America First - Nicholas J. Fuentes - Learn From China On Immigration | America First Ep. 14

00:00:03.000 You are watching America First.

00:00:03.000 Good evening, folks.

00:00:05.000 My name is Nicholas J. Fuentes.

00:00:06.000 We've got an exciting episode for you tonight.

00:00:09.000 Obviously, not a lot of news, not a lot of news this week or today at all, really.

00:00:15.000 I'm on BBC, I'm on Fox News, I'm on Breitbart.

00:00:18.000 There's nothing.

00:00:19.000 They're all talking about what's going on in Alabama, the special election.

00:00:23.000 I'm going to be very honest, I'm not very interested in that.

00:00:26.000 You know, we're looking at the primaries, we're looking at the budget showdown in December.

00:00:31.000 It's tedious, it's too much logistics.

00:00:33.000 I don't want to look into it.

00:00:34.000 I don't live in Alabama.

00:00:35.000 I know it's important.

00:00:36.000 You'll say, Nick, Nick, it matters.

00:00:40.000 It doesn't pique my curiosity, all right?

00:00:43.000 It's not big.

00:00:43.000 It's not grand.

00:00:44.000 It's not glamorous.

00:00:46.000 And that's what America First is, right?

00:00:48.000 We got a shout out from the president this morning.

00:00:50.000 If you saw, he said that we need America First to make America great again.

00:00:54.000 So he was referencing our show.

00:00:56.000 He was referencing the great work that I do every night and that my team of producers does as well, and all of you folks.

00:01:03.000 So really, it's been an exciting day.

00:01:05.000 Been a whirlwind, really.

00:01:06.000 I mean, I've been getting calls all day.

00:01:09.000 Great job.

00:01:10.000 The president referenced your show.

00:01:12.000 And so we love him.

00:01:12.000 He's a good guy.

00:01:13.000 He's a good guy, a close friend.

00:01:15.000 But no, the only thing going on in the news today was this earthquake in Mexico.

00:01:19.000 That's about it.

00:01:21.000 This earthquake in Mexico.

00:01:22.000 And I don't know about you guys.

00:01:23.000 I don't know if it's just me, but I'm getting a little bit worried.

00:01:28.000 I'm getting a little bit worried.

00:01:29.000 There's been this Christian prophecy that the world's going to end on the 23rd, I think it is.

00:01:37.000 And I don't think that's really far fetched. 0.93

00:01:39.000 Ever since the solar eclipse, we've seen like 15 hurricanes, three earthquakes.

00:01:45.000 There was an earthquake in L.A., then there was one in Mexico City, there was one in Illinois, I think, yesterday.

00:01:52.000 There was Hurricane Harvey, there was Hurricane Irma, Hurricane Jose, Hurricane Katia, and I think there was one other one that happened south of Mexico.

00:02:02.000 So, folks, I think it might be happening soon.

00:02:05.000 You know, I don't know.

00:02:06.000 I think I'm.

00:02:07.000 I think I'm good to go.

00:02:08.000 I've done enough of this show.

00:02:09.000 I think I've said enough.

00:02:11.000 I think it'd be my time.

00:02:12.000 But a little bit disturbing.

00:02:14.000 If it's not North Korea, if it's not mass immigration, it'll be the floods, it'll be the earthquakes and the hurricanes.

00:02:14.000 I don't know.

00:02:21.000 What can you do about that?

00:02:23.000 But anyway, we're still going to be talking about immigration.

00:02:25.000 There's no news, but we're still talking about immigration.

00:02:28.000 It's the hot topic of the week, hot topic of the century, maybe the millennium.

00:02:33.000 And I saw this on the BBC, okay?

00:02:36.000 I'm scanning the BBC for a story, I'm not finding anything.

00:02:39.000 It's, you know, Mexico, it's not going so well over there because of the earthquake.

00:02:44.000 And some other things.

00:02:45.000 Iran is sparring with President Trump at the United Nations.

00:02:49.000 Beyond that, I saw some reaction to President Trump's address to the General Assembly on the BBC from some of the world leaders there.

00:02:56.000 And I don't know who this was.

00:03:00.000 There was no title for her.

00:03:02.000 I mean, it showed the Ugandan president's reaction, it showed, I think, some Latin American countries' reaction.

00:03:07.000 And then there was just this female cosmopolitan, this female European reporter. 0.63

00:03:13.000 Reacting to President Trump's speech, and it was just the most outrageous thing I think I've heard all week, and maybe in the entire series of America First. 0.72

00:03:23.000 Never before have I heard something so unironically ludicrous from the open borders globalist side.

00:03:31.000 I'll quote it to you.

00:03:32.000 I didn't want to, I'm lazy.

00:03:34.000 That's why I didn't put it up on the screen, but I'll quote it to you, all right?

00:03:37.000 She says this Quote, Well, it strikes me as very self centered the fact that President Trump mentioned America First.

00:03:45.000 And that every country should fight for their sovereignty and that we should respect laws and borders, not very united, which is funny because we're in the United Nations.

00:03:53.000 So you heard it here first, folks.

00:03:56.000 You know, if you don't have open borders, if you don't have national sovereignty, you're united.

00:04:02.000 If you have borders, if you have a sovereign, if you have a government that isn't this globalist network, this sketchy globalist establishment, cosmopolitan, rootless transnational elite, well, you're not united, folks, and you have no business being in the United Nations.

00:04:18.000 Or rather, it's funny if you're in the United Nations and you want to maintain borders.

00:04:23.000 And, you know, I hear things like this all day long.

00:04:25.000 I hear things like this all the time from the left.

00:04:28.000 From the right, even from Paul Ryan, from conservatives, conservathots, you know, whoever it is, that we need to have open borders, that we need to have this unity, that it's a positive good.

00:04:38.000 And, you know, I thought, just for example, China.

00:04:41.000 I thought, as I saw this, as I'm watching this and reacting to it, I thought, you know, the United States is expected to not put America first.

00:04:49.000 Europe is not expected to put Europe first.

00:04:52.000 And that's obviously the sentiment of this reporter of the globalist establishment, is that these countries, the immigrants come first and the foreigners come first.

00:05:01.000 And I thought to myself, you have China, and China has sort of been, I think, the leader of the third world.

00:05:08.000 As we've seen the Cold War era come crumbling down, and we've seen the second and the first world kind of lose their significance, and all the worlds really lose their significance, you've seen China take in real leadership of the developing world, of the developing countries in Latin America, in Africa in particular, where they're investing lots of money, lots of human capital as well, and of course, lots of financial capital.

00:05:32.000 And I thought, let's take a nation like China, who is.

00:05:36.000 Emblematic of the United Nations, which is serving developing countries, representing developing countries at the expense of first world developed countries. 0.97

00:05:44.000 And I thought, what is China's immigration policy? 0.99

00:05:47.000 China's a P5 country. 1.00

00:05:49.000 It's non white. 1.00

00:05:50.000 It's the leader of the developing countries. 0.65

00:05:52.000 What would be their immigration policy?

00:05:54.000 Surely because there's no pressure on China.

00:05:56.000 Surely because we don't hear about the racism of China or of Chinese chauvinism or supremacy.

00:06:03.000 Surely it must be a very open and liberal migration policy.

00:06:07.000 Well, I looked into it.

00:06:08.000 I looked into the matter and I found something that was pretty surprising.

00:06:13.000 Pretty surprising details, folks.

00:06:15.000 I read that according to experts, it is, quote, nearly impossible to become a permanent resident in China if you are not of Chinese descent.

00:06:24.000 And imagine that, folks. 0.96

00:06:25.000 The Chinese want China to remain Chinese.

00:06:29.000 What a concept.

00:06:30.000 I mean, we talk about that on this show and we get called all sorts of names.

00:06:35.000 We get clipped by the Reagan battalion and everything else.

00:06:38.000 But apparently, you have this rabid Chinese supremacist country on the loose. 0.98

00:06:43.000 You better hide Africa. 0.98

00:06:44.000 You better hide Latin America. 1.00

00:06:46.000 You better hide the third world because China's the Ku Klux Klan, folks. 1.00

00:06:50.000 They're not letting in immigrants. 1.00

00:06:52.000 They're not being diverse. 1.00

00:06:53.000 They're not being very united.

00:06:56.000 And we need to organize, I don't know, some kind of financial boycott.

00:06:59.000 I'm wondering where the Bill Crystals of the world are that we don't have American boots on the ground there in Beijing or Shanghai.

00:07:06.000 And then I read a little bit further.

00:07:08.000 I read that beyond the fact that.

00:07:10.000 It's nearly impossible to become a permanent foreign resident in China.

00:07:14.000 I mean, there are some ways you can marry into it, says you can marry a Chinese citizen or a close family member, and that would qualify you for a two year visa, and that lets you work or study, but you wouldn't be able to do full time work.

00:07:28.000 And then additionally, it says, and this is basically the most important part, it says that technically there is no such thing as permanent residence for foreigners at all, because the Chinese government reserves the right to revoke any and all visas given to foreigners at any given time.

00:07:43.000 So, You go to China and you're not of Chinese descent, you cannot work.

00:07:48.000 You cannot work full time. 0.99

00:07:49.000 You cannot work or study part time unless you're Chinese descended or married to a Chinese. 0.98

00:07:55.000 And beyond that, even if you somehow made it there through the back door, through Hong Kong rules, if you somehow made it there, even if you had the Chinese family, you had the Chinese hookup, they could still yank it if you start making trouble. 0.90

00:08:07.000 I don't know. 0.99

00:08:07.000 Sounds like a good policy. 0.99

00:08:08.000 Sounds like an interesting policy.

00:08:11.000 So I read about that.

00:08:12.000 I read about their immigration situation.

00:08:15.000 And then beyond that, I read that there's actually something going on in China which is pretty familiar, something that is.

00:08:21.000 Pretty relevant to what's going on in Europe and America.

00:08:24.000 I found, and this surprised me, I've never heard of this before.

00:08:26.000 I don't think many people have heard of this.

00:08:29.000 There is a community of about 20,000 African migrants in the city of Guangzhou in southern China. 0.92

00:08:37.000 Now, this is the largest, I sort of had to laugh at that. 1.00

00:08:40.000 This is the largest black community in all of Asia. 1.00

00:08:44.000 So you imagine Asia, right?

00:08:46.000 And you got all of Russia or the eastern portion of Russia, you've got Mongolia.

00:08:51.000 You've got the stands.

00:08:53.000 You've got Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, Turkmenistan, Uzbekistan. 0.69

00:08:57.000 You've got Iran. 0.68

00:08:58.000 You've got Pakistan.

00:08:59.000 You've got India.

00:09:00.000 You've got all kinds of countries in Asia, big and small, some islands, some contiguous.

00:09:07.000 And the largest black community in the entire continent, the biggest continent in the world, is 20,000.

00:09:14.000 20,000 blacks.

00:09:16.000 And, you know, I don't know.

00:09:17.000 Maybe I haven't been paying attention to the news closely enough, but it's funny.

00:09:21.000 I don't hear a lot of the media scrambling and advocating and pressuring China to accept.

00:09:26.000 This glorious gift of diversity, the divine gift of diversity, of migration from the third world.

00:09:34.000 I haven't heard so much about that.

00:09:35.000 I haven't heard so much about the racism, the selfishness of the Chinese that aren't bringing in all these winners, all these Albert Einsteins, these real beauties from Central and Sub Saharan and Western Africa.

00:09:48.000 But they do have 20,000.

00:09:50.000 Okay, so that's a start.

00:09:52.000 Germany brings in 1 million in 2015 alone.

00:09:56.000 Italy brings in millions over the course of two or three years, or excuse me, they brought in 670,000 over the course of the past three years.

00:10:05.000 China, we're working with 20,000.

00:10:06.000 We're working with 20,000, and that's the biggest one in all of Asia.

00:10:10.000 So it's a start with China.

00:10:12.000 We'll keep working on it.

00:10:13.000 But so I'm reading about this community, and you know, I started to see the same old, the same old tired prejudices, the same old disgusting stereotypes, the same racist things being said about these people.

00:10:30.000 Now, this is from a member of the Chinese People's Political Consultative Conference.

00:10:36.000 So, this is a member of the government.

00:10:37.000 This is from the, I think, every two years or so often, or maybe it's five years.

00:10:42.000 Every five years, they convene the Communist Party or the People's Congress, rather, and that acts as a rubber stamp institution to basically pass forward everything that was established by the ruling nine group.

00:10:55.000 I forget who that is, but it's nine people, and they rule the country.

00:10:59.000 There's obviously the premier and the president, but.

00:11:01.000 They have a cabinet of nine people, and they make all the rules.

00:11:04.000 They make all the laws.

00:11:05.000 They convene every five years the great congress to fanfare and nationalism, and they basically pass everything through.

00:11:12.000 So this is someone of that body.

00:11:15.000 And he said, these are my words, or rather, these are his words.

00:11:18.000 He says, quote, Black brothers often travel in droves.

00:11:23.000 They are out at night, out on the streets, nightclubs, and remote areas. 0.95

00:11:27.000 They engage in drug trafficking, harassment of women, and fighting, which seriously disturbs law and order in Guangzhou.

00:11:34.000 Africans have a high rate of AIDS and the Ebola virus that can be transmitted via body fluids. 0.93

00:11:40.000 If their population keeps growing, China will change from a nation state to an immigration country, from a yellow country to a black and yellow country. 1.00

00:11:51.000 Folks, I mean, you never want to go full Chinese, I guess, right? 0.99

00:11:54.000 You don't want to go full Faulkner, right? 1.00

00:11:56.000 You don't want to go full Chinese because this is setting off. 1.00

00:11:59.000 Some alarm bells in my head. 0.98

00:12:01.000 I'm seeing the same disgusting racism that I've experienced as a person of color, as a Hispanic, for so long in this country, the same ugly, ugly racism and stereotypes here in China.

00:12:14.000 But, you know, for to entertain the notion, for example, that this isn't a prejudiced individual, but maybe making a sober evaluation and observation of the situation, isn't it peculiar that whether you look at the African population in the United States, Or the African population in Europe, or the African population in China, we see the same trends, the same patterns, the same behaviors, the same reaction by the locals.

00:12:41.000 Now, a professor from China assures me, and they have the expert, of course, and thank God, they have the expert come on. 0.86

00:12:48.000 We have this disgusting racist, the yellow supremacist, come on and tell us all these vile stereotypes. 0.89

00:12:54.000 They bring on a professor to explain away, like, you know, this is not actually what's happening. 0.99

00:12:59.000 And so the professor said, quote, The blacks have become a projection point for all the anxieties of society.

00:13:06.000 And you know, I find it so interesting that every time you have a foreign alien group in any country, whether it's Hispanics or blacks or Muslims or Jews, there is never, there is never a legitimate criticism of these groups that is accepted by the mainstream.

00:13:23.000 There is no legitimate beef that anybody could have with multiracialism, with multiethnic, multicultural countries. 0.70

00:13:32.000 There is nothing that can be accepted beyond prejudice.

00:13:35.000 Why do we complain about the harassment of women, the violence, the gang violence at night in the nightclubs and the streets?

00:13:43.000 And we see it in the United States and Europe and China.

00:13:45.000 Well, it's not because certain populations are predisposed, given their culture or geography or other factors, to these behaviors.

00:13:53.000 No, you see, it is merely the fact that around the world, on all continents, you have the same relatable but ugly, evil stereotypes of the same people.

00:14:05.000 And you understand that, you know, where do stereotypes come from?

00:14:08.000 Why are stereotypes relatable? 0.91

00:14:10.000 If I said that the black population in China, you know, how about these blacks with their purple hats? 1.00

00:14:16.000 How about these blacks with their purple hats and their blue dogs? 1.00

00:14:19.000 People would say, I'm crazy. 1.00

00:14:21.000 People would say, you know, what are you talking about?

00:14:23.000 Purple hats, blue dogs?

00:14:25.000 That's crazy talk.

00:14:26.000 Maybe that's going on in your neighborhood.

00:14:28.000 Maybe that's going on in your community.

00:14:30.000 I don't see that. 1.00

00:14:32.000 But you hear some of these other stereotypes, and from China to Germany to France to Belgium, To the Congo, to South Africa, to Detroit, to Baltimore, they ring true.

00:14:42.000 And why do they ring true? 0.78

00:14:44.000 Because to a certain extent, they are true.

00:14:47.000 And I think that is something that's crucial in the immigration debate we have to fight back against this concession that we all make, I think, at some point in the debate that there is no wrongdoing that a group can do, that there is no collective responsibility. 0.86

00:15:01.000 You know, maybe you don't believe in collective responsibility ethically or morally, but certainly as a government, there is no collective responsibility that can be assigned to alien populations.

00:15:12.000 And that's a real problem.

00:15:14.000 Because if we imagine that a nation is like an organism or like a home or any other structure, we imagine that when foreign alien elements come into it and they start causing trouble, this is something that can happen.

00:15:29.000 For us to say that this is impossible unless you're a prejudiced bigot, you know, of course, all of these maladies that are attributed to these foreign and alien influences go untreated, go unnoticed, go undiagnosed. 0.63

00:15:44.000 And that's the issue here with immigration.

00:15:46.000 And I just think it's really fascinating.

00:15:48.000 Beyond that, you know, the professor says, well, it's a projection point for all the anxieties.

00:15:53.000 Isn't that how it always is, right?

00:15:55.000 It's never that any foreign population can do any harm, no matter who it is. 0.97

00:15:59.000 And, you know, certainly some more than others.

00:16:01.000 But it's never any group.

00:16:02.000 It's always the need for a scapegoat, right?

00:16:05.000 It's always, well, you know, these bigoted, these evil people that wanted their own countries, they needed a scapegoat, right?

00:16:13.000 All the great leaders, all the big leaders of history, well, You know, wasn't that you have actual barbarians from the Germanic tribe, the Visigoths, the Muslims, or other migrants, developing world migrants?

00:16:28.000 It's never that they actually present problems, but no, it was the need of some despot to create a scapegoat so that they could pass economic policy that works.

00:16:38.000 I don't know.

00:16:40.000 And they say, and they cap it all off, they cap off this article that I'm reading about it.

00:16:45.000 They present the general sentiment of this.

00:16:48.000 This Chinese People's Political Consultative Conference member.

00:16:51.000 And they say that everybody on social media agrees with him.

00:16:54.000 On the Chinese social media website, everybody's endorsing this opinion. 0.99

00:16:59.000 Someone said, one commenter said that they cannot allow a black invasion to pollute thousands of years of Chinese blood.

00:17:07.000 We don't hear about that so much. 1.00

00:17:09.000 But people agree with this guy, pretty mainstream opinion.

00:17:12.000 And we hear them, you know, they try and cover this up.

00:17:15.000 They try and sweep this under the rug with their professor, and they say, You know, actually, all these trends and patterns you're noticing, you're not noticing them.

00:17:22.000 If you're noticing them, it's confirmation bias.

00:17:24.000 If you're noticing them, it's your own prejudices.

00:17:27.000 You know, so they have the professor who says, no, no, no, these concerns are not real.

00:17:30.000 These concerns are not legitimate or authentic.

00:17:33.000 If your child is killed by a migrant who should have never been in the country, well, you know, that's just what happens. 0.84

00:17:38.000 You have criminals in China, too, right?

00:17:41.000 But beyond that, then they cap it all off and they say, well, is it racism or ignorance?

00:17:48.000 Ugly stereotypes that persist around the world.

00:17:51.000 And of course, it could only be those two things, right? 1.00

00:17:55.000 It could only be that these people are evil, white supremacist Nazis. 1.00

00:17:59.000 They're either racists or they just don't know enough. 1.00

00:18:02.000 God help them, my galaxy brain. 0.98

00:18:05.000 I feel so sorry for them.

00:18:07.000 I pity them that they cannot see the benefits, the luxury goods that start pouring in. 1.00

00:18:12.000 You know, when you bring in migrants, it's Christmas every day. 1.00

00:18:16.000 It's Christmas every day. 1.00

00:18:17.000 The GDP surges, crime rate plummets. 0.97

00:18:20.000 It's their ignorance. 1.00

00:18:21.000 It's the Chinese ignorance. 1.00

00:18:23.000 It's our ignorance that, you know, we just haven't been inculcated with the right books and articles to explain what they're doing. 0.99

00:18:30.000 You know, the black Uber drivers in Boston and D.C., or the black Muslim gang members in Britain or in Minnesota or in Germany, you know, we just, we're just ignorant, folks. 0.98

00:18:41.000 There's no possible, between racism and ignorance, there's no possible third way. 1.00

00:18:46.000 You're either ignorant of the benefits, you're either ignorant of the inarguable cost benefit analysis, which says that. 0.94

00:18:53.000 Migration is good. 0.99

00:18:54.000 You just don't know about it. 0.56

00:18:56.000 You just don't know that that's the only justifiable position.

00:19:00.000 Or you're malevolent, or there is malice in your heart.

00:19:03.000 Either you don't know that it's inarguable, or you know it is, but you don't care because you just hate people because they look different from you, right?

00:19:12.000 It really triggers you.

00:19:13.000 It must trigger you, old man, to see someone that looks different from you walking down the street. 0.59

00:19:17.000 There is no possible third way. 0.96

00:19:20.000 There is no possible alternative where people that come here actually have collective responsibility, where people that come here may contribute to problems more than the native population, where they contribute to actual problems that wouldn't exist if you had a homogenous country. 0.79

00:19:37.000 And you quickly understand that this narrative must be maintained at all costs, because if there is anything in between racism and ignorance, The entire establishment comes crumbling down. 0.73

00:19:49.000 The whole scheme, the whole propaganda conditioning effort that's been underway for 50 years, that all collapses.

00:19:56.000 Because if we can attribute responsibility, and that's the crucial word, to populations outside of our country, then we create a justifiable and legitimate reason to keep them out.

00:20:09.000 If that is even allowed, if that's permissible, if that's accepted as a legitimate thing, as a legitimate opinion, that perhaps. 0.81

00:20:21.000 It is not us, but it is them.

00:20:24.000 You know, and they make fun of the us and the them.

00:20:25.000 Oh, you know, why is it?

00:20:27.000 We want to make people not feel like the other.

00:20:30.000 We want to make people feel like they're not alien or different. 0.78

00:20:33.000 But if they are different, if they are alien, if they are truly the other, and they are bringing crimes and problems and injustices that didn't exist here, but from somewhere else, then we have a valid reason.

00:20:45.000 We have every valid reason to say no more. 0.99

00:20:49.000 But you see, the people that want them here, whether it's the political interests, That want them here so they vote reliably Democratic or for big government, or the big multinational business interests that want these people here so they don't have to pay for their FICA, so they don't have to pay for OSHA regulations, or so that they could just so that they could not employ our own people, you know, then we can keep them out.

00:21:14.000 And they don't want that, right?

00:21:15.000 So that is, you know, that's just an interesting thing I discovered.

00:21:18.000 I know, you know, we talk a lot about rhetoric, and I think the alt right is very good with rhetoric in terms of.

00:21:25.000 I think more than any other group, we're very poetic.

00:21:28.000 We read poetry, we read fiction, we read great philosophy.

00:21:32.000 And so, more than anybody else, I think the alt right has a sort of poetic quality to it where we have sort of this romantic, I mean, good language on a lot of fronts.

00:21:42.000 You know, if you listen to a Richard Spencer speech, in my opinion, whether you are for him or against him, the language itself is more inspired than a Ben Shapiro speech.

00:21:51.000 You know, Richard Spencer, Mike Enoch, say what you will, but these speeches appeal to.

00:21:57.000 Something higher, something to give your life to, something greater than the individual.

00:22:02.000 The Ben Shapiro appeals to the gross domestic product.

00:22:05.000 Ben Shapiro and Milo and some of these others, they appeal to material comfort, which, you know, it's just not doing it for us anymore.

00:22:14.000 And so when you hear this poetry, this waxing from the alt right, waxing dramatically, rhapsodizing about race and people and culture, you know, that's all very fine and well.

00:22:24.000 But I think when we break it down and just look, and we just look at these double standards, and we look at How these arguments are constructed and why certain ones are omitted or not allowed, you very quickly understand that this is not accidental.

00:22:37.000 This is not, you know, oh, whoops, we eliminated a logical alternative to this ideologically charged policy we've been pushing for 50 years.

00:22:47.000 You know, oh, whoops, we abrogated the fact that actually some groups do have responsibility.

00:22:52.000 And as a pragmatic government, we should address that as such, or at least discuss it.

00:22:58.000 And you understand why that can't be done now.

00:23:01.000 And it's not rhetoric.

00:23:03.000 It's not flowery.

00:23:04.000 It's not inspired.

00:23:05.000 But if you break it down just purely into abstract logic, you understand why there's only two options racism or ignorance, because the two can be remedied.

00:23:14.000 Ignorance is remedied by indoctrination in elementary schools, in secondary schools, in higher education, or propaganda by watching television and movies.

00:23:24.000 And racism can be fixed through any combination of fluoride in the water or chemicals in the food, xenoestrogens in your meat or other things, your produce.

00:23:36.000 I mean, And these are things that they actually talk about where they're plugging in all kinds of chemicals to reduce quote unquote xenophobia.

00:23:43.000 You understand why it is the way it is.

00:23:44.000 You understand that this is a system.

00:23:46.000 This is truly a systemic injustice perpetrated against the people of the world where they're unleashing this hell of people who I don't think they have any experience in a civilized, wealthy, developed country. 0.99

00:24:01.000 And we expect them that they're going to go from Africa, where it's corrupt and violent and there's terrorists and you have to give bribes when you're driving around town. 0.98

00:24:09.000 And they're going to go to the United States where you have millennia of the rule of law, and it's just going to be a seamless transition. 1.00

00:24:17.000 And not only, we're not even talking about individuals.

00:24:20.000 Maybe you pick the top of the class, maybe you pick the top guy at Nairobi University and you bring him over to the United States, and maybe he could learn English and he could function in Manhattan.

00:24:30.000 Maybe he could get a job and he could work okay.

00:24:33.000 But you're not talking about the head of the class at Nairobi, you're talking about millions.

00:24:39.000 And not just millions in a decade, not millions in a generation.

00:24:43.000 You're talking about millions, plural, in the span of a year or two or three.

00:24:49.000 And to question it, to present any sort of alternative, you know, it's not accepted, it's omitted, and it's deemed racist and in need of fixing.

00:24:57.000 But that's the issue there.

00:24:59.000 That was just a small thing.

00:25:01.000 You know, I kind of went down a rabbit hole there, starting with that BBC video.

00:25:05.000 But you just hear someone, someone who's so clearly just insulated in this cosmopolitan bubble saying, You know, you're not united if you believe in laws and borders and sovereignty.

00:25:16.000 And then you see that the biggest, most populous country in the world, second in GDP, and the representative of developing countries itself isn't accepting them.

00:25:28.000 Right? 0.90

00:25:28.000 I mean, we're going to start talking about Chinese privilege, Chinese supremacy. 0.90

00:25:32.000 I'd love to hear the day. 0.97

00:25:34.000 But white countries, French, German, English, Italian, Spanish, Polish, Hungarian, we're expected to open up the borders. 0.75

00:25:41.000 And if we don't, You get sued by the European Union. 0.99

00:25:44.000 You get sued by the rootless cosmopolitans in Brussels, in the European Central Bank, in the European Commission.

00:25:51.000 And we know why that is. 1.00

00:25:52.000 But that is that little immigration thing.

00:25:55.000 I saw that video.

00:25:56.000 I was very rustled.

00:25:57.000 I was very triggered, needless to say.

00:26:00.000 And then the other thing I want to talk about there are two other things, and we'll do the questions at 45.

00:26:05.000 But the two other things I saw this as well.

00:26:08.000 I saw this on Twitter, these Google searches, where people don't believe me.

00:26:13.000 When I say there's an intentionality, To what's going on.

00:26:15.000 When I say there's an agenda, there's something more to these trends, these patterns, than an organic evolution of history.

00:26:23.000 You know, this is not Hegel, where we're one, where we give birth to this country that doesn't make any sense, and men are women, and women are men, and we're bringing in all kinds of people that are raping and killing, and nobody can say anything about it.

00:26:37.000 This is not an organic evolution of history, right?

00:26:40.000 There's something more to it.

00:26:41.000 People don't believe me when I say that.

00:26:42.000 You know, my own mother doesn't believe me when I say that.

00:26:45.000 She says, you know, Nicholas, that's a little much, that's a little wacky.

00:26:49.000 Well, if you don't believe me, I have a good example, and we've done this before the Google search series, alright?

00:26:55.000 And, you know, if you'll indulge me for a moment, I'm going to do it myself.

00:26:58.000 We'll do a little bit of an experiment, alright?

00:27:01.000 Now, first, before we initiate the experiment, I want you to think of American scientists.

00:27:06.000 I want you to think of some American scientists that you can think of.

00:27:08.000 And, you know, I'm not a science guy.

00:27:10.000 I'm not an engineer.

00:27:11.000 I'm not a, you know, chemist with the test tubes and the dissecting frogs and all that.

00:27:16.000 But you think of some of the scientists.

00:27:17.000 You think of the ones that discovered DNA.

00:27:19.000 You think of the scientists like Albert Einstein or what's that guy, Max something?

00:27:25.000 Max Planck or Fermi or some of these other scientists.

00:27:29.000 And get a good idea, some scientists in your mind, American scientists in particular, you know, just start.

00:27:34.000 Brainstorming some of them.

00:27:36.000 And then let's do this experiment, all right?

00:27:39.000 So if you open a new tab, if you open a new tab on your computer, and I'm doing it right now, and you Google American scientists, let's try it out, huh?

00:27:49.000 Now, if, before we click the search button, if there's no agenda, if there's nothing going on that they're trying to terraform public opinion in a very aggressive and unconstitutional, dishonest, duplicitous way, surely if we Googled something as innocent as benign,

00:28:05.000 As American scientists, we would find the great scientists of American history who invented things like, oh, electricity, like the phone, like telecommunications, all sorts of good things, the structure of DNA, mapping the human genome, landing on the moon, right?

00:28:21.000 If there was nothing going on.

00:28:22.000 Well, let's try it.

00:28:23.000 Let's search it up.

00:28:26.000 And let's see who are our scientists.

00:28:28.000 Okay, so we have our first entry.

00:28:33.000 We have George Washington Carver.

00:28:36.000 Now, I'm drawing a blank.

00:28:39.000 I'm not sure what, you know, what was peanut butter, right?

00:28:42.000 He did peanut butter?

00:28:43.000 Okay, you know, that's, I enjoy peanut butter.

00:28:45.000 So, top result for American scientists is not Alexander Graham Bell, not Thomas Edison, not Fermi, not Albert Einstein.

00:28:54.000 No, it is George Washington Carver, the humble inventor of peanut butter.

00:29:01.000 Next entry, oh, and by the way, this might be a little bit, this might be kind of important.

00:29:06.000 He's black, by the way.

00:29:08.000 Next entry, number two, is it, is going to be Einstein, is going to be.

00:29:11.000 Newton?

00:29:12.000 Is it going to be Planck?

00:29:13.000 Is it going to be Fermi?

00:29:14.000 Who's.

00:29:16.000 May C. Jemison.

00:29:18.000 May C. Jemison. 1.00

00:29:20.000 That's the middle initial C. May Jemison, a black woman. 1.00

00:29:25.000 Yeah, never heard of her.

00:29:26.000 Sorry, folks.

00:29:27.000 Never heard of her. 0.77

00:29:28.000 Don't know what she did.

00:29:29.000 Don't know what she contributed.

00:29:31.000 Must be something really big, right?

00:29:33.000 Must be something really big.

00:29:34.000 If we got Albert Einstein on hold for George Washington Carver and May Jemison, I mean, what did she discover, right?

00:29:43.000 Then, third, we got Albert Einstein.

00:29:45.000 Okay, I mean, he's German.

00:29:46.000 He's Jewish.

00:29:47.000 You know, he was a refugee.

00:29:48.000 They keep bringing that up.

00:29:50.000 So, you know, we're still getting there. 1.00

00:29:53.000 Our next entry, number four, Catherine Johnson, another one of our based black woman scientists.

00:29:59.000 You know, again, can't say what it is.

00:30:01.000 If she came before Alexander Graham Bell, it must be better than the telephone.

00:30:06.000 Then we have Neil deGrasse Tyson, based black astrophysicist. 0.87

00:30:10.000 Then we have Percy Levon Julian, another based black guy.

00:30:13.000 Then we have Ernest Everett Just, another based black scientist. 0.74

00:30:17.000 And then at long last, at long last, after one, two, three, four, five, six, seven entries, six of which never really heard of, don't really know what they've done, finally we have Thomas Edison. 0.81

00:30:30.000 Finally we have Enrico Fermi.

00:30:32.000 But does that not strike you as a bit peculiar, a bit odd, that you Google American scientists and instead of the first entries being people that discovered the relationship between space and time, people that discovered the telephone, people that discovered flight or electricity, Are taking a back seat to the peanut butter inventor, to May Johnson, to Catherine Johnson. 0.87

00:30:55.000 Do you think it's a coincidence that they're all black folks? 0.68

00:30:57.000 Do you think that's. 0.99

00:30:58.000 Whoops.

00:30:59.000 Someone at Google who runs the code there, someone who does, I don't know, the cyber over there, took out all the people that are most searched and inserted all these people.

00:31:10.000 You don't think there was some intentionality to who was inserted and who was left out?

00:31:14.000 Who was put first and who was put second?

00:31:16.000 What does that tell you?

00:31:17.000 Are these the most prominent American inventors?

00:31:20.000 When Google sends its American inventors, they're not sending their best folks, or scientists rather.

00:31:26.000 And, you know, maybe that's.

00:31:27.000 Okay, Nick, you got a Google search. 0.89

00:31:30.000 All right, what are you, nut job? 0.94

00:31:32.000 So, what?

00:31:33.000 Peanut Farmer comes before astrophysicist who discovers the relationship between space and time.

00:31:38.000 It's an anomaly, you know, nice data point.

00:31:41.000 Well, let's try another.

00:31:43.000 Let's give another one a go.

00:31:44.000 We can try American actors.

00:31:47.000 Let's see.

00:31:48.000 Who comes up on American actors?

00:31:49.000 Maybe Marlon Brando, maybe, I don't know, Humphrey Bogart, James Cagney.

00:31:55.000 Certainly some of the great American actors.

00:31:57.000 Let's see.

00:31:58.000 We've got, and oh, and it's a blackout.

00:32:00.000 Sam Jackson.

00:32:01.000 Certainly, well, he's good in Pulp Fiction.

00:32:04.000 Snakes on a Plane, Men in Black.

00:32:06.000 Pretty prolific.

00:32:07.000 I don't know if he's quite there with Humphrey Bogart.

00:32:10.000 I don't know if he's there yet, but certainly a good one.

00:32:14.000 Denzel Washington is number two.

00:32:17.000 Okay.

00:32:18.000 Yeah, maybe.

00:32:19.000 Maybe he's better than James Cagney.

00:32:21.000 Maybe he's better than Edward G. Robinson.

00:32:23.000 Johnny Depp.

00:32:24.000 Okay.

00:32:25.000 So a big actor.

00:32:26.000 Big actor, one of the highest paid.

00:32:28.000 We got Morgan Freeman.

00:32:30.000 And we're back.

00:32:31.000 Clint Eastwood.

00:32:32.000 Okay, we're getting somewhere.

00:32:33.000 Leonardo DiCaprio, Robert De Niro, Will Smith, Don Cheadle.

00:32:39.000 On what planet are Don Cheadle and Denzel Washington and Sam Jackson more prolific than, I don't know, Robert Downey Jr., than George Clooney, than Brad Pitt, Humphrey Bogart, Edward G. Robinson?

00:32:52.000 You can go historical, you can go modern. 0.86

00:32:55.000 It doesn't make any sense, unless, of course, it's racially motivated.

00:33:00.000 Another example, another data point, Nick.

00:33:02.000 You know, nice try.

00:33:04.000 Good job.

00:33:04.000 Good job, bigot.

00:33:05.000 You know, you had more whiteies in there. 0.95

00:33:07.000 Are you happy? 0.99

00:33:08.000 Well, let's try American musician.

00:33:10.000 I promise this is the last one.

00:33:12.000 American musicians, oh, and we got some strong entries from the black community Duke Ellington, Louis Armstrong, Elvis Presley, Bob Dylan, Aretha Franklin, James Brown, Jimi Hendrix, Ray Charles, Charles Mingus.

00:33:28.000 You're telling me, you know, we don't have the Beatles.

00:33:32.000 We don't have, well, they're British.

00:33:33.000 I guess that doesn't count. 0.68

00:33:35.000 But we don't have, oh, I don't know, Frank Sinatra up there.

00:33:38.000 We don't have the Rolling Stones.

00:33:40.000 We don't have Aerosmith.

00:33:42.000 We got Aretha.

00:33:43.000 We got Charles Mingus.

00:33:45.000 And these are our top entries.

00:33:48.000 And if you scroll far enough back, you'll get Madonna.

00:33:52.000 You'll get Eminem.

00:33:54.000 You'll get who else?

00:33:56.000 You really have to scroll back.

00:33:58.000 Holy cow.

00:33:59.000 This is a Billy Joel, okay.

00:34:02.000 And some more.

00:34:03.000 Kurt Cobain.

00:34:04.000 And these are, you know, we're really far back.

00:34:06.000 Point is, folks, this is not, I don't think anybody is Googling.

00:34:11.000 These are not the top organic searches, submissions on Google.com.

00:34:17.000 Someone had to change this.

00:34:18.000 And that's not conspiracy talk.

00:34:19.000 I don't think that's wild, crazy talk to suggest that more people are Googling Albert Einstein or Alexander Graham Bell or Thomas Edison than May Jemison.

00:34:33.000 I don't think that's far fetched.

00:34:34.000 And we realize that if you're not searching those names, and those names are not more prolific on the Google search, then someone has to be putting in these names.

00:34:45.000 And I don't think the selection process is based on any objective measurement.

00:34:49.000 I think we all know what the measurement is.

00:34:51.000 And, you know, this is one small example, but it just goes to show that there is an agenda here.

00:34:55.000 And you got to ask yourself, why are they doing that?

00:34:59.000 You know, maybe you can say, oh, well, PC, add it again.

00:35:03.000 Diversity, safe space culture, add it again.

00:35:06.000 But why is Google, a trillion dollar company that is building like AI and robots that float and like airplane robots and doing some very shady stuff, why are they instructing their employees?

00:35:18.000 Because certainly this must have come to Google's attention.

00:35:21.000 It's on Twitter every day.

00:35:23.000 Why are they instructing or allowing their employees to change the algorithm so that only in the United States, this doesn't happen in Mexico, by the way.

00:35:30.000 If you go in Mexico on Google for Mexico and you search American musicians, you get authentic ones.

00:35:37.000 And same with scientists and everything else.

00:35:40.000 So, why is it that in the United States the Google division is actively changing American musicians, American actors, American scientists, American inventors?

00:35:48.000 What purpose does that serve?

00:35:50.000 And certainly, Google, there must be some opportunity cost where people are going to get upset by this.

00:35:54.000 Someone's going to find out about this.

00:35:56.000 Someone might bring attention to this.

00:35:57.000 So, why do they take the risk?

00:35:59.000 It's worth considering.

00:36:00.000 It's worth considering why a seemingly private institution. 0.53

00:36:03.000 A seemingly private organization, which we were led to believe by Milton Friedman and Paul Ryan and Ayn Rand would be exempt and immune from prejudice and discrimination, is now actively promoting one race at the expense of another, and unjustly so, not according to merit, not according to achievement, but according to skin color. 0.52

00:36:24.000 Why is that happening?

00:36:25.000 Why is Google doing that?

00:36:27.000 Why is the government doing that?

00:36:28.000 Why are all these private organizations and banks and everything else, which are seemingly just disparate, you know, they're at war with each other, right?

00:36:36.000 Government versus big business.

00:36:37.000 You know, why does it look like they're all in unison pushing for the same thing?

00:36:43.000 Really activates the old almonds, really, you know, almond status activated.

00:36:48.000 So that's Google.

00:36:49.000 You know, you can try it out for yourself.

00:36:51.000 Try it at home, kids.

00:36:53.000 You know, you'll see.

00:36:54.000 I'm not making it up.

00:36:55.000 That's not some fantastical, you know, Nazi theory that I found on 4chan.

00:37:01.000 It's like, you know, you see it on Twitter and people are like, you know, hey, try this.

00:37:04.000 And you Google it and you say, gee, Mae Jemison, it's not registering.

00:37:09.000 And neither is what Google is doing.

00:37:11.000 So that's that. 1.00

00:37:12.000 Just another suspicious element of the rootless transnationals in Google.

00:37:19.000 And then our last topic, last thing I wanted to talk about.

00:37:22.000 You know, again, I told you, folks, slow news day, but we're still going to shout and yell for the fans about the fundamental transformation of our country that we embarked on long ago.

00:37:32.000 Last thing of the day, we hear from our old friend, and it's been a while.

00:37:36.000 I haven't heard from him in a long time.

00:37:39.000 Our old friend Barack Obama gave a speech to the Gates Foundation this morning.

00:37:44.000 Obama gave a speech to the Gates Foundation. 0.89

00:37:47.000 I almost feel kind of like, I almost feel kind of basic to even talk about Obama because it's such a boomer thing to say.

00:37:54.000 You know, Obama's at it again. 0.88

00:37:57.000 Barack Obama and the demon crats are at it again.

00:38:00.000 It's so, you know, I'm so over it.

00:38:03.000 But I just, I think this is another interesting thing.

00:38:06.000 Barack Obama, he's giving a speech to the Gates Foundation.

00:38:09.000 And like, never mind what he's even saying.

00:38:11.000 He's at the Gates Foundation.

00:38:12.000 This is the guy, this is you didn't build that administration, right?

00:38:17.000 This is, you know, rich Americans need to pay their fair share guy.

00:38:21.000 And he's given a speech to the Gates Foundation.

00:38:23.000 Who do you think is in attendance at the Gates Foundation?

00:38:26.000 You think it's his hypothetical son who would look like Trayvon Martin?

00:38:30.000 You think it's those poor souls on the south side of Chicago?

00:38:32.000 You think it's these poor, poor, oppressed minorities that he was standing up for that he won his election off of?

00:38:39.000 Or do you think it's, you know, who do you think it is?

00:38:41.000 Maybe you can guess who they actually are.

00:38:43.000 But who do you think it is in the Gates Foundation?

00:38:45.000 Rich.

00:38:46.000 Connected aristocrats, globalists, all of them.

00:38:50.000 I just think, you know, right off the bat, that kind of says it all right there.

00:38:52.000 For anybody that remains unconvinced, you know, what the real divide in the country is, people call Barack Obama leftist.

00:39:00.000 I disagree with this.

00:39:01.000 If Barack Obama was a leftist, he would be for the people.

00:39:05.000 He would be, to some extent, a populist.

00:39:07.000 He would be like Hugo Chavez, who, you know, say what you will, the people loved him.

00:39:12.000 He would be like Pablo Escobar.

00:39:13.000 The people loved the guy.

00:39:16.000 But he is with the globalists.

00:39:18.000 He is with the Bill Gates audience.

00:39:19.000 He is with the rich.

00:39:21.000 He is with people that are not ideological.

00:39:23.000 By the way, with people that support open borders, free trade, and everything else, regardless of who's supporting it, whether it's red or blue, Republican or Democrat.

00:39:33.000 And that says it all right there.

00:39:34.000 Barack Obama is going to run his whole campaign and presidency on the community organizing platform.

00:39:40.000 Get a clipboard and start organizing.

00:39:42.000 Do some organizing, he says.

00:39:44.000 Is that what he's doing right now?

00:39:45.000 Is that what organizing looks like?

00:39:47.000 You go to the Gates Foundation and you talk before people who paid 10 grand a plate about free trade and open borders?

00:39:55.000 I don't think so.

00:39:56.000 But so he goes up there at the Gates Foundation this morning, and he talks about how frustrated he is that he keeps having to defend Obamacare.

00:40:04.000 And, you know, we really feel for the guy, right?

00:40:06.000 We really feel for this president who skated in with no qualifications, with no experience in politics, with no record, and, you know, maybe not even a birth certificate, right?

00:40:17.000 Skates in there, and that's not good enough. 0.54

00:40:19.000 Now, his legacy, folks, which is such a silly thing.

00:40:23.000 I mean, how long were we told that Barack Obama, he may go down in history as the greatest?

00:40:28.000 As one of the best presidents, the most effective, genius politician, genius rhetorician, really an orator, so smart, genius.

00:40:36.000 Can't get one past Barack.

00:40:38.000 Not only is he cool, not only is he cool, and he's handsome and sexy, but he's also a political mastermind, also a political genius, right?

00:40:48.000 I mean, that's what we were led to believe.

00:40:49.000 This was, he was like, you know, it was Gandhi, Jesus, Barack Obama. 0.96

00:40:55.000 And now here he is, and really in a pretty sad and pathetic fashion before Bill Gates and all the elitists. 0.95

00:41:01.000 Complaining and whining about how his legacy is getting eviscerated. 0.92

00:41:05.000 And why do you think that is?

00:41:07.000 It's because he passed it without a single Republican vote.

00:41:10.000 No one to blame but yourself.

00:41:11.000 Another, you know, boomer talking point.

00:41:15.000 But it just goes to show, you know, with these people, the arrogance, the pretentiousness, the elitism of these people that he thinks that, you know, like the democratic process that, you know, is sacred in this country and the bill making process, the legislative process, he is exempt from that.

00:41:33.000 His legacy is exempt from that.

00:41:35.000 You know, the people want to repeal and replace or make a change, that's his legacy coming under fire.

00:41:40.000 Don't you feel bad for him and Michelle making $500,000 a speech in New York City and in all the finest cities in the world?

00:41:49.000 And, you know, maybe if Barack Obama in 2010, instead of jamming through, you know, the most offensive, technocratic health care reform bill in American history without a single Republican vote and with this unholy mechanism, I don't know if people really understand what happened there.

00:42:07.000 But what happened was, was this was an old military spending bill because the Obamacare bill originally, the American, or not the American, the Affordable Health Care Act originated in the Senate, which is unconstitutional because the Affordable Care Act is a spending bill and all spending bills must originate in the House.

00:42:27.000 Well, they took an old like military like vets funding bill that was kind of scrapped and they took out all that language and put in the Obamacare language so that Obamacare could originate in the Senate.

00:42:39.000 So they passed it through the Senate without a single Republican vote.

00:42:42.000 It goes to the House without a single Republican vote.

00:42:44.000 And the process transpires, and it turns out they need to make amendments.

00:42:48.000 They need to make revisions because, you know, the way it works is you have a version in the Senate, you have a version in the House.

00:42:54.000 It goes to a reconciliation committee, and they put together a final version of the bill that goes to the president.

00:43:01.000 Well, what happened in the interim was Ted Kennedy dies in, I think it was like 2010.

00:43:06.000 And so now they lose their majority in the Senate.

00:43:10.000 They can't pass it through the Senate again.

00:43:11.000 They can't pass through the needed revisions.

00:43:14.000 They fill his seat very quickly.

00:43:16.000 They get through a reconciliation act, and that is supposed to fix everything, and then it passes without one Republican vote.

00:43:23.000 And you know, if Barack Obama had forged a consensus, if Barack Obama had reached across the aisle, as he said he would do in 2004 at the Democratic convention or in his 2008 inaugural, if he actually believed in bipartisanship, if he actually believed in his own reform, because if you believe in your reform, you want it to last.

00:43:42.000 If you want it to last, you have bipartisan support, so it's legitimate in the eyes of both halves of the country.

00:43:47.000 Well, he would have met.

00:43:49.000 With Paul Ryan, or rather at the time of Boehner and Mitch McConnell and Eric Cantor and all the rest, and he would have made a compromise.

00:43:57.000 But he didn't do that.

00:43:58.000 He didn't do that, and now the legacy's toast, and nobody should feel bad, not even Democrats.

00:44:02.000 Because, you know, you can believe in affordable health care, you can believe in universal health care, even.

00:44:07.000 I'm sympathetic to single payer.

00:44:11.000 But that sort of political calculus and all of that, you just cannot expect anything to come out of that.

00:44:20.000 I mean, really, I don't expect.

00:44:22.000 I don't understand how he expected to get away with that.

00:44:24.000 That, you know, what do you think?

00:44:25.000 You were pulling a fast one on the other half of the country because temporarily you control both chambers of Congress?

00:44:31.000 I don't think so.

00:44:33.000 So, real travesty.

00:44:34.000 We're really sad.

00:44:35.000 I think we're going to move into questions.

00:44:36.000 We're at the 15 minute mark here, and it looks like we've already got 14 questions.

00:44:42.000 Always the magic number, right?

00:44:43.000 It always ends up like that.

00:44:44.000 But it's true.

00:44:45.000 You know, I didn't insert that in there.

00:44:48.000 Remember, it's hashtag AmericaFQ.

00:44:48.000 So, let's see.

00:44:50.000 If you want to ask a question, I will start taking them now.

00:44:53.000 So, if you got one, send it up.

00:44:56.000 And we'll try and finish within the hour today.

00:44:57.000 Last night we went 40 minutes over.

00:44:59.000 40 minutes of America First Overdrive.

00:45:02.000 I do this for free, folks.

00:45:04.000 But so we got Epsilon A here.

00:45:06.000 Or, excuse me, that's from yesterday.

00:45:08.000 We have Werner Hunter.

00:45:10.000 How do you debate with a professor about white advocacy when he says any race identity is racist since we invented the term race? 1.00

00:45:17.000 You know, I think it's actually a very good question.

00:45:20.000 Who coined the term race?

00:45:22.000 I believe it was Trotskyist. 0.93

00:45:24.000 I believe it was.

00:45:26.000 It was either Trotsky himself or a follower of Leon Trotsky.

00:45:29.000 And what was Leon Trotsky's original name?

00:45:32.000 I don't think it was Leon Trotsky.

00:45:35.000 So, of course, it's arguable who came up with the term racist.

00:45:38.000 But, I mean, you would respond to that. 0.96

00:45:40.000 If you're asking how you would respond, I would respond and say that you're abrogating, you're eliminating black identity. 0.88

00:45:47.000 I don't think any one of these professors that talk about the constructivism, that race is a social construct, they would be cowards to say this to any. 0.54

00:45:58.000 Any black man who has pride in his history, or any Hispanic or Muslim or Asian.

00:46:04.000 So I would say that you would debate that by saying, Are you saying that black people haven't suffered more than white people?

00:46:11.000 Are you trying to whitewash the suffering of the black community?

00:46:15.000 I would say that. 1.00

00:46:15.000 That would be funny because, you know, it's so ridiculous and two sided on its face that, I mean, you must be going to a community college or something. 1.00

00:46:24.000 I mean, when the globalist intelligentsia is sending the professors, they're not sending their best. 0.81

00:46:30.000 Steve Chatterson, my man, otherwise known as Cheese Wheelie in the chat, says Would you rather live in a socialist all white country or a libertarian country where a pluralism slash diversity actually works?

00:46:44.000 Hmm. 0.96

00:46:46.000 That's a good question.

00:46:47.000 It's tough to say.

00:46:50.000 I think I would go for the latter, to be honest.

00:46:52.000 And that's a really good question.

00:46:53.000 I think it puts in perspective what people's values are. 0.94

00:46:56.000 Because if you're in an all white country and there's socialism, socialism is broken. 1.00

00:47:01.000 It doesn't work. 1.00

00:47:03.000 Even in the most, and all the nat socks are going to get pissed at me. 0.84

00:47:07.000 But even in the highest trust, most homogenous white countries in the world, which are Norway, Sweden, Finland, Denmark, even in those countries, socialism doesn't work. 0.88

00:47:17.000 And that's not even socialism. 0.86

00:47:18.000 That's social democracy, which is like the most tepid, light form of socialism there is.

00:47:24.000 And even that, even a generous social safety net doesn't work in the most, in the whitest, most homogenous, high trust society.

00:47:31.000 So I would say that, you know, that would just be a no go because if you're in that country, you're going to have a broken economy and all of that.

00:47:38.000 And then, as to the question of a libertarian country where pluralism and diversity actually works, I don't think it could work.

00:47:44.000 I don't think there's any example where it does work.

00:47:46.000 You look at any major country where this has been practiced, whether it is Bosnia.

00:47:52.000 Bosnia at the time, people forget this, but at the time in the 1990s when you had the outbreak of the Yugoslavian Civil War, Bosnia was sort of this multicultural place that people talked about.

00:48:04.000 You had the convergence of three separate civilizations.

00:48:07.000 You had Orthodox Slavs.

00:48:09.000 You had Catholic or Protestant European, more European oriented people.

00:48:14.000 You had Muslims.

00:48:16.000 You had Muslims in there as well.

00:48:17.000 And this was for a long time supposed to be like the cosmopolitan place where it works until it didn't, until it all fell apart and many died because of tribalism.

00:48:29.000 The same old song.

00:48:31.000 And then you look at countries like Ukraine.

00:48:33.000 Even in Ukraine, where it's diversity of ethnicity and religion, it's not even racial, it's not even like a broad religion.

00:48:40.000 It's the difference between Catholics and Orthodox, the difference between More Russian, ethnic Russian people in the East and more Ukrainian ethnic nationalists in the West, that country is in civil war. 0.69

00:48:55.000 Nigeria, it's religious.

00:48:57.000 You have Muslims in the North, Christians in the South, and all kinds of ethnicities competing.

00:49:01.000 I mean, everywhere where this is tried to a significant degree, it doesn't work.

00:49:06.000 The one example where maybe it works is Russia. 0.56

00:49:09.000 The one example where maybe you have some degree of maybe not terrible failure is Russia, where You have the Caucasus, but the Caucasus is the Caucasus.

00:49:19.000 It's over there. 0.52

00:49:20.000 You know, it's not Moscow is Russian.

00:49:22.000 Moscow is Muscovites, and St. Petersburg is Russians and a European type of Russian. 0.82

00:49:30.000 And then in the Caucasus, you have your Tatars, you have your Dagestanis, you have your Chechens, and all the rest. 0.90

00:49:37.000 And, you know, it might be unstable in the Caucasus because you have all the different ones melting there, but I think this system of like federalism, of ethnic federalism, Generally, might have a record of success in countries like Ethiopia as well, but it has to be, you know, obviously that negates the whole purpose of diversity and pluralism if you're just going to separate them all out and give them their own votes and everything.

00:49:58.000 So I would say if it actually works, I want to be a part of it. 0.74

00:50:01.000 That said, I don't think it could work.

00:50:03.000 And, you know, libertarian is kind of what we're going for to a certain extent.

00:50:07.000 I'm not a libertine to an extent, at least in terms of what government policy should be.

00:50:12.000 I suppose I'm a very far right leaning libertarian.

00:50:17.000 I'm going to get a lot of flack for that.

00:50:18.000 I've made my positions clear before.

00:50:20.000 You guys know I'm not like your standard libertarian, but I think I would prefer to live in a free country that works where this fantastical conception of diversity works, again, which is impossible, than a socialist country where even when you have that, it doesn't work.

00:50:39.000 And what do we have?

00:50:40.000 Loading up all the rest.

00:50:42.000 We got 22 more.

00:50:43.000 You guys are very aggressive with the questions.

00:50:46.000 Trad, Americaner, asks Is calling the North Korea guy, Kim Jong un, rocket man smart? 0.90

00:50:53.000 Yeah, it's brilliant.

00:50:54.000 And Donald Trump is brilliant at marketing.

00:50:56.000 And, you know, people would say he's unqualified to be president, or they would say that he's a celebrity.

00:51:01.000 Now, any celebrity could be president.

00:51:03.000 Donald Trump had a very specific set of skills coming into the White House.

00:51:07.000 He ran a private company, a billion dollar private company for all his life.

00:51:13.000 And a private company is far different than a public company.

00:51:15.000 A public company, you have shareholders, you have board members, you have a CEO.

00:51:21.000 In a private company, you're running the whole show, and it's make or break on your own leadership, on your own gamble, on your own money.

00:51:28.000 So there was that element of leadership, that element of organization that he had.

00:51:32.000 And in addition to that, with Celebrity Apprentice, with real estate, New York real estate in particular, you're looking at a very specific kind of strategic and public relations conscious thinking where, you know, in order to sell a building, in order to put a deal together, you have to sell it.

00:51:48.000 And I've quoted this before on the show.

00:51:50.000 In The Art of the Deal, he talks about one time where he was trying to get people to invest in this deal he was doing in Atlantic City.

00:51:58.000 And it wasn't really going so well in terms of he was having difficulty putting the plots of land together.

00:52:04.000 Construction was behind schedule.

00:52:06.000 So he ordered all his dump trucks on this construction site to just move the dirt around, to pick up the dirt and put it down and make it look like they were doing something.

00:52:15.000 And he had the investors come over and they said, Wow, I've never seen a construction site so active, so busy.

00:52:20.000 This must be a huge project.

00:52:22.000 We will invest.

00:52:23.000 And by virtue of that, he got a deal together that otherwise wouldn't have been.

00:52:27.000 It just needed convincing that.

00:52:29.000 That he had the wherewithal.

00:52:30.000 And so that's a very specific set of skills in terms of marketing, being conscious of game theory, of multiple actors and strategy and how to cope with that.

00:52:41.000 That's where you get the four dimensional chess meme. 0.58

00:52:43.000 And so calling Kim Jong un rocket man, it takes all the energy, all the intimidation out of Kim Jong un, which people saw in the sixth nuclear test where he tested a hydrogen bomb.

00:52:56.000 People are seeing with the first medium range ballistic missile he launched over Japan and the ICBM he launched over Japan.

00:53:04.000 The narrative in the world is that, like, oh my God, North Korea is actually serious.

00:53:09.000 We made jokes about him before, but now this is real.

00:53:13.000 And Donald Trump took all the wins out of the sails by saying, you know, this rocket man doofus, you know, really?

00:53:19.000 He's just got to behave.

00:53:21.000 He's just got to behave himself.

00:53:22.000 He's completely taken him down a peg. 0.53

00:53:25.000 And this is so important because Kim Jong Un's entire geo strategy, his entire grand strategy, is to cultivate this sort of man man, this madman aura that at any moment he could press the button and nuclear.

00:53:38.000 The world, and we should all be afraid, and we must negotiate.

00:53:42.000 That's what he wants essentially for us to come to the negotiating table or to let him have a nuclear weapon, lest we incur his wrath. 0.97

00:53:51.000 And so, when Trump says he's just some silly rocket man, I think that takes everything out of him. 0.74

00:53:56.000 And rocket man is so genius because, of course, you have the song, so, rocket man is a phrase that is in the collective unconscious. 0.96

00:54:05.000 It makes sense because he launches rockets.

00:54:06.000 I mean, the guy's a genius.

00:54:09.000 You would never hear this out of a political.

00:54:11.000 Consultant in Washington, D.C. You could pay, Hillary Clinton could pay millions of dollars for the best political consultant in the world, and they wouldn't come up with branding as genius, but as simple as that.

00:54:22.000 So it's really a testament. 1.00

00:54:24.000 And that's why I get so mad when people say, well, maybe Trump is just a fool. 1.00

00:54:28.000 Maybe Trump is just a neocon puppet. 1.00

00:54:30.000 Very smart guy. 1.00

00:54:32.000 Johnny Rebb, what do you think about the Juggalos? 1.00

00:54:35.000 It's so dumb. 0.99

00:54:36.000 And I was, it's funny, I was watching a video about the Juggalo March. 0.99

00:54:41.000 And these people brought their kids there, and they're in a motel, and they're with their kids, and they're clown makeup. 0.74

00:54:47.000 And it was really sort of black pilling because I was like, you know, imagine being the child of juggalo parents. 0.75

00:54:53.000 Imagine what prospects do you have to be like a well adjusted, rational, cool, with it person if your parents are going to listen to like really bad rap music in clown makeup. 0.92

00:55:08.000 Very black pilling.

00:55:09.000 The juggalos, I think, are a reflection of the absurdism, the surrealism of.

00:55:14.000 The modern world, that something like that can garner tens of thousands of followers.

00:55:19.000 I mean, at least the wackos, the crazy people in pre modern times were crazy about like ideology, like a utopian ideology, like socialism or, you know, syndicalism or something like that or anarchism. 0.95

00:55:34.000 There was a higher thing to ascribe to or to, what's the word, to strive for, such as a political ideal, a religious ideal, a social ideal. 0.95

00:55:46.000 And now the mass cult followings are behind the juggalos, you know, the insane clown posse. 1.00

00:55:53.000 How stupid. 1.00

00:55:56.000 What do we have? 1.00

00:55:57.000 Huang Zhen En.

00:55:58.000 What is your opinion, if any, on the question of Kurdish nationhood, especially now that Turkey is becoming less secular?

00:56:05.000 It's tough.

00:56:06.000 It's tough because essentially what America is doing is intervening in other nations' affairs.

00:56:13.000 And it's sort of a difficult question because you have these two.

00:56:18.000 Of international relations coming into conflict with each other.

00:56:21.000 Because on the one hand, you have the Westphalian state system, which was launched in the early 17th century with the Peace of Westphalia that concluded the Thirty Years' War.

00:56:30.000 And this says that every country is sovereign and the leader of every country is sovereign over the affairs of any given state.

00:56:37.000 So for the United States to intervene and cause like a revolution across how many different countries you have Kurdish, major Kurdish populations in Iraq, in Syria, in Iran, in Turkey, I think a little bit in Azerbaijan.

00:56:51.000 To cause that sort of political instability in those countries is a violation of the foundation of the international state system.

00:56:58.000 That's number one.

00:56:59.000 Number two is the modern day international system presented by Wilson, the Wilsonian right to self determination, which says that every nation should support an ethnicity or a racial group trying to establish their own country or government to determine their own affairs.

00:57:18.000 So it's tough.

00:57:19.000 There's precedent for both ways.

00:57:21.000 I would say, in terms of America's.

00:57:25.000 National interest, our self interest?

00:57:28.000 It depends.

00:57:28.000 It depends a lot.

00:57:29.000 I think more instability is bad in the Middle East. 0.94

00:57:32.000 It just becomes a question of do you create more or less instability by causing Kurdish nationhood? 1.00

00:57:37.000 I think you would cause more. 1.00

00:57:38.000 Although it's going to take a lot to pick up the pieces. 1.00

00:57:41.000 We already know there's been an attempted Kurdish referendum that's been quashed by the Assad regime and by the Iraqi government.

00:57:48.000 So it's really a mess.

00:57:50.000 I am just generally opposed to nation building. 1.00

00:57:53.000 If they have the resources, if they have, and I'm not familiar totally with the Kurdish situation. 0.95

00:57:58.000 I I know generally what's going on, but not so much the specifics.

00:58:02.000 If they can get it together, you know, and they can do this independently with little, if no support from America or her allies, I would say, in principle, I support it.

00:58:11.000 But generally, I'm against any more instability in the Middle East. 0.65

00:58:14.000 I mean, it's killing the United States. 0.99

00:58:16.000 It's just no good.

00:58:18.000 James, or excuse me, Elwood Holgrun.

00:58:21.000 It was liked by James Alsop.

00:58:23.000 Immigration was transformed, or immigration has transformed demographics.

00:58:27.000 This is especially acute among young people.

00:58:30.000 Young whites vote GOP but are outnumbered.

00:58:32.000 Well, yeah, and in this country, I think it's something like 51% of babies born in this country are white. 0.78

00:58:38.000 And nobody voted on that. 0.80

00:58:40.000 I mean, that's the most criminal aspect of it we had it where it was 90% white babies being born every year, and now it's 50%. 0.80

00:58:48.000 And nobody got a vote, even if you don't think that's fine, even if you think, oh, that's good, white people are being taken down a notch, even if you're for that. 0.83

00:58:59.000 The same people that are championing democracy and participation in elections and civic responsibility think that it's totally okay.

00:59:08.000 That the demographics of the nation, the most important concept, the most important component, was fundamentally altered by people behind closed doors in Washington, D.C.

00:59:18.000 I think whether you're for or against, no good.

00:59:23.000 Huang Zhen En, I'll have you know that I'm a natural born American citizen.

00:59:27.000 I demand satisfaction, sir.

00:59:30.000 Well, you know, you can be grandfathered in, all right? 1.00

00:59:33.000 Once we cut off all the immigration, you know, you can be grandfathered into the identity. 1.00

00:59:37.000 You know, I said yesterday that. 1.00

00:59:38.000 There comes a point where we have to say, this is who we are and this is who we are not.

00:59:43.000 And that's what the wall is about.

00:59:45.000 I'm not even for the wall so much for pragmatic reasons. 0.92

00:59:48.000 I think the wall will contribute to stopping illegal immigration. 0.89

00:59:51.000 But what the wall says in a very physical, and I think it's a commitment to this idea because you have to pay billions of dollars for it, is to say that that is Mexico. 0.95

01:00:01.000 This is America.

01:00:02.000 America is not Mexico. 0.87

01:00:04.000 And if you want to go to Mexico, go over there.

01:00:06.000 And so that's a very physical, powerful manifestation, a very physical and powerful statement that says, This is American identity.

01:00:13.000 It is this, it is not that.

01:00:15.000 And so, you know, at some point, we're going to have to lay it out, folks.

01:00:19.000 Maybe when we have stronger numbers, right?

01:00:22.000 But, yeah, the rest can be grandfathered in.

01:00:25.000 We'll say the rest, because people have been here for a long time, and they can be grandfathered in.

01:00:29.000 But it just can't continue to be moving in that direction.

01:00:34.000 Admiral Falagos, the secret of the unjustified racial prejudice bias is the premise that people are solely influenced by their environment, not DNA. 0.90

01:00:45.000 Yeah, that's true. 0.86

01:00:45.000 I mean, that about sums it up, basically. 0.86

01:00:48.000 Once you bring biology into the mix, then it becomes understandable because the entire premise of both parties, both ideologies, rests on the undiscussed assumption, presumption, that all people are equal in all capacities across all continents and everything else.

01:01:05.000 And certainly they're equal before God, they should be equal before the law.

01:01:10.000 But if we're talking about characteristics, this is demonstrably not the case.

01:01:15.000 And it's fine and well.

01:01:18.000 When these disparities are in favor of not white people, you know, how many times have white people been humiliated by the media by talking about how well endowed black people are, how tall they are, how fit they are, how athletic they are, and how cool they are?

01:01:35.000 And wow, I mean, they're so musical and they're so good at dancing and everything. 0.99

01:01:40.000 And white people are lame. 0.99

01:01:41.000 They don't eat spicy food like they do, they don't dance cool like they do, they don't dress cool, they don't sing cool. 1.00

01:01:49.000 You know, so when those real differences between groups are humiliating to white people, it's everywhere. 0.81

01:01:55.000 Of course, that's the case. 0.63

01:01:57.000 And of course, the well endowed thing is actually a myth.

01:02:00.000 But, you know, nonetheless, we hear it on television all day long.

01:02:03.000 But the moment that you say, hey, wait a minute, maybe Africa has been uniquely the worst place to live for thousands of years is not because of culture.

01:02:11.000 Or maybe culture has something to do with geography or other factors.

01:02:14.000 I don't know.

01:02:15.000 I couldn't tell you.

01:02:16.000 But we have to really have a conversation about race.

01:02:19.000 I know that's really trite and, like, cosmopolitan, but we really need to have this message get out there that, you know, everyone believes in race.

01:02:28.000 They just don't talk about it, they're just pretending.

01:02:30.000 Like, everybody knows these things.

01:02:32.000 They just pretend that they don't because it would be offensive and they could lose their job for it.

01:02:37.000 Just another nobody.

01:02:39.000 What is the best way to start getting ready for 2018?

01:02:42.000 Well, I mean, depends on what you're getting ready for.

01:02:45.000 If it's an election, you know, that's something else.

01:02:47.000 But I think everybody should be getting ready for the long term by lifting weights, reading books, going to church, finding that Trad QT, that mommy GF, buying guns, ammunition, food, water, shelter, all these things.

01:03:03.000 I mean, that's what we should be preparing for.

01:03:04.000 But for 2018, how can we get our guys in and not some conservative or alt like guy?

01:03:09.000 You got to get off the chair, you know, get off the couch.

01:03:13.000 So many people are complaining and they're up in arms, and nobody's volunteering for campaigns.

01:03:18.000 Nobody's making phone calls for campaigns.

01:03:21.000 And I really had a problem with this at Boston University where I had all these Republicans, all these Trump supporters that wanted to be my best good friend because I had a little bit of notoriety.

01:03:31.000 And they all wanted to complain all day long about the loony left, about demographics, about High taxes, about everything else, but nobody or very few of them accepted the call to actually go and campaign in New Hampshire.

01:03:43.000 It was raining, it was cold, it was a long drive, you didn't get paid for it, but if you cared, you were there.

01:03:49.000 And so I would say that the way to get ready for that is to start getting yourself involved, not only in politics by volunteering and making these connections, but also by integrating into the community.

01:04:01.000 And I'm a big advocate for this that we need to cut all the political stuff.

01:04:05.000 I mean, it's fine and well that people are engaged in politics, they should be.

01:04:09.000 But it's not the only thing.

01:04:11.000 In fact, it's actually a very tertiary thing in the grand scheme of things.

01:04:15.000 Like, if you think of it, would you prefer that we had a nation of people that are alt right and woke on certain questions?

01:04:21.000 Or would we prefer a nation of 300 million people that are going to church, that are classically educated, that are lifting weights, that are physically fit, and everything else?

01:04:31.000 I think the one begets the other.

01:04:33.000 So become a member of the community.

01:04:36.000 Become who you are first, and the politics will follow.

01:04:39.000 That's how you should prepare.

01:04:42.000 And church is a perfect example.

01:04:43.000 Go to church.

01:04:45.000 Accept the body and blood of Jesus Christ and commune with your neighbors, fellow Christians, and shake their hands.

01:04:55.000 Get to know the names of their spouses, the names of their kids, what they're up to.

01:04:59.000 Have them over for dinner.

01:05:00.000 Have them over for drinks.

01:05:03.000 Actually, don't drink.

01:05:04.000 That's degenerate, at least in my opinion.

01:05:06.000 But do fun community things.

01:05:09.000 And then when politics season rolls around, you know what?

01:05:11.000 When you say, hey, campaign for.

01:05:14.000 You know, trad Americanner for local office, they'll say, okay, you know, I'm with you.

01:05:19.000 I'm with you.

01:05:20.000 You're a good guy.

01:05:20.000 I'll do it.

01:05:21.000 And that's what it's all about, folks.

01:05:24.000 Forgotten man.

01:05:25.000 Hey, Nick.

01:05:26.000 What is your opinion of.

01:05:27.000 I love when people say, hey, Nick.

01:05:28.000 Like, you know, hey, Nick.

01:05:29.000 Hey, Teddy.

01:05:30.000 Or, Forgotten man.

01:05:32.000 What is your opinion of Teddy Roosevelt?

01:05:33.000 Is it positive or negative?

01:05:35.000 It used to be negative.

01:05:36.000 Now it's positive.

01:05:37.000 Teddy Roosevelt is an icon, is a titan.

01:05:40.000 And I've grown to, even if people are liberal, even if people are a little bit left leaning, if they're American, if they're nationalist, if they're If they got good character, I'm all for him.

01:05:50.000 So, Teddy Roosevelt was a smart guy, tough guy, gritty guy.

01:05:53.000 I mean, really tough.

01:05:55.000 Like, you know, people talk all the time about how he got shot during a speech that he gave, and then he just went and continued it. 0.97

01:06:01.000 And, you know, the art of manliness has kind of co opted this, and you have like this boutique manliness culture for disaffected and cucked men, which I resent. 0.77

01:06:11.000 And Teddy Roosevelt has been kind of like the face of that. 0.79

01:06:15.000 Nevertheless, I think he's a really awesome guy.

01:06:17.000 Trustbuster, which is good.

01:06:19.000 Fought the National Bank, which is good.

01:06:21.000 He ran as an independent in 1912, right?

01:06:25.000 1908, he ran as an independent.

01:06:28.000 So I think that was good.

01:06:30.000 Yeah, because Taft was 1908 to 1912.

01:06:33.000 Yeah, so I thought he was really good.

01:06:34.000 Strong guy.

01:06:36.000 Ken Cannon, suggestions for red pilling those close to you, i.e., loved ones.

01:06:41.000 Easy to ignore strangers who don't care, but what about the family?

01:06:44.000 You know, it's something I've been experimenting with myself.

01:06:47.000 I've still been trying to red pill my parents and siblings and everything else, or sibling singular.

01:06:54.000 And it's tough because people are so conditioned.

01:06:56.000 And that's the most difficult part.

01:06:58.000 Once you realize what's really going on, to see everyone else as like controlled opposition, to see everyone else as like an automaton carrying out their conditioning, and it's very insulating, it's isolating.

01:07:12.000 And additionally, I think the most painful part is when your parents or your siblings or whatever, your family or your friends, see you as like a bad person because their allegiance is more so to the group, to the conformist mob of the country, which is anti racist, which is code for anti white, which is Pro immigration and everything else than they are to the people they love, the people they know.

01:07:37.000 So it's difficult.

01:07:39.000 How do you red pill them?

01:07:40.000 I think the easiest way is getting them to read books.

01:07:42.000 Getting them to read, you know, that's how I started to red pill my parents, was saying, here is my extensive library of books on the subject.

01:07:50.000 Here's one.

01:07:51.000 It's 90 pages.

01:07:53.000 The rest of it is citations, and just read for yourself.

01:07:57.000 And the other way to do it, I think the best approach is to state it in an inquisitive fashion, which is to say, You know, why is it that certain groups you're not allowed to criticize?

01:08:06.000 Why is it that this double standard exists?

01:08:09.000 You know, you can't give them all the answers, but you can get them asking the right questions, and that's what's important.

01:08:15.000 P.S. Really dig what you do.

01:08:16.000 I love hearing a sharp mind at work.

01:08:18.000 Keep it up.

01:08:19.000 Well, thank you, my man.

01:08:20.000 Thank you for the kind words.

01:08:22.000 Bobby Lane, have you read E. Michael Jones?

01:08:25.000 His magnum opus is The Jewish Revolutionary Spirit. 0.76

01:08:29.000 Jones is like Buchanan, another based Catholic.

01:08:31.000 I've never heard of E. Michael Jones.

01:08:34.000 And I've never heard of the book, but I'll check it out.

01:08:36.000 I'll check it out.

01:08:37.000 I love Pat, so we'll see what happens, right?

01:08:40.000 Anyone who's an enemy of Ben Shapiro is a friend of mine, and Lord knows he spent his whole career going after good old Pat.

01:08:46.000 We love Pat.

01:08:49.000 Purest boy. 0.68

01:08:50.000 Will we see you wearing Fashtetics?

01:08:52.000 Seriously, do you see the serious stuff dying down, or will the U.S. forces push more against Assad?

01:08:57.000 Well, of course, you'll see me wearing my Fashtetics attire.

01:09:01.000 I'll do maybe a Periscope wearing one of the sweatshirts or whatever.

01:09:05.000 And the serious stuff, it's hard to predict because once the easiest part right now is defeating ISIS.

01:09:12.000 That's part one.

01:09:12.000 Part two is stabilization.

01:09:14.000 Part three looks like everybody wants Assad to go.

01:09:18.000 Trump, neocons, everyone.

01:09:20.000 Even Putin has said that they're not wedded to Assad staying there.

01:09:25.000 So I think once stabilization occurs, then we will have a real diplomatic row on our hands.

01:09:31.000 So I think this is not going anywhere. 0.89

01:09:33.000 Syria stuff will continue. 0.56

01:09:35.000 As far as I'm concerned, I know Raqqa has not been recaptured yet by Syria. 0.92

01:09:39.000 So. 0.69

01:09:40.000 Until Damascus gets full control of the country again, you know, we're not going to hear the end of that. 0.96

01:09:47.000 Bill Skirner, when are you putting up the paywall? 0.99

01:09:50.000 We want to give more shekels.

01:09:51.000 And, you know, look, I want to take the shekels, but we're trying to put out a lot of content right now so people can experience the show.

01:09:58.000 People can get familiar with me, grow to like my content.

01:10:02.000 You know, we could get more growth with our reach, our exposure with free stuff. 0.98

01:10:07.000 And then once we get a little bit of clout, I'm going to totally shill for shekels all day long and turn my back on everyone that follows me. 0.99

01:10:15.000 No, I'm joking. 1.00

01:10:16.000 That's what they'll say.

01:10:17.000 But, yeah, we want to wait until we get more content out there, and I think we'll do a little bit more.

01:10:22.000 I wanted to do.

01:10:23.000 From the outset, but there's just not enough time.

01:10:25.000 I wanted to do like a Sunday special where I make a show over the whole week that's produced and edited and there's clips and things to do on Sunday, like an hour show.

01:10:35.000 And I think I'd do that behind a paywall.

01:10:38.000 David Wooderson, as a Christian, any thoughts on the Marching to Zion documentary if you've seen it?

01:10:44.000 I've never seen it, to be honest.

01:10:46.000 And let me take a swig of this water.

01:10:48.000 I'm getting a little dry.

01:10:55.000 Okay, Admiral.

01:10:56.000 Phallagos, Google searches. 0.85

01:10:58.000 Do you think Google's hand is being forced to be anti white by laws that are not viewable to the public? 0.95

01:11:04.000 No. 0.88

01:11:05.000 No, I think that to, you know, to like slavishly try to explain away private, you know, private negative externalities, negative externalities from the private sector, I think is like a blind commitment to the free market that is undeserved.

01:11:22.000 You know, I think we can all understand that it's not secret laws that Google is trying to brainwash the United States, but, you know, maybe there's something going on in Google.

01:11:32.000 Jimmy Chowda, like some of your econ proposals, but most tax credits just go to institutions that fund our adversaries or raise market prices.

01:11:40.000 You know, again, it would have to be comprehensive.

01:11:41.000 I didn't say just subsidies, I said you'd have to do a lot of things, which would be tax credits, subsidies.

01:11:47.000 I don't know, maybe some form of price control.

01:11:50.000 People say, you know, that's a dirty word, but maybe some way to control that.

01:11:55.000 I'm not an economist.

01:11:56.000 I'm not an expert on economic instruments that we could use to get where we need to go, but we need something that's run by, like, Chicago or Austrian school economists.

01:12:05.000 For how we can have the government make these things more affordable and get these things to be incentivized.

01:12:11.000 And it'll have to come at the cost of economic efficiency, but we have goals now.

01:12:16.000 Our goal is not conspicuous consumption, our goal is not endlessly high stock market prices and high GDP.

01:12:23.000 We want to go somewhere.

01:12:24.000 So I am more than willing to sacrifice efficiency for things that we actually need.

01:12:30.000 Otto Vaughn, thoughts on these Google searches American inventors, happy American couple, what races have blue eyes, European people history.

01:12:39.000 Well, yeah, I mean, you can do experimenting of your own with all those kinds of things, but I think it's no coincidence. 0.96

01:12:46.000 Mr. White, did Kim ever call you white trash? 0.98

01:12:50.000 Mr. White, we've been over this before. 0.99

01:12:52.000 We're doing the North Korea debate sometime this week or next week.

01:12:55.000 We're waiting for all the challengers to come forward.

01:12:57.000 It looks like we have a couple of candidates, and then we'll do the debate. 0.99

01:13:01.000 But I explained it, and it's not like, you know, they say, did Kim Jong un ever call you white trash? 0.96

01:13:07.000 No, but that's not why I said we should go to war with them, or we can make a justifiable case to go to war with them. 0.97

01:13:12.000 I said it was because.

01:13:14.000 You have irreconcilable geostrategic differences between the two countries.

01:13:18.000 And these differences happen to be the foundation of either grand strategy.

01:13:23.000 North Korea's grand strategy is we must have a nuclear weapon so America cannot destroy us.

01:13:30.000 That is irreconcilable with the American grand strategy, which is against nuclear proliferation.

01:13:36.000 No countries can have nuclear weapons beyond the ones that already do.

01:13:39.000 So you have an irreconcilable difference between the core grand strategies of the two countries.

01:13:44.000 That does not get resolved over diplomacy.

01:13:47.000 I mean, maybe.

01:13:48.000 Trump can swing it by bringing in the Chinese to negotiate or the Russians to negotiate or Japan or South Korea, but I just don't see it happening.

01:13:56.000 So I say there's a justifiable case because when you have like these differences, that's when war makes sense.

01:14:03.000 War makes sense when like you have differences that cannot be overcome through discussion. 0.80

01:14:08.000 This is one of those where you can make the case that that is true. 0.94

01:14:11.000 So that's why I said you can make the case.

01:14:13.000 And I'm not saying like we should, I'm not saying that would be great or good or whatever, desirable.

01:14:19.000 I'm just saying the case is justifiable.

01:14:22.000 Joe Gearhart, what would be a good name for a men's alt-right group?

01:14:26.000 How do you think we should form them and organize them?

01:14:28.000 I don't know.

01:14:30.000 We got to get away from the political.

01:14:32.000 I think that's the thing.

01:14:33.000 A good name for a men's alt-right group would just be like any kind of group that values classical virtues.

01:14:40.000 It doesn't have to be political.

01:14:42.000 I mean, I think the politics comes later.

01:14:44.000 Look at the left.

01:14:45.000 The left has all these organizations that are apolitical but get politics injected into them.

01:14:52.000 You know, like the Boy Scouts, they have all kinds of neoliberal, or rather just plain liberal propaganda there.

01:14:58.000 You have all kinds of liberal propaganda in all the voluntary organizations for liberals.

01:15:03.000 You know, college campuses churn out liberals all day long.

01:15:05.000 They're not billed as like youth liberal campuses.

01:15:09.000 So I would say that a men's alt right group shouldn't be an alt right group at all.

01:15:13.000 It should be maybe started by someone who's alt right, but should promote, like I said before, classical education, faith, virtue, monogamy, you know, all those good things.

01:15:25.000 And the rest will follow.

01:15:26.000 Trust me, the rest will follow.

01:15:28.000 Once you get that fraternal, once you get those healthy male relationships back, which have been missing for so long, the politics will come.

01:15:36.000 When men get together, they talk about these things.

01:15:38.000 And you don't have to worry about all the filming that happens when you involve women or minorities that get offended and they're going to drag you out to the court of public opinion to get fired.

01:15:47.000 You know, once you have these fraternal organizations where people are sitting down and they're comfortable with each other and they know each other and they share the same values and they know each other's families, they can talk about.

01:15:57.000 What's really going on?

01:15:58.000 They can talk about these things, and trust me, all that will come. 0.78

01:16:03.000 American Candor, how would you explain the importance of metaphysics to society/slash culture when having a talk with those with a soulless worldview? 0.70

01:16:12.000 That's just it. 0.78

01:16:12.000 You don't bring up the metaphysics, it's just beyond people. 0.78

01:16:15.000 And, you know, that's why meme culture is important.

01:16:19.000 Out of all the Keck nonsense, the one good article I did read was about esoteric Keckism.

01:16:26.000 And it said that basically memes were so powerful, and why memes work for us.

01:16:30.000 Is because we take really esoteric, like difficult, inaccessible ideas and we simplify them into a completely accessible image that everyone understands.

01:16:40.000 You know, you could read all of Jared Taylor's books and all of the French postmodernists, and you can read countless books by European obscure authors, and you can break the conditioning, and you can watch a six hour documentary.

01:16:53.000 I don't know what that is, but you could go through all those hoops, or you could look at a meme that explains exactly what's going on.

01:16:59.000 And so that's just it.

01:17:00.000 You don't address the metaphysics.

01:17:02.000 You just start people on the road there and you explain sort of the stuff that is a little bit more superficial, easy to understand, and the rest will follow.

01:17:13.000 King of Savian.

01:17:14.000 I mean, like, nobody ever won a political movement advocating for Kant, right?

01:17:20.000 Kant is impossible to read.

01:17:22.000 Nobody ever won a political movement advocating for Nietzsche, or maybe he did with Roussel, but he was easy to understand.

01:17:30.000 King of Savian. 0.72

01:17:31.000 Do you think war in the country could solve the minority problem in America slash the West? 1.00

01:17:37.000 No, no, I think that would be bad. 0.96

01:17:40.000 I think war is the last thing we would do because that would be, you know, we could never predict the outcome of that because the biggest variable in that is like the American military.

01:17:51.000 If you know who controls the Pentagon, if you know who controls the government, and we assume that the military will side with them, it's not going to work out well for us, you know, when maybe we have 67% strong population wise, and that's rapidly decreasing.

01:18:07.000 The ones with all the technology and all the lasers and guns and everything is the U.S. military.

01:18:12.000 So.

01:18:14.000 That'll be an issue.

01:18:15.000 King Pluto.

01:18:17.000 Nick, thoughts on Castizo versus Mestizo integration? 0.99

01:18:20.000 It seems like Castizos blend right in, but Mestizos refuse integration. 1.00

01:18:25.000 Well, it's true. 1.00

01:18:26.000 And it's so funny because, you know, why do you think that is? 0.73

01:18:29.000 Why do you think it is that Castizos integrate into America and not Mestizos? 0.89

01:18:34.000 Well, maybe because Castizos are European descended and Mestizos are not.

01:18:39.000 And again, you know, we talk all day long about rich and vibrant cultures. 1.00

01:18:43.000 Great, but keep them where they are. 1.00

01:18:47.000 Peruvians.

01:18:48.000 Have a very rich, distinct, unique Amerindian culture.

01:18:51.000 So let them remain in Peru, in the homeland of their ancestors.

01:18:55.000 I mean, you look at some of these cities, you look at like Machu Picchu, which has seen the passage of centuries, which has seen centuries and hundreds of generations of Peruvians where their kin, their families have spilled blood, have made sacrifices, have done all their working, all their thinking, and the solution that the globalists propose is well, they should just go and drive Uber cars in Boston.

01:19:18.000 I mean, what a perverse idea.

01:19:21.000 What a perverse idea.

01:19:23.000 And they say blood and soil is a Hitler slogan.

01:19:26.000 But really, a people has a connection to its land.

01:19:30.000 Americans have a connection to the Mississippi, to the Grand Canyon, to the New World and its prospects.

01:19:36.000 And the Germans have a connection to the Rhine and to the, what's the other river?

01:19:42.000 I forget the name of it.

01:19:44.000 And the Russians have the Volga and they have the Urals and they have their winter.

01:19:50.000 And that's a part of them that you just can't take away.

01:19:53.000 And why would we want to anyway?

01:19:56.000 What else?

01:19:57.000 Seven more.

01:19:58.000 We'll try and get to this.

01:19:59.000 I'm cutting it off at the last seven, all right?

01:20:00.000 Because we're already 20 minutes over.

01:20:03.000 Admiral Falagos, far right libertarianism equals highest IQ ideology.

01:20:08.000 It's true, folks.

01:20:09.000 250 IQ only for that club.

01:20:12.000 Tim, my man, Tim Geckline, how to frame ideas that rise in organized religion lead to economic prosperity. 0.86

01:20:19.000 Africa is highly religious but not prosperous. 0.78

01:20:21.000 I don't think it's necessarily, you know, totally a religious thing.

01:20:25.000 I don't really believe in that, like, You know, what do they call that religion where you believe in God and then, like, you get money?

01:20:31.000 Like, that's not how it works.

01:20:33.000 It has a lot more to do with tradition and order and hierarchy. 0.83

01:20:36.000 Where if Africa were allowed to be a traditional order and hierarchy as existed before colonies, I'm sure they'd be doing better than they are now. 0.91

01:20:44.000 Maybe they wouldn't be doing, you know, they wouldn't achieve parity with South Korea or Japan or Hong Kong.

01:20:50.000 But certainly I think they'd be doing better off if they returned to their pre colonial power structures, which was not geographic nation states, but.

01:20:59.000 Power projection over tribes and ethnic groups and everything else.

01:21:03.000 So, I don't think it's necessarily organized religion.

01:21:08.000 It's ritual, it's structure, it's hierarchy, it's tradition in whatever form in whatever country. 0.99

01:21:13.000 And the Christian Universalists always get on my back.

01:21:15.000 They say, No, no, Christianity works for everyone.

01:21:18.000 Jesus said so.

01:21:19.000 Like, yeah, okay, fine, but that shouldn't be official government policy.

01:21:23.000 Catholic nationalists, as I'm sure you know, our generation loves marijuana.

01:21:28.000 How do we convince them it's degenerate? 0.95

01:21:30.000 Should we even bother trying?

01:21:32.000 It's not even a question of convincing them not to smoke pot.

01:21:35.000 Again, it's all about incentives.

01:21:37.000 People are, I think, the problem with people these days is they want like an easy solution.

01:21:43.000 You know, how do we get people to stop smoking pot?

01:21:45.000 Tell them to stop smoking pot.

01:21:46.000 We have to convince them.

01:21:47.000 You have to think about it strategically.

01:21:49.000 You have to think in terms of game theory.

01:21:51.000 You have to think of it in terms of the OODA loop, organize, orient, decide, act loop, and how that plays into game theory in the sense that we need to make it so that people don't want to smoke marijuana.

01:22:06.000 You know, why do people smoke marijuana?

01:22:07.000 It's not, I mean, certainly it's because it's fun, and that's why.

01:22:10.000 You know, people do it recreationally.

01:22:12.000 But why are people doing it to medicate so heavily?

01:22:15.000 It's because they have nothing to look forward to.

01:22:19.000 They have nothing to live for.

01:22:20.000 I mean, all this work, all this toil that young people are expected to do, and for what?

01:22:25.000 You know, to get an A on the paper so that they could get the big credit, so that they could get the college certificate, so that they could land the full time job.

01:22:34.000 And then they get to commute to work every day in the Subaru and do data entry for 20 years.

01:22:42.000 So why wouldn't you be self medicating?

01:22:44.000 Why wouldn't you be?

01:22:45.000 Taking the edge off suffering for 100 years so that you could raise the gross domestic product by 50 grand.

01:22:53.000 So, I would say that if we give people meaning in their lives, they won't need that.

01:22:56.000 And certainly, we need to, I think a big part of that is holding people to a higher standard.

01:23:00.000 If we give people something higher to strive for, they will meet the challenge.

01:23:04.000 If we say, you don't need this, there is more to life, they'll meet us there.

01:23:09.000 Tim, a progressive point to Africa being very religious and not very prosperous, while Western Europe is more secular and prosperous.

01:23:18.000 Well, yeah, and. 0.90

01:23:20.000 Europe was extremely Christian until very recently. 0.55

01:23:22.000 And that's, you know, do we really want material wealth or do we want fulfilled lives? 0.72

01:23:27.000 I would trade material wealth for a fulfilled life.

01:23:30.000 And people might say, like, well, you've never been to a gulag.

01:23:32.000 And that's true.

01:23:33.000 But I would say that sacrificing religion, nation, race, culture at the altar of conspicuous consumption is misguided.

01:23:44.000 Lynch, stop getting mad at people who want to see specific subjects and content from you.

01:23:49.000 Not all of us are big brain nibbas.

01:23:51.000 I didn't get mad at you. 0.76

01:23:53.000 I just said I, well, I did actually.

01:23:55.000 I did get mad at you actually.

01:23:58.000 I just don't like this, this sort of like, talk about this.

01:24:01.000 Like, hey, Nick, discuss this.

01:24:02.000 Talk about this.

01:24:03.000 Like, if you ask a question, I can address, I can answer a question, but like, I'm going to create talking points out of thin air.

01:24:09.000 I won't do it.

01:24:10.000 I won't do it, Lynch.

01:24:13.000 And we got two more DM me rare loomers.

01:24:15.000 Proposal, everyone focus on Big Fish, Bugman, and vow not to let up until the cost is too high for them not to debate you.

01:24:22.000 Like Ben Shapiro.

01:24:23.000 Yeah, we got to keep the pressure up on these people.

01:24:25.000 I think that's the gateway to becoming mainstream.

01:24:27.000 You know, it's like they say, first they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win.

01:24:31.000 And that's what it's got to be.

01:24:32.000 And also, we have to go after influencers.

01:24:35.000 You know, do you want to influence the guy next to you, or would it be a real grand slam if we got like PewDiePie on our side or someone like that where our influence is compounded many times over?

01:24:45.000 I think we've got to be thinking like that.

01:24:47.000 And our last question for the night DM me, Rare Loomers says, B, Ben Shapiro, Vox Day, et cetera.

01:24:55.000 I'll debate anyone. 1.00

01:24:57.000 Not retard. 1.00

01:24:58.000 Okay, when? 1.00

01:24:59.000 Pay me 10 grand.

01:25:00.000 Radio silence.

01:25:01.000 They're busy.

01:25:02.000 Well, yeah, I mean, exactly. 0.97

01:25:03.000 I mean, that's all these clowns with the free speech stuff. 0.96

01:25:06.000 I'm so smart. 0.99

01:25:07.000 I'm a galaxy brain.

01:25:08.000 No one can stop me.

01:25:10.000 And they debate like Ben Shapiro.

01:25:12.000 Who is he debated?

01:25:13.000 People tell me, yeah, Nick, I don't agree with him, but he's a good debater.

01:25:17.000 And they all say it like they're out of breath, like, oh, you ought to give the devil his due.

01:25:21.000 Well, who's he debated? 0.80

01:25:22.000 He debated Chenk Uyghur, who's a dummy from the Young Turks. 0.90

01:25:26.000 And I don't even say that because he's a liberal, but because he's just not a smart guy.

01:25:30.000 He's not an ideological.

01:25:32.000 Specialist kind of a guy. 1.00

01:25:34.000 He debated like this black panel of dummies. 0.99

01:25:37.000 He debates young college kids on abortion. 0.99

01:25:41.000 But when is he answered for the fact that he supports a Jewish ethnostate in the Middle East but thinks a white nationalist or a white ethnostate is the height of absurdity?

01:25:51.000 He never answered that one.

01:25:52.000 That's the hardest question.

01:25:53.000 I'd like to hear it answered.

01:25:54.000 But that's all our questions.

01:25:56.000 We got one more, but you know what?

01:25:57.000 We're saving it for tomorrow, all right?

01:25:59.000 We've gone over like 20 and more questions, but that's all.

01:26:03.000 If you have any more questions, comments, concerns not addressed, remember AmericaEthnostate.

01:26:08.000 Q on Twitter.

01:26:09.000 You can follow me on Twitter at Nick J. Fuentes, Periscope at Nick J. Fuentes, Facebook.com slash Nick J. Fuentes.

01:26:16.000 You can find all my content at Nicholas J. Fuentes.com.

01:26:20.000 You can also find a place to donate if you're looking to drop some shekels my way.

01:26:26.000 And what's the other thing?

01:26:27.000 Oh, yeah, subscribe.

01:26:28.000 Click subscribe, click the like button, smash the buttons.

01:26:32.000 Smash the buttons.

01:26:33.000 All right, it helps us.

01:26:34.000 I know it's chill, I know, you know, it's kind of cucked.

01:26:37.000 The YouTubers do that, but really it helps us.

01:26:40.000 Subscribe, click the notification.

01:26:42.000 You'll know when I'm streaming and all that.

01:26:44.000 And like the vid, you know.

01:26:46.000 Help me out that much.

01:26:48.000 If you don't have any gold coins to throw my way, at least give me the like, at least give me the thumbs up, right?

01:26:53.000 But so that's the show.

01:26:54.000 We're on the air Monday through Friday, 8 p.m. Eastern, 7 p.m. Central Standard Time.

01:26:59.000 I'm Nicholas J. Fuentes.

01:27:00.000 This was America First.

01:27:01.000 We will see you tomorrow for another high energy episode.

01:27:05.000 Hope you have a great evening.

01:27:07.000 We will see you then.

01:27:07.000 And as always, thanks for watching.

01:27:09.000 I almost forgot that part.

01:27:11.000 But we'll see you.

01:27:14.000 Americanism, not globalism, will be our credo.

01:27:21.000 It's going to be only America first.

01:27:23.000 America first. 0.99

01:27:25.000 The American people will come first once again.

01:27:31.000 With respect to respect. 0.87

01:27:53.000 This day always is going to be only America first. 0.64

01:27:57.000 America first. 0.90

America First - Nicholas J. Fuentes - September 20, 2017

Learn From China On Immigration | America First Ep. 14

Episode Stats

Summary

Transcript