America First - Nicholas J. Fuentes - Rand Paul is Right | America First Ep. 104

00:00:04.000 Good evening, everybody.

00:00:05.000 You are watching America First.

00:00:07.000 My name is Nicholas J. Fuentes, and we have a great show for you tonight. 0.96

00:00:12.000 Very exciting, coming hot off of another total victory, another crushing defeat, another crushing defeat delivered to the Zionists, delivered to the rootless transnational elite of the country, and happily delivered by yours truly here at America First. 0.96

00:00:32.000 We are doing great. 0.95

00:00:33.000 We are doing fine.

00:00:34.000 We have a big show, lots to talk about, of course.

00:00:37.000 Government shutdown pending tonight, pending this evening, thanks to Rand Paul.

00:00:42.000 Black Panther receiving its first negative review, and people are not happy about it, and many other things.

00:00:50.000 Lots going on in the news.

00:00:51.000 But of course, we've got to summarize.

00:00:52.000 We have to summarize for people that maybe they didn't watch it, maybe they didn't catch the whole thing, they didn't see it yet.

00:00:58.000 But last night, and I announced it on the show, I think last night at some point, that I was going on Warski after the show yesterday, and it was a pretty brutal, pretty bloody debate.

00:01:09.000 Me versus, what's the guy's name, Halsey?

00:01:12.000 Halsey.

00:01:13.000 Halsey English and pretty rough stuff.

00:01:17.000 It ended up being about the Jewish question, which I wasn't anticipating.

00:01:20.000 I wasn't sure what exactly he wanted to talk about, but now that I've learned he's Jewish, now it's not all that surprising that that was the one thing he wanted to talk about and why he hates me, why he's going to say all these nasty things.

00:01:33.000 But it was a fun debate, I have to say, as always on the Andy Worski stream, it was a blast. 0.57

00:01:40.000 Me, Worski, JF, this Halsey character, battling it out.

00:01:45.000 Throwing hands, bringing the issues, and it was a fun time.

00:01:49.000 People say that I won.

00:01:50.000 I believe that I won.

00:01:51.000 But I think the victory in that stream last night was to demonstrate that you can be aware of Jewish influence and not be a crazy person. 0.79

00:02:02.000 You can be aware, you can look at these patterns, you can see what's going on in Hollywood, you can see what's going on in the media, see what's going on in our country more broadly or our civilization at an even broader level.

00:02:13.000 And you don't have to be a hater, you don't have to be a bigot, you don't have to be some. 0.95

00:02:18.000 Psycho nut job.

00:02:19.000 It doesn't have to be your obsession at every waking hour of the day, but you can be a rational person and simply observe that there is something going on here.

00:02:28.000 You can just simply observe some of these patterns, which are undeniable.

00:02:31.000 And funnily enough, you know, Halsey English, who gets on there and he has this preconception, he has this presumption of what my argument's going to be.

00:02:39.000 We ended up basically agreeing on the most fundamental questions. 0.75

00:02:43.000 I mean, sure, he used the typical Talmudic tricks of deception, trying to lie about the USS Liberty, trying to lie about. 0.91

00:02:52.000 Jesus Christ in the Babylonian Talmud, and on and on and on. 0.82

00:02:55.000 But we basically agreed on the fundamental premise, which is that you have this overrepresentation of Jewish people in media. 0.79

00:03:02.000 It's not a result of intelligence, it's probably a result of group evolutionary strategy.

00:03:07.000 And there is a prejudice that they exercise.

00:03:08.000 And of course, you know, it's funny.

00:03:10.000 Halsey says, Well, I don't really care. 0.87

00:03:14.000 It doesn't really matter to me that Jewish people are overrepresented and they exert this influence on the media, they exert this prejudicial interest over the media.

00:03:23.000 And of course, of course, he doesn't care because he is Jewish, you know, and that was a big part of the debate last night.

00:03:30.000 I didn't even know he was of that persuasion.

00:03:33.000 And with a name like Halsey English, you know, why would anybody think that?

00:03:37.000 That's another big part of it, of the deception.

00:03:40.000 You know, they have a tendency to change their names or use pseudonyms, and this is how they kind of get around it.

00:03:46.000 You know, there's even prominent people in our own movement who change their names and who they forge documents and they try and do all kinds of things to pretend that they aren't something.

00:03:57.000 And that's a big part of it.

00:03:58.000 But so it was a fun time, a really great time, a very special stream that they have, JF and Andy.

00:04:03.000 It's a lot of fun.

00:04:04.000 They really put on a good show and a really great dynamic, I think, between the two people there.

00:04:10.000 You know, Andy's very fun.

00:04:12.000 He's hilarious.

00:04:13.000 He's got a great personality.

00:04:14.000 And then you got JF, who's rigorous, who's smart, who's going to break it down.

00:04:19.000 It's a very good combination.

00:04:20.000 But I don't want to spend the whole time talking about it, but just pretty interesting stuff going on.

00:04:24.000 I thought it was a great conversation.

00:04:26.000 And it was number four trending in the world in terms of live streams, so a very big stream.

00:04:31.000 And so hopefully a lot of people.

00:04:34.000 Are opening themselves up to information that for a long time was taboo, for a long time was subject to this political correctness speech code.

00:04:42.000 And hopefully now people are finally starting to wake up to these double standards and they can see that these facts are out there, this position is reasonable, and you don't necessarily have to be a certain kind of person to hold these positions.

00:04:53.000 And I'm happy to go on there and clear it up for everybody.

00:04:56.000 So a great time there on Worski.

00:04:58.000 But with that out of the way, we got to get into the news, folks.

00:05:01.000 We got to get into what is going on in the Senate.

00:05:06.000 Now, we talked yesterday about how the Republican and Democrat leadership in the Congress had reached a deal on a long term budget proposal.

00:05:16.000 If you recall, a couple of Mondays ago, Republicans and Democrats passed a short term spending bill to fund the government through February 8th, which is today.

00:05:25.000 Fund the government through to midnight tonight.

00:05:27.000 After the government shut down a couple of weeks ago, they came to an agreement on a short term spending bill, and the decision was that the Democrats would only sign that short term spending bill unless Mitch McConnell.

00:05:40.000 Would negotiate with them on immigration.

00:05:42.000 Well, it turns out that they got nowhere on immigration, even after three weeks.

00:05:46.000 They got nowhere on DACA.

00:05:47.000 They got nowhere on the wall in diversity visa and chain migration.

00:05:51.000 And here we are this week, right up against another hard deadline, another government shutdown.

00:05:56.000 And the Democrats realized, I think, pretty early on in this instance, pretty early on in this cycle of running out of money, that they couldn't afford another shutdown, that electorally it would have been suicidal for them in the midterms, that they were blamed for the first government shutdown.

00:06:11.000 You know, by many people, by a pretty significant margin compared to Republicans.

00:06:16.000 And even if both parties got blamed, they would still be hurting because more Democrat seats are up for grabs and Republicans as incumbents in 2018 for the Senate.

00:06:24.000 So they realized this week that they couldn't have it.

00:06:27.000 They could not have another shutdown.

00:06:29.000 And so once they understood that President Trump was willing to let it happen again, they came to the table.

00:06:35.000 And yesterday we talked about this.

00:06:36.000 We said, look, it's probably going to get resolved.

00:06:38.000 They'll pass another short term spending bill, which will fund the government for six weeks.

00:06:44.000 The short term spending bill, which is.

00:06:46.000 In the works right now in the House and the Senate will fund the government through to March 23rd and it will eliminate all restrictions on borrowing by the government for a whole year.

00:06:57.000 So, any debt ceiling, any kind of limits on government borrowing, that will be completely out the window for a year and it'll also fund the government for the next six weeks.

00:07:07.000 And in the meantime, between now and March 23rd, when the government runs out of money again, in these six weeks, what is supposed to happen is that a long term spending bill will be written.

00:07:19.000 And drafted and voted on and passed, hopefully.

00:07:22.000 And that will fund the government through for the entire fiscal year all the way until September 30th.

00:07:28.000 And we'll finally have a budget for the year of 2018.

00:07:32.000 Now, we thought that that was going to go pretty smoothly.

00:07:35.000 As of last night, we said it should pretty much be smooth sailing from here.

00:07:39.000 They agreed on a budget, they agreed on something to pass to avert another government shutdown.

00:07:43.000 But now, as things tend to happen, it's always something.

00:07:47.000 Rand Paul, Senator Rand Paul of Kentucky, former 2016 presidential hopeful has jumped in and is blocking the vote in the Senate on the short term spending bill, on the six week spending bill.

00:08:00.000 And the reason being, he says in his speech, is because when Republicans are in charge, they don't seem to have a problem with deficits.

00:08:08.000 When Barack Obama was running trillion dollar deficits, $500 billion deficits throughout his presidency, Republicans complained and they were up in arms and they shut down the government and they campaigned against this.

00:08:21.000 And Rand Paul says, Where are all the budget hawks now?

00:08:24.000 Where are all those people now that were running massive deficits, that were growing the debt, that were not making any attempt to balance the budget, that there's another.

00:08:32.000 $80 billion being injected in the short term bill for disaster relief, an additional $80 billion for the military, an additional $60 billion for other discretionary items.

00:08:45.000 This is ending these sequestered cuts from 2011.

00:08:49.000 And Rand Paul is saying, Where are the Republicans on this?

00:08:51.000 The deficit is growing, the debt is growing, and all these people who in 2010, when we won the House, and 2014 when we won the Senate, and they ran on cutting the budget and they were going to be fiscally responsible, where are they now?

00:09:06.000 And we understand where Rand Paul is coming from.

00:09:08.000 He's right.

00:09:09.000 Unfortunately, the guy is right.

00:09:11.000 And so often, this is what happens in politics you get caught up in it.

00:09:15.000 You get caught up, and when your team is winning, when your team is governing, you want the budgets to pass because, of course, the reason being why parties who are in power are resistant to cutting the budget is because what has to go typically to make any significant cut in the deficit or the growth of federal spending is entitlements.

00:09:36.000 Or major cuts to the federal agencies.

00:09:38.000 And when that happens, when you make cuts to programs like Medicare or Social Security or Medicaid or welfare or unemployment, or even if you cut some significant budget pieces, some significant discretionary budget items for the agencies, then the same thing happens.

00:09:55.000 You get the approval rating going down, and obviously that's a big problem electorally.

00:09:58.000 And we get caught up in that.

00:10:00.000 We see the reasoning behind that.

00:10:01.000 We understand politically why we have to do it.

00:10:03.000 But at the end of the day, unfortunately, Rand Paul happens to be correct.

00:10:08.000 And people don't like to talk about it.

00:10:10.000 People kind of like to pretend that this isn't happening.

00:10:13.000 People like to pretend that this is not a concern.

00:10:16.000 This is something that we don't have to deal with right now.

00:10:19.000 Our party doesn't have to suffer for it right now.

00:10:22.000 But this truly is a case of putting the country over the party in addressing this matter.

00:10:27.000 And Rand Paul, he's a courageous guy.

00:10:29.000 I think he's one of the most respected guys on the Hill.

00:10:32.000 He's one of the most respected guys in D.C., and certainly by the president, by myself, for going out there and saying this.

00:10:38.000 And he is simply correct in the sense that.

00:10:41.000 You look at our debt, you look at our deficit, and there is no exit strategy here.

00:10:47.000 You talk about an exit plan, you look at our dire financial straits, and we talked about this during the last government shutdown.

00:10:53.000 We talked about the extent to which the debt has grown and how there really is something wrong with our government financial system, and there is simply no answer for this.

00:11:03.000 The debt right now sits at over $20 trillion.

00:11:07.000 The unfunded obligations for the country, which is Medicare, Social Security, Medicaid, All the promises that we've made to people that are alive today and even unborn in some cases, we don't have the money for those even.

00:11:20.000 We don't have the money for our debt.

00:11:22.000 We don't have the money for the promises we've made for in the future for 20 or 30 or 50 years down the road.

00:11:27.000 That's another $110 trillion on top of the $20 trillion we have now.

00:11:32.000 So we're looking at something like upwards of $130 trillion that our government does not have the money for, but that we need to pay, whether you're talking about current debt, which is accruing interest, or future debt, which will accrue interest and will accrue interest.

00:11:47.000 We will have to pay for.

00:11:48.000 And this is something like almost double the total amount of currency in the world.

00:11:54.000 The World Bank estimates that there's about $80 billion, excuse me, $80 trillion in currency in the world.

00:12:02.000 So you think about that, there's $80 trillion in money, $80 trillion in media of exchange, in money in the world, and we owe $50 trillion more than that.

00:12:13.000 This country only produces a little bit more than $20 trillion in GDP in any given year.

00:12:18.000 So everything that the country produces in a given year, the value of that is a fifth.

00:12:25.000 Are increasingly coming to be a sixth of everything that we owe.

00:12:29.000 So if we took everything that this country produces in a year and we did that for six years and we sold all of it, that would be the size of the debt that we have.

00:12:39.000 And that's the magnitude of the problem here.

00:12:41.000 And like I said, not only are we not beginning on that problem, not only do we not have any idea about it, not only can we really not do it at this point, but there's no plan for any time to do it in the near future.

00:12:54.000 There is no exit strategy, there is no escape route here.

00:12:58.000 And if that doesn't keep you up at night, I don't know if it should keep you up at night in the sense that you will probably not be around to see the worst of it.

00:13:06.000 It will be our kids and their kids that are really going to pay for it.

00:13:09.000 My generation will pay for it in a big way.

00:13:11.000 But I mean, you know, my children, the next generation is going to be the ones that are really going to bleed because of this, where they will see things coming, collapsing down in a very real, very devastating way.

00:13:23.000 And what's the answer for it?

00:13:25.000 What is the answer for it?

00:13:26.000 Are we going to keep kicking the can down the road?

00:13:28.000 I mean, there's no plan for solving this problem in 100 years, let alone in the next 10 years.

00:13:34.000 And we understand the problem with the debt.

00:13:36.000 You know, for people that are not initiated on this, is that we accumulate lots of debt and people kind of think, oh, the debt just kind of sits there and it's not really an issue.

00:13:46.000 It's not really a practical problem.

00:13:48.000 But people really don't know how finances work.

00:13:51.000 When you have this debt sitting there, what happens is that it accrues interest.

00:13:55.000 And ultimately, by 2070, the interest will.

00:13:59.000 Come to accumulate to about 50% of tax revenues.

00:14:02.000 And when 50% of the money the government brings in is just on interest for debt, it's not actually paying for anything.

00:14:08.000 It's not paying for roads or military or health care or salaries for public sector workers, but it's simply just on interest to service the debt.

00:14:17.000 We're in a very bad position.

00:14:18.000 And not only do you have the interest, but the problem is forget the debt for a moment, forget the interest, forget the debt for a moment.

00:14:25.000 The problem is with entitlement spending.

00:14:26.000 The fact that you have this snowballing amount of obligations.

00:14:30.000 Where for Social Security and Medicare and Medicaid, there simply are not enough people paying into the system that are getting money out of the system.

00:14:39.000 You know, when Social Security was founded in the 1930s, I believe it was the 1930s, there were more than 120 people paying into the system for every one beneficiary.

00:14:50.000 So for every retiree who was taking a check, for every retiree who was collecting Social Security, there were 120 people, well over 120 people paying into the system.

00:15:01.000 And so then, you know, it was sustainable.

00:15:04.000 Because 120 people paying in, that's a lot more than the one person taking out.

00:15:08.000 And also, you have to remember that the life expectancy was a lot lower, too.

00:15:11.000 So you were lucky if you made it to be 65.

00:15:14.000 There were a lot less retirees.

00:15:15.000 They didn't live for very long.

00:15:17.000 And compared to the amount of people paying into it, it is very small.

00:15:20.000 Well, today, you have less than three workers for every beneficiary.

00:15:24.000 Less than three.

00:15:25.000 So when the program was founded, it was 120, more than 120.

00:15:29.000 Now it's less than three for every one beneficiary.

00:15:32.000 And of course, people are living longer, people are retiring earlier. 0.94

00:15:37.000 And of course, then you have the problem of people coming here from other countries and they take Social Security and they've never paid into the system. 0.98

00:15:44.000 So forget the debt even for a moment. 0.97

00:15:46.000 The debt is kind of a way of keeping track.

00:15:49.000 The debt is keeping track of how much money we're spending that we don't have.

00:15:53.000 But at its core, at the root of it, it's not a debt problem, it's an entitlement problem.

00:15:57.000 Really, at its core, it's the fact that not enough people are paying in and the government is just giving money out.

00:16:05.000 And this is a big reason in Europe and increasingly in the United States why we have to bring in immigration.

00:16:11.000 For people that think, you know, oh, well, the debt, the GDP, these are not real concerns. 0.91

00:16:11.000 It's all connected. 0.91

00:16:17.000 I'm not one of these old school conservatives who simply cares about the GDP.

00:16:17.000 I'm not.

00:16:21.000 I don't see America as a common market, and therefore, because I care about demographics, I don't have to care about the budget.

00:16:27.000 This is a common refrain we hear from the alt right.

00:16:29.000 This is something that James Alsop talked a lot about on Nationalist Review.

00:16:34.000 You know, we don't really care about the economy.

00:16:36.000 We don't really care about taxes.

00:16:37.000 We don't really care about the numbers and the green stamps because countries need to take it over and Texas goes blue, and that's all fine and well. 0.98

00:16:44.000 But you look at one of the predominant motivators for why our politicians bring in immigrants.

00:16:51.000 And I think to a much larger extent in Europe, why they bring in immigrants. 0.94

00:16:54.000 And it's because they need that low skilled worker. 0.98

00:16:58.000 They need young, able bodied workers who are going to come over here and support this burgeoning welfare state.

00:17:04.000 When we're looking at our demographics, and not just in terms of race, but in terms of age, and we look at in this country when the fertility rate is shrinking, and it used to be very high during the baby boom, but now the millennials were a very small generation, excuse me, the Generation X is a very small generation.

00:17:21.000 Millennials was comparatively a small generation.

00:17:24.000 Generation Z is a small generation.

00:17:26.000 And, you know, if things don't change, the next generation will be even smaller. 0.99

00:17:30.000 You have this inverted pyramid where to support the top, to support the old people at the top, of which there are many and of which there are very few workers to support them getting their pensions and their entitlements and so on, you need to shore up the base of that pyramid with immigrant labor. 0.98

00:17:46.000 And that's what's happening in many respects in Europe. 0.97

00:17:49.000 That's why they're talking about bringing immigrants into Japan.

00:17:51.000 They don't want to do it, but they may have to do it for financial reasons or they're being pressured to do it by certain interests. 0.88

00:17:58.000 And that's a big reason why we're doing it in this country.

00:18:00.000 So, have to look at the financials.

00:18:02.000 Rand Paul is right.

00:18:05.000 Is now the right time to shut it down?

00:18:07.000 I think it makes sense.

00:18:09.000 I mean, the most that he can hold out, the soonest that they can vote on it, is, you know, he can only block it until 1 a.m. tonight.

00:18:17.000 So, the government will shut down for an hour, and then the Senate will reopen, and then they can pass very quickly the budget.

00:18:23.000 And so, if the government shuts down tonight, it'll be very brief.

00:18:27.000 It'll be over probably before tomorrow even begins in any real way.

00:18:32.000 So, I think this is maybe the right opportunity for him to take this and use it as, I don't know, maybe a spectacle to draw attention to this issue because it is one of those things.

00:18:43.000 It will make or break the country.

00:18:45.000 And it's one of those things where it won't make or break until it's already too late.

00:18:50.000 You know, in 20 or 30 years, sometime within the next 20 or 30 years, when the dollar collapses because it has no value, when we find out that our stock market is built on assets that don't exist and it's just wild speculation.

00:19:05.000 And our government is propped up on debt, and our entire economy is propped up on debt.

00:19:09.000 And this is true all over the world, by the way.

00:19:11.000 This is not a problem just confined to the United States, but China has a 200% debt to GDP ratio.

00:19:18.000 Japan has a 170% debt to GDP ratio.

00:19:22.000 In Europe, almost uniformly across the entire continent, it's between 80 and 130% debt to GDP.

00:19:28.000 So it's all over the world.

00:19:30.000 And it's going to be okay, it's going to be tolerable until it isn't.

00:19:35.000 One day it's going to blow up on all of us, the biggest debt bomb in the history of the world, and we will regret not having taken action on this.

00:19:43.000 And it'll be the proverbial, it's happening, why didn't you do anything to stop it meme.

00:19:48.000 But that's Rand Paul.

00:19:50.000 He's right.

00:19:51.000 It may seem annoying, but it's true.

00:19:54.000 That's a very real problem.

00:19:56.000 And there it is on the budget.

00:19:58.000 But moving right along, we'll see what happens with that.

00:20:00.000 We'll monitor this.

00:20:02.000 Obviously, tomorrow we'll have a development on how successful it was that he blocked it.

00:20:06.000 If there's any change, if they're going to shore up any spending or not, it's not going to change anytime soon.

00:20:12.000 And it's not going to change because of the way that Congress works.

00:20:16.000 For Congress to make any changes to the financial system, they would have to go against the people that support the reelection campaigns, right?

00:20:24.000 So if you imagine you're in Congress and you're voting on a bill that would hurt the people that fund your next campaign in the next two years, there's no incentive for that to ever change.

00:20:36.000 And outside of massive public pressure, which doesn't exist on an issue that's as boring, that's as dry as economics, there simply is not an incentive.

00:20:46.000 It does not exist.

00:20:47.000 You couldn't create it for a congressman to vote against this system, whether it's the Federal Reserve monetary system, whether it's this globalist trade scheme, or it's this fiscal system, or it's the entitlement system.

00:21:00.000 There's no incentive to do it.

00:21:02.000 You know, you look at the people that stand to gain from this, the people that are using the government as a conduit through which to direct money.

00:21:09.000 From the pockets of the American people into the coffers of corporations and banks and other companies, and the government is just basically a channel.

00:21:18.000 It is just a funnel to get that money from them to the big people.

00:21:23.000 It's not going to stop because they fund the congressman.

00:21:26.000 But we'll see.

00:21:27.000 We'll keep an eye on it.

00:21:28.000 But moving right along, that was the budget.

00:21:31.000 We've talked about this before.

00:21:33.000 The other major thing, and this is something I want to get into, this is a little bit more fun.

00:21:37.000 This is much more fun to talk about, much more exciting.

00:21:41.000 Black Panther, Black Panther, our favorite movie, comes out next week, February 16th.

00:21:48.000 And ooh, it's going to be so good, folks.

00:21:51.000 I can't wait for the black superhero, folks. 0.84

00:21:55.000 A black director, all black cast, black superhero.

00:21:59.000 They revere Africa, the great Africa, with their mighty and noble history, their noble culture, and their brilliant people.

00:22:07.000 It will be on full display on February 16th with the premiere of Marvel's new superhero movie, The Black Panther.

00:22:15.000 And today, you know, it doesn't come out yet.

00:22:17.000 It hasn't been out yet.

00:22:18.000 So I haven't gotten the pleasure of seeing it.

00:22:19.000 I'm debating whether or not I'm going to see it.

00:22:21.000 You know, I'll find it fun, just interesting, whatever.

00:22:25.000 Today, where they used to have on Rotten Tomatoes, if you're familiar with Rotten Tomatoes, it's this movie review aggregator.

00:22:33.000 So Rotten Tomatoes, they take all kinds of reviews from magazines and websites and they put them into a composite and they give it a rating and they say, you know, well, 50% of reviewers said it was good.

00:22:44.000 And so that means it's a good movie.

00:22:46.000 Well, Black Panther had a 100% Rotten Tomatoes rating.

00:22:51.000 Every reviewer, and there were more than 80 reviews of this movie today, out of every review, all of them were positive.

00:22:58.000 All of them were a net positive 100% rating.

00:23:02.000 And, folks, let me tell you, let me tell you, as a movie guy, as a big movie buff such as myself, a 100%, that's a rare thing.

00:23:13.000 You know, the few 100% ratings I can even remember.

00:23:17.000 I think Toy Story 3 had a 100%.

00:23:20.000 I think The Artist had a 100%, that black and white movie, and typically that happens when movies celebrate Hollywood.

00:23:27.000 It's no surprise that the Hollywood people all love it.

00:23:29.000 So The Artist had a 100%.

00:23:31.000 This is a very rare thing.

00:23:32.000 You very rarely see this.

00:23:34.000 And those are just the ones that I remember off the top of my head.

00:23:37.000 Well, Black Panther gets a 100%, and people are saying, you know, I don't know, is that good?

00:23:41.000 Is that bad?

00:23:42.000 Is that because, you know, they didn't allow any other reviews?

00:23:45.000 Well, today, today, the 100% rating was crushed.

00:23:50.000 It was broken by a single bad review.

00:23:55.000 Single bad review from independent.ie, who gave the movie a 3 out of 5 star rating.

00:24:02.000 And doesn't that just kill you?

00:24:04.000 And you should have seen this was a news story.

00:24:07.000 This was a news story on real news sites.

00:24:10.000 This was on the front page of Twitter.

00:24:14.000 The front page of Twitter read today Black Panther has gotten its first negative review, and people are not happy.

00:24:22.000 And all across Twitter, to the tune of tens of thousands of likes and retweets, you have people going into this review and saying, This reviewer didn't like the movie because it didn't have enough action sequences.

00:24:33.000 Really?

00:24:34.000 You were going to take out this 100%.

00:24:37.000 You know, fresh rating on Ron Tomatoes because you didn't think there were enough action sequences.

00:24:42.000 And this story just lays bare everything that we've been saying about the country.

00:24:49.000 It exposes everything that's been happening in the country. 0.99

00:24:51.000 I think it says it all right here, folks, where what you see is a pathetic, a pathetic and sad and downright evil condescension towards black people. 1.00

00:25:05.000 How pathetic, how pathetic are we? 1.00

00:25:08.000 And not we, not me, of course, but. 0.99

00:25:11.000 People in this country, I guess the left, I guess liberals, I guess the Judeo Marxist left, which sees the black man as so pitiable, as so pathetic, that they have to make this movie for them. 0.98

00:25:24.000 And they have to say, look, little guy, look, here's your big superior movie with your black director, and here are your blacks. 0.97

00:25:30.000 Isn't this really great? 0.99

00:25:31.000 And not only that, but they're going to shame anybody who doesn't like the movie.

00:25:34.000 They're going to go out there and say, how dare you go out and say you didn't like this movie?

00:25:39.000 This is their movie.

00:25:40.000 How could you say that?

00:25:42.000 And not only that, but the entire premise of the movie.

00:25:45.000 The entire premise of the Black Panther movie is what?

00:25:48.000 That you have this mystical secret country in Africa called Wakanda, where it was never touched by colonialism, it was never touched by Western imperialism.

00:25:58.000 And because of that, it is the most technologically advanced civilization in the history of the world.

00:26:04.000 They went to the moon, they created great technologies, they can fly, they have all this great stuff.

00:26:09.000 They are great, proud warriors and technical geniuses. 0.93

00:26:14.000 And just how pathetic is that? 0.93

00:26:18.000 That there is, what, is there no glory? 0.92

00:26:20.000 Is there no great history of these people that it has to be invented and then guarded with their sacred credibility in the mainstream media?

00:26:29.000 That if anybody points this out, if anybody points out, well, you know, maybe it's just a movie, or maybe it's not even that good of a movie, they're going to be dragged through the mud, their review is going to be torn apart.

00:26:39.000 That's not a sufficient reason for not liking the Black Panther movie.

00:26:42.000 How could you say that? 0.72

00:26:44.000 It says it all right there.

00:26:45.000 You have to ask yourself at the end of the day, why?

00:26:49.000 Why do they need this?

00:26:51.000 Why do they need this movie? 0.99

00:26:53.000 Why do they need a movie to create an image of Africans which is not violent, impoverished, ridden with disease, dysfunctional, broken, chaotic?

00:27:06.000 Why is it? 1.00

00:27:08.000 I don't think anybody can explain that.

00:27:10.000 I don't think anybody who is still under the shackles, under the yoke of political correctness can explain this.

00:27:15.000 And we all know why.

00:27:16.000 By the way, we all intuitively know why, even if we're not aware that we know why, even if we don't allow ourselves to acknowledge the reason we know why, even though we all know it.

00:27:27.000 Why is it that we see something like Wakanda?

00:27:29.000 Why is it that we see something like Black Panther?

00:27:32.000 And it is so outside of our experience.

00:27:34.000 Why is that something so special?

00:27:35.000 Why is that something so unique?

00:27:37.000 Why is that something so great?

00:27:39.000 Why did they need that? 0.55

00:27:40.000 Why is that in sharp contrast with everything that they have ever produced in Africa or in any other place in any other time?

00:27:47.000 Why? 0.94

00:27:47.000 You have to ask yourself why. 0.94

00:27:49.000 And fundamentally, deep down, we have to explain, and this is why race relations have gone so sour. 0.71

00:27:57.000 This is why they will never be healed until we acknowledge this fact. 0.72

00:28:00.000 Just be as fundamentally and deep down. 1.00

00:28:03.000 The explanation for black failure is that there are simply differences between the races. 0.83

00:28:09.000 Nobody wants to say it.

00:28:11.000 Nobody wants to say it. 0.73

00:28:12.000 We want to pretend that the difference between an African and a European is that one person's skin color is dark and the other person's skin color is light. 0.74

00:28:22.000 The only difference between a Frenchman and a Nigerian is the fact that they are different colors. 0.89

00:28:29.000 In the same way that the only difference between an apple and a banana is that one is red and one is yellow. 0.99

00:28:34.000 And the only difference between grass and dirt is that one is green and one is brown.

00:28:40.000 And the only difference, you know, and we could list countless examples.

00:28:44.000 But many people would like to believe, and I think they tell themselves, we have dedicated how much scholarship, how much apologetics to trying to explain away these differences as merely arbitrary, as merely owing to skin color.

00:28:59.000 And that is what, is that not what our immigration system is based on?

00:29:02.000 Is that not what our false American mythology of the past 50 years has been based on?

00:29:07.000 This idea that if you have people that come over here from Latin America and people that come over here from Africa and people that come over here from Asia and people that come over here from Europe, and they all spend a little bit of time here, they all spend a little bit of time here assimilating.

00:29:23.000 They learn English, they listen to rap music, they stuff their face with greasy McDonald's and fast foods.

00:29:30.000 And our conception of our American identity is that, well, we can erase all those identities, they can all start fresh here because, of course, we are all the same.

00:29:40.000 And so, when they come into America, as long as there's no racism, as long as there's no prejudice, as long as we don't talk about these differences, well, they will simply subside.

00:29:50.000 Any kind of difference, any kind of differences between groups, or loyalty to groups, or allegiances to groups, or patterns between groups, it's merely owing to the fact that, well, they haven't spent enough time here, or, you know, there's other forces, there's other things going on.

00:30:06.000 And all of this is in naive ignorance.

00:30:09.000 All of this is ignoring.

00:30:11.000 All of this is in resistance to.

00:30:13.000 Like gravity, the reality that we are all aware of, that we all understand intuitively, that these groups are just different.

00:30:20.000 And of course they are.

00:30:21.000 Of course they are.

00:30:22.000 This is why stereotypes exist.

00:30:24.000 This is why patterns exist between different groups.

00:30:27.000 People want to chalk this up to historical oppression or this and that.

00:30:31.000 It was the welfare state.

00:30:32.000 It's this and the other thing.

00:30:34.000 But it comes down to so much of the Western canon, so much of Western dogma, liberal, secular Western dogma, is built on this presupposition.

00:30:44.000 That we are all liberals in different colors.

00:30:46.000 We're all just the same human being.

00:30:48.000 We're all, you know, homo economicus.

00:30:50.000 We all just want to maximize our utility and buy the cheapest Chinese good and, you know, all the rest.

00:30:57.000 And these other things don't matter.

00:30:59.000 But we see time and time again when you have a movie like Black Panther, the absurdity, the ridiculousness of it just goes to show that there is something else going on here.

00:31:09.000 And so you really got to feel for that reviewer who he didn't come up with a sufficient reason, he didn't come up with a good enough reason not to like Black Panther.

00:31:19.000 And is that the case for any other movie?

00:31:22.000 Is that the case for, you know, when there's a movie with white people in the future, does anybody say, wow, whoa, white people in space? 0.64

00:31:31.000 White people in spaceships? 0.76

00:31:33.000 Flying cars? 1.00

00:31:34.000 Now that's something I could get behind.

00:31:36.000 That's progressive.

00:31:38.000 That's really, wow.

00:31:39.000 I'm proud. 0.89

00:31:40.000 I'm proud to be white. 0.60

00:31:41.000 That just goes to show we're capable.

00:31:43.000 Nobody says that because we actually went to the moon, because we actually build skyscrapers, because we actually build flying cars.

00:31:52.000 And helicopters and planes and railroads and submarines and great ships.

00:31:57.000 And we map the human genome and we've been there and we've done that and we've got the t shirt.

00:32:02.000 And you got to ask yourself then, why is that not the case for the others?

00:32:06.000 So every time they do this, they risk, I think, they risk people finding out because what the globalists do, what they're pushing here, is they're pushing so hard because they understand that if they don't act very quickly, our truth will spread.

00:32:21.000 If they don't act very quickly to enforce their narrative, To silence people that are dissenting.

00:32:26.000 They know that if things took their natural course, our message would get out there, it would resonate with people because it is the truth, and we would win the day and we would change what's going on in the country.

00:32:38.000 But they understand that it's also kind of a gambit here because if they push too hard, if they make it too absurd, too ridiculous, too out there, well, then people are going to say, well, this is absurd and we're going to fall into that camp anyway.

00:32:51.000 So they're trying to shoot the gap between not doing enough.

00:32:55.000 That just by the nature of gravity, people come around to what is the truth, what is so obvious, what everybody sees every day of their lives, and what is our experience, and pushing so hard, making it so over the top, so ridiculous that it becomes apparent anyway.

00:33:09.000 And they're shooting the gap here.

00:33:10.000 It's times like this when they go way too, way too hard, and people start to say, What the hell's going on?

00:33:17.000 And a little bit in that vein, moving right along, a little bit in that vein, this is kind of similar.

00:33:22.000 To tie these things in very nicely, this occurred, and this is another one of those moments where you say, Oh, so that's what's going on.

00:33:30.000 This is one of those light bulb turning on moments for the boomer, for the average conservative, for the libertarian who can't quite explain, who does not quite have a coherent political ideology, doesn't quite account for things like mass immigration and race and so on.

00:33:47.000 Nancy Pelosi, yesterday, in her eight hour House speech, her historic eight hour House speech, it wasn't technically a filibuster because filibusters can only occur in the Senate, but she held the floor of the House for a whopping eight hours.

00:34:03.000 To speak in the service of, excuse me, the DACA recipients, the DACA illegal immigrants.

00:34:09.000 And it wasn't really to do anything other than to draw attention to the plight of the young dreamers, the young illegal immigrants in the country who are about to be deported.

00:34:18.000 And I don't know, it was a publicity stunt.

00:34:20.000 Well, she goes up there and she speaks for eight hours.

00:34:22.000 I didn't watch any of it.

00:34:24.000 We talked about it a little bit last night.

00:34:25.000 But then I saw this clip appear.

00:34:27.000 This clip started to circulate today on social media from this eight hour speech where she started to tell a little story about her son.

00:34:36.000 Or her grandson, her grandson who has a friend by the name of Antonio, she says.

00:34:41.000 She says that her grandson has a good friend from school by the name of Antonio who's from Guatemala, Guatemala.

00:34:50.000 And he is a dark, he is a dark child, dark skinned, dark eyes, and they're fast friends.

00:34:55.000 And this is great.

00:34:57.000 And Nancy Pelosi is telling this little story about a proud day for her, about a proud day in her life, about what her grandson said about his friend Antonio.

00:35:06.000 She said, This was such a proud day for me because when my grandson blew out the candles on his birthday cake, he said, or excuse me, I said, Did you make a wish?

00:35:16.000 He said, I wish I had brown skin and brown eyes like Antonio.

00:35:22.000 Nancy Pelosi says, So beautiful, so beautiful.

00:35:25.000 The beauty is in the world.

00:35:27.000 The mix.

00:35:27.000 The beauty is in the mix, in the mixed race individuals.

00:35:31.000 And it's moments like this when the mask slips a little bit. 0.99

00:35:35.000 It's moments like this when all those decades, all those decades of carefully plotting, carefully building up the pieces, hiding, dodging, crafting these lies, crafting these sophisticated facades for their real agenda, it's moments like these, these little micro expressions, when it all becomes quite clear what's going on.

00:35:59.000 When Nancy Pelosi says that she's proud, she is proud that her grandson hates who he is, looks in the mirror, sees his white skin, sees his blue eyes, and he says, I don't like that.

00:36:14.000 I wish I had brown skin like Antonio.

00:36:14.000 I don't like that.

00:36:17.000 I wish I had brown eyes like Antonio.

00:36:20.000 And not only is that said, and maybe we could understand why a young person would have a naive thought like that, and why wouldn't they in a culture that all they do is celebrate? 0.94

00:36:31.000 Non white people. 0.73

00:36:32.000 You know, all we see all day long, like that Netflix ad and like all these other countless things, is, you know, black excellence and black is beautiful and black is strong and black celebrities and black athletes and this and that.

00:36:43.000 And look at how great they are. 0.98

00:36:45.000 And the depictions of white people are miserable. 1.00

00:36:48.000 The depictions of white men in particular are as these simpletons, these buffoons. 0.99

00:36:54.000 When they're not simpletons and buffoons, when they're not Phil Dunphy from Modern Family, and oh, I'm just a goofy house dad, I can't seem to get anything right. 0.98

00:37:02.000 I'm tripping over my own two feet, and I'm just a goofy guy who needs a woman in my life to remind me, and I need a black guy to tell me how to dance and be cool. 0.99

00:37:10.000 And when they're not goofy like that, well, then they're evil. 0.99

00:37:13.000 They're being blamed for the crimes of a very particular, close to white, but not quite white group. 1.00

00:37:19.000 They're rapists, and they're evil, and they pillage, and they enslaved, and they choked everybody out of their wealth, and they stole the land, and they stole all the money, and they're evil, and they're rapists, and they're misogynists, and they're racists. 1.00

00:37:33.000 And so on. 1.00

00:37:33.000 And so maybe you can understand why a child in this day and age would resent being white. 1.00

00:37:37.000 You could certainly understand it. 0.95

00:37:39.000 Not that it's right, and it's very downright evil, downright satanic, but the naivety of a child, you know, you could say, okay.

00:37:48.000 But here's Nancy Pelosi who says, this is beautiful.

00:37:51.000 This is a proud day.

00:37:53.000 This is the proudest day for me.

00:37:56.000 Not only does this child believe that it's a bad thing to be white, not only does he envy people for being brown, and look, not that there's anything wrong with being brown, but You should love who you are.

00:38:05.000 You should love the way God created you.

00:38:07.000 You should love your own history, your own people, your own heritage.

00:38:11.000 If you really believe in diversity, you would believe that.

00:38:15.000 But Nancy Pelosi says it was a proud day that her grandson rejected his ancestors, rejected his heritage, rejected his history, rejected what God gave him, rejected what God made him to be.

00:38:28.000 And she said she's proud of that.

00:38:30.000 She said that's a beautiful thing.

00:38:32.000 She says the beauty is in the mix.

00:38:34.000 What in God's name does that mean?

00:38:37.000 The beauty is in the mix?

00:38:39.000 And that's what it comes down to, folks. 1.00

00:38:41.000 They want the mixture.

00:38:43.000 They want the mixture of all people.

00:38:46.000 And this is what we have a problem with.

00:38:48.000 We don't have a problem with brown people.

00:38:50.000 We love brown people, they're great in their own countries.

00:38:55.000 You know, I would love to take a vacation to Mexico.

00:38:58.000 You know, I would try my best to avoid the drug gangs.

00:38:58.000 I would love to.

00:39:02.000 I would try my best to not get shot.

00:39:03.000 I would try my best to not get stabbed or robbed.

00:39:06.000 But I would love to go down to Mexico and see the weather and enjoy the authentic Mexican food and enjoy the culture, go to the Aztec monuments, see the Great Pyramids.

00:39:17.000 It'd be very interesting.

00:39:18.000 Get, you know, talk.

00:39:19.000 I'm sure they're very funny.

00:39:20.000 I want to enjoy their music in Mexico.

00:39:23.000 And I'd love to go to.

00:39:25.000 Saudi Arabia.

00:39:26.000 Wow.

00:39:27.000 And see the great mosques.

00:39:29.000 Really something really cool.

00:39:31.000 Maybe not because, you know, that's not a very savory thing, but we recognize it's an interesting culture.

00:39:36.000 Maybe I'd go to Morocco.

00:39:38.000 I would see the beautiful architecture and we would see the beautiful costumes.

00:39:42.000 And, you know, what a great place that is.

00:39:44.000 Very interesting in Morocco. 1.00

00:39:46.000 But the danger, what we oppose is the mixture. 1.00

00:39:49.000 What we oppose is the mix up.

00:39:52.000 We can live in peace and friendship.

00:39:55.000 In separate nations and separate developments with these other people of the world.

00:40:00.000 But what we cannot have is the mix.

00:40:03.000 And of course, I'm paraphrasing the great Oswald Mosley. 0.92

00:40:06.000 Because, of course, when you have these mixings, when you have, and people think again, this goes back to Black Panther. 0.63

00:40:13.000 If you believe that the only differences between people is arbitrary skin color, well, it's just happenstance.

00:40:20.000 You're red, you're blue, you're pink, you're purple, and we're all just the same. 0.97

00:40:24.000 It's all just guts.

00:40:25.000 It's no race but the human race.

00:40:27.000 If that were true, Maybe you could have this.

00:40:30.000 And maybe that's why they believe this.

00:40:32.000 But the problem, of course, is that when people come over here, they don't just bring their skin color.

00:40:36.000 They don't bring this universal tabula rasa, John Locke idea.

00:40:41.000 We're all just a human race.

00:40:42.000 They bring with them 10,000 years of human evolution.

00:40:46.000 They bring with them 3,000 years of culture, of civilization, of baggage, of their religion, of their values, their physiognomy, simple things like how they defecate, simple things like how they eat.

00:40:59.000 Simple things like, do they make eye contact or do they not?

00:41:02.000 Do they shake hands?

00:41:03.000 When they nod their head, does that mean no or does that mean yes?

00:41:06.000 I mean, there's countless things.

00:41:07.000 I mean, you compare, for example, and people like to say, oh, well, America has diversity from Alabama to New York to California, and that's true.

00:41:16.000 And Europe has diversity from Russia to Italy to the UK, and that's true.

00:41:20.000 But compare and contrast a country like China with the United States and think of the differences.

00:41:25.000 Think of the differences here. 0.95

00:41:29.000 A different skin color and their eyes look a little different. 0.97

00:41:32.000 But other than that, we're all just pink on the inside, right? 0.99

00:41:34.000 Wrong!

00:41:35.000 Think about the differences.

00:41:36.000 Our alphabet is phonetic.

00:41:38.000 It means that we have letters that have sounds and we put the letters together to make words.

00:41:42.000 And, you know, this is how our language operates.

00:41:45.000 It's very unique to the West.

00:41:47.000 In China, they do characters, characters which are supposed to represent words and supposed to represent, in some sense, some kind of symbology.

00:41:55.000 And they have an alphabet with thousands of different letters.

00:41:57.000 I mean, this is just on the most fundamental level.

00:42:00.000 And if you have read anything, if you've read McLuhan, if you've read anything about If you've read anything about thought, if you've read anything about linguistics, simple things like language, simple things that are different in the Germanic languages or in the Romantic languages, change how people think, change the way people see themselves and their relation to the world.

00:42:20.000 And you imagine such a stark difference as between a phonetic alphabet and an alphabet that is based on characters.

00:42:27.000 I mean, that's just one of many.

00:42:28.000 But then you also factor in things like monotheism. 0.55

00:42:32.000 Not only is the West a Christian civilization, which is vastly different from.

00:42:37.000 The Buddhist civilization or the Hindu civilization of the East or the Orient, but it's also a monotheistic system. 0.51

00:42:44.000 It's one built around a church, built around a community, vastly different than China.

00:42:49.000 And so, just you look at just two countries where the universalist, the liberal would say, oh, well, they come here and they buy McDonald's and that's all hunky dory.

00:42:58.000 We're all just fine and well.

00:42:59.000 And we can mix it up and the beauty is in the mix and all of this stuff.

00:43:02.000 But think of all these differences.

00:43:04.000 Think of the conflict you are creating when you bring these people in together and not just the conflict without, but within.

00:43:11.000 Of course, you have conflict without. 0.87

00:43:12.000 We've seen this in the race riots of the past 50 years. 0.86

00:43:15.000 We see this in the fact that people choose to self segregate.

00:43:19.000 The fact that, you know, racial animuses and religious animuses still have not been resolved and it looks like they will never be resolved. 0.83

00:43:27.000 But even within, even within, you look at the statistics on race mixing and you'll find that when you have, and regardless of what your position on this, the facts are undeniable. 0.74

00:43:37.000 Regardless of what your position is on this, I used to think there was nothing wrong with it until I saw the data. 0.98

00:43:42.000 And the data that I saw showed that when you have mixed marriages between blacks and whites or whites and Hispanics or Asians and Hispanics or Asians and blacks and so on and so forth, is that you have A much higher propensity for the children to abuse drugs, much higher propensity for the children to have mental illness. 0.62

00:43:59.000 So many things can go awry for the children, and you have to ask yourself, why is that? 0.90

00:44:04.000 Where's the beauty in that mixture?

00:44:05.000 Why is that the way it is?

00:44:07.000 Why are they not loving it? 0.93

00:44:09.000 If the beauty is in the mix, why are they not loving this fact that, oh, they are the child of difference and they're going to bring about the universalist, you know, globo, homo race, you know, whatever? 0.93

00:44:20.000 Why not? 0.91

00:44:21.000 Well, it's because you have these values, these histories.

00:44:24.000 These identities that are smashed into conflict with each other and destroyed, eroded, and they have no place anymore.

00:44:32.000 And that is what these people want.

00:44:35.000 That is what Nancy Pelosi wants. 1.00

00:44:37.000 That is what the rootless transnationals want. 1.00

00:44:39.000 They want to cut us off from our roots. 1.00

00:44:42.000 They want to take, if we are trees, if we are, you know, if you cut a tree down and you see all its rings and you see its age, you see its rich age and it grows tall and thick and its branches grow long, if we are the branches, if we are the great evolution of so many years.

00:44:58.000 Of our ancestors and our cultures and our civilizations, they want to chop us off right at our roots.

00:45:04.000 They want to make us rootless like themselves. 0.95

00:45:07.000 They want to chop us down and cut us off from any kind of identity racial, ethnic, national, religious, community.

00:45:16.000 And to what end? 1.00

00:45:17.000 Well, when we are all these rootless people, when we are the mixture, when we are the unwashed mass, the unwashed amalgamation, the globo homo man. 0.99

00:45:29.000 And, you know, we were pansexual. 0.99

00:45:32.000 We're BuzzFeed writers.

00:45:33.000 We all go to work every day in makeup, and none of us have genitals, and we're all just beige.

00:45:41.000 And we don't know who we are or what we are.

00:45:43.000 We don't know what we believe.

00:45:44.000 We just know that we're designed to go to work and write about what?

00:45:48.000 Fashion?

00:45:49.000 You know, we're supposed to buy the latest iPhone, and we're supposed to cram our mouths full of pills, drugs, alcohols, and numbing agents, and we're supposed to go out and have these hedonistic sex parties on the weekends. 0.98

00:46:02.000 And that is their vision for the world, is to create this disassociated slave class. 0.94

00:46:08.000 That is their intention. 0.96

00:46:09.000 And every time, every so often, the mask slips and they reveal when they say these dastardly things, the beauty is in the mix.

00:46:19.000 She's proud of her kid for hating himself.

00:46:21.000 Oh, that's a very special thing.

00:46:23.000 That's a very significant thing, an evil thing. 0.74

00:46:26.000 So that's Nancy Pelosi. 0.99

00:46:28.000 We've quite the pontification, quite the.

00:46:32.000 We really laid it all out there, right?

00:46:34.000 We're really, really earning those super chats tonight.

00:46:36.000 But we're coming up here, 10 minutes to go, so we'll check our super chats.

00:46:40.000 We'll see what people are saying here.

00:46:43.000 We'll see how people have responded to my sermonizing, my conspiratorial, my wild sermonizing.

00:46:49.000 You know, people could say, and I understand it.

00:46:52.000 I understand why some people would be hesitant to show this to a mainstream kind of a person, to a conservative.

00:46:59.000 But all of this stuff, you understand that this case, it all proceeds logically from these statements.

00:47:06.000 That when you start to see that the biological, the sociological, the historical evidence simply does not support these presuppositions.

00:47:17.000 This rhetoric that's been preached, that's been so artificially propped up, that has been made ubiquitous by design, you have to question why that is.

00:47:27.000 And that is the end game here.

00:47:29.000 Anybody who believes in diversity would not want to make this country beige. 0.63

00:47:33.000 Anybody who truly believes in rich diversity and rich multiculturalism would not want to throw all these people in there and melt them down, put them in a meat grinder and grind them all out and make these patties and make the human meat patty.

00:47:49.000 Here's the human meat. 0.97

00:47:50.000 To go work in the mills, right? 0.83

00:47:52.000 I mean, and that's essentially what they're doing. 0.95

00:47:53.000 Throw in the German, throw in the Arab, throw in the Chinaman, throw in the Indian, throw in the Hispanic, the Amerindian, and let's grind it all up. 0.79

00:48:02.000 And out comes this thick, black haired, beige person with no roots, no language, no ancestors. 0.88

00:48:10.000 And it's a tragic thing.

00:48:12.000 If you believed in diversity, you wouldn't believe in that.

00:48:14.000 We love all people and we want them to remain.

00:48:18.000 We want to keep the richness.

00:48:22.000 Anywho, super chats.

00:48:23.000 Crashed Pelican says Nick is destroying this chosen one.

00:48:27.000 And I believe that's from last night, right?

00:48:29.000 And yeah, I did give it to him, didn't I?

00:48:32.000 It was fun times, fun time.

00:48:35.000 But these are the debates that have to be had.

00:48:39.000 It's unfortunate that I'm probably blacklisted for talking about something like that.

00:48:43.000 And you've got to ask yourself why that is. 0.94

00:48:46.000 What did I do yesterday but point out empirical facts that even a Jewish person acknowledges, right? 0.99

00:48:51.000 There was not a single thing. 0.98

00:48:53.000 I wasn't quoting sources from.

00:48:55.000 A white nationalist pamphlet.

00:48:57.000 I wasn't reading from Mein Kampf.

00:48:58.000 I wasn't reading from George Lincoln Rockwell's diaries.

00:49:02.000 I was talking about Peter Schaefer, who graduated from Princeton with a PhD.

00:49:07.000 I was talking about statistics that are readily available to anybody who finds them from the General Social Survey.

00:49:14.000 I was quoting about things about the employees of CNN that's publicly out there that anybody can find.

00:49:19.000 Things that, again, a Jewish person, an avowed Jewish supremacist and Zionist, had no issue with.

00:49:26.000 And you got to wonder, why am I disqualified from working anywhere for pointing this out?

00:49:32.000 Makes you think.

00:49:33.000 Altmedia, Nick won the debate on Worski last night.

00:49:37.000 You are one of the most talented people in this movement.

00:49:39.000 Keep it up.

00:49:39.000 Thank you, my guy.

00:49:40.000 Much appreciated.

00:49:41.000 I really do appreciate it. 0.96

00:49:43.000 Ari Shekel says, badass debate yesterday. 0.97

00:49:47.000 Smokey fat boy had a hard day trying to sophist his way out of his hypocritical position. 0.96

00:49:53.000 Great aesthetics. 0.99

00:49:54.000 Well, it was fitting.

00:49:55.000 It's so.

00:49:56.000 I think it's convenient in a lot of ways that every time I debate somebody on these questions, to be quite fair, their arguments would go a lot farther if they were pleasant.

00:50:08.000 They would get a lot more mileage out of the sophistry that they push if they were simply pleasant to be around, if they presented as nice people.

00:50:16.000 And I would have to say that Jacob Wolf maybe did the best job of this in terms of he looks like a normal enough guy.

00:50:21.000 I guess he was polite enough.

00:50:23.000 But even then, he was just outright lying about the Israeli nuclear program.

00:50:27.000 But even like Will Chamberlain and this guy, they make it that they are the most unlikable, unpleasant people that you would want to have a debate with.

00:50:36.000 And I don't even say that as a personal attack.

00:50:38.000 I don't really care about this guy.

00:50:40.000 But I say it as an objective observer that you have this guy who's making an argument, which is very thin, but he's also making it in such an unpleasant way.

00:50:48.000 First of all, he's sitting there with poor posture. 0.98

00:50:50.000 He's fat. 0.86

00:50:50.000 He's got sunglasses on. 0.86

00:50:52.000 How disrespectful to the audience and to the debate opponents. 0.99

00:50:55.000 He's got these ridiculous cans. 0.98

00:50:58.000 He's vaping during it. 1.00

00:50:59.000 I mean, this is a disgusting human being. 0.99

00:51:01.000 And then on top of it, he's going to be rude. 1.00

00:51:02.000 On top of it, he's going to call names and he's going to cuss.

00:51:05.000 And that's not a good look for an old man either, for an old man to be so agitated by a young person.

00:51:11.000 That's not a good look.

00:51:12.000 So, these people would get a lot more mileage out of their arguments if they were simply pleasant about them.

00:51:17.000 And I think fundamentally what happens is they can never be pleasant about them because they are not confident in them, because they know the arguments don't stand.

00:51:26.000 And so, it's not a coincidence.

00:51:27.000 It's not a coincidence that every time you have these people debate you, they get so angry and so defensive and so disingenuous.

00:51:36.000 It's because what they are fighting for is nothing short of, in their mind, the survival of their people.

00:51:43.000 But We have to understand why it happens.

00:51:43.000 And it makes sense.

00:51:46.000 It's one of our greatest benefits, I think.

00:51:50.000 It's one of the strengths of our side that we are fighting with the truth, and that tends to exercise these demons from inside them, and it makes them very difficult to rally behind.

00:52:01.000 So I will say that.

00:52:03.000 If you're out there, I'm aiming for the truth.

00:52:06.000 I want it to be fought out hard and truthfully, and this is how it happens.

00:52:11.000 This is what John Stuart Mill said is the purpose for free speech. 1.00

00:52:14.000 But Jewish people, Zionists, The arguments go a lot longer if you're civil and if you're likable. 1.00

00:52:20.000 But they have a hard time with that.

00:52:22.000 Pragmatic culture says Do you think the Fed will bring back inflation in a big way to help pay back the debt, especially because they're raising interest rates?

00:52:31.000 Well, you understand that in a big way, the inflation is what's driving the debt, in the sense that a big way that they pay for the programs is simply by printing more money.

00:52:41.000 And you know this because they stopped publishing the statistics.

00:52:45.000 I believe it's the M. What is it, the M3 statistics, I believe?

00:52:53.000 It's been a long time since I was in macroeconomics, but the most detailed numbers on Federal Reserve open market transactions, the most detailed numbers on how much money is being printed, how much the quantity of money in circulation is increasing, they stopped publishing those a long time ago, and that tells you a lot.

00:53:13.000 Quantitative easing has been in place for a long time.

00:53:16.000 You've had near zero interest rates for 10 years, and so nothing but inflation has gone on.

00:53:22.000 The inflation rate hasn't gone up, but In effect, that's what's happened in order to subsidize this debt spending, in order to subsidize this economy, which is built on cheap and easy credit, there's nothing but inflation at the core of it.

00:53:36.000 So, absolutely, and they will have to keep inflating the money supply because there simply is nothing behind the growth in the economy.

00:53:45.000 When the stock market soars past 26,000 points, what you're seeing now when the stock market is tumbling is a correction.

00:53:54.000 And we believe, people that are more classically minded on economics, that the stock market and the economy is a reflection of the resources in the economy.

00:54:03.000 And sometimes the speculation gets out of control, and sometimes people overvalue, you overbuy the economy, and then there's a correction when there is simply not enough value in the economy that underlies what people believe there is.

00:54:17.000 And that's when you get a correction.

00:54:18.000 That's when you get it to start tumbling down.

00:54:20.000 That's why you get the boom and the bust cycle.

00:54:22.000 And Mises writes a lot about this as well.

00:54:26.000 LC 1707, Baked Alaska has Jared Taylor versus Tariq Nasheed.

00:54:31.000 Would you like to join?

00:54:33.000 I don't know, he didn't send me an invite.

00:54:34.000 Maybe I'll DM him after the stream here.

00:54:36.000 I'd love to jump in.

00:54:37.000 I mean, Tariq Nasheed is just one of these insufferable people. 0.99

00:54:41.000 You know, one of the problems I think with a lot of the black nationalists is just that they are so damn arrogant. 0.99

00:54:47.000 Oh my gosh. 0.99

00:54:49.000 And we have to call them out on the curb for this, really.

00:54:52.000 I mean, if a white person entered into life like some of these people do, I mean, they would get called on it like you wouldn't believe.

00:55:00.000 But with people like Tariq Nasheed, I guess it's just par for the course.

00:55:04.000 And that's another thing.

00:55:05.000 We have these very low expectations.

00:55:08.000 You get called a racist if you want to have expectations for black America, right? 0.87

00:55:12.000 If you want someone like Tariq Nasheed to be humble and respectful and to be realistic and to be charitable in a debate, you're a racist. 0.74

00:55:21.000 And it's kind of ironic.

00:55:22.000 Holding somebody to the same standard is racial prejudice.

00:55:26.000 Isn't that pretty backwards? 0.87

00:55:27.000 So maybe I'll jump in there, but he's the worst man. 0.64

00:55:32.000 Thomas Howard, Black Panther, red pills, normies on the ethnostate. 0.76

00:55:35.000 Yeah, that too.

00:55:36.000 I mean, Black Panther is about an insulated society, an isolated society, an insider society.

00:55:44.000 That is rejecting outside influences, outside peoples, foreign cultures, and on and on.

00:55:49.000 And that has contributed to the success of it.

00:55:52.000 Well, you know, we want our own Wakanda, right? 0.99

00:55:55.000 So I agree. 0.96

00:55:57.000 Right from wrong, imagine an article saying, My son wished he was white. 0.99

00:56:00.000 Yeah, exactly. 0.95

00:56:01.000 Right. 0.99

00:56:01.000 And then we hear that all day long black people moaning, and, you know, we want to be white because, you know, white people get all the perks, white people get all the benefits. 0.99

00:56:13.000 And, you know, we're so sick of the whining. 0.99

00:56:15.000 But, yeah, exactly. 0.97

00:56:17.000 I mean, could you imagine if Mitch McConnell got on the floor of the Senate and said something like, black people wish they were white, right?

00:56:24.000 Or if Ben Carson said that his son or his grandson said, I wish I was white and I was proud of him, could you imagine?

00:56:31.000 Could you imagine the names they would call him?

00:56:33.000 But it's kind of useless to go about double standards, but it is useful to say that there's something not right here.

00:56:39.000 Dissident Right with five bucks.

00:56:41.000 Thank you, my guy.

00:56:43.000 Much appreciated.

00:56:44.000 Tan Staffel.

00:56:46.000 Says, Moloch wants a mix.

00:56:48.000 God wants nations. 0.92

00:56:49.000 Very true.

00:56:50.000 Very true.

00:56:51.000 And for all the people that said Catholicism is universalist and it means that there can't be nations, if you read the New Testament, and if you read like the first four books of the New Testament, in each of them, Jesus Christ says, subtly, but he says that the nations will end.

00:57:09.000 The nations will be around until the end of time.

00:57:11.000 Jesus Christ writes about when God is coming again.

00:57:14.000 When Jesus Christ comes again, he says the nations will be at war with each other.

00:57:20.000 And so that's a subtle way of essentially affirming the fact that nations will exist until the end of time. 0.54

00:57:24.000 And of course, God created the nations in the story of Genesis with the Tower of Babel.

00:57:30.000 When people were all together, working all together for one project under one society, and they were building the great Tower of Babel that would penetrate the heavens, what did God do? 0.85

00:57:42.000 He smashed it and he scattered the people and he made them speak in strange tongues. 0.94

00:57:48.000 So it's just, you know, there's just no basis for it.

00:57:50.000 I mean, the whole Old Testament is about nations.

00:57:53.000 The whole Old Testament is about tribes and nations and walls and borders and kingdoms. 0.80

00:57:59.000 For anybody to say that, you know, Christianity is cucked, they don't know the history and they don't know the scripture.

00:58:06.000 Ari Shekel says, Globo Homo gives me a religious experience, Goy.

00:58:10.000 I love that phrase, Globo Homo, because at once it means like a hominid, at once it means like a classification of a genus, you know, Globo Homo.

00:58:19.000 But at the same time, it's a slight. 1.00

00:58:21.000 At the same time, it's like calling you a Faggot. 1.00

00:58:23.000 So I really like that. 1.00

00:58:25.000 Globo homo. 1.00

00:58:26.000 You know, you think of like the metrosexual citizen of the world who goes to the U2 concert in New York City. 0.77

00:58:35.000 I'm a citizen of the world.

00:58:37.000 I'm the Globo Homo, you know, and so I'm a big fan of that phrase.

00:58:41.000 I coined it.

00:58:42.000 If anybody says that in the future, say Nick Fuentes made that up.

00:58:47.000 Marcus Antonio, since you are me, these two shekels are mine, right?

00:58:51.000 Yes, that's right, you know.

00:58:53.000 Halsey, he starts out in the debate alleging, based on no evidence, based on what I believe is a total misunderstanding of how Twitter works, which is to be expected from a boomer, that I am using all kinds of alt accounts.

00:59:07.000 I'm using alternative accounts.

00:59:09.000 To spreading anti Semitic messages, which I do have one alt.

00:59:13.000 And I don't even want to say what it's going to post, but it has nothing to do with politics.

00:59:18.000 It's dedicated completely to cryptocurrency, and it doesn't have a profile picture, and it doesn't have a header.

00:59:24.000 So I guess it wasn't totally true, and I said I have no alt.

00:59:26.000 So I have one alt.

00:59:28.000 But it has tweeted exactly zero times.

00:59:30.000 It is a cryptocurrency account.

00:59:32.000 But he alleges that I have this big network, which makes no sense because I have a reach of close to 20,000 followers.

00:59:40.000 Why would I? 0.55

00:59:41.000 Create accounts that have 10 or 20 or 30 followers to say, boo, 1488, you know, shuckle man. 0.85

00:59:50.000 You know, why would I do that?

00:59:51.000 Makes no sense.

00:59:53.000 But yeah, thank you to Marcus Antonius for clearing that up for me.

00:59:57.000 While I was, excuse me, while I was in the middle of the broadcast, I stopped for a moment.

01:00:02.000 I don't know if you saw it, it was pretty quick to make that little donation there to whip out my credit card and put in all the information to create the illusion that I wasn't doing that.

01:00:12.000 The Bible and a beer with a single shekel.

01:00:14.000 Thank you, my guy. 1.00

01:00:15.000 Colin Gorton, Nick, you called him a fat boomer faggot, LMAO. 1.00

01:00:19.000 He is. 1.00

01:00:20.000 He had it coming.

01:00:21.000 You know, and this is a guy, not for nothing, but I don't start out that way. 1.00

01:00:25.000 This is a guy who was following me around for the better part of six months in my mentions Nick is a fag. 1.00

01:00:33.000 Nick is a pencil neck. 1.00

01:00:35.000 Nick won't debate me. 1.00

01:00:37.000 Nick's a coward. 0.70

01:00:38.000 And, you know, look, generally speaking, if people ask me to debate, even if they're lower on the totem pole, Or, you know, in terms of follower count, if I have nothing to gain from it, typically if there's a good debate to be had, I'll entertain it. 0.97

01:00:51.000 You know, I brought on Millennial Matt to have a debate, and there was nothing really to gain from that.

01:00:56.000 I brought on Ricky Vaughn the other day on my show just to discuss, and there was nothing really to gain from that.

01:01:02.000 And so, if Halsey wanted to come on the show, I mean, even with Will Chamberlain, the guy got no engagement.

01:01:07.000 Jacob Wohl has less engagement than me.

01:01:11.000 I'm pretty sympathetic because I like controversy, I like fights.

01:01:15.000 Patrick Casey, I invited him on.

01:01:17.000 Even though he has.

01:01:18.000 Less than half the followers I have, even though I think he's a total dweeb.

01:01:22.000 I was going to have him on the show for what I thought was going to be a good conversation.

01:01:27.000 But Halsey, his approach was to call me names, to be vulgar, to be crass, to be crude, and not even in a funny way.

01:01:36.000 I can be pretty crass, I can be pretty pugnacious at times.

01:01:40.000 I can get personal, but I do it in a funny way.

01:01:42.000 It's snarky, it gets under people's skin, it's funny. 1.00

01:01:45.000 Like when the old height came after me, I called him a fag, but in a funny way, in a way that was clever. 1.00

01:01:52.000 But Halsey came at me with, like, you fucking idiot, I hate you, you know, and just goofy stuff. 1.00

01:01:58.000 And so when that happens, you have to retaliate in kind, unfortunately. 1.00

01:02:03.000 Jake Destavia says, You're Jewish, busts a gut. 0.99

01:02:07.000 Great stuff, my man. 0.98

01:02:08.000 Well, it's just so funny because the guy's name is Halsey English.

01:02:12.000 And this just epitomizes the my fellow white person meme, you know.

01:02:17.000 And they don't, he says, Oh, well, I tell people I'm a Jew all the time.

01:02:20.000 Okay, but your name is Halsey English.

01:02:22.000 Give me a break.

01:02:23.000 That's not your real last name, my guy.

01:02:25.000 That's not your real last name.

01:02:27.000 You're not Halsey English.

01:02:28.000 That was changed somewhere at some point.

01:02:30.000 I've never met a Jewish person named English, right? 1.00

01:02:34.000 And they come out and they pretend, oh, I'm a conservative. 1.00

01:02:36.000 I'm against Islam. 0.99

01:02:37.000 I'm a proud American. 1.00

01:02:39.000 And it's just phony.

01:02:41.000 It's just BS.

01:02:42.000 And so, whenever you find that kind of a thing out, you know, we're knee deep in it.

01:02:47.000 And he's been antagonizing me for six months you're an anti Semite and so on.

01:02:52.000 Well, it all clicks. 0.89

01:02:53.000 And it's very funny, very hilarious.

01:02:55.000 So, good old Halsey.

01:02:57.000 We love him.

01:02:59.000 Michael, been listening to radio for over 25 years.

01:03:02.000 Keep at it.

01:03:02.000 You have once in a generation command of principle.

01:03:05.000 Thank you, my guy.

01:03:06.000 I appreciate that.

01:03:08.000 Thoughts on the new utilities of internet content delivery, Google, YouTube, and countering suppression?

01:03:15.000 It's a good question.

01:03:16.000 It's a good question.

01:03:17.000 And this is something I talk about on the show all the time.

01:03:20.000 In the age of mass communications, initially, and this was inaugurated in the 1920s with radio, after the 1940s with television, with cable television in the 1980s, what you have in the past 100 years in liberal, free, democratic societies is gatekeepers of information.

01:03:37.000 You know, you had the era of the printing press, then you had the era of mass.

01:03:41.000 Media, which is audio and visual and cable.

01:03:45.000 And for that time, you had the gatekeepers.

01:03:47.000 And under those 100 years, you had rules for the gatekeepers where there was an equal time rule.

01:03:53.000 And more things were allowed.

01:03:54.000 There wasn't this political correctness police.

01:03:56.000 For example, you could go on the Christopher Hitchens show even in the 1990s and talk about the Holocaust or talk about white nationalism.

01:04:03.000 And there were rules up until the 1980s that right and left would have equal time.

01:04:08.000 And so there were different rules as well.

01:04:11.000 But now we're entering an age where mass communications.

01:04:14.000 Whereas before this consolidation of media ownership in a few hands, before it was decentralized and you could probably get out there and there wasn't this PC mob, you can get something out there to some extent or you could buy up a TV station or a radio station, you could get decent circulation in print.

01:04:29.000 Nowadays, 95% of media is controlled by six corporations.

01:04:35.000 And you understand that those six corporations aren't going to let fringe dissident political opinions into the mainstream.

01:04:40.000 They're not going to allow that.

01:04:41.000 They're the gatekeepers, they decide what goes, they're the taste makers.

01:04:45.000 They're not going to let that in.

01:04:46.000 And what recourse do you have when the barriers to entry in mass media are you buy a television station?

01:04:51.000 Good luck with that.

01:04:52.000 And you get an FCC to give you a station or a channel, rather.

01:04:56.000 You buy a radio station.

01:04:57.000 You print your own newspaper.

01:04:59.000 Hey, good luck with that.

01:05:00.000 New York Times barely has good circulation anymore.

01:05:03.000 They can barely keep their offices up and running and pay their bills.

01:05:07.000 And so, what's the alternative in the 21st century?

01:05:09.000 It's the decentralized, the new utilities, the mass media, the social media, the Twitter, YouTube, Facebook.

01:05:15.000 Facebook, and in the absence of a free market of ideas in conventional media, conventional mass media, our only recourse in a free and open society to get ideas out there, to introduce candidates, is through social media.

01:05:30.000 And when even these now are coming under consolidation in very small hands, Mark Zuckerberg controls Facebook.

01:05:37.000 He controls a website that is a medium of communication for 2 billion people, for a fourth of the world's population.

01:05:45.000 Twitter, controlled by Jack Dorsey and his arbitrary cadre of censors.

01:05:50.000 That's a real problem.

01:05:51.000 That's a real challenge for the free world, for the West.

01:05:57.000 And so the solution, which has been proposed by Paul Nealon, is you have shall not censor legislation.

01:06:02.000 You put it in place that these institutions are trusts.

01:06:06.000 And unless you want the U.S. government to go in and bash these people up, go in and bash these corporations up and say Twitter has a monopoly on short form content, YouTube has a monopoly on video content, Facebook has a monopoly on the social content, unless We're going to break up these trusts and introduce competition to the marketplace.

01:06:26.000 Well, then you're going to have to submit to regulation.

01:06:30.000 And the founders would be behind this.

01:06:32.000 I don't think, you know, Ben Franklin and Thomas Jefferson and Alexander Hamilton would have said, no, you know, it's not government, and therefore you can have mass censorship.

01:06:41.000 You can have all the media controlled by six corporations and all the social media controlled by like five guys.

01:06:48.000 I don't think so.

01:06:48.000 I don't think they would have let that fly.

01:06:50.000 You have to get to the spirit of free speech, not the letter of free speech, or the First Amendment, rather.

01:06:56.000 The Bible and the beer.

01:06:57.000 Hello, Nick.

01:06:58.000 You often speak against advocating for an ethnostate.

01:07:02.000 So, with that said, What would be the ideal demographic mix be based on where we are today, and how do we get there?

01:07:08.000 Thanks. 0.61

01:07:09.000 Well, the only reason I speak out against the ethnostate is because it's jargon.

01:07:14.000 You talk to your barber about ethnostate, they won't know what the hell you're talking about.

01:07:18.000 You talk to your neighbor about the ethnostate, they don't know what the hell you're talking about.

01:07:22.000 What does that mean?

01:07:22.000 What is the ethnostate?

01:07:24.000 Is it an ethnic state?

01:07:24.000 What is an ethnostate?

01:07:26.000 Even the people that are proponents of the ethnostate are against ethnic nationalism, but it's an ethnostate.

01:07:33.000 So is it an ethnic state, or is it, oh, it's a racial state? 0.81

01:07:35.000 It's the white state. 0.66

01:07:36.000 Was that 100% white? 0.89

01:07:37.000 Are there no minorities allowed?

01:07:38.000 Is there second class and first class? 0.70

01:07:40.000 How does that work?

01:07:41.000 So many questions.

01:07:42.000 It's so ambiguous.

01:07:43.000 It's unfamiliar.

01:07:44.000 It's strange.

01:07:45.000 And politics is the art of the possible.

01:07:47.000 Let's use words and ideas that are already resonant, that are already relevant.

01:07:53.000 And we can put a new spin.

01:07:56.000 We can have new ideas and new aesthetics, but let's use symbols, ideas, words, phrases that already appeal.

01:08:03.000 And a lot of the work is already done for us.

01:08:07.000 So that's my objection as to the phraseology.

01:08:09.000 But number two about the ethnostate is here's what it implies.

01:08:13.000 On a political theory level, the ethnostate implies a certain worldview that is very different from what conservatives believe about politics.

01:08:22.000 I still consider myself a conservative.

01:08:24.000 I don't consider myself like a neocon, a neoliberal.

01:08:27.000 I don't consider myself like a Ben Shapiro, national review conservative.

01:08:31.000 I consider myself of the same tradition as Otto von Bismarck, of Edmund Burke.

01:08:38.000 Cato the Elder of the Roman Empire, Metternich of Austria, Palmerston of Great Britain.

01:08:46.000 And we believe that a society evolves, it's not designed.

01:08:50.000 So when people talk about the ethnostate, what they're talking about is something that is dictated from the top down.

01:08:55.000 They're talking about a project.

01:08:57.000 When you talk about, well, what's the racial makeup?

01:08:59.000 What's the ideal quota?

01:09:01.000 What's this and that?

01:09:02.000 Well, you're talking about something that is designed, you're talking about something that is put in place, built, constructed on top of.

01:09:09.000 An organic and evolved order.

01:09:11.000 And I don't think politics works that way.

01:09:12.000 I think every time you see something like that, it fails.

01:09:15.000 This is what the communists believed.

01:09:16.000 This is what the Bolsheviks believed.

01:09:20.000 You know, Vladimir Lenin thought that with the Vanguard Party, with the Bolshevik Vanguard Party, they could skip the step.

01:09:27.000 Karl Marx believed that you would have this rural and feudal society like in Russia, which is where Russia was.

01:09:34.000 You would then have capitalism, and then capitalism would give birth to socialism.

01:09:38.000 Well, Lenin thought, well, we could just skip that capitalism part.

01:09:41.000 If we have an intellectual vanguard, we'll have a revolution and we'll have this vanguard.

01:09:45.000 And of course, Stalin was a Marxist and also a Leninist.

01:09:48.000 He said, let's collectivize the farms and we'll rapidly industrialize.

01:09:53.000 And that was a design.

01:09:54.000 And when you have design coming from the top down, these utopian and progressive schemes, it typically doesn't work too well.

01:10:01.000 People tend not to conform to the plan so well, plans tend to go awry.

01:10:05.000 And so I believe in an evolved, an evolutionary order.

01:10:08.000 And so let's choose the direction that we're going in.

01:10:12.000 And that will dictate what the ethno state will look at.

01:10:15.000 Not like let's sit down and, well, the ethno state will have this, that, and the other. 0.92

01:10:18.000 It'll be this percentage white, and these are the rules. 0.93

01:10:21.000 But rather, let's set a course. 0.93

01:10:22.000 Let's say that from now on, the demographics will be different. 0.97

01:10:26.000 Let's make it so that the white fertility rate is 2.5. 1.00

01:10:30.000 And let's just shore up our fertility rate. 0.92

01:10:32.000 And so you'll see the proportion of native stock increase against the stock of foreign born peoples. 0.70

01:10:40.000 And let's see where that goes in 50 to 100 years.

01:10:43.000 Let's make it so that our people, our young men, are becoming strong again and becoming educated again.

01:10:49.000 And they're having kids again and starting families and they're going to church.

01:10:52.000 And they start having six or seven or eight kids.

01:10:55.000 And they're strong and they go to work and they're virtuous people.

01:10:58.000 And let's see where it goes with that.

01:11:00.000 And so I'm a much bigger believer in that kind of an approach, of an evolutionary approach let's set a course, let's choose our direction, let's set our trajectory.

01:11:09.000 And this is how we build a movement that is fortified.

01:11:13.000 This is how we build a movement that is strong, that is resilient, is if you build it up with people, if it evolves, if it's organic, not if it's inorganic, not if it's forced, artificial from some kind of revolutionary vanguard.

01:11:25.000 I don't think it'll work very well that way.

01:11:28.000 Ian Weber, I've heard you praise Otto von a couple of times.

01:11:31.000 Before.

01:11:32.000 What do you like about him?

01:11:33.000 I don't know, other than he was a nationalist.

01:11:37.000 Well, I'm a big fan of Bismarck because, you know, above all, he was a protector of his people.

01:11:42.000 I mean, the story of Bismarck is that he acceded, you know, at the time, at the time when he entered statecraft in the 1860s as a foreign minister, Germany did not exist yet.

01:11:54.000 Germany was not created until 1871.

01:11:57.000 And so Bismarck came onto the scene and he acceded to power in Prussia.

01:12:01.000 And his project, over the course of his 20 year, 25 year political career was forcing through pragmatism, through opportunism, through pretty brilliant statecraft, the creation of the second German Reich, you know, the second German Empire, the successor to Charlemagne.

01:12:20.000 And so, for example, what he did to get the southern German states was he had, well, this was a really great thing that he did, was that he leaked a telegram to the German people that was this fight between France and Germany, and which essentially instigated a war between France and Prussia.

01:12:39.000 And at the time, he wanted the southern German states to join up with northern Germany, with Prussia.

01:12:44.000 And in order to do that, he leaked this telegram to the people.

01:12:47.000 They were outraged and they agitated for war.

01:12:50.000 And France eventually attacked.

01:12:51.000 They invaded. 0.56

01:12:53.000 They came out after Prussia.

01:12:54.000 And the southern German states said, We're not prepared to fight France.

01:12:57.000 We're not strong enough to fight France.

01:12:59.000 Prussia is the military powerhouse of Central Europe.

01:13:02.000 Let's join in with their confederation.

01:13:04.000 Let's join into a political union with them.

01:13:06.000 And that was how Bismarck created Germany.

01:13:08.000 And so, what I love about Bismarck was that he was not ideological.

01:13:12.000 I think that's the brilliance of Bismarck he was not ideological.

01:13:16.000 He was very hesitant to go to war.

01:13:18.000 Bismarck was one of the few great men in history, I think of the 20th century maybe, who understood the gravity of war.

01:13:26.000 You know, he said, when you go to war, you're rolling the iron dice in his words.

01:13:29.000 It's a toss up.

01:13:30.000 It's unpredictable.

01:13:31.000 Unlike politics, unlike diplomacy, where you can exercise a great deal of control, a great deal of influence, war, it's pretty much up to the circumstances, pretty much up to God.

01:13:42.000 And he also said that anybody who's eager to start a war should look into the eyes of somebody who's bleeding out on a battlefield.

01:13:49.000 And so I like that he was anti war.

01:13:51.000 I like the fact that he was a pragmatist.

01:13:55.000 I mean, there are a slew of reasons, but I mean, this was one of the last great statesmen, I think, of the 19th century.

01:14:02.000 And obviously, he wasn't active in the 20th century, but I think the loss of that kind of Bismarckian pragmatism, that loss of that Bismarckian realism, conservatism, Doesn't want radical transformation, but simply wants stability, simply wants what's best for the people.

01:14:19.000 I think that was lost, and that was a big precursor to a lot of what happened in the period of the Great Wars.

01:14:27.000 Thomas Howard, Nick, my guy, your description of the ethnostate is a bit of a straw man construction.

01:14:32.000 The Pilgrims built an ethnostate at Plymouth Rock.

01:14:36.000 Well, of course, you understand that was a settlement, right? 0.96

01:14:39.000 That was a settlement.

01:14:40.000 That was, in a very real sense of the word, a planned system because they went from an existing country to start a new country on a new land, on virgin soil.

01:14:52.000 So, I would say that's kind of a nonsense argument.

01:14:55.000 I'm not straw manning it.

01:14:57.000 Your refutation is saying, oh, well, actually, design is possible.

01:15:01.000 Well, sure, design is possible when you have no society that exists before it. 0.86

01:15:05.000 Even in that case, the Pilgrims came and they transplanted English Protestant civilization onto the American continent. 0.76

01:15:14.000 What they brought to America was not novel. 0.74

01:15:16.000 What they brought to America was not a radical repudiation of the past 50 years of British civilization, right?

01:15:24.000 I mean, it was still English.

01:15:25.000 It was still Protestant. 0.87

01:15:26.000 It was still individualist.

01:15:27.000 It was still liberal.

01:15:29.000 Maybe it was, it differed a little bit in terms of culture.

01:15:32.000 But even then, and then it evolved by itself.

01:15:35.000 It started out as a commune, and that didn't work.

01:15:37.000 So then they reverted to a market system.

01:15:40.000 And so, again, and again, I would say that that kind of design would be more plausible, more effective on virgin soil in a colony.

01:15:49.000 But of course, we're not in a colony, we're not on virgin soil.

01:15:52.000 We have a civilization that exists now.

01:15:54.000 I know if we went to the moon, I could say maybe we could try it.

01:15:58.000 If we went to Mars, I would say we could try it.

01:16:01.000 But we are in a very developed, advanced civilization where we're 200 and no, even longer.

01:16:06.000 I mean, the country's only been around for 240 years, but the settlement's been here for 400 years.

01:16:13.000 So I would say that that's kind of disingenuous, my guy.

01:16:15.000 But it looks like that's our last super chat.

01:16:17.000 We're about 20 minutes over, so we're going to call it an evening here.

01:16:21.000 We got a big casual Friday episode tomorrow.

01:16:23.000 So check us out.

01:16:25.000 We'll be in the live chat taking all your questions, having a little bit of fun.

01:16:28.000 Very cozy, very relaxed.

01:16:30.000 So join us, please, tomorrow.

01:16:32.000 Looks like we got one more super chat.

01:16:34.000 Thoughts on these Rand Paul comments?

01:16:36.000 Well, we went through it in the first 15 minutes of the show, so you can catch the replay of that.

01:16:41.000 We went pretty in depth on it earlier in the show.

01:16:43.000 But that's going to do it for us here tonight.

01:16:45.000 Remember, if you want to support the show, go to makersupport.comslash Nick J. Fuentes.

01:16:52.000 The link is in the description.

01:16:54.000 Five bucks a month on makersupport.

01:16:56.000 We'll get you an audio only format of the show.

01:16:58.000 You get priority on our bi weekly call in shows.

01:17:01.000 And a special role on our Discord server.

01:17:04.000 And if you're not going to use any of that, consider donating, making a monthly contribution just to keep the lights on, just to keep the show going.

01:17:12.000 It does help us do what we're doing out here.

01:17:15.000 And if you watch it frequently, if it brings you joy in your life, and you have a little bit of money to spare, feel free to contribute.

01:17:23.000 It's very helpful for us here on the show.

01:17:25.000 We are on the air Monday through Friday, 7 p.m. Central, 8 p.m. Eastern Standard Time.

01:17:29.000 Remember to subscribe, click the like button, or if you didn't like it, give us a dislike.

01:17:33.000 See who cares.

01:17:34.000 But give it a big fat like.

01:17:36.000 Click the notification button.

01:17:38.000 Leave us a comment.

01:17:39.000 Subscribe to the channel.

01:17:40.000 It helps when you press all the different buttons.

01:17:42.000 You know, it's kind of basic to talk about it, but it does help when you press the buttons for the algorithms, folks.

01:17:47.000 The algorithms.

01:17:49.000 But that's all for us tonight.

01:17:50.000 I'm Nicholas J. Fuentes.

01:17:51.000 This was America First, as always.

01:17:53.000 Thank you so much for watching.

01:17:54.000 Thank you to our super chatters.

01:17:57.000 Thank you to our premium members.

01:17:58.000 We couldn't do the show without you.

01:18:00.000 Thank you to everybody that patronizes the stream, that follows us around and watches the show.

01:18:05.000 You guys are the best, best audience in the whole world.

01:18:08.000 We will catch you tomorrow for our casual Friday episode.

01:18:11.000 Until then, have a great rest of your evening.

01:18:17.000 Americanism, not globalism, will be our credo.

01:18:24.000 It's going to be only America first.

01:18:28.000 America first. 0.99

01:18:33.000 The American people will come first once again. 0.99

America First - Nicholas J. Fuentes - February 08, 2018

Rand Paul is Right | America First Ep. 104

Episode Stats

Summary

Transcript