America First - Nicholas J. Fuentes - MIDTERM PRIMARIES - Arizona Groyper Delegation to WIN HUGE | America First Ep. 1039

00:00:02.000 Good evening, everybody.

00:00:03.000 You are watching America First.

00:00:05.000 My name is Nicholas J. Fuentes.

00:00:06.000 We have a great show for you tonight.

00:00:08.000 Very excited to be back with you here tonight on Tuesday.

00:00:12.000 We have a lot to talk about tonight, lots to get into.

00:00:16.000 Very important show.

00:00:18.000 And it's a big night.

00:00:20.000 Tonight, we are covering the primaries in the 2022 midterm elections, in particular, some very, very important races in Arizona, Washington State, Michigan, Missouri, and Kansas.

00:00:35.000 So, our feature story tonight, we'll be watching the results of those elections come in live, and hopefully, we get results in all the races that we're watching tonight.

00:00:48.000 I'm going to go as long as I can, and hopefully, we'll get some certainty about the ones that we're interested in.

00:00:55.000 But that'll be our coverage tonight watching the live results and talking a little bit about their significance as they come in.

00:01:04.000 We actually just got a huge call right before.

00:01:07.000 I went live just now.

00:01:10.000 Arizona's 9th district primary, congressional Republican primary, has been called for Representative Paul Gosar, the incumbent, which is one of the races we're watching.

00:01:22.000 Obviously, that's our favorite, or one of our favorite congressmen in the United States Congress.

00:01:28.000 And him winning the primary all but secures his seat as he will sail to reelection easily in the general.

00:01:36.000 So, huge 07.

00:01:37.000 Can we get some 07s in the chat for Representative Paul Gosar?

00:01:42.000 Huge W, huge victory.

00:01:44.000 America first, we're back.

00:01:47.000 And that's just the beginning. 0.62

00:01:48.000 That's already.

00:01:49.000 But it looks like we're going to get some other big victories tonight with Carrie Lake in Arizona, who is running for the Republican nomination for governor, as well as Blake Masters running for the Republican nomination for the Senate, as well as Wendy Rogers running in her district for the Republican nomination for Senate.

00:02:11.000 So it looks like all those.

00:02:13.000 America Firsters.

00:02:14.000 The entire Arizona America First delegation is on its way to a total, resounding, complete victory.

00:02:22.000 But we'll be watching all that as the official results come in, and that'll be later.

00:02:27.000 Our first story, though, we're going to talk about Nancy Pelosi's trip to Taiwan, and that's something that's been going on now for the past few days.

00:02:35.000 Didn't get to cover it last night.

00:02:37.000 I was doing that debate on Modern Day Debate, which I'll talk a little bit about that before we get into the news.

00:02:45.000 And so, before we get into our coverage of the primary results, we're going to kill a little bit of time while we wait for those.

00:02:51.000 I think the polls are all closed, but we have to wait for the votes to come in and for them to be counted.

00:02:57.000 And so, in the meantime, we're going to talk about Nancy Pelosi, who is on the highest profile visit of a U.S. diplomat or a U.S. government official to Taiwan in 25 years.

00:03:10.000 And if you've been watching the news, you see that Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi landed in Taipei last night.

00:03:19.000 And this is an extremely contentious move, major provocation to China.

00:03:26.000 And so she's there against the wishes of the White House, obviously against the wishes of China.

00:03:33.000 And people are watching very closely what China's response will be to that, if anything.

00:03:38.000 They're already conducting massive military drills all around Taiwan, as well as sending fighter jets over the strait that separates China from Taiwan.

00:03:48.000 So we'll talk about that too.

00:03:49.000 It should be a pretty good show.

00:03:51.000 I'm excited to be back.

00:03:54.000 I was planning on doing a show last night, but this debate that I was on just went all night.

00:04:00.000 And so I told you last week that I would be on this debate with Lauren Southern, Alex Stein, and then some other people who I don't even really know who most of them were Stardust, and ultimately Destiny wound up joining the panel.

00:04:16.000 That was an exciting surprise.

00:04:18.000 So I was planning on doing the debate last night, and if it ended early, I was going to go on and do a show, but the debate started at 8 o'clock Central.

00:04:27.000 It went on until like 11 30 midnight.

00:04:31.000 Three and a half hour, four hour debate.

00:04:34.000 And at that point, I said, you know what, I'm just going to bed.

00:04:36.000 It was a long debate, it was a slog.

00:04:38.000 So forgive me that I did not follow through with the show.

00:04:42.000 I thought that was enough content for one night.

00:04:46.000 So that was last night.

00:04:48.000 But it's good to be back.

00:04:49.000 Before I get into the news, though, I just want to remind you to follow me here on Cozy.

00:04:54.000 Smash the follow button to get a push notification whenever I go live.

00:04:58.000 Also, follow me on Gavin Telegram and Truth Social.

00:05:02.000 The links are down below.

00:05:04.000 And I just actually added a button for Truth Social so you could follow me there.

00:05:09.000 And I want to talk a little bit about the debate.

00:05:12.000 My hair's a little bit messed up, also.

00:05:17.000 Is that better?

00:05:17.000 How's that?

00:05:20.000 A little bit better.

00:05:25.000 And uh oh.

00:05:26.000 Looks like there may be a big upset in Washington State.

00:05:29.000 Results are coming in 7% reporting.

00:05:32.000 And it looks like Joe Ken not doing so hot right out of the gate.

00:05:35.000 But we're going to take a look.

00:05:36.000 We're going to watch that.

00:05:37.000 I'm just glancing over at my screen.

00:05:39.000 While I'm fixing my hair, looking at Washington.

00:05:42.000 Looks like maybe not going so well there, but we're going to wait and see.

00:05:47.000 So, anyway, before we get into all of that news, I want to talk a little bit about the debate, but not too much.

00:05:54.000 It was a long debate, three and a half hours.

00:05:57.000 So, I don't know how many of you tuned in last night, but it looked like we had a pretty good turnout between all the platforms.

00:06:03.000 It looked like we had close to 10,000 people watching the debate between Lauren Southern, Destiny, Baked Alaska, Modern day debate, Stardust, everybody streaming it looked like we were getting about 10,000 live viewers, which makes it one of the bigger streams we've done in a long time.

00:06:22.000 So that was very exciting.

00:06:24.000 And unfortunately, I thought it was going to be me versus Lauren Southern.

00:06:30.000 That's kind of what I was led to believe.

00:06:34.000 And that is kind of what I was hyping it up to be.

00:06:38.000 And that was supposed to be my big confrontation with Lauren Southern.

00:06:42.000 And then she was on my team, so I couldn't even argue with her. 0.76

00:06:46.000 And she was totally nice to me.

00:06:48.000 So I don't know what that was all about.

00:06:51.000 Because if you're not following all the drama, and I'll just give you a brief summary.

00:06:57.000 Last night, I go on the debate.

00:06:59.000 It's hosted by Modern Day Debate, which is a debate channel on YouTube. 1.00

00:07:04.000 And it was me, Alex Stein, Lauren Southern, this girl, Stardust, this other girl named Marie, this Tranny.

00:07:13.000 And then some anarchist guy who I don't even know.

00:07:16.000 And then this guy, Doobie, who was on the last debate, and he's in the biggest politics Discord server on Discord.

00:07:24.000 So it was a big debate.

00:07:25.000 It was like eight people.

00:07:27.000 And what I was told on Thursday or Friday was that it was me, maybe I just interpreted it this way.

00:07:36.000 I thought it was going to be me versus Lauren Southern.

00:07:39.000 Because months ago, Lauren Southern was trashing me in America First and calling me a catboy and all this other stuff. 1.00

00:07:47.000 And then I was trashing her. 1.00

00:07:49.000 And I said, she changed her name and she got plastic surgery. 1.00

00:07:54.000 And that means that she's got a fake name, a fake face, and that makes her a fake bitch. 1.00

00:08:00.000 And so I put her on blast and I said, oh, yeah, well, you got plastic surgery and you changed your name and you're a grifter. 1.00

00:08:07.000 You only came back and threw everybody under the bus to make a quick buck and you're a centrist. 0.77

00:08:13.000 So there's been this war of words going on now for months between me and Lauren Southern, my bitter enemy and rival.

00:08:21.000 That's why I go into the debate last night thinking, okay, game on.

00:08:25.000 You know, now it's time to beat up a woman, verbally, of course, which I have no problem doing at all. 0.99

00:08:33.000 But then I get in the debate, and right out of the gate, the moderator says that we're on the same team. 1.00

00:08:41.000 And I'm like, what the heck?

00:08:43.000 And I said that.

00:08:44.000 I said, I thought I was supposed to be arguing against Lauren Southern.

00:08:48.000 And she goes, I know, right, Souri, blah, And then she's all nice to me.

00:08:54.000 Then she's like, Well, that's a really interesting perspective, and let me ask you some questions and all this.

00:09:02.000 And I'm not gonna, you know, if she's gonna be friendly, we've never engaged directly in a hostile way. 0.98

00:09:10.000 I'm not gonna, if she comes on the debate and says, hey, you know, and she's sort of friendly and flirty, I'm not gonna be like, all right, well, you know what, you're ugly. 0.94

00:09:20.000 So it kind of disarmed me, it was disarming. 0.99

00:09:23.000 And she's on my team, I'm there to win, I'm there to kill. 0.64

00:09:28.000 So it put me in a bad spot. 0.71

00:09:31.000 And so now, I don't know, I guess that confrontation has to happen later.

00:09:36.000 And we'll see how that goes.

00:09:37.000 I'm actually planning on doing a stream with her and Destiny, just her and Destiny, later this week.

00:09:44.000 So that should be very interesting.

00:09:46.000 And some have suggested that maybe we should all do a podcast together.

00:09:51.000 And I think that's very interesting.

00:09:53.000 I think it's an interesting proposition.

00:09:56.000 So we'll see how that plays out.

00:09:57.000 The saga is ongoing, okay?

00:09:59.000 The me.

00:10:00.000 Me and Lauren Southern and Stephen Bonnell in this sick love triangle, where me and Destiny are sort of like bros.

00:10:08.000 We're sort of like BFFs, best friends since childhood.

00:10:13.000 You know, we're sort of like wrestling around and, you know, we're lab partners in science class and high school and college roommates.

00:10:21.000 And we're sort of like best friends like that.

00:10:23.000 You know, we know each other's favorite colors and favorite movies.

00:10:26.000 We know each other's order like McDonald's.

00:10:27.000 And, you know, we're just, we have that connection like that.

00:10:31.000 We're just like BFFs.

00:10:33.000 And then you have this Lauren Southern character into the mix where Stephen has feelings for her.

00:10:40.000 She's in love with me, but also she hates me.

00:10:44.000 And I sort of hate her, but I'm nice to her because I know that Stephen has a thing for her.

00:10:50.000 So we're all sort of in this weird love triangle.

00:10:52.000 We're all in this sort of sick triangle of friendship, but also desire and romance.

00:10:59.000 It's a very strange thing.

00:11:01.000 I think the chemistry would be very good for a show.

00:11:05.000 You know, I don't have to like her, but I do have to deal with her because Steven likes her and we are best friends.

00:11:11.000 And she's got to deal with me because we're best friends.

00:11:14.000 And I think that dynamic, that chemistry is going to be very interesting, maybe to set up a regular thing.

00:11:20.000 I don't know.

00:11:21.000 So we'll see how it goes, but that's a setup.

00:11:24.000 So that was the one aspect of the debate, which I was a little surprised at.

00:11:28.000 She comes on the show and she's like, hey, we haven't talked in a long time and all this.

00:11:33.000 And I tried to get some barbs in there, but she wasn't biting. 0.99

00:11:36.000 So I was like, I'm not going to be the jerk. 0.92

00:11:40.000 So, anyway, so we're going to do another stream, I think, later this week. 0.82

00:11:46.000 And maybe on Cozy, on Destiny's Cozy channel.

00:11:48.000 I'm not sure.

00:11:49.000 I don't know all the details yet, but we have that to look forward to.

00:11:52.000 Besides that, honestly, I had a great time last night.

00:11:56.000 It was a long debate, it was like three and a half hours, but it was fun.

00:12:00.000 It was a funny debate, it was a lot of fun.

00:12:05.000 Destiny wasn't supposed to be on it, but he joined in at the very end.

00:12:09.000 And I thought it was great.

00:12:10.000 I thought it was a lot of laughs.

00:12:12.000 I thought it was sort of Some interesting back and forth, and I saw some people were saying that it was a waste of time and it was kind of like a bad format to have a lot of these people that nobody really knows.

00:12:26.000 Like, there was this anarchist guy, this bearded guy, I don't even know his name, and I don't really know anything about him.

00:12:34.000 And he was on there just talking and talking, and people in the audience are like, This is just a waste of time.

00:12:40.000 Who cares about this guy?

00:12:41.000 We came to see Nick, Lauren, Alex, Destiny.

00:12:46.000 But I actually kind of like the format because it keeps it engaging.

00:12:51.000 When there's like eight people and everybody's fighting for airtime, it creates more content.

00:12:58.000 And also, it also creates fodder because the people themselves become the content.

00:13:04.000 And it's like that guy was maybe the least famous guy on the panel.

00:13:08.000 And I don't think anybody knows who he is.

00:13:10.000 But he also provided some of the best content because he was just a total goofball and we got to make fun of him.

00:13:16.000 So.

00:13:17.000 So, I really liked it.

00:13:18.000 I thought it was a real return to form.

00:13:20.000 You know, we've had a lot of drama lately, and things got really intense after January 6th, and still feeling the repercussions from that.

00:13:32.000 But I felt like last night it was like Internet Bloodsports.

00:13:35.000 It was like 2018.

00:13:37.000 It was just fun and funny and bringing a lot of different kinds of people together, big personalities clashing.

00:13:45.000 So, I thought it was good.

00:13:47.000 I like the direction that that's taking.

00:13:47.000 I kind of like that.

00:13:49.000 So,.

00:13:50.000 So it was fun.

00:13:52.000 And the subject of the debate was about women and the war on women or something like that. 0.97

00:13:58.000 And honestly, I mean, the topics are so asinine like, it's a war on women. 0.96

00:14:03.000 And at one point, I think the tranny, who honestly, that was a little bit weird, okay? 0.99

00:14:12.000 Because that tranny didn't really look like a tranny. 0.98

00:14:14.000 I don't know that person's name. 0.97

00:14:16.000 I think it's a guy who became a girl.

00:14:21.000 You know, at one point, anyway, so that was a weird situation. 0.78

00:14:24.000 But anyway, but this trans guy jumps in at the very end. 0.99

00:14:29.000 This is just to show you how ridiculous the debate is. 0.87

00:14:31.000 And he's making these arguments about, oh, well, the reason the wage gap between men and women exists is because men and women choose different jobs.

00:14:40.000 And that's okay.

00:14:41.000 And I'm like, okay, what is it, 2015 again?

00:14:44.000 Am I watching Dave Rubin?

00:14:45.000 Like, I remember hearing these talking points in high school.

00:14:48.000 Are we not so far past that? 0.94

00:14:52.000 That's the debate, the gender pay gap. 0.75

00:14:54.000 Are you kidding me?

00:14:57.000 And the same exact talking point.

00:14:58.000 He unironically is saying at the end, at the three hour mark, well, the reason there's a pay gap is because it's looking at all of men and women, and men and women make different decisions.

00:15:11.000 So you're not comparing apples to apples, it's apples to oranges because men choose high paying jobs and women choose low paying jobs. 0.97

00:15:20.000 I'm like, are you fucking kidding me? 0.96

00:15:22.000 Like,. 1.00

00:15:24.000 This is just ridiculous. 0.60

00:15:26.000 So, the subject is not really the important stuff. 0.97

00:15:29.000 I mean, that's fun and all, and that's the reason for the debate, but it was such a silly debate, or at least the questions posed were sort of silly.

00:15:41.000 And anyway, so that was that, but it was a fun debate.

00:15:44.000 So I hope everybody enjoyed that.

00:15:46.000 I'd like to do more of those.

00:15:47.000 I think it's sort of a good thing we have going with modern day debate.

00:15:51.000 Maybe we'll see if we could get him on Cozy, because I know there are some limitations, because he is on Twitch, he is on YouTube, they have very restrictive terms of service.

00:16:00.000 So, maybe we could get him on Cozy and make it like a regular thing because it's fun.

00:16:07.000 You know, the last one we had with Alex Stein was really fun.

00:16:10.000 This one was great.

00:16:12.000 So, and he emailed me today and said, hey, that was one of the most fun streams I've ever had.

00:16:17.000 I said, yeah, I totally agree.

00:16:19.000 Anyway, so that was that.

00:16:21.000 I hope you guys enjoyed.

00:16:22.000 I thought it was fun.

00:16:24.000 That's when you remember why I'm the guy.

00:16:27.000 It's because I'm literally the best at this.

00:16:29.000 When you watch debates like that, it's like, oh, yeah, because I mean, I'm just unmatched.

00:16:34.000 When it comes to charisma, when it comes to debates, or at least when it comes to rhetoric and being funny and all that.

00:16:43.000 So that was good to remind people hey, that's why I sit behind the desk. 0.99

00:16:48.000 That's why I rule the Groyper minions. 0.81

00:16:52.000 So, anyway, but I want to get on into the news because we got some big news tonight.

00:16:56.000 And I want to move quickly through this Taiwan story so we can get to our election results.

00:17:00.000 That's the big thing.

00:17:02.000 But still waiting on some of these polls to close.

00:17:04.000 Let me just double check on Telegram and see if we have any updates.

00:17:09.000 If we have any calls.

00:17:13.000 And it looks like, and this is interesting, with 57% reported in Washington's 3rd district, no call, but it looks like Joe Kent is in last place.

00:17:27.000 He is behind both the Democrat as well as the Republican incumbent.

00:17:31.000 So we're watching that one very closely.

00:17:34.000 That one matters a lot to me.

00:17:37.000 So we'll see how that one goes.

00:17:38.000 So, anyway, so I want to move quickly through this week and get to that.

00:17:42.000 But our first story is about Taiwan, and I'm sure you've seen this.

00:17:45.000 Nancy Pelosi, we're all watching and waiting for her to get shot out of the sky by China, and unfortunately that didn't happen.

00:17:53.000 But Nancy Pelosi is on an official visit to Taiwan, and this is supposed to be some kind of really symbolic rebuke of not just Chinese aggression in Asia, but also it's a rebuke of autocracy.

00:18:13.000 And it is supposed to be some really important message about America's solidarity with democracies.

00:18:22.000 And the backstory behind this, behind China and Taiwan, we can get into that a little bit first to set the stage.

00:18:31.000 So in 1949, the communists win the Chinese Civil War and they take over the Chinese mainland, ruling from Beijing.

00:18:41.000 The nationalists take over Taiwan, and Taiwan and China split.

00:18:47.000 In 1949, and they're two separate governments, but they both call themselves China.

00:18:55.000 So the communists rule mainland China from Beijing, and the nationalists rule the island of Taiwan, which is just off the coast of China from Taipei in Taiwan.

00:19:06.000 And they both claim to be the legitimate government of China.

00:19:11.000 The communists in Beijing say that we are China and we rule Taiwan, but we're sort of permitting them to exist.

00:19:19.000 And Taiwan says that they're China, that they actually have a claim to all of China, even mainland China, but that they are the government in exile.

00:19:31.000 And so this is a diplomatic row which has been going on ever since 1949.

00:19:36.000 And the official U.S. policy, which goes back about 50 years, and this is all technical diplomatic stuff, the official American policy towards Taiwan and China is what's called the One China policy.

00:19:51.000 And so formally, they recognize Beijing as the legitimate China and the government in Beijing as a legitimate government of China.

00:20:01.000 But indirectly and quietly, and you could say almost clandestinely, they support the government of Taiwan diplomatically as well as militarily and economically.

00:20:13.000 And so we do trade with Taiwan and we've given them defensive military capabilities and we have given them something like a security guarantee.

00:20:24.000 It's a halfway security guarantee.

00:20:26.000 We maintain a deliberate ambiguity about our posture towards defending Taiwan.

00:20:32.000 We have not explicitly said that we would intervene to defend Taiwan from China.

00:20:37.000 We've also not said that we won't intervene to defend Taiwan against China.

00:20:42.000 And that represents a security and diplomatic support.

00:20:47.000 So that's the backstory on Taiwan and China and the current diplomatic situation.

00:20:53.000 Of course, the other situation.

00:20:56.000 Which is relevant historically is what is going on this year in Eastern Europe.

00:21:01.000 And I've said this on the show before, so I'm not going to go into great detail.

00:21:06.000 But of course, this year, in February of this year, 2022, Russia invaded Ukraine.

00:21:13.000 And this represents a very similar situation, not perfectly, but similar enough to what is happening right now between the United States and China over Taiwan.

00:21:28.000 In the war in Ukraine, you have a very powerful, you could say a superpower, which is antagonistic towards the United States and Russia.

00:21:38.000 You have Ukraine, which, by a sort of diplomatic technicality, is effectively and formally independent from Russia, but that's not truly acknowledged by Russia.

00:21:50.000 It's sort of reluctantly acknowledged by Russia, and Russia has always wanted Ukraine, as well as the other former Soviet Union countries, returned under the control of Moscow.

00:22:02.000 And so, in the same way that Russia is a great power antagonistic to the United States, so is China.

00:22:09.000 And in the same way that Ukraine became independent by a fluke in 1991, in a way that Russia regrets and is reluctant to acknowledge, it's a very similar situation with Taiwan, where it's a military fluke that Taiwan became effectively independent in 1949.

00:22:28.000 And this is regrettable in the opinion of the Chinese, and they have designs to take Taiwan back. 0.74

00:22:34.000 You've also got the same. 0.91

00:22:37.000 Proxy conflict going on, where over the years the United States has given increasing support to Ukraine as a proxy of American influence and exerted both hard and soft power in Ukraine, giving them defensive military capabilities as well as pouring money into Ukraine through NGOs and through the State Department to prop up a sham democracy as a bulwark against Russian power in the region.

00:23:03.000 In the same way that the United States is doing to the so called democratic government of Taiwan.

00:23:08.000 Pouring in defensive military capabilities, supporting with NGOs, and so on.

00:23:14.000 And in both cases, these represent fault lines of the old American hegemonic world order, which are changing as a result of Russia and China rising relatively in the world against the United States.

00:23:31.000 And what do I mean by this?

00:23:33.000 In the 1990s, the United States could exert its influence right up to the formal borders of former great powers like Russia and China.

00:23:44.000 The United States could effectively extend and project power right up to Russia's border, its Russian Ukraine border, by exerting control over Ukraine.

00:23:54.000 And it could do the same to China, right up to their maritime border with Taiwan, and do things that are provocative and do things that are against the sovereignty, the claimed sovereignty of Russia and China.

00:24:08.000 As Russia and China have risen economically and militarily over the last 30 years, they're able to push back against America's borders.

00:24:18.000 Against America's claimed borders, its projected power to the furthest reaches of the globe.

00:24:25.000 And where are they going to push back?

00:24:27.000 Russia will push back in Ukraine by taking Crimea in 2014 and trying to claim control over the Donbass since 2014.

00:24:38.000 And how is China exerting its newfound power, relative power, against the United States?

00:24:44.000 It's going to do so in the South China Sea and in Taiwan.

00:24:49.000 So that's the recent history, and that's the setup for the trip and why this is relevant.

00:24:54.000 Now, when Russia invaded Ukraine, this was a major challenge to American global hegemony.

00:25:00.000 America says we defend democracies globally, and we defend Ukraine, and we stand for liberalism globally.

00:25:07.000 And so, if Russia attacks Ukraine, this is an attack on America's claim in Ukraine, America's claim to defend democracies and sovereignty worldwide.

00:25:19.000 And that's a major blow then to America's credibility.

00:25:23.000 And all these other borderlands, all these other countries where America is pushing to the furthest reaches and projecting power to the furthest extent that it can right up against the borders of its adversaries, those other democratic proxy states are going to say, well, if Russia could invade Ukraine, what would stop Iran from invading Israel?

00:25:44.000 What would stop China from invading Taiwan?

00:25:46.000 What would stop any belligerent rogue state from attacking its neighbors?

00:25:52.000 So now, because America has taken unequivocally a major loss with this ongoing Russian invasion of Ukraine, they've got to kind of recapture the initiative and restore their credibility and their image in the world by bolstering Taiwan.

00:26:11.000 That's the backdrop of the visit from Nancy Pelosi into Taiwan.

00:26:20.000 And I'm watching the results come in.

00:26:24.000 And let's see, do we have any results?

00:26:27.000 I don't know if we have a call yet.

00:26:30.000 Let me just take a look really quickly.

00:26:33.000 Okay, so still no update.

00:26:34.000 By the way, I'm watching my notes over here.

00:26:36.000 I'm watching our Politics Telegram channel, and they're in there talking about it, but it looks like still no call.

00:26:44.000 So we're watching eagerly for that one.

00:26:48.000 In any case, that's the backdrop for the visit, which is what we're covering right now.

00:26:55.000 So I want to read a news story.

00:26:56.000 So, in the midst of all this, Nancy Pelosi. Is visiting Taiwan, and it's a very provocative move.

00:27:03.000 No similarly high ranking government official from America has visited Taiwan in 25 years.

00:27:11.000 The last time an American government official of that stature visited Taiwan, it was when Newt Gingrich visited Taiwan 25 years ago, when he was the Speaker of the House.

00:27:23.000 And it's very symbolic in a way, because 25 years ago, in 1997, you could say that the United States was at or near its peak.

00:27:35.000 Of relative global power.

00:27:37.000 And we could push China around and we could push Russia around.

00:27:40.000 We could really do whatever we wanted.

00:27:42.000 And all the countries put together, and the next most powerful country would not be able to resist.

00:27:50.000 So we could take Taiwan.

00:27:51.000 We could visit Taiwan.

00:27:53.000 We could take Ukraine.

00:27:53.000 We could take the Baltic states.

00:27:56.000 We could invade Iraq and Afghanistan and Niger and Pakistan and Syria and Yemen and Somalia at the same time.

00:28:04.000 And nobody could.

00:28:06.000 Really, offer any kind of meaningful resistance.

00:28:09.000 Well, here we are 25 years later.

00:28:11.000 That's the last time that the Speaker of the House visited Taiwan and that climate and that global power dynamic.

00:28:18.000 And here we are 25 years later.

00:28:22.000 25 years ago, Russia was poor and corrupt and violent, and President Putin had not been elected yet, and it was basically a fire sale where the sham democracy there was selling off all the state assets to.

00:28:40.000 Oligarchs and foreign powers, and basically the entire country of Russia, was being looted because the collapse of the Soviet Union left them very vulnerable to foreign influence in the form of foreign governments and foreign investors.

00:28:57.000 Same thing with China.

00:28:59.000 China was, at that time, a developing country and still a very weak country militarily and economically.

00:29:08.000 Now it's come full circle 25 years later where Russia has been rebuilt.

00:29:13.000 They have a new czar.

00:29:15.000 They have a strong economy.

00:29:16.000 They have a strong military.

00:29:18.000 Their relative and absolute global firepower has increased substantially.

00:29:25.000 Their standard of living, their economy has increased substantially, and they've reasserted their sovereignty over Ukraine.

00:29:32.000 Similarly, 25 years later, China, because of free trade policies, is vastly richer, now has about 80% of the United States' productive economic capacity.

00:29:45.000 It also has.

00:29:46.000 The second most powerful military in the world, outspending now Russia.

00:29:52.000 And that's the backdrop for this visit.

00:29:54.000 So I'll read this article.

00:29:55.000 This is from Fox News.

00:29:58.000 It says, U.S. House Speaker Nancy Pelosi arrived in Taiwan late Tuesday, becoming the highest ranking American official in 25 years to visit the self ruled island claimed by China, which quickly announced that it would conduct military maneuvers in retaliation for her presence.

00:30:15.000 Pelosi flew in aboard a U.S. Air Force passenger jet.

00:30:19.000 And she was greeted on the tarmac at Taipei's International Airport by Taiwan's foreign minister and other Taiwanese and American officials.

00:30:28.000 She posed for photos before her motorcade whisked her unseen into the parking garage of a hotel.

00:30:34.000 Her visit ratcheted up tension between China and the United States because China claims Taiwan as part of its territory and it views visits by foreign government officials as recognition of the island's sovereignty.

00:30:50.000 The governments of the world formally don't recognize Taiwan.

00:30:56.000 And in doing so, if they had done that, it would upset China.

00:31:00.000 China is a powerful, influential country, so states don't want to do that.

00:31:06.000 They technically don't support Taiwan, but when, for example, the American government sends the Speaker of the House, which is the third or fourth in line for the presidency in terms of succession, it's almost like the United States is acting like Taiwan is legitimate.

00:31:25.000 When we send the third or fourth in line for the presidency on an official visit, To a disputed territory, although we're not formally recognizing Taiwan, that's the kind of thing that you would do to a formally recognized state, to a sovereign state.

00:31:43.000 That's a very belligerent action.

00:31:45.000 And we haven't done anything like that in decades.

00:31:48.000 But these are the extraordinary circumstances.

00:31:50.000 It's about reasserting that waning American influence from 25 years ago, the last time that we did that.

00:31:59.000 That's why China is upset.

00:32:02.000 It says the Biden administration and Pelosi says that the United States remains committed to the so called One China policy, which recognizes Beijing but allows informal relations and defense ties with Taiwan.

00:32:15.000 The speaker framed the trip as part of a broader mission at a time when, quote, the world faces a choice between autocracy and democracy.

00:32:24.000 Her visit comes after she led a congressional delegation to the Ukrainian capital of Kiev in the spring, and it serves as a capstone to her many years of promoting democracy abroad.

00:32:35.000 The Biden administration did not explicitly urge Pelosi to call off her plans.

00:32:41.000 It repeatedly and publicly assured Beijing that the visit did not signal any change in U.S. policy.

00:32:47.000 Soon after Pelosi's arrival, China announced a series of military operations and drills, which followed promises of, quote, resolute and strong measures if Pelosi went through with her visit.

00:32:59.000 The People's Liberation Army said the maneuvers would take place in the waters and skies near Taiwan and includes the firing of long range ammunition in the Taiwan Strait.

00:33:11.000 China said, This action is a solemn deterrent against the recent major escalation of negative actions of the United States on the Taiwan issue and a serious warning to the Taiwan independence forces seeking independence.

00:33:29.000 Twenty six Republican lawmakers issued a statement of rare bipartisan support for the Democratic speaker.

00:33:35.000 The statement called trips by members of Congress to Taiwan routine.

00:33:40.000 And Mitch McConnell. Backed Pelosi's visit as a display of support for Taiwan's democracy and said any allegations that her itinerary was provocative were utterly absurd.

00:33:53.000 So, I mean, we don't need to go into too much more detail, but that's the story, and this is where we're at.

00:33:59.000 Nancy Pelosi is going to Taiwan in a very desperate bid to shore up the American posture and American stature in the world.

00:34:12.000 And all this rhetoric about autocracy and democracy, it's a thinly veiled barb at Russia, it's a threat to China.

00:34:19.000 The details are not really extremely important.

00:34:23.000 What matters is the changing global landscape, which is a very general, very broad thing, which has been going on for 30 years.

00:34:32.000 And it's understandable, I think, why the U.S. government would undertake this kind of a play.

00:34:38.000 This is supposed to be a very tactful, Diplomatic maneuver to try to deter Chinese military intervention in Taiwan.

00:34:48.000 And the reason they're doing that, this is not a maneuver that is born out of strength.

00:34:53.000 It's born out of weakness.

00:34:55.000 The United States and China and Taiwan and Russia and Ukraine and every country in the world is acutely aware of what is at stake in Ukraine.

00:35:06.000 And what is at stake?

00:35:07.000 We've been over it a million times.

00:35:10.000 Russia, by invading Ukraine against the wishes of the United States, against their empty threats, against their idle posturing, And Russia continuing the invasion of Ukraine in spite of sanctions from NATO of an unprecedented nature,

00:35:28.000 in spite of NATO and American military support of Ukraine, diplomatic support of Ukraine, what that represents is a stark rejection that America retains any semblance of global hegemony or control over the world.

00:35:46.000 If Russia can successfully invade Ukraine, Seize territory and do that against the wishes of the United States, and in spite of everything the United States tried to do to stop it, short of going to war, what does that communicate?

00:36:01.000 It communicates that America and its threats are weak and empty, and the soft power that we think we can exert through sanctions and moral high ground and diplomacy is not what we say it is. 0.57

00:36:16.000 And it also says that America is not willing to go to war with nuclear powers.

00:36:22.000 Over fringe states.

00:36:25.000 Fringe meaning states that are on the periphery between the West and the antagonists against the West, which would be China, Russia, Iran, Venezuela, Bolivia, Nicaragua, to name a handful of them, to name the most important ones, North Korea.

00:36:42.000 And so that's what's at stake in Ukraine. 0.57

00:36:44.000 And every country is acutely aware of the significance of Russia's invasion with the sort of relative impunity they're getting away with it. 0.55

00:36:54.000 And of course, because the situation in Taiwan is so analogous, well, the Chinese are saying, hey, if Russia can invade Ukraine, then we can invade Taiwan.

00:37:04.000 Russia invaded Ukraine, and America was not willing to go to war.

00:37:09.000 They were willing to send military means and tell Putin that he's very bad and impolite and sanction and so on, but they weren't willing to go to war.

00:37:20.000 And probably the United States would not even be willing to do to China what they've done to Russia.

00:37:26.000 The United States can sanction Russia because the United States is not really dependent on Russia.

00:37:32.000 And the United States has sanctioned Russia all the time.

00:37:35.000 They really can't do that to China because the United States is far more dependent on China than they are on Russia.

00:37:41.000 And so in Beijing, they're saying look, Russia invaded Ukraine.

00:37:46.000 And even as crazy as the neocons are in the United States, they're not going to go to war with Russia over Ukraine.

00:37:53.000 They're not going to intervene directly, or at least.

00:37:56.000 Publicly, they're not going to intervene directly.

00:37:59.000 And the sanctions, even the minimal things they are doing to fight Russia, they couldn't even do that to China.

00:38:07.000 And they're not working against Russia anyway.

00:38:10.000 So Beijing says now's the time.

00:38:12.000 We've wanted Taiwan for 70 years.

00:38:15.000 We're far more powerful than we were 70 years ago.

00:38:19.000 We're far more powerful than we were 30 years ago.

00:38:21.000 The United States is weak, it's constrained, it's already involved in a proxy war with a great power, it's still at war in Iraq.

00:38:30.000 The United States economy is still struggling after COVID.

00:38:33.000 We could take Taiwan and the United States wouldn't go to war with us over it.

00:38:37.000 We could take Taiwan.

00:38:39.000 They couldn't even sanction us. 0.57

00:38:40.000 We could take Taiwan and maybe they couldn't do anything about it.

00:38:43.000 That's what they're thinking in Beijing.

00:38:46.000 And we are thinking the same thing.

00:38:49.000 They know that.

00:38:51.000 We know that they know that.

00:38:53.000 And they know we know that they know that.

00:38:56.000 And so they're provoking Taiwan and making preparations, probably to an extent that we're not even aware of, that maybe the U.S. intelligence agencies and Defense Department are aware of.

00:39:07.000 And so the United States going out to Taiwan is like saying, okay, we're serious.

00:39:13.000 Don't invade Taiwan if you do.

00:39:16.000 That's going to be a big no no.

00:39:18.000 We're going to be really mad about that.

00:39:21.000 But the visit, like I said, is not an expression of strength.

00:39:25.000 If they wanted to show strength, they would recognize Taiwan as sovereign.

00:39:29.000 And they would say, we're going to give a security guarantee to Taiwan.

00:39:33.000 And if China invades, then we're going to war.

00:39:36.000 That would be a message of strength.

00:39:38.000 And China may back down, they may think twice.

00:39:41.000 But China knows, and the United States knows, that the United States can't do that.

00:39:46.000 Because the United States cannot go to war with China.

00:39:49.000 And so they cannot go to war with China over Taiwan.

00:39:53.000 And the United States can't even really sanction China.

00:39:56.000 They couldn't sanction China eight months ago before the war with Russia, and they certainly can't sanction China now.

00:40:04.000 They cannot, it's just not in the cards for the United States.

00:40:08.000 And so when we send this delegation to Taiwan, this is a very weak thing, and it's almost the inverse of what we did 25 years ago.

00:40:17.000 25 years ago, we sent a delegation there daring China, saying, This is the liberal democratic world order.

00:40:24.000 We won.

00:40:25.000 We defeated Russia.

00:40:26.000 We defeated communism.

00:40:28.000 And it's our world now.

00:40:29.000 And you play by our rules. 0.90

00:40:32.000 And China couldn't do anything about it.

00:40:34.000 Here we are 25 years later with a transparently weak attempt at deterrence, just about the only thing that we can afford right now.

00:40:44.000 We can't threaten them.

00:40:46.000 We can't threaten them with hard power, soft power.

00:40:49.000 Military actions, sanctions.

00:40:51.000 We can't even give a defense guarantee.

00:40:52.000 We can't even recognize Taiwan.

00:40:55.000 We can do is send a foreign diplomat and hope that China doesn't shoot him out of the sky and start a world war. 0.84

00:41:01.000 That's what's going on here.

00:41:03.000 And so it's actually a very symbolic closing chapter and epilogue to American hegemony because Nancy Pelosi can leave Taiwan and China could take it. 0.62

00:41:15.000 In fact, they may do that. 0.68

00:41:16.000 They may take some land in Taiwan, they may take some kind of more concrete effort than what they've done in the past.

00:41:24.000 They could probably take Taiwan and not have the United States declare war.

00:41:29.000 And what would that signal to the world and prove, I guess objectively, not just what would people think, but what would be in fact?

00:41:39.000 What that would prove is that it's not the 1990s anymore.

00:41:42.000 It's not 1997 anymore.

00:41:45.000 We flew to Newt Gingrich, flew there in '97 and flew home, and that was it.

00:41:49.000 Nancy Pelosi flies there in '22.

00:41:51.000 She could fly back, and China could take the island, and we could do nothing about it.

00:41:55.000 So, it's a very weak move.

00:41:57.000 And all this talk about democracy and autocracy is window dressing.

00:42:02.000 It's window dressing over power politics.

00:42:05.000 It's not about democracy.

00:42:07.000 It's not about autocracy.

00:42:10.000 It is about power.

00:42:13.000 And it's about this old, outdated, anachronistic balance of power that existed 30 years ago, led by the West and NATO, and what is happening now, which is the rise of.

00:42:27.000 Block that maybe doesn't even have a ton of security interests in common and maybe should be natural adversaries and don't really have anything culturally in common.

00:42:36.000 You think about Russia, China, and Iran.

00:42:38.000 They don't share a religion.

00:42:39.000 They don't share an ethnicity.

00:42:41.000 If anything, because of their proximity to each other, they actually have a lot to fight over in terms of the natural issue of radical Islam, where China is oppressing Muslims in Xinjiang and Iran is a Muslim state.

00:42:57.000 And Russia has concerns about radical Islam in Central Asia and in the Caucasus.

00:43:02.000 Also, China and Russia are fighting over Central Asia.

00:43:05.000 And so there's all sort of natural contentions between these states, but they're being brought together.

00:43:12.000 To negate Western power, they're being pushed into a coalition which really has no positive basis for existence, but rather a negation, a negative basis, which is that they're not America and they're not NATO and they're not the CIA and they're not the DOD and they're winning.

00:43:33.000 Or at least they're creating and carving out a parallel society, a parallel global alliance that will exist next to and in coexistence with the United States and may eventually challenge the United States.

00:43:46.000 States, in terms of its relative economic capacity, its productive capacity, and its firepower.

00:43:52.000 That's what this is about.

00:43:54.000 And it's honestly very sad.

00:43:57.000 And it's sad every day.

00:43:58.000 It's sad to watch Joe Biden because of what he is.

00:44:03.000 And it's also sad to see things like Nancy Pelosi flying into Taiwan.

00:44:09.000 And China is conducting military drills, which in any other time would be unacceptable.

00:44:14.000 Surrounding the peninsula, making threats, they're going to shoot her out of the sky. 0.96

00:44:18.000 And she's going to fly in at night and fly out at night.

00:44:22.000 And that will signal the end of American hegemony in the Pacific, if not now, in the near future.

00:44:28.000 And everybody knows it.

00:44:30.000 That's what makes it sad.

00:44:32.000 We know it.

00:44:33.000 They know it.

00:44:34.000 Everyone knows it.

00:44:35.000 And it's just a matter of time.

00:44:37.000 So that's the trip.

00:44:39.000 I don't think Nancy Pelosi is going to get shot down. 0.80

00:44:42.000 That would objectively be bad because then we would have to go to war. 0.99

00:44:45.000 And I don't want to fight the Chinese. 1.00

00:44:49.000 It would be funny. 1.00

00:44:50.000 It would be hilarious and it would be content.

00:44:52.000 And she would kind of deserve it.

00:44:54.000 But it's objectively a good thing it didn't happen.

00:44:58.000 But nevertheless, it's almost sadder if she doesn't get shot down, in a sense. 0.69

00:45:05.000 It's almost sadder for the United States because China doesn't need to shoot her down. 0.83

00:45:09.000 They wait for her to leave, and then America's done there. 0.86

00:45:12.000 And everyone knows that.

00:45:14.000 So, anyway, that's that.

00:45:15.000 But I want to move on.

00:45:16.000 I want to get into our election results.

00:45:17.000 I'm a little bit distracted because we have all this interesting stuff going on in the election.

00:45:25.000 Why don't we shift gears a little bit to our election coverage?

00:45:28.000 And let me pull it up here for you.

00:45:30.000 I'm going to shift over to our election headquarters camera.

00:45:37.000 And I'm going to pull it up here.

00:45:38.000 So I'm going to move down to the lower quadrant.

00:45:43.000 It's not perfect, but I'm going to move myself down here.

00:45:47.000 This is the official New York Times coverage of the primary races happening here for the 2022 midterms.

00:45:47.000 We're going to look.

00:45:55.000 And so, August 2nd, you can see here, this is a big day for primaries.

00:46:01.000 All of the American states hold their primaries on different days.

00:46:07.000 So, you can see in this category, some states held their primaries in July, some in June, some as far back as May.

00:46:15.000 And so, August 2nd is a very big day in primaries.

00:46:18.000 A lot of races that we're watching.

00:46:20.000 Today is primary day in Missouri, Michigan, Kansas, Arizona, and Washington State.

00:46:26.000 And these, if you don't know, primary races will determine the nominees.

00:46:31.000 So, they will determine who's going to run for the Republicans and the Democrats in the various state and federal races and local races as well.

00:46:43.000 And so, the ones that we're watching tonight, the reason we're giving some coverage of this tonight is because we've got some big races, a lot of consequential ones that we're watching.

00:46:53.000 In particular, we are watching several races in Arizona, we're watching the Arizona governor race.

00:47:02.000 Or, governor primary.

00:47:03.000 We're watching the Arizona Senate primary.

00:47:06.000 We're watching two Arizona congressional primaries.

00:47:11.000 That's Arizona's first district and Arizona's ninth district.

00:47:14.000 We're watching Michigan's third congressional district primary.

00:47:18.000 And we're watching Washington State's third congressional district primary.

00:47:25.000 And the reason that we're looking at all of those, and I'll go backwards this time, in Washington State, its third district, we're watching the Republican primary.

00:47:35.000 Between the incumbent, which is Butler, who voted for Trump's impeachment last January.

00:47:42.000 And notably, she is running against Heidi St. James as well as Joe Kent.

00:47:47.000 And Joe Kent, we want to see lose tonight.

00:47:50.000 But in Washington state, it's a little bit of a unique situation.

00:47:55.000 And I'll scroll down to Washington state so we can look at their congressional primary results.

00:48:00.000 So this is Washington's third district, congressional district for the congressional race.

00:48:07.000 Now, this is an open primary.

00:48:10.000 And what that means is that in some states, like Illinois, for example, the Republicans will select a nominee and the Democrats will select a nominee, and voters will go in and they will vote for a Republican to represent the Republicans in the general election, and the Democrats will go in and they'll vote for a Democrat to represent them as a nominee in the general election.

00:48:33.000 And it's guaranteed that a Republican and a Democrat will compete and one of them will win.

00:48:38.000 In Washington state, in this congressional primary that we're watching, it's an open primary.

00:48:45.000 That is different from the kind of primary that I've just described because in this one, the top two vote getters, regardless of party affiliation or party membership, the top two vote getters will go out into the general to face off against one another.

00:49:02.000 So you could have two Republicans as the top two vote getters.

00:49:06.000 The two Republicans could win the most votes.

00:49:09.000 And then you could have two Republicans facing off in the general election, two Republican nominees in the same general, ensuring a Republican wins.

00:49:17.000 You could have a Republican and a Democrat.

00:49:19.000 And structurally, that is the favorite outcome because left leaning Republicans and Democrats will vote for the Democrat, and right wing people, their vote will be split between several Republicans.

00:49:34.000 And so, consequently, it's almost structured so that the most likely outcome will be Democrats with the number one vote getter because all the liberals rally around.

00:49:49.000 One Democrat candidate, so the Democrat candidate will get all the liberals, and you'll get a runner up who's a Republican because the conservative vote will be split between several Republican candidates.

00:50:01.000 So that is the likely outcome.

00:50:03.000 And so in this race, what we're really looking at is who is going to be the runner up.

00:50:08.000 We can almost certainly say that the Democrat will be in the general, that the Democrat, which is Marie Perez, she'll capture all of the liberals and therefore probably capture a plurality of all the voters in the primary.

00:50:23.000 And then the conservative vote, which will be split between the incumbent, Butler, Joe Kent, and Heidi St. John, all Republicans, and Vicki Kraft to some extent.

00:50:34.000 The runner up will be the Republican that gets the most conservative votes out of a crowded Republican field.

00:50:42.000 And so this race is very relevant to us.

00:50:45.000 I'm not going to go into too much detail because I want to introduce all the races.

00:50:49.000 But this race is very relevant to us because Joe Kent is.

00:50:54.000 A candidate who has received major support from the MAGA movement, and he's received a tremendous amount of support from outside the district.

00:51:04.000 He's received a lot of outside money.

00:51:06.000 He's appeared on shows like Tucker Carlson and the War Room with Steve Bannon.

00:51:09.000 He's gotten the Trump endorsement.

00:51:11.000 And although he's a very popular candidate nationally, and he's a very popular candidate in very right wing Trump supporting circles, this is a district.

00:51:25.000 Which is a little bit more moderate.

00:51:26.000 And it's also a district with a crowded field, regardless of the support.

00:51:30.000 There's a lot of support pouring in for the other candidates as well.

00:51:35.000 And so, in any case, that's Joe Kent.

00:51:37.000 That's the state of the race.

00:51:38.000 Joe Kent, back in March, or I think late February, disavowed me in the America First movement.

00:51:46.000 He said that America First is too divisive because it talks about white people too much and it talks about Christianity too much.

00:51:54.000 And so he said that he represents something different that's not explicitly Christian.

00:51:58.000 Or implicitly or explicitly white, he said that he represents inclusive populism as opposed to Christian nationalism.

00:52:07.000 And he explicitly said that.

00:52:09.000 He said that he's not in favor of Christian nationalism.

00:52:12.000 He's not in favor of Christianity or nationalism.

00:52:15.000 He's in favor of inclusive populism, which means something like non Christians and non whites, along with whites and Christians, coming together based on the fact that they are poor, coming together based on class.

00:52:31.000 And uniting against rich people, as opposed to Christian nationalists who would say they're asserting a specific kind of American culture and identity and asserting a particular religion, and with really a more revolutionary view of America,

00:52:46.000 that we need to look not just at competing classes, but about who we are and what it means to be an American and what America is based on and what America will be in the future at the fundamental level, at the level of demographics, culture, religion, law, and so on.

00:53:05.000 So, the reason this race matters very much is because we have told people not to vote for Kent.

00:53:13.000 You know, we've undertaken some initiatives.

00:53:16.000 America Firsters have undertaken some initiatives to try to get Joe Kent to lose because that would represent that his brand of inclusive populism is not going to hijack this moment, will not hijack the battle over Trump's succession, will not triumph over Christian nationalism.

00:53:34.000 He went against Christian nationalism, and so as a consequence, he needs to lose.

00:53:39.000 That's why we're interested in this race, because of that significance.

00:53:43.000 So that's one of the races.

00:53:45.000 In Arizona, we're watching a couple of congressional primaries, Republican congressional primaries.

00:53:53.000 In particular, we're watching Arizona's first district and the Republican primary there.

00:54:00.000 And this is a normal primary, not an open primary, where you've got Josh Barnett running.

00:54:05.000 He's an America First candidate running against the incumbent David Schweikart, although it looks like with 65% of votes counted.

00:54:13.000 Probably not going to win.

00:54:15.000 So it's not called yet, but it doesn't look very favorable.

00:54:19.000 And then also, we were watching Arizona and its 9th congressional district Republican primary, where Paul Gosar was running against a crowded Republican field.

00:54:30.000 And you could see this race has already been called, and it's not just a victory for Paul Gosar, but it's a decisive victory.

00:54:41.000 63% of votes counted, and Representative Paul Gosar, the incumbent, the Republican, the legendary America Firster, Has won with a decisive lead of 63% in a field with four Republicans.

00:54:58.000 That's a crushing lead.

00:55:00.000 Four Republicans, and he not only won, he didn't get a plurality, he didn't get a majority, he got a super majority, which is a major rebuke because, and this race is very important, because Paul Gosar, because he is one of the most America First congressmen, he is one of the most targeted Republicans in Congress.

00:55:20.000 Paul Gosar gets no support from D.C., he gets no support.

00:55:26.000 From the party establishment.

00:55:27.000 He gets no support from Kevin McCarthy.

00:55:30.000 If anything, resources are pouring into his district from DC and from Kevin McCarthy to his challengers.

00:55:38.000 And his challengers are backed in money and in other ways by Kevin McCarthy and by the Republican Party.

00:55:47.000 And so Gosar winning, and I'll also say, before I even move on, not only is Gosar a pariah in Washington, DC, which is a good thing.

00:55:58.000 But also, his district, his new district, was specifically created in the redistricting from the 2020 census.

00:56:08.000 This district was deliberately created, and the lines were drawn to try to push Gosar out of the seat.

00:56:15.000 Because the state Republican Party in Arizona doesn't like Paul Gosar either.

00:56:21.000 And so, this entire district, Paul Gosar's old district, was redrawn for this election because of the 2020 census.

00:56:29.000 And it was redrawn to push him.

00:56:31.000 Output transcript Out of his seat through the primary.

00:56:33.000 This is going to be a safe Republican seat, whoever wins the primary, but they redrew it so that it would be more competitive for him.

00:56:41.000 So Paul Gosar wins tonight, and we don't know what the final total is because not all the votes are in, but it looks like he is ahead with a commanding lead with most of the votes in.

00:56:52.000 Major rebuke, again, not just to DC, but also to the state party.

00:56:59.000 Major rebuke to the Republican establishment, major rebuke to Democrats.

00:57:04.000 Paul Gosar went to AFPAC.

00:57:07.000 In 2021, and he went to AFPAC in 2022.

00:57:11.000 And guess what?

00:57:13.000 He is still going to be your representative in Arizona's 9th district.

00:57:17.000 Survived primary challenge, survived outside money, the establishment against him.

00:57:22.000 He campaigned this year, and he went back to the district.

00:57:26.000 Not that he ever left, but they had to campaign a little bit more, from what I understand this year. 0.99

00:57:32.000 And they went into the district, and they've kicked ass. 0.99

00:57:34.000 They kicked ass up and down the district. 0.99

00:57:36.000 You can see it's a big district. 0.99

00:57:39.000 So, God bless.

00:57:39.000 Can we get some 07s in chat?

00:57:41.000 Huge W. Major win for Paul Gosar.

00:57:45.000 Major win for America First nationally.

00:57:49.000 Nobody wants the establishment.

00:57:51.000 We don't care if you throw three primary challengers in, still going to win.

00:57:56.000 So, major congratulations.

00:57:58.000 God bless Paul Gosar.

00:58:00.000 My official congrats to Representative Gosar and his entire team, who we love his team.

00:58:07.000 We love his team a lot.

00:58:09.000 And he's got a great chief of staff over there and a great comms team and really talented, skilled people.

00:58:16.000 And we love everybody there, they're all good people.

00:58:18.000 Paul Gossar, a very strong Catholic as well, in addition to being an America firster.

00:58:23.000 Christian nationalist, America firster.

00:58:25.000 And just like Martin, and by the way, this is the last thing I'll say and then we'll move on.

00:58:31.000 This is the second congressperson to win by a commanding lead their primary after attending AFPAC 3.

00:58:41.000 I'm just going to throw that out there.

00:58:44.000 Representative Marjorie Taylor Greene, who attended and spoke at AFPAC 3 this year, and she took a lot of heat for that.

00:58:50.000 She earlier this year won her primary in Georgia with a substantial lead, total blowout.

00:58:58.000 She was fine, and she's going to go on and win the general.

00:59:01.000 It's going to be a safe Republican seat.

00:59:04.000 And now, August 2nd, that means that two, two, count them, two Republican congresspeople who spoke at AFPAC 3 have decisively won Republican primaries where they had a crowded primary field with several challengers.

00:59:21.000 With a commanding lead in spite of opposition from the left and from outside money coming in from DC and from the establishment.

00:59:29.000 So that's a huge win.

00:59:30.000 That's a very decisive win for America First.

00:59:34.000 Because everybody likes to say, oh, America First isn't mainstream, America First is radical, America First isn't with it.

00:59:42.000 Well, guess what?

00:59:44.000 Marjorie Taylor Greene and Paul Gosar, Christian nationalism, America First, they're probably more in line with us than anybody else in Congress.

00:59:52.000 And they probably have more opposition from the left and from the right than anybody else in Congress. 0.97

00:59:58.000 And both of them kicked ass up and down their district. 0.69

01:00:01.000 It didn't matter that money came in and challengers came out. 0.97

01:00:06.000 And that is because America First and Christian nationalism is the future of the party.

01:00:12.000 It's where the base is, it's where the constituents are.

01:00:16.000 America First, this movement, me, AFPAC, MTG, GOATS are, Trump, MAGA, Alex Jones, Tucker Carlson.

01:00:25.000 Not going anywhere.

01:00:27.000 So that's a huge, huge victory, not just for Gosar, who we wish him our most heartfelt congratulations, but also a huge victory for the movement across the country and for all of us and for the Groypers.

01:00:43.000 You go to AFPAC 3 and you win your election.

01:00:45.000 That seems to be the trend so far.

01:00:48.000 I don't know that anybody who is at AFPAC 3, at least as an incumbent, I know McGeehan, she lost a pretty tough uphill battle for Idaho governor, but that Really had nothing to do with us.

01:01:02.000 But as far as Representative Green and Gosar, they're golden.

01:01:07.000 So you're basically, you could go to AFPAC 3 and that improves your odds, I think.

01:01:11.000 You could go to AFPAC 3 and your odds are better because the voters are begging for it.

01:01:15.000 The voters go out there, and this was really a referendum on AFPAC 3.

01:01:19.000 Voters are going out there and they're saying, Paul Gosar, you went to AFPAC 3, we support you.

01:01:24.000 Thank you for standing up for Nick Fuentes.

01:01:28.000 Among other things, he's a great congressman.

01:01:31.000 But they're also going out there and certainly they're saying, God bless you, Representative Gosar.

01:01:36.000 God bless you, Representative Green.

01:01:38.000 We want to see you at AFPAC next year.

01:01:40.000 They're saying, thank you for going to AFPAC.

01:01:42.000 Thank you for standing up for Nick Fuentes' right to fly and his right to speak.

01:01:47.000 They're saying, we are all Groypers, and we need more Groypers in Congress.

01:01:52.000 That's unequivocally what's being said here.

01:01:55.000 You cannot deny that.

01:01:58.000 So, a big, big win.

01:01:59.000 Okay, what else are we watching?

01:02:02.000 We're also watching Michigan's third district.

01:02:06.000 So let me get us over to here.

01:02:08.000 We're watching the Republican primary in Michigan's 3rd District between John Gibbs and Peter Meyer.

01:02:15.000 Looks like a close race.

01:02:18.000 And John Gibbs is an America First candidate.

01:02:21.000 I don't know too much about him.

01:02:24.000 And I've never met him.

01:02:25.000 I don't really have any kind of personal relation.

01:02:30.000 But Representative Gibbs, not Representative, he was, I think he worked in housing and urban development under Ben Carson and the Trump admin.

01:02:41.000 His background is he comes from, I believe, Harford, and then he was a developer at Apple.

01:02:46.000 And then he worked in HUD under Ben Carson and the Trump admin.

01:02:51.000 So, John Gibbs going up against Peter Meyer, the incumbent.

01:02:54.000 It's a Trump impeachment district.

01:02:56.000 The incumbent voted for Trump's impeachment.

01:02:58.000 As far as I know, great candidate.

01:03:00.000 All the right people support him.

01:03:02.000 I've looked at his platform.

01:03:03.000 He is very America first.

01:03:05.000 So, we're looking for him to beat Meyer and go on.

01:03:09.000 His district is a D plus three district, Michigan's third district.

01:03:14.000 But because this is going to be a red wave election, because this is an election where there's going to be big Republican turnout.

01:03:20.000 Because of the inflation, because of the economy, because of Biden's low approval.

01:03:26.000 This is a race where it's going to be contested.

01:03:29.000 And if Gibbs wins the primary here, he could really sail on to become a congressman, and that would be very good.

01:03:35.000 So we're watching that one.

01:03:36.000 Looks like no call yet from Associated Press or New York Times, but he's got the lead.

01:03:43.000 And excuse me, we have a little bit of an update 63.6% of the votes counted, and Gibbs is leading with 51.7% to 48.3%.

01:03:55.000 Okay, back to those are all of our congressional races we're watching.

01:04:02.000 Back to Arizona.

01:04:06.000 Let's see, we were also watching the Arizona governor primary, and it looks like that one is still ongoing.

01:04:13.000 This is a statewide race and a state race as opposed to a federal race.

01:04:20.000 So it's not just the federal offices, but the state offices that hold their primaries as well.

01:04:25.000 In these states.

01:04:27.000 And so another race that we're watching is the race for Arizona governor, where you've got Corinne Robinson running against Kerry Lake.

01:04:37.000 And this is another one with a crowded field and a very close race.

01:04:41.000 57% of votes counted.

01:04:44.000 And Rob is, I'm sorry, not Robinson, Robson.

01:04:48.000 Robson.

01:04:49.000 Robson leads 49% to Kerry Lake's 40%.

01:04:53.000 Although I wouldn't read too much into that.

01:04:55.000 Still pretty close.

01:04:56.000 Half the ballots counted. 1.00

01:04:58.000 And the betting markets and the polling had Carrie Lake winning.

01:05:02.000 The betting markets had Carrie Lake by far to be the favorite, and I think the polls said that as well.

01:05:08.000 So, on that one, we stand behind Carrie Lake.

01:05:11.000 She's an ally of Wendy Rogers, Paul Gosar, Blake Masters, everybody that we like.

01:05:17.000 Everybody, I think Josh Barnett as well.

01:05:19.000 She is an ally of everybody who is America first in Arizona.

01:05:24.000 She is America first.

01:05:26.000 Truly impressive. 0.89

01:05:27.000 I think even my mom likes her. 0.99

01:05:29.000 And I say that because my mom, you know, she's not totally engaged in the electoral politics.

01:05:36.000 And I remember when we were talking about the primary, she said, Oh, Carrie Lake, I love her.

01:05:42.000 I saw her give a speech.

01:05:44.000 She's the best.

01:05:46.000 So she's a favorite.

01:05:47.000 She's a favorite in my house and certainly in America's first favorite.

01:05:52.000 So we're watching to see what the outcome will be there.

01:05:55.000 And that'll be a big one because here's why the governor race matters.

01:06:00.000 These state offices are extremely important in the wake of what happened in 2020.

01:06:06.000 2020, Donald Trump won the election.

01:06:10.000 And he won the election, but he lost the presidency because of funny business that was carried out in contested states that just so happened to be controlled by Republican state legislatures and governors.

01:06:27.000 Five, I think it's five out of the six, or four out of the five contested states have Republican state legislatures in Arizona, in Pennsylvania, in Georgia.

01:06:41.000 In Michigan, and I think in Wisconsin too.

01:06:44.000 I'm not, it's been a long time, so I don't remember.

01:06:48.000 My recollection isn't perfect on that.

01:06:51.000 But in most of the contested states, they had Republican legislatures, and in most of those states, they had Republican governors as well.

01:06:59.000 And of course, the state legislatures control the election process.

01:07:06.000 Even though the presidency is a federal office, it is the state legislatures that determine the rules, and it's the governors that enforce the rules.

01:07:13.000 Pertaining to the statewide elections that are being held, statewide elections, even for federal offices.

01:07:19.000 And so, Kerry Lake becoming the governor, very, very important because Arizona is one of these states.

01:07:24.000 It was a battleground state in 16, it was a battleground state in 2020.

01:07:29.000 It's going to be a battleground state in 2024.

01:07:32.000 And we need an America First Trump Republican as the governor so that if there's any funny business, we can see to it that the election is corrected.

01:07:44.000 And if you think that that doesn't matter, some people say, oh, they cheat anyway.

01:07:49.000 They cheated in 2020.

01:07:49.000 Nothing matters.

01:07:51.000 They'll cheat again.

01:07:52.000 I'm sure they will.

01:07:53.000 But the governor makes a difference.

01:07:55.000 And I'll give you a perfect example of this.

01:07:57.000 In 2018, in the statewide race in Florida, there was major election fraud in the race for governor and in a few other races.

01:08:09.000 And at the time, Governor Rick Scott, who's now a senator, Generally, I think one of the better Republicans.

01:08:18.000 I don't know that he's completely on side, but he is one of the better ones, I think.

01:08:23.000 Governor Rick Scott, at the time, governor of Florida, Republican, he went in there, he looked into the fraud, he investigated it, the election was corrected, and the right result was delivered.

01:08:35.000 I think that delivered the governorship to Ron DeSantis.

01:08:39.000 And again, maybe the details aren't perfect on that because it's a long time ago, and now we're going four years back.

01:08:45.000 But the point is, the governor makes a difference.

01:08:49.000 And it doesn't just matter that they are Republican because Doug Ducey, who is the governor of Arizona, he's a Republican.

01:08:58.000 And Karen Fan, who is a leader in the Republican state legislature, she was a Republican.

01:09:03.000 And Doug Ducey and Karen Fan conspired in 2020 to overthrow Trump.

01:09:09.000 And they took the illegitimate election results and they gave the electors to Biden, even though the Republican state legislature was in revolt, even though Republican voters were in revolt, didn't matter.

01:09:20.000 That they had a Republican legislature and a Republican speaker and a Republican governor.

01:09:25.000 It doesn't just matter the party affiliation, it matters who they are.

01:09:29.000 So that's why this race is very important.

01:09:31.000 Carrie Lake is solid. 1.00

01:09:32.000 She's great. 0.95

01:09:33.000 And in 24, it's going to be contested again. 0.97

01:09:36.000 There's going to be cheating.

01:09:37.000 There's going to be funny business.

01:09:39.000 Arizona is going to be a battleground state.

01:09:41.000 And the governor is going to matter, just like it did with Florida with Rick Scott.

01:09:45.000 A good governor is going to deliver the electors we need, assuming that we win.

01:09:51.000 The election hasn't happened yet.

01:09:52.000 Certainly, I think we'll win and face the same thing we did in 2020.

01:09:57.000 So that's that.

01:09:58.000 And we're still watching that one.

01:10:00.000 The other Arizona statewide race that we're looking at is the Republican primary for the Arizona State Senate seat.

01:10:08.000 And this one is between Blake Masters, who is a Silicon Valley guy, outsider, friend of Peter Thiel's, notably.

01:10:16.000 And one of Peter Thiel's, you could say one of his main allies who's running for office.

01:10:22.000 Ally is one way to put it.

01:10:24.000 But then you've also got Jim Lamone and Mark Brnovich and Michael McGuire and Justin Olson.

01:10:31.000 And this one is going to be a little bit more contested.

01:10:35.000 We don't know who's going to win the Senate seat, Republican or Democrat, in the general election.

01:10:42.000 This is a big one because Blake Masters is one of the most right wing America First Republicans running for Senate.

01:10:51.000 If Blake Masters becomes the nominee and if he wins the Senate seat, that would make him on January 6, 2023, the most right wing America First member of the U.S. Senate.

01:11:05.000 Period.

01:11:07.000 And that is more right wing than any sitting Republican senator, more right wing than any incumbent Republican senator running, and that is more right wing than any Republican Senate candidate that is viable that is running.

01:11:23.000 This is a very important race.

01:11:25.000 Blake Masters has received tremendous support from Peter Thiel.

01:11:28.000 That's where he comes from.

01:11:29.000 He's an old business partner of Peter Thiel's, and I believe the startup capital for his race and a lot of the endorsements and other things are the work of Peter Thiel.

01:11:40.000 He's an outsider.

01:11:42.000 And if you've seen him in the debate performance against the other Republican candidates running in the primary, if you've seen what he said on Twitter and other places, he's Trump endorsed.

01:11:56.000 This is a guy who is not just in substance America first, but he's also in some ways in style America first.

01:12:03.000 He's more brash, he's more straight talking, he doesn't take debate from the left and disavow and play that whole game.

01:12:13.000 And I'll say this too some people are skeptical of the influence of Peter Thiel in the Republican Party and in right wing politics.

01:12:21.000 And by extension, Blake Masters, who's received a lot of support from Thiel, and Blake Masters, who is almost of the same ilk.

01:12:29.000 Blake Masters is a Silicon Valley guy, like Peter Thiel.

01:12:33.000 And I'll say this to people that are skeptical in politics, you have got many different factions who have their candidates and their interest and their influence.

01:12:44.000 And some people might look at Peter Thiel and see a billionaire.

01:12:49.000 And when people see a billionaire, they see money.

01:12:52.000 And when they see Peter Thiel, who has created a hedge fund and been on the board of major publicly traded companies like Facebook, which is an SP 500 company, SP 500 company, when people see that, they see Wall Street or they see big money or they see something like that.

01:13:16.000 But there is a notable distinction between Silicon Valley and Wall Street.

01:13:22.000 There's a notable distinction between Silicon Valley and the more conventional players in politics.

01:13:28.000 Silicon Valley is a separate institution.

01:13:32.000 The billionaires of Silicon Valley and the companies they run and the culture of the companies and the culture of where they reside is fundamentally different from Wall Street.

01:13:42.000 We call them Silicon Valley because they all live in the same place, they all live in San Francisco.

01:13:48.000 And they call it Silicon Valley because they're all tech companies.

01:13:51.000 And they're all tech companies located in San Francisco.

01:13:55.000 Obviously.

01:13:57.000 But that matters because San Francisco is different from New York City.

01:14:03.000 And tech companies are different from General Electric.

01:14:07.000 And they're different from Lockheed Martin and JP Morgan.

01:14:10.000 And the kinds of people, the billionaires and the companies and the people that work at those companies that run Facebook and PayPal and the others, they're a different kind of people than the people that work at Goldman Sachs and JP Morgan.

01:14:27.000 General Electric and the rest of them, all these sort of conventional Wall Street players, all the major blue chip stock companies.

01:14:37.000 So I would say this don't be so quick to write off Peter Thiel.

01:14:43.000 I will say for full disclosure, I've never gotten money from Peter Thiel.

01:14:47.000 Peter Thiel is sort of, from my understanding, ambivalent towards us and towards me.

01:14:53.000 I'm not being paid to say that, okay?

01:14:56.000 And I'm not saying that.

01:14:57.000 To try and gas him up so he'll give me money.

01:15:02.000 I'm saying that objectively.

01:15:03.000 And these are things that other people that we like have said as well and agree with.

01:15:09.000 Silicon Valley, there's overlap, but it does, in a way that is not totally insignificant, differ from these other billionaires and from these other kinds of companies.

01:15:20.000 And it does differ from Wall Street.

01:15:22.000 And the proof of that is in people like Elon Musk.

01:15:25.000 And the proof of that is in people like Peter Thiel.

01:15:29.000 And certainly there are others.

01:15:31.000 Tech guys, particularly these sort of self starting, autodidactic, individualistic, entrepreneurial tech guys running tech companies in the valley.

01:15:42.000 Some of them, like Zuckerberg, fit into the pattern of what we've seen before.

01:15:47.000 They contribute and vote like Warren Buffett and like the other players.

01:15:52.000 Elon Musk and Peter Thiel and some notable others, they're quite contrary to that trend.

01:15:58.000 And so, anyway, so Blake Masters is a story not just about America First.

01:16:04.000 And about Trumpism.

01:16:06.000 And it's not even just a story about Peter Thiel's personal influence in the Republican Party, the Blake Masters contest is also a story about Silicon Valley and the kind of influence that these high powered, very intelligent tech people, billionaires or otherwise, are increasingly playing in American society and the role that they'll play in politics.

01:16:31.000 Peter Thiel's obviously a right wing guy.

01:16:33.000 Some say more libertarian, and maybe that was true 10 years ago.

01:16:37.000 Now, definitely more nationalist and definitely more objectively right wing.

01:16:44.000 We don't know necessarily what his endgame is and what his true, sincere beliefs are.

01:16:48.000 And that's complicated by the fact that he's a Straussian.

01:16:51.000 But we can look at the candidates that he backs and we can look at the things that he says and we can deduce that certainly it's a different play than Mark Zuckerberg is making.

01:17:00.000 It's a different play than Warren Buffett is making.

01:17:02.000 And he is of Silicon Valley, from Silicon Valley.

01:17:06.000 And that is just another way that Silicon Valley is influencing society.

01:17:11.000 And it's a changing society because it's a different elite.

01:17:14.000 It's a different kind of people inhabiting the elite, exerting a different influence on the rest of the country.

01:17:19.000 So that's the Masters one.

01:17:21.000 That's why we're watching.

01:17:22.000 That's what we're going to learn from the Masters race the strength of Trump's endorsement, the strength of style and substance, America first, the strength of Peter Thiel's influence in the GOP, and the relative changing influence of Silicon Valley.

01:17:38.000 That's what we're watching.

01:17:40.000 I believe those are.

01:17:42.000 The major ones that we're watching, we're also watching the Kansas Secretary of State race where Chris Kobach is running, although that one doesn't have a tremendous significance.

01:17:53.000 Chris Kobach, he's an America first patriot, but he's got a lot of difficulty.

01:18:00.000 If you don't know him, Kobach was lieutenant governor of Kansas from 2010 until 2018.

01:18:08.000 He ran for Senate in 2018, and he lost.

01:18:12.000 And actually, to rewind it a little bit, Chris Kobach, lieutenant governor of Kansas, he actually ran for Congress and lost, I think, in 2008.

01:18:21.000 So he lost in 2008 for Congress, runs for lieutenant governor in 2010.

01:18:26.000 And he's a patriot, anti immigration, very America first, very conservative.

01:18:32.000 He serves two terms, and he was widely believed in 2016 to be on the shortlist to be Donald Trump's DHS secretary, his Homeland Security secretary.

01:18:46.000 Many people thought after the transition in 2017 or even in 2018 or beyond that Chris Kobach was going to be a favorite to be DHS secretary in the Trump administration.

01:18:57.000 That never happened.

01:18:58.000 He was never tapped.

01:18:59.000 He was never nominated.

01:19:02.000 And so that was in 17.

01:19:03.000 In 2018, Chris Kobach ran for Senate in Kansas and he lost.

01:19:10.000 And then he ran for governor of Kansas in 2020 and he lost.

01:19:14.000 And now here we are in 2022 and he's running for Secretary of State of Kansas.

01:19:21.000 Now, I don't know what you would say is the relative import.

01:19:25.000 Is that a step down from lieutenant governor?

01:19:27.000 Certainly it's a step down from Senate and from governor and from DHS secretary.

01:19:32.000 But nevertheless, He's fighting for his political future.

01:19:36.000 And I like him.

01:19:37.000 I like Chris Kobach.

01:19:38.000 I think he's a great guy personally, from what I've heard.

01:19:41.000 I've never met him, but I know one in particular, very patriotic guy from Kansas who's a great guy.

01:19:49.000 And he loves Kobach.

01:19:51.000 And I know some other people that worked with Kobach, and nothing but positive things I've heard on a personal level.

01:19:58.000 And on policy, he's very solid.

01:19:59.000 He was a favorite of Ann Coulter and a favorite of the PPO faction.

01:20:04.000 From the Trump White House.

01:20:07.000 And so we like him.

01:20:09.000 The thing is, though, and this is just true, he's got some trouble with electability.

01:20:14.000 I don't know if that's because Kansas is trending leftward over time.

01:20:17.000 Kansas trended leftward from the 2016 to the 2020 presidential election.

01:20:23.000 And there was a referendum in Kansas today about abortion.

01:20:28.000 And if you look at that map, it's very blue.

01:20:30.000 Kansans voted to keep abortion, which is very tragic.

01:20:33.000 And that was called earlier.

01:20:36.000 So I don't know if that's.

01:20:37.000 The fact that Kansas is a relatively moderate state and is trending leftward, or maybe Chris Kobach struggles with campaigning because he's lost a lot of races.

01:20:49.000 He lost in 08 for Congress, he lost in 18 for Senate, lost for Governor 20, and he didn't swing the DHS nomination.

01:20:57.000 That being said, I support him.

01:20:59.000 I support him in this election.

01:21:01.000 I hope that he wins, and I hope that he's going to stage a comeback and maybe he's going to run for a higher office later on.

01:21:08.000 But that's.

01:21:09.000 That's a race which I'm not watching as closely because it doesn't have a tremendous amount of significance outside of Chris Kobach's personal political ambitions.

01:21:20.000 But it's one that we can comment on.

01:21:23.000 And I'm going to pull up my politics telegram chat here and see if we have any other calls.

01:21:31.000 It looks like Mark Fincham has won the Secretary of State Republican nomination.

01:21:35.000 That's a big one.

01:21:37.000 That's a statewide race where Fincham is an ally of Wendy Rogers and Carrie Lake.

01:21:42.000 He's an America firster.

01:21:44.000 Very important that he clinched this nomination because just like the governor, the Secretary of State plays a very important role in the elections.

01:21:52.000 So if we get Fincham as Secretary of State and if we get Kerry Lake as governor, very, very good combination heading into 2024.

01:22:01.000 It's good for Arizona, but for people that are not in Arizona, it is very significant because a very good Secretary of State who is hit to election fraud and a very good governor who is the same way, very good outcome.

01:22:15.000 That's very favorable for.

01:22:18.000 The kinds of problems that we may see in 24.

01:22:22.000 The kind of election fraud and the repeat of what we saw in 2020.

01:22:26.000 Because if you've got Fincham and Kerry Lake, you can bet that Arizona's going to have a fair election, and that is a good thing for Trump.

01:22:33.000 So it's all a big setup, okay?

01:22:37.000 We're all setting up for 2024.

01:22:42.000 Let's see.

01:22:43.000 Looks like we also have an official call for Michigan, and this is not from the New York Times, but it looks like this is from another site.

01:22:50.000 So, I don't know how reputable that is.

01:22:52.000 Associated Press hasn't called it, but some are calling Michigan's third district for John Gibbs, which is our guy.

01:23:00.000 So, that's a good one.

01:23:03.000 Let's see, what else?

01:23:06.000 And there's a picture of a very fat, ugly person that somebody sent to me, which I can't say who it is, but that's funny.

01:23:15.000 Let's see, what else do we have?

01:23:21.000 Okay, John Gibbs not confirmed.

01:23:23.000 Thanks, guys.

01:23:24.000 This is my politics team.

01:23:27.000 I'm looking at updates from them.

01:23:28.000 They say it's confirmed.

01:23:29.000 He won.

01:23:30.000 Ten messages later.

01:23:31.000 Actually, at Nick Fuentes is not confirmed.

01:23:34.000 Okay, thank you.

01:23:35.000 Good job.

01:23:37.000 So, John Gibbs did not win.

01:23:39.000 I'm glad I added that caveat.

01:23:41.000 He did not win.

01:23:48.000 Chris Kobach, 87% reporting with a 3.5% lead.

01:23:48.000 Let's see.

01:23:53.000 Very nice.

01:23:56.000 Let's see.

01:23:57.000 Do we have any other calls?

01:23:58.000 I'm looking here.

01:24:03.000 Well, it looks like some people are calling it.

01:24:05.000 Dave Wasserman has called Michigan's third.

01:24:09.000 Not confirmed by AP, but we have a source that says John Gibbs.

01:24:13.000 So it looks like we're doing well in Michigan's third.

01:24:17.000 Some are saying it's confirmed, some are saying it's not.

01:24:19.000 I don't really know.

01:24:21.000 But it looks like okay.

01:24:23.000 A friend of mine is saying it's real.

01:24:25.000 Okay, so I guess John Gibbs won.

01:24:27.000 New York Times not saying it, but apparently he won.

01:24:32.000 And a fight is breaking out in the America First Politics Team Telegram group over whether or not it's confirmed.

01:24:38.000 So I honestly am confused here.

01:24:41.000 And what's going on?

01:24:42.000 I'm sorry, this isn't New York Times.

01:24:43.000 This is Fox News.

01:24:44.000 Okay, we're a mess here.

01:24:46.000 And now this isn't even updating.

01:24:48.000 So what the freak is this all about?

01:24:50.000 Do I got to.

01:24:51.000 Okay.

01:24:52.000 Okay, now it's loading.

01:24:58.000 All right, let's see.

01:24:59.000 Let's do a quick.

01:25:00.000 Check on our results, and then I want to get into the Missouri Senate race a little bit because there's kind of a funny story about that.

01:25:09.000 Let's see, Michigan, and let's take a look at where's Congress?

01:25:18.000 Here we go.

01:25:20.000 I'm sorry, that's the third.

01:25:23.000 Okay, they still have not called Michigan's third, but some are saying it is called.

01:25:29.000 And let's check in on our other races.

01:25:31.000 Looks like no call in the Arizona Senate race, no call in The Arizona governor's race.

01:25:37.000 No call in Arizona's first.

01:25:40.000 And so the only call we have tonight is that Paul Gosar won.

01:25:45.000 But it looks like that's it.

01:25:46.000 Okay.

01:25:50.000 And there's a major fight breaking out in the politics chat with lots of N words and F words flying around.

01:25:58.000 Some saying it's confirmed, some saying it's not confirmed.

01:26:01.000 It's getting very heated.

01:26:03.000 People are being tagged, all capital letters, slurs, and swear words abound.

01:26:12.000 So let's try to chill out a little bit on that.

01:26:15.000 Let's try to.

01:26:16.000 No, I don't care, honestly.

01:26:17.000 But just give me calls.

01:26:18.000 Just give me some calls, all right?

01:26:20.000 Let's give me some calls.

01:26:23.000 But a lot of N words and F words flying around. 0.98

01:26:26.000 Hey, it wouldn't be the Groypers if we didn't have a little bit of language, okay?

01:26:29.000 It's because we care, it's because we're passionate.

01:26:29.000 It's heated.

01:26:37.000 Okay.

01:26:39.000 Okay.

01:26:44.000 All right, well, it looks like we're in a holding pattern.

01:26:46.000 No calls right now as it stands.

01:26:50.000 No new calls.

01:26:53.000 But let me go back in here.

01:26:54.000 I want to talk about this race in Missouri while we wait.

01:26:57.000 I'm not going to be here all night, okay?

01:26:58.000 I've already been here for a couple hours.

01:27:02.000 But let me get into Missouri, and then I'm going to get into Washington's third again.

01:27:06.000 Because there's one other race I didn't cover, which is not tremendously important.

01:27:10.000 And this is Missouri's Senate primary, Republican Senate primary.

01:27:16.000 Which has already been called earlier tonight.

01:27:19.000 So, in the Republican primary for Missouri's U.S. Senate seat, we've got Eric Schmidt versus Eric Greitens.

01:27:28.000 At least that was kind of the main contest going on here.

01:27:34.000 And I never really had a very strong opinion on this race.

01:27:38.000 Eric Schmidt and Eric Greitens were both Trump candidates, both claimed to be America first, both technically endorsed by Trump.

01:27:47.000 And I'll tell you a funny story about this one.

01:27:50.000 This is a race where Trump technically endorsed both candidates.

01:27:56.000 Trump endorsed both Eric Gridens and Eric Schmidt because months ago, and you have to understand the economy of these races, every Republican in the country is fighting viciously for Trump's endorsement.

01:28:12.000 They're fighting each other, they're fighting people at Mar a Lago, they're paying money, they're doing everything they can to get Trump's endorsement.

01:28:20.000 And the Trump endorsement process is a circus.

01:28:23.000 Even people like Peter Thiel.

01:28:24.000 With money and tremendous influence, I am told.

01:28:29.000 Even they are frustrated with the process because it is completely disorganized and it is a complete madhouse.

01:28:36.000 And there's no consistency and there doesn't seem to be any kind of objectivity or interest based method to secure that endorsement.

01:28:44.000 So it's this big free for all.

01:28:46.000 It's the most coveted commodity in right wing politics in Republican primaries.

01:28:51.000 And there is no way to get it other than it's like taking a number at.

01:28:57.000 At a bakery in a ghetto neighborhood or something. 0.82

01:28:59.000 It's just no rules. 0.82

01:29:01.000 And so, in any case, this is a very funny race because you've got Eric Greitens and you've got Eric Schmidt.

01:29:10.000 They're both named Eric.

01:29:12.000 And both of them claim to be America First.

01:29:14.000 Both of them claim to be Trump guys, MAGA people.

01:29:20.000 And a few months ago, Donald Trump released a statement about this race and said that he endorses Eric.

01:29:28.000 But that's it.

01:29:29.000 That's all he said.

01:29:30.000 Donald Trump said in an official press release his official endorsement for Missouri's Senate Republican primary was that he endorsed Eric.

01:29:42.000 But there are two people named Eric in that race, and both of them had a lot of support, and both of them support Trump.

01:29:54.000 So nobody really knew he was talking about, and Trump never clarified, he never said which Eric he was talking about.

01:30:03.000 And both Eric's, both Eric Greitens and Eric Schmidt, took that and said, Trump endorsed me.

01:30:08.000 So it's a very weird dynamic.

01:30:10.000 And that's because some said that Schmidt would win.

01:30:13.000 Some said that Greitens would win.

01:30:15.000 It was a tense race.

01:30:16.000 The results are actually sort of surprising that Greitens didn't even come in second because many were saying that he was going to win first place.

01:30:24.000 But he's very unpopular in the Missouri Republican Party. 0.99

01:30:29.000 And that's because Eric Greitens kind of shit the bed. 1.00

01:30:33.000 Recently, he was forced to step down due to a major sex scandal where he was into some weird thing with his wife or he beat his wife or something. 1.00

01:30:41.000 Kind of some weird details there.

01:30:43.000 So, in any case, he was unpopular in the party, but he's a veteran and a Trump guy, and some polls said that he was going to win.

01:30:53.000 And I believe he was a favorite among Trump supporters, too.

01:30:58.000 But this is a race where Trump won. 0.97

01:30:59.000 Trump endorsed Eric, and one of the Erics won. 0.98

01:31:02.000 So, I didn't have very strong feelings about that, but that is the outcome of that one. 0.98

01:31:08.000 Okay, and we have, before I move on, I want to talk about Joe Kent, but before I do, we have got an official call.

01:31:14.000 Chris Kobach has won the nomination to represent the Republican Party as the nominee for Secretary of State in the state of Kansas, which is good.

01:31:26.000 That's very good.

01:31:28.000 So, Chris Kobach almost certainly will go on to become Kansas Secretary of State, which doesn't have a ton of significance nationally, but.

01:31:40.000 It does insofar as maybe this is the beginning of a big comeback by Chris Kobach, staging a comeback.

01:31:47.000 If he could win the statewide office, maybe he makes another bid for governor or senate, or maybe he'll be tapped in the next Trump administration.

01:31:54.000 I think certainly that's a possibility.

01:31:56.000 So that is the significance there.

01:32:00.000 But it looks like that is called.

01:32:02.000 So congratulations to Chris Kobach.

01:32:04.000 We love that.

01:32:06.000 That's huge.

01:32:07.000 And that is very America first.

01:32:09.000 We have a lot of friends working with Chris Kobach.

01:32:12.000 He was our candidate in that race.

01:32:14.000 Again, not something with a tremendous amount of national import, but that's a huge one.

01:32:19.000 I'm sorry, not Secretary of State, Attorney General.

01:32:22.000 My mistake.

01:32:23.000 Let me correct myself.

01:32:24.000 He won for Attorney General, not Secretary of State.

01:32:27.000 We're getting a correction from the politics desk at America First.

01:32:32.000 Attorney General, my bad.

01:32:35.000 Chris Kohlback, the Republican nominee for Kansas Attorney General.

01:32:39.000 Thank you for the clarification.

01:32:41.000 Let me just check my phone.

01:32:42.000 We've got some tips coming in, we've got some insider tips, some street level tips.

01:32:46.000 chatter coming in.

01:32:54.000 And let's take a look at Washington State.

01:32:57.000 And we'll see.

01:32:58.000 I'm hearing some street level chatter.

01:33:01.000 Okay, I'm hearing some on the ground reporting from some very high level sources, some very good friends of mine, that Joe Kent is losing badly.

01:33:11.000 And if you take a look at the results here on Fox News, 56% of the vote counted.

01:33:16.000 And it looks like Marie Perez, the Democrat, and the Republican incumbent, Jamie Butler, are in the lead.

01:33:24.000 With 56% in, Joe Kent is in a distant third place with half the votes counted.

01:33:32.000 And you know the rules.

01:33:35.000 If Perez and Butler are the top two vote caters, they will go on to face off in the general election.

01:33:41.000 And Joe Kent will not even be in the running, he'll be out of the race and lose.

01:33:47.000 And I'm hearing some rumors that there's a spirit of malaise and dread, which is grit.

01:33:54.000 The Kent campaign.

01:33:56.000 And it seems that they may be getting ready to concede at their campaign where they're holding their potential party.

01:34:04.000 And so it looks like they're losing badly.

01:34:07.000 It looks like they're losing very, very badly over there.

01:34:10.000 And I want to say this.

01:34:12.000 I want to say this. 1.00

01:34:15.000 If Joe Kent loses tonight, that is because of the Groypers. 1.00

01:34:20.000 Make no mistake about it. 1.00

01:34:22.000 That is 100% the Groypers.

01:34:26.000 That's me.

01:34:27.000 That's you.

01:34:28.000 That is the America First interns.

01:34:31.000 That is Joe Kent at CIA.com and the genius, the mad genius that is running that operation.

01:34:39.000 And that's all of us right here.

01:34:40.000 Because remember, this is not about Joe Kent versus Butler.

01:34:45.000 I don't even like Butler.

01:34:46.000 I don't like Butler and I don't like Perez.

01:34:48.000 It's not about that.

01:34:50.000 This is about succession.

01:34:52.000 This is about who and what will succeed Donald Trump and Trumpism in the Republican Party.

01:34:59.000 So ever since Trump won in 2016, You have had succeeding generations in every cycle since, in 2018, in 2020, and now in 2022, of Republicans running for office and backing people running for office claiming to be the legitimate successors or spiritual successors to the Trump election.

01:35:19.000 And why is that?

01:35:20.000 It's because Donald Trump is the most popular, most favored, most energetic, most successful Republican politician of this century and probably of our lifetimes, maybe Ronald Reagan notwithstanding.

01:35:33.000 Although most people watching the show weren't born when Reagan was president.

01:35:38.000 And a lot of them even after Reagan had died.

01:35:42.000 Point being is everybody is lining up to get behind Trump.

01:35:48.000 And just like a young girl getting in line to marry an old guy, they're all getting in line, not because they necessarily support Trump personally or what Trump stands for, but they're waiting in line for Trump to leave politics, for Trump to lose in 24, decline to run in 24.

01:36:06.000 For Trump to win in 24 and bow out in 28, they're waiting in line to pick up the mantle after Trump leaves as the personal successor and the ideological successor.

01:36:18.000 And who is going to inherit all of that influence and all that power and the significance that came with the Trump revolution?

01:36:25.000 That's the question of these years.

01:36:27.000 That's a question of the intervening years between 2020 and 2024 or 2020 and 2032.

01:36:35.000 That's the preeminent question concerning Republicans.

01:36:38.000 But more specifically, in this Interregnum between Trump leaving office in 20 and potentially regaining in 24.

01:36:46.000 That's the number one thing for Republicans.

01:36:48.000 Now, the significance of this race in Washington's third is about who or what is going to do that.

01:36:56.000 Is it going to be the legitimate, logical conclusion of Trumpism, the true spirit of Trumpism, which is America first and Christian nationalism?

01:37:06.000 When Donald Trump says he's speaking up for those that don't have a voice, when Donald Trump says America first, make America great again, do not listen to the false siren song of globalism, who embodies that?

01:37:19.000 It's Gosar, it's Marjorie Taylor Greene.

01:37:22.000 It's us.

01:37:23.000 It's the Groypers.

01:37:25.000 What is the next stage of Trumpism? 0.86

01:37:27.000 If Trumpism is the first step on our way to a more revanchist, stronger, more robust right wing, what is the next step?

01:37:37.000 What goes further than make America great again?

01:37:40.000 America first.

01:37:41.000 What goes further than America first? 0.65

01:37:43.000 Jesus Christ first. 0.79

01:37:45.000 That's what goes further.

01:37:47.000 That's a spiritual succession of Trump.

01:37:50.000 That's a logical conclusion of Trumpism.

01:37:53.000 It's us in style and in substance.

01:37:56.000 Joe Kent is there as an interloper.

01:37:59.000 Joe Kent is here in 2022 claiming the mantle of Trumpism and claiming to be part of a new generation that will shape the post Trump GOP and says it's not about Christianity and it's not about race and it's not about white people and it's not about America first.

01:38:18.000 Joe Kent comes on the scene and says the real future is inclusive populism.

01:38:23.000 It's an inoffensive, cookie cutter, focus group tested, consulted, provided, and paid for brand of politics, which Republicans have really been pursuing for decades, which is once again making overtures to Hispanic and black voters that don't exist, which don't even exist in his district, ignoring right wing social issues and right wing positions on social issues,

01:38:51.000 ignoring the historic character of the country.

01:38:55.000 And ultimately, ignoring the foundation of right wing political thought, which is the Catholic Church and more broadly, Christianity.

01:39:04.000 That's what's at stake here.

01:39:06.000 Now, Joe Kent declared war earlier this year on Christian nationalism.

01:39:11.000 He declared war on America First. 1.00

01:39:14.000 He didn't just disavow me, he didn't get up there and say, I don't like Nick because he's a jerk. 0.98

01:39:19.000 He got up there and said to Andrew Torba, Andy said to me, I don't like America First because it's pushing religion in people's faces. 0.98

01:39:30.000 And I don't like America First because it's pushing the race issue.

01:39:33.000 He said, I don't like Christian nationalism.

01:39:36.000 He said, even talking about those things, much less taking our position, but he said, talking about those things is divisive.

01:39:43.000 So we shouldn't really talk about religion or race.

01:39:47.000 We should talk about the economy. 0.97

01:39:49.000 And we shouldn't try to appeal to white people or Christians, but we should try to sell out white people and Christians. 0.99

01:39:57.000 In this fool's errand trying to pursue black and Hispanic voters, don't even live in his district. 0.99

01:40:03.000 His district's 95% white. 1.00

01:40:06.000 And so that's what's really at stake here.

01:40:08.000 If Joe Kent loses this election, it shows all the support from Bannon, all the support from Tucker, the Trump endorsement, the outside money did not overwhelm the America First base.

01:40:22.000 That's what that means.

01:40:24.000 Because Trump stamped him, Tucker stamped him, Darren Beatty stamped him, Bannon stamped him.

01:40:30.000 Everybody likes this guy.

01:40:32.000 Except for us.

01:40:35.000 We're the ones that don't like them.

01:40:36.000 Specifically, me.

01:40:39.000 I think Paul Gosar even endorsed them or something like that.

01:40:42.000 And I like Paul Gosar.

01:40:43.000 We disagree on that.

01:40:44.000 I get why he did it.

01:40:47.000 But it's really just us.

01:40:50.000 Joe Kent, inoffensive to everybody, even some other America firsters, even people we like, like Donald Trump.

01:40:56.000 But he deeply offended the conscience of Christians.

01:41:00.000 And he deeply offended the conscience of American patriots by pretending that America's identity is too divisive to campaign on.

01:41:08.000 That's why we're campaigning, that's why we want to win.

01:41:12.000 And the same goes for the Christian religion.

01:41:14.000 That's the foundation of what it means to be right wing.

01:41:18.000 And so, as a consequence, that should be the foundation of the Republican Party, which is the right wing party in America, or should be.

01:41:26.000 And certainly, you can't claim to be part of the solution in making the Republican Party right wing if you're not right wing, if you don't obey the foundation of it, which is belief in God, the God.

01:41:38.000 So, if Joe Kent loses tonight, never forget it's because of us.

01:41:44.000 It's not because of anybody else, it's because of us.

01:41:47.000 We alone refuse Joe Kent.

01:41:49.000 Now, if Joe Kent wins, It's like, hey, he had everybody supporting him, okay?

01:41:54.000 But if he loses, he lost because of us.

01:41:57.000 And that's our victory.

01:41:59.000 If Paul Gosar wins going to AFPAC 3, and Joe Kent loses disavowing AFPAC 3, Paul Gosar's in Arizona.

01:42:08.000 Joe Kent is in Washington State.

01:42:11.000 They're on opposite sides of the country.

01:42:15.000 And if America First wins in Arizona, and if America Last loses in Washington, that tells you.

01:42:22.000 We've got it going on. 0.99

01:42:24.000 That tells you this is a Groyper country.

01:42:26.000 That tells you this is a Groyper Republican Party.

01:42:29.000 Because it's not just a Trump party.

01:42:33.000 Trump endorsed Joe Kent.

01:42:35.000 So if Joe Kent loses, endorsed by Trump, Tucker, Bannon, and Darren Beatty, what does that tell you about the Republican Party?

01:42:44.000 It's not just a Trump party.

01:42:46.000 It's not just an America First party. 0.88

01:42:50.000 The indisputable takeaway will be this it's a Groyper party. 0.71

01:42:54.000 Paul Gosar won on America First.

01:42:56.000 Joe Kent lost because he didn't have the support of the Groypers. 0.98

01:43:02.000 So, who is really the spirit of the Trump movement? 0.56

01:43:06.000 Trump's endorsement may lose tonight, and a Trump impeachment candidate may win.

01:43:14.000 So, whose party is it really? 0.71

01:43:16.000 And the outcome of this race, even if it's close, is going to suggest that there are a lot more Groypers in the Republican Party than a lot of people fought.

01:43:26.000 And it will tell you something else. 0.92

01:43:28.000 It will tell you the Groypers successfully went from internet live streams to the college campuses in 2019 to national politics and the Congress in 2022.

01:43:41.000 That's the significance. 0.99

01:43:43.000 The Groypers started out on live streams yelling at each other in 2018. 0.98

01:43:49.000 In 2019, we went to the college campus and said, Excuse me, we're not going to staple green cards to diplomats, Charlie Kirk. 1.00

01:43:57.000 And Turning Point bent the knee. 0.60

01:44:00.000 Turning point submitted to the Groypers, and now they sound just like us.

01:44:05.000 2022 is the year that the Groypers got involved, and guess what?

01:44:09.000 Marjorie Taylor Greene, Paul Gosar, that spoke at AFPAC 3, they crushed their primaries and they won, and they're the most popular Republicans in America.

01:44:18.000 Joe Kent, campaigning against an impeachment incumbent with Trump's endorsement, on Tucker, on Bannon, supported by Revolver, supported by Teal, supported by Money.

01:44:29.000 I mean, just about every kingmaker in Republican politics.

01:44:33.000 Lost, may lose tonight, even if he wins by a slim majority. 1.00

01:44:39.000 And that's because the Groypers are in. 1.00

01:44:42.000 This is our party now. 1.00

01:44:43.000 This is a Groeper Republican Party.

01:44:46.000 And that conclusion is, you can't run away from it.

01:44:50.000 This should have been a blowout.

01:44:52.000 We were led to believe that this should have been a blowout.

01:44:56.000 And with 56% in, he's not even leading among the Republicans.

01:45:03.000 So let's see.

01:45:03.000 I'm going to take a look here in my politics desk and see if we have any other announcements.

01:45:08.000 Doesn't look like we have any other major announcements, but we're going to take a look through and scan, see if there's any other major developments here.

01:45:17.000 Looks like Fox News is still not called Michigan for John Gibbs, although others have said that it's over, so we'll see.

01:45:26.000 And we'll take another look at Arizona.

01:45:36.000 And it looks like still no call in the governor race, still no call in the Senate race either.

01:45:41.000 So, no new calls.

01:45:43.000 And it doesn't even look like the vote count has been tabulated yet.

01:45:49.000 Or there's no increase, I should say, in the amount of ballots counted.

01:45:53.000 So, no new updates, but yeah, that's what's going on in Washington State.

01:45:57.000 I'm taking a victory lap.

01:45:58.000 This is our victory. 0.85

01:45:59.000 I'd like to raise a toast to the Groypers.

01:46:05.000 From our lips, To the US House of Representatives, the Groypers are unstoppable.

01:46:10.000 America First is unstoppable in spite of everything.

01:46:14.000 Think about that.

01:46:16.000 Think about what I've personally been put through.

01:46:18.000 I'm a guy that's been banned on every social media for a year.

01:46:23.000 Some of them for a year and a half, some of them longer than that.

01:46:26.000 I'm a guy that's been banned from every social media TikTok, Twitter, Facebook, Instagram, Discord, Reddit, you name it.

01:46:36.000 I'm banned from every payment processor.

01:46:38.000 I'm banned from almost every bank.

01:46:40.000 I just got banned from another bank this week.

01:46:43.000 US Bank, Chase Bank, Bank of America, this local bank in Chicago, which I thought was good.

01:46:49.000 I'm blacklisted by Turning Point USA, the number one youth campus group in the country.

01:46:54.000 I'm blacklisted by the GOP, hated by the left, dodged, targeted by Antifa, swatted, investigated by the FBI, subpoenaed by the Congress, put on the no fly list, my funds frozen, income destroyed.

01:47:09.000 You go down the list, subject to disavowals, people associated with me disavowed, internal drama.

01:47:18.000 Here we are, August 2022, and in spite of it all, America First is more influential than ever before.

01:47:27.000 Here we are in the year 2022, five years in, a year after the sixth, a year after the censorship, after the debanking, after the financial sanction, and we held AFPAC 3, a conference with 1,200 people.

01:47:42.000 With nine government officials.

01:47:44.000 And then, after everybody disavowed us and everybody disavowed our speakers and attendees, speakers went on and won their primaries, and the people that spoke against us are losing theirs.

01:47:58.000 If that doesn't tell you the power of what we're doing, the uniqueness of what we're doing, I don't know what does.

01:48:04.000 If none of that can stop America first, what can?

01:48:08.000 What else can be done?

01:48:09.000 They took off all the media, all the money, all the banks.

01:48:14.000 Every source of institutional support or legitimacy, and we're still defeating everybody, still pushing through.

01:48:22.000 Just goes to show.

01:48:24.000 So we're watching that one very closely, and we'll see what the outcome is.

01:48:31.000 But it looks like Joe Kent not having a great night tonight.

01:48:33.000 Let's maybe look specifically here at maybe district by district, or rather, county by county.

01:48:46.000 And it looks like with 50% of this county, Joe Kent has a slight lead over Butler.

01:48:56.000 In this county, Butler and Perez have a huge lead over Kent.

01:49:02.000 In this county, Joe Kent almost dead last.

01:49:07.000 In this county, we've got Joe Kent winning by 2%.

01:49:11.000 Heidi St. John was 17%.

01:49:15.000 And in this county, Joe Kent leading by 5%.

01:49:20.000 Now, what it looks like to me, frankly, and this is Joe Kent's problem, this makes me optimistic, is that Butler is winning too many votes for Kent.

01:49:32.000 That seems to be the problem.

01:49:33.000 Or rather, not Bueller. 1.00

01:49:36.000 Heidi St. John seems to be winning a lot of votes here. 1.00

01:49:43.000 See here, like in this district, for example, Heidi St. John with 14% to Joe Kent's 18%. 0.98

01:49:54.000 Heidi St. John with 23% to Joe Kent's 19%.

01:49:59.000 In this district, Heidi St. John 21% to Joe Kent's 18%.

01:50:05.000 In this district, now Joe Kent's got a little bit of a lead, 14 to 25, Heidi St. John, Joe Kent.

01:50:12.000 In this district, 17, and this one, Joe Kent's a little bit stronger, but still 30 to 28 with Butler.

01:50:19.000 And in this district, 30 to Perez's 25, and Butler's 20%.

01:50:24.000 Now, that tells me, and here's the trick in this district here's a dynamic.

01:50:30.000 You've got Perez, who's a Democrat, you've got Butler, who's a moderate Republican and the incumbent.

01:50:37.000 You've got Joe Kent, who's considered an extreme right winger.

01:50:40.000 He's considered the most right wing guy running.

01:50:43.000 And then you've got St. John, who's somewhere in between Kent and Butler.

01:50:47.000 And so there's sort of a race within a race happening where you've got the Democrat, who's going to be the number one or number two vote getter.

01:50:55.000 And then it's a contest to see who is going to get the most Republican votes.

01:51:00.000 That's one race who's going to be the number one Republican vote getter.

01:51:05.000 And obviously, the Republican nomination is split.

01:51:08.000 Between three candidates getting high vote totals, Butler, Kent, and St. John.

01:51:15.000 Within that, though, so the Republicans are split between three candidates to go up against the Democrat.

01:51:22.000 Within that, the Republicans are split, or you could say that the very conservative Republicans are split between Kent and St. John, where the question of who is going to be the top Republican vote getter.

01:51:38.000 It's a question of overcoming Butler.

01:51:41.000 Butler is the moderate, and she's somebody the Democrats are going to vote for, and that this is a moderate district that a lot of the moderate Republicans will vote for.

01:51:51.000 Almost certainly, she's the one to beat as the incumbent.

01:51:54.000 And so, Joe Kent, maybe if he were running just against her, and if it was just Kent versus Butler, maybe he'd win.

01:52:03.000 But it's almost like St. John is splitting the anti Butler vote within this Republican part of the race.

01:52:12.000 Within the part of the race where you've got a Democrat as well.

01:52:16.000 And so, anyway, so I don't know everything about this district, but from my understanding of the dynamic, is that for Joe Kent to really have a good chance, what he needed was for Heidi St. John to drop out and throw her support behind Kent.

01:52:30.000 That's what Kent needed.

01:52:32.000 If Heidi St. John dropped out and supported Kent, Kent would win.

01:52:36.000 Obviously, look at the totals.

01:52:39.000 And it looks like maybe an update here.

01:52:42.000 And Kent is now 20, and St. John, or rather, actually, no, this is the same.

01:52:46.000 But you see here, if St. John threw support behind Kent, Kent may be the number one vote getter, or at least number two.

01:52:57.000 What's more, not just Heidi St. John dropping out, but the question is is Heidi St. John going to get enough?

01:53:04.000 Is Heidi St. John going to get enough of the anti-Butler Republican vote to prevent Kent from overcoming Butler? 1.00

01:53:14.000 That's the problem. 1.00

01:53:17.000 Is the Perez going to be the number one?

01:53:22.000 And then the question of who comes next, it's going to be between these three Republicans.

01:53:26.000 And this is largely so it's Perez versus whoever the Republican is.

01:53:30.000 And whoever the Republican is, is largely a contest between Butler and Kent plus St. John.

01:53:36.000 So, the extent that St. John is bigger, Kent is smaller.

01:53:40.000 The extent that St. John is getting more of the anti Butler vote, she's getting more of the Kent vote.

01:53:46.000 And to the extent that she's getting the Kent vote, she's preventing Kent, who's going to get more of the anti Butler vote, from getting more than Butler.

01:53:54.000 And so, just based on that dynamic and my understanding of that dynamic, it looks like with 50% voting already, with 50% of the votes counted, St. John is performing, it seems, too well for Kent to overcome because this is 35%.

01:54:12.000 35% of the votes so far are Republicans that don't like Butler.

01:54:17.000 And it's split.

01:54:21.000 You know, what would that be?

01:54:25.000 It's not quite 50 50, but it would be what?

01:54:29.000 4 over 7 for Kent?

01:54:32.000 Which is what?

01:54:34.000 I would have to do the quick math on that.

01:54:34.000 I don't know.

01:54:36.000 I think that's.

01:54:39.000 So it would be 37, 37, 63, something like that.

01:54:50.000 Is that right?

01:54:53.000 Yeah, so it would be roughly 36, 37, 64, 63.

01:54:59.000 Kent versus St. John.

01:55:01.000 And to me, that seems like too much of a split.

01:55:03.000 In other words, St. John is acting as a spoiler for Kent against Butler.

01:55:10.000 And so, if she's getting 15 to 20, right, if she's getting 37% of the anti Butler Republican vote, that seems like there's not enough anti Butler Republicans to go around.

01:55:22.000 So, let's see. 0.91

01:55:23.000 Why don't we pull up the.

01:55:26.000 I'm going to pull up predicted, and let's see what predicted says.

01:55:29.000 Whoops.

01:55:30.000 Okay.

01:55:30.000 Typing check.

01:55:35.000 And let's see what we have in predicted.

01:55:38.000 This is a betting market, by the way.

01:55:39.000 It's not perfect, but it does give you some idea.

01:55:43.000 Okay.

01:55:44.000 Uh oh, this is not good.

01:55:46.000 This is not looking good for Ken.

01:55:47.000 Look at this.

01:55:48.000 Look at this.

01:55:49.000 So, this is the market.

01:55:50.000 This is the way it works.

01:55:52.000 People can bet.

01:55:54.000 If you're not familiar with this, this is one of the ways that we can assess the odds of political outcomes the betting markets, where you have Predicted and a few other forums where people can bet on who's going to win an election, what the polling number is going to look like for.

01:56:16.000 Biden job approval, something like that.

01:56:19.000 And the way it works is that people can vote yes and they could vote no.

01:56:23.000 And so if I, and it's out of 100, and the shares are denominated in sort of like percentages.

01:56:29.000 I don't know how it technically works.

01:56:32.000 Okay, but here's what it means it means that if you think that a certain thing is going to happen, if you think that Butler is going to be in the top two, you can buy, you can bet that she will by buying a share of yes.

01:56:47.000 For 77 cents, redeemable for $1.

01:56:51.000 So if I think that Butler's gonna win, I will buy a share of yes, I will say yes, and the best offer for that is 77 cents, redeemable if that contract is completed.

01:57:01.000 If she does become the top two finisher, I could redeem that share for $1.

01:57:08.000 And inversely, if I say no, she's not gonna be it, I could buy that share for 24 cents, and I could redeem that for a dollar if she does not finish in the top two.

01:57:20.000 And so that means you're assigning obviously better betting odds for her being a top two vote getter because it's a lower payout, less risky, meaning more likely, versus that she's not going to do that.

01:57:35.000 So, anyway, that's how it works if you don't know, if you've never seen predict it.

01:57:39.000 And so this is the market.

01:57:41.000 Will Jamie Butler finish in the top two in the Washington primary?

01:57:46.000 Meaning, essentially, Will she be effectively the Republican nominee?

01:57:52.000 Because as we've established, Perez, as the Democrat, is going to be the number one vote getter, or the minimum number two.

01:57:59.000 And so the real contest is between the Republicans and who's going to be the top Republican vote getter and then be number one or number two overall and face Perez in the general.

01:58:10.000 Perez has 30%.

01:58:12.000 Now she may go down to second. 0.94

01:58:15.000 The reason why is because this is not a district with a huge Republican advantage, so it's about 50 50.

01:58:22.000 All the Democrats are going to vote for Perez, and the Republicans are voting for four different candidates.

01:58:29.000 So, all the Democrats are going to outnumber some of the Republicans voting for one of four candidates.

01:58:37.000 So, what the predicted market is really asking is who is going to be the top Republican vote getter?

01:58:44.000 If Butler finishes in the top two, that means she's finishing in the top two almost certainly with the Democrat.

01:58:50.000 That means that she essentially wins the primary as the Republicans.

01:58:54.000 That's not exactly what's happening, but that's what's happening.

01:58:58.000 So, what we're looking at here is the past 24 hours in this market.

01:59:03.000 We're looking at the odds that this would happen in the last 24 hours.

01:59:07.000 Currently, the betting markets give her a 77% chance of finishing in the top two.

01:59:15.000 And this is based on the people investing in these markets, to some extent, have a knowledge of the district.

01:59:23.000 I don't think people are betting in this market.

01:59:26.000 And making big buys and sells if they're not political nerds and if they're not specifically political nerds acquainted with the details and the particulars of what these results mean, you know, these incomplete results mean.

01:59:39.000 So that means that as the results have been counted, 24 hours ago, there was a 55% chance assigned by the betting markets that Butler would be the top two vote getter, meaning there's a 50% chance that she's going to win.

01:59:53.000 And as the day has gone on, I think the polls closed two hours ago.

02:00:01.000 So, this would be about around here.

02:00:03.000 Okay, this is 24 hours ago before the polls closed.

02:00:08.000 I believe the polls closed at 10 o'clock local time.

02:00:11.000 Let me check my notes.

02:00:14.000 The polls closed at 8 o'clock local time, which is 10 o'clock central time.

02:00:18.000 So, that means two hours ago, two hours ago minus two hours would have been at 77%.

02:00:24.000 So, this means that six hours ago, which would have been at 4 o'clock local time, six hours before polls closed.

02:00:33.000 Okay, why did I convert it like that?

02:00:35.000 Six hours before polls closed in the district, it went from 54% to 49% to 65% to 61%.

02:00:45.000 And then as the polls closed, it shot up.

02:00:49.000 Just as the polls closed, her odds of winning went from 61% to 77%.

02:00:58.000 Then up to 79%.

02:01:00.000 It's fluctuating right now, but that's what it looks like right now.

02:01:03.000 Right now, the best offer, it's even going up.

02:01:05.000 You saw that.

02:01:07.000 I pulled this up a few minutes ago.

02:01:09.000 It said 77%.

02:01:11.000 Now it says 79%, which means that it just went up 2% since I started talking about it.

02:01:21.000 So it was tracking, let's see, 30 days.

02:01:25.000 It was tracking at about 80% for the past, it says 30 days, but this is two weeks ago.

02:01:34.000 It was tracking at about 80% that she was going to win.

02:01:37.000 Went down to 50% in the past week.

02:01:40.000 And now it's shot back up to 80% as the polls have closed, if we're tracking it closely.

02:01:46.000 And in this election week, it was down, polls closed, it went up.

02:01:54.000 So that is what we're looking at right now.

02:01:56.000 Let's give it another refresh and let's see where we are.

02:01:58.000 Okay, still at 79%.

02:02:00.000 So again, we don't know.

02:02:02.000 And the betting markets flip all the time.

02:02:04.000 The betting markets, it tends to be the case that the betting markets follow the results rather than the betting markets predicting the results, especially on election night.

02:02:15.000 Because if you watch the election night on 2020, There were wild fluctuations.

02:02:20.000 It would go from 90% to 10%.

02:02:22.000 So anything could still happen.

02:02:24.000 I think they can still win here.

02:02:27.000 In other words, the betting markets are not a perfect indicator of.

02:02:31.000 It's a question of are the betting markets making this prediction based on the results?

02:02:39.000 Or rather, are they predicting into the future based on what the results tell them?

02:02:44.000 Or are they kind of just voting on what the results tell them?

02:02:49.000 Have just said.

02:02:49.000 Okay, well, the results say that right now Butler's leading, so the betting markets say sell can't buy Butler.

02:02:56.000 Rather than based on these results, I predict in the future that the certain outcome is more likely.

02:03:03.000 Some markets are one way, some markets are the other.

02:03:03.000 So you have that.

02:03:07.000 Sometimes the market will just sort of follow the horse race and they're sort of follow as it's in progress.

02:03:16.000 Trump takes the lead, Trump is winning in the market.

02:03:18.000 Biden takes the lead, Biden's winning in the market.

02:03:21.000 In some races, There are legitimate predictions, and some are more one way than the other.

02:03:28.000 So I'm just saying this is one source of information, but I wouldn't get any.

02:03:35.000 I wouldn't look too deep into this.

02:03:37.000 This is just a little bit more information than what we're seeing in Fox News.

02:03:41.000 That's all.

02:03:43.000 So we're going to check back in on Fox and we're going to refresh, see where we are, if we have any other developments.

02:03:49.000 I'm going to hang on here for as long as I can, and we'll look at the other races too.

02:03:56.000 So let's see.

02:03:58.000 Okay, still no updates from Arizona Senate.

02:04:01.000 Still no updates from Arizona Governor.

02:04:05.000 And we'll check in on Washington District 3.

02:04:08.000 Still no updates in Washington's 3rd District.

02:04:11.000 Okay, so no updates.

02:04:13.000 We got a little bit of information from Predicted.

02:04:16.000 I would say this bodes very well.

02:04:19.000 Because again, what this represents is that people are putting their money on the line.

02:04:23.000 You know, they're putting their money where their mouth is and they're saying.

02:04:30.000 They're saying, okay, we, you know, the polls closed, the results started coming in, we've looked at the results, and now we think after the results came in that Butler has a 30% greater chance of winning than she did before, than she did earlier this week.

02:04:48.000 The 30 days shows that she was the favorite to be the second vote getter, one of the top two, and then since the polls closed, that trend has resumed.

02:04:59.000 So that's where we are.

02:05:03.000 And we're going to wait and see.

02:05:07.000 Looks like it was trading at about.

02:05:09.000 Oh, this is trade volume.

02:05:11.000 Okay, not price.

02:05:12.000 This is price.

02:05:12.000 This is volume.

02:05:16.000 So let's take a look and we'll see.

02:05:19.000 What do our comments say?

02:05:21.000 Wine Mom says, but they said Joe Kent was chiseled.

02:05:25.000 They said that in the New York Times about Joe Kent.

02:05:28.000 But they said Joe Kent was chiseled.

02:05:30.000 Now that's funny. 0.98

02:05:32.000 God bless Heidi St. John. 0.99

02:05:33.000 Let's go.

02:05:34.000 Sold my new house, yes, but I think this one is over.

02:05:38.000 Okay.

02:05:41.000 Somebody goofed here.

02:05:42.000 They saw Butler fall to second and bought no, but she increased her lead on third, and over half the vote is in.

02:05:51.000 Did something happen?

02:05:51.000 Okay.

02:05:52.000 Meyer?

02:05:53.000 I don't know what that means.

02:05:56.000 Oh, they say Meyer winning in Michigan, so it's good for Butler here.

02:06:00.000 Is Meyer an impeachment Republican?

02:06:00.000 Oh, I see.

02:06:03.000 I think that's talking about, if I'm, let me take a look and see.

02:06:07.000 Meyer, Michigan.

02:06:11.000 I'm not familiar with all of them.

02:06:16.000 Oh, I see.

02:06:16.000 Yeah, okay.

02:06:17.000 So Meyer is the Republican Gibbs is running against.

02:06:20.000 He voted for impeachment.

02:06:23.000 And I guess they're saying if he had a good performance, if he had a better than expected performance than Butler, another impeachment Republican will have a better than expected performance.

02:06:33.000 And that she will probably be the top Republican vote getter because the anti Butler vote will be split between St. John and Kemp.

02:06:42.000 Now, that is what they're saying there for those that aren't following very closely.

02:06:49.000 Breaking.

02:06:50.000 Bueller found crying on the steps of the Capitol after seeing the Michigan third results.

02:06:54.000 Okay.

02:06:54.000 John Gibbs winning.

02:06:55.000 But that was four hours ago.

02:06:56.000 That's before the polls closed.

02:06:58.000 I want to max yes, but I don't have the stones.

02:07:03.000 MAGA vote is split between four Republicans.

02:07:05.000 The progressive candidate is fractured between two Democrat candidates and a far left one.

02:07:10.000 Pshh.

02:07:22.000 Let's see.

02:07:23.000 I guess this is two days ago.

02:07:26.000 We're just reading comments.

02:07:28.000 It says, I guess it's going to be either Kent and Butler or Perez and Kent.

02:07:34.000 Can't see Butler finishing first, either second or out.

02:07:38.000 If Perez is in, Kent gets most of the GOP, even with St. John bearing down his neck.

02:07:42.000 If number one occurs, I think she gets reelected.

02:07:44.000 If two, Kent wins.

02:07:47.000 Smart man.

02:07:48.000 Butler was a nine point deficit to Kent a month ago.

02:07:51.000 Yeah, but that's BS.

02:07:52.000 Even with the PAC money coming in late to help her and Booth St. John, that is a huge lead to make up.

02:07:57.000 Also, Kent is everywhere.

02:07:58.000 His campaign knocked on every suburban door that has a Republican voter in it, many of them more than once.

02:08:02.000 He has a public event every night since last summer.

02:08:05.000 Butler hasn't had one in six years.

02:08:07.000 Okay, Carlson, Kent, 28.

02:08:10.000 Okay, I think that may be a little biased, but that's another data point.

02:08:15.000 That's another opinion.

02:08:20.000 Let's take a look at this.

02:08:23.000 This is Marie Glusenkamp Perez. 1.00

02:08:26.000 Oh, she's a Democrat.

02:08:27.000 Okay.

02:08:28.000 There's a strong base of Democrats in our district, and as a rural Democrat who works in the trades, I am the candidate who can flip the seat. 1.00

02:08:34.000 Okay, so she's just full of shit. 0.99

02:08:39.000 She's saying, here's how it's going to play out 45 Dem, 47 Republican. 1.00

02:08:44.000 Okay, now the Democrat predicts that Kent is going to get 28.

02:08:49.000 Here's a likely breakdown.

02:08:51.000 Interesting.

02:08:52.000 So a week ago, two weeks ago, she said she thinks Kent is going to be the number one Republican.

02:08:57.000 So we'll see.

02:09:00.000 Let's see.

02:09:00.000 Any updates?

02:09:01.000 Still no updates.

02:09:03.000 Still, we do not have a new number.

02:09:05.000 Boo!

02:09:06.000 What the freak?

02:09:06.000 Give us a new number, man.

02:09:11.000 Um.

02:09:17.000 All right, well, we'll see.

02:09:21.000 We'll see what happens.

02:09:22.000 Let's look up Joe Kent just for the fun of it.

02:09:24.000 We'll see.

02:09:25.000 What's the chatter?

02:09:26.000 What is the chatter happening on Twitter?

02:09:35.000 Let's take a look at this.

02:09:37.000 Let's take a look at his speech.

02:09:40.000 This is him on election night 37 minutes ago.

02:09:43.000 I'll play this clip and we'll see what he's got to say.

02:09:47.000 Itself.

02:09:48.000 So far, it's because of you guys, because of the people in this room, people out there, people all throughout the district getting engaged and getting us this far.

02:09:56.000 I'm still very optimistic we have a clear pathway to victory.

02:09:59.000 There's 42% of that study.

02:10:06.000 So, really, this is kind of like probably the shortest speech I'll ever do.

02:10:09.000 All I'm going to say tonight. 0.52

02:10:11.000 I hate, I just hate his whole disposition. 0.85

02:10:13.000 He has this just like a Reddit fake folksy disposition. 0.98

02:10:21.000 Which I hate.

02:10:21.000 Like, why don't you.

02:10:23.000 Wow, thanks for dressing up to your own freaking election party, right? 0.98

02:10:29.000 Thanks for dressing up. 0.98

02:10:30.000 You couldn't wear something with sleeves.

02:10:32.000 You couldn't wear pants.

02:10:34.000 These are work pants. 0.91

02:10:35.000 He's wearing work pants and a freaking untuckable flannel. 1.00

02:10:40.000 Thanks for dressing up, asshole. 1.00

02:10:42.000 Why don't you wear a suit? 1.00

02:10:43.000 Why don't you dignify the office and dignify your supporters by wearing a freaking tie, by wearing a freaking necktie and a suit? 0.99

02:10:50.000 I hate that stuff. 1.00

02:10:52.000 I hate this.

02:10:53.000 Oh, he's not wearing a necktie.

02:10:54.000 That means he's just like one of us. 1.00

02:10:56.000 No, it means you're a goofball. 0.99

02:10:58.000 It means you don't take this seriously. 1.00

02:11:00.000 I hate it.

02:11:01.000 I think it's totally pretentious. 0.91

02:11:02.000 I mean, it's totally fake.

02:11:05.000 So, anyway, but let's see.

02:11:06.000 How confident does he look?

02:11:10.000 Does that sound very confident?

02:11:12.000 I'm still optimistic.

02:11:13.000 There's a pathway to victory.

02:11:20.000 Yeah, that's a face of confidence.

02:11:23.000 Wow, very confident.

02:11:25.000 This is a guy that knows he's going to win.

02:11:27.000 This is a guy that is very confident he's going to get 28%. 0.95

02:11:31.000 That's a face of supreme confidence in the wake of disappointing performance so far in his untuckable shirt and in his freaking Dickies work pants.

02:11:42.000 Jagof getting millions of dollars pouring into the super PACs and he's wearing work pants because he's just one of us, right? 0.76

02:11:50.000 Let's see.

02:11:54.000 The scene as Kent arrives.

02:12:12.000 Okay, well we don't really learn too much from that.

02:12:22.000 Okay, let's take a look and let's see what the other chatter is on Twitter.

02:12:28.000 We're going to look at our latest tweets.

02:12:29.000 Let's check in on Predicted, then we'll check Fox and we'll check Twitter.

02:12:33.000 Let's just get our minute by minute updates.

02:12:36.000 Okay, back down to 77.

02:12:37.000 Okay.

02:12:41.000 Let's take a look at the hour by hour.

02:12:42.000 Okay, back down to 77 from 79.

02:12:45.000 Looks like a little bit of movement in the wrong direction.

02:12:49.000 Let's get a refresh on Fox.

02:12:50.000 Do we get an update in the vote count?

02:12:55.000 And maybe that's a reaction.

02:12:57.000 Let's take a look.

02:13:01.000 Okay, no, so there was no update.

02:13:12.000 Uh oh.

02:13:14.000 America first, far right candidate Joe Kent looks like he's not going to make it out of the primary in Washington against Republican Jamie Herrera.

02:13:21.000 Butler, weirdly, Kent may have been hurt by being outflanked on his right.

02:13:24.000 You're damn right he was. 0.86

02:13:26.000 You're damn right he was. 0.95

02:13:28.000 Absolutely. 0.98

02:13:29.000 If Joe Kent hadn't disavowed Jesus and gotten duped by Bannon into campaigning as a Marxist with his inclusive populism, bourgeoisie versus proletariat crap, maybe he'd be winning this right now. 0.98

02:13:39.000 Good point, Yankee perspective. 0.97

02:13:41.000 You're absolutely right. 1.00

02:13:42.000 Great point.

02:13:44.000 And who's this?

02:13:46.000 Christian nationalist Zoomer. 0.96

02:13:48.000 Let's freaking go. 0.97

02:13:50.000 Let's see. 0.68

02:13:50.000 This guy says, if these ratios hold up, MAGA prick, Joe Kent is gone. 0.68

02:13:55.000 I can vote in President General.

02:13:56.000 Okay, so he's saying what I'm saying, that this is not a good ratio.

02:14:00.000 Well, I guess, you know, that's obvious.

02:14:04.000 Joe Kent smells.

02:14:05.000 Joe Kent unfollowed me from Twitter before his disavowal of Nick.

02:14:08.000 Now we're unfollowing him from this race.

02:14:10.000 Let's go. 1.00

02:14:13.000 Let's take a look at this.

02:14:18.000 That's not about that.

02:14:18.000 That's about Arizona, whatever.

02:14:22.000 Joe Kent is a CIA agent who came from out of town to ruin a district that should have gone to true Christian candidate Heidi St. John. 1.00

02:14:29.000 So true. 0.91

02:14:31.000 AIDS Alaska.

02:14:32.000 Boo! 1.00

02:14:32.000 We don't support you. 1.00

02:14:34.000 We don't support that sentiment, but this sentiment, I agree.

02:14:40.000 Joe Kent losing in Washington.

02:14:43.000 Let's take a look at the replies.

02:14:45.000 Based, good, awesome.

02:14:46.000 MAGA guy, right?

02:14:47.000 Not quite. 1.00

02:14:49.000 He sucks. 1.00

02:14:50.000 Embarrassment. 1.00

02:14:50.000 Yay. 1.00

02:14:52.000 Not quite an insane enough MAGA candidate didn't drop out.

02:14:55.000 True.

02:14:58.000 Hell yeah. 1.00

02:14:58.000 Well, she's got a gay Ukraine flag, though, so whatever. 1.00

02:15:03.000 Ryan Gerdusky. 0.99

02:15:04.000 There he is again, Ryan.

02:15:06.000 You know, me and Ryan are cool again.

02:15:08.000 After our little beef earlier this year, he called me up and we're cool.

02:15:15.000 But we have this sort of friendly rivalry.

02:15:17.000 Come on, Joe Kent, pull through and give me a perfect record.

02:15:19.000 Sorry, pal.

02:15:20.000 You're running up against the Nick Fuentes block time again, time and time again.

02:15:26.000 You know, because me and Ryan Grodusky feuded over the Georgia Senate runoff a year and a half ago, and I saw him at the Trump rally.

02:15:38.000 The Georgia Senate runoff was on January 5th, a Tuesday, January 5th, 2021.

02:15:45.000 It was Assoff and Warnock versus Loeffler and Perdue, the Republicans being the latter.

02:15:51.000 And Ryan Gurdusky was one of the main people saying, You got to get out to Georgia to campaign.

02:15:56.000 We got to hold the line in the Senate.

02:15:58.000 And I said, No, stay home.

02:16:00.000 Don't vote. 1.00

02:16:01.000 Fuck the GOP. 1.00

02:16:02.000 We're going to destroy the GOP. 1.00

02:16:04.000 And Ryan Gurdusky was calling me an idiot. 1.00

02:16:06.000 Ryan Gurdusky was like, If you don't vote for, you know, Leffler and Purdue, you're an idiot. 1.00

02:16:10.000 You're stupid. 1.00

02:16:11.000 And I said, No, you're stupid. 1.00

02:16:13.000 You're stupid for saying we should vote for him. 1.00

02:16:15.000 And then they both lost. 1.00

02:16:17.000 They both got their clocks cleaned.

02:16:19.000 And I, so then I, you know, flew out to D.C. that day.

02:16:24.000 And I was at the Trump rally the following morning on Wednesday, January 6th.

02:16:29.000 And I was in the VIP section with Alex Jones and who's the MyPillow guy.

02:16:37.000 I was out there with him and Alex Jones and all the others in attendance, in attendance.

02:16:43.000 They were all in attendance.

02:16:44.000 Mike Lindell were all in attendance, Owen Schreuer, et cetera.

02:16:48.000 And I bumped into Ryan Grodowski and I'm like, hey, oh, too bad.

02:16:53.000 What's too bad about. 0.88

02:16:55.000 Bleffler and Purdue, that they didn't win their primaries, that really, or their runoffs, that really sucks. 0.93

02:17:01.000 And he was a little pissed. 0.51

02:17:02.000 He was not happy.

02:17:03.000 He didn't see the funny side of that.

02:17:05.000 And so, yeah, so big problem.

02:17:07.000 And it was the same thing.

02:17:09.000 I was one of the only people then, me and Lynn Wood, were the only ones telling people not to vote.

02:17:14.000 Trump was telling people to vote.

02:17:15.000 Gurdusky, everybody was telling people to vote in Georgia, except for me and Lynn Wood.

02:17:21.000 We were the only ones saying, stay home, don't vote.

02:17:24.000 And Ryan was like, no, no, you have to vote.

02:17:27.000 And so it goes, please, please, Joe Kent, pull through so I can have a perfect record.

02:17:31.000 Yeah, uh oh, there's just one problem.

02:17:34.000 And it's called the Groypers, pal. 0.99

02:17:37.000 I like Ryan.

02:17:38.000 Ryan's a good guy.

02:17:40.000 But, uh,.

02:17:42.000 Yeah, but he's just wrong about some of these things.

02:17:45.000 Oh!

02:17:46.000 Get this out of here! 0.99

02:17:48.000 Ugh!

02:17:49.000 Alright, whatever.

02:17:51.000 I didn't want to see that information anyway.

02:17:55.000 Okay, so that's that.

02:18:00.000 Let's see.

02:18:11.000 What else we got?

02:18:12.000 What else?

02:18:17.000 Andrew McCarthy, I send my power to brother Joe Kent.

02:18:20.000 Well, you know, I kind of like Andrew McCarthy, but he did drop out after the first quarter, so I don't know how valuable that energy is going to be.

02:18:26.000 I like Andrew McCarthy.

02:18:27.000 I maxed out a donation to his campaign in the first quarter, and I know a few other people that did as well, and then he dropped out.

02:18:34.000 So I like him.

02:18:36.000 I like him.

02:18:37.000 He's America first and everything, but that was a little frustrating.

02:18:43.000 I maxed out or I gave to his campaign in the first quarter on like March 31st or whatever, and then April 2nd he drops out.

02:18:52.000 I'm like, okay, you could have told me that before I donated all that money.

02:18:56.000 Whatever.

02:18:57.000 Not a big deal.

02:18:57.000 Don't care.

02:18:58.000 So I don't know how much power that's worth.

02:19:00.000 I mean, is he going to stop sending the power tomorrow?

02:19:04.000 Because that would be maybe analogous in some ways.

02:19:09.000 Uh oh.

02:19:10.000 Let's go.

02:19:11.000 84, 84, 84%.

02:19:15.000 Let's go.

02:19:16.000 It's up to 84, highest yet.

02:19:20.000 Best offer 84%.

02:19:22.000 We're holding on here.

02:19:24.000 Kent surging, no freaking way.

02:19:26.000 We don't even have any results. 1.00

02:19:29.000 The results are the same, idiot. 1.00

02:19:31.000 Surging how? 1.00

02:19:32.000 Surging in a third place?

02:19:33.000 Yeah, maybe, you dip.

02:19:36.000 I don't think so.

02:19:42.000 Okay, we don't have any other developments here.

02:19:47.000 Where's our updates?

02:19:47.000 Boo!

02:19:49.000 I set aside time for this, and now we're not getting any results.

02:19:59.000 Let's check Arizona.

02:20:06.000 Where is it?

02:20:06.000 I keep scrolling past it.

02:20:08.000 Okay, still nothing in Arizona's first.

02:20:10.000 Still nothing in the Senate. 0.95

02:20:12.000 What the freaking heck, man? 0.98

02:20:14.000 Count some votes. 0.99

02:20:16.000 Huh?

02:20:17.000 Let's count some votes for crying out loud, huh?

02:20:21.000 Sheesh.

02:20:23.000 Joe Kent with an uphill battle, not over yet, says some random, I guess.

02:20:39.000 I don't know what that's all about, but thank you for that.

02:20:53.000 I'm not seeing anything new here.

02:20:59.000 Uh oh, uh oh, uh oh.

02:21:01.000 Dave Wasserman says based on initial returns, based, by the way, based on initial returns, it's also a strong bet.

02:21:10.000 Pro impeachment Jamie Herrera Butler will advance in the top two primary.

02:21:15.000 As long as she does, she's safe in November. 0.87

02:21:18.000 Let's go!

02:21:19.000 Strong bet, strong bet, strong bet, strong bet.

02:21:24.000 84, 84, 84. 1.00

02:21:28.000 Kent sucks. 0.99

02:21:31.000 Not chiseled. 1.00

02:21:33.000 Not chiseled.

02:21:34.000 You're not even chiseled at all.

02:21:36.000 I'm chiseled.

02:21:38.000 My belly is not chiseled.

02:21:38.000 Not my belly.

02:21:40.000 It's very round.

02:21:42.000 It's very round and flabby.

02:21:42.000 Okay.

02:21:44.000 But my face is more chiseled than anything you've ever seen.

02:21:50.000 Strong bet.

02:21:54.000 You're losing.

02:21:56.000 Get the chant going in the chat.

02:21:57.000 Get the chant going.

02:21:58.000 Let's see.

02:21:59.000 What else? 0.99

02:21:59.000 Get this out of my face! 0.99

02:22:04.000 Can I not browse Twitter?

02:22:08.000 We don't have any updates here anyway.

02:22:14.000 Can we get a glimpse?

02:22:16.000 No.

02:22:19.000 All right.

02:22:22.000 Strong bet, by the way.

02:22:24.000 Uh oh.

02:22:24.000 Joe Ken Bussy is quivering as we speak.

02:22:30.000 Joe Kent felt it by the quote Groyper army.

02:22:33.000 Reports indicate that this is true. 0.99

02:22:35.000 Joe Kent of CIA, Turning Point is gay. 0.99

02:22:39.000 Digits confirm. 0.98

02:22:42.000 Okay, what else? 0.61

02:22:43.000 L O O Bro.

02:22:44.000 Okay, I know, no, I disavowed that. 1.00

02:22:47.000 I disavowed that.

02:22:48.000 That's not right.

02:22:49.000 This looks like they're, no, I don't support that.

02:22:52.000 They're making fun of his dead wife.

02:22:54.000 That's not appropriate.

02:22:56.000 Let's look at this masterwork here from the God Emperor.

02:23:01.000 Joe Kent is CIA.com. 1.00

02:23:03.000 That's right, bitch. 0.99

02:23:04.000 Joe Kent is CIA. 1.00

02:23:06.000 Joe Kent is CIA.com.

02:23:10.000 Joe Kent is CIA.com. 1.00

02:23:12.000 That's right, bitch. 1.00

02:23:13.000 Very nice at it. 1.00

02:23:17.000 Rumor has it Joe Kent has sex with men, gay style. 0.99

02:23:20.000 That's street level chatter brought to us by an insider, clearly. 0.99

02:23:24.000 Thank you for that, Mason for America. 0.70

02:23:27.000 Joe Kent, agent of the deep state, a carpetbagger, lifelong mark. 0.99

02:23:31.000 So true. 1.00

02:23:32.000 That's what I say every day.

02:23:33.000 I wake up and say that every day. 0.80

02:23:35.000 Joe Kent lost because he went against the Groypers and hates Jesus. 1.00

02:23:38.000 That's fundamentally true. 1.00

02:23:39.000 Joe Kent is getting Groiped.

02:23:41.000 Also true.

02:23:46.000 Joe Kent vastly underperforming after being outflanked from the right.

02:23:50.000 Let's go!

02:23:52.000 And this is a zero follower analysis account, so that must be true.

02:24:02.000 Do, What else?

02:24:04.000 There's nothing.

02:24:04.000 There's no information.

02:24:05.000 No information.

02:24:06.000 This is an information drought.

02:24:08.000 Oh, geez.

02:24:11.000 Joe Kent, we're in your walls.

02:24:12.000 Okay, all right.

02:24:13.000 Thank you for that.

02:24:16.000 Thanks for that, buddy. 0.97

02:24:19.000 Joe Kent should not have sold out to the Jews to perpetuate the genocide of white America. 1.00

02:24:23.000 It's also true, it's also a fact. 1.00

02:24:26.000 Joe Kent, faggot. 1.00

02:24:28.000 Joe Kent does not want you to. 1.00

02:24:29.000 Okay, let's just not look at that for a second.

02:24:32.000 Joe Kent losing LMAO.

02:24:34.000 Nice picture.

02:24:36.000 Look at this website.

02:24:37.000 I don't think I've ever seen this before. 0.98

02:24:40.000 Joe Ken is an agent of the deep state, a carpetbagger, lifelong Marxist, Democrat, rhino, corrupt opportunist. 0.94

02:24:47.000 Very interesting. 0.91

02:24:50.000 Decision desk.

02:24:51.000 America First Decision desk has an update breaking.

02:24:55.000 Updates from Arizona.

02:24:57.000 Uh oh.

02:24:59.000 We're hearing some street level chatter that Carrie Lake is losing and Blake Masters is winning.

02:25:03.000 Well, that is, well, hey, I'll say one thing.

02:25:05.000 Carrie Lake didn't go to AFPAC.

02:25:07.000 I love her.

02:25:07.000 You know what?

02:25:08.000 I love her to death, but she didn't go to AFPAC.

02:25:10.000 I don't know.

02:25:13.000 So that is a tremendous loss.

02:25:14.000 I really do like Carrie Lake.

02:25:16.000 I support her.

02:25:16.000 I supported her then.

02:25:17.000 I support her now.

02:25:19.000 But the street level insider chatter from on the ground, on the desert, in the desert floor among the snakes and scorpions and the cacti.

02:25:30.000 Insider report, inside edition, straight from the America First Decision Desk, America First Political Headquarters.

02:25:37.000 Carrie Lake losing, Blake Masters winning.

02:25:41.000 That is one bad thing and one good thing.

02:25:45.000 But I will say, Carrie Lake, you know what? 0.79

02:25:46.000 Maybe she would have gotten the AFPAC vote like Paul Gosar.

02:25:49.000 I'm just saying.

02:25:51.000 Or Mark Fincham.

02:25:53.000 So, certainly, I support her and I like her, and I wish she would have won, but you know what?

02:25:59.000 Push came to shove.

02:26:01.000 She wasn't at the preeminent America First Conference on planet Earth, and that certainly cost her, and that is unfortunate.

02:26:07.000 We wanted her to win, but that's okay.

02:26:11.000 She'll have another shot later.

02:26:13.000 Kent down bad.

02:26:15.000 LMFAO.

02:26:16.000 Nick Fuentes must go.

02:26:16.000 Joe Kent.

02:26:18.000 Who must go?

02:26:21.000 LOL.

02:26:22.000 Yeah, let's go.

02:26:23.000 Groyper. 1.00

02:26:25.000 Joe Kent, more like Joe, can't win this election because he's stupid and cringe and lame and boring and is a federal operative, by the way. 1.00

02:26:33.000 Very true, Aiden, at fart smell on 9 11. 1.00

02:26:36.000 Absolutely agree with that.

02:26:37.000 Joe Kent would be like, I am confident we still have a path to victory.

02:26:40.000 And there's a live look at Joe Kent at his loss party, at his loss party in his frog face and in the work pants.

02:26:50.000 We are in your walls. 0.99

02:26:52.000 Joe Kent, I hate you.

02:26:53.000 Joe Kent does not want you to see this.

02:26:55.000 Okay, I'm not going to click on that.

02:26:58.000 Let's see, what else do we have here?

02:26:59.000 This looks like a really well made website.

02:27:03.000 And I love the slogan.

02:27:04.000 Whoever came up with that is genius, I think.

02:27:08.000 Marxist Rhino.

02:27:12.000 Carpetbagger, that's so real.

02:27:16.000 The new Grifton Town. 0.67

02:27:17.000 Kent described just a suburb of Portland as hometown.

02:27:23.000 Biggest city is a suburb.

02:27:25.000 Our biggest city is a suburb of Portland, Oregon, but a real big contrast there on the other side of the river.

02:27:29.000 You're just a suburb of Portland. 1.00

02:27:31.000 You dumbasses. 1.00

02:27:32.000 That's what Ken is saying. 1.00

02:27:33.000 He's saying, Hey, you dumbass voters, I hate you, and you're just a peon compared to me. 1.00

02:27:39.000 I'm Joe Kent. 1.00

02:27:40.000 I'm from Portland.

02:27:42.000 Workers of the world unite.

02:27:44.000 I'm Joe Kent.

02:27:45.000 I am a communist. 0.99

02:27:46.000 You're all just a bunch of losers because I'm from a big shot. 0.99

02:27:49.000 I'm from Portland, Oregon. 1.00

02:27:51.000 Yeah, okay, whatever, idiot. 1.00

02:27:53.000 You shouldn't have said that. 1.00

02:27:53.000 Stupid ass. 1.00

02:27:54.000 I have a question. 1.00

02:27:58.000 Hey, hey, he couldn't even name five lakes in his district.

02:28:02.000 Give me a break.

02:28:03.000 I'm an outdoorsman.

02:28:06.000 I'm an avid outdoorsman.

02:28:07.000 I'm just like you.

02:28:08.000 Look, I roll my sleeves up just like that.

02:28:10.000 And I'm wearing a flannel just like that when I go fishing.

02:28:13.000 Then he gets asked, hey, name some of the lakes in your district.

02:28:16.000 He can't name five lakes in his own district.

02:28:19.000 As someone who's very concerned about your background, name five lakes in your district. 0.97

02:28:23.000 What the hell? 0.52

02:28:24.000 Merwin, Yale. 0.97

02:28:26.000 Two.

02:28:27.000 Nice.

02:28:27.000 Yeah.

02:28:28.000 You can't name. 1.00

02:28:29.000 That's a river, dumbass. 1.00

02:28:31.000 Three? 1.00

02:28:32.000 Whatever.

02:28:32.000 Okay.

02:28:34.000 When was the last time you lived in the Pacific Northwest?

02:28:38.000 I'm from here.

02:28:39.000 I was in the military.

02:28:39.000 When was the last time you actually lived here?

02:28:42.000 Great question.

02:28:43.000 No, but I know you moved here two years ago, three years ago.

02:28:46.000 My wife was killed in 2019.

02:28:48.000 So what?

02:28:49.000 So what?

02:28:50.000 Hey, name five lakes.

02:28:52.000 Oh, I can't.

02:28:53.000 When did you move here?

02:28:54.000 Oh, I was born here.

02:28:56.000 Yeah, but when'd you move here?

02:28:57.000 Oh, my wife got killed.

02:28:58.000 Uh oh, okay. 1.00

02:29:00.000 Whatever, idiot. 1.00

02:29:02.000 That doesn't even make any sense. 1.00

02:29:03.000 Yeah, stupid goofball. 1.00

02:29:05.000 Uh oh, whoa! 1.00

02:29:06.000 Latest yes price, 84.

02:29:09.000 Boom.

02:29:12.000 Now, don't be buying this just because I told you, okay?

02:29:14.000 I don't want you to influence this market.

02:29:16.000 Okay, we're trying to get an unmolested.

02:29:19.000 We're trying to get a completely unraped, unmolested count here.

02:29:27.000 Okay.

02:29:29.000 All right, what else?

02:29:33.000 That's about it.

02:29:34.000 Where's all the other information, huh?

02:29:37.000 Now it's just you guys saying this.

02:29:40.000 Now it's just you guys memeing this into reality.

02:29:46.000 Joe Kent isn't doing so well.

02:29:48.000 Probably will be locked out.

02:29:49.000 Is this one of ours?

02:29:50.000 Nope.

02:29:52.000 No, it's not.

02:29:53.000 MTF, Trudeau must go social libertarian, Georgist.

02:29:57.000 I haven't heard that one in a long time.

02:29:59.000 Let's take a look.

02:30:00.000 Uh oh.

02:30:03.000 And it's all Butler.

02:30:05.000 It's Butler all the way.

02:30:06.000 Let's freaking go.

02:30:09.000 What? 0.84

02:30:10.000 I hate Nick Fuentes.

02:30:10.000 I love Joe Kent.

02:30:12.000 No, shut the fuck up. 1.00

02:30:13.000 Do not give him your energy. 1.00

02:30:15.000 You know, you're fucking gay anyway. 1.00

02:30:17.000 That's a woman. 1.00

02:30:17.000 That's literally a woman. 1.00

02:30:20.000 You're literally a woman. 1.00

02:30:22.000 So why don't you just shut up and go home, idiot? 1.00

02:30:25.000 Because Kent is, uh. 1.00

02:30:27.000 Do not send him your energy. 1.00

02:30:30.000 SpongeBobby boy can't believe that a carpetbagger who is a former member of the CIA is running for office in Washington state. 1.00

02:30:37.000 No, Mr. Krabs, who is he? 0.99

02:30:39.000 His name is J. Kent.

02:30:40.000 Find out more information at joekennesea.com.

02:30:43.000 Hey, hey, hey, now get back to work, SpongeBob!

02:30:46.000 Sounds legit to me.

02:30:48.000 Big endorsement from Mr. Krabs there.

02:30:51.000 Joe can't mess with the wrong guy. 0.97

02:30:53.000 Okay, this edit sucks. 0.86

02:30:54.000 No offense. 1.00

02:30:55.000 What the fuck is this? 0.99

02:30:57.000 Oh, this is against me. 1.00

02:30:59.000 Oh, well, no wonder it sucks. 0.98

02:31:00.000 That's a great meme. 0.92

02:31:03.000 Oh, I studied the blade with a, it looks like it did a crop there on Mac photo editor.

02:31:10.000 A weird mustache and Virgin.

02:31:13.000 That's very good.

02:31:14.000 This is great stuff.

02:31:16.000 Okay. 0.99

02:31:18.000 I thought that was a pro me meme and I was going to say, hey, I'm sorry, but that's shit. 0.98

02:31:22.000 Oh, and then it turns out it's against me. 0.99

02:31:24.000 Go figure.

02:31:26.000 All right, what else?

02:31:27.000 Come on, man.

02:31:31.000 Occupy Democrat, disappointed to see Joe Kent losing.

02:31:34.000 He's not a Democrat, but it was nice to see him denounce Christianity in America First.

02:31:39.000 Headlined by white supremacist Nick Fuentes.

02:31:41.000 Yeah, there you go. 1.00

02:31:43.000 Look at this disgusting pig. 1.00

02:31:44.000 Yeah, who wants to see that? 0.99

02:31:48.000 All right, okay, we're not even, this is just, we're just not even getting anything out of that.

02:31:53.000 And we're not getting anything out of this.

02:31:56.000 And we're not getting any results.

02:32:01.000 Are we gonna get any?

02:32:05.000 Is like one freaking person who actually knows what's going on gonna comment?

02:32:10.000 Let's just look up WA03.

02:32:18.000 Yeah, okay.

02:32:19.000 Why hasn't there been an update for Washington Sturge since 11 35?

02:32:24.000 It's been over two hours.

02:32:26.000 Unacceptable.

02:32:26.000 Totally agree.

02:32:28.000 It was all in Chinese or Japanese or something.

02:32:41.000 Okay, yeah, we're not getting any other info here.

02:32:53.000 Let's see.

02:32:54.000 Let me know if you know any other information.

02:32:57.000 Our politics team is not giving us any updates here.

02:33:01.000 No, and for some reason they stopped counting.

02:33:03.000 That's very bizarre.

02:33:13.000 Do That SpongeBob song stuck in my head now.

02:33:31.000 All right, they're just commenting on what we already know.

02:33:33.000 I could look at that, okay?

02:33:34.000 I could look at that.

02:33:37.000 Hasn't been an update in all of Washington State.

02:33:39.000 Okay, so it's not just the third, it's all of them.

02:33:42.000 All right, boo!

02:33:44.000 56%. 1.00

02:33:45.000 Give us an update, you bitch. 1.00

02:33:50.000 Okay, let's see. 1.00

02:33:51.000 What do we got going on here?

02:33:57.000 Let's look at the votes, okay?

02:34:00.000 So Clark County, let's see.

02:34:06.000 Clark County, 58% of votes counted, and it looks like all these votes are going to Perez and Butler.

02:34:17.000 24,000 is the highest total.

02:34:19.000 It looks like 70,000 votes.

02:34:25.000 70,000 votes in this county, okay?

02:34:28.000 70,000 in this county, and this is very weak for Kent.

02:34:34.000 And St. John is on his tail there.

02:34:37.000 Okay, 50% of votes counted, and this is a county with, it looks like, 2,000 votes, 2,500 votes.

02:34:47.000 50% of votes counted, and this is 65, what is that, 11,000, 12,000 votes.

02:35:00.000 This is a county with 12,000 votes, and it looks like, again, very bad shooting for Kent and more for St. John.

02:35:08.000 Those are the two biggest counties so far.

02:35:11.000 This county, 72% counted, 1,000 votes.

02:35:16.000 1,500 votes.

02:35:17.000 Again, not good for Kent.

02:35:19.000 This county looks like we've got 2,500.

02:35:25.000 No, I'm sorry.

02:35:27.000 Looks like 3,500 votes.

02:35:31.000 Half in.

02:35:32.000 Very good for Perez and Butler.

02:35:33.000 Not good for Kent.

02:35:35.000 And this county, 50% of the votes in looks like.

02:35:42.000 3,500, 4,000 votes total, and this is Kent's only one he's leading in.

02:35:47.000 And this one with 64% counted looks like we've got, what would that be, like 14,000 votes?

02:36:01.000 So the way it looks to me is that Kent is not getting a lot more votes.

02:36:05.000 This is his strongest big county, and he's winning by 2%.

02:36:13.000 Okay, this is the biggest county with 15,000 votes, a little bit more than halfway in, and this is the one he's in 30%.

02:36:22.000 This one he's leading in, and this is 3,000 votes.

02:36:25.000 The votes are coming in from these very populous counties in the South, it looks like.

02:36:31.000 In particular, this one and this one.

02:36:34.000 Or rather, where is it?

02:36:37.000 Where's the other big one?

02:36:39.000 Aren't there two that were big?

02:36:40.000 Yeah, these two seem to be very populous, or more populous.

02:36:45.000 And they're about halfway in, and both of these are very bad for Kent.

02:36:48.000 The other districts are bad for Kent.

02:36:49.000 He's leading in the north here, but this one, half the votes are counted, and 3,000 people voted.

02:36:56.000 In this one, 65% of the votes have been counted, and he's only in the lead by 2%.

02:37:01.000 Butler's 28%, and St. John's 17%.

02:37:04.000 So it seems like, from, and again, I'm not the expert here in what's being counted and what isn't, but it looks like this district, half of the votes have been counted, and you've got.

02:37:18.000 You know, 70,000 votes.

02:37:20.000 So that means there's another, you know, 60%.

02:37:23.000 So that means there's another 60,000 votes to come in in a district that Kent is in third place in.

02:37:30.000 And the same goes for this district.

02:37:31.000 Half the votes in with, you know, 15,000, 10,000.

02:37:36.000 And Kent is in fourth place.

02:37:38.000 Where are the Kent votes going to come from?

02:37:42.000 The districts that he's leading in.

02:37:45.000 In fact, the only districts where he's even in.

02:37:48.000 The only district that he's not in third place in these districts, he's in third place.

02:37:54.000 The only districts he's not in third place.

02:37:57.000 The votes aren't going to come from here.

02:37:59.000 The votes aren't going to come from here.

02:38:01.000 This is the only one where he's performing strong, and there's a lot of votes left.

02:38:04.000 And in this one, he's in second place here.

02:38:08.000 And Butler's got 30 fewer votes than him, and they're already 50% done.

02:38:14.000 I mean, there's no call, and I'm not in a position to call it, but from what it looks like where the votes are, if 64% of the votes have been counted, how many more votes can come in for Kent?

02:38:28.000 35% out of.

02:38:32.000 You know, 35% out of 15,000.

02:38:37.000 Well, that's wrong.

02:38:38.000 What am I saying?

02:38:38.000 50% of those are maybe 7,000 votes yet to come in here.

02:38:42.000 7, 8,000 votes left to be counted.

02:38:47.000 And even if every remaining vote is counted in this district, the biggest district where Kent is not in third place and he barely beats Butler, and you still got 70,000 more votes to come in, 60,000, 50,000 more votes to come in from this county where he's in third.

02:39:05.000 So, where are the votes?

02:39:06.000 Where's that differential going to come in?

02:39:08.000 Where's that big Joe Kent turnout going to happen?

02:39:11.000 It doesn't look like it's happening.

02:39:12.000 It doesn't look like it's coming from Lewis.

02:39:15.000 It's certainly not.

02:39:16.000 I mean, again, 40% of the votes counted.

02:39:19.000 So, what's remaining?

02:39:20.000 1,000 votes?

02:39:21.000 And how many of those are for Joe Kent?

02:39:23.000 He's got 300 more votes coming from this district, 600 more votes coming.

02:39:27.000 How many from this? 0.98

02:39:29.000 There's fucking 10 people in this district, and it's halfway counted. 0.99

02:39:32.000 He's in second, and he's got 25%. 0.99

02:39:36.000 What's he going to get from here?

02:39:37.000 Three more votes?

02:39:39.000 This is where the votes are going to come from, and he's in third.

02:39:41.000 This is where the votes are going to come from, and he's in fourth.

02:39:45.000 This is where the votes are going to come, or not this one.

02:39:48.000 You're going to have votes coming in from here, and he's in third.

02:39:51.000 Now, you're going to have some votes come in from here, but that's about all he has going for him. 0.96

02:39:56.000 Heidi St. John still got a pretty good turnout there.

02:40:00.000 So, that's what it looks like for me right now.

02:40:09.000 That's what it looks like to me.

02:40:10.000 But let's refresh here.

02:40:11.000 Let's see what we got.

02:40:12.000 Uh oh, back down to 80%.

02:40:20.000 So it's been fluctuating at between 77 and 84, it looks like.

02:40:27.000 77 and 84.

02:40:34.000 So, but again, no information coming in.

02:40:40.000 So it looks like that's just people trading based on what we already know.

02:40:43.000 It doesn't look like any new information.

02:40:46.000 Let's check back with Twitter.

02:40:47.000 Let's see if we have any updates.

02:40:52.000 Okay, it's just you guys.

02:40:53.000 It's just you guys spamming.

02:40:55.000 Let's try Joe Kent again.

02:40:59.000 We'll see if we have any new developments.

02:41:02.000 And then, you know, I'm probably just going to call it at like a half hour.

02:41:04.000 They're just not counting votes, you know.

02:41:07.000 It's getting to be 11 o'clock over there.

02:41:13.000 Joe Kent stole Nick Fuentes' haircut and then lost a congressional run just to make Nick look bad.

02:41:17.000 Yeah, that's true, actually.

02:41:20.000 Okay, let's see.

02:41:22.000 Nothing new here.

02:41:28.000 Ethan Ralph, I actually deleted my tweet earlier about Joe Kent being on pace to lose because one of his supporters showed a fake decision desk screenshot.

02:41:35.000 Excuse me.

02:41:36.000 LMFAO, sad.

02:41:37.000 Yeah, very sad.

02:41:38.000 Very desperate.

02:41:40.000 Joe Kent will actually lose. 1.00

02:41:41.000 Damn. 1.00

02:41:42.000 All right, gross. 1.00

02:41:44.000 We don't need to see that either.

02:41:46.000 All right, yeah, let's give it another half hour.

02:41:49.000 If we don't see any updates, I'm just, you know, we're just going to call it.

02:41:54.000 Or do something else.

02:41:55.000 I don't know.

02:41:56.000 What else can we do here?

02:41:58.000 Let's see if we have any other updates. 0.99

02:42:00.000 Looks like Wendy Rogers, 57% reporting.

02:42:04.000 Wendy Rogers is leading by 10%.

02:42:06.000 That's good.

02:42:08.000 But again, another incomplete result.

02:42:22.000 So it doesn't look like we're getting any updates here.

02:42:27.000 Let's check in again on Fox News.

02:42:30.000 We'll see.

02:42:32.000 Now we refresh and we wait.

02:42:33.000 And then I'll just go, I'll just start making some stuff up.

02:42:37.000 Now I'll just start coming up with some stuff to keep it going because we are just waiting at this point.

02:42:44.000 Let's take a look at third again.

02:42:45.000 Nope.

02:42:46.000 No updates.

02:42:51.000 Let's see.

02:42:53.000 Whoops.

02:42:53.000 I scrolled past Arizona again.

02:42:58.000 Why is this so needlessly complicated?

02:43:03.000 All right, where are we?

02:43:04.000 What the freak?

02:43:05.000 Where's our.

02:43:07.000 Here we go, here we go.

02:43:09.000 Okay, still 60%, still 60%.

02:43:11.000 Okay, so we're just not getting any information here from Associated Press.

02:43:15.000 Nothing on Blake, nothing on Lake, nothing on Blake.

02:43:20.000 Let's do another look. 1.00

02:43:22.000 Okay, let's take a look and we'll see what Carrie Lake is up to. 1.00

02:43:25.000 Do we have any updates here? 1.00

02:43:29.000 Anything new from election watchers?

02:43:33.000 I don't see anything.

02:43:35.000 Well, oh wow, this is a very contentious one.

02:43:37.000 A lot of people writing in on this one on Twitter.

02:43:41.000 A lot of people weighing in from around the globe on Kerry Lake.

02:43:49.000 Here we go.

02:43:50.000 Why Kerry Lake will win.

02:43:52.000 Posted at current results NPR 49 40.

02:43:57.000 Garrett Archer is analyzing each dump, and Lake is getting over 60, and Robeson is getting under 30.

02:44:02.000 But to be generous, let's Let's give her 30 and Lake 60.

02:44:06.000 Estimated remaining vote is 336 out of roughly 800,000 total cast votes.

02:44:12.000 Okay, well, you're just applying the existing ratio to.

02:44:16.000 I bet there's no guarantee it'll work out like that, so that doesn't even make any sense.

02:44:19.000 Goofball.

02:44:20.000 His name's Gus.

02:44:22.000 Shouldn't really be too surprised.

02:44:24.000 A bad take would come from somebody named Gus.

02:44:27.000 Hi, I'm Gus, and I think that according to the proportion of new votes, if that trend holds, yeah, I think anyone could do that.

02:44:34.000 I think anyone could do math and say, oh, this proportion of votes.

02:44:37.000 New votes is going to this one.

02:44:39.000 If that trend holds exactly, then the mathematical total will be this.

02:44:43.000 Yeah, I think anyone could do that.

02:44:45.000 Use a calculator.

02:44:49.000 Thank you, Gus.

02:44:50.000 Thank you, Gus, for the math advice.

02:44:53.000 All right, I think Blake Masters is going to be the same.

02:44:56.000 I don't think we're going to learn anything. 0.99

02:44:57.000 Probably just a lot of crap here. 0.98

02:45:02.000 Okay, let's see. 0.99

02:45:03.000 Shorter AZ primary.

02:45:04.000 Blake Masters, 34%, looks like it could be good enough to win the Senate primary, while Kerry Lakes, 40%, doesn't look like it will cut it.

02:45:11.000 Okay.

02:45:23.000 Are you, dude? 0.99

02:45:24.000 This just sucks, man. 0.99

02:45:27.000 Stop blocking me. 0.99

02:45:28.000 This is why it's just total oppression to be banned from Twitter.

02:45:32.000 You literally can't even be on the site without an account.

02:45:34.000 I can't log in.

02:45:35.000 They ban me every day.

02:45:37.000 Okay.

02:45:40.000 Let's see.

02:45:40.000 Do we have any other updates from the AF decision desk?

02:45:43.000 The answer is no.

02:45:44.000 There are no updates anywhere.

02:45:56.000 Let's refresh this.

02:46:00.000 Okay, not really a significant change.

02:46:06.000 Okay, a little bit more in Governor, but not really anything to sneeze at, not really anything to look at or anything like that.

02:46:19.000 Nothing on Twitter, nothing on Predicted, nothing on Associated Press.

02:46:25.000 Boo!

02:46:27.000 Looks like Kerry Lake has a stronger lead in Arizona, but again, it's like one additional percent is in. 0.77

02:46:37.000 So that's that.

02:46:39.000 Well, yeah, so that's the state of the race right now.

02:46:39.000 All right.

02:46:43.000 I don't know how much longer it's going to take.

02:46:45.000 I'm honestly a little bit surprised.

02:46:46.000 You think at this point you'd get calls, you think at this point in the night you'd at least have enough in that you can make a prediction, you can make a call.

02:46:55.000 But there hasn't been one update.

02:46:59.000 Since 10 35 local time.

02:47:04.000 So, or no, I think that's.

02:47:06.000 No, that is local time.

02:47:09.000 So, hasn't been an update in half an hour.

02:47:14.000 And not really a major update in longer than that.

02:47:16.000 So, I don't know what's going on over there.

02:47:18.000 Why are they not updating the vote total in the state?

02:47:18.000 What's going on?

02:47:21.000 They haven't updated it in a long time.

02:47:22.000 And when they do update it, we're at what, 56%?

02:47:25.000 Where's the results?

02:47:28.000 I guess it's close because it's a spoiler race, but.

02:47:32.000 I would have thought they'd have more in.

02:47:34.000 Same thing with Arizona.

02:47:35.000 But, you know, it's these spoiler races where you have all these candidates in there and tighter margins.

02:47:41.000 Tight margin in the Senate, tight margin for governor.

02:47:45.000 The difference is, though, here in the Senate, is you've got more spoilers.

02:47:49.000 That's what it looks like.

02:47:50.000 Brnovich, Lamone, and Masters, that's what's doing it in.

02:47:54.000 That's the difference.

02:47:55.000 You got really three candidates here and two candidates here.

02:47:59.000 And it looks like that's what's making the difference, which is why Masters is up.

02:48:03.000 Because Masters and Lake, you could say, are like.

02:48:06.000 The package deal.

02:48:07.000 They're both America first, both Trump endorsed.

02:48:10.000 As you could say, if you're getting Lake, or rather, if you're getting Mastersons, you're getting Lake, Masters.

02:48:18.000 But Masters is breaking away, and Lake is not.

02:48:23.000 But that's not because of the relative level of support.

02:48:25.000 Masters has fewer votes with roughly the same amount in.

02:48:29.000 But the difference is the dynamic of the race.

02:48:31.000 That is what makes all the difference.

02:48:35.000 So.

02:48:36.000 That's what's going on there.

02:48:38.000 But otherwise, no relevant information is coming in.

02:48:42.000 Uh oh, back down to 79.

02:48:44.000 So we're fluctuating between 77 and 84 on the betting markets.

02:48:48.000 I wonder, do we have anything else here unpredicted we can look at?

02:48:51.000 Let's take a look. 0.94

02:48:53.000 Arizona governor still strong for Kerry Lake.

02:48:57.000 Can I, seriously?

02:49:00.000 Dude, you just like, this is the society we live in.

02:49:02.000 User accounts, passwords for everything. 0.98

02:49:04.000 It's just ridiculous.

02:49:07.000 And it looks like Lake was at 91% and trending downward to 46%, back up to 76.

02:49:15.000 So it looks like she was way up, 90%, down 46%, back up to 72.

02:49:24.000 That is about when polls close, and this is where we are now.

02:49:27.000 As the race plays out, it looks like her likelihood is getting stronger.

02:49:31.000 That's Arizona governor. 0.73

02:49:32.000 Let's look at Arizona Senate.

02:49:38.000 99, okay, so looks like Masters is a done deal.

02:49:41.000 99%, that usually means it's done.

02:49:45.000 And we can look at seven days, it's been trending 86 all the way through to 99.

02:49:50.000 30 days, yeah, 86 straight through to 99.

02:49:53.000 Okay, so it looks like Masters is in.

02:49:55.000 Kerry Lake trending upward, but in a little bit of trouble.

02:50:01.000 Do we have any other markets we could look at?

02:50:04.000 Try and see where the bets are at, where opinion is at among election watchers.

02:50:12.000 Butler, yeah, no change there.

02:50:18.000 Are there any other relevant Washington state markets?

02:50:21.000 I want to take a look and see.

02:50:24.000 It doesn't look like it.

02:50:26.000 Because sometimes they'll mess with the words and it'll be the same outcome that they're measuring, but just a different.

02:50:32.000 You know, they'll say Butler, top two vote getter, Kent, top two vote getter.

02:50:35.000 It's fundamentally the same thing, they're just inverses.

02:50:38.000 But it doesn't look like there's any other market for that race. 1.00

02:50:50.000 Yeah, that's not helpful. 1.00

02:50:51.000 Okay.

02:50:54.000 Let's go back to this one.

02:50:56.000 We'll keep an eye on that.

02:50:57.000 Let's get back to our results, see if we have any updates.

02:51:00.000 Somebody in our politics team flashbacked to 2020.

02:51:03.000 Yeah, you could say that again.

02:51:05.000 Big flashback to 2020.

02:51:07.000 Not in a good way either.

02:51:13.000 No change and no change.

02:51:18.000 Okay.

02:51:20.000 Let's get back on Twitter.

02:51:21.000 Let me, I exited out of that on accident.

02:51:24.000 Let's get back on this and let's see.

02:51:37.000 Early results.

02:51:38.000 Yeah, we've seen the early results. 0.92

02:51:42.000 Joe Kent is a traitor who hangs out with Matt Gaetz and the Proud Boys. 0.94

02:51:45.000 Okay, whatever. 0.98

02:51:46.000 We don't care about that.

02:51:48.000 Joe Kent is in third.

02:51:49.000 Bad day for the CIA.

02:51:51.000 So true.

02:51:51.000 LOL.

02:51:52.000 Okay, that's it.

02:51:53.000 That's all of our updates on this.

02:51:56.000 Let's check Washington third again.

02:51:59.000 It looks like the Arizona race is the Masters race, I think, is basically over.

02:52:04.000 It looks like the Gibbs race is over.

02:52:08.000 Kerry Lake, that one's it's Kerry Lake and it's Kent.

02:52:11.000 That's what we're waiting for.

02:52:13.000 And American Virtue claiming that victory.

02:52:15.000 That's hilarious for reasons which I understand privately.

02:52:20.000 Outstanding races.

02:52:21.000 Yeah, just like I said, Arizona governor and then these Washington state primaries.

02:52:26.000 Otherwise, no new information.

02:52:28.000 Boo!

02:52:30.000 Come on, man!

02:52:32.000 Give us something.

02:52:33.000 We want, just update the vote.

02:52:35.000 It's been hours.

02:52:38.000 If we don't get an update in 23 minutes, I'm just going to call the stream because it seems like maybe we won't get results tonight.

02:52:44.000 I mean, they are two hours behind, but it's 11 08 p.m.

02:52:49.000 Polls closed hours ago now.

02:52:52.000 They should have more than 57% in.

02:52:54.000 You know, or at the minimum, they should be adding votes to the total.

02:53:07.000 Okay.

02:53:08.000 All right.

02:53:08.000 Well, I'm going to read super chats.

02:53:09.000 You know what?

02:53:10.000 I'll read super chats.

02:53:11.000 And we'll see if there's any update in the meantime, okay?

02:53:14.000 Let me read my super chats.

02:53:16.000 We'll see what we got in here, and then we will carry on, okay?

02:53:20.000 Then we'll see if there's any updates.

02:53:22.000 All right.

02:53:30.000 Yeah, honestly, it's disappointing that he would say that because it's just so obviously not true.

02:53:48.000 There's a labor shortage, it's so visible.

02:53:52.000 Some things economically are difficult to parse, but the labor shortage is tangible.

02:53:57.000 Anywhere you go, there's a labor shortage.

02:54:00.000 Specifically, if you've been to a restaurant at any time in the past nine months, help wanted signs everywhere.

02:54:07.000 There's a very visible, tangible, you don't need to be an economist or even pay attention to see that's going on.

02:54:15.000 And that's because people have dropped out of the labor force.

02:54:18.000 And so he's going to cite, oh, wages are rising and unemployment is low.

02:54:22.000 Yeah, wages are rising because there's a labor shortage.

02:54:26.000 When there are not enough workers that are demanded, the price of labor will rise.

02:54:31.000 Because employers are competing for a smaller pool of employees.

02:54:37.000 So, how do they entice them? 0.63

02:54:38.000 How do they compete for the labor? 0.72

02:54:40.000 They raise the price of the labor, they raise the wage.

02:54:46.000 But the rising wages are indicative of labor shortage, not any kind of economic progress.

02:54:55.000 And as far as the unemployment rate goes, same thing.

02:54:57.000 I mean, how could you say that?

02:54:59.000 We have lost so many jobs, millions of jobs.

02:55:02.000 Since the lockdown started in 2020, to say that unemployment is below 4% flies in the face of reality, flies in the face of everything that's gone on in the past two years. 0.90

02:55:13.000 So it's a totally ignorant, baseless statement. 0.81

02:55:15.000 I don't know why he's saying that. 0.98

02:55:17.000 If he just doesn't know or he's a partisan, I don't know.

02:55:20.000 But it's like, yeah, it's sort of inexcusable.

02:55:24.000 Justin sent $5.

02:55:26.000 Great job in the debate. 1.00

02:55:28.000 That Brenton nigga sucks, and I bet he smells like Gorilla Knuckles. 1.00

02:55:31.000 I don't know what that means, but yeah, that was pretty brutal of him. 1.00

02:55:35.000 Blinny and Joyer sent $3.

02:55:37.000 Hi, Nick.

02:55:38.000 Smile.

02:55:39.000 Hi.

02:55:41.000 Boogley Woogley sent $3.

02:55:43.000 Nick, Dr. Sheckelberg, was the operation successful?

02:55:47.000 Sheckelberg, no, we couldn't remove the brain tumor. 0.99

02:55:50.000 Scott Greer will keep saying key, even he's literally the only nigga saying that. 1.00

02:55:55.000 I like it. 1.00

02:55:55.000 I think it's funny. 1.00

02:55:56.000 I mean, I'm never going to say that because I think BASED is still good, but I think it's a funny inside joke.

02:56:03.000 Russell Hoglin sent $12.

02:56:05.000 When debating, mainstream conservatives make the mistake of compromising their ideas or message in order to be optical or make useless common ground with their opponents.

02:56:14.000 However, every time you debate, your opponents have to concede that you're W. Russell Hoglan sent $3.

02:56:22.000 Worldview is both consistent and totalizing, unlike conservatives who inevitably contradict themselves by not being consistent or totalizing.

02:56:29.000 Yeah, that's a very good point, you know, because you start when you come in and concede these like left wing presuppositions.

02:56:37.000 You will be led in a left wing direction.

02:56:38.000 So you can go in there and say, Well, I think men and women are equal, but, and you're just going to lose.

02:56:43.000 You lost that debate because the reason why men and women have to be segregated and have different roles is because they're different, meaning unequal. 0.53

02:56:51.000 And so if you go into the debate saying, Well, I think women and men should have the same opportunities, you lost. 0.67

02:56:55.000 Why?

02:56:57.000 Presupposed equality, which is not real.

02:57:00.000 And so the left will beat you up every time, they will take it to its logical conclusion, and you're right.

02:57:07.000 They'll show that you're arguing in bad faith because the reasons you say you support are not the real reasons, not the foundational reasons.

02:57:15.000 And so, if you're being consistent, you're going to be taken to a left wing place.

02:57:19.000 There's not a lot where that's not true.

02:57:20.000 There are not a lot of arguments like that that aren't, of political arguments that don't go that way.

02:57:26.000 So, it's true.

02:57:27.000 I mean, I'll go on.

02:57:28.000 I mean, you get these people in this debate where they're like, oh, Fox News said that women are more fulfilled.

02:57:34.000 It's like, it's not about women's fulfillment.

02:57:36.000 Because you could then equally say, you could make this utilitarian argument and say, well, we don't know what's best for women.

02:57:43.000 Let women choose, right? 0.82

02:57:45.000 If your argument is that work is not satisfying for women, and that's the issue, that women are more satisfied and fulfilled as mothers, you know, a left wing person is going to come back and say, well, some women aren't. 0.88

02:57:57.000 So shouldn't we live in a free society where people can choose?

02:58:00.000 Because We don't know, and only individuals can determine what is the unique recipe for their unique flavor of happiness.

02:58:10.000 And you would have no answer.

02:58:11.000 You would be like, okay, well, yeah, that's a great question.

02:58:14.000 Why wouldn't you support that then? 1.00

02:58:15.000 Because certainly there are some women who are infertile or lesbians, or there are women that want to be president.

02:58:20.000 And it's like, okay, well, if the question is women's fulfillment, then shouldn't you let the moms be moms and the women who want to be the lesbians be the president?

02:58:30.000 Well, then they go, oh, well, but women are being pressured by society, and I just want society not to. 0.97

02:58:35.000 Pressure women. 0.99

02:58:36.000 They could have the choice, but not really. 0.92

02:58:38.000 And then the argument is something like, well, they're not being pressured.

02:58:41.000 It's just that women have been oppressed for years, and promoting STEM for women and promoting these things for women against traditional motherhood is rectifying centuries of discrimination and unequal opportunity.

02:58:56.000 What's the argument against that?

02:58:58.000 It's like, oh, well, I just what? 0.88

02:59:00.000 You just want women working and you just want slightly less advertisements with girls in it? 0.82

02:59:05.000 I mean, what even then are you arguing? 0.72

02:59:07.000 You're not even arguing anything.

02:59:09.000 There's like fighting about the details because it's like you agree with them and everything.

02:59:13.000 You're just like, well, you argue yourself down.

02:59:16.000 You see how that goes.

02:59:17.000 That's just an example.

02:59:18.000 You argue yourself down to like, I agree with you at everything.

02:59:22.000 I just think some commercials are too political.

02:59:24.000 Okay, whatever.

02:59:25.000 Like, who cares?

02:59:27.000 Oh, I just think the commercials are too forceful.

02:59:30.000 Whatever.

02:59:31.000 Who cares? 1.00

02:59:32.000 Feminism has poisoned society. 1.00

02:59:34.000 Like, the birth rates are down. 1.00

02:59:35.000 Okay. 0.95

02:59:36.000 Men are killing themselves. 1.00

02:59:38.000 Family formation isn't happening.

02:59:40.000 And your argument is that the.

02:59:42.000 Commercials are just too political.

02:59:43.000 Like, it's deeper than that. 0.99

02:59:45.000 So, that's the problem when you go in and say, well, women just aren't fulfilled and, you know, whatever else. 0.69

02:59:52.000 No, you need to go in there with a beginning to end idea, a complete, self contained, consistent idea. 0.87

02:59:59.000 And yeah, and eventually they have to, at the minimum, the left has to concede, well, if you believe this, then you're right about this.

03:00:05.000 They have to concede that, okay, if you believe in God, then this.

03:00:09.000 If you believe in sex as an essential characteristic, then this.

03:00:14.000 And they have to concede that it's consistent.

03:00:16.000 And then we parse the difference.

03:00:17.000 And it's like, well, the difference is that the left thinks that sex is a construct and the right does not.

03:00:23.000 And if you believe sex is not a construct, then you necessarily must be right wing and believe the things I believe.

03:00:31.000 If you don't, then you necessarily must believe the former.

03:00:34.000 And same is true about race or anything else like that.

03:00:39.000 But Republicans, they are building their house on a left wing foundation.

03:00:43.000 And then the left bulldozes their house, and what's left is the foundation.

03:00:47.000 And then they put like a potted plant on there.

03:00:49.000 And the right builds up their house and says, we're in favor of this, this, this, and this.

03:00:53.000 That's their house.

03:00:55.000 And the foundation is egalitarianism, libertarianism, et cetera.

03:01:00.000 You know, they believe in all the fundamental premises of the Enlightenment.

03:01:03.000 And then the left comes in and says, no, you know, they shake that house to its core and say, you can't build that here.

03:01:09.000 You can't build houses on this foundation.

03:01:11.000 And then the right comes in with a little potted plant and says, commercials are too biased.

03:01:16.000 Joe Biden is a well meaning person, et cetera, et cetera.

03:01:20.000 But, you know, I just don't really like him.

03:01:22.000 In the sort of like putting like a very lame, like you're quibbling with the details on the left wing castle.

03:01:29.000 Okay, well, but our potted plant, left wing has built a cathedral on their left wing ground and they sieged our little hut and then we were imprisoned and enslaved and we said, hey, but you know, we made this sculpture, we made this little pot, we made a coffee mug that says number one Republican and you could put that in the king's throne room and that coffee mug is.

03:01:55.000 You know, commercials are just too political these days, or some other nonsense.

03:02:00.000 So, yeah, that is 100% how it goes every time.

03:02:04.000 Russell Hogg just read that.

03:02:06.000 So, there's that.

03:02:07.000 Epical underscore Doge sent $3.

03:02:10.000 How to win a debate against Nick Fuentes.

03:02:12.000 Step one bring up how third world savages and ancient Romans sodomized young boys in great and disgusting detail. 0.85

03:02:19.000 Step two bask in the light of victory. 0.78

03:02:21.000 Yeah, I don't know what that was about, but it was weird.

03:02:25.000 He kept bringing it up like five times.

03:02:27.000 He's like, well, you know, you say that women. 0.83

03:02:30.000 Historically, it had a secondary role. 0.99

03:02:34.000 But the Greeks were having sex with kids. 0.98

03:02:37.000 It's like, okay, so what? 0.98

03:02:40.000 That's not even the basis of my argument.

03:02:43.000 And he completely misunderstood what I was saying.

03:02:45.000 I said that even the 20th century conception of traditional relationships is not really traditional.

03:02:53.000 That's what I said.

03:02:54.000 I said the idea of the nuclear family and women being inside of a suburb, in a home in a suburb, I said that's not even really traditional. 0.71

03:03:02.000 I said, what I'm talking about.

03:03:04.000 It's something older than that, where men and women are segregated, but women have a more communal role and things like that.

03:03:11.000 And he said, Oh, so that means that because it's traditional, it's valid.

03:03:15.000 I said, No, I'm saying that it is true, that that is the real tradition.

03:03:19.000 I said, It's valid because it's consistent with biology.

03:03:23.000 But that was lost on him. 0.54

03:03:24.000 He really just wanted to talk about sex with kids for some reason.

03:03:29.000 Bleach sent Shimeyuan, Stardust in a sorry dress or cathedral in a kimono, both have dog martens. 0.51

03:03:38.000 Oh, it's hilarious.

03:03:39.000 That's so funny.

03:03:40.000 Oh, duh.

03:03:42.000 Duh.

03:03:43.000 That's hilarious.

03:03:44.000 Yeah, it's really a great premise.

03:03:48.000 I don't know, dude.

03:03:49.000 Kathy Zhu. 0.99

03:03:52.000 Alaskan rapper 444 said $3. 0.99

03:03:55.000 Nigga, what was up with Doobie bringing of having sex with boys, and not only once, but many times and in detail? 1.00

03:04:01.000 These Discord people are fucked up, and blacks too, I guess. 1.00

03:04:04.000 I guess he's not really black. 1.00

03:04:05.000 I think he was just trolling us, but yeah, all Discord people are a little bit not right. 0.67

03:04:12.000 Florida Grow Eyper sent $3.

03:04:14.000 Hey!

03:04:17.000 Micah sent $3. 0.99

03:04:18.000 When you mentioned Jews on the debate panel, the collective panic to change topics was hilarious. 0.92

03:04:24.000 Yeah, and that proved that I was wrong, right? 1.00

03:04:26.000 Because everybody scrambled to make me move on. 0.99

03:04:29.000 Everybody was just like, shut up, shut up, shut up. 0.98

03:04:31.000 Like, okay, so yeah, and they're saying that because, like, I'm wrong, for sure. 0.99

03:04:36.000 So yeah, that was cack.

03:04:37.000 Great moment.

03:04:38.000 Ritz Garbage sent $10.

03:04:41.000 China, China, China, imagine if America loses Afghanistan, Ukraine, and Taiwan.

03:04:46.000 All inevitable, under Joe Biden before Trump comes back in 2024, who knew the plan could be this good?

03:04:52.000 China versus Taiwan is pure Kino.

03:04:55.000 Honestly, that would cement Joe Biden's legacy as one of the greatest presidents ever, certainly.

03:05:01.000 Micah sent $3.

03:05:03.000 Marie Fuentes?

03:05:03.000 I don't know about that, man.

03:05:04.000 Every time she started talking, I was just like, are you kidding me, man?

03:05:08.000 She's just got that, like, loud, like, deep woman voice.

03:05:13.000 You know what I mean? 1.00

03:05:13.000 Like, there are some women that have, like, that voice. 1.00

03:05:17.000 She sounds like a belligerent woman on like a TV show or something, you know, like on a sitcom. 0.93

03:05:22.000 And every time she started talking, it was like, oh, okay, well.

03:05:28.000 And I was just like, it was just grating.

03:05:30.000 Frankly, I know that's maybe hurtful to say, but it was grating.

03:05:35.000 So I don't know if I really need a Fox News GF.

03:05:38.000 I don't think I need Fox News GF blasting my ear off about, you know, the recession or what you.

03:05:47.000 Did you know that they won't call it a recession?

03:05:49.000 Because, but they would under Trump.

03:05:52.000 All right.

03:05:53.000 Yeah, can you just bring me some breakfast for crying out loud?

03:05:56.000 I don't really care.

03:06:01.000 That was rough, man. 1.00

03:06:02.000 It was this booming, bellowing female voice, softball voice. 1.00

03:06:08.000 And, yeah, so I don't know. 1.00

03:06:09.000 I mean, she was good looking. 1.00

03:06:10.000 She's a good looking girl. 1.00

03:06:12.000 Not really my type. 1.00

03:06:13.000 I don't really like the blonde look, if I'm being honest.

03:06:16.000 I like the brown hair.

03:06:18.000 Frankly, I like. 0.98

03:06:19.000 I like other races, which is unfortunate for me. 0.87

03:06:24.000 But if I do like white people, I like brown hair, okay? 1.00

03:06:29.000 I like women that are Italian, brown hair. 1.00

03:06:36.000 I like blondes. 1.00

03:06:37.000 I mean, what guy doesn't like blondes? 0.61

03:06:39.000 I mean, you can't really not like them. 1.00

03:06:41.000 But to me, they're almost too much.

03:06:44.000 You know what I mean?

03:06:45.000 I think that a girl that is more homely looking, like a girl next door, I think that's more. 0.99

03:06:53.000 I hate talking about this because this is such a cringe, pussy worship conversation. 0.99

03:07:00.000 But I think the kind of quirky look, maybe I'm just weird. 0.99

03:07:07.000 Maybe I'm just eccentric.

03:07:08.000 But I like alternative.

03:07:10.000 I like sort of more plain looking.

03:07:15.000 When you think about a bombshell blonde or blonde bombshell or whatever, it's almost like a little bit too much. 0.99

03:07:22.000 It's like you need. 0.96

03:07:23.000 You need kind of like, need to be more of attention there.

03:07:27.000 You know what I'm saying?

03:07:28.000 Maybe I'm just not vanilla like that.

03:07:32.000 See, to me, that's very vanilla.

03:07:34.000 I'm not a very vanilla guy.

03:07:35.000 I'm very alternative.

03:07:36.000 I'm very eccentric.

03:07:38.000 That's a sort of like hottest girl.

03:07:41.000 You know, it's not really the same as like a really beautiful woman who's, you know, or a woman of like another race or like an emo girl or a goth girl, like a girl with a beanie.

03:07:52.000 You know, that kind of thing. 0.66

03:07:54.000 Girl of Doc Martens on.

03:07:56.000 It's a little different.

03:07:59.000 So, that's sort of my position on that.

03:08:01.000 So, I mean, yeah, she's a pretty girl, but I'm not like, oh, that's my dream girl or something.

03:08:10.000 And I don't know how old she is, if she's my age or not, but yeah, it's not going to work out for a variety of reasons.

03:08:15.000 Point being, it's not going to work out for a variety of reasons.

03:08:19.000 Sort of loud voice and the Fox News talking points and this. 1.00

03:08:23.000 She's very loud.

03:08:26.000 And that whole, like, you know, it's just not really the look that I'm going for there.

03:08:30.000 So.

03:08:33.000 Yeah, so that's my take on that. 1.00

03:08:38.000 Stardust, on the other hand, the Sanpaku eye, she looks insane. 1.00

03:08:41.000 She looks totally insane. 1.00

03:08:43.000 She looks like a total crazy person. 0.99

03:08:47.000 Looking at that woman's eyes, and you see Vishnu. 1.00

03:08:49.000 You see the destroyer of worlds. 0.99

03:08:51.000 You see just burning. 1.00

03:08:53.000 You see the elephant man, multi armed Hindu god. 1.00

03:09:01.000 You see chaos. 1.00

03:09:02.000 You see the world becoming.

03:09:08.000 So it's a little bit different.

03:09:10.000 Like I said, it's a little alternative.

03:09:12.000 I'm different.

03:09:13.000 It's too basic for me.

03:09:14.000 It's too basic. 0.99

03:09:15.000 Oh, you like the beautiful blonde girl? 1.00

03:09:19.000 It's like, no, it's too basic for me. 0.96

03:09:21.000 That's the same reason I didn't want to go to BU and be a lawyer.

03:09:24.000 Okay?

03:09:26.000 And my tastes are the same way about that. 0.95

03:09:29.000 In the same way that I didn't become a lawyer or work for the GOP, same thing is true about I'm not going to go with the blondie or whatever, blondie conservative gun girl or whatever. 0.93

03:09:43.000 So I'm a little bit more complicated than that. 0.96

03:09:45.000 Okay?

03:09:46.000 I'm a little bit deeper than that.

03:09:47.000 I'm a little bit more complicated.

03:09:48.000 Complex and sophisticated than that, actually.

03:09:51.000 That just sort of plain Jane, whatever.

03:09:55.000 That's like saying, What's your dream car?

03:09:58.000 A Lamborghini.

03:10:00.000 That's like what that's the equivalent of that.

03:10:01.000 What's your dream car?

03:10:02.000 A Lamborghini.

03:10:03.000 I want a Lambo.

03:10:04.000 That's the same thing, same concept, okay?

03:10:08.000 You know, same story there.

03:10:11.000 I want a Lambo.

03:10:14.000 What's your favorite food?

03:10:15.000 Lobster.

03:10:16.000 Okay.

03:10:18.000 And who do you like? 1.00

03:10:19.000 That blonde model looking girl. 1.00

03:10:20.000 Okay, whatever. 1.00

03:10:23.000 It's boring.

03:10:23.000 It's just lame.

03:10:24.000 Where's the imagination, huh?

03:10:25.000 Where's the imagination?

03:10:26.000 Where's the tension?

03:10:27.000 Where's the conflict?

03:10:28.000 Where's the mystery?

03:10:31.000 Where's any of that?

03:10:32.000 Where's the fighting?

03:10:33.000 Where's the contradiction?

03:10:37.000 It's not present there.

03:10:37.000 Where is that?

03:10:38.000 So it's not really that interesting, is it?

03:10:41.000 No, it's not.

03:10:43.000 It's like t shirts, like white t shirts, okay, or pants.

03:10:45.000 It's like jeans.

03:10:47.000 You're like the jeans of people.

03:10:49.000 You're like the jeans of people.

03:10:51.000 You know, I don't want to wear jeans.

03:10:53.000 I want to wear.

03:10:54.000 I want to wear Yeezy Gap pants that look too big.

03:10:59.000 Where's the contradiction?

03:11:01.000 Where's the duality?

03:11:02.000 Where's the tension and the harmony?

03:11:06.000 Where's that sort of dynamism?

03:11:07.000 It's not there.

03:11:08.000 It's not there.

03:11:09.000 I'm sorry. 1.00

03:11:12.000 It's a basic lady for a basic guy. 1.00

03:11:18.000 Now, she's beautiful and she's nice and all that, but I'm just a little bit more out there. 0.99

03:11:24.000 For better or for worse, I'm a schizoid, eccentric loner with, you know, nobody really understands me.

03:11:31.000 Nobody really fully gets it.

03:11:33.000 And that's okay, you know?

03:11:35.000 So I'm troubled.

03:11:36.000 She doesn't want to be part of this, you know, because she's going to want to come in and be like, Nick, why are you so mad all the time?

03:11:42.000 You understand that if I ever married a woman like that, do you know what that would look like? 0.53

03:11:47.000 She'd be like, man, you're so mad all the time.

03:11:49.000 You know, why are you doing that?

03:11:51.000 Why are you so unpleasant?

03:11:52.000 Can't we just have like a normal Thanksgiving and stuff like that?

03:11:56.000 And it's just not going to work.

03:11:58.000 It's not going to work. 1.00

03:12:00.000 You know, she's going to be like making a chore chart and doing crafts with the kids.

03:12:07.000 And I'm going to be like, you know, I'm going to be like running up to a dead horse and being like, I understand you.

03:12:14.000 You know, like, it's just not going to work.

03:12:16.000 It's just, that's not compatibility.

03:12:18.000 So I'm saving her.

03:12:19.000 It's just, it's a dark path that she is not equipped to go down.

03:12:22.000 Okay.

03:12:23.000 I'm Haunted House. 0.94

03:12:24.000 She's Princess Peach.

03:12:26.000 It's just, it's not going to work. 0.64

03:12:28.000 So, uh, That's why I need somebody like Kathy Ju. 1.00

03:12:32.000 She's a little bit insane, a little twisted. 1.00

03:12:34.000 Same thing with Stardust. 1.00

03:12:35.000 A little bit crazy. 1.00

03:12:36.000 Like, you look in your eyes and she would kill you. 1.00

03:12:39.000 And she would kill a room full of people, maybe. 1.00

03:12:45.000 That's the kind of compatibility that we're talking about. 0.99

03:12:49.000 That's the difference.

03:12:50.000 So, Marie Fuentes, I'm sorry, it's not going to happen.

03:12:53.000 For her own good.

03:12:55.000 Primarily for my own good, but secondarily for her own good as well.

03:12:58.000 I'm telling you, it wouldn't go well. 0.95

03:13:01.000 She'd be like, let's take a vacation to Aspen and go skiing.

03:13:06.000 And I'm like, I want to live underground.

03:13:09.000 I'll be like, I like living underground because it's cold and dark and I could open my eyes all the way.

03:13:13.000 She'll be like, What does that mean?

03:13:14.000 I'll be like, You wouldn't understand.

03:13:20.000 So, I don't know what I'm going to do.

03:13:24.000 I don't know what I'm going to do.

03:13:24.000 So, I don't know.

03:13:25.000 I'm an asexual incel.

03:13:27.000 What am I going to do? 0.98

03:13:28.000 It's a great question.

03:13:29.000 Okay.

03:13:29.000 I've been asking myself that question for a long time.

03:13:31.000 I don't know what I'm going to do.

03:13:32.000 Don't rush it.

03:13:33.000 Don't rush me.

03:13:34.000 Stop getting in my business.

03:13:36.000 Stop analyzing me.

03:13:37.000 Okay.

03:13:38.000 All right.

03:13:40.000 I'm weird.

03:13:41.000 I'm eccentric.

03:13:42.000 Okay.

03:13:43.000 That's really kind of my business.

03:13:46.000 And, you know, I'm going to get my wife and I'm going to have my kids, all right, as long as that happens.

03:13:50.000 Who really, it's not really your business what the details are, is it?

03:13:54.000 So, I don't know.

03:13:57.000 I don't know what's going to happen with that.

03:13:59.000 But hopefully the right insane person will sort of like trap me.

03:14:03.000 Not like that!

03:14:04.000 Not like that.

03:14:05.000 I meant like in a cage, like literally. 1.00

03:14:07.000 Like, hopefully the right biological woman is what I meant. 1.00

03:14:12.000 Hopefully the right biological woman will sort of like force herself onto me. 1.00

03:14:17.000 You know, like Stardust. 1.00

03:14:19.000 Like, what if Stardust trapped me in some kind of like Indian temple, like Raiders of the, not Raiders, Temple of Doom? 0.92

03:14:28.000 What if Stardust trapped me in some kind of like Temple of Doom jungle trap and said, like, if you don't marry me, I'm going to stab, I'm going to rip your heart out, need it.

03:14:37.000 You know, and I'm just sort of waiting for something like that to happen, frankly.

03:14:42.000 I'm waiting for, you know, I'm waiting for Kathy Zhu to send her ninjas. 0.67

03:14:47.000 I'm waiting for Kathy Zhu to send her soldiers of the Imperial Chinese Army to sort of capture me and send me on a cargo ship to China and that kind of thing, you know? 0.67

03:15:00.000 Because otherwise, I don't know, you know, how it's going to develop organically. 0.52

03:15:06.000 Like, I'm not going to go to Starbucks and order plain coffee and sit there and wait for it, and some, like, you know, goth Asian girl who looks white is going to be there, like, oh, the coffee with cream and sugar?

03:15:17.000 That's me, too.

03:15:18.000 And we're like, oh, we have the same order.

03:15:20.000 Like, that's just not going to happen.

03:15:22.000 So, how is it going to happen?

03:15:24.000 Well, like I said, some kind of unforeseeable, bizarre situation is going to happen.

03:15:34.000 That's what I'm saying. 0.94

03:15:35.000 It's like I'm going to be taking my state visit to India, meeting with the Indian government, and then a giant net will descend from the jungle canopy, and Stardust and the villagers will take me back, take me to the village and force a marriage. 0.99

03:15:53.000 Something crazy like that.

03:15:56.000 So, anyway, Dalton says, Nick off the goop right now.

03:16:00.000 I'm kidding.

03:16:01.000 I'm kidding somewhat.

03:16:03.000 I'm a little bit kidding.

03:16:05.000 But that's sort of broadly why it's just never going to work out between me and Marie.

03:16:09.000 So, to answer your question, that's why it's just never going to work out between me and Marie.

03:16:14.000 So, did you get all that?

03:16:17.000 That's why it's just never going to work out and why it can't happen.

03:16:20.000 But I appreciate the question.

03:16:24.000 So, but that's me.

03:16:26.000 That's my life.

03:16:27.000 That's.

03:16:28.000 You know, I never pretended to be, you know, six foot three, you know, Chad quarterback who's going to, you know, I always said I'm the eccentric guy who's going to wind up with the goth GF, okay, who's going to wind up with Grimes or, you know, the equivalent.

03:16:50.000 So I don't think anybody should really be.

03:16:53.000 Nobody can, you know, maybe you might not like that, but nobody could really say that they're, like, feel cheated or something.

03:16:58.000 Like they feel like they were, you know.

03:17:02.000 That's all I'm saying.

03:17:03.000 That's what I'm saying, frankly.

03:17:05.000 So, anyway.

03:17:07.000 Micah sent $3.

03:17:09.000 Stardust has dollar store opinions, call them 7 Eleven.

03:17:13.000 That's good, that's funny.

03:17:15.000 Polish underscore mail sent $3.

03:17:17.000 Marie Fuentes.

03:17:19.000 Incel by the way.

03:17:20.000 I am an incel, I am.

03:17:21.000 She wants nothing to do with me, I'm bad news.

03:17:23.000 I am an incel.

03:17:25.000 Hustlin' Russian sent $5.

03:17:27.000 Hey Nick, I'm feeling depressed after being ghosted by a girl I was talking to for a few weeks.

03:17:32.000 But you've already cheered me up.

03:17:34.000 Maybe this is a sign from God to continue to be his warrior.

03:17:38.000 You know, this guy was like, well, I was gonna be God's warrior, but then a girl stopped talking to me on StepChun.

03:17:44.000 Maybe this is, I feel better now.

03:17:46.000 Maybe, like, you know, what's wrong with you?

03:17:48.000 Like, where are your priorities, man?

03:17:50.000 This guy is really like, oh, I was going to, like, kill myself because this girl goes to me.

03:17:54.000 Oh, show made me happy.

03:17:56.000 Show made me chuckle.

03:17:58.000 Oh, back in it.

03:17:59.000 Like, you know, reevaluate, okay, buddy?

03:18:02.000 You're a soldier for God.

03:18:04.000 Let's rearrange our priorities a little bit.

03:18:08.000 Well, I dropped out because I got my heart broken.

03:18:11.000 I dropped out of the fight.

03:18:13.000 Oh, but this new show made me laugh.

03:18:15.000 Now I'm back in it.

03:18:16.000 Oh, okay.

03:18:18.000 Someone says bait.

03:18:19.000 Yeah, maybe.

03:18:21.000 Either way, some people really are like this, though, so you can't say bait.

03:18:24.000 Boogly Woogly sent $3. 0.99

03:18:27.000 Dat Brenton nigga in the debate is the dumbest MF I've ever heard. 0.99

03:18:30.000 No cap father at one point. 1.00

03:18:31.000 The tranny in a cartoon frog were felting him. 1.00

03:18:34.000 Remember that this passes off as normal to many people. 1.00

03:18:38.000 I don't think that passes off as normal to most people.

03:18:41.000 But yeah, it was pretty rough. 0.99

03:18:42.000 That guy just sucked. 0.99

03:18:43.000 I mean. 1.00

03:18:44.000 Hustlin' Russian sent $3. 0.61

03:18:46.000 Z. Custodian Growiper sent $3.

03:18:52.000 WA has universal mail in voting.

03:18:54.000 The FAQ says you can open a ballot, change your vote, tape it shut, and as long as the signature on the outside envelope matches your registration, the vote is counted.

03:19:03.000 You're saying there's a big potential for fraud.

03:19:05.000 You're saying that Joe Kent, all of Joe Kent's votes are stolen.

03:19:09.000 I believe it.

03:19:10.000 Fresh Prince sent $5.

03:19:13.000 I know we all pledged loyalty a little while ago, but I'd probably betray you for stardust.

03:19:17.000 You understand though, right?

03:19:19.000 She has this Jane Nisequa.

03:19:21.000 It's her eyes.

03:19:22.000 No, I would not.

03:19:22.000 Listen, what happens between me and Stardust is our business, but I would never betray a brother for Cathy Ju or any of them for that matter.

03:19:31.000 So, I mean, I get where you're coming from, but you can't betray.

03:19:35.000 Spence sent $3. 0.92

03:19:37.000 Nice to see that Super Chatter's feminine girlfriend make an appearance on the debate last night. 0.98

03:19:41.000 Yeah, that was the male to female trans quote GF that the Super Chatter was talking about. 0.78

03:19:50.000 That stuff is so bizarre to me. 0.70

03:19:53.000 I don't know how, because that guy kind of looked like a girl, but then he opened his mouth and he sounds like, Hi, I'm a girl. 0.90

03:20:04.000 And you're like, Okay.

03:20:08.000 Now that I don't understand.

03:20:10.000 Because the look, there's subtle things in the look, like his arms are clearly too long, and there's other problems.

03:20:20.000 But the look, you would say, like, Hang on, hang on here. 0.98

03:20:25.000 I'm saying the look, you would say, okay, that looks like a girl.

03:20:29.000 But the problem with these people is they're not.

03:20:32.000 So, like, it's sort of like the uncanny valley.

03:20:35.000 That's what I'm trying to get at. 1.00

03:20:36.000 Even this guy who looks more like a girl than other trannies, but it's still just like, just not right enough that it's freaky. 1.00

03:20:45.000 That's what I'm saying. 1.00

03:20:47.000 Where it's like, first glance, if you glanced, you'd be like, girl. 0.84

03:20:51.000 But then it's like, okay, arms are way too long.

03:20:55.000 Okay, the hands are mannish.

03:20:57.000 Okay, what's the voice? 1.00

03:20:59.000 And then ultimately, the guy's got a penis, you know. 1.00

03:21:02.000 So at the end of the day, there's that as well. 0.99

03:21:04.000 But so, you know, and that's a good example of that may be a person who could pass as well as a person could pass.

03:21:12.000 That's a guy who could probably pass as good as anybody could pass.

03:21:16.000 And it's still like, and it's still bizarre. 1.00

03:21:21.000 So, you know, that in itself kind of debunks the whole trans thing. 1.00

03:21:25.000 I don't know how anybody's like, yeah, this checks out. 1.00

03:21:29.000 You gotta be like, there's gotta be something wrong with you to be.

03:21:36.000 To be able to digest all of that because it's pretty weird.

03:21:41.000 So, anyway, yeah, true.

03:21:44.000 Spinefish sent $3.

03:21:46.000 Did you watch the Hunger Games movies when they came out?

03:21:49.000 Um, I think I saw the first one and hated it.

03:21:53.000 And then I binge watched them one day when I was sick.

03:21:55.000 And, uh, yeah.

03:21:58.000 Spinefish sent $3.

03:22:00.000 Do you like water parks?

03:22:02.000 No, I don't.

03:22:04.000 Spinefish sent $3.

03:22:06.000 You're too nice to the super chatters.

03:22:08.000 That's true.

03:22:10.000 Spinefish sent $3.

03:22:12.000 Was Patreon the first platform that you were banned from?

03:22:15.000 I think so, but I don't remember.

03:22:16.000 I'm pretty sure I was the first one, though.

03:22:18.000 And then we went on Patreon and then we went on Maker Support.

03:22:22.000 Some of you guys will remember.

03:22:23.000 Patreon and then Maker Support.

03:22:26.000 And then there's America First Premium.

03:22:31.000 So, yeah, good times.

03:22:34.000 Spinefish sent $3.

03:22:36.000 Next August, you'll be 25. 0.96

03:22:38.000 I know, it makes me want to commit suicide.

03:22:41.000 Spinefish sent $3.

03:22:43.000 Could Bernie Sanders have won the 2020 Democratic presidential nomination had Elizabeth Warren not run?

03:22:50.000 I think he could have won if there weren't so many spoilers.

03:22:53.000 I mean, yeah, Warren is a big one, but you remember, I think it was after Nevada or South Carolina, they all dropped out and endorsed Biden.

03:23:05.000 Because Bernie was on a roll.

03:23:07.000 He won Iowa, he won New Hampshire.

03:23:11.000 Did he win Nevada?

03:23:11.000 He won.

03:23:13.000 I don't remember exactly, but he was on a roll.

03:23:16.000 And then they literally all dropped out except for Warren and endorsed Biden.

03:23:19.000 It was the most transparent screw job ever.

03:23:22.000 So, yeah, I think it's definitely possible.

03:23:27.000 Spinefish sent $3.

03:23:29.000 How old were you when you got your driver's license?

03:23:31.000 I'm not going to.

03:23:32.000 You want the date my driver's license was issued?

03:23:35.000 I'm not going to tell you that.

03:23:36.000 Spinefish sent $3.

03:23:38.000 Great job holding your own against white nationalist Stephen Bunnell last night.

03:23:42.000 Yeah, I had to do it for our values, you know.

03:23:45.000 Jay Poll sent $3.

03:23:47.000 How much do you think we should worry about fraud in these elections?

03:23:50.000 After Trump, I would have expected them to go hard against Amy and every America First candidate.

03:23:55.000 How much power do they have?

03:23:57.000 Nobody knows.

03:23:58.000 Nobody knows.

03:23:59.000 There was no real investigation in 2020.

03:24:03.000 So we can assume it was very big, but we don't even know how far reaching it really was and if it affected the down ballot races.

03:24:10.000 So it's tough to say.

03:24:12.000 I think that the mail in ballots, the continued.

03:24:17.000 Sort of mass use of mail in ballots.

03:24:19.000 That's the biggest vulnerability.

03:24:20.000 You have to assume the elections are fraud if there's so many mail in ballots and if there's not auditing.

03:24:25.000 So that's the problem. 0.96

03:24:28.000 It's like illegal immigration.

03:24:29.000 How many illegals are in here?

03:24:30.000 I mean, we can guess, but that's just it.

03:24:32.000 We don't know.

03:24:33.000 They're not documented.

03:24:34.000 We don't clock them when they come in. 1.00

03:24:36.000 Those are the people that slip through.

03:24:37.000 So similarly with voting fraud, if you don't audit the votes, you really have no idea.

03:24:42.000 But if there's a lot of mail in ballots, you can assume, well, there's a big source of fraud there.

03:24:46.000 If there's a much higher likelihood of fraud, And a significant proportion of the votes are mail in, you don't really need to know exactly how far it goes.

03:24:55.000 You can say that it has the potential to be very small or as many votes as there are mail in ballots or a significant proportion of them.

03:25:04.000 So it's difficult to say.

03:25:05.000 And I assume there's fraud in every election, and there's some fraud in almost every election.

03:25:14.000 And I would say it would not be impossible for there to be fraud in these elections.

03:25:21.000 Mason for America sent $10.

03:25:23.000 America First is so good at it, and it's all thanks to you and Jesus.

03:25:26.000 Let's go.

03:25:27.000 Hey, thanks a lot, man.

03:25:28.000 Oh, and thanks to a lot of other people.

03:25:30.000 I mean, mostly Jesus and mostly me, but thanks to a lot of other people working behind the scenes as well, and other leaders.

03:25:37.000 I stand on the shoulder of giants like Pat Buchanan, Trump, Alex Jones, all that.

03:25:43.000 So, you know, but I appreciate it.

03:25:46.000 It's true, but I am the tip of the spear, absolutely.

03:25:49.000 Edgemaster 69 cent $3.

03:25:52.000 Peter Thiel once said, I no longer think freedom and democracy are compatible based.

03:25:56.000 Yeah, he is pretty based.

03:25:57.000 If you read his essay on.

03:26:00.000 If you read his essay on Strauss and Girard and all that, he is very based, I think.

03:26:06.000 Catgirl Placetta Juice sent $5.

03:26:09.000 This advertisement brought to you by Wendell Gang.

03:26:11.000 Okay, thank you for that.

03:26:13.000 Pietro Capella sent $3.

03:26:15.000 The pro abortioners in Kansas got a huge ton of cash from out of state donors and they poured it into boosting turnout in liberal Johnson, Wyandotte, Douglas, and Shawnee counties.

03:26:26.000 Interesting.

03:26:29.000 Polish underscore mail sent $3.

03:26:32.000 What if people wrote in Paultown and Claro? 0.99

03:26:34.000 That would be funny, I think.

03:26:35.000 That wouldn't be funny.

03:26:36.000 Wouldn't even be a little bit funny.

03:26:38.000 Bryce sent $3.

03:26:40.000 Joe Kent's political.

03:26:44.000 Alex Roncelli sent $3.

03:26:46.000 All my candidates lost, but I won precinct delegate.

03:26:49.000 What now?

03:26:52.000 Um, well, you know, just use that to leverage yourself further in the party.

03:26:56.000 That's the plan, you know.

03:26:57.000 You're not really there to be a precinct delegate, you're there to get a foothold in the party.

03:27:02.000 Maxie Abras sent $10.

03:27:04.000 I wonder if Grayson is going to cry more now that Joe Kent has lost.

03:27:08.000 I don't know who that is. 0.94

03:27:09.000 Sounds like some kind of poor loser, but I don't know. 0.98

03:27:13.000 Alright, jeez. 0.99

03:27:17.000 Stowie sent $3.

03:27:19.000 No lore in Southern Stream?

03:27:21.000 There were some weirdos in the chat saying that it was because you buried the hatchet with her.

03:27:25.000 Please don't tell me that's true.

03:27:26.000 It's not true.

03:27:27.000 I'm still planning on doing it.

03:27:28.000 I saw people saying that.

03:27:31.000 And people just make things up.

03:27:33.000 No, I'm still going to do that stream.

03:27:34.000 We didn't bury the hatchet.

03:27:35.000 Stowie sent $3.

03:27:37.000 Also, when did Michael Alberto get so damn sexy?

03:27:41.000 I don't know.

03:27:42.000 Octopus Man sent $3.

03:27:44.000 Got to see Trump at Earl at Live Golf on Sunday.

03:27:47.000 Just Trump and MTG were talking for around 15 minutes while watching the golf.

03:27:51.000 Tucker and Trump seemed to be having a great time too.

03:27:54.000 Super cool to see.

03:27:55.000 Huh, congratulations, I'm glad that happened for you. 0.74

03:27:58.000 Polish underscore male sent $3. 1.00

03:28:00.000 Wising wages? 1.00

03:28:02.000 It's so over, of bros.

03:28:03.000 We're Porky the Pig from Looney Tunes now.

03:28:05.000 Yeah, yeah, thank you for that.

03:28:09.000 Anon.

03:28:11.000 Virginian sent $3.

03:28:13.000 Someone's probably already asked this.

03:28:16.000 But if China invades Taiwan, does that unironically start World War III? 0.79

03:28:21.000 If it does, then based. 07 and God bless you, Nick. 0.85

03:28:24.000 Aw, no, not necessarily.

03:28:27.000 Virginian sent $3. 1.00

03:28:29.000 I like other races clipped. 0.99

03:28:33.000 Thank you. 0.97

03:28:34.000 Edgemaster69 sent $5.

03:28:37.000 I haven't been to church in a long time but would like to go back.

03:28:40.000 I had my communion but not my confirmation.

03:28:43.000 I live in a different area now.

03:28:45.000 How should I get back into it?

03:28:46.000 If he didn't get confirmation, then you got to do RCIA.

03:28:50.000 So, you've got to contact your parish and figure out how to get involved in their RCIA program.

03:28:58.000 I haven't had to do that because I was confirmed.

03:29:00.000 So, I don't know particularly how it works, but you've got to find whatever your church is, go to your parish and see how you can go through RCIA.

03:29:09.000 I believe if you're baptized at birth and then you don't get confirmed, you have to do RCIA.

03:29:16.000 So, that's how you've got to get back into it.

03:29:18.000 But don't take communion until you do that.

03:29:21.000 I'm pretty sure that's how it works.

03:29:22.000 Grow I percent $3.

03:29:23.000 It wasn't just that he used ancient Greek pederasty, it was that he had to add how they would rub olive oil on the boys' thighs beforehand.

03:29:30.000 Yeah, I know, I don't understand it either.

03:29:34.000 Optics Respector sent $3.

03:29:36.000 A certain kind of crazy is very appealing.

03:29:38.000 Of course, you would say, of course. 0.94

03:29:41.000 Oh, someone giving their opinion on girls?

03:29:44.000 Optics Respector with the chat. 1.00

03:29:46.000 Optics Respector weighing in to respect the opinions on girls.

03:29:54.000 No, we love them though, but we love Optics, but Optics loves himself some girls.

03:29:58.000 I'll say that.

03:29:59.000 We love big ol' Optics, but Optics loves himself the ladies.

03:30:03.000 And he's a Chad, he pulls, because he's a mesomorphic.

03:30:09.000 What is he?

03:30:10.000 No, he's kind of an endomorphic, but like a Chad endomorph.

03:30:14.000 So here he comes, the endomorph weighing in on how a certain amount of crazy is super attractive.

03:30:25.000 Let's go.

03:30:27.000 Bus underscore in underscore boots sent $5. 1.00

03:30:30.000 Quit talking shit about my wife, Stardust. 1.00

03:30:32.000 I've already threatened to beat up Beardson for hitting on her. 1.00

03:30:35.000 She's mine. 1.00

03:30:36.000 We're gonna have white babies together. 0.99

03:30:38.000 Oh, hilarious, man. 1.00

03:30:39.000 The hilarity just keeps coming.

03:30:40.000 You guys are so funny, man.

03:30:42.000 It's a real laugh riot.

03:30:44.000 Comedy show.

03:30:45.000 I didn't know I bought tickets to a comedy show.

03:30:47.000 Wow.

03:30:49.000 I'm getting to do this show.

03:30:50.000 I'm getting to talk about the election and current events, and I'm getting a comedy show.

03:30:55.000 I didn't realize.

03:30:57.000 Uh, that I was in for a pro bono.

03:30:59.000 I didn't realize I was in for such a treat here.

03:31:01.000 Comedy abounds.

03:31:02.000 Thank you so much for that.

03:31:04.000 Virginian sent $3. 0.56

03:31:05.000 I almost need a girl like Stardust.

03:31:07.000 What if Stardust kidnapped me successfully?

03:31:09.000 Clipped.

03:31:10.000 This stream has been blessed with mush meme potential.

03:31:13.000 07 and God bless.

03:31:15.000 Thanks.

03:31:16.000 Bryce sent $3. 0.99

03:31:18.000 Nick needs a nice Jewish girl. 0.82

03:31:20.000 Make peace with your enemies. 0.70

03:31:24.000 Catholic Gooba sent $3. 1.00

03:31:27.000 Dafti is proof you can't accidentally fuck a tranny. 1.00

03:31:30.000 He looks like a girl when posing still for a photo, but any movement, not to mention speech, breaks the illusion. 1.00

03:31:36.000 You'd notice that on a date. 0.99

03:31:38.000 That's very true.

03:31:39.000 That's very true.

03:31:42.000 Dirk Diggler sent $3.

03:31:44.000 Stardust cut you deep with that old man insult.

03:31:47.000 God gave you the voice of a 45 year old to lend credibility to your genius.

03:31:51.000 People have deepened Shapiro's voice on YouTube and it's much better.

03:31:54.000 Yeah, thank you.

03:31:56.000 Yeah, I was not actually offended by that.

03:32:00.000 But thank you.

03:32:00.000 Johnny Bravo sent $3.

03:32:02.000 Not sure if you noticed the tranny with the glasses, taftie, and her whole chat sexualizing you during the debate. 1.00

03:32:09.000 Gross. 1.00

03:32:09.000 You don't want to watch her stream. 1.00

03:32:12.000 I did not see that.

03:32:13.000 I don't want to see that.

03:32:14.000 It was funny though, because he was actually racist. 1.00

03:32:18.000 He was a racist tranny. 0.99

03:32:19.000 He was like, race and biology are the same. 1.00

03:32:22.000 And I was like, oh, it's tranny kind of going off. 1.00

03:32:25.000 I was like, at first I was like, your whole life is disgusting. 1.00

03:32:29.000 I think I said at the beginning, he was like, that's disgusting. 1.00

03:32:32.000 And I was like, your life is disgusting. 0.99

03:32:35.000 And then at the end, he was like, Race is biological. 1.00

03:32:39.000 And I was like, okay, this tranny kind of going off though. 1.00

03:32:42.000 Don't agree with the life choices, but this tranny kind of going off though. 1.00

03:32:46.000 He is right about race and IQ. 1.00

03:32:50.000 American Crusader sent $3.

03:32:52.000 Seeing Joe Cat lose and all our candidates win proves that anyone who disavows you will pay.

03:32:57.000 You are inevitable.

03:32:58.000 True, very true.

03:33:01.000 G Figu sent $3.

03:33:03.000 Greetings, thumbs underscore up, joy underscore cat.

03:33:07.000 Thank you.

03:33:09.000 Fan Wanglin sent $5.

03:33:11.000 My father and I went to mass for the first time this weekend.

03:33:14.000 Thanks, man.

03:33:15.000 Glad to hear it.

03:33:16.000 Keep it up, man.

03:33:18.000 I'm really glad to hear that.

03:33:19.000 Keep going and, you know, become Catholic, of course.

03:33:25.000 But that's good, you know.

03:33:27.000 That's the first step, so that's exciting to hear.

03:33:30.000 Chicken Strip Basket Nugget sent $99.

03:33:32.000 Have you seen The Wire? 1.00

03:33:35.000 Niggas act like it's the best show ever when it's just boring. 1.00

03:33:38.000 Hey, big shout out. 1.00

03:33:39.000 I appreciate it.

03:33:40.000 Thank you so much, Chicken Strip Basket Nugget.

03:33:43.000 We love you, buddy.

03:33:44.000 07's for you.

03:33:46.000 No, I've never seen The Wire.

03:33:48.000 So, I can't really weigh in on the wire debate.

03:33:50.000 I don't like all these TV shows people talk about.

03:33:52.000 I will never watch The Walking Dead.

03:33:55.000 I'll never watch The Wire.

03:33:56.000 I don't want to watch, I kind of want to watch Breaking Bad, but part of me doesn't because everyone likes it.

03:34:01.000 So, no, I've never seen that.

03:34:03.000 But I appreciate the super chat.

03:34:05.000 Thanks a lot, man.

03:34:06.000 07s.

03:34:11.000 Edgemaster 69 cent $3.

03:34:13.000 What can we do to minimize the effect of election fraud in 2024?

03:34:17.000 Does the Trump team have a plan?

03:34:19.000 Nope, not to my knowledge.

03:34:21.000 And I'm pretty connected, and I haven't heard anything like a real plan.

03:34:26.000 So that's scary.

03:34:28.000 But what can we do?

03:34:29.000 You got to have people watching the votes.

03:34:31.000 You got to have Republicans in every room where votes are being counted.

03:34:36.000 And we got to be ready.

03:34:37.000 We got to be ready with the legal arguments and Republican state governments on board because we could have overturned the election.

03:34:44.000 It was just that we literally weren't prepared for that campaign.

03:34:48.000 The legal team gave up, Republican state legislatures, the Dems got to them first.

03:34:54.000 So, you know, you gotta prevent it, and then if it does happen, you gotta be prepared to litigate it.

03:35:01.000 And that's as simple as that.

03:35:02.000 What else could you do?

03:35:07.000 Spinefish sent $3.

03:35:09.000 Where did you get your Georgetown hoodie?

03:35:12.000 Georgetown.

03:35:14.000 Optics Respector sent $3.

03:35:16.000 Bruh.

03:35:17.000 Bruh.

03:35:19.000 Johnny Bravo sent $3.

03:35:21.000 Lauren Southern acts the friendliest and civil with you. 0.96

03:35:24.000 To just leave the debate early and indirectly throw a shot at you the next day on Twitter for not practicing what you preach. 1.00

03:35:30.000 Fake bitch, DBH. 1.00

03:35:35.000 Is she talking trash about me? 1.00

03:35:46.000 I don't follow her on Twitter or anything. 0.96

03:35:48.000 Let me see.

03:35:49.000 Warren Southern.

03:35:54.000 Let's see.

03:35:55.000 What do we got?

03:36:04.000 I meet way too many people who spend ages contemplating their understanding of philosophy and morality.

03:36:09.000 You never apply it in their own life.

03:36:10.000 Strangely enough, it's often those who have no education or means to explain the morality that consistently act decent and fair.

03:36:17.000 I don't think that's necessarily an attack on me.

03:36:20.000 I don't think that's pointed towards me in any way.

03:36:24.000 I think that sounds general enough.

03:36:27.000 Because she didn't really say anything like that in the debate.

03:36:31.000 So I don't even know that that necessarily has to do with the debate.

03:36:35.000 Because I am living my morality.

03:36:37.000 So, you know, I went on the stream and people were like, Why don't you have a wife?

03:36:41.000 I'm like, I'm an asexual incel and blah, blah, blah.

03:36:43.000 And so, like, I don't think that that would even make sense in context.

03:36:49.000 Let's see.

03:36:50.000 Okay, what else?

03:36:54.000 The God Emperor sent $10.

03:36:57.000 Election results stream is getting me hyped for another Trump revolution.

03:37:00.000 Yeah, me too, man.

03:37:03.000 Edgemaster69 sent $5. 0.58

03:37:06.000 The average IQ of whites living in England is on track to fall below 85 by the end of the century. 0.78

03:37:11.000 This is happening in all industrialized countries. 0.76

03:37:14.000 Doesn't this make a complete collapse inevitable?

03:37:16.000 No, it's a total non sequitur, man.

03:37:20.000 And I'm just sick of hearing these arguments.

03:37:21.000 It's like, well, if this happens, then this totally unrelated thing has to happen, right?

03:37:26.000 It's like, okay, where's the foundation for that?

03:37:30.000 Well, this fact, so that means everything's over, right?

03:37:33.000 It's like, well, what does that even mean?

03:37:34.000 What does total collapse even mean?

03:37:36.000 And how would one thing have anything to do with the other?

03:37:40.000 I mean, I understand.

03:37:40.000 I could guess, but, you know, oh, so this means this, right?

03:37:45.000 No, that's a total non sequitur.

03:37:46.000 The one does not follow from the other.

03:37:49.000 Complete collapse, inevitable.

03:37:50.000 You don't even know what these things mean.

03:37:52.000 What do these things mean?

03:37:53.000 The average IQ of West African countries is in the 60s.

03:37:56.000 They still have societies.

03:37:58.000 The average IQ south of the Rio Grande, 85, 80.

03:38:03.000 Okay.

03:38:04.000 But once again, you're still working with the society.

03:38:07.000 Would you say that Brazil has completely collapsed, or is there still a society there?

03:38:11.000 Average IQ is lower than America.

03:38:13.000 So, what does that mean?

03:38:14.000 And why does one necessarily lead to the other?

03:38:17.000 And what is, you know, so, you know, you just don't know what you're talking about.

03:38:20.000 You got to just, you know, introduce a little bit of rigor here.

03:38:24.000 Oh, well, this thing is going to happen, so doesn't this other thing have to happen?

03:38:27.000 Yeah, based on what?

03:38:28.000 And what does that even mean?

03:38:30.000 No, non sequitur.

03:38:36.000 B underscore Sharp sent $5.

03:38:38.000 I had a popsicle today, but afterwards I was sticky frowned.

03:38:41.000 Thank you for that.

03:38:43.000 Bryce sent $3.

03:38:44.000 CIA is a joke.

03:38:46.000 Okay, thank you for that.

03:38:47.000 All right, let's check back in and let's see how we're doing with election results.

03:38:59.000 I'm going to refresh this.

03:39:01.000 I'm going to refresh this.

03:39:04.000 Butler down to 75.

03:39:06.000 Okay.

03:39:11.000 She was at 74 earlier, I believe.

03:39:14.000 Okay.

03:39:17.000 Yeah, so she's down to 75, down a couple cents from 77.

03:39:22.000 Let's see.

03:39:24.000 No new comments.

03:39:27.000 Let's see.

03:39:28.000 Let's check our results, and then I got to go.

03:39:30.000 I got to go to bed.

03:39:33.000 So let's take a look.

03:39:34.000 Let's see how we're doing.

03:39:41.000 Let's see, Arizona Senate, a little bit more in, but no decision.

03:39:47.000 Arizona governor, so you have about 9% more than an hour ago, about 4% more in the governor race than an hour ago.

03:40:00.000 And let's take a look at Washington's District 3 and no change in Washington State.

03:40:06.000 Okay, so there's almost nothing new no new calls, no major updates.

03:40:12.000 So, I guess we're going to have to leave it hanging there because it's midnight over there.

03:40:18.000 And we haven't had an update in a long time here.

03:40:22.000 10 35 was the last update.

03:40:23.000 So, we haven't gotten an update in 90 minutes.

03:40:25.000 Nothing.

03:40:26.000 No new votes.

03:40:27.000 So, that's going to do it for me.

03:40:28.000 I'm going to swap back here and we'll pick this back up tomorrow.

03:40:31.000 Hopefully, we'll have results even tomorrow.

03:40:34.000 And we'll have to go over that.

03:40:36.000 But it's a big day.

03:40:37.000 I think it's a big day.

03:40:38.000 Big win for Paul Gosar.

03:40:41.000 Some big wins in local races as well.

03:40:43.000 Win for Chris Kobach.

03:40:45.000 Looking like a win for Blake Masters.

03:40:47.000 Kerry Lake still in the game.

03:40:48.000 Joe Kent, undecided still.

03:40:50.000 Wendy Rogers still up in the air.

03:40:52.000 So it's not, we haven't gotten any bad news yet other than the Kansas abortion referendum, which is pretty bad.

03:41:02.000 But as far as elections go, a lot of good, and the rest is undecided.

03:41:07.000 So we'll have to pick this up tomorrow, and once we get some vote totals, we'll be able to get a complete analysis of what happened tonight.

03:41:16.000 So that's going to do it for me tonight.

03:41:19.000 Thanks for watching.

03:41:20.000 Remember to follow me here on Cozy.

03:41:22.000 Smash the follow button to get a push notification whenever I go live.

03:41:26.000 Follow me on Gab, Telegram, and True Social.

03:41:28.000 Links are down below.

03:41:29.000 I'm on the air Monday through Friday, 9 o'clock Central, 10 o'clock Eastern.

03:41:33.000 As always, thanks for watching.

03:41:35.000 Thanks to our super chatters, in particular, Chicken Strip Basket.

03:41:38.000 Thanks to all our super chatters, everybody that watches.

03:41:41.000 We love you.

03:41:42.000 I'll see you tomorrow.

03:41:43.000 Until then, have a great rest of your evening.

America First - Nicholas J. Fuentes - August 02, 2022

MIDTERM PRIMARIES - Arizona Groyper Delegation to WIN HUGE | America First Ep. 1039

Episode Stats

Summary

Transcript