00:00:08.000My name is Nicholas J. Fuentes, and we've got a great show for you tonight.
00:00:13.000We are here, we are well rested, and we are prepared for another fine episode of the greatest show, the greatest news show going on on YouTube or anywhere else.
00:00:24.000So much going on in the world today to talk about.
00:00:28.000We'd like to talk about Starbucks, we'd like to talk about Iran, North Korea.
00:00:35.000So, it's all going down here on the show.
00:00:37.000And unlike other YouTube live streams, which will remain unnamed, there are no girls allowed on this show.
00:01:09.000You know, it's got nothing to do with legal stuff, but I might be doing a new logo here.
00:01:13.000And I paid, have you ever been on that website, Fiverr?
00:01:16.000Are you familiar with the website, Fiverr?
00:01:18.000It's the premise of the website you pay five bucks, and it's supposed to be like a flat rate that you pay five bucks for a logo, or you pay five bucks for an infographic, or, you know, just all kinds of work they do.
00:01:31.000I'm not sure the scope of it, but it started out, I guess the main thing is like graphics kind of design, supposed to be easy for that sort of thing.
00:01:39.000And that's what I'm using to get my new logo done.
00:01:41.000I don't know, is that a bad idea or a good idea?
00:01:43.000I know people in the live channel, you know, as always, people will be like, no, Nick, you shouldn't give your money to Fiverr.
00:01:50.000It's run by Jews, or you shouldn't give your money to Fiverr.
00:02:10.000This logo was made in like, China or something like the mug was made in China, and so I said, You know, I want a solid logo, something really good, really robust.
00:02:20.000So I go to the top rated sellers, right?
00:02:22.000I go into the top rated sellers because I'm thinking we want the finest kind of thing.
00:02:26.000And here's how they get you it says the list price is like, you know, five bucks, seven bucks, ten bucks, fifteen bucks.
00:02:33.000You go and you okay, I want this, you know, blah blah.
00:02:37.000And then they say, Well, actually, if you want a vector kind of image, which a vector is like you can resize it as much as you want, and the resolution doesn't change, the quality doesn't change.
00:03:17.000You can send it back and I want this, that, and you can do that as many times as you like, which is why I paid the money.
00:03:24.000So I get the first logo and I'm thinking, I'm not paying 60 bucks to settle for this.
00:03:27.000There's like the, for the America, it's a redesign of the current one, not like a brand new one.
00:03:32.000And so they redesigned it and the F is like huge and there's like, it's a blue A and a big red F and the blue from, you know, an A has the bar in the middle.
00:03:43.000That's extended into the F and it's also blue.
00:06:01.000Now they're finding all my other tweets.
00:06:02.000They found the tweet from the Cumbie live stream where I tweeted out that campus conservatives are the most persecuted race in world history, aside from gamers, of course.
00:06:13.000Which is obviously a joke, and it's on Reddit.
00:06:17.000People are like, oh my God, is this guy serious?
00:06:31.000It is also, before we get into the news, last thing I'll say it is also the birthday of the man, the myth, the legend, Mr. Theodore Kaczynski, better known as the Unabomber.
00:06:42.000So we're wishing him a big, fat, happy birthday on his birthday today.
00:06:46.000Michael Brown's birthday was like the other day.
00:07:13.000But it is today a much more glorious birthday.
00:07:15.000You know, he did kill some people, which is not great.
00:07:18.000But we do celebrate his legacy, his writing, the infamous 14 words, which are, of course, that the Industrial Revolution and its consequences have been a disaster for the human race.
00:07:30.000And for his birthday, I was going to get some kind of a plant.
00:07:35.000I was going to get like some kind of leafy thing to put on the desk for his birthday.
00:07:39.000But as I was thinking about it, I'm like, maybe I'll get a potted plant or I'll get a flower.
00:08:40.000I mean, so some groundbreaking stuff, you know, in all fairness, I make fun of it a little bit, but we do believe in Ted Kaczynski.
00:08:46.000A lot of these people who watch the show are strong primitivists, and it's understandable.
00:08:52.000Some people take it a little bit too far.
00:08:53.000I think a lot of people, when they're like, oh, I hate the industrial world, while benefiting from the industrial world, it's like, really?
00:09:00.000You know, you're in an air conditioned apartment, you're in a temperature controlled room.
00:09:57.000I think they got to him, though, because he published a bunch of books after he got in jail that were like, no, actually, don't put tension on the system, be friendly, and all the rest.
00:10:06.000And I don't know, I think they got to him.
00:10:21.000And so we have to get to the serious current events.
00:10:24.000And so the first, the big things that we got to talk about are our rogue state friends or our revisionist state friends, which are North Korea and Iran.
00:10:33.000We intended to talk about Iran yesterday, but of course, some things came up, which were Jordan B. Peterson.
00:10:44.000But we have to get to Iran and Secretary of State Pompeo's comments, as well as the Pentagon's comments on the Trump doctrine with regard to Iran.
00:10:52.000There were some new developments about North Korea today, some contradictory statements from the president and from the Secretary of State.
00:10:59.000Last but certainly not least, we'd like to talk about Starbucks and our campaign there.
00:11:05.000I'm going to launch a new campaign, so you're going to want to stick around to hear about it.
00:11:08.000The call to action to bring down the Globo Homo complex starts with this plan.
00:11:15.000But so the big development with Iran, which we heard yesterday, was from the Secretary of State, Mike Pompeo.
00:11:21.000And I got to say right away, it was kind of a disaster in terms of the delivery.
00:11:26.000You know, Donald Trump had a famous expression, he said.
00:11:48.000So, anyway, Mike Pompeo, he gives a speech yesterday for the Heritage Foundation, and there's an expression that Trump said several years ago.
00:11:56.000And like I said, I'm not sure if that was when he was running for president or when he was just a civilian, but he was talking about China.
00:12:04.000And he said, it's very important who you get to send a message to these foreign countries.
00:12:09.000He said, you can say the same message, but if they're delivered in the wrong way, it can give the wrong interpretation.
00:12:17.000He said, for example, you send one guy who says, we're going to tax you at 25%.
00:12:22.000And he does it in this funny, like, weak voice.
00:12:25.000And then he says, or he could send somebody who says, Listen, you motherfuckers, we're going to tax you a 20, and it's a humorous, hilarious event, but the point stands.
00:12:33.000And this is something I think that Donald Trump pays attention to in his own delivery and with his people, with his staff, which is, and I think it's true, it's important who's delivering the message.
00:12:44.000It's important how it's said and all the rest.
00:12:46.000You know, they say that he was hesitant to hire John Bolton because he had a mustache, you know, so there's a certain look he's after.
00:12:53.000And so I listened to the speech the other day by Mike Pompeo, and before we get to the substance of it, I don't know if he'll last very long.
00:13:01.000I know he's loyal to the president and maybe he's a solid guy in that regard, but just watching the speech, it was sloppy.
00:13:34.000But nevertheless, big Uncle Mike, big guy, he's up there.
00:13:38.000And the message of the speech, the substance was that the United States was putting the harshest ever sanctions on Iran in the history of the country.
00:13:48.000And those sanctions will be put down in several unwinding periods.
00:13:52.000I think in 90 and 180 days, the sanctions will come down.
00:13:56.000And this is what was talked about months ago when President Trump presented the JCPOA, the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action, when he pulled out of the Iran deal.
00:14:07.000And of course, many people said, well, it's not going to work the same way as North Korea because we ratcheted sanctions on North Korea.
00:14:14.000And not only did we do that, but we got China involved.
00:14:18.000And with China involved, that was the only lifeline to North Korea.
00:14:21.000We could really create strong economic pressure because, of course, China was the only major economic power that North Korea did any kind of trade with.
00:14:31.000You know, the UN Security Council has implemented drastic sanctions against North Korea with China's.
00:14:36.000First, it was with China's approval that they abstained or they just didn't veto it.
00:14:41.000Now, China endorses those resolutions, and now they've been rejecting coal shipments and that kind of thing.
00:14:48.000And so, with U.S. sanctions, and we've already got the whole world on our side, isolating North Korea, and with China on our side, which is new to the equation in the Trump administration, we really brought about real pressure.
00:15:00.000With Iran, it's a little bit different, of course, because Iran is trying to salvage the nuclear deal with the European countries, with China, with Russia.
00:15:09.000And of course, Iran does a lot of trade with all kinds of countries regionally and in the world.
00:15:15.000You know, a lot of their major oil exports don't go to European countries or the United States.
00:15:19.000They go to China, they go to other countries, they go to India.
00:15:23.000And so it's much more difficult to try to recreate the sanctions regime that was put on Iran over the course of decades by the international community, by Europe, by their great power client states or patron states, rather, patron states.
00:15:38.000And so a lot of the critics say, well, will the sanctions be totally effective?
00:15:42.000Because we're talking about Putting on sanctions from the United States, but Iran never did a lot of trade with the United States.
00:15:48.000And, anyways, they're going to try and pursue trade with the European countries anyway.
00:15:52.000And already the countries they're dependent on are not countries that are under our sphere of influence.
00:15:58.000That's why I say it's a little bit different.
00:16:00.000Because, of course, the approach for, I think, the approach for the Trump administration on Iran is not totally the same approach with North Korea.
00:16:10.000I think it's the same tactic, but the pressure is going to come from a different place.
00:16:14.000With North Korea, the problem was that they were pursuing Juche, which has, we want to be self sufficient, we want to have autarky.
00:16:20.000With Iran, the pressure is going to come from the people.
00:16:29.000So there is kind of this facade of democracy, even if it isn't totally legitimate.
00:16:34.000And who are we to say what's legitimate and what isn't?
00:16:36.000But nevertheless, they do have this popular dissatisfaction.
00:16:40.000The economy's been doing pretty badly.
00:16:43.000And even if we can't get everybody to sanction them, even if we can't crush them like we did North Korea, we can force, we can coerce enough companies, enough countries into not doing business that it will create pressure amongst the people.
00:16:57.000So, it won't be like North Korea, where they're running out of energy and they're running out of food and they're on the brink of starvation and they're running out of resources.
00:17:06.000But it will be that we will be able to exert enough pressure through our trade activities with Europe and China and other places that we can put sufficient pressure to get the people to threaten the viability of the regime.
00:17:20.000And that's what will make, I think, the leadership think twice.
00:17:23.000And as long as that's the case, I think we're okay.
00:17:25.000I've said this before, but the new development, which is, I don't know, there's multiple ways to look at it.
00:17:31.000Is you had that from Pompeo yesterday.
00:17:33.000And immediately after that, the Pentagon said that they have to take a more aggressive approach with Iran.
00:17:42.000And now, coming from the Defense Department, that's a little bit worrisome.
00:17:46.000And we heard when Trump pulled out of the Iran deal this talk about the Iranian people and they deserve better and we have to help them and their regime is not the people.
00:17:55.000And I said that is implicitly a way to say that we are looking at regime change because that's the same kind of stuff we heard with George W. Bush.
00:18:04.000About how we'd be greeted as liberators and the Iraqi people need democracy and all the rest.
00:18:09.000This is something that Bibi Netanyahu has been saying for about a year about how the Iranian people are not their government and they deserve democracy.
00:18:17.000The Iranian government's the enemy of the Iranian people, all the rest.
00:18:21.000And that was worried someone Trump said it about the JCPOA.
00:18:24.000Pompeo reiterated it in his speech yesterday.
00:18:27.000And that kind of thing is just very troublesome.
00:18:30.000And there's a couple of ways to look at it.
00:18:32.000Either you can look at it as sincere and genuine, they mean it, in which case, That's no good at all.
00:18:38.000In which case, if they're serious about the people, you know, they deserve better and all the rest, if that is a genuine and sincere reflection of the Trump doctrine, we ought to be scared because that's usually a prelude to regime change.
00:18:51.000And the Department of Defense didn't say exactly what they were talking about when they said more aggressive approach, but they did hint at possibly doing these freedom of the seas operations, which isn't something that's overtly aggressive.
00:19:04.000But what they do is they sail Navy ships.
00:19:08.000Close to a country's borders, and this is a way to possibly provoke a military response to justify a reaction.
00:19:16.000So they'll sail close to Iran with the expectation that Iran will try in some way to impede that or to interfere with that or to antagonize U.S. ships.
00:19:24.000We use that as the pretext for some kind of escalation.
00:19:28.000So if they're genuine about the Iranian people comment, there's a lot to be worried about.
00:19:33.000I think the alternative explanation is that when somebody like a Pompeo or a Trump says that, Or when Trump instructs people to say that, or he himself says that, I think he knows that it creates that idea in people's heads.
00:19:47.000I think he's been very deliberate about that.
00:19:51.000He said a lot of things that could be interpreted if they were sincere as Trump was committed to regime change.
00:19:57.000But I think that was the intended result.
00:19:59.000If you're thinking regime change, then Iran is thinking regime change.
00:20:04.000And if Iran is hearing that and they're thinking he's sincere about regime change, what are they going to do?
00:20:09.000They're going to change their behavior.
00:20:11.000And we had Alex Wytoslavsky on to talk about this.
00:20:14.000And he said, well, that kind of talk only makes them want to get a nuclear weapon more because a nuclear weapon will deter a U.S. strike.
00:20:22.000And of course, this is, and we debated a pretty At length, when we had him on the show, but of course, this is a mistake because if the nuclear arsenal, which is supposed to deter an intervention, becomes the pretext of the intervention, becomes the cause of the intervention, well, then the calculation changes.
00:20:40.000And that's what Trump wants to do to convince countries, persuade them through many different elements, not just through, you know, I honestly want to do this, but through rhetoric, through different kinds of chaotic messages from the DOD or from state or from the White House and different symbolic gestures in the region or in other regions.
00:20:59.000He wants to convey to these different regimes that if you don't meet me halfway, if you don't come to the table, the deterrent will become the pretext for war.
00:21:10.000And so we will actually go to war in spite of a nuclear arsenal.
00:21:16.000And that's basically what this foreign policy is predicated on persuasion.
00:21:20.000Persuading these powers, where their entire grand strategy is to get a nuclear arsenal to deter the use of force by the U.S. against us, it's to turn that on its head and convince them that's actually the worst thing you can do.
00:21:33.000And that's in our interest to convince them of that.
00:21:35.000So I think there's a couple of ways to look at that.
00:21:38.000And we'll have to see the further developments and how events will conform to one or two theories.
00:21:46.000I think with North Korea, we can be rest assured that he's not looking at a major effort to force regime change.
00:21:52.000You know, you can look at how we're winding down our involvement in Syria and Iraq, the one bombing there.
00:21:59.000Everybody said during the second missile strike it's World War III.
00:22:02.000Not only are we going to war against Syria, but we're going to war against Russia.
00:22:21.000All the threats about North Korea turned out to be exactly what we said it was, which was a form of persuasion.
00:22:27.000And I think that if you look at the history, if you look at Trump's behavior, his deal making, his strategy so far, this is what we can expect for Iran.
00:22:36.000On North Korea, it's basically more of the same.
00:22:39.000And a lot of people have been getting a little bit nervous, I understand, because of course, we talked about this last week.
00:22:44.000North Korea canceled a summit with South Korea last Wednesday that was scheduled for last Wednesday.
00:22:51.000They canceled it on Tuesday, it was set for Wednesday.
00:22:54.000And they've taken a much more provocative approach.
00:22:57.000They're sort of back to their old ways.
00:22:59.000It's soured, as they say, whereas before the attitude was very different.
00:23:04.000North Korea was saying, well, we're going to do this show of good faith, we're going to release these hostages.
00:23:09.000We're going to disassemble our nuclear plant.
00:23:11.000They adopted a much more harsh and kind of vicious tone towards South Korea and the United States.
00:23:17.000They've been saying for about a week now that the June 12th scheduled summit between Kim Jong Un and Donald Trump might not happen.
00:23:25.000They've been laying down all these conditions, saying the rhetoric that people like Bolton have been using is problematic, to say the least.
00:23:32.000And at first, Trump, it looked like he balked, and he got a lot of criticism for this in the mainstream press and also.
00:23:39.000In the conservative press, that there was joint operations planned with the U.S. and South Korea that started, I think it was not last Friday, but maybe the Friday before.
00:23:49.000And these have been scheduled for a long time.
00:23:51.000And President Trump said from the outset, when this was planned back in late March, he said, We are not going to stop military drills.
00:24:00.000We have to have complete pressure remain and nothing change until denuclearization is achieved.
00:24:07.000And he said, The denuclearization does not mean reciprocity and synchronicity, which means that, like with Iran or other countries, as North Korea disassembles, we will let up on sanctions.
00:24:20.000And it's Reciprocal, meaning they do something and we do something, and synchronized in the sense that it's bit by bit for both sides.
00:24:27.000You deconstruct this element, we let up this sanction.
00:24:30.000You take apart this thing, we let up this restriction.
00:24:36.000It's going to have to be complete, verifiable, and irreversible denuclearization, which means that you get it out of there, you completely take it apart, it's all gone, and then you get everything.
00:24:49.000Then you get protection, we lift the sanctions and all the rest, which is a big ask.
00:25:25.000And when things were going very good, people said, well, this is not because of Trump.
00:25:30.000Even people on the right wing, Patrick Casey, Ryan Dawson, many people said, actually, in an extremely intellectual voice, actually, I'm an expert now in East Asian politics.
00:25:42.000In the case of Ryan Dawson, I live in South Korea, or in the case of others.
00:25:45.000I'm suddenly an expert in East Asian affairs.
00:25:48.000And actually, it wasn't because of President Trump coercing China to assist him.
00:25:55.000The South Korean president's sunshine policy.
00:26:33.000And so, South Korea, it seemed like at first that we were balking with South Korea, that we said, okay, we'll scale back the military drills.
00:26:50.000What they proved, and they set a bad precedent, at least in the White House, was that North Korea can threaten to call off the talks, which are still a ways away, still about a month away, a little bit less than a month.
00:27:03.000Or they could threaten to call off the peace process.
00:27:06.000They could threaten to cancel the diplomacy and will give in to the pressure, which is a terrible precedent for reasons I shouldn't have to tell you why.
00:27:14.000But then, of course, today, President Trump, always, always the best, you know, he'll never let us down.
00:27:20.000He came back today and in a press conference with Moon Jae in, he had the South Korean president at the White House.
00:27:26.000He said that the meeting might not happen at all.
00:27:28.000He said, it might happen, it might not happen.
00:27:49.000It looks like, and it's the trick is, it's a very complicated negotiation because you have many moving parts, many different factors here.
00:27:57.000So I understand a lot of people might say it was a terrible thing that he canceled the military exercises.
00:28:04.000And ideally, he wouldn't have done that.
00:28:06.000But you have to understand that the South Korean president, the South Korean factor in this, they are very opposed to Trump's style.
00:28:15.000They said no to the THAAD, which was the Terminal High Altitude Air Defense System, the anti- Missile defense shield that was supposed to go in last year.
00:28:26.000They were constantly critical of Trump's approach.
00:28:29.000And so the trick is that at once you have to appease South Korea so that you present a united front when you negotiate with North Korea.
00:28:38.000At once you appease and are compliant enough with South Korea and Japan and others that you present a united front and you don't appear divided so they can't exploit those weaknesses.
00:28:49.000But at the same time, we can't totally give in to South Korea and adopt their.
00:28:54.000Kind of pussified approach where we're going to bend the knee.
00:28:56.000We're going to, no, please just negotiate with us because we have to negotiate from a position of strength.
00:29:01.000So it's easy to critique and say he shouldn't have done that.
00:29:05.000But you have to understand it's a complicated situation.
00:29:09.000You have to walk that line, balance between totally going with South Korea and it won't be effective and going against South Korea and having North Korea and China exploit the differences and perhaps even growing animosity between the allies here.
00:29:25.000So it's a tough, Tight rope to walk, and we'll see how Trump handles it going forward.
00:29:30.000As long as he maintains that we can walk away from the negotiating table, we're in good shape.
00:29:35.000That's all that you need in any negotiation, whether it's with business people, whether it's with nations, whether it's in anything.
00:29:43.000You always have to be willing to walk away, of course, because if people understand that you are going to give something, if North Korea believes that no matter what, Donald Trump will be ready, willing, and able to negotiate away different things on the table, well, then there's no pressure.
00:30:44.000And they think that that kind of approach works.
00:30:46.000They think if we all just chill out, if the U.S. deconstructs our military, if we bring home the troops and we disable our nuclear arsenal, well, then everyone will respond by being so nice and so sweet and so good, and they'll follow suit.
00:31:01.000Because the only reason that a war exists.
00:31:05.000The only reason that revisionist powers threaten our interests and do all the rest is because the big, bad, imperialist United States forced them into it.
00:31:14.000Otherwise, they'd be peaceful nationalists in every nation, which is total horseshit.
00:33:27.000We talked about North Korea, big whip.
00:33:29.000But the real news of the day, of course, is Starbucks' new bathroom policy.
00:33:35.000So you remember there was a big incident earlier in the month, or maybe it was last month, where a couple of black chaps, a couple of black fellas were in a Starbucks in Philadelphia and they got arrested because they were loitering there.
00:33:50.000They were waiting for a meeting to begin, which, you know.
00:35:20.000And so Starbucks has announced that they're changing their policy.
00:35:23.000First, they're going to have a sensitivity training day where they're going to shut down all their stores and they're going to have racial prejudice training or racial.
00:35:34.000Racial bias training, where they'll have their employees come in and they'll receive training that has been put together by like the ACLU and the ADL and the SPLC, and they'll basically be programmed clockwork orange style to not be racist.
00:35:49.000And going into effect immediately is a new policy.
00:35:52.000It was sent down from the company down to all the employees saying that now, even if you don't buy anything, you're still considered a customer, which means that you can go in, you can sit there, you can hang out there as long as you want, you can use the bathrooms.
00:36:06.000And they say, because We don't want to make you feel less than.
00:36:12.000So we're going to let you use the bathroom, even if you don't buy anything.
00:36:14.000Go into Starbucks and you can use your imagination as to who this is going to attract.
00:36:21.000You know, you think, hmm, temperature controlled room, free Wi Fi, public bathroom.
00:36:28.000It's nice, it's well lit, it's shelter.
00:36:30.000Hmm, who might take advantage of this?
00:36:33.000Is it going to be black people, black business people who just want to buy a coffee on their lunch hour while they wait for meetings?
00:36:41.000Or do you think it's going to be people who don't have all of the above for very good reasons?
00:36:45.000You know, drug users, homeless people, the poor.
00:36:49.000No, we love the poor, but we don't like homeless people.
00:36:53.000You know, we don't like homeless people in Starbucks.
00:36:56.000And so already they've had to come out and clarify their policy.
00:36:59.000They came out with a statement today saying, but actually it's open for everybody, but if you use drugs and if you sleep, we're going to have to kick you out.
00:38:01.000And remember, if they call you out, if they tell you you have to leave, if they say you haven't purchased anything, don't make any purchases, go there, hang out.
00:38:09.000By all means, bring in outside food and drink.
00:38:12.000Bring in your own fine America First jug of water.
00:38:15.000Bring in any kind of McDonald's, Burger King, and enjoy yourself.
00:38:19.000And if anybody says anything about it, start a big loud scene.
00:38:32.000Start a big scene and promptly resume what you're doing.
00:38:35.000Because we have to demonstrate to these people through activism, I think it's a great thing, that this kind of policy not only will not work in general, I mean, we have to fundamentally bankrupt the value of inclusion and tolerance and all the rest.
00:38:50.000I think that's a great demonstration in and of itself.
00:38:52.000We have to make these people play by their own rules and bankrupt companies that do this kind of thing because we can't have it anymore.
00:39:00.000I'm tired of living in a country where we have to be receiving racial bias training and we can't have rules anymore because people don't want to play by them.
00:39:09.000You're in Starbucks, you have to buy something.
00:42:11.000If I were the same guy, Talking this, well, maybe in a different way, maybe in a more conversational tone, or I don't know, maybe like a more modern, like kind of kid way to talk.
00:42:22.000And I was in a sweatshirt and I had like, you know, goofy toys on my desk.
00:42:26.000I had like a Simpsons toy on my desk and a Pez dispenser and like a McDonald's toy.
00:42:32.000And I was in some like goofy, I was in like my bedroom or something.
00:42:35.000And, you know, with my bed unmade, and I was like, hey, dudes, what's up?
00:42:40.000You know, you wouldn't get the same feel.
00:42:41.000But of course, you dress nice because you respect the audience.
00:42:45.000You have a certain kind of presentation.
00:42:48.000You talk not like in an up talking way, and you talk just like a regular person, then I think you get that aesthetic.
00:44:31.000And I double and triple checked that from Business Insider.
00:44:35.000They reported that the Pentagon might be missing over $21 trillion unaccounted for, which you understand the Defense Department budget is less than $700 billion, at least for the last eight years.
00:44:47.000So how do they have $21 trillion unaccounted for?
00:44:49.000That tells you just how much money is being printed and how much little value is underlying that.
00:45:49.000I haven't actually seen that, but it probably would have any chance of getting passed, let alone getting the wall built.
00:45:55.000The trick is that the wall costs $25 billion.
00:46:00.000For anybody to put any kind of money into that, I haven't seen what that bill looks like, but the only way you're going to get that funded is through Congress.
00:46:09.000The only way is through the federal government just spending the money.
00:46:12.000And you can look at many different options, but it has to go through the House of Representatives.
00:46:16.000People say you could build it through the military, you could build it through this, you could build it through that.
00:46:21.000You've got to have Congress appropriate the money.
00:46:23.000And if that's the case, then the best way to do it is just to appropriate the money.
00:46:28.000And I think doing it any other way would be kind of tough, you know, in the sense that.
00:46:35.000In the sense that it would be, I think, a crime, basically, that we spend money on just about everything else under the sun, but we can't secure our own border.
00:46:44.000You know, we spend $38 billion on aid for Israel, no money for the wall.
00:46:48.000We spend billions of dollars on foreign wars, no money for the wall.
00:46:52.000We spend, you know, so for me, you look at all the expenditures of our government on other countries, on people who don't work, on all these other things, and to build it any other way, I think is.
00:47:04.000It's almost just as bad as not having a wall.
00:47:07.000Like, I understand, I would accept a wall getting built no matter what, but that's almost half the battle we have to break the back of the Congress such that they will finally do what is right.
00:47:17.000And to me, that's almost as important because you get the wall built.
00:47:21.000But if Congress isn't changed, if they're not forced to do that and held accountable, they'll take it down within the next two terms or they'll revise immigration policy, all kinds of things.
00:48:09.000If you're not Catholic and you don't get it, just watch literally anything by Fulton Sheen.
00:48:14.000Watch his old show because you watch that and it really, I think, gives you a sense for what it used to be like when.
00:48:25.000I don't know, maybe just 60 years ago in general, just everything about that time, where nowadays you watch even political content and it's just so in your face.
00:51:10.000Okay, Mr. President, let's make it a mental health issue and talk about how you're still fing it up.
00:51:16.000We are committed to working with state and local leaders to help secure our schools and tackle the difficult issue of mental health.
00:51:26.000In February of 2017, sometime between the fifth and sixth worst shootings in the last year, President Trump signed into law a bill that made it way easier for those families with mental health issues to get guns.
00:52:14.000Well, the self care bills that Trump has pushed for have all taken coverage away from mental health.
00:52:20.000Graham Cassidy would have unlisted mental health as an essential service.
00:52:23.000The American health care act could have taken Medicaid and private coverage away from mental health, and an October executive order just made it harder to get health coverage in general.
00:52:32.000On top of that, Trump's proposed budget cuts over $600 billion from health and human services, and the latest GOP budget cuts over $1.4 trillion from Medicare and Medicaid, all of which make it harder for someone who needs mental health support to get health coverage.
00:52:44.000We have a lot of mental health problems in our country, as do other countries.
00:52:48.000Yeah, we tried, but you get a really big picture.
00:52:51.000Let me try and bring them up one more time.
00:52:55.000I'm sure the noise is probably crazy right now.
00:56:00.000The new nuclear physics, the new investigations.
00:56:06.000And it was edifying to see their love of research, their objectivity, their concern for truth, and the complete absence of a purely personal point of view.
00:56:24.000Sometime later, when we went to the second banquet, we discussed the subject of comparative religions.
00:56:32.000These same men, who seemed so objective, now allowed prejudices, points of view, narrowness, and even a certain amount of bigotry to creep in.
00:56:48.000Why was it that they were so objective when they were considering one field of knowledge?
00:56:54.000And so narrow when considering another.
00:56:58.000It was because science did not concern them personally.
00:57:12.000And that's what I try to, you know, that's the world that we're trying to recreate.
00:57:17.000It's not a world that's, we're not trying to turn back the clock and go back in time, but we are trying to go back to a world that makes sense, where that, That kind of delivery is real talent.
00:57:29.000You know, when you have that kind of presentation, when people vary their tone and it's actually engaging, it's actually, there's some gravitas, they take themselves seriously.
00:57:41.000You know, that's the kind of thing that we're trying to get back to.
00:57:58.000And it's not even like they're like crooks or murderers or anything like that, but they're just, that's when you get into sin against nature, you know, when something is unnatural and it becomes repulsive.
01:03:26.000I understand people who are, you know, if you're a person you like legitimately are like, oh my God, I feel like a girl in a boy's body.
01:03:35.000You could also, I do believe that people have this.
01:03:38.000Capacity that they could be in two places at once where they can believe something, but in their personal conduct, they can act in a very different way.
01:03:46.000You know, you could talk to like an alcoholic or a drug abuser, and I wouldn't think that a drug abuser is like pro drugs, you know, at least if you're on like heroin.
01:03:55.000I don't think if you talk to them in a general sense, would they say everyone should be on opioids, you know?
01:04:01.000And so I guess you can be, but transgenderism goes against real conservatism.
01:04:09.000I understand the paradox, but we just don't want to encourage that kind of thing.
01:04:13.000I guess, I don't know, it's hard because you don't want to make these kinds of blanket expressions of tolerance or approval.
01:04:21.000But the trick is, you just don't want that to be an example for people.
01:04:25.000You don't want that to be the example.
01:04:27.000You don't want to go out there and make it out like this is an acceptable and normative thing to do, or this is on the same level as anybody else.
01:05:01.000And when that happens, people who are watching, and if you're trying to be a role model or a leader or a voice for something, they get in their head like, oh, well, you know, this person's not married or this person's being a thought, this person's doing that, and they're a conservative.
01:07:09.000We've got Reagan who says, Right this minute, I am blasting America first from my iPad while taking an hour long dump in a Starbucks restroom and holding up the line, T posing on the toilet while eating Chick fil A. Praise the Lord, the earth is hollow.
01:08:24.000But to say that, to identify that and be like, well, I'm a part of this community of men who are turning away from women and all the rest, it's kind of sad.
01:09:24.000I'm not out there gung ho, like, gee, I can't wait to jump into the awesome field of women that are out there in a city like Chicago or in Boston.
01:09:38.000I'm not really gung ho about getting into that, but I want a male heir.
01:09:41.000I want sons and daughters, I guess, but I want sons.
01:09:45.000So that I can create a great empire and so that we can further the existence of our people.
01:09:52.000And so that's got to be a big part of it.
01:09:54.000You can't be a pronatalist and also be MGTOW, as far as I'm concerned.
01:10:06.000It's not optically good because, of course, what the other side has on their side is status signaling.
01:10:14.000Oh, well, you're just a low status male because you can't find a woman.
01:10:17.000And it's all the difference in the world between saying, We are for marriage and we are for sexual virtue and morality, as opposed to saying we just want no part of women because they're mean.
01:10:34.000But it's like to make that, optically speaking, you have to think about it critically, meaning you have to think about it how the other side or people not in the movement look at it.