00:00:11.000It is a casual Friday call in show tonight, and we love the call ins.
00:00:16.000We love to talk with the fans one on one, the unwashed masses, getting them on the show and having a little one on one intimacy with each and every one of the fans.
00:00:28.000So remember for the call in show, you've got to get on the Discord server for me to take your call.
00:00:34.000I think we're going to do the same thing that we did last week.
00:00:37.000Last call in show, not last week, but the last call in show, which was take a premium member, a non premium, a premium, a non premium.
00:00:46.000So we get a good mix in there of our old souls, our patrician class, and then the plebs, the unwashed masses who huddle in line waiting for their bread, waiting for their sustenance.
00:00:59.000But before we get into the call ins, before we get into the Discord, I have another fun little segment here based on the success of our segment on the last call in show.
00:01:32.000And of course, the joke that was always told, I should mention that today is also Good Friday.
00:01:37.000So we are keeping in mind the Lord and Savior and his sacrifice today.
00:01:42.000The joke would always go, When I was in state, we called it CCD, which was like every Wednesday you would go and you'd learn about Catholicism.
00:01:51.000It was like Sunday school, but it was on Wednesday nights.
00:01:54.000And the joke would always go before Good Friday.
00:01:57.000Oh, you know, it's Good Friday, but not so good for Jesus.
00:03:37.000That a small masonry club in the 18th century during the French Revolution, which became known as the Illuminati, now controls the world.
00:03:47.000Isn't that hilarious and totally lighthearted and fun?
00:03:50.000They think that all the world leaders get together in Bohemian Grove or Bilderberg, all these great and powerful people, and they decide what's going to happen.
00:03:58.000So people really believe this Illuminati stuff.
00:04:21.000In fact, one of the big justifications for the Revolutionary War as a way to distinguish the continental United States from Britain was that they accused the king of.
00:04:33.000In the UK, of being a papist, of being secretly a part of the Vatican.
00:04:37.000So people have believed this kind of stuff.
00:04:39.000There's been all kinds of conspiracies about popery for as long as this country's been around and for as long as the papacy's been around.
00:05:08.000They think that aliens have been here for a long time, and there's a day that is rapidly approaching called Disclosure, where we all find out aliens have been here for a long time and they've been running the show.
00:05:19.000They've been pulling the levers behind the scenes.
00:05:21.000I read a book in middle school that said that aliens gave us technology like television, and that's the only way that we're here.
00:05:32.000This is kind of like the Illuminati, very similar.
00:05:35.000The idea that the Freemasons control the world.
00:05:37.000And another wacky, just silly one to say that.
00:05:40.000Freemasons control the world, which it really is just a fraternal organization.
00:05:44.000At the top levels, they are Satanists, don't get me wrong.
00:05:47.000At the top levels, and there are a lot of them, it's very conspicuous.
00:05:50.000If you look back in history, how many of the signers of the Declaration of Independence were Masons?
00:05:55.000And you look at schools that were founded and all kinds of institutions in this country and in Europe, it is disturbing how much Masonic influence is involved.
00:06:03.000So this one's like a joking one, but it's also kind of serious.
00:06:16.000They say there's possibly trillions of dollars in oil reserves in Saudi Arabia.
00:06:22.000And of course, they're going to use that money.
00:06:24.000They're going to use that money to further their influence in this country, all around the world.
00:06:29.000And QAnon was famous for pushing these conspiracy theories back in the fall that American politics was undergoing this transformation because of these connections with Saudi politics, because MBS, the crown prince, was.
00:06:43.000Doing this corruption purge against all the Saudi princes that helped Clinton and they were involved in Pakistan.
00:07:25.000The Rothschilds, the Rothschilds, a bank that was started about 250 years ago, people say that this small Jewish bank in Europe is responsible for controlling the world.
00:07:34.000This one's a little bit problematic, I have to say.
00:07:37.000But people believe that, for example, we go to war in countries like North Korea, Libya, Iraq, Iran, because they don't have Rothschilds banks.
00:07:45.000I don't know if that's true or not, but people do say it.
00:07:49.000Number nine, the Trilateral Commission.
00:07:51.000People say that this small organization formed in 1973, I believe it was, by David Rockefeller, which incorporates three different, I guess, laterals of the world Asia, America, and Latin America, the Trilateral Commission, is responsible for controlling the world.
00:08:09.000This was a much more popular one back in the 70s, 80s, and 90s.
00:08:13.000Not so much now, falling out of favor.
00:08:15.000And then, you know, on second thought, I think we're just good with nine.
00:17:12.000Well, we have, I live in, well, I don't want to say exactly where I live, but at least in Chicago, you have some of the strictest gun laws in the country.
00:19:19.000So, I wanted to know what you think about attending.
00:19:24.000So, every day after work, I'm at work right now, but every day after work on like a Friday, I'll go to Buffalo Wild Wings near my house every single day.
00:20:06.000As long as it's not licentious, as long as it's not degenerative, you know, there's a big difference between hanging out with the boys and the kind of degeneracy that you see these days where it's.
00:20:19.000Excessive drinking, excessive hedonism of all kinds of forms.
00:20:24.000As long as it's good, innocent, moderate, temperate, fun.
00:20:28.000I think there's nothing more trad than that.
00:23:08.000I was trying to work out the motivations of the people in power, but I don't really have your powers of analysis.
00:23:17.000And I was wondering if you could, I don't know, if you pay attention to our side of the pond, but I was wondering if you could maybe shed some light for me.
00:23:29.000Sure, yeah, that's a great question, actually.
00:23:43.000The mainstream, all politics that falls within the mainstream will say that if there's any kind of malicious policy, well, it's always an unintended consequence.
00:23:56.000And I think once you start looking at the actors in the state and their incentives for these kinds of policies, I think that's when you start to become a radical.
00:24:04.000That's when you start to get into the fringe because you look at the British policy over the course of the last 50 years, and they've been warning about this really since the end of World War II about the mass immigration.
00:24:15.000Enoch Powell famously said that the rivers would run with blood because of the policy that was undertaken.
00:24:22.000And I think that it's, I think you'd be hard pressed to say that these consequences are unintended, right?
00:24:28.000I mean, you see that every time there's a terror attack, every time there's a rape attack or whatever, it's always the same people.
00:24:34.000And so you come to a point where you say, once it's not an accident, once you understand it can't be an accident because the trends would suggest, and if people love their country, it would suggest that they would.
00:24:44.000Work to end these policies that are creating bad and ills for society.
00:24:52.000I would say that it has a lot to do with the fact that the technocrats that are in control of the country are either committed to this ideology, they're committed wholeheartedly to the vision.
00:25:04.000And Thomas Sowell wrote a great book about this called The Quest for Cosmic Justice.
00:25:08.000And he talked about how the intellectuals in society believe in the vision more than they even believe in the people.
00:25:15.000And these are maybe more the ideological people.
00:25:17.000In the sense that if you look at policies that hurt minorities, that hurt white people, that are going to hurt the country overall, in the end, the people that are committed to their egalitarian postmodern vision, they could care less about the actual effects.
00:25:30.000It's about the vision, it's about getting there ideologically.
00:25:35.000The other category are people who know exactly what they're doing, which is to say that when you see terrorism in the United Kingdom, when you see mass migration happen in Europe and in the United Kingdom, you see terror is brought on the soil of the UK.
00:25:55.000And I don't think it's a coincidence that every time there's a terror attack, every time there's danger brought to our shores by mass immigration, that you have a corresponding increase in the power of the central government.
00:26:07.000You know, you have to notice how these trends coincide that terrorism directly benefits the central government.
00:26:13.000It's a sick way to look at it if you still believe in the efficacy of your government.
00:26:18.000But every time there's a terror attack, another 10,000 troops who are accountable to the central government are deployed to the streets of the UK.
00:26:26.000Not the local police, not people that are in the neighborhoods, but people from London.
00:26:30.000And the same is true in Brussels or Berlin or wherever else.
00:26:32.000Every time there's an increase in the power of the surveillance state, every time there's an increase in the amount of regulations, every time politicians get more power.
00:26:41.000And so I don't think that's a coincidence.
00:26:42.000So I think you have people that are postmodernists, they're egalitarians.
00:26:46.000You have this element of the cathedral where they're committed zealously to ideology.
00:26:51.000And then I think there's people who know exactly what they're doing and they're trying to create a pliable, compliant slave class.
00:26:59.000And you see that all around the Western world.
00:27:00.000So I think those are the two big answers.
00:27:32.000You just saw, for example, former French President Sarkozy's being brought to trial for corruption in France because he received billions of dollars from Muammar Gaddafi for his election.
00:27:42.000So, I would definitely not rule it out.
00:27:45.000They've got ungodly amounts of money in Saudi Arabia, and you know it's being spent in Europe.
00:27:50.000They're building mosques, they fund the Department of Education.
00:27:54.000There's been books written about this in the United States.
00:27:57.000So, I think there's a component there as well, definitely.
00:30:18.000And so I wanted to ask about your personal opinions on the idea of set of the contentism.
00:30:24.000And the idea that, like, the Pope can, that there could be a false Pope in the seat of Peter or something like that.
00:30:31.000And there's been increasingly a lot of weird things going on with this Pope and some other recent popes and whatnot.
00:30:38.000And I'm not too familiar with the Catholic doctrine myself, so I was wondering what's your perspective on that and if there's Antichrist stuff involved with the church?
00:30:46.000Yeah, well, of course, I'm no expert on theological matters either, but it does present sort of a problem.
00:30:52.000Now, I will say that on the topic of hell, Or this most recent controversy, the Vatican did come out today and say that the reporter did not report it accurately.
00:31:04.000And they said, of course, we believe in hell.
00:31:05.000Now, that said, that's still problematic because the reporter who interviewed the Pope, he's a 90 year old atheist who has done this.
00:31:14.000He's done interviews with the Pope like five times.
00:31:17.000And every time, this interviewer doesn't take notes, he doesn't record it, he just writes from memory.
00:31:23.000And he's misquoted every time he's interviewed the Pope.
00:31:26.000So at a certain point, you know, maybe the first time.
00:31:29.000The pope could say, Yeah, this guy's not a professional.
00:32:11.000Square to circle there, which is to say that if the claim by people who are against the Novus Ordo and they're against the current pope and they subscribe to a different pope, they believe there's a false pope.
00:33:27.000And it's very confusing, too, as somebody who's just trying to get into it as well, because it's, you know, the Bible does talk about towards the end of days, there will be a lot of these types of figures.
00:33:36.000They talk about the spirit of Antichrist.
00:33:37.000So it's kind of that's one thing I heard set of accountists talking about is Antichrist and the church.
00:33:43.000And I honestly don't know because I haven't been around long enough.
00:33:46.000But one coincidence I did want to ask you about.
00:33:48.000That came up, I think, either today or yesterday evening was that in the Vatican, I'm not sure if you heard about this, chunks of the plaster in St. Peter's Basilica rained down on a bunch of statues, and they had to clear everybody out of there during their processions.
00:34:05.000I don't know if they were doing a mass or what during that time, but it was kind of weird because it was right after the interview came out where the Pope was saying there isn't hell, and then St. Peter's Basilica starts breaking.
00:34:22.000You know, it's funny you bring that up because, of course, when Christ was crucified today, that was the immediate response at 3 o'clock earthquakes and the thing tore in half.
00:34:33.000And I forget, what is it that tears in half?
00:34:38.000But I mean, we saw the church shake or the temple shake.
00:34:42.000And additionally, there was a story that was relayed to me by our mutual friend Stevie Chatz where it talked about how under the reign of, I believe it was Justinian in the Roman Empire, I believe it was Justinian.
00:34:53.000He was the last emperor who tried to get rid of Christianity.
00:34:55.000He was the last one to resist the tide of Christianity.
00:34:59.000And he ordered, in order to disprove Christianity, the Jews to rebuild the temple because, of course, Christ said that the temple would remain destroyed.
00:35:08.000And so he thought that if he could rebuild the temple, it would invalidate the religion and they could resume paganism.
00:35:13.000And so he ordered them to rebuild the temple.
00:38:02.000Of course he's bringing new people and he brought in.
00:38:04.000No, I mean, no, but I mean, like, when he kicked out Rex Tillerson, he just moved Mike Pompeo up.
00:38:11.000And then when he's kicking out Shulkin, the old VA director, and he's bringing in his, like, personal doctor.
00:38:20.000And then when he's just like moving people around in his cabinets, he's not like bringing any new people.
00:38:27.000Well, I mean, you understand that he doesn't have an unlimited pool of people, right?
00:38:31.000I think at this point, he's moving in people who have shown that they're loyal to the president, people that have shown that they're competent to the president.
00:38:39.000You know, I don't think they are arbitrary moves.
00:38:42.000You know, I understand what you're saying that there's not like new blood being injected, like the people that are taking these new roles, like Pompeo was in CIA, new CIA head was the deputy CIA head.
00:38:55.000But by the same token, I mean, these are people who have demonstrated, obviously, to Trump that they can be trusted, that they could be confidants.
00:39:03.000And so I think it's a good thing regardless.
00:39:04.000I think the moving around is a good thing.
00:39:06.000Nobody's allowed to get entrenched with their responsibilities or with the jurisdiction of their department or their agency or whatever.
00:39:15.000But by the same token, you have to recognize that there's not an unlimited pool of people that are populist nationalists, that are Trump loyalists, that are going to be.
00:39:25.000So, it's sort of this tough balance of you want people that are experienced, that will execute your agenda, that can handle a staff, but at the same time, people that are not going to leak and that you can trust and that have a proven track record.
00:39:39.000And by the way, though, he should have been doing this from the start.
00:39:41.000People have been telling me who know the situation better than I do that this is what he should have been doing from the start filling up his entire administration from the ground up with loyalists from the campaign.
00:39:54.000And not just in the press secretary, but in defense.
00:39:57.000In state, in the important ones, and chief of staff, and all the rest.
00:40:16.000Well, yeah, and that's why I don't think Bolton is totally the end of the world because although he's a hawk, although he's a neocon, he's not quite like the other neocons.
00:40:25.000And people are going to say, oh, Nick is justifying Bolton.
00:40:30.000Zionists have no place in the administration, certainly nobody with dual citizenship to Israel like Bolton does.
00:40:37.000Now, that said, though, if you look at what Bolton says about foreign policy, he doesn't justify these wars on the basis of building democracy and nation building, which is what neoconservatism is.
00:40:48.000He says we have to do these wars in defense of America's interests.
00:40:52.000And he's obviously, I think it's dubious that he's telling the truth on that, but it is different rhetoric.
00:40:57.000And that said, he's also good with his, I think he's a competent guy.
00:41:36.000What she's saying, which is true, in the sense that we're all frustrated, I think, to an extent that we're facing this uphill battle and it's tough and it's not working out exactly as was promised during the campaign.
00:41:47.000So I think a lot of it is channeling the frustration of people and also frustration she may personally have.
00:41:53.000But I don't think we could totally, excuse me, rule out the idea that she's saying this kind of stuff to motivate the president.
00:41:59.000I mean, the president follows her on Twitter, the president was a friend of hers during the campaign.
00:44:11.000I mean, all my classes, not only were the professors incompetent, they were also left wing.
00:44:16.000And it's tough because academia, unlike politics, unlike, you know, these other institutional things that we talk about, there's not a clear cut, you know, point A to point B of gaining power.
00:44:29.000You know, in politics, it's very easy.
00:44:30.000You win more votes than the other team.
00:44:37.000For academia, it's a bit more challenging because, of course, it's a little bit more of a top down infrastructure as opposed to bottom up.
00:44:44.000I guess we just need people that are going to go in and be academics.
00:44:48.000At the end of the day, I think we need more right wing people that are willing and able to go into academia and to have, I guess, the courage or the fighting spirit to go in and lead the charge and become professors and get into academia.
00:45:03.000You know, it is controlled in a top down way, and it's hard, you know, even for somebody like, who is it, the guy that discovered the structure of DNA, even he can't give a speech at a university because he said that there were racial differences in IQ.
00:45:15.000So I understand it's tough, but I think we have to take a subversive approach to it.
00:45:22.000But I got to say, that's going to be the trickiest one.
00:45:24.000Of all the struggles that we have, that's probably, I think, going to be the most difficult because there is not that clear cut, you know, methodology of infiltrating.
00:45:44.000Yeah, well, a good question, an important one, because academia, it's right up there in terms of importance with institutions, with government, and all the rest.
00:48:46.000So I just wanted to bring up the gun thing again.
00:48:50.000This is something that was pushed around a little while back when Trump first said, He was going to propose action on bump stocks.
00:48:58.000And the prevailing 2D chess theory at the time was that both he and Jeff Sessions, knowing full well that even if they ordered the ATF to ban bump stocks, it wouldn't hold up in court.
00:49:11.000And the ATF technically would not be able to do it because the ATF already authorized the manufacture and distribution of bump stocks, stating that they were not a firearm and that they did not mechanically alter a firearm.
00:49:26.000That they operated solely on the recoil of a firearm.
00:49:30.000And people are saying that they know that, but they're trying it anyway just to look good.
00:49:34.000And the, I suppose you'd say, the proof that this is what they're doing is that Dianne Feinstein and Chuck Schumer say that that's not enough, that it won't hold up, and that legislation needs to be passed to do it.
00:49:59.000You know, by the same token, the president ordered the Justice Department to look into it, and we didn't see, obviously, any final result on that one way or the other.
00:50:08.000And that gives me a little bit of confidence because if there was a time to do it, it would have been in the immediate aftermath or before the protest, right?
00:50:17.000It would either have been, you know, February 20th, it would have been within a week of the shooting, or it would have been, you know, within a reasonable span of time afterward.
00:50:26.000And that we've just gone farther and farther away.
00:50:28.000And I think after this, This big rally on the 24th, it seems like, at least for the time being, it's evacuated the public consciousness.
00:50:36.000I think that every day that we don't see action, it gives credibility to the 2D chess theory.
00:50:43.000And so, excuse me, I guess that's a good thing.
00:50:45.000I guess at the end of the day, that's great.
00:50:47.000And if he goes back and he does a bump stock ban, you know, I was tweeting about that the day that it was announced last Thursday that it makes absolutely no sense for him to compromise on guns.
00:51:07.000So, I think if you're looking at Trump, who's got to be a smart enough guy to see that, and you're looking that there has been no law passed, there was nothing in the omnibus bill, there's been nothing through the executive.
00:51:18.000I think every day we don't see action, it's white pilling.
00:51:24.000I find it rather liberating of late that from these Parkland anti gun activists, anti gun right activists, and from many people all over social media and many people in mainstream media, mainstream publications, the New York Times, all of the big leftist publications, Washington Post, all calling for either the repeal of the Second Amendment or all out of bands on semi automatic weapons.
00:51:50.000I find it refreshing that they're finally, that the brunt of it all, that it's just, they're just being honest now.
00:51:57.000They're really telling us what they want to do.
00:51:59.000And that was on display at the March for Our Lives rally.
00:52:02.000This girl got up there in front of hundreds of thousands of people on national television and basically said, when we get the bump stocks, we are going to keep going.
00:52:11.000When we get that inch, we are going to take a mile.
00:52:37.000More and more of them are going to come out.
00:52:41.000These progressives who live in a bubble, I think they're just going to keep pushing it more and more.
00:52:44.000You're going to see it more and more in mainstream publications and mainstream media.
00:52:49.000And I would like to know how you think that's going to factor into 2018.
00:52:53.000Well, the elections coming up this year.
00:52:56.000And 2020, if it's still going by then, because we've only seen, well, since the days of Charlton Hest in the late 90s, we've only seen an escalation in the rhetoric of gun confiscation, gun banning, repealing the Second Amendment.
00:53:22.000I think a lot of people are becoming aware of this more and more that the Democrats and the left, they are just coming right out and saying it, you know, enough with the half measures, enough with the You know, reasonable, commonplace, common sense gun reform.
00:53:34.000Let's just repeal the Second Amendment.
00:53:36.000I think this is something that Trump has done since he started running.
00:53:40.000And I used to say this when people would say, you know, Trump is dividing the country, Trump is hurting the country.
00:53:45.000Trump is doing something very effectively, and he's doing it deliberately.
00:53:48.000I think this is a conscious strategy on his part, which is that he is bringing all of these issues to the fore.
00:53:54.000All these differences, all this division that has lurked below the surface for so long, Trump is forcing it to come to the top very strategically.
00:54:03.000Through the way that he uses language and rhetoric.
00:54:06.000You know, you notice that right after the Parkland shooting, people didn't immediately start calling for an end to gun violence and all the rest.
00:54:15.000They didn't, or rather, to the Second Amendment.
00:54:16.000They didn't immediately come out and say, you know what, just ban the Second Amendment, just get rid of it.
00:54:21.000It started out as the same with Sandy Hook.
00:54:23.000It was, when are we finally going to do something?
00:54:25.000When are we finally going to act on it?
00:54:27.000And Donald Trump, if you remember, very carefully, very poignantly, and consistently said, if you want the Second Amendment to remain, Vote for us in 2018.
00:54:37.000They want to take your Second Amendment.
00:54:39.000We can have this, we can have that, but they're trying to take your Second Amendment, and we can't do that.
00:54:44.000And he forced the dialogue because the left in there, they've pandered so much to the far left progressive base, they've already let the cat out of the bag, and so they've seized on that now.
00:54:54.000The far left has said, no, but we have to take away the Second Amendment.
00:54:57.000I mean, they've basically shown their hand prematurely, whereas I think the more centrist left wing, you know, Barack Obama in 2008, Hillary Clinton said they wouldn't take your guns.
00:55:06.000They said we have to protect the Second Amendment.
00:55:11.000States that are up for re election in 2018, Democrat seats that are up for re election in the Senate in 2018 in states like Montana and states like North Dakota, Missouri.
00:55:20.000You have Republican seats that are vulnerable in Arizona and Nevada, very pro gun states.
00:56:52.000Before, you know, that was kind of, that was always there.
00:56:55.000You always had the far left progressives that was always lurking in the left, and there was always conspiracy about that.
00:57:00.000There was always, you know, paranoia about that on the right.
00:57:03.000But at the end of the day, there was no question that the Democratic Party was strategic and it was tactical, and they understood better than the ideologues, you know, who brings in the money, who brings in the votes.
00:57:13.000Bernie Sanders, you know, he's one of the most pro gun Democrats in the whole lobby.
00:57:18.000He understood it very well, or in the whole caucus, rather, and he's an independent.
00:58:34.000And, excuse me, we're running out of time here.
00:58:38.000We're coming up on 8 o'clock, so I'll take some super chats and some Streamlabs, and then we'll bring in a couple more, excuse me, then we'll bring in a couple more callers.
00:58:47.000Frederick White says, a Catholic episode would be nice.
01:00:31.000And so now we've just like steered into Africa.
01:00:34.000You know, while the boomer was asleep at the wheel, the collective Jeep that is our country went right off the safari path and into, you know, the third world.
01:01:01.000You know, it wasn't bad enough that they wrecked the country, that they let in all these, you know, degenerate practices and behaviors, and they let all these people take over the country and people flood in.
01:01:13.000But then they're going to be annoying online.
01:01:15.000They're going to get in and say, You're a snowflake.
01:01:23.000And then, their final, if that wasn't good enough, you know, it wasn't good enough, they're going to punch you in the gut.
01:01:28.000They're going to slap you in the face.
01:01:30.000And then, when their generation goes away, we'll be a minority in our own country.
01:01:34.000And that's the last revenge of the boomer.
01:01:36.000So, it wasn't, you know, they came in, they trashed the place, they pissed on the carpet, and then they let in all the neighbors from the bad neighborhood.
01:02:04.000You know, they try and pretend like they don't care that I block them, and then they're complaining about it in multiple tweets, like this Borzoi character.
01:02:18.000Here's the process I tweet, somebody says something that's rude or disrespectful or just outright low IQ, just unintelligent.
01:02:26.000And they don't follow me, and so I block them.
01:02:28.000There's no, I have no interest in that.
01:02:30.000I have no interest in people, you know, getting likes or getting momentum off of my content, getting a rise out of me, injecting negativity into my life.
01:02:40.000And if they're not even following me, you know, what's even the business?
01:02:43.000This Borzoi fella, very low IQ individual, and there's just nothing to be gained from it.
01:02:49.000So it's not like I'm there, like, this made me so mad, blocked.
01:02:53.000It's like, oh, another low IQ person, don't need to see that.
01:02:56.000You know, they're, There are what Donald Trump calls life's losers, and they don't build anything of their own.
01:03:15.000Believe me, I have had people bancing me the whole show, you know, but when it's low IQ and it's not in good faith, then I'm just not interested in it.
01:05:34.000Well, I don't want to spoil it all for you, but towards the end, I'm not going to spoil it at all, but towards the end, Shinji is given a choice.
01:08:05.000You know, you're a conspiracy theorist, you're anti the movement, you're actually like a plant.
01:08:11.000And so we know that this is obviously retarded.
01:08:13.000But she did have kind of a good point in that you will criticize the girls very quickly because you have to because they're ridiculous, the modern woman.
01:08:23.000But I kind of wanted to get your what do you think is the biggest problem with kind of the modern male?
01:08:30.000Like, what's some constructive criticism that we could have to kind of put the onus on us to better ourselves going forward?
01:08:51.000Of course, this thought, you know, she gets in with the conspiracy theories.
01:08:54.000And the reason that I criticize thoughtery more than I criticize men, and I've explained this before on Twitter, there is an imbalance, and I make that very clear and deliberate.
01:09:03.000And the reason being is because men are already under assault all the time, every day.
01:09:12.000They're not a protected class like women are.
01:09:14.000You say something nasty to a woman, and they'll chop your head off.
01:09:17.000They'll come in, they'll set you on fire, they'll burn your house down, they'll kill everyone you've ever met if you say something nasty to a woman.
01:09:25.000If you say something nasty to a man, it's like they give you a medal.
01:09:27.000Congratulations, you're the king of the world now.
01:09:30.000And so that's why I have to give the ladies a little bit of a hard time because these women, they've been let out, they've been given free reign.
01:09:38.000When they left to their own devices and released into the wilderness, they've become thoughts, they've become this.
01:09:45.000This scourge, this plague, and that's not all of them, by the way.
01:12:45.000Or would you like me to finish my uh, I can tell what kind of question this one's going to be.
01:12:50.000Um, if you allow me to resolve, I mean, if you if you understand the Bible, Jesus Christ was sent to redeem the Jewish people and they rejected him and he became the savior of all mankind.
01:13:00.000I mean, that was what happened in the new so the word testament means covenant essentially.
01:13:06.000The old covenant was that God came down for this ethnic tribe and he said, You know, go forth and multiply, I'll give you a kingdom.
01:13:13.000They were repeatedly went against God and they suffered the consequence.
01:13:16.000The New Testament, the New Covenant, was that God, where previously He became the sponsor of this particular people, in the New Covenant, He became the Savior of all mankind by becoming flesh and blood and saving the world by being crucified for their sins.
01:13:33.000And so He came to, technically, I mean, if you read, have you read the Gospel?
01:13:38.000Well, in the Gospel, He gives a very great analogy about this.
01:13:42.000He says, Imagine that you own a farm and you lease that farm.
01:13:47.000To some tenant farmers, and they come in and they're doing the land.
01:13:52.000The father sends a servant to come and collect the taxes, or it's something to this effect.
01:13:55.000He sends someone to come to collect the taxes, and the people who he's leased the farm to kill the servants that have come to collect the taxes.
01:14:03.000And so the guy who owns the farm, he's like, What the hell?
01:14:57.000I'm sure you know Jews run sites like Vox and like Huffington Post, and these websites literally churn out anti white propaganda every single day, and they specifically target vulnerable white children.
01:15:12.000How do you ever forgive Jewish identity for that crime?
01:15:17.000Well, I mean, it's how do you ascribe guilt?
01:15:21.000I mean, would you ascribe the guilt for Jewish editors at Huffington Post to a Jewish newborn baby?
01:15:28.000Did that Jewish newborn baby play a part?
01:15:31.000I mean, I understand the claim, which I've never been shy about talking about, that there's Jewish influence in the media, that as a nomadic people, as a people with a strong in group preference, they tend to rise to these positions of power and exert their interest at the expense of the native population.
01:15:52.000But to say that, I mean, these kinds of gross generalizations, and I think this is where you get into legitimate anti Semitic territory, I wouldn't describe myself as an anti Semite.
01:16:02.000I describe myself as somebody who recognizes the patterns, recognizes why they exist, tries to understand the causation, but I'm not somebody who will blanket say, all Jews are evil and they're all out to get us.
01:16:25.000There are a number of pernicious interests in this country.
01:16:27.000When I understood that there was this element that was being kept quiet, that was being actively censored, and for a specific reason, This consumed me, much like it consumed Paul Nealon.
01:16:38.000But then I came around and I said, okay, well, the world's a little bit more complicated than that.
01:16:44.000There's a lot of bad people in the world.
01:16:45.000There's a lot of tribes and interests and all kinds of factions.
01:16:49.000And to say that, well, oh, the blanket, they're all this way, every single one of them, or it's this black and white, I just think that's a very juvenile and sophomoric understanding of the world.
01:17:04.000I think I. Explain my views pretty explicitly in the Halsey debate, which is, you know, look, we have a media that has a significant population of people who have a certain interest, and shouldn't that be talked about?
01:17:17.000But I'm not going to say, I mean, I don't understand where your problem comes from.
01:17:21.000You say, how do you not blame Jewish identity?
01:17:23.000First of all, does Jewish identity act?
01:18:24.000And you read the literature that's historical where these views come from, and any rational person can say, okay, here's cause, here's effect.
01:18:31.000Here are, you know, this group of people.
01:18:34.000But then when you lose me when you get into this territory of, well, the Jews are, there are too many of them here, and they're exerting this influence there.
01:18:57.000I think people be willing to hear us out if we were to just look at facts and look at things that can be observed as opposed to trying to convince the world that there's a global conspiracy and they're all in on it.
01:19:08.000I mean, you have to understand they're two very different premises.
01:19:22.000And I think, you know, people are going to call me all kinds of names on that, but I mean, that's just simply the truth.
01:19:29.000And, And for example, you watch Paul Nealon.
01:19:31.000He's a great case study in this because here's somebody who takes half truths that he heard online that maybe they're supported by partial truths, but the broader conclusions and premises are half truths.
01:19:43.000He takes these, he says, wait a minute, I see where they're based in, and he runs with it before doing any research, before looking at the world, thinking about it actively.
01:19:51.000And then he gets on the John Cardillo show and he can't even explain the most basic premise.
01:19:56.000He can't even tell you what it means to be ethnically Jewish.
01:20:00.000Podcast there, and it was a disaster for him because he took something that he saw online, he took something that had some half truths in it that he didn't properly challenge, that he didn't properly think through, and then he got embarrassed.
01:20:12.000And this is what happens to our movement where people, regular people, get lost when you start going into these crazy, oh, you know, Jew here, Jew there.
01:20:22.000And that's not to say that there's not an outsized look, nobody's denying that they're overrepresented in media by 2,000%, and there's something conspicuous about that.
01:20:30.000Nobody's denying the influence of the Israel lobby, which is absurd, which that it's able to go so far and for so long is a scandal.
01:20:39.000But when you start taking it to this next level, I mean, that's when you lose me.
01:20:45.000And there's a great Hiller Belloc wrote a book about this.
01:20:47.000It's called The Jews, which it's, you know, that sounds like an anti Semitic diatribe or whatever, but he actually does lay out very explicitly in the end that it's not anti Semitism to notice that different peoples living together tend to conflict with one another.
01:24:11.000But, yeah, I mean, that's what I mean when I say that the world is a complicated place.
01:24:16.000And it's not, you cannot ascribe all of the society's ills to one thing, and that consumes your whole ideology because there are those influences, there are these fortunes that have lasted for.
01:24:29.000Thousands of years, merchant fortunes in the past hundreds of years.
01:24:32.000You see, like you said, these old fraternal organizations, old religious orders.
01:24:37.000You see these old families that go back the Medici's, the Rockefellers, the Kennedys, and on and on.
01:24:45.000And so when I say the world is a complicated place, I don't think, you know, the reason I think that people get so weird about the Jewish thing is because it's censored.
01:24:56.000You're not allowed to talk about that one.
01:25:01.000I mean, it's one of those things that, like, I can't tell that story on air, but my boss, my boss, he likes to tell stuff in the past when he was downtown.
01:25:40.000Well, Alexander Dugan, the creator of the fourth political theory and national Bolshevism, he's an interesting character.
01:25:50.000And he is, I think, what's most fascinating about Dugan is that he is a political philosopher, he's a political theorist, and a brilliant one.
01:25:58.000I mean, the guy's like a mad scientist.
01:25:59.000But unlike many of the intellectuals of the past 100 years, what's different about him is that he is active in world affairs.
01:26:08.000You know, this is something that we've seen.
01:26:10.000Very recently, it's a recent phenomenon in the history of the West that our intellectuals, our philosophers are not public men.
01:26:17.000You know, you look at people like Goethe, you look at Bastiat, you look at some of the older political or other philosophers, and these were people who served in government, who were influential, and we created this class of like people who do nothing but write for a living in cabins.
01:26:30.000So, what's interesting about Dugan is he breaks from that tradition.
01:26:33.000He's involved, he was a broker in deals between Russia and Turkey.
01:26:37.000He's a major power player in Russia with the different oligarchs in the Middle East.
01:26:41.000And so, he's a fascinating character in his own right.
01:26:44.000On his political theory, I haven't read very extensively into Dugin, but I think what he represents in many ways, I don't, and like I said, I'm not speaking authoritatively on Dugin, but from what I understand, I think he represents this kind of new reactionary ideology, and maybe not even ideological, but like a new realism in politics.
01:27:05.000Whereas the Soviet Union was characterized by an identity that was based on ideology, based on communism, and not so much about ethnic or religious or anything like that.
01:27:16.000Dugan is returning back to a world that is defined by real pragmatic identity, real pragmatic interests.
01:27:24.000Not so much, you know, we believe in liberalism or communism, but we believe in Russia and we believe in Russia's interest.
01:27:30.000And so I think he is this kind of new wave of political philosophy.
01:27:35.000He fits in, you know, he's a big influence on Spencer, like some of the other new right in Europe.
01:28:22.000I was reading about that in middle school, Max Sterner, and he said some very interesting things.
01:28:27.000Well, first of all, I think it's a great meme because it's esoteric, it's inaccessible, and people have no idea what you're talking about when you talk about spooks and that kind of thing.
01:28:37.000You've got the guy sitting back with this little cigarette, and people don't know what the fuck he's talking about.
01:28:41.000Yeah, you've got the cartoon, yeah, with the glasses.
01:28:43.000But I thought it was really interesting what he said about Jesus Christ, which he said that Christ was.
01:28:49.000Really, like the first anarchist, really like the first revolutionary, in the sense that his whole life was based on a rejection of life itself, that you could not punish him because he was transcendent.
01:29:00.000And I thought, I never read anything by him because it was like a middle school.
01:29:04.000I wasn't going to pay $100 for the sterner reprint from whatever university.
01:30:15.000You know, fighting is an ugly thing, people get hurt.
01:30:17.000It's definitely more often than not, it's not worth the risk.
01:30:20.000But that said, I think fighting is what makes people strong.
01:30:24.000Get a if you can get punched in the face, if you could take a beating, you know, I think you're prepared for life, and uh, so I think this we're mostly sparring to help out uh, the best boxer in Illinois, Tommy White Lightning Hughes.
01:30:41.000Next time he fights here, you got to get tickets.
01:32:35.000Remember to subscribe, give us a big thumbs up on YouTube, leave a comment, click the notification bell to get notified every time we go live.
01:32:41.000Give us a thumbs up on Twitch and on Facebook and on all the rest.
01:32:45.000We'll take the super chats we didn't get to today on Monday, so don't worry about any of that.
01:32:50.000Remember, we're on the air Monday through Friday, 7 p.m. Central, 8 p.m. Eastern Standard Time.