And I want to share with you a picture from that activism.

00:02:54.000 We'll do our boomer tech here, and I'll upload this.

00:02:59.000 And here, let me, I don't know why it always defaults to the wrong folder when I open these pictures, but here we go.

00:03:06.000 This is their activism from today when they unveiled their United Kingdom branch, so to speak.

00:03:13.000 And let me resize it there so it fits.

00:03:16.000 And so you can see here, and I want to give some notes on why this is basically flawless activism.

00:03:22.000 This big unveil, this big launch for United Kingdom generation identity.

00:03:28.000 I want to say why this is so important and so good here.

00:03:32.000 If you look at this picture, and I don't know, I think that's big enough, right?

00:03:34.000 You can see it.

00:03:36.000 What's so crucial and what's so good about this, what I loved about this when I saw this, is right off the bat, the message is simple, the message is appealing, the message is in big letters, it's short, it's concise, it's straightforward.

00:03:50.000 This is exactly what we want. 1.00

00:03:52.000 It says, Defend London, Stop Islamization. 1.00

00:03:55.000 And then you have the logo and the name of the organization. 1.00

00:03:58.000 That is beautiful.

00:04:00.000 If you know anything about marketing, if you know anything about politics, about any of these things, you know that it is so important that people know the name of your organization, they know the logo, and they know what it stands for.

00:04:11.000 I mean, obviously, this should be obvious to anybody thinking about activism.

00:04:15.000 It's the what.

00:04:17.000 You think of activism in terms of the who, what, when, where, and why, or sometimes the how.

00:04:22.000 But the first thing is the what.

00:04:24.000 What is your organization?

00:04:25.000 What do they stand for?

00:04:26.000 Who are they?

00:04:27.000 What are they about?

00:04:28.000 This answers all those questions right there so easy. 1.00

00:04:33.000 Defend London, stop Islamization. 1.00

00:04:35.000 And what I love about this slogan, I mean, number one, it's the brevity of it, the syntax of it. 1.00

00:04:39.000 It's defend London, stop Islamization. 1.00

00:04:42.000 Four words. 1.00

00:04:44.000 It dedicates, or rather, it motivates people to action.

00:04:47.000 It says, this is what we're about, this is what we're doing. 1.00

00:04:50.000 Defending London, stopping Islamization. 1.00

00:04:53.000 Number two, it's the rhetoric of this slogan. 1.00

00:04:56.000 There is no ambiguity as to what generation identity stands for.

00:05:01.000 Whereas with Charlottesville 2.0, 3.0, and Gainesville, is it ethnostate?

00:05:07.000 Is it white identity?

00:05:09.000 Is it Confederate monuments?

00:05:10.000 Is it conservatism?

00:05:12.000 Is it National Socialism?

00:05:14.000 Is it Identitarianism?

00:05:16.000 Is it Identity Europa?

00:05:17.000 I mean, what is, what's the organization?

00:05:20.000 Who is this?

00:05:21.000 What is the brand?

00:05:21.000 What do they stand for?

00:05:23.000 Maybe the guys that are in there know what they're about, but they need to make it more accessible if they want to pull it off like Generation Identity did. 0.94

00:05:32.000 Anybody who sees this banner, who is walking down the street, who's driving in their car, walking down the sidewalk, anybody who sees this picture, they see the symbol, they see the name, And it's defend London, stop Islamization. 0.94

00:05:44.000 Wow. 1.00

00:05:44.000 Oh, that's so that's what they're about. 1.00

00:05:46.000 It's about defending London, it's about stopping Islamization. 1.00

00:05:49.000 The rhetoric of it, too, is very important. 1.00

00:05:51.000 Think of the way it's worded.

00:05:53.000 Whereas a lot of the things with the alt right and IE are offensive, and I don't mean offensive like abrasive, although they are abrasive as well, but I mean they are taking the offensive position.

00:06:06.000 And some of these super right wing organizations in America sometimes advocate for violence.

00:06:12.000 Hunter Wallace has talked about bringing guns to rallies.

00:06:16.000 And very offensive stuff where they want to take the city, they want to take the town square, they want to have a big rally, big rally, and they want to talk about how we're going to take our country back.

00:06:25.000 You will not replace us, et cetera, et cetera.

00:06:28.000 This is purely defensive, and obviously because it says defend London, stop Islamization. 1.00

00:06:34.000 The rhetoric of it is beautiful. 1.00

00:06:36.000 Anybody who lives in London, I'm sure, anybody who lives in London who is not one of these cosmopolitan, feely, like, sympathy kind of guys for the refugees, They're going to be sympathetic to this message.

00:06:49.000 They will empathize with this message.

00:06:52.000 Whatever they've heard about Generation Identity, whatever they've heard about the fringe right, whatever they think of UKIP, whatever they think of Brexit, for the people that walk down the streets in London and they see the terror attacks, they see the rape gangs, they see the Muslim migrant gangs, they hear the Muslim call to prayer in their neighborhoods, they see the mosques going up, they see the mosques replacing the churches, and they see this banner, which is so appealing to them, which says it doesn't say.

00:07:19.000 We hate Muslims. 0.98

00:07:20.000 It doesn't say we hate Islam. 0.99

00:07:22.000 It doesn't say anything about Jewish people.

00:07:24.000 Notice.

00:07:24.000 It doesn't say anything about Hitler.

00:07:26.000 It doesn't call back to anything fascist.

00:07:28.000 It simply says defend London, defend your city, defend your homeland from an outside influence. 1.00

00:07:36.000 Stop Islamization. 1.00

00:07:37.000 It doesn't say stop Muslims.

00:07:39.000 It doesn't say we hate Arabs. 0.84

00:07:41.000 It doesn't say stop Latins. 0.99

00:07:42.000 It says stop the Islamization, stop the process, stop the transformation of the country. 0.93

00:07:48.000 And so the rhetoric of this is at once very concise, very simple. 1.00

00:07:53.000 Very straightforward.

00:07:54.000 But don't be fooled.

00:07:56.000 When I say simple, I don't mean simple as in people didn't put thought into it.

00:08:00.000 It's simple as in it's concise and it's straightforward.

00:08:03.000 There has been tremendous thought put into the rhetoric of the message.

00:08:08.000 Because although it's concise, although it's straightforward, although it's only four words and it's pretty simple, the rhetoric is so appealing.

00:08:15.000 The rhetoric has been constructed both in the syntax of it, in terms of the use of verbs and nouns, et cetera, but in addition, the political message that it's sending, that this could appeal to a mass audience.

00:08:27.000 This will appeal to people in the Conservative Party in Britain.

00:08:31.000 This will appeal to UKIP.

00:08:33.000 I'm sure this would appeal to some people in the Labour Party, some of the cultural conservatives in the Labour Party in the United Kingdom. 1.00

00:08:40.000 Defend London, stop Islamization. 1.00

00:08:43.000 Okay, I know what Generation Identity is about now. 1.00

00:08:45.000 I know what that movement is about.

00:08:47.000 I know their name, I know their symbol, I know their message, I know what they're trying to do.

00:08:53.000 Maybe I'll think about joining this.

00:08:54.000 Maybe I'll look more into this.

00:08:56.000 I'm a regular Brit, I'm a regular Londoner, and I'm tired of keeping calm and carrying on. 0.57

00:09:01.000 When my daughter's killed by a nail bomb.

00:09:03.000 So I'm going to look up Generation Identity. 0.62

00:09:05.000 That's what we want.

00:09:06.000 That's what we're going for.

00:09:07.000 Additionally, beyond just the message, beyond the banner, look at the people that are holding it up.

00:09:12.000 You can't see them so well, but these are regular guys.

00:09:15.000 These are regular people.

00:09:17.000 They're wearing black, they're wearing regular clothes.

00:09:19.000 They're not wearing some like uniform.

00:09:22.000 They're not wearing some kind of fasci uniform.

00:09:24.000 They're not wearing white polos and khakis.

00:09:27.000 They're not doing any kind of Nordic thing.

00:09:29.000 They're not waving flags.

00:09:30.000 They don't look aggressive.

00:09:31.000 It's a small group, a small group probably of connected people who were briefed beforehand, who knew the plan going in, who knew the rules, who organized on a particular date and they set it up.

00:09:42.000 It was probably a little bit covert.

00:09:44.000 And they look like normal guys.

00:09:45.000 These look like normal guys.

00:09:47.000 These look like your friends.

00:09:48.000 These look like guys who are out at a sporting event, guys who you'd see out after work at a bar.

00:09:54.000 And sure, they're wearing black because they have to have some kind of coordination.

00:09:58.000 They have to look like they're a part of an organization and not just some rabble rousers.

00:10:04.000 But these look like regular guys in regular outfits.

00:10:07.000 These could be your friends.

00:10:08.000 This could be your uncle.

00:10:10.000 This could be your brother, your older brother.

00:10:11.000 This could be your dad.

00:10:13.000 This could be somebody you know, your boss, somebody that you see every day at work.

00:10:17.000 These are just normal, regular guys who have a message.

00:10:20.000 And what is the message? 1.00

00:10:22.000 Defend London, stop Islamization. 1.00

00:10:23.000 It's not extreme. 1.00

00:10:24.000 It's not crazy.

00:10:26.000 It's not far out.

00:10:27.000 It's not radical.

00:10:28.000 It's just saying protect our homeland.

00:10:29.000 And these are regular guys that are pushing it.

00:10:31.000 That is so crucial to a movement.

00:10:34.000 I mean, that's one of the biggest things the optics of the people.

00:10:37.000 That separates the fringe from the mainstream.

00:10:40.000 Because the mainstream has regular people that vote up and down for one party or the other, whether it's Labor and Conservative in the UK, or Republican or Democrat.

00:10:50.000 You can use these labels, you can use these terms at any kind of neighborhood gathering.

00:10:56.000 You could use them when you're talking in polite company with your friends.

00:10:59.000 Are you a Republican?

00:11:00.000 Are you a Democrat?

00:11:01.000 And people know people that are Republicans or Democrats.

00:11:04.000 People know people in their local party who are Republicans or Democrats.

00:11:09.000 People don't know these fringe, extreme, LARP-y organizations where people have to be brought in from West Virginia.

00:11:16.000 People have to be shipped in from Virginia.

00:11:18.000 And they're alien and they're a little strange. 0.99

00:11:21.000 And they use different language. 0.57

00:11:22.000 Language which is not accessible to people.

00:11:24.000 They use memes which are not accessible. 0.84

00:11:26.000 They look different.

00:11:28.000 They dress differently.

00:11:29.000 They have a completely alien and not accessible attire and appearance that says, I don't know, do I want to make that leap?

00:11:37.000 Do I want to be the outcast?

00:11:38.000 Do I want to be that other guy?

00:11:40.000 Because I could just be a radical Republican.

00:11:42.000 I could just call myself a Republican like my other football buddies in blue jeans and t shirts.

00:11:47.000 And so it's so important the optics that these guys look like regular folks.

00:11:51.000 So that's the optics of it.

00:11:53.000 This is what's so important about the optics.

00:11:55.000 The appearance of these people is the banner, the message, and the people.

00:11:59.000 Beyond this, we look at this operation in terms of the tactics compared to a rally, compared to a Charlottesville, compared to a Gainesville or an Auburn.

00:12:10.000 This operation is small.

00:12:12.000 It's a small group of people, and it's ultra coordinated.

00:12:12.000 It's small.

00:12:15.000 I know Brittany Pettibone was involved with this and her boyfriend Mark.

00:12:19.000 And God bless them.

00:12:20.000 Very good activism, very smart.

00:12:21.000 It looked like it went off without a hitch.

00:12:23.000 And look at the benefits of an operation like this.

00:12:26.000 When you have a small group of people, A small group that is highly coordinated.

00:12:31.000 And it's not, I mean, notice there's not dozens of people here.

00:12:34.000 I don't think there's more than 10 people in this picture.

00:12:37.000 Maybe they had more than 10 people plan this, but there's not more than 10 people here.

00:12:41.000 And with a small coordinated group of people like this, where they have a concerted effort, they know what they're going to do, they know the plan, they're sticking to it, they get in, they put their message out, they get out, look at the benefit of this.

00:12:53.000 There's no chaos, there's no hijacking of the event by CIA agents or fads or liberals who show up with Nazi tattoos.

00:13:02.000 They have extreme and tight control of the optics, of the message, of the behavior.

00:13:07.000 I'm sure if you talk to these guys, they weren't wearing like Nazi shirts and saying F, you know, minorities.

00:13:13.000 They weren't like the people they got arrested at Gainesville who tried to kill somebody with a gun, who were throwing up casual Roman salutes.

00:13:20.000 Because it was a small, concerted, coordinated group of people, they knew the rules, they knew the optics, they knew the tactics, they knew the operation.

00:13:28.000 They went in, they did it, they got out.

00:13:31.000 So, I mean, that's number one is the size of it and the type of tactic that we're talking about.

00:13:35.000 When you compare this to a Charlottesville or a Gainesville, when you have this open invite, let's have as many people as possible and we'll do speeches and we'll do this and that, think of all the chaos you open yourself up to.

00:13:49.000 And people must necessarily accept this.

00:13:51.000 They can blame the police, they can blame Antifa, they can blame whoever they want for the chaos, but it is necessarily one component of the rally type of activism that you have chaos, that you have a very open and unstable event, that you introduce.

00:14:09.000 These unpredictable elements, when you have it in a public place, when it's anybody can come, when you're trying to maximize attendance, and on and on, is there's chaos.

00:14:18.000 But this is controlled.

00:14:20.000 It's ordered.

00:14:21.000 They have tight control over everything that happens.

00:14:24.000 Everybody who's there knows what they're doing.

00:14:25.000 They know the mission.

00:14:26.000 They know what they're trying to accomplish.

00:14:29.000 That is the key.

00:14:30.000 This is something worth replicating.

00:14:33.000 This is something that we can do.

00:14:35.000 Now, there are some minor things that are not perfect about this.

00:14:39.000 It's no secret.

00:14:40.000 I've made no secret of this.

00:14:42.000 It's not mysterious that I'm not wild about the color scheme, that I'm not wild about the symbols, and generally the European movements.

00:14:50.000 I don't think the European movements are directly transferable to the United States.

00:14:55.000 I would not tell anybody, I would not encourage anybody to take up the banner of generation identity in America.

00:15:02.000 Because I think generation identity, excuse me, and movements like this are European in character in terms of their appearance.

00:15:10.000 Their tactics, sort of this fringe politics.

00:15:13.000 I mean, that's as a very European tradition, is very European in character.

00:15:17.000 So I would not advocate for people to start throwing up generation identity banners.

00:15:21.000 And even in the United Kingdom, they could have done better with the symbolism.

00:15:24.000 They could have done better with their optics, with their brand.

00:15:28.000 I don't know if I'd go for generation identity.

00:15:30.000 It's not my cup of tea.

00:15:31.000 I certainly understand what they're doing, and I respect what they're doing.

00:15:34.000 I mean, that's a real diversity of tactics when they have a vision of what they want and I disagree with it, as opposed to some people who have no vision and they don't know what they're doing.

00:15:44.000 Generation Identity, I respectfully disagree that that was totally the best move in the United Kingdom, altogether in the United States.

00:15:51.000 But that said, I respect the activism.

00:15:54.000 Small tweaks in the United Kingdom, they could have used some kind of royal monarchical symbol, maybe a lion.

00:16:00.000 I know people on Twitter were saying this.

00:16:02.000 Small tweaks that would drop connotations with the United Kingdom, the English national character.

00:16:09.000 And look, I understand that their generation identity organization is supposed to be an international European organization.

00:16:18.000 So I understand what they're trying to do.

00:16:20.000 I would have done it differently, but that's not to say that there's anything wrong with that.

00:16:24.000 It's just my.

00:16:26.000 A difference of opinion in terms of what I would have done, but I think they have a good brand.

00:16:29.000 I think they have a good message for Europe.

00:16:31.000 In America, we could totally pull this off.

00:16:35.000 A banner like this, tight coordination, tight optics like this, a tightly knit, succinct, concise, straightforward operation instead with American optics, with an American flag.

00:16:47.000 Maybe the slogan is put America first, resist multiculturalism, something like that.

00:16:52.000 And you have American flags.

00:16:54.000 Everybody who shows up carries American flags.

00:16:57.000 They dress like regular people, they look like blue collar people.

00:17:00.000 That would go so far in America.

00:17:02.000 That would be a perfect kind of activism to do.

00:17:05.000 And the takeaway from this, the takeaway from Generation Identity, what they did so well more than anything else, because, I mean, really, we can disagree about the small things, and these are really small things.

00:17:15.000 When you talk about basically a flawless presentation here, I am nitpicking when I say it could have been a lion or whatever.

00:17:23.000 But what makes this flawless is the messaging, it's clear, it's easily identifiable, it's straightforward, anybody knows what they're about.

00:17:32.000 I mean, that's what's really missing with our brand.

00:17:35.000 Is every question I got after Charlottesville was, why did you go?

00:17:40.000 What were you protesting?

00:17:41.000 What were you guys trying to accomplish?

00:17:43.000 Why did you do this?

00:17:45.000 There was so much confusion.

00:17:47.000 Because we had no concise, no straightforward message about what was going on there, the media was able to hijack it.

00:17:55.000 People that showed up were able to hijack it.

00:17:57.000 I had people asking me, was this about Confederate monuments?

00:18:01.000 And certainly, to some degree, it was about Confederate monuments.

00:18:04.000 People were saying, was this about.

00:18:07.000 White people not being replaced. 0.67

00:18:09.000 To an extent, that's also what it was about. 0.52

00:18:11.000 That's what the slogan for the event was.

00:18:13.000 People were asking, was it to unite the right wing and did it accomplish that?

00:18:17.000 Well, to an extent, it was about uniting the right.

00:18:19.000 That was the name of the event.

00:18:20.000 But notice at every level, there is no coherence, there is no consistency.

00:18:26.000 The rally was called Unite the Right.

00:18:29.000 So is the message unity?

00:18:30.000 The slogan was, You will not replace us.

00:18:33.000 So is the message anti immigration?

00:18:35.000 We were there to protest the removal of a Robert E. Lee statue.

00:18:38.000 So is.

00:18:39.000 The message was against the removal.

00:18:41.000 I mean, do you see how on every level the messaging created by our guys was confusing, incoherent, inconsistent?

00:18:50.000 Maybe you can say, maybe you can say, oh, well, it's all part of the same message.

00:18:53.000 Maybe it makes sense.

00:18:55.000 And I'm sure it makes sense to people that are in our movement.

00:18:58.000 I'm sure it makes sense to people like myself.

00:19:00.000 Of course, it did.

00:19:01.000 I'm sure it made sense to people like Spencer and people that showed up to this rally and protested.

00:19:06.000 We know what it's all about.

00:19:09.000 The disaffected white guy in college, the young disaffected white guy who he gets home from school and miserable guy, right?

00:19:17.000 He doesn't know if he's going to have a job when he graduates college.

00:19:20.000 He's in mountains of debt.

00:19:22.000 He's probably going to skimp on dinner because he doesn't have that much money to pay for food.

00:19:27.000 He's got to watch his budget. 1.00

00:19:28.000 His girlfriend's a slut, okay? 1.00

00:19:30.000 She's a degenerate, feminist, modern woman. 1.00

00:19:33.000 He's getting harassed by his professors and by his peers for being white, and white people are evil, and maybe he leans conservative, but he can't really be open about it. 1.00

00:19:43.000 And he sees this banner and he says, Defend London, stop Islamization. 0.89

00:19:48.000 In the 10 second video clip that he watches, from I don't know what he'd be watching. 0.80

00:19:52.000 Maybe he catches it on John Oliver or a video somebody shares with him, or he sees it on YouTube briefly, or he sees it trending on Twitter.

00:20:00.000 He sees this image.

00:20:02.000 And notice that's all he has to see to know everything about what they're about. 0.52

00:20:07.000 He sees this image pop up on his timeline, and suddenly he understands oh, stop Islamization, defend London. 0.54

00:20:14.000 Wow, I've been feeling this.

00:20:16.000 This has been intuitive for me.

00:20:18.000 Feeling this.

00:20:19.000 I see this image of this, and even though the media calls them Nazis or whatever, I support this message.

00:20:24.000 I support my generation, which seems to be a generation of identity.

00:20:28.000 I'm going to look into this.

00:20:30.000 Now, imagine similarly, you have a young, the same young, disaffected college student, and he brings up the Unite the Right coverage or the Gainesville coverage, even better.

00:20:38.000 He brings up the Gainesville coverage and he sees these three psychopaths, these three insane lunatics, the one guy who's got crazy eyes.

00:20:48.000 You see him in the mugshot where he's got crazy eyes, and the headline is, Three charged after Gainesville's speech for attempted homicide.

00:20:56.000 And he's like, what's going on?

00:20:58.000 He reads the article.

00:20:59.000 They pulled up to a small group of protesters saying, Hail Hitler, and throwing up Nazi salutes, and then they shot at the protesters.

00:21:07.000 That guy's going to say, Oh, brother.

00:21:10.000 Oh, brother.

00:21:11.000 I have real practical problems in my life.

00:21:14.000 I wanted to be a part of a right wing movement, but these guys are ruining it for me.

00:21:18.000 I can't be associated with this.

00:21:20.000 I'm not a Nazi.

00:21:21.000 I don't believe in Hitler.

00:21:24.000 I don't believe in killing protesters.

00:21:26.000 He sees the video of Richard Spencer getting heckled by, and they're yelling at him, and he's yelling back and pointing at them, and then he's dancing around, and people are saying, and he just says, Oh my God, this is a headache.

00:21:39.000 This is a nightmare.

00:21:40.000 This is a disaster.

00:21:41.000 I can't watch this for more than five seconds.

00:21:43.000 It's making my head hurt.

00:21:45.000 Who succeeded?

00:21:45.000 Who has the better optics?

00:21:47.000 Who has the better movement?

00:21:48.000 Who is going to succeed?

00:21:49.000 Who's going to create a bigger movement?

00:21:51.000 Is it Generation Identity?

00:21:53.000 Is it this, or is it the yelling?

00:21:56.000 That's why optics matters.

00:21:57.000 That's why this is so important.

00:21:59.000 That's why this conversation needs to happen.

00:22:02.000 And people give me a lot of grief.

00:22:04.000 They say, You're just doing a show or whatever.

00:22:06.000 You're just, you're only churning out 10 hours of content a week on this stuff, providing analysis and thoughtful suggestions and turning, but you're only doing that.

00:22:17.000 How could you criticize?

00:22:18.000 How could you criticize people that are out there on the field?

00:22:21.000 I'm not criticizing the people behind it.

00:22:23.000 I'm not saying they're bad people. 0.99

00:22:25.000 I'm not saying they're dumb people. 0.97

00:22:26.000 I'm not saying I don't agree with them on most everything. 0.94

00:22:30.000 But we got to get the movement going, guys.

00:22:32.000 We really do.

00:22:33.000 We really have to start going forward with this and start thinking practically about our goals, start thinking practically about how we're going to right these wrongs in our country.

00:22:43.000 And I see examples like this, and you get pissed off a little bit because this is perfect.

00:22:48.000 This is flawless.

00:22:49.000 This is stellar.

00:22:50.000 And if we had banners going up like this in every major city in the country, like Atlanta, Chicago, New York, Seattle, LA, we'd be far and away.

00:22:59.000 We'd be better off.

00:23:00.000 And if you changed the branding, if you tweaked it a little bit, it'd be better.

00:23:03.000 And people say, well, Nick, Identity Europa does the same thing.

00:23:08.000 Identity Europa does their flyers all over campus.

00:23:11.000 They do banners like this.

00:23:12.000 And I've seen some of the banners.

00:23:14.000 And the banners are not well made.

00:23:16.000 And the rhetoric is not well thought out.

00:23:18.000 And the branding is not American.

00:23:21.000 The branding is alien.

00:23:22.000 It's a little bit different.

00:23:23.000 It's a little bit too edgy.

00:23:24.000 If you look at the posters, it's the kind of message that would only appeal to somebody who's understood the memes.

00:23:30.000 Anybody who knows what this organization is about is turned off by them.

00:23:34.000 We need a fresh start.

00:23:35.000 We need a new brand.

00:23:36.000 We need something that appeals.

00:23:38.000 You know, for example, I saw American Renaissance.

00:23:40.000 Somebody posted, they did some kind of a poster at B.C., at Boston College, which was like 10 minutes from where I was in Boston University.

00:23:50.000 And the pamphlet that they posted, or some flyer they posted on one of the bulletin boards, said, Don't be ashamed for being white.

00:23:58.000 And it was a picture of George Washington, an American flag, and it said, No, no, I'm sorry. 0.55

00:24:04.000 It was the Uncle Sam poster where he says, I want you to not be ashamed of who you are. 0.84

00:24:09.000 Don't apologize for being white. 0.66

00:24:11.000 And in the top, it said, American Renaissance. 0.59

00:24:13.000 That is.

00:24:14.000 Is something that gets people asking questions.

00:24:17.000 That is something that gets people interested.

00:24:19.000 Because the college student I'm talking about, which is me, which is you, which is everybody who came onto this movement, who doesn't necessarily know the finer points, who hasn't read the literature, they're walking down their hallway, they're walking down, and they see this bulletin board.

00:24:34.000 They see a poster, and it says, I want you to not be ashamed for being white.

00:24:37.000 Be a patriot. 0.66

00:24:39.000 I say, Wow, I kind of resonate with this.

00:24:42.000 I can resonate with this, or this resonates with me rather.

00:24:45.000 This makes sense to me.

00:24:46.000 I'm going to look into this American Renaissance.

00:24:49.000 Then they get red pilled.

00:24:49.000 And then they get turned on.

00:24:51.000 So, very important.

00:24:52.000 Very important stuff.

00:24:53.000 That's who we're trying to recruit. 0.99

00:24:54.000 You're not going to recruit with this purity spiraling circle jerk. 0.98

00:24:59.000 You can't critique anybody. 0.99

00:25:00.000 You can't criticize anybody.

00:25:03.000 We have to be cheerleaders for bad optics.

00:25:05.000 We have to sell.

00:25:06.000 Oh, it was a wild success. 0.96

00:25:08.000 I love it when people who I support and am associated with are also associated with people that shoot at people and do Roman salutes. 0.93

00:25:17.000 That was great. 0.99

00:25:17.000 I love things that make our movement look. 0.99

00:25:19.000 I love things that make our message look bad.

00:25:22.000 I love things that drag us down.

00:25:24.000 I love when people spend money and time doing things only to have them make everyone look bad because you didn't think through some small details.

00:25:31.000 Come on, guys.

00:25:32.000 Simple as that.

00:25:33.000 But so that's optics.

00:25:34.000 I'm going to get rid of that photograph so we can move on here.

00:25:38.000 I know we're all tired of the optics debate.

00:25:40.000 It's one we've been having all week.

00:25:43.000 But I think we can retire that one.

00:25:45.000 We can retire that one for this week and we can move on to some other interesting stuff.

00:25:50.000 But I hope that didn't come across as making people mad because.

00:25:54.000 I go on poll the other day, and there's all kinds of threads about me.

00:25:57.000 There's all kinds of threads about me and James and America First Media.

00:26:01.000 And people are on there, and this intense fight is raging.

00:26:05.000 And people are saying, Nick needs to shut his mouth.

00:26:08.000 He needs to get in line.

00:26:09.000 He needs to learn that being right isn't always the number one thing.

00:26:13.000 He needs to put his head down and keep going.

00:26:16.000 And then the other side is saying, Richard Spencer's an undercover agent, and Nick is going to take it over.

00:26:20.000 And look, it doesn't need to be so contentious, it doesn't need to be this ugly fight.

00:26:27.000 And I wish people would stop comparing me to Richard Spencer.

00:26:30.000 Stop comparing me to Richard Spencer.

00:26:32.000 Stop saying, people on poll are saying, like, Nick is the future of the movement.

00:26:36.000 Nick is going to lead the movement.

00:26:39.000 Richard's time is up.

00:26:40.000 And, like, people are, I'm not, like, just injecting that into the dialogue.

00:26:44.000 Like, if you saw some of the posts on poll, people are saying this.

00:26:47.000 I'm not vying for control of the movement.

00:26:49.000 I am not making a bid for control of the movement.

00:26:52.000 For all the people that are out there and everybody's suggesting, like, Nick and James are the future, Nick's, you know, they're going to lead this, and they're comparing me to Spencer.

00:27:00.000 I'm not trying to compare myself to Spencer.

00:27:03.000 I'm not trying to compare myself to anybody.

00:27:06.000 I am not making a bid for leadership of anything.

00:27:08.000 I'm 19.

00:27:10.000 You know, and everybody's saying, all the critics are saying, Nick can't lead the movement.

00:27:13.000 He's 19.

00:27:14.000 Yeah, I agree with you.

00:27:16.000 I agree.

00:27:17.000 Nobody can lead a political movement at 19, and especially not when they've only entered after six months.

00:27:23.000 The purpose of this conversation is not to compare myself, it's not to launch some entryist bid for leadership of a political movement.

00:27:32.000 It's just to, it's exactly what it is.

00:27:34.000 It is what it is.

00:27:35.000 I know that's sort of an asinine tautology, but the purpose of my criticism of bad optics is to criticize bad optics, is to get better optics.

00:27:45.000 I'm not saying I'm the next, I'm not saying that.

00:27:48.000 And I wish people would stop comparing me to him and stop trying to create this false dichotomy between me and the alt right or me and the alt light.

00:27:57.000 I get along with everybody.

00:27:58.000 I get along with Spencer.

00:28:00.000 I met Spencer.

00:28:01.000 I get along with Jared Taylor.

00:28:02.000 I met Jared Taylor.

00:28:04.000 I met Peter Brimlow.

00:28:05.000 I met Eli Mosley.

00:28:06.000 I met Caloris Rex.

00:28:08.000 I met all these guys.

00:28:09.000 I like these guys.

00:28:10.000 They're good guys.

00:28:11.000 By the same token, I know many people in the alt light, and I don't agree with everything they say.

00:28:16.000 I don't agree with a lot of what they say, and I don't agree with a lot of what they do.

00:28:19.000 But I'm friendly with them, and we share each other's tweets.

00:28:22.000 And I'm friends with everybody.

00:28:24.000 I'm only speaking on the issues.

00:28:26.000 We have to divorce ourselves from the personality politics of it.

00:28:30.000 The personality politics will kill this movement before it gets off the ground.

00:28:34.000 So many people are so concerned with the egos, the personalities, they want to root for a team or something.

00:28:41.000 You got to root for the message.

00:28:43.000 My message is America First.

00:28:45.000 My brand is America First.

00:28:47.000 That I think will work.

00:28:48.000 And in due time, maybe in a few years after I get some experience, I do a little bit more networking.

00:28:55.000 Maybe it'll be time to launch some America First activism.

00:28:59.000 I think people are hungry for that.

00:29:00.000 People have been asking for that.

00:29:02.000 And once we get in a good position, once we build up the kind of organization that we want to see, that'll happen.

00:29:08.000 But in the meantime, it's just not constructive for people to be.

00:29:12.000 Fighting in this weird gossipy, like cat fight to be breaking out between people who I agree with, but just not entirely on optics.

00:29:20.000 So, just want to put that to bed with all this, you know.

00:29:25.000 Like, I'm not trying to do anything more than I am, which is to submit a humble criticism.

00:29:31.000 And I always say that.

00:29:31.000 I always say that, which I think is fair.

00:29:33.000 You got to be fair to me that when I launch into my criticisms, I always say I submit this humbly.

00:29:39.000 I submit this with the utmost respect.

00:29:41.000 I respect their sacrifices, I respect what they're doing.

00:29:45.000 But if they thought these things through just a little bit, if they tweaked these things a little bit, all that work, all that sacrifice would go a long way.

00:29:53.000 It would go much farther, I think.

00:29:55.000 So there it is.

00:29:56.000 That's optics.

00:29:57.000 We're done on that for the week, all right?

00:29:59.000 We're done with that for the week.

00:30:00.000 We've talked enough about it.

00:30:01.000 I've talked your ears off about it, so to speak.

00:30:05.000 So our next thing we got to talk about is I don't know.

00:30:09.000 Do we want to talk about Steve Bannon or Eli or Ellie Wiesel?

00:30:13.000 That's going to be a fun one.

00:30:15.000 I guess we'll talk about Steve Bannon.

00:30:17.000 I saw.

00:30:18.000 Richard Spencer did a long thread about Steve Bannon.

00:30:21.000 Because if you notice today, it was reported that Steve Bannon says that Milo Yiannopoulos is dead to him.

00:30:27.000 Since that BuzzFeed expose came out, where Milo was shown in a video doing Roman salutes, or rather, he was singing America the Beautiful to a crowd full of alt right guys giving Roman salutes, Richard Spencer included.

00:30:43.000 And after Steve Bannon saw that, apparently, he said Milo Yiannopoulos is dead to him.

00:30:48.000 He has no place at bright parties, cutting off all ties.

00:30:52.000 And then Richard Spencer launched into this whole thread about how Steve Bannon is not our guy.

00:30:58.000 Steve Bannon is not good.

00:30:59.000 Steve Bannon is our enemy. 1.00

00:31:00.000 Steve Bannon is a cuck. 1.00

00:31:04.000 And I see this and I am a little bit suspect. 0.99

00:31:07.000 And this is kind of an extenuation of the previous conversation.

00:31:10.000 But when we think in terms of alliances, when we think in terms of tactics for our movement, Steve Bannon is launching an all out war.

00:31:20.000 Against the GOP establishment.

00:31:22.000 He says it's for economic nationalism.

00:31:25.000 And he gets a lot of heat from that for the alt right, for being the proponent of economic as opposed to white nationalism.

00:31:31.000 But think of it.

00:31:32.000 He's going to full scale war with the GOP.

00:31:35.000 Massive resources in media, massive resources in politics, massive economic resources to give to primary challengers in safe Republican seats.

00:31:47.000 And he's going to war with the GOP establishment.

00:31:50.000 And for what issues?

00:31:51.000 Maybe it's for economic nationalism, but for what issues?

00:31:54.000 Because they're not strong enough on immigration, they're not strong enough on trade, they're not strong enough on health care.

00:32:02.000 They're not strong enough on economics.

00:32:04.000 They're not strong enough on Trump, essentially.

00:32:07.000 So you see Steve Bannon, he says he's for economic nationalism.

00:32:10.000 Okay, maybe.

00:32:11.000 But he's dedicating massive resources, motivating a massive civil war to oust a party which is pro amnesty, pro globalization, pro global government.

00:32:21.000 And we have people in our movement who are saying that's not good enough.

00:32:25.000 We have people in our movement saying he's a cuck because he doesn't like Richard Spencer, because he doesn't like the alt right.

00:32:33.000 Do you see the problem?

00:32:34.000 Do you see the problem with the purity spiraling, with the isolationism of this movement?

00:32:40.000 You have people like Bannon.

00:32:42.000 You have people in the alt light who are willing to fight for the RAISE Act, who are willing to fight for an end to illegal immigration, and they have massive support.

00:32:51.000 I don't care what anybody says.

00:32:53.000 Paul Joseph Watson has, I think, 800,000 followers on Twitter.

00:33:00.000 Infowars, Alex Jones, have a million followers.

00:33:03.000 Cernovich, Stefan Pasobiek, what do they have?

00:33:06.000 Like a million followers between all three of them?

00:33:09.000 And maybe if you factor in some of the other guys, they have a massive reach.

00:33:14.000 They have great connections in politics.

00:33:17.000 They have lots of influence.

00:33:18.000 Steve Bannon was in the White House, you guys.

00:33:21.000 He has the ear of Donald Trump.

00:33:23.000 He's got massive resources.

00:33:25.000 He runs Breitbart News.

00:33:27.000 That was bigger than ESPN before the election. 0.95

00:33:31.000 And our guys, who want to see immigration end, say, No, we don't like them. 1.00

00:33:39.000 We don't like them. 1.00

00:33:40.000 That's not good enough.

00:33:42.000 They're our enemies. 1.00

00:33:42.000 They're cucks. 1.00

00:33:44.000 They're not good enough. 1.00

00:33:45.000 They suck. 1.00

00:33:46.000 They're degenerates. 1.00

00:33:48.000 We hate them. 1.00

00:33:49.000 We hate their audience. 1.00

00:33:50.000 We hate their people. 0.80

00:33:52.000 We're going to do our own thing. 0.90

00:33:53.000 Do you see the madness?

00:33:56.000 Do you see the utter and complete madness of this?

00:34:01.000 Donald Trump is building a wall.

00:34:03.000 There have been prototypes constructed in San Diego, and they're testing them this month.

00:34:08.000 That's what you have to do before you build the wall.

00:34:11.000 They've built the prototypes.

00:34:13.000 He's getting the money together.

00:34:14.000 He shot down a deal to repeal, or rather, he shot down a deal where he would have to legalize DACA, but he would get all kinds of other concessions because it didn't include wall funding, because it didn't include an end to chain migration.

00:34:29.000 Donald Trump is the president of the United States.

00:34:32.000 He has 62 million followers.

00:34:35.000 He is in a position to make change.

00:34:37.000 He wants to make change, it's important to him.

00:34:40.000 His ally, Steve Bannon, is running a civil war against the GOP.

00:34:45.000 So that the GOP, an enormous party, that's 50% of the country, so that, or 50% of the voters, but that's what matters, so that they will support Donald Trump on his crusade for less immigration, for building a wall.

00:34:58.000 The alt-right supports Steve Bannon.

00:35:01.000 They support the candidates running against the establishment candidates, the ones that want less immigration, the ones, and you're seeing an entire power structure, an entire power structure, infrastructure that will get things done,

00:35:16.000 that will get the border wall built, that will get immigration suspended, that will get chain migration ended, that will get tax reform, that will get trade reform, reforms that will boost the economy, that will allow us to start having kids again, that will get the entitlement reform, the immigration reform, the employment reform, that'll make immigrants self deport.

00:35:36.000 And our guys look at this, this beautiful, well oiled machine, this amazing, spontaneous organization that has been constructed in a matter of 15 months.

00:35:46.000 And they say, that's cucky.

00:35:50.000 That's not good enough.

00:35:53.000 We're going to keep doing our podcasts.

00:35:55.000 We're going to keep doing our rallies where 15 people show up and people get shot and people get run over by cars.

00:36:05.000 We need to get out of it.

00:36:06.000 Of our own way.

00:36:08.000 Get out of your own way with these people.

00:36:11.000 That's not good enough.

00:36:13.000 What is good enough?

00:36:14.000 What will satisfy these people?

00:36:16.000 At once, they will take Gainesville and say, That's a big success.

00:36:20.000 Gainesville was awesome.

00:36:21.000 I don't care if someone got shot or shot at.

00:36:24.000 I don't care if people got arrested for attempted homicide. 1.00

00:36:27.000 I don't care if the optics were shit. 0.98

00:36:29.000 I don't care if there was not a single good recording. 0.99

00:36:31.000 I don't care if nobody showed up to it.

00:36:33.000 I don't care if all the press coverage was universally bad.

00:36:36.000 It was a good rally.

00:36:37.000 We can't counter signal our guys.

00:36:39.000 But Donald Trump.

00:36:40.000 He's not getting the border wall constructed quickly enough.

00:36:44.000 Steve Bannon isn't, he's in his war to replace pro amnesty politicians.

00:36:50.000 He isn't edgy enough.

00:36:51.000 He doesn't throw up enough Nazi references.

00:36:54.000 What?

00:36:55.000 What kind of logic is that?

00:36:57.000 What sense is there in this?

00:37:00.000 This is, this is the tough love.

00:37:03.000 This is the message that people need to hear.

00:37:05.000 Hate me for it.

00:37:06.000 Fine.

00:37:07.000 Love me.

00:37:08.000 Criticize me.

00:37:08.000 Hate me.

00:37:09.000 Call me a shill. 1.00

00:37:10.000 Call me a cuck. 0.92

00:37:11.000 Say I'm not doing IRL activism. 0.94

00:37:14.000 Say whatever you want.

00:37:15.000 I'm right.

00:37:17.000 I'm right, and you are wrong.

00:37:19.000 And unless these criticisms are internalized, unless somebody does something about this, unless somebody takes this into consideration, say goodbye to your movement, say goodbye to your country.

00:37:31.000 If that's not good enough, I don't know what is.

00:37:33.000 What's the alternative? 0.98

00:37:35.000 What is the goddamn alternative to that? 0.99

00:37:37.000 I don't see it. 0.99

00:37:39.000 That's what politics is.

00:37:40.000 It's the art of what you have in front of you, the art of the practical, the art of the pragmatic.

00:37:45.000 And we're going to throw away, we're going to say, We don't want to associate with this.

00:37:50.000 Isolate ourselves from that real movement so that we could have our 9%, right? 0.91

00:37:56.000 Ridiculous. 0.99

00:37:57.000 Ridiculous stuff. 0.99

00:37:59.000 I wish we could all come around to Steve Bannon. 0.98

00:38:03.000 Maybe that is.

00:38:05.000 And again, this is not a criticism.

00:38:07.000 This is not an indictment of anybody's moral character.

00:38:11.000 This is not an indictment of anybody's convictions.

00:38:14.000 Notice I'm not saying Spencer is a Fed.

00:38:16.000 I'm not saying he's a communist.

00:38:18.000 I'm not saying his ideology is bad.

00:38:21.000 I'm not even saying I don't like him.

00:38:23.000 I'm just saying that when you counter signal the real people doing real things, I question what thought has been put into that.

00:38:32.000 I really do.

00:38:34.000 Because I recognize that Spencer has done a lot for this movement.

00:38:37.000 Well, he's founded the movement and he's been working at it for his whole life in terms of getting educated, in terms of building the NPI, the Radix Journal, the Taki Magazine, and now altright.com.

00:38:49.000 And he's been instrumental with IE, and Mosley has as well.

00:38:53.000 And Enoch has done well with the right stuff.

00:38:55.000 And they've done a tremendous job of getting this stuff out there, getting this stuff to that 10%, getting people to show up to these rallies and express these messages and getting the word out there.

00:39:06.000 Nobody denies this.

00:39:07.000 But moving forward, moving over to the next phase of this movement so that we can grow, so that we can expand, we have to start thinking more practically.

00:39:16.000 I'm not taking a dump on anything they've done previously.

00:39:19.000 Where have they taken us?

00:39:20.000 Because that's been a godsend.

00:39:22.000 Believe me, that's been good work.

00:39:23.000 And it's arguable the record of that.

00:39:25.000 But they've done a lot of stuff.

00:39:26.000 And I think it would be silly not to acknowledge.

00:39:28.000 That a lot of it's been productive.

00:39:30.000 But if we want to get beyond that, if we want to emerge past this stage, we have to get smart, have to get pragmatic.

00:39:37.000 Counter signaling Steve Bannon, you know, does us no good.

00:39:40.000 And I love that word, counter signaling.

00:39:43.000 Notice if you criticize like the optics of a rally, I'm counter signaling.

00:39:48.000 I'm a bad guy.

00:39:50.000 I should be making my criticisms in private.

00:39:52.000 I should be cast out.

00:39:53.000 I should face punishment.

00:39:55.000 I should be.

00:39:56.000 It's like this weird, like, cult like.

00:39:59.000 Like SM thing, he needs to be punished for counter signaling.

00:40:02.000 It's insane, like Jonestown stuff for saying, hey, maybe there should have been a podium there. 0.98

00:40:09.000 People all day long say Trump is a cock, he's a shill, Steve Bannon's bad, and they counter signal the president of the United States. 0.98

00:40:17.000 That's fine. 0.99

00:40:18.000 Totally fine.

00:40:19.000 We have to pressure him, you see.

00:40:21.000 We have to put pressure on him so he does.

00:40:23.000 We can throw analysis out the window when we criticize President Trump because it's about the criticism in and of itself, which motivates him. 0.95

00:40:32.000 You know, clown world. 0.96

00:40:33.000 Clown world over here, clown world over there. 0.97

00:40:37.000 And here we are, the sane people. 0.92

00:40:38.000 Here we are, the coalition of the sane, right?

00:40:42.000 Anyway, that's enough.

00:40:44.000 I say enough about the optics, then I talk more about optics.

00:40:46.000 But our last story, and I don't know, maybe we'll move into questions because we got the 15 minute mark coming up on us.

00:40:53.000 We'll save the Ellie Wiesel story for tomorrow.

00:40:57.000 That's a juicy one.

00:40:58.000 Short, or a long story short, rather, Ellie Wiesel, who has written the book, About his experience during the Holocaust, which, by the way, there's a lot of lies in that book, which is not disputed by historians.

00:41:13.000 In his book, Night, like I'm not denying the Holocaust, I believe the Holocaust happened, but in Ellie Wiesel's book, Night, he says that at his concentration camp, people were being shoveled into pits of fire, which every historian says that's a lie.

00:41:30.000 Every historian said that did not happen.

00:41:33.000 As opposed to the gas chambers, which, well, most historians accept.

00:41:36.000 The gas chambers were there.

00:41:38.000 Ellie Wiesel said there were no gas chambers.

00:41:41.000 It was fire.

00:41:42.000 People were being shoveled into pits of fire.

00:41:44.000 10,000 people a day shoveled into pits of fire.

00:41:47.000 And one pit of fire was for the babies, and one pit of fire was for the adults, which is an outright lie.

00:41:54.000 I mean, both the deniers or the revisionists and the regular Holocaust scholars say that didn't happen. 0.76

00:42:00.000 So Ellie Wiesel, he's already a war profiteer and a liar.

00:42:03.000 Makes you think, though.

00:42:04.000 I hear a lot of stories like that, like the electricity, the steam powered chambers.

00:42:04.000 Makes you think.

00:42:11.000 Like the lampshades and bar.

00:42:12.000 I mean, there were a lot of like inconsistencies.

00:42:14.000 I'm sure they cleared that up, though.

00:42:16.000 I'm sure it's totally consistent now.

00:42:18.000 But anyway, there was a story that came out this week from Jennifer, Jenny Listman from Medium.com, where she has come out since the Harvey Weinstein thing broke.

00:42:28.000 And she said that Ellie Wiesel groped her in 1989.

00:42:33.000 When she was a 19 year old girl, Ellie Wiesel grabbed her butt when they were taking a picture together.

00:42:40.000 She said that they got together for a picture at this charity like benefit dinner. 0.98

00:42:45.000 And Ellie Wiesel, the sly dog, while he's holding the back of her shoulder, whatever, makes his way down the Casanova himself, down to the butt.

00:42:54.000 And he gave it a nice little grab, and then he skirted off into a crowd of 1,000 people.

00:42:59.000 And I just think that's comical.

00:43:01.000 But we'll get into more of that tomorrow.

00:43:03.000 I think we'll talk about some of the.

00:43:05.000 We'll do a circle around to the Vegas stuff and the sex scandal stuff tomorrow.

00:43:10.000 But just a little preview for our show on Tuesday.

00:43:13.000 Now we're going to get into our questions because I'm sure we got a lot.

00:43:17.000 I'm sure we got a lot of.

00:43:19.000 Things going on in our live chat here.

00:43:22.000 And let's check our super chats.

00:43:24.000 J22 report says, Have a nice week.

00:43:28.000 Also, are you going to put some shades on the pumpkin for one show?

00:43:31.000 Well, thank you, J22.

00:43:33.000 I may put some shades on the pumpkin.

00:43:35.000 I may do a little dressing up of the pumpkin.

00:43:37.000 Remember, next Tuesday is our Halloween special.

00:43:41.000 I think we're going to call it, and I'm going to make a flyer for it.

00:43:44.000 We're going to call it the America First Halloween Spooktacular.

00:43:48.000 How's that?

00:43:49.000 The America First Halloween Spooktacular.

00:43:52.000 And it'll be me featuring your.

00:43:54.000 Yours truly, I'll be wearing a festive tie.

00:43:57.000 I'll change the set.

00:43:58.000 I'll put in some Boomer Tech.

00:44:01.000 I'll put in a request at Boomer Tech.

00:44:02.000 I'll fax over an order form to Boomer Tech in, you know, wherever, at Computer World or whatever, at Circuit City.

00:44:12.000 And they'll insert like some spiders and things on our set.

00:44:16.000 And we'll take calls and I'll carve a pumpkin maybe and we'll have a good Halloween show.

00:44:21.000 Patrick Berry says we should adopt a New England slash Midwest middle class American aesthetic.

00:44:28.000 To try and keep it humble but classy with a clear message of a full blown stop on immigration thoughts.

00:44:33.000 I think that's beautiful.

00:44:34.000 I think that's exactly what we need.

00:44:36.000 Something like that.

00:44:37.000 Exactly right.

00:44:38.000 That's who we need to target.

00:44:39.000 Midwest, New England, that's demographically, politically, where we need to focus on.

00:44:44.000 And another thing you look at what's going to happen in the next 20 years with demographics Texas, Arizona, New Mexico, Colorado, and this sounds like I'm just going to list them off.

00:44:55.000 But the following states will turn blue in the next 20 years Nevada, Georgia.

00:45:03.000 New Mexico, Arizona, Colorado, Texas, Florida, probably North Carolina, and Virginia.

00:45:12.000 And when I say blue, I mean they will remain blue.

00:45:14.000 These will be solid blue states.

00:45:16.000 This will all happen in the next 20 years.

00:45:18.000 Anything we could hope to achieve through politics, through elections, goes out the window when these states go blue.

00:45:24.000 I mean, you think of all the electoral votes that are offered up by every swing state, every Southwest state, and Texas, impossible for Republicans to win the Senate.

00:45:34.000 Impossible for Republicans to win the presidency.

00:45:37.000 Arguably impossible for Republicans to win the House.

00:45:41.000 That happens. 1.00

00:45:41.000 Democrats legalize illegal immigrants. 1.00

00:45:44.000 There's another 40 million Mexicans in the country who support the Democratic Party. 0.80

00:45:49.000 They have massive immigration that continues, that is both legal and illegal. 0.98

00:45:53.000 Country is gone forever. 1.00

00:45:55.000 What we should focus on doing is shoring up in the short term to counteract this.

00:46:00.000 In the short term, I stress the short term, if we were to shore up a pro white Anti immigration vote or a voting block in Wisconsin, Michigan, Pennsylvania, New Hampshire, maybe even in some of the mid Atlantic states, maybe even in Ohio, in Iowa, Minnesota.

00:46:21.000 If we could turn these states red, if we could turn Washington and Oregon red, we could counteract for a short time the demographic takeover of the Southwest. 0.62

00:46:30.000 I think that's what we should be focusing on right now. 0.82

00:46:32.000 That would be a wise thing to do because we broke the blue wall in 2016.

00:46:36.000 And if we got the Midwest and the Rust Belt to be reliably red in the next 20 years, we could stave off this electoral winter.

00:46:44.000 To your point, with the optics, with the New England Midwest middle class aesthetic, that would serve that goal.

00:46:52.000 That's why I think it's very good.

00:46:53.000 And Trump started that.

00:46:54.000 Trump got the ball rolling with this Midwest, Mid Atlantic, or rather Midwest New England type thing.

00:47:00.000 I think that's the prototype for any kind of movement that we could have with the alt right or with anti immigration type people.

00:47:06.000 So I think it's very smart.

00:47:09.000 Two Dicks says, and we love our buddy Two Dicks, says, What do you say to the folks who say Christianity is the cause of these problems?

00:47:18.000 As in Christian ideals of equality causing the West to act against their interests.

00:47:22.000 Also, its Jewish roots. 1.00

00:47:24.000 It's ridiculous. 0.99

00:47:25.000 People who push this idea that Christianity caused the decline of the West don't know their history. 0.96

00:47:32.000 I mean, they know a lot of buzzwords, they know a lot of talking points.

00:47:36.000 They read a little blurb about Nietzsche, right?

00:47:38.000 They read what someone else had to say about Nietzsche.

00:47:41.000 But they don't understand Christianity.

00:47:44.000 Anybody who makes that criticism has never read the Bible.

00:47:46.000 You know this because in the Bible it directly undermines that idea of egalitarianism, of the nationless globalist world order, and of the quote unquote Jewish roots of Christianity.

00:48:02.000 For people that have read the Bible, you don't even have to get very far.

00:48:06.000 In Genesis, you have the story of the Tower of Babel.

00:48:09.000 In Revelations, they say that the nations of the earth will exist.

00:48:13.000 Until the end times, until the end of the world, nations will exist.

00:48:17.000 Jesus Christ himself says, Render unto Caesar what belongs to Caesar and what to God belongs to God.

00:48:23.000 In other words, there is a distinction between the kingdom of God, which is egalitarian, you do have the equality of souls, and the temporal kingdom of Caesar, which you have nations and governments, and these affairs are separate.

00:48:36.000 Moreover, with the Jewish element of it, number one, it's funny because the same people that criticize Christianity, i.e., Richard Spencer, Richard Spencer was mentored by Paul Gottfried, who was Jewish.

00:48:50.000 So, anybody that's skeptical of Christianity because it originated from Jesus, who was Jewish, Richard Spencer was mentored by Paul Gottfried, who was Jewish.

00:48:59.000 He was the one that coined the term alt right.

00:49:02.000 So, it's kind of a contradiction.

00:49:03.000 They say, oh, well, that's different.

00:49:05.000 Oh, that's different.

00:49:06.000 He was fine.

00:49:07.000 He was one of the good ones.

00:49:08.000 Oh, so you can make exceptions there, but, you know, right?

00:49:11.000 And not that I share the same skepticism as other people, but for people that have these views.

00:49:18.000 Jesus Christ himself drove the moneylenders from the temple.

00:49:22.000 Jesus Christ himself criticized the teachings of the rabbis, of the Pharisees.

00:49:28.000 And again, I've talked about this at length the difference between the Talmud and the New Testament.

00:49:33.000 It's just not the same.

00:49:35.000 And additionally, the Talmud is contrary to the Old Testament.

00:49:39.000 People say, oh, well, someone commented on one of my videos and they said, oh, well, I think what they mean is that the Old Testament was the religion of the Jews, that's the Torah, and Jesus was Jewish.

00:49:50.000 Okay, but the Talmud.

00:49:51.000 Contradicts the Old Testament even.

00:49:54.000 The supposed scripture that they adhere to, that they did in biblical times, they do not anymore. 0.85

00:49:59.000 Because in the Talmud, which was written in 200 AD and 400 AD, the two versions of it, in the Talmud it says that the rabbis correct God on scripture.

00:50:11.000 There's multiple stories in the Talmud where God says it should be this way and the rabbis say, no, According to rabbinical teaching, it says this and they correct God.

00:50:21.000 Does that sound like the Old Testament to you?

00:50:23.000 Does that sound consistent with scripture?

00:50:26.000 Additionally, the very idea of a Talmud, the very idea of an oral tradition, is contrary to the Old Testament because the Old Testament does not make any mention of an oral tradition handed down to Moses on Mount Sinai by God.

00:50:42.000 You know, the rabbis have it that in addition to the Ten Commandments, God gave the Jews a secret oral law, which was to become the Talmud, which is eventually culminated and aggregated into the Talmud in 200 and then 400 AD.

00:50:58.000 But that's not in Scripture.

00:50:59.000 That goes against Scripture.

00:51:00.000 So there's all these things to consider where it's just not true.

00:51:04.000 Anybody who knows the first thing about this religion knows that's not the case.

00:51:07.000 And moreover, the whole idea I don't think people know this, Testament means covenant.

00:51:14.000 Testament is almost a synonym for covenant in the biblical sense, where the Old Testament means the three covenants between first Noah, and then Abraham, and then Moses.

00:51:24.000 And that was the Old Testament.

00:51:26.000 That was the Old Covenant, where first God made a covenant with Noah, he would never flood the world again.

00:51:31.000 Then he made a covenant with Abraham where he said, I will bless your nation if you go forth and multiply.

00:51:36.000 And then the covenant with Moses where he said, I will save your people, or he fulfilled his promise to save his people and said, You know, if you follow my laws, everything will work out.

00:51:49.000 And then the New Testament, the new covenant, was that God sent his son, and it's both man and God, to come and save the world.

00:51:58.000 And that was supposed to abrogate the idea of Judaism because. 0.92

00:52:02.000 Christianity was meant to replace that. 0.92

00:52:04.000 Jesus was the prophesied Messiah in the Old Testament, and he fulfilled that. 0.99

00:52:09.000 And that was the point.

00:52:10.000 He was supposed to come and say, No, no, no, no.

00:52:12.000 Remember how you had a personal God?

00:52:14.000 A personal, you were the, what do you call it?

00:52:18.000 You were the client of a personal God.

00:52:21.000 Yahweh was your God.

00:52:22.000 Now I am the God for all people, and you have to join.

00:52:25.000 You know, we're all Jewish essentially now, in the sense that now we're all Christians. 0.86

00:52:30.000 And the Jews were like, No, we don't believe you. 0.88

00:52:32.000 You're a false prophet.

00:52:34.000 And they turned their back on him, they rejected him. 0.97

00:52:36.000 They rejected Jesus Christ.

00:52:39.000 And so that's why, you know, to say that he's some Jewish conspiracy, it's absurd. 0.62

00:52:44.000 And somebody was referring me to some essay where it's like, you can talk about the Rothschilds and you can talk about all this other stuff, but the real conspiracy, you can say protocols of elders of Zion is true, whatever, because the real conspiracy is Christianity. 0.82

00:53:01.000 I mean, that's a lie. 0.87

00:53:02.000 It's just a flat out lie.

00:53:03.000 This is somebody who hasn't read the Bible.

00:53:05.000 This is somebody who doesn't understand the first thing about the issue.

00:53:09.000 I mean, this is well known.

00:53:10.000 So.

00:53:12.000 Not to get all religious, but you ask about this and you have to look at the religious aspect of it, which is, you know, just not true.

00:53:19.000 Just not true.

00:53:21.000 Howard Morton dropping the dollar.

00:53:22.000 Thank you, Howard Morton.

00:53:23.000 We love the single shekel.

00:53:27.000 Woke Tree, did you see any of Julian Assange's tweets today about the Schofield Bible and how it was what injected Zionism into evangelic Christian churches?

00:53:37.000 I didn't read that, but I did see that tweet.

00:53:40.000 I ended up reading the article.

00:53:41.000 I'll have to check that out.

00:53:42.000 But.

00:53:43.000 Yeah, I think Assange is woke.

00:53:45.000 He knows what's going on.

00:53:46.000 And, you know, again, about these Christians who are wild about Israel, these Christians who believe in this Judeo Christian thing. 0.95

00:53:54.000 Jews, by their very nature, because they exist, have rejected Jesus Christ. 0.98

00:53:59.000 Like, how do you reconcile that? 1.00

00:54:01.000 Like, hi, I believe that God sent his son to save the world, and he's my savior, and the perfect, ideal man is him.

00:54:13.000 And then they say, no, we're the same.

00:54:14.000 We're on the same team as the people that rejected him, as the people that say that he's boiling in hell and his followers will go there too, and we're glad about that, and who were partly responsible for being crucified in the first place.

00:54:28.000 I don't know how, you know, maybe you can have tolerance, and sure, you know, you can have a peace, you can have like a detente between these two people, but I don't know how Christians take it a step further and say, actually, we're the same. 0.83

00:54:40.000 We're of the same tradition, and we love each other, and we could spend billions of dollars on this rogue country. 0.99

00:54:47.000 I don't see how you take it that far.

00:54:50.000 Dissident right message received.

00:54:52.000 Let this be a wide awakening.

00:54:54.000 Hell yeah, my man.

00:54:55.000 Hell yeah.

00:54:56.000 David Andrews outsourcing jobs, immigration, disappearing middle class tradition.

00:55:02.000 Talking about for 40 years, nobody cared as long as they had football, hockey, and television. 1.00

00:55:07.000 It's true.

00:55:08.000 And it's unfortunate how distracted we have become with the bread and circus that people care more about the sports game, people care more about the television than they do about their race.

00:55:08.000 It's true.

00:55:22.000 Their ethnicity, their heritage, their people, their money.

00:55:26.000 I mean, anything.

00:55:28.000 People like my own parents, taxes are getting higher.

00:55:33.000 The property taxes in Cook County, which is where Chicago is, it's like twice a month or twice a month, twice a year, the property taxes rise.

00:55:43.000 Everything is getting more expensive.

00:55:46.000 Wages are going down.

00:55:47.000 You know, health care is getting more expensive.

00:55:49.000 Health insurance is getting more expensive.

00:55:51.000 Car insurance is getting more expensive.

00:55:53.000 We have taxes on food.

00:55:54.000 We have taxes in restaurants.

00:55:56.000 We have taxes on gas.

00:55:57.000 Energy prices are going up.

00:55:59.000 Property taxes are going up.

00:56:01.000 Income taxes are going up.

00:56:02.000 Everything's going up.

00:56:04.000 Everything's getting more expensive.

00:56:05.000 Wages are going down.

00:56:07.000 Every day, people own less.

00:56:09.000 They're more in debt on their credit cards.

00:56:10.000 They're more in debt on their cars.

00:56:12.000 They're more in debt on their homes.

00:56:13.000 They don't own anything.

00:56:14.000 They don't have anything.

00:56:16.000 They don't have a retirement.

00:56:18.000 Social Security is drying up, and people's 401ks are drying up.

00:56:21.000 The value of the dollar is drying up.

00:56:24.000 People are losing their jobs.

00:56:25.000 The amount of jobs is decreasing. 1.00

00:56:28.000 The immigrants that are coming here are taking the jobs. 1.00

00:56:30.000 They're taking the houses. 1.00

00:56:31.000 They're taking all the resources.

00:56:33.000 Everything's getting worse.

00:56:34.000 We're under assault everywhere.

00:56:36.000 There's degeneracy on television for our children. 0.98

00:56:39.000 Our kids are getting raped by their teachers, and when they're not getting mind raped from what's in school, in the curriculum, they're getting raped by the teachers, actually, like physically. 0.96

00:56:49.000 Then they go to college and they get swamped with that. 0.97

00:56:51.000 I mean, it's just this crushing, broken system that is coming down on the common man in this country.

00:56:57.000 And they can't get off the couch for five minutes to give a damn about it.

00:57:02.000 They can't turn off the big football match.

00:57:04.000 They can't turn off the big sitcom for long enough to read about this stuff or to get mad about this stuff or, I don't know, cause a little trouble.

00:57:13.000 I don't know, maybe flip over some cars.

00:57:15.000 Maybe riot in the streets.

00:57:19.000 I don't know what you would have to do.

00:57:19.000 I don't know.

00:57:20.000 I don't know what you do when your kids are getting raped, your jobs are being taken, there's terrorists in your country, illegal immigrants who should never be in here are killing our children. 0.99

00:57:30.000 You're losing your job. 0.99

00:57:31.000 You're losing everything you own.

00:57:32.000 You're losing your country.

00:57:35.000 And what is a man to do?

00:57:37.000 What is a man to do? 0.99

00:57:38.000 Well, we're supposed to sit on our ass and take it. 0.99

00:57:40.000 We're supposed to watch the sitcom, watch the big football match, hey, and vote. 0.99

00:57:47.000 Hey, but be sure to get out and vote.

00:57:50.000 Be sure to get out and vote for a Republican or a Democrat to affect change, right?

00:57:56.000 Don't kill politicians.

00:57:57.000 Don't kill journalists.

00:57:58.000 Don't, no.

00:58:00.000 No.

00:58:00.000 We discourage that.

00:58:01.000 We discourage violence on this show.

00:58:03.000 Violence, you know, I think we can all agree that violence is wrong.

00:58:07.000 I think we can all agree that no matter what happens, violence is never the answer.

00:58:12.000 Right?

00:58:13.000 I'm sure we can all agree that when we see our children being exploded at children's concerts, we understand that the politicians that continue to let these people in, that let terrorists into our country, should face no consequences other than a soft dismissal from their position, right?

00:58:33.000 That's the most we should do.

00:58:36.000 Of course, I'm not, it's not sarcastic.

00:58:38.000 That's true.

00:58:39.000 We are against violence in all its forms.

00:58:42.000 But really, yeah, it's so, it grinds my gears how that's.

00:58:47.000 Oh, that's the case.

00:58:48.000 You know, it's always the television, it's always the sports, always the big, you know, whatever.

00:58:53.000 And then for the youngsters, it's drinking.

00:58:55.000 For the youngsters, it's drugs, alcohol, sex.

00:58:58.000 I look at my friends and I'm up on my Friday night and I'm watching like Oswald Mosley speeches, I'm watching like documentaries, I'm reading.

00:59:07.000 And not to be like Big Nibba posting here, but in other words, on my Friday night, I'm trying to perfect my craft, I'm trying to get better with my business, trying to learn things for my show.

00:59:17.000 And every weekend, every weekend, and most weekdays, to be frank, I look on Snapchat, I look on Twitter, Facebook, and my friends, you know, they're drinking, they're doing cocaine, they're smoking pot, they're smoking cigarettes, they're having sex.

00:59:34.000 And all the while, they're in school, you know, learning nothing, wasting money.

00:59:38.000 And it's just tragic.

00:59:40.000 We have to stand up.

00:59:41.000 We have to say enough to this sick order.

00:59:45.000 And what else do we got here?

00:59:47.000 Iridema Bill says Have you read Mencius Moldbug?

00:59:50.000 If so, how has he interrupted?

00:59:52.000 I have read Moldbug.

00:59:53.000 I have read some of the NRX literature, and it's influenced my thinking.

00:59:59.000 It's made me a lot less libertarian politically and economically because I saw, and this has sort of been, I had always been kind of like going in this direction when I read Hop, when I read, even when you get into Pinochet and that historical example, and you look at some other nationalists from back in the day, you say, wait a minute, liberalism is flawed.

01:00:25.000 Libertarianism is flawed, both in its political manifestation, economic, and social manifestations.

01:00:30.000 I would read, like, John Stuart Mill, and I would say, something not quite right here.

01:00:33.000 I'd read Milton Friedman, and I'd say, there's something off here.

01:00:36.000 I don't know if I necessarily agree with this.

01:00:38.000 And I think NRX gave shape to an ideology which harnesses that skepticism of liberalism.

01:00:47.000 I wouldn't say, like, I am not a socialist.

01:00:50.000 I am not a big government kind of a guy.

01:00:53.000 In fact, because I'm an American traditionalist, I believe that this country requires.

01:00:58.000 A certain degree of liberalism.

01:00:59.000 But I just have become skeptical of democracy and liberalism in and of themselves.

01:01:04.000 Liberalism for the sake of itself.

01:01:06.000 Very important distinction.

01:01:07.000 You know, I criticized libertarianism the other day, and people are in my mentions saying, So what?

01:01:14.000 You're a big government totaler?

01:01:16.000 What?

01:01:16.000 You're a statist?

01:01:17.000 You want Venezuela?

01:01:17.000 What?

01:01:18.000 What are you, Bernie, bro?

01:01:19.000 What are you? 1.00

01:01:19.000 It's like, no, no retard. 1.00

01:01:22.000 There's all the difference in the world between recognizing that liberalism should be for this country because it is the tradition of this country and Liberalism is the highest thing that we can aspire to and should be pursued for the sake of itself. 1.00

01:01:38.000 Liberty for the sake of itself.

01:01:40.000 I don't agree with that.

01:01:42.000 I agree we should have liberalism in this country because our founding culture was one of liberalism, whether it was the Constitution, the Declaration, the Transcendentalists, sort of an Anglo Saxon liberal Western European culture.

01:01:56.000 You know, that is perfectly, I think, what should be done in this country.

01:01:56.000 Fine.

01:02:01.000 Although there should be more vertical hierarchy in government, you need to restore the Constitution in its original form.

01:02:08.000 But to say that we should have all these freedoms and rights and liberties and everything for the sake of itself, because freedoms are always good.

01:02:17.000 Freedoms are always good, and we should always be expanding them and should always be more liberal, more democratic, because that's good and rights are good. 0.97

01:02:24.000 That's dumb. 1.00

01:02:25.000 That is dumb. 1.00

01:02:26.000 It's juvenile, adolescent. 1.00

01:02:28.000 That's where I used to be.

01:02:29.000 I used to be that way.

01:02:30.000 And there was always this nagging doubt in my head where I would say, why though?

01:02:36.000 Why should liberty be the answer?

01:02:38.000 Why should liberalism be the answer?

01:02:40.000 Why should it be free like this?

01:02:42.000 And I think it should be for people that can handle it, which is us. 0.53

01:02:47.000 Sarah Highlander, Christianity is inherently counter Semitic. 0.91

01:02:51.000 The entire New Testament is Jesus calling out certain hypocrites and people scheming to kill him for it. 0.96

01:02:58.000 Let's take it easy.

01:02:59.000 We don't, again, we want to make our message accessible, but I tend to agree with this.

01:02:59.000 All right.

01:03:04.000 Undefined tits or GTFO. 1.00

01:03:07.000 Tits, you want to see my nips? 1.00

01:03:09.000 Not going to happen. 1.00

01:03:10.000 That is degenerate.

01:03:12.000 You want to see that?

01:03:13.000 Go to some salacious.

01:03:15.000 Website or R rated movie.

01:03:17.000 This is not, this is a wholesome show.

01:03:19.000 No nudity on this show.

01:03:23.000 George Menta, your top three U.S. presidents.

01:03:28.000 I would have to say top three U.S. presidents.

01:03:28.000 Difficult.

01:03:34.000 Donald Trump is number one.

01:03:36.000 Number two would probably be Jackson.

01:03:39.000 Number three would probably be Kennedy.

01:03:43.000 Because I think Trump, if he gets this right, he'll have saved the country.

01:03:46.000 Andrew Jackson, because he created the country with.

01:03:50.000 Manifest Destiny, destroying the second national bank, fighting against the establishment, and then Kennedy because he knew what was going on.

01:04:00.000 He knew what was going on.

01:04:01.000 He fought against it.

01:04:03.000 Obviously, he did not succeed, but I think it was, you know, that integrity I admire greatly. 0.91

01:04:10.000 Saxon Runes, do you think a white ethnostate is a reality? 0.52

01:04:13.000 Nope, nope, not anytime soon.

01:04:15.000 And people should stop talking about it because you have to start, you know, number one, that's not like nobody's going to buy that.

01:04:22.000 You cannot, like, undo.

01:04:24.000 So many years of conditioning.

01:04:25.000 That should not, even if that's your North Star, that should not be the brand.

01:04:30.000 Nobody's going to buy into that.

01:04:31.000 Not after all these years of programming.

01:04:33.000 It has to be gradual.

01:04:35.000 It has to be, well, it has to be gradual.

01:04:39.000 I mean, that's just it. 1.00

01:04:40.000 Nobody in the left started out saying, boys are girls, girls are boys, blacks should kill everyone, like white people should be destroyed. 1.00

01:04:47.000 They didn't start out that way. 0.99

01:04:48.000 You know, the left went from the 1950s to 2017, one of the most successful ideological campaigns in world history.

01:04:57.000 The left, the globalists. 0.55

01:04:59.000 And they didn't start out in the 1950s saying, White should be a minority in their own country. 1.00

01:05:04.000 Whites are evil. 1.00

01:05:05.000 White's history should be discarded. 1.00

01:05:07.000 White is evil. 1.00

01:05:08.000 You know, they didn't start out that way. 1.00

01:05:09.000 It started out with, Oh, look at these blacks. 0.95

01:05:15.000 Look at their plight. 0.98

01:05:16.000 It's so unfortunate.

01:05:17.000 We should be equal.

01:05:19.000 We should be equal.

01:05:20.000 We should have civil rights.

01:05:21.000 Look at them.

01:05:22.000 They're peaceful.

01:05:23.000 They're marching down the street.

01:05:25.000 And they just want rights, they just want to vote.

01:05:28.000 They just want to be a part of it. 1.00

01:05:30.000 And then with the feminist thing, they just want to work. 1.00

01:05:33.000 They just want to be treated equal. 0.99

01:05:35.000 Why do you hate women? 1.00

01:05:37.000 And it was good optics and it was a good message. 0.97

01:05:39.000 It was defensive.

01:05:40.000 And then gradually it got to this point where it's like, bake the cake, bigot. 0.99

01:05:45.000 If you don't want 50 year old mentally ill psychopaths, sociopaths in wigs in the girls' bathroom with your children, you're a bigot. 0.99

01:05:54.000 Like it didn't start out that way, but it is that way now. 0.99

01:05:57.000 So.

01:05:59.000 Gradualism is the name of the game, Goy.

01:06:02.000 Spoiler alert. 1.00

01:06:03.000 I think that the Bible is a history about and survival guide for the white race who are the actual ancient Israelites. 0.93

01:06:11.000 Ooh, white people are wisely instructed to remain a people apart lest they be destroyed. 0.80

01:06:16.000 I don't know about that.

01:06:17.000 I wouldn't go that far.

01:06:19.000 No, I don't think that's true.

01:06:22.000 I'm not sure about that.

01:06:23.000 I haven't researched this theory, but from my understanding, the people that wrote the Bible were Semitic people.

01:06:32.000 And if I read correctly, the.

01:06:36.000 The historical Aryan race were the people that the Jews fought on their way out of Egypt during the Exodus.

01:06:45.000 So that's the only thing I've heard about that.

01:06:48.000 But I don't know.

01:06:49.000 I'll have to research that theory.

01:06:51.000 Interesting, but I don't know if it's true.

01:06:53.000 And our last super chat here, we're about 10 minutes over, so this will be the last one.

01:06:57.000 Undefined.

01:06:58.000 First, men rallied behind religion, then men rallied behind the state.

01:07:02.000 In a time of decline regarding religion as well as the state, what rallying cry would more people find appealing?

01:07:10.000 That's a good question.

01:07:11.000 That's a really good question.

01:07:13.000 I think it would be religion.

01:07:15.000 I really do, because religion offers answers.

01:07:18.000 Religion offers meaning in a place where there is none anymore.

01:07:22.000 I mean, that's if you read Evola, if you read Spengler, if you read even Huntington on these issues, Jung, any of the German authors, any of the kind of like the pessimists of the past 100 years, they talk about how this nihilism has pervaded our civilization.

01:07:41.000 Nietzsche's Is the progenitor of this idea that nihilism and Dostoevsky too has like taken out everything that matters in life from an epistemological sense, or that's the right, that's how you pronounce it, right?

01:07:55.000 Epistemological sense, from an ontological sense, from an existential sense.

01:08:00.000 It's taken out the meaning of life for individuals.

01:08:02.000 You subtract that, you know, you don't have anything.

01:08:05.000 So I think the religious is so key, so crucial for that reason.

01:08:08.000 That's why I preach it.

01:08:10.000 That's why I say it's indispensable to our movement.

01:08:13.000 This idea that we can.

01:08:15.000 Not answer those fundamental questions or have like paganism as a substitute.

01:08:20.000 It's absurd.

01:08:21.000 So, but that's that.

01:08:25.000 Looks like that's our last question.

01:08:26.000 So I think we'll call it a night.

01:08:28.000 It's been a good show, been a fun show.

01:08:30.000 It's always pretty comfy, always pretty fun when we do the optics.

01:08:33.000 I like the tension.

01:08:34.000 I like the conflict.

01:08:35.000 It's fun for me.

01:08:35.000 So, and I don't think there's any bad side to it either.

01:08:39.000 People always say, you cannot counter signal.

01:08:41.000 Like, what's the downside?

01:08:43.000 You know, what's the bad part?

01:08:44.000 What's the consequence?

01:08:45.000 But anyway, that's our show.

01:08:47.000 Always a fun time here on America First.

01:08:50.000 That's our show.

01:08:50.000 Remember, you can ask us questions on Twitter using the hashtag AmericaFQ.

01:08:55.000 Follow me.

01:08:56.000 All the details down below Twitter at NickJFuentes.

01:08:59.000 You got the PayPal, the Hatreon, the Patreon.

01:09:02.000 All that good stuff is down below in the description.

01:09:05.000 Remember, we have another episode of Nationalist Review on Wednesday.

01:09:09.000 So if you didn't miss it or if you didn't catch it on Saturday, we have two episodes a week now because we are in a good position on our Patreon.

01:09:17.000 We passed our $500 a month threshold.

01:09:19.000 So we'll be doing an episode on Wednesday with the lovely trad Faith Goldie.

01:09:24.000 So look.

01:09:24.000 Forward to that.

01:09:26.000 We're on the air Monday through Friday, 7 p.m. Central, 8 p.m. Eastern Time.

01:09:29.000 Don't forget about Overdrive with James Alsup.

01:09:32.000 Tuesdays and Thursdays every week at 8 p.m. Central, 9 p.m. Eastern Time.

01:09:37.000 I'm Nicholas J. Fuentes.

01:09:38.000 This was America First.

01:09:39.000 Thank you guys so much for watching.

01:09:41.000 250 IQ only.

01:09:42.000 No Reinhard Wolfson.

01:09:44.000 This show will take it out of context and send me weird emails.

01:09:47.000 Only 250 IQs.

01:09:49.000 Thank you for watching.

01:09:50.000 Thank you for being a part of it.

01:09:52.000 We know you.

01:09:52.000 We love you.

01:09:53.000 We'll catch you again tomorrow.

01:09:54.000 Have a great rest of your evening, my big brain nibbus.

01:10:01.000 Americanism, not globalism, will be our credo.

01:10:07.000 It's going to be only America first.

01:10:12.000 America first. 0.99

01:10:17.000 The American people will come first once again.

01:10:29.000 With respect to respect. 0.52

01:10:46.000 America first.

America First - Nicholas J. Fuentes - October 23, 2017

Generation Identity Does It Right | America First Ep. 37

Episode Stats

Summary

Transcript