00:01:05.000I mean, whenever I do this, and I do it deliberately, by the way.
00:01:08.000I always get crazy traffic on my account, which is what you want.
00:01:14.000I'm telling people, you know, who are there's all kinds of people in my mentions because I tweeted something, I guess, that ended up pertaining to the Ariana Grande song that came out last night or something.
00:01:26.000And so there's been a big reaction from Ariana Grande fan Twitter.
00:01:30.000They're all very upset at me, very displeased.
00:01:35.000And people are like, oh my gosh, you know, that's crazy telling me all this stuff.
00:05:01.000But it had to happen basically, so I don't hold the grudge against them.
00:05:05.000I didn't then, I don't now, but I did about 50 shows with them last year, so it's really like 252 shows I've done, or a little bit more than that, I think.
00:05:15.000So I'm really at more than 250 shows, that's well over 250 hours of content.
00:06:38.000And so what's on your mind today, Mr. Brainsick?
00:06:41.000Well, Recently, I went to an old Americana museum full of antiques, antique planes, antique cars, all American, all beautiful, a bunch of old American stuff, American flags everywhere, all that type of stuff, everything you'd imagine that would be in that type of a museum.
00:07:03.000And it made me wonder why it is that the old, you know, early 1900s, before World War II, during World War II, a little bit after World War II, all of the stuff that was made then.
00:07:15.000Had so much soul, so much aesthetic value.
00:07:19.000And today, the architecture, the cars, everything, the posters, the comics, the art, it's all derivative.
00:07:27.000It's all just downright disgusting, awful.
00:07:30.000There's no aesthetic value to any of it.
00:08:06.000I mean, you look at the cars, like, really?
00:08:09.000And to me, I always think, like, it's not a matter of cost in terms of architecture or cars or anything else.
00:08:17.000For the most part, it would be very, you know, I don't think it would be that great an expense to make things just look a little bit different, a little bit nicer.
00:08:24.000But I think, You're, you know, it's kind of implicit in the question you're asking, which is the soul.
00:08:29.000I mean, I think we all understand that what's lost is sort of an immaterial thing.
00:08:35.000You know, it's a feel, it's something that's a little bit more out there as opposed to something concrete and definable.
00:08:41.000And it's definitely something that you see in the aesthetics, it's something you see in everything.
00:09:53.000I think there's something in it where somewhere I'm not sure exactly when it was the American people went from having value in this sort of stuff.
00:10:04.000To just thinking that whatever is the most economical is the best option.
00:10:09.000Because you look at the cars and they're very aerodynamic, but the way that they've made them aerodynamic has made them ugly and just disgusting.
00:13:00.000They were wearing like jeans and vests, and they didn't have like the ice on the back of the front.
00:13:07.000And I guess when it's not a multi agency operation, ice isn't required to put the like identifying stuff on the front or the back.
00:13:19.000So I just thought that was really interesting.
00:13:21.000You know, I can't believe there's ice actually carrying out raids in Massachusetts and actually like literally right across the street from my house.
00:15:37.000And, you know, I was in the drive thru, and these idiots, okay.
00:15:41.000The Burger King sign, one half of it is lit up, and that's just like the value menu.
00:15:46.000So you've got about like the five options there.
00:15:49.000And the other portion of the menu is not lit.
00:15:53.000Okay, like one is there's a light bulb behind it, you know, so it's like glowing, and the other one is just plain and there's no light on it.
00:18:05.000It shows how often that you're so ahead of the curve where you're vindicated over and over, where with the trad, not debate, we're continuously being vindicated where these women online, they're a problem.
00:18:19.000And, you know, look, not for nothing, but you look at a Tara McCarthy, you look at any one of these people, and it's not even so much that they are hypocritical.
00:18:32.000I would be hesitant to say that we should totally be judgmental.
00:23:48.000We'll have a very short window to get a bill passed before the midterms.
00:23:53.000And then, obviously, that would be the best opportunity because then we know that we have control of the House and control of the Senate, and we'd be able to get it through a 51.
00:24:01.000And also, the pressure would be on because the election is coming up.
00:24:04.000After the election, you don't know if we have control of the House.
00:24:08.000I think it's pretty certain we'll have control of the Senate.
00:24:10.000But, I mean, then, you know, even if you had 51 in the Senate, you might not have 218 in the House.
00:24:15.000So, once again, you're in a difficult spot.
00:24:17.000So, I would say our prospects are tough, but it's still doable.
00:24:23.000We either got to whip the Democrats, which would seem impossible, might be doable before the election when we could get people like Donnelly and Don, or not Connelly, Donnelly and Heidkamp and Manchin and some of those other McCaskill, possibly, or we get it with that rule.
00:27:07.000And so when we're talking about God not being a woman, we don't mean he's literally a man.
00:27:14.000We're saying that it's important to understand his nature that he is masculine.
00:27:18.000That's why we call him God the Father and God the Son.
00:27:22.000And so I'm seeing all these tweets the other day saying, God is a woman, God is a woman, all this kind of stuff, because the single's coming out.
00:27:29.000I didn't know about the song, but I'm seeing it, so I tweeted out, God is not a woman.
00:27:33.000And, you know, of course this is a bait.
00:27:59.000Because the one time that he became man, the one time he became flesh and blood, this is what he looked like.
00:28:08.000And so we're just going to go through some of the replies here.
00:28:10.000Whenever something like this happens, it's always fun to see what people are saying because it's never enough that they're saying these things where you might say, oh, well, it's just, it's all in good.
00:28:37.000You tweet something like this, and you get, along with people who just like the music, people who legitimately are cultural Marxist, postmodernist, if not consciously, they are that.
00:28:50.000And particularly, we'll look at this tweet.
00:28:52.000Look at the replies to this one, all right?
00:29:51.000And I'll show you what I mean by this, why I'm bringing this up.
00:29:55.000If you're talking about a number like infinity, If you were to divide a number by infinity, no matter what number it is, it would always be zero.
00:30:04.000If I divide 10 by infinity, it's zero because infinity is such a large, incomprehensible number.
00:30:10.000I mean, it's infinite, that's in the word, that any number above that is going to be zero because you could go from 10 and then infinity, maybe you start at 100 and then you go to 1,000 and then a million and then a billion and a trillion and you keep adding on zeros to the point where that fraction is always approaching zero, always is zero as you.
00:30:32.000And so, why this is important, understand this.
00:30:36.000Let's say that time starts at a finite point, but compared to us, it's like infinity, right?
00:30:42.000In other words, there is an infinite amount of time before you are born, and then you live for a little while, and then there's an infinite amount of time after you're born.
00:30:51.000And so, if we can conceive of a lifetime, not in just three dimensional space, that, well, Ariana Grande is alive now, and let's say Jesus Christ was not God, well, then that meant he would have died 2,000 years ago.
00:31:06.000But if we're thinking about lives in terms of time, and this is 100% logical, by the way, well, technically, Ariana Grande, because she has damned her soul forever, she'll be burning in hell forever because she blasphemes God and because she does, there's a whole other basket of sins there.
00:31:25.000Because she'll be burning in hell for eternity, technically, if we look at her life and Christ's life, not in a cross section of 2018, but in a holistic way, in a four dimensional way, Then we can say that Ariana Grande is dead forever.
00:32:25.000Because this is a person that young people idolize, and I think they have it that, like, oh, well, because she is attractive, because she's beautiful, oh, well, you know, this is a person to idolize.
00:34:19.000This is what I mean when I was referring to earlier how it just always devolves into outright hatred of white people, of Western civilization.
00:40:43.000Now, when I say that most people are 100 IQ, this is what I mean by this.
00:40:48.000This is why we don't really get all upset about things that are said online because most people are a former Christian fundamentalist minister turned atheist due to research that revealed many flaws in human doctrine.
00:47:08.000So it's not an anti woman thing, but it's an anti people who are against the laws of nature, which dictate that, yeah, football has to be men only, and video games has to be men only, and education.
00:47:22.000Doesn't have to be men only, but you do have to have segregation.
00:47:25.000And the reason being is because we all know that when women are inserted into a male space, they change the dynamic.
00:47:32.000This has been known since the beginning of time.
00:47:35.000They didn't have women in the army for obvious reasons that everybody knows.
00:47:53.000Because you want to have men out or young men out unattended, camping, and you know what happens if there's no supervision and it's boys and girls.
00:48:06.000Not only does it distract men, not only does it, you know, not necessarily problems with that, but also what happens, and this is something that Anglin, I think, wrote about a lot during Thought Wars, is that when women are inserted into the equation, it usually divides men into two camps.
00:48:22.000There are men who they're not really affected by that, they're going to do their thing.
00:48:27.000And it's not like a 50 50 split or anything, but there are men who are largely unaffected.
00:48:31.000And then there are men whose behavior changes.
00:48:35.000And we all know these types of people.
00:48:37.000I certainly know a fair share of them.
00:48:39.000They become different people when they're around their girlfriend or when they're around girls in general.
00:50:17.000But, yeah, so I've been looking at this resistance all star lineup this week of Ariana Grande fans, Eugene Gu, and the giant floating inflatable baby Trump.
00:50:30.000And, you know, with enemies like this, if we don't win, we deserve whatever happens to us, in my opinion.
00:50:46.000I mean, the system that is against us is very powerful.
00:50:51.000By the same token, think of the people that are running the system.
00:50:53.000Yes, they're demons, but also look at them.
00:50:55.000I mean, all these people that you see at these protests, these rallies, those are the people that are going to be in charge of it in the next generation.
00:51:03.000I mean, these people are not competent.
00:53:28.000Okay, so first we got Chick fil A, and now we got Papa John's.
00:53:32.000What do you think is the next fast food place?
00:53:35.000What is the next alt right fast food place on the market?
00:53:38.000Hmm, unpredictable, I gotta say, you know.
00:53:41.000Chick fil A will be a staple forever because Christian, they're off on Sundays and they're the most successful, and that's a testament to their dissonant right values.
00:53:52.000See, Papa John's was kind of a curveball.
00:53:54.000You would never expect, who could expect that Papa John would have such a foul mouth, right?
00:55:28.000I really, it's tough to pick the 2070 paradigm shift.
00:55:32.000I'm naming a lot of the basic ones, but I also like what's the meet me in the quad vertical video that he does where he's got the beanie and the headphones.
00:57:35.000Well, actually, this is something that atheists will probably be able to make sense of because atheists are, you know, godless rationalists and scientists and empiricists.
00:57:46.000Like, look, the moon is a very large celestial body.
00:57:51.000It exerts power over us, not totally in a spiritual way, but absolutely in a physical way.
00:57:58.000I mean, the moon affects the tides of the ocean.
00:58:01.000You think the moon doesn't affect your body chemistry?
00:58:06.000When the moon is a supermoon, which means it's closer to us, or the moon is affecting in a way that is different, I think it does have effects on people.
00:58:15.000And this also, by the way, applies to women's time of the month.
00:58:20.000This is something Sean told me, Prince Hubris, who's been on the show before.
01:09:08.000That's just how it sounds, but the substance is just totally asinine.
01:09:12.000Gets back to my point I was talking about earlier this week, where I said women don't think about politics, and therefore they shouldn't talk about politics.
01:09:21.000My mom was like, Nicholas, I don't like the way you're talking about women.
01:09:25.000It's getting to the point where it offends me.
01:09:27.000And I'm like, Mom, I'm not saying anything that isn't true.
01:09:31.000All I'm saying is women shouldn't talk about politics because they don't care.
01:09:34.000And I'm like, You don't even care about politics.
01:09:37.000But this Cassie Dillon, she's the one in the middle.
01:09:49.000I had a dream last night that I went back to my old high school and I talked to my model UN coach or advisor, whatever.
01:09:58.000And the reason being was because we did not have a good relationship in high school because he was pro Palestine and I was pro Israel at the time.
01:10:07.000And I'll never forget, we got into a big argument one day about Israel Palestine.
01:10:12.000And I was like, you know, there, the Arabs tried to kill him four times and all the usual propaganda.
01:10:34.000We know that Israel's all the things Patrick Little said.
01:10:37.000It's a shame I find myself rooting for Patrick Little in this debate, but she clearly gets blown out.
01:10:42.000It's such a shame because in this video, Patrick Little makes a compelling case.
01:10:47.000If he toned down the rhetoric slightly, and I'm talking very finely, if he tuned it down, or toned it down rather, This would be a supremely effective line of attack.
01:11:06.000But when he goes out there, he's planning on doing a protest this week where he goes out and says, you know who media should have their mouths shut for them or something like that.
01:11:16.000Well, then you're going to turn a lot of people off.
01:11:18.000Then that, you know, that's somewhat distasteful, I think, to say the least, right?
01:16:42.000Yeah, you'll be eating bugs for dinner.
01:16:46.000I mean, this is what white women in yoga pants fly halfway across the world and get dysentery for days and nearly dehydrate themselves to death by pooing to see.
01:16:56.000And we're going to have it on our doorsteps.
01:17:27.000I mean, the thing with Brexit and the EU and everything.
01:17:31.000On a serious note, I was thinking a lot about when you were saying about your little theory about the concentric rings of like your ability to care about people in your life and how far removed they are from you like your family, your friends, your work colleagues, etc.
01:17:49.000And I was thinking the EU, they have an immediate consequence for the actions, the laws, and the regulations they pass.
01:17:57.000And I think at the top of the hierarchy for immediate consequences, probably.
01:18:02.000The armed forces and then the citizens and then the immigrants and then the gated communities, and then eventually, all the way at the end, you have people making laws that don't even live in your country.
01:18:16.000Not even a country, they're just a little like it's like McDonald's passing laws.
01:21:23.000Alex says Donald Trump, Scotland's greatest son, is a mere 50 miles south of my home tonight.
01:21:29.000Future historians will pinpoint this moment as the beginning of Britain's divinely ordained return to being a sovereign, Christian, conservative land once more.
01:23:47.000Because it's better to have a president like Trump and oh, he colluded with Russia than have a president like Clinton and they collude with Israel, Saudi Arabia, China, and every other government under the sun.
01:25:13.000Well, thank you, big guy, much appreciated.
01:25:16.000Well, I had an important question, but I guess I might as well give myself a little bit of a background on uh, where I come from as a religiously centered question.
01:25:27.000I was uh, raised in a Protestant home, right?
01:25:30.000And uh, I kind of when I was around 13, I guess, kind of grew out of that and I uh, I became an edgy atheist.
01:25:39.000I look back on that part of my life and I'm like, oh, Lord, I don't know how to handle that.
01:25:45.000But I'm still kind of agnostic, I guess you could say.
01:25:49.000But I've been one thing I find really beautiful and interesting is Catholicism.
01:25:55.000And I've been really interested in it.
01:25:57.000In it, but I was kind of confused by some of it because I was thinking, um, how, uh, maybe I should have done a little more research, but I figured you might be the man to ask, sure.
01:26:09.000In terms of, uh, I'm aware of the history of the pope, as in, um, the first pope being St. Peter, but, uh, is there sort of, I guess, biblical basis for the continuation of the office of the pope?
01:26:29.000And how, when a Protestant says that, you know, The Pope isn't supposed to have any authority, and you're supposed to take everything directly from the Bible, literally, and not have any other outside authority on that.
01:26:44.000Well, what you have to understand if you've read the Bible is, and this is something that Faith Goldie talked about when she was on the show, is that if you've read the Bible and you understand the spirit of it, I mean, you know that Christ came and left us a church, not a book.
01:27:32.000From Protestants who deny they're Protestant, they say, I'm not a Protestant, I'm a Christian.
01:27:36.000And that means I just believe in Jesus Christ and the Bible.
01:27:39.000But of course, Christ did not leave us a book, He left us a church.
01:27:44.000And the funny thing about the Bible argument is that where did the Bible come from?
01:27:49.000What books constitute the Bible, and who decided that?
01:27:51.000Of course, it was the church at the Council of Nicaea.
01:27:56.000And so, what you really have to understand, and this is based in scripture as well, if you read in the gospel, Jesus Christ says that He prays for the faith of Peter.
01:28:05.000He gives Peter the keys to bind and loose.
01:28:08.000He says that Peter is the rock on which he would build his church.
01:28:12.000And so, Peter, by the end of the book of Acts, basically is firmly established as the vicar of Christ on earth.
01:28:18.000Not only do you have a scriptural basis for all of that, and Protestants have, oh, we disagree with that interpretation.
01:28:24.000Well, there was no disagreement about it for 1,500 years, or at least no strong disagreement, or maybe 1,000 years before you had the split with the Orthodox Church.
01:28:34.000But if you go to the Council of Florence in the 15th century, they basically admitted that the Pope was supreme.
01:28:40.000It really wasn't until 1518 that you had a significant, or 1517, that you had a significant amount of people who said, oh, we suddenly have a problem with the Pope.
01:28:49.000And anyway, forget Scripture for a moment.
01:28:52.000All the early church fathers, the most important, the most intelligent thinkers in the early days of the church, in the most crucial days of the church, all agreed that Rome was the head, was the center, was the authority in the church.
01:29:07.000And you just got to think about it logically then, too.
01:29:09.000You have Scripture, you have history, but then also think of it logically.
01:29:13.000If I'm a Bible alone Christian, and let's say that makes sense, the Bible is a great book, you know, Jesus Christ is real and his teachings are real and what's in it happened and all that.
01:29:52.000And then beyond that, who's to say which interpretation is correct?
01:29:56.000Who's to say that one segment means one thing and not another thing?
01:29:59.000That's a pretty important part of faith, is knowing that it's correct.
01:30:05.000You know, if we're supposed to believe that there are a certain amount of conditions we need to meet to achieve eternal life, do you think that's something that God would leave to a matter of interpretation?
01:30:15.000Well, I think that you could have an abortion and you could have adultery and be polygamous and all the rest, and you could sin all day long, but as long as.
01:30:28.000You're a nice person, you get to go to heaven.
01:30:57.000It's just natural, it's a part of the human experience because there's hierarchy.
01:31:01.000In terms of human beings, I think God understands that some people are simply not equipped to interpret the Bible for themselves.
01:31:10.000Individualists, it's no secret that the Protestants came from the individualists who came from the liberals who came from the Enlightenment.
01:31:18.000This idea that everybody has the agency and the competence to interpret the Bible for themselves correctly is wrong and dangerous and a stupid presupposition.
01:31:28.000People that are priests, that are bishops, that are, if you're the Pope, you've studied.
01:31:33.000For years, language, history, theology, philosophy, so that you know your stuff.
01:31:39.000If I'm just some schmo, I know some people that are illiterate who are pastors, or I've heard stories about this, where they're illiterate and they're Protestant pastors.
01:31:54.000And that's not an insult, but it's just to say how could you have any expectation that these people could be an authority on the Word of God?
01:32:07.000I did have a sort of secondary half of that question.
01:32:10.000And it's, I guess, when what the Pope has to say, and I guess the church as a whole, what they have to say and the sort of ideas that they're pushing, when that comes into conflict with what the Bible says and how that all works.
01:32:22.000Like, for instance, you see just recently the Pope saying something about some atheist going to heaven, and it's pretty clear that you need, you know, eternal life from Jesus to go to heaven.
01:32:51.000It's very strange because he's saying almost like it almost seems like he's saying that being gay isn't a sin, which, I mean, kind of goes against all past tradition in the church.
01:33:00.000Well, the papal encyclical, which is when the pope is speaking.
01:33:06.000In his infallible power, when he's writing in an encyclical.
01:33:09.000The most recent one, I think, was in the 80s, and it said that it's not a sin to be a homosexual, but it is always a sin to engage in homosexual acts.
01:33:18.000So, in the same way that it's not a sin for you to be tempted by certain things, whether it's, and that goes for any sin, whether you be tempted to commit adultery or tempted to be a glutton, you know, whatever it is, to be a homosexual and be tempted by homosexual acts in and of itself is not a sin.
01:33:38.000So, to commit sodomy, those kinds of things, or to think about something that would lead to that, or to engage in activity that would lead to that, that's always a sin and damnable, and it's a mortal sin.
01:33:49.000But regardless of that, the Pope, just him saying something that might be incorrect or that might diverge from the Bible, and I haven't heard the latest comment or if it's even on record.
01:34:01.000You know, some of the things they say that the Pope has said is things that are like half remembered or it's alleged or whatever.
01:34:09.000But anyway, even if he did say that, As long as he's not speaking using his power of infallibility when Christ protects him from making errors, it's not to say that it doesn't matter, but he's another man, you know?
01:34:22.000And so I understand where you're coming from, and that's it kind of sucks when you have a pope that's like this because it really does call into question the legitimacy of the pope.
01:34:31.000But when the pope is acting as the vicar of Christ and he's contributing to the magisterium in various ways, he has never erred, he has never contradicted the Bible.
01:34:43.000He has never reversed anything, anything that the church has ever decided on doctrine.
01:34:48.000But I think popes can make errors when they're just speaking as the leader of the church in the temporal world, but not when they're invoking their infallibility.
01:35:07.000So, yeah, I guess there was just one last bit I wanted to mention.
01:35:11.000I was just kind of having a discussion with a guy in chat on the whole.
01:35:15.000The whole view, we were kind of, I guess he was sort of fascist, national socialist, something along those lines.
01:35:21.000And he was, I happen to be a big fan of the founders' vision for America, aside from, you know, they probably didn't expect people to suddenly, all the way down a couple hundred years later, to start thinking that, you know, diversity is all their strength, all this nonsense, and just bringing a bunch of foreigners into the country.
01:35:43.000But, and they might have been good for them to maybe put something in the Constitution about that.
01:35:48.000But, I guess really what I wanted to ask you is kind of your view on the sort of more authoritarian side of the right.
01:35:56.000If you agree with that, you think democracy is just not necessary and that whole side of it, and if the market needs to be pretty much brought under control.
01:36:11.000I mean, it's tough to say because I'm not really an ideological person, so I'm not really ideologically committed to one system over another.
01:36:23.000I don't like to think in abstractions like that or in hypotheticals like that, like a lot of political science type people do.
01:36:29.000But I will say that we need to have a system that reflects hierarchy.
01:36:35.000You need to have a system that is reflective of human nature in the sense that the implicit assumption about democracy is that people are competent to make political decisions.
01:36:48.000I choose that this person should run the government or these people should run the government.
01:37:20.000And then from there, it's a question of where do you draw the line where it is conducive to governance that you have.
01:37:28.000Organize at the local level and make decisions at a local level.
01:37:31.000You have some degree of decentralization.
01:37:34.000And at what point is it excessive where it's too decentralized, it's too chaotic, and not all people can make these decisions?
01:37:41.000So, I definitely think there are some merits to our system, which is not necessarily in the democracy, but in the sense that there's localities where a federal government, a centralized government, needs a lot of information, and it's difficult to get that information to make sound decisions about every part of the country.
01:38:01.000For example, if you have a super authoritarian and rigid system, Well, the central government is going to have to appoint people and send people out to the various faraway cities to make decisions about people in California, people in Alaska, people in Hawaii, people in Maine, very diverse conditions, populations, climates, economies, traditions, and all the rest.
01:38:24.000And so there is something to be said about having the people make those decisions, and not because we believe in populism and liberty and all the rest, but simply because it's just more pragmatic that you have the smart people, the competent people.
01:38:38.000From this locality, make better decisions there.
01:38:41.000And also, it's a check on different institutions of power.
01:38:45.000This is what the founders understood that the mob, the people, was just as much an institution of power as the House of Representatives or of the central government or the businesses.
01:38:56.000They saw the society as comprised of factions keeping each other in equilibrium so that no one side would dominate and then become unaccountable and then therefore inefficient or malignant.
01:39:09.000But that's how we have to look at it, as how do we make a society that works, not a society that's totally so democratic.
01:39:16.000So, the founders, for example, said that senators should be chosen by state representatives and that the president should be chosen by the electoral college, which at the time was not decided by a popular vote if you go back to the 18th century.
01:39:27.000It just wasn't, it didn't work like that.
01:39:29.000The electors actually got together and made a decision as to who the president would be.
01:39:34.000And so, when you look at it like that, it was a much less democratic system, a much more hierarchical system.
01:39:41.000And I think, you know, it was more free than any other system, but it also worked.
01:39:49.000It has to look like that, but for reasons of pragmatism and for order, not because we're so in love with the idea of people voting at the ballot box.
01:40:53.000I mean, I think it depends on the time and place.
01:40:57.000You know, certainly at some points you need to compromise free speech.
01:41:02.000For example, if you're in a period of great instability, I think it is worth it to sacrifice the freedom of speech for a limited amount of time.
01:41:11.000This has been the case throughout American history.
01:41:13.000People say that's so un American, really?
01:41:16.000The Alien and Sedition Acts under John Adams.
01:41:18.000You had the Sedition Act under Woodrow Wilson.
01:41:22.000You had all kinds of acts like this throughout American history the suspension of habeas corpus, the internment of the Japanese.
01:41:32.000Freedoms have been abridged all the time because of these pragmatic concerns.
01:41:36.000So, I don't know if I'm a free speech absolutist eternally, but certainly at this point in time, we have to be for free speech because we know that there is only one group of people that's being denied that right.
01:41:48.000It's not literal anarchists and communists, it's people who want to defend the country.
01:41:54.000So, I would say that in this point in time, we have to be free speech absolutists.
01:44:00.000Do you think Trump should wait until after the midterms to?
01:44:08.000If they block Brett, do you think Trump should wait till after the midterms and just put in someone better because he'll have a greater majority?
01:44:47.000Just because, like, I was reading this thing about how, like, most, if not all, like, almost all the Republican appointed Supreme Court justices have shifted left.
01:45:04.000And, you know, you have to be really careful with that because, like, there was Souter, I think.
01:45:12.000Who was appointed by George W. Bush and he became a consistent liberal.
01:45:19.000And then there was, and then Nixon appointed like three guys and like two of them became consistent liberals.
01:45:26.000And so it's really, I'm hoping that Brett is like a strong enough guy to avoid shifting left, but that is something that worries me.
01:45:39.000Well, the trick is that when you become a swing vote, it's a very different calculation than when you're not.
01:45:45.000Because when you're the swing vote on the court, you have a lot of power, you're the deciding vote.
01:45:51.000And that was the effect that was had with Anthony Kennedy.
01:45:55.000You know, we have to remember that justices are people.
01:45:58.000And this is absolutely a consideration if it's a four to four decision, well, now I suddenly get to decide, and you effectively get to play God.
01:46:10.000We just have to have hope that Kavanaugh is of enough character and experience that he'll be able to stick to his guns.
01:46:19.000I think that's why he was a better pick than Barrett, because I imagine that a young woman like Barrett would be a much bigger issue with her than it would be with Kavanaugh.
01:48:48.000Thank you for the incredible support all the way here.
01:48:51.000Couldn't have done it without you, folks.
01:48:52.000It's a remarkable achievement because you see so many shows rising and falling, or there's drama, or it falls off the rails, or there's a big thing.
01:49:04.000But America First has been consistent every night, five days a week, and we've been going uninterrupted since August of last year.
01:49:25.000And then I think I had one three day in November, and I think maybe one three day in February for CPAC.
01:49:32.000But with few exceptions, it's been five episodes a night, every night, seven o'clock sharp, consistent quality, content, technical issue here or there.
01:49:41.000But we're basically, we've got a pretty good percentage, I think, pretty good batting average for my sports fans out there.