00:01:29.000There's been this Christian prophecy that the world's going to end on the 23rd, I think it is.
00:01:37.000And I don't think that's really far fetched.
00:01:39.000Ever since the solar eclipse, we've seen like 15 hurricanes, three earthquakes.
00:01:45.000There was an earthquake in L.A., then there was one in Mexico City, there was one in Illinois, I think, yesterday.
00:01:52.000There was Hurricane Harvey, there was Hurricane Irma, Hurricane Jose, Hurricane Katia, and I think there was one other one that happened south of Mexico.
00:02:02.000So, folks, I think it might be happening soon.
00:03:02.000I mean, it showed the Ugandan president's reaction, it showed, I think, some Latin American countries' reaction.
00:03:07.000And then there was just this female cosmopolitan, this female European reporter.
00:03:13.000Reacting to President Trump's speech, and it was just the most outrageous thing I think I've heard all week, and maybe in the entire series of America First.
00:03:23.000Never before have I heard something so unironically ludicrous from the open borders globalist side.
00:03:34.000That's why I didn't put it up on the screen, but I'll quote it to you, all right?
00:03:37.000She says this Quote, Well, it strikes me as very self centered the fact that President Trump mentioned America First.
00:03:45.000And that every country should fight for their sovereignty and that we should respect laws and borders, not very united, which is funny because we're in the United Nations.
00:03:56.000You know, if you don't have open borders, if you don't have national sovereignty, you're united.
00:04:02.000If you have borders, if you have a sovereign, if you have a government that isn't this globalist network, this sketchy globalist establishment, cosmopolitan, rootless transnational elite, well, you're not united, folks, and you have no business being in the United Nations.
00:04:18.000Or rather, it's funny if you're in the United Nations and you want to maintain borders.
00:04:23.000And, you know, I hear things like this all day long.
00:04:25.000I hear things like this all the time from the left.
00:04:28.000From the right, even from Paul Ryan, from conservatives, conservathots, you know, whoever it is, that we need to have open borders, that we need to have this unity, that it's a positive good.
00:04:38.000And, you know, I thought, just for example, China.
00:04:41.000I thought, as I saw this, as I'm watching this and reacting to it, I thought, you know, the United States is expected to not put America first.
00:04:49.000Europe is not expected to put Europe first.
00:04:52.000And that's obviously the sentiment of this reporter of the globalist establishment, is that these countries, the immigrants come first and the foreigners come first.
00:05:01.000And I thought to myself, you have China, and China has sort of been, I think, the leader of the third world.
00:05:08.000As we've seen the Cold War era come crumbling down, and we've seen the second and the first world kind of lose their significance, and all the worlds really lose their significance, you've seen China take in real leadership of the developing world, of the developing countries in Latin America, in Africa in particular, where they're investing lots of money, lots of human capital as well, and of course, lots of financial capital.
00:05:32.000And I thought, let's take a nation like China, who is.
00:05:36.000Emblematic of the United Nations, which is serving developing countries, representing developing countries at the expense of first world developed countries.
00:05:44.000And I thought, what is China's immigration policy?
00:06:15.000I read that according to experts, it is, quote, nearly impossible to become a permanent resident in China if you are not of Chinese descent.
00:07:10.000It's nearly impossible to become a permanent foreign resident in China.
00:07:14.000I mean, there are some ways you can marry into it, says you can marry a Chinese citizen or a close family member, and that would qualify you for a two year visa, and that lets you work or study, but you wouldn't be able to do full time work.
00:07:28.000And then additionally, it says, and this is basically the most important part, it says that technically there is no such thing as permanent residence for foreigners at all, because the Chinese government reserves the right to revoke any and all visas given to foreigners at any given time.
00:07:43.000So, You go to China and you're not of Chinese descent, you cannot work.
00:07:49.000You cannot work or study part time unless you're Chinese descended or married to a Chinese.
00:07:55.000And beyond that, even if you somehow made it there through the back door, through Hong Kong rules, if you somehow made it there, even if you had the Chinese family, you had the Chinese hookup, they could still yank it if you start making trouble.
00:09:35.000I haven't heard so much about the racism, the selfishness of the Chinese that aren't bringing in all these winners, all these Albert Einsteins, these real beauties from Central and Sub Saharan and Western Africa.
00:09:52.000Germany brings in 1 million in 2015 alone.
00:09:56.000Italy brings in millions over the course of two or three years, or excuse me, they brought in 670,000 over the course of the past three years.
00:10:13.000But so I'm reading about this community, and you know, I started to see the same old, the same old tired prejudices, the same old disgusting stereotypes, the same racist things being said about these people.
00:10:30.000Now, this is from a member of the Chinese People's Political Consultative Conference.
00:10:36.000So, this is a member of the government.
00:10:37.000This is from the, I think, every two years or so often, or maybe it's five years.
00:10:42.000Every five years, they convene the Communist Party or the People's Congress, rather, and that acts as a rubber stamp institution to basically pass forward everything that was established by the ruling nine group.
00:10:55.000I forget who that is, but it's nine people, and they rule the country.
00:10:59.000There's obviously the premier and the president, but.
00:11:01.000They have a cabinet of nine people, and they make all the rules.
00:11:15.000And he said, these are my words, or rather, these are his words.
00:11:18.000He says, quote, Black brothers often travel in droves.
00:11:23.000They are out at night, out on the streets, nightclubs, and remote areas.
00:11:27.000They engage in drug trafficking, harassment of women, and fighting, which seriously disturbs law and order in Guangzhou.
00:11:34.000Africans have a high rate of AIDS and the Ebola virus that can be transmitted via body fluids.
00:11:40.000If their population keeps growing, China will change from a nation state to an immigration country, from a yellow country to a black and yellow country.
00:11:51.000Folks, I mean, you never want to go full Chinese, I guess, right?
00:11:54.000You don't want to go full Faulkner, right?
00:11:56.000You don't want to go full Chinese because this is setting off.
00:12:01.000I'm seeing the same disgusting racism that I've experienced as a person of color, as a Hispanic, for so long in this country, the same ugly, ugly racism and stereotypes here in China.
00:12:14.000But, you know, for to entertain the notion, for example, that this isn't a prejudiced individual, but maybe making a sober evaluation and observation of the situation, isn't it peculiar that whether you look at the African population in the United States, Or the African population in Europe, or the African population in China, we see the same trends, the same patterns, the same behaviors, the same reaction by the locals.
00:12:41.000Now, a professor from China assures me, and they have the expert, of course, and thank God, they have the expert come on.
00:12:48.000We have this disgusting racist, the yellow supremacist, come on and tell us all these vile stereotypes.
00:12:54.000They bring on a professor to explain away, like, you know, this is not actually what's happening.
00:12:59.000And so the professor said, quote, The blacks have become a projection point for all the anxieties of society.
00:13:06.000And you know, I find it so interesting that every time you have a foreign alien group in any country, whether it's Hispanics or blacks or Muslims or Jews, there is never, there is never a legitimate criticism of these groups that is accepted by the mainstream.
00:13:23.000There is no legitimate beef that anybody could have with multiracialism, with multiethnic, multicultural countries.
00:13:32.000There is nothing that can be accepted beyond prejudice.
00:13:35.000Why do we complain about the harassment of women, the violence, the gang violence at night in the nightclubs and the streets?
00:13:43.000And we see it in the United States and Europe and China.
00:13:45.000Well, it's not because certain populations are predisposed, given their culture or geography or other factors, to these behaviors.
00:13:53.000No, you see, it is merely the fact that around the world, on all continents, you have the same relatable but ugly, evil stereotypes of the same people.
00:14:05.000And you understand that, you know, where do stereotypes come from?
00:14:32.000But you hear some of these other stereotypes, and from China to Germany to France to Belgium, To the Congo, to South Africa, to Detroit, to Baltimore, they ring true.
00:14:44.000Because to a certain extent, they are true.
00:14:47.000And I think that is something that's crucial in the immigration debate we have to fight back against this concession that we all make, I think, at some point in the debate that there is no wrongdoing that a group can do, that there is no collective responsibility.
00:15:01.000You know, maybe you don't believe in collective responsibility ethically or morally, but certainly as a government, there is no collective responsibility that can be assigned to alien populations.
00:15:14.000Because if we imagine that a nation is like an organism or like a home or any other structure, we imagine that when foreign alien elements come into it and they start causing trouble, this is something that can happen.
00:15:29.000For us to say that this is impossible unless you're a prejudiced bigot, you know, of course, all of these maladies that are attributed to these foreign and alien influences go untreated, go unnoticed, go undiagnosed.
00:15:44.000And that's the issue here with immigration.
00:15:46.000And I just think it's really fascinating.
00:15:48.000Beyond that, you know, the professor says, well, it's a projection point for all the anxieties.
00:16:02.000It's always the need for a scapegoat, right?
00:16:05.000It's always, well, you know, these bigoted, these evil people that wanted their own countries, they needed a scapegoat, right?
00:16:13.000All the great leaders, all the big leaders of history, well, You know, wasn't that you have actual barbarians from the Germanic tribe, the Visigoths, the Muslims, or other migrants, developing world migrants?
00:16:28.000It's never that they actually present problems, but no, it was the need of some despot to create a scapegoat so that they could pass economic policy that works.
00:17:09.000But people agree with this guy, pretty mainstream opinion.
00:17:12.000And we hear them, you know, they try and cover this up.
00:17:15.000They try and sweep this under the rug with their professor, and they say, You know, actually, all these trends and patterns you're noticing, you're not noticing them.
00:18:23.000It's our ignorance that, you know, we just haven't been inculcated with the right books and articles to explain what they're doing.
00:18:30.000You know, the black Uber drivers in Boston and D.C., or the black Muslim gang members in Britain or in Minnesota or in Germany, you know, we just, we're just ignorant, folks.
00:18:41.000There's no possible, between racism and ignorance, there's no possible third way.
00:18:46.000You're either ignorant of the benefits, you're either ignorant of the inarguable cost benefit analysis, which says that.
00:18:56.000You just don't know that that's the only justifiable position.
00:19:00.000Or you're malevolent, or there is malice in your heart.
00:19:03.000Either you don't know that it's inarguable, or you know it is, but you don't care because you just hate people because they look different from you, right?
00:19:20.000There is no possible alternative where people that come here actually have collective responsibility, where people that come here may contribute to problems more than the native population, where they contribute to actual problems that wouldn't exist if you had a homogenous country.
00:19:37.000And you quickly understand that this narrative must be maintained at all costs, because if there is anything in between racism and ignorance, The entire establishment comes crumbling down.
00:19:49.000The whole scheme, the whole propaganda conditioning effort that's been underway for 50 years, that all collapses.
00:19:56.000Because if we can attribute responsibility, and that's the crucial word, to populations outside of our country, then we create a justifiable and legitimate reason to keep them out.
00:20:09.000If that is even allowed, if that's permissible, if that's accepted as a legitimate thing, as a legitimate opinion, that perhaps.
00:20:27.000We want to make people not feel like the other.
00:20:30.000We want to make people feel like they're not alien or different.
00:20:33.000But if they are different, if they are alien, if they are truly the other, and they are bringing crimes and problems and injustices that didn't exist here, but from somewhere else, then we have a valid reason.
00:20:45.000We have every valid reason to say no more.
00:20:49.000But you see, the people that want them here, whether it's the political interests, That want them here so they vote reliably Democratic or for big government, or the big multinational business interests that want these people here so they don't have to pay for their FICA, so they don't have to pay for OSHA regulations, or so that they could just so that they could not employ our own people, you know, then we can keep them out.
00:21:15.000So that is, you know, that's just an interesting thing I discovered.
00:21:18.000I know, you know, we talk a lot about rhetoric, and I think the alt right is very good with rhetoric in terms of.
00:21:25.000I think more than any other group, we're very poetic.
00:21:28.000We read poetry, we read fiction, we read great philosophy.
00:21:32.000And so, more than anybody else, I think the alt right has a sort of poetic quality to it where we have sort of this romantic, I mean, good language on a lot of fronts.
00:21:42.000You know, if you listen to a Richard Spencer speech, in my opinion, whether you are for him or against him, the language itself is more inspired than a Ben Shapiro speech.
00:21:51.000You know, Richard Spencer, Mike Enoch, say what you will, but these speeches appeal to.
00:21:57.000Something higher, something to give your life to, something greater than the individual.
00:22:02.000The Ben Shapiro appeals to the gross domestic product.
00:22:05.000Ben Shapiro and Milo and some of these others, they appeal to material comfort, which, you know, it's just not doing it for us anymore.
00:22:14.000And so when you hear this poetry, this waxing from the alt right, waxing dramatically, rhapsodizing about race and people and culture, you know, that's all very fine and well.
00:22:24.000But I think when we break it down and just look, and we just look at these double standards, and we look at How these arguments are constructed and why certain ones are omitted or not allowed, you very quickly understand that this is not accidental.
00:22:37.000This is not, you know, oh, whoops, we eliminated a logical alternative to this ideologically charged policy we've been pushing for 50 years.
00:22:47.000You know, oh, whoops, we abrogated the fact that actually some groups do have responsibility.
00:22:52.000And as a pragmatic government, we should address that as such, or at least discuss it.
00:22:58.000And you understand why that can't be done now.
00:23:05.000But if you break it down just purely into abstract logic, you understand why there's only two options racism or ignorance, because the two can be remedied.
00:23:14.000Ignorance is remedied by indoctrination in elementary schools, in secondary schools, in higher education, or propaganda by watching television and movies.
00:23:24.000And racism can be fixed through any combination of fluoride in the water or chemicals in the food, xenoestrogens in your meat or other things, your produce.
00:23:36.000I mean, And these are things that they actually talk about where they're plugging in all kinds of chemicals to reduce quote unquote xenophobia.
00:23:43.000You understand why it is the way it is.
00:23:46.000This is truly a systemic injustice perpetrated against the people of the world where they're unleashing this hell of people who I don't think they have any experience in a civilized, wealthy, developed country.
00:24:01.000And we expect them that they're going to go from Africa, where it's corrupt and violent and there's terrorists and you have to give bribes when you're driving around town.
00:24:09.000And they're going to go to the United States where you have millennia of the rule of law, and it's just going to be a seamless transition.
00:24:17.000And not only, we're not even talking about individuals.
00:24:20.000Maybe you pick the top of the class, maybe you pick the top guy at Nairobi University and you bring him over to the United States, and maybe he could learn English and he could function in Manhattan.
00:24:30.000Maybe he could get a job and he could work okay.
00:24:33.000But you're not talking about the head of the class at Nairobi, you're talking about millions.
00:24:39.000And not just millions in a decade, not millions in a generation.
00:24:43.000You're talking about millions, plural, in the span of a year or two or three.
00:24:49.000And to question it, to present any sort of alternative, you know, it's not accepted, it's omitted, and it's deemed racist and in need of fixing.
00:25:01.000You know, I kind of went down a rabbit hole there, starting with that BBC video.
00:25:05.000But you just hear someone, someone who's so clearly just insulated in this cosmopolitan bubble saying, You know, you're not united if you believe in laws and borders and sovereignty.
00:25:16.000And then you see that the biggest, most populous country in the world, second in GDP, and the representative of developing countries itself isn't accepting them.
00:25:57.000I was very triggered, needless to say.
00:26:00.000And then the other thing I want to talk about there are two other things, and we'll do the questions at 45.
00:26:05.000But the two other things I saw this as well.
00:26:08.000I saw this on Twitter, these Google searches, where people don't believe me.
00:26:13.000When I say there's an intentionality, To what's going on.
00:26:15.000When I say there's an agenda, there's something more to these trends, these patterns, than an organic evolution of history.
00:26:23.000You know, this is not Hegel, where we're one, where we give birth to this country that doesn't make any sense, and men are women, and women are men, and we're bringing in all kinds of people that are raping and killing, and nobody can say anything about it.
00:26:37.000This is not an organic evolution of history, right?
00:27:36.000And then let's do this experiment, all right?
00:27:39.000So if you open a new tab, if you open a new tab on your computer, and I'm doing it right now, and you Google American scientists, let's try it out, huh?
00:27:49.000Now, if, before we click the search button, if there's no agenda, if there's nothing going on that they're trying to terraform public opinion in a very aggressive and unconstitutional, dishonest, duplicitous way, surely if we Googled something as innocent as benign,
00:28:05.000As American scientists, we would find the great scientists of American history who invented things like, oh, electricity, like the phone, like telecommunications, all sorts of good things, the structure of DNA, mapping the human genome, landing on the moon, right?
00:29:50.000So, you know, we're still getting there.
00:29:53.000Our next entry, number four, Catherine Johnson, another one of our based black woman scientists.
00:29:59.000You know, again, can't say what it is.
00:30:01.000If she came before Alexander Graham Bell, it must be better than the telephone.
00:30:06.000Then we have Neil deGrasse Tyson, based black astrophysicist.
00:30:10.000Then we have Percy Levon Julian, another based black guy.
00:30:13.000Then we have Ernest Everett Just, another based black scientist.
00:30:17.000And then at long last, at long last, after one, two, three, four, five, six, seven entries, six of which never really heard of, don't really know what they've done, finally we have Thomas Edison.
00:30:32.000But does that not strike you as a bit peculiar, a bit odd, that you Google American scientists and instead of the first entries being people that discovered the relationship between space and time, people that discovered the telephone, people that discovered flight or electricity, Are taking a back seat to the peanut butter inventor, to May Johnson, to Catherine Johnson.
00:30:55.000Do you think it's a coincidence that they're all black folks?
00:30:59.000Someone at Google who runs the code there, someone who does, I don't know, the cyber over there, took out all the people that are most searched and inserted all these people.
00:31:10.000You don't think there was some intentionality to who was inserted and who was left out?
00:31:14.000Who was put first and who was put second?
00:32:33.000Leonardo DiCaprio, Robert De Niro, Will Smith, Don Cheadle.
00:32:39.000On what planet are Don Cheadle and Denzel Washington and Sam Jackson more prolific than, I don't know, Robert Downey Jr., than George Clooney, than Brad Pitt, Humphrey Bogart, Edward G. Robinson?
00:32:52.000You can go historical, you can go modern.
00:32:55.000It doesn't make any sense, unless, of course, it's racially motivated.
00:33:00.000Another example, another data point, Nick.
00:33:12.000American musicians, oh, and we got some strong entries from the black community Duke Ellington, Louis Armstrong, Elvis Presley, Bob Dylan, Aretha Franklin, James Brown, Jimi Hendrix, Ray Charles, Charles Mingus.
00:33:28.000You're telling me, you know, we don't have the Beatles.
00:34:19.000I don't think that's wild, crazy talk to suggest that more people are Googling Albert Einstein or Alexander Graham Bell or Thomas Edison than May Jemison.
00:34:34.000And we realize that if you're not searching those names, and those names are not more prolific on the Google search, then someone has to be putting in these names.
00:34:45.000And I don't think the selection process is based on any objective measurement.
00:34:49.000I think we all know what the measurement is.
00:34:51.000And, you know, this is one small example, but it just goes to show that there is an agenda here.
00:34:55.000And you got to ask yourself, why are they doing that?
00:34:59.000You know, maybe you can say, oh, well, PC, add it again.
00:35:03.000Diversity, safe space culture, add it again.
00:35:06.000But why is Google, a trillion dollar company that is building like AI and robots that float and like airplane robots and doing some very shady stuff, why are they instructing their employees?
00:35:18.000Because certainly this must have come to Google's attention.
00:35:23.000Why are they instructing or allowing their employees to change the algorithm so that only in the United States, this doesn't happen in Mexico, by the way.
00:35:30.000If you go in Mexico on Google for Mexico and you search American musicians, you get authentic ones.
00:35:37.000And same with scientists and everything else.
00:35:40.000So, why is it that in the United States the Google division is actively changing American musicians, American actors, American scientists, American inventors?
00:36:00.000It's worth considering why a seemingly private institution.
00:36:03.000A seemingly private organization, which we were led to believe by Milton Friedman and Paul Ryan and Ayn Rand would be exempt and immune from prejudice and discrimination, is now actively promoting one race at the expense of another, and unjustly so, not according to merit, not according to achievement, but according to skin color.
00:36:28.000Why are all these private organizations and banks and everything else, which are seemingly just disparate, you know, they're at war with each other, right?
00:37:12.000Just another suspicious element of the rootless transnationals in Google.
00:37:19.000And then our last topic, last thing I wanted to talk about.
00:37:22.000You know, again, I told you, folks, slow news day, but we're still going to shout and yell for the fans about the fundamental transformation of our country that we embarked on long ago.
00:37:32.000Last thing of the day, we hear from our old friend, and it's been a while.
00:37:36.000I haven't heard from him in a long time.
00:37:39.000Our old friend Barack Obama gave a speech to the Gates Foundation this morning.
00:37:44.000Obama gave a speech to the Gates Foundation.
00:37:47.000I almost feel kind of like, I almost feel kind of basic to even talk about Obama because it's such a boomer thing to say.
00:39:21.000He is with people that are not ideological.
00:39:23.000By the way, with people that support open borders, free trade, and everything else, regardless of who's supporting it, whether it's red or blue, Republican or Democrat.
00:39:56.000But so he goes up there at the Gates Foundation this morning, and he talks about how frustrated he is that he keeps having to defend Obamacare.
00:40:04.000And, you know, we really feel for the guy, right?
00:40:06.000We really feel for this president who skated in with no qualifications, with no experience in politics, with no record, and, you know, maybe not even a birth certificate, right?
00:40:17.000Skates in there, and that's not good enough.
00:40:19.000Now, his legacy, folks, which is such a silly thing.
00:40:23.000I mean, how long were we told that Barack Obama, he may go down in history as the greatest?
00:40:28.000As one of the best presidents, the most effective, genius politician, genius rhetorician, really an orator, so smart, genius.
00:40:38.000Not only is he cool, not only is he cool, and he's handsome and sexy, but he's also a political mastermind, also a political genius, right?
00:40:48.000I mean, that's what we were led to believe.
00:40:49.000This was, he was like, you know, it was Gandhi, Jesus, Barack Obama.
00:40:55.000And now here he is, and really in a pretty sad and pathetic fashion before Bill Gates and all the elitists.
00:41:01.000Complaining and whining about how his legacy is getting eviscerated.
00:41:11.000Another, you know, boomer talking point.
00:41:15.000But it just goes to show, you know, with these people, the arrogance, the pretentiousness, the elitism of these people that he thinks that, you know, like the democratic process that, you know, is sacred in this country and the bill making process, the legislative process, he is exempt from that.
00:41:35.000You know, the people want to repeal and replace or make a change, that's his legacy coming under fire.
00:41:40.000Don't you feel bad for him and Michelle making $500,000 a speech in New York City and in all the finest cities in the world?
00:41:49.000And, you know, maybe if Barack Obama in 2010, instead of jamming through, you know, the most offensive, technocratic health care reform bill in American history without a single Republican vote and with this unholy mechanism, I don't know if people really understand what happened there.
00:42:07.000But what happened was, was this was an old military spending bill because the Obamacare bill originally, the American, or not the American, the Affordable Health Care Act originated in the Senate, which is unconstitutional because the Affordable Care Act is a spending bill and all spending bills must originate in the House.
00:42:27.000Well, they took an old like military like vets funding bill that was kind of scrapped and they took out all that language and put in the Obamacare language so that Obamacare could originate in the Senate.
00:42:39.000So they passed it through the Senate without a single Republican vote.
00:42:42.000It goes to the House without a single Republican vote.
00:42:44.000And the process transpires, and it turns out they need to make amendments.
00:42:48.000They need to make revisions because, you know, the way it works is you have a version in the Senate, you have a version in the House.
00:42:54.000It goes to a reconciliation committee, and they put together a final version of the bill that goes to the president.
00:43:01.000Well, what happened in the interim was Ted Kennedy dies in, I think it was like 2010.
00:43:06.000And so now they lose their majority in the Senate.
00:43:10.000They can't pass it through the Senate again.
00:43:11.000They can't pass through the needed revisions.
00:43:16.000They get through a reconciliation act, and that is supposed to fix everything, and then it passes without one Republican vote.
00:43:23.000And you know, if Barack Obama had forged a consensus, if Barack Obama had reached across the aisle, as he said he would do in 2004 at the Democratic convention or in his 2008 inaugural, if he actually believed in bipartisanship, if he actually believed in his own reform, because if you believe in your reform, you want it to last.
00:43:42.000If you want it to last, you have bipartisan support, so it's legitimate in the eyes of both halves of the country.
00:43:49.000With Paul Ryan, or rather at the time of Boehner and Mitch McConnell and Eric Cantor and all the rest, and he would have made a compromise.
00:45:35.000So, of course, it's arguable who came up with the term racist.
00:45:38.000But, I mean, you would respond to that.
00:45:40.000If you're asking how you would respond, I would respond and say that you're abrogating, you're eliminating black identity.
00:45:47.000I don't think any one of these professors that talk about the constructivism, that race is a social construct, they would be cowards to say this to any.
00:45:58.000Any black man who has pride in his history, or any Hispanic or Muslim or Asian.
00:46:04.000So I would say that you would debate that by saying, Are you saying that black people haven't suffered more than white people?
00:46:11.000Are you trying to whitewash the suffering of the black community?
00:46:15.000That would be funny because, you know, it's so ridiculous and two sided on its face that, I mean, you must be going to a community college or something.
00:46:24.000I mean, when the globalist intelligentsia is sending the professors, they're not sending their best.
00:46:30.000Steve Chatterson, my man, otherwise known as Cheese Wheelie in the chat, says Would you rather live in a socialist all white country or a libertarian country where a pluralism slash diversity actually works?
00:47:03.000Even in the most, and all the nat socks are going to get pissed at me.
00:47:07.000But even in the highest trust, most homogenous white countries in the world, which are Norway, Sweden, Finland, Denmark, even in those countries, socialism doesn't work.
00:47:18.000That's social democracy, which is like the most tepid, light form of socialism there is.
00:47:24.000And even that, even a generous social safety net doesn't work in the most, in the whitest, most homogenous, high trust society.
00:47:31.000So I would say that, you know, that would just be a no go because if you're in that country, you're going to have a broken economy and all of that.
00:47:38.000And then, as to the question of a libertarian country where pluralism and diversity actually works, I don't think it could work.
00:47:44.000I don't think there's any example where it does work.
00:47:46.000You look at any major country where this has been practiced, whether it is Bosnia.
00:47:52.000Bosnia at the time, people forget this, but at the time in the 1990s when you had the outbreak of the Yugoslavian Civil War, Bosnia was sort of this multicultural place that people talked about.
00:48:04.000You had the convergence of three separate civilizations.
00:48:17.000And this was for a long time supposed to be like the cosmopolitan place where it works until it didn't, until it all fell apart and many died because of tribalism.
00:48:31.000And then you look at countries like Ukraine.
00:48:33.000Even in Ukraine, where it's diversity of ethnicity and religion, it's not even racial, it's not even like a broad religion.
00:48:40.000It's the difference between Catholics and Orthodox, the difference between More Russian, ethnic Russian people in the East and more Ukrainian ethnic nationalists in the West, that country is in civil war.
00:48:57.000You have Muslims in the North, Christians in the South, and all kinds of ethnicities competing.
00:49:01.000I mean, everywhere where this is tried to a significant degree, it doesn't work.
00:49:06.000The one example where maybe it works is Russia.
00:49:09.000The one example where maybe you have some degree of maybe not terrible failure is Russia, where You have the Caucasus, but the Caucasus is the Caucasus.
00:49:22.000Moscow is Muscovites, and St. Petersburg is Russians and a European type of Russian.
00:49:30.000And then in the Caucasus, you have your Tatars, you have your Dagestanis, you have your Chechens, and all the rest.
00:49:37.000And, you know, it might be unstable in the Caucasus because you have all the different ones melting there, but I think this system of like federalism, of ethnic federalism, Generally, might have a record of success in countries like Ethiopia as well, but it has to be, you know, obviously that negates the whole purpose of diversity and pluralism if you're just going to separate them all out and give them their own votes and everything.
00:49:58.000So I would say if it actually works, I want to be a part of it.
00:50:01.000That said, I don't think it could work.
00:50:03.000And, you know, libertarian is kind of what we're going for to a certain extent.
00:50:07.000I'm not a libertine to an extent, at least in terms of what government policy should be.
00:50:12.000I suppose I'm a very far right leaning libertarian.
00:50:17.000I'm going to get a lot of flack for that.
00:50:20.000You guys know I'm not like your standard libertarian, but I think I would prefer to live in a free country that works where this fantastical conception of diversity works, again, which is impossible, than a socialist country where even when you have that, it doesn't work.
00:50:54.000And Donald Trump is brilliant at marketing.
00:50:56.000And, you know, people would say he's unqualified to be president, or they would say that he's a celebrity.
00:51:01.000Now, any celebrity could be president.
00:51:03.000Donald Trump had a very specific set of skills coming into the White House.
00:51:07.000He ran a private company, a billion dollar private company for all his life.
00:51:13.000And a private company is far different than a public company.
00:51:15.000A public company, you have shareholders, you have board members, you have a CEO.
00:51:21.000In a private company, you're running the whole show, and it's make or break on your own leadership, on your own gamble, on your own money.
00:51:28.000So there was that element of leadership, that element of organization that he had.
00:51:32.000And in addition to that, with Celebrity Apprentice, with real estate, New York real estate in particular, you're looking at a very specific kind of strategic and public relations conscious thinking where, you know, in order to sell a building, in order to put a deal together, you have to sell it.
00:51:48.000And I've quoted this before on the show.
00:51:50.000In The Art of the Deal, he talks about one time where he was trying to get people to invest in this deal he was doing in Atlantic City.
00:51:58.000And it wasn't really going so well in terms of he was having difficulty putting the plots of land together.
00:52:06.000So he ordered all his dump trucks on this construction site to just move the dirt around, to pick up the dirt and put it down and make it look like they were doing something.
00:52:15.000And he had the investors come over and they said, Wow, I've never seen a construction site so active, so busy.
00:52:30.000And so that's a very specific set of skills in terms of marketing, being conscious of game theory, of multiple actors and strategy and how to cope with that.
00:52:41.000That's where you get the four dimensional chess meme.
00:52:43.000And so calling Kim Jong un rocket man, it takes all the energy, all the intimidation out of Kim Jong un, which people saw in the sixth nuclear test where he tested a hydrogen bomb.
00:52:56.000People are seeing with the first medium range ballistic missile he launched over Japan and the ICBM he launched over Japan.
00:53:04.000The narrative in the world is that, like, oh my God, North Korea is actually serious.
00:53:09.000We made jokes about him before, but now this is real.
00:53:13.000And Donald Trump took all the wins out of the sails by saying, you know, this rocket man doofus, you know, really?
00:53:25.000And this is so important because Kim Jong Un's entire geo strategy, his entire grand strategy, is to cultivate this sort of man man, this madman aura that at any moment he could press the button and nuclear.
00:53:38.000The world, and we should all be afraid, and we must negotiate.
00:53:42.000That's what he wants essentially for us to come to the negotiating table or to let him have a nuclear weapon, lest we incur his wrath.
00:53:51.000And so, when Trump says he's just some silly rocket man, I think that takes everything out of him.
00:53:56.000And rocket man is so genius because, of course, you have the song, so, rocket man is a phrase that is in the collective unconscious.
00:54:05.000It makes sense because he launches rockets.
00:54:09.000You would never hear this out of a political.
00:54:11.000Consultant in Washington, D.C. You could pay, Hillary Clinton could pay millions of dollars for the best political consultant in the world, and they wouldn't come up with branding as genius, but as simple as that.
00:54:36.000And I was, it's funny, I was watching a video about the Juggalo March.
00:54:41.000And these people brought their kids there, and they're in a motel, and they're with their kids, and they're clown makeup.
00:54:47.000And it was really sort of black pilling because I was like, you know, imagine being the child of juggalo parents.
00:54:53.000Imagine what prospects do you have to be like a well adjusted, rational, cool, with it person if your parents are going to listen to like really bad rap music in clown makeup.
00:55:09.000The juggalos, I think, are a reflection of the absurdism, the surrealism of.
00:55:14.000The modern world, that something like that can garner tens of thousands of followers.
00:55:19.000I mean, at least the wackos, the crazy people in pre modern times were crazy about like ideology, like a utopian ideology, like socialism or, you know, syndicalism or something like that or anarchism.
00:55:34.000There was a higher thing to ascribe to or to, what's the word, to strive for, such as a political ideal, a religious ideal, a social ideal.
00:55:46.000And now the mass cult followings are behind the juggalos, you know, the insane clown posse.
00:56:06.000It's tough because essentially what America is doing is intervening in other nations' affairs.
00:56:13.000And it's sort of a difficult question because you have these two.
00:56:18.000Of international relations coming into conflict with each other.
00:56:21.000Because on the one hand, you have the Westphalian state system, which was launched in the early 17th century with the Peace of Westphalia that concluded the Thirty Years' War.
00:56:30.000And this says that every country is sovereign and the leader of every country is sovereign over the affairs of any given state.
00:56:37.000So for the United States to intervene and cause like a revolution across how many different countries you have Kurdish, major Kurdish populations in Iraq, in Syria, in Iran, in Turkey, I think a little bit in Azerbaijan.
00:56:51.000To cause that sort of political instability in those countries is a violation of the foundation of the international state system.
00:56:59.000Number two is the modern day international system presented by Wilson, the Wilsonian right to self determination, which says that every nation should support an ethnicity or a racial group trying to establish their own country or government to determine their own affairs.
00:57:50.000I am just generally opposed to nation building.
00:57:53.000If they have the resources, if they have, and I'm not familiar totally with the Kurdish situation.
00:57:58.000I I know generally what's going on, but not so much the specifics.
00:58:02.000If they can get it together, you know, and they can do this independently with little, if no support from America or her allies, I would say, in principle, I support it.
00:58:11.000But generally, I'm against any more instability in the Middle East.
00:58:14.000I mean, it's killing the United States.
00:58:40.000I mean, that's the most criminal aspect of it we had it where it was 90% white babies being born every year, and now it's 50%.
00:58:48.000And nobody got a vote, even if you don't think that's fine, even if you think, oh, that's good, white people are being taken down a notch, even if you're for that.
00:58:59.000The same people that are championing democracy and participation in elections and civic responsibility think that it's totally okay.
00:59:08.000That the demographics of the nation, the most important concept, the most important component, was fundamentally altered by people behind closed doors in Washington, D.C.
00:59:18.000I think whether you're for or against, no good.
00:59:23.000Huang Zhen En, I'll have you know that I'm a natural born American citizen.
00:59:45.000I'm not even for the wall so much for pragmatic reasons.
00:59:48.000I think the wall will contribute to stopping illegal immigration.
00:59:51.000But what the wall says in a very physical, and I think it's a commitment to this idea because you have to pay billions of dollars for it, is to say that that is Mexico.
01:00:15.000And so, you know, at some point, we're going to have to lay it out, folks.
01:00:19.000Maybe when we have stronger numbers, right?
01:00:22.000But, yeah, the rest can be grandfathered in.
01:00:25.000We'll say the rest, because people have been here for a long time, and they can be grandfathered in.
01:00:29.000But it just can't continue to be moving in that direction.
01:00:34.000Admiral Falagos, the secret of the unjustified racial prejudice bias is the premise that people are solely influenced by their environment, not DNA.
01:00:45.000I mean, that about sums it up, basically.
01:00:48.000Once you bring biology into the mix, then it becomes understandable because the entire premise of both parties, both ideologies, rests on the undiscussed assumption, presumption, that all people are equal in all capacities across all continents and everything else.
01:01:05.000And certainly they're equal before God, they should be equal before the law.
01:01:10.000But if we're talking about characteristics, this is demonstrably not the case.
01:01:18.000When these disparities are in favor of not white people, you know, how many times have white people been humiliated by the media by talking about how well endowed black people are, how tall they are, how fit they are, how athletic they are, and how cool they are?
01:01:35.000And wow, I mean, they're so musical and they're so good at dancing and everything.
01:01:57.000And of course, the well endowed thing is actually a myth.
01:02:00.000But, you know, nonetheless, we hear it on television all day long.
01:02:03.000But the moment that you say, hey, wait a minute, maybe Africa has been uniquely the worst place to live for thousands of years is not because of culture.
01:02:11.000Or maybe culture has something to do with geography or other factors.
01:02:16.000But we have to really have a conversation about race.
01:02:19.000I know that's really trite and, like, cosmopolitan, but we really need to have this message get out there that, you know, everyone believes in race.
01:02:28.000They just don't talk about it, they're just pretending.
01:02:39.000What is the best way to start getting ready for 2018?
01:02:42.000Well, I mean, depends on what you're getting ready for.
01:02:45.000If it's an election, you know, that's something else.
01:02:47.000But I think everybody should be getting ready for the long term by lifting weights, reading books, going to church, finding that Trad QT, that mommy GF, buying guns, ammunition, food, water, shelter, all these things.
01:03:03.000I mean, that's what we should be preparing for.
01:03:04.000But for 2018, how can we get our guys in and not some conservative or alt like guy?
01:03:09.000You got to get off the chair, you know, get off the couch.
01:03:13.000So many people are complaining and they're up in arms, and nobody's volunteering for campaigns.
01:03:18.000Nobody's making phone calls for campaigns.
01:03:21.000And I really had a problem with this at Boston University where I had all these Republicans, all these Trump supporters that wanted to be my best good friend because I had a little bit of notoriety.
01:03:31.000And they all wanted to complain all day long about the loony left, about demographics, about High taxes, about everything else, but nobody or very few of them accepted the call to actually go and campaign in New Hampshire.
01:03:43.000It was raining, it was cold, it was a long drive, you didn't get paid for it, but if you cared, you were there.
01:03:49.000And so I would say that the way to get ready for that is to start getting yourself involved, not only in politics by volunteering and making these connections, but also by integrating into the community.
01:04:01.000And I'm a big advocate for this that we need to cut all the political stuff.
01:04:05.000I mean, it's fine and well that people are engaged in politics, they should be.
01:04:11.000In fact, it's actually a very tertiary thing in the grand scheme of things.
01:04:15.000Like, if you think of it, would you prefer that we had a nation of people that are alt right and woke on certain questions?
01:04:21.000Or would we prefer a nation of 300 million people that are going to church, that are classically educated, that are lifting weights, that are physically fit, and everything else?
01:05:37.000Teddy Roosevelt is an icon, is a titan.
01:05:40.000And I've grown to, even if people are liberal, even if people are a little bit left leaning, if they're American, if they're nationalist, if they're If they got good character, I'm all for him.
01:05:50.000So, Teddy Roosevelt was a smart guy, tough guy, gritty guy.
01:05:55.000Like, you know, people talk all the time about how he got shot during a speech that he gave, and then he just went and continued it.
01:06:01.000And, you know, the art of manliness has kind of co opted this, and you have like this boutique manliness culture for disaffected and cucked men, which I resent.
01:06:11.000And Teddy Roosevelt has been kind of like the face of that.
01:06:15.000Nevertheless, I think he's a really awesome guy.
01:06:58.000Once you realize what's really going on, to see everyone else as like controlled opposition, to see everyone else as like an automaton carrying out their conditioning, and it's very insulating, it's isolating.
01:07:12.000And additionally, I think the most painful part is when your parents or your siblings or whatever, your family or your friends, see you as like a bad person because their allegiance is more so to the group, to the conformist mob of the country, which is anti racist, which is code for anti white, which is Pro immigration and everything else than they are to the people they love, the people they know.
01:07:40.000I think the easiest way is getting them to read books.
01:07:42.000Getting them to read, you know, that's how I started to red pill my parents, was saying, here is my extensive library of books on the subject.
01:07:53.000The rest of it is citations, and just read for yourself.
01:07:57.000And the other way to do it, I think the best approach is to state it in an inquisitive fashion, which is to say, You know, why is it that certain groups you're not allowed to criticize?
01:08:06.000Why is it that this double standard exists?
01:08:09.000You know, you can't give them all the answers, but you can get them asking the right questions, and that's what's important.
01:09:51.000And, you know, look, I want to take the shekels, but we're trying to put out a lot of content right now so people can experience the show.
01:09:58.000People can get familiar with me, grow to like my content.
01:10:02.000You know, we could get more growth with our reach, our exposure with free stuff.
01:10:07.000And then once we get a little bit of clout, I'm going to totally shill for shekels all day long and turn my back on everyone that follows me.
01:10:23.000From the outset, but there's just not enough time.
01:10:25.000I wanted to do like a Sunday special where I make a show over the whole week that's produced and edited and there's clips and things to do on Sunday, like an hour show.
01:10:35.000And I think I'd do that behind a paywall.
01:10:38.000David Wooderson, as a Christian, any thoughts on the Marching to Zion documentary if you've seen it?
01:11:05.000No, I think that to, you know, to like slavishly try to explain away private, you know, private negative externalities, negative externalities from the private sector, I think is like a blind commitment to the free market that is undeserved.
01:11:22.000You know, I think we can all understand that it's not secret laws that Google is trying to brainwash the United States, but, you know, maybe there's something going on in Google.
01:11:32.000Jimmy Chowda, like some of your econ proposals, but most tax credits just go to institutions that fund our adversaries or raise market prices.
01:11:40.000You know, again, it would have to be comprehensive.
01:11:41.000I didn't say just subsidies, I said you'd have to do a lot of things, which would be tax credits, subsidies.
01:11:47.000I don't know, maybe some form of price control.
01:11:50.000People say, you know, that's a dirty word, but maybe some way to control that.
01:11:56.000I'm not an expert on economic instruments that we could use to get where we need to go, but we need something that's run by, like, Chicago or Austrian school economists.
01:12:05.000For how we can have the government make these things more affordable and get these things to be incentivized.
01:12:11.000And it'll have to come at the cost of economic efficiency, but we have goals now.
01:12:16.000Our goal is not conspicuous consumption, our goal is not endlessly high stock market prices and high GDP.
01:12:24.000So I am more than willing to sacrifice efficiency for things that we actually need.
01:12:30.000Otto Vaughn, thoughts on these Google searches American inventors, happy American couple, what races have blue eyes, European people history.
01:12:39.000Well, yeah, I mean, you can do experimenting of your own with all those kinds of things, but I think it's no coincidence.
01:12:46.000Mr. White, did Kim ever call you white trash?
01:12:50.000Mr. White, we've been over this before.
01:12:52.000We're doing the North Korea debate sometime this week or next week.
01:12:55.000We're waiting for all the challengers to come forward.
01:12:57.000It looks like we have a couple of candidates, and then we'll do the debate.
01:13:01.000But I explained it, and it's not like, you know, they say, did Kim Jong un ever call you white trash?
01:13:07.000No, but that's not why I said we should go to war with them, or we can make a justifiable case to go to war with them.
01:13:48.000Trump can swing it by bringing in the Chinese to negotiate or the Russians to negotiate or Japan or South Korea, but I just don't see it happening.
01:13:56.000So I say there's a justifiable case because when you have like these differences, that's when war makes sense.
01:14:03.000War makes sense when like you have differences that cannot be overcome through discussion.
01:14:08.000This is one of those where you can make the case that that is true.
01:14:11.000So that's why I said you can make the case.
01:14:13.000And I'm not saying like we should, I'm not saying that would be great or good or whatever, desirable.
01:14:19.000I'm just saying the case is justifiable.
01:14:22.000Joe Gearhart, what would be a good name for a men's alt-right group?
01:14:26.000How do you think we should form them and organize them?
01:14:45.000The left has all these organizations that are apolitical but get politics injected into them.
01:14:52.000You know, like the Boy Scouts, they have all kinds of neoliberal, or rather just plain liberal propaganda there.
01:14:58.000You have all kinds of liberal propaganda in all the voluntary organizations for liberals.
01:15:03.000You know, college campuses churn out liberals all day long.
01:15:05.000They're not billed as like youth liberal campuses.
01:15:09.000So I would say that a men's alt right group shouldn't be an alt right group at all.
01:15:13.000It should be maybe started by someone who's alt right, but should promote, like I said before, classical education, faith, virtue, monogamy, you know, all those good things.
01:15:28.000Once you get that fraternal, once you get those healthy male relationships back, which have been missing for so long, the politics will come.
01:15:36.000When men get together, they talk about these things.
01:15:38.000And you don't have to worry about all the filming that happens when you involve women or minorities that get offended and they're going to drag you out to the court of public opinion to get fired.
01:15:47.000You know, once you have these fraternal organizations where people are sitting down and they're comfortable with each other and they know each other and they share the same values and they know each other's families, they can talk about.
01:15:58.000They can talk about these things, and trust me, all that will come.
01:16:03.000American Candor, how would you explain the importance of metaphysics to society/slash culture when having a talk with those with a soulless worldview?
01:16:12.000You don't bring up the metaphysics, it's just beyond people.
01:16:15.000And, you know, that's why meme culture is important.
01:16:19.000Out of all the Keck nonsense, the one good article I did read was about esoteric Keckism.
01:16:26.000And it said that basically memes were so powerful, and why memes work for us.
01:16:30.000Is because we take really esoteric, like difficult, inaccessible ideas and we simplify them into a completely accessible image that everyone understands.
01:16:40.000You know, you could read all of Jared Taylor's books and all of the French postmodernists, and you can read countless books by European obscure authors, and you can break the conditioning, and you can watch a six hour documentary.
01:16:53.000I don't know what that is, but you could go through all those hoops, or you could look at a meme that explains exactly what's going on.
01:17:02.000You just start people on the road there and you explain sort of the stuff that is a little bit more superficial, easy to understand, and the rest will follow.
01:17:40.000I think war is the last thing we would do because that would be, you know, we could never predict the outcome of that because the biggest variable in that is like the American military.
01:17:51.000If you know who controls the Pentagon, if you know who controls the government, and we assume that the military will side with them, it's not going to work out well for us, you know, when maybe we have 67% strong population wise, and that's rapidly decreasing.
01:18:07.000The ones with all the technology and all the lasers and guns and everything is the U.S. military.
01:18:48.000Have a very rich, distinct, unique Amerindian culture.
01:18:51.000So let them remain in Peru, in the homeland of their ancestors.
01:18:55.000I mean, you look at some of these cities, you look at like Machu Picchu, which has seen the passage of centuries, which has seen centuries and hundreds of generations of Peruvians where their kin, their families have spilled blood, have made sacrifices, have done all their working, all their thinking, and the solution that the globalists propose is well, they should just go and drive Uber cars in Boston.
01:20:33.000It has a lot more to do with tradition and order and hierarchy.
01:20:36.000Where if Africa were allowed to be a traditional order and hierarchy as existed before colonies, I'm sure they'd be doing better than they are now.
01:20:44.000Maybe they wouldn't be doing, you know, they wouldn't achieve parity with South Korea or Japan or Hong Kong.
01:20:50.000But certainly I think they'd be doing better off if they returned to their pre colonial power structures, which was not geographic nation states, but.
01:20:59.000Power projection over tribes and ethnic groups and everything else.
01:21:03.000So, I don't think it's necessarily organized religion.
01:21:08.000It's ritual, it's structure, it's hierarchy, it's tradition in whatever form in whatever country.
01:21:13.000And the Christian Universalists always get on my back.
01:21:15.000They say, No, no, Christianity works for everyone.
01:21:47.000You have to think about it strategically.
01:21:49.000You have to think in terms of game theory.
01:21:51.000You have to think of it in terms of the OODA loop, organize, orient, decide, act loop, and how that plays into game theory in the sense that we need to make it so that people don't want to smoke marijuana.
01:22:06.000You know, why do people smoke marijuana?
01:22:07.000It's not, I mean, certainly it's because it's fun, and that's why.
01:22:10.000You know, people do it recreationally.
01:22:12.000But why are people doing it to medicate so heavily?
01:22:15.000It's because they have nothing to look forward to.
01:22:20.000I mean, all this work, all this toil that young people are expected to do, and for what?
01:22:25.000You know, to get an A on the paper so that they could get the big credit, so that they could get the college certificate, so that they could land the full time job.
01:22:34.000And then they get to commute to work every day in the Subaru and do data entry for 20 years.
01:22:42.000So why wouldn't you be self medicating?
01:24:32.000And also, we have to go after influencers.
01:24:35.000You know, do you want to influence the guy next to you, or would it be a real grand slam if we got like PewDiePie on our side or someone like that where our influence is compounded many times over?
01:24:45.000I think we've got to be thinking like that.
01:24:47.000And our last question for the night DM me, Rare Loomers says, B, Ben Shapiro, Vox Day, et cetera.
01:25:34.000He debated like this black panel of dummies.
01:25:37.000He debates young college kids on abortion.
01:25:41.000But when is he answered for the fact that he supports a Jewish ethnostate in the Middle East but thinks a white nationalist or a white ethnostate is the height of absurdity?