America First - Nicholas J. Fuentes


The 19th Amendment: 100 Years Later | America First Ep. 392


Summary

In this episode of America First, host Nicholas J. Fuentes talks about the impact of the Women's Suffrage Amendment and the lack of movement in the White House regarding a new immigration czar, as well as some new information about the possibility of a new position at the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) involving Kris Kobach or Chris Kobach. He also talks about a potential White House whiteboard whiteboard prepared for the 100th anniversary of the 19th Amendment and why he thinks it's a great day to be a woman. America First is a show about Americanism, not globalism, will be our credo. It's going to be only America First. Only America First! Americanism not Globalism. It's gonna be only, only, America FIRST. The American people will come first once again. America First - the American People's Creed. We're watching America First and we're here to bring you the best and the most authentic version of the show you've ever seen on the America First Network. Welcome to America First: The Podcast! - where we're watching you, listening to you, and we are here to serve you, not to be served by you, the people! Today's episode is all about America First...and we're going to talk about it! We'll be talking about women's suffrage, immigration, and women's rights, and the women's amendment, and why you should vote for a woman's suffragist, and how to vote for women who voted for women in the election. and much more. - a woman s suffrage. , we'll be covering the big day, and a big 100th amendment day. we're celebrating the day! , and we have a whiteboard with a big day to remember the day, a day that will be a day where we should be celebrating women s suffragism, and so much more! Thanks for listening, and thank you for listening and supporting us, and for supporting us. . - Nicky, Nicky and Joe, and hope you enjoy the show, and keep listening to us! Thank you, Nick, and God bless you, bye, and see you next week! -- NICKY, Kristy, the host, - Nicksy, Natalie, and Niamh, and Jack, the reporter, and J.J., the host.


Transcript

00:01:58.000 Wall.
00:04:42.000 Wall.
00:07:27.000 Wall.
00:10:12.000 Whoa.
00:12:56.000 Wall.
00:15:41.000 Wall.
00:18:26.000 Wall.
00:21:10.000 Wall.
00:23:55.000 Wall.
00:24:29.000 Americanism, not globalism, will be our credo.
00:24:35.000 It's going to be only America first.
00:24:40.000 America first.
00:24:45.000 The American people will come first once again.
00:25:11.000 America First!
00:25:12.000 America First!
00:25:36.000 Good evening, everybody.
00:25:37.000 We're watching America First.
00:25:38.000 My name is Nicholas J. Fuentes.
00:25:40.000 We have a great show for you tonight.
00:25:41.000 Very excited to be back with you today here on Tuesday.
00:25:45.000 And it's a bit of a tough day, a bit of a dark day for us.
00:25:49.000 The feature of the show, of course, is about the 100th anniversary of the 19th Amendment.
00:25:55.000 So, I can't really tell you that it's a great day.
00:25:58.000 I can't really tell you that it's a fabulous day that we're experiencing today.
00:26:03.000 We're gonna be talking about that.
00:26:04.000 We've got a whiteboard prepared for you.
00:26:06.000 That's really our big news story.
00:26:09.000 Not so much else going on.
00:26:10.000 It seems like everything else is kind of simmering, kind of calming down a little bit.
00:26:15.000 Simmering?
00:26:16.000 Is that calming or is that escalating?
00:26:18.000 I guess, well...
00:26:19.000 Regardless, things are slowing down a little bit.
00:26:22.000 You know, last week I said we were getting excited because things were heating up with China, things were heating up with Iran, and now it just seems like nothing happens, you know?
00:26:31.000 And that's how I was feeling a little bit last week.
00:26:33.000 People are saying, War with Iran!
00:26:35.000 War with Iran!
00:26:36.000 We're going to war with Iran!
00:26:38.000 And in the back of my mind I'm thinking, nothing ever happens, you know.
00:26:41.000 Of course it's not going to happen.
00:26:43.000 But a little part of me is like, there would be such a big show!
00:26:47.000 It would be such a big show if we went to war with Iran.
00:26:52.000 And it would have been a lot of big shows down the road, right?
00:26:55.000 So maybe there's the military-industrial complex and then there's the America First industrial complex.
00:27:00.000 Maybe you have some high-level America First viewer in the State Department, in the Defense Department.
00:27:06.000 Maybe a high-level America First viewer on a submarine somewhere in the ocean presses the button, turns the key, whatever.
00:27:13.000 Says, you know what?
00:27:14.000 We have to do it for the content.
00:27:15.000 So, kind of a slow week.
00:27:17.000 So we'll be talking about women's suffrage.
00:27:20.000 Big 100th anniversary.
00:27:21.000 We'll be getting into that.
00:27:22.000 There's also some new information.
00:27:25.000 Out of the White House, actually very important related to personnel.
00:27:29.000 We've been looking at this position now for a couple of months now.
00:27:32.000 The immigration czar, you might have heard of this.
00:27:35.000 I think it was right around the government shutdown, people in the White House started to talk about the creation of a new position outside of the Department of Homeland Security, outside of some of these policy advisors.
00:27:48.000 And they would create a new immigration czar and they've had these czar positions in the White House for a while now.
00:27:54.000 I think this began under the Obama administration where they appoint kind of a temporary official to oversee one particular issue that is not being focused on maybe or is not getting the desired attention from the major departments because there's only so many departments and a lot of them do many different things.
00:28:13.000 So for example, I believe Barack Obama hired an Ebola czar or a Zika czar, something like that, during his administration to oversee, just as one example, one particular area, you know, strain of a disease, one particular crisis.
00:28:28.000 And so they talked about this during the government shutdown, the appointment of an immigration czar.
00:28:33.000 And of course, the DHS Secretary is out.
00:28:35.000 They have an acting DHS Secretary, Mick Alinan.
00:28:39.000 And what they've been discussing with these two positions is, of course, Chris Kobach.
00:28:44.000 Are we going to get Chris Kobach as either an Immigration Czar or as the DHS Secretary?
00:28:51.000 And so far, we haven't seen any movement on that.
00:28:54.000 We haven't seen anything in the way of
00:28:57.000 Well, it was announced this week, first reported by the New York Times, that the President has found his immigration czar.
00:29:06.000 And it's somebody by the name of Ken Cuccinelli.
00:29:09.000 Not Kris Kovacs.
00:29:10.000 We'll be talking about that decision, and there's a lot of palace intrigue going on there about why it wasn't Kris Kovac, who might have played a role in torpedoing Kris Kovac's prospects in getting this position, or any other position for that matter.
00:29:25.000 We'll be talking about another personnel change which happened and some pretty interesting things happening in the White House, pretty interesting movements happening, but I can tell you not all of it good.
00:29:34.000 Not all of it good.
00:29:35.000 Like we were talking about yesterday with the E-Verify statement that was made in that interview with Fox News the other day, things seem to be going in the wrong direction.
00:29:44.000 It seems like just when we start to go in the right direction, just when we start to see, okay, maybe there's this renewed effort on this particular issue, or maybe it's on trade, or it's on foreign policy, every time he says we're pulling out of Syria, or we've got the USMCA ready, it always just, out of nowhere, just begins to go in the wrong direction.
00:30:04.000 It goes nowhere, right?
00:30:05.000 So, we'll get into all of that.
00:30:07.000 It should be a pretty fun
00:30:09.000 Great show, even though it's a slow news day.
00:30:11.000 Slow news week, we have these sometimes, but we're going to try and keep it fun, energetic, regardless.
00:30:16.000 But that should do it for the show.
00:30:19.000 I was going to talk a little bit about the Australian elections, but honestly, I don't really feel it's that particularly exciting.
00:30:26.000 You know, I mean, we have a lot of Australian people who watch the show.
00:30:29.000 A lot of Kiwis and a lot of Aussies.
00:30:32.000 Kiwis, I guess, is New Zealand, right?
00:30:34.000 So, people in that general area, same accents.
00:30:37.000 We have a lot of those types in the audience, but, you know, for people that don't know, they have this big election in Australia.
00:30:43.000 The Conservative Party there pulled out a major upset victory.
00:30:47.000 I don't think so.
00:31:03.000 I guess it's fair to say if we see that happening in Australia, if we see this happening elsewhere in Europe, we see the European Union elections coming up, and the Brexit party is polling very well, and Lega Nord, or just Lega as it's called now in Italy, is polling very well.
00:31:20.000 Suffice to say, I think that perhaps right-wing populism is not dead.
00:31:25.000 So, I don't want to expand too much on the Australian election subject, didn't really want to devote too much time to that, but I do think it's worth mentioning, I do think it's worth throwing out there just briefly to say, as we talked about a little bit last week when Viktor Orban came to visit Trump, that it seems to me like if the right-wing doesn't pull it off in America,
00:31:44.000 If we're not able to save the country politically with a conservative party, or a right-wing political revolution, or something akin to the insurgency we saw in 2016, if that doesn't work in America, I think we can all be very white-pilled that it's happening everywhere else, I guess.
00:32:00.000 I guess it's happening everywhere else.
00:32:02.000 So I don't know if you want to interpret that as a white pill or a black pill.
00:32:06.000 Black pill because it's highly disappointing here.
00:32:08.000 White pill that even if it doesn't happen here, it's happening elsewhere.
00:32:12.000 But we can look across the ocean on both sides and we can see that it seems like in Australia things are looking up.
00:32:19.000 I'm not sure exactly if their conservative party is exactly the kind of populist nationalist movement that we need, but regardless, it's better than the Liberal Party.
00:32:28.000 And we look across the other way in Europe, it seems like things are getting a lot better.
00:32:33.000 So, disappointing.
00:32:34.000 I guess maybe that's a little bit of a cope.
00:32:36.000 The virgin Trump in America versus the Chad, Orban, Salvini, Farage in Europe.
00:32:42.000 But that's something else that's going on.
00:32:46.000 Like I said, that should do it for our show.
00:32:47.000 We're going to jump into the immigration thing first.
00:32:51.000 Really, this has been the story of the administration.
00:32:53.000 This has been the most disappointing thing this year.
00:32:56.000 As I've been saying, I thought after the midterms we were going to get serious about immigration.
00:33:00.000 And I thought for a short time a couple of weeks ago we were going to get serious about immigration again, even though I've been totally blackpilled, totally off the Trump train.
00:33:09.000 You know, after the midterms we had executive orders in the works, allegedly, and we had a government shutdown that began, and it seemed like there was this focus, and then that evaporated.
00:33:20.000 And then that, of course, was totally derailed, totally failed.
00:33:23.000 We didn't get the federal government funding for the wall, and actually we lost on everything else.
00:33:29.000 And then after the government shut down, I said, okay, it's over.
00:33:33.000 It's game over.
00:33:34.000 Maybe we're gang gang.
00:33:35.000 Maybe we're gonna vote for Democrats.
00:33:37.000 Maybe we're gonna just go underground.
00:33:39.000 Maybe politics is finished.
00:33:40.000 But then we saw things were starting to pick up again.
00:33:43.000 Then we saw there was this renewed focus on immigration again, and we had this new proposal from Jared Kushner, which we talked about last week.
00:33:51.000 Turned out it was actually pretty good as far as modernizing the immigration system, shifting from chain migration to skills-based migration.
00:34:00.000 I said to you and I said to myself, okay, there is room for course correction.
00:34:04.000 There's room to make things better.
00:34:06.000 But just time after time, we see it always thwarted.
00:34:10.000 And that's the announcement from today.
00:34:12.000 This is from CNN.
00:34:14.000 It says, President Donald Trump is expected to name Ken Cuccinelli, a former Attorney General of Virginia, to a top job at the Department of Homeland Security overseeing the administration's immigration policies.
00:34:25.000 Trump was considering Cuccinelli and former Kansas Secretary of State Chris Kobach
00:34:32.000 I've heard from a couple of sources that Ken Cuccinelli is actually good on immigration.
00:34:54.000 I don't know if that's legit or not.
00:34:56.000 I haven't heard from some of the usual suspects on whether or not that's authentic.
00:35:01.000 Because we've heard a lot of people are good on immigration, right?
00:35:04.000 I mean we've heard that from a lot of different people and somehow it never seems to come to fruition.
00:35:08.000 It never seems to actualize.
00:35:10.000 So I'm not exactly certain about his prospects as will he be tough on immigration?
00:35:15.000 Will he be a good immigration czar?
00:35:17.000 They say he's good on border security.
00:35:20.000 This is continuing from CNN.
00:35:23.000 It says, although Cuccinelli shares the President's view on border security and immigration, he was a strong critic of Trump during the 2016 Republican primary.
00:35:30.000 Cuccinelli famously threw his credentials on the ground during the 2016 Republican National Convention in protest of Trump.
00:35:37.000 So I find it hard to believe.
00:35:38.000 They say at once he's a strong supporter.
00:35:41.000 He's great and strong on immigration.
00:35:43.000 He's in favor of border security.
00:35:44.000 But at the same time, and you might have seen this, there was a clip posted and it was circulating on Twitter from the 2016 National Convention.
00:35:52.000 Your member was very controversial at the time.
00:35:55.000 There was this question of the unbound delegates versus the bound delegates.
00:35:59.000 Is the party going to try to steal the nomination from Donald Trump and give it to Ted Cruz?
00:36:04.000 Will they throw it to Marco Rubio?
00:36:06.000 You know, what's going to happen?
00:36:07.000 And if you remember, there were a number of Republican Party apparatchik-type people who were not happy, who were in protest of this, and they wouldn't pledge their delegates to Donald Trump.
00:36:20.000 In some cases they were taking their placards, throwing them on the ground.
00:36:23.000 This was one of these people.
00:36:24.000 Ken Cuccinelli, who embarrassed everybody, embarrassed the whole party, he was so upset with the nomination, and actively campaigned against Donald Trump and spoke out against Donald Trump, throws his credentials to the ground in protest.
00:36:37.000 Donald Trump Jr., his son, goes on an interview and says, this guy's an idiot for doing that.
00:36:43.000 This is now our immigration czar?
00:36:45.000 I just think...
00:36:47.000 Every step of the way, every opportunity that we get to turn it around, every opportunity that we get to capitalize, we have this big crisis where now even the New York Times and the Washington Post and publications like this are saying, yes, there is a crisis at the border.
00:37:03.000 Yes, we need to secure the border.
00:37:05.000 You know, six months ago, they were saying, what crisis?
00:37:08.000 There is no crisis.
00:37:09.000 And it's gotten so bad.
00:37:10.000 It was bad six months ago.
00:37:12.000 It was bad two years ago.
00:37:14.000 It's gotten so bad now that now even the major publications are saying, yeah, Trump is right.
00:37:19.000 It's a crisis.
00:37:20.000 Now even Democrats are being polled as saying it's a crisis in huge majorities.
00:37:25.000 They're even saying that Trump's immigration plan should be voted in the affirmative by the Democrats.
00:37:30.000 They're saying Democrats should adopt and accept and vote for the president's immigration plan.
00:37:35.000 So yet again, a critical perfect opportunity to capitalize on what's happening at the border.
00:37:41.000 And instead of picking Chris Kobach, who we've talked about on the show, would be perfect for the job.
00:37:46.000 This guy served under George W. Bush.
00:37:48.000 He created like the first ever national system to root out foreign aliens.
00:37:53.000 He basically was one of the masterminds and architects of E-Verify in Arizona.
00:37:57.000 I mean this guy was like
00:37:59.000 He is one of the modern, like, godfathers of strong immigration policy of the Department of Homeland Security.
00:38:06.000 This guy's a great lawyer.
00:38:07.000 He's very intelligent.
00:38:09.000 Not a great politician.
00:38:11.000 That's why he's not the governor of Kansas.
00:38:12.000 You know, he lost in 2018.
00:38:14.000 But nevertheless, he was the right pick, and we've gone through his credentials before, and we can't... I mean, he's got all the right backing from all the major organizations, all the right pundits, all the right politicians, and he was passed over.
00:38:26.000 In favor of Ken Cuccinelli, who didn't even, I'm sure, vote for Donald Trump, who didn't even want him to become the nominee.
00:38:31.000 Now he's working in the White House.
00:38:33.000 And this is one of the time-old, age-old problems that we see in the White House, which, again, is the personnel.
00:38:39.000 That's kind of the tricky thing, is for a long time, it's sort of hard to parse out.
00:38:44.000 Things have not been going our way.
00:38:45.000 Things have been failing, obviously.
00:38:47.000 We haven't seen progress.
00:38:49.000 We haven't even seen stasis on the core issues that were
00:38:53.000 Uh, that were elevated during the 2016 election.
00:38:56.000 Things like foreign policy, things like trade, immigration.
00:38:59.000 Not only is it not progress, it's not even stasis.
00:39:02.000 It's not even staying the same.
00:39:03.000 It's all getting worse and getting drastically worse.
00:39:06.000 It's like accelerating.
00:39:07.000 It's the rate and it's also getting worse, right?
00:39:10.000 And it's hard to parse out, well, who's really responsible?
00:39:13.000 For a long time I think we were fit to say, well,
00:39:17.000 And I would say it's strictly personnel.
00:39:19.000 I think in recent weeks and recent months, like we talked about last night with E-Verify, we can probably place a lot of the blame on the man himself, on the president.
00:39:28.000 But time and again I don't know how you keep making these decisions.
00:39:32.000 How many times have we seen this where we get somebody in the cabinet, or we get somebody who's a deputy to a cabinet member, or we get somebody who's in Congress working with the president, who you could go back in 2016, it takes a simple Google search, and they either worked for another campaign, or they spoke out against Trump, or they called Trump like Hitler, or the devil, or a white nationalist.
00:39:53.000 You go down the list of probably half the people in the White House didn't vote for the guy, campaigned for somebody else, or they spoke out against him.
00:40:01.000 You know, that's half the cabinet, that's probably half of everybody in the White House.
00:40:04.000 How does this keep happening?
00:40:05.000 You know, but then we get yet another one.
00:40:08.000 You would think two years in, we would have learned the lesson.
00:40:10.000 That's when I think you really have to put the blame on the man.
00:40:13.000 That's when I really start to question, do we vote for him again?
00:40:16.000 You know, I wavered a little bit last week.
00:40:19.000 We interviewed Jesse Lee Peterson on The Premium Show, and Jesse Lee Peterson, he's still on the Trump train, and we had a little bit of an exchange on this, and he urged me, he pressed me, he said, you know, you gotta vote for him because everybody's against him, and he's the only one who's fighting back, and he's the great white hope, and, you know, we have to trust that God is guiding him in all this.
00:40:40.000 I said, oh, all right, you know, maybe maybe we're being a little hard on him.
00:40:45.000 He does have a hard time out there.
00:40:47.000 But how do you keep making these mistakes two years?
00:40:50.000 And it's happened dozens of times and it's reported in the mainstream media.
00:40:54.000 It's not like this is
00:40:56.000 Like a secret.
00:40:57.000 You know, it's not like I'm the only one who knows about it.
00:41:00.000 If I know about it, I'm some 20 year old guy in Chicago doing a YouTube show.
00:41:05.000 If I know about it, your advisors know about it, the people in your administration know about it, your friends know about it.
00:41:11.000 It's in the newspapers that you yourself read.
00:41:14.000 It's on television.
00:41:15.000 That's all you do is watch television.
00:41:17.000 So I think, time and again, when this happens, you have to say, I don't even think it's Cuccinelli's.
00:41:22.000 If he doesn't do a good job, it's not his fault.
00:41:25.000 If immigration is failing, it's really not the fault of DHS.
00:41:28.000 It's this man's fault!
00:41:29.000 Get it together, man!
00:41:31.000 For two years, I said, okay, well...
00:41:34.000 You know, he's he's getting his sea legs, like Steve Bannon said, you know, that's the excuse he gives for Trump when he goes around on his, you know, Trump apology tour.
00:41:42.000 Well, you know, he was figuring everything out.
00:41:45.000 How can you continue to say that?
00:41:46.000 So the Cucinelli thing is, you know, it's nothing we haven't seen before.
00:41:50.000 But to me, what is most shocking is a detail in this CNN excerpt that I read.
00:41:56.000 Why was Kris Kobach passed over?
00:41:58.000 Why?
00:41:59.000 Why was there this big backlash?
00:42:02.000 Why was Cuccinelli chosen over Kobach?
00:42:04.000 It had to do with this list that was leaked.
00:42:06.000 Like CNN said, Kobach only came under scrutiny this week when he reportedly demanded a list of requirements for the job.
00:42:13.000 And it was all kinds of embarrassing things, I guess.
00:42:16.000 I don't really know what's standard for this kind of position.
00:42:18.000 We're good to go!
00:42:35.000 That the president was preparing a 120,000 strong ground force to invade Iran.
00:42:40.000 Or a leak that said the president was actually very skeptical of war in Iran.
00:42:44.000 Or, you know, years ago when Steve Bannon was still around and you'd hear all these leaks about personnel changes and drama in the Oval Office, swearing, fighting, phone calls, this kind of thing.
00:42:55.000 Where did the leak come from?
00:42:57.000 According to people connected to the White House, this is according to Ryan Gerduski,
00:43:02.000 Stephen Miller leaked the list.
00:43:04.000 So that's to me what's most shocking.
00:43:05.000 Donald Trump hiring somebody who campaigned against him.
00:43:08.000 Donald Trump hiring somebody who isn't good on policy, who is not true to the MAGA spirit, the America First Revolution.
00:43:17.000 That's not new.
00:43:18.000 The shock to me is that according to a lot of sources the person who leaked this list of demands that got Kobach passed over came directly from Stephen Miller which if you know anything about the White House Stephen Miller is he's one of the top policy advisors and he is seen as the last remaining
00:43:35.000 I don't know.
00:43:53.000 All the heavy hitters, all the hardcore people, even lower-level people like Darren Beatty.
00:43:57.000 And I don't say that in a negative way.
00:43:59.000 I mean, he was a speechwriter.
00:44:00.000 But somehow, all these people in the White House who were Trump campaign people, who were America First people, who have been around the block, who are endorsed by people like Ann Coulter or others, somehow they've all been cleaned out of the White House, yet Miller remains.
00:44:15.000 And I never really thought too much about that.
00:44:17.000 You know, we always saw Miller as the saving grace of the administration.
00:44:21.000 Well, maybe they get Mick Mulvaney as the Chief of Staff, and Mick Mulvaney's totally Koch brother owned, and, you know, maybe we get Mickalinen in his DHS, and he's maybe worse than Nielsen.
00:44:31.000 But hey, at least we got Stephen Miller looking out for us.
00:44:35.000 He was looking out for us last year, when you had the government shutdown, and he torpedoed all these deals that would have given amnesty for DACA.
00:44:42.000 And we talked last week, why was Kushner's immigration proposal seen as good?
00:44:46.000 Well, because Stephen Miller gave it a stamp of approval.
00:44:49.000 But according to Ryan Gerduski, who's very connected to these sources, he's one of our favorites on the show, he says that actually Stephen Miller has to do with a lot of these different incidents.
00:44:59.000 I've actually also heard that in the case of Darren Beatty, another perfect example.
00:45:03.000 You know Darren Beatty?
00:45:04.000 He was one of the only tenured university, or I'm sorry, non-tenured university faculty to endorse Donald Trump in the 2016 election.
00:45:13.000 He has written great articles in American Greatness, a few other publications.
00:45:17.000 He spoke at the HL Mencken Conference.
00:45:19.000 I mean, a very solid dude and very strong America First type guy.
00:45:23.000 Totally, 100% our guy, America First type person.
00:45:27.000 When he was fired as a speechwriter, I've heard from some back channels, from QAnon himself, that when Darren Beatty was fired, Stephen Miller did not stick up for him.
00:45:36.000 And it seems like that is a pattern.
00:45:38.000 I've heard this from multiple people.
00:45:40.000 That when these pro-immigration people get fired, or they get forced out, or they don't get hired, it seems like Stephen Miller perhaps is behind this.
00:45:47.000 I guess the word on the street is that Miller wants to take all the credit.
00:45:51.000 He wants the strong immigration agenda in the White House, but he wants people to see that it was done by Stephen Miller.
00:45:57.000 And again,
00:45:58.000 This is what we've heard.
00:45:59.000 We've heard this from good sources.
00:46:01.000 So I don't want to, when I say that this is what we've heard from back channels and things like that, I don't want to undermine the claims being made.
00:46:08.000 These are good sources saying this, but I am saying this is the word on the block.
00:46:12.000 This is what we hear, but they are pretty legitimate sources.
00:46:15.000 So to me, that's pretty shocking.
00:46:17.000 That's pretty surprising.
00:46:18.000 Because like I said, for the longest time, we always said, well as long as Miller's in there, if Miller goes, we're done.
00:46:24.000 If Miller is out of the White House, then it's over.
00:46:26.000 But I think you're starting to see that this is how, this is politics.
00:46:29.000 This is the mean game of politics.
00:46:31.000 And egos enter into play, and personalities enter into play.
00:46:35.000 And that should tell you something about the struggle that we face ahead of us.
00:46:38.000 When a lot of people are very much obsessed about policy,
00:46:42.000 And people are obsessed about legislation, and people are obsessed about ideology, and meta-politics, and philosophy.
00:46:49.000 All of that really takes a backseat to personnel.
00:46:54.000 All of that takes a backseat to logistics, to politics, character, loyalty, things of this nature.
00:47:01.000 You know, if you think about politics as a car,
00:47:04.000 All that, you know, intellectual, heavy, high-minded type stuff is in the trunk of the car.
00:47:09.000 What's in the driver's seat is things like character.
00:47:12.000 It's who the politicians are.
00:47:14.000 And I've said that a lot about the Democratic contest in 2020.
00:47:17.000 People always say, well, who do you think is going to be the nominee?
00:47:20.000 Is it going to be a progressive?
00:47:21.000 Is it going to be a socialist?
00:47:22.000 All of that matters a lot less
00:47:25.000 As opposed to, who are the people that are competent?
00:47:28.000 Who are the people that actually have the character traits?
00:47:31.000 Who has it in them that they're going to be able to close the deal, get the nomination, whatever?
00:47:35.000 And that's an analogy, but I think it fits with Stephen Miller as well.
00:47:39.000 Clearly, it doesn't really matter that he's very strong in immigration, if that's the kind of attitude that he has.
00:47:44.000 If that's the kind of
00:47:45.000 We're good to go!
00:48:04.000 Or do you have Stephen Miller, who's this psycho, I guess this is what the word on the street is, and he's somebody who's going to force everybody out, leak things to keep Kris Kobach out?
00:48:13.000 Because if Kris Kobach got on as immigrations are, I think a lot of people would say, you've got a much better chance of turning the border security situation around.
00:48:21.000 But he didn't let that happen.
00:48:23.000 So, very disappointing if that's true.
00:48:25.000 Very disappointing to hear about Miller.
00:48:27.000 And the obvious disappointment is the end result, which is that now we've got, you know, the next best, the second best pick, as opposed to the best pick for Zarf.
00:48:35.000 So we hope, you know, we hope this guy Cuccinelli does a good job.
00:48:39.000 We hope that what they say about him is true.
00:48:41.000 We hope that he's good on border security, but I don't think he's a substitute for Kovach.
00:48:46.000 And if Kovach doesn't get in at DHS, I think we know we can blame two people, Donald Trump and Stephen Miller, for why the border isn't secured.
00:48:53.000 You got the White House.
00:48:54.000 You got the presidency.
00:48:56.000 It's all locked and loaded, ready to go.
00:48:58.000 You've even got fine people waiting in the wings to take over and guide policy and get things done, but you're not making it happen!
00:49:05.000 There's no excuse anymore!
00:49:07.000 There's nothing that you can blame it on anymore.
00:49:09.000 You know, when people say, oh, Nick turned on Trump when it wasn't popular.
00:49:13.000 No, I stuck with Trump even when it was unpopular for probably a lot longer than I should have.
00:49:17.000 But it was only at this point when you can say so clearly, so transparently, you had the opportunity.
00:49:25.000 It was right there for you.
00:49:27.000 Chris Kobach, you could have hired him, you could have hired all these other fine people, you could have fired these people, but you didn't make it happen.
00:49:34.000 That's on you now.
00:49:34.000 That's on the people in the White House as opposed to all these external forces, right?
00:49:39.000 Now the other development, which to me is even a little bit more surprising, kind of a shocking turn of events today, is that Johnny DeStefano was fired today.
00:49:47.000 This is according to
00:49:49.000 Another source here it says quote in January Trump had a meeting with or I'm sorry I know this is from Gerduski.
00:49:54.000 I'm reading the wrong one.
00:49:55.000 It says DeStefano has a wide range of roles inside the West Wing including overseeing the Office of Intergovernmental Affairs and the Office of Presidential Personnel and was one of the last remaining aides from the beginning of the Trump administration.
00:50:07.000 And he resigned today.
00:50:09.000 So remember the key office that he holds, the key responsibilities for people that don't know.
00:50:14.000 If you've watched the show for a long time, that name might sound familiar.
00:50:17.000 If you're from Washington D.C., there are some people in government who watch the show who have given me that name.
00:50:22.000 It's not a household name, but Johnny DeStefano was the head of the Office of Personnel for the White House.
00:50:28.000 We're good to go.
00:50:47.000 Who's the number one person that you need to agitate to get fired?
00:50:50.000 Who's the number one person who needs to be named in the White House besides, you know, some other people?
00:50:55.000 It's Johnny DeStefano.
00:50:56.000 Johnny DeStefano was put in charge of the Office of Personnel, and he's the reason why the entire White House is staffed with people who worked for Marco Rubio in 16, or worked for Ted Cruz in 16.
00:51:06.000 He was one of the chief architects of this failing Trump White House.
00:51:10.000 And we said this last week.
00:51:12.000 If you get bad personnel, if you get George Bush personnel in the White House, it becomes the George Bush White House!
00:51:17.000 So this is the guy!
00:51:19.000 And Donald Trump tweeted today that, you know, we're sad to see him go, he did great work, blah blah blah, but apparently behind the scenes, this is according to Ryan Gerduski, he tweets out, quote, in January Trump had a meeting with conservative leaders and his staff when he asked them why he had so many personnel issues, so maybe he's hip to this,
00:51:38.000 Connie Hare, who is Gohmert's Chief of Staff, called out to Stefano as the culprit.
00:51:43.000 Trump turned to Johnny, who was in the meeting, and this is my favorite, and said, quote, that doesn't surprise me.
00:51:49.000 I hear that from a lot of people.
00:51:51.000 So to me, this is the killer.
00:51:53.000 Trump knew about this.
00:51:55.000 Trump knows about the personnel issues.
00:51:57.000 He knows enough about it to inquire.
00:51:58.000 That's according to somebody familiar with a closed door meeting in the White House.
00:52:02.000 That Trump is going around and asking, why am I having all these issues?
00:52:06.000 Why are people leaking?
00:52:07.000 Why do I find out that people in my White House are not executing my orders?
00:52:12.000 You know, like we saw with Mattis a couple of weeks ago.
00:52:14.000 Why are they leaking things?
00:52:15.000 Like we saw with Raj Shah, I think was his name, who was in the communications department.
00:52:20.000 Why are they stabbing me in the back on policy as we've seen time and again with some other people?
00:52:24.000 Why is this happening?
00:52:25.000 We knew about it.
00:52:26.000 He's been hit to it.
00:52:27.000 And they say Johnny DeStefano.
00:52:29.000 He says, well I know that too.
00:52:30.000 I hear that from everybody.
00:52:31.000 He's getting fired today.
00:52:33.000 So I don't know.
00:52:34.000 It's like a white pill, black pill sort of thing.
00:52:37.000 Are we black pilled that, like, we're two years in and it seems like even though we're aware of these things or have been aware of these things, only now we're hearing about it from the man himself?
00:52:48.000 Only now do we start to see a little bit of a change?
00:52:51.000 You know, in the sense that DeStefano gets fired?
00:52:54.000 Is it a white pill that if some of these people are being cleaned out, maybe it's long overdue, but it's finally happening and there's course correction?
00:53:01.000 It's hard to tell.
00:53:02.000 You're just like dizzy at this point.
00:53:04.000 Are we going to fix immigration or are we not going to implement E-Verify?
00:53:08.000 Are we going to change personnel in the White House or are we going to turn over people like Chris Colbeck?
00:53:12.000 It's like, just can we pick a lane here?
00:53:15.000 Can we choose up?
00:53:16.000 Because I don't know.
00:53:17.000 I don't know if we're going to be Keep America Great 2020.
00:53:21.000 We're on board.
00:53:22.000 This is our last ride.
00:53:23.000 We're going to do it.
00:53:24.000 Or if I should be, you know, shilling for Yang Gang or for Tulsi Gabbard.
00:53:28.000 I don't know what to do anymore because it seems like every day it's like
00:53:31.000 We're cooking.
00:53:33.000 I hate America.
00:53:34.000 I'm totally with the Koch brothers and Big Ag.
00:53:36.000 And then the next day it's like Johnny DeStefano's out.
00:53:39.000 Nielsen's out.
00:53:40.000 Everybody's out.
00:53:41.000 And we've got this new immigration bill.
00:53:42.000 We're changing the consensus.
00:53:44.000 So it's all up in the air.
00:53:46.000 I can only say so much.
00:53:48.000 I can only analyze so much.
00:53:50.000 I can only agitate as much as I can from my throne here in the America First Kingdom, you know, to my to my club of knickers, to my court of knickers.
00:54:00.000 I can only do so much, but it's very confusing.
00:54:04.000 It's very chaotic times, and I guess the subtle white pill on that is if it's chaotic,
00:54:10.000 If it's uncertain, if it's unstable, then that means there's a chance, there's a chance, a possibility that things could turn around.
00:54:18.000 That's all I'm gonna say.
00:54:19.000 It's clearly turmoil.
00:54:21.000 There's clearly conflict in the White House.
00:54:23.000 Perhaps there's internal conflict within the man.
00:54:25.000 Something is definitely happening here.
00:54:28.000 And I guess the one, you know, if we're going to remain optimistic, if we're going to remain a little bit hopeful, the one thing we can say about that is if there is some kind of a brawl, if there's some kind of a battle happening, then we know at the very least that we're not down and out quite yet.
00:54:43.000 It's not over until it's over.
00:54:45.000 So that's not to say that it's highly likely that things are going to turn around, but it is to say that there's a chance it's not over yet.
00:54:51.000 If DeStefano gets fired because Trump is hip to the fact that he sucks,
00:54:55.000 Maybe that means he's hip to it, and maybe that means that he's looking to do something about it.
00:55:00.000 And he has been making personnel changes, and hey, the appointment of an immigration czar, even if it's not Kobach, is a good thing.
00:55:06.000 So, I think there's two ways to look at it.
00:55:08.000 There's glass half empty, glass half full.
00:55:11.000 We're good to go?
00:55:26.000 Late May 2019.
00:55:28.000 It's like you should have done that yesterday.
00:55:30.000 You should have done that six months ago, you know?
00:55:33.000 We wanted personnel changes before the beginning of the new year, before 2019, and now here we are.
00:55:38.000 And only now are we getting around to it, and you still haven't replaced Defense, DHS, some of these other big ones.
00:55:44.000 Mick Mulvaney's still the Chief of Staff.
00:55:47.000 What are you doing, big guy?
00:55:49.000 You gotta get, you gotta get Mick Mulvaney out.
00:55:51.000 He's just gotta put, like, Ann Coulter in charge of personnel, or, I don't know, one of my friends.
00:55:56.000 You gotta put somebody in charge of personnel who knows what they're doing, because it's just a mess right now.
00:56:01.000 It's a disaster.
00:56:02.000 So that's personnel, but we gotta get to our feature story of the day.
00:56:05.000 Like I said, we have a whiteboard.
00:56:06.000 As I said, and you may have seen this online,
00:56:09.000 All the representatives are celebrating.
00:56:11.000 Everybody's talking about this.
00:56:13.000 Today is the big day, everybody!
00:56:15.000 Whoo!
00:56:16.000 Happy 100 years!
00:56:17.000 Happy one century!
00:56:20.000 Can you believe it?
00:56:20.000 It's already been a century.
00:56:22.000 Has it really been that long?
00:56:24.000 One full century of women's suffrage.
00:56:26.000 Today is the day, a hundred years ago, May 21st, 1919,
00:56:33.000 When the 19th Amendment was passed.
00:56:35.000 Incredible!
00:56:36.000 Incredible!
00:56:36.000 Good job!
00:56:37.000 Congratulations!
00:56:39.000 The 19th Amendment passes and I'll read the text of the bill to commemorate this momentous occasion.
00:56:45.000 It reads, quote, the right of citizens of the United States to vote shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or by any state on account of sex.
00:56:56.000 Congress shall have power to enforce this article by appropriate legislation.
00:56:59.000 So, in short,
00:57:01.000 All the amendment says is, women have the right to vote.
00:57:04.000 And it's so funny, because I'm doing a little research for the show, and I have to rely almost entirely on things that I have found in the past, you know, happened upon, stumbled upon, red pills that I have found, because you try and do a little research, you google something like, women's suffrage cons, you know, women's rights mistake, 19th amendment, biggest mistake, 19th amendment, you know, whatever, and nothing comes up.
00:57:30.000 Article after article after article about, okay, it's the 19th amendment, it's the 100th anniversary, here's the effects, whatever.
00:57:37.000 Nobody can tell me one con.
00:57:38.000 Nobody can tell me one area there.
00:57:41.000 And this is the standard position.
00:57:42.000 And I say that because this is the standard position for everybody to have.
00:57:46.000 We're going to wait into some uncomfortable waters.
00:58:02.000 No, you're equal.
00:58:03.000 And everybody should be equal.
00:58:06.000 I believe everybody should have the right to vote.
00:58:08.000 Do I think the 19th Amendment was a mistake?
00:58:12.000 Perhaps.
00:58:12.000 But I think everybody should have the right to vote.
00:58:15.000 Regardless, we are here.
00:58:17.000 We have to live with it.
00:58:20.000 We're going to offer some critiques.
00:58:22.000 We're going to offer some criticisms of the 19th Amendment, but I don't want anybody to get the wrong idea.
00:58:27.000 I don't want anybody to get the wrong idea that I don't respect women or women's rights, because I do.
00:58:32.000 And that's just part of my personal terms of service.
00:58:36.000 That's part of my personal ethical terms of service, I guess you could say, that I'm not spreading hatred, I don't hate women, I don't hate any class based on gender or race or anything like that.
00:58:47.000 That is according to my personal terms of service, my ethical terms of service.
00:58:52.000 I'm going to say at the outset, these are just some little critiques.
00:58:55.000 Just a little food for thought as we celebrate the 100th anniversary of women's right to vote.
00:59:01.000 And I found some very interesting numbers here.
00:59:02.000 I found some very interesting...
00:59:04.000 You know, the moral, perhaps the most important moral thing in our country, civic duty, civic obligation
00:59:33.000 We're good to go!
00:59:55.000 19th century kind of person?
00:59:57.000 This is just how it's supposed to go.
00:59:58.000 But there are some curious consequences.
01:00:00.000 We're gonna look at probably the first consequence, which I think is undisputable.
01:00:04.000 I mean, this is just completely factual.
01:00:06.000 It's math.
01:00:07.000 Since women have the right to vote, and almost immediately since women have the right to vote, you can see a direct correlation between women voting, and the rise in women's participation in voting, and the rise of both taxes and spending.
01:00:22.000 It's a direct relationship.
01:00:24.000 This is totally undisputed.
01:00:25.000 I'll read you two studies here.
01:00:27.000 The first is a Harvard paper by John Lott.
01:00:31.000 So if you don't know John Lott, he is a brilliant statistician.
01:00:34.000 You might know him
01:00:35.000 He writes papers on mostly about guns, mostly about statistics about gun crime and things like that.
01:00:40.000 He's written a number of books on the subject, but this is a Harvard paper from John Lott.
01:00:44.000 And he writes, so this is not, this is not like, you know, MGTOW.com.
01:00:48.000 This is not, you know, wayofthebarbarian.net.
01:00:51.000 You know, it's like women should be whatever.
01:00:53.000 This is a Harvard paper from a serious statistician, well regarded, well respected.
01:00:59.000 Suffrage coincided with immediate increases in state government expenditures and revenue and most liberal voting patterns for federal representatives, and these effects continued growing over time as more women took advantage of the franchise.
01:01:11.000 On the basis of these estimates, granting women the right to vote caused expenditures to rise immediately by 14%, by 21% after 25 years, and by 28% after 45 years.
01:01:24.000 So fully 45 years after women get the right to vote and understand they didn't even have matching turnout with men 45 years later.
01:01:32.000 You know, it passes in 1919.
01:01:35.000 45 years later is what?
01:01:38.000 1965?
01:01:38.000 They did not match men's turnout in voting and then ultimately exceed men's turnout in voting until the 1980s.
01:01:45.000 So we're talking about just a little bit of women voting into the mix.
01:01:49.000 We introduce a little bit of women's suffrage into the mix.
01:01:52.000 It's all men.
01:01:53.000 Okay, now we've got the sweetie squad rolling in.
01:01:55.000 Now we've got, you know, we got the females entering in and they're gonna vote.
01:01:59.000 So you track this over time and you see a direct correlation over so many years as women turn out in higher numbers and become a higher proportion of the electorate from 14 ultimately to 21 to 28 percent after 45 years.
01:02:13.000 28 percent rise in state expenditures and that's before you even get, that's almost a third before you even get to women matching men's turnout in voting.
01:02:24.000 That's one study.
01:02:25.000 Study number two is from the University of Cambridge.
01:02:27.000 It says, using historical data from six Western European countries from the period 1869 to 1960, we provide evidence that social spending out of GDP increased 0.6 to 1.2 percent in the short run.
01:02:41.000 And this isn't surprising.
01:02:41.000 I'm pretty sure this is exactly what people said when women were going to get the right to vote.
01:02:46.000 Women and men vote differently.
01:02:47.000 That's really the red pill about this.
01:03:02.000 That's what people have to understand, you know, and we're going to get to that in greater detail with this whiteboard, but just something to understand as we read out these numbers, as we read out these reasons, why do you think the state spends more money after women get the right to vote?
01:03:15.000 Well, clearly women are voting for different policies.
01:03:19.000 That's a very subtle detail.
01:03:20.000 That's a very subtle
01:03:22.000 We're good to go.
01:03:42.000 That's really what's critical here.
01:03:44.000 What we understand in this, you know, democratic sort of mentality, universal mentality, is that we are atomic individuals.
01:03:54.000 We are these units of person.
01:03:56.000 You know, we are the individual voter, the individual consumer, the individual producer.
01:04:01.000 And if there are no differences between us, if we are all interchangeable, then therefore we should have the same rights and responsibilities, the same privileges, the same obligations, the same expectations,
01:04:12.000 If we take this liberal tabula rasa, blank slate approach that everybody is one atomic unit, you know, individual human person, then that means they're interchangeable.
01:04:22.000 You know, why should women and men have different voting rights if they're interchangeable?
01:04:27.000 Women are gonna vote and they'll vote, you know, we expect the same as men.
01:04:30.000 Why should
01:04:31.000 You know, people that are rich and people that are poor have different rights or different treatment by the government.
01:04:36.000 Well, because they're interchangeable.
01:04:38.000 They're the same.
01:04:39.000 You know, it's just kind of a thing.
01:04:41.000 You know, it's just arbitrary that one person is a man, one person a woman, one person is black, one person is white, one person is rich, one person is poor, somebody is young, somebody is old.
01:04:51.000 That's why now they're agitating for 16-year-olds to vote.
01:04:54.000 They say, well, 16-year-olds are a part of our democracy too, and they should vote.
01:04:58.000 Well, people vote differently.
01:05:00.000 They vote differently because they are different.
01:05:02.000 Women vote differently from men because they are different.
01:05:04.000 They think different.
01:05:05.000 They have different temperaments.
01:05:07.000 And we can see this.
01:05:08.000 Women have a totally different system of ethics than men.
01:05:11.000 They have a care-based ethical system, whereas men have a justice-based ethical system.
01:05:17.000 Why do you see a rise particularly in social spending?
01:05:21.000 Because women
01:05:22.000 Care for the poor.
01:05:24.000 Women care for the needy.
01:05:26.000 Women care for the disabled, or whatever.
01:05:28.000 And what is the solution?
01:05:29.000 It's a government program.
01:05:31.000 Whereas a man, who can think about a situation from an impersonal, abstract view, and go outside of himself, and say, hmm, if I were God, if I were in a third person position, if I take a justice based, ethical view of this situation, not being partial as me, myself,
01:05:50.000 But as somebody looking at it from outside, from ahead, how is this going to work?
01:05:56.000 Well, you see that there are poor people and there are rich people, and we can pay poor people.
01:06:00.000 You know, we could have something like welfare as one example of social spending, but necessarily to do that we would have to take from people who are working.
01:06:07.000 Perhaps that's not the best approach.
01:06:09.000 Perhaps we should look at the efficacy of these programs.
01:06:13.000 Are they working?
01:06:14.000 Does it create perverse incentives?
01:06:15.000 There is a justice-based
01:06:17.000 I don't know.
01:06:35.000 We're good to go!
01:06:54.000 Change their life basically to accommodate another life, but then even once the baby is out of the womb, they have to have this special bond.
01:07:00.000 You know, it's almost like this.
01:07:01.000 It's basically a parasitic relationship and strictly biological terms.
01:07:05.000 I don't mean that in a negative way.
01:07:07.000 I don't mean that in a pejorative way, but it's, you know, the baby is taking and the woman is providing.
01:07:12.000 So it is this relationship where the baby is dependent.
01:07:14.000 The mother is relied upon for care.
01:07:17.000 And so it is seen that this, this sort of abstract thinking,
01:07:21.000 I don't know.
01:07:36.000 Somebody who is trained to do this kind of a thing?
01:07:38.000 We're talking about, generally speaking, we're talking about sort of evolutionary psychology here.
01:07:43.000 Women's ethical systems, typically, their temperament is to think in terms of care.
01:07:48.000 Their ethics is to think in terms of, oh, you know, poor so-and-so.
01:07:52.000 We have to take care of people.
01:07:53.000 We have to be sensitive to people because of that relationship that they have.
01:07:57.000 We could say that the man is an individual.
01:08:00.000 We can say that all this liberal tabula rasa type thinking can apply
01:08:05.000 To a single, solitary, adult, mature man.
01:08:08.000 It cannot apply really to anybody else.
01:08:10.000 It cannot reasonably apply to a mother.
01:08:13.000 It cannot apply to a child.
01:08:14.000 It cannot apply to, you know, maybe the indigent or low IQ people.
01:08:18.000 It really just does not apply so much to those others.
01:08:20.000 So that's why you see these differences.
01:08:22.000 That's why you see big differences in the way women vote, and particularly with
01:08:27.000 The spending.
01:08:28.000 And we're gonna bring up the whiteboard here.
01:08:30.000 There's some more direct consequences as well, something a little bit more contemporary, a little bit more concrete.
01:08:35.000 Of course, when we look at rising state expenditures, that raises the question of who are they voting for?
01:08:41.000 Which party?
01:08:42.000 You know, not just in terms of policy, but what candidates are they voting for?
01:08:46.000 And let me change my settings here so you can see the writing on the whiteboard a little bit better there.
01:08:52.000 I know it's a little bright sometimes.
01:08:55.000 We'll bring that down.
01:08:56.000 We're looking at the way women voted in 2016 and 2018.
01:09:00.000 This to me was the biggest red pill and maybe the most informative.
01:09:04.000 Maybe you have women who are conservative.
01:09:06.000 I know there are a handful of conservative women who watch this show.
01:09:10.000 You know, all ten of them.
01:09:11.000 The whole dozen women that watch this show.
01:09:14.000 They are out there.
01:09:15.000 And there are women out there who are conservative.
01:09:17.000 And there are women out there who can make sense of these things.
01:09:19.000 And they can take a more justice-based, ethical approach.
01:09:22.000 You know, we're not saying that that's everybody.
01:09:24.000 We're not saying that every single woman down to an individual person
01:09:29.000 Thinks this way, or falls victim to these kinds of things.
01:09:31.000 We are saying, in general, it is a woman's temperament to think in this way.
01:09:36.000 And that shouldn't be a controversial thing to say.
01:09:39.000 I feel like a lot of leftists ridicule that position, that women have different brains, or they think differently.
01:09:45.000 But it's obvious.
01:09:47.000 If you have different outcomes in voting, that is reflective of different thinking, of course.
01:09:51.000 You wouldn't have a direct correlation between a rise in spending or, you know, these kinds of voting patterns based on female enfranchisement if they didn't think differently, of course!
01:10:02.000 You know, so leftists might come around and say, oh, you think women have different brains?
01:10:05.000 What are you, some kind of knuckle-dragging?
01:10:07.000 You know, what are you, some kind of backwards bigot, sexist misogynist, whatever?
01:10:11.000 No!
01:10:12.000 No, if women thought the same as men, if it were interchangeable, it were the same, replaceable, then they would vote the same.
01:10:19.000 There would be no rise in expenditures.
01:10:21.000 These numbers wouldn't be so different, but they are.
01:10:24.000 And so we're going to look at 2016 and 2018.
01:10:27.000 This is if only women voted in the election.
01:10:29.000 This is if only men voted in the election.
01:10:32.000 If only women voted in the 2016 presidential election, you know, so let's say women get the franchise.
01:10:37.000 In other words, you control for gender and you keep all men out.
01:10:42.000 Hillary Clinton wins.
01:10:45.000 458 to 80.
01:10:47.000 Hillary Clinton wins.
01:10:48.000 This is like a super landslide.
01:10:49.000 This is like one of the biggest landslides in the history of American politics.
01:10:53.000 Hillary Clinton wins.
01:10:55.000 The same Hillary Clinton who, do I have to remind you, was physically impaired, who was physically not fit to become president.
01:11:03.000 Outside of that, she was a criminal.
01:11:06.000 I'll tie to that the policies.
01:11:08.000 I mean so you add every reason in the book a rational person to say we should not vote for this person.
01:11:14.000 She is not physically fit.
01:11:16.000 She legally could be in jeopardy.
01:11:18.000 Her policies are a disaster.
01:11:20.000 She's just obviously a psychotic bad person.
01:11:23.000 She would have won one of the biggest landslides in American history.
01:11:27.000 Everybody agrees she was a bad candidate.
01:11:29.000 Perhaps one of the worst candidates.
01:11:31.000 One of the most corrupt candidates.
01:11:33.000 One of the most controversial candidates.
01:11:35.000 She could not beat Donald Trump!
01:11:38.000 458 electoral votes if only women are voting, compared to 80 for Trump.
01:11:42.000 That's women, okay?
01:11:43.000 If only men voted, it's 188 to 350.
01:11:46.000 So we know that Trump actually won by 306 electoral votes.
01:11:48.000 306 to, I think, 232.
01:11:53.000 Okay, so women are voting obviously in the complete opposite direction.
01:11:57.000 Hillary Clinton not only wins, but she wins by a ultra historical landslide.
01:12:02.000 If men are voting, Trump wins by a much bigger landslide, 44 more electoral votes.
01:12:07.000 Does that not tell you something?
01:12:08.000 Does that not tell you something that women are thinking differently?
01:12:11.000 And perhaps we can say that in thinking differently we can evaluate which kind of thinking is better for the maintenance of the affairs of the state?
01:12:21.000 Kind of obvious, right?
01:12:23.000 In 2018.
01:12:23.000 And it's not just 2016, by the way.
01:12:25.000 It's not just because Hillary Clinton is a woman.
01:12:27.000 We look at 2018.
01:12:29.000 If only women voted, Democrats would have 275 seats in the House of Representatives, compared to only 164 Republicans.
01:12:35.000 So they won something like 228.
01:12:37.000 So again, you're talking about 60, 50 more seats for Democrats.
01:12:44.000 If only women voted in 18 versus if only men voted, Republicans would actually have a majority!
01:12:49.000 249 to 186 seats.
01:12:52.000 And all of this is to say, you take a look at this picture.
01:12:55.000 Look at it!
01:12:56.000 If you like women's suffrage, if you think I'm misogynistic, if you think I'm sexist or something, look at this!
01:13:03.000 Look at it!
01:13:04.000 Take a long hard look.
01:13:05.000 Do you want people like Hillary Clinton being elected?
01:13:08.000 Do you want Democrats being elected?
01:13:10.000 Can we fairly say that Democrats and Hillary Clinton are objectively bad for the country?
01:13:17.000 What they represent, objectively, is not good for a nation.
01:13:21.000 Can we all agree upon that?
01:13:23.000 I'm sure if you watch the show you agree that what Donald Trump and what Republicans run at is objectively good for the country.
01:13:29.000 It's not a matter of opinion.
01:13:30.000 It's not a matter of perspective.
01:13:33.000 A country must have borders.
01:13:35.000 A country must have a strong economy.
01:13:38.000 A country must have a strong balance of payments system.
01:13:41.000 A country should not be overseas fighting other countries' wars.
01:13:44.000 That's what Trump and the Republicans represent in 2016 and 2018.
01:13:47.000 Can we agree these are objectively the right answers?
01:13:51.000 And yet women get them wrong!
01:13:53.000 Yes, and yet the way we evaluate how women are thinking about these subjects reflected in their vote is incorrect.
01:14:00.000 I'm sorry, sweetie.
01:14:01.000 It's wrong.
01:14:02.000 It's a big red X. You voted for Hillary Clinton 458 to 80.
01:14:05.000 That's the wrong choice.
01:14:09.000 And so if we could say that women are voting differently than men, and men voting differently than women, we can say that there is, you know, choice A, which is, you know, men are gonna vote within their temperament, which is for Trump, or they're gonna vote for, you know, Mitt Romney, or they're gonna vote for John McCain over Barack Obama.
01:14:24.000 And women are gonna vote for...
01:14:26.000 They're gonna vote for Hillary Clinton.
01:14:27.000 They're gonna vote for Barack Obama.
01:14:28.000 They're gonna vote for Al Gore.
01:14:29.000 They're gonna vote for these other people.
01:14:31.000 Can we say, if we have this unequal relationship, if we have, you know, this disproportionate pattern here, that one is objectively better than the other?
01:14:40.000 That if we can differentiate these things and
01:14:42.000 No, no, no.
01:15:13.000 Nope.
01:15:14.000 Nope, because that would be sexist.
01:15:15.000 No, no, no.
01:15:17.000 We can clearly say that Donald Trump would have been better for the country in 2016.
01:15:20.000 We can clearly say that Republicans are better for the country in 2018.
01:15:24.000 And even though women make the wrong choice, even though we can say that women vote differently because they think differently and their thinking is not suitable to political subjects, no, it doesn't matter.
01:15:36.000 No, it doesn't matter.
01:15:39.000 It just simply doesn't matter.
01:15:39.000 20-some-trillion-dollar debt and the spending increases, Democrat-Democrat demographic electoral winter setting in in the next couple of years, Republicans never winning another election again, it's of no concern.
01:15:52.000 Because what is far more important than maintaining a balanced budget, than having an efficient government, than having some kind of demographic stability, what is far more important than all of those things is that everybody is treated and feels equal.
01:16:07.000 And that's my position.
01:16:08.000 That's really my position.
01:16:09.000 I take a look at this chart.
01:16:10.000 I take a look at state expenditures.
01:16:11.000 I look at our current situation.
01:16:13.000 And even there's a correlation between the status of women and the fertility rate.
01:16:17.000 3.3% before women's suffrage, 1.7% after.
01:16:19.000 You know, I look at all these different things in spite of all the negative consequences or potential negative consequences.
01:16:26.000 It's really all relative to even say negative.
01:16:28.000 In spite of the consequences of women voting,
01:16:31.000 This simply does not matter to me, because no consequence is worth having a society that is not equal.
01:16:37.000 No consequence is too great.
01:16:39.000 No disaster, no catastrophe, too horrible, too dangerous for the American people, too adverse to the national interest, is too great.
01:16:49.000 To overwhelm or to convince us that women should not be treated fairly and equally before the law.
01:16:54.000 That they should not be joyfully participating in the democratic process.
01:16:59.000 So I look at all this and it doesn't mean anything to me.
01:17:02.000 If you were to be...
01:17:04.000 Whoops.
01:17:04.000 If you were to be against women's voting in the current year, in 2019, I would say you're a bigot.
01:17:11.000 I would say you're some kind of misogynist.
01:17:12.000 What, do you hate women?
01:17:14.000 You think women are dumb?
01:17:15.000 What, you think women are only good for cooking and cleaning?
01:17:19.000 You think women are only good for pumping out babies?
01:17:22.000 What a ridiculous, silly person you are.
01:17:24.000 What an anachronism.
01:17:25.000 Can't you see that everything's going just fine?
01:17:27.000 Can't you see that women's suffrage is just so obviously and naturally not only right, but unequivocally the moral thing to do?
01:17:35.000 That's my belief.
01:17:37.000 That's my belief.
01:17:38.000 So happy 100 years of women voting.
01:17:40.000 You know, I look back at 1919 and I look at 2019,
01:17:44.000 And you know what I see?
01:17:45.000 Progress.
01:17:46.000 I see improvement.
01:17:48.000 I see a country that was the number one economy, military power in the world!
01:17:54.000 The envy of planet Earth!
01:17:57.000 Everybody wanted to go there!
01:17:58.000 Clean, orderly, moral, traditional.
01:18:02.000 Families are strong, we're reproducing, you know, and all that.
01:18:06.000 And I look at 2019.
01:18:08.000 Shit literally in the streets, garbage everywhere, new outbreaks of typhus, tuberculosis, polio, measles.
01:18:16.000 I see just waves of dirty, smelly people traveling from across hundreds of miles of desert, coming across the border to set up shop, you know, somewhere in the country.
01:18:26.000 I see the crime, the gangs, and everything that goes on.
01:18:30.000 I say 100 years of women's suffrage.
01:18:31.000 Now that's what I call progress.
01:18:33.000 But there is still so much work to be done.
01:18:36.000 There is still so much work to be done.
01:18:38.000 We can enfranchise people that are younger.
01:18:40.000 We can enfranchise the disabled.
01:18:42.000 We can enfranchise felons.
01:18:43.000 We can enfranchise everybody so that we can continue to see the fruits of universal suffrage, the democratic process.
01:18:49.000 It's a beautiful thing we've had in the country.
01:18:51.000 You know, I look back at 100 years, all those backwards, terrible people, you know, living back then.
01:18:56.000 I think, wow, what a disaster that was.
01:18:58.000 Good thing we changed all that, and we are where we are, right?
01:19:02.000 So congratulations, everybody.
01:19:04.000 Congratulations!
01:19:05.000 We did it!
01:19:06.000 We did it!
01:19:07.000 America is number one, the moral leader of the world.
01:19:10.000 Congratulations, women.
01:19:12.000 We salute you.
01:19:13.000 Go out there, keep voting, keep doing your thing, keep going to work.
01:19:17.000 Hey, ladies, keep kicking ass, baby!
01:19:20.000 Future's female!
01:19:21.000 Because we have a lot more progress ahead with with women getting the right to vote.
01:19:25.000 So that's a hundred years and um, you know, please no ban.
01:19:30.000 Please no ban.
01:19:32.000 Please don't put in a limited state.
01:19:34.000 I'm not being sarcastic.
01:19:35.000 Women voting, I love it.
01:19:36.000 So that's that.
01:19:37.000 We're going to take a look at our super chats and we'll see what you guys are saying about all this.
01:19:40.000 Do you agree?
01:19:41.000 Do you disagree?
01:19:42.000 You know, women, speak up!
01:19:44.000 Raise your hand!
01:19:45.000 You know, you want to get that Girl Scout patch for raising your hand in class?
01:19:48.000 Speak up, girl!
01:19:49.000 You know, tell me what you think.
01:19:51.000 Stand up to me.
01:19:52.000 You know, tell me, tell me why I'm wrong.
01:19:53.000 You know, I want to hear that.
01:19:55.000 But let's take a look.
01:19:56.000 We'll read our Super Chats and we'll see, we'll hear from the unwashed masses.
01:20:00.000 NC Ritz's first episode, Daenerys burns the Cull.
01:20:04.000 Series finale, Jon Snow collects the toll.
01:20:06.000 Is Game of Thrones based in Redpill?
01:20:09.000 Well, I don't even know what, burning the Cull?
01:20:12.000 What does that mean?
01:20:13.000 What, did she work in a factory?
01:20:14.000 Where there was, um... Did she work at a factory?
01:20:17.000 There's some kind of coal-based, uh, you know, energy source?
01:20:20.000 I'm not sure.
01:20:20.000 Is that some kind of other expression?
01:20:22.000 Never heard it before.
01:20:24.000 Um, but, uh, yeah, could be.
01:20:26.000 Could be.
01:20:26.000 I-I never watched Game of Thrones.
01:20:28.000 I never watched... I don't think I watched one episode of it, but I heard that liberals, libtards are mad about it.
01:20:34.000 So, yeah, maybe it's based in Redfield after all.
01:20:36.000 You know, maybe Game of Thrones actually is, uh... Maybe they're woke, right, on the FQ?
01:20:41.000 Who knows?
01:20:43.000 Commented before about being a LARPer Okay, very descriptive username says I don't know if you're hurting for content or not But if you ever like to talk to a now red-pilled ex-ante for the work for a refugee resettlement agency drop me a line And he gives me his email
01:21:00.000 I will do that.
01:21:01.000 I would love to speak with you one-on-one, personally.
01:21:03.000 That is my favorite thing.
01:21:05.000 Cody says, do you think murder should be legal?
01:21:08.000 Still no.
01:21:09.000 I think I answered this one yesterday, actually.
01:21:11.000 I think somebody inquired about the legality of murder yesterday, actually, and that's been asked in the past.
01:21:18.000 Still no.
01:21:19.000 My position is still that murder should be illegal.
01:21:22.000 But thanks for the question.
01:21:35.000 No, I don't I don't think that'll ever be pointless saving pure milk.
01:21:38.000 I think will never be pointless because you know You know, it's I could see the appeal of chocolate milk I guess I could see the appeal of you know Putting a little bit of chocolate syrup in your milk.
01:21:48.000 I get it.
01:21:49.000 Look I get it, but at the same time
01:21:52.000 There is a certain value.
01:21:53.000 I think there's definitely something that is important and wholesome about a good, clean old glass of pure milk.
01:22:02.000 So I don't think we should allow that pure glass of milk to leave the earth forever.
01:22:08.000 Because there's only so much of it to go around.
01:22:11.000 There's only so much.
01:22:13.000 And do we really want to be the generation that dumps out the last glass of pure milk?
01:22:18.000 The last generation that had
01:22:20.000 You know, the pure milk.
01:22:21.000 I don't think that's something we want to do.
01:22:23.000 I don't think that's something that we want to do.
01:22:25.000 Who thinks that's a good idea?
01:22:26.000 That we should completely, you know, get rid of all the milk.
01:22:29.000 I'm in favor of, you know, we can have chocolate milk and we can also have regular milk and that's fine, you know, but I think they should both be preserved.
01:22:36.000 We, look, in some ways I just think that we have to sort of protect a future for pure milk, you know?
01:22:46.000 That's just how I, that's how I think of it.
01:22:48.000 We must, we must, you know, somehow enshrine pure milk and a future for pure milk to be created.
01:22:54.000 That's, that's how, kind of how I think about it in those terms.
01:22:58.000 Lauren Rose says, you should have Walter from Drake and Josh on the show.
01:23:02.000 Thanks, yeah, I'll give him a call after the show.
01:23:05.000 I'll look for his contact information online.
01:23:08.000 NC Ritz says, remember when Drake, PP, and Josh poo-poo?
01:23:11.000 Okay.
01:23:12.000 Lauren Rose says, no gaming stream marathon this morning?
01:23:15.000 Coward!
01:23:15.000 Well, yeah, because I slept last night, so...
01:23:19.000 I only do them in the morning.
01:23:20.000 I'm only awake in the morning when I haven't slept.
01:23:22.000 You know?
01:23:23.000 And last night I should have slept because I was up all day.
01:23:25.000 I was exhausted, but I still couldn't sleep.
01:23:28.000 I went to bed at like 10 o'clock, and I could not fall asleep until 4 a.m.
01:23:34.000 So, that was my situation.
01:23:36.000 Woke up a little bit late, but you know, I guess it's better than not sleeping, which is what I've been doing.
01:23:41.000 So, it's just the curse of the high IQ.
01:23:44.000 Tortured.
01:23:44.000 Laying awake at night.
01:23:47.000 But that's you know, but that's that's how the good content is generated I wouldn't be so funny and edgy if I wasn't a tortured, you know in some ways Twisted soul so so you should actually be grateful Glenn sees as I disavow women.
01:24:02.000 I disavow that comment.
01:24:04.000 I disavow that comment, sir
01:24:07.000 Talk about racist.
01:24:09.000 Nave says, hey big guy, love the show.
01:24:11.000 Thanks for fighting the good fight.
01:24:12.000 A true martyr.
01:24:13.000 So true.
01:24:14.000 I really am a martyr.
01:24:15.000 But thanks.
01:24:16.000 You know me.
01:24:17.000 I'm always out there fighting.
01:24:19.000 Fighting the good fight against the Democrats.
01:24:21.000 Zoom says, have you read any Jacques Ellul?
01:24:24.000 No.
01:24:26.000 Eric says, Nick, you're a shot of Febreze in this cultural sewage treatment plant we call the USA.
01:24:32.000 That's an adequate description.
01:24:34.000 A pleasant smell to mask the stench of the rotting corpse that is the country.
01:24:40.000 I could say that's probably accurate.
01:24:42.000 But hey, maybe one day, maybe one day we're actually going to turn it into something.
01:24:46.000 You know, for now we're doing the show.
01:24:47.000 First YouTube, then the world.
01:24:50.000 You know, from humble beginnings.
01:24:52.000 Right?
01:24:54.000 Maybe one day.
01:24:54.000 Mike Pence started out as a radio host.
01:24:57.000 So important to remember.
01:25:00.000 Doom Marine says, Nick, Chad, I am 30-something with a wife and kid and more on the way.
01:25:06.000 We go to church and just bought a house.
01:25:07.000 What comes next?
01:25:08.000 Lay out the plan.
01:25:10.000 Well, good to hear.
01:25:11.000 Congratulations.
01:25:12.000 30-something.
01:25:14.000 Can't relate.
01:25:15.000 Can't imagine.
01:25:15.000 You know, I imagine myself being 30-something and I just, I just can't, I can't deal.
01:25:20.000 You know, I just get paralyzed.
01:25:22.000 But 30-something.
01:25:23.000 Wife and kids.
01:25:24.000 More on the way.
01:25:25.000 Got the house.
01:25:26.000 Excellent.
01:25:27.000 Going to church.
01:25:27.000 Perfect.
01:25:29.000 What comes next?
01:25:30.000 I don't know.
01:25:30.000 I don't know what you need to do.
01:25:32.000 You got it made, dude.
01:25:33.000 You know, just gotta take care of the marriage, take care of the kids.
01:25:37.000 You did it.
01:25:38.000 You achieved the end game.
01:25:40.000 So now you just gotta make sure that the kids are healthy and well adjusted, educated.
01:25:45.000 I would say that the...
01:25:47.000 No, I don't.
01:26:04.000 You know, and that's, I think, why they're set up better than a lot of these Anglos, better than a lot of these Anglo white-bred Americans.
01:26:10.000 The ethnics take care of their own.
01:26:12.000 Mexicans do this as well.
01:26:14.000 You know, Mexicans, I think, are able to get by because they really are.
01:26:16.000 You know, they have this very family-based mentality, whereas I think you see a lot of white people, and it's like, you know, white kids, they graduate from high school, nope, you're pushed out, you're pushed, and you got to be on your own, and they're not able to develop the same kind of resiliency, I don't think.
01:26:30.000 That's my perception, at least.
01:26:32.000 We're good to go!
01:26:52.000 I don't know what you mean what comes next.
01:26:54.000 Just got to make sure the kids are set up, you know, that they don't get paused, they don't get brainwashed, you're able to provide for them, able to gain some kind of financial independency for your retirement, you know.
01:27:04.000 I haven't really thought that far ahead.
01:27:05.000 I'm trying to get to that stage, so I can't really relate to these challenges down the road.
01:27:10.000 Uh, but I would imagine I would start accumulating weapons, accumulating land, saving up money.
01:27:16.000 These would be my concerns.
01:27:18.000 These aren't my concerns now.
01:27:19.000 But if you've got the children, I'm just such a klutz today, I'm knocking everything over.
01:27:24.000 But if you've got all that figured out, I would say that's what's next.
01:27:28.000 But hey, congrats.
01:27:29.000 Who am I to tell you you already got it made?
01:27:32.000 Jose Antonio says there is no competition to Nick's high IQ reactionary hot takes.
01:27:37.000 Entertaining educational fresh and raw truth with you, my white homie.
01:27:41.000 Hey, thank you, my man.
01:27:43.000 So true.
01:27:43.000 Who can't compete?
01:27:44.000 Truly.
01:27:46.000 With me, the humble campus conservative.
01:27:50.000 I don't think there are any other hot takes.
01:27:52.000 I don't really know how to roller skate.
01:27:57.000 I can't, I have trouble, I have difficulty walking and running as opposed to, as opposed to, you know, you want to throw wheels into the mix.
01:28:06.000 I don't know why you want to throw wheels into the mix.
01:28:08.000 You know, ice skating, rollerblading, people say, you know,
01:28:13.000 You mastered walking and running, why don't we try it in wheels or blades or something?
01:28:17.000 I'm perfectly content just hanging around.
01:28:20.000 But yeah, Jess Southern, would I go on a date with Jess Southern?
01:28:24.000 I don't know, is she... I don't know.
01:28:26.000 I know the elder Southern, or actually I believe she's older.
01:28:30.000 So the younger Southern has a certain...
01:28:34.000 Proclivities.
01:28:35.000 I'll just say that much.
01:28:37.000 I don't know if Jess Southern shares that.
01:28:38.000 I'm not, you know, and I love Lauren Southern.
01:28:41.000 I think she's, you know, she's beautiful and talented.
01:28:44.000 Lauren Southern is a beautiful, beautiful and talented girl, you know, so I'm not trying to say anything negative, but Jess Southern, total babe.
01:28:52.000 Would I go roller skating with her?
01:28:54.000 Maybe.
01:28:54.000 I'd be slipping and sliding and falling all over the place, but yeah, sure.
01:28:58.000 Sure, I'd go roller skating with her.
01:28:59.000 Maybe I'd be in the arcade gaming it up while she roller skates, you know.
01:29:04.000 No, I don't know.
01:29:05.000 But Jess Southern, total babe.
01:29:08.000 I don't know if that offends anybody.
01:29:09.000 Does that offend you, Libtard?
01:29:11.000 Does that offend you, Snowflake?
01:29:13.000 I'd go roller skating with Jess Southern.
01:29:16.000 Cassie, Queen of Spades Dylan says, 725 p.m.
01:29:19.000 Your Moorish ancestry is showing.
01:29:21.000 It has steadily gone from Anglo work ethic to Mediterranean work ethic.
01:29:27.000 We are reaching dangerous levels.
01:29:29.000 We are gradually... I guess it's in the opposite direction.
01:29:32.000 We start, and it's also latitude as well.
01:29:35.000 Latitude as well as time.
01:29:37.000 We start out seven o'clock, Anglo work ethic.
01:29:40.000 Now we're heading down 705, 710, 715, firmly in Mediterranean work ethic.
01:29:46.000 We're at a much lower latitude.
01:29:48.000 Now we're getting dangerously low.
01:29:49.000 We're heading down past the Sahara Desert.
01:29:52.000 We are entering into a Moorish, perhaps a Sub-Saharan work ethic, one might say.
01:29:57.000 Dropping in latitude as well as work ethic.
01:30:00.000 Jokes!
01:30:00.000 It's jokes, everybody!
01:30:01.000 I'm kidding!
01:30:02.000 I'm kidding!
01:30:03.000 1.5% African!
01:30:04.000 I'm kidding!
01:30:05.000 It is a joke, everybody.
01:30:07.000 That is a joke.
01:30:08.000 I am 1.5% African.
01:30:10.000 I am something like 2% North African, West Asian.
01:30:14.000 I'm only kidding, of course.
01:30:18.000 No, I, I, yeah, we're gonna have to fix that.
01:30:20.000 Maybe tomorrow.
01:30:21.000 Tomorrow we're back on schedule.
01:30:23.000 Seven o'clock sharp.
01:30:25.000 Soft commitment to this, uh, but a good observation nonetheless.
01:30:29.000 It's jokes, everybody.
01:30:30.000 Why so serious?
01:30:31.000 I know some, some little libtard, some, uh, junior whopper hand libtard cuck is gonna go on Destiny's Subreddit and say, look at this clip.
01:30:40.000 Nick said that, you know, black people have bad work ethic.
01:30:43.000 It was a joke!
01:30:44.000 I was kidding!
01:30:45.000 I was just joking.
01:30:47.000 Alright, everybody?
01:30:48.000 Sheesh.
01:30:49.000 Everybody's so politically correct these days.
01:30:51.000 You can't even, you can't even say these things.
01:30:55.000 Temple Drake says, congrats on 32,000 subscribers, big guy.
01:30:59.000 You deserve a million.
01:31:00.000 Also, you look great with your new haircut.
01:31:02.000 Wow, thank you!
01:31:04.000 Thanks, I'm glad you like it.
01:31:06.000 I'm glad I'm glad people like it because you know, I don't always it's not always a winner You know, I I got a few bad haircuts You know in like 2018.
01:31:15.000 I think I got a bear a bad haircut in the beginning of 2019 So I've been trying to get it right I've been trying to get it just right so I appreciate that and and thanks I do deserve a million I deserve more than a million actually and
01:31:28.000 Black Swan says hi, how would Alabama go about challenging Roe v. Wade?
01:31:32.000 Well, that's just it.
01:31:34.000 The work is done on the part of Alabama.
01:31:36.000 What happens now is that...
01:31:39.000 There has to be a contest by a circuit judge or, you know, a federal judge.
01:31:44.000 It has to work its way up through the court system, basically, where somebody will challenge it.
01:31:48.000 They'll say, well, I want to get an abortion, or, you know, some rights group or something will sue and say this is unconstitutional, this goes against Roe v. Wade, because Roe v. Wade interpreted the Constitution saying abortion's a constitutional right.
01:32:01.000 That'll work its way up the court system through the federal courts, ultimately,
01:32:05.000 If the Supreme Court decides to take it, they take it, they'll hear it, and they would have the chance to overturn Roe v. Wade.
01:32:13.000 Alabama state government has already done their part, so now it's just a matter of will the Supreme Court take the case if it makes its way all the way up.
01:32:21.000 And then what will they decide?
01:32:24.000 918 says, these Anglos just don't appreciate the perfect timeliness of 7 p.m.
01:32:28.000 MST, Med Standard Time.
01:32:30.000 A lot of nags, a lot of nags in the chat.
01:32:32.000 I deserve it.
01:32:33.000 I deserve it.
01:32:34.000 Yeah, fair enough.
01:32:35.000 Fair enough!
01:32:36.000 You know, I think if Leonardo da Vinci was doing America First, I think he would be later than me.
01:32:41.000 And so what does that tell you?
01:32:43.000 Basically, we're living in a society.
01:32:45.000 I think...
01:32:47.000 I think if Raphael and Dante Alighieri were doing America First, I think they actually would be late, too.
01:32:53.000 You know, they'd be too busy being philosophers and painting the Mona Lisa.
01:32:57.000 Oh, sorry, I'm late.
01:32:58.000 I was painting the Mona Lisa.
01:33:00.000 And that's kind of, in a way, what I do every night on the show, so... I would just think about that before you criticize.
01:33:06.000 Dylan Brown says, Nick, have you seen Professor Edward Dutton?
01:33:10.000 No, but that name sounds familiar.
01:33:12.000 Why does it sound familiar?
01:33:17.000 Edward Dutton, English anthropologist.
01:33:22.000 I may have seen him because it sounds so familiar.
01:33:26.000 What was his book?
01:33:27.000 What book did he write?
01:33:31.000 Yeah, it sounds really familiar, but not off the top of my head.
01:33:35.000 Let's see, Gabriel says, how do I access premium shows?
01:33:38.000 I signed up for them.
01:33:39.000 WTFrig, I feel like a boomer looking for the E. Michael Jones conversation.
01:33:43.000 That's on Friday.
01:33:45.000 And the premium shows, you just go to the website.
01:33:47.000 It's in the top right corner.
01:33:49.000 It says premium content.
01:33:50.000 You log in and it's all on the page.
01:33:52.000 I don't know why people are like, how can I find it?
01:33:54.000 How can I find it?
01:33:56.000 Where's the button?
01:33:57.000 You know, hey, Sonny, where's the button for premium?
01:34:00.000 Literally, it's on the top right corner.
01:34:02.000 You can't miss it.
01:34:03.000 It says premium content.
01:34:05.000 So, but if you have any trouble, just email me.
01:34:08.000 I'll get back to you.
01:34:09.000 Dylan Brown says, worst comes to worst.
01:34:12.000 Which would suck.
01:34:12.000 We all go to Australia, maybe if you're 56%.
01:34:15.000 British move to Britain.
01:34:17.000 Britain is a Muslim country now.
01:34:18.000 I don't think we're gonna escape to there.
01:34:21.000 If anything, I'm going to Italy.
01:34:22.000 That's my contingency plan.
01:34:24.000 Italy is gonna be white Israel.
01:34:26.000 At least for us ethnics.
01:34:28.000 Anglos are not allowed.
01:34:29.000 Sorry.
01:34:30.000 Sorry Nordcux.
01:34:31.000 You know, you want to talk about Odin and Thor and blond hair, blue eyes.
01:34:36.000 Well, you can go back to Sweden then.
01:34:37.000 You know, you can go and when America goes upside down, you can return home to Sweden, you know.
01:34:41.000 Or you can return home to Germany or return home to England or whatever.
01:34:45.000 And us Chad Mediterraneans will be chilling, hanging out on the beach in Italy.
01:34:50.000 We'll be watching as dear leader, as Il Duce Salvini is personally driving the ship, bringing all the Africans back to Africa, bringing all the Arabs back to North Africa.
01:35:02.000 And we'll be on the beach.
01:35:06.000 We'll be on the beach.
01:35:07.000 We'll be on the beach.
01:35:09.000 And maybe there'll be some bitches involved, too, on the beach.
01:35:12.000 Hello, department?
01:35:13.000 We'll be on the beach, sippin' wine, havin' some pasta, havin' some pizza.
01:35:18.000 Oh!
01:35:19.000 Havin' some gabagool on the beach.
01:35:21.000 We'll be watchin' Il Duce, drivin' him off into the sunset, away from the homeland.
01:35:27.000 And all the Nordcucks will be in Sweden, and they'll say, at least I have my blonde hair and blue eyes and grenades thrown in their apartment.
01:35:34.000 There's a grenade!
01:35:35.000 Get down!
01:35:36.000 You know?
01:35:37.000 So, it's jokes!
01:35:38.000 It's jokes, everybody!
01:35:39.000 It's all jokes.
01:35:40.000 I'm only kidding.
01:35:41.000 I'm only... It's only... This is all jokes, everybody.
01:35:44.000 We love Nordic people.
01:35:46.000 We love... We love Nordic Slav.
01:35:48.000 We love them all.
01:35:49.000 Germanic.
01:35:50.000 We love Anglos.
01:35:51.000 We love everybody.
01:35:52.000 Cheeky Anglos and their funny words and accents.
01:35:54.000 We love them all.
01:35:55.000 So it's... We're only kidding.
01:35:57.000 But yeah, Italy's gonna be my contingency plan, definitely.
01:36:00.000 Unclean says referring to the Liberal Party as a conservative party is a bit of an overstatement.
01:36:05.000 We got some Aussie in here gonna challenge me on this.
01:36:08.000 They're basically the equivalent of the Republicans.
01:36:11.000 G'day, mate!
01:36:13.000 Look, dude, I'm not Australian, but what I mean to say is that...
01:36:18.000 At least it's the right-wing party in the country, right?
01:36:20.000 This is all relative, is what I... And I said that.
01:36:23.000 I said... And I said that at the top of the show.
01:36:26.000 I said, this is not the reactionary thing.
01:36:28.000 This is not like what we're seeing so much in Italy or whatever.
01:36:32.000 I said, but it is the right-wing as opposed to the left-wing.
01:36:34.000 So I said that.
01:36:36.000 Before I get some Aussie.
01:36:37.000 In before some Aussie.
01:36:38.000 Well, actually... Oy!
01:36:41.000 I can't even do an Australian accent, but they're like, you know...
01:36:44.000 But the Liberal Party isn't actually that conservative.
01:36:48.000 Well, I said that.
01:36:48.000 So, why don't you just calm down, big guy?
01:36:51.000 Well, thank you, bro.
01:36:52.000 Thank you, homie.
01:36:53.000 Thank you.
01:36:53.000 I kind of like when it's a little bit of scruff.
01:37:08.000 I like the look.
01:37:09.000 I'm probably going to shave tonight, but I like when it's a little bit.
01:37:12.000 I think it looks good when it's a little bit, little bit.
01:37:14.000 I got to get a full mustache and then this kind of stubble going.
01:37:18.000 I think that's going to be the look.
01:37:20.000 Justin says, remove women's voting rights and repeal the 1965 Immigration Act and this country will be number one for years to come.
01:37:27.000 Thanks, Nick.
01:37:28.000 Yeah, um...
01:37:30.000 I don't know about that big guy.
01:37:31.000 Sounds pretty prejudiced.
01:37:33.000 Sounds pretty racist, sexist, misogynistic.
01:37:35.000 I think everybody should vote.
01:37:36.000 Everybody should come here.
01:37:37.000 I don't discriminate based on those kinds of arbitrary divisions.
01:37:42.000 Sounds like you're trying to divide America.
01:37:43.000 I'm trying to unite America behind one unifying principle.
01:37:47.000 Behind two unifying principles.
01:37:49.000 Support for Israel and gay marriage.
01:37:51.000 You're trying to divide America.
01:37:53.000 You, you haters, you hate mongers, you spreaders of hate trying to divide Americans based on class and race and sex, dividing America, creating a divided state of America.
01:38:06.000 We are uniting America behind fractional reserve banking, foreign aid to Israel, gay marriage, transsexuality, hormone replacement therapy, and there's nothing you can do about it.
01:38:18.000 Tyrone says chain link just hit $1.20.
01:38:20.000 We're gonna make it bros.
01:38:22.000 How big's your stack big guy?
01:38:24.000 How big's your link stack?
01:38:26.000 Are you a linklet?
01:38:28.000 Imagine being a linklet.
01:38:29.000 Imagine not having a 50,000 stack of link.
01:38:33.000 No, I don't have any link.
01:38:35.000 I don't want to buy into link because there's so much shilling of it on biz that I'm highly skeptical.
01:38:40.000 You know, I was like, because I see all the posts initially and I'm like, what am I doing?
01:38:44.000 I got to buy link.
01:38:45.000 But then I'm like, wait a second.
01:38:46.000 Oh, oh, hold the phone.
01:38:49.000 Why is everybody shilling link?
01:38:50.000 Why is it like a dedicated link shilling going on?
01:38:53.000 Is it really the next big thing and everybody knows about it?
01:38:57.000 Or are people pumping and dumping?
01:38:58.000 Are people shilling it so everybody buys in, you know?
01:39:02.000 That's the cycle where you got these big players, and they accumulate very quietly, and then the public finds out, and then it skyrockets, and they dump, and while the big whale people are dumping the link, the price stabilizes up at the top, and then it crashes.
01:39:18.000 That's kind of what happened to Bitcoin, they say.
01:39:19.000 That's the cycle.
01:39:21.000 So I'm skeptical.
01:39:22.000 Highly skeptical.
01:39:24.000 Thanks for putting on a great show for us.
01:39:26.000 I just got the premium membership.
01:39:28.000 When can I expect to receive my leftist tears tumbler in the mail?
01:39:41.000 I don't know.
01:39:41.000 Pretty soon.
01:39:42.000 Pretty soon.
01:39:42.000 We're still working on the design.
01:39:44.000 Still working on the design with Benny Palacek.
01:39:46.000 He's making it.
01:39:47.000 And, uh, and I'm sure it'll have some kind of satanic... We have to make sure that all the, uh, the symbolism is correct.
01:39:53.000 We have to make sure the sacrifices have been done before we can start distributing those.
01:39:58.000 Gen Z Philosophy says, PSA Knickers, if you need help, ContraPoints, aka a man in a dress named Natalie, can help you all escape the alt-light pipeline.
01:40:08.000 And he is referring to
01:40:11.000 My recent premium show where he talked about Faraday Speaks, you know, this gay Jew guy who was like, oh, I was alright, but then I watched ContraPoints and like, ContraPoints was really speaking to me and, and he woke me up.
01:40:24.000 Yeah, well, she, he called it, she, she woke me up out of my alright brainwashing.
01:40:31.000 So yeah, we did a whole premium show on that.
01:40:33.000 So true, so relatable.
01:40:36.000 Cloudstar says, give us your diseased, poor, and huddled gangsters yearning to be lazy.
01:40:41.000 Shit.
01:40:42.000 Hey, that's racist, man.
01:40:44.000 That is racist.
01:40:46.000 Disavow.
01:40:47.000 So much hardcore disavowing on the show tonight.
01:40:49.000 It's out of control.
01:40:50.000 Racist in the audience.
01:40:52.000 I can't believe it.
01:40:53.000 I'm so disappointed in this community.
01:40:56.000 Michael says, FYI, the so-called Conservative Party in Australia are piss weak, but it's better than that they won.
01:41:03.000 Thanks again for your content, mate.
01:41:05.000 No, thank you, mate.
01:41:07.000 G'day.
01:41:07.000 Thank you so much for the Aussie shekels.
01:41:10.000 And yeah, I understand they're probably cucked, just like, you know, just like the...
01:41:16.000 What do they call them in Britain?
01:41:17.000 The Tories?
01:41:18.000 Or just like the Republicans or anybody else, but it's better.
01:41:21.000 You know, it's relative.
01:41:22.000 It's all relative, right?
01:41:24.000 David Spurnis's top three best and worst Super Chatters.
01:41:27.000 Top three best easily.
01:41:29.000 Poo Poo King.
01:41:30.000 Really good comics.
01:41:32.000 Um... And, um... Mumumumumum... Who's the one from... What's his, uh... Simon Scola.
01:41:40.000 I would say those are probably my top three, but it's a tough top three.
01:41:42.000 It's a tough top three.
01:41:44.000 You know, there's a lot of Super Chatters.
01:41:46.000 Well, um, what's his name also?
01:41:48.000 Um... What's the name?
01:41:50.000 What's the name?
01:41:52.000 What's the name?
01:41:52.000 I met him at CPAC.
01:41:53.000 Tall, tall gentleman.
01:41:56.000 I don't know.
01:41:56.000 I can't think of him off the top of my head.
01:41:59.000 Everybody's my favorite.
01:42:00.000 Everybody's the best Super Chatter.
01:42:02.000 Everybody is my top three favorite.
01:42:05.000 Uh, no, we like Jose Antonio.
01:42:07.000 We like, uh, who's, um...
01:42:09.000 Who's the one I'm thinking of?
01:42:11.000 It's on the tip of my tongue.
01:42:12.000 I met him at CPAC Tall.
01:42:15.000 I think I missed one on Friday, but I can't think of it.
01:42:18.000 So those are probably my top three, I guess.
01:42:20.000 Top ten.
01:42:22.000 You're all in my top Super Chatters.
01:42:23.000 I don't have any favorites, but definitely the top three worst, I would say.
01:42:27.000 What's a Wigmat?
01:42:30.000 I would say he's probably just the worst.
01:42:31.000 And that one guy was giving me a hard time the other week about Venezuela.
01:42:39.000 I don't know, but I don't really want to name anybody who's worse and they're not going to super chat me anymore.
01:42:43.000 So those are our favorites.
01:42:45.000 Yeah, hopefully.
01:42:45.000 He does give me a little bit of hope because it was a great speech.
01:42:48.000 Very solid, hit all the right notes, the right ideas.
01:43:00.000 You know, talking about woke capital and social media and that kind of thing.
01:43:04.000 So yeah, I definitely think he's part of the future of the party and it's very exciting because he got in in 2018.
01:43:10.000 Don't forget, he's one of the new arrivals.
01:43:12.000 He's part of the MAGA, America First class.
01:43:14.000 So that gives me a little bit of hope, you know, that maybe the Republican Party could still have some future even after Trump.
01:43:22.000 So it's exciting.
01:43:23.000 Your local milkman says you like in Aquaman, or just like in Aquaman, women ruin society.
01:43:29.000 I don't remember the Aquaman movie, so I don't really know.
01:43:32.000 I saw that like months ago.
01:43:34.000 I'm totally forgettable.
01:43:36.000 Tony Belt says 19th Amendment was a mistake.
01:43:39.000 You know, disavow.
01:43:40.000 What a sexist thing to say.
01:43:42.000 BB says you still yang gang big guy?
01:43:44.000 No, not really.
01:43:46.000 Like I said, I was never really in the Yang Gang.
01:43:48.000 I memed on it for a while.
01:43:50.000 But I never intended to vote for him.
01:43:52.000 I never thought he would get the nomination and win the presidency.
01:43:55.000 And I said that.
01:43:56.000 And before somebody says, oh now he's backtracking, he's corn cobbing.
01:44:00.000 I said throughout the whole thing, I was never really Yang Gang.
01:44:03.000 I never really was gonna vote for him in the presidential election.
01:44:06.000 And I didn't think he'd win the nomination.
01:44:08.000 So, uh, so no the memes kind of dead.
01:44:10.000 I'm kind of off of it.
01:44:11.000 He's totally cringe now He's he was always a little bit cringe, but I feel like we were able to overlook it now.
01:44:16.000 Not so much God's plan says remember the Gerdusky interviews on the Gavin McInnis show.
01:44:22.000 I never saw him on The Gavin McInnis show so I don't remember those Max Carson says who in the mainstream do you think cares about demographics Carson Coulter?
01:44:32.000 Yeah, Tucker and Coulter, um
01:44:37.000 Michelle Malkin I think cares, Pat Buchanan obviously.
01:44:42.000 Those are probably, that's almost about it in the mainstream that cares about demographics as far as I know.
01:44:47.000 I think everybody else is kind of in on it, you know.
01:44:50.000 At least everybody else is more cowardly about it if they do care.
01:44:53.000 So I would say those are probably the biggest ones that care about demographics or maybe care explicitly or directly about demographics.
01:45:00.000 The Angry Inch says, Heyo, how's it hanging, Big King?
01:45:03.000 It only took 50 years after women's suffrage for them to legalize them killing babies.
01:45:07.000 Ain't that whack-a-doodle?
01:45:08.000 Haha.
01:45:09.000 Well, to be fair, it was Roe v. Wade, not a law.
01:45:11.000 But yeah, birth control and abortion and all that.
01:45:16.000 Cause and effect?
01:45:17.000 Perhaps.
01:45:19.000 Bill says they act like it's a choice for women to work or have a family, but since the workforce doubled, only higher class couples can easily make that happen.
01:45:26.000 Exactly.
01:45:27.000 Yeah, 100% true.
01:45:29.000 Although I will say it's a little bit of a fallacy, because if you calculate the total cost of a woman working,
01:45:37.000 Typically it doesn't exceed the income.
01:45:38.000 I guess it depends on what job you're getting.
01:45:41.000 A lot of people think in terms of, well, women have to work these days.
01:45:45.000 But if you think about it, if you're a working mother and you have kids, daycare is a huge cost.
01:45:50.000 Transportation is a huge cost.
01:45:53.000 There's a lot of costs associated with a woman in the household working.
01:45:56.000 Stefan Malin who's done the math on this.
01:45:59.000 And often you'll find that a woman will only add marginally
01:46:03.000 I don't think so.
01:46:20.000 What are you talking about?
01:46:21.000 What's wrong with increased expenditures?
01:46:23.000 Well, obviously, look at the national debt.
01:46:25.000 That's one problem, you know.
01:46:27.000 And also, they're not raising kids.
01:46:29.000 They're working.
01:46:30.000 So, voters, or rather, women's suffrage came with women in the workforce.
01:46:35.000 Elevating women and giving them the right to vote was the first step, obviously, in a long chain of other decisions which are not good.
01:46:44.000 What's wrong with increased expenditures?
01:46:46.000 I don't think we're in a good financial position, obviously, for a variety of reasons.
01:46:49.000 And also, beyond that, it's not just expenditures, it's also immigration.
01:46:53.000 It's also immigration as well.
01:46:54.000 Democrats don't just represent increased expenditures, they represent increased immigration, and there's a direct correlation between women voting and women's education and fertility rates.
01:47:05.000 So, fertility rate goes down after women's suffrage.
01:47:08.000 So, we say, well, they're raising kids, they're making kids.
01:47:11.000 Are they?
01:47:11.000 Not really.
01:47:12.000 Not really.
01:47:13.000 What's the fertility rate?
01:47:15.000 The Bunk says, I highly doubt femloids are more immoral than males.
01:47:18.000 I didn't say that.
01:47:19.000 I don't think I said that.
01:47:21.000 Desu says, honest question, if only a fraction... whoops, scrolled down too far there.
01:47:27.000 He says, if only a fraction, 15% of women were actually voting right after suffrage, how did that impact social spending so much?
01:47:35.000 Well it says, again, it says immediately after.
01:47:37.000 It says immediately in the short term after women's suffrage, social spending increased 0.6% to 1.2% in Western Europe.
01:47:47.000 And it says 14% in areas.
01:47:50.000 This is state-based.
01:47:52.000 In the Harvard paper by John Lott, it's not talking about national expenditures.
01:47:56.000 It's talking about state government expenditures.
01:47:59.000 And it's saying in certain communities where they legalized it first as opposed to later.
01:48:04.000 And it increases over time.
01:48:06.000 I would say that it is a pretty direct correlation.
01:48:09.000 Once you look at as women are added into the voter turnout, you could see that expenditures are going up.
01:48:16.000 Because, you know, they're a pretty big percentage of the population.
01:48:18.000 Even if they're low turnout, if it's maybe 50-50, and women swing it one way or the other, if they have 15% turnout, that has a sizable effect, right?
01:48:27.000 But you can look up the study on that.
01:48:28.000 You can look up all the numbers.
01:48:29.000 It's pretty, it's not, it's not really a controversial thing.
01:48:32.000 You know, there's plenty of studies that show that, and not just in America, by the way, also in Europe.
01:48:37.000 Max Carson says, that's a good honest question, but it's all there in the data.
01:48:41.000 Max Carson says IQ-based suffrage?
01:48:43.000 Not necessarily, but maybe on qualitative things like if you own land, if you have a family, those kinds of things.
01:48:51.000 You know, I wouldn't say that blanket women should be able to vote, but maybe single women should be able to vote.
01:48:56.000 You know, maybe you vote if you're married, you vote if you're a mother or something like that, because clearly
01:49:03.000 The suffrage, if anything, needs to be contracted, not expanded.
01:49:06.000 That's my humble opinion on this, and it should be contracted for everybody.
01:49:09.000 It should be contracted based on age.
01:49:11.000 It should be contracted based on ownership, perhaps.
01:49:14.000 I mean, it's a little dicey now because of the way the financial system works, but I'm not necessarily offering a path forward.
01:49:20.000 I'm just offering a critique of the current situation, but it definitely needs to be contracted.
01:49:25.000 Umph Love says, McFuentes, if people listen to the lab coats on the woman question, there would be no woman question.
01:49:31.000 Genetics and physiognomy shows their difference.
01:49:35.000 Not really.
01:49:35.000 Are lab coats really putting out a lot of studies on that or are the lab coats going along with it?
01:49:39.000 That's the thing.
01:49:40.000 All these dumbass lab coat defenders, lab coat apologists, they say, don't criticize science.
01:49:45.000 We win when we use science.
01:49:46.000 Really?
01:49:47.000 Science is in support of all this transgender stuff.
01:49:51.000 Science is in support of all this stuff.
01:49:53.000 They line up right behind the liberals on this.
01:49:55.000 There was an article not too long ago from BBC where it was some, it was some mystery meat, transgender or whatever,
01:50:03.000 Who is saying, here's why quantum physics actually supports transgenderism.
01:50:08.000 I'm in two different states and gender just like an electron, you know?
01:50:11.000 And it's like, clearly science is not in support.
01:50:15.000 Oh, look at Bill Nye!
01:50:16.000 And I know Bill Nye only has a degree in engineering, but him and his ilk, our representative, pop science, whatever you want to call it, they're the ones pushing this stuff.
01:50:26.000 So people come at me all the time with this, oh, Nick, Nick, you hit on lab coats, but don't you know that actually science is legit?
01:50:33.000 Yeah, sure.
01:50:34.000 Empirical, physical sciences are legit, and we should talk about them.
01:50:39.000 But we're not really criticizing that.
01:50:41.000 We're criticizing...
01:50:43.000 The Reddit, like, liberal over-reliance on these kinds of material explanations, this scientist ideology that says everything is material, everything is reducible, this sort of Neil deGrasse Tyson, I-effing-love-science kind of cult.
01:50:58.000 So don't be a stupid bitch about this thing.
01:51:01.000 Don't be a little bitch about this.
01:51:03.000 Trying to defend the lab coats.
01:51:05.000 I have to defend the lab coats.
01:51:07.000 I have to defend vaccines and round earth and I have to defend all this other stuff.
01:51:11.000 Yeah, okay man.
01:51:13.000 Okay man, you do you.
01:51:14.000 White night for the lab coats.
01:51:16.000 That's a great idea.
01:51:17.000 Your local milkman says don't buy your wife a watch for Christmas.
01:51:21.000 There's a clock on the oven.
01:51:23.000 That's funny.
01:51:24.000 That's a funny joke.
01:51:27.000 Noit says, when was the last time you saw a platinum blonde male in public that was his natural hair color?
01:51:33.000 Are they going extinct?
01:51:34.000 Does it matter?
01:51:36.000 Platinum blonde male.
01:51:38.000 What does platinum blonde hair look like?
01:51:41.000 Platinum blonde hair.
01:51:45.000 Is that even naturally occur?
01:51:47.000 Platinum blonde?
01:51:49.000 Is that a naturally occurring phenomenon?
01:51:50.000 I've never seen it naturally occurring before.
01:51:53.000 If you mean like gray or white.
01:51:56.000 A lot of people dye their hair now.
01:51:57.000 It's very trendy, but I don't think I've ever seen that naturally occur.
01:52:02.000 Maybe it's because I'm Mediterranean.
01:52:04.000 I only see brown hair people in my native homeland of Italy.
01:52:08.000 But I've never seen platinum blonde before I didn't know I don't think that was a real thing But yeah, if it is I guess it's worth preserving, but I don't I've never seen that before El Sapo says the Industrial Revolution has been a disaster for the human race Ted Kaczynski agree Calyxtus says Joe Rogan is gay.
01:52:26.000 Yeah true XL jackpot says shout out to my based in Trad pill Danish mate whose birthday it is today thoughts on America's long-term geopolitical future
01:52:36.000 Well yeah, happy birthday to the Dane.
01:52:38.000 America's long-term geopolitical future is decline.
01:52:42.000 It is an absolute decline and a relative decline in power.
01:52:46.000 So, the long-term future is going to be losing power over NATO, you know, European countries.
01:52:52.000 It used to be that it was like NATO policy was American policy.
01:52:56.000 And now I think Trump has clearly shown that that's going to change a little bit.
01:53:00.000 I think there will be a little bit of a break between Europe and some of these other countries.
01:53:05.000 I also think that we won't have absolute control over the Western Hemisphere.
01:53:08.000 We won't have global hegemony, and I think regional hegemony will be contested.
01:53:12.000 I think that'll be brought on by domestic problems.
01:53:16.000 We're good to go.
01:53:35.000 For our military and that's basically true.
01:53:37.000 So I would say that's a long-term geopolitical outlook.
01:53:39.000 It's definitely declined relatively and absolutely unless something radically changes.
01:53:44.000 That's what I see.
01:53:45.000 I see China rising against America, India rising against America.
01:53:49.000 Not that I'm not one of these India superpower type people.
01:53:52.000 America will still be a great power by 2050 and probably still a hegemonic power by 2050, but definitely we're on the downswing I would say.
01:54:03.000 XL jackpot says or I'm sorry I just read that one local milk man says never under any circumstances mix your milks yeah definitely big mistake big mistake I've seen it happen a lot never ends well never ends well you mix the milks you know you mix the chocolate milk up with the white milk and somehow you always end up dropping the glass of white milk it always ends up that the white milk spilled on the floor it's completely battered beyond recognition it's like what we're just like oh I
01:54:28.000 Whoops!
01:54:28.000 I just dropped that glass of milk.
01:54:30.000 Oops!
01:54:31.000 That glass of milk just knocked that other glass of milk off the counter.
01:54:34.000 Completely smashed it.
01:54:36.000 And I was like, what's going on?
01:54:38.000 What's going on in my kitchen?
01:54:41.000 Right?
01:54:43.000 But yeah, I don't know.
01:54:44.000 I don't know what you mean by that.
01:54:45.000 If there's some kind of subtext there.
01:54:47.000 A weird analogy to bring up.
01:54:48.000 It's something that's happened to me before.
01:54:49.000 I don't know if that's common.
01:54:52.000 Let's see.
01:54:53.000 Stereo says, okay, not reading that.
01:54:55.000 Okay.
01:54:56.000 Well, that's what he says, which I read.
01:54:58.000 M.A.
01:54:58.000 says, get a female co-host.
01:55:00.000 Show would be twice as good.
01:55:02.000 Would be twice as bad, actually.
01:55:04.000 It would be half as good.
01:55:06.000 Stereo says, okay, still not reading that.
01:55:09.000 Patty McGill says, ask E. Michael Jones how, why the Irish Germans who built Chicago are displaced and why those old Catholic neighborhoods matter.
01:55:17.000 Pray the rosary.
01:55:18.000 In other words, ask him what he says on every other podcast.
01:55:21.000 I love that.
01:55:21.000 Nick, Nick, Nick.
01:55:23.000 Ask him so he says this.
01:55:25.000 Ask him so you're not only dictating the question to me that I ask him, you're dictating that question because you already know the answer and you want him to say what you want him to say so everybody else can hear it.
01:55:39.000 Unbelievable the way people operate.
01:55:40.000 That's a thought process.
01:55:41.000 Nick, Nick, Nick.
01:55:42.000 Ask him this so he'll say this to everybody.
01:55:45.000 Patty McGill, get your own show.
01:55:46.000 How about that?
01:55:47.000 Get your own show.
01:55:50.000 For crying out loud.
01:55:51.000 He says that on every show.
01:55:52.000 We're gonna ask him some fresh stuff.
01:55:53.000 We're gonna change it up a little bit.
01:55:55.000 Okay, cuz I've heard that.
01:55:56.000 He talked about that on The Spencer Show.
01:55:57.000 He talks about that in his books.
01:55:59.000 We're trying to, we're gonna try and, you know, get a little new content out there.
01:56:03.000 Gen Z Philosophy says, you know, I'm 1000% pure Aryan blood, but my girlfriend is half Italian, one quarter Korean, and one quarter Dutch.
01:56:11.000 Do you avow?
01:56:13.000 I avow.
01:56:13.000 I avow.
01:56:15.000 Prince of Conquest says, watching your work ethic has convinced me of Ben Franklin's quote about Italians being lazy and dumb.
01:56:21.000 Love you big guy.
01:56:22.000 Hashtag wasp gang.
01:56:23.000 Yeah, how has that worked out, right?
01:56:25.000 Lazy and dumb Italians and we elected Matteo Salvini and what's going on again in the...
01:56:31.000 What's going on again in the United Kingdom?
01:56:32.000 I'm sorry, who's your Prime Minister?
01:56:35.000 Lazy and dumb Italians!
01:56:36.000 We have Matteo Salvini, who's based in Red Pill, and he's got the rosary, and he's, you know, praying with people, and he's hugging and kissing, and there's hordes of fans, he's deporting migrants, and, um, I'm sorry, who's the leader of the United Kingdom?
01:56:53.000 Oh, it's a woman?
01:56:54.000 Oh, it's a woman named Theresa May who dances and, you know, does all this other crazy stuff and she's totally cringe and blue pilled?
01:57:01.000 Couldn't be me, can't relate.
01:57:03.000 Can't relate.
01:57:04.000 Oh, America is run by a fat drumpf?
01:57:08.000 Anglo-America elected fat blumpf?
01:57:10.000 Really?
01:57:11.000 Man, if only they had Matteo Salvini, right?
01:57:14.000 What a shame.
01:57:15.000 But yeah, I love you too, I guess.
01:57:17.000 Cloudstar says, Nick, your M-rated rant yesterday reminded me of how my parents were not like that.
01:57:22.000 I saw RoboCop when I was seven and it's still my favorite movie.
01:57:25.000 Have you seen it?
01:57:27.000 RoboCop?
01:57:28.000 Yeah, I think I saw it once a long time ago.
01:57:31.000 How's that your favorite movie?
01:57:34.000 I don't even consider that a great movie, but okay.
01:57:38.000 Yeah, it was okay.
01:57:39.000 I thought it was an okay film.
01:57:41.000 I watched it when I was in, like, middle school, though.
01:57:43.000 My parents were less strict about the movies than they were about the video games.
01:57:47.000 You know, I was always able to watch some of the, you know, explicit film-type content, but never the video games for some reason.
01:57:54.000 I guess my parents, maybe they bought into some of that scare stuff, that, you know, hype about violent video games or whatever.
01:58:01.000 I remember one time I got Dead Rising 2, that zombie game, and my mom was like, well let me see, it's M-rated, well let me see what it's all about.
01:58:10.000 I showed her, and I was like, but mom, it's zombies!
01:58:13.000 And she's like, oh so it's not people?
01:58:15.000 I'm like, no.
01:58:16.000 And for some reason that distinction was so important.
01:58:19.000 That was the difference between me being allowed to get it and not getting it.
01:58:22.000 But mom, there's zombies!
01:58:24.000 I'm only killing zombies!
01:58:25.000 She's like, well, in that case, you can get it.
01:58:27.000 Like, what are you... You're just cutting people in half anyway.
01:58:29.000 What difference does it make?
01:58:31.000 What difference does it make?
01:58:32.000 You see, when I play Grand Theft Auto, would it matter?
01:58:35.000 Does it really matter, you know?
01:58:36.000 But yeah, I... Childhood ruined!
01:58:40.000 Childhood absolutely ruined, mom and dad!
01:58:44.000 Not letting me get M-rated games, had to get that Wallace and Gromp game or whatever from Blockbuster.
01:58:49.000 What was that stupid-ass game I got for PlayStation 2?
01:58:52.000 My first game for... Gromit.
01:58:56.000 My first game for PlayStation 2 was... Let me look it up.
01:59:02.000 Was Wallace and Gromit... Was it The Curse of the Were-Rabbit?
01:59:06.000 No, it was something else.
01:59:08.000 Project Zoo?
01:59:09.000 It might have been?
01:59:10.000 No.
01:59:12.000 How many, how many, how many PlayStation 2 games were there like this?
01:59:17.000 Google Images, maybe?
01:59:18.000 Okay, well I can't find it.
01:59:22.000 But nevertheless!
01:59:23.000 Yeah, my first PlayStation 2 game, Wallace & Gromit.
01:59:26.000 Thank you so much, Mom!
01:59:28.000 All my friends are playing Grand Theft Auto.
01:59:29.000 All my friends have PlayStation 3, and I had Wallace & Gromit.
01:59:34.000 Thank you so much.
01:59:36.000 so anyway patty mcgill says uh do the whole show with dr jones about chicago the greatest american city and how it was destroyed how the catholic cities were clean safe strong yeah thank you for your input maybe we'll talk about this chicago was one of the finest cities and now obviously in decline and marie says nick you remind me of my granddaughter she's cute thank you yes i've i've heard about this
01:59:59.000 That's good to know.
02:00:00.000 Boopers says, uh, hang on.
02:00:04.000 Boopers says, brah, I really like your cup.
02:00:06.000 Thanks!
02:00:07.000 You can order one at gearbubble.com slash njfmug.
02:00:10.000 Gearbubble.com slash njfmug.
02:00:13.000 You can buy it.
02:00:13.000 Fifteen bucks.
02:00:15.000 Very reasonable price.
02:00:17.000 ASDF says lady next to me at work said how she loved how her son's kindergarten teacher was gay.
02:00:22.000 Guy talking to her was countersignaling this Catholic school.
02:00:25.000 Wow, so progressive, so cool.
02:00:28.000 If you're not down with homosexuals in your schools teaching your kids... Alright, isn't that what Sam Hyde said?
02:00:34.000 It's all coming to fruition.
02:00:36.000 ASDF says meant his, not this.
02:00:38.000 Two upsetting things to hear.
02:00:40.000 Ah, yes.
02:00:41.000 Cassie says, speaking of, why did you ban him?
02:00:46.000 Because he was dumb.
02:00:46.000 He was talking mad smack in the comments, so I had to kick him out.
02:00:51.000 Andrew says, why do fools complain when you block them on Twitter?
02:00:54.000 They know what they are doing.
02:00:55.000 Their shock is silly when they know they were talking trash.
02:00:59.000 Well yeah, exactly.
02:01:00.000 All these people...
02:01:01.000 First of all, people are obsessed.
02:01:04.000 I block them and they're like, I'm not mad.
02:01:06.000 I'm not mad.
02:01:07.000 And then they talk about it for like literally years.
02:01:10.000 Literally for years.
02:01:11.000 Oh, yeah.
02:01:12.000 He blocked me like a year ago.
02:01:13.000 I'm like every post.
02:01:15.000 He blocks everybody.
02:01:16.000 He's the worst.
02:01:17.000 Blah, blah, blah.
02:01:17.000 You know, so people, first of all, I block them because I'm like, I don't like you.
02:01:22.000 I don't want to associate with you.
02:01:23.000 I don't want to see your content.
02:01:25.000 I don't know.
02:01:40.000 You literally are asking to be blocked.
02:01:43.000 I block, and then they can't get over it, and they're trouble.
02:01:46.000 He's, oh, he just blocks everybody.
02:01:48.000 I do block a lot of people.
02:01:49.000 A lot of people are stupid, and I don't want to see their content.
02:01:53.000 It's got nothing to do with being sensitive.
02:01:55.000 It's just got to do with, why would I allow somebody to harass me?
02:01:58.000 If somebody comes up to you on the street, and they're like, ooh, you suck, you're dumb, I hate you, you wouldn't just, you wouldn't just sit there and take it, you would get up and go somewhere else.
02:02:08.000 You know?
02:02:09.000 So people make it their their like whole their whole week is replying to my tweets and counter signaling me or you know whatever saying something nasty and I block because I'm like I don't want to deal with that I don't want to get this negative juju in my brain bad juju so I block I ban and then people make it out like oh he's just uh you know he bans everybody whatever yeah damn right 5,300 blocks and counting what about it?
02:02:34.000 And what about it?
02:02:36.000 Lauren Rose says grow a scraggly beard, bro.
02:02:39.000 Sam Hyde style.
02:02:40.000 Kino.
02:02:41.000 I don't know.
02:02:41.000 I kind of like being clean-shaven.
02:02:42.000 It's too itchy.
02:02:44.000 When it grows out too much, it just itches and I don't really like that sensation.
02:02:48.000 So, I think I'm just gonna keep it short.
02:02:52.000 Maybe we'll do a mustache at the max.
02:02:54.000 Simon Scola says, you know, I'm something of a scientist myself.
02:02:58.000 I don't know what that's referring to, but you know what I mean.
02:03:00.000 You know, scientist ideology.
02:03:02.000 Smelly says, uh, what should I tell Walter when I meet him?
02:03:05.000 Okay.
02:03:06.000 Patty McGill says, the church is eternal.
02:03:08.000 www.latinmassdir.org.
02:03:12.000 Okay.
02:03:13.000 Dominic says, hey there, big guy.
02:03:14.000 My wife and I just got married Saturday.
02:03:16.000 We both love the show.
02:03:18.000 We'd love to watch the rest, but we got to start making those white Christian Protestant babies.
02:03:22.000 God bless.
02:03:23.000 Well, yikes on the Protestant part, but hey,
02:03:26.000 Congratulations.
02:03:27.000 God bless.
02:03:27.000 Congrats on the marriage.
02:03:30.000 Hope everything works out.
02:03:31.000 Hope the babies are forthcoming.
02:03:34.000 We can be progenitors of white race.
02:03:36.000 Glad you're making the most important kind of content there is.
02:03:40.000 Even though they're going to be Protestant.
02:03:41.000 Better than nothing, right?
02:03:42.000 Better than atheists.
02:03:43.000 Better than anything else.
02:03:45.000 Except for Catholic, of course.
02:03:46.000 But hey, congrats.
02:03:49.000 Lauren Rose says do a live stream with the Krusty Krab drive-thru.
02:03:53.000 Okay.
02:03:54.000 Skye says what's up Monica?
02:03:56.000 I don't know what that means.
02:03:57.000 Patty McGill says no one ever detailed Chicago.
02:04:00.000 Paco Loco.
02:04:01.000 Ouch.
02:04:02.000 Reckoning says found out GF's make out with their gay friends barf.
02:04:07.000 Is that I don't think that's a very I don't know Maybe it's a common thing.
02:04:10.000 I wouldn't know I canceled women in 2019 wouldn't know anything about it All these women defenders be like, did you know that women are killing their babies and making out with gay men?
02:04:18.000 I'm like can't relate wouldn't know anything about that That's 2019.
02:04:23.000 They're canceled.
02:04:24.000 Huh?
02:04:25.000 All these women defenders all these cope cope posters white nighters beta orbiters
02:04:31.000 Reply guys, Nick, did you know women are acting... Nick!
02:04:35.000 These women are acting different!
02:04:36.000 And I'm like, they're, bitch, they're cancelled.
02:04:38.000 They're cancelled, what are you still doing?
02:04:40.000 What are you still doing hanging around them?
02:04:42.000 They're like, Nick, Nick, you liked that post of a trans catgirl in diehighs.
02:04:46.000 And then they come to me later and they're like, Nick, these women are off the goop.
02:04:50.000 And I'm like... You're gonna be saying, how do you live like you do?
02:04:55.000 And I'm gonna say, I tried to show you.
02:04:57.000 I tried to show you, right?
02:04:59.000 so not not surprising not surprising women are psycho degenerates oh oh my gosh surprising that's so surprising women are cancelled women remain cancelled uh glen c says my parents only let me play or watch e pg movies until i was 13 then only teen pg 13 lame childhood relatable relatable yeah very lame childhood my dad was very red pill though he took me to the r-rated films when i was uh
02:05:29.000 Probably when I was in middle school.
02:05:46.000 based on three categories which is nudity and sex violence and swearing and if the nudity and sexuality score was low i was able to see it if it was high i couldn't see it so like for example couldn't see the american with george clooney which came out and i think uh september october 2011 or 2010
02:06:07.000 Couldn't see it because it was R-rated and it had too much sex in it.
02:06:11.000 And the list went on and on with this kind of stuff.
02:06:13.000 I had to miss a lot of feature presentations because of this website.
02:06:18.000 Too much sex going on.
02:06:20.000 But if it had high violence, high swearing, low sex, then I was able to see it.
02:06:25.000 So that's how that worked.
02:06:27.000 But yeah, the video games cringe and blue pilled until the end.
02:06:30.000 Still had to get permission for Grand Theft Auto V when I was in high school, okay?
02:06:34.000 So, so cringe and blue pill childhood.
02:06:36.000 No good.
02:06:38.000 Lauren Rose says, your keyboard research is elite ASMR.
02:06:41.000 Thank you, King.
02:06:42.000 I'm glad you enjoy it.
02:06:44.000 Lauren says, we love our Chinese mugs, don't we folks?
02:06:47.000 Okay, Chinese manufactured, but the design is all American and the theme is American as well.
02:06:52.000 And really, that is what counts.
02:06:55.000 Okay, that's our last Super Chat.
02:06:57.000 That's going to do it for us on the show tonight.
02:07:10.000 Wow, a lot of really terrific Super Chats.
02:07:12.000 I especially like the ones about Pooper Chats and, you know, asking to get Walter from Drake & Josh on the show.
02:07:19.000 I would say those are my favorites tonight.
02:07:21.000 But that's going to do it for us on the show.
02:07:23.000 Remember to check us out at nicholasjfuentes.com slash membership.
02:07:27.000 Five bucks a month to become a premium member.
02:07:29.000 You get one additional show every week.
02:07:31.000 And it also supports the show.
02:07:33.000 It's the best way to monetarily support the show.
02:07:36.000 We're 100% viewer funded.
02:07:37.000 We need, we need the Shekels, baby.
02:07:40.000 We're not getting them from Benny Politsak.
02:07:42.000 That's for sure.
02:07:42.000 We're not getting them from the World Jewish Congress.
02:07:45.000 So be sure to check that out.
02:07:46.000 The link is down below.
02:07:48.000 We got a two-hour show posted up from Sunday, and it's a pretty big show.
02:07:53.000 20 plus hours of content already available.
02:07:55.000 So check that out.
02:07:57.000 Remember to subscribe to the channel, give us a big thumbs up, leave a comment down below, click the notification bell to get notified every time I go live.
02:08:04.000 Remember, we are on the air Monday through Friday, 7 p.m.
02:08:07.000 Central, 8 p.m.
02:08:09.000 Eastern Time, you know, somewhere around there.
02:08:11.000 Thanks so much for watching the show.
02:08:13.000 Thanks to our Super Chatters premium members, everybody who watches.
02:08:17.000 We love you folks and we will see you tomorrow.
02:08:19.000 Until then, have a great rest of your evening.
02:08:24.000 Americanism, not globalism, will be our credo.
02:08:31.000 It's going to be only America first.
02:08:35.000 America first.
02:08:40.000 The American people will come first once again.
02:09:07.000 America first, America first