00:00:45.000Our featured story tonight is about the George Floyd Memorial, which is now being built in Minneapolis, and the $27 million settlement that has been awarded to the family of George Floyd by the city of Minneapolis.
00:01:05.000And we talked earlier this week about an Ipsos USA Today poll about the American public's feelings towards BLM and George Floyd and law enforcement and everything that's gone on in the past year.
00:01:19.000And we're inching our way closer and closer towards the trial of Derek Chauvin.
00:01:26.000And so all of that rage, all the racial tension, everything that we saw last year is about to have a big resurgence.
00:01:35.000Basically, depending on the outcome of this trial.
00:01:38.000And one of the developments that is related, but not really part of it, is that the city has awarded, as a result of a civil suit, the family of George Floyd $27 million in a settlement.
00:02:13.000They're going after me very hard ever since AFPAC 2, really all year.
00:02:18.000It just hasn't stopped because, of course, after the Capitol riots, all the media and SPLC, Atlantic Council, ADL, they seized on that to try to get me arrested, try to get me investigated and arrested and looked into by the FBI.
00:02:37.000And they also tried to get me deplatformed.
00:02:40.000They went around to every social media platform, every back end service that I use, and tried to get me kicked off there.
00:02:47.000And for the most part, I did get deplatformed.
00:03:39.000I want to go through it and just kind of explain what's going on because it's really sick.
00:03:43.000And, you know, a lot of people don't even, I feel like, discuss it anymore.
00:03:48.000You know, maybe I don't discuss it as much as I need to because sometimes it feels like it's futile to even explain it because most of the people that watch this show already understand how it works.
00:04:00.000And when you talk about it and try to defend yourself, it almost feels like it's fruitless because as much as you can try to correct the record, as much as you could try to clarify context and everything, it almost doesn't matter because journalists are literally just going to lie out of spite, lie because they don't like my views, because they don't like me.
00:04:23.000And there's almost no recourse, legally or otherwise.
00:04:28.000Looked into defamation, very costly endeavor.
00:04:30.000It cost me lots and lots of money to figure out that it costs you 10 times the money that I spent to look into it to pursue a case and then win no money.
00:04:42.000In other words, you could go and sue somebody for defamation and it'll cost you $50,000, $80,000, $100,000 unless you could prove damages.
00:04:52.000Even if you win, and it's very tricky to win.
00:04:54.000Unless you can prove damages, you don't make that money back.
00:04:58.000So these are really kind of like your options it's that or it's nothing.
00:05:02.000So I want to get into that article and explain what's going on there.
00:05:08.000It's something that I hate because I hate liars and I hate when people lie about me, but it is a good sign because it shows that they're threatened.
00:05:19.000It shows that they're panicking and that what we're doing is working.
00:05:23.000If what we were doing wasn't working, they wouldn't care.
00:05:41.000So it shows that we're doing something right.
00:05:43.000It shows that we're making a difference if we're on their radar and if they deem us a large enough threat to their system, and it is their system, that they feel the need to try to preempt us by pushing the deplatforming so hard and all the other.
00:06:49.000I have like sweatshirts, and then I have suits.
00:06:52.000I don't really have anything in the middle.
00:06:53.000I have like a v neck sweatshirt that if I'm going to put on a collared shirt and then a sweater and then a jacket, it's like that's more complex, that's more tedious than just wearing a tie.
00:07:11.000At a certain point, I'm just going to wear one thing and just buy a hundred of it.
00:07:15.000I'm just going to buy a hundred white shirts and a hundred blue jackets, and they all fit exactly the same, and just not have to worry about it.
00:07:23.000I've got so much on my plate to wake up every day and, oh, gee, what am I going to wear for Casual Friday?
00:07:29.000Go through my closet, which is totally disorganized, and half the clothes don't fit.
00:08:58.000And the link is trovo.live slash Jaden P. McNeil.
00:09:03.000So it'll be me, Bryson Gray, Jaden, and Beardson will be playing in a Fortnite tournament after the show on Jaden's channel on Trovo.
00:09:12.000If you go to trovo.live, you can look it up or you could go with that link that I just told you.
00:09:17.000And I'll probably tweet it out or repost it on Telegram.
00:09:20.000But Just something fun we're going to do after the show in case you want to watch to decompress a little bit.
00:09:28.000Okay, with that out of the way, I want to get into this ABC article because there's a lot to talk about here, and I'll read through it.
00:09:35.000And the guy that wrote this, his name, I'll give you a little bit of background here.
00:09:40.000The guy that wrote this, his name is Will Steakin or Steakin, something like that, I don't know.
00:09:46.000And this guy was partly responsible for getting me deplatformed from Clubhouse.
00:09:52.000Last week, I did a Clubhouse stream last Saturday, my first stream ever on the platform.
00:09:59.000And this journalist, as well as some others, were live tweeting my stream and taking things I said out of context, the usual game that they play.
00:10:09.000You know, every off color thing I said, they're putting it in scare quotes and tagging Clubhouse.
00:10:18.000And so that's the first time this guy came on my radar.
00:10:20.000He was in the call, he's live tweeting it, he's trying to get me kicked off.
00:10:23.000And I did get kicked off Clubhouse, probably because I was just.
00:10:27.000Saying things that were controversial.
00:10:29.000I don't know that it necessarily was a direct result of journalists live tweeting it, but anyway, that's how we know this individual.
00:10:36.000He's part of the usual cadre of far right reporters, you know, these people that write for mainstream media, that their job is to cover the so called far right.
00:10:47.000People like me, America First, friends of mine, you know, associates of mine.
00:10:53.000And so we got an email, me and my assistant and my team, we got an email this morning from this guy.
00:11:00.000Saying that he was going to write an article about how experts, you know, experts, are demanding that I be banned from Twitter and asking us for comment.
00:11:10.000And this was like the third or fourth email that we got like this.
00:11:13.000There's a story that they're working on for the Chicago Tribune, there's a story they're working on for NPR, the Atlantic Council's Digital Forensic Lab, which is Jared Holt.
00:11:23.000They already published an article like this.
00:11:25.000All those publications are in the process of writing up an article about why I should be banned from Twitter and how I'm evading deplatforming and all of this.
00:11:35.000So, we've gotten a few emails like that asking us for comment, describing the nature of some of these articles that are being prepared.
00:11:43.000And, you know, it's not the first time it's happened.
00:12:14.000If they're deliberately colluding, basically, coordinating their hit pieces to get me deplatformed, normally I just ignore the media.
00:12:24.000The media lies, they twist your words.
00:12:26.000There's really nothing to be gained by talking to them.
00:12:29.000But in these cases, when their intention deliberately is to get you deplatformed, you do have to come up with a defense.
00:12:36.000I think you do have to put it on the record if it helps to clarify that what they're saying is not true or it's.
00:12:45.000Partially true, or it's out of context, you know.
00:12:48.000In the event that a social media company is going to look at my post, if they're evaluating it, you know, it helps to make a defense, not for the sake of the media, but for the sake of myself, for the sake of my platform access.
00:13:01.000So we got this email, and my assistant emails the guy back and says, Hey, can we give you a comment on Monday?
00:13:09.000And he goes, Yeah, yeah, we'll publish it on Monday.
00:13:12.000And I go on Twitter, and I put this guy on blast.
00:13:16.000And I say, this guy from ABC is writing a hit piece about me saying that experts are calling for me to be deplatformed.
00:13:23.000And this is a part of a coordinated effort, and that's what it is, by left wing political activists posing as journalists at ABC, Chicago Trib, Atlanta Council, NPR to get me deplatformed.
00:13:36.000And it's not journalism, it's not investigative, it's not truthful, it's not objective, it's political in nature, and it's a hit job.
00:13:44.000The purpose is not to report the news, it's to achieve.
00:13:49.000A certain political objective, which is to hurt me politically and this movement politically by removing our access to certain platforms.
00:14:00.000I published the email, and immediately, like almost immediately after I put that tweet out, we get an email from this journalist saying, It's going live this afternoon, actually.
00:14:12.000Really, you know, obviously, this is spiteful.
00:14:16.000And they don't like when you preempt them.
00:14:19.000I mean, I go on Twitter and I basically expose what he's going to do.
00:14:23.000I preempt the hit piece that's going to be published on Monday or at some point over the weekend.
00:14:29.000And in response to that, he spitefully publishes it this afternoon immediately.
00:14:35.000Because, of course, if I can explain my side of the story on Twitter, that would defeat the purpose of him writing this article to get me deplatformed.
00:14:43.000He wants me deplatformed as quickly as possible so I can't tell my side of the story about censorship, about politics, about anything.
00:15:02.000And like I said, it's one of several that have already been published or will be published in the future.
00:15:09.000It says A group of far right youth activists looking to capitalize on a recent conference it held in Orlando, Florida, that promoted white nationalistic rhetoric, is recruiting a new round of interns into the movement by turning to one of the last major social media platforms that has yet to ban them, Twitter.
00:15:29.000And this is the lead, and there's so much wrong in the lead, in the first paragraph.
00:15:36.000Number one, notice the first sentence.
00:15:39.000It says a group of far right youth activists looking to capitalize on their conference that promoted white nationalistic rhetoric is recruiting.
00:15:48.000Well, I guess that is only one sentence, but that first part, notice the label.
00:15:53.000They call us far right youth activists.
00:15:57.000And then in the same sentence, they say who are capitalizing on their conference where they said white nationalistic things.
00:16:21.000I've tweeted it out several times in the past couple of weeks.
00:16:25.000And I've refuted the label itself and the substance of the label.
00:16:29.000I pointed out how in my speech at AFPAC, I said, We live in a multiracial country.
00:16:35.000We will live in a multiracial country.
00:16:38.000If it's going to work, everybody has to be treated equally.
00:16:41.000This is in direct contradiction to a white nationalist ideology.
00:16:47.000And I didn't say that for any other reason other than that's what I believe.
00:16:51.000It happens to not be white nationalist because I'm not a white nationalist.
00:16:55.000So, over the past few weeks, and I've said it many times over the years, I have strenuously refuted to the press that I am not a white nationalist.
00:17:04.000Number two, because they use these words to try to deplatform you.
00:17:09.000You know, if they can make a certain label stick, Neo Nazi, white supremacist, white nationalist, then they know that all you have to do is say the magic words and you're banned from all of social media.
00:17:23.000So this journalist said, okay, well, you know, I can't call him a white nationalist because he has refuted, you know, definitively, thoroughly, and with evidence that he's not a white nationalist.
00:19:43.000It's about trying to get that label to stick no matter what.
00:19:47.000No matter how ridiculous, no matter how silly, it makes no sense.
00:19:52.000But if they could get that to stick, if they could, with some legal confidence, put that in the article, they know that if enough publications publish those words next to my name, That Twitter is more likely to ban me, and that every other social media platform is more likely to ban me, and that mainstream media outlets are less likely to give me favorable coverage, and that I'm more likely to get blacklisted by mainstream organizations.
00:20:22.000So, the words, like we talked about the other day with Anthony Fauci, the words are not meant to describe anything real, they're not meant to aid in understanding, they're not meant to describe the news.
00:20:37.000These words are injected into the article next to my name to achieve a very specific and deliberate political objective, which is deplatforming and censorship.
00:20:48.000You could get that and you can glean that in the first part of the first sentence of the article.
00:20:55.000They're capitalizing on their conference that promoted white nationalist rhetoric.
00:21:00.000And then the second part, and then we'll move on and we'll get through the rest of the article, but the second part is it says they are recruiting a new round of interns into the movement by.
00:21:09.000Turning to one of the last major social media platforms that is yet to ban them, Twitter.
00:21:15.000I read the second part of the sentence and I think to myself, why is this a story?
00:21:26.000I have less than 200,000 followers on Twitter.
00:21:30.000I am banned from every other social media platform.
00:21:33.000Why is this newsworthy for ABC News that me, a relatively small political activist, Is passing around an internship application on Twitter.
00:22:22.000I mean, yeah, the Republican Party, they, I'm sure, are putting out advertisements and they're publishing applications for a variety of things.
00:22:33.000We're a legitimate political organization using social media according to their terms of service to recruit interns to work for our company.
00:22:42.000We're not recruiting terrorists, we're not recruiting suicide bombers.
00:22:48.000We're recruiting people to edit videos.
00:22:51.000We're recruiting people to give us legal advice.
00:22:54.000Recruiting people to design music for the show and a variety of other innocuous things.
00:23:01.000You know what the interns did at AFPAC?
00:23:34.000We are engaging in the democratic process the way that everybody has a right to, and the way that you would think that liberals would want us to.
00:25:21.000We're supposed to just shut up and keep it to ourselves and just pay taxes, I guess, right?
00:25:27.000And all of these free, open, democratic institutions, which we pride ourselves on, we can't get involved in any of that, lest the media write giant hit pieces saying how there's something, insinuating that there's something sinister going on there.
00:25:43.000It goes on, and I'll finish the article.
00:25:46.000It says, Nicholas Fuentes, a far right online streamer who founded the America First Political Action Conference and the Groyper Movement, a loose coalition of mostly young far right extremists, has been banned from nearly all major social media platforms, including YouTube, Twitch, TikTok, and most recently the new voice chat app Clubhouse, which last week suspended Fuentes' account for hate speech.
00:26:12.000But Fuentes and a collection of AFPAC linked accounts have continued to harness Twitter.
00:26:16.000To promote daily live streams and sell merchandise.
00:26:21.000And recently promoted and sold tickets to the Orlando event in late February, where Fuentes and other speakers pushed white nationalist ideas.
00:26:30.000This is the story Fuentes used Twitter to promote his website and his show and sell tickets to his conference where they said white nationalist things.
00:27:03.000Michelle Malkin, in case you haven't noticed, is Filipina.
00:27:08.000John Miller, in case you haven't noticed, is black.
00:27:12.000So, I mean, that just doesn't even make any sense.
00:27:15.000But even if that were the case, What's wrong with that?
00:27:19.000I mean, it would be one thing if they were writing white nationalist militia gathering in the Pacific Northwest for an assault on the power grid.
00:27:38.000You've got people that have conferences surrounding pedophilia and bestiality and God knows what else, and left wing views and right wing views and everything in the middle.
00:27:50.000Anyway, it says, and they're quoting me it says, If America loses its white demographic core, then this is not America anymore.
00:27:59.000The AFPAC founder told the Orlando crowd in a speech that followed an address by Republican Congressman Paul Gosar, whose appearance at the conference has since sparked backlash.
00:28:10.000And apparently, that's the so called white nationalist sentence in the speech.
00:28:15.000I said that if America loses its white demographic core, then this is not America anymore.
00:28:20.000That is the remark, that is the sentence fragment that makes the whole thing white nationalist, which happens to be true.
00:28:31.000But the sentence is not, I mean, that's not a white nationalist sentiment.
00:28:35.000It's common sense and it's conservative.
00:28:38.000And most people agree with this, by the way.
00:28:40.000The morning after Gosar's speech, Gosar was on stage at the neighboring CPAC, where he appeared to try to distance himself from the ideas promoted at the AFPAC conference by telling the crowd he denounces white racism.
00:28:53.000But in the following days, Gosar defended his AFPAC appearance and has since shared memes containing slogans popular among Fuentes' Groyper followers.
00:29:04.000Representative Gosar was not trying to distance himself from that event when he said that.
00:29:10.000We had lunch after his appearance at CPAC.
00:29:13.000He appeared at CPAC in the morning, and then we got lunch at Majiano's in the afternoon.
00:29:19.000And we talked about what he said at CPAC, and we had a big laugh.
00:29:23.000He said that, you know, I don't want to get into the particulars of the conversation, but he told us what he said, and I said, yeah, and we're against white racism too.
00:29:35.000So, the media has kept reporting this, which is not true.
00:29:39.000It says, and in the two weeks since the AFPAC conference, Fuentes and a collection of related accounts on Twitter have shifted their efforts to recruit a new batch of interns for the organization, which they say will be an important step as the group looks to further push its movement into the mainstream.
00:29:54.000Fuentes, or rather, an account tied to Fuentes' group, tweeted on March 2nd The AF intern program was a central and key component to the success of AFPAC.
00:30:04.000The America First internship program is now looking to onboard its second wave of interns.
00:30:10.000Days later, the account tweeted that the program had received hundreds of applications for the internship program, which Fuentes then retweeted to his followers.
00:30:19.000In a statement to ABC News, a Twitter spokesperson said that Fuentes' account is not in violation of the Twitter rules.
00:30:26.000They said, If we identify accounts or content that violate these rules, we will take enforcement action.
00:30:48.000This is what I told ABC when they asked for comment.
00:30:51.000It says Big tech and left wing media are colluding to smear and silence Nick Fuentes, a proud Latino patriot who strives to always put America first.
00:31:02.000A representative for Fuentes told ABC News This campus conservative is being targeted by the fake news media because he refuses to bow to the socialist cancel culture mob.
00:31:28.000Recruiting interns isn't the only step Fuentes has taken to advance his movement since the AFPAC event.
00:31:33.000He has spoken repeatedly about recruiting 2022 congressional candidates that align with his group's far right views.
00:31:40.000And earlier this week, he formally introduced a new 501 organization that will enable him to raise funds while keeping donors' identity secrets.
00:31:50.000Now, this is sort of, there's a natural break here, and then it goes on to talk about Megan Squire, which that's.
00:31:57.000A whole separate thing, which we'll get into.
00:32:00.000But all in all, the hit piece is about us using the political process to achieve moderate political reforms.
00:32:09.000You know, we go to a conference at the Hilton and we sell tickets and we give speeches with congressmen about how immigration must be reduced, tech censorship must be stopped, election integrity must be restored, among other things.
00:32:52.000And everybody is equal, and everyone has rights, and everybody has the ability to step up and engage with these linkage institutions to achieve reforms through.
00:33:04.000The government, because that's what it means to live in a free and open and democratic and just society, according to the media.
00:33:40.000We're calling all these different organizations trying to paint it as an insinuation that there's some kind of bad motive here, that there's something sinister going on here.
00:33:51.000This is all happening out in the open.
00:33:53.000If you want to know what is said at AFPAC, buy a ticket to AFPAC.
00:33:58.000Watch the stream that is free, that we stream from our own platform.
00:34:28.000They insinuate and implicate that we are trying to do something evil or I don't even know what.
00:34:35.000And the question for journalists then, for Wajahat, who I talked to yesterday on Twitter, and for this asshole from ABC, and from all these journalists, Is what are 75 million people in this country supposed to do?
00:34:49.00075 million people that voted for Donald Trump and obviously are not okay with the liberal consensus.
00:34:56.000They voted for Trump because we don't like the way that the left wing power structure is running the society.
00:35:03.000And so if we can't vote for candidates, run for office, create nonprofits, raise money, use social media to share our message, what exactly are we supposed to do?
00:35:14.000Because there's sort of only two answers to this question.
00:35:17.000Either the answer is you should do nothing because your views are so reprehensible that you can't advance them in the society, in which case we don't live in a free society.
00:35:27.000And all this stuff about democracy is nonsense.
00:35:30.000All this stuff about living in a free, open, just, democratic society is a big lie.
00:35:36.000Because clearly, if 75 million people, in other words, half of the voters, are disenfranchised and excluded from it, then this is not really a free society.
00:35:46.000It's a one party state, it's an oligopoly, it's whatever you want to call it.
00:35:52.000But it is not the sacred temple of democracy that they're describing it as.
00:35:56.000And they should just shut up about that stuff because clearly it's not true.
00:36:01.000On the contrary, then, you know, on the flip side, the other way to look at it is tell us then what we're supposed to do.
00:36:09.000What are these 75 million people supposed to do?
00:36:12.000You know, if you're not total hypocrites, then please tell us what's wrong with us going through the legitimate legal process and trying to get reformed that way, the way that everybody else does, the way that it works, the way that you're supposed to.
00:36:26.000If not that, then what are we supposed to do?
00:36:29.000Because, of course, if you're violent, you know, that's illegal and illegitimate and not through the system.
00:36:34.000You go to jail and the FBI raids your house and all of that.
00:36:40.000So, what then are we supposed to do other than, I guess they just want to put us in a re education camp and, you know, you just can't not have liberal ideas if you want to participate?
00:37:17.000And then we get into their expert on the deplatforming angle.
00:37:22.000It says some experts are baffled that Fuentes, who rose to prominence after attending the 2017 Charlottesville rally as a student at Boston University and praising it as an incredible event.
00:37:34.000Has been allowed to remain on Twitter after being banned from multiple other major platforms due to hate speech violations.
00:37:40.000Dr. Megan Squire, a computer science professor at Elon University and a senior fellow at the SPLC, told ABC News Twitter is much too large of a platform for him to still be using it unfettered.
00:37:54.000And worse than that, he's been verified on there.
00:38:40.000And does like an advanced Facebook search, right?
00:38:45.000No, no, she's looking to the source code.
00:38:47.000She put out a tweet recently where she said, This was like a month ago, supposed to be intimidating, I guess.
00:38:54.000She said, Every night before bed, I go into Nick Fuentes' website source code and I find all the services they're using and I report to them and try to get him deplatformed, basically.
00:39:06.000And she says that like this is some kind of like, wow, real super sleuth.
00:39:11.000This is a woman's brain on hacking, right?
00:39:15.000I mean, she clicked or she right clicked inspect element, right?
00:39:19.000Ooh, hacker, uh oh, zoomer dev, we're in trouble.
00:39:24.000Oh, no, not this middle aged woman from Elon University looking at the source code.
00:41:03.000I can't stress enough how important it is and how he's going to leverage that in order to appear normal and to make his movement appear more normal.
00:41:11.000If he's removed from that platform, it's a huge signal that he did something wrong.
00:41:15.000And right now, he hasn't been labeled in that way.
00:41:18.000So he can use that as basically literal verification.
00:41:23.000He not only has a blue check mark, but literally being verified by one of the largest platforms.
00:41:28.000Like, literally, like I'm a doctor at like Elon University, and like, literally, he's like literally Hitler, and literally, Twitter is so big, and I like literally looked up the source code, and I'm literally an ugly, dumb bitch.
00:41:45.000But she writes this, and it's just apparent, you know, reading the first sentence.
00:41:52.000In her statement and the entire thing, what the end game is here.
00:42:15.000This is supposed to be an expert cited by an investigative journalist for a major news platform, and what she's saying is he should be banned because.
00:42:26.000He would lose credibility, and I would like that.
00:42:58.000But nominally, society is not governed by rules where right wing people are supposed to be hurt and attacked in order to benefit left wing activists.
00:43:08.000I mean, I know that's often how it works, but that's not the rules.
00:43:11.000The Twitter rules don't say, well, we'll ban your account if it means that that is sort of like a demerit and you lose credibility if you have the wrong views, according to Megan Squire.
00:43:24.000The rules are you can't do hate speech and incitement and, you know, everything else that we know about the Twitter TOS.
00:43:31.000Clearly, what she's saying is, I want him banned now.
00:43:35.000That's what it amounts to a big temper tantrum.
00:43:38.000She is wetting her adult diaper that she probably wears, and she's saying, I want him banned now if he got banned.
00:44:26.000You know, you would think that if you were going to write a hit piece saying that I should be deplatformed, you would say something like, well, here are Twitter's rules, and here's a tweet where he broke the rules.
00:45:24.000Now, I'll add to this about Megan Squire that she's got a pretty interesting background, too.
00:45:29.000And I'll read you this is an excerpt from a Wired article.
00:45:33.000Wired is like a pretty left wing source, pretty mainstream.
00:45:38.000They wrote a glowing profile about her.
00:45:40.000And this is what Wired had to say about Megan Squire, the so called SPLC doctor, the expert, weighing in on why I should be deplatformed.
00:45:50.000It says, Though Squire may be peaceful herself, Among her strongest allies are Antifa activists, the far left anti fascists.
00:46:00.000She doesn't consider herself to be Antifa and pushes digital activism instead of the group's black block tactics, in which bandana masked activists physically attack white supremacists.
00:46:16.000But she is sympathetic to Antifa's goal of silencing racist extremists and is unwilling to condemn Antifa's use of violence.
00:46:26.000Describing it as the last resort of a diversity of tactics.
00:46:31.000She's an intelligence operative of sorts in the battle against far right extremism, passing along information to those who might put it to real world use, who might weaponize it.
00:46:41.000Well, that's an interesting choice of words.
00:47:50.000Number four, Meghan Squire uses her digital activism to aid and abet Antifa so that they can weaponize with violence the intelligence that she gathers.
00:48:20.000So, they're not going to be doing any of the violence.
00:48:22.000They just simply dox Trump supporters, dox right wing people, and pass that information along to violent Antifa, who they're in love with, who will then take that and weaponize that violently.
00:50:16.000Let's take the word from a hardcore left wing Antifa intellectual on why her political opponents should be hindered in their political objectives.
00:50:26.000The article goes on it says, By mid December, the SPLC had compiled a list of 130 people and was contacting them to give them a chance to respond before informing their employers or taking legal action.
00:50:38.000Meanwhile, the left wing activist, whom Squire had separately sent data, was preparing to release certain names online.
00:51:02.000It says in the digital age, doxing is a particularly blunt tool, one meant to terrorize and threaten people in their most private spaces.
00:51:10.000The tactic allows anonymous hordes of any persuasion to practice vigilante justice on anyone they deem evil, problematic, or just plain annoying.
00:53:07.000Who dislike me personally and dislike my politics, they then govern what comes up when you Google my name and the preambulatory paragraph in every news article that will be written about me until the day that I die.
00:53:24.000You Google Nick Fuentes and it pulls up white nationalist because of far left radicals.
00:53:31.000Across the board, they decided that that would be so.
00:53:34.000People that hate my views, hate my faith, hate my ideology, hate me, want to see me harmed personally.
00:53:40.000They got to decide what comes up when you Google my name.
00:53:44.000And when you pull up an article from ABC or wherever else, they get to decide what's in that first paragraph when they say, well, at one time he made a cookie joke and he said something about Jim Crow and whatever.
00:53:57.000And then the whole society works like that.
00:53:59.000If I try to get a job, oh, here's the article.
00:54:03.000And I try to get a bank account, here's the article.
00:54:06.000I try to get credit card processing, here's the article.
00:54:46.000You can hear it in the article that people like Megan Squire and the rest of them are panicking.
00:54:51.000They would never say that because they know that if they said that, I would clip that and put that in a promotional video.
00:54:57.000They know that if they ever said it, I would screenshot it and post it on Twitter and say America First is inevitable.
00:55:04.000So they will never say Nick Fuentes is the most alarming thing happening in the right wing.
00:55:08.000They will never say we are scared shitless of the fact that Nick Fuentes is unstoppable and he is just plunging through, powering through everything we throw at him.
00:55:37.000The articles do all the talking the headlines, the hit pieces, the research documents from that jerk off they used to cover, Jaden at Kansas State.
00:55:50.000But all of that communicates the same message, which is they are terrified.
00:55:56.000AFPAC did exactly what it needed to, which is, you know, having Representative Gosar there, we know what a big deal that was, and they know what a big deal that was.
00:56:09.000You know, Megan, you know, whatever the guy's name is, Will Stakes, whatever, you know what a big deal that was, and you have no idea how we pulled it off, even though I've been banned from literally 20 different platforms, even though I'm banned from credit card processing, even though.
00:56:30.000I'm blacklisted from con ink institutions, even though I get more resistance than anybody.
00:56:37.000So they fall back on the tactics that don't work.
00:56:41.000They fall back on the old tactics, which is, I don't know, write up a hit piece, call him a white nationalist, write up an article, ask Twitter to ban him.
00:56:51.000Twitter responds, Well, he hasn't broken the rules.
01:00:34.000They feel the inexorability of what is coming.
01:00:39.000With or without me, with or without America first, with or without any of us, inside America and outside America, they fear what is coming, what is inevitably coming.
01:02:30.000Everything I'm saying here is bulletproof, you know, about the white nationalist smear, about Megan Squire, about the way the media works, and Dee Platinum.
01:03:16.000And Jared Holt quote tweeted that and he goes, Oh, well, Nick Flint is trying to convince you he's not a white nationalist.
01:03:22.000Well, here's an article where he says that he just doesn't want to be called that because he doesn't want to suffer the consequences of it.
01:03:28.000And it's this old article from like four years ago from Right Wing Watch that he wrote.
01:03:34.000And in the article, I'm quoted as saying something like, White nationalist doesn't actually have a meaning.
01:03:40.000It's just a word that is used by the left to smear people they don't like.
01:03:45.000It's just a tool to deplatform people.
01:04:17.000You know, a lot of these people are just stupid, but.
01:04:23.000But anyway, and I want you to know, I'm not pushing back on that for any reason other than, you know, we're at this stage where we've got a lot of attention on us right now, and there are people that are going to give us a fair shake.
01:04:38.000Conservatives are going to watch this show, and they may be wondering is this guy a white nationalist?
01:04:42.000Does this guy want like ethnic cleansing?
01:04:49.000And I'm not saying that for the media, I'm not saying that because I think the media will cover me favorably.
01:04:55.000I'm saying that, you know, and this is one reason, is because there are conservatives, there are right wing people and Christians who their views align totally with this show and with this movement.
01:05:06.000And they're going to find this show and they're going to say, what is this guy about?
01:05:11.000Is he this horrible, despicable, nasty guy?
01:05:14.000And so partly it's for people where you are going to convince them that you're America first and all this because we are, you know, because it's true.
01:05:24.000But number two, also then there's this deplatforming push.
01:05:27.000When people say you're a white nationalist, You got to understand, like I said, these are the magic words they need to line up so that they could bring that to Twitter, they could bring that to whoever, and punish me as a result of that.
01:05:39.000And it's not fair because it's not true.
01:05:41.000So I have to refute that characterization so that I can continue to have access to platforms and other things.
01:05:48.000You know, if I was a white nationalist, I would say it.
01:05:51.000If that were the case, I would say it, and I would say, suffer the consequences, whatever they may be.
01:06:16.000It's about setting the record straight for, you know, prospective fans of the show and setting the record straight for platforms in the event that that would make a difference on whether or not I retain access.
01:06:51.000And in this case, it's beneficial to push back.
01:06:54.000But normally, I say they're liars, they're disingenuous, they lie about everybody.
01:06:59.000You know, go and look up any right wing person's Wikipedia page and see what it says about them about Jack Posobic, about Baked Alaska, about Donald Trump, about anybody.
01:07:08.000And I say, let that tell the story for itself.
01:07:11.000But this is a rare instance when, you know, it's beneficial or necessary to throw it back.
01:07:19.000Normally, though, I say, I'm just going to keep saying my message, which is American nationalism, Christian nationalism.
01:08:47.000They want us to be totally under the thumb of a tyrannical left wing government.
01:08:51.000I mean, that's what they want us to do.
01:08:54.000But this, excuse me, Barry LaCroix, everybody.
01:09:01.000The rhetorical question is for non aligned people, people on the right, maybe even sympathetic people on the left, it is to undermine their stated values with their effective actions.
01:09:15.000Their stated value is that this is a free, open democracy.
01:10:57.000You're a white nationalist, separatist, you're violent, right?
01:11:01.000So, not only are we oppressed and we don't have a say and we cannot participate, it's troubling when we do.
01:11:09.000And we're relentlessly persecuted everywhere the leaders, the intellectuals, the donors, the participants.
01:11:16.000But if we try to opt out, if people say, okay, you know, clearly, clearly you don't want us to run the show, what if we go our separate ways?
01:11:25.000Then they say, nope, nope, no, you don't, you're staying right here.
01:11:30.000What they want is for us to be slaves.
01:11:33.000They want to trap us and imprison us in this country.
01:11:46.000You're a second class citizen and you can't run away.
01:11:49.000And you're going to keep working and you're going to keep paying your taxes and laying bricks and working in hospitals and schools and factories and dying in war.
01:11:58.000And you're going to keep doing what you do and you don't get a say and you can't leave.
01:13:31.000But I'm telling you that if 75 million people are not allowed an outlet, if they're not allowed some redress of their grievances, you very well may get a violent outcome.
01:13:57.000Not prescribing, not advocating, predicting how I think events will unfold given these conditions.
01:14:04.000Because that's the kind of system they're setting up.
01:14:09.000Anyone who tries to rise up gets shot down.
01:14:12.000Marjorie Taylor Greene, Donald Trump, Andrew Torba, Representative Gosar, Michelle Malkin, Nick Fuentes, Vince James, Jaden McNeil.
01:14:23.000Anyone that rises up, however moderate, however professional, legitimate, legal, However, amicable, however friendly, tolerant, you name it, they get intimidated, harassed, threatened, shut down, shut down by the system.
01:14:42.000And nobody is able to make it through and make reforms through the system.
01:14:45.000So then, if we can't, I mean, they literally want us to disappear from the face of the earth, and that's not going to happen.
01:14:52.000So, what happens when 75 million people who cannot go through the system, who cannot voice their opinions, they can't speak about it publicly?
01:15:41.000That's kind of, you know, if you were to be the architect of the implosion of America, I think that's how you would do it.
01:15:49.000Gradually increase the tension, increase the pressure, shut off all the release valves, shut off all the institutions that would allow for these things to express themselves in a peaceful and legitimate way.
01:16:54.000I think it was like April 2nd, 3rd, or 4th, 2019.
01:16:59.000The train wrecks TV debate that I had with Vosh and Destiny, and I was debating with Sargon, we debated this very point.
01:17:07.000I said, Look, you're making terrorism more likely when you censor people.
01:17:13.000Don't censor people, let them have a conversation.
01:17:15.000What's a right wing view that you're able to express?
01:17:18.000And like Destiny and the other guy, fat Ian Kaczynski, they were both like, well, I mean, they didn't say it outright, but this was the logical conclusion of what they said.
01:17:27.000They said, there is no right wing view that you can express.
01:22:27.000Oh, yeah, the white nationalist conference with me and Michelle and John Miller, where there were many black people and You know, non white people and Jewish people in attendance.
01:25:15.000Not literally, not literally dying, but, you know, people challenge me and often, look, I mean, in a lot of ways, I mean, there's room for valid criticism, but when people go ham on me, Everybody sees it for what it is.
01:26:49.000Fat Florida Paleocon says, Hey, Nick, just wanted to say I was on Trovo today and saw some people, mostly teens and young adults, and some had AF flags and AF merch, and they're streaming with a face cam, which I wouldn't recommend right now to be sheep among wolves.
01:29:27.000Polish American Groyper says, What are your thoughts on Jake Lloyd's professional hot dog eating ambitions?
01:29:32.000It's not often one sees a 38 year old in the sport, but Jake told me he thinks with enough practice he can take on Joey Chestnut, holder of the Nathan's World Record.
01:36:06.000I mean, any individual of that size, it's just naturally intimidating because the size itself inspires shock and awe in everybody who looks upon him.
01:36:17.000Joe the Boomer, the last of the Nephilim, truly.
01:36:20.000I didn't believe in the Nephilim until I met Joe the Boomer and I said, They didn't all die.
01:36:45.000I'll never forget when he busts through Scott Greer's door and he goes, Hey, Nikki, I forgot to give you this candy.
01:36:53.000And, you know, Scott Greer disputed my characterization of the event that he was having.
01:36:58.000So we're at Scott Greer's place, and we've got a lot of different people there.
01:37:03.000And a Scott Greer party, this is going to come as no surprise to you.
01:37:07.000But Scott Greer from the podcast, highly respected, when we go and visit him at his place and have a get together, everybody's sitting in a circle talking about like books, okay?
01:37:17.000Don't get me wrong, I say that in good fun.
01:37:44.000And I invite Joe the Boomer, and he comes bursting through the door in a bathrobe and slippers and a big floppy hat and a cigar in his hand.
01:40:53.000That's my whole life, and everyone gets mad at me.
01:40:57.000The FBI gets mad at me, the government gets mad at me, the media, the SPLC, the ADL, Charlie Kirk, Raheem Kassam, everybody my friends, my parents, my family, everybody that I know just gets mad at me.
01:44:08.000Yeah, I'll tell them to follow you back for sure.
01:44:11.000Toucan says, Jeremiah 119 They will fight against you, but they shall not prevail against you, for I am with you, declares the Lord to deliver you.
01:50:21.000White nationalist Nick J. Fuentes, aka Adolf Hitler, is using Twitter to recruit interns and help his movement as some middle aged person, she, her, says Nick Fuentes is a dangerous far right winger and banned from everywhere else, therefore should be banned from Twitter.
01:52:05.000Well, yeah, don't put that in writing, but thanks.
01:52:08.000AAA says, Nick, I have a really cool Among Us outfit I want to wear to the store, but I don't want to come off as gay slash believing in COVID.
01:54:15.000Kevin Brose says the left wants to make an example of you to intimidate honest conservatives back into the arms of the Daily Wire and Mitch McConnell.
01:54:22.000It's either back to the party of constant concessions or it's your job and eventually your life.
01:54:29.000Did you hear about the George Floyd civil suit with an acquittal on the horizon?
01:55:19.000Isaac James says, regarding the unfair treatment conservatives get on Wikipedia, they added a time you joked about the police kneeling on that activist's neck as evidence of racism.
01:55:45.000Fat Florida PaleoCon says, Pizza Hut delivery driver showing up to Nick's house like, hey, do I know you from somewhere?
01:55:51.000Nick quickly pays and closes the door.
01:55:54.000That's why you do no contact delivery.
01:55:57.000I literally will peek through the curtain and wait until they pull away before I open the door and get the food.
01:56:04.000That's the best thing to come out of COVID no contact delivery.
01:56:08.000That's the one way that COVID lockdown made our lives better.
01:56:11.000You don't have to do the awkward, like, open the door in your slippers and, like, kind of like hold it open while you, like, sign the thing.
01:56:20.000And then you, it's like a very awkward experience.
01:56:24.000It's not the porch setting is not optimized for a handoff like this.
01:56:32.000So the no contact delivery is really keen on.
01:56:34.000The one thing that they always do, though, and this is what you get with like, this is just what you get.
01:56:42.000These people, they put the food right in front of the fucking door.
01:56:46.000So what do you think happens when you open the door?
02:01:17.000Dragon Groypers is, I don't know if anyone ever said this, but Jake Lloyd is the name of the actor who played young Anakin in Phantom Menace.
02:04:21.000The racial conflict is not just about whites or blacks.
02:04:27.000It's the dynamics between all the different groups, the interrelatedness between them.
02:04:32.000And this is what we're going to get more of blacks and Mexicans, or blacks and Hispanics, Asians and blacks, whites and Hispanics, whites and blacks.
02:04:40.000I mean, all these different things are all flashpoints for conflict because there's friction between all the different groups based on proximity, shared spaces, shared resources, clashing cultures.
02:04:52.000And cultural norms and values, that's multiracial America.
02:04:59.000Massachusetts Sucks says, Eusebius wrote that the early Christians being persecuted would do what we would now call a T-pose and proclaim Christ.
02:05:11.000When we T-pose, let's keep the energy of those brave martyrs.