America First - Nicholas J. Fuentes - Remembering the Russian Revolution | America First Ep. 48

00:00:01.000 Good evening, everybody.

00:00:02.000 You are watching America First.

00:00:03.000 My name is Nicholas J. Fuentes.

00:00:05.000 We have a great show for you tonight. 1.00

00:00:07.000 Sorry to report, there are no trannies on this program, no based black frauds, no Jewish homosexual liberals. 1.00

00:00:16.000 So I know we just got finished with a very entertaining stream on the Rubin Report that we've all been watching, we've all been commenting on about Twitter. 1.00

00:00:25.000 Sorry to report, it's not going to be as exciting. 1.00

00:00:28.000 We don't have as many wild card minority elements there. 0.90

00:00:32.000 To include just a white Christian guy trying to do the best for the country.

00:00:37.000 So, no drama. 0.52

00:00:39.000 But have you guys been watching that?

00:00:41.000 Has anybody else been watching that?

00:00:42.000 I tried to watch it.

00:00:44.000 I have been trying to watch it, you know, in preparing for my show about a half hour ago.

00:00:49.000 I was turning it on and off for like 10 or 15 seconds. 0.92

00:00:52.000 I just can't stand it because it's just so inane and nonsensical.

00:00:57.000 And the people involved are just so uninteresting.

00:01:00.000 I mean, that's, I think, the biggest crime of this whole.

00:01:03.000 Like, new right faction.

00:01:05.000 It's just not interesting.

00:01:06.000 You know, the Rubin Report, what Dave Rubin set out to do when he launched his show was to have these conversations.

00:01:13.000 And I so hate people who talk about conversations and dialogue.

00:01:18.000 That is an excuse for somebody who has nothing to talk about.

00:01:21.000 Like, if you're talking about talking, you have nothing interesting to say.

00:01:25.000 I'm sorry.

00:01:26.000 I mean, maybe you talk about that on the side.

00:01:28.000 Maybe that's like a passing observation about the state of the dialogue.

00:01:32.000 But forgive me if I'm.

00:01:36.000 If I'm misidentifying this, but I believe Dave Rubin's entire ideology, his entire profession, his entire person, his belief system is let's have a conversation.

00:01:47.000 Let's talk about the conversation.

00:01:50.000 It is literal semantics.

00:01:52.000 Trivial semantics is the definition of his ideology in his show.

00:01:58.000 And maybe it would be an interesting show if you had interesting people.

00:02:02.000 He sets out to be kind of like this William F. Buckley type person.

00:02:07.000 Right?

00:02:08.000 And for the youngsters who don't know William F. Buckley, you know, the British guy back in the day who would have on the great minds of the 70s and 80s, and they would discuss politics and culture, he had on people like Ayn Rand, people like Friedrich Hayek, Thomas Sowell, Milton Friedman, who you might not necessarily agree with them on their ideology, but they were interesting.

00:02:29.000 You watch this program that he set up, and who does he have on? 0.90

00:02:32.000 He has on all these skeptics, all these fat pigs, these atheists. 1.00

00:02:37.000 Fat pigs with the fedoras. 1.00

00:02:39.000 He brings on the trannies. 1.00

00:02:40.000 He brings on the Jewish people, the rabbis, the blacks. 1.00

00:02:45.000 And you know that's why he brings them on, because, you know, the very basis of their skin color. 1.00

00:02:48.000 It's not like anything interesting is coming out of here. 0.98

00:02:51.000 It's just interesting what's going on here.

00:02:54.000 You know, we're going to hear the same talking points, the same nonsense about identity politics, the same stuff about small government, this vapid people should be free, people should have rights. 0.84

00:03:06.000 From the catalog, from the pamphlet, we have Guy Benson, the homosexual. 0.97

00:03:11.000 We have Red Pill Black, the black based feminist. 1.00

00:03:14.000 We have Blair White, the tranny. 1.00

00:03:17.000 We have Ben Shapiro, the orthodox Jew. 0.99

00:03:19.000 We have Sargon, the atheist. 0.99

00:03:21.000 And of course, this is presided over, presided over, of course, of course, as always, by our left leaning liberal homosexual degenerate Jew. 0.99

00:03:32.000 So that's the Dave Rubin program. 1.00

00:03:34.000 It's just frustrating because it's a missed opportunity.

00:03:37.000 That's what's frustrating about it, I think, in my opinion.

00:03:41.000 Because here you have a program that has a lot of followers, that has a market for this.

00:03:45.000 Kind of thing where people are talking about right wing type things, but you have a person that is uninterested in ideas, a person that is interested in personalities.

00:03:56.000 I use that term loosely, of course, relatively speaking.

00:04:00.000 It's a great opportunity for people to come on the show and actually talk about intellectual things.

00:04:05.000 There is a shortage, I will say, of interesting intellectual people in this day and age.

00:04:10.000 I guess maybe that's an excuse.

00:04:11.000 But, for example, people like myself, people like Richard Spencer, and it's not even just alt right people.

00:04:18.000 But who's that Czech guy?

00:04:22.000 Who's the one that Comrade Stump likes?

00:04:24.000 Zizek. 1.00

00:04:25.000 Have Zizek on.

00:04:26.000 That would be an interesting interview.

00:04:27.000 There's a guy who, you know, it's communist, it's left wing, it's communist.

00:04:31.000 It's a little bit mainstream with the skeptics, but it's interesting.

00:04:34.000 He's an interesting guy.

00:04:35.000 He's a personality.

00:04:36.000 But they have on all these, oh, it's just so nothing.

00:04:39.000 It just defends me.

00:04:40.000 It insults me.

00:04:41.000 You know, because I could go on that show and ruffle some feathers saying things that people wouldn't agree with, but that people haven't heard before.

00:04:48.000 Say things that people haven't thought about it that way before. 0.98

00:04:51.000 And he has on the tranny and the black, you know, and this ridiculous thing. 0.98

00:04:56.000 So that's Dave Rubin. 0.98

00:04:57.000 Not to go on too much about that.

00:04:59.000 But I just see this and I think, is this what the right wing is supposed to look like?

00:05:03.000 Does anybody think that's correct?

00:05:04.000 I mean, I know people.

00:05:06.000 In recent times, have made a fetish out of like redefining the Republican Party and redefining the right wing in the image of the left.

00:05:15.000 There's this sick goal, this sick self hating pathology on the right, where anything that looks like the right, anything that looks like America, or anything the right used to value is wrong.

00:05:26.000 It's a leftist caricature.

00:05:28.000 We're actually the party of diversity. 1.00

00:05:31.000 We're actually the party of blacks and Indians and degenerates and trannies. 1.00

00:05:38.000 And that I don't think anybody believes that's right. 1.00

00:05:40.000 I don't think anybody in their right mind thinks the right wing is about small government and black people and trannies. 1.00

00:05:48.000 And not like there's anything wrong with any of those things, but what are the virtues? 1.00

00:05:51.000 What are the core values?

00:05:54.000 Is it liberty?

00:05:55.000 Is it libertinism?

00:05:56.000 Is it do whatever you want?

00:05:58.000 Don't have any discipline?

00:05:59.000 Do whatever you feel?

00:06:01.000 Do whatever.

00:06:01.000 Exercise every impulse that comes to you.

00:06:05.000 I don't think that's it.

00:06:06.000 I don't think that's the right wing.

00:06:08.000 I think if you look at the past 2,000 years of the right wing, And of traditionalist conservatism.

00:06:14.000 I don't think you'll find a lot of strains of small government, do what you feel, do whatever you want, care about only yourself, care about only the individual.

00:06:23.000 I think you hear a lot about tradition.

00:06:26.000 I think you hear a lot about order, wisdom, intuition, these, nature.

00:06:32.000 These are the defining things of the right wing, not this classical liberal enlightenment nonsense that has dominated everything now.

00:06:42.000 There is no right wing in the country anymore.

00:06:44.000 There's no right wing.

00:06:45.000 Everything has been shifting to the left.

00:06:48.000 And anybody that wants to resist this in any capacity is defamed by both the right and the left.

00:06:54.000 You understand this.

00:06:56.000 Anybody who is remotely right wing is associated with Adolf Hitler.

00:07:00.000 And of course, Hitler, we can't look at his ideology.

00:07:04.000 Benito Mussolini, Francisco Franco, they're all part of the same evil right wing. 0.72

00:07:10.000 Or they're all collectivists, right?

00:07:12.000 Or they're Democrats.

00:07:13.000 All these categories.

00:07:14.000 But nobody wants a legitimate right wing in the country.

00:07:17.000 Nobody will heed the voice of order, of discipline, of tradition, of restraint, nature.

00:07:25.000 Nobody wants to hear that.

00:07:28.000 They want to hear different people in different colors, of different ages, from different countries telling people do whatever you want, do whatever you like.

00:07:36.000 Nobody will judge you.

00:07:38.000 The people of the past were wrong and they don't matter and we're smarter than them.

00:07:43.000 That's all anybody wants to hear anymore.

00:07:45.000 You understand why?

00:07:46.000 I mean, you get a lot of dopamine when you do the things you feel, when you do the impulses.

00:07:50.000 It's a very personal thing for people.

00:07:54.000 When you have people who are saying you are wrong, you're in the wrong place, you're doing the wrong things, then suddenly it becomes an issue.

00:08:04.000 Then suddenly people don't want to hear that.

00:08:06.000 It's authoritarian, it's big government, it's statist.

00:08:09.000 The real divide is between moral relativism, liberalism ostensibly, and conservatism, which is an objective reality, an objective morality, objective rules, order, hierarchy, institutions.

00:08:24.000 That's the real divide, if you want to know.

00:08:27.000 You know, it's not liberal Dave Rubin saying we can have low taxes and people can do whatever they want. 0.68

00:08:34.000 And Ben Shapiro, another, an Orthodox Jew instead of a reformist Jew, secular Jew.

00:08:39.000 What does that mean if it's a religion? 0.93

00:08:41.000 Ben Shapiro saying you can do whatever you want, but I'm just not going to be okay with it.

00:08:45.000 That is not a political spectrum.

00:08:46.000 That is not a divide.

00:08:48.000 One person saying do whatever you want and that's fine, another person saying do whatever you want and I won't agree with it.

00:08:53.000 That is, that's not a divide. 1.00

00:08:56.000 The real divide is all these clowns, all these jerks. 1.00

00:08:59.000 These frauds, the merchant right, and you have the voice of reason. 1.00

00:09:04.000 Well, actually, not so much, actually, the voice of intuition, the voice of God, Vox Dei.

00:09:10.000 Not Vox Dei, the personality, Vox Dei, the Latin expression, Vox Dei, D E I, the voice of God.

00:09:19.000 And how kind of pretentious that he named himself the voice of God.

00:09:22.000 But anyway, that's Dave Rubin.

00:09:24.000 We got a lot to talk about.

00:09:25.000 I know that was supposed to be the intro, but then we jumped into some rant there about what's going on.

00:09:30.000 And there I am talking about the conversation.

00:09:32.000 Really, it's more about meta politics.

00:09:34.000 There's a lot of news going on today.

00:09:36.000 It's been a very busy week.

00:09:38.000 It continues to be a busy week.

00:09:39.000 We have a governor's race in Virginia, which is wrapping up, not looking so hot.

00:09:44.000 Well, depending on how you evaluate it, I suppose.

00:09:47.000 We have a debate coming up tomorrow between myself and Destiny.

00:09:53.000 A little rematch from the first debate that we had on this show.

00:09:59.000 Another burp.

00:10:00.000 And Electric Boogaloo stream on Lauren Southern's channel on Sunday.

00:10:04.000 So we got a rematch with Destiny about immigration.

00:10:06.000 And I know people are going to say, oh, you know, this guy again, we're going to do that again.

00:10:10.000 We don't want to hear him again. 1.00

00:10:12.000 He's a spurg, whatever. 1.00

00:10:13.000 I've heard it all before. 0.93

00:10:15.000 The reason I want to have him on is because I think he is a good left wing person who is smart and I think epitomizes a lot of what the left wing is feeling and how they express themselves.

00:10:27.000 That's why I think he's an important person to have on.

00:10:30.000 Not because I like, don't get me wrong, I don't like having this guy on to autistically misread my arguments and put words in my mouth and quote studies that don't exist.

00:10:40.000 I don't enjoy it.

00:10:40.000 I don't.

00:10:42.000 Okay.

00:10:43.000 Nobody's sitting at home and going, more destiny.

00:10:46.000 That's exactly what we want.

00:10:47.000 We want more of this video game player yelling about things he doesn't understand that we intuitively know are wrong.

00:10:55.000 But it's productive to have him on for me to build my skill set, but also, I think, for us to better understand how to deal with these people.

00:11:03.000 I'm going to try a little bit of a different approach tomorrow.

00:11:06.000 And if you saw our first debate, I tried a very different approach.

00:11:09.000 Go back and watch that debate.

00:11:11.000 I tried a very different approach than most people do.

00:11:14.000 You watch some of Destiny's stream andor other debates with other video game players and other people, and I think that the mistake that people make is there is no system.

00:11:24.000 There is not a systematic understanding of virtues and values and actions. 0.55

00:11:31.000 And I say this in a very deliberate way in the sense that nobody has asked Destiny under what conditions he would say he doesn't want immigration.

00:11:40.000 Nobody has asked Destiny if immigration is axiomatic to him, if it's axiomatic to him.

00:11:46.000 That we bring people in and that diversity is a good thing and that material wealth is better than this more spiritual, admittedly more abstract concept of community.

00:11:58.000 Nobody's asked him that.

00:11:59.000 Nobody has asked him to define what his values are, what his virtues are, under what conditions he would see an issue with immigration, what he thinks of our position.

00:12:09.000 So I think if we undertake it in a more systematic way, I think that'll shed some light on.

00:12:16.000 This debate that's been going on.

00:12:18.000 And I think it'll help us find better and more persuasive arguments and methods to get people on our side with immigration.

00:12:25.000 I think that's a very big problem because we have a very convincing case on immigration, right?

00:12:30.000 I mean, we have statistics about crime, we have statistics about terrorism, statistics about economics, about labor, statistics about community, family, happiness.

00:12:40.000 I mean, all kinds of things, historical examples.

00:12:43.000 And just fundamentally, the virtue that we like people that look like us and sound like us and talk like us.

00:12:49.000 Are of the same stock and of the same country.

00:12:52.000 We have a strong argument.

00:12:53.000 And yet, about half the country and a lot of the youth say that bringing more people in is axiomatic a good thing.

00:13:00.000 And I think if we broke that down and we really interrogated that topic, I think we could find better ways because we're not doing it right now.

00:13:09.000 Donald Trump is the only one that's doing a good job of this.

00:13:11.000 Everybody else, not so much.

00:13:13.000 Republican Party is failing.

00:13:15.000 Alt-right, not doing so hot on this issue.

00:13:17.000 Alt-light, not doing great on this issue.

00:13:19.000 So, we're going to try and find that.

00:13:20.000 But that's tomorrow.

00:13:21.000 That's our big debate with Destiny tomorrow.

00:13:24.000 Today's the 100th year anniversary of the Russian Revolution.

00:13:28.000 And, of course, there was a news story that came out in the New Yorker today, all right, maybe it was yesterday, that Harvey Weinstein hired Mossad agents to spy on his sexual abuse victims.

00:13:39.000 Isn't that rich?

00:13:40.000 So, lots to get to.

00:13:41.000 I think we'll start with what should we start with on this fine day today?

00:13:46.000 What are we starting with?

00:13:47.000 Why don't we start with.

00:13:49.000 How do we start with the Russian Revolution? 1.00

00:13:51.000 I think this is a good one, okay?

00:13:53.000 I know it's not so topical, it's not current events, but it's big.

00:13:56.000 It's huge.

00:13:57.000 Hundred year anniversary of the Russian Revolution, which of course happened.

00:14:02.000 Technically, it was in October of 1917.

00:14:06.000 The way the calendars work in Russia at the time, and I'm not sure the exact details of this, I wasn't reading about this stuff in high detail since like the seventh or the eighth grade.

00:14:15.000 That's when I really was obsessed with this topic.

00:14:18.000 But the way that the calendar works, In Russia at the time, I think they were using a different calendar.

00:14:22.000 Had it that the initial or the second revolution, which was the Bolshevik revolution, it happened in October for them.

00:14:30.000 It's the October revolution for the Russians, but for us, it happens in November in this calendar.

00:14:36.000 So it was October 7th, 1917.

00:14:40.000 I know it's November 7th now, but I mean, that's how it is.

00:14:43.000 And this launched like a 100 year struggle that is ongoing today, that is ideological to a certain extent, ethical.

00:14:51.000 I mean, there are many components to this, why this is significant that we look at this anniversary.

00:14:56.000 And we recall that 100 years ago on that day, this was the Second Revolution.

00:15:01.000 A little bit of history for you.

00:15:03.000 We saw a lot of tumult, a lot of chaos in Russia.

00:15:06.000 At the time, they had been undergoing a very rough century in the 19th century, specifically the later 19th century, where they saw several assassinations of their czars, several transfers of power.

00:15:19.000 And they found themselves under the leadership of Nicholas.

00:15:22.000 The second in the early 20th century, who was a weak ruler, not very competent, not a lot of experience, somebody who wasn't so much interested in the duties of governance and the duties of the monarchy, the Russian, what was the name of the monarchy?

00:15:38.000 The name escapes me right now.

00:15:40.000 But not so much interested in the duties of the royals for them as a figurehead, as the head of state, and not so much interested in the head of the autocracy, the head of government, the state apparatus.

00:15:51.000 Additionally, this is a man without a male heir, his only son, and he tried to have sons many times, but his only male son was suffering from a blood disorder, looking like he wasn't going to make it.

00:16:01.000 Of course, that was a big secret at the time.

00:16:04.000 And so the autocracy was in crisis.

00:16:07.000 You had this top down form of government that at the time was very much outdated.

00:16:11.000 Whereas much of Europe was transforming into liberal republics, some democratic, some not so much, but whereas Western Europe was transforming into a more democratic, liberal, and Western in character European society, Russia, which had tried to become European in the vision of Tolstoy, in the vision of the worldly great French European city, was lagging behind economically, culturally, politically, socially.

00:16:37.000 And so you had this anemic autocracy, the Russian government, which was failing completely.

00:16:42.000 Assassinations, anarchy in the streets, couldn't control political dissidents.

00:16:46.000 You had faraway parts of the empire that were rising up in rebellion.

00:16:51.000 You know, you had certain expressions that you see some strains of today of populism, of nationalism.

00:16:57.000 Of course, that was the trend in the early 20th century.

00:17:00.000 And you had a government that wasn't able to cope with it, an economic system that wasn't able to feed its people.

00:17:05.000 And of course, this created some problems.

00:17:07.000 So in 1917, after you had a couple of rebellions, a couple of bloody massacres, we remember the 1904 Bloody Sunday Massacre.

00:17:15.000 Finally, it pops off in February.

00:17:17.000 They overthrow the government and they're not quite sure what to do.

00:17:20.000 And I think this is very instructive, okay?

00:17:22.000 I think this is very instructive for our time, which is very unstable.

00:17:25.000 And I'm going through the history of the Russian Revolution to paint a picture for you, to show you an example which may be a cautionary tale for our country and more specifically our movement and some of the people in it, because this was a massive event in world history.

00:17:40.000 You have maybe four revolutions which are really significant in the past 300 years American, French, Russian, and Iranian.

00:17:47.000 This is a big one to talk about and a very good example of what to do, what not to do. 0.84

00:17:52.000 So in February, they throw off this broken government, a broken government that is out of touch with the Russian peasant class. 0.74

00:18:00.000 Out of touch and in many ways separated from the Russian soul.

00:18:05.000 Spangler writes about how the Russian aristocracy, the Russian government, the Russian ruling class in the cities, St. Petersburg and Moscow, were of a totally different soul.

00:18:18.000 Than the people in the peasantry, than the vast majority of Russians in the plains and the farms.

00:18:23.000 And he characterized this with the dichotomy between Tolstoy and Dostoevsky.

00:18:27.000 Whereas Tolstoy and the Muscovites and the people in St. Petersburg and the government wanted to see Russia in the character of the French, the great worldly cities, more of a Faustian soul.

00:18:40.000 The peasantry was of a specifically and characteristically Russian, Slavic soul.

00:18:44.000 And they were more religious, more mystic, of a different time, of a different culture.

00:18:49.000 And this divide ultimately.

00:18:51.000 Ultimately ended up and boiled over into the Russian Revolution in February 1917.

00:18:57.000 They weren't sure what to do.

00:18:58.000 You know, in February they overthrew the government, they installed the provisional government, but they weren't sure which way to go so much.

00:19:07.000 They understood what they didn't want, which was they didn't want the Tsardom, they didn't want the Tsarist autocracy, they didn't want Nicholas II, they didn't want the royal family, but they didn't know what they wanted yet.

00:19:19.000 Nobody had quite consolidated power yet out of all the warring left wing and right wing groups.

00:19:25.000 And so in February, you had a provisional government headed by Kerensky, who happened to be Jewish.

00:19:30.000 So this provisional government goes on.

00:19:32.000 It's unsuccessful, it's not working.

00:19:34.000 And finally, then you have the October Revolution in 1917.

00:19:38.000 And what ensues is five years of civil war between the Red Army, between the Bolsheviks led by Vladimir Lenin and Leon Trotsky, and the White Army led by various elements of the old Russian military, the old Russian aristocracy, the White Army, the monarchists.

00:19:54.000 And I think what this shows, what this example demonstrates, is sort of the poorness, sort of the lack of wisdom of our contemporary revolutionaries.

00:20:06.000 We have a lot of revolutionary talk in the right wing and the alt right.

00:20:11.000 And we talk to people like Richard Spencer or people like Eli Mosley, and they talk about this revolution.

00:20:16.000 You know, IE people talk to me about revolutionary discipline.

00:20:20.000 And Richard Spencer compares himself to Karl Marx, and he's presenting a vision for us to strive for.

00:20:26.000 And we see that in the Russian Revolution, they were able to do many of the things we talk about doing.

00:20:32.000 Many of the things that people in our movement see as ends in themselves.

00:20:36.000 You know, they threw off this broken, corrupt, out of touch government.

00:20:41.000 And I know, you know, that's in some ways superficial.

00:20:44.000 Comparison, but I mean, I think in principle it demonstrates these things in a mechanical sense.

00:20:49.000 We threw off an oppressive force.

00:20:51.000 We threw off this broken government.

00:20:53.000 We decided we didn't want this.

00:20:55.000 And through military force, which would be, I don't think that even be practical in this country, but they threw off the government, but then they didn't know what to do next.

00:21:03.000 And it was a lot of chaos and a lot of suffering. 0.66

00:21:04.000 And then when they did decide, when they did have a vision of what to do next, when finally you had these ideologues, hardline extremist ideologues, the Bolsheviks far more extremist than the Mensheviks, far more.

00:21:18.000 Committed to the ideology of Karl Marx and communism, then the Mensheviks, then the unionists, then some of the socialists.

00:21:26.000 And they had a vision for what they wanted.

00:21:28.000 They had a vision, a top down vision.

00:21:30.000 Karl Marx didn't, but Vladimir Lenin did, of what they wanted the society to look like, what they wanted the economy to look like, what they wanted education to look like.

00:21:39.000 They had a complex vision of what the society should look like.

00:21:42.000 And that motivated people in the peasant class, even though it was put forth by this vanguard party of Vladimir Lenin and the intellectuals and Trotsky.

00:21:51.000 Even though it was put forward by academics and people who, in just about every mannerism, were the same as the same ruling class that the peasants hated.

00:22:00.000 But the peasants ate it up because they wanted that vision.

00:22:02.000 They wanted that something else.

00:22:04.000 They wanted that replacement. 0.82

00:22:05.000 And they overthrew the government.

00:22:06.000 They got in place their communist paradise in 1922 and the Civil War ended.

00:22:11.000 They put in place a wartime communism in the meantime.

00:22:15.000 And when they consolidated control, they had the new economic policy by Lenin. 0.54

00:22:20.000 And then they had the five year plans under Stalin.

00:22:22.000 And then they had the de Stalinization under Khrushchev and on and on and on.

00:22:26.000 And what we see is that it never quite worked.

00:22:30.000 They never quite figured it out.

00:22:32.000 The vision wasn't what it cracked up to be.

00:22:36.000 And fundamentally, this is a lesson, I think, in human fallibility, in human imperfection, a lesson on human nature that we can have a vision.

00:22:46.000 We can succeed in overturning a government.

00:22:48.000 We can succeed in implementing that vision.

00:22:51.000 And we can try and reform that vision.

00:22:53.000 And we can try for 100 years to put in place.

00:22:57.000 This utopian design of what we want, whether it be a communist paradise or a collectivized agricultural society or an ethnostate.

00:23:07.000 But it demonstrates that vision, ideology is insufficient every time.

00:23:12.000 Vision, you know, this grand design of what we want, it will never be what it's cracked up to be.

00:23:18.000 And that's why we need to temper that with wisdom.

00:23:21.000 We need to temper that with virtue, with tradition, with conservation.

00:23:27.000 A hundred years from that revolution, and we look at the legacy of that revolution.

00:23:32.000 We look at the legacy of its leaders, of its intellectual antecedents, of its vision, and of its follow through.

00:23:40.000 That this was an example, this is an illustration of human folly, of the utopian ideological folly of the 19th century.

00:23:49.000 People, intellectuals who thought we could make it better if we just had a good system, if we just had it this way, it would be okay.

00:24:00.000 And you know what?

00:24:02.000 We don't care what we have to sacrifice to get there, so long as we get there. 0.99

00:24:06.000 We can kill people. 1.00

00:24:07.000 We'll kill millions of people to get where we want to go. 1.00

00:24:10.000 We'll start wars to get where we want to go. 0.99

00:24:14.000 We'll execute children to get where we want to go, in the case of some of the revolutionaries of a certain ethnic character who killed the royal family.

00:24:24.000 And all that suffering, all that bloodshed, all the misery, the gulags, the camps, the labor I mean, people eating themselves in Ukraine and for what? 0.91

00:24:33.000 And for what?

00:24:34.000 Did it work?

00:24:36.000 Did they get there?

00:24:37.000 Did they ever achieve what they wanted?

00:24:39.000 Did they even achieve a working system, let alone something that approached their dream, their vision for what it wanted?

00:24:46.000 Or did it just set them back 100 years?

00:24:48.000 Or did they stagnate for 100 years?

00:24:50.000 And now that they've re entered history, now that they've re entered a time that is immune from ideology, now are they starting to grow again?

00:25:00.000 I think that's the lesson of the Russian Revolution.

00:25:02.000 And by the way, that's not a lesson of communism was tried and it's failed and all these anti communist posters in the Turning Point USA.

00:25:11.000 Don't get me wrong, I'm vehemently against communism.

00:25:15.000 But I think it's not just communism, it's ideology itself.

00:25:18.000 So, anybody that's pitching communism or anybody that's pitching capitalism, the free market, I think is the same thing. 0.89

00:25:24.000 Anybody that's pitching the ethnostate, these visions, I think are wrong, are misguided, I think will only lead us to ruin. 0.92

00:25:33.000 And that is the result of human folly.

00:25:35.000 These people who want to force things to change, who want to force and think by their own human hands, by their own human reason, they can mold and shape.

00:25:46.000 Society, all these moving parts according to their design.

00:25:52.000 I don't think it's going to happen.

00:25:53.000 And that's why the future of the right wing is in virtue.

00:25:59.000 And be that Christianity, I think it is in Christianity, but be that Christianity or just simple self help, taking self responsibility like Jordan Peterson teaches or others, and people call that centrism, I think it's a different kind of ordering.

00:26:13.000 It's a different paradigm to look at the society.

00:26:16.000 And the Russian Revolution teaches us that. 0.60

00:26:19.000 That grand experiment, it's not going to work. 0.89

00:26:21.000 It'll never get you there.

00:26:22.000 You'll only get to heaven after you die if you've done well.

00:26:26.000 Not going to happen here.

00:26:27.000 And I say that on the show, and people say, that's not his argument.

00:26:31.000 That's not people.

00:26:32.000 People don't argue it's going to be perfect.

00:26:34.000 Well, but to an extent, they do.

00:26:36.000 Because what are they preaching?

00:26:37.000 They're preaching it doesn't matter what kind of person you are, it doesn't matter what kind of character you have, it doesn't matter if you're black or white or red or brown.

00:26:45.000 I mean, depending on which group you're talking about, depending on if it's the free market crowd or the ethno state crowd.

00:26:51.000 But they put the vision, they put this material system ahead of virtue.

00:26:59.000 They put it ahead of development of the self, of human systems, systems that work on the micro level.

00:27:05.000 And I don't think you're going to have it.

00:27:08.000 Not going to work. 0.74

00:27:08.000 So that's the Russian Revolution. 0.74

00:27:10.000 Hope that's not too. 0.86

00:27:11.000 I know we meandered a little bit between history and philosophy and religiosity and some things there, but I hope we're generally getting what I mean by that.

00:27:22.000 It's not metapolitical, it's metaphysical.

00:27:25.000 That I'm getting at, the metaphysical component of it.

00:27:27.000 You know, they talk about metapolitical.

00:27:29.000 We're going to move this political overton window.

00:27:31.000 I'm talking about ages and millennia of people that try and fail these things and really the long view, the large view, the context of where these things are taking place.

00:27:43.000 So that's why I stress things like that's why I say we have to focus less on the racialism.

00:27:50.000 We have to focus less on this ideology stuff, identitarianism.

00:27:55.000 How about we focus on justice?

00:27:55.000 You know, what is that?

00:27:57.000 How about we focus on morality, discipline?

00:28:01.000 Being good, being charitable.

00:28:03.000 I mean, these are the things I think that will lead to a good society.

00:28:06.000 If you're preaching Christian virtues, guess what?

00:28:08.000 You're going to have a good country.

00:28:09.000 You know, if you have a country of Christians, you're going to have a country that's going to make a lot of people happy and well adjusted.

00:28:17.000 So there it is.

00:28:19.000 Don't be a nihilist.

00:28:20.000 Don't be a materialist.

00:28:21.000 Don't be a Bolshevik.

00:28:23.000 And we know what that means.

00:28:23.000 Okay?

00:28:24.000 We know who are the kings.

00:28:25.000 We know who are the kings, the gods among men, the chosen gods among men of materialism, of nihilism, of the carnal, of the flesh.

00:28:36.000 The blasted globalist elite who cannot lead us astray any longer.

00:28:43.000 And you look behind every, it's no coincidence, by the way, you look behind every ideology, you look behind every mass movement, every vision, and you will find the globalist. 0.94

00:28:54.000 You will find the globalist who cares about the flesh and the carnal and the materialist trying to move us to paradise on earth, trying to create for us, you know, wonderland.

00:29:08.000 Every time, without fail, without fail.

00:29:11.000 Show me an ideology.

00:29:13.000 Show me a vision.

00:29:14.000 Show me human folly, and I will show you a globalist behind it.

00:29:19.000 Maybe didn't create it, maybe didn't originate it, but is the father in some sense.

00:29:26.000 So, there it is.

00:29:27.000 Maybe that sounds wacky, but for people that are reading some of these things, for people that know what I'm talking about a little bit, this is high energy content.

00:29:35.000 This is some quality stuff.

00:29:36.000 That's what I talk about when I say, Dave Rubin should have on me.

00:29:40.000 You know, it's a little bit bitter.

00:29:41.000 There's some bitterness there.

00:29:42.000 There's no lie.

00:29:43.000 I'm not going to pretend it's not a little bit bitter.

00:29:47.000 But yeah, so there it is. 0.57

00:29:49.000 There's your Russian Revolution.

00:29:50.000 Learn.

00:29:51.000 Learn!

00:29:52.000 Not to Jordan Peterson's centrist post.

00:29:54.000 I do believe that this is very right wing ideology, by the way.

00:29:57.000 I'm not saying be a centrist, let everything go, do it everyone.

00:30:01.000 I'm saying the natural order is decidedly right wing, characteristically right wing.

00:30:09.000 And I think that's just where it falls on an ideological spectrum.

00:30:13.000 But there it is.

00:30:14.000 So that's the Russian Revolution. 0.61

00:30:16.000 Enough about all this up in the air stuff.

00:30:18.000 Let's talk politics.

00:30:19.000 You know, we talk all the time on the show about how we got to implement it in practice, we got to be pragmatic.

00:30:24.000 Well, let's talk about that.

00:30:25.000 Another big development here is the Virginia gubernatorial revolution.

00:30:30.000 That word has always been comical to me. 0.99

00:30:32.000 I know that sounds kind of juvenile, but, you know, when you call a governor's race gubernatorial, like they're all goobers. 1.00

00:30:39.000 Kind of funny. 0.98

00:30:40.000 But so we have this Virginia election going on.

00:30:43.000 Between Ed Gillespie and Ralph Northam.

00:30:46.000 And let's see the live results here with 77% of precincts reporting.

00:30:52.000 And this is the freshest data here, up to date here on the New York Times.

00:30:58.000 With 77% of precincts reporting, Ralph Northam wins.

00:31:02.000 You might know this already if you're watching Twitter live.

00:31:05.000 You know, I've been going on and on about Russians for a while. 1.00

00:31:08.000 So you might have seen the results here, but I'm seeing them now.

00:31:11.000 It's been called for Ralph Northam, the Democrat here, he will be the governor of Virginia.

00:31:19.000 And of course, this has major implications for Donald Trump and for the midterms.

00:31:25.000 I don't know if it's as big as people are saying it is.

00:31:29.000 Okay, and we haven't been following it too closely on this show, but I've been reading about it sort of on the periphery for some time, and I don't think it's a huge deal.

00:31:38.000 Because we look at every special election that's been had since 2016, whether it was Georgia, who could forget Georgia?

00:31:44.000 I think there was one in Minnesota.

00:31:46.000 I mean, there were a couple of sporadic special elections between this one and 2016, and everyone, save the Alabama GOP primary, has been won by the Trump Republican candidate.

00:31:57.000 So I don't think this is.

00:31:59.000 This is definitely the worst thing in the world.

00:32:01.000 It is a blow.

00:32:03.000 And I think it's a little bit early to analyze what exactly went wrong.

00:32:05.000 I mean, we don't have all the data.

00:32:08.000 We don't even have all of the precincts reporting here.

00:32:11.000 But I think if I can speculate a bit, a lot of people are saying that the reason that Gillespie lost is for two major reasons on an electoral level, because the suburbs of D.C., they had a huge turnout and they went decidedly for the Democrat, which was a little bit surprising.

00:32:30.000 And then on a more Metapolitical level that Ed Gillespie was this rhino. 0.98

00:32:34.000 He was a cuck.

00:32:35.000 Steve Bannon said, even if Gillespie wins, it's because his rival in the Virginia GOP, Corey Stewart, has been carrying him with his Trump like rhetoric, his Trump like style. 0.94

00:32:48.000 And I think there's truth to both of that.

00:32:52.000 I think it demonstrates, I don't think it's like a death blow for the president because I think if Corey Stewart were in this election, it would be a totally different story.

00:32:59.000 I mean, that sounds basically right.

00:33:01.000 That if Corey Stewart were in this and he was the Trump Republican, well, you'd get a fair read on Trump's approval, or rather, you'd get some kind of litmus test on how Trump would fare in the primaries or in the midterm elections coming up in 2018.

00:33:16.000 So I think that's one, why it's not so much of a big deal.

00:33:19.000 Number two, Virginia went blue in 2016.

00:33:22.000 So why would we say, why would we even expect that a Republican would win a race where you have a Democratic governor already, you have Democratic senators, or excuse me, you have A Democratic senator in Tim Kaine.

00:33:34.000 I believe the governor was Republican previously in Virginia.

00:33:39.000 I'm not sure on that.

00:33:41.000 But regardless, he lost in Virginia in 2016.

00:33:45.000 So why would Virginia be a good litmus test for Trump's approval or Trump's success in 2018 if he'd even win in 2016?

00:33:52.000 So I think for those two reasons, it's not such a good measure.

00:33:55.000 Democrats are going to say, you know, 2018, Democrats are going to win.

00:33:59.000 I saw a story on Twitter the other day.

00:34:01.000 Democrats are confident about leading in the polls in 2018.

00:34:06.000 It's kind of a mixed bag.

00:34:06.000 So, I don't know.

00:34:07.000 We never want to see our guy lose.

00:34:09.000 We never want to see a Republican lose.

00:34:11.000 Well, maybe not never.

00:34:12.000 We want to see people like John McCain and Jeff Flake lose.

00:34:16.000 But we don't like to see somebody that Trump explicitly endorsed on his Twitter lose unless it's part of a bigger thing.

00:34:22.000 So, it's kind of mixed.

00:34:24.000 On the one hand, we could have had it.

00:34:26.000 We really could have had it with Corey Stewart, maybe.

00:34:29.000 And that would have been a big win.

00:34:31.000 That would have been a good opportunity.

00:34:32.000 But at the same time, I don't think anybody could reasonably say.

00:34:36.000 That this was a good example.

00:34:38.000 This was in any way symbolic or foreshadowing what we will see in 2018 because Trump didn't win this in 2016.

00:34:47.000 Virginia has been going blue forever.

00:34:49.000 If the D.C. metropolitan area swung the election, that's not exactly a surprise that a Republican or Trump couldn't carry that, you know, after all the rhetoric about the swamp.

00:34:59.000 So I say we put this on the GOP establishment.

00:35:04.000 We say, you know what?

00:35:05.000 Missed opportunity.

00:35:06.000 We could have seen what would have happened with Corey Stewart.

00:35:10.000 But now this is on the rhinos.

00:35:11.000 This is on the GOP establishment.

00:35:14.000 They, I think, own this, and that's a good way to pass it off.

00:35:17.000 Trump has tried, and this is a good way to go forward, I think, with the narrative.

00:35:20.000 Trump tried to save Luther Strange in Alabama.

00:35:23.000 He tried his best.

00:35:24.000 He did a rally.

00:35:25.000 Didn't work.

00:35:26.000 He tried his best.

00:35:27.000 Fred Gillespie wasn't enough.

00:35:29.000 Now it's time to put in place the populists.

00:35:31.000 Now it's time to put in place the nationalists, the Roy Moores of the world, the Corey Stewarts of the world.

00:35:38.000 So ultimately, I think it might actually end up being positive in that regard because when we go into the 2018 elections, it's just as important to see what will happen with Democrats and Republicans as it is to see, possibly even more so, to see what will happen between establishment Republicans.

00:35:56.000 And challenger populist Steve Bannon type Republicans.

00:36:00.000 I think it's a much more telling thing that Ed Gillespie lost and Corey Stewart never got in the race than it was that some Democrat won.

00:36:09.000 Because the Democratic Party is in shambles.

00:36:11.000 Let's not pretend like Ralph Northam is leading the Democrat revival.

00:36:17.000 They don't have a candidate for 2020.

00:36:19.000 You have this civil war going on in there that's not even being addressed, that is far worse than ours.

00:36:25.000 So I think the real takeaway here is establishment loses.

00:36:31.000 Ed Gillespie and Luther Strange cannot cut it.

00:36:37.000 They will not cut it.

00:36:38.000 Now, they didn't cut it in August in Alabama.

00:36:41.000 They didn't cut it in Virginia in November, and they won't cut it come the GOP primaries in March through August when those take place.

00:36:49.000 So, overall, mixed bag.

00:36:51.000 We'll see what happens.

00:36:52.000 Unfortunate for the people of Virginia.

00:36:55.000 When we see Democratic governors and state legislatures, which I think is not so much reported, how important the local government aspect is.

00:37:03.000 When you see Democrats get in control of state governments, they tend to implement policies that hurt us electorally on the national level.

00:37:12.000 You know, you consider you get, you know, hypothetically, let's say you get a Democratic administration in California or in Texas or in Georgia, and they tinker with the voting ID laws, or they tinker with illegal aliens voting, or they tinker with citizenship requirements, or, you know, they allow voter fraud to occur through negligence.

00:37:31.000 I mean, that's why these things are impactful.

00:37:33.000 That's why I say it's a mixed bag.

00:37:35.000 So, The metapolitical people who can say, you know, nothing really matters.

00:37:39.000 It's all just about the narrative.

00:37:40.000 These things do have real consequences.

00:37:42.000 So that's why I say it is a mixed bag.

00:37:44.000 When Democrats get in office for the governorship and in the state legislatures, it means it's going to be that more difficult for Republicans to win in the Senate, for Republicans to win the White House, even Republicans to win the House of Representatives.

00:37:57.000 But by the same token, in 2018, we could see a stronger hand to be played by Steve Bannon, the populist, the nationalist, when you have such a Obvious record of failure among the establishment.

00:38:11.000 So we'll see what happens as always.

00:38:13.000 But that's Virginia.

00:38:14.000 People know I'm not wild about talking about these types of elections.

00:38:17.000 Generally, it's kind of boring stuff.

00:38:19.000 And the sources are not great on these things.

00:38:22.000 You know, you don't get a lot of reporting on these things like you do with international or national news.

00:38:27.000 So that's what makes it a little bit more difficult.

00:38:30.000 So that's Virginia.

00:38:32.000 Why don't we talk about our last topic here?

00:38:32.000 What else do we have?

00:38:35.000 And we'll talk about this pretty briefly before we get into your questions.

00:38:38.000 Because, of course, we have James Alsop coming up on the show.

00:38:43.000 America First Overdrive in about 20 minutes.

00:38:46.000 So, we want to get to your questions.

00:38:47.000 We want to get 15 minutes in for your questions in five, we'll say, five or 10.

00:38:51.000 Our last major story.

00:38:52.000 Here's the best one.

00:38:53.000 Greatest story of the week.

00:38:54.000 It's like God just loves us.

00:38:56.000 And I'm not talking about Yahweh, by the way.

00:38:59.000 I'm talking about God loves us.

00:39:01.000 He loves us.

00:39:02.000 He loves what we're doing here on this show.

00:39:04.000 He loves what we're doing as a country, as a movement.

00:39:08.000 Because just time and time again, we just get vindicated.

00:39:10.000 I'm like, I'm getting tired of being vindicated.

00:39:12.000 How many times have I been right about these things?

00:39:15.000 Harvey Weinstein.

00:39:17.000 Harvey Weinstein.

00:39:19.000 Harvey Weinstein has done more for the alt right.

00:39:22.000 Harvey Weinstein has done more for the right and for Christians and for Americans than like anybody in the right wing in 25 years.

00:39:30.000 Okay.

00:39:31.000 Harvey Weinstein is a team player.

00:39:33.000 You want to know the most valuable player in 2017 for the alt right?

00:39:37.000 It's not me.

00:39:38.000 It's not Richard Spencer.

00:39:39.000 It's not James Alsop.

00:39:40.000 It's Harvey Weinstein.

00:39:42.000 Maybe Harvey Weinstein's tied with like Will Chamberlain.

00:39:45.000 I don't know.

00:39:46.000 No, not even on a similar scale.

00:39:48.000 But so Harvey Weinstein, today, there was an article published in New Yorker by Ronan Farrow, who he's like.

00:39:56.000 Who is Ronan Farrow?

00:39:57.000 I forget who this guy is.

00:39:59.000 I'm not totally sure.

00:40:00.000 But he writes for The New Yorker.

00:40:01.000 He published a piece claiming that Harvey Weinstein used Mossad agents, former Mossad agents.

00:40:07.000 He hired these private intelligence services that were occupied by former Mossad agents.

00:40:14.000 And Mossad, of course, is the Israeli intelligence agency to spy on people he sexually abused and people who are going to blow the whistle on him.

00:40:24.000 So here you have Harvey Weinstein, the bigwig. 0.92

00:40:29.000 Hollywood producer who's going around raping people, who's going around abusing women, and he's a kingpin in Hollywood, in the Oscars, in the movie industry, as a producer. 0.96

00:40:42.000 And everybody knows about it, nobody talks about it. 0.99

00:40:45.000 And he's raping these women, he's abusing these women, and people are like, yeah, well, he happens to be a certain kind of guy. 0.98

00:40:52.000 Well, he happens to be not so much a white male, so much as something else. 0.99

00:40:58.000 And if that wasn't enough, if that was not glorious enough that we have. 0.54

00:41:03.000 Scandal after scandal after scandal perpetrated by a very particular type of person against a very particular type of person for very pervy particular reasons.

00:41:14.000 If that wasn't enough, that you got Harvey Weinstein and people coming down the list with certain names that you hear over the times, if that wasn't enough, then it comes out that he is actually directly involved with Israel's special forces, their spying agency, to harass and spy on these people and to keep lips shut.

00:41:35.000 I mean, it's like.

00:41:37.000 Alex Jones, like, he could not be more vindicated by things that are happening. 0.86

00:41:43.000 Everybody says he's a loop, he's a nut job, he's a psychopath, and it seems like every week real things are happening that prove him right. 0.77

00:41:51.000 It's glorious. 0.98

00:41:53.000 You know, I mean, you would have, if you postulated like six months ago, if you said, you know what, there is this certain conspiracy in Hollywood of a certain kind of people that is raping children and raping women, and everybody's keeping quiet about it, and everybody's, Being hushed up, either they're being killed or threatened or paid off, and the Israelis are involved, Mossad is involved, people laugh at you.

00:42:19.000 You'd be on John Oliver. 1.00

00:42:20.000 If you were like a major figure, John Oliver would be on his retarded show, laughing at you, chortling at you with his ridiculous, soiled audience. 1.00

00:42:32.000 And now, six months later, it's in the New Yorker, it's in the New York Times, it's in the Washington Post. 1.00

00:42:37.000 So who's laughing now?

00:42:38.000 You know, I think it only goes to show.

00:42:41.000 Pays to tell the truth.

00:42:42.000 It pays to tell the truth on these matters because we are heading towards a period of chaos.

00:42:50.000 And when these destabilizing events happen, things come out and you get credibility that way.

00:42:56.000 So it's a good thing to see.

00:42:57.000 It's a pretty magnificent development.

00:42:59.000 It's like, thank you, Harvey.

00:43:01.000 Thank you, Harvey.

00:43:02.000 A love letter, a thank you note.

00:43:04.000 I want everybody, everybody in the alt right, you know, I got to play mom here.

00:43:09.000 I got to play the mom.

00:43:10.000 You have to get on your thank you notes.

00:43:12.000 You got to write out a thank you note, it'll take you 30 seconds.

00:43:15.000 Right out of thank you note, say, Dear Harvey, thank you for your service.

00:43:19.000 Love Christianity.

00:43:21.000 Love the alt right, love America.

00:43:25.000 My mom, whenever I have a birthday party, whenever I used to have a birthday party, she'd always be egging me out.

00:43:29.000 You got to do your thank you notes.

00:43:31.000 When are you going to do your thank you notes?

00:43:33.000 Well, here I am.

00:43:34.000 I got to play my own mom and say, listen, folks, we have to be gracious in victory.

00:43:39.000 So it'll take you 30 seconds.

00:43:41.000 Okay, just do it.

00:43:42.000 Just get it done.

00:43:42.000 Just do it.

00:43:43.000 Fill out your thank you note.

00:43:45.000 Dear Harvey, thank you for your service.

00:43:47.000 And to a certain extent, all these people, Dear Ben Shapiro, Thank you for your service.

00:43:52.000 Dear Will Chamberlain, thank you so much for what you've done.

00:43:58.000 That's the news.

00:43:58.000 So that's that.

00:43:59.000 That's a nice little, that's a gracious note to leave off on, thanking our adversaries for helping us out.

00:44:06.000 Now we got to get to our questions.

00:44:07.000 We got to get to our generous donors here in the Super Chat. 1.00

00:44:11.000 You know, I had that fag, that bunty guy insulting my audience the other day, last night actually, saying my audience is a bunch of racists. 0.99

00:44:20.000 And he didn't even mean it in a good way, he didn't even mean it in the sense that we love who we are. 0.99

00:44:25.000 He meant it in like we're bad people.

00:44:27.000 I said, you know what?

00:44:27.000 Don't insult my audience.

00:44:29.000 I have the best audience in the world.

00:44:30.000 These are people that, whether you agree with them or not, they care about their country.

00:44:34.000 And I don't even say that to blow smoke.

00:44:36.000 I don't even say that to be like a schmooze or anything. 1.00

00:44:40.000 But it's true.

00:44:41.000 I mean, we get maligned so much.

00:44:43.000 Got to defend my people.

00:44:44.000 We want what's best.

00:44:45.000 We want what's best for our families.

00:44:47.000 It's truly not.

00:44:48.000 It's truly not about hate. 0.82

00:44:49.000 It has nothing to do with, you know, we don't like people that don't look like us.

00:44:53.000 It's about the fact that we want our kids to be safe and healthy and prosperous.

00:44:58.000 And live in a country that they like.

00:44:59.000 Okay.

00:45:01.000 So we have our super chats here, and we got one from Alec here who says If Nova steals another Virginia election, I will start building a wall myself, starting in Fredericksburg. 0.87

00:45:12.000 Who's Nova? 0.67

00:45:13.000 Nova, is that like Neo N O V A? 0.99

00:45:16.000 I don't know who that is. 0.99

00:45:18.000 Simon Skull with the single shekel.

00:45:19.000 Thank you.

00:45:20.000 Spoiler alert says The Tranny in the Black, my least favorite 80s sitcom.

00:45:25.000 Yeah, right?

00:45:25.000 I mean, it's just cartoonish at this point.

00:45:27.000 Like, let's just get all these freaks, let's get as many freaks on our show as possible. 1.00

00:45:32.000 Let's get this degenerate freak who's mentally ill and she doesn't know what the hell she is. 1.00

00:45:36.000 Let's get this pathological attention seeking freak who was soliciting information to dox people. 1.00

00:45:43.000 Now she wants to be a conservative because, I don't know, daddy didn't pay attention to her when she was growing up. 1.00

00:45:48.000 Or maybe she didn't have one. 0.82

00:45:49.000 Who knows?

00:45:50.000 The statistics support that.

00:45:52.000 Dominic Liberator, from where does the idea of irrational violence as a personal refutation of determinism and nihilism originate?

00:46:01.000 Is there a book you've read?

00:46:05.000 I can't tell if you're saying this is like a legitimate argument.

00:46:09.000 I mean, I think just generally speaking, it's not so much the violence.

00:46:13.000 It's just to say that people who pursue these sorts of things, it never works out.

00:46:19.000 It's not to say that, I mean, you're going to have, I mean, my whole argument is that you're going to have irrational violence.

00:46:25.000 I mean, that's human nature.

00:46:27.000 That's my whole argument is that anybody that attempts to do these things is going to get irrational violence and probably more of it.

00:46:34.000 So people that are saying, like, I don't like what's going on, I want to make things better.

00:46:39.000 I want less irrationality.

00:46:41.000 I want things to make sense and people to be happier and things to be, you know, whatever.

00:46:45.000 And I want this grand thing.

00:46:47.000 I want it to be happier and healthier and I want to become who we are, whatever that means.

00:46:53.000 They get it worse.

00:46:55.000 In trying to exceed our limitations, they fall short of our limitations.

00:46:59.000 That's what I'm getting at.

00:47:00.000 You will always have irrational violence.

00:47:02.000 I'm not, you know, I think maybe you're misreading my argument like I'm saying, well, my non ideological way will be the solution.

00:47:09.000 I'm saying if we try for incremental and moderate.

00:47:14.000 And ultimately, natural.

00:47:16.000 I mean, I'm not even arguing for progress, I'm just arguing for nature.

00:47:19.000 You will see a just, you will see justice.

00:47:23.000 I think that's what I'm arguing for.

00:47:24.000 Instead of an unjust irrational violence, you will see a just level of irrational violence, if that makes sense, an organic level of irrational violence.

00:47:33.000 It's sort of like killing animals.

00:47:35.000 You know, animals will be killed in the wilderness, of course.

00:47:39.000 But do they have to be killed in a cruel way?

00:47:42.000 Do they have to be killed in a systematic, unnecessary way?

00:47:45.000 I mean, that's, it's the question of justice there.

00:47:47.000 You know, Hayek, as much as we begrudge him for becoming a social democrat later in his life and being a neoliberal and Other things.

00:47:56.000 He did have one good line where he said that the particulars of a spontaneous order can be neither just nor unjust.

00:48:03.000 And I believe that's true.

00:48:04.000 You know, in a spontaneous order, in the natural order, you will not have injustice or will you have justice.

00:48:11.000 But when you try to, when you lunge for these things, then you get unnecessary irrational violence, if that makes sense.

00:48:18.000 I hope that makes sense.

00:48:20.000 C.S. says, everyone is modernity in.

00:48:24.000 Everyone is modernity.

00:48:26.000 Okay, you're not phrasing this correct.

00:48:28.000 I think you mean everyone in modernity is a man from the underground.

00:48:31.000 If that's what you mean there, then yes, you are correct.

00:48:34.000 It's true.

00:48:35.000 It's true.

00:48:36.000 And I encourage everyone to read that.

00:48:37.000 Again, it's a short read.

00:48:38.000 It's like 200 pages.

00:48:39.000 No, not even 130 pages.

00:48:42.000 It's a great read.

00:48:44.000 It's a little bit off putting.

00:48:45.000 The tone is not full of likable characters like a John Grisham book.

00:48:50.000 It's not like The Fault in Our Stars where everybody's cute and everybody, oh, we want to see what happens.

00:48:56.000 It's not like that.

00:48:57.000 You don't like the narrator.

00:48:58.000 You don't like the people he interacts with.

00:49:01.000 You don't understand why he does the things he does.

00:49:04.000 Not on a rational level.

00:49:05.000 You might on an intuitive level.

00:49:08.000 Good book.

00:49:09.000 Everybody should read that.

00:49:09.000 But you're right.

00:49:11.000 All the perversity, the neuroticism, I mean, really, we've been driven to ruin.

00:49:15.000 That's why Ted Kaczynski posts so much, because you just want to see some kind of disruption there.

00:49:21.000 Simon Skola, would you have Ramsey Paul on?

00:49:23.000 Have you ever done a DNA test?

00:49:26.000 Mike Cernovich would be a nice guy, but he is an opportunist and literal blue pill merchant.

00:49:30.000 A lot of questions there.

00:49:31.000 On Ramsey Paul, I mean, I would have him on, but I don't like having people on to interview.

00:49:39.000 I don't think people are that interesting generally.

00:49:41.000 Like, people that make content make content.

00:49:44.000 You know what I mean?

00:49:46.000 Like, if I had Lauren Southern on and, like, interviewed her, she'd just say things that she said on her channel to a smaller audience, right?

00:49:55.000 So that's why I'm not, I just don't think it's a very interesting format, in my opinion, unless I have, like, a burning question or, like, a feud.

00:50:02.000 Like, I love disagreements and fights because.

00:50:05.000 There's something new that comes out of it.

00:50:07.000 There's a synthesis.

00:50:08.000 But when you just have like this circle jerk crossover stuff, like when Spencer came on Nationalist Review, we didn't have Spencer on before as like a collaborator.

00:50:17.000 We had him on to hash out this issue that we had and to have new thoughts on new questions.

00:50:23.000 And I think that's why I was wildly successful.

00:50:25.000 And the same was true with Enoch coming on the show.

00:50:27.000 I didn't have Enoch to come on to joke around.

00:50:30.000 And Nationalist Review, I think, is more for that.

00:50:34.000 So I don't know.

00:50:34.000 If me and Ramsey Paul ever had beef, I would definitely, I wouldn't be opposed to it.

00:50:38.000 Have you ever done a DNA test?

00:50:40.000 I have not.

00:50:41.000 It's $100.

00:50:42.000 It's $100.

00:50:42.000 If somebody wanted to give me $100 to do the 23 in me, I would say okay.

00:50:47.000 I don't know if I'd release the results, you know, because again, people get so fixated on the racialist component.

00:50:54.000 And people on poll are going to say, Nick is afraid to release his results. 0.79

00:50:57.000 He knows he's non white. 0.99

00:50:59.000 And, you know, people just on poll, there's just no pleasing people. 0.90

00:51:04.000 You could be clean cut, articulate, like doing a production.

00:51:09.000 Message doing productive things in the world, and they find something and they read into it some kind of thing.

00:51:15.000 You know, I'll do the DNA test if somebody gives me the money.

00:51:17.000 I mean, there's no lie on that.

00:51:18.000 There's no bluff.

00:51:19.000 People have told me to buy books.

00:51:20.000 I bought their books, you know?

00:51:23.000 So if people want to, you know, if people that care about my DNA want to front the money, okay.

00:51:28.000 But if that hurts my narrative, I'm not putting it out there because I think it's counterproductive to a certain extent, right?

00:51:34.000 Because if people are going to fixate on that and use that, I don't know if I'd release it in that case, right? 0.90

00:51:40.000 You know, because I'm confident that I would come off as like 90% European origin blood. 0.64

00:51:47.000 But then again, I don't know.

00:51:48.000 You know, I have no idea what's in my blood.

00:51:50.000 And most people don't either.

00:51:51.000 And I don't think necessarily they identify what's in their blood.

00:51:54.000 That's why my ideology has always been not fixated on the racialist thing.

00:51:59.000 I believe in race.

00:52:00.000 I think race is real. 0.82

00:52:01.000 And I think race is a good determinant, a good generalizing factor for some of these policies and things. 0.95

00:52:08.000 But to take somebody who is white and European, essentially, you know, and say, people on polls say, this guy's a spick. 0.98

00:52:17.000 He doesn't speak for me. 0.99

00:52:18.000 I just think it's so absurd. 1.00

00:52:20.000 It's so autistic. 1.00

00:52:21.000 It's so ridiculous, you know. 1.00

00:52:24.000 And I think those people don't have the right motives either. 0.81

00:52:26.000 I think those people, we don't know who those people are.

00:52:29.000 So there you go.

00:52:31.000 But if somebody wants to front, I don't know.

00:52:33.000 I probably would release it regardless, but I just have a problem with when people say, you know, what you're saying is not valid because of this thing.

00:52:41.000 You know, I mean, consider this the vast majority of people in poll are opposed to mass immigration, are opposed to people from the third world coming into our country.

00:52:52.000 The argument that they use goes because.

00:52:56.000 People of other races on average have lower IQs. 1.00

00:52:58.000 That's why. 1.00

00:53:00.000 Well, if I'm a demonstrably high verbal IQ person on the right side of the European IQ bell curve distribution, then why?

00:53:08.000 You know, so that's just, it's contradictory.

00:53:11.000 I think people, I think they lose sight of their arguments.

00:53:14.000 They lose sight of how they constructed their perspective, how they constructed their worldview.

00:53:20.000 They took all the bottom out of it and they focused on one thing.

00:53:23.000 And if that's going to delegitimize what I'm saying, it's counterproductive, but we'll see what happens.

00:53:29.000 Howard Morton gives us the dollar.

00:53:31.000 There it is.

00:53:32.000 Woke Tree says Harvey Weinstein hired ex Mossad slash Black Cube to trail Rose McGowan.

00:53:40.000 BS for this to happen in the USA.

00:53:42.000 Literally was typing this when you mentioned it.

00:53:44.000 Yeah, it is BS that you have foreign intelligence agencies operating on our soil and nobody talks about it and nobody cares. 0.94

00:53:51.000 You know, you have all these alt light clowns, alt light clowns, new right clowns. 0.93

00:53:56.000 Sorry, Ali. 0.86

00:53:57.000 I'm not talking about Ali and Lucian because, you know, they've made amends with me.

00:54:01.000 But people who attack me.

00:54:03.000 For being an anti Semite or something. 1.00

00:54:05.000 These are idiots who are going to go on and on and on about Russian influence. 1.00

00:54:09.000 They're going to talk about Russian influence. 1.00

00:54:10.000 Oh, I'm a moderate Republican. 0.87

00:54:12.000 Even I'll talk about Russian influence being a bad thing. 1.00

00:54:14.000 And these fucking cowards don't want to say a word. 1.00

00:54:17.000 They don't want to say a peep about Israeli influence and intelligence and all the rest. 1.00

00:54:22.000 And sorry for the language.

00:54:24.000 Sorry to be a little crude.

00:54:26.000 I know people don't like that.

00:54:27.000 I know people don't like the swearing. 0.89

00:54:28.000 But really, I mean, it's such a striking and naked hypocrisy there.

00:54:33.000 And And it couldn't be clearer why they don't talk about it.

00:54:35.000 It's because they're afraid or they're owned or both.

00:54:40.000 Tyler Jarjore, I hope you've been hitting the gym, buddy.

00:54:43.000 I've been a little bit busy.

00:54:44.000 So, not a lot of time, but I will probably get into the gym at some point.

00:54:50.000 It's just there's so much going on.

00:54:52.000 You know, I don't understand where all these people find the time to get on this self help regimen or where they expect me to get on a self help regimen where it's like I'm building this company.

00:55:02.000 We're talking about expanding, we're talking about building a Studio, we're working on this website.

00:55:07.000 We're doing merch.

00:55:08.000 We're doing 10 hours of content a week.

00:55:11.000 You have to prepare for that.

00:55:12.000 You have to do equipment for that.

00:55:14.000 You have to do AV for that, editing, all kinds of things.

00:55:17.000 I'm looking into starting a separate organization for politics.

00:55:21.000 We're organizing a database of more than 100 people in 30 states to organize and looking into how they can do it in the Republican Party, on campus.

00:55:30.000 We're looking into the legal aspect of that.

00:55:32.000 What's the best way to do that?

00:55:34.000 Paper, I mean, all kinds of things.

00:55:36.000 And people are like, oh, bro, what are you going to start hitting the gym?

00:55:38.000 It's a lot going on over here.

00:55:41.000 I've got 50 emails in my inbox I haven't responded to yet because I've been so busy and people are telling me, you know, you're.

00:55:41.000 All right, a lot going on.

00:55:48.000 You aren't lifting and you, for a superficial reason, what's going on?

00:55:54.000 So, I'll hit the gym, okay?

00:55:57.000 I'll hit the gym.

00:55:58.000 Once it slows down a little bit, we'll get right on that.

00:56:01.000 Joe Cole says, found you recently.

00:56:03.000 You have so much potential, extremely talented.

00:56:05.000 If you play your cards right, you can change the world.

00:56:08.000 Be tactful and keep it up.

00:56:09.000 Thank you.

00:56:10.000 I try.

00:56:11.000 Much appreciated. 1.00

00:56:12.000 And people, you know, that psychopath, that Indian gamer, he was telling me, he thinks he has the world figured out. 1.00

00:56:18.000 I don't say he has the world figured out. 1.00

00:56:20.000 I've maintained that my views are.

00:56:23.000 Have been evolving.

00:56:24.000 They've always been evolving.

00:56:25.000 They continue to evolve.

00:56:26.000 You know, I have certain core virtues here that I think are correct, but I don't pretend to have it all figured out.

00:56:34.000 And like you said, there's potential there, and we're working towards that.

00:56:36.000 We're building that.

00:56:37.000 So all these people saying, he's a kid, he's young, he's got a lot of potential, but I don't really.

00:56:43.000 Okay, but you have to build blocks here, baby steps.

00:56:46.000 You know, it's the same people that are saying, I want the border wall now.

00:56:50.000 Okay, well, the prototypes have been constructed.

00:56:52.000 Yeah, but I want the border wall.

00:56:53.000 Okay, but.

00:56:54.000 It is necessary for the prototypes to be constructed before you have the wall.

00:56:58.000 So you have to have one and then the other.

00:57:00.000 You got to be young before you can be old.

00:57:02.000 People telling me he's impulsive, he's young.

00:57:05.000 I'm entitled to be young.

00:57:06.000 I'm entitled to be a young guy and to be my age.

00:57:11.000 But thank you, though.

00:57:11.000 So thank you.

00:57:12.000 Evan Campbell, Nick, should we advocate for a black ethnostate?

00:57:15.000 Just get that ethnostate stuff out of your vocabulary.

00:57:18.000 I think that's just, you know, talk to anybody in the country that hasn't, that's not in this 10% of charged partisan political people.

00:57:27.000 Do they know what an ethnostate is?

00:57:29.000 Would they be for that? 0.85

00:57:31.000 Ask your neighbor, would you be for an ethnostate? 0.91

00:57:33.000 What's an ethnostate? 0.98

00:57:34.000 Oh, it's a country that's 100% white.

00:57:36.000 What are they going to call you? 0.93

00:57:38.000 Are they going to vote for you?

00:57:40.000 Are they going to vote for the other guy, actually, if they see that the Republican candidate is associated with you?

00:57:45.000 What's the Democratic candidate going to do?

00:57:47.000 Are they going to work for or against the ethnostate? 0.93

00:57:49.000 I mean, that's the line of thinking we need. 0.65

00:57:52.000 So just get that idea out of your head.

00:57:54.000 Can we implicitly talk about black identity as being separate than American? 0.99

00:57:59.000 I think that's a tactful way to go about it. 1.00

00:58:01.000 But.

00:58:03.000 You got to be strategic.

00:58:05.000 Milk says, Have Sam Hyde on a casual Friday.

00:58:08.000 I would love to have Sam Hyde.

00:58:10.000 If anybody knows Sam Hyde, and if he watches the show or if he knows who I am, I don't know if he does or not, but if he does, I would love to get him on the show or something.

00:58:21.000 I mean, to collaborate with him in any capacity would be a great honor.

00:58:25.000 You know, it's so funny.

00:58:26.000 People ask me all the time, Who are your political influences?

00:58:29.000 And I always have to hesitate for a minute because the first thought that pops into my head is, Sam Hyde.

00:58:36.000 Ted Kaczynski, other people that maybe you can't name.

00:58:41.000 And then I have to be like Pat Buchanan, Ian Coulter.

00:58:45.000 Like those people do influence me to a great extent.

00:58:47.000 But Sam Hyde, these are the people that really got me down the path.

00:58:52.000 So great respect for him.

00:58:53.000 Great respect for the work he does.

00:58:54.000 I think he's hilarious.

00:58:57.000 He's gotten me through tough times.

00:58:58.000 He's gotten my friends through tough times.

00:59:01.000 Great guy.

00:59:02.000 Can't say enough positive things about him. 0.99

00:59:04.000 Patrick Gordon dropping the double shekel.

00:59:08.000 Jent Kutarov says, Oh, and whoops, we got to go.

00:59:12.000 Overdrive starts in a moment, so I'll speed read these.

00:59:15.000 Czar was a martyr and a good man, did his best.

00:59:17.000 That's true.

00:59:18.000 Dissident says Dems brag Virginia forever.

00:59:21.000 Blue Stapia's demographics now. 0.88

00:59:22.000 They're probably right, and we just have to avoid a similar fate in Georgia, et cetera.

00:59:26.000 Peter dropping the five, and Mike invests in a shake weight during the show.

00:59:30.000 Champ, interesting idea.

00:59:32.000 I don't know.

00:59:32.000 Sounds degenerate.

00:59:33.000 But thank you for the donation.

00:59:35.000 Sorry for the quick outro, but Overdrive starts now.

00:59:37.000 I can't keep going over my time like this.

00:59:40.000 But that's the show.

00:59:41.000 All the time we have, all the information is down below Twitter, Facebook, Apple.

00:59:45.000 At Nick J. Fuentes on Twitter.

00:59:47.000 Donation info is down below as well if you want to help a brother out.

00:59:50.000 But that's going to do it for us tonight.

00:59:52.000 Remember to like, subscribe, click the notification button.

00:59:54.000 We're on the air Monday through Friday, 7 p.m. Central, 8 p.m. Eastern Standard Time.

01:00:00.000 I'm Nicholas J. Fuentes.

01:00:01.000 This was America First.

01:00:02.000 Thank you guys, as always, for watching, donating, commenting, sharing, and subscribing, which you're obligated to do.

01:00:09.000 That's going to do it for us tonight.

01:00:10.000 We'll catch you tomorrow.

01:00:11.000 Have a great rest of your evening and enjoy Overdrive with James Alsop.

01:00:17.000 Americanism, not globalism, will be our credo.

01:00:23.000 It's going to be only America first.

01:00:28.000 America first. 0.99

01:00:30.000 The American people will come first once again. 1.00

01:00:57.000 It's going to be only America first. 0.99

01:01:00.000 America first. 0.98

America First - Nicholas J. Fuentes - November 07, 2017

Remembering the Russian Revolution | America First Ep. 48

Episode Stats

Summary

Transcript