00:00:50.000He, and I don't know if people remember this, but Gary Cohn was the guy who, because of President Trump's response to Charlottesville, he offered his resignation after President Trump gave comments after the Charlottesville rally.
00:01:03.000And he said there were good people on both sides, there were very fine people, of which I was one of them.
00:01:08.000Who just wanted to protest the renaming of the park and the destruction of the monument?
00:01:14.000Gary Cohn was like, Yeah, no, we can't have it.
00:01:34.000But what I think is most optimistic, what is most encouraging out of all the news about North Korea, is I don't think Trump is taking the bait.
00:01:43.000On the diplomatic talks, the negotiations.
00:01:46.000I think he is playing hardball all the way until the end, which is exactly what we need.
00:01:52.000This is quintessential Trump, and that's why we want him in the White House.
00:01:56.000And then, of course, we got to talk about InfoWars.
00:01:59.000These lying bastards over at InfoWars who say on Sunday, oh, we're going to get banned, our YouTube channel is going to get taken down, and then, oh, you know, look who's still around a few days later, right?
00:02:09.000But first, I got to say something, all right?
00:03:24.000And if I could hit the gym consistently, and we'll see if that maintains, I think it will, but if I could hit the gym multiple times a week, then you should be able to do it too.
00:03:34.000A lot of people reply, Nick, Nick, now I have no excuses.
00:03:52.000Everybody, for how long, for how many months and weeks and days and years and years, generations, how many people have said, Nick, when are you going to get in the gym?
00:04:14.000So I will continue to give you the play by play every day, just for the hypocrites, for the haters, but also for the young men out there who are looking for a strong, powerful role model.
00:04:24.000Who is as iron as he is brains, you know, Hulkamania.
00:04:29.000I think my plan, I'm going to get a Hulkamania t shirt and I will just wear that without washing it every time I go to the gym.
00:04:36.000And I'm going to wear really tiny shorts and I'll pull them all the way up and really high knee socks.
00:05:04.000This is just, okay, these InfoWars people really?
00:05:07.000So on Sunday, Alex Jones tweets out the InfoWars YouTube channel with over 3 billion views and thousands of videos.
00:05:18.000We've just been informed that Google is going to delete our channel.
00:05:22.000And I think a lot of people are gloating about that.
00:05:24.000A lot of people are saying, like, on the one hand, I think a lot of people are saying, wow, you know, so it really paid Alex Jones to pull your punches.
00:05:34.000It really paid to not talk about Israel.
00:05:36.000It really paid to not talk about racialism and what's happening in our country, the invasion, and to have people like Red Pill Black on, you know, these obvious token minorities on the show just to prove, oh, look, we're not racist.
00:05:51.000And people like Baked Alaska, they have rules, you can't even mention them.
00:05:54.000And one of my buddies they fired because they found out he had certain connections.
00:05:57.000And me, you know, never talked about me, never brought me on.
00:06:01.000And so I think a lot of people said, wow, so it really paid off.
00:06:04.000Obviously, it was really a grand slam that you didn't talk about.
00:06:07.000The things you're not allowed to talk about.
00:06:08.000And then in the end, he got banned anyway.
00:06:10.000And then I think a lot of other people said, well, you know, we have to defend them because it's censorship.
00:06:16.000And censorship is wrong no matter how you cut it.
00:06:18.000If it's about Israel, if it's about race, if it's even about Sandy Hooker, you know, whatever kind of conspiracy stuff they were peddling about Parkland and all the rest.
00:06:28.000But then, but then it turns out a day later, that never happened.
00:06:33.000Google never got in touch with Alex Jones to say, we're deleting your channel.
00:06:41.000And one of the consequences, I guess, I don't know if it was because of what he tweeted, but it just so happened that the same week, YouTube informed Infowars that they can no longer monetize their videos.
00:06:52.000A lot of advertisers came out of the woodwork after the shooting and they said, We have our advertisements on Alex Jones' shows.
00:07:46.000And, you know, I guess God bless them for that.
00:07:47.000But when it comes to the fundamental question of what's happening in the West, which is demographic replacement, I mean, that's at the core of everything.
00:07:55.000I don't think anybody would have so much of a problem with the economic stuff and the trade stuff and health care and all the rest.
00:08:02.000And the reason being is because these are fixable issues.
00:08:05.000These issues you can fix in five or 10 years, you can fix these in a generation.
00:08:45.000And Alex Jones thought, well, I'm not going to touch that because if I touch that, I'll get in real trouble.
00:08:51.000I can peddle the conspiracy theories, but if I talk about that stuff, then the money pulls out, the advertisers pull out, people start saying, oh, I don't know if that's totally the kind of thing I want to jump on board with.
00:09:03.000They made a decision at some point, I don't know when, because they used to talk about this stuff, but at a certain point, they made a decision to say, we will compromise our integrity, we will compromise our principles, we will leave our own bleeding on the field.
00:09:17.000Baked Alaska, who got maced, who got attacked by Antifa.
00:09:20.000Well, He's not a based black, attractive woman who can appeal to the boomers.
00:09:27.000And we'll bring on all these hucksters and these merchant people that have no ideology because we want to have clicks and we want to have money and we want to be this entertainment empire.
00:09:38.000And I think now they are paying the price.
00:09:41.000Now they've lost their credibility and they've lost the money.
00:10:13.000I think more often than not, the people that talk about these kinds of issues and the real issues affecting the country and the deep issues that aren't talked about, the messaging is an obstacle and it detracts from the message.
00:10:31.000If you're out there and you're producing a product like this, if you're producing content and you show up to people and you say, this is the truth.
00:10:37.000And that's what InfoWars says it's an information war.
00:10:42.000And they allowed the truth to be a casualty.
00:10:59.000Stuff that you'll hear about North Korea.
00:11:01.000These will be some pretty milquetoast takes.
00:11:03.000These will be some pretty, the usual stuff.
00:11:05.000What I've noticed being a commentator, what I've noticed being a pundit, when I gather my notes, when I gather, because you have to look at the raw facts, but you also have to look at analysis.
00:11:14.000You have to look at how people are putting things together, how they're grouping facts and events and interpreting them with a narrative, making them conform to a certain theory or a hypothesis about what different actors are thinking, what their strategy is.
00:11:28.000And so you have to look at the raw data, but you also have to look at analysis.
00:11:31.000And I look at analysis a lot to do these shows.
00:11:34.000And what I find so often is that people just repeat what they hear.
00:11:39.000You'll get the main story from the Associated Press, which they sell their stories then to Fox and to ABC and NBC and CNN.
00:11:47.000You get your story from the AP, or you'll get it from Reuters, or you'll get it from the AFP, and that's all that you hear.
00:12:01.000And from Ben Shapiro to Crowder to all these kinds of people, you can predict pretty accurately, maybe 99.9% what's going to be said if you see the original report, if you see the original document, the source material.
00:12:15.000And that's unfortunate because this is why so many people get it wrong.
00:12:18.000I think I've been one of the few people in the past year, and I don't say it in a gloating way, but I'm one of the few people in the past year who really has a stellar record on predictions.
00:12:27.000And it's because I don't care what the experts say, I don't care what the analysts say and the pundits say.
00:12:32.000I consume all the data in the day, and a lot of it's instinct, a lot of it's intuition, but I piece it together according to the worldview laid out by Trump and the various people.
00:12:42.000And I think that's why we're able to call it.
00:12:45.000So, with that preface in mind, we had some major developments here at the North Korea situation.
00:12:50.000So, if you recall, there was this big opening to North Korea during the Winter Olympics where there were invitations exchanged on both sides to visit South Korea, and the North Koreans came over and they visited the South Koreans.
00:13:03.000Now, the South Koreans have sent a delegation over to North Korea, and they reached some pretty solid ground.
00:13:09.000It was communicated by South Korea to the world.
00:13:12.000South Korea said that North Korea told them.
00:13:15.000That they would be willing to give up their nuclear program.
00:13:46.000The reason why a war in this case would be justifiable is because the two grand strategies of the different countries are opposed to each other and you cannot, they're mutually exclusive.
00:13:57.000North Korea says we have to have nuclear weapons.
00:14:00.000This is vital to our national security.
00:14:02.000This is the pillar of our grand strategy in foreign relations.
00:14:06.000Get a nuclear arsenal, protect ourselves from the United States and South Korea.
00:14:13.000The United States says since 1991, since the collapse of the Soviet Union, Now, our single central objective is to prevent the proliferation of weapons of mass destruction, prevent chemical, nuclear, biological weapons that have this asymmetrical effect on civilian populations, get them out of the hands of rogue actors that oppose America's hegemony in the world.
00:14:34.000People like Iraq, Iran, Libya, you know, all very conveniently located in one region, but also Venezuela, Cuba, and North Korea.
00:14:42.000And you understand that if the United States is saying these guys can't have nukes, and that's imperative, and North Korea says we have to have nukes, and that's imperative, There's no way to resolve this.
00:14:51.000But that North Korea told South Korea today hey, we might be willing.
00:14:57.000If we got to sit at the table with the United States and we got to have bilateral negotiations, hey, we might consider giving up our nuclear program.
00:15:04.000And we have to be very careful about this because we've heard this talk before.
00:15:08.000This is what North Korea has been doing for 25, 30 years they come to the negotiating table, they make a lot of promises about curbing their missile program, curbing their nuclear program.
00:15:58.000They make it look like they're implementing, but they don't really implement.
00:16:02.000And they make it so that, well, you know, you thought you were going to get us to denuke.
00:16:06.000And actually, in the time that we were going to, Make this peace treaty and implement it.
00:16:10.000We just built 100 missiles, or we just tested a long range missile, or we just tested another nuke.
00:16:16.000And so, this is why we have to be really careful.
00:16:18.000When North Korea says, Hey, the United States, we're definitely willing to denuke if you just come to the table with us, you have to be very careful about that.
00:16:27.000A lot of people will say, a lot of these doves, you know, so called doves, who I think they, instead of wanting peace, instead of wanting a sustainable peace, They just want to be left alone.
00:16:40.000They want to pretend that problems don't exist.
00:16:41.000They might welcome rhetoric like this and say, okay, let's just meet with them and let's just make a deal.
00:16:50.000Because we have no guarantee that they'll follow through.
00:16:52.000We have no guarantee that that'll be anything more than them stalling.
00:16:56.000And in the meantime, perfecting their technology, miniaturizing a nuclear warhead to put it on their ICBMs, or perfecting some other form of nuclear deployment.
00:17:06.000You have the nuclear triad, which is submarine, missile, and airplanes.
00:17:29.000We also got a promise from North Korea that they would stop their ICBM tests and their nuclear tests, and that they'll be holding summit talks with South Korea in April.
00:17:40.000President Trump himself said in a press conference with the Swedish prime minister, That it's promising, and he said, We'll see what happens.
00:17:46.000And that's, I think, a very good approach.
00:17:50.000He says he thinks they have goodwill, and it looks like the sanctions effort is working.
00:17:55.000Never before in history has a more strict and harsh sanctions regime been applied on North Korea or any country for that matter.
00:18:03.000And so it looks like it's working that North Korea is making these overtures to South Korea, and they're making these overtures to the United States.
00:18:09.000While they are strategic, while they are tactical, this is a cry for help, essentially.
00:18:15.000It's saying, We can't feed our people.
00:18:20.000And who knows what that'll end up being.
00:18:22.000But his approach has been we'll wait and see.
00:18:24.000But also, and this is important, the White House has maintained that as a precondition to even any kind of talks beginning, any talks at all to even start, for them to sit at the negotiating table, North Korea has to denuke.
00:18:36.000They have to get rid of their nuclear program.
00:18:39.000North Korea says we can't have any preconditions to talk.
00:19:24.000Ironically, it was a press dinner, so he went and it was a roast of the president, and the president roasted the press and all kinds of other people.
00:19:31.000And it was supposed to be this event for the press, but it wasn't broadcast anymore.
00:19:37.000But Trump came and he told some jokes and, you know, it was all very fun and lighthearted.
00:19:40.000But he did say something that was very serious.
00:19:42.000He did say something that was very peculiar that should stand out to all of our foreign relations people, all our international affairs people.
00:20:47.000He thought if the North Vietnamese will not capitulate, because these people were nuts in Vietnam.
00:20:53.000I mean, you had these people where they were fighting for their land, and in spite of getting their whole country just blown to smithereens, carpet bombed, set on fire, invaded, occupied for decades, they wouldn't give up.
00:21:07.000And so Nixon said, you know what, we're going to have to amp it up a little bit.
00:21:11.000And so the madman strategy was he was trying to convince.
00:21:14.000The Soviet Union and Vietnam, but ostensibly the whole world, that he was crazy, that he was not all the way there.
00:21:20.000So he coordinated this with his cabinet.
00:21:22.000He coordinated with this to very carefully cultivate a public image that he was not sane so that the Soviet Union and Vietnam might think this guy might drop a nuke on us.
00:21:33.000We better be careful because this guy is a madman.
00:21:36.000We hear this crazy stuff coming from his White House.
00:21:39.000He's appearing erratic and he's making all these threats and he's got his finger on the button.
00:22:19.000Here you have another situation in East Asia, you know, in the same theater of war.
00:22:24.000You have essentially the same problem with Asians in particular.
00:22:27.000Maybe not problem, but a characteristic of East Asians.
00:22:31.000We saw this in World War II with the Japanese.
00:22:33.000We saw this with the Koreans in the 50s.
00:22:35.000We saw this with the Vietnamese in the 60s and 70s.
00:22:38.000And now we see it with the Koreans again, which is that these people are hyper nationalistic, hyper ethnic nationalistic, militaristic, collectivist.
00:22:48.000And what that means is that they are willing to sacrifice the individual for the greater good, a much greater propensity for that than the United States.
00:22:55.000You consider the origins of the United States, which is an English Protestant colony coming from the United Kingdom, which was a very individualist and liberal country.
00:23:04.000This idea of altruism, this idea of not so much in group preference, actually out group generosity.
00:23:11.000And you compare that with the Japanese, the South Koreans, the North Koreans, the Vietnamese, where the Japanese were literally willing to fly their planes with kamikazes.
00:23:20.000They were willing to give their lives just for a.
00:23:22.000Tactical victory in some naval battle.
00:23:25.000And so we see the same, I think, the same essentially situation, the same scenario, more or less.
00:23:32.000And he's employing a similar strategy, saying, you know what?
00:23:44.000And I think this is why, in a lot of ways, maybe you're hearing about Trump being crazy.
00:23:50.000You know, we heard a big report earlier in the week from, you know, 20 White House sources saying that President Trump is not mentally stable.
00:24:00.000And you understand that all these people answer to the president.
00:24:03.000All these people serve at the pleasure of the president.
00:24:05.000They wouldn't be working in the White House if they didn't.
00:24:08.000So you have close friends of the president, people that are really good friends with him for years, people that work under him, that are dependent on him for a living, for influence, for money.
00:24:18.000And they're all going to the press and saying, Can you believe this guy?
00:24:34.000And then he said in the comments to at the press conference with the Swedish prime minister, he said that we would be willing to go hard in either direction.
00:24:41.000He says, I have some faith in these talks.
00:24:45.000It looks very promising, but hey, we're willing to go hard in either direction, meaning we can do diplomacy or we could go to war, and we will do it.
00:24:53.000And then another little tidbit here, which I think also plays into it, is Syria entering into the equation again.
00:24:59.000And this is exactly what we saw last April.
00:25:03.000So basically, this time last year was April 7, 2017.
00:25:08.000When President Trump launched 59 Tomahawk missiles at an airfield in Syria in response to a chemical weapons attack.
00:25:17.000And if you remember, this came at the same time, the same weekend, in fact, the same night that President Trump met with Chinese President Xi Jinping for the first time for their first bilateral negotiations.
00:25:29.000And, you know, Xi Jinping just crowned himself dictator for life, essentially, of China.
00:25:34.000So President Trump will be dealing with him for the next four, possibly eight years.
00:25:38.000And so it was very important for him to set the tone.
00:26:45.000Very curious why they're not reporting on this.
00:26:47.000But apparently, President Trump is preparing another attack on Syria.
00:26:52.000He's consulted the Pentagon and ordered them to prepare different options for him to strike the Assad government in Syria in response to unverified claims that the Assad regime has been using chlorine gas in East Ghouta, where there have been terrible human rights atrocities and children killed.
00:27:11.000And by the way, I'm remembering just now, I predicted this last week.
00:27:14.000If you've been watching the show for a couple of weeks, I predicted, I said, Look at the coverage of East Ghouta.
00:27:20.000Look at how they're covering this humanitarian rights disaster.
00:27:23.000Look at the kinds of things they're saying about it.
00:27:26.000And they've been sustained on that for weeks about the civilian casualties, the Assad government allegedly using chemical weapons.
00:28:43.000Same human nature, same elements of leverage, of pressure, and all the rest.
00:28:51.000And Trump has been doing this successfully in one of the toughest markets in the world, in one of the toughest industries, in the toughest locations.
00:29:00.000Uniquely, the ability to see it in that kind of way, not in terms of ideology.
00:29:05.000He's not blinded by some academic paper, by some ideology from some scholar at Harvard or Princeton saying, We need to spread democracy or we need Wilson's 14 points.
00:29:17.000We need international institutionalism.
00:29:38.000And either they'll attack us, in which case we get to go ahead and we get to wipe them off the map, in which case there's a justification, or we're going to get what we want.
00:29:47.000I think we're going to get what we want because at the end of the day, Trump has a unique insight into human nature that he knows that Kim Jong un is a rational actor.
00:29:57.000He's not a crazy person, he's not suicidal, he's not a maniac.
00:30:01.000He sees this as the best way to protect his country, and you know what?
00:30:08.000Out of all the countries that have fallen, Libya, Egypt, Iran, or not Iran yet, but I mean, they're in the sights.
00:30:15.000Yemen, Iraq, Syria has been taken to pieces.
00:30:20.000Venezuela, there's been talk about military action.
00:30:22.000Cuba, we're back against them, we're back at their throats.
00:30:27.000So you look at all these countries which have paid the price, which have been in the crosshairs, and North Korea has been doing okay.
00:30:33.000So it's worked so far, and President Trump understands that.
00:30:36.000If they're given a better option, if they're forced to see the light, they're going to take it.
00:30:40.000And if we're doing the military drills, if we demonstrate we're willing to walk away from the table and go to war with them, they'll probably say, all right, all right, uncle, nobody here wants to die.
00:31:11.000I really believe he's brilliant with electoral, with legislative, but really with foreign affairs, he shines because that's when he gets to represent the country and everybody falls in line because it's the USA.
00:33:32.000That is so symbolic of what has gone on in the White House, and that's a good thing.
00:33:35.000That's what we wanted during the election.
00:33:37.000I wrote extensively about this on my blog before the election in summer, before I went to school, about how one of the biggest reasons we wanted Trump was because you have this high turnover.
00:33:48.000This is something that we could have observed even during the election, where he went through multiple campaign managers.
00:33:53.000He went from Lewandowski to Manafort to Bannon, and he changed up the staff a bunch of times.
00:33:58.000And many people said he was making a big mistake.
00:34:00.000This was unheard of to be throwing people out left and right, tossing people out unceremoniously.
00:34:06.000Embarrassing people, humiliating people, and having, you know, as Jeb Bush said, it was the chaos campaign and the chaos White House was unheard of.
00:34:16.000But this was actually a good thing all along.
00:34:18.000This is one of the main reasons I eventually flipped over to Trump from Cruz and the others, was because this is how you prevent entrenchment.
00:34:24.000This is how you prevent any one actor, any one person from gaining some kind of entrenched influence, any kind of personal mechanism to discharge power.
00:34:35.000I mean, this is what we saw with Barack Obama, Hillary Clinton, George W. Bush, even.
00:34:39.000Is when you get these people who stay in there, the longer they stay in there, the more their tentacles grow, the more they pursue their own interests, the more they get their own connections, they get to freelance in the White House.
00:34:49.000And so this is something that we liked from the beginning during the campaign, now during the White House, during the time that he's governing.
00:35:10.000Are the neocons controlling a lot of people?
00:35:12.000Spread around all these pictures during the serious strike of look at all these people that are sitting next to President Trump.
00:35:19.000Look at all these globalists, you know, Goldman Sachs, other types hanging around President Trump who might be exerting a pernicious influence.
00:35:27.000But you've seen that one by one, the only people that have remained are Mike Pence, Jeff Sessions.
00:35:35.000Chief of Staff, you know, oh, and maybe the Secretary of State, Rex Tillerson, but just about everybody else has been rotated or shaken up a little bit.
00:35:44.000And I think that just goes to show that President Trump is doing his own thing.
00:35:48.000He is not controlled, he's not beholden to anybody.
00:35:50.000You wouldn't see this level of turnover.
00:35:52.000You wouldn't see this level of turnover.
00:35:54.000Of autonomy exercised by the president or independence from his own apparatus.
00:35:59.000If he's able to just throw people out left and right and they're all playing court with him, and this also cultivates a very unique culture in the palace, in the palace intrigue of the White House, in the sense that if people get into the White House and they understand it's kill or be killed, you either perform, you win, you defend yourself, and you serve the president, you do a good job, or you're out.
00:36:20.000What kind of people do you think that invites?
00:36:22.000What kind of performance does that breed in the White House among our cabinet?
00:36:26.000If you get into the White House and the understanding is you're basically set, you're there for the next four years, and hey, you know, kick your feet up on the desk, relax a little bit.
00:36:35.000If you don't get it done today, hey, you're an old friend and you're cashed in on a favor, so nobody's going to kick you out.
00:36:43.000If you get out, you know, you jeopardize Cloud or whatever.
00:36:46.000Think about the difference in the incentives there.
00:36:48.000If you're in the White House and people are getting just tossed to the dogs every other week, you're fired, you're an idiot, you know, and all the crazy stuff that's going on, you're going to say, well, I better get to work.
00:37:13.000And a lot of it's admittedly a boomer talking point.
00:37:15.000People say President Trump is running the country like a business.
00:37:19.000You know, I hear this kind of stuff a lot.
00:37:20.000And there is a lot of truth to that in the sense that not so much like America is a corporation, as much as the globalists love to see America as a corporation, as much as many, many people love to see America.
00:37:33.000As just this place where everybody can go in and they can piss all over it so long as they buy and sell their wares.
00:37:39.000But President Trump is operating according to market principles.
00:37:42.000Maybe that's a more accurate way to put it.
00:37:44.000In the sense that in the private sector, this is the ethic of the marketplace.
00:37:48.000You either get the job done or you're out.
00:37:51.000You know, you get fired or your company goes under and you get outcompeted and you're put out of business.
00:38:05.000How could somebody like Ted Cruz or Marco Rubio or any one of these public servants understand what it's like to meet a bottom line, to have those kinds of constraints?
00:38:15.000If they've been in a job where they get elected and then six years, yeah, well, six years, well, we got six years to figure it out.
00:38:22.000We got six years to figure out how we're going to put together the campaign, six years to figure out how we're going to bring this all together.
00:38:28.000And there's no performance report, by the way.
00:38:30.000There's no, you don't have to sell anything, you don't have to compete with anybody.
00:38:34.000You know, you've got to beat the other party, but that's the campaign.
00:38:37.000How could they ever understand what it's like to work in that kind of high stakes environment, that intensity?
00:38:43.000And so, that there's conflict in the White House is a great thing.
00:39:00.000When you're in an alliance, when it's very touchy feely, people can kind of go along to get along, but not so when you have that kind of conflict.
00:39:08.000Now, on the reason why, Gary Cohn was kicked out.
00:39:12.000Number one, he's been opposing the president since the beginning.
00:39:14.000The only thing he was really for was the tax cut because all his buddies got a big windfall from it.
00:39:21.000And beyond the fact that this is a great sign that obviously nobody from Cohn to the Goldman Sachs people and some of the other globalist type people, Kushner getting security clearance revoked, it shows that there's no influence.
00:39:32.000But on top of that, why this week did Gary Cohn get kicked out?
00:39:36.000And in a large way, I think it was because of the tariffs.
00:39:46.000That says that if Trump could cut the trade deficit in half, which I think it's something like $650 billion in total, if he could cut that in half, he would create 2 million jobs, which is incredible.
00:39:59.000And you look at the tariff situation, and just to reiterate the case, because all day long you're hearing from the mainstream media that free trade is the way to go, and this is so great.
00:40:07.000I don't think what Trump is going for is protection.
00:40:09.000I don't think what he's going for is protectionism in terms of ideology.
00:40:13.000People's commitment, as we said when they first came out, the tariffs, people's commitment to free trade is ideological.
00:41:15.000So for all these people to get up on television, and, you know, I saw Cabot Phillips on CNN defending free trade, and he's saying, it's not fair because.
00:41:22.000Trump is passing on these costs to the consumer.
00:41:25.000The consumer has a right to choose if he wants to buy products from China or buy products from the United States.
00:41:30.000And these people cannot see the forest from the trees.
00:41:33.000What we are doing when we open our markets to these hostile, to these antagonistic, these predatory economic actors is we lose economically and we lose in terms of national security.
00:41:58.000If China's going to kill us on trade, as they're doing, if they're going to do all these shady practices, unfair practices, and they have crazy tariffs, Europe has tariffs, and they protect their own industries, well, we should do the same.
00:42:12.000And maybe at the very least in the expectation that they will take down their trade barriers and then we can take down ours and there would be some kind of a fair playing field.
00:42:20.000That can't happen with China because China is not a free market economy.
00:42:24.000And so there should never be any expectation that there will ever be a level playing field with them.
00:43:28.000And if that doesn't work out, hey, they can always fall back on mommy and daddy.
00:43:32.000And these are the people saying, hey, you might be 45 and you're a machinist and you're the only plant.
00:43:40.000In town that was keeping your town afloat, the biggest game in town in terms of employment just got shut down because of competition from Mexico because of NAFTA or competition from China because they're dumping their raw materials or Europe and so on and so forth.
00:43:55.000And you have all these young bastards, all these people, they got it all figured out saying, Hey, old man, I know you're 50, you have no education, you're trying to support a family.
00:44:04.000The only industry that was keeping your town afloat just got sunk by China.
00:44:08.000But did you know that automation is the future anyway?
00:44:11.000Maybe you should just learn programming, old man.
00:44:13.000Hey, man, that's just the free market.
00:44:16.000Do you know that the market's actually highly elastic for labor if you just go back to school and learn how to program computers and you can work for like Dell and play ping pong in the lounge?
00:44:26.000I mean, like, these are the people, these are the people that we're going to listen to.
00:44:30.000And without fail, these are the people that are making the policy.
00:44:33.000Where do the legislators get their policy proposals?
00:44:37.000When they all go to their retreats at the Holiday Inn, when they all meet at the Ramada outside Washington, D.C., with the lobbyists and the bankers and the financiers.
00:44:45.000Who do you think is drafting all this legislation?
00:44:47.000Where do you think they get the policy from?
00:45:38.000These are people that are actually writing laws, they come up through the university and they'll spew this stuff without having worked a day in their lives.
00:45:45.000They never worked a job where their back hurt when they got done or their hands got dirty.
00:45:50.000And they're going through college and it's all paid for, and they're in these top schools and they get through because they never say anything controversial, they never rock the boat.
00:45:57.000Those are the people that end up in these institutions.
00:46:01.000They end up in the Iron Triangle, as they call it in political science, they end up in the think tank world.
00:46:06.000And those are the people drafting the laws.
00:46:32.000Of course it's the halfling, Meghan Markle.
00:46:37.000It's really something how they push race mixing.
00:46:40.000You know, nobody finds anything weird about that.
00:46:42.000Nobody finds that a little bit peculiar that every commercial, every television show, everything, all the politicians now, they're all pushing race mixing.
00:47:47.000They didn't want me in there anyway because they say I'm not fully white.
00:47:51.000So that's interesting, but I'm not really into all the palace intrigue on that stuff anymore.
00:47:56.000But I guess that's a pretty significant departure.
00:47:59.000I will say, just as an analyst, as a third party objective observer, you know, and I analyze what happens in the left and the alt light, and I'll analyze what happens in the alt right, I will say that Spencer's running out of allies.
00:48:12.000And I say that not in like a joyful way, like woohoo.
00:48:15.000I say that as in, you know, just from an unbiased, kind of apathetic way that, you know, Spencer's alienated Identity Europa.
00:48:23.000And I guess if this is true, he's alienated Anglin and Orenheimer or, well, how do you pronounce his name?
00:53:03.000I'm not really mad so much as it is just kind of, you know, it's so transparent what that is.
00:53:08.000They bring on people who are eye candy.
00:53:10.000And that way, Alex Jones is not much different than Roger Ales.
00:53:13.000He brings on Red Pill Black because she's a token minority.
00:53:16.000She's a black woman, and I'm not really into black women, but, you know, for these, like, weird boomers who are into that kind of thing, it's like, oh, and look, we got this person on, and oh, look, we got Millie Weaver and, you know, Ashton Thoddy going on there.
00:53:33.000And it's like, I don't exactly believe that they're being brought on for their deep political insights.
00:53:37.000Don't think Millie Weaver was brought on with her cute little helmet when she goes to the rally.
00:53:42.000Don't think she was brought on for her deep historical insights.
00:54:58.000We believe that everybody's a sinner, but what's different about our religion is that we confess our sins.
00:55:02.000We don't say it was different times or, oh, you know, I have a neurosis, I have a syndrome, it was an impulse thing, but I really wasn't at fault.
00:55:13.000We say, no, a man has fallen, we make mistakes, and we admit them.
00:55:16.000We admit that we have sinned against God.
00:55:19.000And when we see these traditional people, look, we can make mistakes, we can make mistakes, but then they go on and they say, oh, but actually it was okay because X, Y, and Z, or oh, actually it was this way.
00:55:29.000Or, in the case of Terry McCarthy, they're going to go around demanding a loyalty pledge, and they're going to say that the movement's not anti feminist, which it is.
00:55:37.000And then this alt hype guy, this Ryan Falk guy, is going to go around saying that the movement is not anti homosexual.
00:55:43.000You know, look, again, we're not going to go out there doing another inquisition.
00:55:48.000Look, odds are, if you just shut the hell up about it, no one's going to have a problem with you.
00:55:53.000But the problem is when you're going around filming yourself doing things, when you're going to antagonize Christians because they have a problem with your lifestyle, then that's when we have to draw the line.
00:58:11.000Vladimir Putin's speech in Moscow about the unstoppable missiles, his new arsenal, because he got three new acquisitions in the nuclear arsenal, which was like a submarine cruise missile, a hypersonic glide missile, and then some other thing, an autonomous submarine like drone, something to that effect.
00:58:33.000But on the hypersonic missiles, what this does in effect is it restores mutually assured destruction.
00:58:37.000That's the TLDR, the too long didn't read, the gestalt of it, is that the hypersonic missile, which, and here's the interesting thing.
00:58:45.000Usually, the missiles would have to be fired from Russia and go over the North Pole to hit the United States.
00:58:50.000If you look at the way the globe works, two countries in the Northern Hemisphere, it's a lot shorter to shoot an ICBM from Russia over the Northern Hemisphere, or excuse me, over the Northern Pole and into the United States.
00:59:00.000Well, the video that he showed of his new ICBM, which he said can reach any point on the globe, he shows it going over the South Pole where there's not much missile defense, and that's a game changer.
00:59:10.000But that essentially restores mutually assured destruction.
00:59:35.000It does help because, you know, as we talk about many times, we're completely shut out from the institutions, from sponsors, from advertisers, from, you know, the institutions.
01:01:27.000The same stuff repeated in the same way, the same pictures, the same message, the same memes, the same appeals to the same virtues, the same ethics.
01:02:25.000Yeah, hopefully, in three months' time, hopefully, I'll have that Bane physique and I'll just be out there beating the hell out of anarchists and communists.
01:02:32.000And hopefully, when I get to the CPAC next year, nobody can mess with me.
01:02:36.000No, you know, little Jewy looking guys in blue pinstripe suits with their tacky gold watches, these little manlet men.
01:03:05.000By the time I got there, like we got to our hotel at about 10 a.m., we didn't even start walking over until 11 a.m., and at that point it was already dispersed, so I was never at Lee Park.
01:03:16.000Mike C., Nick, you are one white pilling lad.
01:03:31.000They put out content and a product that is appealing to the masses, something that's palatable to most people, and a message that's entirely reasonable.
01:03:40.000I've always held that we are not the ones that are the radicals.
01:03:45.000And I don't say that to soften our message.
01:03:47.000I mean that what the mainstream might call crazy is actually not crazy at all if you sit down with somebody and explain it.
01:04:29.000Those are the people that you're bringing onto your team.
01:04:31.000So I think that American Renaissance, we can learn a lot from them.
01:04:35.000And Spencer, we can learn a lot from them too, maybe just in different ways.
01:04:38.000But I think there's a pretty clear distinction now where Jared Taylor, I think he's still seen as respectable.
01:04:44.000He's still seen as like the elder statesman.
01:04:47.000And I could share Jared Taylor's content with my family.
01:04:50.000Spencer's stuff, as much as we might think he's a smart guy or a charismatic guy, it's just not, and he's not trying to appeal to normal people.
01:04:57.000So you have to keep that in mind as well.
01:04:59.000Spoiler alert, did you get my email, big guy?
01:05:02.000I probably did, but I've been slow on the draw because I've had such a hectic day today.
01:05:06.000I was up all night, was working out, had to get lunch with a friend, and had to work on the show, work on some other projects.
01:05:12.000So I'll probably get back to you tonight.
01:05:15.000Ian Weber, when people say a homogeneous country would be, quote, boring, not a real argument, point to Japan, China, Europe, and America in the 50s, the best time.
01:07:43.000When you have a 250 IQ, you're going too fast for it.
01:07:46.000Stell Bell, found your channel because people are always commenting on my videos saying I was copying you or had been watching too much America First, starting watching your vids.
01:07:54.000And our views are nearly identical on traditionalism.
01:07:57.000Wow, we'll have to check out your channel.