America First - Nicholas J. Fuentes - The Deep State Coup | America First Ep. 96

00:00:39.000 All right, all right, all right.

00:00:40.000 Okay, we got it fixed.

00:00:41.000 We got it good.

00:00:42.000 All right.

00:00:45.000 That's how it goes.

00:00:46.000 Yeah, I know, I know.

00:00:47.000 We got it, we got it fixed.

00:00:48.000 Thank you to my producer, though.

00:00:50.000 So, we are here.

00:00:51.000 You're watching America First.

00:00:53.000 My name is Nicholas J. Francis.

00:00:55.000 Already off to a pretty rocky start here.

00:00:57.000 Pretty rocky start.

00:00:59.000 A little bit late, a little bit late, having some technical difficulties, and obviously they continue.

00:01:04.000 Obviously, they are ongoing.

00:01:06.000 But we are here.

00:01:08.000 We are on the maiden voyage of the America First supercomputer.

00:01:11.000 Let me know if everything is coming through.

00:01:13.000 Crisp and clean in audio and video.

00:01:16.000 Am I?

00:01:16.000 Is it auto focusing?

00:01:18.000 Okay, I don't think it is.

00:01:20.000 So it looks like we're okay.

00:01:22.000 I completed the construction of the computer this weekend.

00:01:25.000 You might have seen.

00:01:26.000 I periscoped myself building it.

00:01:28.000 I must be a computer genius or something because no experience with computers, no experience with circuitry and wires and technology, but we put it together pretty flawlessly, running pretty smoothly from the start.

00:01:43.000 I go today, I go this morning to Best Buy to get myself a monitor.

00:01:48.000 And I go in and, you know, I'm looking around.

00:01:50.000 I'm trying to see which one's going to be the best.

00:01:52.000 And the guy comes over.

00:01:53.000 He's like, Oh, hi.

00:01:54.000 Do you need any help?

00:01:55.000 And I really resent this.

00:01:57.000 I really resent when people, I know it's their job, but I just, I like to go and do my own thing.

00:02:01.000 I don't really like to be bothered so much.

00:02:03.000 So I'm looking, I'm trying to pick out monitors.

00:02:05.000 And the guy's like, Yeah, do you need any help?

00:02:07.000 I'm like, No, I'm good.

00:02:08.000 I'm all right.

00:02:08.000 And so I'm sitting there for a good 15, 20 minutes.

00:02:11.000 I'm Googling all the different monitors they have.

00:02:13.000 I'm texting people, Is this good?

00:02:15.000 What's a bezel?

00:02:16.000 What's the specs on this?

00:02:18.000 Whatever.

00:02:20.000 I finally am ready to make my purchase.

00:02:20.000 And so I'm ready.

00:02:23.000 And the same guy comes back over and he says, Hey, just to let you know, you have to pay in cash today because our system's down.

00:02:30.000 You couldn't have told me that a half hour ago?

00:02:30.000 I'm like, What?

00:02:33.000 You should have a sign on the door.

00:02:35.000 I have to pay in cash.

00:02:37.000 I don't carry that kind of money around in cash.

00:02:40.000 You know?

00:02:41.000 So then I had to go to Walmart and that was a whole ordeal.

00:02:44.000 But anyway, the tech issues that I, you probably don't want to hear about it Ethernet, OBS, all kinds of things going on.

00:02:51.000 But We're good now, it looks like.

00:02:53.000 And in here, there's a really cool feature which I found on the camera, which we didn't have before, but this is pretty neat.

00:03:01.000 This is pretty neat.

00:03:03.000 Oh, but it's not going to let me do it, I guess.

00:03:06.000 Maybe next time.

00:03:07.000 All right.

00:03:08.000 There's a really neat feature now where I can enable the camera to follow my face.

00:03:14.000 I didn't know you could do that.

00:03:15.000 I don't know.

00:03:16.000 It was working earlier.

00:03:17.000 I guess it's not working once you're streaming, but it's this cool feature where it follows you around.

00:03:21.000 Anyway.

00:03:22.000 But we have a lot of news today, obviously, a lot of news tonight.

00:03:26.000 A lot of this stuff that we've been talking about these past couple of weeks in January is finally coming to fruition.

00:03:36.000 And of course, I'm talking about the memo, which has been ordered to be released as of, I believe, 6 30 Central Time this evening.

00:03:44.000 And if you recall, the Office of the Inspector General began to compile the IG report, the Inspector General's report.

00:03:53.000 Around this time last year, they were ordered, and this was at the whim of Democrats, to look into the Russia thing.

00:04:00.000 They were ordered also to look into the FBI, the Obama surveillance of the Trump transition team and the Trump campaign, and a lot of other things, a host of other things that Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama have had their hands in.

00:04:14.000 And the OIG report was supposed to be due already.

00:04:17.000 They were supposed to come out with it, but they extended the deadline, excuse me, and will now be releasing the full report in late March, early April, because there is so much.

00:04:28.000 That they are investigating, which really gets the knock and jog and really makes you think why have they had to extend it for so long?

00:04:34.000 So they revealed some of those documents to Congress last Monday.

00:04:39.000 If you recall, I made some big predictions.

00:04:41.000 I said, watch, this is going to be very consequential.

00:04:43.000 The documents that come out on Monday will sort of give us a glimpse into what we will expect, what we should be expecting later in spring when the full report comes out.

00:04:54.000 And so, of course, once that memo, or excuse me, once those documents hit the Congress, and they were, of course, only available to lawmakers, you started to hear murmurings, I believe it was late last week or the week before, that this was worse than Watergate.

00:05:08.000 That the FBI, the intelligence community would have to undergo serious restructuring because of what is contained in the memo and more broadly in the IG report.

00:05:17.000 There's massive corruption, massive corruption, not only in the Democratic Party, but in the deep state as well, which is big.

00:05:24.000 The intelligence community, you know, the big dogs over there.

00:05:28.000 And so finally, we got this memo to be released.

00:05:31.000 This memo was drafted by Republican lawmakers at the behest of Republican Devin Nunes.

00:05:38.000 And compiling the information they got from the OIG report, compiling some of the other evidence that they've gathered in their oversight function over the special counsel investigation into 2016 hacking, Russian hacking in the 2016 election.

00:05:53.000 And so they put together this memo.

00:05:55.000 It was just voted to be released using a 40 year old rule that has never been used in terms of this committee, one where they can release it publicly without the minority party.

00:06:08.000 Being made aware of this, being apprised of this, getting a vote on this.

00:06:11.000 So, Republicans unilaterally released this memo publicly without the Democrats.

00:06:16.000 And now the president has five days to decide whether he wants to release the memo or whether he wants to hold it back.

00:06:24.000 And so, a courier was sent as of about a half hour before the show from Capitol Hill to the White House to deliver the memo for President Trump to give it his okay.

00:06:33.000 And word is that he will give it his okay.

00:06:36.000 And an idea of what's going to be contained in this memo, we've We've heard some rumors about this.

00:06:42.000 We've heard and seen some of the pieces start to come together.

00:06:46.000 But the gist of it is it's all about Fusion GPS.

00:06:50.000 It's all about the Trump Russia dossier.

00:06:52.000 It's all about FISA warrants, FISA spying.

00:06:56.000 And if you go back to spring of 2016, during the election, you had Fusion GPS, which was this intelligence company.

00:07:06.000 They were contracted by Hillary Clinton and the Democratic National Committee to go and collect information.

00:07:12.000 Opposition research on Donald Trump.

00:07:15.000 Fusion GPS was given access to the national security database.

00:07:21.000 They were given access to massive surveillance using the FISA system.

00:07:26.000 And certain FISA permissions in order to use United States intelligence didn't need to go through a judge, they didn't need to go through lawmakers, they didn't need to go through the usual regulatory processes.

00:07:38.000 And so, this particular kind of FISA warrant, they could achieve, they could attain for Fusion GPS to go looking around.

00:07:45.000 Using the national surveillance apparatus without going through too much oversight.

00:07:50.000 And so, this is a lot of speculation.

00:07:52.000 These are a lot of rumors of what's going to be in the memo that Fusion GPS was able to collect this intelligence basically illegally, that they were able to look through all of this surveillance without a warrant, without a just cause to do it, really only to go after a political opponent.

00:08:10.000 They were able to use the national security apparatus, the surveillance apparatus, to go after a political opponent.

00:08:17.000 And they used.

00:08:18.000 What they discovered using this database to compile the Trump dossier, which of course was the 35 page document compiled by the former British spy Christopher Steele, who used to work in the Soviet Union, who used to work in Russia during the times of the Cold War, who put together this document which famously alleged that Donald Trump went off to Moscow and peed in the bed of Barack Obama where he stayed in the Ritz Carlton,

00:08:44.000 and Vladimir Putin filmed it all and was using that to blackmail the president.

00:08:48.000 That was the Trump dossier, of course, released by BuzzFeed.

00:08:52.000 About last year, this time last year.

00:08:55.000 And so Fusion GPS, using the national security apparatus, put together this dossier.

00:09:00.000 They put it in the hands of Christopher Steele.

00:09:03.000 This was later then used.

00:09:04.000 This wouldn't be so much of a problem.

00:09:06.000 This probably would have gone away.

00:09:08.000 I don't think it would have gone away.

00:09:09.000 I mean, they still probably would have found this, but it wouldn't be as big of a deal if not for the fact that not only did Christopher Steele compile this dossier, which was a total lie, which was total fiction, not only did the national Security apparatus, the surveillance apparatus conspire with a political campaign to target their political opponent.

00:09:32.000 But after the election was over, they then used this 35 page Russia dossier, which was a total lie, which was a total fabrication, as the basis for the special counsel with Robert Mueller.

00:09:45.000 And so this is where it becomes a problem.

00:09:48.000 This is where we start to see some of the corruption.

00:09:51.000 That you have this dossier where they're missing documents, they're missing witnesses.

00:09:57.000 In terms of how they were able to make these claims, how they were able to make these outlandish and wild accusations that Putin had compromised and Trump was in Russia and all this other stuff.

00:10:08.000 And the House Oversight Committee has been subpoenaing the FBI and these other apparatuses, the Department of Justice, to say, where are the documents?

00:10:16.000 Where are the witnesses to substantiate the claims made in the dossier?

00:10:19.000 Because the Robert Mueller special counsel, the only reason it exists, the only reason it was appointed, the only reason they've been investigating and looking through documents and bringing people.

00:10:31.000 To court and bringing charges against people like Manafort and Gates and Papadopoulos is because of the document.

00:10:38.000 And Nunes is out there saying this document is total BS.

00:10:42.000 It was constructed by the Democrats in collusion with the national security apparatus to take down a political opponent, which is bad news.

00:10:51.000 It's bad news all around.

00:10:53.000 When they say it's worse than Watergate, if all of this is true, if there is this conspiracy at the highest levels to collude against the president in the election, During the transition to undermine the sitting president, you are talking serious heads rolling.

00:11:09.000 You are talking major upheaval.

00:11:11.000 And we'll see what's in the memo.

00:11:14.000 We don't know what's in the memo.

00:11:15.000 It could be overblown.

00:11:16.000 It could be totally overblown, totally hyped up.

00:11:19.000 And we've been disappointed before.

00:11:21.000 We saw this with the October surprise with WikiLeaks in 2016.

00:11:25.000 We saw a lot of this kind of stuff during the 2016 election with the Pizzagate, with Project Veritas, where There's minor things, but it really just gets overblown in terms of the hype.

00:11:38.000 But we'll see what happens, obviously, once the memo is released.

00:11:42.000 And it's not looking very good.

00:11:44.000 It's not looking very good because, of course, this comes off the heels last week when the FBI announced about a month late that they were missing 50,000 text messages between Peter Sturzok and Lisa Page between the period of December 2016 and May 2017 when they were allegedly conspiring to undermine the president.

00:12:05.000 Offsite away from the FBI as part of a secret society.

00:12:08.000 And so just a lot of pieces and fragments.

00:12:11.000 We don't totally know the whole story.

00:12:13.000 Lawmakers know a lot of it.

00:12:15.000 The OIG, the Office of the Inspector General, knows all of it.

00:12:20.000 And we kind of, we're getting the crumbs.

00:12:22.000 We're kind of getting the bits and pieces.

00:12:24.000 It's trickling down to us slowly through back channels and through documents and rumors and everything.

00:12:30.000 We don't know completely what's going on, but the gist of it, the gist of what is coming together, as I've been saying all year long, really for the entire month of January, that the genesis of all of this is in Hillary Clinton's tenure.

00:12:45.000 As Secretary of State.

00:12:47.000 While she was Secretary of State, she used her position, she used the office of the State Department to curry favors, to deliver favors to foreign countries, to foreign oligarchs, to foreign wealthy people, and foreign corporations. 1.00

00:13:02.000 She made all these deals as the Secretary of State using the United States government, using our leverage and our money and our diplomacy. 0.99

00:13:09.000 She gave favors to people in Russia, she gave favors to people in Saudi Arabia. 1.00

00:13:15.000 She got huge contributions, $100 million contributions from those very same people to the Clinton Foundation, which is, of course, a slush fund for the Democratic Party, but more specifically for Hillary Clinton herself for this eventual presidential run.

00:13:31.000 She was doing this during her tenure as Secretary of State, which I believe was from 2008 when Barack Obama was inaugurated until pretty late.

00:13:39.000 I think it was 2013 or 2014.

00:13:41.000 She stayed on for a little while.

00:13:42.000 And so while she was serving as Secretary of State, she was wheeling and dealing, she was doing this pay to play.

00:13:48.000 Where the foreign countries pay, and they then got play from the State Department.

00:13:53.000 They got their favors, they got their things approved, they got the money they needed.

00:13:58.000 And that is why, of course, we saw the email scandal.

00:14:01.000 Because in order to do all these shady negotiations, these shady deals, if she had to turn over her government emails at the end of her tenure, as is required of public servants, well, they would find out about all this stuff. 0.70

00:14:14.000 If she were conducting these affairs, if she were conducting the affairs of state on her government computer, at the end of the day, she'd have to turn it all over.

00:14:22.000 And the American people, Freedom of Information Act requests, would be able to see what's going on with these emails and they'd be able to see what she's doing.

00:14:30.000 So that's why she then went in and she installed a private server in the bathroom of her home, an unsecured private server to handle all this information.

00:14:40.000 And while this is happening, by the way, while she's using her private email server for public emails, it's unsecure.

00:14:47.000 So you have confidential, classified information going through the server.

00:14:52.000 National state security secrets going through this private server, which is in her house, which is not secure, which people could hack, which could endanger the lives of people.

00:15:01.000 There was a big talking point during the 2016 election that you had special access program intelligence.

00:15:09.000 I was talking about this stuff months ago, but the special access program intelligence was the highest level intelligence.

00:15:09.000 I remember this stuff.

00:15:16.000 Like, if this gets exposed, people in the field start to die.

00:15:20.000 And that's the kind of stuff that was on her private email server, which if she's building it in her home, She has no guarantee that it has the security that the United States government would afford if she had used her government email.

00:15:31.000 So while she's using this private email server, and the whole reason she's doing it is, of course, to obscure the fact that she's wheeling and dealing, she has these confidential things on the email server.

00:15:40.000 And so that's a crime in and of itself.

00:15:43.000 It's negligence.

00:15:44.000 And there's also some other crimes involved with that as well. 0.93

00:15:47.000 But then on top of it, then she deletes them, of course, because she resigns.

00:15:52.000 They don't get all the emails.

00:15:53.000 They find out she's got confident information.

00:15:55.000 Confidential information on the computer.

00:15:57.000 The U.S. Congress subpoenas her and they say, Look, lady, you had them on the private email server. 0.99

00:16:03.000 Maybe we buy that it was yoga and wedding planning. 1.00

00:16:07.000 Maybe we buy that you're old and you don't know the difference.

00:16:10.000 But now you got to turn over the rest of the emails.

00:16:12.000 Now you got to turn over the emails.

00:16:14.000 We have the government ones.

00:16:15.000 Where are the ones from your private server?

00:16:17.000 And she says, Oh, well, I accidentally deleted 33,000 of them.

00:16:22.000 Whoops.

00:16:23.000 I guess I didn't think they would matter that much. 1.00

00:16:25.000 And so now you have a scandal on top of that because now she's obstructing justice.

00:16:30.000 So it all goes back to the pay to play. 1.00

00:16:31.000 She builds a private server. 0.98

00:16:33.000 Private server has confidential information. 1.00

00:16:35.000 They say, Hillary, turn it over. 0.97

00:16:36.000 Then she deletes it.

00:16:37.000 So you have the negligent storage of the information, negligent distribution of the information, the pay to play.

00:16:44.000 Then you have the obstruction of justice.

00:16:46.000 Then she knows.

00:16:48.000 She knows that if a Republican gets into office, we find out everything.

00:16:53.000 We get into these offices and we see what's been going on, the criminal racket that's been going on for eight years.

00:16:59.000 And so we are going to go in there and discover it all, and people are going to go to jail.

00:17:03.000 So Clinton conspires, of course, with Barack Obama and the national security apparatus, the intelligence community, to conspire to spy on President Trump, on his campaign, on his transition team in order to dig up dirt.

00:17:16.000 The whole reason they were able to hear the private phone call between Michael Flynn and that Russian ambassador, which occurred in December, is.

00:17:23.000 The only reason they knew who was on the call and what was said, even though Michael Flynn didn't disclose that to the FBI, is because Barack Obama was spying on them using the FISA warrants, which were, you know, again, pretty loose and shady in terms of how they got them, and then unmasked them to the media, which is a crime in and of itself, and then used it as the basis for the Trump Russia dossier.

00:17:45.000 And now they're investigating Trump, trying to undermine its credibility.

00:17:49.000 They're making a broader play for a coup.

00:17:52.000 And this is what we are going to see happen.

00:17:54.000 This is what's unfolding right now. 0.99

00:17:56.000 Why hasn't Hillary Clinton gone away? 1.00

00:17:59.000 Why did she publish a book? 1.00

00:18:00.000 Why is she on tour?

00:18:02.000 Why is she talking about running again?

00:18:04.000 Why is she not faded away into obscurity?

00:18:06.000 Why is the special counsel still going on, even though they have nothing?

00:18:10.000 Even though a year in, the only charges that have been brought forward are against Paul Manafort and Rick Gates and for financial crimes that happened four years ago that were put away because there were no crimes at all.

00:18:22.000 And not only that, but were committed in relevance, in pertinence to Ukraine and not Russia anyway.

00:18:29.000 And that's.

00:18:30.000 The whole point of the special counsel.

00:18:31.000 Why is it still going on?

00:18:33.000 The reason is because Hillary Clinton, Barack Obama, John McCain, Lindsey Graham, the people that are on top here, the swamp, so to speak, they will be making a play to contest the legitimacy of President Trump.

00:18:49.000 That's what's going on because they'll get the special counsel to fabricate some kind of a case.

00:18:54.000 And their hope is that in the court of public opinion, people will side, enough people will side with the Democrats.

00:19:02.000 And say, I don't recognize the president as legitimate.

00:19:06.000 I recognize the judiciary and the Congress and the intelligence community.

00:19:11.000 I recognize the system essentially as sovereign.

00:19:13.000 And so, what you have going on at this deep level is a war between our democratically elected civilian president and the deep state, which has been controlling policy for 50 years essentially, which has been guiding the ship.

00:19:28.000 And you have, you know, slight minor adjustments in our trajectory, in our course.

00:19:34.000 But the deep state makes sure that we essentially stay on the same path no matter what.

00:19:39.000 And so, right now, what the deep state is attempting to do is to get enough people to say they are the rightful rulers of the country. 0.67

00:19:46.000 I don't care that Hillary Clinton didn't win according to the Constitution.

00:19:49.000 I don't care that there's no real basis to impeach Donald Trump.

00:19:53.000 I don't care if we don't have the votes in Congress.

00:19:55.000 We're going to get this guy out.

00:19:57.000 And if enough people support that, then they can win a civil war.

00:20:01.000 And these are the morbid calculations that are going on.

00:20:04.000 And the minds of people who have a lot to lose right now.

00:20:09.000 So that's the memo.

00:20:11.000 Of course, this also comes today, this afternoon, with the deputy director of the FBI, Andrew McCabe, resigning.

00:20:19.000 And the reason being is because he was named in this memo as being pretty complicit in what went on in the construction of the dossier, in the weaponization of it by the special counsel and by other forces in the Obama administration.

00:20:33.000 So he resigned this morning.

00:20:34.000 He was set to retire on March 17th.

00:20:38.000 He retired a little bit early in anticipation.

00:20:40.000 I guess he got wind.

00:20:41.000 That this memo would come out and he would be named in it.

00:20:44.000 He would, of course, be indicted by this.

00:20:46.000 And so he resigned.

00:20:47.000 I think that gives us kind of an idea, a signal of the gravity of what to expect tonight.

00:20:53.000 And then also, we heard that Republican lawmakers in the House Oversight Committee are launching an investigation into the Department of Justice and the FBI.

00:21:03.000 And if you recall, this, we heard rumors about this.

00:21:06.000 We had an inkling of this in December when Representative Nunes, or excuse me, earlier in January.

00:21:12.000 When Representative Nunes issued that letter to the FBI and to the Attorney General to say, you need to turn over the documents and the witnesses to substantiate the Trump dossier, and they didn't meet that deadline.

00:21:25.000 That happened on Wednesday.

00:21:26.000 I changed my calendar to February, so I don't have it as clean, but I believe that happened on maybe three or four Wednesdays ago.

00:21:34.000 And so this has been ongoing, this investigation by Republican lawmakers into the special counsel, into the Department of Justice, and into the FBI, because They're over here trying to perform their oversight function, trying to make sure that everybody's playing by the rules.

00:21:49.000 And it's becoming apparent that this special counsel with Rob Mueller, not only is it exceeding the scope of what it was intended to do in the sense that they were put together by the deputy attorney general.

00:22:01.000 The whole reason that Robert Mueller's out there looking through documents and has the authority that he does is because Rod Rosenstein says, look into Russian hacking in the 2016 election.

00:22:12.000 Well, Bob Mueller said, yeah, that's nice.

00:22:15.000 I'm going to look into Paul Manafort's financial history and George Papadopoulos and Rick Gates, and I'm going to bring charges against this guy and that guy.

00:22:22.000 And he's vastly exceeding the scope of the original investigation.

00:22:25.000 That's number one.

00:22:27.000 And then number two, what they're finding in their oversight function is that Rod Rosenstein, in the first place, didn't have the authority to elect the special counsel because it was built on such flimsy evidence.

00:22:39.000 So, some major developments we have the memo, the investigation, McCabe resigning, looking like a big storm, looking like a big.

00:22:47.000 Stuff storm is coming our way.

00:22:49.000 It's about to hit the fan in a big way.

00:22:52.000 And we'll really get an idea of this as we move towards March and April when we see the OIG report and see really the extent of what's going on, how much of it is true, how much of it is rumor.

00:23:04.000 And I have a strong feeling that you're going to see because you're going to see people go away here.

00:23:09.000 You're going to see serious stuff because there are too many coincidences.

00:23:14.000 There are too many weird things going on.

00:23:16.000 And this is admittedly more speculative, this is a little bit less empirical.

00:23:21.000 But there's weird stuff going on.

00:23:23.000 And we've been talking about it for a long time.

00:23:26.000 But in the midst of all this, you could dismiss all this wild speculation.

00:23:30.000 And you could say, oh, it's all overblown.

00:23:32.000 It's all overhyped.

00:23:33.000 Okay, well, then where's Barack Obama?

00:23:35.000 Where's Hillary Clinton?

00:23:36.000 When was Barack Obama's last public appearance?

00:23:38.000 Hillary Clinton, she disappears for the longest time.

00:23:41.000 She comes back during the Grammys.

00:23:43.000 House fire in her home.

00:23:45.000 You have people connected to her who built the Clinton Library dying in a plane crash.

00:23:49.000 You have people that worked with James Comey dying in a mysterious plane crash.

00:23:53.000 You have these massive outages at major airports in the span of 60 days in Atlanta, New Orleans, customs computers going down across the country.

00:24:04.000 You have Barack Obama following, or rather, he's going to all these foreign countries before President Trump.

00:24:09.000 Before President Trump goes to Europe, Barack Obama's there.

00:24:12.000 Before he goes to South Korea, Barack Obama's there.

00:24:14.000 Why is he going there?

00:24:16.000 What's the tour?

00:24:18.000 Why is he going there?

00:24:19.000 John McCain, he's got the boot on one foot.

00:24:21.000 The next day, he's got the boot on the other foot.

00:24:23.000 Hillary Clinton, she goes to England for her book tour.

00:24:26.000 She has to cut it short because she stubs her toe a little bit.

00:24:28.000 She comes back with a boot, too.

00:24:30.000 There's a lot of fishy stuff.

00:24:32.000 It sounds a little bit wacky.

00:24:34.000 I know it sounds out there, I know it sounds very speculative.

00:24:37.000 But you only see these kinds of strange occurrences with such frequency and such high concentration in a short amount of time when movements are being made behind the scenes.

00:24:48.000 It's sort of like, remember, in Interstellar, you know, our boomers are not going to get this reference.

00:24:53.000 Only my strong Christopher Nolan fans here are going to get this reference.

00:24:57.000 But in Interstellar, what happens is, I don't know the science of it.

00:25:01.000 You know, I'm not a science guy.

00:25:02.000 You know, this is not my experience, this is not my aptitude.

00:25:06.000 But Matthew McConaughey, He's receiving messages from his daughter, who is in the 10th dimension, but she's sending out these signals using gravity to knock stuff around in his room.

00:25:18.000 And that's essentially what we have going on here, where you have all this stuff going on in the 10th dimension.

00:25:24.000 You have all this stuff going on with the Intelligence Committee and the Oversight Committee and the FBI and the FISA warrants and the Deep State.

00:25:32.000 And all of this is going on, and people are being killed and all the documents, everything.

00:25:38.000 Real bad stuff going on here.

00:25:39.000 Down here, we only hear like little murmurs of it.

00:25:42.000 We only see a little bit of stuff coming down from the ceiling, a little bit of debris.

00:25:47.000 We only hear a little bit of rumbling.

00:25:48.000 And that's what we see when we see these weird occurrences because there's really no other way to explain it, I don't think, in the context of what's going on more broadly in the country.

00:25:57.000 So that's our memo.

00:25:59.000 We'll see how it plays out.

00:26:00.000 We'll see how devastating it is.

00:26:03.000 We've been pretty disappointed in terms of happenings these past couple of years.

00:26:08.000 There's a lot of hype about a lot of things, and then usually it just kind of blows over.

00:26:11.000 But we'll see.

00:26:12.000 I have a strong feeling that we're going to see something here.

00:26:15.000 So that's that.

00:26:17.000 The other thing I wanted to get to was DACA.

00:26:20.000 Sweet DACA proven right again here.

00:26:23.000 We are coming to you live. 0.89

00:26:25.000 Again, I had to ship all my parts to Vindication City here.

00:26:30.000 I had to get my CPU, my GPU, my memory, my core gigawatt Jing Chong processor, Bing Bong Zoom processor, and the elemental circuit board mother overdrive.

00:26:45.000 Had to get it all shipped over to Vindication City because I was right again on DACA.

00:26:50.000 Don't mean to toot my own horn, but fresh off of a big win, a big major prediction, I said, Yeah, and here's how the negotiations are going to play out. 0.52

00:27:00.000 And there it is.

00:27:01.000 So remember last week, we got wind from a conference call.

00:27:06.000 We heard that there was a conference call between Stephen Miller and Republican and Democratic lawmakers, and that they agreed to a framework on a DACA fix, which would be 1.8%.

00:27:18.000 Million dreamers, which is the childhood arrivals, not eligible for DACA, but just the childhood arrivals, which hypothetically could be eligible.

00:27:29.000 Amnesty for all 1.8 million of those in exchange for $25 billion in wall funding.

00:27:35.000 Amnesty for 1.8 million immigrants in 10 years in exchange for the wall funding.

00:27:40.000 And everybody said, and also diversity visa and chain migration.

00:27:44.000 And everybody said, this is a terrible deal.

00:27:46.000 Everybody said, Nick, is it still four dimensional chess?

00:27:50.000 And I said, I said, watch what happens next.

00:27:50.000 Nick, what's going on?

00:27:53.000 I said, Chuck Schumer will shoot this down.

00:27:56.000 The Republicans will shoot this down.

00:27:58.000 This is more framing.

00:28:00.000 I said this.

00:28:02.000 I said this last week.

00:28:03.000 This is more framing to illustrate the fact that even if Trump doubles the amount of people that he would give protection, and not only gives them protection, but gives them amnesty, and he gives them a sweet deal, in his own words, a deal they couldn't turn down, a liberal deal, and they still turned it down.

00:28:21.000 Well, then he frames it as when the government shuts down again, or if it shuts down again, if they don't concede to Trump on everything he wants, and I don't think they will, when the government shuts down again, They will be blamed again and they will pay dearly for it in the midterms.

00:28:36.000 They will pay dearly for it among their far left base and, more importantly, among the people in the middle.

00:28:42.000 And I tweeted a little bit about this last night.

00:28:45.000 I got into why this is so effective.

00:28:48.000 People might say Trump's approval ratings are not good, government shutdowns are not good for the president.

00:28:53.000 It looks like he can't handle his position.

00:28:56.000 And there is credence to this idea.

00:28:58.000 Of course, he will get a lot of the flack too.

00:29:02.000 And Democrats will get blame.

00:29:03.000 I think Democrats will get more of the blame.

00:29:05.000 I think absolutely they'll take the brunt of it.

00:29:08.000 And even CNN acknowledged this when the government shutdown resolved itself last Monday.

00:29:13.000 They said Donald Trump won this unequivocally.

00:29:16.000 He forced them to cave and he won.

00:29:18.000 So the media recognizes this.

00:29:19.000 But of course, people will say Donald Trump and Republicans bear some responsibility too.

00:29:24.000 And that's true.

00:29:25.000 The difference is Donald Trump has a lot less to lose than the Democrats.

00:29:30.000 This is the real genius of the play.

00:29:31.000 And I illustrated this.

00:29:33.000 The other week, with the map of which seats were open in the Senate come 2018, where you have 24 Senate Democrats and it's 22 Democrats and two independents that are up for re election in the Senate in 2018, compared to only eight Republicans.

00:29:50.000 And four of those are safe.

00:29:51.000 So you have realistically about four Republican seats that are up for grabs and something like 14 or 15 Democrat seats that are up for grabs.

00:29:59.000 So even if it's a 50 50 split, even if they blame both sides, if both sides get their incumbents swap out in 2018 in the contested states because People are upset about government shutdowns.

00:30:10.000 Republicans lose four, but they gain 15.

00:30:13.000 If you have it that people are blaming both parties and whoever it is, they blame their incumbent.

00:30:19.000 Say you're in Montana and you blame the Democratic incumbent.

00:30:23.000 Or say you're in a state where it's a Republican incumbent and you blame the Republican.

00:30:27.000 Well, if they just get switched out, if the combined 19 or 20 or so people in contested states are simply swapped out for a challenger, like I said, you lose four Republicans, you gain 15.

00:30:40.000 15, you're rather you lose the four Republican seats, but you gain the 15 or so Democratic seats.

00:30:45.000 And so, not only do you have that, not only do you have that playing on in the midterms, but more broadly, in terms of credibility, in terms of legitimacy, you have to understand what we mean when we talk about liberal media.

00:30:58.000 You have to understand what we mean when we say that the left and the liberals have this monopoly on power in media, in Hollywood, in the culture at large.

00:31:07.000 What we mean by that is that the left wing paradigm and narrative is.

00:31:13.000 Is the standard, it's the starting, the default position for most people.

00:31:17.000 The left wing values, the left wing positions, the platform, this is perceived as the starting point, as the middle.

00:31:24.000 You know, you go on television, and it's no coincidence that you get these kinds of spineless conservatives and Republicans who go on television and they try to convince everybody that the Republicans are more liberal than the Democrats.

00:31:35.000 They try and say, oh, no, no, no, the Democrats are the real racist, the Democrats are the real party of the KKK, and this happens because.

00:31:44.000 We all intuitively understand that we're operating within the left wing paradigm.

00:31:47.000 It's very different, and we all know this, arguing as a Republican than as a Democrat.

00:31:52.000 A Democrat doesn't have to really defend a whole lot.

00:31:55.000 A Democrat doesn't really have to go out and defend a lot of these highly debatable points that they have about American history, about how the system functions.

00:32:04.000 We understand that these things are basically taken for granted because you're going to get slammed by the media.

00:32:09.000 You know, slavery is a big one.

00:32:11.000 Even though like 3% of white people ever own slaves, it's a given that slavery is the bludgeon that they will use.

00:32:18.000 And you just kind of have to deal with that as a Republican.

00:32:21.000 Well, when you talk about how much credibility and legitimacy the media and the left has in this country, that they control the paradigm and the narrative essentially.

00:32:30.000 And I tweeted about this yesterday.

00:32:32.000 When they lose their legitimacy, when they are forced to defend this gross, artificial, excessive liberal system, they are at a real weakness here.

00:32:43.000 Whereas all Trump has to do is punch it and poke holes in it and make fun of it and get people essentially simply to doubt it.

00:32:50.000 Just get people to start saying, these guys don't know what they're doing.

00:32:54.000 And even some of the left wing people, but more importantly, the moderates, saying, this is the Democrats are not unified.

00:33:02.000 The Democrats are not who they say they are.

00:33:04.000 The CNN is not moderate.

00:33:06.000 They're not centrist.

00:33:07.000 They're full of it just like the other guys.

00:33:09.000 And it doesn't matter that the Republicans are getting lumped in with them.

00:33:12.000 They don't have anything to lose, they don't have any institutional power to lose.

00:33:16.000 The Republican base is still there because we're anti establishment.

00:33:19.000 And so we're saying, you know, that's a liberal smear.

00:33:22.000 Fox News is great.

00:33:23.000 Donald Trump is great.

00:33:25.000 But the people in the middle and on the left, when they see this happening, are saying, wait a minute.

00:33:30.000 Barack Obama was a war criminal.

00:33:32.000 This guy was spying on people. 0.95

00:33:34.000 CNN, I used to think that was the centrist one.

00:33:36.000 I used to think that was the moderate one.

00:33:38.000 Now it looks like they're very partisan.

00:33:40.000 I used to think the Democrats were out there talking about pro choice and pro this and pro that. 0.87

00:33:45.000 But now I see that they're just a bunch of con men, just like the other guys.

00:33:49.000 And so if you look at it like this, that the Democrats are all the way up here and the Republicans are down here, Republicans don't have much to lose.

00:33:56.000 Democrats get brought all the way down.

00:33:59.000 And so that's the genius of this play.

00:34:00.000 Even if you might say Trump is paying a price, Trump is losing a little bit, it doesn't matter so much.

00:34:06.000 It's a war of attrition, essentially.

00:34:06.000 It doesn't matter.

00:34:08.000 It's an asymmetrical war where we're picking them off.

00:34:11.000 They have a lot more area to defend.

00:34:14.000 They have a lot of nonsense to defend, and they're spread too thin.

00:34:19.000 So that's DACA.

00:34:20.000 And President Trump tweeted on Friday, he tweeted confirming this, back to the original point of him putting this out there essentially to prove that Democrats were just conning the Republicans, were just using DACA to obstruct and to impede the progress of this administration.

00:34:37.000 He tweeted on Friday, essentially confirming this.

00:34:39.000 He said, There were two reasons why I put forward this DACA proposition, which many people are surprised about.

00:34:45.000 He said, number one, I want a long term fix on this.

00:34:48.000 And that's to maintain his sincerity, to say, I'm not a con man.

00:34:51.000 I was really looking for a compromise here.

00:34:54.000 But number two, then he said, it was also to illustrate that the Democrats are insincere.

00:34:59.000 It was to illustrate that even if I give the Democrats double the amount of DACA recipients or double the amount of dreamers that I was talking about before and give them amnesty and give them a very sweet deal.

00:35:11.000 They still rejected it.

00:35:12.000 A liberal plan, even as acknowledged by left wing people in media.

00:35:17.000 And they still rejected it because they fundamentally don't care.

00:35:20.000 And so he has now pushed, he has sufficiently, convincingly, and persuasively pushed the responsibility of the previous and any future government shutdown onto the Democrats.

00:35:32.000 And we'll see that play out February 8th when the government runs out of money again.

00:35:37.000 And that may go on until March 5th when DACA expires.

00:35:41.000 And that will be a very rough day for the Democrats.

00:35:43.000 So that's DACA.

00:35:45.000 And then the last thing we wanted to talk about, I don't know if we really should get into this too much, but it is worth mentioning.

00:35:54.000 It is worth mentioning that this morning, very disheartened to see this, but Paul Nealon, and we love him.

00:36:00.000 We've had him on the show.

00:36:01.000 He's a great friend of the show.

00:36:04.000 He appeared on the David Duke show, the David Duke radio show this morning.

00:36:09.000 And you know, look, I know some people are fans of David Duke who watch the show, and we're big fans.

00:36:15.000 We love Paul Nealon, but we understand the optics question, we understand the OQ, optics question, aesthetics, connotations.

00:36:26.000 And whatever you think of David Duke, maybe you think he writes good books.

00:36:29.000 Maybe you think he has a good point.

00:36:31.000 In an ideal world, you could say it is desirable that we could have David Duke on the show, sit down at a round table, and we could just discuss ideas with no baggage, with no media smear, without looking like anything other than what you are.

00:36:50.000 In an ideal world, you could say he was in the KKK, but he was in the KKK 40 years ago.

00:36:56.000 And we all made mistakes 40 years ago. 0.57

00:36:58.000 In an ideal world, we could say that.

00:37:00.000 In an ideal world, we could brush that off, but unfortunately, we don't live in an ideal world.

00:37:05.000 We live in the real world.

00:37:06.000 And so to see Paul Nealon go on the David Duke show, it's pretty rough.

00:37:11.000 And we'll see what happens.

00:37:14.000 You know, I'm still in Paul Nealon's corner, and we'll see what happens.

00:37:19.000 We'll see what comes of this.

00:37:20.000 I hope this doesn't get too much media attention.

00:37:22.000 I hope this doesn't become an issue, but you just got to really be careful.

00:37:26.000 And I guess this is a testament to what he's doing.

00:37:31.000 In the sense that he's out there exploring.

00:37:33.000 He's out there as a frontiersman, pioneering, and mistakes will be made.

00:37:37.000 Mistakes will be made.

00:37:39.000 And so I think, despite that, despite the fact that I see this as a miscalculation, despite the fact that I think this is kind of one of the last things that I would have done in his position, I still think it's a learning opportunity, and I don't think we should totally throw it out just yet.

00:37:55.000 I don't think it's totally beyond repair, but I mean, this is just simply not good.

00:38:00.000 And here's why.

00:38:01.000 Here's the why.

00:38:02.000 They call us Nazis.

00:38:04.000 They call us the KKK.

00:38:06.000 And many people in this movement say, well, then we ought to just be comfortable with that.

00:38:11.000 We ought to just be comfortable with being associated with the Nazis and the KKK.

00:38:16.000 I'm not a Nazi.

00:38:17.000 I am not a Klansman, you know?

00:38:19.000 And I don't even say that so much to appeal to the left, but just to make this objective distinction for people that watch this show and who are genuinely curious.

00:38:28.000 I'm not a National Socialist.

00:38:30.000 I don't believe the KKK was a positive force.

00:38:33.000 The KKK was anti Catholic.

00:38:35.000 I'm Catholic.

00:38:35.000 The KKK was anti Italian.

00:38:39.000 So when I say that, I don't say that to pander or to appeal.

00:38:43.000 I don't say that in response to an accusation.

00:38:46.000 I say that in the sense that it's not the same.

00:38:49.000 They may say it's the same and they can say what they want, but it's not the same.

00:38:53.000 And there are people in the movement who say, well, that's an arbitrary distinction.

00:38:57.000 This distance between the undesirables and a pretty moderate and reasonable right wing position, it's pretty arbitrary because they're going to call you what they're going to call you anyway.

00:39:06.000 And I think that's.

00:39:07.000 I think that's bull.

00:39:08.000 I think there is a real hunger in this country for a real right wing.

00:39:13.000 There's a real hunger, a real appetite out there for a real solid right wing.

00:39:18.000 One that is anti immigration, one that is pro tradition, one that is pro God, one that's anti war, that wants to lower taxes, that wants to see our economy grow.

00:39:29.000 There is a real hunger for that in this country, for that kind of a right wing.

00:39:33.000 The right wing that we have now is no right wing, it's right of Karl Marx.

00:39:37.000 Relatively speaking, but this is not a right wing.

00:39:40.000 And people, I think, saw in Donald Trump, they were anticipated a real right wing. 0.99

00:39:45.000 Somebody went out there and said, you know what, we don't want illegal immigrants.

00:39:49.000 We want the rule of law.

00:39:51.000 We don't really care so much about a lot of the stuff that's going on with stop and frisk and the civil liberties.

00:39:56.000 We want law and order.

00:39:58.000 That's a pretty right wing proposal. 1.00

00:40:00.000 We don't want all this gender bending queer stuff. 1.00

00:40:03.000 We want somebody to affirm that biology and sociology exists, it's real. 1.00

00:40:11.000 And there's a real hunger for that.

00:40:13.000 And when you attach yourself to people's worst expectations of what that is, I mean, you talk about.

00:40:19.000 Quote unquote white nationalism.

00:40:20.000 And what do you think of?

00:40:21.000 You ask any boomer, you ask any millennial, any young person, what do you think of?

00:40:25.000 What do you think of when you hear white nationalist?

00:40:27.000 And I'm not talking about people in the movement who might think of, you know, a cool Depeche Mode song or might think of their Fashway video on YouTube, which is very cutesy.

00:40:37.000 Most people are going to think of skinheads, they're going to think of people with shaved heads, punk rock, blowing stuff up, they're going to think of, you know, the neo Nazi archetype.

00:40:49.000 And it just simply does not help.

00:40:52.000 When you are affiliated with people who were a part of that kind of a thing or who were seen as associated with that kind of a thing.

00:40:59.000 And that's not a dig.

00:41:00.000 That's not to say there's any truth to it.

00:41:02.000 That's not to say that that's fair. 0.99

00:41:04.000 It's so not fair and it sucks. 0.96

00:41:07.000 In an ideal world, like I said, in an ideal world, I'm with you. 0.96

00:41:11.000 I wish it weren't that way.

00:41:13.000 I really do.

00:41:14.000 I wish we could consider people's ideas and not what the media would smear them as, but that's just not where we live.

00:41:21.000 And so if you had Paul Nealon going out there and saying, End immigration, no free trade, people would love that.

00:41:29.000 If you had him saying end immigration, no free trade, and there's some skepticism about certain elements in the government and in the media, people might say, I'm willing to let that go.

00:41:38.000 And maybe I'd be open to that in the future, but I'm still on board.

00:41:42.000 Well, when he comes out there and he says this stuff about Jewish people, and then also I was on David Duke, and that's what's going to be in the newspapers and in the media, then people go, okay, all right, I'm off.

00:41:54.000 That's not me.

00:41:55.000 But that is a lot of voters.

00:41:57.000 That is a lot of people.

00:41:58.000 And that's one of the challenges when you're running an informative campaign like that, when you're running an educational campaign, you have to understand that the purity of the message stands before everything else.

00:42:09.000 And when you start thinking about, I don't want to hurt people's feelings, I don't want to offend people, I don't want to snub somebody, all of that is secondary to the message.

00:42:18.000 You are a vessel for a message.

00:42:20.000 And if something is going to damage the receptiveness of that message, if something is going to damage the effectiveness, the persuasiveness of that message, Get it out.

00:42:29.000 It has no business.

00:42:30.000 And I think that's one of those things.

00:42:31.000 It damages the persuasiveness of the message.

00:42:34.000 It grounds it in something that fulfills or satisfies people's worst expectations.

00:42:40.000 And, you know, we're still with Paul Nealon.

00:42:43.000 But I just think that's an unfortunate thing.

00:42:45.000 And I got to wonder who's advising.

00:42:47.000 Who's advising here?

00:42:49.000 Right?

00:42:50.000 It's just a tough thing.

00:42:51.000 But I think he can recover.

00:42:53.000 I think he can recover from this.

00:42:55.000 You know, it's a different time now.

00:42:55.000 We'll see.

00:42:58.000 Obviously, it's 2018, and things are already pretty wild, and we've had Donald Trump.

00:43:02.000 But.

00:43:04.000 Who knows?

00:43:05.000 It remains to be seen how much the media still governs public opinion.

00:43:09.000 And I certainly think there's time for this to be forgotten, for this to go away.

00:43:14.000 And he's independent.

00:43:14.000 He's got a pretty solid base.

00:43:16.000 And we'll see what happens.

00:43:17.000 I think it's definitely still worth looking at.

00:43:20.000 But it's just one of those things where I'm sure people egged him on.

00:43:24.000 I'm sure people forced him into this.

00:43:26.000 And that was very irresponsible for them to do.

00:43:29.000 Right?

00:43:30.000 So, but that's Neil and that's David Duke.

00:43:34.000 It's.

00:43:36.000 And we'll see what happens.

00:43:37.000 We'll see what happens with that.

00:43:38.000 I'm still rooting for him. 1.00

00:43:40.000 We still want an end to immigration. 1.00

00:43:41.000 We still want an end to free trade. 0.62

00:43:43.000 And for that, you know, Paul Nealon is still the candidate.

00:43:46.000 And people just got to ask themselves that.

00:43:48.000 Do we want Paul Ryan or do we want, and look at it from the policy perspective?

00:43:52.000 Do we want the TPP?

00:43:53.000 Do we want open borders?

00:43:55.000 Do we want war in Iran or do we want none of that?

00:43:58.000 I don't care who he's on the radio show with in terms of my, in terms of if I'm a Wisconsin voter, that doesn't enter into my head.

00:44:05.000 But I think of the other voters who, that might be an issue for them.

00:44:09.000 But so that's the news of the day.

00:44:11.000 Those are our stories.

00:44:12.000 Let's take a look at our super chats here.

00:44:15.000 And we'll see what is being said, what we got going on here.

00:44:20.000 We got Martin Barnsley who says, Good evening, Nick.

00:44:23.000 Is Martin Luther still in purgatory?

00:44:25.000 You know, it's not really within my competence to judge who ends up where in the faith.

00:44:32.000 Martin Luther is fulfilling part of God's plan, right?

00:44:36.000 I think the idea that Martin Luther could thwart God's plan is, you know, kind of insulting.

00:44:41.000 You know, you imagine you're the superior, you're the supreme being, and nothing moves, literally, nothing moves in a philosophical sense of move, meaning.

00:44:50.000 Change in any way without your go-ahead, without pure actuality there to actualize things.

00:44:57.000 And you imagine that, oh, you know, some German guy, some German priest, he put a stop to all of that.

00:45:03.000 I think that Martin Luther was part of the plan, and this was a very devout person.

00:45:07.000 You have to understand that, although, in my estimation, he did tremendous damage to the faith by opening up the door to this relativism, this universalist stuff, people free to interpret the Bible however they want.

00:45:20.000 This was a very devout man in his time in 1518 or 1517, when he went about this and he nailed the 95 theses to the door.

00:45:29.000 He was probably more in line with what the Bible said, more in line with what Christianity historically was than the Catholic Church at the time.

00:45:36.000 I think you could make that case.

00:45:38.000 I think you could make that case.

00:45:39.000 The problem is that there was no mechanism in place to sustain that kind of Christianity.

00:45:45.000 He might have been very devout, and he was certainly a learned man.

00:45:49.000 He knew all kinds of languages.

00:45:50.000 He was a true scholar, a true scholar in every sense of the word, of the faith.

00:45:55.000 But the problem is, in principle, there was no mechanism that was there to maintain the integrity of that.

00:46:03.000 Whereas the church can go astray at times because it's led by imperfect men.

00:46:09.000 Number one, the church can never err because it's led by Jesus Christ.

00:46:12.000 But number two, you have the clergy, you have a hierarchy, you have a system in place where there is one authority, there is a tradition of how things are done.

00:46:21.000 And that's why there hasn't been wild deviation from how it's been going pretty much for 2,000 years.

00:46:27.000 With Protestantism, it might have started off with a really pure guy, but in the absence of the clergy, in the absence of a repository institution, of any kind of mechanism to withstand the integrity of the interpretation in 1517, it's gone wildly.

00:46:43.000 It's all over the place.

00:46:44.000 And now you have people running around the churches screaming and yelling, and they're fainting. 0.96

00:46:49.000 And you have gay marriages going on in the churches. 0.99

00:46:52.000 You have all these Christians for abortions. 0.99

00:46:54.000 You have all these other wild things going on. 1.00

00:46:57.000 You have people in Latin America. 1.00

00:46:59.000 You have people in Africa, these folk. 1.00

00:47:01.000 Religions abusing it, and this is the problem. 1.00

00:47:05.000 So let's see. 1.00

00:47:07.000 Bennett's Bressman.

00:47:08.000 Nick, people say they don't believe the fake news media, yet they black pill after seeing one DACA headline.

00:47:14.000 They still hold faith. 0.99

00:47:15.000 Foolish. 0.99

00:47:16.000 Well, exactly. 0.99

00:47:17.000 That was my contention a couple of weeks ago, which is that people will talk all day long about how the media is corrupt, the media is owned by a certain group of people who hate us, they're owned by this rootless transnational elite of rich people, and They're out to get us.

00:47:35.000 And then they see The Hill. 0.95

00:47:36.000 The Hill says, Donald Trump cuck on immigration. 0.99

00:47:38.000 They say, The Hill said Donald Trump is cucking. 1.00

00:47:41.000 Burn your MAGA hats, smash your monitors, destroy everything. 0.99

00:47:46.000 Electoral politics is out. 0.99

00:47:48.000 Siege now.

00:47:49.000 You know, and you're exactly right.

00:47:51.000 You're exactly right.

00:47:53.000 There's no conscientiousness there. 1.00

00:47:56.000 Carl Ritzenthaler, best way to deal with trannies is Einsatzgruppen. 1.00

00:48:01.000 I don't know what that means. 1.00

00:48:02.000 I don't speak German.

00:48:05.000 I can only assume where that might originate from.

00:48:09.000 So that's an unfortunate soundbite, maybe.

00:48:12.000 I don't speak it.

00:48:12.000 I don't know, though.

00:48:13.000 So.

00:48:14.000 We got Raging Papist with a single shackle. 0.59

00:48:19.000 Thank you, my man. 0.87

00:48:20.000 Barry, how's the new computer?

00:48:22.000 What CPU did you end up buying?

00:48:24.000 Dude, I don't know.

00:48:25.000 The only box I kept was my power supply.

00:48:28.000 I don't know what CPU.

00:48:29.000 It was an ASROC 580, I want to say.

00:48:35.000 I don't know.

00:48:38.000 Somebody sent me a list.

00:48:38.000 I don't know.

00:48:40.000 I sent it around to a couple of other people.

00:48:42.000 I purchased the parts, I put the parts together.

00:48:46.000 This is the extent of my involvement.

00:48:51.000 Carl Ritzendiller, what are your thoughts on Ernst Zundel?

00:48:54.000 Hail Nick.

00:48:55.000 I don't know who that is.

00:48:57.000 I don't know who that is.

00:48:58.000 I don't think about that person too much.

00:49:00.000 Carl M., the feel when no GF.

00:49:03.000 I feel you, brother.

00:49:04.000 I feel you, my man.

00:49:06.000 It's a rough one.

00:49:07.000 I was hitting the late night sad jams on late night, early morning sad jams on Sunday.

00:49:13.000 Rediscovered the killers.

00:49:15.000 Paul Town was posting about them, and I completely forgot.

00:49:18.000 I went through a big killers phase when I was in middle school.

00:49:21.000 And I totally forgot.

00:49:22.000 It's one of those things where, and I'm sure many Generation Z, late Generation Z, or excuse me, early Generation Z, late millennials can relate to this, where you kind of lose some things on the transition between devices.

00:49:34.000 Like I had on my iPod Nano, my blue iPod Nano from years ago, I had all my music on there.

00:49:41.000 And then when you transfer over to the other thing, some things get lost.

00:49:44.000 When you transfer over from buying every song for $1 to Spotify, you know, you lose some things.

00:49:52.000 And so I totally forgot about The Killers.

00:49:54.000 I totally forgot about Samstown and some of these other songs and albums.

00:49:59.000 And so I was hitting them pretty hard last night.

00:50:02.000 Pretty nostalgic, wistful posting last night.

00:50:05.000 Matt Williams, Nick, how do we get men to stop wasting time and their souls from the porn menace?

00:50:12.000 There are millions of hours of free porn available that could be torrented even with a ban.

00:50:17.000 We need God.

00:50:18.000 Well, and this is my problem with legalism.

00:50:20.000 This is my problem with people who say, just make it illegal.

00:50:24.000 The problem is, in some cases, you exacerbate the problem when you make it illegal. 0.97

00:50:28.000 And I know people might say that's like shit to your libertarian logic, like the prohibition argument. 0.82

00:50:34.000 Really, it's not the case. 0.99

00:50:36.000 If people want porn, people are going to acquire porn.

00:50:38.000 Porn is illegal in China.

00:50:40.000 Porn is illegal in South Korea. 0.78

00:50:42.000 Porn is illegal in Japan.

00:50:43.000 Do you think there's any shortage of porn in any of these places? 0.54

00:50:47.000 Do you think they're not getting their pornography in South Korea? 0.67

00:50:51.000 And that's why legalism, it could be part of the solution. 0.78

00:50:54.000 I think it could be a big.

00:50:55.000 I think we could look at some of Russia's laws on pornography and maybe take an example off of those where we can put in place restrictions and we can make it more difficult, but you're never going to succeed in your objectives unless you change the culture.

00:50:55.000 Part of it.

00:51:10.000 You know, think of this we have all these people, and this is a major presupposition that people don't even think about.

00:51:18.000 People think systematically, which is a big problem.

00:51:21.000 I don't know if this is a Western thing, I don't know if this is a liberal thing, I don't know if this is a modernist thing, but people think in terms of systems.

00:51:28.000 You have a problem X. How do we use government?

00:51:32.000 How do we use the state?

00:51:33.000 How do we use a private entity?

00:51:35.000 How do we use some kind of a corporate faction to eliminate this?

00:51:39.000 And this is the wrong way to go about it.

00:51:41.000 You know, the porn problem.

00:51:43.000 How do we get the government to construct sufficient regulations and restrictions and laws?

00:51:48.000 You look at things with the environment.

00:51:50.000 How do we put in place regulations or this and that?

00:51:53.000 Very simple.

00:51:54.000 Here's the alternative have virtuous people.

00:51:58.000 Done.

00:51:58.000 Easy.

00:51:59.000 No system will work if you don't have virtuous people.

00:52:02.000 I don't care how perfect the system is, how calibrated it is to the type of people, how time tested, how many different political theorists you use to construct it.

00:52:12.000 It's only as good as the people that are living within it.

00:52:15.000 It's only as good as the people which constitute the system.

00:52:18.000 So the Constitution functioned a lot better in 1776 because we had responsible people.

00:52:24.000 Because to a much greater degree, we had stable families.

00:52:27.000 We had a basic acceptance.

00:52:29.000 You know, we weren't living in this postmodernist or modernist world where we were questioning logic and reason and biology and these other things.

00:52:37.000 And so that's why the Constitution functioned a lot better.

00:52:40.000 The order, no matter what laws you put in place, will never succeed if the people within it do not have integrity.

00:52:46.000 If the constituent elements do not have integrity.

00:52:49.000 And so the focus should not so much be on passing laws, changing the rules, but making the people stronger, smarter, more wise, more virtuous, more God fearing.

00:53:00.000 And people are so quick to throw out Christianity, even in a utilitarian sense.

00:53:04.000 And I don't like to argue about it from a utilitarian sense because, you know, of course, I believe in it because it's the truth, not because it's helpful for getting stuff and getting material wealth.

00:53:16.000 But I don't think it's coincidental that the divine system has in place these incentives.

00:53:21.000 Which helped to ride our course.

00:53:22.000 I don't think it's a coincidence that the Catholic system really is perfect in the sense that you look at the concept of a judgment.

00:53:29.000 Think of the concept of a final judgment and its impact, its consequence on human behavior.

00:53:34.000 Some people might say, well, even if you believe or don't believe, you can agree that's a good thing.

00:53:39.000 I think that's a testament to the fact that it's the truth, that this is almost a divine system, that this has profound implications and very positive implications for people, that if they believe that in the end, when they die, they are judged, they sit before judgment.

00:53:54.000 Somebody who knows everything, who knows right and wrong, and they're given it.

00:53:59.000 Are they going to go to hell or are they going to go to heaven?

00:54:02.000 That idea, that God fearing idea, is a big part of why people behave themselves.

00:54:07.000 And this is an understanding of human nature.

00:54:09.000 I think that's a big reason why it's the truth.

00:54:12.000 But again, get virtuous people.

00:54:14.000 Get people to start believing in God again.

00:54:17.000 People are afraid of the government, so they'll try and find a way around the law.

00:54:22.000 If they're afraid of getting arrested, they'll find a way to not get arrested.

00:54:25.000 There's no way around God.

00:54:26.000 There's no way around guilt, conscience.

00:54:29.000 You know, if they are imbued with the idea that pornography is morally wrong and there may be a consequence for it, either in this life or the next, well, then people are going to say, I don't want to touch that.

00:54:41.000 That's wrong.

00:54:42.000 It's not wrong because I would, you know, I would get arrested or I'd have to pay a fine.

00:54:46.000 It's wrong because it will damage my eternal soul because God says it's wrong.

00:54:50.000 I could go to hell forever.

00:54:54.000 So, you're right.

00:54:55.000 We need God.

00:54:56.000 That's the way to do it.

00:54:57.000 That's the way to do it. 1.00

00:54:58.000 Get people interested in women again. 1.00

00:55:00.000 Get them in contact with women again. 1.00

00:55:01.000 The problem is, you know, I think women in big measure drive men to pornography because of the way they behave themselves these days. 1.00

00:55:10.000 You know, who would want to go to all the effort, the wine and dine? 1.00

00:55:13.000 You pay, you take them out to dinner, you pay for dinner, you hold open the door, you push open the chair, you knock on the door, you ask the father for you, you go to leaps and bounds and you date and you do all these things.

00:55:25.000 And then one day you find out, oh, you know, she was cheating on you.

00:55:28.000 Then you find out one day. 0.80

00:55:30.000 She doesn't want to have kids.

00:55:31.000 Then you find out one day she doesn't want to get married or she wants to pursue her own career or, you know, she, I don't really feel like it's, you know, and that kind of thing. 0.99

00:55:39.000 These women, they're not holding up their end of the bargain.

00:55:42.000 And I understand that men aren't doing it either. 0.99

00:55:44.000 And it's kind of this what came first, the chicken or the egg. 0.59

00:55:46.000 But both sides have to get back together because we're both, it sucks for both.

00:55:51.000 Both sides are paying a big penalty for this, you know? 0.99

00:55:54.000 Women are out there and they're miserable and they're lonely and they've become these satanic creatures. 1.00

00:56:01.000 I'm talking about modern women, I'm not talking about all women. 1.00

00:56:04.000 They're very fine women.

00:56:05.000 There are very fine women out there. 1.00

00:56:07.000 But these modern women have become these instruments of evil in many cases. 1.00

00:56:12.000 And they're paying a price for it too. 1.00

00:56:14.000 They sleep around.

00:56:15.000 They think they can have it all.

00:56:17.000 They want to have a career and they want to also sleep around like a guy.

00:56:20.000 And then they find out they're 45, ovaries are dried up, no husband, no man is going to look their way, no kids.

00:56:28.000 They got the cats, they got the dogs, they got daytime television.

00:56:28.000 And what are they?

00:56:33.000 And so they're paying a price.

00:56:34.000 And then the men are paying the price.

00:56:35.000 They're in pornography purgatory.

00:56:37.000 So.

00:56:38.000 Get them back together.

00:56:39.000 Get them back together.

00:56:41.000 Set them up.

00:56:41.000 Maybe this is where the government can come in.

00:56:43.000 Set up a mandatory every man a GF program. 0.96

00:56:48.000 Every man a GF.

00:56:49.000 Every man a king.

00:56:51.000 Every man a GF.

00:56:52.000 Every man a trap.

00:56:53.000 Every man a catboy.

00:56:55.000 Every man a Minecraft server. 1.00

00:56:57.000 Let's start a new social welfare program. 0.81

00:56:59.000 Perhaps that's the solution. 0.58

00:57:01.000 A new social engineering program. 1.00

00:57:03.000 Maybe you cut their taxes. 0.98

00:57:04.000 Maybe you.

00:57:05.000 I don't know what you would do.

00:57:06.000 Maybe you do it in public schools and high schools. 0.98

00:57:09.000 You know, imagine if instead of sex ed, instead of. 0.99

00:57:12.000 Vile, satanic, sexual education. 0.76

00:57:16.000 Maybe instead of that, you have EGF time, or rather just regular EGF time, where it's like you get together in the gymnasium and you do speed dating and they force it on you. 0.93

00:57:27.000 And everybody's forced to take a date to the homecoming or the prom.

00:57:30.000 And then you cultivate these relationships.

00:57:32.000 And people are taught, maybe they have a class on this kind of a thing.

00:57:36.000 Who knows?

00:57:37.000 But we have to get in the business of making a society that functions again, that reproduces. 0.98

00:57:43.000 That is harmonious on the fundamental level between the sexes. 0.91

00:57:48.000 And we're both paying a price.

00:57:49.000 And both sides, look, there were fine people on both sides, and also there are problems on both sides, but have to come together.

00:57:57.000 Men, you got to do it.

00:57:59.000 You got to work out.

00:58:00.000 I'm going to start working out this week, finally.

00:58:02.000 I'm getting nagged to death for it.

00:58:04.000 I'm finally going to do it.

00:58:05.000 And the next time you see me, I'll be the ubermensch.

00:58:07.000 I'll be 250 IQ.

00:58:09.000 And also, I will be walking around like this.

00:58:13.000 I'll be walking around, arms extended, just to let everybody know. 0.97

00:58:18.000 And so, men, you got to go to work, get a job, stop being a dummy, you know, stop being a sissy, stop playing video games. 0.95

00:58:26.000 Look, I'm 19. 0.94

00:58:27.000 I got a couple of years on me left.

00:58:28.000 I still have some time to play the video games, but I'm talking about the obsession with it.

00:58:34.000 It's fine maybe for recreation every now and again, but by and large, take up fishing, take up, I don't know, automobile care, who knows, a hobby, start a business, make some money, take care of yourself, go to the gym. 0.99

00:58:47.000 And women, women, Women, you got to be loyal. 0.89

00:58:51.000 You got to save it until marriage. 1.00

00:58:53.000 Newsflash.

00:58:55.000 Nobody wants all of that.

00:58:56.000 All right.

00:58:57.000 No tattoos.

00:58:58.000 Be respectful.

00:58:59.000 Be polite.

00:59:00.000 I don't want to hear any cussing.

00:59:02.000 I hate the cussing. 0.80

00:59:03.000 The cussing, it's one of those things. 0.93

00:59:06.000 And more importantly, most importantly, have the babies, have the kids, rear the kids, bear them, raise them. 0.68

00:59:14.000 That's your job.

00:59:15.000 We'll do our job if you do your job.

00:59:17.000 Look, honey, babe, we'll die in the wars.

00:59:20.000 We have no problem getting blown up by IEDs.

00:59:23.000 We have no problem, excuse me, going on the assembly line and breathing in mercury and asbestos and hammering away and working our fingers to the bone, getting our heads chopped off on these dangerous jobs.

00:59:36.000 We will do all of that.

00:59:37.000 And all you have to do is raise the kids, okay?

00:59:40.000 But that's a big part of it.

00:59:44.000 Ian Weber says It's amazing how similar the censorship of Mosley and the British Union of Fascists in the 1930s and 1940s was.

00:59:55.000 Compared to the censorship we face today, the ones in control don't change.

01:00:00.000 Well, you know, censorship is censorship.

01:00:02.000 You have censorship at all times and all places.

01:00:05.000 The idea that there's never been censorship, that's the anomaly.

01:00:09.000 There's always been, even in this country.

01:00:12.000 The country started off, we kicked off the country in, I believe, what was the year?

01:00:18.000 It was in the, obviously, it was between 1796 and 1800 with the Alien and Sedition Acts under John Adams.

01:00:26.000 We had the suspension of habeas corpus.

01:00:29.000 In the 1860s, we had the Sedition Acts during World War I.

01:00:32.000 We had the Red Scare, two of them, in the 20s and then again in the 50s.

01:00:37.000 And then, of course, the Patriot Act in 2001, which is a funny thing.

01:00:42.000 Did you know that the USA Patriot Act is actually an acronym?

01:00:46.000 This is one of my fun facts.

01:00:49.000 It stands for Uniting and Strengthening America through Providing the Appropriate Tools, like necessary for intercepting and obstructing terrorism.

01:01:01.000 I forget the whole thing.

01:01:02.000 But that's actually USA Patriot is an acronym, and that's most of it, right?

01:01:06.000 Uniting and Strengthening America by Providing, you know, and it's something to that effect.

01:01:13.000 But there's been censorship in all countries in all times, even in this one.

01:01:17.000 So, yeah, I guess it's similar in that regard that it is censorship and it is by similar interests.

01:01:24.000 There was censorship even in the 40s in this country.

01:01:27.000 Right from Wrong says not being with the KKK is not arbitrary to normies.

01:01:32.000 Exactly.

01:01:33.000 And these bozos wanted to march.

01:01:35.000 With the KKK in Tennessee.

01:01:37.000 Remember in Mole Friesboro, or I believe that was the city in Tennessee?

01:01:43.000 It was in.

01:01:44.000 The first one escapes me.

01:01:46.000 It was in Shelbyville, Tennessee, that they did the White Lives Matter rally back in October or November.

01:01:52.000 And they were literally marching with people who had the KKK patch on.

01:01:56.000 And that is not an arbitrary distinction whether the left calls you the KKK or whether you actually march with the KKK.

01:02:04.000 That's a big difference.

01:02:05.000 And I was the biggest proponent saying you can't have that.

01:02:07.000 Mike Enoch doing the Roman salute.

01:02:10.000 Really?

01:02:11.000 It just boggles my mind the lack of maturity, the lack of responsibility in the movement.

01:02:18.000 That's not totally.

01:02:18.000 I think Neilan was pushed in the wrong direction here.

01:02:20.000 But I'm talking more people who know full well what they're doing, and I think they do it intentionally.

01:02:27.000 Blunderbuss, let's buy that Dodge Challenger for the AR Hall of Fame.

01:02:31.000 Let's do it.

01:02:33.000 Forrest says, Nick, can you explain Nazbol to me? 0.67

01:02:37.000 Okay, well, national Bolshevism is sort of this proto fascist ideology. 0.54

01:02:44.000 That was fathered by a man by the name of Alexander Dugin and another man by the name of Linovov, I think his name is.

01:02:52.000 I'm not sure the pronunciation.

01:02:54.000 In the early 1990s in Russia, national Bolshevism essentially posits a flavor of fascism that is not progressive, that is not utopian in the sense that national socialism was.

01:03:13.000 National Bolshevism is much more like the character of Bolshevism in Russia.

01:03:17.000 It's combined with.

01:03:18.000 With Russian nationalism and everything else, without the revolutionary aspect, without the cosmopolitan internationalist element.

01:03:26.000 So it's a lot of this like communist rhetoric stuff, a lot of this stuff here from the alt right, but also combined with this more stable, more conservative, more fascist type.

01:03:37.000 And that's a difficult explanation of it, or rather a short and insufficient explanation of it.

01:03:43.000 But that's basically the gist of it it's kind of like Russian fascism.

01:03:48.000 And so this was founded in the early 1990s by Dugan and this other fella.

01:03:52.000 They founded the National Bolshevik Party.

01:03:54.000 And this has been going on for a good while.

01:03:58.000 For some reason, I got lumped in with it.

01:04:01.000 I don't know why.

01:04:02.000 But when the Trad Thought thing happened, people like James Alsop and others said that the reason people were criticizing Lawrence Southern and Taryn McCarthy on 4chan was because they were a part of a secret club. 0.86

01:04:16.000 They were part of the National Bolsheviks.

01:04:19.000 They were part of a secret club who coordinated this on Discord.

01:04:23.000 People like Sean.

01:04:24.000 People like Paul Town, Beardson, the Irony Bros, they all got together as the National Bolsheviks on Discord and they conspired to go after Lauren Southern and these other women on 4chan in order to divide the movement, in order to destroy the movement from within.

01:04:44.000 In their calculation, Lauren Southern was very prominent and very important, so they wanted to take her down because the National Bolsheviks wanted to accelerate the end of the alt right to give way to a new movement and a new country.

01:04:58.000 And that was the accusation that I was aiding and abetting this conspiracy.

01:05:03.000 And the reason why it was funny is because the founder of NOSBL, Alexander Dugan, is a very good friend of Richard Spencer's and a very good friend of Richard Spencer's wife, by the way, as well.

01:05:13.000 Nina Byzantina, which is her pseudonym, she publishes, or rather, she translates books by Alexander Dugan.

01:05:20.000 She is a Russian nationalist, even though she lives in America.

01:05:24.000 She's married to Spencer, who publishes Alexander Dugan's books.

01:05:28.000 Who has Alexander Dugan Skype in to Matt Heimbach's conference in Texas?

01:05:33.000 Who had Alexander Dugan Skype in a week before Spencer spoke at Texas AM?

01:05:37.000 He went to a conference with Dugan in Hungary, I believe, in 2014.

01:05:43.000 And that's not to say anything more than they accuse me of being national Bolshevik.

01:05:47.000 They don't know what it means.

01:05:48.000 I don't know what it means.

01:05:49.000 I found out what it means.

01:05:50.000 They follow somebody who's actually a national Bolshevik.

01:05:55.000 Dominic Liberator, Dr. Duke is bad optics, the good doctor.

01:06:00.000 He did win a decent chunk of votes in his prime, though, 43% in the 90s.

01:06:05.000 It's getting harder to like our guys unanonymously.

01:06:08.000 Well, you know, you got to consider the time and the place.

01:06:11.000 David Duke won a good percentage of the vote, and he won a state seat, a seat in the state house in the 1990s in Louisiana.

01:06:22.000 That's a little bit different.

01:06:24.000 You know, if you're running as kind of this neo Confederate kind of character, and I don't say that in like a disparaging way, it would be more appealing in Louisiana than it would be in Wisconsin.

01:06:35.000 You know, you have people in the South who understand what the Confederacy was about, and there's a different history there.

01:06:42.000 There's kind of a different thing there.

01:06:44.000 And maybe they might have been a more receptive audience to somebody like David Duke, and also somebody who was, he's from Louisiana, he's in Louisiana.

01:06:51.000 And I think at the time he was a pretty good politician.

01:06:54.000 If I recall, I see some of his interviews, and he was pretty good at that.

01:06:59.000 But again, you have to understand the time and the place that we are now, which is not then.

01:07:04.000 And it's unfortunate that he's bad optics, but you're bad optics, bad optics.

01:07:09.000 And that's not to say you're a bad person.

01:07:12.000 That's not to say that what you're saying isn't legitimate or that you've been given an unfair shake, which he has, but that's how it goes.

01:07:21.000 Carl Ritzenthaler, thoughts on the lame Grammy show?

01:07:24.000 Great show today.

01:07:25.000 Well, thank you.

01:07:26.000 I watched bits and pieces of the Grammys.

01:07:30.000 And, you know, that's to be expected. 0.98

01:07:34.000 It's a lot of liberal nonsense. 0.83

01:07:36.000 I just get so tired of seeing the same stuff. 0.86

01:07:36.000 I don't know. 0.86

01:07:39.000 The same stuff.

01:07:40.000 It's the BET Awards now. 1.00

01:07:42.000 It's all blacks. 1.00

01:07:42.000 It's the BET Awards. 1.00

01:07:43.000 It's all blacks winning all the awards, and you know why that is.

01:07:48.000 That's appealing to a certain demographic.

01:07:51.000 And by the way, I don't think it's the black people, I think it's another demographic.

01:07:56.000 But no, I watch it. 1.00

01:07:57.000 It's just amazing the degeneracy, the swearing, the anti Trump stuff that goes on, and this is just the norm.

01:08:04.000 This is supposed to be like what normal television is. 0.70

01:08:07.000 People, kids watching this, and the performances where you have the women sticking their butts out, and it's all the sexualization of everything, the language. 0.68

01:08:17.000 And it's just so degenerative.

01:08:19.000 How did we get here?

01:08:22.000 Is anybody proud of this?

01:08:23.000 Is anybody proud of the direction we're going in?

01:08:26.000 Has to change.

01:08:27.000 Has to change for the children, for the youth.

01:08:30.000 We have to think about posterity.

01:08:32.000 That's the surest way to get motivated.

01:08:35.000 Start thinking about your children.

01:08:37.000 Behave in such a way that your children would be proud of you if you were their father, if you were their mother, if you're a man or you're a woman.

01:08:45.000 I think that's a big part of the degradation.

01:08:47.000 Of the dignity of our people is the fact that we no longer see ourselves as responsible.

01:08:52.000 We see ourselves as individuals.

01:08:56.000 If I'm going to do this, well, I can live with the shame.

01:08:58.000 I can live with this.

01:08:59.000 I can drink it down.

01:09:00.000 I can do whatever.

01:09:01.000 But when you're a father, when you're a mother, it's a little bit different.

01:09:04.000 There's expectations.

01:09:05.000 You don't want to disappoint the team in terms of the marriage or the kid.

01:09:10.000 And so you have to act in such a way that your children will think highly of you.

01:09:15.000 That's a big motivator. 0.88

01:09:18.000 So, Phantom Groyper, shekels for a good guy. 0.98

01:09:21.000 Much appreciated. 0.99

01:09:22.000 Have you thought about joining in on the internet blood sports more?

01:09:25.000 Good for your ratings.

01:09:27.000 You know, I go on these things.

01:09:28.000 Well, it's funny.

01:09:29.000 I do the internet blood sports, and people give me a hard time about it.

01:09:32.000 What do you think it is when I call out Richard Spencer and all these other people?

01:09:35.000 I love internet blood sports.

01:09:37.000 Nobody wants to jump in and join me with it.

01:09:39.000 And when I do, everybody yells at me.

01:09:42.000 Everybody's like, Nick, you're burning bridges, Nick.

01:09:45.000 Nick, really?

01:09:46.000 Again?

01:09:46.000 You're starting drama again?

01:09:48.000 Shut up. 1.00

01:09:49.000 Faggot. 1.00

01:09:49.000 I'll start drama wherever I want. 1.00

01:09:51.000 If I have a problem, I'm going to say it.

01:09:53.000 And I have a problem with a lot of these people.

01:09:57.000 Nick, you're starting drama.

01:09:58.000 Nick, you're burning.

01:09:59.000 Nick, you haven't persuaded us why it wasn't you who was the reason who started all these things.

01:10:04.000 Maybe it was me.

01:10:04.000 Maybe I did start all this stuff.

01:10:07.000 And so what?

01:10:08.000 I had a right to.

01:10:09.000 Look at what's been going on in this movement.

01:10:11.000 And we'll have more on that in a little while.

01:10:13.000 There's some ongoing things, and we'll talk about this later.

01:10:17.000 But anyway, I don't want to start all that up again.

01:10:21.000 I don't want to.

01:10:21.000 I don't want to start it up again.

01:10:23.000 But I do love the internet blood sports.

01:10:25.000 If anybody wants to debate, you know me.

01:10:26.000 I'm always ready to debate.

01:10:28.000 I'm always ready to get into it.

01:10:29.000 I'm always ready to jump in to bust some people up, rhetorically, of course.

01:10:36.000 So, yeah, I'd love to.

01:10:38.000 FKNWTF says other nationalist candidates for the primaries.

01:10:45.000 I haven't seen any prominent ones.

01:10:46.000 I've heard of some obscure challengers that people have let me know about, but nobody major, really.

01:10:54.000 Ian Weber, optics are extremely important.

01:10:57.000 Presentation is key.

01:10:58.000 My friends called me racist for saying that each people deserves their own prosperous nation.

01:11:03.000 Optics is essential.

01:11:05.000 It is essential.

01:11:06.000 And if you don't believe me, I mean, ask yourself for example, McDonald's puts in how much effort and money into their advertisements.

01:11:15.000 I watched a video on this maybe a year ago where they show when they take a picture of a hamburger, they have somebody come in and they do all kinds of things to it.

01:11:24.000 They artificially create something, they spray it, they adjust it with tweezers and things so it looks just right.

01:11:30.000 They paint it so it looks like it's glistening, they make it so that the proportions look just right and everything.

01:11:36.000 And why do you think they do that?

01:11:37.000 Why do you think McDonald's does that?

01:11:39.000 If it's a tasty burger, they shouldn't have to do that, right?

01:11:42.000 But they do it anyway.

01:11:43.000 It's because the visual, the visual, the reputation, more importantly about optics is important.

01:11:50.000 These things matter marketing, advertisements, these things matter, appearance, reputation, all of this matters.

01:11:59.000 You get a bad reputation, you're done.

01:12:01.000 You're sunk. 1.00

01:12:02.000 Hillary Clinton, a big part of why she lost was she had this reputation that she was corrupt. 1.00

01:12:08.000 And she was. 1.00

01:12:09.000 But she had this reputation that she was corrupt, that she was a crook, she was a criminal, and all these things. 1.00

01:12:14.000 And that's a big part of what did her in. 0.98

01:12:16.000 You know, look at Trump.

01:12:17.000 How did Trump win?

01:12:18.000 It was branding.

01:12:19.000 Look at the Trump brand.

01:12:21.000 Look at the Trump optics.

01:12:23.000 Everywhere he went, American flags, hugging the American flag, pointing at the American flag.

01:12:28.000 And every time, Navy suit, red tie, excuse me, podium, standing strong, you never saw him in a flannel.

01:12:36.000 You never saw him in shorts.

01:12:38.000 You never saw him in a t shirt.

01:12:39.000 You never saw him eating.

01:12:42.000 With few exceptions, he never saw him doing any of these other goofy campaign stunts.

01:12:48.000 The optics were key there.

01:12:49.000 He was always in the suit.

01:12:50.000 He was always all business.

01:12:51.000 He came in in the big plane in the hangar, and the audience was always big.

01:12:56.000 It was always packed, people yelling with signs.

01:13:00.000 And that's a big part of why he won.

01:13:01.000 He convinced people that he was winning, even in the primaries with the polls.

01:13:05.000 He said, I'm winning.

01:13:06.000 And people said, This guy's credible.

01:13:08.000 This guy, I will support this guy because he's viable.

01:13:12.000 And we have to do that with our movement. 0.99

01:13:13.000 We have this movement that's like, Oh, we'll just take a shit. 0.99

01:13:16.000 And who cares? 1.00

01:13:18.000 KKK neo Nazi, they're going to call us that anyway.

01:13:21.000 Might as well do Roman salutes. 0.98

01:13:24.000 Might as well do Roman salutes, mindbruder. 0.90

01:13:27.000 You know? 0.86

01:13:29.000 Just, it should be so easy.

01:13:32.000 It should be so easy.

01:13:35.000 It should be so common sense.

01:13:37.000 And this is a big reason why I'm out.

01:13:38.000 I'm on the outs.

01:13:39.000 I'm on the outs with this movement. 0.99

01:13:41.000 It's a clown show.

01:13:42.000 I realized that everybody who warned me about this movement was 100% right, and I didn't listen. 0.91

01:13:48.000 I didn't listen.

01:13:48.000 I said, no, no, no, no.

01:13:49.000 You guys just don't understand.

01:13:51.000 You guys just don't understand about demographics, about this and that.

01:13:53.000 Believe me, they understand.

01:13:55.000 They understand.

01:13:56.000 That's not why they're not associating with this movement.

01:13:59.000 It's because people in this movement are unserious.

01:14:01.000 It's governed by people who, and governed by the demands of a very small group of people who don't understand what it takes to get where we need to go or is unwilling to do what it takes to get where we need to go.

01:14:13.000 So I'm really on the outs.

01:14:14.000 This alt right stuff, people start talking about ethnostate and, and, uh, We got to shift the Overton window, fasci goy.

01:14:24.000 We got to shift the Overton window so we can get the ethnostate and so we can become who we are.

01:14:29.000 We have to create an ideal. 0.99

01:14:31.000 Like, shut up, dummy. 1.00

01:14:33.000 This is so impractical. 1.00

01:14:34.000 This is so not pragmatic, right?

01:14:37.000 This is not to say that we don't share the same goals, but it's not arbitrary how we decide to go there. 0.82

01:14:44.000 Nick is countersignaling the ethnostate. 0.91

01:14:46.000 No, no, no. 0.59

01:14:47.000 That's not how you talk to regular people.

01:14:50.000 Forrest, thanks.

01:14:52.000 Keep up the good work.

01:14:53.000 Thank you, my man.

01:14:54.000 Rick Smith, how can we repair the image of fascism?

01:14:57.000 There you go.

01:14:58.000 There you go.

01:14:59.000 How can we repair the image of fascism?

01:15:01.000 People are more concerned about questions like this than questions like, how can we end immigration?

01:15:07.000 If you're more concerned with rehabilitating a brand or an historical figure or a label or a name, you're asking the wrong questions.

01:15:16.000 If we have to expend additional energy to rehabilitate a term, that's energy that we didn't use to convince people about the issues.

01:15:25.000 It doesn't matter what you call it, it really doesn't.

01:15:27.000 It's really arbitrary what you call things.

01:15:29.000 Fascism, they have.

01:15:33.000 Dedicated how many billions, you could say trillions of dollars to convincing people that fascism is the worst thing in the world.

01:15:41.000 This is their strongest, their most well defended, their most fortified point that fascism, that Nazism, and all of this is wrong and bad, and nobody should think about it.

01:15:52.000 And we want to just charge straight ahead at their most well defended, their most fortified, where they've dedicated the most money and attention. 0.66

01:15:59.000 And we just want to say, let's just go head on.

01:16:02.000 We got to go around the back door, we got to go through the side door. 0.93

01:16:06.000 Attack them on the points where they are weak.

01:16:08.000 They cannot defend what's going on in this country.

01:16:10.000 They cannot defend free trade. 0.79

01:16:12.000 They cannot defend illegal immigration.

01:16:14.000 They can't defend legal immigration. 1.00

01:16:16.000 They can't defend this gender stuff. 1.00

01:16:17.000 Hit them on that. 1.00

01:16:19.000 Hit them at their weak point. 1.00

01:16:22.000 They want to go in and hit them where they're strongest. 0.96

01:16:24.000 And how do we redefine fascism?

01:16:26.000 Why would we want to do that?

01:16:28.000 That would be the most costly thing we could do.

01:16:30.000 We could spend all our resources on doing that, and maybe we'd get it accomplished in 50 years and nothing else.

01:16:36.000 So, it's the wrong question.

01:16:38.000 It's the wrong question.

01:16:40.000 Joe the Serb, like to think I had a small part in your planning to work out.

01:16:44.000 Apparently, I'm changing minds in the Discord.

01:16:46.000 Also, second piece, get a squatty potty stool.

01:16:50.000 I don't know what that means, but appreciate you.

01:16:53.000 Appreciate you, Joe the Boomer.

01:16:55.000 There was actually some other motivations outside.

01:16:58.000 There were some other motivations going on, some other things, some other special interests, which made me.

01:17:04.000 Was it phone calls that I received?

01:17:07.000 Was it DMs?

01:17:08.000 I mean, Who could say why a man decides to work out?

01:17:11.000 Who could say why a man decides?

01:17:13.000 Is it for protection?

01:17:14.000 Is it for aesthetic purposes?

01:17:16.000 Is it because a deal is struck?

01:17:18.000 Who knows?

01:17:19.000 Who could possibly imagine the inner machinations that go on up here?

01:17:23.000 But it looks like those are all our super chats for this evening.

01:17:27.000 A pretty great show.

01:17:29.000 I'm so excited with this monitor.

01:17:31.000 This thing is really beautiful.

01:17:33.000 It's big, it's wide, we're not having any streaming problems.

01:17:39.000 I really like this.

01:17:40.000 And you know what else?

01:17:41.000 On OBS for Microsoft, oh, it looks like our brightness is a little bit jazzed up here.

01:17:49.000 Let me go in and I'm sorry about that.

01:17:51.000 I should have noticed this earlier.

01:17:53.000 Let's do this.

01:17:55.000 Does that look a little bit better?

01:17:58.000 Does that look a little bit better?

01:18:00.000 Okay.

01:18:01.000 With Microsoft on Mac, when you want to have Skype stream to YouTube, you have to go through all these extra steps.

01:18:09.000 When you want to.

01:18:10.000 Do Skype, you have to put it through the broadcasting application.

01:18:15.000 And in order to do that, you have to do a window capture.

01:18:17.000 So it's not really like Skype is feeding into the YouTube stream.

01:18:21.000 Skype is being captured via a window.

01:18:24.000 It's doing a screen capture.

01:18:26.000 And then, so there's a delay, there's technical things, so you have to do workarounds.

01:18:29.000 But with this, it just goes right on with Microsoft.

01:18:32.000 And the Logitech camera settings are right on there.

01:18:35.000 So I'm very happy with this.

01:18:35.000 It's all very good.

01:18:37.000 It's very big.

01:18:38.000 And we did it in one week, by the way.

01:18:41.000 One week.

01:18:43.000 And I'm looking at myself now.

01:18:44.000 What did we just turn on the autofocus all of a sudden?

01:18:48.000 Fellas, fellas.

01:18:51.000 If we have the autofocus, how did that come back on?

01:18:53.000 I really, the autofocus is very distracting.

01:18:57.000 We did this in one week.

01:18:58.000 When I was at America First Media, I don't want to get into that too much for legal reasons, but we did this so quickly.

01:19:04.000 We did this in a week.

01:19:05.000 I got the best stuff.

01:19:06.000 I put it together.

01:19:07.000 Here we are.

01:19:08.000 And now we're going to get a desk.

01:19:09.000 We're going to get a new desk. 0.85

01:19:10.000 I'm tired of this stinky thing. 0.96

01:19:12.000 Look at how dirty it gets.

01:19:14.000 And then it rubs on my nose and I start to sneeze and things.

01:19:18.000 But I'm going to get a new desk.

01:19:19.000 I'm going to get a new microphone.

01:19:21.000 There's been one guy who has a real problem with the snowball microphone.

01:19:24.000 Every day after the show, he says, Nick, I hate you because you're using the most basic Yeti microphone.

01:19:30.000 I hear you.

01:19:31.000 I hear you.

01:19:32.000 I got this for free, all right?

01:19:33.000 So I'll be looking into a new desk, a new mic, a new camera, and looking into building a new set.

01:19:42.000 The key here is then a lot of these lighting issues that we're having.

01:19:45.000 There's a couple of issues that we're having that are more on my end that maybe you don't see so much.

01:19:50.000 But a lot of issues will be resolved once we get a real set.

01:19:53.000 So I'm looking at bookcases, other possible solutions here.

01:19:57.000 And so we will be probably ready to go by March.

01:20:00.000 We'll be really upgraded in a big way.

01:20:03.000 But that's going to do it for us tonight.

01:20:04.000 That is the program.

01:20:05.000 That's America First.

01:20:06.000 As always, thanks for watching.

01:20:08.000 Please, if you want to support the show, remember, America First Premium, $5 a month.

01:20:14.000 It's only $5 a month.

01:20:15.000 You get the MP3 audio only version of the show on SoundCloud if you're a podcast listener.

01:20:21.000 If you want to listen to it on the bus, on your way to work, on your way to school, you know, whatever.

01:20:27.000 If you want the audio only format on SoundCloud, you can get that.

01:20:31.000 You can get a special role in the Discord server and.

01:20:35.000 Priority on the call in shows on Friday.

01:20:37.000 And we'll have our next call in show this Friday, this week.

01:20:41.000 So if you want priority on that, five bucks on maker support per month.

01:20:44.000 The link is in the description below.

01:20:46.000 Please subscribe.

01:20:47.000 Give us a thumbs up.

01:20:48.000 Give us a thumbs up.

01:20:49.000 It really helps.

01:20:50.000 If you like the content, it helps with our analytics, our whatever the technology is.

01:20:57.000 I'm not a YouTuber either, so I don't know.

01:20:59.000 But it helps when you like the video.

01:21:01.000 Click the notification bell so you know when we're streaming and click subscribe and all the rest.

01:21:06.000 Leave a comment.

01:21:07.000 If you like what you saw, if you didn't like what you saw, let me know in a constructive way.

01:21:11.000 Don't be rude.

01:21:12.000 Don't be mean.

01:21:13.000 You know, we don't need to be mean.

01:21:15.000 This is a Christian channel.

01:21:17.000 But that's all for us tonight.

01:21:19.000 We're on the air Monday through Friday, 7 p.m. Central, 8 p.m. Eastern Standard Time.

01:21:23.000 I'm Nicholas J. Fuentes.

01:21:24.000 This was America First, as always.

01:21:26.000 Thank you so much for watching.

01:21:27.000 Thank you for the super chats.

01:21:28.000 Thanks for donating.

01:21:29.000 Thanks to our premium members, our supporters.

01:21:32.000 You guys are the real MVPs.

01:21:34.000 You keep the lights on around here.

01:21:37.000 But that's all for us tonight.

01:21:38.000 We will see you tomorrow.

01:21:40.000 Have a great rest of your evening.

01:21:41.000 Thanks for watching.

01:21:42.000 We'll see you.

01:21:45.000 Americanism, not globalism, will be our credo.

01:21:54.000 It's going to be only America first.

01:21:56.000 America first. 0.99

01:21:57.000 The American people will come first once again. 1.00

01:22:30.000 I'm not gonna

America First - Nicholas J. Fuentes - January 29, 2018

The Deep State Coup | America First Ep. 96

Episode Stats

Summary

Transcript