America First - Nicholas J. Fuentes - Radical Female Terrorism | America First Ep. 138

00:00:03.000 Good evening, everybody.

00:00:04.000 You are watching America First.

00:00:05.000 My name is Nicholas J. Fuentes, and we have a great show for you tonight.

00:00:09.000 Lots to talk about.

00:00:11.000 We are feeling good.

00:00:12.000 We had a fun show yesterday.

00:00:14.000 Very fun, very exciting show yesterday.

00:00:17.000 We had a lot of fun, a lot of gimmicky stuff, got to admit, but still fun nonetheless.

00:00:24.000 And we were celebrating yesterday for some big announcements that were made by the president.

00:00:30.000 Some of them followed through on today, some of them shied away, but nevertheless, an exciting day.

00:00:35.000 We heard today.

00:00:37.000 That President Trump gave the order finally for Homeland Security to deploy the National Guard to the border.

00:00:43.000 So we're very excited about that.

00:00:45.000 Syria didn't exactly work out, and we'll get into why and all of that.

00:00:49.000 But we are feeling good. 0.85

00:00:50.000 It's looking like it's going to be a pretty big week with that one big announcement.

00:00:55.000 Additionally, we're going to have to talk about the YouTube shooting and whatever that was all about.

00:01:00.000 We found out who it was that did the shooting yesterday at YouTube headquarters, which, if you didn't hear, I think a lot of people heard about it.

00:01:09.000 Right up until they found out who the shooter was.

00:01:11.000 And then you heard nothing about it.

00:01:13.000 We all were hearing about there's a shooting at YouTube headquarters, big shooting.

00:01:18.000 And then they found out who it was, and then we didn't hear so much about it.

00:01:21.000 But there was a big shooting yesterday at the YouTube headquarters in San Bruno, California.

00:01:27.000 Nobody's died so far except for the shooter.

00:01:30.000 And it turned out everybody, of course, suspected it was a white male. 0.99

00:01:34.000 White men are the problem. 0.99

00:01:36.000 Maybe it was a conservative. 0.99

00:01:37.000 Maybe it was a right wing person. 1.00

00:01:39.000 Turned out it was some Persian.

00:01:41.000 Woman, a Persian woman who may or may not have listed, I think, Jewish as her religion, but Persian woman, vegan, bodybuilder, rapper.

00:01:51.000 I mean, just a very strange character.

00:01:53.000 And initially, it was funny because initially, maybe it wasn't funny that there was a shooting, but it was funny initially because they listed the shooting as domestic violence.

00:02:03.000 Could you imagine?

00:02:04.000 She goes into YouTube headquarters with a semi automatic handgun, starts shooting people, people are running, there's chaos. 0.77

00:02:12.000 They call that domestic violence.

00:02:13.000 She shoots three people.

00:02:15.000 Now, remember when the Parkland school shooting happened, they said that was the 18th school shooting of the year.

00:02:22.000 They said it was the 18th in what, the month and a half that we had been into 2018?

00:02:30.000 And then we went back and we looked at the data.

00:02:31.000 We looked at the data and we found that in their calculation, when CNN was saying there were 18 school shootings, one of them was somebody who shot himself in a school parking lot after school hours, one of them was a school bus.

00:02:44.000 And somebody shot like a BB gun at the school bus.

00:02:46.000 So they count these as mass school shootings.

00:02:51.000 Somebody goes to school, they kill themselves.

00:02:53.000 Nobody's even at the school.

00:02:54.000 Somebody shoots an airsoft gun at a school bus.

00:02:57.000 That's a mass shooting.

00:02:59.000 But a woman goes in, she shoots three people. 0.99

00:03:02.000 She intends to do mass casualties, domestic violence.

00:03:06.000 And initially they said she was targeting a boyfriend or something at YouTube.

00:03:11.000 Then they said, actually, we just completely made that up.

00:03:13.000 That was not true.

00:03:15.000 And the reason being, which we'll get into in a moment, was that.

00:03:18.000 YouTube was filtering her videos, or so she claimed.

00:03:21.000 But we're going to get into all of that.

00:03:23.000 It's a big, exciting show.

00:03:25.000 Not so much fallout yesterday from last night's show, which was very provocative, very controversial.

00:03:31.000 Actually, people are very excited.

00:03:32.000 I think people were happy to see somebody with the courage to stand up to some of the insanity that's going on in the movement.

00:03:41.000 So we had a fun show yesterday.

00:03:43.000 We're back to business on this show.

00:03:45.000 We're back to covering the news, hard hitting analysis, as you can count on, on the Nick Nation.

00:03:51.000 Some people like the fun, the zany.

00:03:53.000 Some people like the serious.

00:03:54.000 So we're going to have a regular show.

00:03:56.000 Remember, tomorrow is our second episode of America First 2018 Election HQ, and that's a podcast on SoundCloud exclusively for our Maker Support premium members, our America First premium members.

00:04:11.000 And we've had signups like you wouldn't believe this week.

00:04:15.000 Last week we had a crazy number, this week we had a crazy number.

00:04:19.000 On April 1st, they renewed the subscriptions for the previous month for April, and we lost a few.

00:04:26.000 We were down to like 168 from like 170.

00:04:29.000 And already we're well past 180, so we're doing really well with our subscribers.

00:04:33.000 We're doing really well this week.

00:04:35.000 Remember to sign up if you want to get some hard hitting and in depth analysis on the 2018 election.

00:04:41.000 We'll be talking about all kinds of special elections, not special like, you know what I mean, all kinds of elections that matter in this election.

00:04:49.000 We're monitoring 89 different House elections, we're monitoring, I believe, seven Senate races.

00:04:56.000 We'll also be looking at state and governor races, so it should be a great episode, very in depth.

00:05:01.000 If you're interested, if you're wondering what's going to happen in 2018, this is the podcast for you.

00:05:05.000 None of that Nate Silver nonsense.

00:05:07.000 He was wrong in 2016, and I was right.

00:05:10.000 In 2016, he said Trump had a 10% chance of winning.

00:05:14.000 I bet $300 on him, and I came away a big winner.

00:05:17.000 But anyway, to get into the news, we want to first get into what we talked about last night, which is President Trump saying that he would deploy troops to the border.

00:05:28.000 And he announced this yesterday.

00:05:29.000 He said very seriously during the press conference with the head of state from Latvia.

00:05:34.000 He said that he was seriously looking at it.

00:05:36.000 He'd already consulted with the Department of Defense and the Department of Justice on whether or not he could deploy the military to the U.S. border.

00:05:45.000 And people said, Oh, I'll believe it when I see it.

00:05:47.000 I'll hold my breath, you know, all in this and that.

00:05:49.000 And people on the left said, Oh, this is illegal.

00:05:52.000 This is illegal for him to use the armed forces as a security force within the country, which is not true.

00:05:58.000 But people freaked out about it on both sides.

00:06:00.000 The black pill right said, Oh, more talk from Donald Trump.

00:06:04.000 We won't believe it until we see it. 0.55

00:06:06.000 And the left said, oh, tyranny, he's Hitler, you know, he's breaking the law. 0.84

00:06:10.000 Even Reason Magazine, I saw in Reason Magazine, which is like this libertarian magazine, the worst, the dumbest libertarians from Reason, who said it's actually illegal for Trump to put troops on the border. 0.89

00:06:22.000 No, it isn't.

00:06:23.000 But so President Trump gave the announcement today that he had officially made the order.

00:06:28.000 And as early as tonight, they will be deploying the National Guard to the border of the United States to protect the border from illegal immigrants, from drug smugglers, from criminals, and all the rest.

00:06:40.000 Additionally, Homeland Security Nielsen said, she said two very great things.

00:06:45.000 In addition to the fact that the military is going to be at the border protecting it until a wall is built, she also said two very key things, which didn't get a lot of coverage from, I didn't see it very much on my timeline.

00:06:57.000 But she also said two very other important things.

00:06:59.000 She said, number one, the military will also be looking into building wall or military installations along the border because apparently the federal government owns a lot of land.

00:07:10.000 Right along the border.

00:07:12.000 So they're going to look into having the military build up wall to protect the country because it's a national security concern.

00:07:19.000 And also possibly military installation.

00:07:21.000 So we don't know what that means.

00:07:22.000 Maybe it's wall.

00:07:23.000 Who knows?

00:07:24.000 She also said the second big thing she said was that she was able to confirm with Mexican government officials that the caravan that we have been so worried about for so long has been disbanded by the Mexican government.

00:07:37.000 The 1,500 person strong caravan that was en route from Honduras up to the United States.

00:07:43.000 Has been disbanded.

00:07:44.000 It's no longer a problem.

00:07:46.000 And yet we get the military on the border regardless.

00:07:48.000 So a very positive step in the right direction on immigration.

00:07:52.000 And I don't need to tell you this, but this is a big win for President Trump and his base.

00:07:56.000 Because, of course, you know, that was the one thing that he hasn't really delivered on.

00:08:02.000 He's delivered on trade.

00:08:03.000 He's repealed the TPP.

00:08:05.000 He implemented the steel and aluminum tariffs.

00:08:07.000 We're engaged in an awesome trade war with China, which is very good.

00:08:11.000 We're going to renegotiate NAFTA.

00:08:13.000 So we're really doing good on trade.

00:08:15.000 In terms of economy, we've been doing really great.

00:08:19.000 GDP growth over 3% in 2017 in the first three quarters, which we never saw those kinds of numbers under Obama.

00:08:26.000 I think it was 2.9% for the last quarter or the first quarter.

00:08:30.000 I forget.

00:08:31.000 But so we had great economic growth.

00:08:33.000 We had our tax cuts for 95% of Americans.

00:08:36.000 Jobs are coming back.

00:08:37.000 Unemployment is down to record lows.

00:08:39.000 Stock market's doing well.

00:08:41.000 You saw foreign policy wise, we're doing very great.

00:08:44.000 We have our meeting with Kim Jong un that's coming up either in April or in May.

00:08:49.000 And President Trump will have the Japanese President Shinzo Abe at Mar a Lago to discuss that.

00:08:55.000 The South Korean leader and North Korean leader will be meeting in April.

00:08:59.000 ISIS has been defeated.

00:09:00.000 Syria, our presence is winding down, and on and on.

00:09:04.000 And so, basically, long story short, we've been doing very well with everything else.

00:09:07.000 But the one big thing, obviously the glaring thing that's been missing, is wall, is real immigration reform.

00:09:15.000 And we've had, like I said yesterday, there's been some good numbers.

00:09:18.000 Deportations are up, arrests are up, illegal border crossings are down.

00:09:23.000 But he didn't promise just that.

00:09:25.000 He promised a wall. 1.00

00:09:26.000 He promised we were going to deport all the illegal immigrants. 0.67

00:09:30.000 And more have been, you know, being deported.

00:09:32.000 And there's been some increase in border security and that he got $1.6 billion to repair fences and to build new fences.

00:09:40.000 But what about the wall?

00:09:42.000 And so obviously, a lot of people had a big issue with that.

00:09:44.000 That we have the military there and not just there, but there until a wall is built is a very solid thing for his base and for the midterms.

00:09:53.000 Additionally, on the caravan, I don't think anybody's really talking about this, but Trump was able to disband the caravan by tweeting.

00:10:00.000 Think about that.

00:10:02.000 You know, for all the people that say, oh, I don't like the way he tweets, he's going to bring us to war with the tweets.

00:10:07.000 He's got to stop with the tweets.

00:10:08.000 I hear this a lot from the basic, you know, the very basic conservatives, the very basic Trump supporters.

00:10:14.000 He's got to stop with the tweeting.

00:10:16.000 He's doing a great job, but he's got to stop with the tweeting.

00:10:20.000 By the power of tweeting, he has brought North Korea to the negotiating table, he has brought Mexico to disband the caravan, and on and on and on.

00:10:28.000 I mean, think about that because what the alternative would have been.

00:10:32.000 If the caravan had kept marching, is that by law we would have been required to stop these people, to arrest them, and then release them into the country?

00:10:41.000 And President Trump said, My hands are tied in terms of the law.

00:10:44.000 We have to catch them, we have to release them.

00:10:46.000 That's the law.

00:10:47.000 And so he would be facing either a confrontation with the legislature and the judiciary, possibly do something illegal by trying to detain these people, or it would have been a big, ugly thing if he tried to, God forbid, fire on these people or anything like that.

00:11:01.000 So it would have been a very ugly situation if there was some kind of a Clash at the border, a big confrontation, which might have been a good thing, but might have been very risky, which you have to consider.

00:11:11.000 Might have been very risky.

00:11:12.000 A lot of people want to impeach him.

00:11:14.000 A lot of people want to get rid of him.

00:11:15.000 That would have been a very good pretext to do it.

00:11:17.000 So, a very risky option if he tried to stop them.

00:11:20.000 If he didn't, it would be a disaster because he would look like he's weak on immigration.

00:11:24.000 He's no different than Bush.

00:11:26.000 That for sure would have sunk him in the midterms and in 2020.

00:11:29.000 People would have never forgotten that.

00:11:31.000 So, he went around the law.

00:11:33.000 He circumvented it by instead of Let's round these people up and arrest them, and I'll risk my presidency and all the rest.

00:11:40.000 Instead, he circumvented the law, he circumvented a direct response, and he got Mexico to take care of it for him.

00:11:46.000 And how?

00:11:47.000 Just simply by tweeting, using his leverage.

00:11:49.000 And this goes back to four dimensional chess.

00:11:52.000 People all the time make fun of it.

00:11:54.000 If you think that President Trump is handling a situation in a way that isn't 100% direct, if he's not addressing the problem directly, you know, in the quickest way from point A to point B, just a straight line of people are coming in, I have to physically stop them.

00:12:12.000 If he's not answering the problem directly, that's a ridiculous theory. 0.92

00:12:16.000 That's a ridiculous conspiracy. 0.96

00:12:18.000 400 dimensional underwater backgammon. 0.99

00:12:21.000 You know, they come up with all the ridiculous memes.

00:12:24.000 When in actuality, what we see time and time again with this president is that he uses his leverage. 0.64

00:12:30.000 He uses the tools at his disposal that he can use unilaterally to influence events.

00:12:36.000 This is not complicated.

00:12:38.000 This is not a fantastic conspiracy theory to say that he's been a deal maker for 30 years.

00:12:43.000 He's put together great deals and putting together plots of land and buying sky rights and building buildings with contractors and casinos and other things with different companies.

00:12:54.000 Leveraging with debt to say that he uses the presidency and the tools at his disposal in the same way.

00:13:00.000 Why would he address this problem by possibly coming into conflict with the judiciary and the legislature where he could either get humiliated or he could possibly do something illegal or he looks weak when he could just say, you know what, you know that $70 billion a year you get because of NAFTA, we'll take that out unless you take care of it.

00:13:18.000 And then they take care of it.

00:13:19.000 I think this is, you know, people are looking at it as well, oh, you know, well, thank God Mexico took care of it for him.

00:13:25.000 I think he did that. 0.53

00:13:26.000 He pressured them into doing it, and this is a proof for the four dimensional stuff.

00:13:31.000 And so when we see, you know, for example, the serious strike, which was in April of 2017, which everybody timelessly used that example as if they're calling Trump a neocon, why?

00:13:42.000 Because he did a serious strike in April of 2017.

00:13:46.000 Never mind that that never expanded into any larger military presence or engagement, never mind that that had no effect on the ground whatsoever.

00:13:55.000 In fact, the target that they hit with 59 cruise missiles.

00:13:58.000 Was operational within 24 hours.

00:14:01.000 That air base they hit in Syria, which people say that's proof he's a neocon.

00:14:05.000 That target that he hit was operational.

00:14:07.000 They were flying planes out of it within a day, had no effect, but they say he's a neocon.

00:14:12.000 And so I think this more than anything, the caravan, it demonstrates, if nothing else, that Trump is intelligent.

00:14:20.000 He's using four dimensional chess.

00:14:22.000 And that's a tool we can use to analyze what he's up to.

00:14:25.000 So that's military coming to the border, a very solid thing.

00:14:28.000 We don't know how long they're going.

00:14:30.000 We don't know how much money is involved.

00:14:32.000 We don't know to what extent, like how many troops will be there.

00:14:35.000 None of those details were given, but we do know he's sending the National Guard in.

00:14:39.000 And that's a great thing.

00:14:39.000 In some ways, that's better than a wall, at least for now.

00:14:42.000 That's better than a wall, I should say, for now.

00:14:45.000 So a very great thing.

00:14:45.000 He's following through there.

00:14:47.000 His approval rating keeps going up, and I can't help but think it's because of the wall.

00:14:51.000 He tweeted out today from Breitbart that according to the Rasmussen daily tracking poll, he's up to 51%.

00:14:59.000 He was at 50% on the second.

00:15:02.000 Which Obama was at 46% on the same day during his presidency, which would be 2010, April 2nd, 2010.

00:15:10.000 And he's actually gone up, up to 51%.

00:15:12.000 And I think that is something to do with the wall, maybe with trade, other things.

00:15:15.000 So it's obviously very popular, popular with his base, popular with the electorate, and a great thing.

00:15:20.000 The one thing which was kind of a disappointment was he did announce today that we are keeping our military presence in Syria, which is not a great thing, obviously.

00:15:29.000 I think that has a lot to do with pressure from just about everybody Saudi Arabia, Israel.

00:15:35.000 The Congress.

00:15:37.000 And I can't help but think it has something to do with 2018 because you look at his decisions in terms of the legislature and in terms of foreign policy, for example, naming Jerusalem as the capital of Israel and all the pandering he's been doing to Israel.

00:15:51.000 And I can't help but think that has something to do with money for the midterms.

00:15:55.000 We talked about this on the 2018 election podcast last Thursday.

00:15:59.000 And we look at the fact that Democrats are out raising, they're out fundraising Republican candidates in 40 different races.

00:16:07.000 The National Republican Congressional Committee is not making astronomical money like we need to be to have a good defense for ourselves in 2018.

00:16:17.000 And you look at the donors that Paul Ryan and President Trump have to court, people like Sheldon Adelson, people like the Koch brothers, other Jewish and Israel donors.

00:16:27.000 And I don't think that that would be the best solution to really rock the boat in terms of foreign policy, because that would be a big move. 0.55

00:16:34.000 Pulling troops out of Syria would be a real game changer in many ways.

00:16:39.000 Like people, I don't think understand the consequences of that.

00:16:42.000 And so maybe he doesn't want to rock the boat until then.

00:16:44.000 Additionally, you have this issue of Russia and Iran and Turkey all being involved in the Middle East right now.

00:16:52.000 If the United States pulled our presence out of there, Russia essentially gets to decide the fate of Syria.

00:16:57.000 Russia gets to decide the fate of the Middle East. 0.93

00:17:00.000 And is that a great thing? 0.92

00:17:02.000 It's not my top priority in terms of I would rather have military on the border.

00:17:02.000 I don't know.

00:17:07.000 Good thing is, you can have it both ways.

00:17:08.000 A lot of people say, We have 2,000 troops in Syria.

00:17:12.000 Why aren't they on the border?

00:17:13.000 We have a pretty big military.

00:17:14.000 We could probably do both things at once. 1.00

00:17:17.000 It's not ideal we have them in Syria. 1.00

00:17:18.000 I understand the decision. 1.00

00:17:20.000 There are large geopolitical implications about just pulling out from the world.

00:17:26.000 Not that I'm not for that in the end, but it's something that has to be finessed.

00:17:30.000 You know, I think a lot of people on the right wing have this cartoonish idea of foreign policy let's just bring them home.

00:17:37.000 It's not directly benefiting us, and we want to get them out, so let's do it tomorrow.

00:17:42.000 We'll start the retreat tomorrow, and there'll be no negative.

00:17:45.000 Consequences.

00:17:46.000 I think it has to be massaged.

00:17:48.000 I think we have to finesse our way into some kind of a pullback from the world.

00:17:52.000 You know, for example, look at Nixon in Vietnam.

00:17:55.000 Nixon came into power in 1968.

00:17:58.000 We had been in Vietnam for three years since 1965, and we had actually been involved in Vietnam for a long time.

00:18:05.000 But technically, the big ground war on the part of the United States started in 65.

00:18:10.000 This was Lyndon Johnson's war.

00:18:11.000 People say that Johnson killed Kennedy in 63 so he could launch this war, but this was Johnson's war.

00:18:17.000 He lost the election because of it, because he wanted the welfare state and the war at the same time.

00:18:22.000 And so in 68, Nixon came to power saying we would bring peace in Vietnam.

00:18:26.000 And he wasn't able to end the war for five years.

00:18:29.000 Remember, Nixon came into power in 68 saying we're going to end the war. 0.73

00:18:34.000 We'll have victory with honor in Vietnam. 0.86

00:18:36.000 We'll get out of there with honor. 0.89

00:18:39.000 And he went in 68, and it took him five years to wind down that war and officially end it.

00:18:44.000 That's a term and then some.

00:18:47.000 And the reason being was because we had to get some kind of a settlement where, at the very least, We were respected.

00:18:52.000 At the very least, we could say that it was a victory, that the United States doesn't just pull out when we're losing, doesn't just pull out when the casualties get high.

00:19:00.000 We would exert ourselves, and eventually he got us out.

00:19:04.000 The peace agreement ended up falling apart because of other concerns.

00:19:08.000 He ended up, you know, people say we lost that war.

00:19:11.000 We actually won that war.

00:19:12.000 In 73, we had, and this is not really with regard to Syria, but people might say, well, that's a flawed analogy because Vietnam went to hell anyway. 0.67

00:19:20.000 It went to the Soviets anyway.

00:19:22.000 We actually secured a peace settlement where South Vietnam and North Vietnam had recognized an armistice line and they were two separate sovereign nations.

00:19:31.000 But that piece was underlined by the Paris Peace Treaty, which was defunded in 1975 by the Democratic Congress after Nixon resigned because he didn't have any clout anymore.

00:19:43.000 So the Democrats were able to defund it.

00:19:46.000 And so if South Vietnam went into a war with North Vietnam, they wouldn't be able to get the kind of funds and support they needed from the U.S.

00:19:53.000 But that's beside the point.

00:19:54.000 I think that's what we're doing in the world today with Trump.

00:19:56.000 You can tell Trump wants to get us out there.

00:20:00.000 The rhetoric has been very strong.

00:20:01.000 He's been fighting internally with the Pentagon and with the DOD on this stuff.

00:20:06.000 And I think he wants to.

00:20:07.000 I think the pressure is there, but it'll take some time.

00:20:10.000 So it's kind of a mixed bag.

00:20:12.000 We got the troops on the border, we got the wall being built by the military.

00:20:16.000 Syria, not a big win.

00:20:18.000 So that was Trump.

00:20:19.000 That's what we were saying the other day.

00:20:21.000 The next big thing we got to talk about, and this was the big story.

00:20:25.000 Buckle up for this one.

00:20:26.000 I'm going to have to take some sips here before we get into this story, which is YouTube.

00:20:34.000 And of course, it was a tragedy that YouTube was shot up.

00:20:38.000 And I have to say this because, you know, notice where you're watching the show on.

00:20:42.000 So, thoughts and prayers, thoughts and prayers with the people affected at YouTube.

00:20:47.000 It was terrible, and we really pray for them.

00:20:50.000 But so this situation unfolded yesterday where, again, there was not a lot of details out about it yesterday.

00:20:57.000 That's really why I didn't want to talk about it so much because, you know, it happens so often where there's a shooting and already people are right on top of it before we know anything about the shooting, right?

00:21:07.000 I mean, in the terms of Las Vegas.

00:21:10.000 We still don't know what happened there.

00:21:12.000 In terms of Parkland, we still don't know what happened there, frankly.

00:21:15.000 You know, I think you hear some of the testimony from some of the people there and some of the details from law enforcement, and there's still a lot of unanswered questions, a lot of unexplained contradictions in some of the testimony and all the rest.

00:21:27.000 But nevertheless, before we get any idea of what happens, people are right out there.

00:21:32.000 They're on there saying, you know, oh, it was this, it was that. 0.88

00:21:35.000 You know, we got to blame this guy, we got to blame white people, we got to blame Muslims.

00:21:40.000 And so I like to figure it out before we totally give a response because, of Course, we have to see the details, and so it turned out there was this shooting yesterday at YouTube headquarters in San Bruno, California. 0.68

00:21:52.000 It was a 39 year old Iranian who perpetrated the shooting.

00:21:56.000 Her name was Nassim Agdam.

00:21:58.000 Nassim Agdam, and she went in there at around lunchtime with a semi automatic handgun, legally purchased and legally owned, and she just opened fire on everybody.

00:22:10.000 Three people were shot, two people were released from the hospital last night, one person still in critical condition.

00:22:17.000 The only death was the shooter, Ogdom, who shot herself at the scene.

00:22:21.000 She was found dead when the police arrived.

00:22:24.000 And the reason that she did it, which is funny because we already know why she shot up YouTube.

00:22:30.000 Isn't that weird?

00:22:31.000 Isn't that weird how we already know why she did the shooting and it's not even been 24 hours since the shooting?

00:22:37.000 It's a little bit after 24 hours after the shooting because Las Vegas was, I think, 160 or so days ago, and we still don't know why Stephen Paddock shot up the college.

00:22:49.000 Nicholas Cruz, we still don't know why he shot up the school.

00:22:52.000 You know, people say, oh, well, he was mentally unstable.

00:22:54.000 Well, that's not really a reason, right?

00:22:56.000 Did anybody find a diary?

00:22:58.000 Did anybody find a note?

00:22:59.000 Did anybody say the person who he was living with said that Cruz texted him 45 minutes before the shooting, hey, what's up?

00:23:08.000 Didn't go to school because he doesn't go to school on Valentine's Day.

00:23:10.000 So, a lot of, you know, isn't that funny?

00:23:11.000 Before we really sink our teeth into it, isn't that funny that it really only takes us about a day to figure out why somebody does something like this?

00:23:19.000 Because, of course, People talk to other people.

00:23:22.000 People know other people.

00:23:23.000 People leave a digital trace.

00:23:25.000 They leave sometimes a written trace.

00:23:27.000 People are not exactly subtle when they're going out and doing these kinds of things.

00:23:31.000 It's not stable, right in the head people who just one day decide, yeah, well, you know, I got to go to the laundry, got to pick up my laundry, got to go to the grocery store, get some milk, get some eggs, got to pick up the kids from school, and then I got to shoot up YouTube headquarters, you know?

00:23:45.000 Or in the case of Stephen Paddock, well, you know, I got to go play the slots for a little while, then dinner with friends at six, and then I bring 10 suitcases.

00:23:53.000 No, I'm sorry, I bring, yeah, 10 suitcases full of 23 guns up to the 32nd floor, and I'm going to shoot. 0.83

00:23:59.000 500 people. 0.76

00:24:00.000 You know, people don't just do things like this.

00:24:03.000 There are signs people unravel, they leave behind notes, they leave behind clues. 1.00

00:24:08.000 And just isn't that queer? 1.00

00:24:10.000 Isn't that strange? 0.81

00:24:11.000 Isn't that a little bit off that we know 24 hours that the reason she did this was because her videos were being filtered, or she claims her videos were being filtered, and we still don't know about the others. 0.94

00:24:22.000 Anywho, the reason she shot up YouTube is she alleged that YouTube was essentially throttling her content, that she was getting a lot of views for a long time.

00:24:32.000 She was making a lot of money from her videos, and it was a pretty weird channel. 0.96

00:24:36.000 Like, we don't know if she was a tranny or she was just weird looking, but she did this weird channel where I guess she was a vegan, but also a bodybuilder, but also a rapper, but also like a humorist. 0.96

00:24:45.000 I mean, a very strange character here. 0.99

00:24:48.000 But the reason that she was, the reason she went out and did this was because she said she was getting a lot of views, and then she wasn't, and she was not making ad revenue off of her videos.

00:24:58.000 She wasn't able to make any money off her videos.

00:25:01.000 And so she posted a lot of content on YouTube, on Instagram, about how.

00:25:05.000 YouTube was demonetizing her, and it's not acceptable.

00:25:08.000 They're censoring her. 1.00

00:25:09.000 Iran is better on censorship than YouTube. 1.00

00:25:12.000 And that's why she went up and shot up YouTube HQ. 0.93

00:25:15.000 And on the one hand, now you have a couple of issues here.

00:25:20.000 You have a couple of angles to tackle the shooting from.

00:25:22.000 On the one hand, obviously it's a gun problem, in the sense that, or rather, it pertains to the gun debate.

00:25:28.000 Not a gun problem, but it pertains to the gun debate, in the sense that here's a woman who legally purchased, legally owned a firearm.

00:25:36.000 No previous signs of mental illness. 0.94

00:25:38.000 Nobody knew she was going to do this. 0.79

00:25:40.000 She didn't have, as far as I'm concerned, a criminal record. 0.95

00:25:43.000 She bought it not at a gun show. 0.66

00:25:45.000 She bought it legally.

00:25:46.000 She owned it legally.

00:25:47.000 She was able to pass background checks and on and on. 1.00

00:25:50.000 This is in California where they have some of the strictest gun laws in the country.

00:25:53.000 And yet she was still able to go into this YouTube headquarters and maybe she had better aim.

00:25:58.000 Maybe she was a man or something. 0.89

00:26:01.000 She would have been able to inflict mass casualties with a legally purchased semi automatic handgun. 0.91

00:26:06.000 Didn't take an AR 15.

00:26:08.000 Didn't take a military style assault weapon, scary, big gun.

00:26:13.000 You know, she didn't come in with a bazooka and a grenade.

00:26:15.000 She came in with a handgun that's standard, that people have, where, by the way, most of the gun crimes are committed with, legally obtained, and nothing, no laws or regulations would have prevented her from acquiring it, and she was able to do it.

00:26:27.000 So, on the one hand, it's a part of the gun debate.

00:26:29.000 On another hand, it's about the shooter debate who is committing the shootings? 0.80

00:26:33.000 You know, with the Parkland shooting, we get this very ugly narrative that we always hear that is that it's white men that are shooting. 0.79

00:26:41.000 Up schools. 0.99

00:26:42.000 It's a toxic masculinity problem or it's a toxic whiteness problem. 0.97

00:26:46.000 And it's so curious to me every time there's a Muslim terror attack, people will be quick to point out, oh, well, but actually, remember like 10 years ago that one time a white guy shot up a place? 0.98

00:26:58.000 And never mind the fact that the country is 30% white men and less than, I think, a quarter of a percent Muslim men, but they'll say it's white men, it's white men.

00:27:07.000 Well, in this case, he had somebody who was an Iranian woman.

00:27:09.000 And they'll be very quick to point out, oh, well, that's, you know, they're in the very small minority. 0.69

00:27:13.000 Then they're very quick to point out proportionality.

00:27:16.000 That, well, if you look at all the shootings, women comprise a very small percentage and blah, blah, blah.

00:27:21.000 On the other hand, it's a censorship issue where it's like, well, I don't know.

00:27:25.000 YouTube is censoring people, it does bring to light this issue.

00:27:28.000 Should YouTube get shot up because they're censoring?

00:27:31.000 Probably not.

00:27:32.000 Probably, you know, maybe that's a little extreme, but it does bring to light the issue of censorship.

00:27:36.000 And then lastly, it's a media question because the media, when we saw the YouTube shooting, they were all over it.

00:27:43.000 Another shooting, another opportunity because they see tragedy as opportunity for them to blame guns, blame the Second Amendment, blame the NRA, blame white men.

00:27:53.000 And all of a sudden, when they found out actually it was a foreign woman, it was an Iranian woman who doesn't speak good English.

00:27:59.000 She donated to the DNC. 0.80

00:28:00.000 She was a vegan who did it.

00:28:02.000 Suddenly, they didn't want to talk about it so much.

00:28:05.000 So, this was in summation.

00:28:08.000 And oh, I just realized something.

00:28:10.000 We never went live on Facebook.

00:28:11.000 Whoops.

00:28:12.000 We'll do that right now.

00:28:14.000 But so, in summation, because, you know, with Facebook, I notice when I glance over, I see the Facebook tab.

00:28:21.000 And with Facebook, you've got to set up the live stream and then you've got to click go live, which is something you don't have to do for the others.

00:28:26.000 So, they're going to get a half episode on Facebook.

00:28:29.000 But, nevertheless, In summation, this has been the most intersectional shooting in American history, maybe even world history, the most intersectional shooting because it encompasses all these different issues.

00:28:43.000 And I think they're all basically important.

00:28:45.000 I think they all give us a pretty good idea of where we are in clown country, in clown world, where things are happening and it simply doesn't conform to the media narrative.

00:28:55.000 It simply does not conform to our idea of what a shooting is supposed to be that's been propped up by the media. 0.96

00:29:02.000 That when we see a shooting, We are led to believe by Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton, and who are the, you know, David Hogg and Emma Gonzalez and all these other characters, that when we see a shooting, it's AR 15s, it's evil white men, it's evil white Republican men. 0.68

00:29:21.000 And the problem in this country is masculinity, and it's white men, it's patriotism, it's guns, it's our traditions, it's marriage, you know, it's all the traditions that we love. 0.88

00:29:33.000 It's basically, it turns into a deconstruction of Western. 0.52

00:29:36.000 Society, and that is their narrative. 0.83

00:29:37.000 That the problem in the world today, if we really want to extrapolate it out into what it's really about, is that the problem in the world today is white men. 0.73

00:29:47.000 I mean, that's what it comes down to. 0.63

00:29:48.000 The problem in the United States is that the country is wrong.

00:29:52.000 How the country was built, how the country was maybe 20 years ago, is wrong and it has to change.

00:29:57.000 And so they'll point a finger at people who represent that and say they're the existential threat.

00:30:02.000 You should be afraid for your life and afraid for the life of your children of these straight.

00:30:09.000 White, masculine, Christian, NRA member men. 0.93

00:30:13.000 They're not just politically nefarious.

00:30:16.000 They don't just disagree with you on tax policy. 0.97

00:30:18.000 They're the kind of people that are going to go into your school and kill your kids. 0.68

00:30:22.000 They're going to come into your high school, your elementary school, and they'll kill your kids because they care about their guns more than your life. 1.00

00:30:29.000 And that's why we need Hispanics and Muslims and Jewish people, left wing people, transgender people to change the world. 1.00

00:30:38.000 We need to make it so that we can de beak. 0.96

00:30:41.000 We can castrate and neuter the men, and we can all become feminine and caring and loving, and we'll get rid of the NRA and the Republican Party, and we will trust the state to take care of us and the media to tell us what's true.

00:30:53.000 At the end of the day, that's what it's all about when you look at all these different angles, because as we see time and time again on the gun issue, the vast majority of shootings and mass shootings are committed with handguns, hands down, no pun intended.

00:31:08.000 Handguns are readily available, they're able just as easily, if not easier.

00:31:12.000 To commit a mass shooting than with an AR 15 because they're easier to conceal, they're easier to acquire, and you can pull the trigger just as fast on a handgun as you can with an AR 15.

00:31:22.000 And so that breaks down the AR 15 narrative.

00:31:25.000 And no Democrat is talking about getting rid of handguns, at least not the extreme, you know, except for the extreme far left that's talking about that.

00:31:33.000 None of the mainstream people are saying ban handguns.

00:31:36.000 But yet here we are mass shootings still being perpetrated by people with weapons that are legal, with weapons that have been regulated to hell by California, and you still have mass shootings.

00:31:47.000 And it goes back to what I said, by the way, on the show a couple of weeks ago that Democrats do not have an answer.

00:31:54.000 The left wing does not have an answer for the gun problem once a gun inevitably falls into the hands of a criminal.

00:32:00.000 That's why it has to end in gun confiscation.

00:32:03.000 Because this inevitably happens.

00:32:05.000 In a country of 300 million people and over 300 million guns, odds are, you know, you think about one in a million, that's pretty wild odds.

00:32:13.000 One in 300 million, there's going to be some kind of a chance, there is some, the odds are that one gun falls into the hands of one wrong person and they're able to commit a shooting.

00:32:24.000 Well, once that inevitably happens, Statistically happens and it's inevitable.

00:32:29.000 Well, then Democrats have no answer.

00:32:31.000 You're supposed to just trust, you're just supposed to pray to God that the police show up in a speedy amount of time.

00:32:36.000 And that's what happened in YouTube.

00:32:38.000 Didn't have armed guards, nobody was armed.

00:32:40.000 They don't believe in guns over there.

00:32:41.000 They stopped allowing people with firearms or I think it's semi automatic rifles to appear on their content, on their channels.

00:32:51.000 So they didn't have any guns.

00:32:53.000 And the odds were that this kind of thing would happen.

00:32:55.000 Somebody showed up with the gun.

00:32:57.000 Who shouldn't have had one showed up with a gun, started shooting people.

00:33:00.000 And what was the solution?

00:33:01.000 Democrats don't have one. 1.00

00:33:02.000 Gun control doesn't save them.

00:33:04.000 Background checks, raising the age limit, banning bump stocks none of that saved them.

00:33:08.000 They just had to crouch under their desk and hope that nothing bad happened.

00:33:12.000 And so that's why Democrats must necessarily be in favor of gun confiscation because unless they just don't want to solve the problem, they're either telling you we're okay with some people dying, we're okay with abridging your freedom so that people still die at the hands of mass shooters, but we just make it a little bit more difficult.

00:33:30.000 Or we do want to solve the problem, but we're just not telling you how we want to solve it yet.

00:33:35.000 And you may be smart enough to figure out the logical conclusion that the only way we could approach a 99% stoppage of mass shootings is to just take them away, make it so that there aren't 300 million guns in the country, but we're just not going to tell you that.

00:33:49.000 So that proves that narrative.

00:33:51.000 On toxic masculinity, here we are again, or men or anything like that.

00:33:55.000 Here we are again, where if we actually look at the color of crime, if we actually look at the color of crime and, you know, Gun, the gun problem in America. 0.79

00:34:04.000 We find that the vast majority of gun crimes, of violent crimes, of murders, of rapes are not committed by white people. 0.81

00:34:12.000 They just simply aren't. 0.68

00:34:13.000 They're actually committed by a certain group of people. 0.54

00:34:16.000 They're committed by another group of people that is not white people.

00:34:19.000 It's actually another group of people. 0.88

00:34:20.000 And so here again, we see another narrative fall apart where every time there is a crazy person, and think about this. 0.96

00:34:27.000 If there are 60, if 65% of the country is white people, You're going to have a lot of crazy people out of that 65%. 0.90

00:34:36.000 Because we're the majority, you're going to have a lot more crazy white people than crazy any other group of people if you're assuming all things equal, if you're an egalitarian, which the left is. 0.99

00:34:46.000 So you're going to have a lot of crazy people. 0.99

00:34:48.000 And yet we still see very few cases of crazy white people getting guns. 0.98

00:34:53.000 And there are lots of guns and carrying out atrocities. 0.97

00:34:56.000 And yet every time there is one, they say that's the trend, that's the problem, that's the pattern. 0.99

00:35:00.000 It's all white men. 0.98

00:35:02.000 Because there were a handful in the past five years out of the 150 million white men in the country, like five crazy ones, have done terror attacks or mass shootings in the past 20 years. 1.00

00:35:13.000 Well, all white men are violent. 1.00

00:35:15.000 All masculinity is a problem. 1.00

00:35:17.000 All men are a problem. 0.98

00:35:19.000 Whereas here you see oh, wait a minute. 1.00

00:35:21.000 Actually, if we look at the broader numbers, if we actually look at violent crime, not just like sensational visual mass shootings with high casualties, if we actually look at just regular homicides, if we actually just, for example, look at murders, you'll find that 7% of the population in African American men commit more than 50% of the murders.

00:35:43.000 And then you find, wait a second, the problem maybe it is masculinity, certainly isn't white masculinity, right?

00:35:49.000 And then suddenly nobody wants to talk about it.

00:35:51.000 Of course, that's not to say that, you know, wah, blah, blah, that we're racist or anything like that, but it's simply to say we want to talk about statistics.

00:35:59.000 We want to talk about racialized trends in crime.

00:36:03.000 Hey, let's have at it.

00:36:04.000 Here we are.

00:36:05.000 We find somebody.

00:36:06.000 We find an immigrant. 1.00

00:36:07.000 We find somebody who commits a crime. 1.00

00:36:09.000 Let's investigate who's actually committing the crimes.

00:36:12.000 Then we look at it from the lens of, where were we?

00:36:15.000 From the lens of, I guess, censorship.

00:36:17.000 At the very least, you know, this shooting does bring attention to the censorship issue.

00:36:21.000 I think.

00:36:22.000 This is maybe the most profound point about this shooting is that this is what happens when censorship occurs.

00:36:28.000 And it's kind of funny because you would think that out of all the censorship that occurs, you know, think about the Daily Stormer, which is a vile right wing publication and I disavow them.

00:36:40.000 But you think about the Daily Stormer, which is the most censored publication in world history.

00:36:45.000 I mean, they get persecuted worse than ISIS in some cases because they say the N word on their paper.

00:36:52.000 Oh, you know, that's terrible.

00:36:53.000 They're more persecuted than ISIS because they say.

00:36:56.000 Racial slurs on their website.

00:36:58.000 You think about Daily Stormer, which is censored.

00:37:00.000 You think about all the right wing content, which is censored.

00:37:03.000 The people kicked off Twitter, the people kicked off YouTube.

00:37:06.000 You know, Jira Taylor, where they make it on YouTube so that his comments, people can't comment on his video, people can't like his video, people can't see how many people watch the video.

00:37:15.000 And you would think, with all the press coverage about the evil right wing, the violent right wing in the country, you would think that, hey, maybe it'd be a right wing person that'd go and shoot up YouTube for censorship.

00:37:25.000 And it turns out, no, it's actually an Iranian woman who may or may not be Jewish.

00:37:29.000 But beside the point, I think what this illustrates is that whether or not she was censored, when people are censored, this is what happens.

00:37:38.000 That's not a threat.

00:37:39.000 That's not, believe me, I don't want that to happen.

00:37:41.000 I don't like to see violence.

00:37:42.000 Violence is a terrible thing.

00:37:44.000 I don't think people who advocate for violence understand what they're getting into.

00:37:48.000 And certainly I've never advocated for violence.

00:37:50.000 I never would.

00:37:51.000 I never would.

00:37:53.000 But this is what happens when there is censorship, when there are no other means of recourse.

00:38:00.000 For a people, if they cannot express themselves with words, if they can't be heard in a civil conversation, if they get shouted down, their websites are shut down, they're kicked off social media, they're fired from their jobs, and they're essentially unpersoned, they're unthinged, they're ostracized.

00:38:17.000 This is the only recourse for people who think I have something to say, I have a message, and I'm not being allowed to share it.

00:38:25.000 And again, this is not to say that's the right, this is not to say that's a good thing.

00:38:28.000 I'm not saying that in like an excited way, like they're finally getting their comeuppance.

00:38:32.000 I'm not saying that at all.

00:38:33.000 I'm simply saying that this is the inevitable result of censorship.

00:38:37.000 Every time you see censorship, whether it's in totalitarian countries, authoritarian countries, or in this authoritarian system, violence is the inevitable result.

00:38:46.000 And I guarantee you, the more you see mass censorship, the more violence you'll see.

00:38:51.000 And nobody wants that.

00:38:52.000 That's why we want conversations.

00:38:53.000 You know, Dave Rubin, for example, he's a great example of this.

00:38:57.000 Where Dave Rubin gets on, he does his little show, and he's been doing a show for a long time.

00:39:02.000 He's got one talking point, and the one talking point is, The real, I'm the real liberal.

00:39:08.000 The leftists are actually regressive, the regressive left.

00:39:13.000 And I'm the real liberal.

00:39:14.000 And he's been saying this.

00:39:15.000 I don't know how.

00:39:16.000 I don't know how he does it.

00:39:17.000 I come on this show every night and I say something new.

00:39:20.000 And he's been saying the same thing for two or three years.

00:39:24.000 It's crazy to me.

00:39:26.000 I feel like the people who watch him have to be in a room with mattresses lining the walls and the ceiling, banging their heads against the wall in a straitjacket, saying, regressive left, the real left is liberal.

00:39:37.000 We're the regressives.

00:39:40.000 But Dave Rubin is a perfect example of this kind of totalitarian, implicit censorship, soft censorship, where His whole show for two years, the entire premise is I like to have conversations with interesting people and I like to have real conversations with you, but we can still have a conversation.

00:40:00.000 And for two years, he has completely ignored anybody to the right of Ben Shapiro.

00:40:07.000 If you are to the right of Ben Shapiro, you're not coming on the show.

00:40:10.000 You know, the closest he's come to having somebody on the show who disagrees about egalitarianism or classical liberalism or modernism or postmodernism.

00:40:20.000 The closest he's come is Stefan Molyneux.

00:40:22.000 And I love Stefan, I really do.

00:40:24.000 But Stefan, I don't think he considers himself a very extremely right wing person.

00:40:30.000 I believe he's still an atheist.

00:40:32.000 I think he understands the necessity of Christianity.

00:40:35.000 He's very solid on the family.

00:40:37.000 But I think in terms of the metaphysics, I wouldn't necessarily say he's a traditionalist.

00:40:42.000 I wouldn't necessarily say he's ultra right wing like Evola or like Burke or somebody like that.

00:40:49.000 And people can disagree with that.

00:40:50.000 I still love the guy.

00:40:51.000 But that's the closest he's come to somebody who really is a dissenter about the modern world.

00:40:56.000 Who says, you know what?

00:40:57.000 I think we should throw all of it out. 0.98

00:40:59.000 I think we should go back to the way it was before the French Revolution. 0.57

00:41:02.000 Forget about before the social justice third wave feminist revolution. 1.00

00:41:05.000 Let's go way back and let's have mothers in the home. 1.00

00:41:08.000 Let's have women. 1.00

00:41:09.000 Let's kill all feminism. 1.00

00:41:11.000 Forget about third wave. 1.00

00:41:12.000 Let's get rid of all of it. 1.00

00:41:13.000 And maybe not all groups of people are equal. 1.00

00:41:16.000 Let's explore that idea.

00:41:17.000 But he won't do it.

00:41:18.000 And he is, I think, a perfect example where YouTube and Twitter.

00:41:23.000 They ban people, they censor people.

00:41:25.000 But Dave Rubin is a perfect example of the soft censorship that even continues on the so called free speech side, where my whole deal is free speech, but I will refuse to even acknowledge, I will refuse to host anybody who is moderately right wing.

00:41:39.000 And then, you know, people say, oh, well, you know, those people are just not big enough.

00:41:42.000 A Jira Taylor, a, you know, a Vox Day, whoever else, they're just not big enough.

00:41:47.000 They're not relevant enough.

00:41:48.000 Who did he have on today?

00:41:49.000 Benji Backer?

00:41:51.000 Benji Friggin Backer with what?

00:41:53.000 You know, 12,000 Twitter followers or whatever? 0.91

00:41:55.000 You know, this goofball who was on.

00:41:57.000 At CPAC when he was 11 years old, saying, You know, I like low taxes. 0.88

00:42:01.000 Give me a break.

00:42:02.000 So there's censorship.

00:42:04.000 And then last but not least is the media who propagates all the false narratives and hide it when it doesn't uphold the narrative.

00:42:10.000 So very interesting shooting.

00:42:13.000 Very interesting takeaways.

00:42:15.000 Very interesting conclusions.

00:42:17.000 And with that, we will get into our super chats.

00:42:20.000 We'll get into our audience feedback and all of that stuff.

00:42:25.000 We'll get into your super chats and your stream labs.

00:42:27.000 We'll see what's going on.

00:42:28.000 Are people in agreement?

00:42:30.000 What do people think?

00:42:31.000 Or do people think Trump's BTFO?

00:42:34.000 And let's see. 0.65

00:42:35.000 In our super chats, we have Russian colluder who says, check crime stats. 0.86

00:42:39.000 America doesn't have a gun problem. 0.74

00:42:42.000 We have a vibrant diversity problem. 0.99

00:42:44.000 It's true. 1.00

00:42:45.000 Nobody I don't think has ever said, be sure to avoid those white neighborhoods. 1.00

00:42:49.000 Be sure to get away from those white neighborhoods, right? 0.99

00:42:52.000 I just think it's just crazy to me that things that everybody can see with their own eyes, everybody knows deep down, it's like a thought crime to even suggest it, right? 1.00

00:43:01.000 We all know what that means.

00:43:03.000 We all know what that means.

00:43:04.000 We're not stupid. 0.99

00:43:05.000 You think we don't know? 1.00

00:43:07.000 You think you don't know?

00:43:08.000 Of course you know.

00:43:09.000 Everybody knows what's going on. 0.96

00:43:11.000 In their heart of hearts, everybody knows what's going on with diversity.

00:43:15.000 Everybody knows what's going on about mass immigration. 1.00

00:43:18.000 Everybody knows why Africa sucks, and they know that it sucks. 1.00

00:43:21.000 Everybody knows why it's dangerous to go on the south side of Chicago or into Detroit. 1.00

00:43:26.000 It's because of those damn Democrat policies. 0.99

00:43:29.000 If we just had a Republican mayor, you know it would be fine. 0.99

00:43:33.000 If they just had a Republican mayor who would put in place economic freedom zones and there would be investment, we know that the south side of Chicago could look like it.

00:43:42.000 Maine or Oregon or New Hampshire.

00:43:45.000 We know it could be like that if it just weren't for those Democrats, right?

00:43:50.000 But it is a problem with diversity, and we all know what the core is of that.

00:43:56.000 What else?

00:43:57.000 Mike Healy, the field when no QT school shooting survivor GF.

00:44:02.000 Yeah, right?

00:44:03.000 Sheesh.

00:44:04.000 Yeah. 1.00

00:44:05.000 Pretty sick counterculture, but it's true. 1.00

00:44:07.000 It's true.

00:44:08.000 He won a QT school shooter survivor GF.

00:44:12.000 Were there any QTs out of Parkland?

00:44:14.000 I got to say.

00:44:16.000 You know, in terms of who do they have? 1.00

00:44:17.000 Emma Gonzalez and that blonde. 1.00

00:44:20.000 That blonde with the troll feet in Time Magazine. 0.99

00:44:23.000 What was that all about? 1.00

00:44:25.000 You know, it's bad enough you got, you know, shaved head Emma Gonzalez and then you got pouty chubby girl with no shoes on, Time Magazine. 1.00

00:44:32.000 Very goofy crowd, right?

00:44:34.000 Not a very pretty crowd, except for Kyle Kashew.

00:44:37.000 Very solid guy there.

00:44:38.000 The rest, not so much. 0.98

00:44:39.000 You know, David Hogg, Emma Gonzalez, and then you got the blondie, you got the homosexual, Cameron Kasky, you got. 0.95

00:44:47.000 But of course, they're very brave. 0.93

00:44:48.000 I don't want to appear like I'm bullying them.

00:44:50.000 I'm not bullying them.

00:44:51.000 If I were bullying them, my sponsors would pull out and YouTube would shut me down.

00:44:55.000 So they're very brave.

00:44:57.000 They're all very brave, but very eclectic looking crowd.

00:45:02.000 Next, John's.

00:45:03.000 Thanks for doing a good job.

00:45:04.000 Hey, thanks, man.

00:45:05.000 Appreciate it.

00:45:07.000 Inner Heaven says, Happy birthday, Nick.

00:45:09.000 Thank you, Matt.

00:45:10.000 Thank you, Matt.

00:45:11.000 Yeah, for those of you that haven't seen it already, Millennial Matt, my buddy, my best friend.

00:45:17.000 No, but I do like him.

00:45:18.000 He was posting around.

00:45:20.000 What did he post?

00:45:21.000 He tweeted out, My son, my autistic son's birthday's today.

00:45:25.000 Could he get 100 RTs wishing him a happy birthday?

00:45:28.000 And it was a picture of me from high school playing with a Barbie doll in like statistics class.

00:45:34.000 And it ended up getting retweeted 3,000 times.

00:45:38.000 Greta Van Susteren from Fox News retweeted it.

00:45:41.000 Greta Van Susteren retweeted it.

00:45:43.000 Kyle Kishu wished me a happy birthday.

00:45:46.000 My mom comes home the other day.

00:45:48.000 She's like, I hear it's your birthday, Nikki.

00:45:51.000 Happy birthday.

00:45:53.000 So, pretty rough, but funny.

00:45:54.000 But we do enjoy it.

00:45:55.000 It was a good joke.

00:45:58.000 Yeah, pretty.

00:45:59.000 I got memed on.

00:45:59.000 I got trolled on.

00:46:00.000 I got dabbed on hardcore by the Inner Heaven Gang.

00:46:04.000 But very fun.

00:46:05.000 But very fun nonetheless.

00:46:06.000 Very, very good people who they think they're doing a good thing.

00:46:09.000 And I guess they are in a way.

00:46:11.000 And we got somebody named Jobits who spent 15 bits.

00:46:17.000 Cheer, cheer, cheer, cheer.

00:46:19.000 Hi, Nick.

00:46:19.000 Keep up the good streams.

00:46:21.000 Thank you, big guy.

00:46:22.000 Much appreciated.

00:46:23.000 I still don't know how the bits work, but we appreciate it nonetheless.

00:46:27.000 And remember to shoot it up on the Streamlabs instead of the Super Chat.

00:46:32.000 You want to go on the Streamlabs link and not the Super Chat.

00:46:35.000 The Super Chat, the money goes to Google and YouTube.

00:46:38.000 The Streamlabs, the money goes to me.

00:46:41.000 And we like that. 1.00

00:46:42.000 They, A M A C A. 1.00

00:46:44.000 They, I don't know if that's a word, but they say, Dan's Game 5, YouTube Shooter. 0.99

00:46:50.000 I don't know what that means.

00:46:52.000 Cactus Blah says, Cheer 5 with 5 bits.

00:46:56.000 Thank you.

00:46:57.000 Begbie says, Thanks for the light pills yesterday.

00:46:59.000 Your righteousness is always welcome.

00:47:01.000 And not mistaken for being smug or arrogant.

00:47:03.000 That's good to hear. 0.84

00:47:04.000 I appreciate that because so many people say, Nick is smug, Nick is arrogant, Nick has a big ego.

00:47:10.000 I'm just a righteous person.

00:47:13.000 Just stay away from the self righteousness that you see from the likes of Halsey.

00:47:17.000 Very true, very true.

00:47:19.000 Too self righteous on him.

00:47:21.000 John Mizell says, What reason do Jews have to believe in Christ if he was not the Messiah God said would come?

00:47:27.000 Also, why is the story of Jesus so similar to previous sun personifying gods like Horus, Attis, Dionysus, and Mithra, etc.?

00:47:38.000 Well, but that's the thing.

00:47:39.000 I mean, Jesus was the Messiah that God said would come.

00:47:42.000 Jesus fulfilled more than 450 prophecies laid out in the Old Testament.

00:47:47.000 Additionally, he performed miracles and great works.

00:47:50.000 He rose from the dead.

00:47:51.000 I don't know what more proof you need.

00:47:53.000 Somebody rises from the dead and then ascends into heaven 40 days later.

00:47:57.000 That's pretty convincing.

00:47:59.000 If I were walking around and it was like, here's this guy where everybody predicted he would come, John the Baptist predicted he would come, and then this guy shows up and they're all like, no, he's the real deal.

00:48:09.000 And he starts raising people from the dead and healing the sick and, you know, doing all this other stuff.

00:48:14.000 And then people kill him.

00:48:15.000 And then he's like, hey, there he is again, though. 0.98

00:48:18.000 I would be pretty convinced.

00:48:19.000 I would say that guy, he's probably got some clout.

00:48:22.000 He's probably up there.

00:48:24.000 And then on the issue of the pagan, you know, the autistic pagan arguments, did Jesus just like pagan gods? 0.56

00:48:33.000 There is no, there is simply no comparable example. 0.58

00:48:40.000 There is simply no comparable deity or mythological figure to Jesus Christ.

00:48:44.000 None that come close to the complexity of the Trinity, of the story of Jesus Christ.

00:48:49.000 And people say, oh, well, there's people that rise from the dead.

00:48:52.000 There's people that had a virgin birth.

00:48:53.000 There's people X, Y, and Z.

00:48:55.000 But none are the holistic picture.

00:48:57.000 None are the Trinity.

00:48:59.000 None have transubstantiation.

00:49:01.000 I mean, there's all kinds of things that go on in Christianity where it's really just a bad argument. 0.82

00:49:07.000 It's really just a ridiculous argument to say that.

00:49:11.000 Any of those gods or deities are comparable to Jesus Christ. 0.72

00:49:15.000 And this is one that Styx made.

00:49:16.000 This is one that I hear made pretty often.

00:49:19.000 And it's just simply not true.

00:49:20.000 None come close to all of the above of Jesus Christ.

00:49:25.000 Somebody who was crucified and came from the dead.

00:49:28.000 I mean, that's just.

00:49:30.000 And with the Trinity was the Son, but was also God, was in the flesh, but was also divine.

00:49:35.000 I mean, you just don't see that in any other cult.

00:49:38.000 Samurai Wonder.

00:49:39.000 Caravan disbanded, but still headed for the U.S. in smaller groups.

00:49:43.000 Worse for us because people are feeling relieved.

00:49:45.000 And no longer vigilant.

00:49:47.000 We are still being invaded.

00:49:48.000 Build the wall.

00:49:49.000 We all want to build the wall, big guy.

00:49:51.000 Trump is doing it.

00:49:52.000 It's very difficult.

00:49:53.000 And I love how people, and maybe this isn't you, but I love how people are just willfully ignorant about the circumstances surrounding the president.

00:50:01.000 People say, I don't care about this Congress stuff.

00:50:04.000 We're being invaded.

00:50:05.000 Build the wall.

00:50:06.000 I used to hear a lot of this stuff from James's audience on Nationalist Review, a lot of low IQ people who listen to James.

00:50:13.000 And it just simply is willful ignorance about the circumstances surrounding the president.

00:50:17.000 He can't just do it.

00:50:19.000 Oh, just build the wall.

00:50:20.000 Well, Well, there's a lot of reasons why it's not that simple.

00:50:23.000 There's a lot of reasons why it's not that easy.

00:50:26.000 And then we still want it.

00:50:27.000 I don't know, you know, and this is how Black Pillars will spin it, which is the caravan is disbanded.

00:50:32.000 The military is deployed to the border until the wall is built.

00:50:35.000 They're going to try and get it through with the military anyway.

00:50:37.000 They're already building fence.

00:50:39.000 But this is actually a bad thing because, well, people are still coming over anyway.

00:50:43.000 And somebody, what did somebody else say?

00:50:46.000 Somebody tweeted at me today and said, oh, great.

00:50:50.000 Great.

00:50:51.000 Trump's deploying the military to the border. 0.99

00:50:53.000 Now one of them will shoot an immigrant and it'll end up in a war with Mexico. 0.97

00:50:58.000 Great work. 0.98

00:50:58.000 It's like the spin is out of control. 0.98

00:51:01.000 No comparable president, or rather, there is no alternative to this president.

00:51:06.000 You know, people will say, Trump isn't getting it done on my timetable, which is 15 months.

00:51:11.000 What's the alternative?

00:51:12.000 Ted Cruz, Marco Rubio, Jeb Bush, any of these guys?

00:51:15.000 Would they have been winners on the wall?

00:51:17.000 Who's the alternative if it's not Trump?

00:51:18.000 Can anybody name a single person, right?

00:51:21.000 So I agree, we got to build the wall, but you got to understand where we're at right now.

00:51:26.000 Criticism is always there, but it has to be good faith criticism that's informed by the facts.

00:51:33.000 Joe the Serb, Nick, ma made manicotti tonight.

00:51:36.000 Amazing stuff.

00:51:37.000 Love for you, Italian brother.

00:51:39.000 Also, what's your beef with Ryan Dawson?

00:51:41.000 Well, love for you.

00:51:42.000 Glad to hear some Italian food going on there.

00:51:46.000 I don't really have beef with Ryan Dawson, but Ryan Dawson, he's just kind of a rude guy to me.

00:51:54.000 He didn't follow me back, which is disrespectful.

00:51:54.000 I followed him.

00:51:57.000 I would think there would be some kind of mutual love there.

00:52:00.000 And then also, he tweeted out that Francis was like me when I was 15.

00:52:04.000 And it's like, you know.

00:52:06.000 You know, when I saw Ryan Dawson, I saw somebody who knew what was going on with Israel, but also somebody who, at the end of the day, is not very intelligent.

00:52:14.000 He's obviously read a lot, and I give him credit for that.

00:52:17.000 He's probably more well read than me on the subject, and a very good debater, very level headed.

00:52:22.000 But here's somebody who's an atheist, you know, please, who still believes in this liberal stuff. 0.83

00:52:28.000 You know, he doesn't like Israel, not because they control our government and all the rest, but because, you know, they're committing war crimes, which is bad. 0.72

00:52:35.000 But, like, it's just very, very moralistic, very Kantian worldview.

00:52:35.000 That's bad enough.

00:52:40.000 And so, and then he goes around saying, you know, oh, Nick, I'm so above Nick.

00:52:44.000 Yeah, I don't know.

00:52:45.000 So I think he's a smart guy, like the commentary, but I don't appreciate the rudeness.

00:52:50.000 I never said anything nasty about him, but, you know, that's all right.

00:52:54.000 John Mizell says, I've had enough of your anti Semitism, Nick.

00:52:57.000 Shut this down now.

00:52:58.000 Yeah, right. 0.95

00:53:00.000 Well, and I love people calling me an anti Semite.

00:53:02.000 They love to call me an Islamophobe, a racist, an anti Semite.

00:53:07.000 And an anti Semite is the one that sticks out because nobody in the right wing criticizes left wing Jews.

00:53:13.000 Nobody in the right wing criticizes the Israel lobby.

00:53:16.000 And so that's why I get called that.

00:53:18.000 All kinds of people on the right will say, call me a racist and an Islamophobe and a sexist because that's just left wing lies. 0.76

00:53:25.000 But then I get called an anti Semite.

00:53:27.000 And it's like suddenly, you know, stop the presses.

00:53:29.000 The world is ending. 0.87

00:53:31.000 You know, and never mind the fact that I've never, that I was friends with Jews before they said, you don't support Israel enough. 1.00

00:53:36.000 We can't be friends with you and all the rest. 0.71

00:53:39.000 Never mind the fact that I've never said anything remotely anti Semitic.

00:53:42.000 You know, the left will call anybody who wants to put America first every name in the book.

00:53:47.000 Anti-set light is the one that sticks.

00:53:49.000 But let's see.

00:53:51.000 Those are our stream labs.

00:53:52.000 Let's see if we have any super chats going on here tonight.

00:53:56.000 We've got a couple here.

00:53:59.000 John Shepard Smith.

00:54:00.000 Nick, if you ever start selling merch, please sell those iHeart European-style socialism buttons you wore at CPAC.

00:54:06.000 I want one.

00:54:07.000 That's good.

00:54:08.000 I like that.

00:54:09.000 And it's tough.

00:54:10.000 Can't do the merch yet because I'm still tied up with my logo.

00:54:13.000 People are still trying to take my logo.

00:54:16.000 It's pretty tough.

00:54:17.000 I don't know how much I can talk about it, but.

00:54:20.000 You know, certain people.

00:54:22.000 We still are not resolved with certain proprietary issues.

00:54:26.000 People want to steal my money.

00:54:28.000 People want to take the money I earn.

00:54:29.000 People want to take my brand and other things.

00:54:32.000 So we're still fighting it.

00:54:34.000 It's dragged on for a very long time.

00:54:36.000 People giving me a hard time, but that's okay.

00:54:39.000 We'll see what happens.

00:54:40.000 The merch will be forthcoming. 1.00

00:54:42.000 Hi Eye Burb says Black Pillars can't assimilate. 1.00

00:54:45.000 They never will. 1.00

00:54:45.000 It's true. 1.00

00:54:46.000 They don't have a winning mentality, they have a hater mentality.

00:54:51.000 They do not possess.

00:54:53.000 The gorilla mindset. 0.66

00:54:54.000 They do not possess the Trump mindset, the baboon mind frame. 0.51

00:54:59.000 Can't do it.

00:55:00.000 Ian Weber, I'm finally back.

00:55:02.000 I'll set up a Streamlabs account soon.

00:55:04.000 Don't worry. 0.96

00:55:05.000 Speaking of Styx, someone that presents himself in such a silly and hippie like way shouldn't be taken seriously. 0.95

00:55:10.000 Oh, I wouldn't go that far. 0.82

00:55:13.000 I think Styx happens to be an intelligent guy.

00:55:15.000 I really do.

00:55:16.000 I happen to think that that argument that he makes about pagans being like Christ is not very solid.

00:55:22.000 I don't think it's a very concrete argument.

00:55:25.000 But I don't know.

00:55:26.000 I think it's an interesting getup.

00:55:27.000 It's not something I would wear.

00:55:29.000 But I think it's There's a charm about it.

00:55:31.000 There's a charm about the presentation.

00:55:33.000 You've got to hand it to somebody who goes all out.

00:55:36.000 I think people similarly make fun of me.

00:55:38.000 So, who would I be to attack his attire?

00:55:41.000 I never hit him on his look, right?

00:55:43.000 But people say, oh, Nick looks like a used car salesman.

00:55:46.000 He looks like a baby in a suit and this kind of stuff.

00:55:49.000 First of all, people who say I don't wear clothes that fit right, they're just simply incorrect.

00:55:53.000 I mean, anybody who knows anything about suits knows that this suit is fitted, is nice.

00:55:58.000 I always wear very solid Kino color combinations.

00:56:02.000 But, nevertheless, who would I be to hit?

00:56:04.000 Sticks on his look.

00:56:05.000 He's a solid guy.

00:56:06.000 Don't want to go around punching people who are friendly.

00:56:09.000 And that's the thing.

00:56:10.000 You know, people have it.

00:56:11.000 Nick is a bridge burner.

00:56:12.000 Nick fights with everybody.

00:56:13.000 Nick can't get along.

00:56:15.000 I can get along with everybody.

00:56:16.000 I get along with left wing people.

00:56:19.000 I get along with alt light people.

00:56:20.000 I get along with alt right people.

00:56:23.000 I get along with everybody.

00:56:24.000 The only people I don't get along with are people who attack me.

00:56:27.000 And this happens all the time.

00:56:28.000 So, let's see.

00:56:30.000 We'll check back on our stream labs and then we'll call it a night.

00:56:33.000 Problematic White Knight says, Heard on Kumite today, you are debating atheism is unstoppable.

00:56:39.000 Careful Nick used to work for Disney as an ardent defender of them.

00:56:44.000 Again, I haven't heard anything from Worski.

00:56:47.000 I haven't heard anything from AIU.

00:56:49.000 I don't know anything about this.

00:56:50.000 The only thing I saw was the video AIU made, which said that Worski suggested it to him, but I haven't heard anything about it.

00:56:58.000 So I don't know.

00:56:58.000 I mean, if Worski reaches out to me and wants to set it up, I'm game for it.

00:57:02.000 I really am.

00:57:02.000 But I just haven't heard anything.

00:57:04.000 But it looks like we are here at 8 o'clock.

00:57:07.000 So we're going to call it a night.

00:57:08.000 We're going to call it a show tonight.

00:57:10.000 Remember, tomorrow we have our 2018 Election HQ podcast for our maker support, America First Premium members.

00:57:17.000 You got to sign up.

00:57:18.000 The link is in the description.

00:57:19.000 Only five bucks a month to get that podcast.

00:57:22.000 Yesterday's World Report and those two podcasts every week.

00:57:25.000 This show in audio format on SoundCloud.

00:57:28.000 Special role in the Discord server and priority on our call in shells.

00:57:32.000 But that's going to do it for us tonight.

00:57:33.000 Remember to subscribe on YouTube.

00:57:36.000 Give us a big thumbs up.

00:57:37.000 Leave a comment.

00:57:38.000 Click the notification bell to get notified every time we go live.

00:57:41.000 If you're on Twitch, Periscope, Facebook, whatever it is, give us a big thumbs up and subscribe and all the rest.

00:57:47.000 We are on the air Monday through Friday, 7 p.m. Central, 8 p.m. Eastern Standard Time.

00:57:52.000 I'm Nicholas J. Fuentes.

00:57:53.000 This was America First, as always.

00:57:55.000 Thank you, folks, for watching.

00:57:57.000 Thanks to our donors on Twitch, the Bit donors, the Streamlabs donors, the Super Chatters, the Periscope coin people, and the premium members, as always, our patricians, our kings.

00:58:13.000 On the premium membership on the Baker support.

00:58:16.000 And everybody else who watches and shares and supports the show, we will see you tomorrow.

00:58:20.000 Have a great rest of your evening.

00:58:25.000 Americanism, not globalism, will be our credo.

00:58:31.000 It's going to be only America first.

00:58:36.000 America first. 0.99

00:58:38.000 The American people will come first once again. 0.98

00:59:10.000 America first. 0.98

America First - Nicholas J. Fuentes - April 04, 2018

Radical Female Terrorism | America First Ep. 138

Episode Stats

Summary

Transcript