00:02:32.000Very excited to be back with you here tonight on Tuesday.
00:02:36.000We have got a lot to talk about, lots to get into.
00:02:40.000And, you know, really, we're kind of in like a new era here.
00:02:44.000I think, like, officially, America First is in a completely new chapter than it was yesterday since Tucker Carlson's monologue last night.
00:02:55.000And that's going to be our featured story tonight.
00:02:57.000I want to talk about what he said on a show yesterday because it was a pretty big deal.
00:03:03.000You know, on this show, I've differentiated myself from the mainstream conservatives and the mainstream right by being one of the only people willing to talk about demographic change, population replacement, Jewish power, and other things.
00:03:26.000Some of them, most of them, the most important ones, expressed on this show and on other shows over the past four years, was on prime time on Fox News last night.
00:06:17.000But the good thing is, it seems like these other platforms are growing too.
00:06:21.000And that's going to be critical because if the Twitter goes down, we want those platforms to be as big as possible.
00:06:27.000So make sure you're following me there.
00:06:30.000Also, remember to subscribe to the email list.
00:06:32.000And if you didn't, remember to call tomorrow the Office of Governor Ron DeSantis.
00:06:39.000I'll put out another tweet tomorrow morning to remind you, but we're keeping up that campaign all throughout this week, trying to get people to call the Office of Governor Ron DeSantis to tell him to amend the tech censorship bill and pass it.
00:10:16.000And Mark Stein is very based on immigration.
00:10:20.000If you've ever watched him or followed him, he's one of the first people that basically introduced me to the idea of demographic change, population replacement.
00:10:30.000Because he's been saying this for decades now.
00:10:32.000And I remember even when I was in high school, when I was like a libertarian, wasn't even aware of the relevant facts, he was talking about how these people are coming in and they're replacing our own people in our own countries, in North America, in Europe.
00:10:47.000So, Tucker was interviewing Mark Stein on Thursday on his daytime show, which only streams on Fox Nation, which is like their internet subscription live stream service.
00:10:59.000And he was interviewing Mark Stein, and he said during the interview, it was like a two minute clip, not a big deal.
00:11:07.000He said that replacement was happening.
00:11:09.000This term, which has been used by certain people and which you're not allowed to use, according to the media, according to the ADL, SPLC, is replacement.
00:11:21.000He said, you know, look, Let's just say it's happening.
00:11:41.000And I said the problem with that, while it is good that he's introducing his audience to the idea of replacement migration, and while it is just true, I mean, it is just mathematically true.
00:11:52.000That the native population is declining and the foreign born population is increasing.
00:11:58.000I had a problem with what he said last Thursday because he went out of his way to explicitly say that it was not racial, that it was just about voting rights.
00:12:09.000In other words, when they bring in immigrants from the third world, it's actually not even notable or significant that the people that they're bringing in are not white and the people that are declining in their relative share of the population are white.
00:12:23.000He said that the worst thing that's happening here, and maybe the only significant consequence of what's happening, is that the voting power, the relative voting power of the native people living here, is being diluted by the influx of people in absolute terms.
00:12:41.000So, in other words, it's got nothing to do with the kind of people that are coming here and the kind of people that they're replacing.
00:12:48.000What matters is that, in terms of absolute number, there are more people in the country, and as that happens, of course, each individual vote is being diluted.
00:12:57.000Diminished in terms of its relative power.
00:13:00.000If you're voting one person out of a hundred people, your vote counts for 1% of the vote total.
00:13:07.000If you're one person voting out of a thousand people voting, then you're 0.1%.
00:13:13.000The relative power of an individual vote has been reduced.
00:13:17.000And that's that kind of a mathematical proportion is all that Tucker said that this means.
00:13:22.000That was last week, last Thursday on Fox Nation.
00:13:25.000He said explicitly went out of his way.
00:13:29.000Some people say it's white replacement.
00:14:12.000They come home to a place in a neighborhood and they have kids and they send their kids to a school.
00:14:20.000And we all have to live together on the off hours when we're not working and voting.
00:14:25.000And so, for that fact, because this is our home, it tends to matter who's living here and what kind of people they are.
00:14:32.000Not just that the amount of people living here has increased.
00:14:35.000Of course, that's a problem for a number of reasons, but the problem is the kind of people that are coming here because those people have got to live with us.
00:14:44.000And if they've got to live with us, We should probably be able to get along and we should like these people.
00:14:53.000They should be familiar and they're not.
00:14:55.000So I went on a big rant on Friday and I said it's really problematic that he said that it wasn't racial because while I understand that would be a more explicit thing to say, it might and it definitely would be more controversial to say that.
00:15:12.000And he might lose his job if he talked about the racial dimension of the replacement of migration.
00:15:21.000And more honest, if he had just omitted the racial aspect of it, if he had just not said anything about that, if he just talked about the dilution of the vote, if he had just said that replacement is happening without specifically saying that it's not racial, just don't say racial at all.
00:16:02.000They're not replacing us with people that are like us, they're really changing the population.
00:16:08.000They're replacing us, but with different people.
00:16:11.000And the people that watch Tucker Carlson might come to that conclusion on their own.
00:16:15.000When you specifically negate that premise and say, no, it's not that, it's not that, it's never that, it's something else.
00:16:23.000Well, this is a misdirection because now, whereas people might have interpreted it that way, whereas people might have read between the lines, now from their trusted newsman, they hear him say, Well, it's actually not that way.
00:16:37.000Well, now you're creating a whole generation potentially of nationalist conservatives aware of replacement migration, but who steadfastly repudiate the idea that it has anything to do with race.
00:16:49.000And that's a problem because it does have to do with race, and we need to develop a racial consciousness.
00:16:55.000And I don't know that it's productive to develop these ideas and flesh them out after you've inoculated them from understanding it with a racial lens.
00:17:05.000So I critiqued Tucker Carlson pretty heavily on Friday, and I said it's almost not worth doing at all to go halfway and then disavow the rest.
00:17:15.000It would be better to just not even go down that path at all.
00:17:19.000It's definitely optimal to, if you can only go halfway, just go that far and stop.
00:17:24.000But I don't know if it does us any favors, I don't know how effective it is.
00:17:28.000To go halfway and then disavow the rest of it and say, actually, the rest of it is not true and it is racist and they're right about it by saying it has nothing to do with race, that would be racist.
00:18:23.000You've got the red pill, you've got the blue pill, you take the blue pill, and you go back into this artificially constructed media reality, this fabricated media reality that are.
00:18:36.000Struggle is between Republicans and Democrats or socialists and capitalists.
00:18:40.000That largely you can trust what you see on TV and you buy into the liberal consensus about equality between the sexes and the races and so on.
00:18:49.000Taking the red pill means you understand that the reality that has been constructed around you by your teachers, by your college, by media and television and Hollywood and maybe your parents and friends is a fabrication.
00:19:02.000And that there are serious flaws in the liberal way of looking at the world, serious flaws in the Fundamental doctrines of the modern political landscape, which are equality, all these different kinds of things, like I said, equality between the races, sexes, things of that nature.
00:19:23.000And so being red pilled means specifically you understand what is occurring, the most important thing that's occurring, which is mass migration into America, which is that white people in America are being replaced by non white people through immigration.
00:19:37.000And this is being done to benefit large corporations who profit from the labor.
00:19:41.000This is being done to benefit the Democratic Party, who gets more votes from this.
00:19:45.000Ultimately, this is benefiting globalist special interests and an emerging, nascent New World Order, which will benefit from all the chaos and division that is created with racial and ethnic conflict and tension across every major city in the United States.
00:20:04.000What's more, is this will lower the average IQ and maybe lead to the creation of a slave class where you've got workers, consumers, and then you've got people that are rich and own the firms.
00:20:16.000On the other side of a bifurcated world.
00:22:27.000It also is true that when you change who lives in a country, you change the country.
00:22:31.000When you change who goes to work, goes to school, and lives in your neighborhood, it changes your school, your work, and your neighborhood.
00:22:37.000When you change their language, their culture, their average IQ, their race, their ethnicity, the place that they came from, it changes the texture of everything that you know, everything in your life.
00:22:49.000So it's not quite perfect, but this is a passing remark.
00:23:20.000They don't think they have to be ashamed.
00:23:22.000In the fall of 2018, a columnist for the New York Times wrote a piece that was literally entitled, We Can Replace Them.
00:23:29.000In case you wondered who the them was, the column told you explicitly.
00:23:34.000Thanks to demographic change, the author noted with hearty approval, the state of Georgia will soon be controlled by Democrats.
00:23:41.000And he's quoting from the article the potential is there.
00:23:43.000Georgia is less than 53% non Hispanic white.
00:23:47.000Again, that's a New York Times columnist, not some QAnon blogger.
00:23:52.000Go to the Anti Defamation League's website sometime if you'd like a glimpse of what an unvarnished conversation about a country's national interest might look like.
00:24:00.000In a short essay posted to the site, the ADL explains why the state of Israel should not allow more Arabs to become citizens with voting rights.
00:24:09.000The ADL explains With historically high birth rates among the Palestinians and a possible influx of Palestinian refugees and their descendants now living around the world, Jews would quickly become a minority within a binational state, thus, likely ending any semblance of equal representation and protections.
00:24:27.000In this situation, the Jewish population would be increasingly politically and potentially physically vulnerable.
00:24:34.000The ADL continues It is unrealistic and unacceptable to expect the state of Israel to voluntarily Subvert its own sovereign existence and nationalist identity and become a vulnerable minority within what was once its own territory.
00:24:51.000That's the ADL being quoted by Tucker Carlson on his show last night.
00:24:57.000Tucker goes on, he says, Now, from Israel's perspective, this makes perfect sense.
00:25:01.000Why would any democratic nation make its own citizens less powerful?
00:25:05.000Isn't that the deepest betrayal of all?
00:25:08.000In the words of the ADL, why would a government subvert its own sovereign existence?
00:25:13.000Maybe ADL President Jonathan Greenblatt will join Tucker Carlson tonight sometime to explain and tell us whether that same principle applies to the United States.
00:25:24.000Unfortunately, most Americans don't have a say in the matter.
00:25:29.000So, that is a little excerpt from the monologue.
00:25:32.000I should have said, yeah, it's not perfect because it doesn't explicitly mention race, but throughout the monologue, it's definitely there.
00:25:41.000And, like I said, it's got all the necessary components.
00:25:46.000I didn't quote that part because it was pretty lengthy and mostly unnecessary because you understand that.
00:25:52.000But it talks about California and how California is the future of America, how Ronald Reagan and other politicians transformed states like California through amnesty for illegals and more legal immigration.
00:26:06.000Talked about how Hispanics are replacing whites in Los Angeles and California.
00:26:26.000And he had the New York Times, We Can Replace Them article.
00:26:29.000Worth pointing out, We Can Replace Them, that article from the New York Times, which Tucker cited, was written by a Jewish woman, and that was written in response to Charlottesville.
00:26:40.000Because, of course, Charlottesville, the chant was, Jews will not replace us.
00:27:05.000I said, Look, and I cited that exact article.
00:27:08.000If you go back, roll back the tape, you could go back to my show on Friday.
00:27:11.000I think I said exactly that with that article.
00:27:14.000And I've cited that article and made the same argument many times on the show.
00:27:18.000I said, Look, you know, if you want to talk about population replacement, media talks about it all the time, specifically the New York Times, the Atlantic, the LA Times.
00:27:29.000So, What his monologue did, it basically said most of what I say on my show every night without mentioning too strongly the fact that it's white people being replaced and that it's explicitly racial and without maybe mentioning Jewish power.
00:27:44.000But both were hinted at and both were there.
00:27:47.000All the necessary ingredients were right there.
00:27:49.000I said it on Twitter it's a full red pill.
00:27:55.000Concise, neatly packaged, and done so in a way that was tactful and done so in a way that was, I think, Walking the line just closely enough that he may be able to get away with that while slipping a red pill to three and a half to four million people that watch his show.
00:28:14.000What's really brilliant about this and what made it so perfect when I saw the first clip, I saw about a minute and a half clip of the monologue on Twitter last night.
00:28:23.000Maybe the most brilliant part, and this is a necessary, I think this is a necessary component, is that he used the example of Israel.
00:28:34.000Is because in American politics, you actually have two poles of Jewish power.
00:28:41.000You've got Jewish power, which is sort of organized Jewry from groups like ADL, from various Jewish federations, Republican Jewish Caucus, things like that.
00:28:52.000And this is largely internationalist and liberal.
00:28:56.000This is your Brett Stevens from the New York Times.
00:29:11.000We're talking about organized liberal Jewry in America.
00:29:15.000The other poll of Jewish power is Zionist power, which is categorically different.
00:29:20.000This is your Bill Kristol, your Ben Shapiro.
00:29:22.000Now, these two polls often work together.
00:29:25.000For example, Harvey Weinstein, who's a Hollywood director, big time media guy, he employed an Israeli firm made up of Mossad agents to stalk and harass his sexual assault accusers.
00:29:41.000A liberal Jewish power broker, you know, major, director, sexual assaulter, teaming up with Mossad agents from Israel working together towards, you know, working towards one objective.
00:30:26.000And what Tucker did and what I've talked to people in DC for years about, people smarter than myself, academics, intellectuals, they've said that this is the path.
00:30:35.000It is to play the sort of Zionist Jewish power off of the liberal Jewish power in America with this critical Israel example.
00:30:46.000Both of these poles have lots of power.
00:30:49.000If you come down hard on Israel, bad things happen to you.
00:30:52.000Look at what has happened to Ilhan Omar.
00:30:56.000And of course, BDS has been outlawed in many states and been barred from certain campuses.
00:31:04.000So if you come down on the Zionist influence, like I have many times, you're going to face the wrath of the neocons, the Zionists, the Zionist Jewish pole of power in America.
00:31:16.000By the same token, if you're right wing at all, and if you mention anything about Jewish people, then you're going to rouse the ire of the sort of world Jewry, organized Jewry in America that is liberal and internationalist.
00:31:29.000So the nationalist, the intelligent nationalist, purely for rhetorical purposes, can play one off of the other by saying, well, I am a nationalist.
00:31:42.000This is a position which antagonizes the liberal Jewish poll.
00:31:46.000But if you compare it to The practices in Israel, if you use the cover of the Zionist practice of their national sovereignty law, you know, their law which defines Israel as a Jewish nation, and they're obsessed with birth rates over there and everything like that, if you play one off of the other, the tension between these two, this gives you a little bit of protection.
00:32:11.000And that is very critical for a nationalist to understand.
00:32:14.000That is a way, it's a very sober and very realistic way of, and you have to understand how these things go.
00:32:23.000It's a very cynical exploit in the system, then you can make an argument for nationalism without bringing everything down on top of you.
00:32:33.000I mean, I even saw Ben Shapiro retweet something from Tucker Carlson that may be a red flag.
00:32:38.000If Ben Shapiro likes it, it's a little bit dubious.
00:32:41.000But I think it's maybe because Tucker used that example.
00:32:44.000And in using that example, even whether or not Zionists like that, maybe they suspect what you're doing, you still are able to play one off of the other.
00:32:54.000And that's kind of a brilliant move, especially too.
00:32:57.000Christian evangelicals, even if not just as a performance for Zionists, it is something that may be persuasive to evangelicals who love Israel.
00:33:08.000That's a way to play off that affinity, which is to say, oh, look, you know, all these conservatives, closest ally and everything.
00:33:14.000Well, hey, the thing that I'm proposing is normal because your best friend Israel does it.
00:33:19.000And then a lot of mainstream conservatives might say to themselves, oh, well, if Israel does it, then certainly it's right.
00:33:29.000And so, this is a, like I said, it's a very cynical exploit and brilliant that was in the monologue.
00:33:36.000And I did not expect to ever hear that on Fox News.
00:33:39.000I did not expect to ever hear that from Tucker Carlson or really anybody other than people that operate in this space.
00:33:46.000And I've had good friends of mine tell me, based on this, they say, you know, whenever you talk to a reporter or the media, try and get them to say something negative about Israel.
00:33:55.000Compare your views on immigration to Israel.
00:33:57.000Try to get them to say something negative about that within that context, and they'll get in trouble.
00:34:10.000Basically, it's like arbitrage between these two different.
00:34:13.000Jewish power poles or power brokers in America.
00:34:17.000And that's in essence what Tucker did.
00:34:19.000So it's even a little bit more subtle than you think.
00:34:22.000Even if a lot of people watch that, who watch this show, they might broadly understand what he's saying.
00:34:27.000They understand what the ADL represents and what they're about.
00:34:31.000And they may also understand the meme of nationalism for me and not for thee, the double standard between what Israel can do domestically and what liberal Jews advocate for in the United States, and even some neocons.
00:35:32.000And so that means that that attempt to push the window to the right, that attempt to open up the conversation, was closed down and shut down.
00:35:45.000Securitrons arrived, arrested, and removed me from the marketplace of ideas, reinforcing the rules that exist there.
00:35:54.000If somebody says something in the marketplace of ideas and they get away with it, maybe they're going to get checked, they're going to get searched by the gatekeepers of the marketplace of ideas.
00:36:05.000If they're released without any major issues, without an apology, then that means that the rules have changed.
00:36:12.000That means that a new precedent has been established.
00:36:16.000And if Tucker's allowed to get away with this on Fox and overall without admitting guilt, without backtracking, then a new precedent has been established, which is if Tucker Carlson can say it, Tucker Carlson, prime time on Fox News, cable television, the place to be for conservatives.
00:36:37.000Somebody who's close friends with Donald Trump, seen as a major thought leader in the Republican Party, a true leader, if he can say it, then everyone else can say it.
00:36:48.000And if everyone else can say it, Then that means the whole conversation has moved just a little bit.
00:36:56.000Whereas a year ago, the most that you could have said was, well, we're in favor of border security, and we're against line cutting and fence jumping.
00:37:05.000We're in favor of border security, but we'll take all the legal immigrants that we could get.
00:37:10.000That was Charlie Kirk's position a couple of years ago.
00:37:13.000And Tucker even responded to that by saying, no, we can't staple green cards and diplomas and so on.
00:37:20.000Now, the window has shifted to being able to acknowledge that it's deliberate, it's by design, it's a conspiracy.
00:37:26.000The intention is to replace with the goal of changing America.
00:37:30.000Now, I recognize there are some limits to this monologue.
00:37:34.000He did once again explicitly reject that it's racial, which is not true.
00:37:38.000And he strictly was talking about voting and how this is going to affect electoral politics in America, how this will affect the electoral map in presidential or congressional politics.
00:37:52.000So there is a limit to how much things have changed, there's a limit to the precedent that's been established.
00:37:57.000But nevertheless, the critical points have been hit there.
00:38:03.000It's going to change everything, right?
00:38:05.000The people that are coming here are voting Democratic.
00:38:08.000I mean, we got really far with that, and all that has to be done is follow it through to its necessary conclusion.
00:38:15.000All that needs to be done is to remind people of just some of the other consequences of what's happening, which is not merely that these people vote Democratic, but they also don't speak English, and they also don't care for the rule of law.
00:38:26.000And they're not like us in many other ways.
00:38:28.000Not just that they don't vote Republican, they're not like us in many other ways, and that's a big problem.
00:38:33.000And it's not too much of a leap from what Tucker said.
00:38:37.000Which is that you replace the voters and you get different winners, to say you replace the people and you get a different country.
00:38:44.000You replace the people, meaning they are distinct, they are different from us in meaningful ways.
00:38:49.000They're coming here in large numbers and we're declining.
00:38:52.000And if you replace the people in this country with people that are different from us, you will get a different country.
00:38:58.000And if you replace the voters and get a different outcome, and it's a worse outcome, if you replace the people and get a different country, it will be a worse country.
00:39:08.000Because these people from these other countries cannot make A better country.
00:39:12.000They will not perpetuate the same country.
00:39:15.000They will make it like the ones they came from, which are worse.
00:39:20.000They come here and they will turn this country into a shithole because that's what they know how to do.
00:39:27.000And it's not a big leap to go from one to the other.
00:39:30.000Now, Tucker did, in a passing way, say, well, it's not inherently racial, which is not true, but it's not too much of a leap to correct that.
00:39:43.000That little imperfection in the monologue.
00:39:48.000If the Murdoch people behind Fox News drew the line and say, well, you can't say it's racial, and I think that's probably the line that they drew, then this is about as good as it gets without explicitly going there.
00:40:01.000This is about as good as it gets without technically crossing that line.
00:40:19.000Well, it's not inherently racial, which doesn't even deny that it's racial, just that it is not maybe intrinsically having to do with genetics, right?
00:40:30.000So, and by the way, the reason we know that is because in response to the ADL calling for Tucker to be fired over what he said last week, Lachlan Murdoch, who's a higher up at Fox News, responded to the ADL with a letter saying that Tucker repudiated racial replacement.
00:41:16.000That to me was a little bit more of a misdirection than to say, well, it's not inherently racial.
00:41:22.000And then go on and talk about how white people are being replaced in California.
00:41:26.000Palestinians are replacing Jews in Israel.
00:41:29.000Why can't we think of our country that way?
00:41:31.000I mean, with a little bit more elaboration on the point last night, I think people have the tools that they need to follow all of this through to its logical conclusions.
00:41:43.000So it was incredible, huge turning point, and no pun intended.
00:41:50.000And I said on Twitter the other day, I said, Tucker just red pilled 4 million people, and there's nothing they could do about it.
00:41:55.000Forget they're trying to get me banned from Twitter, they're censoring people, whatever.
00:42:01.000This is where the conversation is going, inevitably.
00:42:21.000We've got Tucker going out there and grilling the governor of South Dakota and Arkansas because they're not sufficiently anti trans, talking about replacement migration and nationalism for me and not for thee.
00:42:39.000The ideas that have been promulgated from America First for four long years in the margins and in the shadows and from the blacklists of Conservative Inc. have now marched a long way into the prime time, into the sunlight and the spotlight, coming from the highest echelons of the conservative movement.
00:43:00.000Now, don't get me wrong, it's just like with Donald Trump.
00:43:03.000Tucker Carlson's one guy, and he's in a very unique situation.
00:43:07.000He is basically necessary for Fox News.
00:43:10.000If Fox fires him, Fox News would be destroyed.
00:43:44.000Was in a very similar situation four years ago.
00:43:47.000He was the elected president of the United States.
00:43:49.000Someone else, because of his billionaire status, was willing and able to say certain things and get away with it.
00:43:55.000That did not mean much because without the rest of the conservative infrastructure to follow, it did not result in a total transformation of the movement, the party, or even the government, which Donald Trump was the head of, was the president of.
00:44:11.000So, in the same way, Tucker Carlson can say this.
00:44:29.000And it's a great thing, don't get me wrong.
00:44:31.000I don't mean to say that it's not a big deal.
00:44:33.000It's a huge deal, and it's a turning point, no pun intended again, for the conservative movement.
00:44:40.000But we have just got to capitalize on these things.
00:44:42.000Trump started the revolution, Tucker Carlson seems to be carrying it.
00:44:47.000Forward by being a voice of reason, being a thought leader, sort of, I think, clarifying the vision of where the Republican Party needs to go.
00:44:58.000There has to be people rising up in the institutions with these ideas because only if that happens will the party reflect those ideas.
00:45:08.000Tucker will say them, Donald Trump initiated all of this, but we need the rest of the infrastructure to reflect that.
00:45:15.000We need the rest of the party to become that.
00:45:19.000And at that point, if the Republican Party becomes an institution which is mobilizing against white replacement, this is our ticket to solving this problem in our country because the Republican Party is a powerful institution and it wields the loyalty of 75 million voters, more than 25, more than half of the state legislatures, close to half of the congressional seats, and half of the senators.
00:45:46.000If the Republican Party becomes an institution, even if weakened over the course of the next 10 years, That is pursuing an end to white replacement.
00:46:05.000Tucker can't even do it by himself behind his desk at Fox News.
00:46:09.000But if the Republican Party is acting in the way that Tucker and I describe or that Donald Trump initiated in 2016, then the Republican Party, I think, can solve it.
00:46:22.000There still is so much work to be done.
00:46:24.000Like I said, we've got to replace everybody in the infrastructure with somebody that is an America First conservative.
00:46:35.000It shows that it's viable, and it maybe shows the progress that has been tacitly made over the past four years.
00:46:43.000Because there are a lot of people that agree with this, and they're not public, and Jared Holt doesn't know their names, and nobody knows their names except for the people that are in the know.
00:46:58.000And slowly but surely, the network that I always said, I've been saying this for four years, the network that must be made across the country and in the halls of power, people that know the relevant facts, it is being built link by link.
00:47:12.000And in the not too distant future, hopefully there will be an explosion in the growth of this.
00:47:18.000And one day the Republican Party will reflect these principles.
00:47:20.000And then, then we are really in good shape.
00:47:24.000And like I said, that happens even if.
00:47:26.000Some might say, oh, well, the Republican Party can't win a presidential election in 10 years.
00:47:35.000It's just about getting all the millions and millions of people, and largely white people, that currently identify as Republicans and have historically voted for Republicans behind this platform.
00:47:46.000It's about mobilizing them to do whatever is necessary, whether that's elected governor or senator, and maybe we win the presidency one last time.
00:47:55.000It's just about mobilizing those people behind a banner that is familiar.
00:47:59.000Behind a banner that they voted before.
00:48:31.000And all the whining and deplatforming has been about is to prevent this moment, this moment when replacement migration hit the mainstream, hit the airwaves on prime time on Fox News, and it just happened last night.
00:48:45.000And today is like the day after the bomb dropped for them.
00:48:47.000They've been trying so hard for so long to prevent it from happening, but what did I tell you?
00:48:53.000With or without me, with or without even this movement that we've created, although I hope that this will be a big part of it, what we're talking about is inevitable.
00:49:02.000The direction of the country, the natural and obvious conclusion, The truth, which is more apparent every day, and the reaction to what's going on is inevitable.
00:51:32.000Do not underestimate what a big deal this was for three and a half to four million mainstream conservatives and many more online to hear the words replacement, new voters, new outcomes, new people, new country.
00:51:48.000No longer, I hope, will we have to suffer the boomers telling us that they have to come here legally.
00:53:08.000I'm feeling pretty smug about what has transpired so far after the Capitol.
00:53:14.000Dude, you know, one way to look at everything is like, oh, the Capitol riot happened, and now the riot is over.
00:53:20.000Another way to look at it is the Capitol riot was like a new plateau.
00:53:24.000Another way to look at it is like the Capitol riot was the fulfillment of the Trump revolution and the high watermark, a new high watermark of reaction.
00:53:39.000Because some people look at it like Trump left office and now they're using this as a pretext to crush the right wing.
00:53:45.000Another way to look at it is like an escalation of a reaction that is unstoppable and that is growing more and more all the time.
00:53:56.000Because some people look at it as like, oh, we got here and this was, nah, now we're going down.
00:54:01.000Another way to look at it is that was a step up and it might be, it might be a little stop, a little stop along the way to a Groyper nation.
00:54:31.000Thank you to our sponsors at Lime LaCroix for endorsing the explicitly racial replacement immigration theory that I promulgate on the show every night with hatred.
00:56:53.000Antisocial Groypers says, in honor of the Twitter fags trying to cancel Sylvester Stallone for joining Mar a Lago, I am spending this week watching a base.
00:59:08.000Spexos, his courage just waits until someone more popular than him gets away with saying something, then pretends he felt the same way all along, even though he'd call you.
00:59:16.000A racist or anti Semite for saying the same thing six months ago, total fraud.
00:59:22.000He just goes where the wind is blowing.
00:59:24.000Tucker is now one of the leading voices in the American right, if not the leading voice.
00:59:30.000And so Charlie Kirk just shamelessly parrots what that guy says.
00:59:35.000When it was Trump, he did it for Trump.
00:59:37.000When Trump wasn't in vogue, he was against Trump.
00:59:41.000He just goes where the wind blows, wherever.
00:59:46.000If I became on the same level as Tucker or whatever, if I was in that position, Charlie Kirk would be singing my praises.
00:59:53.000And that's just to say that it doesn't matter who or what, who is saying the message or what the message is.
01:00:00.000If it's coming from somebody with money and power, Charlie Kirk is there and he's there to say it enthusiastically like he believed it all the time.
01:00:07.000So it's not even like he waits in the wings for someone to get away with it.
01:02:09.000I don't know what you're talking about.
01:02:11.000If you're late to my show, that's your problem, okay?
01:02:15.000Beezer says Are you blue cities and red states worth staying in to stem the tide, or should we really focus on moving to smaller red towns?
01:02:38.000Cities will be the loci of control for the globalist empire.
01:02:43.000That's how they're going to control people.
01:02:44.000Because inside of a city, you've got surveillance, you've got control of transportation, you've got control of entry and exit, you've got control over the local economy.
01:02:55.000City councils have wide latitude with the kinds of laws that they can pass.
01:03:01.000Of course, that's where the racial shock troops of the New World Order are living.
01:03:08.000So the city is going to be increasingly dangerous, chaotic.
01:03:13.000And under the control of people that want to kill you and want to imprison you.
01:03:19.000So I think that at this point, it's probably a good idea to move out of the big cities.
01:03:24.000As far as states go, I don't know that it matters so much.
01:03:27.000At that point, I think it just comes down to preference, but probably it would be a good idea to begin fortifying red states.
01:03:35.000The problem is, though, whatever we do to move to a red state, it'll be offset by internal or external migration.
01:03:43.000For example, if you move to Montana, There's not going to be more right wing people moving to Montana than Californians.
01:03:51.000And the same goes for Wyoming and a lot of these western states.
01:03:54.000So I think at that point, it's less about the state.
01:05:06.000And it's just really a matter of controlling for all these other characteristics.
01:05:13.000And you find that, you know, using just basic statistical methods, that it is race that is the common denominator, not socioeconomics, not really anything else, not education, which is what everybody defaults to.
01:05:37.000Oh, well, because women are different than men.
01:05:39.000Okay, well, why do poor whites not commit crimes at the same rate?
01:05:42.000Well, because it's race, it's not about how much money you make, and it never has been.
01:05:51.000And then the same argument can be made for all these other countries.
01:05:54.000I mean, maybe the causation goes in the other direction.
01:05:58.000Maybe it's the fact that they're not committing crimes that makes them rich, and it's the fact that people commit crimes that makes them poor.
01:06:05.000Maybe there's something there, you know?
01:06:07.000In other words, white countries and white populations are low crime, and white countries and white populations are high net worth and high income.
01:06:16.000Black populations worldwide are high crime, low net worth, and low income, and low education.
01:06:24.000Do you think maybe the causation flows in a different way?
01:06:27.000Maybe it's not education, crime rate, and income, which is why blacks fail, and maybe it's the other way around.
01:06:40.000Maybe education, crime, and all those things are in the wrong direction because of the people.
01:06:45.000And it's not the external factors that are making the people a certain way, you know?
01:06:52.000As people say, oh, well, Europeans have it so easy.
01:06:56.000Well, why do you think it is so easy for the Europeans?
01:12:21.000MB says, Stop saying the clip was on Tucker's daytime show.
01:12:24.000Tucker appeared on Fox News Primetime, the new 7 p.m. show on the channel, as a guest while Mark Stein was guest hosting the show, which does not have a static host yet.
01:24:04.000Pfeffer says, nothing is more important, or nothing is more certain than these people are to be free, nor is it less certain that the two races, equally free, cannot live in the same government.
01:24:15.000Nature, or rather, nature, habit, opinion has drawn indelible lines of distinction between them, said Thomas Jefferson.
01:24:23.000There's a quote like that from like every founding father and every major American president or figure since the founding.
01:25:18.000Obviously, we have a difference of opinion on that.
01:25:20.000And ultimately, I mean, it's a pretty big one.
01:25:23.000It's a pretty big and a serious heresy.
01:25:25.000Because, you know, some Protestants, they're like, you look at a lot of Protestants, they may deny the authority of the church, but they believe in the Trinity.
01:26:31.000Terrence says You've said that Richard Spencer is what you'd call a white globalist.
01:26:36.000This might sound like a stupid question, but what exactly does that mean in his case?
01:26:40.000Well, because he is a globalist, he's in favor of globalism, but.
01:26:45.000He's in favor of, I don't know, a racialist kind of a globalism.
01:26:50.000Like he wants a white super state in Europe, like the European Union.
01:26:54.000He's in favor of vaccination, global government.
01:26:58.000He's in favor of all the things that globalists are, but he just wants it to be only for white people, which is a problem because globalism, the racial replacement is one of the biggest, but not the only problems with globalism, right?
01:27:12.000So the guy is a liberal, but with a racialist worldview.
01:27:44.000She's a neoconservative Jewish female.
01:27:46.000Well, she is very hard against Muslims.
01:27:49.000And like I said, you've got Zionist Jewish power, you've got liberal Jewish power, and, you know, it's no secret that the people that run.
01:27:59.000The social media sites, either they directly run them or they run them by being trusted flaggers or nonprofits that consult with the companies for trust and safety and community guidelines.
01:28:10.000They're the ones running the platforms.
01:28:12.000They're the ones that ultimately give the green light on who's allowed.
01:28:15.000YouTube, for example, while it might not be a Jewish person and control the whole deal, who do they consult with for flagging certain channels?
01:28:25.000Who do they consult with to make their community guidelines?
01:28:47.000And those people, I don't think, have any bones about banning Zionists, insofar as Zionists may be against Muslims, insofar as they might be conservative or something like that.
01:28:58.000Ben Shapiro doesn't seem to run afoul of it too much, but they write hit pieces about him occasionally.
01:29:04.000But Ben Shapiro isn't as explicitly against immigration or against Muslims.
01:29:09.000Ben Shapiro is somebody who still fits in the liberal Jewish framework.
01:29:13.000Like Brett Stevens is a hardcore neocon, but at the same time is also one of these liberal internationalist Jewish people.
01:29:20.000So it's sort of like a Venn diagram, maybe, where there are people like Benjamin Netanyahu who opposes Soros, right?
01:29:30.000Hungary bans Soros from the country, but Orban is a Zionist.
01:29:36.000And the same goes for someone like Laura Loomer.
01:29:39.000I mean, she's a hardcore Jewish Zionist, but banned by and targeted by some of these groups.
01:29:44.000But there is also some overlap where somebody like Ben Shapiro, while a Zionist, while a hardcore nationalist for Israel, will toe the liberal internationalist line in America.
01:32:57.000Neocon Slammer says, what about the argument that the Republicans are controlled by our discussion leader friends and they're never going to turn over the keys to the Lamborghinis?
01:33:06.000Well, that's the point, is that at some point we're going to have to overthrow and displace them, which this is a step in that direction.
01:33:12.000So, Dr. Zumer says Have you ever been led down by your physiognomy instinct?
01:33:17.000It feels like one of our strongest senses once you tap into it.
01:33:21.000Most people have never even heard of it.
01:35:11.000Based Tree Frog says, Did you hear about the trans middle schooler who was left outside during an active shooter drill because school administrators couldn't decide whether the student should be sheltered with boys or girls?
01:37:13.000Sailor Twift says there are illegals in the U.S. awaiting hearings who have been here for over a decade.
01:37:19.000They now have multiple American citizen children.
01:37:22.000They're importing these people knowing they will never be able to address the validity of their asylum claims and then granting amnesty down the road.
01:37:29.000What's the prescriptive on addressing anchor babies?
01:37:32.000We just have to get rid of birthright citizenship.
01:39:16.000And, you know, it's very important to, although this is basic and although everybody should understand this, you have to keep in mind that not all of a certain group of people is a certain way.
01:39:27.000The point of this show is not to condemn an entire group of people.
01:39:30.000It's not to say that every single group of this, every single individual constituent part of this group is evil or a parasite or see, because that's wrong and that's not true.
01:39:40.000As a civilization, we have to make decisions based on generalities, we have to make decisions based on patterns.
01:39:48.000And so, talking about national politics, we necessarily have to be generalizing, we necessarily have to talk about large groups of people rather than individuals.
01:39:58.000But we have to maintain that it's not every individual, it's not the group that is damnable as a whole.
01:40:04.000It's the groups that have differences, and these differences can lead to different outcomes.
01:40:09.000To say that a whole group is evil is just not true because groups cannot be moral or immoral, individuals can be moral or immoral, and all individuals are both moral and immoral.
01:40:21.000Now, there may be more immoral people in a group at a given time due to certain characteristics.
01:40:28.000Deriving from their genetics or from their group or whatever, even from environmental factors within their group.
01:40:34.000But that's not to say that, oh, everyone in there is bad.
01:40:41.000So, no, that's not what we believe on the show.
01:40:44.000And this sort of like, oh, well, if criminals are parasites and blacks are criminals, like, no, Because while blacks may be 50% of the criminals, and while criminal activity is a parasitic activity, it doesn't necessarily follow then that, oh, every individual or the group is a certain way.
01:41:03.000Yeah, see, that's where that's a little bit too far, which I don't agree with.
01:41:07.000And the idea that they don't have the human spirit of work and creativity, there are hardworking blacks, there are creative blacks, that goes without saying, obviously.
01:41:17.000But that's just a total bonehead, like.
01:41:19.000And I almost suspect that maybe this isn't even a sincere, good faith super chat because that's not anything close to what we say on the show.
01:41:26.000And, you know, some people may not understand that because they're stupid, but there's a fine line between saying.
01:41:34.000Clearly, there's two sides to this criminal justice thing because blacks are committing lots of the crime, and saying something like, well, if crime is a parasitic activity and blacks are committing the crimes, then they are not possessing the human spirit of work.
01:41:48.000It's like, yeah, no, that's just not true.
01:41:51.000Kevin Bro says, Hey, Nick, I've been drafting a bill to combat big tech censorship in Texas.
01:41:56.000In the coming weeks, I plan on presenting the bill to my state GOP.
01:41:59.000Before I do, would you mind reviewing the final draft and giving me some feedback?
01:42:04.000Any tips you have for being effective at lobbying?
01:44:02.000Well, the point is to build something parallel to what they're building that is going to weather the storm.
01:44:10.000Their ship will not weather the storm.
01:44:12.000Even if their ship is bigger, it's still going to sink.
01:44:15.000We just got to build a ship, we got to build the ark with all our people on it so that when the storm comes, when this sort of cataclysm comes, whether it's economic fallout, whether it's a giant war, whether it's civil disorder, when this coming disaster hits, there will be an ark where people can come to.
01:44:35.000It is built on the principles that we know work, that are aligned with our nature, that are aligned with what we know to be true about people.
01:44:50.000And what we're trying to do is to create infrastructure that can challenge them, that can catalyze the failure, catalyze the collapse, and that will survive it.
01:44:59.000One that, while not as big, because it is solid, because it is airtight, Will be able to defeat what they're building over there.
01:45:08.000At least that's an analogy I've made on the fly, but I've talked about this for a long time.
01:45:14.000I've said that even if whites are 50% of the population or less, and we can build a political infrastructure that works, it will defeat their larger political infrastructure, which does not work.
01:45:26.000Their political infrastructure built on competing groups, even if taken together, they're bigger and maybe more powerful than us, if we are all on the same page and have something that has.
01:45:36.000Sort of structural integrity, we will exist.
01:48:56.000GM Groyper says, have you ever not been paying attention and accidentally just piss all over the back of the toilet or like on the floor or something?
01:50:39.000Zoom says, I initially thought Tucker's monologue was a huge white pill, then I realized that he was just using the set from his other show.