00:00:40.000Usually I make it a habit to not waste my time with boomer faggots with no audience, fat boomer faggots with no audience.
00:00:48.000So, you know, if I were out giving my time to everybody with 100 subscribers, you know, 100 followers on Twitter, that'd be a long list of people.
00:00:56.000So usually it's relevant people with something intelligent to say.
00:02:28.000So, as I said, if you want to just get into it where we're going to say, you know, you're a pathetic faggot, then I think you fit the description a lot better than me.
00:02:47.000As I said, all right, guys, I'm gonna intervene here.
00:02:50.000As I said, every time I'd like to intervene with your great platform and all of your followers, you seem to last a couple months and then you get fired.
00:02:58.000Now, I've seen you come out and work, and I actually thank you.
00:03:03.000Okay, are we gonna talk about the issue?
00:03:14.000There was an accusation, and this needs to be addressed before we talk about the IDs, Nick.
00:03:19.000It is claimed now that you would have used other nicknames to interact either with ALZI News or elsewhere, where you would be critical of the Jewish people and making comments about Talmudic conspiracies of any kind.
00:03:50.000So, Halsey, do you have facts that allow you to deny what Nick is claiming now?
00:03:56.000What I said was that I can't prove it 100%.
00:03:59.000But when I was arguing with one of his followers, he referenced a conversation that no one else was there for except for me, Nick, and one other person.
00:04:07.000So the fact that his follower represented this conversation that was quiet and that nobody else knew about because it was in a private DM room, which, as I said, Nick ran like a little child from, then I'm very interested to know how he knew about that conversation.
00:04:21.000And also, Nick, who had been liking all of his tweets for the entire weekend, all of a sudden jumped in and his comment was, I muted him a long time ago.
00:04:29.000So, if he muted me so long ago, how did he even know we were still having this conversation?
00:04:33.000And he jumped right in right when this guy mentioned the conversation.
00:04:37.000Old man, do you not know how Twitter works?
00:04:40.000If somebody replies to a tweet that I'm tagged in and he's not muted, but you are, I still see the tweet.
00:05:12.000What you have is a weird hunch based on what I think is a misunderstanding of how Twitter.com functions, which it wouldn't be surprising from someone of your age.
00:05:48.000If you take issue with some of the things that Nick has been defending on the public space, from my understanding, Nick, you are not an alt-writer, right?
00:06:41.000And that's simply not comparable with any other racial or religious group.
00:06:44.000So I don't think it's a question of, you know, are they or are they not?
00:06:48.000It's simply a fact that they're overrepresented in media.
00:06:52.000But I don't understand why that fact has any relevance to what you're actually saying because Jewish people are overrepresented in a lot of places that are intellectual endeavors.
00:07:01.000They tend to go to college more, they tend to go to law school more, they tend to go to medical school more.
00:07:06.000That's why they're overrepresented in Nobel Prizes as well.
00:07:10.000If your bitch is that Jewish people are overrepresented in the media, then I would like to hear what your solution is.
00:07:16.000Well, the solution which was proposed by Hilaire Belloc back in the early 20th century was simply that of recognition, simply that of recognition that there is a people that is a nomadic people, that is a people that does not identify as white or European or Christian, that recognizes themselves as actually quite alien, and yet they present as very much like ourselves.
00:07:37.000And it's actually pretty much illicit, it's pretty taboo to even discuss.
00:07:41.000Or make mention that they are present or that they are different.
00:07:44.000And I think simply a recognition of that fact would go a long way.
00:07:47.000And you say that they're overrepresented in other things.
00:07:49.000I don't think that's a point in your favor.
00:07:53.000You know, the point you're trying to get across is that, well, they're overrepresented in media and they're also overrepresented in academia, and that means, well, they're smarter or they're more educated.
00:08:28.000I would love to see these sources because it's the first time, even as a biologist interested in IQ, it's the first time I hear this claim.
00:08:34.000So I'd love to see quicker versus Jews.
00:08:58.000He just says, Ask this boomer, does he think it's acceptable for young European men like me to be looking at the Muslim invasion of Europe and the future of my people and civilization and be prepared to fight these people off politically and violently if necessary?
00:09:16.000Why would I ever deny their right to do that?
00:09:20.000I mean, maybe they weren't watching earlier, but I can't understand why the Europeans wouldn't throw out every single Muslim that comes to their border.
00:09:27.000And I have a very good friend, Jada Franson, who's about to go to prison for saying that.
00:09:52.000Hey, wait, I got a question for you, Halsey.
00:09:53.000If you say that you would have no problem with people throwing every Muslim, Output transcript Out of their borders, and you call a Muslim rape gang a Muslim rape gang.
00:10:01.000If it's okay to call out Muslims, why is it not okay to call out the Jewish media?
00:10:38.000And you recognize that the media has this great influence over the public.
00:10:42.000And of course, they have influence in elections because they're the gatekeepers of information, so to speak.
00:10:47.000And so, don't you think that if a particular group of people or a group that has particular persuasions or prejudices is overrepresented in that powerful and important institution, don't you think it's kind of important who those people are?
00:11:00.000If it were liberals, I'm sure he would say yes.
00:11:02.000If it were Muslims, I'm sure he would say yes.
00:11:04.000But if it's Jews, well, this is a benign and arbitrary distinction with them and everybody else.
00:11:16.000I find it very interesting that a person who says, Why would I give any time to someone who doesn't have a lot of followers, that is now complaining that Jews are overrepresented and not giving any time to you.
00:11:27.000I see you complaining about something that you seem to do quite a bit.
00:11:30.000But at the same time, I'm Jewish and you're saying that I'm not popular enough.
00:11:57.000I mean, every time you have a conservative that's unwilling to talk about, you know, Jewish influence in media or Jewish overrepresentation, you know, nine times out of ten, they're Jewish.
00:12:06.000I mean, we talk about this with the alt light.
00:13:11.000You say that you don't care that the media, as an overrepresentation of Jews, you don't care that Jews would exert their prejudices in media.
00:13:20.000And of course, it's because you yourself, Would benefit from this.
00:13:24.000A Muslim would not have a problem if Muslims were running the media.
00:13:27.000An Anglo Saxon would not have a problem if Anglo Saxons were running the media and running it in accordance with their interests.
00:13:57.000And at the same time, as I said, you and Nayland and all of these people, you love to come out and you love to whine and you love to go like this and you love to sit down and go, oh my God, I can't do good in the world because the Jews are keeping me from saying something.
00:14:20.000What I have a problem with is that they look at you as, as I said, a little Richard Dawson lookalike who likes to come on and go, I'm so upset.
00:14:48.000I'm absolutely floored at the evasion tactics, which is that, I mean, when you're discovered, it turns into, you know, the name calling and everything else.
00:14:57.000I didn't come on and say, you know, they're keeping us down and, you know, we can't say, I said there's an overrepresentation, and when there's this kind of prejudice, it leads to adverse consequences.
00:15:07.000Nobody said anything about, you know, oh, woe is me, we can't get our message out there.
00:15:12.000What I came on here and said very simply is that you have this overrepresentation, and it has adverse consequences because, you know, and this is why the Talmud becomes very important.
00:15:23.000If you have a Christian civilization, you have a civilization that is built on the Catholic Church, that's built on Christianity, and you have people that are overrepresented in media in this very important institution who have these.
00:15:35.000Significant religious prejudices against Jesus Christ, as documented in the Babylonian Talmud in the year 200.
00:15:41.000I mean, these were the people, it's written in the New Testament, these were the ones that rejected Christ, that condemned Christ to die.
00:15:48.000And of course, that is why we Christians cannot afford to be apathetic about who controls the media.
00:16:01.000If we're founded on a Catholic Church, which doesn't allow our priests to reproduce, who are supposedly our best in our society, so the fact that they all get busted, diddling little boys, which is probably what I'm saying, but what I'm saying is that the Babylonian Talmud doesn't say anything about Jesus really.
00:16:18.000And at the same time, I am more than happy to say that Jews reject the Christ.
00:16:23.000It's called being a different religion.
00:16:25.000Secondly, I love how you're willing to say, oh, Jews have nothing to offer.
00:16:29.000But at the same time, you're pointing to a Jew and saying, oh, look, if it's based on his philosophy, then everything is all hunky dory.
00:16:36.000Well, wouldn't you say there was an over representation in the beginning of Jews and Christianity, considering all of them were Jewish?
00:16:43.000If you're trying to draw a comparison between Christian civilization having what really in practice constitutes a fifth column controlling its media.
00:16:53.000To pre Christian times, that's not really an accurate comparison.
00:16:58.000You're the one who brought it to pre Christian times, not me.
00:17:01.000You're the ones who said, oh, in the year 200, Jews decided this.
00:17:06.000And you somehow brought it up till now.
00:18:02.000In contrast with the Jerusalem Talmud and the Babylonian Talmud, it actually details pretty graphically, in a pretty blasphemous way, how Jesus Christ is boiling in excrement and semen in hell, how he's going to hell, how all his followers are going to hell, how he was an adulterer and his mother was an adulterer.
00:18:21.000So these are some pretty nasty things that are said in your holy book, in the holy book of the people, overrepresented in media.
00:18:29.000And again, these are people overrepresented, not in Israeli media.
00:18:35.000And you say, well, oh, well, it's called having a different religion.
00:18:38.000Well, maybe that would be one thing if it were Buddhists.
00:18:42.000I wouldn't see so much of an issue if it were Buddhists because Buddhists don't have, I mean, they did not take responsibility for the blood of the savior of the religion of this civilization.
00:18:52.000You understand why that's kind of a crucial difference.
00:18:54.000And now we can get into the real point of it, which is that you have no idea what you're fucking talking about because the Jerusalem Talmud was the one that was written in 200 AD, the Babylonian Talmud was written in 500 AD.
00:19:05.000And the part that you're referring to, you know the difference between AD and a couple hundred years ago, Nick, right?
00:19:11.000But secondly, the part that you're referring to says that idol worshipers are suffering anything about Christians.
00:19:19.000In fact, it had nothing to do with Christians.
00:21:14.000And you have to do this thing yourself.
00:21:17.000After doing summary research, and I'm not a scholar on this issue, Wikipedia states, The Talmud contains passages that some scholars have concluded are reference to Christian traditions about Jesus through the mention of an individual called Yeshu, a derivative of Jesus' Aramaic name, Yeshua.
00:23:26.000And this is a book that's widely available.
00:23:28.000So, as I said, if there's a disagreement, As to whether Jesus is mentioned in the Talmud, he's stating it as fact that Jesus is mentioned in the Talmud.
00:23:36.000As I said, I have read the passage that he's talking about, which distinctly says idol worshipers and has no mention of Yeshua.
00:23:44.000So, at the same time, he's claiming something that just isn't true.
00:23:51.000I was the one who was willing to have a civil discussion, and you came in with faggot and all of this, which is fine if that's how you feel.
00:23:58.000But at the same time, I don't really give a shit about an overrepresentation.
00:24:02.000I care about what that overrepresentation means.
00:24:05.000And what you're hinting at and what you're trying to portray is that the overrepresentation shows collusion, which you have no proof of.
00:24:12.000You have no proof that the Jews have their secret Jew meeting and they sit down and talk to each other.
00:24:17.000And they decide this is our plan of action.
00:24:33.000And everybody gave him a big round of applause for proving that Jewish people, you know, they don't have these secret conspiratorial meetings, although they do have a World Zionist Congress.
00:24:43.000He proved that, well, Jews don't actually control the world.
00:24:47.000People like myself or others, I guess I can't speak for others, but people like myself have an issue with.
00:24:52.000We don't believe that they get together and have these little meetings, although, you know, they certainly do have the World Zionist Congress, but we do believe that there is a hyper in group preference among Jewish people that can be observed.
00:25:03.000They have a group evolutionary strategy where they prefer their own over other people, where, you know, compared to any other civilization, but particularly Europeans, where Europeans are individualists, where Europeans have this kind of selflessness, they are.
00:25:19.000More liberal, they are a more open society.
00:25:28.000And again, if you're trying to say that the reason they're overrepresented, the reason that, you know, you look at CNN, and here, let me pull up because this stuff is wild.
00:26:06.000The second point I will say to you, Alze, you claim that there is no evidence of conspiratorial, uh, actions.
00:26:14.000There is, since we have the emails of John Podesta, we have strong evidence that there are Jewish billionaires Who control aspects of politics in America, including media, and especially media, through large, very large donations?
00:26:30.000Do you deny that these conspiratory actions have occurred from the John Podesta records?
00:26:38.000And what I'm saying is that it showed non Jewish large donations as well, just like it's shown large donations of Jews to right wing causes.
00:26:46.000What I'm saying is the fact that they're Jewish is not the primary deciding factor of where they lie in society.
00:26:53.000What I'm saying is that the majority of them, especially on the left, could care less about the fact that they're Jewish unless it's to come up with a leftist point of view, which is what all leftists do, even the white ones.
00:27:03.000And what I'm liking also is that I say that Jews don't control the world.
00:27:08.000If you're saying they do, then you're saying that the Jews are a superior society to your supposedly humane, advanced Christian society, which I don't really understand either.
00:27:18.000If you're saying they control the world, but yet at the same time, they don't work well, then.
00:27:24.000I explicitly said that's not what I'm saying.
00:27:28.000Okay, so then explain further, please.
00:27:31.000So, what I was about to say, what I was about to lay out was just to give you a little taste, and there's so much evidence here, but just to give you a little flavor for how in depth the Jewish control of an institution like CNN is, let's look at Jewish people in CNN.
00:27:49.000The parent company of CNN has a Jewish president and a Jewish majority of C level executives.
00:27:54.000CNN has a Jewish president, a Jewish vice president.
00:27:58.000The majority of executive vice presidents are Jewish.
00:28:00.000Their lead political anchor is Jewish.
00:28:02.000Their chief political correspondent is Jewish.
00:28:05.000Their chief political analyst is Jewish.
00:28:07.000Their chief political director, their chief national correspondent, their chief Washington correspondent, and all six of their chief anchor positions.
00:28:16.000They are 2% of the population, 60% of all elite media positions.
00:28:21.000And look, you know, people can say that's because they're educated, that's because they're intelligent.
00:28:26.000But if we look at the data on IQ and religious groups or ethnic groups, you look at, for example, the SAT scores in 2002, the highest SAT score for religious groups was Unitarians.
00:28:39.000With an average score of 1209, it was 1161 for Jews.
00:28:43.000If you look at the SAT scores in 1990, for Unitarians, it was 1073, for Quakers, 1037, for Jews, 1030.
00:28:50.000If you look at the general social survey, Episcopalians had an average IQ of 109 compared to Ashkenazi Jews, of also 109.
00:29:00.000Now, Quakers, Unitarians, Episcopalians, they are similarly a small percentage of the population, 1% to 3% on each of those, and yet none of them even scratch, they don't even come close.
00:29:11.000To 2,000 percent, do you know that blacks are not even 2,000 percent represented in violent crimes?
00:29:17.000You know, the Muslims are not even 2,000 percent represented in terrorism compared to Jewish people, 2,000 percent represented in media.
00:29:25.000And it is something that is just so unexplainable.
00:29:28.000But then, when you look at it with their 5,000 year history or however long they've been around, their thousand year history of hyper nationalism, hyper ethnic nationalism, this hyper in group preference, and then you look at the Podest emails, that's one good example.
00:29:43.000Where they have this in group preference and they favor one over the other.
00:29:46.000The Rothschild's Bank, the reason it was so successful when it was founded in the late 18th century was because David Rothschild was able to send his kids all over Europe to the great capitals and they can trust each other with their money.
00:29:58.000They can trust each other with their accounting practices because they have that high trust society.
00:30:23.000When these things really matter, because the media is a very important and influential institution, it matters who runs that institution, especially when it's people that may have resentment towards the host country that they're in.
00:30:36.000Well, as I said, you can say that and you can go off on the fact that there's an overrepresentation of Jews, but you cannot prove that there is any kind of causality of that overrepresentation that they're pursuing a Jewish interest.
00:30:47.000Especially when the leftist Jews are the ones that are probably the most detrimental to the Jewish population by pushing Muslim multiculturalism and pushing practices on Israel that could actually create an Arab invasion.
00:31:03.000So, what I'm saying is that you're trying to make this comparison that because there's a lot of Jews in media, that it's their Jewishness that is the overriding factor of how they believe and who they trust.
00:31:14.000But it's just not borne out by any kind of practicality.
00:31:23.000It's not an explicitly Jewish religious interest or an overtly Jewish ethnic interest, but here is why they stand to gain, for example, when they donate all this money to the Democratic Party, when 50% of all donations to the Democratic Party come from Jewish people and Jewish people support mass migration and they support wars for Israel and on and on.
00:31:45.000Here is the interest that is overriding there.
00:31:47.000If we understand Jewish people in modern Western civilization, What is the contrast?
00:31:53.000What are the cleavages between Europeans and Jewish people?
00:31:57.000Well, Jewish people are a nomadic people.
00:32:00.000They don't have a geographic entity, or at least since the first century, they have not had a geographic state.
00:32:08.000They move around, they are a worldly people.
00:32:10.000Since the diaspora, you have Jews in every major world city.
00:32:13.000And what occupations do they take up because of, whether it's usury laws or other things?
00:32:18.000They take up things like accounting, finance, media.
00:32:21.000Maybe this is where the high verbal IQ comes from.
00:32:24.000And so you look at these cleavages, you look at these contrasts, and you look at the Jew in European civilization as an outsider, as fundamentally and always an outsider, resistant to assimilation.
00:32:35.000And you look at what their interests are as an outsider.
00:32:37.000Well, might it make sense why they would support the Democrats?
00:32:40.000The Democrats who are anti-racist, anti-Islamophobia, anti-homophobia, anti-antisemitism.
00:32:48.000The reason that they adopt the position of mass migration and this anti-white, anti-host country position is because if the If the host population is not unified, if the host population does not have a coherent identity, if they do not have a coherent interest, well, then the Jewish person is safe.
00:33:07.000Who is the safest in a multicultural society when there's no coherent identity, when there's no coherent Christian identity?
00:33:14.000The Jewish person stands to gain from this.
00:33:16.000And that's not to say that doesn't make them a bad people, by the way.
00:33:19.000That's their evolutionary group interest, and they pursue it very successfully.
00:33:24.000But we simply have to recognize that as antithetical, sometimes antithetical to the national interest.
00:33:32.000And to not recognize that, to say, we don't care or it doesn't exist, well, that is only symptomatic of the very thing that you're trying to deny.
00:33:43.000I almost said that word for word earlier in the presentation that there are a lot of Jews who believe that multiculturalism is a good thing because it keeps them safe.
00:33:53.000As I said, the Jewish minority in America is the only one that has successfully integrated to the point, but yet has remained different due to rejection of them integrating.
00:34:03.000Jewish people were rejected from joining Protestant banks, so they formed their own.
00:34:07.000And then people say, oh my God, Goldman Sachs is 100% Jewish.
00:34:10.000Well, that's why they founded Goldman Sachs, because no one would give them jobs doing anything else.
00:35:00.000First of all, you say, I don't care if the Jews pursue their own interests.
00:35:05.000Maybe because you are a Jew pursuing his own interests to the detriment of the country.
00:35:10.000Yeah, you know, that's weird that you in particular wouldn't have a problem with that, you know, but for the little people, for, you know, the people.
00:35:16.000But again, how am I doing it to the detriment of this country?
00:35:31.000Well, because even Jewish people who are not leftists, even Jewish people who are not advocating for mass immigration or advocating for policies antithetical to the country, people like yourself stand in the way of honest to goodness people in this country waking up to why the media acts in the way it does, why the banks act in the way that they do.
00:36:11.000And you'll come on here and you'll say, Oh, no, actually, I acknowledge it.
00:36:14.000Actually, if you weren't paying attention, actually, I said this.
00:36:17.000But it's no secret that people like yourself, you get on my case, you get on people like myself, you get on our case for putting these facts out there, innocently putting the facts out there for.
00:36:41.000I think the best thing that can happen to this country is people like you getting out there and talking because I know that the majority of the country, whether it be Jew, whether it be whites, whether it be anyone, the vast majority of the country finds you repulsive.
00:37:00.000And so I am more than happy with you getting out there and spewing your message to anyone who will listen to it.
00:37:06.000Because as I find you spewing it more and not running and hiding behind, oh, my subs, you know, that you're able to sit there and get your message out there because I believe people will find it repulsive.
00:37:19.000I believe that people will find it as repulsive as I find you.
00:37:22.000Well, again, I'm more than happy with you getting on CNN and spewing your message.
00:39:05.000I don't consider Jews to be bad people.
00:39:09.000I don't judge them on a general basis.
00:39:11.000But I mean, as a civilization, we have to generalize to some degree.
00:39:14.000But Hillary Belloc said that the solution was simply an acknowledgement, simply a recognition that there is us and there is them.
00:39:21.000There are Europeans and there are Jewish people.
00:39:23.000There are Christians and there are Jewish people.
00:39:25.000And that doesn't mean that we can't cohabitate.
00:39:27.000That doesn't mean that we can't live together.
00:39:29.000You know, I believe that to some extent it's inevitable.
00:39:33.000And Hillary Belloc talks about this where the Jews were expelled at many different times and places and, you know, maybe 108 different times.
00:39:40.000And, you know, we'll leave it to the audit to decide who is responsible.
00:39:43.000Is it the host or is it the People that's kicked out 108 times.
00:39:46.000But he said that inevitably they're going to live together.
00:39:49.000The best solution is just to acknowledge that there are these disparate peoples with disparate interests and simply to recognize that.
00:39:55.000And that's all I'm calling for here is to say that when we hear people in the media that say, I'm white and I'm ashamed of myself for being white, I'm ashamed for being white, and then it turns out that they're celebrating Passover, they're celebrating Hanukkah, there simply has to be some honesty.
00:40:11.000There simply has to be a recognition that some people in the media, when they put out these positions presenting as, you know, I'm this white American, I'm concerned about.
00:40:19.000White America, Christian America, and it actually turns out that they have a very different allegiance.
00:40:23.000And that's all we're calling for is honesty.
00:40:26.000But I don't understand where I haven't been honest about that point.
00:40:31.000I just said very clearly, again, right in the beginning, that I don't consider myself white.
00:40:37.000I don't know what other people consider me, but I don't come out and talk about white people as if white people need to do this or white people need to do that.
00:40:48.000But what I'm saying is that, no, what you're talking about is when someone comes out on the left.
00:40:52.000And says, I believe in this and I'm white, and therefore that the fact that they're Jewish is the overriding factor in what they're saying, as opposed to the fact that they're on the left, because a white leftist would say the same thing, a black leftist would say the same thing.
00:41:05.000They all tend to say, as a black person, I believe this, or as a white person, I believe this.
00:41:10.000Jews on the left all consider themselves white.
00:41:59.000You're not representative of the left or the right or the people in the media.
00:42:04.000But you were saying that the people that are in the media that are Jewish are representative of Jews, which, as you just acknowledged, if there's maybe a couple hundred of them, I would be surprised, as just the numbers bear out, as there's not that many people employed in high level positions in the media.
00:42:19.000So if they're overrepresented, I'd about to number more.
00:42:40.000You said we need to acknowledge that this over representation leads to a coherent strategy and a coherent policy where these people are advocating for X.
00:42:49.000And it's not proven that they are a monolith.
00:42:58.000I said there has to be a recognition that when a Jewish person is saying something, That they're not white and they're not Christian and that they consider themselves outsiders.
00:43:10.000I had a lot of friends at Daily Wire who are Jewish, and I never saw them as any different.
00:43:16.000But when they talked about Israel, for example, I said, okay, well, here is somebody who's prejudiced.
00:43:21.000When you hear, like, Jeff Zucker and the way he runs CNN and the way they advocate for immigration against Donald Trump, you say, oh, well, that is a Jewish person and they have certain prejudices.
00:43:31.000And we recognize it with every other people, by the way.
00:43:34.000We recognize it with every other people that is advocating for a policy which serves their own group's interests.
00:43:41.000Because of the nature of race, usually we can tell if a Chinese person is advocating a policy favorable to Chinese, we say, you know, okay, well, we kind of read into it, I think, almost by default to prejudice.
00:43:51.000But because Jewish people, either knowingly or unknowingly, consciously or unconsciously, or maybe they just don't do a very good job of it, they present themselves as white.
00:44:01.000They present themselves as, you know, we're a part of this.
00:44:08.000But then when push comes to shove, very different allegiances.
00:44:11.000And again, And again, I mean, this is not immoral on their part.
00:44:17.000This is their reason, their national interest, so to speak.
00:44:22.000This is the national interest of the Jewish people.
00:44:25.000And that's not immoral for them to pursue it.
00:44:26.000But for us to survive, for white Christian Americans to survive in this century, we have to recognize that there's a divergent interest there.
00:44:35.000And you keep pointing out, like, oh, it's left wing and right wing.
00:44:38.000Because you'll have just as easily right wing Jews advocating against the interests of this country when they talk about war against Iran.
00:44:45.000And war against Iraq, and war against Libya, and war against Egypt and Syria and Lebanon, and every other country known to man in the Middle East.
00:44:52.000And the same is true with the left wing Jews who talk about mass immigration and all these other things.
00:44:57.000So, like, there's any distinction, but there's always the prejudice.
00:45:03.000I agree that you have to be mindful of the prejudice.
00:45:06.000What I'm saying is that you're not acknowledging by saying Christians are a monolith in that white Christians represent the interest of white Christians is ridiculous as well.
00:45:15.000Because, as I said, a large portion of regular white Christians find what you say to be repulsive.
00:45:22.000The fact that Paul Nalin tweets out something that Jews aren't even actually Jews, they're Khazars, and you like the tweet and say, oh, show these Talmudic Pharisees what's up, then I have to say, so you're not advocating that they represent an interest.
00:45:35.000You're advocating they're not even Jews, but then you're at the same time advocating they are Jews and that we should take their.
00:45:40.000Well, I mean, what do you mean by Jews?
00:45:42.000When I say Talmudic Pharisees, it is to differentiate.
00:45:45.000Between the Jews of the Old Testament and the Jews, of course, who rejected Christ, and now the rabbinical Jews, which is very different.
00:45:53.000A Talmudic Jew is very different from the Jews of Abraham and Jacob and Isaac and Moses.
00:46:55.000There was an oral law and there was a written law.
00:46:58.000So, I mean, at the time, in, as you say, 200 AD and 500 AD, they decided that because Israel was not together, it was being separated more and more, it was a good idea to write these things down.
00:47:12.000Which, if you look at them, they are all rabbinical discourse as to the same principle to figure out what is it that we're writing down to pass on about Scripture.
00:47:22.000They're not saying they disagree with God, they're saying that this is the way it has been practiced since handed to the Jews on Sinai.
00:47:28.000And this is the way that it's been done.
00:47:30.000And then all of the scholars at the time debated it and came to a conclusion on how it would be transmitted further because they didn't believe it could be orally transmitted anymore.
00:47:40.000So you're saying there's a big difference between Talmudic Judaism and original Judaism when there is no difference?
00:47:51.000Because in the scripture, when the Ten Commandments are received on Mount Sinai, there's no mention in scripture of an oral tradition that is given from God to the rabbis.
00:49:39.000What you're saying is that when God gave the Old Testament, he put it in every Jew's brain how to interpret what it actually said, because after all, it doesn't explain it at all.
00:50:26.000You are making things up to make your case when you're called out on.
00:50:31.000Please, I would like to read the Wikipedia page called Oral Torah.
00:50:39.000The third paragraph says Belief that the Oral Torah was transmitted orally from God to Moses on Mount Sinai.
00:50:46.000During the exodus from Egypt is a fundamental tenet of faith of Orthodox Judaism.
00:50:52.000It was recognized as one of the 13 principles of faith by Maimonides.
00:50:57.000However, not all branches of rabbinic Judaism accept the divine provenance of the oral Torah, such that conservative and to a greater extent Reformed Jews give deference to the Talmudic Sages while empowering themselves to formulate and adopt their own rulings and interpretations.
00:51:17.000Before I continue, I just want to say two things here.
00:51:21.000First of all, congratulations to all of us here.
00:52:47.000They believe in things that have absolutely nothing to do with traditional Judaism.
00:52:52.000So to say that those people reject it, those are people that reject Judaism.
00:52:57.000Like he said, the 13 tenets of Maimonides are that you have to accept that the oral Torah was given to Moses at Sinai, which is something that was a universal belief.
00:53:07.000Until European Jews decided to liberalize some of Judaism.
00:53:13.000Well, I mean, look, again, I don't see how this is even relevant.
00:53:24.000You know, it goes back to what I said, which was Talmudic Pharisees.
00:53:27.000And regardless of these distinctions, the point was to differentiate between the Jews of the Christian tradition and the Jews of the rabbinical Jewish tradition, not an attempt.
00:53:48.000What we are merely calling for is a recognition, and you seem to be okay with that.
00:53:52.000So I'm not quite sure what the disagreement is here.
00:53:55.000You say, like, oh, people find your views repulsive, and yet you've agreed with my prescription and my facts, and in basically my entire position here.
00:54:04.000So I'm not even quite sure what it is beyond just this kvetching, beyond this, oy vey, Nick is telling everybody what's going on.
00:54:12.000You know, we agree that there should be recognition of the prejudices.
00:54:15.000We agree that this over representation exists.
00:55:42.000So, first of all, the Russian narrative has been pretty much pushed by Hillary Clinton, Barack Obama, James Comey, like these are not Jewish names.
00:56:02.000Secondly, I don't believe that there is a lack of Russian evidence of Russian influence anywhere.
00:56:08.000I believe that Russia has tried to influence, I believe every country tries to influence our elections.
00:56:12.000I believe that AIPAC is specifically a lobbying group that's set up to promote Israeli interests.
00:56:18.000And I think that they can do whatever they want.
00:56:20.000But as I've said the other day, That the relationship between Israel and America is a business one as opposed to the foreign aid that's given to many others.
00:56:29.000So, and if we want to get into that, we can too, as Nick Dillich obviously tried to smell his own fart.
00:56:34.000So, the heart of the question of the super chat, though, the heart is not does it align with Hillary Clinton's interests?
00:56:43.000The question is given that there are two countries out there who may have influenced the election, why do we only hear about Russia?
00:56:50.000Do you think that the fact that there are Jews in the media makes them not want to talk about Israel influence?
00:59:21.000Do you think that they are serving our interests when they conduct the third most aggressive spying operation on American soil, when they sell our military technology to China, when they develop a clandestine nuclear program?
00:59:34.000They don't sign the NPT, they steal our uranium.
00:59:38.000You look at all these examples, and how can you sit there and say that you are America first, but then you also are supportive of Israel and the aid that we give them?
00:59:47.000Okay, let's unpack all of the bullshit that you just said.
00:59:50.000First of all, every bit of money that was given to Israel before 1989, or it was 86, I think, it was one of the two, I'm not sure of the actual date, were loans that were paid back in full.
00:59:59.000Secondly, after that, the memorandum of understanding that had been reached with subsequent governments, A, requires 73% of the money be spent here and requires that all Israeli tech developed in military industries be given to America as American tech and produced here as American goods that Israel has to buy.
01:00:16.000No other country on the planet has this arrangement with Israel.
01:00:19.000In fact, Israel is the only one that gives America something for their aid.
01:00:23.000And you said the most foreign aid received every single year since then, the UN gets more money from Israel every year than Israel.
01:00:41.000Yeah, but NATO and the United Nations are not countries.
01:00:46.000Countries and the only other countries, as I just said, last year Afghanistan got more, which is kind of a special case, wouldn't you think?
01:01:15.000We give money to Europe, which supplements.
01:01:18.000Almost all of their military budget, hence why Donald Trump handed Angela Merkel a bill.
01:01:22.000And what we get out of it is the idea that they push socialism because they're able to afford it because of our aid.
01:01:28.000Israel's money is paid back to America 10 times over because of the tech that America gets absolute exclusive right to.
01:01:35.000And they get veto power over everybody Israel sells weapons to.
01:01:39.000So right now, there is a business relationship between Israel and America that you don't want to accept.
01:01:44.000But as I said, every dollar we give them, 73% of it has to be spent in America.
01:01:50.000With American military tech given to them from America.
01:01:54.000So if you're talking about it being a jobs thing, then yes, I might be able to say to you that I don't like the idea of giving corporate welfare.
01:02:02.000But at the same time, you're talking about money that's only spent here.
01:02:05.000The other 27% is only spent on military tech research, which America has, again, 100% rights to.
01:02:14.000So I'd like to understand how we're giving Israel anything, but yet we're not giving to anyone else who doesn't give us anything in return.
01:02:25.000But number two, and this is the argument I hear all the time, this is the argument I heard from Will Chamberlain and Jacob Woolley.
01:02:30.000You know, well, they're spending all this money.
01:02:32.000They have, and I'll grant you that they have to spend a lot of it here.
01:02:36.000Actually, they get a very favorable deal than any other country in terms of the amount of money, the amount of foreign aid that has to be spent on the American defense industry is much smaller for Israel than any other country.
01:02:50.000Most countries have a much higher percentage that they have to spend on U.S. military, but that's beside the point.
01:02:55.000If we wanted to subsidize our military, if we wanted to buy Israeli military technology, we could just do those things.
01:03:02.000We could have 100% of the money go to our defense industry if we just spent it here.
01:03:07.000We could buy their technology outright if we cared.
01:03:10.000There's no reason we should be giving this money to them.
01:03:12.000And actually, if you look at the way the money is given to Israel, it's funny, you say before 86, it was loans and they were paid back in full.
01:03:18.000I don't know if that's totally true, but hypothetically, let's say it is.
01:03:22.000The way that the situation works now is that we give them loans.
01:03:26.000We don't give them grants because if we gave them grants, we would have to station the U.S. military there to oversee how the grants are spent.
01:03:32.000We give them the money in loans and then we cancel the loans.
01:03:36.000So we give them basically a grant, but without the oversight that comes with the grant.
01:03:39.000On top of that, Unlike any other country in the world who gets U.S. foreign aid, Israel gets it in a lump sum.
01:03:46.000They get it at the beginning of the year in full.
01:03:50.000Unlike other countries, Israel gets to use some of that money to invest in U.S. Treasury bonds.
01:03:55.000They get the money at the beginning of the year and they get to buy our Treasury bonds and make interest off of the foreign aid money we give them.
01:04:01.000So we give them a loan, we cancel it, and then they make interest off of the loan that we gave them.
01:04:15.000And what we are doing, in effect, is rewarding a regime which actively hurts our interests, a rogue regime who actively hurts our interests in the Middle East and in the United States.
01:04:26.000They conduct, depending on who you ask, the second, the third, or the fourth most aggressive spying operation on U.S. soil behind only Russia and China, our two major adversaries when they spy on us.
01:04:39.000You look at the wars in the Middle East that they've caused us to go in, the intelligence, the vaunted intelligence that we get in exchange for our money.
01:04:47.000Which led us to war in Iraq, where there were no weapons of mass destruction.
01:04:52.000You look at how, and you say, that was another rich thing you said about how we sell our weapons to them.
01:04:56.000You say, oh, the United States gets veto power over who they sell their weapons to.
01:05:00.000They've been caught red handed every decade for the past 30 years selling our military technology to China or other foreign adversaries.
01:05:08.000So, you know, the idea that, oh, you know, they're really good with our technology, just five years ago, they sold our tech to France, and then France sold it to China.
01:05:16.000And so our missile tech ended up in the hands of China.
01:05:24.000You're actually saying that Israel sold it to France and then France sold it to China, but yet it's Israel's fault for selling military tech to an American ally that America would have sold it to because it's Israel's fault.
01:05:46.000Because the way the contract works is it's supposed to be that Israel is just supposed to stop with Israel, but then they sell it to France and then France acts as a third party to sell it to China.
01:05:55.000If it ends up, if we give weapons to Israel and it ends up in the hands of China, it doesn't matter if it went through France, our tech went into the hands of China.
01:06:03.000You know, that technology was not intended to go into the hands of the French and then into China.
01:06:08.000So you kind of try and wiggle your way out of that one.
01:06:29.000Well, he's a friend of the show, but he's asking a question here.
01:06:35.000Do you believe Israel is responsible for their attack on the USS Liberty as in it wasn't a misunderstanding, but a deliberate act during wartime?
01:06:55.000There's another example where, you know, and I don't usually use that one because, you know, they still haven't declassified all the intelligence on that one.
01:09:03.000I think there's probably a better case that the Israelis deliberately blew up that ship than a lot of other atrocities that happened in the past.
01:09:09.000And, you know, people love to say, oh, well, the USS Liberty, the Levant affair, that was so long ago.
01:09:13.000Well, you know, we're still paying for a lot of the atrocities.
01:09:16.000That were hypothetically committed at other times.
01:09:26.000And then you're using it as evidence that what you're saying is right.
01:09:30.000So, as I said, if you've ever been on a plane, then you would say a flag is hard to see.
01:09:35.000Secondly, they admitted to doing it for hours.
01:09:38.000There was no massacres being committed, it was a war, which obviously you seem to think can be done in a very clean way where wars can be fought and nobody gets killed.
01:09:47.000Thirdly, you love to say, oh my God, we're still paying for that.
01:09:50.000And there's Classified information that we don't have.
01:09:53.000But you're making the assumption that the classified information proves your point.
01:09:57.000And that's where you're just spouting bullshit.
01:10:00.000And also the massacres that happened that only get documented, it seems, by these fringe right wing sites that don't have anything to back it up.
01:10:08.000From people that were on the ships, from people that were on.
01:10:39.000But that's why, though, because they were committing a war crime.
01:10:42.000Well, and here's why because they had to kill a bunch of Egyptian prisoners of war so they could revert their troops up to their northern flank because they didn't have enough supplies up there.
01:10:49.000And, you know, look, despite that, we could get into the what or the why.
01:10:53.000But again, this was a sustained attack on the USS Liberty.
01:12:43.000If I was to ask you, just like Nick backed up his statement by the evidence that he believes in, what makes you think that there was no reason?
01:12:52.000They admitted it, and the American government also said what happened.
01:12:56.000Both Israeli and American governments said it was an accident.
01:12:59.000Israel apologized and made restitution, and they moved on.
01:15:25.000Aze, do you recognize that the governments, when they emit public statements, it's More aligned with interest than necessarily seeking for the truth.
01:15:36.000I acknowledge that can happen as well as a Secretary of State could do the same.
01:15:41.000So, what is the Secretary of State's interest in telling that story about his feelings, his belief about what happened?
01:15:53.000What I'm saying is his one account does not carry more weight than anyone else.
01:15:58.000It does carry more weight than some people.
01:16:02.000Would you agree that the Secretary of State is better positioned?
01:16:05.000To have had information than the average citizen.
01:16:09.000Yes, but then so is the governments of both sides, who are made up of secretaries of defense, interior, the president, Congress, all of them.
01:16:18.000So I would say that their opinion carries some weight as well.
01:16:21.000So even if you want to discount that they could be lying, I say they could be lying, but I don't believe it.
01:16:28.000And Nick is saying that just because this one guy said this and there's classified information on it, therefore it points to the fact that they're guilty, is ridiculous.
01:16:38.000It's saying that just because he has other sources that say something, he's right.
01:16:44.000But what I'm saying is the official account says something different.
01:16:47.000Okay, so I think that everyone here agrees that there is uncertainty in that case, but everyone has presented their evidence.
01:16:54.000I think that calling the Secretary of State in that moment of history a guy is big.
01:17:02.000I will tell you, Secretary of State revealing their personal thoughts about important war events, my ears would be all open.
01:17:10.000Now, Andy, did you want to do a concluding statement and end the show at this point?
01:17:17.000Yeah, the first thing I want to just someone clarified.
01:17:23.000Sorry, let me just find this one thing.
01:20:54.000And, uh, Halsey, let's start with you, man.
01:20:57.000Um, I just, as I said, I don't really have a concluding statement, I don't buy his crap.
01:21:03.000Think that he's someone that anyone should care about, and maybe some people do.
01:21:07.000I hope that sometime he actually grows up a little bit and he's able to see the world for what it is, as opposed to his closed minded kind of idiocy.
01:21:16.000But at the same time, there are definitely good points that he made, there's definitely things he said that are somewhat true.
01:23:55.000And Sargon made a point about what he often says, which is, How would you characterize what is proper white behavior in the ethnostate?
01:24:05.000But it turned into saying, hey, you guys are not acting white enough.
01:24:10.000You guys are a bunch of N words, which was his way to insult white nationalists.
01:24:17.000So I can understand from within the mind of Sargon, it was like, I'm going to point to their incapacity at defining what is white behavior and I'm going to call them N words.
01:25:41.000I hope he comes back from this strong, takes a couple breaths.
01:25:46.000I know it gets pretty intense in the arena.
01:25:52.000But everyone who's watching right now, remember to hit like.
01:25:56.000And it's always good to subscribe to people, even if you disagree with them.
01:26:00.000I'm subscribed to a bunch of people on every political spectrum because then you could watch their videos and figure out what they are saying and then learn how to debunk it if you disagree.