America First - Nicholas J. Fuentes - Respect Women Day | America First Ep. 121

00:00:01.000 Good evening, everybody.

00:00:02.000 We're watching America First.

00:00:03.000 My name is Nicholas J. Fuentes, and we have a great show for you tonight.

00:00:08.000 Lots going on in the world, lots of news.

00:00:11.000 A big announcement was just made an hour ago by South Korean officials about the United States and North Korea.

00:00:18.000 We're going to get into that.

00:00:19.000 I'm a little bit close here.

00:00:20.000 Let me scoot back a little bit.

00:00:23.000 As you can see, we're in a new studio, we're in a new set.

00:00:26.000 We are up here in a high rise apartment now in New York City in a studio.

00:00:33.000 At the top of a very tall building, and it's a beautiful evening out, as you can see.

00:00:37.000 Wow, isn't that something?

00:00:38.000 Look at all the things going on.

00:00:40.000 So, we're moving up in the world thanks to our maker support page.

00:00:44.000 We're now just making more money than we know what to do with.

00:00:46.000 So, we said, let's just get the studio at the best view in the best city.

00:00:50.000 We're on Fifth Avenue right now, so it's very great in our new studio.

00:00:54.000 But, wow, what a powerful show for you tonight.

00:00:57.000 It's Women's Day.

00:00:59.000 This announcement with North Korea, the tariffs were signed into law.

00:01:03.000 So much to get into, so much to talk about.

00:01:05.000 I'm very excited.

00:01:06.000 Fix yourself a snack, get comfortable, America first, marches along with another powerful episode.

00:01:14.000 And wow, what a day!

00:01:15.000 What a day with news!

00:01:16.000 I mean, there was the announcement with the tariffs this afternoon where President Trump signed into law his tariffs on aluminum and steel.

00:01:23.000 And what a tremendous press conference with the steel and aluminum industry workers.

00:01:28.000 And then just shortly after, it was announced that there was going to be an announcement at 7 o'clock Eastern Standard Time made by a South Korean official who announced that.

00:01:38.000 President Trump will be meeting with the leader of North Korea, Kim Jong un, before May.

00:01:45.000 And we'll see what happens with that.

00:01:46.000 I think we'll tackle that one first because that is the newest, that is the most fresh.

00:01:50.000 And we talked a little bit about this on Tuesday, I believe.

00:01:54.000 Tuesday or Monday, we talked about North Korea.

00:01:57.000 And there were rumors because of the South Korean delegation sent to North Korea that the North Korean regime expressed an interest in meeting with the United States.

00:02:08.000 There had been this opening of diplomacy, this opening of relations between the Two Koreas during the Olympics.

00:02:14.000 The South Koreans hosted the North Koreans.

00:02:16.000 The South Koreans sent a delegation to North Korea.

00:02:19.000 And there was a meeting earlier this week where North Korea made a promise to suspend their ballistic missile testing, to suspend their nuclear testing, and they expressed an interest in meeting with the United States.

00:02:29.000 And they'll have official summit talks between South and North Korea later in the year.

00:02:34.000 Well, today we heard it, and earlier in the week we expressed some skepticism, and so did the president.

00:02:38.000 The president, in his press conference with the Swedish prime minister, he said, you know what, look, Very good that the North Koreans are open to diplomacy.

00:02:47.000 This is how we want to resolve it.

00:02:49.000 And we'll see how it works out with South and North Korea.

00:02:52.000 And so it was optimistic, but it was cautiously optimistic.

00:02:55.000 And we talked a little bit about the planned potential Syria strike later in the year with regard to the Assad government's treatment of East Ghouta with potentially chemical weapons.

00:03:06.000 And we viewed it in the context of that, in the context of the madman remarks he made last week.

00:03:10.000 And now, but now finally, we see the Trump administration's official response to this invitation.

00:03:15.000 Obviously, this was a much more serious invitation, as was maybe thought earlier in the week, and President Trump accepted it and said that he will meet with Kim Jong un before May.

00:03:25.000 Now, here's what's interesting Kim Jong un, in reaching out to the United States, he said, We want to meet, and he also gave some preliminary concessions.

00:03:33.000 Now, remember, President Trump said, I will not meet with North Korea unless they agree to denuclearize.

00:03:40.000 And North Korea said, No, we will not agree to any preconditions.

00:03:43.000 We will not agree to any concessions before the meeting begins.

00:03:47.000 And although they didn't commit to Totally to getting rid of their nuclear weapons.

00:03:50.000 They didn't promise or begin that process.

00:03:53.000 They did say, until the talks are held, we promise to suspend missile and nuclear testing.

00:03:59.000 And additionally, Kim Jong un also said that he is committed to denuclearization.

00:04:05.000 Now, that's a big commitment.

00:04:07.000 North Korea, they've given us the runaround for a long time.

00:04:10.000 They've given us the runaround for 25 years.

00:04:12.000 And they've made different summit talks with the United States under Clinton, under Bush, less so during the reign of Barack Obama.

00:04:19.000 And we tried to do diplomacy with them in the past, and people have laid the blame at the feet of the United States or North Korea.

00:04:25.000 But point being, it's been tried before.

00:04:27.000 That's why people are a little bit cautious.

00:04:29.000 Now, that said, North Korea is saying that they are committed to denuclearizing.

00:04:34.000 This is not arbitrary rhetoric.

00:04:35.000 This is not rhetoric that is, oh, well, you know, they're probably just lying.

00:04:40.000 When North Korea says we are committed to these goals, I think you could view that with skepticism and you have to be cautious about it.

00:04:46.000 But that's a very sharp departure from the rhetoric that we were hearing from them for the past year or for the past year and a half.

00:04:53.000 Since President Trump's inauguration in January, January 20th, 2017, The rhetoric from Kim Jong un and from North Korea has been, we will never not denuclearize.

00:05:03.000 That is just not on the table.

00:05:05.000 The nuclear program is not on the table.

00:05:07.000 It's not negotiable.

00:05:09.000 We have it.

00:05:10.000 We are going to continue to have it.

00:05:11.000 We are going to continue to bolster it and increase it and strengthen it, and there's nothing you can do about it.

00:05:17.000 And this was the official rhetoric from Kim Jong un and from North Korea for a year and a half, at least under Trump, and for a long time before Trump.

00:05:24.000 Since Kim Jong il died, this was the official line of the party, which was, we are not giving up the nuclear program.

00:05:30.000 So that they are committed, that's why this is different.

00:05:33.000 So, I see already a lot of people online.

00:05:34.000 They're saying, this is, you know, we should be very skeptical.

00:05:39.000 We should be very cautious.

00:05:40.000 And to an extent, that's true.

00:05:41.000 But they say, oh, well, nothing good can come of this.

00:05:44.000 They're just giving us the runaround in X, Y, and Z.

00:05:47.000 But in so many different respects, this invitation, this opening is different from previous ones.

00:05:52.000 And for starters, just without even looking at what was said, which we can view as skepticism, we have to look at the things that we know about North Korea.

00:06:00.000 Qualitatively, what are the things that we know to be different?

00:06:04.000 About this round of talks as opposed to previous rounds of talks.

00:06:07.000 This is the first time, this is the first time since we've been dealing with North Korea since the 1950s that we have China on our side.

00:06:15.000 This is the first time that any president, that any administration has made a serious attempt to engage China, to bring China aboard, to cooperate in getting North Korea to denuclearize.

00:06:27.000 No other president has attempted this, not Bush, not Clinton, not Obama, at least not effectively.

00:06:33.000 And President Trump, unlike any other president, he saw where North Korea was drawing their strength from.

00:06:39.000 How they were able to weather American sanctions, isolationism from the American and Western led world order, financial system, diplomatic, military system, international institution system.

00:06:51.000 They were getting their energy from China.

00:06:51.000 And that was China.

00:06:53.000 They were getting their foreign currency from China.

00:06:56.000 They were getting really a host of resources and support from China.

00:07:00.000 And so President Trump said, We've done all we can with North Korea.

00:07:02.000 Let's engage China.

00:07:03.000 And so over the course of the Trump administration, you've seen China implement increasingly stringent and tighter sanctions against North Korea.

00:07:10.000 They stopped taking their coal.

00:07:13.000 They shut down all kinds of businesses doing business with North Korea.

00:07:16.000 North Korea is set to run out of foreign currency in very short order because they have very few businesses left, very few sectors or industries left that are connected to the outside world that are doing business and getting U.S. dollars or Chinese RMB or euros or anything like that because of increased sanctions, not only from the United States, but from China.

00:07:36.000 So we see the involvement of China, which is very different.

00:07:38.000 And we saw even from the Beijing government this week, They said that this would be the time for North Korea and the United States to have talks to denuclearize.

00:07:47.000 You see pressure from Russia.

00:07:49.000 You see increased pressure from the international community led by the United States.

00:07:53.000 We've never seen a sanctions regime stronger than the current regime that's been implemented over the course of the last year and a half by President Trump.

00:08:01.000 And the prevailing wisdom under Bush and Obama was we're doing all that we can.

00:08:06.000 We're doing all that is possible.

00:08:07.000 Sanctions are as tight as they can go.

00:08:09.000 We're doing the best that we can.

00:08:11.000 We're pressuring them as best as we can.

00:08:13.000 And Trump showed that's not true because over the course of a year and a half, sanctions have.

00:08:18.000 Have increased consistently.

00:08:19.000 It wasn't just like, okay, we did more sanctions in February and now we're done.

00:08:24.000 You had a sanctions increase as recently as CPEC.

00:08:27.000 President Trump announced new sanctions at CPEC two weeks ago.

00:08:31.000 So you've had a year and a half of increasing sanctions.

00:08:33.000 It seems like every month, every couple of weeks, the screws are tightening.

00:08:37.000 They're running out of energy to power their country.

00:08:40.000 They're running out of foreign currency.

00:08:40.000 They're running out of food.

00:08:42.000 They're running out of everything they need to maintain themselves because of the sanctions, because of China.

00:08:47.000 And you also look at, and this is the aspect that is much different than Obama.

00:08:51.000 Which is probably the most striking difference from Obama because you could say there was diplomacy before.

00:08:56.000 Maybe there was attempted engagement with China.

00:08:59.000 Maybe there was a sanctions regime.

00:09:00.000 But here's what's really different President Trump is using the military.

00:09:04.000 He's using the leverage of the military in the Pacific and also in different theaters of war.

00:09:10.000 For example, you saw earlier in the fall the first three carrier strike group military drill in five or six or ten years, I think.

00:09:19.000 The last one, I believe, was in 2007.

00:09:22.000 And so he put out three carrier strike groups, which is an aircraft carrier and a number of battleships, a number of destroyers and submarines and all kinds of things.

00:09:32.000 And they did a three carrier strike group drill, which is unheard of.

00:09:35.000 Nobody's ever seen military power like this.

00:09:38.000 And not only did he have drills with the United States and South Korea in the Pacific, and not only did he answer every North Korean missile test with a Minuteman missile test, an ICBM test from California or from Alaska, not only did he do ABM tests, not only did he start to implement the THAAD system, but additionally, he followed through.

00:09:57.000 On his promises in the Middle East.

00:09:59.000 This is a striking difference from Obama.

00:10:01.000 And again, this is not neocon stuff.

00:10:04.000 This is not insignificant stuff.

00:10:06.000 That when President Trump says we are going to follow through on a military action and then he follows through, that's significant.

00:10:13.000 That's consequential.

00:10:15.000 That sends a message to North Korea that when President Trump says do what we say or else, there is at least the potential, there is at least the possibility.

00:10:24.000 It is a plausible outcome that he means it, that it's not a bluff.

00:10:28.000 So, it's very important then, for example, in April of 2017, when he said, We are going to punish the Assad government.

00:10:36.000 He said, If the Assad government uses chemical weapons, we'll punish them, and they use them.

00:10:40.000 And then he said, We're going to do something about it.

00:10:42.000 And then he actually did, and then he followed through.

00:10:44.000 And he did do a missile test.

00:10:46.000 And if you recall, it wasn't important what he did with the missile test.

00:10:50.000 It wasn't important the target.

00:10:52.000 It wasn't important how much of a consequence that played in the war.

00:10:56.000 It wasn't important that it was missiles and not air raids and everything else.

00:11:00.000 The important thing was.

00:11:01.000 That he said he was going to do something militarily in response to, in very particular order, in response to a rogue regime amassing and using weapons of mass destruction, and then he followed through on it.

00:11:13.000 He made a promise, he followed through, and he set a precedent.

00:11:16.000 And he did this many times.

00:11:18.000 He did this with Iran when he supported the rebels there.

00:11:21.000 The mix up in the Middle East with Saudi Arabia, he set a new tone, a new precedent with diplomacy when he reset relations with Saudi Arabia.

00:11:30.000 And you see his engagement with the Pacific, with China, with some of these other adversaries.

00:11:34.000 And he's really just fundamentally changing the way that the United States interacts and engages with the world.

00:11:40.000 And that's why this is different.

00:11:41.000 So, I'm not here to tell you that this is going to work.

00:11:44.000 I'm not here to say it's a done deal.

00:11:48.000 North Korea is denuclearized.

00:11:50.000 It's a very rosy picture.

00:11:51.000 Good things are ahead.

00:11:52.000 I'm not saying that.

00:11:53.000 I'm not saying that because there's a very good chance that North Korea is just giving us a line.

00:11:58.000 There is a very strong possibility that North Korea is wasting our time.

00:12:03.000 And they're biding their time and they're stalling.

00:12:05.000 They invite President Trump over for high level negotiations, they give him the runaround.

00:12:10.000 It lasts months and months and months.

00:12:11.000 And in the meantime, They perfect their nuclear weapons program.

00:12:14.000 That's a very real possibility, probably a likely scenario.

00:12:18.000 But if we're looking at the qualitative differences between previous talks, previous engagement with North Korea, and this engagement with North Korea, there is also a strong thing to consider that this very well could be a genuine peace talk.

00:12:33.000 I would be skeptical of that.

00:12:34.000 We should be cautious about that.

00:12:36.000 But I think if we're observing the things that we know to be true, the things that have happened, which we can confirm, not this like West Wing rumors about what's going on.

00:12:44.000 And possibilities, but what's established, what has been established, how we know national or nation state actors to operate, how we know people to operate on the foreign policy stage, given what we know, I think we can project that this will have a higher probability of success than previous attempts.

00:13:02.000 And so that's, you know, that's not really, I don't know if that's a slogan or a catchphrase, but I think that's basically the prediction that we have.

00:13:08.000 That's basically the picture of what's going to happen that we have right now.

00:13:12.000 They very well could give us a runaround, and it very well could be.

00:13:15.000 I think it's highly likely that this is the case.

00:13:17.000 They've done it before, they'll do it again.

00:13:19.000 But we have a strong reason to believe that we have a better chance now than ever before because of the differences in how the Trump administration has approached North Korea.

00:13:28.000 And there was a report I was reading in a Chinese paper the other day.

00:13:31.000 It wasn't in Chinese, but it was from Beijing.

00:13:34.000 And they said that actually in North Korea, they see Trump very differently than Barack Obama.

00:13:39.000 They see Donald Trump as a wild card, the people and also the regime.

00:13:42.000 They see Donald Trump as somebody who they don't know if he's going to engage militarily because they've seen him engage militarily in other places.

00:13:50.000 They see him engage in Syria.

00:13:52.000 They see him engage with Iran.

00:13:53.000 They see him engage with his allies and with his enemies.

00:13:56.000 And there's a very different mentality in the North Korean regime with President Trump than with previous administrations.

00:14:02.000 And it's also something interesting that President Trump, remember the way that he talked to Kim Jong un and to North Korea?

00:14:09.000 It wasn't typical diplomacy like Barack Obama or George Bush.

00:14:12.000 It wasn't your standard fare of rogue regime or axis of evil or, you know, he's not cooperative, he's not 21st century.

00:14:20.000 President Trump called him fat.

00:14:22.000 He called him short and fat.

00:14:23.000 He called him rocket man.

00:14:25.000 He made him look impotent on the world stage.

00:14:27.000 He said, You're going to threaten us, but we have more guns than you.

00:14:30.000 We have a bigger nuke than you.

00:14:32.000 I have a bigger button than you.

00:14:33.000 So the disrespect that President Trump has shown towards Kim Jong un, and now Kim Jong un is taking the initiative and inviting him to his country for a face to face negotiation.

00:14:45.000 I mean, that's a tremendous level of respect and legitimacy that he's affording to President Trump in the eyes of his own people on the world stage.

00:14:52.000 You also have to take that into consideration.

00:14:54.000 I don't think Kim Jong Un would be making this overture, making this initiative to a president that's disrespected him like he has, if there wasn't something he was going to offer him.

00:15:04.000 I really don't believe that.

00:15:05.000 And look, as cautious as you can be about the North Korean talks, what I am confident in, why I'm confident in this, is that President Trump said, Great, we'll meet with you.

00:15:16.000 We look forward to denuclearization.

00:15:18.000 And we're not letting up the sanctions in the meantime.

00:15:21.000 Sanctions are not being loosened at all until the talks.

00:15:24.000 And additionally, A military drill with South Korea and the United States will move forward later in the year, regardless.

00:15:30.000 So I think that is the white pill there.

00:15:33.000 I think that's the silver lining that if North Korea is giving us the runaround, they're doing it at tremendous risk to their own well-being.

00:15:42.000 They're doing it very stupidly because we're not giving anything up.

00:15:45.000 We're not giving up on sanctions.

00:15:47.000 We're not giving up the military pressure on drills.

00:15:49.000 The best thing that could happen is while they are in talks with North Korea, President Trump takes more action against Syria and does another missile strike equal to or greater than the one last year.

00:15:59.000 That could be the best thing that could happen.

00:16:01.000 Not because I want to see conflict in Syria escalate.

00:16:03.000 I don't want to see that at all.

00:16:05.000 But that would send a message.

00:16:06.000 And so we would be getting in there.

00:16:08.000 We'd be getting respect.

00:16:09.000 We'd be getting legitimacy.

00:16:10.000 President Trump gets a big foreign policy win.

00:16:13.000 And hey, if it doesn't work out, we got missile and nuclear tests suspended.

00:16:18.000 And in the meantime, we gave nothing.

00:16:19.000 We gave up nothing.

00:16:20.000 Not sanctions, not military, nothing.

00:16:22.000 And so that's why I think it's a win all around.

00:16:24.000 We have to be cautious.

00:16:25.000 We have to be skeptical.

00:16:27.000 We have the best chance, I think, so far to achieve something.

00:16:30.000 And all the signs point to that.

00:16:32.000 But hey, if it doesn't work at the end of the day, we gave up nothing.

00:16:34.000 There are no concessions.

00:16:37.000 If the talks fail in three months, North Korea still runs out of foreign currency.

00:16:41.000 They still run out of energy.

00:16:42.000 China still has a sanctions regime against them.

00:16:45.000 We still have a military that is right on their doorstep.

00:16:48.000 And they still don't have a functional nuclear triad.

00:16:51.000 So I think it's a win win no matter what.

00:16:53.000 So that's North Korea looking very optimistic.

00:16:55.000 It's the art of the deal.

00:16:57.000 Exactly the kind of stuff that we predicted last year during the campaign how he would be different, how President Trump would be different.

00:17:04.000 This is why it was so crucial that we got an outsider in and a real outsider.

00:17:08.000 That wasn't just rhetoric, that wasn't just.

00:17:11.000 An arbitrary thing.

00:17:12.000 I know a lot of people said, well, he is basically a politician because he's running for office.

00:17:16.000 But it was so significant that he wasn't a senator, that he wasn't a governor, he wasn't a representative.

00:17:23.000 You know, people called Ted Cruz an outsider because everybody who worked with him just hated him.

00:17:27.000 But he wasn't really an outsider.

00:17:29.000 He was working in the public sector his whole life.

00:17:31.000 And that's why it was so critical.

00:17:33.000 That's why it's so crucial when you're looking at the calculus of this president that he is actually an outsider, that he was not a politician.

00:17:41.000 That's why you have to analyze him differently than anybody else because he doesn't play by the same rules.

00:17:46.000 He does not have, his life did not have the same experience, the same physiognomy of that of a politician.

00:17:53.000 It just wasn't the same.

00:17:54.000 The incentives, the relationships, the interaction with people and institutions, it just wasn't the same.

00:18:00.000 It was not arbitrary that he was a real estate developer, that he was in the private sector where he had to compete with people, where he had to understand human nature and different actors pursuing their interests and how to negotiate with them, how to negotiate and maneuver with leverage.

00:18:16.000 And that's why it's different this time around.

00:18:18.000 So we'll see.

00:18:19.000 Cautiously optimistic, but I think it's a pretty big win no matter what.

00:18:22.000 So that's President Trump on North and South Korea.

00:18:24.000 We talked a lot about it earlier in the week, but finally, some big movement on it.

00:18:28.000 And all the signs are looking very good.

00:18:30.000 All the signs are looking very optimistic, but we'll see what happens.

00:18:33.000 And it'll happen in the next six or seven weeks, right?

00:18:37.000 What is it, March 8th?

00:18:38.000 So this is in the next eight weeks, about that we should expect to see a meeting between Kim Jong un and Donald Trump in North Korea.

00:18:46.000 Could anybody imagine?

00:18:47.000 That kind of thing happening a year ago?

00:18:49.000 Can anybody imagine going back in time to, you know, when I was a young boy?

00:18:54.000 People say, you know, you're young now, but when I was a youngster watching the celebrity apprentice on television in my pajamas and you watch this guy on television, who would imagine 10 years later he's conducting nuclear diplomacy as the president?

00:19:08.000 Just, you know, you have to take a step back and think of the scope of it all.

00:19:12.000 You have to put it all in perspective.

00:19:13.000 So, pretty fascinating stuff.

00:19:15.000 But the real thing that I was going to get into, the real thing we were going to sink our teeth into, Before this North Korea business was International Women's Day.

00:19:24.000 We have so much going on with North Korea, so much going on with terrorists, but we have to take a step back and pause and look at International Women's Day.

00:19:32.000 So, all around the world, businesses and banks and countries and social media, and there's protests celebrating International Women's Day.

00:19:42.000 And you see something like this you see the International Women's Day, and it really gives you a lot of pause.

00:19:47.000 I think people really have to look at the way the world is today, the consensus, many of the things we take for granted, and really break down and ask ourselves how these things came to be.

00:19:58.000 Why these things came to be.

00:19:59.000 You know, we have this International Women's Day.

00:20:01.000 And first, before we get into women and men in 2018 and how we're going to break down the complementarity between men and women and why it's significant the different gender roles and what they are and all the rest.

00:20:13.000 But first, think about International Women's Day.

00:20:15.000 Think of the language that's used on a day like today and with women in general, with women and girls.

00:20:21.000 You hear a lot of words like empowerment.

00:20:23.000 We have to empower women.

00:20:25.000 This is my favorite one.

00:20:26.000 And I hear something like empowerment.

00:20:28.000 I hear it at Women's Day.

00:20:29.000 And we see these ads that are saying, you know, you go, girl.

00:20:32.000 And what's curious about a day like International Women's Day, and what's curious about the language and the propaganda, is the fundamental paradox that underwrites this.

00:20:41.000 The fundamental paradox that underwrites a lot of the so called identity politics, as the left has it in America today.

00:20:49.000 I happen to be a big believer in identity politics in the sense that I don't think there is politics outside of identity.

00:20:55.000 But I'm talking specifically with regard to the victim politics of the left, which is to say, the paradox that underwrites this for blacks, for women.

00:21:05.000 For Hispanics, for Muslims, for homosexuals, for transgenders, for all the different minorities, the victim groups, is this curious paradox that at once women are tough, women are smart.

00:21:18.000 You can do it.

00:21:19.000 You are just as good.

00:21:20.000 You're just as smart.

00:21:21.000 And actually, you're smarter.

00:21:23.000 And actually, you're stronger.

00:21:24.000 And actually, studies say that women are tougher and men just need them to show them how it goes.

00:21:29.000 And at once, there's this message of they are equal or better.

00:21:33.000 But then at the same time, Doesn't giving women their own day, doesn't that it's necessary, that it's incumbent on businesses and banks and leaders to give them an extra leg up, to give them their own day, to give them a special consideration, a peculiar distinction between men and say, you have to be lifted up, you have to be empowered from without, not from within.

00:21:58.000 It's not you who lifts yourself up, you have to be lifted up from without.

00:22:01.000 You need other powerful people to come in and lift yourself up.

00:22:04.000 And this is the peculiar contradiction.

00:22:07.000 Which underwrites all the politics of minorities in these different groups, all groups except for white people, except for white men, straight white men, really, straight white Christian American men in particular, if we're going to get down to the details.

00:22:21.000 But that's the paradox that underwrites all under people, which is at once they are strong, at once they are warriors, but at the same time they need.

00:22:29.000 At the same time they need, they have to have this support, they have to have their own day.

00:22:35.000 We have to recognize them, we have to distinguish them.

00:22:37.000 And that is, of course, contradictory.

00:22:39.000 Wouldn't it presuppose?

00:22:41.000 Giving them their own day, that they are weaker, that they need something else.

00:22:44.000 And if they need something, doesn't that presuppose that they are lesser in many ways?

00:22:47.000 And of course they are.

00:22:48.000 Of course they are.

00:22:50.000 Of course women and men are not equal.

00:22:52.000 That's the message today for International Women's Day.

00:22:54.000 Women and men are not equal.

00:22:55.000 They're not the same.

00:22:57.000 That doesn't mean they're inferior.

00:22:59.000 That doesn't mean men are superior.

00:23:00.000 That doesn't mean women are superior and men are inferior.

00:23:03.000 There's this very interesting, another interesting contradiction that exists today where if you're against egalitarianism, which egalitarianism is radical equality, it's the belief that, you know, we're all equal.

00:23:14.000 We're all just pink.

00:23:15.000 We're all just these androgynous flesh units men and women, black and white.

00:23:19.000 There's no distinctions.

00:23:20.000 We're all the same.

00:23:22.000 The contradiction inherent in egalitarianism, or maybe the presupposition, is that if you believe in difference, you believe in hierarchy.

00:23:32.000 That if you believe that men and women are different, well, you believe that one is better than the other.

00:23:36.000 One is superior.

00:23:37.000 We also hear the same kind of rhetoric with race.

00:23:40.000 If you believe that white and black people are different, you must necessarily believe that one is better than the other.

00:23:47.000 If you believe that Christianity and Islam are different at a fundamental level, you must necessarily believe that one is better than the other.

00:23:54.000 If you think that these people belong in that country so that they can be happy and do their own thing, well, you just must think that this is your country because you're better.

00:24:01.000 And of course, none of this is true.

00:24:02.000 Of course, none of this is true.

00:24:04.000 We look at men and women, and they are different qualitatively and quantitatively.

00:24:08.000 Men are taller than women, men are stronger than women.

00:24:12.000 They have more muscle mass.

00:24:13.000 When we say strong, strong is a very loaded term.

00:24:16.000 Or if you say something like men are stronger than women, and we all know what that means, they'll say women are strong because they endure hardships you can't even imagine.

00:24:23.000 And maybe while that's certainly true, they have emotional fortitude.

00:24:26.000 We're talking about muscle mass.

00:24:27.000 Quantitatively, men on average have more muscle mass.

00:24:30.000 They grow taller.

00:24:31.000 They grow larger.

00:24:33.000 They have a different bone structure.

00:24:35.000 They hit puberty at different ages.

00:24:36.000 Their bones fuse at different ages.

00:24:39.000 Their intelligence is different.

00:24:41.000 Their brain development is different.

00:24:42.000 You know, here's a very interesting thing about their brain chemistry where people might say about men being smarter or women being smarter.

00:24:49.000 The truth of the matter is that women on average, I believe, they have a higher intelligence.

00:24:53.000 I don't know if I would agree with that, but there are studies that say that women on average have a higher intelligence.

00:24:58.000 But at the same time, Time, men have a higher spread of intelligence, that they have more savants, they have more geniuses, more people at the upper end, and they also have more dummies, more people that are under the average, more people that are going to be on the lower, the left side of the bell curve.

00:25:15.000 And there's a perfect difference.

00:25:16.000 I think that epitomizes it, where just because they are different, just because there is a greater spread and one has maybe a higher average, that doesn't mean that one is better than the other.

00:25:27.000 That doesn't mean that, well, men, because they have more geniuses, they are smarter, they are superior.

00:25:33.000 And because women have a higher average, they are smarter, they are superior, but we just allow them to be different.

00:25:39.000 And the same is true of anatomy.

00:25:40.000 The same is true of, of all the other differences.

00:25:43.000 The qualitative and quantitative differences exist.

00:25:46.000 And here's the kicker.

00:25:47.000 Here's why the transgenderism and all the rest is so destructive.

00:25:50.000 The reason why there are differences, the reason why we believe in difference, and that's not problematic for our worldview, is because we believe in the comparative advantage of men and women.

00:26:00.000 The reason that they can be different while being equal, Is because they were both made to complement each other.

00:26:07.000 They were made to satisfy different roles, different responsibilities.

00:26:11.000 If you believe that men and women, their sole task, their sole obligation in life is to become wealthy and to pursue pleasure and to consume, well, then your world, you would have a big problem with men and women being different.

00:26:25.000 Because if both people are one and the same and pursuing the same goals, they're just these atomized individuals and all they want is to have big houses and fast cars.

00:26:34.000 And they want to have full bellies and a lot of sexual pleasure, then yes, this would be a hierarchy.

00:26:40.000 You would say that men are better than women because they're more aggressive and they do have more geniuses and they're more assertive and they take much more risk than women.

00:26:50.000 And you would say that yes, if we're judging it just by this metric at pursuing the same goal, that men are better if you're an egalitarian.

00:26:57.000 But here's why that's not a trouble for our worldview.

00:26:59.000 We say that women are better, they are better suited and they are superior in their function, in their role.

00:27:06.000 Which is, of course, the birthing, the rearing, the nurturing of children.

00:27:11.000 And men are better and superior in their domain, which is to protect the woman, to go out and provide for the woman and for the family at large.

00:27:19.000 And so, when you have a worldview that's constructed, and this is why our worldview is coherent, the reason that we can allot for different genders, different sexes that are, in the real sense of the word, different is because we see them as having different final causes in an Aristotelian sense, in a teleological sense.

00:27:37.000 We see men and women not as like they came out of nowhere.

00:27:41.000 Oh, poof, here's mankind.

00:27:43.000 And there's two kinds of men there's men and there's women.

00:27:46.000 And it doesn't really matter.

00:27:48.000 That's just arbitrary.

00:27:49.000 They just are the way they are.

00:27:51.000 And some are taller and some are shorter.

00:27:53.000 And some have this part and some have that part.

00:27:55.000 And some have breasts and some don't.

00:27:57.000 But these are all just minor details.

00:27:59.000 They're pursuing the same thing.

00:28:00.000 All they want is pleasure.

00:28:02.000 In a very liberal, capitalist, late stage capitalist sense of the word, they all just want the same thing.

00:28:08.000 They're all directed towards the same goal.

00:28:11.000 If there is no goal directed in this, if there is, they're all directed towards the same thing.

00:28:15.000 Well, we see men and women as created for a purpose.

00:28:18.000 That's where religion and metaphysics come into it.

00:28:20.000 We see men and women as created towards a specific end with a certain goal in mind.

00:28:26.000 That men would serve this function, and that's why they're different in this way.

00:28:29.000 That's why they're better in some respects than women in their own domain.

00:28:33.000 And women are better in some respects than men in their domain because they are designed, they have a goal directedness, they are aimed towards a specific end the rearing and the nurturing of children for one, and the protecting and the provision for women and children in the other.

00:28:48.000 And here's why this is so fundamental.

00:28:50.000 Here's why this is important.

00:28:51.000 We see the different masculine and feminine virtues.

00:28:55.000 Let me pull this out over here.

00:28:56.000 We're going to have to figure something out with this microphone.

00:28:59.000 Phone in the whiteboard because it never works so well.

00:29:01.000 Either the sound is bad and then the lighting is goofy, but we'll turn up the gain here.

00:29:05.000 So here you have men, these are the blue guys, and you have women, these are the pink, the ladies.

00:29:12.000 And here are your masculine virtues, here are your feminine virtues, and here's why this is consequential.

00:29:17.000 When we talk about men and women, when we talk about teleology, we talk about goal directedness.

00:29:23.000 This is not just, you know, like Oxford talk, this is not just intellectual talk.

00:29:27.000 And let me actually increase the brightness here because Whenever the whiteboard comes out, it throws off our white balance.

00:29:34.000 So let me do a little boomer tech here.

00:29:37.000 Will that help it?

00:29:39.000 Maybe if I do this?

00:29:40.000 No, that's not it.

00:29:42.000 Maybe if I do that?

00:29:43.000 No, that's not it.

00:29:45.000 Whatever.

00:29:45.000 You know what?

00:29:46.000 Who cares?

00:29:47.000 We're getting off track.

00:29:48.000 So we'll just have to deal with it a little bit darker.

00:29:51.000 The studio's having some trouble here, but I assure you that's just optical illusion.

00:29:56.000 So the reason why this is consequential, when we talk about goal directedness, why this is not just pie in the sky abstraction talk, here's why this is important.

00:30:04.000 Men have certain biological differences from women, and they have spiritual differences from women as well.

00:30:11.000 We believe, at least we in a traditional sense of the word, that men are not just material.

00:30:18.000 They're not just atoms and neurons and flesh and blood, but they also have an essence.

00:30:22.000 They also have a spirit.

00:30:23.000 There's also a formal cause to men.

00:30:25.000 And they have virtues.

00:30:26.000 They have different proclivities in a personal way, that they are better suited towards aggression, strength, heroism.

00:30:33.000 These are masculine virtues.

00:30:35.000 Masculinity is a form in itself.

00:30:37.000 You have the male.

00:30:38.000 But you have a masculine spirit, a masculine energy, and women have the same.

00:30:43.000 Now, men and women were created to complement each other, not just biologically, in that you have male and female parts, and it's not, again, that's not an arbitrary thing, that it fits, it makes sense.

00:30:54.000 You know, that if you look at a plug that goes into a wall socket, it just makes sense.

00:30:59.000 That's how it was designed to work and towards a certain end.

00:31:02.000 And not only do you have a biological complementarity in that sense, but you also have a complementarity in a social sense.

00:31:08.000 That the different virtues of men and women complement each other.

00:31:11.000 That a man is aggressive and they take risks and they're strong and they have to have a predatory animalistic instinct because they may have to kill people that want to hurt their family and they may have to kill animals, ferocious animals to defend for themselves, at least in ancient times.

00:31:26.000 Nowadays, they have to compete for resources.

00:31:29.000 And so they're strong and they compliment the woman in that they have to protect.

00:31:32.000 They have to have this particular energy to make up for the women where they are softer and they are more gentle and they don't have those same capacities.

00:31:40.000 And in the same sense, women are patient.

00:31:42.000 And they are caring and they're nurturing and they're refined and they temper that animosity, that predatory instinct in men.

00:31:48.000 They're calm and they are able to rear the children with warmth, with tenderness.

00:31:52.000 They are there to temper the masculinity of men.

00:31:55.000 And so there is this complementarity on a biological and a spiritual level.

00:32:00.000 And when this is functioning, when this is in harmony, when the complementarity exists on both levels and you have marriages and when these things are all syncing up together, you have marriages and long marriages and healthy marriages.

00:32:15.000 This all contributes to what we're all here for at the end of the day.

00:32:18.000 Kids, happy, healthy, well developed, well adjusted children.

00:32:24.000 If mommy and daddy are masculine and feminine, and you have a real father who is a man and a real mother who is a woman, and they're functional together, and they love each other, and they have an enduring marriage, and they compliment each other in those ways, hey, then the kids are going to be okay.

00:32:41.000 They understand what it means to be a man, they understand what it means to be a woman.

00:32:45.000 Their worldview makes sense.

00:32:47.000 They know who they are in their own skin.

00:32:47.000 They know who they are.

00:32:49.000 They love themselves and they're happy and they're good and they go out and they meet up with other men and women and they can procreate for the next generation.

00:32:56.000 This is how the world is supposed to function.

00:32:58.000 This is the foundation of my worldview.

00:33:00.000 My worldview is not based on, at the end of the day, it's not so much based on race.

00:33:04.000 It's not based on ideology.

00:33:07.000 It's not based on economy.

00:33:08.000 It's not based on free trade.

00:33:09.000 It's based on this.

00:33:11.000 If this is an order, if this triangle is working properly and men and women are okay and the kids are okay, we are so much better off.

00:33:20.000 No matter what economic system, no matter what anything else looks like, if this is in harmony, odds are you're going to fix the problems that you have, whether demographic, health care, immigration, any problem that you have.

00:33:32.000 If this gets back in order, all of this contributes to solving problems.

00:33:36.000 Kids are happy and healthy.

00:33:37.000 That means they're educated.

00:33:38.000 That means they have a sound mind.

00:33:40.000 That means they're wise.

00:33:42.000 And they're going to be able to make good decisions.

00:33:43.000 That means they're working.

00:33:45.000 And all the rest, it's very good.

00:33:47.000 Well, what happens is nowadays you have all these things are out of whack.

00:33:52.000 Men are becoming feminized and women are becoming masculinized.

00:33:55.000 When they mix together in schools, when they grow up together in schools and they grow up side by side, and you have the elimination of male and female spaces, men and women have been desegregated.

00:34:07.000 You have kind of this process of osmosis where the women pick up the traits of the men and they become coarse, they become profane, they become inferior men, in a phrase, to borrow a phrase from Yaki.

00:34:21.000 And men adopt all the traits.

00:34:23.000 Of women, they become feminized.

00:34:25.000 They adopt this up talking that women do.

00:34:28.000 They adopt this gentleness, this feebleness.

00:34:31.000 They become weak.

00:34:31.000 They become too sensitive.

00:34:33.000 They can't exercise their masculine virtues.

00:34:35.000 And when this stuff is out of whack, it throws everything out of whack.

00:34:38.000 Courtship becomes confusing.

00:34:40.000 Nobody knows what the rules are.

00:34:42.000 Should we be gentlemen?

00:34:43.000 Should we be dominating?

00:34:44.000 Or should we be passive?

00:34:45.000 Should we be effeminate?

00:34:47.000 For women, should they be gentle?

00:34:48.000 Should they be traditional?

00:34:50.000 Should they expect men to take the lead?

00:34:51.000 Or should they be out there paying their way and pulling their own chairs out for themselves and opening their own doors?

00:34:56.000 These are minor things, but.

00:34:58.000 They represent broader disparities or broader dissonance between what women understand themselves to be and what society says they are.

00:35:05.000 And you throw these virtues out of whack.

00:35:07.000 Men and women are not able to relate to each other in a healthy way.

00:35:11.000 Courtship becomes impossible.

00:35:13.000 Relationships become difficult.

00:35:14.000 Marriages become confusing.

00:35:16.000 Because there is so much conflict and people don't know how to navigate in these changing times, they dissolve and they fall apart.

00:35:23.000 And then what happens to the kitties?

00:35:25.000 What happens to the kitties?

00:35:26.000 They're either not made, or they come up in broken homes, or they come up in single parent homes, and then they don't know what a man is or what a woman is.

00:35:36.000 They don't know how they're supposed to relate to the opposite sex.

00:35:38.000 They don't have both energies in their parenting.

00:35:41.000 And then it all falls apart.

00:35:42.000 So, this is at the end of the day, if you think about why we're here, what we're directed towards, why we have certain, you know, what liberals might call vestigial reproductive organs, why it's all like this, this is the reason.

00:35:55.000 And this is fundamentally the difference in worldview between traditionalists and liberals or the left or, you know, whatever you want to call it.

00:36:04.000 The real fundamental difference in worldview is not between right wing people and left wing people.

00:36:08.000 It's not.

00:36:09.000 Capitalists and communists, it's not, you know, the real racists and what the media calls racist.

00:36:15.000 The real difference is do you believe in truth?

00:36:18.000 Do you believe that the world as it was 50 years ago was a place of racism and sexism and xenophobia and misogyny and homophobia?

00:36:27.000 Do you think that all the prejudices and all the traditions of the past were arbitrary?

00:36:33.000 They were the result of accident or ignorance?

00:36:36.000 Or do you believe that the world has a rhyme and a reason to it?

00:36:39.000 Do you believe that the world has a reason that things exist the way they are?

00:36:42.000 Do you believe that things are different and they're directed towards goals?

00:36:45.000 Or do you believe that we're all just different flesh animals?

00:36:49.000 We're all the same, all pink on the inside.

00:36:52.000 And everything that came before 1991, or everything that came before the United Nations, or everything that came before the Atlantic Charter, was just ignorant and it was bigoted.

00:37:01.000 They just didn't know as much as we did.

00:37:03.000 And that's the difference between the two different worldviews.

00:37:05.000 That's why these things can never be reconciled.

00:37:08.000 I don't think you'll ever resolve this with a debate because we're operating on two different dimensions, two different planets.

00:37:14.000 Different presuppositions, different metaphysics.

00:37:18.000 And until we can address these differences on that level, until we can sit down and have a debate about our political differences on that higher level of metaphysics, debating the presuppositions that underlie the philosophy and the ideology and therefore the political opinions, we're never going to resolve it.

00:37:36.000 But I think more and more you're seeing people come around to it.

00:37:38.000 I think Generation Z is coming around to it because it's intuitive, it's natural to people.

00:37:43.000 You understand that all the left wing, Social experiments and social projects, they entail rewriting.

00:37:49.000 They entail reprogramming.

00:37:51.000 If women or blacks or Hispanics or whoever, if they're not thinking the right way, well, they are just ignorant.

00:37:57.000 They have to be reeducated.

00:37:58.000 They have to be taught.

00:37:59.000 They have to be indoctrinated in public school and then in college and then with media and commercials.

00:38:04.000 You ever notice that you see something unnatural on television and you have to rewire your brain?

00:38:10.000 It's put out there to rewire your brain to say, this is normal, actually.

00:38:14.000 We have to artificially create this image.

00:38:16.000 To get you to start thinking in a natural way.

00:38:18.000 And isn't that sort of contradictory?

00:38:20.000 It's natural, it's intuitive that the world is the way it is.

00:38:23.000 That boys are going to be boys and girls are going to be girls.

00:38:26.000 And so I think Generation Z is waking up to it.

00:38:29.000 And maybe possibly the best example of this, which I like to bring up, is the movie Fifty Shades of Grey, or the book Fifty Shades of Grey.

00:38:37.000 Because here is a book which is degenerate, which is disgusting, but here's a book which at the end of the day has a very perverted but traditional gender role.

00:38:46.000 It has a very perverted but traditional worldview.

00:38:48.000 In the sense that you strip away all the sick and depraved stuff, and here is a man being masculine and aggressive, and it's taken, it's perverted, it's taken to these cartoonish, it's turned into a caricature, a mockery of what it's supposed to be.

00:39:03.000 But you boil it down, and here you have this uncontrolled, raw, and masculine energy, which is problematic.

00:39:09.000 And then you have the woman, who is equally problematic that she's submissive and all the rest, and in a very sick and perverted way.

00:39:16.000 But look at who supported that project.

00:39:19.000 In the age of feminism, in the age of female empowerment, in the age of we're free from our biological and sociological constraints, marriage is slavery, and having kids is a shackle, it's a ball and chain around the ankle of women and their potential to break the glass ceiling.

00:39:35.000 Who drove the sales of the books?

00:39:37.000 Who drove this to the number one sold book on the New York Times list?

00:39:41.000 Who drove the movie to be a huge blockbuster?

00:39:43.000 It was women.

00:39:44.000 It was women.

00:39:45.000 And if you're really scrutinizing, you can see this everywhere.

00:39:49.000 The writing on the wall is everywhere where women are craving real men again.

00:39:54.000 They're craving real masculinity again.

00:39:57.000 And men, I think, are craving real femininity in the same way.

00:39:59.000 Problem is, because the society has told men and women that these are wrong, If you play into that, if women want to have a strong husband and they want to have kids and they want to be a mom, well, they're oppressed.

00:40:13.000 They're wrong to think that.

00:40:15.000 They've been brainwashed.

00:40:16.000 You can't trust yourself.

00:40:17.000 You have to trust the communist literature.

00:40:19.000 You have to trust the Marxist propaganda.

00:40:21.000 People just repress these natural instincts, they repress these intuitive feelings.

00:40:28.000 And naturally, they come to the surface in unhealthy ways, in perverted, distorted ways.

00:40:34.000 And I think that's what you're seeing on both sides of the equation.

00:40:37.000 I think in many ways, you know, people talk about the trap question in the far right.

00:40:42.000 I think an anime, I think this is a perversion of men's desire for feminine women again.

00:40:48.000 I think with women, when you hear a lot of this stuff about, you know, Fifty Shades of Grey and that kind of thing, I think it's equally their desire for strong and masculine men.

00:40:57.000 I don't think it's any secret.

00:40:59.000 So that's what we have to think about on International Women's Day.

00:41:02.000 Get rid of it.

00:41:03.000 We have to go back.

00:41:04.000 The men and women's day is Mother's Day and Father's Day.

00:41:07.000 That's what's important.

00:41:09.000 Not about people as ends in themselves, but as connected, as part of a process.

00:41:14.000 I think that's another fundamental difference the liberals and the left, and maybe more broadly, neoliberals, neoconservatives, these utopian, these progressive people, they see men and women, they see the individual as an end in itself.

00:41:29.000 You are nothing more than yourself.

00:41:30.000 You're just you.

00:41:32.000 And community doesn't matter.

00:41:33.000 Mom and dad don't matter.

00:41:34.000 Kids, if you want them, if they're going to make you happy, sex, if it makes you happy.

00:41:40.000 Bigger house, hey, if it floats your boat, if that's what you want, and it's all about you, it's all about me, me, me.

00:41:45.000 It's a solipsistic world that the individual is the end in himself.

00:41:50.000 We want to, and you hear this on Twitter I'm living my best life.

00:41:54.000 I'm being my authentic self.

00:41:56.000 I shouldn't have to feel this way.

00:41:58.000 I shouldn't have to feel that way.

00:41:59.000 I shouldn't be responsible for this.

00:42:01.000 And that's what the consumer, the neoliberal, sees himself as.

00:42:05.000 We're not a part of anything larger.

00:42:06.000 We're an end in ourselves.

00:42:08.000 And the conservative, the traditionalist, says, no, we're a part of something bigger.

00:42:11.000 We don't celebrate Women's Day, we celebrate Mother's Day, we celebrate Father's Day.

00:42:15.000 We don't see ourselves as, well, I'm just this Adam.

00:42:18.000 No, we're a part of a legacy.

00:42:20.000 We're a part of a continuum, past, present, and future, that we have parents, and their parents had parents, and now here we are, and we'll have children, and our children will have children.

00:42:31.000 And we're not just connected vertically in time, but also horizontally.

00:42:35.000 We're in a community among other people, and we have to be considerate and cognizant of those other people.

00:42:40.000 And you're in a community with other men and women.

00:42:42.000 You're in a community with other men, and also other women, and also people in your nation and your religious affiliation.

00:42:47.000 And I think that's another fundamental difference.

00:42:49.000 But that's what we have to think about on Women's Day.

00:42:51.000 We have to really break down what are the assumptions?

00:42:55.000 What's the metaphysics behind this?

00:42:57.000 It doesn't make any sense to us, but we have to ask ourselves why.

00:43:01.000 It's not sufficient to say it's crazy.

00:43:03.000 It's not sufficient to say this is lunacy.

00:43:07.000 The world has gone mad.

00:43:08.000 We have to ask ourselves why.

00:43:10.000 Why is it crazy to us?

00:43:12.000 For what reason?

00:43:13.000 What's the alternative?

00:43:14.000 What instinct?

00:43:15.000 By what instinct do we say it's crazy?

00:43:16.000 By what standard do we say it's crazy?

00:43:18.000 Until he can answer those questions, I don't think we can adequately reform.

00:43:22.000 I don't think we can adequately mount a counteroffensive.

00:43:27.000 So that's Women's Day.

00:43:29.000 Woohoo.

00:43:30.000 You know, we respect women.

00:43:31.000 We love women.

00:43:32.000 We've got to bring women back.

00:43:33.000 Women have become these.

00:43:34.000 Like I said, these coarse, these profane people, we've got to bring back the real broads, the real wives.

00:43:40.000 I think everybody would be so much happier.

00:43:42.000 I think few people understand.

00:43:44.000 I think few people will acknowledge these days how much happier we would all be if we could all just be who we are, if we could all just become who we are, as Spencer likes to say, which was actually an adage that Nietzsche liked.

00:43:57.000 But if we could just be who we are, if we could just be men, and women could just be women, and whites could just be whites, and blacks can be blacks, and nobody would bother saying you have to meet this expectation, you have to prove these people wrong.

00:44:09.000 We'd be so much happier, folks, if we just told the truth, if we just said what's on our mind, but we can't do it or else we get fired.

00:44:15.000 So that's Women's Day.

00:44:16.000 Should we talk about the tariffs?

00:44:16.000 I don't know.

00:44:18.000 Do we have enough time?

00:44:19.000 It's 7 45.

00:44:22.000 Let me check and see how many super chats we have.

00:44:24.000 If we have a ton, we'll just get to super chats.

00:44:26.000 If not, we'll spend a little time on the tariffs.

00:44:30.000 I think we'll just do the tariffs because we don't have that many super chats.

00:44:33.000 Looks like we're taking a real dive here.

00:44:35.000 Is there blood sports going on?

00:44:36.000 Because we went from like 7 50 on Monday down to 4 30 today.

00:44:40.000 What's going on, folks?

00:44:42.000 But.

00:44:43.000 I guess we'll cover briefly the tariffs.

00:44:45.000 And just one final note I think it does tie in pretty nicely to the men and the women's stuff.

00:44:51.000 The tariffs were signed into law today on steel and aluminum, and we talked about this all week.

00:44:55.000 We talked about this all week last week the benefits of tariffs, how they're bringing back millions of jobs, how they can open back our factories if done correctly, and that's great.

00:45:06.000 But what's also interesting about tariffs is what they do is they prioritize production over consumption.

00:45:11.000 And that's just the last note that I will leave on tariffs.

00:45:14.000 It's kind of interesting how the two.

00:45:16.000 Connect.

00:45:16.000 You're starting to see the connections in the different issues, be they economic, be they demographic, social.

00:45:23.000 It's all connected.

00:45:24.000 They're not these isolated, pigeonholed different issues.

00:45:27.000 They're all connected to a larger worldview.

00:45:29.000 That when we talk about tariffs, we're saying we want to produce instead of consume.

00:45:34.000 We don't just want to have and buy products and use products, we want to make the products.

00:45:40.000 That's how we see a country that is successful, that is self sufficient.

00:45:43.000 And in the same way, isn't that what we're saying about men and women?

00:45:46.000 We don't want to just consume life, we want to produce life.

00:45:50.000 We don't want to just participate and take part in it.

00:45:52.000 We want to prolong it.

00:45:53.000 We want to engage with it.

00:45:55.000 So I think that's just an interesting tie in.

00:45:57.000 Many people say, a person like Destiny with no imagination, a last man will say, he thinks tariffs are like men and women.

00:46:04.000 But I think people can see the similarities there.

00:46:06.000 But we'll jump in and we'll take the super chats.

00:46:10.000 We'll see what our patricians are saying in the super chats here today.

00:46:17.000 One person put up a super chat, but the message got retracted, which is unfortunate.

00:46:21.000 Marcus Antonius says, all of your.

00:46:24.000 All of you booger eaters out there, take notice.

00:46:26.000 Work hard, be consistent, don't miss work, and you win.

00:46:30.000 Congrats on the new set, fella.

00:46:31.000 You earned it.

00:46:32.000 Well, thank you, big guy.

00:46:33.000 Yes, isn't it very nice?

00:46:34.000 Isn't it very spacious?

00:46:36.000 We have our producers over there.

00:46:37.000 We have our technology over there.

00:46:40.000 We have a bar over there.

00:46:43.000 We have Coke for me and Sprite and all that.

00:46:46.000 We have all kinds of game tables, and it's a pretty large loft, actually.

00:46:51.000 And there's a party going on upstairs.

00:46:53.000 That's another level of the loft.

00:46:54.000 So we're doing actually very well.

00:46:57.000 But it's true.

00:46:58.000 It's true.

00:46:58.000 That's what we did on the show.

00:46:59.000 And then, look, you know, you can read into it the context that you will, but look, you work hard, you put out consistent content, you do your job, and odds are you'll find success.

00:47:09.000 It's not guaranteed, but this is how you can increase your odds.

00:47:12.000 So, for those people out there who don't do their job, who don't work, who aren't consistent, that's why.

00:47:17.000 Factors 805.

00:47:18.000 How do you feel about Heimbach and his movement?

00:47:20.000 Comes off as corny to me.

00:47:22.000 Can't expect much from a slovenly neckbeard, though.

00:47:26.000 No more Zog food.

00:47:27.000 Well, it's just Heimbach and the traditionalist workers' party.

00:47:31.000 It's just goofy.

00:47:32.000 It's just silly.

00:47:32.000 It's just goofy.

00:47:35.000 Not serious people, unfortunately.

00:47:38.000 And also, they're national socialists.

00:47:40.000 Sorry, that has no place in America.

00:47:42.000 Not because racist or any of that.

00:47:45.000 It's foreign.

00:47:46.000 It's foreign.

00:47:47.000 In many cases, it is actually hateful.

00:47:49.000 It is, in many cases, a supremacist ideology.

00:47:53.000 And I want no part in that.

00:47:55.000 I'm not affiliated with that at all.

00:47:57.000 And that's why, after this whole Michigan debacle, whereas before I could have said maybe I was friendly with Spencer, maybe we were somewhat aligned, now I say, You know, I think personally he's a nice guy.

00:48:07.000 I think personally he's very smart and he's charismatic and he's a good conversationalist.

00:48:13.000 But I just can't be affiliated with somebody who works with the Traditionalist Workers' Party.

00:48:20.000 That's not anything I believe in.

00:48:21.000 That's not anything that remotely approaches my values or my virtues.

00:48:26.000 And at the end of the day, they're bad optics.

00:48:29.000 They just look terrible.

00:48:30.000 I don't care what you believe in, but you show up with these people and they've got their tattoos, shaved heads, they're in the black outfits, the jackboots.

00:48:39.000 And they're throwing up the Roman salutes, yelling neckbeards.

00:48:44.000 It's just goofy.

00:48:45.000 It's fringe.

00:48:46.000 This is not what we need.

00:48:47.000 We are reasonable people.

00:48:48.000 We are not extremists.

00:48:49.000 We are not fringe.

00:48:50.000 We are not out there.

00:48:51.000 We're not yelling baboons like that.

00:48:53.000 We are serious people.

00:48:55.000 There is a rich intellectual tradition that underwrites our worldview.

00:48:59.000 And when we have a right, I think we have an obligation to present it in a serious way with the gravity that it deserves.

00:49:05.000 So I think Heimbach, I don't doubt that he's not intelligent, but I just think he's misguided.

00:49:11.000 I don't know what he seeks to achieve.

00:49:14.000 Optically, politically, I just think he's very misguided and it's unfortunate.

00:49:19.000 And on the Zog food, look, it tastes good.

00:49:21.000 All right, I'm on the Donald Trump diet.

00:49:22.000 I'm on the populist diet.

00:49:24.000 We want to understand the people.

00:49:25.000 We've got to eat like the people.

00:49:26.000 And also, I was checking out the nutritional information on the meal that I had last night, which was a quarter pounder with cheese and a four piece buttermilk tenders.

00:49:38.000 That was actually a really good source of protein and of calories.

00:49:41.000 You know, I'm trying to bulk up.

00:49:42.000 I'm trying to, you know, people tell me you've got to bulk up.

00:49:45.000 You've got to eat more.

00:49:47.000 And I eat as much as I can, but.

00:49:48.000 In that small meal, I was taking in 1,000 calories and 60, 70 grams of protein.

00:49:54.000 It's a good source.

00:49:56.000 So, I don't know.

00:49:57.000 And cheap.

00:49:58.000 The Daily Oven, happy belated Kazmir Pulaski Day, Nick.

00:50:02.000 Thank you, thank you.

00:50:03.000 We were also going to cover the Poland thing, but we just didn't have time between North Korea and Women's Day.

00:50:08.000 We may get to that tomorrow.

00:50:10.000 Ratapunks, you should have C.V. Vitolo.

00:50:13.000 She's a biologist at UW Madison.

00:50:16.000 She's been in alt-right podcasts debating them about race.

00:50:19.000 Very smart.

00:50:20.000 I'll try and have her on.

00:50:21.000 Maybe we'll.

00:50:22.000 If she's on the same page as us, or if she's not, we can have her and JF.

00:50:26.000 That might be a fun combination.

00:50:29.000 Greg Gilling says, R.E., North Korea, when the less powerful party invites you to the table to negotiate, they're already half taken.

00:50:35.000 P.S. thoughts on Q. That's basically true, actually.

00:50:39.000 That's basically true.

00:50:40.000 And especially North Korea.

00:50:42.000 They've tried to present it like they hold all the cards.

00:50:45.000 And they made it, I think, a pretty focus of their messaging during Obama that they would not come to the table.

00:50:53.000 They were not going to negotiate.

00:50:54.000 So that they did was a pretty.

00:50:56.000 Stark departure.

00:50:57.000 And thoughts on Q?

00:50:59.000 I don't know.

00:50:59.000 I haven't looked into it since it came around.

00:51:02.000 To be honest, it seems like a LARP.

00:51:04.000 A lot of the stuff he said resonated with me because he was drawing connections that were interesting that I hadn't thought of before about the administration, the Obama administration, and who was involved and where they came from and other things.

00:51:18.000 But by the same token, are we supposed to believe that somebody with that kind of clearance are going to put out their message on poll?

00:51:24.000 I mean, it's just a little bit convoluted.

00:51:25.000 But we'll see.

00:51:27.000 I guess if he turns out to be right, then we'll be the silly people, right?

00:51:32.000 Dominic Liberator says the media wants femininity to be promiscuity.

00:51:36.000 It's true.

00:51:37.000 They're destroying the dignity of women.

00:51:40.000 They're destroying the dignity of men, what it means to be men and women.

00:51:44.000 How is it empowering that they want women to go out there and be these degenerates?

00:51:48.000 How is that empowering that they want women to degrade and debase themselves and to make themselves ugly, to make themselves obese?

00:51:56.000 I mean, you look at the feminists, the people talking about female empowerment, and the physiognomy of these people tells you everything you need to know about them.

00:52:03.000 That they don't take care of themselves, they hate themselves.

00:52:06.000 I don't think you can't, I don't think you can not hate yourself and put your body through that with the piercings and the tattoos and you balloon up to 400 pounds and you dye your hair and the lipstick and you put your body through hell with the sexual degeneracy.

00:52:23.000 Are those the people that love women?

00:52:24.000 You don't even love yourself.

00:52:26.000 You don't even love your own body enough to take care of it.

00:52:28.000 You're going to prescribe things to other people?

00:52:29.000 I don't think so.

00:52:31.000 So, and somebody says, great looking background pal, got to appreciate the whiteboard streams.

00:52:37.000 It's easier to control individuals.

00:52:40.000 Than an angry community.

00:52:41.000 It's true.

00:52:42.000 This is their path for control.

00:52:43.000 People ask me all the time what would the elites have to gain with mass immigration?

00:52:48.000 What do they have to gain by doing these pernicious things you say they're doing?

00:52:52.000 And it's control, it's power.

00:52:54.000 It's much easier to control a population, as you just said, that sees themselves as remote and separate and distinct and alone than a sovereign and responsible community.

00:53:06.000 You know, a faraway capital tries to impose its will on a community and they'll get pushback.

00:53:10.000 They'll get protests.

00:53:11.000 They'll get petitions.

00:53:12.000 They'll get the opposition candidates in their district funded.

00:53:16.000 It could even come to armed resistance.

00:53:19.000 It could.

00:53:19.000 You look at Clive and Bundy and the Bundy Ranch, a perfect case of that.

00:53:24.000 But if they're going up against individuals, good luck fighting the government all by yourself.

00:53:28.000 Good luck petitioning to the neighbors who don't even speak English.

00:53:31.000 Good luck petitioning to the neighbors who hate white people.

00:53:33.000 Good luck petitioning to the single mom who has her hands full.

00:53:37.000 Not going to happen.

00:53:38.000 So, strong communities that are responsible, that take care of themselves, this is the enemy of the Tyrant of the rootless international government that wants to take away your sovereignty.

00:53:49.000 Magic3383 says, What's your favorite episode of Murdoch Murdoch to show everyday Trump voters?

00:53:56.000 I don't really watch Murdoch Murdoch.

00:53:58.000 I think it's kind of silly.

00:54:00.000 It's, granted, it's funny.

00:54:01.000 I watched the most recent one and it was kind of funny.

00:54:04.000 But it's just, I was never into cartoons.

00:54:06.000 I was never into that goofy, silly, like over the top style.

00:54:09.000 You know, I never watched South Park.

00:54:11.000 I always thought that was, you know, juvenile.

00:54:13.000 I never watched Family Guy.

00:54:15.000 Simpsons was the only one I could really tolerate.

00:54:17.000 And I see Murdoch Murdoch in kind of the same way.

00:54:19.000 Like, it is funny, but it's just kind of lowbrow.

00:54:21.000 It's kind of juvenile.

00:54:23.000 It's funny.

00:54:23.000 I will say, and people are going to say, oh, Nick counter signals Nick.

00:54:27.000 Nick doesn't have a sense of humor.

00:54:28.000 I think it's funny, but it's just not really my cup of tea.

00:54:31.000 And I don't think that's what you should be showing normies.

00:54:33.000 It's inaccessible to them.

00:54:35.000 To show that to an average Trump voter, they will totally not understand anything that's in there the memes, the references, the characters that appear in there.

00:54:44.000 No chance.

00:54:44.000 You're better off showing them something from Pat Buchanan than a silly cartoon.

00:54:50.000 Frederick White, my favorite movie is I Know What You Did Last Summer.

00:54:52.000 I've never seen that.

00:54:54.000 I'll have to add that to the list.

00:54:55.000 My favorite is probably Casablanca or Citizen Kane.

00:55:00.000 And JB Summer 75, have you seen all the abortion bills being passed?

00:55:04.000 Yeah, I've seen some of them.

00:55:06.000 I see some of them that are, I believe one of them made it outright illegal, didn't it?

00:55:11.000 In Iowa or somewhere in the Midwest, if I'm not mistaken, which is a good thing because hopefully that'll ultimately result in it being taken up to the Supreme Court.

00:55:20.000 And if it gets taken up to the Supreme Court, then we can repeal Roe v. Wade.

00:55:25.000 And that would be a very good thing.

00:55:26.000 So.

00:55:27.000 Hopefully, these things get challenged and we get the law that we want.

00:55:30.000 But it looks like those are all our super chats coming in a little bit early.

00:55:34.000 I don't know what's going on.

00:55:36.000 Let me whip out the old keyboard and let's pull it up.

00:55:38.000 We'll see.

00:55:39.000 Is there a Worski stream going on or something?

00:55:42.000 Or maybe there's something else going on.

00:55:44.000 Maybe there's a sporting event.

00:55:45.000 Who knows?

00:55:46.000 But it seems like the traffic's way down from Monday.

00:55:49.000 We'll pull it up and we'll peep.

00:55:52.000 Yeah, there it is.

00:55:53.000 There it is.

00:55:54.000 Worski, libertarianism in the state with Shane Killian and that guy T versus the old ass.

00:56:00.000 Of course, we're going to lose out to, you know, when there's conflict and blood sports.

00:56:05.000 That is what it is.

00:56:07.000 But, anywho, the All Type.

00:56:10.000 The All Type going on there to debate.

00:56:14.000 It's funny because I liked the All Type's content.

00:56:18.000 I, you know, I was never a subscriber.

00:56:20.000 I never watched it, like, religiously, but I was aware of the guy.

00:56:23.000 And people said he was smart, and I followed him for a little while.

00:56:25.000 He never followed me back.

00:56:26.000 So I said, okay, I'm unfollowing.

00:56:28.000 And I watched a couple of his videos, and I said, you know, this isn't really my style, but.

00:56:32.000 It's okay stuff.

00:56:33.000 And then he comes at me out of a clear blue sky on James Alsop's video after the split with America First Media.

00:56:40.000 James did a video explaining what happened.

00:56:43.000 And all pipe goes in the comments section just taking me to task over oh, Nick thinks he's working hard by going on and spouting off every day for an hour and bop, bop, bop, and jumping all over the place.

00:56:55.000 And then Red Elephants jumps on, and then Millennial Lowe's jumps on.

00:56:58.000 And it's just like, you know, take a dump on Nick Fest.

00:57:02.000 And then, and I don't even respond to that, I don't even bring that up.

00:57:05.000 And then, like a month later, he comes at me out of nowhere on Twitter, tearing me apart, saying all these nasty things.

00:57:13.000 And where does it come from?

00:57:14.000 Where does the animosity come from with these people?

00:57:17.000 Right?

00:57:18.000 I don't know where it comes from.

00:57:20.000 Because, and people say, oh, well, Nick, it's because you're divisive.

00:57:23.000 It's because you're a bridge burner.

00:57:24.000 I have never attacked anybody who hasn't slighted me or gone after me first.

00:57:28.000 Never.

00:57:29.000 Even people I disagree with, even people I go after, even people that I won't have on the show, I'm always very diplomatic.

00:57:36.000 I'm always very diplomatic.

00:57:37.000 I don't go after somebody unless they go after me.

00:57:39.000 Cernovich never went after him until he went after me one night.

00:57:42.000 And then I went after him and he was like, hey, what the hell?

00:57:45.000 And I was like, oh, I thought you had a problem.

00:57:47.000 He was like, not really.

00:57:48.000 So I said, oh, okay.

00:57:49.000 And even with Spencer and some of these other guys, they came after me and I went after them.

00:57:54.000 I never agreed with them, but I never had a problem with them until they started saying stuff about me and then we resolved it.

00:58:02.000 But this guy comes out of a clear blue sky with all this nasty stuff.

00:58:05.000 I don't know if he's got a crush on me.

00:58:07.000 I don't know if it's because I'm a Christian and, you know, that goes against his worldview.

00:58:10.000 I don't know what it is.

00:58:12.000 I really couldn't tell you.

00:58:14.000 But we got one more here Prince Vegeta.

00:58:16.000 I was a Bernie voter before I saw Murdoch.

00:58:18.000 Murdoch.

00:58:19.000 Well, hey, to each their own.

00:58:20.000 To each their own.

00:58:22.000 It's funny.

00:58:22.000 This is how you can spread the message, sure.

00:58:25.000 But it's just not my style.

00:58:26.000 It's just not my style.

00:58:27.000 That's all.

00:58:28.000 I'm not saying nobody can enjoy it.

00:58:30.000 Nobody can watch it.

00:58:31.000 I'm just saying it's not.

00:58:32.000 I look, like I said, I watch it occasionally.

00:58:35.000 I think it's funny, but it's just not.

00:58:37.000 It was just never my cup of tea.

00:58:39.000 You know, people are weird about that.

00:58:41.000 You don't like their show or you don't praise their show hard enough, and it's like you've personally offended them.

00:58:48.000 But to each their own.

00:58:50.000 I'll have to check out this All Type and That Guy T Bloodsports.

00:58:54.000 We'll have to check it out.

00:58:57.000 That's the thing.

00:58:58.000 I wish I could make peace with all these people.

00:59:00.000 I'm willing, and I'll put that out there right now.

00:59:02.000 If anybody's out there listening, if anybody who knows these people is out there listening, Taryn McCarthy, old hype, you know, whoever it is, I'm willing and able to make amends with these people, but it has to come from both sides.

00:59:13.000 You know, what happened with Patrick Casey, perfect example, where Patrick Casey, I met this guy in September, and I thought so highly of him.

00:59:21.000 I said, here's a guy who's mature, who's smart, he looks like the only adult in the room.

00:59:26.000 I was hanging out with all kinds of alt-right people.

00:59:28.000 I had so many nice things to say about him to my friends, to people I knew.

00:59:31.000 I said, hey, did you know this guy?

00:59:33.000 He's very great.

00:59:34.000 And then we got into this silly beef on Twitter, and I was upset that that had to happen because I said, here's somebody who I respect, who I think is smart, who I like.

00:59:42.000 And we got into this silly fight, and I was so happy when at CPAC we were able to resolve it because I said, here is a guy who, you know, we're on the same page in many ways, and there's a mutual respect now, and that's a good thing.

00:59:54.000 But, and I'd be willing to have the same arrangement with any of these other people, but they have to come back and say, you know, look, It can't work like that, where you're making ultimatums or you're throwing shade at me on the comment section and on Twitter out of nowhere.

01:00:07.000 Can't have it.

01:00:08.000 Can't have it.

01:00:09.000 Has to go both ways.

01:00:11.000 And let's see, we got one more in the meantime.

01:00:13.000 Prince Vegeta, what was your favorite part of Seaville and why was it Lee Park?

01:00:17.000 Yeah, for the last time I wasn't at Lee Park.

01:00:19.000 Favorite part of Charlottesville?

01:00:21.000 I don't know.

01:00:24.000 I guess if I had to pick a single moment, here would be the best moment of Charlottesville.

01:00:29.000 It was just a disaster from the beginning.

01:00:32.000 You know, we're marching over to McIntyre, and it was just a mess because there were more than twice the amount of counter protesters as there were protesters.

01:00:41.000 And we're marching over to McIntyre.

01:00:42.000 We don't know where we're going.

01:00:44.000 We don't know where we're headed.

01:00:45.000 We don't know where everybody else is, but we're just marching with the rest of the people.

01:00:48.000 We get to the park, and then we get word that the National Guard is coming in to round everybody up and arrest them.

01:00:54.000 So we're like, we gotta evacuate.

01:00:56.000 We gotta get out of here.

01:00:57.000 So we just are walking back towards our hotel.

01:01:00.000 We get to our hotel, and we're hanging out in the lobby.

01:01:03.000 And it's me.

01:01:04.000 It's James Alsop, it's Baked Alaska, it's Millennial Matt, my buddy Steve Chatterston, some others who were friends with James, and Bryden.

01:01:14.000 And we're hanging out in the lobby of the hotel, and a couple of them are having drinks.

01:01:18.000 I'm having a glass of water.

01:01:20.000 And we're talking about, man, this is crazy.

01:01:22.000 We're watching all the chaos going on outside.

01:01:24.000 And then we see President Trump is set to address.

01:01:27.000 He's doing a press conference, he's going to talk about Charlottesville.

01:01:31.000 And we get out and we sit in front of the television, the hotel lobby, and he's talking about it.

01:01:37.000 And we're like, oh boy, because he's really laying it on thick about how, you know, this is not a good thing.

01:01:42.000 And then a reporter asked about Charlottesville at some point, and he made the distinction.

01:01:47.000 He was going into it, and then he said, you know what, but there were very fine people on both sides.

01:01:51.000 And we were yelling so loud, we all got up and cheered and were clapping.

01:01:56.000 Everybody in the hotel's looking at us.

01:01:58.000 That was probably the finest moment of Charlottesville because it was true.

01:02:01.000 You had some very nasty people at Charlottesville, you really did.

01:02:04.000 And it's dubious whether they were federal agents or not, but there were some genuinely nasty people who I disavow.

01:02:10.000 But we were there because we wanted to protest the removal of the monument.

01:02:13.000 We were there because we wanted to protest the removal of the Lee, the statue of Robert E. Lee, and the renaming of Lee Park.

01:02:20.000 And we were there righteously, I think, to defend the cultural heritage of the United States from Marxism.

01:02:27.000 And when Donald Trump acknowledged us that we were there and we were good people, and we weren't Nazis for wanting that, we weren't white supremacists for wanting that, we were fine people, that was just really a tremendous moment.

01:02:39.000 And I'll never forget, I'll never forget the Brotherhood.

01:02:41.000 You know, we went up to the hotel room and.

01:02:43.000 You know, it was me and it was James and it was Baked and it was Matt and Baked wasn't doing so hot.

01:02:48.000 His eyes were damaged after he got maced.

01:02:51.000 And that's why it made it so bitter, that split with James, because it was like, you know, we shared a hotel room with you, we were hospitable to you, you know, we experienced this tough time together, and then it seemed like there was just this, you know.

01:03:05.000 But we can't talk so much about that now because we're litigating.

01:03:09.000 Carpe Noctum says Have you read Guanan?

01:03:12.000 Rene Guanan?

01:03:13.000 I have not.

01:03:13.000 I have not cracked into the European New Right just yet, but I am familiar generally with the New Right.

01:03:21.000 The French New Right.

01:03:22.000 So maybe we'll do that.

01:03:24.000 I know he's on the Radix Journal book list.

01:03:24.000 Is he New Right?

01:03:27.000 He's on the Spencer book list.

01:03:28.000 He's on my book list a few times over because I take from Poland and from other places and I compile them.

01:03:34.000 But I haven't read so many of his essays or whatever just yet.

01:03:38.000 But it looks like those are all our super chats.

01:03:40.000 That's all the time we got.

01:03:41.000 We lost out again to the blood sports.

01:03:43.000 We're going to have to do something about the blood sports.

01:03:45.000 It's like we're getting killed in the ratings by conflict.

01:03:49.000 We're going to have to start doing our own thing to compete.

01:03:51.000 But.

01:03:52.000 That's going to do it for us tonight.

01:03:53.000 Remember, you've got to check out our maker support.

01:03:56.000 Five bucks a month gets you America First Premium, which means you get the audio only format of the show.

01:04:01.000 You get priority on the call in shows, and you get a special role in the Discord server.

01:04:07.000 Somebody did the math on the premium membership, broke it down by hours of content per dollar spent.

01:04:15.000 And for every one hour of content, you pay 20 cents.

01:04:21.000 You pay two dimes for every hour of content.

01:04:23.000 That's the premium membership.

01:04:26.000 If you want to support the show, if you want to get the SoundCloud, the podcast format, if you want to get the Discord role, you're only paying two dimes.

01:04:26.000 So, think about that.

01:04:34.000 You pick up, you know, in the console of your car, you pick up a couple of dimes.

01:04:38.000 A dollar, that buys you a week of content.

01:04:41.000 Very good deal.

01:04:41.000 So, the link is in the description.

01:04:43.000 It's makersupport.comslash Nick J. Fuentes.

01:04:46.000 Remember to subscribe, give us a big thumbs up, leave a comment, inject some positivity, some lightheartedness, a lot of negativity in the world.

01:04:54.000 Inject some positivity here for our queens.

01:04:57.000 International Women's Day, but also for our Kings who have it very hard.

01:05:01.000 And remember to click the notification bell to get notified every time we go live.

01:05:07.000 And we got all the buttons comment, like, subscribe, notification, get on the notification squad.

01:05:12.000 We're on the air Monday through Friday, 7 p.m. Central, 8 p.m. Eastern Standard Time.

01:05:16.000 I'm Nicholas J. Fuentes, and this was America First.

01:05:19.000 As always, thanks for watching.

01:05:21.000 Thank you to our super chatters.

01:05:23.000 Thank you to our premium members, premium member patricians.

01:05:27.000 We love those people.

01:05:28.000 And thank you to everybody who watches the show.

01:05:30.000 We love you, folks.

01:05:31.000 Couldn't do without you.

01:05:33.000 And we will see you tomorrow for a casual Friday episode.

01:05:36.000 Have a great rest of your weekend.

01:05:39.000 You see, I'm already trying to get to the weekend.

01:05:41.000 Have a great rest of your evening.

01:05:42.000 And we'll see you tomorrow on Friday.

01:05:56.000 America first.

01:06:06.000 Once again.

America First - Nicholas J. Fuentes - March 08, 2018

Respect Women Day | America First Ep. 121

Episode Stats

Summary

Transcript