00:01:11.000They were involved in a congressional hearing yesterday concerning the monopolistic nature of these different companies in their respective markets.
00:01:21.000We'll be talking about those hearings and what happened and everything that's going on with that, including we're going to look at a very interesting confidential memo from Jim Jordan, which you might have seen on Twitter, which was floating around.
00:01:35.000We'll also be talking tonight about a new order from President Trump, which is a white pill.
00:01:42.000The president is sending federal agents to Cleveland, Ohio, Milwaukee in Wisconsin, and Detroit in Michigan.
00:01:51.000So we're seeing this deployment of federal agents and federal.
00:01:57.000Initially, it was Portland, and then they added on Chicago, Kansas City, and Albuquerque, and now they've expanded that to Milwaukee, Detroit, and Cleveland, which is good because my initial critique of this deployment in Portland and then in Chicago, Kansas City, and Albuquerque, I said it's great.
00:02:19.000It's great that they were deploying 150 federal troops, I think, in Chicago and Kansas City, and 35 in Albuquerque.
00:02:26.000But it's not enough because the riots, the insurrection isn't just happening in four cities, it's happening in virtually every major city.
00:02:35.000So now that we've got these federal deployments in eight cities, that's much better.
00:02:41.000So we'll talk about that, and it should be a good show.
00:02:45.000Some good, some not so good, such is life.
00:04:14.000I messed around with the settings and I did a few things differently tonight, so we're back.
00:04:20.000And hopefully, we don't have those problems, but my apologies.
00:04:23.000I know it sucks for it to be canceled at like 8 15.
00:04:27.000The show should be live at 8 15, but that's just how it goes.
00:04:32.000But, I will say if you're upset about yesterday, I've got a very big announcement tomorrow concerning the future of this show, concerning streaming with this show.
00:04:45.000And it's a long anticipated announcement.
00:04:48.000It's something that's been in development for a long time now.
00:04:53.000And it's something that was just actually completed this morning.
00:04:57.000So we're not, we're not, maybe you have an idea of what I'm talking about.
00:05:01.000We're not all the way there just yet, but tomorrow there's going to be a very critical step that's going to be announced in the future of this show, streaming this show.
00:05:11.000So if you're interested in that, tune in tomorrow night.
00:05:14.000I'll be making an announcement, and I think a lot of people will be very excited.
00:05:19.000And a lot of people be very proud of me, and they should be because nothing can stop this show.
00:05:27.000Think of everything that we've overcome.
00:05:29.000Well, together, but with an emphasis on me.
00:05:34.000We, together, you showing up, me solving a lot of problems, but it is all of us from, you know, starting the show and getting blacklisted by everybody, getting attacked by everybody, getting doxxed, getting banned off of YouTube, getting demonetized, getting banned off.
00:05:53.000PayPal and Stripe and Streamlabs and Twitch, and the list goes on and on.
00:05:59.000And the show literally just gets stronger every day.
00:06:02.000I see leftists all the time say, like, oh, Nick Fuentes can't even feed himself.
00:06:08.000You know, Nick Fuentes, he's irrelevant.
00:06:10.000It's like the show is bigger than it's ever been.
00:06:12.000We were averaging during the George Floyd protests initially, averaging like 15,000, 16,000 live viewers per night.
00:06:20.000In the past few weeks, and that was like at a world historical moment, in the past few weeks, the average has been 10,000.
00:07:45.000So, to have the show malfunction yesterday wasn't the end of the world, if you want to know the truth, because it's been such a slow news week.
00:07:56.000But the one thing that did happen, which I think is noteworthy in the past 24 hours, and maybe you saw this on Twitter, but the president suggested that we.
00:08:05.000Delay the election obviously because of the coronavirus and the implications of social distancing and coronavirus prevention at the polling places.
00:08:18.000You know, in a lot of different states, they're suggesting that because the coronavirus is so out of control, they're not going to be able to do conventional voting, which would mean, of course, if you have polling places, you're going to have large groups of people, you're going to have common surfaces being touched and having to be desanitized.
00:08:57.000To me, that is honestly the part that terrifies me the most about the election, which is the mail in voting.
00:09:06.000And of course, the media reaction to this suggestion was the usual hysterics.
00:09:11.000You know, if you go on the Twitter moments section, all the highlighted tweets are talking about how this is a dictatorship and this is Trump wanting to stay in office forever and this is what authoritarians do and whatever.
00:09:28.000But it's so funny to me because these are the people that, remember in 2016, were screaming like banshees about any perceived impropriety in the election process because of Russian hacking or something like that, right?
00:09:44.000You know, that a few Russian people bought Facebook advertisements in Michigan.
00:09:50.000Well, the world has to stop spinning on its axis because of what a disgusting intervention in our sacred democratic process that was.
00:10:01.000But now people are going to mail in millions, tens of millions of ballots through the postal system, and nobody's concerned about that.
00:10:11.000And that, you know, just to give you a sense of proportion and how inconsistent the reaction is, it's not surprising.
00:10:19.000All that election fraud benefits the Democrats.
00:10:22.000When it's illegals voting, when it's dead people voting, when it's the machines glitching, when it's mail in ballot fraud or they're losing ballots, it always benefits the Democrats.
00:10:34.000Because, of course, where are most of the votes coming in?
00:10:58.000They're being counted in major liberal Democrat cities, the major population centers where the majority or the plurality of the votes are coming in.
00:11:07.000And that's where the fraud will occur.
00:11:09.000And who's going to be overseeing those precincts?
00:11:46.000And I think that the president does have a chance of getting reelected.
00:11:50.000I think if the election were held today, he'd lose.
00:11:52.000But I think a lot can go in his favor in the next couple of months.
00:11:56.000But I'll tell you that it doesn't matter if it's super close, if Trump tips it in, the mail in voting could be his undoing because I don't see how you surmount that obstacle.
00:12:07.000And he retweeted a video, I think it was yesterday or today, from a local news station, and they did their own experiment where they sent out 100 test ballots, and I think they got 97 of them back, which would mean that 3% of the ballots went missing.
00:12:25.000And in an election of 120 million people, right?
00:12:28.000I think that's about how many voted in 16.
00:12:31.000When you're talking about more than 100 million people, what's 3%, right?
00:12:36.000That's the difference between a Trump presidency and a Biden presidency, or a second term for Trump and a Biden presidency.
00:13:40.000And that's the kind of thing where, you know, really at the end of the day, there's only so much we could do.
00:13:48.000Even if Trump pulls it off in 2020, which I think would be extremely difficult and at this point unlikely, you're still, you know, you still might get cheated.
00:13:57.000There's a significant chance that we'll get cheated out of it no matter what because of the mail, right?
00:14:03.000Post us the, or the, the, Post office, the postal system is notoriously unreliable.
00:14:08.000So, but anyway, I just want to point that out.
00:14:11.000I saw that today and it's just so ridiculous.
00:14:14.000The president says, maybe we should just delay the election.
00:15:19.000It says the Trump administration is sending additional federal agents and funding to Cleveland, Milwaukee, and Detroit, expanding a program that has targeted Democratic run cities facing increases in violent crime.
00:15:31.000Which, by the way, it's such a deceptive way even to write this article.
00:15:35.000All the major cities are Democratic run.
00:15:38.000And all the cities that are Democratic run and all the cities, period, are experiencing a surge in violent crime.
00:15:45.000So to say, oh, he's targeting Democratic run cities.
00:15:48.000Where are the cities that are Republican run?
00:15:51.000And where are the cities that are not experiencing a surge in crime?
00:15:54.000Anyway, it says the Department of Justice announced a deployment of dozens of federal officers to the three cities to assist local law enforcement as part of Operation Legend.
00:16:06.000The administration has already sent agents to Kansas City and Chicago as part of the program, as Democratic leaders expressed reluctance about the government's intentions amid clashes involving the DHS in Portland, Oregon.
00:16:20.000The DHS is sending more than 25 federal investigators from the FBI.
00:16:25.000DEA and the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, and Firearms and Explosives, or the ATF, to Cleveland to assist state and local law enforcement focused on gang activity, gun violence, and drug trafficking.
00:16:39.000The city's police department will also receive $10 million to fund the hiring of additional officers.
00:16:45.000Roughly 40 agents from the same agencies are being dispatched to Detroit to assist the city's police department, including 11 new permanent ATF agents.
00:16:57.000And the DOJ will send another 25 agents to Milwaukee, which is set to host the DNC next month to combat violent crime.
00:17:05.000The department cited increases in violent crime in each of the cities, noting homicides and shootings are up in all three places compared to 2019.
00:17:14.000President Trump last week announced similar deployments of agents to Chicago and Albuquerque as part of Operation Legend, which is named for a young victim of gun violence in Kansas City.
00:17:25.000And so, you know, again, we've been talking about this for months now.
00:17:36.000Every time that you see troops being deployed to these major cities, it's a step in the right direction.
00:17:42.000And we're seeing that these troop deployments are expanding to more and more cities every week.
00:17:46.000Like I said, it started with the DHS deployments in Portland, and then you had, like this article says, the DOJ deployments in Chicago and Kansas City and Albuquerque.
00:17:58.000And now you've got a couple dozen, few dozen federal agents each.
00:18:22.000They're surrendering, in some cases, even government property, state or federal buildings.
00:18:29.000So, in order to restore order, federal troops or federal agents.
00:18:34.000Necessarily are going to be a part of that.
00:18:36.000They have to be there, they have to be on the ground, they have to have jurisdiction, right?
00:18:43.000So, this is a necessary precondition to getting any of these cities back on the right track.
00:18:49.000The problem, however, remains with even this, as far as I'm concerned, is still it's just not enough.
00:18:59.000It's not enough agents, it's not enough troops, it's not enough cities, and more than just a problem of numbers.
00:19:07.000When they send these people there, it's not simply a question of having people on the ground.
00:19:12.000It's also a question of their willingness to actually make arrests and conduct investigations and then pursue federal charges, which has not happened.
00:19:24.000You know, if we look at Portland, the DHS police have been in Portland the longest out of any of these cities.
00:19:31.000Portland was the first city where you had feds deployed to put a stop to these riots and these political demonstrations that are out of control.
00:20:41.000And if you send in a dozen, it's not enough.
00:20:43.000If you send in a thousand, that's more appropriate.
00:20:46.000But fundamentally, it doesn't matter how many you send in if they're not actually doing their jobs.
00:20:51.000If they're going in and they're really just.
00:20:55.000Another line of police that are going to stand there while fires are started and bombs are set off, and people are marching down the streets with firearms and blunt objects and so on, right?
00:21:20.000I think only in the most extreme cases, I think the guy that set off the bomb in front of the federal court building is having charges pressed.
00:21:29.000But except for that, I haven't heard anything.
00:21:33.000It's good that they're being put on the ground.
00:21:35.000But now the question is when are the charges going to come?
00:21:38.000Because, and maybe this is obvious or common sense, but to just say it, the reason that people are going out there and doing this is because there's no consequences.
00:21:52.000The reason that people are out there every single night in these cities for 60 days and they're out there doing spray paint and graffiti and smashing cars and starting fires and Attacking police is because there's no repercussions.
00:22:07.000If you even had a handful or a dozen of these people arrested, which you see people getting arrested, but they get arrested and then they get released, or they get arrested and charged and the charges are dropped.
00:22:20.000But if you even had a dozen people that were arrested and charged and they got severe sentences, like 20 years in jail or something like that, you would see very quickly these riots would begin to dissipate because people would look at that and say, Well, you know, I wanted to go out there and start fires and have fun, but now I don't want to go to jail for 20 years like these guys.
00:22:47.000People need to be made an example out of.
00:22:49.000So you take some of the worst people, you charge them, and you sentence them, and you really throw the book at these people, and then you just start rounding people up and you start arresting people.
00:23:00.000And watch how gradually and slowly but surely these crowds will just disappear after a matter of a week, right?
00:23:10.000But that's not going to happen until you start charging people.
00:23:13.000So I see this and I'm like, okay, you know, that's a step in the right direction.
00:23:17.000But unless Trump goes full on like Hitler mode, you know, not like Hitler mode in the way of the Holocaust, I'm saying Hitler mode in the way of like secret police, routing up dissidents.
00:23:33.000You know, Stalin can kill 60 million white people and nobody cares.
00:23:39.000And that is comparable to Hitler who can kill a smaller amount of another group of people and, you know, that's like, Now you're the worst person ever.
00:23:47.000So let's say he needs to go Stalin mode.
00:23:50.000He needs to start rounding people up and putting them in jail, putting them in like Antifa camps, and maybe working them and maybe forcing them to watch like Carpe Donctum videos or something like Clockwork Orange.
00:24:03.000Strap them to chairs and force them to watch Carpe Donctum meme videos where they take Spaceballs or Rambo and they put Trump's head in front of it.
00:24:13.000You only need to do that to a couple dozen people, and then the cities will just totally dry out and it'll look like.
00:24:34.000And honestly, I just wish Trump was as bad as everybody says he is.
00:24:38.000You know, for all that we hear about Trump being like, oh, he hates immigrants and he's a dictator and he's trying to remain in power for life.
00:24:47.000I wish all of that were true, but every time it's not.
00:24:50.000They're talking about stormtroopers and secret police.
00:24:55.000I don't know about you, but I would feel a lot safer if there actually was a secret police that answered to Donald Trump personally and not the government.
00:25:06.000And they were out there looking for liberals.
00:25:09.000And they were showing up to their houses late at night in unmarked cars.
00:25:12.000And they weren't wearing any identifying stuff.
00:25:16.000And they would break into people's houses and throw them in the back.
00:25:19.000And then, you know, send them to cages at the border.
00:26:39.000You know, in an alternate timeline, it's like those memes about, like, oh, if Trump went dictator mode and it looks like Wakanda or something.
00:26:47.000You know, in an alternate timeline, when the coronavirus hit, we just shut down every immigrant coming into America and we did a major infrastructure bill.
00:26:58.000And if you're a liberal, you don't get an infrastructure job and we nationalized Twitter.
00:27:03.000And we nationalized the healthcare industry and we nationalized manufacturing.
00:27:08.000And then when the race riots happened, we just had federal troops like a Revolutionary Guard occupying every city.
00:27:15.000And if you're liberal, you go to jail.
00:27:17.000If you're conservative, you get a coronavirus subsidy.
00:28:14.000When I'm driving down Western, when I'm driving down First Avenue, And I see a BLM supporter sauntering across the street, and I'm driving down First Avenue and he's taking his time.
00:28:34.000Those ATF agents are really going to do a lot for me.
00:28:38.000Those 25 ATF agents hanging out somewhere.
00:29:24.000You know, golfing with Brett Favre and whatever.
00:29:27.000But we're going to move on and talk about the big tech hearing from yesterday.
00:29:32.000And, you know, I got to tell you, I don't love the hearings.
00:29:36.000This one was a little bit more interesting because it concerns something that is obviously much closer to me and what I do.
00:29:45.000Not that the hearings about the federal police wasn't important, but, you know, it was nice to see Zuckerberg have to take the stand, you know.
00:29:55.000But I feel the same way about this hearing as I did the one with Bill Barr the other day.
00:30:00.000I don't want to watch any more hearings.
00:30:06.000I don't want to have to talk about them because it's all bullshit.
00:30:10.000And, you know, every other news outlet and every other political commentator, you know, they're doing this wall to wall coverage of the Bill Barr hearing.
00:30:20.000The big tech hearing is starting in five minutes.
00:30:31.000You know, the people that take the stand in the hearings are going to say the same things that they say to the press, and the congressmen are going to say the same things that they say on cable news.
00:30:44.000And they're just going to do this performance in front of everybody.
00:30:47.000I mean, that's really what that comes down to, you know?
00:30:50.000And I said the same thing on Tuesday when we talked about Bill Barr.
00:30:54.000I actually don't care that Bill Barr is going to, you know, Say something really snarky and then drink his coffee.
00:31:01.000That's my whole timeline, is like Con Inc. people.
00:31:05.000It's all these political junkies and DC yuppies, and they're all live tweeting it.
00:31:12.000I saw some bimbo from the Daily Caller.
00:31:14.000She tweeted out this meme video of Bill Barr playing the bagpipes, and then superimposed over that video of him playing the bagpipes, which I guess is supposed to be funny, is his best moments during the hearings.
00:31:29.000Sipping his coffee in a very nonchalant way, and him doing these snarky comments, snarky rebuttals back at the Democrats.
00:31:39.000And the bimbo says, Oh, hello, base department.
00:31:44.000And this is probably my least favorite thing in the world when these political consultant types are going to try to co opt meme culture in order to advance a nakedly partisan agenda, a totally corporate and sterilized agenda.
00:32:01.000Like, in other words, there's nothing organic about that, there's nothing funny about that, but they think that if they just plug in their gay corporate political message to a certain Format to a certain template which they see on real meme formats, they think that that is going to have the same appeal that our memes have.
00:32:21.000And I put this out on Twitter, I had to delete it.
00:32:24.000But I said, Our memes are funny because they're racist, they're sexist, they're directed at gay people or Jews.
00:33:22.000If Bill Barr was arresting people for being liberal.
00:33:25.000If Bill Barr sent out literal secret police to arrest people for being left wing or for being Black Lives Matter, right?
00:33:35.000It would be funny if a lot of militant black people with their shirts off yelling in cops' faces got the shit kicked out of them with batons and then thrown in the back of a truck.
00:33:48.000But the attorney general, like, You know, sitting there and like drinking his coffee over him playing the bagpipes.
00:33:54.000That's probably something that a woman made or a womanish man, like some 30 year old consultant made who is the digital editor at like the Daily Caller, right?
00:34:57.000Like I said, I think it's just a circus.
00:34:59.000But I'll read you the report about the big tech hearings yesterday.
00:35:03.000It is important for our purposes because it actually said something about the Republican Party.
00:35:09.000In the same way that the hearings from Bill Barr say a lot about the Justice Department and the Justice Department's lack of action on the insurrection, I think these hearings say a lot about the GOP and big tech.
00:35:26.000It says, quote, House lawmakers on Wednesday grilled the heads of some of the world's largest tech companies with Democrats questioning whether the companies violated U.S. antitrust laws and stole from competitors, while Republicans slammed them over alleged censorship and bias against conservatives.
00:35:45.000Facebook's Mark Zuckerberg, Amazon's Jeff Bezos, Sundar Pichai of Google, and Apple's Tim Cook testified before the House Judiciary Committee or the House Judiciary Antitrust Subcommittee.
00:35:59.000Each telling tales they faced competition not only from one another, but other large companies inside and outside the country as well.
00:36:08.000In his opening remarks, Subcommittee Chairman David Siciline said the committee had spoken to more than 100 sources with hundreds of hours talking to them about the behaviors of the marketplace, noting it's the most bipartisan issue in some time on Capitol Hill.
00:36:26.000According to research conducted between June 16th and June 22nd, 72% of U.S. adults. Surveyed, said that social media firms wield too much power and influence.
00:36:38.000According to the report, quote, majorities of both Republicans and Democrats believe that social media companies wield too much power, but Republicans are particularly likely to express this view.
00:36:50.000Concerns about antitrust violations have cropped up among the four companies.
00:36:55.000Combined, the four accounted for more than $770 billion.
00:37:01.000That's almost a trillion dollars, by the way.
00:37:03.000In 2019, revenue, including $260 billion for Apple and $280 billion for Amazon, the two largest companies by market cap.
00:37:14.000Amazon is expected to account for 38% of U.S. e commerce sales and 5.5% of total U.S. retail sales in 2020, according to research firm eMarketer.
00:37:45.000More than a third of all of that commerce, which is pretty crazy to think about.
00:37:51.000Of that, 41% comes directly from Amazon, and 58.9% is from Amazon Marketplace, Amazon's third party business, which allows other sellers to use the company's platform to sell goods.
00:38:04.000Google and Facebook are the two biggest digital advertisers combined for more than 80% of all digital ad spending.
00:38:11.000So, you know, when you're talking about these four companies, I don't think most people even understand the gravity, the scope, and the scale of these companies in the overall economy.
00:38:25.000When you're looking at these four companies in particular and their market cap and the stranglehold that they have, you know, for Amazon and all of e commerce.
00:38:36.000But in these other companies and businesses like advertisements and other things, I think few people have really given a lot of thought to just how big big tech is.
00:38:46.000When we say big tech, it's not simply a matter of the censorship of conservatives.
00:38:52.000We're talking about the modern day Rockefeller, the modern day Standard Oil, the modern day Vanderbilt and Carnegie.
00:38:59.000I mean, we're talking about the biggest companies in the history of the world, a handful of them, and the power that they have, which is different actually than, in some ways, different than.
00:39:10.000The titans of industry at the turn of the last century, not only because of their domination of the economy, but also then the influence because of the nature of that domination that they wield over politics.
00:39:23.000What I mean by that is, you know, maybe you have Standard Oil 100 years ago and they're the biggest player in the economy.
00:39:30.000But now you've got Amazon and Facebook and Twitter and Apple, and all of them are directly involved in the dissemination and the distribution of information.
00:39:42.000It's not simply that they are these giant, ungodly, powerful corporations, but also they happen to be in the business of everything that you hear and see and know about the world.
00:39:55.000Through social media and how your feed is aggregated, which is pretty scary.
00:40:01.000The takeaway from all of this to me is not really so much what is happening in the hearing.
00:40:08.000Hearings like this have been going on for a decade, where Mark Zuckerberg testifies about all kinds of things privacy, antitrust, censorship.
00:40:20.000This has happened many, many, many times.
00:41:05.000And to me, that's really the story we can all do this big charade, this big circus where Zuckerberg is going to change out of the flip flops and the sweatshirt and he's going to wear a suit.
00:41:16.000And all the commentators are all going to comment on that every time.
00:41:21.000And Jim Jordan and Matt Gaetz and Josh Hawley, all the usual suspects, they're going to grill these billionaires.
00:43:14.000The point is to say that these people in big tech can buy and sell any one of these people in Congress personally and their office.
00:43:26.000You know, if you're looking at what it costs for a senator or a congressman to run a race, Google, Amazon, Facebook, Apple, all of them by themselves and certainly together can buy every one of these offices.
00:43:41.000They can, if they wanted to, buy every office in the House of Representatives.
00:43:46.000Every office in the Senate and the presidency.
00:43:51.000How much does it cost to run a presidential campaign?
00:44:28.000And with conservatives in particular at these hearings, all the headlines after the big tech hearing are fiery exchange, you know, Jim Jordan grills big tech, oh, you know, fiery debate in Capitol Hill.
00:44:45.000And then you find with somebody like Jim Jordan in particular something very curious.
00:44:50.000This is something that leaked a couple of days ago, a confidential memo from his office.
00:44:56.000This came out, I think Politico acquired it, and then somebody else published it.
00:45:01.000It was a confidential memo which was full of pro Google, pro Apple, pro big tech talking points for Jim Jordan.
00:45:12.000It just so happens that Jim Jordan, the second biggest single contributor for his campaign in 2018, can you guess who it was?
00:45:34.000It says Antitrust laws should be used to promote freedom, competition, and the American dream, not to punish success or attack companies solely because they are large.
00:45:47.000Many Democrats seek to use opportunities to change antitrust laws as an opening to undo a century's worth of legal precedents.
00:45:55.000That gave rise to the greatest economy in history and to Europeanize the American business climate, which is playing on some conventional Republican themes about those European socialists versus that good old fashioned American innovation.
00:46:15.000If we want Jeff Bezos, the $150 billion man with his trillion dollar company, to actually be accountable to the American people, Well, that's that damn European socialism.
00:46:28.000That's that damn European socialism trying to foil that rugged individualistic American spirit.
00:46:36.000I don't know about you, but when I think of rugged individualists, I think of cowboys, I think of homesteaders, I think of pioneers and ranchers in cowboy hats.
00:46:47.000I do not think about somebody who has enough money to do anything that he wants on planet Earth and maybe space.
00:47:06.000It says, pursuant to existing law, each of these companies is already subject to numerous investigations.
00:47:13.000These investigations are ongoing, and we should trust the Trump administration and the Attorney General to bring appropriate enforcement actions.
00:47:22.000So, in other words, Trump has got this handled.
00:47:26.000We as Congress don't need to do anything.
00:47:29.000It goes on, it says, while the committee's big tech investigation and this hearing may prove instructive generally, And provide fodder for those with a chip on their shoulders against capitalism.
00:47:42.000It is important to remember that the Trump administration is already enforcing the antitrust laws that Congress has given it to administer and is examining Google, Amazon, Apple, and Facebook.
00:47:53.000Arguably, far from showing that the existing antitrust framework is dysfunctional, as they play out, these investigations may establish just how well the existing framework functions.
00:48:04.000The point of describing each of these executive branch investigations, and in brief, Their overlap with some of the most prominent concerns about Google, Amazon, Apple, and Facebook is not to predict what the agencies may find or how any enforcement actions will play out.
00:48:20.000Instead, it suggests that to the extent the committee's investigation duplicates the work of the agencies, the legislative branch is unnecessarily taking on work for which it is ill equipped.
00:48:33.000Relatedly, even if this hearing suggests that any of these companies have violated antitrust laws, That would arguably not establish systemic problems with current antitrust laws.
00:48:44.000Changing laws in response to such findings would be premature.
00:48:48.000So, in other words, what this is saying is that Google, Facebook, Amazon, Apple, they're not breaking antitrust laws simply because they're big.
00:48:58.000And anyway, the Trump administration is already pursuing the antitrust laws.
00:49:04.000And if we were to pursue those antitrust laws, that would just be redundant and unnecessary.
00:49:11.000And even if they were breaking the antitrust laws, And the Trump administration didn't catch them, that wouldn't necessarily show that the system is broken.
00:49:20.000And even if it did, it would be premature to change the laws.
00:49:28.000This is a confidential memo from Republican Jim Jordan, the rock rip conservative that's getting in front of Congress and he's gonna hold their feet to the fire.
00:49:42.000This is Jim Jordan who gets paid $11,000.
00:49:45.000In the last cycle, second biggest single contributor is Google.
00:49:49.000You know, where do these insane and ridiculous talking points come from?
00:49:54.000What it comes down to this is the conservative argument.
00:50:03.000We're going to bitch and moan about censorship and we're going to complain about election interference and we're going to make tweets and we're going to get on Fox News and we're going to rail, but we don't actually want to do anything about it.
00:50:18.000We will not do anything about it, and we don't want to do anything about it, and we don't know what we would do about it even if we did want to do it, right?
00:50:30.000You know, everybody in the GOP and everybody in Washington acknowledges there's something wrong with big tech, but where is actually the solution?
00:50:38.000It's interesting because with big tech, our big problem as conservatives, before anything, is that these companies are censoring us.
00:50:47.000These are the most powerful companies led by the most powerful men in the world.
00:50:52.000And their agenda is to prevent us from speaking our minds, to prevent us from influencing political outcomes in this country.
00:51:02.000Jeff Bezos, with Amazon and 38% of the market share of all e commerce and $150 billion and his trillion dollar company, he personally wants to prevent E. Michael Jones from publishing books.
00:51:18.000He personally wants to make sure that nobody buys a book written by Jared Taylor.
00:51:23.000Mark Zuckerberg, who is worth $50 billion and another potential trillion dollar company.
00:51:29.000And how much of the market share for social media?
00:51:53.000And so this represents clearly an existential threat to conservatives, to the right wing, to the country, because we're the only ones that care about it.
00:52:04.000We are being throttled and strangled to death in the crib by these people.
00:52:09.000And in that way, they're more powerful than the government because they precede government.
00:52:13.000If government is its elected officials and its elected officials appointing their bureaucrats and their interns and their staff, well, what precedes the regime?
00:52:26.000It is those people being elected and it is those people receiving money, it is those people running advertisements, it is those people reaching voters on these platforms.
00:52:36.000So, in that way, These giant companies, they may not be the government, but they are the gatekeepers to government.
00:52:52.000And people like Jim Jordan, they want to do nothing about this.
00:52:57.000They're taking money from them to get elected, and they want to do nothing about the fact that these giant companies are preventing people like Jim Jordan from existing in the future.
00:53:27.000Before we can do anything else, we have to smash the gates open that Zuckerberg and Bezos and Jack Dorsey and all the others control so that we can enter politics on a level playing field, a viable playing field.
00:53:42.000Only way to do that is through congressional action.
00:53:46.000The executive branch is powerless to do this because the only way to force these companies to stop censorship is to change how these companies operate, which is to say, to change what the rules are regarding social media, change the rules are with regards to liability for social media.
00:54:06.000One of the most effective ways we could do this is Section 230, Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act.
00:54:14.000These are special liability protections given to tech companies, to social media platforms, which says that they're protected from being held legally liable for the content on their platforms insofar as they are an open forum for discussion, particularly political discussion, to take place.
00:54:36.000Insofar as they're not a free and open political forum, there's no reason they should get this legal immunity that is not afforded to any other publisher.
00:54:45.000Like Fox News or MSNBC or the New York Times or anything else.
00:54:49.000The only way to enforce that is through Congress.
00:55:03.000They passed, the Trump administration passed an executive order in specific or specifically looking at Section 230.
00:55:11.000And none of that has any teeth because the administration does not have the enforcement power, the teeth to do anything about these problems.
00:55:35.000He knows all about all this ridiculous procedural and legal and constitutional stuff.
00:55:41.000He knows everything I've just told you full well.
00:55:44.000And he's telling you, in spite of the fact that he knows what's going on, the problem, the solution, the gravity of the problem, he's telling us he can do nothing about it.
00:55:53.000Congress, the only institution that can do anything about it, should do nothing about it.
00:56:06.000And this is why we have been losing for 60 years because of people like this.
00:56:12.000You know, you wonder why we can have Republican presidents and Republican Congress and Republican House and Senate and Republican courts and get nothing.
00:57:47.000The think tanks, they're the ones that generate all the staffers that write the legislation, and they generate all the reports and the legislation itself sometimes that then serves as the basis for laws and bills being passed.
00:58:01.000The congressmen are the ones passing them.
00:58:05.000These different conferences where they organize fundraising, like CPAC, every step of the way it's funded by Google.
00:58:12.000Even some of these giant publications.
00:58:17.000The only way to stop what's going on in the country is for something that is truly outside the system.
00:58:25.000And I've been a proponent of this for a long time.
00:58:27.000There is no way, there is no way that you get inside the system and you're going to be really top secret and you're going to be really clever and you're going to take the Google money, but you're secretly working against them.
00:58:42.000The only way to fix this country, the only way to take over this country, is something has to either take over the system from outside or antagonize the system from outside, but there has to be this outside component.
00:59:02.000And a lot of people tell me things like, what you should have done, all these armchair generals always tell me, what you should have done with your career is you should have taken the trip to Israel.
00:59:14.000And you should have worked for Daily Wire, and you should have bided your time, and you should have been undercover, and then when you got really big, then you should have started to red pill people.
00:59:24.000And it doesn't work, because this is what happens to everybody who tries that.
00:59:29.000You're dependent on these people, you're in on the take, many people become compromised.
00:59:34.000And so the only way to truly reform the system is for something that is completely outside the system, the Groypers, America First, to either take over and become the system.
00:59:47.000Or through their interaction with the system, they can antagonize some kind of rebellion from within.
00:59:53.000But that outside component is essential.
01:00:28.000Jim Jordan, he really gave it to them.
01:00:31.000Jeff Bezos really took it from Jim Jordan, and then he got in a fucking rocket ship and went back to his space station where he's going to control the weather and govern the affairs of everything on this planet through, you know, through nanobots and things like that, right?
01:00:48.000On an adrenochrome IV like Darth Vader, he's going to take off his skin helmet and he's a cyborg.
01:00:55.000And Jim Jordan, wow, he really gave it to him.
01:00:58.000And then he got in his Civic and he drove back to his two bedroom apartment in D.C., right?
01:01:10.000The red pill about all of this is that the state is our only hope.
01:01:15.000All these conservatives talking about small government, the private sector, American innovation, they got to go.
01:01:22.000Because the state, the government, that's the only institution.
01:01:27.000That can compete with these other giant institutions that want to destroy us.
01:01:33.000Big tech, academia, you name it, Hollywood, Wall Street, all these giant, moneyed institutions that want to destroy us, they're far too powerful to be taken on by themselves.
01:01:47.000We need our, it's sort of like a giant mech fight.
01:01:58.000With money and with power that is comparable to them in order to put up a resistance.
01:02:03.000And the state, because it is democratic, because it is public, that's the only one that we stand a reasonable chance of taking over.
01:02:12.000If we wield the power of the state, well, now it's a different ballgame.
01:02:16.000Amazon might be a trillion dollar company, and George Soros might be a billionaire, but the US government has $4 trillion in its purse and a limitless borrowing capacity, and we have the rule of law.
01:04:14.000We're showing up to a nuclear exchange with a knife.
01:04:17.000You talk about bringing a knife to a gunfight.
01:04:20.000We have just showed up to Amazon headquarters where they have got artificial intelligence, supercomputer, and 500 nuclear warheads, and we've got a knife, right?
01:04:47.000In other words, Hearings aren't going to solve it.
01:04:50.000The iron hand of the government will solve it.
01:04:53.000If we get the government, we need the government to take its giant, giant steel hand and smash through Amazon headquarters and grab Jeff Bezos and throw him in a dungeon.
01:05:07.000And we need tanks to roll in and start just blowing holes in the walls.
01:06:22.000Polish American Groyper says, do you think the whole Florida being Florida meme is a covert way of attacking and mocking white people?
01:06:29.000Similarly to Karen, what is your opinion, or am I just being a schizophrenic?
01:06:33.000I think there's definitely some truth in that when people say, like, oh, Florida, man.
01:06:38.000Then again, Florida is, you know, Florida is weird.
01:06:44.000You know, when people say, oh, that's just Florida, I don't think it's necessarily an anti white thing because even as a white person, I have to say, Florida is a pretty bizarre place.
01:09:35.000So, if a woman tells me, if a woman has a totally inane and arbitrary request, well, that is an outrage.
01:09:42.000But if I have an excuse to wear a mask and sunglasses indoors, and people don't see my face, and I can have a poker face, it's like, well, you know what?
01:10:06.000You know, I never bought this manosphere idea that wearing a jersey was this humiliation because you have another man's name on it.
01:10:17.000I don't, I mean, I understand where they're coming from, but I think that thinking like that actually just betrays like an insecurity on your part.
01:11:43.000I mean, there's some truth in that when you look at some of these countries, because obviously the countries are their people, and the people are different.
01:12:15.000It's actually interesting to talk to people from other countries because they have a totally different temperament, a totally different perspective.
01:13:10.000When people talk about collectivism, that is made up.
01:13:14.000This idea of the collective being in conflict with the individual.
01:13:18.000The different levels of groups and group identification and social, what would you say?
01:13:29.000These concentric social circles, they work in harmony and they're complementary with the individual.
01:13:35.000The idea that there's this antagonism between this.
01:13:39.000Illusory and abstract collective versus the individual is wrong.
01:13:44.000Because if you want to know the truth, there really is no such thing as the individual in the sense that we are defined by our relationships with other people and we're also defined by our own intrinsic characteristics.
01:13:59.000What I mean by that is we are defined by our age, we're defined by our gender predominantly, we're also defined by our faculties and our capabilities.
01:14:10.000What I mean by that is You know, when you're talking about individualism, how does that apply to babies?
01:14:17.000You know, what is implicit in every discussion about the individual is we are talking about a mature, mentally competent man for the most part.
01:14:27.000You know, when all these different, when the founding fathers and the liberals are talking about an individualist society, they're talking about free, high agency, competent, mature men.
01:14:40.000But you have got babies, you have got the indigent, you have got retarded people, you've got the elderly, you've got women.
01:14:49.000You know, you've got a whole host of groups where that doesn't necessarily apply.
01:15:36.000This idea of the individual as the organizing unit of society, if we think about the individual as an atom and the society is made up of atoms in the same way as an organism is made up of atoms, you know, you're leaving out.
01:15:57.000Half the country's women, what percentage of the men are babies or elderly?
01:16:01.000You're really talking about like a quarter of the population.
01:16:03.000And then you're stripping away all those differences, which is what we've effectively done with direct democracy and this mass democracy and total liberalism.
01:16:15.000There's no such thing as the collective and the individual.
01:16:19.000This is a totally constructed dichotomy based on abstractions.
01:16:24.000These are words that exist on paper that were created by intellectuals.
01:16:29.000What makes a lot more sense is this interconnectedness of people and this sort of flow of life from the time you're born until the time you die.
01:16:40.000In the sense that we are defined as individual people, as distinct and differentiated people, like I'm me, in the sense that I am the son of my father and mother, I'm the brother of my sister, I'm the neighbor to these people, I'm a friend of these people.
01:16:58.000I'm employed by or employ these people.
01:17:05.000That is how I, as an individual, derive identity and meaning from others, how others derive identity from me.
01:17:14.000And there is this sort of reciprocal and complementary relationship between these different concentric social circles throughout my life.
01:17:24.000As a baby, I'm dependent on my parents.
01:17:26.000You know, when I'm in school, I'm obviously like under a teacher and with peers.
01:17:31.000As an adult, My wife and children are dependent on me.
01:17:36.000When I'm elderly or infirm, I'm dependent on caretakers or my children or something like that.
01:17:41.000So, this idea that the collective and the individual are in conflict, this is made up.
01:17:48.000This is why some societies are mass murdering people, communist societies, and it's insanity over there.
01:17:57.000And that's why in this country, it's insanity over here, where you've got the whole of society is killing themselves and on drugs and so on.
01:18:07.000Because it turns out that the individual starves and suffocates without the collective.
01:18:13.000So that's totally the wrong way to think about it.
01:18:15.000I've been saying that for a long time.
01:18:16.000So it's like, no, you're a conservative if you're a collectivist.
01:18:20.000No, you're a conservative if you're an individualist.
01:19:28.000And this is the case, by the way, for Texas, for Arizona, Colorado, Virginia, New Mexico, Nevada, Florida, Georgia, North Carolina, South Carolina, New Hampshire, Michigan, Wisconsin, Minnesota, Ohio, Pennsylvania.
01:19:46.000It's that case for every swing state and then every state.
01:19:50.000And what states will we be able to win?
01:19:52.000We will be able to, you could probably count on two hands the number of states we can win, right?
01:19:58.000Montana, Idaho, Wyoming, North Dakota, South Dakota, Kansas, Nebraska, Oklahoma.
01:23:20.000We lost that morbidly obese midwit cunt bot.
01:23:24.000We lost the bald wignat who can't get 1,500 views and wants to debate me on Ralph retort over the fact that he is not actually gay and retarded like we say he is.
01:23:35.000And we lost an eight year old who won Benjamin Sim.
01:24:29.000Warring over economics while being puppeteered by an elusive dark religion based George.
01:24:35.000That is really an incorrect interpretation of the.
01:24:40.000You know, we can enjoy things without making everything an analogy for like, you know, you know what you're trying to make it an analogy about.
01:26:04.000It is not, you know, the worst thing that they did with Star Wars is take it and adopt the same, like, Marvel humor that you see in the sequel trilogy.
01:26:14.000You watch a sequel trilogy for Star Wars, and they're making all these, like, cheap jokes that are sort of, like, self referential in a way.
01:26:22.000They're, like, it's almost like too cool for their own, like, the characters are too cool for their own movie, you know, where they're sort of in on the absurdity of the movie.
01:26:32.000But that is wrong because it's a space opera.
01:26:36.000So, Within the movie, you know, the characters have to recognize the stakes.
01:26:42.000And in Star Wars, in the prequel trilogy and the original trilogy, they do.
01:26:46.000You know, it is very corny and camp, you know, like in Star Wars 3 when they're like really, really serious about, you know, the dark side and then, you know, all of this.
01:27:03.000And then in the sequel trilogy, they're like, oh, isn't this all silly?
01:27:32.000You're supposed to be watching this with this idea that this is like this you're inside this universe where the force is real and it's good and evil and it's this very.
01:27:43.000Serious tradition, and there's evil has taken over the land.
01:27:49.000And in the superhero movies, it's like, oh, kerpow punching bad guys.
01:27:56.000So, now superhero movies can be serious too, but Marvel is a particular genre, it's like a particular style.
01:28:04.000So, they like marvelize the sequel trilogy.
01:28:08.000And I think by contrast, now people realize the appeal of the prequel trilogy, which is that.
01:28:13.000You know, all the things that they critiqued it for is what makes it enjoyable compared to the new trilogy.
01:28:19.000It was silly and it was out there and everything, but anyway.
01:28:25.000Yamato says this might have a bit of a Wignat vibe to it, but the term white supremacy is nothing more than a huge cope for those who just can't handle the earth shattering achievements of European civilization.
01:28:38.000Well, because, I mean, when they say white supremacy, What they're really doing is trying to create a taboo out of white excellence.
01:28:52.000There's no taboo around black supremacy or celebration of black excellence, but Europeans have literally dominated world history for 500 years and then even before that.
01:29:06.000And they have pathologized that and made that into the worst moral wrong.
01:31:22.000If you don't remember, Matt Gaetz recently revealed that he had been, like, in a very loose way, acting as a foster father to a Cuban refugee who arrived in Florida when he was 13 or something.
01:31:39.000And even though Matt Gaetz never formally adopted him, And this kid had like a real father.
01:31:45.000Matt Gaetz was like a father figure to him and kept it quiet until Nestor turned like 18 and then he revealed it to the world.
01:34:04.000I know that I have just as much of a claim and a right to an opinion and for my opinion to be legitimate as anybody else, with or without a non white kid, with or without non white DNA, right?
01:35:01.000And then today with the Judeo Christianity, he was the one.
01:35:04.000That after we did the turning point thing, after we got Don Jr. and Charlie Kirk booed off the stage at UCLA, it was Matt Gaetz who said, I love Turning Point USA.
01:36:39.000I know what you mean on one hand, but on the other hand, it's like, oh, everybody that is nice to an animal, oh, I can't hate you because you held the dog.
01:37:05.000Do you see Russia regaining some of its lost territory?
01:37:08.000Wow, you're really getting your money's worth here.
01:37:11.000Belarus, however worthless Belarus is, and maybe the Donbass, I know not relevant with what's going on right now, but again, want to hear your IR take.
01:37:20.000Well, I'm not a sovereign, so it doesn't matter whether I recognize Russia's sovereignty over Crimea.
01:37:28.000I don't think the U.S. should, and I don't think that the U.S. should because, in fairness, that does embolden countries to make land grabs.
01:37:41.000I don't believe that we should be fighting wars over what happens in.
01:37:58.000And the Budapest Memorandum said that Ukraine would give up the nuclear arsenal that the Soviet Union had stored in Ukrainian territory.
01:38:09.000They would give that back to Russia in exchange for a defense guarantee from the United States.
01:38:16.000Ukraine said, okay, we'll give up the nukes that happen to reside on our turf, but you have to protect us from Russia.
01:38:23.000Why would they give up their nuclear deterrent as the Soviet Union dissolved and Russia became its own country, so to speak, unless they had a guarantee?
01:38:34.000I mean, Crimea, although was autonomous, was technically under the jurisdiction of Ukraine, and Russia just came in and took it.
01:38:42.000And yeah, you know, it was, they had a referendum, and, you know, there are a lot of ethnic Russians in Crimea, but that's not how it works.
01:38:52.000We made a promise, and we failed them.
01:38:56.000So, you know, part of keeping the peace, part of our grand strategy is to keep this sort of tripwire.
01:39:04.000And it backed up these promises with a deterrent.
01:39:07.000And I still believe in that, even though I'm not in favor of like giant wars or huge troop, you know, a huge presence of American troops in some of these countries.
01:39:19.000I still do think those tripwires and these deterrents are important.
01:39:22.000I think that's generally what keeps the peace.
01:39:24.000And that is what prevents other countries from making land grabs.
01:39:27.000You know, you might say that, okay, well, big deal, he lost Crimea, but now Russia can project power in the Black Sea, which is a big deal.
01:39:35.000You know, having that Black Sea base is a big deal.
01:39:38.000Now, Iran is going to think, oh, the United States doesn't care if you just take over strategic ports, doesn't care if you take over strategic regions, and so does China, and so do our other adversaries.
01:39:52.000And when China takes over the South China Sea, because they see, oh, if Russia could take over Crimea, well, we can build artificial islands in the South China Sea, and we can claim the Senkaku Islands.
01:40:43.000It sets a precedent for every other country, but also for Russia.
01:40:48.000And I think that I don't know if Russia is going to go after Belarus.
01:40:53.000Like I said, a lot of these countries are in their sphere of influence, which is more of a 21st century way to do it than to just take over and administer those countries directly.
01:41:06.000I mean, because that's basically what they do in those contested regions in Georgia.
01:41:10.000That's basically what they do in the Donbass, right?
01:41:16.000Al Buss says if Trump were to invoke presidential direction 51 to cancel the election to become God Emperor, what do you think about the idea of an electoral college working not on a state but county level?
01:41:28.000The U.S. would become a conservative republic forever.
01:41:48.000I don't know what all the consequences of that would be off the top of my head.
01:41:52.000But wouldn't it be the case, though, that some of these counties would.
01:41:56.000I mean, how would that really be much different than the states?
01:42:00.000Some of these counties have no people living in them.
01:42:02.000So, I mean, I guess the way that that would work is that Wyoming has this disproportionality, right?
01:42:10.000Because the ratio of people to the minimum two electoral votes is obviously much higher than the population of California, and there, you know, however many electoral votes.
01:42:21.000And you'd have many, many, many counties who would have a minimum number of electoral votes, and so many Wyomings, right?
01:43:06.000The thing, though, about that is it would be kind of difficult to campaign.
01:43:10.000I don't logistically, you know, the more that you break up something administratively like that into a thousand units as opposed to 50 units, I think it would just complicate the process.
01:45:25.000I don't want to give an exact timeline, but maybe sometime after the election.
01:45:31.000Tactical Nuke says, Why is Cernovich unironically so butt ugly?
01:45:35.000Saw where he liked Gates' reply to you.
01:45:37.000Well, I'm not going to call the guy ugly, but.
01:45:42.000Yeah, I saw that he liked Matt Gaetz' reply to my tweet, and it's just, it's honestly just amusing because Matt Gaetz did that reply to my tweet.
01:45:51.000He said, I hope your heart is filled with love, or something like that.
01:45:55.000And of course, Cernovich would like that because it's fake.
01:46:00.000And, you know, whatever your feelings are about Cernovich, I think, you know, basically the guy's a pretender.
01:47:51.000And, you know, Cernovich is going to like this tweet where it's like, oh, you know, this guy that's a total shill, oh, he just BTFO'd you with moral.
01:48:01.000Preening, like, you know, fake and phony moral posturing.
01:48:04.000And it's like, of course he would like that.
01:48:05.000Of course he would like that because that's what he's all about.
01:48:08.000You know, it's all just like a frame game to him.
01:48:12.000And it's not to say that frame games aren't important.
01:48:15.000It's not to say that framing and rhetoric isn't important.
01:48:18.000I talk about that all the time on the show, but these things are only important insofar as you're using them to move the ball down the field, insofar as you're using them to actually advance goodness.
01:48:31.000Be aware of those games and you have to be good at them.
01:48:34.000But why are you playing the game if you're not actually, if you don't actually want to win and win for a God and ultimately win for what's right?
01:48:41.000So I saw that Matt Gaetz tweet and it's very impressive and very amusing the way that he, his counter on Twitter.
01:52:12.000And every time, you know, I remember I saw Cernovich in DC and he was telling us not to like make fun of Mindy Robinson or whatever the hell her name is.
01:52:22.000And he was like, you know, I've been nice to you.
01:53:47.000You know, these grown men, these millennials, these millennials with money and connections, you know, they hold court at Trump Hotel in DC and they think they're smarter than me.
01:54:01.000Yeah, I'm a 21 year old college dropout.
01:54:05.000I'm a 21 year old race realist, anti Zionist college dropout.
01:54:11.000Let me embarrass you, sitting congressman.
01:54:14.000Let me embarrass you and ratio you and all the fucking King's men.
01:54:19.000You know, he was trying to bait me with that reply like I'm some regular James Alsup.
01:54:25.000You know, James Alsup represents everything that they think I am.
01:54:28.000Everybody who underestimates me thinks I'm like James Alsup, that I'm just some, like, you know, hot headed, knuckle dragging, you know, white American youth radical.
01:54:39.000You don't know what you're dealing with, man.
01:55:34.000And the reason I go off on the tangent is because I'm sure the expectation is that if he replied to that, that I was going to reply something really hateful or ugly or unoptical, that I was going to say, You're a shell for Zionists, or, you know, how's next?
01:55:53.000And I was going to look really bad, right?
01:55:55.000I'm sure that's what they thought, and then I would look really bad.
01:55:58.000Fill your heart with love, says Matt Gaetz.
01:56:45.000Yamato says first six million Jews killed, then a hundred million killed by communism, then 45 trillion rupees stolen from India, and then six quadrillion in slavery reparations.
02:01:42.000Alex says, America First mobile has a good look, selection of elements, and clear calls to action, but I think it needs a statement about values of the movement.
02:02:46.000Because I'll be the first one to admit that men, you know, men do need to, men need work too, in the sense that a lot of men are, you know, they're not in shape.
02:05:24.000Entropy says, would you feel displaced or envious if Cami's stream gets more viewers than you?
02:05:30.000He already has double your numbers on Telegram.
02:05:33.000I don't know what that's supposed to mean, but I don't think that's going to happen anytime soon.
02:05:38.000I mean, it's really not such an easy thing to get 8,000 live viewers and carefully cultivated through not just doing the stream every night and high quality and so on, but also evading censorship, which is something that he hasn't done.
02:05:54.000So, if he can even stream at all anywhere, I mean, where can he stream?
02:06:00.000But no, I don't think I would feel displaced or envious.
02:06:03.000People have, you know, look, as a streamer, I feel somewhat competitive with everybody, even if we can all coexist to some extent in the streaming ecosystem.
02:06:13.000Had you know, if he was really successful, I mean, we obviously are doing two very different things anyway.
02:06:24.000But the other thing is, there have been times when people have gotten more viewers than me when I first started out, and many people have many people rise and fall.
02:06:31.000But what's unique about this show is the staying power.
02:06:33.000This show has been around for three years, and it just gets bigger every year.
02:06:37.000You know, this show was bigger now than it was last year, and last year was very big, you know, so and it's also stayed consistent, so.
02:07:06.000When everybody was like calling me gay because of that.
02:07:08.000And it's like because I saw the potential, I saw the obvious potential there.
02:07:12.000And it's all the reasons that he's succeeding now it's because he has a good sense of humor, it's because he's good looking, it's because he has demonstrated.
02:07:21.000This repeatability that he's able to achieve like viral moments and he's able to retain a streaming audience.
02:07:31.000I recognized all those components early on.
02:07:33.000When he was on DLive, he did a 24 hour, seven day a week stream and he would consistently get 100 live viewers and he would consistently achieve these semi or somewhat viral moments on Reddit or elsewhere.
02:08:07.000He came to America to stream with the intention of moving here, with the intention of finding a wife to get a green card to stay here, which he ultimately ended up doing.
02:08:15.000He visited, we hung out, we did a stream, and everybody at the time called me crazy because of a psyop, you know, because of lies that one of our enemies told.
02:08:29.000And now here we are, you know, six or seven months later, he's a breakout success.
02:08:33.000And it's like, I'm not going to take credit for this success, but I am going to say that, you know, the credit that I will take is saying that I had the eye for it.
02:13:48.000Maybe I would watch that on the internet, but I would not want to see intimately, you know, like somebody I know on their back pooping out a baby.
02:14:01.000Maybe I'd be there, but I'd be like in the waiting room drinking juice or something.
02:14:06.000Tuatha says, I feel like a concerned father sending his daughter off to a priest, but I watched your commentary from Sunday, and I was wondering if you'd watch Kim Iverson's casual Kim video.
02:14:17.000She's becoming slightly insufferable and is in need of a few red pills.
02:14:39.000I'm sorry, man, but that was like historically bad and made all made worse by the fact that Charlie Kirk implemented your idea and it went exactly as I said it did, right?
02:14:51.000This guy super chatted during Groyper Wars.
02:14:53.000He's like, what we should do is sneak a projector into the event and then project onto the wall Charlie Kirk saying things that are not conservative.
02:15:06.000And I told them, you know, for starters, that's never going to happen.
02:15:10.000But, you know, if you want a reason why, it's because.
02:15:16.000I have never seen an AV presentation go smoothly, much less an AV presentation where it's covert and security is going to be trying to shut it down.
02:15:31.000So I think that in the moment, people are going to choke and it wouldn't even work if everything went off without a hitch.
02:15:38.000Even if you got it in no problem, even if some other things didn't happen, I still think you'd have audio, video problems.
02:15:45.000Somebody's just going to put their hand in front of it and then game over, right?
02:17:32.000My brain is just like, you know, I'm just a very smart guy.
02:17:39.000Been around the block, and even if I haven't been around the block, I can see around the block.
02:17:44.000I can visualize what's around the block because I've seen other blocks and I've dreamt about them, and I know enough about this side of the block to think about the other parts of the block.
02:17:56.000You know, I mean, that's just what it's like to be 5,000 IQ.
02:18:00.000So, Doomer Squidward says, Man, the America First Jagger against the big tech.
02:20:29.000The difference is that they cannot co opt our style or our substance because the nature of our style and our substance is the antithesis of what they are.
02:20:38.000Ben Shapiro can never be based or red pilled.
02:20:40.000He can never be based because he's sponsored by billionaires and he answers to too many people, and he never be red pilled because he's a Zionist.
02:20:49.000That's why when I say America First is inevitable, it's because America First is basically designed so that no matter what happens, we win.
02:20:58.000Like, there's a finite amount of options, and in whichever one it is, there's an advantage.
02:21:04.000And the advantage of America First, we're sort of like a porcupine in the sense that we cannot be co opted, right?
02:21:35.000They either authentically become one of us, in which case they will be one of us, and then, you know, they're amplifying our message and they're fighting on our team.
02:21:43.000Or, you know, they answer to the same puppet masters and they affect the same, you know, lame and boring and corporate style.
02:21:51.000But, I mean, there's no way that they can, you know, they can truly co opt us like they did the Tea Party or other movements.
02:22:20.000Optics Respector says, Nick, your exposition about feeling like plankton controlling SpongeBob through his brain was the most neurotypical take you've had in a while going off tonight.
02:22:29.000I don't know if people can relate to that.
02:27:06.000From the crowd, when they think I can't see or when they think I don't care, they'll retweet something hurtful, they'll like things that are hurtful, they'll tweet, they'll mention me in things that are hurtful, they'll DM, and I won't allow it.
02:27:20.000I will not allow people to lie or slander or abuse me online just because you think I don't see it.
02:28:29.000If you post something that's questionable and you don't follow me, I block you.
02:28:34.000There's really actually a lot of reasons that I'll block you.
02:28:38.000It's actually not even just attacking me.
02:28:41.000But it's really just part of this cleanup effort to clean up Twitter for me.
02:28:46.000It makes my experience much more enjoyable, you know, to not have to see dumb, cringe, bad takes, things that are just lies, things that irritate me.
02:28:56.000You know, if I just systematically exterminate that from my timeline, it works.
02:32:15.000It was simultaneously very funny, but also sad.
02:32:20.000Epic Swag says Nick, fine show and all, but I believe you're making the juvenile error of mistaking a problem with race with the true clash of culture slash social econometric status.
02:32:31.000I view you capitalizing on the false premise of white versus black mentality rather than class.
02:32:38.000I don't know if that's a joke or if you're trying to be funny, or I don't know what that's about, but I don't get it.
02:33:10.000He's got an endless, you know, me and QAnon, we used to joke about this that, you know, Richard Spencer, he's got the three classic characteristics of a supervillain.
02:33:22.000I might butcher this because I don't know if I remember it perfectly, but we said he really does have those three classic characteristics of a comic book supervillain, which is to say that he will sometimes, he will often come close to achieving his objectives, you know, to achieving like a really significant victory, but it'll be foiled typically due to his own incompetence, you know, typically due to like something like reading off his master plan or something, and then he's foiled, right?
02:33:56.000Number two, I forget what the third one is, but number two is the endless supply of henchmen.
02:34:01.000That no matter what happens to him or what people say about him or whatever horrible things befall these henchmen, there always seems to be an endless supply of young people willing to just carry boxes or wear these uniforms or show out to rallies or something.
02:34:54.000MB says So what's the plan for after Trump?
02:34:58.000We need a true blue, rough and tumble American like Donald Reagan in the White House again, a man who defends our liberty from Democrat oppression in the halls of Congress.