00:00:07.000Sorry to report, there are no trannies on this program, no based black frauds, no Jewish homosexual liberals.
00:00:16.000So I know we just got finished with a very entertaining stream on the Rubin Report that we've all been watching, we've all been commenting on about Twitter.
00:00:25.000Sorry to report, it's not going to be as exciting.
00:00:28.000We don't have as many wild card minority elements there.
00:00:32.000To include just a white Christian guy trying to do the best for the country.
00:01:36.000If I'm misidentifying this, but I believe Dave Rubin's entire ideology, his entire profession, his entire person, his belief system is let's have a conversation.
00:02:08.000And for the youngsters who don't know William F. Buckley, you know, the British guy back in the day who would have on the great minds of the 70s and 80s, and they would discuss politics and culture, he had on people like Ayn Rand, people like Friedrich Hayek, Thomas Sowell, Milton Friedman, who you might not necessarily agree with them on their ideology, but they were interesting.
00:02:29.000You watch this program that he set up, and who does he have on?
00:02:32.000He has on all these skeptics, all these fat pigs, these atheists.
00:02:40.000He brings on the Jewish people, the rabbis, the blacks.
00:02:45.000And you know that's why he brings them on, because, you know, the very basis of their skin color.
00:02:48.000It's not like anything interesting is coming out of here.
00:02:51.000It's just interesting what's going on here.
00:02:54.000You know, we're going to hear the same talking points, the same nonsense about identity politics, the same stuff about small government, this vapid people should be free, people should have rights.
00:03:06.000From the catalog, from the pamphlet, we have Guy Benson, the homosexual.
00:03:11.000We have Red Pill Black, the black based feminist.
00:03:21.000And of course, this is presided over, presided over, of course, of course, as always, by our left leaning liberal homosexual degenerate Jew.
00:03:34.000It's just frustrating because it's a missed opportunity.
00:03:37.000That's what's frustrating about it, I think, in my opinion.
00:03:41.000Because here you have a program that has a lot of followers, that has a market for this.
00:03:45.000Kind of thing where people are talking about right wing type things, but you have a person that is uninterested in ideas, a person that is interested in personalities.
00:03:56.000I use that term loosely, of course, relatively speaking.
00:04:00.000It's a great opportunity for people to come on the show and actually talk about intellectual things.
00:04:05.000There is a shortage, I will say, of interesting intellectual people in this day and age.
00:04:41.000You know, because I could go on that show and ruffle some feathers saying things that people wouldn't agree with, but that people haven't heard before.
00:04:48.000Say things that people haven't thought about it that way before.
00:04:51.000And he has on the tranny and the black, you know, and this ridiculous thing.
00:05:06.000In recent times, have made a fetish out of like redefining the Republican Party and redefining the right wing in the image of the left.
00:05:15.000There's this sick goal, this sick self hating pathology on the right, where anything that looks like the right, anything that looks like America, or anything the right used to value is wrong.
00:06:08.000I think if you look at the past 2,000 years of the right wing, And of traditionalist conservatism.
00:06:14.000I don't think you'll find a lot of strains of small government, do what you feel, do whatever you want, care about only yourself, care about only the individual.
00:06:23.000I think you hear a lot about tradition.
00:06:26.000I think you hear a lot about order, wisdom, intuition, these, nature.
00:06:32.000These are the defining things of the right wing, not this classical liberal enlightenment nonsense that has dominated everything now.
00:06:42.000There is no right wing in the country anymore.
00:07:28.000They want to hear different people in different colors, of different ages, from different countries telling people do whatever you want, do whatever you like.
00:07:46.000I mean, you get a lot of dopamine when you do the things you feel, when you do the impulses.
00:07:50.000It's a very personal thing for people.
00:07:54.000When you have people who are saying you are wrong, you're in the wrong place, you're doing the wrong things, then suddenly it becomes an issue.
00:08:04.000Then suddenly people don't want to hear that.
00:08:06.000It's authoritarian, it's big government, it's statist.
00:08:09.000The real divide is between moral relativism, liberalism ostensibly, and conservatism, which is an objective reality, an objective morality, objective rules, order, hierarchy, institutions.
00:08:24.000That's the real divide, if you want to know.
00:08:27.000You know, it's not liberal Dave Rubin saying we can have low taxes and people can do whatever they want.
00:08:34.000And Ben Shapiro, another, an Orthodox Jew instead of a reformist Jew, secular Jew.
00:08:39.000What does that mean if it's a religion?
00:08:41.000Ben Shapiro saying you can do whatever you want, but I'm just not going to be okay with it.
00:10:15.000The reason I want to have him on is because I think he is a good left wing person who is smart and I think epitomizes a lot of what the left wing is feeling and how they express themselves.
00:10:27.000That's why I think he's an important person to have on.
00:10:30.000Not because I like, don't get me wrong, I don't like having this guy on to autistically misread my arguments and put words in my mouth and quote studies that don't exist.
00:10:47.000We want more of this video game player yelling about things he doesn't understand that we intuitively know are wrong.
00:10:55.000But it's productive to have him on for me to build my skill set, but also, I think, for us to better understand how to deal with these people.
00:11:03.000I'm going to try a little bit of a different approach tomorrow.
00:11:06.000And if you saw our first debate, I tried a very different approach.
00:11:11.000I tried a very different approach than most people do.
00:11:14.000You watch some of Destiny's stream andor other debates with other video game players and other people, and I think that the mistake that people make is there is no system.
00:11:24.000There is not a systematic understanding of virtues and values and actions.
00:11:31.000And I say this in a very deliberate way in the sense that nobody has asked Destiny under what conditions he would say he doesn't want immigration.
00:11:40.000Nobody has asked Destiny if immigration is axiomatic to him, if it's axiomatic to him.
00:11:46.000That we bring people in and that diversity is a good thing and that material wealth is better than this more spiritual, admittedly more abstract concept of community.
00:11:59.000Nobody has asked him to define what his values are, what his virtues are, under what conditions he would see an issue with immigration, what he thinks of our position.
00:12:09.000So I think if we undertake it in a more systematic way, I think that'll shed some light on.
00:12:18.000And I think it'll help us find better and more persuasive arguments and methods to get people on our side with immigration.
00:12:25.000I think that's a very big problem because we have a very convincing case on immigration, right?
00:12:30.000I mean, we have statistics about crime, we have statistics about terrorism, statistics about economics, about labor, statistics about community, family, happiness.
00:12:40.000I mean, all kinds of things, historical examples.
00:12:43.000And just fundamentally, the virtue that we like people that look like us and sound like us and talk like us.
00:12:49.000Are of the same stock and of the same country.
00:12:53.000And yet, about half the country and a lot of the youth say that bringing more people in is axiomatic a good thing.
00:13:00.000And I think if we broke that down and we really interrogated that topic, I think we could find better ways because we're not doing it right now.
00:13:09.000Donald Trump is the only one that's doing a good job of this.
00:13:21.000That's our big debate with Destiny tomorrow.
00:13:24.000Today's the 100th year anniversary of the Russian Revolution.
00:13:28.000And, of course, there was a news story that came out in the New Yorker today, all right, maybe it was yesterday, that Harvey Weinstein hired Mossad agents to spy on his sexual abuse victims.
00:13:57.000Hundred year anniversary of the Russian Revolution, which of course happened.
00:14:02.000Technically, it was in October of 1917.
00:14:06.000The way the calendars work in Russia at the time, and I'm not sure the exact details of this, I wasn't reading about this stuff in high detail since like the seventh or the eighth grade.
00:14:15.000That's when I really was obsessed with this topic.
00:14:18.000But the way that the calendar works, In Russia at the time, I think they were using a different calendar.
00:14:22.000Had it that the initial or the second revolution, which was the Bolshevik revolution, it happened in October for them.
00:14:30.000It's the October revolution for the Russians, but for us, it happens in November in this calendar.
00:15:03.000We saw a lot of tumult, a lot of chaos in Russia.
00:15:06.000At the time, they had been undergoing a very rough century in the 19th century, specifically the later 19th century, where they saw several assassinations of their czars, several transfers of power.
00:15:19.000And they found themselves under the leadership of Nicholas.
00:15:22.000The second in the early 20th century, who was a weak ruler, not very competent, not a lot of experience, somebody who wasn't so much interested in the duties of governance and the duties of the monarchy, the Russian, what was the name of the monarchy?
00:15:40.000But not so much interested in the duties of the royals for them as a figurehead, as the head of state, and not so much interested in the head of the autocracy, the head of government, the state apparatus.
00:15:51.000Additionally, this is a man without a male heir, his only son, and he tried to have sons many times, but his only male son was suffering from a blood disorder, looking like he wasn't going to make it.
00:16:01.000Of course, that was a big secret at the time.
00:16:07.000You had this top down form of government that at the time was very much outdated.
00:16:11.000Whereas much of Europe was transforming into liberal republics, some democratic, some not so much, but whereas Western Europe was transforming into a more democratic, liberal, and Western in character European society, Russia, which had tried to become European in the vision of Tolstoy, in the vision of the worldly great French European city, was lagging behind economically, culturally, politically, socially.
00:16:37.000And so you had this anemic autocracy, the Russian government, which was failing completely.
00:16:42.000Assassinations, anarchy in the streets, couldn't control political dissidents.
00:16:46.000You had faraway parts of the empire that were rising up in rebellion.
00:16:51.000You know, you had certain expressions that you see some strains of today of populism, of nationalism.
00:16:57.000Of course, that was the trend in the early 20th century.
00:17:00.000And you had a government that wasn't able to cope with it, an economic system that wasn't able to feed its people.
00:17:05.000And of course, this created some problems.
00:17:07.000So in 1917, after you had a couple of rebellions, a couple of bloody massacres, we remember the 1904 Bloody Sunday Massacre.
00:17:17.000They overthrow the government and they're not quite sure what to do.
00:17:20.000And I think this is very instructive, okay?
00:17:22.000I think this is very instructive for our time, which is very unstable.
00:17:25.000And I'm going through the history of the Russian Revolution to paint a picture for you, to show you an example which may be a cautionary tale for our country and more specifically our movement and some of the people in it, because this was a massive event in world history.
00:17:40.000You have maybe four revolutions which are really significant in the past 300 years American, French, Russian, and Iranian.
00:17:47.000This is a big one to talk about and a very good example of what to do, what not to do.
00:17:52.000So in February, they throw off this broken government, a broken government that is out of touch with the Russian peasant class.
00:18:00.000Out of touch and in many ways separated from the Russian soul.
00:18:05.000Spangler writes about how the Russian aristocracy, the Russian government, the Russian ruling class in the cities, St. Petersburg and Moscow, were of a totally different soul.
00:18:18.000Than the people in the peasantry, than the vast majority of Russians in the plains and the farms.
00:18:23.000And he characterized this with the dichotomy between Tolstoy and Dostoevsky.
00:18:27.000Whereas Tolstoy and the Muscovites and the people in St. Petersburg and the government wanted to see Russia in the character of the French, the great worldly cities, more of a Faustian soul.
00:18:40.000The peasantry was of a specifically and characteristically Russian, Slavic soul.
00:18:44.000And they were more religious, more mystic, of a different time, of a different culture.
00:18:58.000You know, in February they overthrew the government, they installed the provisional government, but they weren't sure which way to go so much.
00:19:07.000They understood what they didn't want, which was they didn't want the Tsardom, they didn't want the Tsarist autocracy, they didn't want Nicholas II, they didn't want the royal family, but they didn't know what they wanted yet.
00:19:19.000Nobody had quite consolidated power yet out of all the warring left wing and right wing groups.
00:19:25.000And so in February, you had a provisional government headed by Kerensky, who happened to be Jewish.
00:19:30.000So this provisional government goes on.
00:19:34.000And finally, then you have the October Revolution in 1917.
00:19:38.000And what ensues is five years of civil war between the Red Army, between the Bolsheviks led by Vladimir Lenin and Leon Trotsky, and the White Army led by various elements of the old Russian military, the old Russian aristocracy, the White Army, the monarchists.
00:19:54.000And I think what this shows, what this example demonstrates, is sort of the poorness, sort of the lack of wisdom of our contemporary revolutionaries.
00:20:06.000We have a lot of revolutionary talk in the right wing and the alt right.
00:20:11.000And we talk to people like Richard Spencer or people like Eli Mosley, and they talk about this revolution.
00:20:16.000You know, IE people talk to me about revolutionary discipline.
00:20:20.000And Richard Spencer compares himself to Karl Marx, and he's presenting a vision for us to strive for.
00:20:26.000And we see that in the Russian Revolution, they were able to do many of the things we talk about doing.
00:20:32.000Many of the things that people in our movement see as ends in themselves.
00:20:36.000You know, they threw off this broken, corrupt, out of touch government.
00:20:41.000And I know, you know, that's in some ways superficial.
00:20:44.000Comparison, but I mean, I think in principle it demonstrates these things in a mechanical sense.
00:20:55.000And through military force, which would be, I don't think that even be practical in this country, but they threw off the government, but then they didn't know what to do next.
00:21:03.000And it was a lot of chaos and a lot of suffering.
00:21:04.000And then when they did decide, when they did have a vision of what to do next, when finally you had these ideologues, hardline extremist ideologues, the Bolsheviks far more extremist than the Mensheviks, far more.
00:21:18.000Committed to the ideology of Karl Marx and communism, then the Mensheviks, then the unionists, then some of the socialists.
00:21:26.000And they had a vision for what they wanted.
00:21:30.000Karl Marx didn't, but Vladimir Lenin did, of what they wanted the society to look like, what they wanted the economy to look like, what they wanted education to look like.
00:21:39.000They had a complex vision of what the society should look like.
00:21:42.000And that motivated people in the peasant class, even though it was put forth by this vanguard party of Vladimir Lenin and the intellectuals and Trotsky.
00:21:51.000Even though it was put forward by academics and people who, in just about every mannerism, were the same as the same ruling class that the peasants hated.
00:22:00.000But the peasants ate it up because they wanted that vision.
00:22:32.000The vision wasn't what it cracked up to be.
00:22:36.000And fundamentally, this is a lesson, I think, in human fallibility, in human imperfection, a lesson on human nature that we can have a vision.
00:22:46.000We can succeed in overturning a government.
00:22:48.000We can succeed in implementing that vision.
00:22:51.000And we can try and reform that vision.
00:22:53.000And we can try for 100 years to put in place.
00:22:57.000This utopian design of what we want, whether it be a communist paradise or a collectivized agricultural society or an ethnostate.
00:23:07.000But it demonstrates that vision, ideology is insufficient every time.
00:23:12.000Vision, you know, this grand design of what we want, it will never be what it's cracked up to be.
00:23:18.000And that's why we need to temper that with wisdom.
00:23:21.000We need to temper that with virtue, with tradition, with conservation.
00:23:27.000A hundred years from that revolution, and we look at the legacy of that revolution.
00:23:32.000We look at the legacy of its leaders, of its intellectual antecedents, of its vision, and of its follow through.
00:23:40.000That this was an example, this is an illustration of human folly, of the utopian ideological folly of the 19th century.
00:23:49.000People, intellectuals who thought we could make it better if we just had a good system, if we just had it this way, it would be okay.
00:24:07.000We'll kill millions of people to get where we want to go.
00:24:10.000We'll start wars to get where we want to go.
00:24:14.000We'll execute children to get where we want to go, in the case of some of the revolutionaries of a certain ethnic character who killed the royal family.
00:24:24.000And all that suffering, all that bloodshed, all the misery, the gulags, the camps, the labor I mean, people eating themselves in Ukraine and for what?
00:24:50.000And now that they've re entered history, now that they've re entered a time that is immune from ideology, now are they starting to grow again?
00:25:00.000I think that's the lesson of the Russian Revolution.
00:25:02.000And by the way, that's not a lesson of communism was tried and it's failed and all these anti communist posters in the Turning Point USA.
00:25:11.000Don't get me wrong, I'm vehemently against communism.
00:25:15.000But I think it's not just communism, it's ideology itself.
00:25:18.000So, anybody that's pitching communism or anybody that's pitching capitalism, the free market, I think is the same thing.
00:25:24.000Anybody that's pitching the ethnostate, these visions, I think are wrong, are misguided, I think will only lead us to ruin.
00:25:33.000And that is the result of human folly.
00:25:35.000These people who want to force things to change, who want to force and think by their own human hands, by their own human reason, they can mold and shape.
00:25:46.000Society, all these moving parts according to their design.
00:25:53.000And that's why the future of the right wing is in virtue.
00:25:59.000And be that Christianity, I think it is in Christianity, but be that Christianity or just simple self help, taking self responsibility like Jordan Peterson teaches or others, and people call that centrism, I think it's a different kind of ordering.
00:26:13.000It's a different paradigm to look at the society.
00:26:16.000And the Russian Revolution teaches us that.
00:26:19.000That grand experiment, it's not going to work.
00:26:37.000They're preaching it doesn't matter what kind of person you are, it doesn't matter what kind of character you have, it doesn't matter if you're black or white or red or brown.
00:26:45.000I mean, depending on which group you're talking about, depending on if it's the free market crowd or the ethno state crowd.
00:26:51.000But they put the vision, they put this material system ahead of virtue.
00:26:59.000They put it ahead of development of the self, of human systems, systems that work on the micro level.
00:27:05.000And I don't think you're going to have it.
00:27:11.000I know we meandered a little bit between history and philosophy and religiosity and some things there, but I hope we're generally getting what I mean by that.
00:27:22.000It's not metapolitical, it's metaphysical.
00:27:25.000That I'm getting at, the metaphysical component of it.
00:27:27.000You know, they talk about metapolitical.
00:27:29.000We're going to move this political overton window.
00:27:31.000I'm talking about ages and millennia of people that try and fail these things and really the long view, the large view, the context of where these things are taking place.
00:27:43.000So that's why I stress things like that's why I say we have to focus less on the racialism.
00:27:50.000We have to focus less on this ideology stuff, identitarianism.
00:28:09.000You know, if you have a country of Christians, you're going to have a country that's going to make a lot of people happy and well adjusted.
00:28:25.000We know who are the kings, the gods among men, the chosen gods among men of materialism, of nihilism, of the carnal, of the flesh.
00:28:36.000The blasted globalist elite who cannot lead us astray any longer.
00:28:43.000And you look behind every, it's no coincidence, by the way, you look behind every ideology, you look behind every mass movement, every vision, and you will find the globalist.
00:28:54.000You will find the globalist who cares about the flesh and the carnal and the materialist trying to move us to paradise on earth, trying to create for us, you know, wonderland.
00:29:08.000Every time, without fail, without fail.
00:29:27.000Maybe that sounds wacky, but for people that are reading some of these things, for people that know what I'm talking about a little bit, this is high energy content.
00:30:40.000But so we have this Virginia election going on.
00:30:43.000Between Ed Gillespie and Ralph Northam.
00:30:46.000And let's see the live results here with 77% of precincts reporting.
00:30:52.000And this is the freshest data here, up to date here on the New York Times.
00:30:58.000With 77% of precincts reporting, Ralph Northam wins.
00:31:02.000You might know this already if you're watching Twitter live.
00:31:05.000You know, I've been going on and on about Russians for a while.
00:31:08.000So you might have seen the results here, but I'm seeing them now.
00:31:11.000It's been called for Ralph Northam, the Democrat here, he will be the governor of Virginia.
00:31:19.000And of course, this has major implications for Donald Trump and for the midterms.
00:31:25.000I don't know if it's as big as people are saying it is.
00:31:29.000Okay, and we haven't been following it too closely on this show, but I've been reading about it sort of on the periphery for some time, and I don't think it's a huge deal.
00:31:38.000Because we look at every special election that's been had since 2016, whether it was Georgia, who could forget Georgia?
00:31:46.000I mean, there were a couple of sporadic special elections between this one and 2016, and everyone, save the Alabama GOP primary, has been won by the Trump Republican candidate.
00:32:08.000We don't even have all of the precincts reporting here.
00:32:11.000But I think if I can speculate a bit, a lot of people are saying that the reason that Gillespie lost is for two major reasons on an electoral level, because the suburbs of D.C., they had a huge turnout and they went decidedly for the Democrat, which was a little bit surprising.
00:32:30.000And then on a more Metapolitical level that Ed Gillespie was this rhino.
00:32:35.000Steve Bannon said, even if Gillespie wins, it's because his rival in the Virginia GOP, Corey Stewart, has been carrying him with his Trump like rhetoric, his Trump like style.
00:32:48.000And I think there's truth to both of that.
00:32:52.000I think it demonstrates, I don't think it's like a death blow for the president because I think if Corey Stewart were in this election, it would be a totally different story.
00:33:01.000That if Corey Stewart were in this and he was the Trump Republican, well, you'd get a fair read on Trump's approval, or rather, you'd get some kind of litmus test on how Trump would fare in the primaries or in the midterm elections coming up in 2018.
00:33:16.000So I think that's one, why it's not so much of a big deal.
00:33:19.000Number two, Virginia went blue in 2016.
00:33:22.000So why would we say, why would we even expect that a Republican would win a race where you have a Democratic governor already, you have Democratic senators, or excuse me, you have A Democratic senator in Tim Kaine.
00:33:34.000I believe the governor was Republican previously in Virginia.
00:34:49.000If the D.C. metropolitan area swung the election, that's not exactly a surprise that a Republican or Trump couldn't carry that, you know, after all the rhetoric about the swamp.
00:34:59.000So I say we put this on the GOP establishment.
00:35:29.000Now it's time to put in place the populists.
00:35:31.000Now it's time to put in place the nationalists, the Roy Moores of the world, the Corey Stewarts of the world.
00:35:38.000So ultimately, I think it might actually end up being positive in that regard because when we go into the 2018 elections, it's just as important to see what will happen with Democrats and Republicans as it is to see, possibly even more so, to see what will happen between establishment Republicans.
00:35:56.000And challenger populist Steve Bannon type Republicans.
00:36:00.000I think it's a much more telling thing that Ed Gillespie lost and Corey Stewart never got in the race than it was that some Democrat won.
00:36:09.000Because the Democratic Party is in shambles.
00:36:11.000Let's not pretend like Ralph Northam is leading the Democrat revival.
00:36:52.000Unfortunate for the people of Virginia.
00:36:55.000When we see Democratic governors and state legislatures, which I think is not so much reported, how important the local government aspect is.
00:37:03.000When you see Democrats get in control of state governments, they tend to implement policies that hurt us electorally on the national level.
00:37:12.000You know, you consider you get, you know, hypothetically, let's say you get a Democratic administration in California or in Texas or in Georgia, and they tinker with the voting ID laws, or they tinker with illegal aliens voting, or they tinker with citizenship requirements, or, you know, they allow voter fraud to occur through negligence.
00:37:31.000I mean, that's why these things are impactful.
00:37:40.000These things do have real consequences.
00:37:42.000So that's why I say it is a mixed bag.
00:37:44.000When Democrats get in office for the governorship and in the state legislatures, it means it's going to be that more difficult for Republicans to win in the Senate, for Republicans to win the White House, even Republicans to win the House of Representatives.
00:37:57.000But by the same token, in 2018, we could see a stronger hand to be played by Steve Bannon, the populist, the nationalist, when you have such a Obvious record of failure among the establishment.
00:40:01.000He published a piece claiming that Harvey Weinstein used Mossad agents, former Mossad agents.
00:40:07.000He hired these private intelligence services that were occupied by former Mossad agents.
00:40:14.000And Mossad, of course, is the Israeli intelligence agency to spy on people he sexually abused and people who are going to blow the whistle on him.
00:40:24.000So here you have Harvey Weinstein, the bigwig.
00:40:29.000Hollywood producer who's going around raping people, who's going around abusing women, and he's a kingpin in Hollywood, in the Oscars, in the movie industry, as a producer.
00:40:42.000And everybody knows about it, nobody talks about it.
00:40:45.000And he's raping these women, he's abusing these women, and people are like, yeah, well, he happens to be a certain kind of guy.
00:40:52.000Well, he happens to be not so much a white male, so much as something else.
00:40:58.000And if that wasn't enough, if that was not glorious enough that we have.
00:41:03.000Scandal after scandal after scandal perpetrated by a very particular type of person against a very particular type of person for very pervy particular reasons.
00:41:14.000If that wasn't enough, that you got Harvey Weinstein and people coming down the list with certain names that you hear over the times, if that wasn't enough, then it comes out that he is actually directly involved with Israel's special forces, their spying agency, to harass and spy on these people and to keep lips shut.
00:41:37.000Alex Jones, like, he could not be more vindicated by things that are happening.
00:41:43.000Everybody says he's a loop, he's a nut job, he's a psychopath, and it seems like every week real things are happening that prove him right.
00:41:53.000You know, I mean, you would have, if you postulated like six months ago, if you said, you know what, there is this certain conspiracy in Hollywood of a certain kind of people that is raping children and raping women, and everybody's keeping quiet about it, and everybody's, Being hushed up, either they're being killed or threatened or paid off, and the Israelis are involved, Mossad is involved, people laugh at you.
00:42:20.000If you were like a major figure, John Oliver would be on his retarded show, laughing at you, chortling at you with his ridiculous, soiled audience.
00:42:32.000And now, six months later, it's in the New Yorker, it's in the New York Times, it's in the Washington Post.
00:44:07.000We got to get to our generous donors here in the Super Chat.
00:44:11.000You know, I had that fag, that bunty guy insulting my audience the other day, last night actually, saying my audience is a bunch of racists.
00:44:20.000And he didn't even mean it in a good way, he didn't even mean it in the sense that we love who we are.
00:45:01.000So we have our super chats here, and we got one from Alec here who says If Nova steals another Virginia election, I will start building a wall myself, starting in Fredericksburg.
00:47:24.000Instead of an unjust irrational violence, you will see a just level of irrational violence, if that makes sense, an organic level of irrational violence.
00:49:46.000Like, if I had Lauren Southern on and, like, interviewed her, she'd just say things that she said on her channel to a smaller audience, right?
00:49:55.000So that's why I'm not, I just don't think it's a very interesting format, in my opinion, unless I have, like, a burning question or, like, a feud.
00:50:02.000Like, I love disagreements and fights because.
00:50:05.000There's something new that comes out of it.
00:50:08.000But when you just have like this circle jerk crossover stuff, like when Spencer came on Nationalist Review, we didn't have Spencer on before as like a collaborator.
00:50:17.000We had him on to hash out this issue that we had and to have new thoughts on new questions.
00:50:23.000And I think that's why I was wildly successful.
00:50:25.000And the same was true with Enoch coming on the show.
00:50:27.000I didn't have Enoch to come on to joke around.
00:50:30.000And Nationalist Review, I think, is more for that.
00:52:31.000But if somebody wants to front, I don't know.
00:52:33.000I probably would release it regardless, but I just have a problem with when people say, you know, what you're saying is not valid because of this thing.
00:52:41.000You know, I mean, consider this the vast majority of people in poll are opposed to mass immigration, are opposed to people from the third world coming into our country.
00:52:52.000The argument that they use goes because.
00:52:56.000People of other races on average have lower IQs.
00:54:52.000You know, I don't understand where all these people find the time to get on this self help regimen or where they expect me to get on a self help regimen where it's like I'm building this company.
00:55:02.000We're talking about expanding, we're talking about building a Studio, we're working on this website.
00:55:14.000You have to do AV for that, editing, all kinds of things.
00:55:17.000I'm looking into starting a separate organization for politics.
00:55:21.000We're organizing a database of more than 100 people in 30 states to organize and looking into how they can do it in the Republican Party, on campus.
00:55:30.000We're looking into the legal aspect of that.
00:58:10.000If anybody knows Sam Hyde, and if he watches the show or if he knows who I am, I don't know if he does or not, but if he does, I would love to get him on the show or something.
00:58:21.000I mean, to collaborate with him in any capacity would be a great honor.