00:01:28.000I must be a computer genius or something because no experience with computers, no experience with circuitry and wires and technology, but we put it together pretty flawlessly, running pretty smoothly from the start.
00:01:43.000I go today, I go this morning to Best Buy to get myself a monitor.
00:01:48.000And I go in and, you know, I'm looking around.
00:01:50.000I'm trying to see which one's going to be the best.
00:03:22.000But we have a lot of news today, obviously, a lot of news tonight.
00:03:26.000A lot of this stuff that we've been talking about these past couple of weeks in January is finally coming to fruition.
00:03:36.000And of course, I'm talking about the memo, which has been ordered to be released as of, I believe, 6 30 Central Time this evening.
00:03:44.000And if you recall, the Office of the Inspector General began to compile the IG report, the Inspector General's report.
00:03:53.000Around this time last year, they were ordered, and this was at the whim of Democrats, to look into the Russia thing.
00:04:00.000They were ordered also to look into the FBI, the Obama surveillance of the Trump transition team and the Trump campaign, and a lot of other things, a host of other things that Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama have had their hands in.
00:04:14.000And the OIG report was supposed to be due already.
00:04:17.000They were supposed to come out with it, but they extended the deadline, excuse me, and will now be releasing the full report in late March, early April, because there is so much.
00:04:28.000That they are investigating, which really gets the knock and jog and really makes you think why have they had to extend it for so long?
00:04:34.000So they revealed some of those documents to Congress last Monday.
00:04:39.000If you recall, I made some big predictions.
00:04:41.000I said, watch, this is going to be very consequential.
00:04:43.000The documents that come out on Monday will sort of give us a glimpse into what we will expect, what we should be expecting later in spring when the full report comes out.
00:04:54.000And so, of course, once that memo, or excuse me, once those documents hit the Congress, and they were, of course, only available to lawmakers, you started to hear murmurings, I believe it was late last week or the week before, that this was worse than Watergate.
00:05:08.000That the FBI, the intelligence community would have to undergo serious restructuring because of what is contained in the memo and more broadly in the IG report.
00:05:17.000There's massive corruption, massive corruption, not only in the Democratic Party, but in the deep state as well, which is big.
00:05:24.000The intelligence community, you know, the big dogs over there.
00:05:28.000And so finally, we got this memo to be released.
00:05:31.000This memo was drafted by Republican lawmakers at the behest of Republican Devin Nunes.
00:05:38.000And compiling the information they got from the OIG report, compiling some of the other evidence that they've gathered in their oversight function over the special counsel investigation into 2016 hacking, Russian hacking in the 2016 election.
00:05:55.000It was just voted to be released using a 40 year old rule that has never been used in terms of this committee, one where they can release it publicly without the minority party.
00:06:08.000Being made aware of this, being apprised of this, getting a vote on this.
00:06:11.000So, Republicans unilaterally released this memo publicly without the Democrats.
00:06:16.000And now the president has five days to decide whether he wants to release the memo or whether he wants to hold it back.
00:06:24.000And so, a courier was sent as of about a half hour before the show from Capitol Hill to the White House to deliver the memo for President Trump to give it his okay.
00:06:33.000And word is that he will give it his okay.
00:06:36.000And an idea of what's going to be contained in this memo, we've We've heard some rumors about this.
00:06:42.000We've heard and seen some of the pieces start to come together.
00:06:46.000But the gist of it is it's all about Fusion GPS.
00:06:50.000It's all about the Trump Russia dossier.
00:06:52.000It's all about FISA warrants, FISA spying.
00:06:56.000And if you go back to spring of 2016, during the election, you had Fusion GPS, which was this intelligence company.
00:07:06.000They were contracted by Hillary Clinton and the Democratic National Committee to go and collect information.
00:07:15.000Fusion GPS was given access to the national security database.
00:07:21.000They were given access to massive surveillance using the FISA system.
00:07:26.000And certain FISA permissions in order to use United States intelligence didn't need to go through a judge, they didn't need to go through lawmakers, they didn't need to go through the usual regulatory processes.
00:07:38.000And so, this particular kind of FISA warrant, they could achieve, they could attain for Fusion GPS to go looking around.
00:07:45.000Using the national surveillance apparatus without going through too much oversight.
00:07:52.000These are a lot of rumors of what's going to be in the memo that Fusion GPS was able to collect this intelligence basically illegally, that they were able to look through all of this surveillance without a warrant, without a just cause to do it, really only to go after a political opponent.
00:08:10.000They were able to use the national security apparatus, the surveillance apparatus, to go after a political opponent.
00:08:18.000What they discovered using this database to compile the Trump dossier, which of course was the 35 page document compiled by the former British spy Christopher Steele, who used to work in the Soviet Union, who used to work in Russia during the times of the Cold War, who put together this document which famously alleged that Donald Trump went off to Moscow and peed in the bed of Barack Obama where he stayed in the Ritz Carlton,
00:08:44.000and Vladimir Putin filmed it all and was using that to blackmail the president.
00:08:48.000That was the Trump dossier, of course, released by BuzzFeed.
00:09:08.000I don't think it would have gone away.
00:09:09.000I mean, they still probably would have found this, but it wouldn't be as big of a deal if not for the fact that not only did Christopher Steele compile this dossier, which was a total lie, which was total fiction, not only did the national Security apparatus, the surveillance apparatus conspire with a political campaign to target their political opponent.
00:09:32.000But after the election was over, they then used this 35 page Russia dossier, which was a total lie, which was a total fabrication, as the basis for the special counsel with Robert Mueller.
00:09:45.000And so this is where it becomes a problem.
00:09:48.000This is where we start to see some of the corruption.
00:09:51.000That you have this dossier where they're missing documents, they're missing witnesses.
00:09:57.000In terms of how they were able to make these claims, how they were able to make these outlandish and wild accusations that Putin had compromised and Trump was in Russia and all this other stuff.
00:10:08.000And the House Oversight Committee has been subpoenaing the FBI and these other apparatuses, the Department of Justice, to say, where are the documents?
00:10:16.000Where are the witnesses to substantiate the claims made in the dossier?
00:10:19.000Because the Robert Mueller special counsel, the only reason it exists, the only reason it was appointed, the only reason they've been investigating and looking through documents and bringing people.
00:10:31.000To court and bringing charges against people like Manafort and Gates and Papadopoulos is because of the document.
00:10:38.000And Nunes is out there saying this document is total BS.
00:10:42.000It was constructed by the Democrats in collusion with the national security apparatus to take down a political opponent, which is bad news.
00:10:53.000When they say it's worse than Watergate, if all of this is true, if there is this conspiracy at the highest levels to collude against the president in the election, During the transition to undermine the sitting president, you are talking serious heads rolling.
00:11:21.000We saw this with the October surprise with WikiLeaks in 2016.
00:11:25.000We saw a lot of this kind of stuff during the 2016 election with the Pizzagate, with Project Veritas, where There's minor things, but it really just gets overblown in terms of the hype.
00:11:38.000But we'll see what happens, obviously, once the memo is released.
00:11:44.000It's not looking very good because, of course, this comes off the heels last week when the FBI announced about a month late that they were missing 50,000 text messages between Peter Sturzok and Lisa Page between the period of December 2016 and May 2017 when they were allegedly conspiring to undermine the president.
00:12:05.000Offsite away from the FBI as part of a secret society.
00:12:08.000And so just a lot of pieces and fragments.
00:12:11.000We don't totally know the whole story.
00:12:15.000The OIG, the Office of the Inspector General, knows all of it.
00:12:20.000And we kind of, we're getting the crumbs.
00:12:22.000We're kind of getting the bits and pieces.
00:12:24.000It's trickling down to us slowly through back channels and through documents and rumors and everything.
00:12:30.000We don't know completely what's going on, but the gist of it, the gist of what is coming together, as I've been saying all year long, really for the entire month of January, that the genesis of all of this is in Hillary Clinton's tenure.
00:12:47.000While she was Secretary of State, she used her position, she used the office of the State Department to curry favors, to deliver favors to foreign countries, to foreign oligarchs, to foreign wealthy people, and foreign corporations.
00:13:02.000She made all these deals as the Secretary of State using the United States government, using our leverage and our money and our diplomacy.
00:13:09.000She gave favors to people in Russia, she gave favors to people in Saudi Arabia.
00:13:15.000She got huge contributions, $100 million contributions from those very same people to the Clinton Foundation, which is, of course, a slush fund for the Democratic Party, but more specifically for Hillary Clinton herself for this eventual presidential run.
00:13:31.000She was doing this during her tenure as Secretary of State, which I believe was from 2008 when Barack Obama was inaugurated until pretty late.
00:13:42.000And so while she was serving as Secretary of State, she was wheeling and dealing, she was doing this pay to play.
00:13:48.000Where the foreign countries pay, and they then got play from the State Department.
00:13:53.000They got their favors, they got their things approved, they got the money they needed.
00:13:58.000And that is why, of course, we saw the email scandal.
00:14:01.000Because in order to do all these shady negotiations, these shady deals, if she had to turn over her government emails at the end of her tenure, as is required of public servants, well, they would find out about all this stuff.
00:14:14.000If she were conducting these affairs, if she were conducting the affairs of state on her government computer, at the end of the day, she'd have to turn it all over.
00:14:22.000And the American people, Freedom of Information Act requests, would be able to see what's going on with these emails and they'd be able to see what she's doing.
00:14:30.000So that's why she then went in and she installed a private server in the bathroom of her home, an unsecured private server to handle all this information.
00:14:40.000And while this is happening, by the way, while she's using her private email server for public emails, it's unsecure.
00:14:47.000So you have confidential, classified information going through the server.
00:14:52.000National state security secrets going through this private server, which is in her house, which is not secure, which people could hack, which could endanger the lives of people.
00:15:01.000There was a big talking point during the 2016 election that you had special access program intelligence.
00:15:09.000I was talking about this stuff months ago, but the special access program intelligence was the highest level intelligence.
00:15:16.000Like, if this gets exposed, people in the field start to die.
00:15:20.000And that's the kind of stuff that was on her private email server, which if she's building it in her home, She has no guarantee that it has the security that the United States government would afford if she had used her government email.
00:15:31.000So while she's using this private email server, and the whole reason she's doing it is, of course, to obscure the fact that she's wheeling and dealing, she has these confidential things on the email server.
00:15:40.000And so that's a crime in and of itself.
00:16:48.000She knows that if a Republican gets into office, we find out everything.
00:16:53.000We get into these offices and we see what's been going on, the criminal racket that's been going on for eight years.
00:16:59.000And so we are going to go in there and discover it all, and people are going to go to jail.
00:17:03.000So Clinton conspires, of course, with Barack Obama and the national security apparatus, the intelligence community, to conspire to spy on President Trump, on his campaign, on his transition team in order to dig up dirt.
00:17:16.000The whole reason they were able to hear the private phone call between Michael Flynn and that Russian ambassador, which occurred in December, is.
00:17:23.000The only reason they knew who was on the call and what was said, even though Michael Flynn didn't disclose that to the FBI, is because Barack Obama was spying on them using the FISA warrants, which were, you know, again, pretty loose and shady in terms of how they got them, and then unmasked them to the media, which is a crime in and of itself, and then used it as the basis for the Trump Russia dossier.
00:17:45.000And now they're investigating Trump, trying to undermine its credibility.
00:17:49.000They're making a broader play for a coup.
00:17:52.000And this is what we are going to see happen.
00:18:02.000Why is she talking about running again?
00:18:04.000Why is she not faded away into obscurity?
00:18:06.000Why is the special counsel still going on, even though they have nothing?
00:18:10.000Even though a year in, the only charges that have been brought forward are against Paul Manafort and Rick Gates and for financial crimes that happened four years ago that were put away because there were no crimes at all.
00:18:22.000And not only that, but were committed in relevance, in pertinence to Ukraine and not Russia anyway.
00:18:33.000The reason is because Hillary Clinton, Barack Obama, John McCain, Lindsey Graham, the people that are on top here, the swamp, so to speak, they will be making a play to contest the legitimacy of President Trump.
00:18:49.000That's what's going on because they'll get the special counsel to fabricate some kind of a case.
00:18:54.000And their hope is that in the court of public opinion, people will side, enough people will side with the Democrats.
00:19:02.000And say, I don't recognize the president as legitimate.
00:19:06.000I recognize the judiciary and the Congress and the intelligence community.
00:19:11.000I recognize the system essentially as sovereign.
00:19:13.000And so, what you have going on at this deep level is a war between our democratically elected civilian president and the deep state, which has been controlling policy for 50 years essentially, which has been guiding the ship.
00:19:28.000And you have, you know, slight minor adjustments in our trajectory, in our course.
00:19:34.000But the deep state makes sure that we essentially stay on the same path no matter what.
00:19:39.000And so, right now, what the deep state is attempting to do is to get enough people to say they are the rightful rulers of the country.
00:19:46.000I don't care that Hillary Clinton didn't win according to the Constitution.
00:19:49.000I don't care that there's no real basis to impeach Donald Trump.
00:19:53.000I don't care if we don't have the votes in Congress.
00:20:11.000Of course, this also comes today, this afternoon, with the deputy director of the FBI, Andrew McCabe, resigning.
00:20:19.000And the reason being is because he was named in this memo as being pretty complicit in what went on in the construction of the dossier, in the weaponization of it by the special counsel and by other forces in the Obama administration.
00:20:47.000I think that gives us kind of an idea, a signal of the gravity of what to expect tonight.
00:20:53.000And then also, we heard that Republican lawmakers in the House Oversight Committee are launching an investigation into the Department of Justice and the FBI.
00:21:03.000And if you recall, this, we heard rumors about this.
00:21:06.000We had an inkling of this in December when Representative Nunes, or excuse me, earlier in January.
00:21:12.000When Representative Nunes issued that letter to the FBI and to the Attorney General to say, you need to turn over the documents and the witnesses to substantiate the Trump dossier, and they didn't meet that deadline.
00:21:26.000I changed my calendar to February, so I don't have it as clean, but I believe that happened on maybe three or four Wednesdays ago.
00:21:34.000And so this has been ongoing, this investigation by Republican lawmakers into the special counsel, into the Department of Justice, and into the FBI, because They're over here trying to perform their oversight function, trying to make sure that everybody's playing by the rules.
00:21:49.000And it's becoming apparent that this special counsel with Rob Mueller, not only is it exceeding the scope of what it was intended to do in the sense that they were put together by the deputy attorney general.
00:22:01.000The whole reason that Robert Mueller's out there looking through documents and has the authority that he does is because Rod Rosenstein says, look into Russian hacking in the 2016 election.
00:22:12.000Well, Bob Mueller said, yeah, that's nice.
00:22:15.000I'm going to look into Paul Manafort's financial history and George Papadopoulos and Rick Gates, and I'm going to bring charges against this guy and that guy.
00:22:22.000And he's vastly exceeding the scope of the original investigation.
00:22:27.000And then number two, what they're finding in their oversight function is that Rod Rosenstein, in the first place, didn't have the authority to elect the special counsel because it was built on such flimsy evidence.
00:22:39.000So, some major developments we have the memo, the investigation, McCabe resigning, looking like a big storm, looking like a big.
00:22:49.000It's about to hit the fan in a big way.
00:22:52.000And we'll really get an idea of this as we move towards March and April when we see the OIG report and see really the extent of what's going on, how much of it is true, how much of it is rumor.
00:23:04.000And I have a strong feeling that you're going to see because you're going to see people go away here.
00:23:09.000You're going to see serious stuff because there are too many coincidences.
00:23:14.000There are too many weird things going on.
00:23:16.000And this is admittedly more speculative, this is a little bit less empirical.
00:23:45.000You have people connected to her who built the Clinton Library dying in a plane crash.
00:23:49.000You have people that worked with James Comey dying in a mysterious plane crash.
00:23:53.000You have these massive outages at major airports in the span of 60 days in Atlanta, New Orleans, customs computers going down across the country.
00:24:04.000You have Barack Obama following, or rather, he's going to all these foreign countries before President Trump.
00:24:09.000Before President Trump goes to Europe, Barack Obama's there.
00:24:12.000Before he goes to South Korea, Barack Obama's there.
00:24:34.000I know it sounds out there, I know it sounds very speculative.
00:24:37.000But you only see these kinds of strange occurrences with such frequency and such high concentration in a short amount of time when movements are being made behind the scenes.
00:24:48.000It's sort of like, remember, in Interstellar, you know, our boomers are not going to get this reference.
00:24:53.000Only my strong Christopher Nolan fans here are going to get this reference.
00:24:57.000But in Interstellar, what happens is, I don't know the science of it.
00:25:02.000You know, this is not my experience, this is not my aptitude.
00:25:06.000But Matthew McConaughey, He's receiving messages from his daughter, who is in the 10th dimension, but she's sending out these signals using gravity to knock stuff around in his room.
00:25:18.000And that's essentially what we have going on here, where you have all this stuff going on in the 10th dimension.
00:25:24.000You have all this stuff going on with the Intelligence Committee and the Oversight Committee and the FBI and the FISA warrants and the Deep State.
00:25:32.000And all of this is going on, and people are being killed and all the documents, everything.
00:25:39.000Down here, we only hear like little murmurs of it.
00:25:42.000We only see a little bit of stuff coming down from the ceiling, a little bit of debris.
00:25:47.000We only hear a little bit of rumbling.
00:25:48.000And that's what we see when we see these weird occurrences because there's really no other way to explain it, I don't think, in the context of what's going on more broadly in the country.
00:26:25.000Again, I had to ship all my parts to Vindication City here.
00:26:30.000I had to get my CPU, my GPU, my memory, my core gigawatt Jing Chong processor, Bing Bong Zoom processor, and the elemental circuit board mother overdrive.
00:26:45.000Had to get it all shipped over to Vindication City because I was right again on DACA.
00:26:50.000Don't mean to toot my own horn, but fresh off of a big win, a big major prediction, I said, Yeah, and here's how the negotiations are going to play out.
00:27:01.000So remember last week, we got wind from a conference call.
00:27:06.000We heard that there was a conference call between Stephen Miller and Republican and Democratic lawmakers, and that they agreed to a framework on a DACA fix, which would be 1.8%.
00:27:18.000Million dreamers, which is the childhood arrivals, not eligible for DACA, but just the childhood arrivals, which hypothetically could be eligible.
00:27:29.000Amnesty for all 1.8 million of those in exchange for $25 billion in wall funding.
00:27:35.000Amnesty for 1.8 million immigrants in 10 years in exchange for the wall funding.
00:27:40.000And everybody said, and also diversity visa and chain migration.
00:27:44.000And everybody said, this is a terrible deal.
00:27:46.000Everybody said, Nick, is it still four dimensional chess?
00:27:50.000And I said, I said, watch what happens next.
00:28:03.000This is more framing to illustrate the fact that even if Trump doubles the amount of people that he would give protection, and not only gives them protection, but gives them amnesty, and he gives them a sweet deal, in his own words, a deal they couldn't turn down, a liberal deal, and they still turned it down.
00:28:21.000Well, then he frames it as when the government shuts down again, or if it shuts down again, if they don't concede to Trump on everything he wants, and I don't think they will, when the government shuts down again, They will be blamed again and they will pay dearly for it in the midterms.
00:28:36.000They will pay dearly for it among their far left base and, more importantly, among the people in the middle.
00:28:42.000And I tweeted a little bit about this last night.
00:29:33.000The other week, with the map of which seats were open in the Senate come 2018, where you have 24 Senate Democrats and it's 22 Democrats and two independents that are up for re election in the Senate in 2018, compared to only eight Republicans.
00:29:51.000So you have realistically about four Republican seats that are up for grabs and something like 14 or 15 Democrat seats that are up for grabs.
00:29:59.000So even if it's a 50 50 split, even if they blame both sides, if both sides get their incumbents swap out in 2018 in the contested states because People are upset about government shutdowns.
00:30:10.000Republicans lose four, but they gain 15.
00:30:13.000If you have it that people are blaming both parties and whoever it is, they blame their incumbent.
00:30:19.000Say you're in Montana and you blame the Democratic incumbent.
00:30:23.000Or say you're in a state where it's a Republican incumbent and you blame the Republican.
00:30:27.000Well, if they just get switched out, if the combined 19 or 20 or so people in contested states are simply swapped out for a challenger, like I said, you lose four Republicans, you gain 15.
00:30:40.00015, you're rather you lose the four Republican seats, but you gain the 15 or so Democratic seats.
00:30:45.000And so, not only do you have that, not only do you have that playing on in the midterms, but more broadly, in terms of credibility, in terms of legitimacy, you have to understand what we mean when we talk about liberal media.
00:30:58.000You have to understand what we mean when we say that the left and the liberals have this monopoly on power in media, in Hollywood, in the culture at large.
00:31:07.000What we mean by that is that the left wing paradigm and narrative is.
00:31:13.000Is the standard, it's the starting, the default position for most people.
00:31:17.000The left wing values, the left wing positions, the platform, this is perceived as the starting point, as the middle.
00:31:24.000You know, you go on television, and it's no coincidence that you get these kinds of spineless conservatives and Republicans who go on television and they try to convince everybody that the Republicans are more liberal than the Democrats.
00:31:35.000They try and say, oh, no, no, no, the Democrats are the real racist, the Democrats are the real party of the KKK, and this happens because.
00:31:44.000We all intuitively understand that we're operating within the left wing paradigm.
00:31:47.000It's very different, and we all know this, arguing as a Republican than as a Democrat.
00:31:52.000A Democrat doesn't have to really defend a whole lot.
00:31:55.000A Democrat doesn't really have to go out and defend a lot of these highly debatable points that they have about American history, about how the system functions.
00:32:04.000We understand that these things are basically taken for granted because you're going to get slammed by the media.
00:32:11.000Even though like 3% of white people ever own slaves, it's a given that slavery is the bludgeon that they will use.
00:32:18.000And you just kind of have to deal with that as a Republican.
00:32:21.000Well, when you talk about how much credibility and legitimacy the media and the left has in this country, that they control the paradigm and the narrative essentially.
00:32:32.000When they lose their legitimacy, when they are forced to defend this gross, artificial, excessive liberal system, they are at a real weakness here.
00:32:43.000Whereas all Trump has to do is punch it and poke holes in it and make fun of it and get people essentially simply to doubt it.
00:32:50.000Just get people to start saying, these guys don't know what they're doing.
00:32:54.000And even some of the left wing people, but more importantly, the moderates, saying, this is the Democrats are not unified.
00:33:02.000The Democrats are not who they say they are.
00:33:34.000CNN, I used to think that was the centrist one.
00:33:36.000I used to think that was the moderate one.
00:33:38.000Now it looks like they're very partisan.
00:33:40.000I used to think the Democrats were out there talking about pro choice and pro this and pro that.
00:33:45.000But now I see that they're just a bunch of con men, just like the other guys.
00:33:49.000And so if you look at it like this, that the Democrats are all the way up here and the Republicans are down here, Republicans don't have much to lose.
00:33:56.000Democrats get brought all the way down.
00:33:59.000And so that's the genius of this play.
00:34:00.000Even if you might say Trump is paying a price, Trump is losing a little bit, it doesn't matter so much.
00:34:20.000And President Trump tweeted on Friday, he tweeted confirming this, back to the original point of him putting this out there essentially to prove that Democrats were just conning the Republicans, were just using DACA to obstruct and to impede the progress of this administration.
00:34:37.000He tweeted on Friday, essentially confirming this.
00:34:39.000He said, There were two reasons why I put forward this DACA proposition, which many people are surprised about.
00:34:45.000He said, number one, I want a long term fix on this.
00:34:48.000And that's to maintain his sincerity, to say, I'm not a con man.
00:34:51.000I was really looking for a compromise here.
00:34:54.000But number two, then he said, it was also to illustrate that the Democrats are insincere.
00:34:59.000It was to illustrate that even if I give the Democrats double the amount of DACA recipients or double the amount of dreamers that I was talking about before and give them amnesty and give them a very sweet deal.
00:35:12.000A liberal plan, even as acknowledged by left wing people in media.
00:35:17.000And they still rejected it because they fundamentally don't care.
00:35:20.000And so he has now pushed, he has sufficiently, convincingly, and persuasively pushed the responsibility of the previous and any future government shutdown onto the Democrats.
00:35:32.000And we'll see that play out February 8th when the government runs out of money again.
00:35:37.000And that may go on until March 5th when DACA expires.
00:35:41.000And that will be a very rough day for the Democrats.
00:36:31.000In an ideal world, you could say it is desirable that we could have David Duke on the show, sit down at a round table, and we could just discuss ideas with no baggage, with no media smear, without looking like anything other than what you are.
00:36:50.000In an ideal world, you could say he was in the KKK, but he was in the KKK 40 years ago.
00:36:56.000And we all made mistakes 40 years ago.
00:37:39.000And so I think, despite that, despite the fact that I see this as a miscalculation, despite the fact that I think this is kind of one of the last things that I would have done in his position, I still think it's a learning opportunity, and I don't think we should totally throw it out just yet.
00:37:55.000I don't think it's totally beyond repair, but I mean, this is just simply not good.
00:38:19.000And I don't even say that so much to appeal to the left, but just to make this objective distinction for people that watch this show and who are genuinely curious.
00:38:39.000So when I say that, I don't say that to pander or to appeal.
00:38:43.000I don't say that in response to an accusation.
00:38:46.000I say that in the sense that it's not the same.
00:38:49.000They may say it's the same and they can say what they want, but it's not the same.
00:38:53.000And there are people in the movement who say, well, that's an arbitrary distinction.
00:38:57.000This distance between the undesirables and a pretty moderate and reasonable right wing position, it's pretty arbitrary because they're going to call you what they're going to call you anyway.
00:39:08.000I think there is a real hunger in this country for a real right wing.
00:39:13.000There's a real hunger, a real appetite out there for a real solid right wing.
00:39:18.000One that is anti immigration, one that is pro tradition, one that is pro God, one that's anti war, that wants to lower taxes, that wants to see our economy grow.
00:39:29.000There is a real hunger for that in this country, for that kind of a right wing.
00:39:33.000The right wing that we have now is no right wing, it's right of Karl Marx.
00:39:37.000Relatively speaking, but this is not a right wing.
00:39:40.000And people, I think, saw in Donald Trump, they were anticipated a real right wing.
00:39:45.000Somebody went out there and said, you know what, we don't want illegal immigrants.
00:40:21.000You ask any boomer, you ask any millennial, any young person, what do you think of?
00:40:25.000What do you think of when you hear white nationalist?
00:40:27.000And I'm not talking about people in the movement who might think of, you know, a cool Depeche Mode song or might think of their Fashway video on YouTube, which is very cutesy.
00:40:37.000Most people are going to think of skinheads, they're going to think of people with shaved heads, punk rock, blowing stuff up, they're going to think of, you know, the neo Nazi archetype.
00:41:14.000I wish we could consider people's ideas and not what the media would smear them as, but that's just not where we live.
00:41:21.000And so if you had Paul Nealon going out there and saying, End immigration, no free trade, people would love that.
00:41:29.000If you had him saying end immigration, no free trade, and there's some skepticism about certain elements in the government and in the media, people might say, I'm willing to let that go.
00:41:38.000And maybe I'd be open to that in the future, but I'm still on board.
00:41:42.000Well, when he comes out there and he says this stuff about Jewish people, and then also I was on David Duke, and that's what's going to be in the newspapers and in the media, then people go, okay, all right, I'm off.
00:41:58.000And that's one of the challenges when you're running an informative campaign like that, when you're running an educational campaign, you have to understand that the purity of the message stands before everything else.
00:42:09.000And when you start thinking about, I don't want to hurt people's feelings, I don't want to offend people, I don't want to snub somebody, all of that is secondary to the message.
00:42:20.000And if something is going to damage the receptiveness of that message, if something is going to damage the effectiveness, the persuasiveness of that message, Get it out.
00:44:25.000You know, it's not really within my competence to judge who ends up where in the faith.
00:44:32.000Martin Luther is fulfilling part of God's plan, right?
00:44:36.000I think the idea that Martin Luther could thwart God's plan is, you know, kind of insulting.
00:44:41.000You know, you imagine you're the superior, you're the supreme being, and nothing moves, literally, nothing moves in a philosophical sense of move, meaning.
00:44:50.000Change in any way without your go-ahead, without pure actuality there to actualize things.
00:44:57.000And you imagine that, oh, you know, some German guy, some German priest, he put a stop to all of that.
00:45:03.000I think that Martin Luther was part of the plan, and this was a very devout person.
00:45:07.000You have to understand that, although, in my estimation, he did tremendous damage to the faith by opening up the door to this relativism, this universalist stuff, people free to interpret the Bible however they want.
00:45:20.000This was a very devout man in his time in 1518 or 1517, when he went about this and he nailed the 95 theses to the door.
00:45:29.000He was probably more in line with what the Bible said, more in line with what Christianity historically was than the Catholic Church at the time.
00:45:50.000He was a true scholar, a true scholar in every sense of the word, of the faith.
00:45:55.000But the problem is, in principle, there was no mechanism that was there to maintain the integrity of that.
00:46:03.000Whereas the church can go astray at times because it's led by imperfect men.
00:46:09.000Number one, the church can never err because it's led by Jesus Christ.
00:46:12.000But number two, you have the clergy, you have a hierarchy, you have a system in place where there is one authority, there is a tradition of how things are done.
00:46:21.000And that's why there hasn't been wild deviation from how it's been going pretty much for 2,000 years.
00:46:27.000With Protestantism, it might have started off with a really pure guy, but in the absence of the clergy, in the absence of a repository institution, of any kind of mechanism to withstand the integrity of the interpretation in 1517, it's gone wildly.
00:47:17.000That was my contention a couple of weeks ago, which is that people will talk all day long about how the media is corrupt, the media is owned by a certain group of people who hate us, they're owned by this rootless transnational elite of rich people, and They're out to get us.
00:49:22.000It's one of those things where, and I'm sure many Generation Z, late Generation Z, or excuse me, early Generation Z, late millennials can relate to this, where you kind of lose some things on the transition between devices.
00:49:34.000Like I had on my iPod Nano, my blue iPod Nano from years ago, I had all my music on there.
00:49:41.000And then when you transfer over to the other thing, some things get lost.
00:49:44.000When you transfer over from buying every song for $1 to Spotify, you know, you lose some things.
00:49:52.000And so I totally forgot about The Killers.
00:49:54.000I totally forgot about Samstown and some of these other songs and albums.
00:49:59.000And so I was hitting them pretty hard last night.
00:50:02.000Pretty nostalgic, wistful posting last night.
00:50:05.000Matt Williams, Nick, how do we get men to stop wasting time and their souls from the porn menace?
00:50:12.000There are millions of hours of free porn available that could be torrented even with a ban.
00:50:55.000I think we could look at some of Russia's laws on pornography and maybe take an example off of those where we can put in place restrictions and we can make it more difficult, but you're never going to succeed in your objectives unless you change the culture.
00:51:10.000You know, think of this we have all these people, and this is a major presupposition that people don't even think about.
00:51:18.000People think systematically, which is a big problem.
00:51:21.000I don't know if this is a Western thing, I don't know if this is a liberal thing, I don't know if this is a modernist thing, but people think in terms of systems.
00:51:28.000You have a problem X. How do we use government?
00:51:59.000No system will work if you don't have virtuous people.
00:52:02.000I don't care how perfect the system is, how calibrated it is to the type of people, how time tested, how many different political theorists you use to construct it.
00:52:12.000It's only as good as the people that are living within it.
00:52:15.000It's only as good as the people which constitute the system.
00:52:18.000So the Constitution functioned a lot better in 1776 because we had responsible people.
00:52:24.000Because to a much greater degree, we had stable families.
00:52:29.000You know, we weren't living in this postmodernist or modernist world where we were questioning logic and reason and biology and these other things.
00:52:37.000And so that's why the Constitution functioned a lot better.
00:52:40.000The order, no matter what laws you put in place, will never succeed if the people within it do not have integrity.
00:52:46.000If the constituent elements do not have integrity.
00:52:49.000And so the focus should not so much be on passing laws, changing the rules, but making the people stronger, smarter, more wise, more virtuous, more God fearing.
00:53:00.000And people are so quick to throw out Christianity, even in a utilitarian sense.
00:53:04.000And I don't like to argue about it from a utilitarian sense because, you know, of course, I believe in it because it's the truth, not because it's helpful for getting stuff and getting material wealth.
00:53:16.000But I don't think it's coincidental that the divine system has in place these incentives.
00:53:22.000I don't think it's a coincidence that the Catholic system really is perfect in the sense that you look at the concept of a judgment.
00:53:29.000Think of the concept of a final judgment and its impact, its consequence on human behavior.
00:53:34.000Some people might say, well, even if you believe or don't believe, you can agree that's a good thing.
00:53:39.000I think that's a testament to the fact that it's the truth, that this is almost a divine system, that this has profound implications and very positive implications for people, that if they believe that in the end, when they die, they are judged, they sit before judgment.
00:53:54.000Somebody who knows everything, who knows right and wrong, and they're given it.
00:53:59.000Are they going to go to hell or are they going to go to heaven?
00:54:02.000That idea, that God fearing idea, is a big part of why people behave themselves.
00:54:07.000And this is an understanding of human nature.
00:54:09.000I think that's a big reason why it's the truth.
00:54:26.000There's no way around guilt, conscience.
00:54:29.000You know, if they are imbued with the idea that pornography is morally wrong and there may be a consequence for it, either in this life or the next, well, then people are going to say, I don't want to touch that.
00:55:01.000The problem is, you know, I think women in big measure drive men to pornography because of the way they behave themselves these days.
00:55:10.000You know, who would want to go to all the effort, the wine and dine?
00:55:13.000You pay, you take them out to dinner, you pay for dinner, you hold open the door, you push open the chair, you knock on the door, you ask the father for you, you go to leaps and bounds and you date and you do all these things.
00:55:25.000And then one day you find out, oh, you know, she was cheating on you.
00:55:31.000Then you find out one day she doesn't want to get married or she wants to pursue her own career or, you know, she, I don't really feel like it's, you know, and that kind of thing.
00:55:39.000These women, they're not holding up their end of the bargain.
00:55:42.000And I understand that men aren't doing it either.
00:55:44.000And it's kind of this what came first, the chicken or the egg.
00:55:46.000But both sides have to get back together because we're both, it sucks for both.
00:55:51.000Both sides are paying a big penalty for this, you know?
00:55:54.000Women are out there and they're miserable and they're lonely and they've become these satanic creatures.
00:56:01.000I'm talking about modern women, I'm not talking about all women.
00:57:16.000Maybe instead of that, you have EGF time, or rather just regular EGF time, where it's like you get together in the gymnasium and you do speed dating and they force it on you.
00:57:27.000And everybody's forced to take a date to the homecoming or the prom.
00:57:30.000And then you cultivate these relationships.
00:57:32.000And people are taught, maybe they have a class on this kind of a thing.
00:58:28.000I still have some time to play the video games, but I'm talking about the obsession with it.
00:58:34.000It's fine maybe for recreation every now and again, but by and large, take up fishing, take up, I don't know, automobile care, who knows, a hobby, start a business, make some money, take care of yourself, go to the gym.
00:58:47.000And women, women, Women, you got to be loyal.
00:59:17.000Look, honey, babe, we'll die in the wars.
00:59:20.000We have no problem getting blown up by IEDs.
00:59:23.000We have no problem, excuse me, going on the assembly line and breathing in mercury and asbestos and hammering away and working our fingers to the bone, getting our heads chopped off on these dangerous jobs.
01:00:49.000It stands for Uniting and Strengthening America through Providing the Appropriate Tools, like necessary for intercepting and obstructing terrorism.
01:02:54.000In the early 1990s in Russia, national Bolshevism essentially posits a flavor of fascism that is not progressive, that is not utopian in the sense that national socialism was.
01:03:13.000National Bolshevism is much more like the character of Bolshevism in Russia.
01:03:18.000With Russian nationalism and everything else, without the revolutionary aspect, without the cosmopolitan internationalist element.
01:03:26.000So it's a lot of this like communist rhetoric stuff, a lot of this stuff here from the alt right, but also combined with this more stable, more conservative, more fascist type.
01:03:37.000And that's a difficult explanation of it, or rather a short and insufficient explanation of it.
01:03:43.000But that's basically the gist of it it's kind of like Russian fascism.
01:03:48.000And so this was founded in the early 1990s by Dugan and this other fella.
01:03:52.000They founded the National Bolshevik Party.
01:03:54.000And this has been going on for a good while.
01:03:58.000For some reason, I got lumped in with it.
01:04:02.000But when the Trad Thought thing happened, people like James Alsop and others said that the reason people were criticizing Lawrence Southern and Taryn McCarthy on 4chan was because they were a part of a secret club.
01:04:16.000They were part of the National Bolsheviks.
01:04:19.000They were part of a secret club who coordinated this on Discord.
01:04:24.000People like Paul Town, Beardson, the Irony Bros, they all got together as the National Bolsheviks on Discord and they conspired to go after Lauren Southern and these other women on 4chan in order to divide the movement, in order to destroy the movement from within.
01:04:44.000In their calculation, Lauren Southern was very prominent and very important, so they wanted to take her down because the National Bolsheviks wanted to accelerate the end of the alt right to give way to a new movement and a new country.
01:04:58.000And that was the accusation that I was aiding and abetting this conspiracy.
01:05:03.000And the reason why it was funny is because the founder of NOSBL, Alexander Dugan, is a very good friend of Richard Spencer's and a very good friend of Richard Spencer's wife, by the way, as well.
01:05:13.000Nina Byzantina, which is her pseudonym, she publishes, or rather, she translates books by Alexander Dugan.
01:05:20.000She is a Russian nationalist, even though she lives in America.
01:05:24.000She's married to Spencer, who publishes Alexander Dugan's books.
01:05:28.000Who has Alexander Dugan Skype in to Matt Heimbach's conference in Texas?
01:05:33.000Who had Alexander Dugan Skype in a week before Spencer spoke at Texas AM?
01:05:37.000He went to a conference with Dugan in Hungary, I believe, in 2014.
01:05:43.000And that's not to say anything more than they accuse me of being national Bolshevik.
01:06:24.000You know, if you're running as kind of this neo Confederate kind of character, and I don't say that in like a disparaging way, it would be more appealing in Louisiana than it would be in Wisconsin.
01:06:35.000You know, you have people in the South who understand what the Confederacy was about, and there's a different history there.
01:06:42.000There's kind of a different thing there.
01:06:44.000And maybe they might have been a more receptive audience to somebody like David Duke, and also somebody who was, he's from Louisiana, he's in Louisiana.
01:06:51.000And I think at the time he was a pretty good politician.
01:06:54.000If I recall, I see some of his interviews, and he was pretty good at that.
01:06:59.000But again, you have to understand the time and the place that we are now, which is not then.
01:07:04.000And it's unfortunate that he's bad optics, but you're bad optics, bad optics.
01:07:09.000And that's not to say you're a bad person.
01:07:12.000That's not to say that what you're saying isn't legitimate or that you've been given an unfair shake, which he has, but that's how it goes.
01:07:21.000Carl Ritzenthaler, thoughts on the lame Grammy show?
01:07:57.000It's just amazing the degeneracy, the swearing, the anti Trump stuff that goes on, and this is just the norm.
01:08:04.000This is supposed to be like what normal television is.
01:08:07.000People, kids watching this, and the performances where you have the women sticking their butts out, and it's all the sexualization of everything, the language.
01:08:37.000Behave in such a way that your children would be proud of you if you were their father, if you were their mother, if you're a man or you're a woman.
01:08:45.000I think that's a big part of the degradation.
01:08:47.000Of the dignity of our people is the fact that we no longer see ourselves as responsible.
01:11:06.000And if you don't believe me, I mean, ask yourself for example, McDonald's puts in how much effort and money into their advertisements.
01:11:15.000I watched a video on this maybe a year ago where they show when they take a picture of a hamburger, they have somebody come in and they do all kinds of things to it.
01:11:24.000They artificially create something, they spray it, they adjust it with tweezers and things so it looks just right.
01:11:30.000They paint it so it looks like it's glistening, they make it so that the proportions look just right and everything.
01:13:56.000That's not why they're not associating with this movement.
01:13:59.000It's because people in this movement are unserious.
01:14:01.000It's governed by people who, and governed by the demands of a very small group of people who don't understand what it takes to get where we need to go or is unwilling to do what it takes to get where we need to go.
01:15:33.000Dedicated how many billions, you could say trillions of dollars to convincing people that fascism is the worst thing in the world.
01:15:41.000This is their strongest, their most well defended, their most fortified point that fascism, that Nazism, and all of this is wrong and bad, and nobody should think about it.
01:15:52.000And we want to just charge straight ahead at their most well defended, their most fortified, where they've dedicated the most money and attention.
01:15:59.000And we just want to say, let's just go head on.
01:16:02.000We got to go around the back door, we got to go through the side door.
01:16:06.000Attack them on the points where they are weak.
01:16:08.000They cannot defend what's going on in this country.