00:00:07.000My name is Nicholas J. Fuentes, and we have a great show for you tonight.
00:00:12.000Very exciting, coming hot off of another total victory, another crushing defeat, another crushing defeat delivered to the Zionists, delivered to the rootless transnational elite of the country, and happily delivered by yours truly here at America First.
00:00:51.000But of course, we've got to summarize.
00:00:52.000We have to summarize for people that maybe they didn't watch it, maybe they didn't catch the whole thing, they didn't see it yet.
00:00:58.000But last night, and I announced it on the show, I think last night at some point, that I was going on Warski after the show yesterday, and it was a pretty brutal, pretty bloody debate.
00:01:09.000Me versus, what's the guy's name, Halsey?
00:01:13.000Halsey English and pretty rough stuff.
00:01:17.000It ended up being about the Jewish question, which I wasn't anticipating.
00:01:20.000I wasn't sure what exactly he wanted to talk about, but now that I've learned he's Jewish, now it's not all that surprising that that was the one thing he wanted to talk about and why he hates me, why he's going to say all these nasty things.
00:01:33.000But it was a fun debate, I have to say, as always on the Andy Worski stream, it was a blast.
00:01:40.000Me, Worski, JF, this Halsey character, battling it out.
00:01:45.000Throwing hands, bringing the issues, and it was a fun time.
00:01:51.000But I think the victory in that stream last night was to demonstrate that you can be aware of Jewish influence and not be a crazy person.
00:02:02.000You can be aware, you can look at these patterns, you can see what's going on in Hollywood, you can see what's going on in the media, see what's going on in our country more broadly or our civilization at an even broader level.
00:02:13.000And you don't have to be a hater, you don't have to be a bigot, you don't have to be some.
00:02:19.000It doesn't have to be your obsession at every waking hour of the day, but you can be a rational person and simply observe that there is something going on here.
00:02:28.000You can just simply observe some of these patterns, which are undeniable.
00:02:31.000And funnily enough, you know, Halsey English, who gets on there and he has this preconception, he has this presumption of what my argument's going to be.
00:02:39.000We ended up basically agreeing on the most fundamental questions.
00:02:43.000I mean, sure, he used the typical Talmudic tricks of deception, trying to lie about the USS Liberty, trying to lie about.
00:02:52.000Jesus Christ in the Babylonian Talmud, and on and on and on.
00:02:55.000But we basically agreed on the fundamental premise, which is that you have this overrepresentation of Jewish people in media.
00:03:02.000It's not a result of intelligence, it's probably a result of group evolutionary strategy.
00:03:07.000And there is a prejudice that they exercise.
00:03:10.000Halsey says, Well, I don't really care.
00:03:14.000It doesn't really matter to me that Jewish people are overrepresented and they exert this influence on the media, they exert this prejudicial interest over the media.
00:03:23.000And of course, of course, he doesn't care because he is Jewish, you know, and that was a big part of the debate last night.
00:03:30.000I didn't even know he was of that persuasion.
00:03:33.000And with a name like Halsey English, you know, why would anybody think that?
00:03:37.000That's another big part of it, of the deception.
00:03:40.000You know, they have a tendency to change their names or use pseudonyms, and this is how they kind of get around it.
00:03:46.000You know, there's even prominent people in our own movement who change their names and who they forge documents and they try and do all kinds of things to pretend that they aren't something.
00:04:34.000Are opening themselves up to information that for a long time was taboo, for a long time was subject to this political correctness speech code.
00:04:42.000And hopefully now people are finally starting to wake up to these double standards and they can see that these facts are out there, this position is reasonable, and you don't necessarily have to be a certain kind of person to hold these positions.
00:04:53.000And I'm happy to go on there and clear it up for everybody.
00:04:58.000But with that out of the way, we got to get into the news, folks.
00:05:01.000We got to get into what is going on in the Senate.
00:05:06.000Now, we talked yesterday about how the Republican and Democrat leadership in the Congress had reached a deal on a long term budget proposal.
00:05:16.000If you recall, a couple of Mondays ago, Republicans and Democrats passed a short term spending bill to fund the government through February 8th, which is today.
00:05:25.000Fund the government through to midnight tonight.
00:05:27.000After the government shut down a couple of weeks ago, they came to an agreement on a short term spending bill, and the decision was that the Democrats would only sign that short term spending bill unless Mitch McConnell.
00:05:40.000Would negotiate with them on immigration.
00:05:42.000Well, it turns out that they got nowhere on immigration, even after three weeks.
00:05:47.000They got nowhere on the wall in diversity visa and chain migration.
00:05:51.000And here we are this week, right up against another hard deadline, another government shutdown.
00:05:56.000And the Democrats realized, I think, pretty early on in this instance, pretty early on in this cycle of running out of money, that they couldn't afford another shutdown, that electorally it would have been suicidal for them in the midterms, that they were blamed for the first government shutdown.
00:06:11.000You know, by many people, by a pretty significant margin compared to Republicans.
00:06:16.000And even if both parties got blamed, they would still be hurting because more Democrat seats are up for grabs and Republicans as incumbents in 2018 for the Senate.
00:06:24.000So they realized this week that they couldn't have it.
00:06:36.000We said, look, it's probably going to get resolved.
00:06:38.000They'll pass another short term spending bill, which will fund the government for six weeks.
00:06:44.000The short term spending bill, which is.
00:06:46.000In the works right now in the House and the Senate will fund the government through to March 23rd and it will eliminate all restrictions on borrowing by the government for a whole year.
00:06:57.000So, any debt ceiling, any kind of limits on government borrowing, that will be completely out the window for a year and it'll also fund the government for the next six weeks.
00:07:07.000And in the meantime, between now and March 23rd, when the government runs out of money again, in these six weeks, what is supposed to happen is that a long term spending bill will be written.
00:07:19.000And drafted and voted on and passed, hopefully.
00:07:22.000And that will fund the government through for the entire fiscal year all the way until September 30th.
00:07:28.000And we'll finally have a budget for the year of 2018.
00:07:32.000Now, we thought that that was going to go pretty smoothly.
00:07:35.000As of last night, we said it should pretty much be smooth sailing from here.
00:07:39.000They agreed on a budget, they agreed on something to pass to avert another government shutdown.
00:07:43.000But now, as things tend to happen, it's always something.
00:07:47.000Rand Paul, Senator Rand Paul of Kentucky, former 2016 presidential hopeful has jumped in and is blocking the vote in the Senate on the short term spending bill, on the six week spending bill.
00:08:00.000And the reason being, he says in his speech, is because when Republicans are in charge, they don't seem to have a problem with deficits.
00:08:08.000When Barack Obama was running trillion dollar deficits, $500 billion deficits throughout his presidency, Republicans complained and they were up in arms and they shut down the government and they campaigned against this.
00:08:21.000And Rand Paul says, Where are all the budget hawks now?
00:08:24.000Where are all those people now that were running massive deficits, that were growing the debt, that were not making any attempt to balance the budget, that there's another.
00:08:32.000$80 billion being injected in the short term bill for disaster relief, an additional $80 billion for the military, an additional $60 billion for other discretionary items.
00:08:45.000This is ending these sequestered cuts from 2011.
00:08:49.000And Rand Paul is saying, Where are the Republicans on this?
00:08:51.000The deficit is growing, the debt is growing, and all these people who in 2010, when we won the House, and 2014 when we won the Senate, and they ran on cutting the budget and they were going to be fiscally responsible, where are they now?
00:09:06.000And we understand where Rand Paul is coming from.
00:09:11.000And so often, this is what happens in politics you get caught up in it.
00:09:15.000You get caught up, and when your team is winning, when your team is governing, you want the budgets to pass because, of course, the reason being why parties who are in power are resistant to cutting the budget is because what has to go typically to make any significant cut in the deficit or the growth of federal spending is entitlements.
00:09:36.000Or major cuts to the federal agencies.
00:09:38.000And when that happens, when you make cuts to programs like Medicare or Social Security or Medicaid or welfare or unemployment, or even if you cut some significant budget pieces, some significant discretionary budget items for the agencies, then the same thing happens.
00:09:55.000You get the approval rating going down, and obviously that's a big problem electorally.
00:10:29.000I think he's one of the most respected guys on the Hill.
00:10:32.000He's one of the most respected guys in D.C., and certainly by the president, by myself, for going out there and saying this.
00:10:38.000And he is simply correct in the sense that.
00:10:41.000You look at our debt, you look at our deficit, and there is no exit strategy here.
00:10:47.000You talk about an exit plan, you look at our dire financial straits, and we talked about this during the last government shutdown.
00:10:53.000We talked about the extent to which the debt has grown and how there really is something wrong with our government financial system, and there is simply no answer for this.
00:11:03.000The debt right now sits at over $20 trillion.
00:11:07.000The unfunded obligations for the country, which is Medicare, Social Security, Medicaid, All the promises that we've made to people that are alive today and even unborn in some cases, we don't have the money for those even.
00:11:22.000We don't have the money for the promises we've made for in the future for 20 or 30 or 50 years down the road.
00:11:27.000That's another $110 trillion on top of the $20 trillion we have now.
00:11:32.000So we're looking at something like upwards of $130 trillion that our government does not have the money for, but that we need to pay, whether you're talking about current debt, which is accruing interest, or future debt, which will accrue interest and will accrue interest.
00:11:48.000And this is something like almost double the total amount of currency in the world.
00:11:54.000The World Bank estimates that there's about $80 billion, excuse me, $80 trillion in currency in the world.
00:12:02.000So you think about that, there's $80 trillion in money, $80 trillion in media of exchange, in money in the world, and we owe $50 trillion more than that.
00:12:13.000This country only produces a little bit more than $20 trillion in GDP in any given year.
00:12:18.000So everything that the country produces in a given year, the value of that is a fifth.
00:12:25.000Are increasingly coming to be a sixth of everything that we owe.
00:12:29.000So if we took everything that this country produces in a year and we did that for six years and we sold all of it, that would be the size of the debt that we have.
00:12:39.000And that's the magnitude of the problem here.
00:12:41.000And like I said, not only are we not beginning on that problem, not only do we not have any idea about it, not only can we really not do it at this point, but there's no plan for any time to do it in the near future.
00:12:54.000There is no exit strategy, there is no escape route here.
00:12:58.000And if that doesn't keep you up at night, I don't know if it should keep you up at night in the sense that you will probably not be around to see the worst of it.
00:13:06.000It will be our kids and their kids that are really going to pay for it.
00:13:09.000My generation will pay for it in a big way.
00:13:11.000But I mean, you know, my children, the next generation is going to be the ones that are really going to bleed because of this, where they will see things coming, collapsing down in a very real, very devastating way.
00:13:26.000Are we going to keep kicking the can down the road?
00:13:28.000I mean, there's no plan for solving this problem in 100 years, let alone in the next 10 years.
00:13:34.000And we understand the problem with the debt.
00:13:36.000You know, for people that are not initiated on this, is that we accumulate lots of debt and people kind of think, oh, the debt just kind of sits there and it's not really an issue.
00:13:48.000But people really don't know how finances work.
00:13:51.000When you have this debt sitting there, what happens is that it accrues interest.
00:13:55.000And ultimately, by 2070, the interest will.
00:13:59.000Come to accumulate to about 50% of tax revenues.
00:14:02.000And when 50% of the money the government brings in is just on interest for debt, it's not actually paying for anything.
00:14:08.000It's not paying for roads or military or health care or salaries for public sector workers, but it's simply just on interest to service the debt.
00:14:18.000And not only do you have the interest, but the problem is forget the debt for a moment, forget the interest, forget the debt for a moment.
00:14:25.000The problem is with entitlement spending.
00:14:26.000The fact that you have this snowballing amount of obligations.
00:14:30.000Where for Social Security and Medicare and Medicaid, there simply are not enough people paying into the system that are getting money out of the system.
00:14:39.000You know, when Social Security was founded in the 1930s, I believe it was the 1930s, there were more than 120 people paying into the system for every one beneficiary.
00:14:50.000So for every retiree who was taking a check, for every retiree who was collecting Social Security, there were 120 people, well over 120 people paying into the system.
00:15:01.000And so then, you know, it was sustainable.
00:15:04.000Because 120 people paying in, that's a lot more than the one person taking out.
00:15:08.000And also, you have to remember that the life expectancy was a lot lower, too.
00:15:11.000So you were lucky if you made it to be 65.
00:15:25.000So when the program was founded, it was 120, more than 120.
00:15:29.000Now it's less than three for every one beneficiary.
00:15:32.000And of course, people are living longer, people are retiring earlier.
00:15:37.000And of course, then you have the problem of people coming here from other countries and they take Social Security and they've never paid into the system.
00:16:37.000We don't really care about the numbers and the green stamps because countries need to take it over and Texas goes blue, and that's all fine and well.
00:16:44.000But you look at one of the predominant motivators for why our politicians bring in immigrants.
00:16:51.000And I think to a much larger extent in Europe, why they bring in immigrants.
00:16:54.000And it's because they need that low skilled worker.
00:16:58.000They need young, able bodied workers who are going to come over here and support this burgeoning welfare state.
00:17:04.000When we're looking at our demographics, and not just in terms of race, but in terms of age, and we look at in this country when the fertility rate is shrinking, and it used to be very high during the baby boom, but now the millennials were a very small generation, excuse me, the Generation X is a very small generation.
00:17:21.000Millennials was comparatively a small generation.
00:17:26.000And, you know, if things don't change, the next generation will be even smaller.
00:17:30.000You have this inverted pyramid where to support the top, to support the old people at the top, of which there are many and of which there are very few workers to support them getting their pensions and their entitlements and so on, you need to shore up the base of that pyramid with immigrant labor.
00:17:46.000And that's what's happening in many respects in Europe.
00:17:49.000That's why they're talking about bringing immigrants into Japan.
00:17:51.000They don't want to do it, but they may have to do it for financial reasons or they're being pressured to do it by certain interests.
00:17:58.000And that's a big reason why we're doing it in this country.
00:18:09.000I mean, the most that he can hold out, the soonest that they can vote on it, is, you know, he can only block it until 1 a.m. tonight.
00:18:17.000So, the government will shut down for an hour, and then the Senate will reopen, and then they can pass very quickly the budget.
00:18:23.000And so, if the government shuts down tonight, it'll be very brief.
00:18:27.000It'll be over probably before tomorrow even begins in any real way.
00:18:32.000So, I think this is maybe the right opportunity for him to take this and use it as, I don't know, maybe a spectacle to draw attention to this issue because it is one of those things.
00:18:45.000And it's one of those things where it won't make or break until it's already too late.
00:18:50.000You know, in 20 or 30 years, sometime within the next 20 or 30 years, when the dollar collapses because it has no value, when we find out that our stock market is built on assets that don't exist and it's just wild speculation.
00:19:05.000And our government is propped up on debt, and our entire economy is propped up on debt.
00:19:09.000And this is true all over the world, by the way.
00:19:11.000This is not a problem just confined to the United States, but China has a 200% debt to GDP ratio.
00:19:30.000And it's going to be okay, it's going to be tolerable until it isn't.
00:19:35.000One day it's going to blow up on all of us, the biggest debt bomb in the history of the world, and we will regret not having taken action on this.
00:19:43.000And it'll be the proverbial, it's happening, why didn't you do anything to stop it meme.
00:20:02.000Obviously, tomorrow we'll have a development on how successful it was that he blocked it.
00:20:06.000If there's any change, if they're going to shore up any spending or not, it's not going to change anytime soon.
00:20:12.000And it's not going to change because of the way that Congress works.
00:20:16.000For Congress to make any changes to the financial system, they would have to go against the people that support the reelection campaigns, right?
00:20:24.000So if you imagine you're in Congress and you're voting on a bill that would hurt the people that fund your next campaign in the next two years, there's no incentive for that to ever change.
00:20:36.000And outside of massive public pressure, which doesn't exist on an issue that's as boring, that's as dry as economics, there simply is not an incentive.
00:20:47.000You couldn't create it for a congressman to vote against this system, whether it's the Federal Reserve monetary system, whether it's this globalist trade scheme, or it's this fiscal system, or it's the entitlement system.
00:21:02.000You know, you look at the people that stand to gain from this, the people that are using the government as a conduit through which to direct money.
00:21:09.000From the pockets of the American people into the coffers of corporations and banks and other companies, and the government is just basically a channel.
00:21:18.000It is just a funnel to get that money from them to the big people.
00:21:23.000It's not going to stop because they fund the congressman.
00:22:18.000So I haven't gotten the pleasure of seeing it.
00:22:19.000I'm debating whether or not I'm going to see it.
00:22:21.000You know, I'll find it fun, just interesting, whatever.
00:22:25.000Today, where they used to have on Rotten Tomatoes, if you're familiar with Rotten Tomatoes, it's this movie review aggregator.
00:22:33.000So Rotten Tomatoes, they take all kinds of reviews from magazines and websites and they put them into a composite and they give it a rating and they say, you know, well, 50% of reviewers said it was good.
00:24:04.000And you should have seen this was a news story.
00:24:07.000This was a news story on real news sites.
00:24:10.000This was on the front page of Twitter.
00:24:14.000The front page of Twitter read today Black Panther has gotten its first negative review, and people are not happy.
00:24:22.000And all across Twitter, to the tune of tens of thousands of likes and retweets, you have people going into this review and saying, This reviewer didn't like the movie because it didn't have enough action sequences.
00:24:37.000You know, fresh rating on Ron Tomatoes because you didn't think there were enough action sequences.
00:24:42.000And this story just lays bare everything that we've been saying about the country.
00:24:49.000It exposes everything that's been happening in the country.
00:24:51.000I think it says it all right here, folks, where what you see is a pathetic, a pathetic and sad and downright evil condescension towards black people.
00:25:11.000People in this country, I guess the left, I guess liberals, I guess the Judeo Marxist left, which sees the black man as so pitiable, as so pathetic, that they have to make this movie for them.
00:25:24.000And they have to say, look, little guy, look, here's your big superior movie with your black director, and here are your blacks.
00:25:42.000And not only that, but the entire premise of the movie.
00:25:45.000The entire premise of the Black Panther movie is what?
00:25:48.000That you have this mystical secret country in Africa called Wakanda, where it was never touched by colonialism, it was never touched by Western imperialism.
00:25:58.000And because of that, it is the most technologically advanced civilization in the history of the world.
00:26:04.000They went to the moon, they created great technologies, they can fly, they have all this great stuff.
00:26:09.000They are great, proud warriors and technical geniuses.
00:26:18.000That there is, what, is there no glory?
00:26:20.000Is there no great history of these people that it has to be invented and then guarded with their sacred credibility in the mainstream media?
00:26:29.000That if anybody points this out, if anybody points out, well, you know, maybe it's just a movie, or maybe it's not even that good of a movie, they're going to be dragged through the mud, their review is going to be torn apart.
00:26:39.000That's not a sufficient reason for not liking the Black Panther movie.
00:26:53.000Why do they need a movie to create an image of Africans which is not violent, impoverished, ridden with disease, dysfunctional, broken, chaotic?
00:27:16.000By the way, we all intuitively know why, even if we're not aware that we know why, even if we don't allow ourselves to acknowledge the reason we know why, even though we all know it.
00:27:27.000Why is it that we see something like Wakanda?
00:27:29.000Why is it that we see something like Black Panther?
00:27:32.000And it is so outside of our experience.
00:28:12.000We want to pretend that the difference between an African and a European is that one person's skin color is dark and the other person's skin color is light.
00:28:22.000The only difference between a Frenchman and a Nigerian is the fact that they are different colors.
00:28:29.000In the same way that the only difference between an apple and a banana is that one is red and one is yellow.
00:28:34.000And the only difference between grass and dirt is that one is green and one is brown.
00:28:40.000And the only difference, you know, and we could list countless examples.
00:28:44.000But many people would like to believe, and I think they tell themselves, we have dedicated how much scholarship, how much apologetics to trying to explain away these differences as merely arbitrary, as merely owing to skin color.
00:28:59.000And that is what, is that not what our immigration system is based on?
00:29:02.000Is that not what our false American mythology of the past 50 years has been based on?
00:29:07.000This idea that if you have people that come over here from Latin America and people that come over here from Africa and people that come over here from Asia and people that come over here from Europe, and they all spend a little bit of time here, they all spend a little bit of time here assimilating.
00:29:23.000They learn English, they listen to rap music, they stuff their face with greasy McDonald's and fast foods.
00:29:30.000And our conception of our American identity is that, well, we can erase all those identities, they can all start fresh here because, of course, we are all the same.
00:29:40.000And so, when they come into America, as long as there's no racism, as long as there's no prejudice, as long as we don't talk about these differences, well, they will simply subside.
00:29:50.000Any kind of difference, any kind of differences between groups, or loyalty to groups, or allegiances to groups, or patterns between groups, it's merely owing to the fact that, well, they haven't spent enough time here, or, you know, there's other forces, there's other things going on.
00:30:06.000And all of this is in naive ignorance.
00:30:34.000But it comes down to so much of the Western canon, so much of Western dogma, liberal, secular Western dogma, is built on this presupposition.
00:30:44.000That we are all liberals in different colors.
00:30:59.000But we see time and time again when you have a movie like Black Panther, the absurdity, the ridiculousness of it just goes to show that there is something else going on here.
00:31:09.000And so you really got to feel for that reviewer who he didn't come up with a sufficient reason, he didn't come up with a good enough reason not to like Black Panther.
00:31:19.000And is that the case for any other movie?
00:31:22.000Is that the case for, you know, when there's a movie with white people in the future, does anybody say, wow, whoa, white people in space?
00:31:43.000Nobody says that because we actually went to the moon, because we actually build skyscrapers, because we actually build flying cars.
00:31:52.000And helicopters and planes and railroads and submarines and great ships.
00:31:57.000And we map the human genome and we've been there and we've done that and we've got the t shirt.
00:32:02.000And you got to ask yourself then, why is that not the case for the others?
00:32:06.000So every time they do this, they risk, I think, they risk people finding out because what the globalists do, what they're pushing here, is they're pushing so hard because they understand that if they don't act very quickly, our truth will spread.
00:32:21.000If they don't act very quickly to enforce their narrative, To silence people that are dissenting.
00:32:26.000They know that if things took their natural course, our message would get out there, it would resonate with people because it is the truth, and we would win the day and we would change what's going on in the country.
00:32:38.000But they understand that it's also kind of a gambit here because if they push too hard, if they make it too absurd, too ridiculous, too out there, well, then people are going to say, well, this is absurd and we're going to fall into that camp anyway.
00:32:51.000So they're trying to shoot the gap between not doing enough.
00:32:55.000That just by the nature of gravity, people come around to what is the truth, what is so obvious, what everybody sees every day of their lives, and what is our experience, and pushing so hard, making it so over the top, so ridiculous that it becomes apparent anyway.
00:33:10.000It's times like this when they go way too, way too hard, and people start to say, What the hell's going on?
00:33:17.000And a little bit in that vein, moving right along, a little bit in that vein, this is kind of similar.
00:33:22.000To tie these things in very nicely, this occurred, and this is another one of those moments where you say, Oh, so that's what's going on.
00:33:30.000This is one of those light bulb turning on moments for the boomer, for the average conservative, for the libertarian who can't quite explain, who does not quite have a coherent political ideology, doesn't quite account for things like mass immigration and race and so on.
00:33:47.000Nancy Pelosi, yesterday, in her eight hour House speech, her historic eight hour House speech, it wasn't technically a filibuster because filibusters can only occur in the Senate, but she held the floor of the House for a whopping eight hours.
00:34:03.000To speak in the service of, excuse me, the DACA recipients, the DACA illegal immigrants.
00:34:09.000And it wasn't really to do anything other than to draw attention to the plight of the young dreamers, the young illegal immigrants in the country who are about to be deported.
00:34:18.000And I don't know, it was a publicity stunt.
00:34:20.000Well, she goes up there and she speaks for eight hours.
00:34:57.000And Nancy Pelosi is telling this little story about a proud day for her, about a proud day in her life, about what her grandson said about his friend Antonio.
00:35:06.000She said, This was such a proud day for me because when my grandson blew out the candles on his birthday cake, he said, or excuse me, I said, Did you make a wish?
00:35:16.000He said, I wish I had brown skin and brown eyes like Antonio.
00:35:22.000Nancy Pelosi says, So beautiful, so beautiful.
00:35:27.000The beauty is in the mix, in the mixed race individuals.
00:35:31.000And it's moments like this when the mask slips a little bit.
00:35:35.000It's moments like this when all those decades, all those decades of carefully plotting, carefully building up the pieces, hiding, dodging, crafting these lies, crafting these sophisticated facades for their real agenda, it's moments like these, these little micro expressions, when it all becomes quite clear what's going on.
00:35:59.000When Nancy Pelosi says that she's proud, she is proud that her grandson hates who he is, looks in the mirror, sees his white skin, sees his blue eyes, and he says, I don't like that.
00:36:20.000And not only is that said, and maybe we could understand why a young person would have a naive thought like that, and why wouldn't they in a culture that all they do is celebrate?
00:36:32.000You know, all we see all day long, like that Netflix ad and like all these other countless things, is, you know, black excellence and black is beautiful and black is strong and black celebrities and black athletes and this and that.
00:36:45.000And the depictions of white people are miserable.
00:36:48.000The depictions of white men in particular are as these simpletons, these buffoons.
00:36:54.000When they're not simpletons and buffoons, when they're not Phil Dunphy from Modern Family, and oh, I'm just a goofy house dad, I can't seem to get anything right.
00:37:02.000I'm tripping over my own two feet, and I'm just a goofy guy who needs a woman in my life to remind me, and I need a black guy to tell me how to dance and be cool.
00:37:10.000And when they're not goofy like that, well, then they're evil.
00:37:13.000They're being blamed for the crimes of a very particular, close to white, but not quite white group.
00:37:19.000They're rapists, and they're evil, and they pillage, and they enslaved, and they choked everybody out of their wealth, and they stole the land, and they stole all the money, and they're evil, and they're rapists, and they're misogynists, and they're racists.
00:37:56.000Not only does this child believe that it's a bad thing to be white, not only does he envy people for being brown, and look, not that there's anything wrong with being brown, but You should love who you are.
00:38:05.000You should love the way God created you.
00:38:07.000You should love your own history, your own people, your own heritage.
00:38:11.000If you really believe in diversity, you would believe that.
00:38:15.000But Nancy Pelosi says it was a proud day that her grandson rejected his ancestors, rejected his heritage, rejected his history, rejected what God gave him, rejected what God made him to be.
00:39:03.000I would try my best to not get stabbed or robbed.
00:39:06.000But I would love to go down to Mexico and see the weather and enjoy the authentic Mexican food and enjoy the culture, go to the Aztec monuments, see the Great Pyramids.
00:40:42.000They bring with them 10,000 years of human evolution.
00:40:46.000They bring with them 3,000 years of culture, of civilization, of baggage, of their religion, of their values, their physiognomy, simple things like how they defecate, simple things like how they eat.
00:40:59.000Simple things like, do they make eye contact or do they not?
00:41:07.000I mean, you compare, for example, and people like to say, oh, well, America has diversity from Alabama to New York to California, and that's true.
00:41:16.000And Europe has diversity from Russia to Italy to the UK, and that's true.
00:41:20.000But compare and contrast a country like China with the United States and think of the differences.
00:41:47.000In China, they do characters, characters which are supposed to represent words and supposed to represent, in some sense, some kind of symbology.
00:41:55.000And they have an alphabet with thousands of different letters.
00:41:57.000I mean, this is just on the most fundamental level.
00:42:00.000And if you have read anything, if you've read McLuhan, if you've read anything about If you've read anything about thought, if you've read anything about linguistics, simple things like language, simple things that are different in the Germanic languages or in the Romantic languages, change how people think, change the way people see themselves and their relation to the world.
00:42:20.000And you imagine such a stark difference as between a phonetic alphabet and an alphabet that is based on characters.
00:42:28.000But then you also factor in things like monotheism.
00:42:32.000Not only is the West a Christian civilization, which is vastly different from.
00:42:37.000The Buddhist civilization or the Hindu civilization of the East or the Orient, but it's also a monotheistic system.
00:42:44.000It's one built around a church, built around a community, vastly different than China.
00:42:49.000And so, just you look at just two countries where the universalist, the liberal would say, oh, well, they come here and they buy McDonald's and that's all hunky dory.
00:43:12.000We've seen this in the race riots of the past 50 years.
00:43:15.000We see this in the fact that people choose to self segregate.
00:43:19.000The fact that, you know, racial animuses and religious animuses still have not been resolved and it looks like they will never be resolved.
00:43:27.000But even within, even within, you look at the statistics on race mixing and you'll find that when you have, and regardless of what your position on this, the facts are undeniable.
00:43:37.000Regardless of what your position is on this, I used to think there was nothing wrong with it until I saw the data.
00:43:42.000And the data that I saw showed that when you have mixed marriages between blacks and whites or whites and Hispanics or Asians and Hispanics or Asians and blacks and so on and so forth, is that you have A much higher propensity for the children to abuse drugs, much higher propensity for the children to have mental illness.
00:43:59.000So many things can go awry for the children, and you have to ask yourself, why is that?
00:44:09.000If the beauty is in the mix, why are they not loving this fact that, oh, they are the child of difference and they're going to bring about the universalist, you know, globo, homo race, you know, whatever?
00:44:37.000That is what the rootless transnationals want.
00:44:39.000They want to cut us off from our roots.
00:44:42.000They want to take, if we are trees, if we are, you know, if you cut a tree down and you see all its rings and you see its age, you see its rich age and it grows tall and thick and its branches grow long, if we are the branches, if we are the great evolution of so many years.
00:44:58.000Of our ancestors and our cultures and our civilizations, they want to chop us off right at our roots.
00:45:04.000They want to make us rootless like themselves.
00:45:07.000They want to chop us down and cut us off from any kind of identity racial, ethnic, national, religious, community.
00:45:17.000Well, when we are all these rootless people, when we are the mixture, when we are the unwashed mass, the unwashed amalgamation, the globo homo man.
00:45:49.000You know, we're supposed to buy the latest iPhone, and we're supposed to cram our mouths full of pills, drugs, alcohols, and numbing agents, and we're supposed to go out and have these hedonistic sex parties on the weekends.
00:46:02.000And that is their vision for the world, is to create this disassociated slave class.
00:46:28.000We've quite the pontification, quite the.
00:46:32.000We really laid it all out there, right?
00:46:34.000We're really, really earning those super chats tonight.
00:46:36.000But we're coming up here, 10 minutes to go, so we'll check our super chats.
00:46:40.000We'll see what people are saying here.
00:46:43.000We'll see how people have responded to my sermonizing, my conspiratorial, my wild sermonizing.
00:46:49.000You know, people could say, and I understand it.
00:46:52.000I understand why some people would be hesitant to show this to a mainstream kind of a person, to a conservative.
00:46:59.000But all of this stuff, you understand that this case, it all proceeds logically from these statements.
00:47:06.000That when you start to see that the biological, the sociological, the historical evidence simply does not support these presuppositions.
00:47:17.000This rhetoric that's been preached, that's been so artificially propped up, that has been made ubiquitous by design, you have to question why that is.
00:47:29.000Anybody who believes in diversity would not want to make this country beige.
00:47:33.000Anybody who truly believes in rich diversity and rich multiculturalism would not want to throw all these people in there and melt them down, put them in a meat grinder and grind them all out and make these patties and make the human meat patty.
00:47:52.000I mean, and that's essentially what they're doing.
00:47:53.000Throw in the German, throw in the Arab, throw in the Chinaman, throw in the Indian, throw in the Hispanic, the Amerindian, and let's grind it all up.
00:48:02.000And out comes this thick, black haired, beige person with no roots, no language, no ancestors.
00:49:56.000I think it's convenient in a lot of ways that every time I debate somebody on these questions, to be quite fair, their arguments would go a lot farther if they were pleasant.
00:50:08.000They would get a lot more mileage out of the sophistry that they push if they were simply pleasant to be around, if they presented as nice people.
00:50:16.000And I would have to say that Jacob Wolf maybe did the best job of this in terms of he looks like a normal enough guy.
00:50:23.000But even then, he was just outright lying about the Israeli nuclear program.
00:50:27.000But even like Will Chamberlain and this guy, they make it that they are the most unlikable, unpleasant people that you would want to have a debate with.
00:50:36.000And I don't even say that as a personal attack.
00:50:40.000But I say it as an objective observer that you have this guy who's making an argument, which is very thin, but he's also making it in such an unpleasant way.
00:50:48.000First of all, he's sitting there with poor posture.
00:51:12.000So, these people would get a lot more mileage out of their arguments if they were simply pleasant about them.
00:51:17.000And I think fundamentally what happens is they can never be pleasant about them because they are not confident in them, because they know the arguments don't stand.
00:51:46.000It's one of our greatest benefits, I think.
00:51:50.000It's one of the strengths of our side that we are fighting with the truth, and that tends to exercise these demons from inside them, and it makes them very difficult to rally behind.
00:52:22.000Pragmatic culture says Do you think the Fed will bring back inflation in a big way to help pay back the debt, especially because they're raising interest rates?
00:52:31.000Well, you understand that in a big way, the inflation is what's driving the debt, in the sense that a big way that they pay for the programs is simply by printing more money.
00:52:41.000And you know this because they stopped publishing the statistics.
00:52:45.000I believe it's the M. What is it, the M3 statistics, I believe?
00:52:53.000It's been a long time since I was in macroeconomics, but the most detailed numbers on Federal Reserve open market transactions, the most detailed numbers on how much money is being printed, how much the quantity of money in circulation is increasing, they stopped publishing those a long time ago, and that tells you a lot.
00:53:13.000Quantitative easing has been in place for a long time.
00:53:16.000You've had near zero interest rates for 10 years, and so nothing but inflation has gone on.
00:53:22.000The inflation rate hasn't gone up, but In effect, that's what's happened in order to subsidize this debt spending, in order to subsidize this economy, which is built on cheap and easy credit, there's nothing but inflation at the core of it.
00:53:36.000So, absolutely, and they will have to keep inflating the money supply because there simply is nothing behind the growth in the economy.
00:53:45.000When the stock market soars past 26,000 points, what you're seeing now when the stock market is tumbling is a correction.
00:53:54.000And we believe, people that are more classically minded on economics, that the stock market and the economy is a reflection of the resources in the economy.
00:54:03.000And sometimes the speculation gets out of control, and sometimes people overvalue, you overbuy the economy, and then there's a correction when there is simply not enough value in the economy that underlies what people believe there is.
00:56:01.000And then we hear that all day long black people moaning, and, you know, we want to be white because, you know, white people get all the perks, white people get all the benefits.
00:56:13.000And, you know, we're so sick of the whining.
00:56:17.000I mean, could you imagine if Mitch McConnell got on the floor of the Senate and said something like, black people wish they were white, right?
00:56:24.000Or if Ben Carson said that his son or his grandson said, I wish I was white and I was proud of him, could you imagine?
00:56:31.000Could you imagine the names they would call him?
00:56:33.000But it's kind of useless to go about double standards, but it is useful to say that there's something not right here.
00:56:51.000And for all the people that said Catholicism is universalist and it means that there can't be nations, if you read the New Testament, and if you read like the first four books of the New Testament, in each of them, Jesus Christ says, subtly, but he says that the nations will end.
00:57:09.000The nations will be around until the end of time.
00:57:11.000Jesus Christ writes about when God is coming again.
00:57:14.000When Jesus Christ comes again, he says the nations will be at war with each other.
00:57:20.000And so that's a subtle way of essentially affirming the fact that nations will exist until the end of time.
00:57:24.000And of course, God created the nations in the story of Genesis with the Tower of Babel.
00:57:30.000When people were all together, working all together for one project under one society, and they were building the great Tower of Babel that would penetrate the heavens, what did God do?
00:57:42.000He smashed it and he scattered the people and he made them speak in strange tongues.
00:57:48.000So it's just, you know, there's just no basis for it.
00:57:50.000I mean, the whole Old Testament is about nations.
00:57:53.000The whole Old Testament is about tribes and nations and walls and borders and kingdoms.
00:57:59.000For anybody to say that, you know, Christianity is cucked, they don't know the history and they don't know the scripture.
00:58:06.000Ari Shekel says, Globo Homo gives me a religious experience, Goy.
00:58:10.000I love that phrase, Globo Homo, because at once it means like a hominid, at once it means like a classification of a genus, you know, Globo Homo.
00:58:53.000Halsey, he starts out in the debate alleging, based on no evidence, based on what I believe is a total misunderstanding of how Twitter works, which is to be expected from a boomer, that I am using all kinds of alt accounts.
00:59:53.000But yeah, thank you to Marcus Antonius for clearing that up for me.
00:59:57.000While I was, excuse me, while I was in the middle of the broadcast, I stopped for a moment.
01:00:02.000I don't know if you saw it, it was pretty quick to make that little donation there to whip out my credit card and put in all the information to create the illusion that I wasn't doing that.
01:00:12.000The Bible and a beer with a single shekel.
01:00:38.000And, you know, look, generally speaking, if people ask me to debate, even if they're lower on the totem pole, Or, you know, in terms of follower count, if I have nothing to gain from it, typically if there's a good debate to be had, I'll entertain it.
01:00:51.000You know, I brought on Millennial Matt to have a debate, and there was nothing really to gain from that.
01:00:56.000I brought on Ricky Vaughn the other day on my show just to discuss, and there was nothing really to gain from that.
01:01:02.000And so, if Halsey wanted to come on the show, I mean, even with Will Chamberlain, the guy got no engagement.
01:01:07.000Jacob Wohl has less engagement than me.
01:01:11.000I'm pretty sympathetic because I like controversy, I like fights.
01:03:17.000And this is something I talk about on the show all the time.
01:03:20.000In the age of mass communications, initially, and this was inaugurated in the 1920s with radio, after the 1940s with television, with cable television in the 1980s, what you have in the past 100 years in liberal, free, democratic societies is gatekeepers of information.
01:03:37.000You know, you had the era of the printing press, then you had the era of mass.
01:03:41.000Media, which is audio and visual and cable.
01:03:45.000And for that time, you had the gatekeepers.
01:03:47.000And under those 100 years, you had rules for the gatekeepers where there was an equal time rule.
01:03:54.000There wasn't this political correctness police.
01:03:56.000For example, you could go on the Christopher Hitchens show even in the 1990s and talk about the Holocaust or talk about white nationalism.
01:04:03.000And there were rules up until the 1980s that right and left would have equal time.
01:04:08.000And so there were different rules as well.
01:04:11.000But now we're entering an age where mass communications.
01:04:14.000Whereas before this consolidation of media ownership in a few hands, before it was decentralized and you could probably get out there and there wasn't this PC mob, you can get something out there to some extent or you could buy up a TV station or a radio station, you could get decent circulation in print.
01:04:29.000Nowadays, 95% of media is controlled by six corporations.
01:04:35.000And you understand that those six corporations aren't going to let fringe dissident political opinions into the mainstream.
01:05:00.000New York Times barely has good circulation anymore.
01:05:03.000They can barely keep their offices up and running and pay their bills.
01:05:07.000And so, what's the alternative in the 21st century?
01:05:09.000It's the decentralized, the new utilities, the mass media, the social media, the Twitter, YouTube, Facebook.
01:05:15.000Facebook, and in the absence of a free market of ideas in conventional media, conventional mass media, our only recourse in a free and open society to get ideas out there, to introduce candidates, is through social media.
01:05:30.000And when even these now are coming under consolidation in very small hands, Mark Zuckerberg controls Facebook.
01:05:37.000He controls a website that is a medium of communication for 2 billion people, for a fourth of the world's population.
01:05:45.000Twitter, controlled by Jack Dorsey and his arbitrary cadre of censors.
01:05:51.000That's a real challenge for the free world, for the West.
01:05:57.000And so the solution, which has been proposed by Paul Nealon, is you have shall not censor legislation.
01:06:02.000You put it in place that these institutions are trusts.
01:06:06.000And unless you want the U.S. government to go in and bash these people up, go in and bash these corporations up and say Twitter has a monopoly on short form content, YouTube has a monopoly on video content, Facebook has a monopoly on the social content, unless We're going to break up these trusts and introduce competition to the marketplace.
01:06:26.000Well, then you're going to have to submit to regulation.
01:06:30.000And the founders would be behind this.
01:06:32.000I don't think, you know, Ben Franklin and Thomas Jefferson and Alexander Hamilton would have said, no, you know, it's not government, and therefore you can have mass censorship.
01:06:41.000You can have all the media controlled by six corporations and all the social media controlled by like five guys.
01:07:56.000We can have new ideas and new aesthetics, but let's use symbols, ideas, words, phrases that already appeal.
01:08:03.000And a lot of the work is already done for us.
01:08:07.000So that's my objection as to the phraseology.
01:08:09.000But number two about the ethnostate is here's what it implies.
01:08:13.000On a political theory level, the ethnostate implies a certain worldview that is very different from what conservatives believe about politics.
01:08:22.000I still consider myself a conservative.
01:08:24.000I don't consider myself like a neocon, a neoliberal.
01:08:27.000I don't consider myself like a Ben Shapiro, national review conservative.
01:08:31.000I consider myself of the same tradition as Otto von Bismarck, of Edmund Burke.
01:08:38.000Cato the Elder of the Roman Empire, Metternich of Austria, Palmerston of Great Britain.
01:08:46.000And we believe that a society evolves, it's not designed.
01:08:50.000So when people talk about the ethnostate, what they're talking about is something that is dictated from the top down.
01:10:22.000Let's say that from now on, the demographics will be different.
01:10:26.000Let's make it so that the white fertility rate is 2.5.
01:10:30.000And let's just shore up our fertility rate.
01:10:32.000And so you'll see the proportion of native stock increase against the stock of foreign born peoples.
01:10:40.000And let's see where that goes in 50 to 100 years.
01:10:43.000Let's make it so that our people, our young men, are becoming strong again and becoming educated again.
01:10:49.000And they're having kids again and starting families and they're going to church.
01:10:52.000And they start having six or seven or eight kids.
01:10:55.000And they're strong and they go to work and they're virtuous people.
01:10:58.000And let's see where it goes with that.
01:11:00.000And so I'm a much bigger believer in that kind of an approach, of an evolutionary approach let's set a course, let's choose our direction, let's set our trajectory.
01:11:09.000And this is how we build a movement that is fortified.
01:11:13.000This is how we build a movement that is strong, that is resilient, is if you build it up with people, if it evolves, if it's organic, not if it's inorganic, not if it's forced, artificial from some kind of revolutionary vanguard.
01:11:25.000I don't think it'll work very well that way.
01:11:28.000Ian Weber, I've heard you praise Otto von a couple of times.
01:11:33.000I don't know, other than he was a nationalist.
01:11:37.000Well, I'm a big fan of Bismarck because, you know, above all, he was a protector of his people.
01:11:42.000I mean, the story of Bismarck is that he acceded, you know, at the time, at the time when he entered statecraft in the 1860s as a foreign minister, Germany did not exist yet.
01:11:57.000And so Bismarck came onto the scene and he acceded to power in Prussia.
01:12:01.000And his project, over the course of his 20 year, 25 year political career was forcing through pragmatism, through opportunism, through pretty brilliant statecraft, the creation of the second German Reich, you know, the second German Empire, the successor to Charlemagne.
01:12:20.000And so, for example, what he did to get the southern German states was he had, well, this was a really great thing that he did, was that he leaked a telegram to the German people that was this fight between France and Germany, and which essentially instigated a war between France and Prussia.
01:12:39.000And at the time, he wanted the southern German states to join up with northern Germany, with Prussia.
01:12:44.000And in order to do that, he leaked this telegram to the people.
01:12:47.000They were outraged and they agitated for war.
01:13:31.000Unlike politics, unlike diplomacy, where you can exercise a great deal of control, a great deal of influence, war, it's pretty much up to the circumstances, pretty much up to God.
01:13:42.000And he also said that anybody who's eager to start a war should look into the eyes of somebody who's bleeding out on a battlefield.
01:13:51.000I like the fact that he was a pragmatist.
01:13:55.000I mean, there are a slew of reasons, but I mean, this was one of the last great statesmen, I think, of the 19th century.
01:14:02.000And obviously, he wasn't active in the 20th century, but I think the loss of that kind of Bismarckian pragmatism, that loss of that Bismarckian realism, conservatism, Doesn't want radical transformation, but simply wants stability, simply wants what's best for the people.
01:14:19.000I think that was lost, and that was a big precursor to a lot of what happened in the period of the Great Wars.
01:14:27.000Thomas Howard, Nick, my guy, your description of the ethnostate is a bit of a straw man construction.
01:14:32.000The Pilgrims built an ethnostate at Plymouth Rock.
01:14:36.000Well, of course, you understand that was a settlement, right?
01:14:40.000That was, in a very real sense of the word, a planned system because they went from an existing country to start a new country on a new land, on virgin soil.
01:14:52.000So, I would say that's kind of a nonsense argument.
01:16:56.000We'll get you an audio only format of the show.
01:16:58.000You get priority on our bi weekly call in shows.
01:17:01.000And a special role on our Discord server.
01:17:04.000And if you're not going to use any of that, consider donating, making a monthly contribution just to keep the lights on, just to keep the show going.
01:17:12.000It does help us do what we're doing out here.
01:17:15.000And if you watch it frequently, if it brings you joy in your life, and you have a little bit of money to spare, feel free to contribute.
01:17:23.000It's very helpful for us here on the show.
01:17:25.000We are on the air Monday through Friday, 7 p.m. Central, 8 p.m. Eastern Standard Time.
01:17:29.000Remember to subscribe, click the like button, or if you didn't like it, give us a dislike.