00:01:04.000Dying to hear my hot take on Syria because here we are again.
00:01:09.000I have to say, I have to say, people know, people who are not strangers to this show know that I'm always a defender of the president, that I always will defend the president, that I always will give him the benefit of the doubt, that I trust the president immensely.
00:01:25.000I mean, I've really invested a lot in the personal integrity and character of the president, and not for no reason.
00:01:33.000You know, I have good reason to do this.
00:01:36.000And so, when we see these various examples in January, when he said he would make a deal for DACA in exchange for $1.6 billion, he actually said in January he stated his intent to do a deal for DACA in exchange for the wall funding we got in the omnibus bill.
00:01:54.000Back in January, he said, I'll give DACA for $1.5 billion on fence repairs.
00:02:59.000We've seen in just about every special election since the Alabama special Senate election, you could go back to the Virginia special elections before that.
00:03:08.000In every primary so far in 2018, We're facing an enthusiasm gap.
00:03:13.000And at the time when President Trump should be stacking our candidates and stacking our bench, you know, whatever you want to call it, with really solid red meat for the base, really solid policy, really solid action that is not contestable, that is not like nobody has to call the White House and say, hey, you know, big head, what's going on?
00:03:34.000We elected you to not do these things, and here you are doing all the things you said you wouldn't.
00:03:40.000So I will say, I will preface the show by saying, I hear you.
00:03:46.000Well, I don't believe, and spoiler alert, well, I don't believe what we'll see in the next 24 hours will constitute the beginning of a ground war in Syria led by the United States.
00:03:58.000And while I think there's a rhyme and reason to what's going on here, I will say I'm getting very tired of having to be on the defensive every other week.
00:04:09.000When we're facing this kind of uphill battle, this enthusiasm gap, where the Democrats are turning out in every special election, in every primary election, in early voting, in voter registration, In candidates running, they're hitting record numbers.
00:04:23.000We cannot be in a position where Trump, you know, through some machination, appears to be betraying his base on core issues.
00:04:32.000It would be one thing if he went back on, I don't know, the EPA.
00:04:37.000It would be one thing if he went back on a promise about transportation.
00:04:41.000But he's going back on immigration and going back, or, you know, he appears to.
00:04:47.000I think there's reasons behind it, but there's this appearance that he goes back on immigration.
00:04:52.000It's very difficult, the position he's put us in.
00:04:55.000Now, that said, where are we right now with Syria?
00:04:58.000What am I even talking about for the people living under a rock who don't watch the news, who've been maybe they've been in the gym five times a day, you know, maybe they've been, you know, watching anime.
00:05:25.000Doesn't it tell you something about American foreign policy?
00:05:29.000Doesn't it really tell you something that we, the sovereign American people, under siege by immigration, both legal and illegal, under siege by an opioid epidemic, under siege by crime and gangs and health care through the roof and on and on?
00:05:46.000Isn't it really something that the average ordinary American has to concern ourselves with far away suburbs of far away countries and capitals that nobody could?
00:05:57.000Put on a map, nobody could tell you what goes on there, what ethnicity they are, what religion they practice.
00:06:02.000I mean, in this case, you could say, you know, maybe a person could reasonably guess Arab, Muslim, but, you know, Syria is a complicated picture.
00:06:10.000So there was a, but, you know, we're going to have to reel it in if we want to lay out the facts, because there's a lot to say about it.
00:06:16.000But so there was a chemical weapons attack two days ago in this suburb of Damascus.
00:06:23.000And this has been one of the biggest, you know, it's tough because allegedly 42 people died in this chemical weapons attack.
00:06:31.000And we saw this exactly one year ago yesterday, April 7th, 2017.
00:06:36.000There was a Tomahawk missile strike by the United States against an airfield in Homs in response to, and I just got some kind of a sound notification.
00:06:48.000But there was, exactly a year ago yesterday, there was a 59 Tomahawk missile airstrike against an airfield in Homs, which allegedly launched a similar chemical weapons attack last year.
00:07:32.000There's the Kurds, there's the Al Nusra Front, there's Al Qaeda, there's ISIS.
00:07:37.000And more broadly, however, the main conflict in Syria, which broke out in 2011, which started the Syrian civil war, was between the Assad government in Damascus, the sovereign government, hasn't changed since the beginning of the war, and these anti government rebels in various flags, stripes, colors, whatever.
00:07:58.000And so this is one of the biggest victories in the last week.
00:08:01.000That he's consolidated control of East Ghouta, which is a region in Damascus, one of the last regions near Damascus, which has been controlled by rebels.
00:08:10.000One of the biggest victories in this civil war by pro government forces since we took Aleppo in 2016.
00:08:17.000And so the chemical weapons, the Pentagon says, and the UN says, it fits into this broader strategy of Assad that he's been trying to starve the rebels, he's been trying to bleed the rebels out, essentially.
00:08:30.000And so, and by the way, I predicted this for months.
00:08:33.000They talked about the humanitarian disaster in East Ghouta, about how Assad was shelling hospitals and schools, and there were these civilian casualties.
00:08:42.000And look at the pictures of dead kids.
00:08:44.000We heard this throughout February about just regular, you know, just standard humanitarian issues in East Ghouta.
00:08:51.000And I said last month, I said, you'll see something very similar to what we saw last year, just based on what we're seeing in the media.
00:08:58.000And so you also have to understand the timing of the chemical weapons attack here.
00:09:02.000What were we just discussing last week?
00:09:06.000Monday, Tuesday, and Wednesday, I believe we covered on the show.
00:09:09.000President Trump announced his intention to withdraw American forces from Syria.
00:09:15.000He said it once, he said it twice, he tripled down on it.
00:09:18.000There were all kinds of reports in the Hill and the Washington Post that he was fighting with his military advisors and the Pentagon and the DOD and the State Department, his foreign allies, like our closest one, Israel, and the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, about whether or not we should pull our troops out, whether or not we should stay in.
00:09:52.000Let's bring our troops home very quickly.
00:09:54.000They ended up resolving, and it was very contradictory in terms of the president, certain messages from the president's loyalists said that we would pull our troops out something in like six months.
00:10:08.000And then the timetable would look something like six months, and then we would pull out of Syria.
00:10:13.000We have about 2,000 to 2,500 boots on the ground in Syria right now, operating mostly with the Kurds in northeastern Syria.
00:10:21.000But then from the military establishment, from the Defense Department, from the Pentagon, we heard another message, and from Nikki Haley, our favorite Indian neocon from the UN.
00:10:31.000She and the DOD and the Pentagon said basically, there are no plans to get out of Syria anytime soon, and we're basically just going to remain there.
00:10:40.000And of course, President Trump, for whatever reason, I don't know if he was persuaded.
00:10:43.000Convinced there was some other form of pressure, but by the end of the week, last week, he said basically, I concede to Saudi Arabia, to Israel, to the military industrial complex, we'll remain in Syria.
00:10:56.000And then, conveniently, we see a chemical weapons attack.
00:11:01.000And notice the timing of it Assad has just won the biggest victory since 2016.
00:11:07.000He's routed the last remaining rebel stronghold in his capital, he's on his way to winning the civil war, just like last year.
00:11:14.000He's on the way, slowly but surely, on the march to consolidating control of his country.
00:11:22.000The first few years didn't go very well.
00:11:24.000It was very scary, a very scary time for him and the presidential family because it was looking like these savages, these moderate rebels, were going to take over the country.
00:11:34.000But gradually, slowly but surely, with the help of Russian airstrikes, the help of Iranian militiamen and boots on the ground, he was able to gradually regain control of the country.
00:11:45.000By 2016, it looked like he'd won it unequivocally.
00:11:48.000And then in 2017, weirdly enough, he uses chemical weapons.
00:11:51.000The one thing, the one red line, That the biggest hyperpower in the history of the world had with him.
00:11:58.000And if you recall, I have a great memory of this.
00:12:04.000A week before the chemical weapons attack last year, April 2017, a week before the chemical weapons attack, I believe the chemical weapons attack in 2017 was on a Tuesday.
00:12:18.000The chemical weapons attack was on a Tuesday.
00:12:21.000The preceding Friday of that week, And I didn't even look into this before because my memory is so good.
00:12:27.000Nikki Haley said at the United Nations that our role in Syria is not to depose Assad.
00:12:34.000She made it clear that although the express policy of the shadow government of the Obama administration for eight years and assumingly into the Trump administration had been to remove Assad, to defeat ISIS, but also to remove Assad, Nikki Haley and the Defense Department and the State Department made it clear the weekend before the alleged chemical weapons attack that our job was not to get rid of Assad.
00:13:00.000Four days later, chemical weapons attack.
00:13:02.000And that was the one thing that President Trump said they could not do.
00:13:06.000That was the one bridge they could not cross without inviting some kind of American response.
00:15:19.000To what extent tertiary powers were involved.
00:15:23.000Not only does the United States come right out of the gate on two days ago on Saturday, not only do we come right out of the gate and say, This is a terrible attack.
00:15:38.000You know, not only do we go on all this stuff, but then we say, And not only do we know this attack happened, not only do we know Assad is responsible, but then they make the leap.
00:15:50.000Here's where you really got to be skeptical.
00:15:52.000Then they make the leap that actually, you know, we already know that Assad did it, but actually Russia is responsible.
00:16:00.000And actually Iran is also responsible.
00:16:46.000This president runs his campaign on we're not going to antagonize Russia, we're going to seek rapprochement with Russia, we have similar interests.
00:16:56.000And he's blaming him for a chemical weapons attack that we don't even know happened.
00:17:00.000The UN announced this evening that they could not confirm that a chemical weapons attack even happened.
00:17:07.000And you notice that the way they say it happens is like, well, people, they've reported symptoms that are somewhat similar to what would happen if a chemical weapons attack occurred.
00:17:17.000Yeah, I'm sorry, that's really not going to cut it.
00:17:20.000If we're going to go to war in Syria, or we're going to strike Syria, and understand the problem here is not a limited strike in Syria at this point.
00:17:29.000The problem this year is the potential for escalation with Russia.
00:17:36.000Last year, we struck Syria with impunity.
00:17:39.000I believe it was 59 Tomahawk missiles on that airfield, the Noms, ended up being totally inconsequential.
00:17:45.000In fact, that airfield, even tactically speaking, was inconsequential.
00:17:49.000That airfield we struck last year was operational 24 hours after the strike.
00:17:53.000If you look at the infrastructure that was hit last year, we didn't even hit the runways because the runways are much more difficult to repair.
00:19:34.000Turns out, after a lot of confusion, reports of joint airstrikes, missile strikes, all kinds of different theories, it turns out the strike that we saw last night was Israel.
00:19:48.000Israel went in, and get this, because I don't know if a lot of people were all over the initial reports of the strike when it implicated the president.
00:19:56.000When it implicated Israel, yeah, well, let's go find something else to do.
00:20:00.000The actual strike that Israel conducted over Syria last night, it was they delivered their warplanes, or rather, they sent their warplanes.
00:20:09.000Israel sent their warplanes into Lebanon.
00:20:52.000Last year, the United States missile strike against the airfield in Homs was the airfield from which the chemical weapons attack allegedly originated.
00:21:02.000This airstrike by the Israelis yesterday was on a base that had nothing to do with the alleged chemical weapons attack in Douma.
00:21:10.000And actually, Israel struck that same military base a month ago in February, or two months ago in February, after an Iranian drone flew from that base and violated Israeli airspace.
00:21:22.000If you remember that, that was two months ago.
00:21:24.000Israel responded by attacking that base, bombing a dozen other bases, and then they came back and bombed another dozen bases.
00:21:31.000So, this is more provocation from Israel.
00:21:34.000I guess it has nothing to do with the chemical weapons attack.
00:21:37.000They then turned around and bombed northern Gaza, which is on the other side of Israel, Syria is to the north of Israel.
00:22:32.000If Israel does a strike and the United States does a strike that's like a little bit, you know, maybe it's the same or a little bit worse, it doesn't have the same effect as if the United States just attacked Syria.
00:22:43.000If we did 59 cruise missiles out of a clear blue sky, well, that's, you know, Syria should watch out.
00:22:52.000That's a market escalation from this kind of quiet period between last year and this year.
00:22:58.000If Israel does a strike and then we do a strike that's kind of similar, it's like, eh.
00:23:03.000It doesn't have that much of an effect.
00:23:04.000So maybe that inspires the president and the Pentagon to up their game.
00:23:08.000Maybe it draws them into some kind of a bigger strike, a bigger engagement.
00:23:12.000Secondly, and the most important thing is that now Russia and Syria are on high alert.
00:23:18.000If the president and the United States did a strike last night, we had the element to surprise, we catch them off guard, probably not so much of a risk for escalation, probably not a big risk for retaliation.
00:23:30.000Now that Israel's basically blown our cover and said, yeah, it's all out war on Syria, we're just going to attack Syria, now Russia's on high alert.
00:23:38.000And now there are reports that they're harassing our warships, they're patrolling the coastline of Syria, they're all over the place.
00:23:45.000And so Russia and Syria are on high alert.
00:23:48.000If the United States is to even do a surgical, tactical, whatever you want to call it, some kind of limited strike, this is going to severely undercut, or rather raise the risk or potential that Russia could respond, that Russia could escalate.
00:24:03.000So that leads us to where we are today, which is what is the United States going to do?
00:24:10.000Unfortunately, we're in a position where today our favorite neocon, John Bolton, just got sworn into office as the chief.
00:24:18.000National Security Advisor, the man who never met a war he didn't love.
00:24:22.000Now, President Trump did say that, or rather, reports came out that President Trump made him promise he wouldn't start any new wars.
00:24:30.000I guess, kind of a tongue in cheek way to say that he acknowledges Bolton's reputation, that he's favored war with Korea, war with Iran, war with Syria, war with, you know, every country, you know, he's like John McCain and Lindsey Graham.
00:25:16.000I shouldn't say it's fun, but in the heat of like breaking news, things are happening, it's kind of exciting to say, like, You know, monitor all the different activity and play world reporter, play foreign affairs expert.
00:25:30.000It's hard to say what's really happening.
00:25:32.000There is an unconfirmed report from CNN Turkey which says that the U.S. Donald Cook destroyer left Cyprus's Larnica, and I don't know how to pronounce that, if I'm pronouncing that right or not, but they left Cyprus's port and they landed near Syrian territorial waters.
00:25:48.000It was claimed that the missile destroyer, class Donald Cook, reached Talus 100 kilometers.
00:25:55.000Or rather, 100 kilometers away from the TARDIS military base in Syria and had 60 Tomahawk fuses on board.
00:26:03.000So essentially, we're seeing something very similar to last year, if this is true, which is that there's a single missile cruiser, a single destroyer that is a little bit off the coastal waters of Syria.
00:26:16.000They've got about the same amount of missiles as last year.
00:26:20.000And like I said, the white pill here is that according to Strategic Forum and their forecast of where naval ships are in the world, This is the only major naval ship in the area.
00:27:07.000The Iraq War in 2003 did not begin with a president who was reluctant just a week before to send troops or additional forces into the region, actually, wanted to pull people out.
00:27:18.000It did not start with the period where the United States was not conducting any significant airstrikes.
00:27:24.000You have to look at the period between 1991 and 2003, between the Persian Gulf War and the Iraqi Freedom War in 2003.
00:27:34.000And we were conducting dozens of airstrikes every day.
00:27:37.000It varied from the Persian Gulf War, obviously, in 2003.
00:28:10.000An invasion does not start with no naval presence in the eastern Mediterranean.
00:28:14.000It does not start when we have Turkey in the north, when we have Russia and Iran in the country.
00:28:19.000I mean, the kind of risks associated with that just, it would not fly.
00:28:24.000I think any, even the most hardened war hawk would be hesitant to go to war in a country where Russia, China, Iran, Turkey, and all kinds of other sovereign actors are operating pretty significantly.
00:28:40.000Number two, you look at the military presence, it just isn't significant enough where it would warrant that.
00:28:44.000I will say, There are some puzzling indicators in terms of Mohammed bin Salman, the Crown Prince of Saudi Arabia, who's been very disruptive, who've basically seized control of the country there, consolidating his grasp on the, the, becoming the heir to the throne.
00:29:01.000He's been making the rounds in the United States, in Europe.
00:29:04.000He's been making a lot of disruptive reforms, I will say.
00:29:08.000So that's the only thing that, that maybe is worrisome.
00:29:11.000I guess the bigger concerns here, the biggest context that we have to look at with Syria, just like with last year, is what's going on in the Pacific.
00:29:20.000And I've said this time and time again.
00:29:23.000President Trump looks at the entire chessboard, so to speak.
00:29:29.000This is how President Nixon governed in the 1970s.
00:29:32.000He was really the first president, Nixon was, to utilize all regions of the world to really play a global strategy with American foreign policy, in that he played the Middle East off of Asia very frequently.
00:30:09.000And it didn't make sense if you were just looking at the Middle East.
00:30:12.000But if you looked at the Pacific, if you looked at the diplomacy with China and with North Korea, if you looked at the fact that when the missile strike occurred last year, Xi Jinping was actually staying at Mar a Lago.
00:30:23.000For the first ever face to face meeting between President Trump and the President of China, then it started to make sense.
00:30:30.000Additionally, you looked at the rhetoric of the President last year, where he had a press conference with the Jordanian king.
00:30:36.000And again, this is just off the top of my head, great memory.
00:30:39.000He had a press conference with the Jordanian king following the chemical weapons attack.
00:30:44.000And if you remember, during that press conference, during every statement that was made in the buildup to the missile strike, all the rhetoric was focused on North Korea.
00:30:52.000It was focused on Syria, but it was also rogue states.
00:30:59.000Similarly, what's the context of this?
00:31:02.000If there is a strike, if there is any kind of retaliation, what's the context?
00:31:07.000In a few weeks, either in April or in May, President Trump will sit down for the first face to face meeting in U.S. history between the American head of state and the North Korean head of state, and that's either in May or April.
00:31:21.000Now, think to yourself two things about this.
00:31:23.000Number one, our ability to leverage North Korea to denuclearize in these peace talks, and it's really these peace talks or it's war.
00:31:32.000It's peace talks with North Korea, or they first strike out of desperation on Guam or the Philippines or God knows where else, or we have to first strike.
00:31:43.000That's going into our summit with them.
00:31:46.000Now, our ability to have successful peace talks never usually works with North Korea, but the way that this one could be different is that we show North Korea that there is a credible threat that we will go to war on the Korean Peninsula.
00:32:00.000Now, it behooves us, if we make a promise and we make good on a promise, That we have a credible threat to go to war in North Korea.
00:32:08.000If we're just out there saying, you know what, we'll go to war with North Korea, I don't care, I'm a madman, I'll do whatever it takes.
00:32:44.000It's almost like taking out a loan to boost your credit score.
00:32:47.000You know, they tell you this in consumer economics in high school you take out a loan, a small loan, you pay it back.
00:32:53.000And the only reason you do this is to get a better credit score, to demonstrate to the banks and to whoever else that you are responsible, that you're able to pay back a loan.
00:33:01.000In the same way, this is how foreign affairs operates.
00:33:08.000That when we make a threat, we'll back it up.
00:33:10.000And understand, in a broader global mindset for foreign policy, this is a much better and a much more non interventionist practice than anything else.
00:33:21.000It is a small investment that pays off big dividends.
00:33:25.000If we make small threats and we follow up in small ways, we can make big threats and not have to follow up on big wars and big strikes.
00:34:17.000It would behoove us to do a limited strike or some kind of a strike to prove credibility.
00:34:21.000Point number two about North Korea is if these peace talks are reliant on our ability to demonstrate that we will credibly strike North Korea, to demonstrate that there's a credible threat that we will invade North Korea if things don't work out, how would that fare?
00:34:38.000How could we reasonably threaten North Korea if we were at war in Syria at the same time?
00:34:44.000Wouldn't that make it a lot harder to say that we would strike North Korea if we were already engaged?
00:34:49.000In a very difficult, a very risky, a very costly and expensive war in Syria?
00:34:54.000Because the timetable for war in Syria would be this month or next month before the peace talks.
00:34:59.000Are we going to have a really strong hand to leverage North Korea if we sit down across from the negotiating table and we're already in a full scale conflict in Syria while we're rebuilding a depleted military?
00:35:11.000Would we be better off if we had our full capability, our full attention dedicated to North Korea and we can send three carrier strike groups and we can send a massive military presence and we wouldn't get war?
00:35:22.000We were fighting two wars at one time, or if we were engaged in Syria where we're also fighting Iran and Russia and China?
00:35:29.000So these are just simple things to think about where we could probably set the upper and the lower bounds of what will happen.
00:35:44.000This is based on essentially a priori reasoning.
00:35:48.000We can reasonably understand that it is in the Trump administration's interest going into this larger foreign policy goal, which has been the focus of the administration since the inauguration.
00:35:59.000Which is to demonstrate a credible threat to North Korea with a limited strike in Syria, like we did last year.
00:36:13.000And we can credibly threaten North Korea with war.
00:36:16.000And they will give in to our demands and they will say, we will denuclearize and give you our nuclear arsenal because otherwise we're all going to die.
00:36:26.000We set the upper bound by saying that if we're going into North Korean negotiations and we have to demonstrate this credible threat, We can't have a big war going on at the same time.
00:36:35.000So, probably any kind of major intervention or any intervention that would lead to escalation, any big engagement that would lead to something that could get out of control or turn into something that would occupy a lot of our resources and attention, we probably wouldn't be wise to do because that would not leave us with a strong negotiating hand in May when we sit down with North Korea.
00:36:57.000So, I think that's a good way to set the upper and lower bounds there.
00:37:01.000The broader, and this is the Forecast about what will happen to get into a little bit of the philosophy of it because we have to spend some time on this is what's happening, but what ought to be happening?
00:37:12.000Let's take a step back and look at the whole situation.
00:37:16.000This is a false flag by the deep state.
00:37:21.000Don't believe for one second that we care about establishing independently that there was a chemical weapons attack and Russia was responsible.
00:37:29.000The deep state, the defense department, the Pentagon, the intelligence community, the foreign lobbying network in the country, they have conspired.
00:37:38.000To deceive the American people, to lie to you.
00:37:41.000They conspired with the mainstream media to push a bogus atrocity, to come up with a bogus casus belli, a bogus cause of war, to drag us back into Syria, to keep us there indefinitely.
00:37:53.000They don't even care anymore that it's convincing.
00:39:08.000The civil war in Yemen, which has been caused by Iran and Saudi Arabia, which the United States has been complicit in, is responsible for the actual worst humanitarian disaster in the world, where there is famine, where there is the worst cholera outbreak in world history, where the casualty rate is through the roof for civilians.
00:40:07.000So you have the brazen hypocrisy of it.
00:40:09.000So I guess the ultimate point here, which needs to be driven home, is that we do not live in a sovereign country, or rather, we are no longer sovereign in the country.
00:42:14.000They have allegiances to the world, to world principles, world, you know, the international ideology and other countries can't have it anymore.
00:42:22.000But we're going to be monitoring the situation.
00:42:25.000I'll stay on for a little bit and we'll see if we see any new developments here.
00:42:29.000But in the meantime, I'll take your questions, comments, concerns on the Super Chats and also in the Streamlabs donations and also Twitch.
00:42:38.000So I'm going to jump over to your Super Chats for now.
00:45:08.000These are part of a coherent worldview.
00:45:10.000When we push ethnic nationalism, that's not just my pet issue.
00:45:16.000That's not, well, I happen to care a little bit more about abortion than gun rights like the standard conservatives do.
00:45:22.000This is a wholly different worldview that we're pushing.
00:45:25.000It's a perennialist worldview, it's a traditionalist worldview, one that understands and one that contradicts, challenges the underlying assumption of liberalism, of modernism, Which is egalitarianism, which is that all people are equal.
00:45:41.000So when I push ethnic nationalism, it's not like, well, you know, this is my pet issue.
00:45:48.000This is a compartmental, isolated piece which I find interesting or important.
00:45:53.000This is a part of a coherent worldview.
00:45:55.000Ethnic nationalism is so off putting because it is diametrically opposed, it challenges the core assumptions upon which phony conservatism and liberalism and progressivism are all built on top of.
00:49:04.000If extrajudicial killings ever become under my jurisdiction, you know, the people at Greyhound Bus are going to be not too happy and their families either, right?
00:52:52.000And I have very European features, I must say.
00:52:55.000You know, people all the time, they try to get under my skin with this You're not white.
00:52:59.000You're a white nationalist, but you're not white.
00:53:02.000You know, it's funny because just by the very logic of it, if somebody is 15% something and that defines the whole, I mean, this is a paradox that a minority constituent piece defines the whole.
00:53:14.000Well, then what about a majority constituent piece?
00:54:45.000He doesn't strike me as a very informed person on the issue, and I will put the blood back in Bloodsports tomorrow.
00:54:51.000I'm going to give him a one way ticket to Vindication City, where he will be put in jail by the Vindication City National Guard.
00:54:59.000He'll be on the pain train on the way to prison in Vindication Nation.
00:55:04.000Wednesday, we have J.F. Gareipi, who will be making an appearance on this show to discuss biology and ethnic nationalism, things of this nature.
00:55:13.000I also have a very important question to ask him about fruit.
00:55:17.000And let me know if you've ever wondered this.
00:55:18.000I was looking at a banana the other day.
00:55:20.000This is a little off topic, but I was looking at a banana the other day, and I said to myself, Where does this come from?
00:55:27.000You have a plant, or I don't know, it comes from a tree, right?
00:55:31.000It comes from a tree, and inside of this pod, you have something that can be eaten by people, and it gives us nutrients.
00:55:42.000I was wondering that, and I said, I got to get JF on.
00:55:45.000We'll talk about politics and usual stuff, but also I have to ask him that one question.
00:55:50.000Friday, we have our friend Yusuf making an appearance on the show.
00:55:54.000We talked about him last week, last Friday.
00:55:58.000About how he debated Steven Crowder, that based socialist slash nationalist who completely ruined Steven Crowder's life, that capitalist shill, that autistic libertarian.
00:56:09.000He completely ruined his life by beating him so badly.