America First - Nicholas J. Fuentes - March 26, 2018


The Disastrous Spending Bill | America First Ep. 131


Episode Stats


Length

1 hour and 11 minutes

Words per minute

195.12886

Word count

14,007

Sentence count

986


Summary

Summaries generated with gmurro/bart-large-finetuned-filtered-spotify-podcast-summ .

Transcript

Transcripts from "America First - Nicholas J. Fuentes" are sourced from the Knowledge Fight Interactive Search Tool. Explore them interactively here.
00:00:06.000 Good evening, everybody.
00:00:07.000 We're watching America First.
00:00:08.000 My name is Nicholas J. Fuentes, and we have a great show for you tonight.
00:00:12.000 Lots to talk about, lots to get into.
00:00:16.000 It's been kind of a rough week.
00:00:18.000 Kind of a rough week last week.
00:00:21.000 We saw John Bolton get kind of nominated to become chief of the National Security Council, which, of course, we covered on Thursday.
00:00:29.000 We saw the signing of a terrible omnibus spending bill, an historic omnibus spending bill, and a big one.
00:00:36.000 And we saw.
00:00:38.000 President Trump tweeting out last week that they were looking into banning bump stocks, that the Justice Department was looking into banning bump stocks.
00:00:45.000 So, not a great week, not a tremendous week last week, but that's all right.
00:00:49.000 It's a new week this week.
00:00:50.000 It's a new week of America First.
00:00:52.000 We're back on the show.
00:00:54.000 We weren't here on YouTube on Friday because I was debating Mike Tokes on the BA experience, which, if you watch that, as predicted, as promised, it was a pretty resounding victory.
00:01:05.000 It was a pretty convincing defeat.
00:01:09.000 Delivered to Mike Tokes, and it was a great time.
00:01:11.000 Ethnic nationalism versus civic nationalism, the debate that never gets old.
00:01:15.000 It's the one we have to have with all kinds of people.
00:01:18.000 And this is, I think, the deciding issue, not just for America, but for the world.
00:01:23.000 I think this is the defining issue for the world order in the 21st century.
00:01:27.000 And so, a very important one.
00:01:28.000 If you missed that, it's on the BA Experience YouTube channel.
00:01:32.000 And that's why we weren't here on Friday.
00:01:33.000 We did a little after debate, a post debate recap on Twitch.
00:01:38.000 We were playing Fortnite.
00:01:39.000 So that was a great time, but we are back here for another exciting week of America First.
00:01:43.000 Remember, we are so excited to announce the release of two exclusive new podcasts for our America First Premium members.
00:01:51.000 Remember that tomorrow we have our debut episode of America First World Report, which is our foreign affairs podcast.
00:01:59.000 It's an hour long, it's going to be a weekly thing.
00:02:02.000 And that'll be debuting tomorrow on SoundCloud only for America First Premium members.
00:02:07.000 And then on Thursday, we'll have the debut episode.
00:02:10.000 Of our other weekly podcast, which will be America First 2018 Election HQ.
00:02:15.000 And that'll be coming out on Thursday.
00:02:17.000 So remember to sign up on makersupport.com slash Nick J. Fuentes.
00:02:21.000 The link is in the description.
00:02:22.000 It's only five bucks a month.
00:02:24.000 And you'll get those two exclusive podcasts.
00:02:26.000 This show in podcast format on SoundCloud.
00:02:29.000 You get a special role in the Discord server.
00:02:32.000 And if that's not enough, you get priority on our call in shows, which are every other week.
00:02:36.000 The next one is on Friday.
00:02:38.000 So it's a very exciting week here on America First.
00:02:40.000 A lot of things coming together.
00:02:42.000 It's a lot of fun.
00:02:43.000 And we got to get into news.
00:02:44.000 We're going to be talking about the omnibus spending bill and sort of reaction to that.
00:02:49.000 We talked a little bit about it on Thursday, but it hadn't been, I don't think, looked into as much.
00:02:55.000 If you recall, it's a 2,400 page bill, and it had barely even been read.
00:02:59.000 It hadn't even been signed when we covered it on Thursday.
00:03:02.000 And so we'll be getting into what this means for the presidency, what this means for the midterms, what this means for President Trump, what's exactly in the bill, white pills and black pills in the bill, white pills and black pills about the bill.
00:03:14.000 Really some interesting takes, I think, we'll have on the show for you tonight about that.
00:03:18.000 We'll also be talking, of course, about the March for Our Lives gun control protest that was nationwide over the weekend.
00:03:26.000 Lots of hot takes about that.
00:03:28.000 I mean, we saw all these youngsters up there speaking in Washington, D.C., and really it was like a Jacobin revolt.
00:03:34.000 I'm watching these youngsters go up on, and, you know, like I'm some old guy, but I'm watching these high school kids get up there on the stage, and they're yelling, and they're screaming, and they're crying.
00:03:45.000 And one of them throws up my cousin, Samantha Fuentes.
00:03:48.000 We're not related, but throwing up all over the place.
00:03:51.000 And I thought it was really like the Jacobins.
00:03:54.000 It was like watching the French Revolution, the way you have all these emotional, passionate people getting up there, and you should have seen some of the signs there.
00:04:02.000 So we'll get into that.
00:04:03.000 And then, last but certainly not least, we have to get into a new disclosure about the Pulse nightclub shooting.
00:04:10.000 If you recall the Pulse nightclub shooting, the gay club shooting in 2016 in Orlando, Florida, the perpetrator of that shooting, Omar Mateen, his father, it came out today that the father of the Orlando nightclub shooting was an FBI informant.
00:04:26.000 And we have to talk about that because everywhere you look, whether it's Vegas, Pulse, Boston bombings, the shooting in Parkland in February, There are feds everywhere.
00:04:39.000 Why are there glow in the dark federal agents in every mass shooting?
00:04:43.000 Every time.
00:04:44.000 Las Vegas, Stephen Paddock had three successive jobs at the federal government.
00:04:49.000 David Hogg, the most vocal, one of the most vocal activists since the Parkland shooting, dad's a retired FBI agent.
00:04:57.000 Omar Mateen, dad's an FBI informant.
00:04:59.000 Boston Bomber's uncle was married to the daughter of a CIA agent.
00:05:04.000 Why are all these feds everywhere?
00:05:05.000 So we'll get into that.
00:05:07.000 But.
00:05:08.000 I don't know.
00:05:09.000 I wanted to get into, before we get into any of the news, I wanted to get into one thing.
00:05:12.000 Before we get into the big stories and the omnibus spending bill in particular, I wanted to get into one thing which I saw on my timeline on Twitter, and this just made me lose my mind.
00:05:22.000 You know me, I'm a very level headed guy.
00:05:24.000 I'm a pretty cool headed guy.
00:05:25.000 Not a lot of things set me off.
00:05:27.000 Not a lot of things send me, you know, reeling and angry and punching the wall.
00:05:32.000 Really, it takes a lot to get me riled up, folks, and to lash out.
00:05:35.000 But I saw this in The Hill.
00:05:38.000 This morning, and you have to look at these things because we do a lot of like media watchdog stuff where we talk about the news, but we also talk about how the news is covered.
00:05:47.000 I think there's no better example than this kind of blatant lying.
00:05:50.000 I'm scrolling through my Twitter timeline today, and I follow The Hill because I think The Hill kind of gives you a good gestalt of what the left wing media is saying.
00:05:58.000 I see one of the headlines from The Hill on Twitter today Afghanistan vet deported back to Mexico.
00:06:06.000 I'm thinking, oh my gosh.
00:06:07.000 Well, I'm not really thinking this, but you know, for a fact, I'm thinking, oh my gosh.
00:06:11.000 An Afghanistan veteran, a brave hero that served in the armed forces, is now being deported.
00:06:16.000 What could actually be the case here?
00:06:18.000 I'm sure nothing actually happened there.
00:06:21.000 I'm sure there was just an innocent Mexican man or an innocent veteran who happened to be Mexican who got deported by evil drunk.
00:06:29.000 Click on the article, and lo and behold, we find out that this Mexican got his green card revoked after he was caught on a felony drug conviction selling cocaine to an undercover police officer.
00:06:42.000 And so I look into this story, and this is just a brief thing before we get into the big stories, but this is just a small thing.
00:06:48.000 Really, it's a big thing.
00:06:49.000 But it's a small, it's one story that gives you an idea of what exactly is going on with the media today, folks.
00:06:56.000 That if you're reading the headlines, if you're just, you know, flipping through, you catch the nightly news maybe one evening, if you're not in tune and you're reading the articles and you're thinking about what you're reading, you're getting what amounts to lies.
00:07:08.000 You're getting effectively nothing but lies from the media.
00:07:12.000 And they write the headlines deliberately like that.
00:07:15.000 And they sit around in their teams and they write these stories deliberately like that to mislead, to deceive for a political agenda.
00:07:22.000 And so we just have to point that out.
00:07:24.000 We've been doing it just about every week.
00:07:26.000 Maybe we'll have to make it a regular segment where we watch the media and what they do.
00:07:30.000 But I just think there's no better example than this where you have a headline that says, Afghanistan veteran deported back to Mexico.
00:07:37.000 And if you don't read the article, like most people, if you have a Twitter and you go into your analytics, how many impressions do you have versus engagements?
00:07:44.000 How many people see the tweet versus how many people click the link?
00:07:48.000 Not a lot of people click the link.
00:07:50.000 And so the Hill will put out this headline that, oh, people are being deported that are veterans.
00:07:54.000 They're deporting fine people who have been here for years.
00:07:57.000 And nobody, I don't think very many people are looking into it.
00:08:00.000 They're not checking it because they don't understand this stuff.
00:08:03.000 And then for people that actually do, you find out wait a minute, it had nothing to do with him being Mexican or a vet.
00:08:08.000 It has to do with he was a felon.
00:08:10.000 He was a felon.
00:08:11.000 He was a drug seller.
00:08:12.000 He was a drug dealer and a felon selling poison to Americans and to children and all the rest.
00:08:21.000 And then you wonder why he got deported, right?
00:08:23.000 So that was just a brief thing.
00:08:24.000 But it's one of those things where it looks like every week there's a story like this, whether it was the Putin thing, whether it was what was covered last week, which I forget, there was a big story we did like that.
00:08:34.000 And of course, today.
00:08:35.000 But to get into the omnibus spending bill, I know this was a very contentious thing on Twitter.
00:08:40.000 This is a very contentious thing in the country.
00:08:42.000 I kind of live in Twitter, so that's kind of my source of reference.
00:08:45.000 But the omnibus spending bill is obviously a very contentious piece of legislation.
00:08:50.000 Here we had a $1.3 trillion spending bill, second biggest omnibus spending bill in history, passed by the House and the Senate on Thursday, signed into law by the president on Friday.
00:09:04.000 Now, to first of all, to go over what an omnibus spending bill is, because I know there was a lot of confusion.
00:09:09.000 People were saying it's not a budget, and so that means there's different considerations, that means there's different rules.
00:09:16.000 All an omnibus spending bill is, is an appropriations bill, but just many of them packaged into one.
00:09:21.000 Omnibus just means that you package all things, a lot of things, into one bill.
00:09:27.000 So omnibus can be applied to a lot of things, but an omnibus spending bill means you package many appropriations bills that would have happened several times throughout the year.
00:09:36.000 Into one major bill.
00:09:38.000 Normally, in a year, you have 12 appropriations bills passed by the House and by the Senate.
00:09:43.000 An omnibus spending bill, omni meaning all, packages all the appropriations bills into one big bill, a 2,400 page, $1.3 trillion spending bill, and they pass it at one time.
00:09:54.000 Now, unlike a budget, a budget which is put forth by the president and by his economic council and his office of management and budget and then passed to the Congress, a budget does not have the force of law.
00:10:06.000 So people are saying, Well, it's not a budget, and that means that it's actually a good thing.
00:10:11.000 The opposite is true.
00:10:12.000 An appropriations bill does have the force of law.
00:10:15.000 It is passed by both the House and the Senate and then signed into law.
00:10:18.000 A budget is just suggested.
00:10:20.000 A budget is suggestive.
00:10:21.000 The president has his budget compiled by the Office of Management and Budget through the other agencies and departments in the federal government, and then he proposes his budget to the Congress, and the Congress then takes the budget and creates appropriations bills, which is a collection of which.
00:10:38.000 Comprises the omnibus bill.
00:10:39.000 So people are saying there were things about that that's actually not true.
00:10:42.000 So the omnibus spending bill passed on Friday, and there were some very tricky components here which people were upset with.
00:10:49.000 For starters, it did not fully fund the border wall.
00:10:51.000 In fact, it didn't fund the border wall at all.
00:10:54.000 President Trump was asking in January when these negotiations began and we had a government shutdown, and then we did a couple of stopgap measures.
00:11:02.000 The proposal by President Trump for the wall was $25 billion, $18 billion for the actual construction.
00:11:10.000 Of a 1,000 mile concrete wall and an additional $7 billion, actually up to $30 billion for border patrol agents, for ICE agents, for federal judges to process illegal immigrants getting deported from the country, and also surveillance, maintenance for the wall.
00:11:27.000 I mean, you had $25 to $30 billion, a very decent chunk of money that the White House proposed as far back as January for what this border security package should look like, for what the wall and other things should look like to get our immigration situation in order.
00:11:41.000 If you recall, President Trump initially wanted to trade.
00:11:44.000 That $30 billion for wall and border and all that for DACA.
00:11:49.000 He wanted the $30 billion for the wall, an end to chain migration, and an end to the diversity visa lottery system in exchange for DACA.
00:11:57.000 Ended up that this omnibus spending bill that appropriated money through September 30th, that's key.
00:12:02.000 Remember, omnibus spending bill funds the government through September 30th.
00:12:07.000 He wanted all of that in the bill, but it turned out none of it ended up in the bill.
00:12:10.000 Not diversity visa lottery, not chain migration, not DACA, and not the $25 billion to $30 billion for the wall.
00:12:18.000 Instead, what we got in this bill for border was $1.6 billion.
00:12:24.000 So we wanted $18 for the wall with $25 to $30 for additional things like agents and maintenance and all the rest.
00:12:31.000 He got $1.6 billion.
00:12:33.000 What is that?
00:12:34.000 4% of what he asked for?
00:12:36.000 A little bit more?
00:12:37.000 Something like 5% of what he asked for for the wall?
00:12:41.000 We got $1.6 billion.
00:12:43.000 And here's the curious thing about that because he said in the press conference where he signed the bill, he said that, well, construction on the wall begins on Monday.
00:12:50.000 It begins immediately.
00:12:52.000 And we got a down payment on the wall.
00:12:53.000 He described the $1.6 billion as a down payment.
00:12:57.000 And they could start on the wall and the rest of the funding would come later.
00:13:00.000 But here's the curious thing about it it's embarrassing enough.
00:13:03.000 It's bad enough that his own party put together an omnibus spending bill that didn't have remotely close to the money he needed for the wall.
00:13:11.000 But if that wasn't enough to add insult to injury, there are specific provisions, very deliberate, specific language in the bill, which says that the $1.6 billion appropriated to immigration and customs cannot go towards any kind of concrete wall anywhere near the border.
00:13:29.000 It can't go towards any kind of the prototypes that Donald Trump inspected last week in San Diego.
00:13:35.000 And actually, most of the money has to go towards.
00:13:38.000 Fencing on the border, and most of it is going towards repairing and replacing existing fencing.
00:13:45.000 And get this here's the rich part, which I didn't hear anywhere, but somebody from the administration told me the vast majority of the $1.6 billion goes towards gates in the fence.
00:13:57.000 So you got $1.6 billion out of the $18 for the wall and the $25 to $30 for border agents and all the rest.
00:14:04.000 And not only could that $1.6 billion not be spent on a concrete wall, not Be spent on anything like Donald Trump inspected in San Diego.
00:14:12.000 Not only can it only go towards building fences or repairing existing fences, but actually a big fat sum of it goes towards gates in the fence.
00:14:24.000 Gates in the fence.
00:14:26.000 Which, if you understand what we're trying to achieve here, if you understand what we're trying to accomplish with a border wall, is we're trying to build a barrier, we're trying to build a physical impediment.
00:14:40.000 Between the United States and Mexico.
00:14:42.000 We're trying to make it so that you physically cannot get from point A to point B.
00:14:48.000 And the majority of the money that was supposed to go towards that project is now going towards making entryways, making it so that people can get through the existing fences, which are already depleted.
00:15:01.000 So people are understandably very upset with the bill, as I am, as many people are.
00:15:08.000 People have described it, and excuse my French, but people have described it as.
00:15:12.000 Donald Trump being forced to eat a shit sandwich when he signed it on the press conference because he came up there and he wasn't exactly enthused.
00:15:21.000 He says, We're not happy with the bill.
00:15:23.000 We're not happy with a lot of things in it, and I'll never sign a bill like this again.
00:15:27.000 I mean, he said that explicitly, but people are rightfully upset.
00:15:31.000 Here we are, more than a year after the inauguration, zero miles of border wall built.
00:15:37.000 The farthest we've gotten, we have the proposal for it, we have the prototypes for it, and I guess some kind of a design.
00:15:44.000 We have no appropriations for it.
00:15:46.000 And here was the chance, here was the time to do it.
00:15:49.000 And instead of getting any kind of money for the wall, we get a big fat slap in the face.
00:15:53.000 We get a paltry sum that isn't even a fraction of what would be required to build a wall.
00:15:58.000 And we get explicit language that says none of it even goes towards anything like a wall, anything resembling a wall, but actually the failed barriers that are already in place, which is fences and gates and all the rest.
00:16:10.000 And so people are very upset about this, and I understand that.
00:16:14.000 I'm certainly upset by it.
00:16:18.000 But I guess where we can maybe see a silver lining here.
00:16:21.000 I said I didn't see a silver lining on Friday, and it's true.
00:16:25.000 The bill is garbage.
00:16:25.000 The bill sucks.
00:16:27.000 There's no white pill.
00:16:28.000 There's nothing encouraging, actually, about the bill.
00:16:30.000 The bill is terrible, and, you know, there it is.
00:16:34.000 It was constructed by Paul Ryan and Mitch McConnell, and I think they deserve the blame.
00:16:38.000 President Trump signed it, I think, because it would only extend the process.
00:16:43.000 I don't think we'd do any better with Paul Ryan and Mitch McConnell.
00:16:46.000 It would only delay the inevitable here.
00:16:48.000 The silver lining might be here where I could maybe lift your spirits a little bit is think about when the appropriations for this bill expire.
00:16:57.000 Think long and hard.
00:16:58.000 You remember what I said to remember just a moment ago?
00:17:00.000 The bill's appropriations expire on September 30th.
00:17:05.000 So, on September 30th, the money runs out again, and we're back where we were in January with government shutdowns and all the rest.
00:17:13.000 September 30th.
00:17:14.000 And think what happens just four weeks later in November.
00:17:17.000 We have our midterm election.
00:17:18.000 So, I guess the one, the silver lining here, may be something that is encouraging about the process.
00:17:23.000 The bill is terrible.
00:17:25.000 There are some things redeeming about the bill, which we'll get into in a moment.
00:17:28.000 But maybe the silver lining here with the wall funding is that.
00:17:32.000 In September 30th, we get to go through this process again.
00:17:35.000 And President Trump said, I'll never sign another bill like this.
00:17:39.000 We're going to get into why that's a good thing.
00:17:41.000 But first, consider the fact that the appropriations run out September 30th.
00:17:44.000 We'll have four weeks then, between then and Election Day, to put together another appropriations bill that'll have money for the wall, that'll have money for other things.
00:17:54.000 And so there is a little bit of light at the end of the tunnel.
00:17:56.000 I know this bill seems like the end of the world, and certainly there are very few good things in the bill, if any at all.
00:18:03.000 And people have a right to be upset with President Trump because it is a setback.
00:18:07.000 You know, people were hitting me on Twitter saying, you know, how's Nick going to defend this?
00:18:11.000 How's Nick going to spin this and say it's all strategic?
00:18:14.000 It was all part of the plan.
00:18:16.000 I legitimately think, for the first time, for the first time in the whole presidency, I legitimately think this was a stumble.
00:18:23.000 I legitimately think this was not part of the plan.
00:18:26.000 This was a legitimate setback.
00:18:28.000 You know, you look at DACA, you look at the Iranian protests, you look at the Syrian strike, and I see all of those things as calculated.
00:18:35.000 I see all of those things as happening.
00:18:37.000 A greater strategy in mind for the long term.
00:18:41.000 Here, I don't see that.
00:18:42.000 I see somebody in President Trump who was caught off guard, who was not able to close a deal on this omnibus spending bill, and who is, we had to take a step back here.
00:18:52.000 And so I'm not defending the bill.
00:18:53.000 I would never defend this bill.
00:18:55.000 But the way that we could prevent ourselves from totally blowing our brains out and saying this is the end of the world is to realize that we'll have another shot at this appropriations process on September 30th in that week, and that'll give us ample time in the remaining weeks to campaign.
00:19:10.000 And win for re election.
00:19:11.000 If we could get a significant amount of money for the wall then or for other things, I think we'd be in good shape.
00:19:17.000 And additionally, here is the white pill about the bill.
00:19:20.000 Here is the one thing in the bill which makes it, I don't know, I think a little bit interesting.
00:19:26.000 Here's just a small detail where if you look in pages 580 through 595 of the Omnibus Spending Bill, there is a clause in the 580 section which allocates $245 million for the Office of the Inspector General.
00:19:43.000 On page 595, the language says, No funds in this act shall be used to deny an inspector general funded under this act timely access to any records, documents, other materials to the department or agency over which the IG has responsibilities or to prevent access to records.
00:20:04.000 And so, what do I mean by this?
00:20:05.000 What do I mean when I talk about the office of the inspector general?
00:20:09.000 Well, the inspector general, which is a man by the name of Horowitz, who served under the Bush administration, the Obama administration, We've been talking about it on the show for a long time.
00:20:18.000 But since a little bit of time before the inauguration, the Inspector General, Mr. Horowitz, has been looking into the Clinton email scandal, has been looking into the FBI's handling of the Clinton email scandal, has been looking into any kinds of leaks, any kinds of improprieties in the FISA scandal that happened with Nunes Mendo and all of that.
00:20:39.000 The Inspector General has been looking essentially into the corruption of Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama for over a year now.
00:20:45.000 And the report was due earlier in fall, but they've expanded the deadline several times.
00:20:50.000 It's now expected sometime in the remainder days, in the remaining weeks of March or in the early weeks of April.
00:20:50.000 Times.
00:20:57.000 And this inspector general support, if it is a good thing, if it's everything that it's hyped up to be, many people have expectations that it's really going to blow the lid on a lot of corruption and a lot of things that have been going on, not just with Democrats, but with everybody in Washington, D.C.
00:21:12.000 Then I think the white pill here, the silver lining here, might be that if this bill allocates the money and the resources and there is language specifically for the IG in here, And the IG report is very explosive.
00:21:26.000 Remember that we have until September 30th to change the rules.
00:21:29.000 So imagine a hypothetical scenario, which this is a hypothetical.
00:21:32.000 This is nothing, this is not an assurance.
00:21:35.000 This is not a prediction.
00:21:36.000 This is nothing anybody should take to the bank or anything like that.
00:21:40.000 But if we have explicit language in here for the IG and the office for the IG and his report that's allocating money and that's preventing money from stopping him from doing what he needs to do, let's say that in April, this report is everything that it's cracked up to be.
00:21:54.000 And Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama and their allies and donors and funders and politicians are seriously looking at indictments, seriously looking at a major shakeup.
00:22:03.000 And suddenly in the midterms, we see the ball or the pendulum shift in favor of the Republicans.
00:22:09.000 This takes all the gas out of the Democratic Party.
00:22:11.000 The enthusiasm gap narrows.
00:22:13.000 We start to do very well.
00:22:14.000 And this is used as a pretext to reform how bills are passed.
00:22:18.000 This is used as a pretext to clean house in the party apparatus and the executive.
00:22:24.000 In the executive branch of government and the legislative branch of government.
00:22:27.000 And by September 30th, we have a party that reflects Donald Trump's ideology and his platform and his leadership, and we're able to pass something good.
00:22:36.000 This is a hypothetical scenario.
00:22:37.000 This is just something to keep people from totally blackpilling because I think there is a lot of time here between now and election day.
00:22:45.000 And we've got a lot of good things forthcoming.
00:22:47.000 The IG report is one of those things.
00:22:49.000 It could be a totally knock your socks off, bigger than Richard Nixon scandal, bigger than Watergate scandal, which could really decisively.
00:22:58.000 Shift the momentum in favor of the Republicans.
00:23:01.000 We have the infrastructure bill, which is still on the table, which is wildly popular among Democrats and Republicans, which seems like it would be relatively easy to pass.
00:23:10.000 And I'm sure that Democrats would fund that.
00:23:12.000 I'm sure there could even be wall funding in that if it were passed.
00:23:14.000 Who knows?
00:23:15.000 You have the historic summit with North Korea set to take place either this month or next month.
00:23:20.000 They were kind of unclear about whether or not they said by the end of May or by the end of, or by the beginning of May when that meeting would happen.
00:23:28.000 But we'll have that.
00:23:29.000 That'll be historic.
00:23:30.000 Very good optics for the president.
00:23:31.000 A very good.
00:23:33.000 Historical thing for us to bank on for the election.
00:23:35.000 So it's a bad bill.
00:23:38.000 Bolton was a bad pick.
00:23:39.000 The bump stock thing was a bad decision, but we had a bad week.
00:23:43.000 We had a bad week.
00:23:43.000 And I think if you consider everything that we have going for us right now, which is that you have one president, one literally one guy who is single handedly fighting a 15 front war with a 100 year legacy system.
00:23:57.000 He's fighting the deep state, the Democratic Party, the media.
00:24:01.000 He's fighting his own party.
00:24:02.000 He's fighting the NFL.
00:24:03.000 He's fighting Wall Street.
00:24:05.000 He's fighting the international foreign lobbying effort.
00:24:08.000 I mean, he's fighting just about everybody in the world.
00:24:10.000 All by himself.
00:24:12.000 And so far, he's done a very good job.
00:24:13.000 I think if you look at the bigger picture here, where he took out ISIS, he took out the TPP, the UN Climate Pact, the migration pact for the UN, the climate pact, the Paris Climate Accords, he's done so much in terms of trade, in terms of economy.
00:24:29.000 And I know the wall was the big thing.
00:24:30.000 I know immigration is the important thing.
00:24:32.000 But I think for people that are saying the sky is falling, Trump has cucked on his promises, he's not our guy anymore, I think it's a little premature.
00:24:40.000 I'll be the first one to concede that it was a bad week, it was a bad bill.
00:24:44.000 Not to defend it or anything, but I think that's just how it has to be looked at.
00:24:48.000 It's one bad bill, it's one bad week, and we have a new week next week, and we have many things on the horizon just in the short term that will be, I think, very good for the Republican Party, for our chances in the midterms, and there's a lot of time between now and the election.
00:25:04.000 At this time last year, or at this time in 2016 during the presidential election, President Trump hadn't even won the primary yet.
00:25:11.000 I don't even think Ted Cruz had dropped out of the race yet.
00:25:14.000 So, imagine all the time between President Trump being very close to clinching the nomination during the primary season in 2016 and the election in November.
00:25:23.000 I mean, that was a lot of time.
00:25:24.000 There was a lot of things that happened between then.
00:25:26.000 You had the conventions, you had the pussygate tape, you had President Trump's trip to Mexico, the flood in New Orleans.
00:25:32.000 I mean, you had all kinds of things going on.
00:25:35.000 And many things will happen between now and 2018.
00:25:38.000 It's not all hope is lost, not yet.
00:25:41.000 And like I said, bad week, bad bill, but there's a lot of real estate between now and then.
00:25:46.000 So, nothing to get too upset about.
00:25:48.000 And then additionally, I will say, President Trump tweeted over the weekend that he could, and he suggested this kind of ambiguously, kind of in a subtle way, that he could potentially use military funds to build the wall.
00:26:01.000 And I don't see, it would be legal for him to do that.
00:26:04.000 I don't think there are any legal impediments for him to use Department of Defense money for the wall.
00:26:09.000 And if you recall, he got a $60 billion increase in military spending with this omnibus spending bill.
00:26:15.000 If that's some kind of a hypothetical white pill here.
00:26:19.000 $654 billion for the Defense Department, which is $60 billion more than last year.
00:26:24.000 And he hinted over the weekend that he could possibly use money and appropriations for the military for the wall.
00:26:30.000 Certainly, that wouldn't be outside the realm of possibility.
00:26:33.000 He's already been working with the Army Corps of Engineers and the Department of Homeland Security for designing the wall, for putting plans together, and all the rest.
00:26:41.000 I don't think it would be totally outside of reality to suggest that he might use that money to get it started sooner rather than later.
00:26:49.000 So, But we'll keep an eye on that.
00:26:51.000 That's just one theory.
00:26:52.000 That's one suggestion.
00:26:53.000 It was a pretty rough week in that regard.
00:26:55.000 But I guess we have to read at it and look at it in context.
00:27:00.000 Bad bill, bad week, but we're going to have bad weeks.
00:27:02.000 It's a 20 year struggle against this enormous establishment, and we'll have a bad week.
00:27:07.000 But people are having a field day with it saying, oh, do you know, Nick's brand is suffering.
00:27:11.000 Nick's brand is Trump.
00:27:12.000 Nick's brand is white pilling.
00:27:14.000 My brand is America first.
00:27:16.000 My brand is looking at the bigger picture.
00:27:18.000 And we understand it was a bad bill.
00:27:21.000 We admit it was a bad bill.
00:27:23.000 But this is a new week.
00:27:24.000 We have another week next week.
00:27:25.000 We have many weeks between now and November.
00:27:27.000 So it's no reason to burn your MAGA hat, no reason to get upset.
00:27:31.000 Trump himself acknowledged it was a bad bill, and you could see it.
00:27:35.000 So that's the omnibus spending bill.
00:27:37.000 The next big thing moving right along into, I guess, another depressing kind of a thing was this March for Our Lives rally where you had people from all over the world participating in it, even people in London, people in Europe, people all over the place, but especially in the United States protesting.
00:27:55.000 They had massive protests in just about every major city.
00:27:58.000 The biggest one was in Washington, D.C., where initially they reported there were 800,000 people in attendance there, and actually it was closer to 200,000, which, you know, Devil's in the details there, where NBC is saying it's 800,000, there's millions of people taking to the streets, and actually it's about a quarter of that number.
00:28:16.000 Nonetheless, it was a big rally.
00:28:18.000 It was a big effort, the March for Our Lives rally, and you had all of our favorite activists, David Hogg, Emma Gonzalez, Cameron Kasky, and all of our favorite characters from Parkland.
00:28:30.000 And it was a circus.
00:28:32.000 It was everything that we expected.
00:28:34.000 I was watching coverage of it on Saturday and just thinking, this is actually doing more harm than good for their cause.
00:28:40.000 I think, you know, in some ways, We look at that rally and we look at the kinds of people that turned out for it and the speeches and what they were cheering for and the signs, which were all despicable for their own reasons.
00:28:52.000 But I think we look at all of that, and on the one hand, we can say, isn't it sad that so many people have bought into this?
00:28:57.000 Isn't it sad that so many people have bought into these lies about gun violence and about AR 15s and gun control and all the rest?
00:29:06.000 But by the same token, I think it's important to realize that just as many people will be looking at it in the way that we are.
00:29:13.000 Then people are looking at it favorably.
00:29:15.000 Maybe even more people be looking at it the way we are.
00:29:17.000 Because you imagine people that are in swing states, people that are in West Virginia, people that are in Pennsylvania, people in Ohio, people in New Hampshire, where you have white working class people, then maybe they vote for Democrats because they liked Obamacare.
00:29:31.000 Maybe they voted for Barack Obama because they didn't like the bank bailout, because they didn't like the way George W. Bush bailed out all these different Wall Street firms.
00:29:40.000 Maybe they were for Democrats because they supported the worker and they supported economically.
00:29:44.000 Lower income people.
00:29:46.000 But then when these Ohioans and these Pennsylvanians and these people in New Hampshire and West Virginia, they see, you know, the Mystery Meat collection from high school get up on stage yelling the Jacobin rallying cry of, we're going to take your guns.
00:30:00.000 We're going to take semi automatic rifles.
00:30:02.000 And suddenly, Democrats' odds at taking back the House or the Senate become a little bit more dubious, become a little bit more questionable.
00:30:11.000 You have to remember that in 2018, you have 15,000.
00:30:15.000 Contested Democrat states, or rather, there's 15 contested Democrat seats in the Senate.
00:30:21.000 You have many states up for grabs in the Senate and in the House that Trump won in 2016, where you have Democratic incumbents in states where Trump won in 2016, or you have Republican governors or Republican legislatures, or a combination of all three, or two, or one of them.
00:30:36.000 And so you look at this rally and you look at where the Democratic Party is headed in terms of how they've pursued their messaging.
00:30:43.000 And even something like this, where you would think that many people are on board with it because you see the numbers that show up in these.
00:30:48.000 Big urban and liberal cities, it actually might be doing a lot more harm than good.
00:30:53.000 You look at, for example, in Montana, where the Democrats have an incumbent defending his Senate seat in Montana, and Montana's not exactly a liberal state.
00:31:01.000 Montana's not exactly a blue state.
00:31:04.000 And you imagine in Missouri, where the Democrats have an incumbent, or some of these other states in the West, in the Midwest, in the South, and you realize that it's going to be a lot harder for the Democrats to hold on or to contest some of these seats in 2018, when on the one hand, We saw in Pennsylvania, they're pulling out a surprise victory because they have a working class message, a moderate message, one that's explicitly anti Democrat.
00:31:28.000 But on the national level, if you look at what they're pushing with millions, billions of dollars in the media with their political activism, it's messaging that is anathema to a centrist, to a moderate, even to some of the average white Democratic voters.
00:31:42.000 So I don't think it was necessarily the end of the world in terms of electoral politics.
00:31:47.000 Now, that said, we heard some very disturbing things.
00:31:50.000 We found out that suddenly these activists who were a couple of weeks ago in favor of sensible gun reform and sensible background checks and raising the age limit.
00:32:00.000 Are now in favor of banning semi automatic rifles.
00:32:02.000 And I think this should tell us everything we need to know about the left, everything we need to know about gun control at all, which is to say that they will come to the rally, they will come to the debating table, they will come to the town hall, and they will tell you with a straight face and with their fingers crossed behind their back that they are in favor of common sense gun reform.
00:32:24.000 They don't want to take your guns, they don't want to take your rifle, they just want sensible reform that everyone can agree on.
00:32:31.000 They just want to make sure that people with mental illnesses can't get.
00:32:33.000 Guns.
00:32:34.000 Oh, that's reasonable enough.
00:32:36.000 They just want to make sure that you have a proper background check when you buy a firearm and that you're an appropriate age when you buy a firearm.
00:32:42.000 Okay, everybody believes that.
00:32:44.000 But when they're among their own, when they really take the mask off and they show you their cards the whole time, the entire time, until the end of time, they are for the confiscation of firearms.
00:32:54.000 And they said it at the rally yesterday.
00:32:57.000 Whereas they went on that town hall and they said the NRA is controlling politicians and we just want reasonable background checks.
00:33:03.000 And they were in support of raising the age limit.
00:33:06.000 And all these half measures, we heard over the weekend, every single one of the speakers said, We're going to take your semi automatic rifles.
00:33:12.000 We're going to take your guns, your military style assault weapons.
00:33:16.000 And we know what that means.
00:33:17.000 That means rifles.
00:33:18.000 That means hunting rifles.
00:33:20.000 That means any kind of semi automatic rifle.
00:33:23.000 You look at even the language of the moderate things they propose, for example, the bump stock ban.
00:33:28.000 And one of our good friends of the show, Joe the Boomer, Joe the Serb, was in our call in show one of those weeks talking about how the language and some of the bills being put forth by Congress. Was so ambiguous that just about anything that could be used to modify the rate of fire of a firearm would fall under that bump stock ban.
00:33:46.000 And so you look at these things, you look at the whole of their message, you look at what they say when they're with their own versus what they say when they're with us.
00:33:53.000 And this is why we can never give an inch on gun control.
00:33:57.000 This is why when President Trump announced last week that he was looking into a bump stock ban in the Justice Department, this is why that was so misguided.
00:34:05.000 You're not going to win any new voters, you're not going to win any new converts with.
00:34:09.000 These half measures, with these small concessions, these gradual incremental concessions, because they're coming for the whole House.
00:34:16.000 They're coming for the whole thing, and they'll never be satisfied.
00:34:19.000 You notice that when President Trump tweeted out after he passed the omnibus spending bill, after he put John Bolton in charge, when he tweeted out that he was looking into a bump stock ban, did the left welcome him with open arms?
00:34:31.000 Did Cameron Kasky and David Hogg and Emma Gonzalez get on Twitter and say, Thank you, Mr. President.
00:34:36.000 Thank you, Mr. President, for making common sense gun reforms?
00:34:40.000 For them, and there's a lot more work to be done, but this is a great step.
00:34:43.000 Did they get on television and say, This is a step in the right direction?
00:34:47.000 Or did you see all the blue check marks and all the leftists and all the mainstream media say, This is never good enough, this is not good enough, and all the rest?
00:34:54.000 Of course, we saw the latter, and we will continue to see the latter until they confiscate every single firearm.
00:35:01.000 And I don't think there's any other way around that.
00:35:04.000 And that's why we can't give on age limits, on background checks, no matter how much you might agree with that, no matter how much you might think that's a good idea.
00:35:12.000 And certainly, I think there are things that could be done to shore up the system.
00:35:15.000 I think Wayne LaPierre made a lot of good points in his speech at CPAC that the regulations in place aren't being enforced, aren't being effectively utilized, they're being neglected.
00:35:24.000 For example, many of the states don't even submit their criminal records to the database for background checks.
00:35:30.000 But, you know, there are some things that can be done, I think, legally to prevent some firearms from falling into the wrong hands.
00:35:35.000 But all of this is beside the point.
00:35:37.000 I don't think it even matters at this point.
00:35:39.000 The laws on the books aren't being enforced.
00:35:41.000 And if you give an inch on any new laws, they will not stop until they get all the firearms banned.
00:35:47.000 And everybody knows this.
00:35:49.000 Fortunately for us, it remains an unpopular issue in terms of.
00:35:53.000 You may look at the polling where it says that people are in favor of banning semi automatic rifles, but the fact has been that for just about 50 years, gun control has been highly unpopular.
00:36:04.000 And just now, because the party has shifted so far to the left, the Democratic Party has just taken and they're just sprinting as far left as Carl Marsh and all the rest as you could possibly imagine.
00:36:16.000 Suddenly now they think it's a great idea because they're in this bubble.
00:36:19.000 But.
00:36:20.000 I think it still remains unpopular, and I think in the end it'll be a net negative for them.
00:36:24.000 That doesn't mean we can't be vigilant, but I think in the end it'll all work itself out.
00:36:29.000 I will say, though, that all those pundits, all those talk radio hosts that we heard about in the 2000s, I'm talking about the Mark Levins, the Glenn Becks, the Alex Jones, the Sean Hannity.
00:36:41.000 I mean, the rhetoric during the Obama administration from these people was Hitler went after the children, Mao went after the children, the Democrats are going after the children, and then they're going to take your guns.
00:36:51.000 And I have to say, Many people laughed at them 10 years ago.
00:36:55.000 Many people made fun of them when they were making those predictions.
00:36:58.000 I remember because I was one of these very basic conservatives talking about these things and getting laughed at.
00:37:04.000 People saying, that's so crazy.
00:37:05.000 That'll never happen.
00:37:06.000 But here we are.
00:37:08.000 Here we saw the children's crusade, the children's march on Washington, where they demanded the confiscation of guns.
00:37:14.000 It's here, folks.
00:37:15.000 It's here.
00:37:16.000 So I guess they weren't too crazy after all.
00:37:19.000 And I have to say, maybe the worst element of the march was not the repulsive speeches, the vomiting, the schizophrenic kids up there.
00:37:27.000 Out of control, passions, emotions flying.
00:37:30.000 The worst part about this rally were the signs, the signage.
00:37:34.000 You know, you imagine that these kids are in some way see themselves as the ideological descendant of Vietnam War protesters or Woodstock.
00:37:42.000 And I think that's baloney because they're in support of the establishment, they're in support of the corporations and the banks, and they have a reciprocal support for each other.
00:37:52.000 But you see some of these signs, and it's SpongeBob, it's Harry Potter.
00:37:56.000 One of the signs was like, well, all the kids in the Hogwarts school had wands.
00:38:02.000 And look what happened there.
00:38:03.000 Or, you know, they have SpongeBob means somebody had a Star Wars poster where it said, Blasters are so uncivilized, which is a quote from Star Wars 3.
00:38:13.000 And I'm just thinking to myself, is this where we are as a country?
00:38:16.000 Is this what kind of a clown country do we have our policy?
00:38:21.000 I mean, think about it in this context that our policy is dictated by children and man children, people that are 20 and 30.
00:38:32.000 Worldview is informed by television shows.
00:38:35.000 Their worldview is informed by pop garbage, by Kim Possible and Sweet Life of Zack and Cody and Star Wars.
00:38:42.000 These are the people dictating our policy, whereas formerly you had people showing up and protesting and doing things because they were reading Henry David Thoreau, they were reading Ralph Waldo Emerson, they were reading Julius Evela, they were reading another conspicuous revolutionary from the 20th century, they were reading Karl Marx, they were reading.
00:39:05.000 You know, all kinds of writings from the French Revolution, socialists, they were reading Proudhon.
00:39:09.000 I mean, all kinds of really revolutionary stuff.
00:39:12.000 And today, the revolutionaries, the people informing our policy, they're coming with their Harry Potter signs and their Star Wars signs.
00:39:20.000 And what kind of a vulgar population have we cultivated in this country where these are the proles that are showing up in the streets?
00:39:30.000 These are the people that have inherited the great cities, these are the people that have inherited this great civilization.
00:39:38.000 Uncultured.
00:39:38.000 I mean, uncouth.
00:39:40.000 People.
00:39:41.000 I think it's very sad.
00:39:42.000 I think that was maybe the most profoundly sad thing just how many people are showing up like this screaming and yelling and cussing and they're bringing their children and the signs and the Terry Potter.
00:39:52.000 We're not a serious country anymore.
00:39:54.000 We're not a serious country anymore.
00:39:55.000 And the country's only as good as the people that comprise it.
00:39:58.000 So that was a March for Our Lives.
00:40:00.000 The last thing we want to get to, we're running out of time here before we take your questions.
00:40:03.000 And remember, we're doing Stream Labs again.
00:40:06.000 We're doing the multi streaming, so we're doing Stream Labs.
00:40:08.000 Remember to check out that link, streamlabs.comslash Nicholas J. Fuentes to Deposit your question, comment, criticism.
00:40:16.000 I know people are always asking me questions on Twitter.
00:40:18.000 I can give a much more in depth response on the show.
00:40:21.000 So check out that link.
00:40:22.000 Make a donation.
00:40:23.000 You can ask your question for the last 15 minutes.
00:40:25.000 But the last big story of today small story, one that went pretty much unnoticed on social media and in the mainstream news, but I found it nonetheless.
00:40:36.000 Omar Mateen, the shooter in the Pulse nightclub shooting in 2016 in Orlando, Florida, his father was an FBI informant.
00:40:44.000 And, you know, this stands out because.
00:40:46.000 We've seen so many unexplainable events in the past year, and even the big events, the Las Vegas shooting, the Parkland shooting.
00:40:53.000 We've talked about it at length on this show.
00:40:55.000 How many different discrepancies, contradictions, things that cannot be explained with the story we've been told by the police and by the intelligence community.
00:41:05.000 And now we're finding that conspicuously in every one of these cases, everywhere surrounding the tragedy, everywhere surrounding the shooting and the victims are federal agents, are people that work for the government.
00:41:18.000 The best example of this was Stephen Paddock in Las Vegas, where throughout his career he worked first as a mail carrier for the United States Postal Service.
00:41:26.000 Then he worked as an IRS agent.
00:41:28.000 Then he worked as an auditor for defense contractors for the Department of Defense.
00:41:34.000 So this guy, Stephen Paddock, who we know nothing about, we don't know his motives.
00:41:38.000 We don't know.
00:41:38.000 It's almost a year out from the Las Vegas shooting.
00:41:41.000 We don't know anything about that story.
00:41:43.000 And here was a guy who worked for the federal government all his life.
00:41:46.000 His father was a bank robber who was put in jail by the FBI several times and then let out.
00:41:51.000 By paying a $100,000 fine towards the end of his life.
00:41:54.000 Another conspicuous guy.
00:41:56.000 In the Parkland shooting that happened in February, how many unexplainable things do you have there?
00:42:01.000 How many questions do you have about that shooting?
00:42:04.000 Where you have all those contradictory witness reports of multiple shooters, of somebody in full metal armor and in a mask.
00:42:11.000 I mean, all kinds of ridiculous things, negligence that just shouldn't be possible at every level from the police to the school to the FBI.
00:42:19.000 And then you find that David Hogg, One of the most popular, one of the people that's been given a voice by the media, by Ellen, and all the rest, his father's retired FBI.
00:42:29.000 You find out Omar Mateen today's father was FBI.
00:42:32.000 You find out the uncle of the Boston bombers, married to the daughter of a CIA agent, and it really, really activates the almonds there.
00:42:40.000 Is there something going on here?
00:42:42.000 Because for the past eight years or so, I mean, really, even since 9 11, maybe even further back, you've just seen case after case of these kinds of tragedies, these highly publicized tragedies.
00:42:55.000 Visceral, visual terror attacks or shootings or what have you, and all around are things that cannot be explained.
00:43:02.000 Contradictions, missing documents, lack of evidence, and federal agents.
00:43:08.000 I think it's worth pointing out that the federal government has planned many times throughout history to impose false flag attacks or perpetrate false flag attacks against the United States citizenry to achieve their political objectives.
00:43:21.000 If you don't believe, if you think this is crazy talk, if you think this is outside the realm of possibility, look up a little something called Operation Northwoods, which was a plan put together by the CIA in the 1970s.
00:43:34.000 To perpetrate terror attacks all over the United States against the American public, kill American civilians, and then blame it on the Cubans so we could go to war with Cuba.
00:43:43.000 This is declassified.
00:43:46.000 This is not made up.
00:43:47.000 This is not anything anybody would deny.
00:43:49.000 This is nothing a mainstream news outlet would deny.
00:43:51.000 This is nothing the federal government would deny.
00:43:54.000 This is something that is declassified, which is all there for anybody looking for it.
00:43:59.000 Operation Northwoods, where our government said we actually did conspire to kill people in terrorist attacks and blame it on foreign governments or other nefarious actors.
00:44:08.000 So that we could pursue our interests with the support of the public.
00:44:12.000 And here you see many cases from Vegas to Parkland to the Boston bombing to the Pulse nightclub shooting, I think even 9 11, where you see all kinds of contradictions, you see all kinds of weird coincidences and federal agents.
00:44:25.000 And by the way, if you even suggest a conspiracy theory, what do they do?
00:44:30.000 YouTube removes your video from the search results on YouTube, Google removes your listing from the search results there, Facebook removes it from your timeline, you get banned from YouTube, you get banned from Twitter, you get banned from Facebook.
00:44:41.000 You got to ask yourself, What's going on there, folks?
00:44:43.000 But that was just a small thing we got to get into our Super Chats and our Stream Labs donations.
00:44:49.000 You just got to be vigilant about that stuff.
00:44:51.000 Always look around.
00:44:52.000 You know, when there's a mass shooting, when there's a tragedy, you want to make sure you're looking at the source material from the day of, and you also got to keep an eye out for the glow in the dark people.
00:45:01.000 But those are the stories of the day.
00:45:04.000 Pretty eventful weekend we've had here.
00:45:06.000 Pretty eventful week.
00:45:07.000 And we'll check in on our Super Chats and our Stream Labs and we'll see what's going on.
00:45:11.000 What are the masses saying?
00:45:12.000 Am I crazy?
00:45:14.000 Am I losing it?
00:45:15.000 Am I shilling for Trump?
00:45:16.000 Am I Bill Mitchell?
00:45:18.000 You know, I got to be honest, the memes are just getting stale.
00:45:22.000 You know, whenever Trump does something, I mean, this is kind of the mindset of people who blackpill about Trump, people who are so pessimistic about Trump.
00:45:31.000 You know, bad headline, bad headline, I no like Trump now.
00:45:36.000 Trump do thing I don't like, I no like Trump now.
00:45:40.000 And then if you try to explain it in any kind of nuanced fashion, which I do on the show and on my timeline, I say, well, this was bad.
00:45:47.000 But this is a possible explanation.
00:45:48.000 This is something that could be going on.
00:45:50.000 This is a likely outcome.
00:45:52.000 But if this is not the outcome, then I agree it's a bad thing.
00:45:55.000 And without fail, every time, oh, okay, Bill Mitchell.
00:46:01.000 Oh, you're the millennial Bill Mitchell.
00:46:04.000 You're Generation Z Bill Mitchell.
00:46:06.000 And then the other one is, it's 100 dimensional underwater checkers, it's four dimensional chests, it's five dimensional hungry, hungry hippos every time.
00:46:14.000 And they always get, and I love it.
00:46:16.000 I love those jokes.
00:46:17.000 It never gets old, right?
00:46:20.000 But the funny thing is, it's not an argument.
00:46:22.000 Not an argument.
00:46:24.000 Loco Murray says Nick, the GOP tax cuts are shit.
00:46:28.000 I live in Ohio, work construction, make $60,000.
00:46:31.000 I got a $7 increase a week.
00:46:33.000 Not going to turn out voters.
00:46:34.000 I agree.
00:46:35.000 And this is what the GOP was banking on very stupidly.
00:46:35.000 I agree.
00:46:39.000 The GOP was banking on this tax cut being basically the hands down item of the Trump administration that would flip voters in 2018.
00:46:49.000 And you're right, it's not good enough.
00:46:50.000 Even for people that are seeing.
00:46:52.000 A slightly bigger increase.
00:46:53.000 For most people, it's a modest increase.
00:46:55.000 And even for people that are seeing a big increase, this is not going to close the enthusiasm gap, right?
00:47:02.000 I mean, you had a tax cut in December, which for some people is more modest than others.
00:47:06.000 I know a lot of people are making a little bit more.
00:47:08.000 And when you factor in lower expenses for some people, like ComEd and other utilities are cutting their rates, when you factor in a lot of the bonuses that are being given out, not so much for construction, but for, you know, for example, a lot of the big multinational corporations, as much as we hate them, they're giving out bonuses, pay raises to a significant extent.
00:47:26.000 That's helping them.
00:47:27.000 But regardless, the tax cut is not going to drive voters to the polls.
00:47:31.000 It didn't drive voters to the polls in 2012.
00:47:34.000 It didn't drive voters to the polls in 2008.
00:47:37.000 And that's what they ran on in those presidential elections cutting your taxes.
00:47:40.000 It's just not a winner.
00:47:42.000 People don't care about that anymore.
00:47:43.000 That's not an issue.
00:47:44.000 That's not a wedge issue that's going to get people jazzed up and excited to vote.
00:47:49.000 It was a bad idea.
00:47:49.000 So I agree.
00:47:50.000 Now, I don't know the extent to which the tax cuts were bad for everybody.
00:47:55.000 I don't know if that's across the board.
00:47:57.000 I mean, that's unfortunate that you're not making more money.
00:48:00.000 But this one anecdote the Treasury Department did say 95% of Americans get a pay raise.
00:48:06.000 And of course, we've seen all kinds of bonuses being given out by many corporations.
00:48:10.000 But I agree, I don't think it's enough, even if it is less modest for other people.
00:48:15.000 DP says, thanks for the white pills, Nick.
00:48:17.000 Definitely need those.
00:48:18.000 It's not so much a white pill so much as it is putting things into context.
00:48:22.000 I hate when people say, Nick is a shill.
00:48:24.000 Nick spins things.
00:48:25.000 Nick always says, you know, Trump can do no wrong.
00:48:29.000 That's nothing of the sort.
00:48:30.000 That has never happened.
00:48:31.000 In every case, I say, let's look at what happened.
00:48:35.000 Let's put it into context.
00:48:37.000 All by itself, it may look bad, but let's put it into context.
00:48:41.000 Let's look at past behavior.
00:48:43.000 Let's look at future events, horizontal and vertical things going on at the same time.
00:48:48.000 And let's try and diagnose the motive here.
00:48:50.000 Let's try and diagnose what really is happening here.
00:48:53.000 And nine times out of 10, it turns out that I'm right.
00:48:56.000 And in the times when it doesn't, I say I'm right there with you as a bad thing.
00:48:59.000 And for example, this bill.
00:49:00.000 I didn't get up here and say, this is a great thing.
00:49:04.000 Raising the debt is an awesome thing.
00:49:06.000 And it doesn't matter that there's no funding in the wall.
00:49:08.000 And it doesn't matter that.
00:49:09.000 That more money went to Israel than went for the wall.
00:49:11.000 I didn't say that.
00:49:12.000 What I said was it's a bad bill.
00:49:14.000 However, there are other weeks.
00:49:16.000 There are other opportunities where we can make change.
00:49:20.000 I said that Trump wasn't responsible for this.
00:49:22.000 Not totally.
00:49:23.000 Maybe he was negligent.
00:49:24.000 Maybe he was this or that.
00:49:26.000 But remember that Congress writes the bills and he understood that it was a bad bill and we have another opportunity on September 30th.
00:49:32.000 So, you know, people have this weird conflation where they hear something they disagree with, they hear something they don't like, and then they hear something totally different than what was said.
00:49:41.000 I'm upset about the bill, and that means that we can't think about it for longer than five seconds.
00:49:46.000 I expect you to go on there and burn your MAGA hat.
00:49:50.000 And it's, we have to look at it a little bit differently.
00:49:53.000 So it's not, I wouldn't necessarily call it a white pill.
00:49:55.000 It's not a white pill or a black pill.
00:49:57.000 It's just context, just giving you a little bit of context.
00:49:59.000 If all we had was this week, it would be the end of the world.
00:50:03.000 But fortunately, there are many weeks to come, there's many months ahead of us, and this is a big struggle.
00:50:08.000 We are in the political fight of our lives for the fate of our nation.
00:50:12.000 And anybody who tells you, That one politician has all the answers, one politician is going to solve it in one year, and any of that other kind of stuff is a liar.
00:50:24.000 I mean, these people really expect that if Trump hasn't unraveled and reversed 50 years of corruption, 50 years of political entrenchment, if he hasn't fixed a systemically broken Congress and gotten everything he wanted in 15 months, then we can't trust him.
00:50:43.000 He's a Zionist puppet, throw him out.
00:50:45.000 I mean, this is just unrealistic expectations.
00:50:47.000 We are in the fight of our lives, and all we have is Trump, and everybody else is against us.
00:50:53.000 And there's going to be setbacks.
00:50:54.000 There are going to be times when we are pushed back, and when there are times when even you could say we lose a battle here and there.
00:51:02.000 But overall, the arc of history bends towards making America great again.
00:51:06.000 If you look at the bigger picture, and we have to keep rooting for them, we have to be there, and we can't lose hope.
00:51:11.000 I think a lot of the blackpilling demoralizes and does more harm than good.
00:51:16.000 So we can criticize, and I was out there saying it too.
00:51:18.000 I was saying this is a bad bill, there's no way to spin it, and we can criticize, but we can't have deserting.
00:51:24.000 We can't have cutting and running.
00:51:26.000 It's a fight.
00:51:26.000 We're going to take a couple of hits.
00:51:30.000 Guns Yanguaya says, Nick, when there's a space for debate, let me know.
00:51:34.000 I don't even.
00:51:35.000 So, this fella, what does that mean when there's a space for debate?
00:51:35.000 Yeah, okay.
00:51:39.000 What does that mean when there's a space for debate?
00:51:42.000 You have an opportunity on your Super Chat to ask a question.
00:51:45.000 We have call in shows twice a week.
00:51:48.000 I'm in the Discord pretty frequently.
00:51:49.000 There are many opportunities.
00:51:50.000 This fella comes into the Maker Support and he DMs me.
00:51:54.000 Since I'm patronizing you, let me know when I can debate you on your show.
00:51:59.000 It's like, buddy, that's not part of the package.
00:52:02.000 There are five things the premium membership comes with, and anytime free debate pass is not on the menu.
00:52:08.000 And I don't say that to be mean.
00:52:09.000 I don't say that to be a nasty guy, but people come at me all the time.
00:52:14.000 It's very frustrating.
00:52:16.000 I don't know what the thought process is.
00:52:18.000 People come at me, Nick, promote my movie on your show.
00:52:21.000 Nick, promote my thing on your show.
00:52:22.000 Nick, debate me on your show.
00:52:24.000 That's not part of the program, folks.
00:52:26.000 Logical conclusion of tolerance.
00:52:28.000 Do you think Trump will ever quote, name the white in an explicit appeal, second term maybe?
00:52:35.000 Well, if you mean that he will appeal to white interests explicitly, I think that's already happened in many cases.
00:52:42.000 I think Charlottesville was a pretty, pretty explicit endorsement of white people, right?
00:52:50.000 I mean, he said that people in Charlottesville, there were fine people there protesting for the sake of their heritage and their legacy.
00:52:57.000 I think that was very explicit.
00:52:58.000 I think that was pretty open, pretty out there.
00:53:01.000 You had Jeff Sessions talk about the Anglo American heritage of the elected office of the sheriff.
00:53:07.000 I mean, there are many things in here.
00:53:09.000 Even just today, the Department of the Interior had Zinke, Ryan Zinke, said that diversity doesn't matter.
00:53:15.000 Is he interior?
00:53:16.000 I think he is.
00:53:17.000 So you have all kinds of things.
00:53:19.000 It's littered throughout the Trump administration, if you pay attention.
00:53:21.000 You have the shithole countries.
00:53:23.000 I mean, people just have an unrealistic expectation that Trump will get out there and say, you know, something like, for all my fasci goys out there, it's just not going to happen.
00:53:33.000 Douchebag says, happy to make you all laugh on BA.
00:53:36.000 You familiar with the NP of Ireland?
00:53:38.000 Would you ever have the leader on?
00:53:40.000 He was on Computing Forever, Sinn Fein Cucked.
00:53:43.000 I'm not familiar with that, and I don't know if I'd have the leader of him on.
00:53:47.000 It's America First.
00:53:48.000 People say, Nick, will you have the leader of this Swedish party on?
00:53:52.000 Nick, will you have the leader of this party on?
00:53:55.000 Maybe, but the show is America First.
00:53:57.000 Maybe we'd have him on America First World Report, the podcast, but we try to focus on the American interest, what's going on in America.
00:54:04.000 It's not the ethno nationalist podcast or the white imperium podcast, Imperium Europa.
00:54:11.000 It's America First.
00:54:13.000 Loco Murray, if Trump doesn't deliver on any populist stuff, the GOP is going to get killed in the midterms.
00:54:19.000 Everything else is a joke.
00:54:20.000 Good show, Nick.
00:54:21.000 Well, thank you.
00:54:22.000 And I happen to agree.
00:54:23.000 I think that's basically true.
00:54:24.000 Fortunately, he has delivered on a lot of the populist stuff.
00:54:28.000 He got rid of the TPP.
00:54:29.000 He's going to renegotiate NAFTA, or at least that's in the process of happening.
00:54:34.000 We have a trade war with China.
00:54:36.000 We have tariffs on steel and on aluminum.
00:54:38.000 We have a tax cut, which was good for businesses.
00:54:42.000 I think you'll see the extent of that later on.
00:54:44.000 For example, we've seen.
00:54:45.000 Billion dollar capital injections in infrastructure and factories.
00:54:50.000 We see companies putting money into existing factories, opening new ones.
00:54:54.000 You've seen this all across the country.
00:54:55.000 Companies coming from Mexico to the United States.
00:54:58.000 Foxconn, which is a Chinese company, coming to Wisconsin.
00:55:01.000 So I think, you know, not every single person in the 330 million person country is going to see, you know, they're going to hit the lottery.
00:55:10.000 But I think a lot of people in these swing states are feeling the economic effect.
00:55:13.000 And that's a big part of why people go to vote.
00:55:16.000 And even health care, I think, is why people go to vote.
00:55:19.000 One of the most popular issues.
00:55:20.000 I guess immigration would be the one thing.
00:55:22.000 But, I mean, even there, if you look at refugees, Being resettled in the United States, if you look at illegal crossings in the United States, if you look at deportations, all these numbers are looking good under Trump in terms of refugees being blocked, illegal border crossings are being stopped at a record rate, deportations have increased, arrests have increased.
00:55:41.000 So I think there's a lot of good stuff there.
00:55:43.000 We don't have the wall.
00:55:44.000 I mean, that's the most striking and the most obvious thing, which is a disappointment.
00:55:48.000 I understand why it hasn't happened, but we should see a little bit more action on that.
00:55:52.000 I don't see why Trump couldn't have done that with the executive, or rather through the Department of Defense.
00:55:58.000 But I think overall we're in a pretty good position.
00:56:01.000 Cream of the Meme says, not so much a question, but I'm pretty sure the Parkland kids are going to be as mentally unstable as Shia LaBeouf within the year.
00:56:09.000 Screen cap this.
00:56:10.000 Yeah, I would screen cap that because it's true.
00:56:13.000 They're going to be some messed up kiddos.
00:56:16.000 And I don't say that in a derisive way.
00:56:18.000 I think it's actually kind of unfortunate what happened to them.
00:56:22.000 They got picked up by the media, forced into the national spotlight, pigeonholed into this partisan role.
00:56:29.000 For the sake of corporate and political interests.
00:56:32.000 And to the detriment of these kids' health.
00:56:34.000 I mean, you see it already with Emma Gonzalez.
00:56:36.000 You see it with some of these kids where they're beginning to unravel.
00:56:40.000 And that's not anybody who's looking after the health and the well being of these kids, you know, that is not going to be a good thing for them.
00:56:50.000 So, yeah, I agree.
00:56:51.000 It's going to be rough for these kids.
00:56:52.000 And I feel bad for them in a way.
00:56:53.000 We were all 17 once.
00:56:55.000 We were all 16 once.
00:56:56.000 We all thought we knew everything.
00:56:58.000 People say that about me, but I'm a little bit smarter.
00:57:01.000 I actually know everything now.
00:57:03.000 Just kidding.
00:57:04.000 But, I mean, these kiddies, they think they know everything.
00:57:07.000 Everybody thought they knew everything at one point.
00:57:09.000 Everybody went in in a youthful crusade in some way, shape, or form, had a youthful act of rebellion, except these kids, because of very corrupt and evil, malicious people, are forcing them into a place where they're never going to recover from this.
00:57:24.000 And yeah, it's good for them in the short term.
00:57:26.000 They get the dopamine rush from the Twitter followers.
00:57:28.000 I'm sure they're making loads of money.
00:57:30.000 They get on Ellen, a lot of once in a lifetime things.
00:57:33.000 But you look at the long term.
00:57:35.000 Health consequences of this, and it's going to be a short time that they'll be in the spotlight, then they're out of the spotlight, and then they're going to have to live with this for the rest of their lives.
00:57:43.000 Very unfortunate thing.
00:57:45.000 So, we feel bad for them.
00:57:47.000 Frederick White, I support you, Nick.
00:57:49.000 Do you support me?
00:57:50.000 I don't really know you.
00:57:51.000 I guess I support you.
00:57:53.000 I guess I support most people.
00:57:54.000 I try to support people, but it depends.
00:57:59.000 That's kind of a mysterious question.
00:58:01.000 Let's check out our Stream Labs here, see what people are saying.
00:58:04.000 And it looks like we're getting some more Stream Labs.
00:58:06.000 And again, the reason I like to do the Stream Labs instead of the Super Chat.
00:58:09.000 Is because Super Chat, 30% of the Super Chat goes to Google.
00:58:13.000 You know, say what you will, oh, Nick is shilling for shekels.
00:58:16.000 It's all about the money for Nick.
00:58:18.000 If you're going to be doing Super Chats, I would prefer, I think many people would prefer that all the money would go to the company.
00:58:24.000 All the money would go towards increasing production value and not be going towards Google, which hates us, right?
00:58:30.000 But let's see what's happening on our Streamlabs.
00:58:33.000 We have Gabe DeGodd who says, Nick, love the show.
00:58:38.000 I still have faith in Trump to come through with the wall.
00:58:40.000 Other than that, we need to run for office.
00:58:42.000 I'm building connections.
00:58:43.000 And plan to run after I graduate college.
00:58:45.000 Do you have any plans to run for anything in the future?
00:58:49.000 Well, first of all, yeah, I agree.
00:58:50.000 Yeah, he'll come through with the wall.
00:58:52.000 And good luck to you.
00:58:53.000 I wish you luck on running for some form of elected office.
00:58:57.000 I would say it's baby steps.
00:58:59.000 I don't think anybody goes straight from college into the machine.
00:59:02.000 To really have influence, you have to build up your own network.
00:59:04.000 I think that's one takeaway we can learn from history a lot of the entryists don't have very much clout.
00:59:12.000 And to explain what I mean by this, if you just walk into elected office like many people do, where they're a community leader or they're a party apparatchik or something, and they get thrust into the spotlight, a good example of this is.
00:59:25.000 Is a fellow from Illinois.
00:59:26.000 I think he came from Peoria or he came from Rockford.
00:59:29.000 And what was his name?
00:59:31.000 His name was Aaron Schock.
00:59:33.000 And he was this bright, up and coming young Republican.
00:59:36.000 He was like the head of the Board of Education in his area when he was like 20.
00:59:42.000 And then he became one of the youngest state reps in the country at like 21 or 22.
00:59:47.000 And he was a rising star.
00:59:49.000 But because he didn't have clout, he got shotgunned because he did like an expensive redecorating of his office.
00:59:56.000 And I think if we learn from history, You look at people like Nixon, you look at people like Ronald Reagan, and not just for president, but for anything.
01:00:03.000 The people that have been most effective in electoral politics do so because they form a party coup, basically.
01:00:09.000 They mount a coup within the party.
01:00:10.000 They form their own connections, their own network, their own donor lobbying, and all the rest, and they put together their own machine, essentially.
01:00:19.000 And that's when you're able to exercise the most clout.
01:00:21.000 So, you know, many people have asked me, Nick, are you going to run for office?
01:00:24.000 Nick, you should run for office now.
01:00:26.000 And I would say it's the wrong time.
01:00:28.000 People should wait until they've been in the system for a little while.
01:00:31.000 They learn the ropes.
01:00:32.000 They learn who to trust.
01:00:33.000 They learn who they can count on.
01:00:35.000 And they build a team.
01:00:37.000 They build a couple of people they can trust.
01:00:39.000 They build a monetary network.
01:00:41.000 And that's the way to do it.
01:00:42.000 That's how we can have a real party coup.
01:00:44.000 That said, all it takes to start building on that is going to one meeting.
01:00:48.000 That may sound complicated.
01:00:50.000 That's the general rule for the long term.
01:00:53.000 But the easiest thing that everyone can do to change the country, just go to your county GOP meeting.
01:00:58.000 Google your county GOP meeting.
01:01:01.000 Find the calendar I did for mine and go to the next meeting.
01:01:04.000 I think for mine, it's like every other Tuesday, like the first Tuesday of every month or something.
01:01:10.000 I mean, just go find your local GOP meeting and see what's happening.
01:01:14.000 You don't have to say anything.
01:01:15.000 You don't have to shake anybody's hand.
01:01:17.000 Just go and sit in and see what's happening and then go the next time and the next time.
01:01:20.000 And then maybe introduce yourself.
01:01:22.000 Then maybe you take on a leadership role.
01:01:24.000 And this is how it's built.
01:01:25.000 Bring a friend next time, bring a couple of friends.
01:01:27.000 And this is how you snowball into a real movement.
01:01:30.000 You don't snowball into a movement by showing up to a rally, but I understand that's not what you're saying.
01:01:34.000 So, just some tips.
01:01:35.000 But I don't have any plans to run in the near future.
01:01:39.000 I got to say, you know, it would inhibit my role as a commentator if I were planning to run because then I couldn't say everything I want to say.
01:01:46.000 I couldn't do everything I want to do.
01:01:48.000 You know, imagine the Catboy tapes they would bring up if I ran for office.
01:01:52.000 I'd run for office, and the next day, Washington Post, rising GOP star Nick Fuentes, Catboy fixation?
01:02:01.000 And then I'd be like, coming out of my house, there'd be like one reporter there with a camera, and I'd be like, I was hacked.
01:02:08.000 I was hacked!
01:02:10.000 So, Barry says, Haven't been able to watch the live show while it was live the past couple of weeks, so here is a good old five banger for some hearty T Bell.
01:02:21.000 Well, thank you, Barry.
01:02:22.000 Much appreciated.
01:02:23.000 Literally shaking says, Our diet consisting of McDonald's and black pills is rough to digest, but we must not stop training our mind, bodies, and souls.
01:02:32.000 And I don't mean IFLS, Reddit, CrossFit, and Harry Potter.
01:02:36.000 Let's get those home cooked meals, white pills, and sunlight back soon.
01:02:40.000 It's true.
01:02:41.000 True body, mind, and soul, folks.
01:02:43.000 That's what it's all about.
01:02:45.000 The body, the mind, and the soul.
01:02:47.000 If you're not working on all three, just forget about it.
01:02:49.000 You got to cut out the endocrine disruptors.
01:02:52.000 You got to cut out the gay hormones and the woman making hormones, unless you're a woman.
01:02:56.000 Cut out the birth control, the hedonistic sex, the drug abuse, the alcohol abuse.
01:03:02.000 No more poisons, no more chemicals poisoning your body.
01:03:06.000 You got to be on your game.
01:03:07.000 You got to become a dignified and responsible human being again.
01:03:11.000 In order to master the country, you have to master yourself first.
01:03:15.000 So many people, they're like 500 pounds.
01:03:18.000 They show up to these rallies, they're 500 pounds.
01:03:22.000 They don't clean their hair, they don't clean their face, they can't pay for their car insurance, and they expect they're going to master the country.
01:03:30.000 They can't even master themselves.
01:03:31.000 They can't even get themselves out of bed in the morning.
01:03:34.000 They can't lose 50 pounds.
01:03:36.000 You expect you're going to take over the country?
01:03:38.000 You can't even decide what's going on with your own body and your own life.
01:03:43.000 And this is when we hit people with optics and we hit people on their personal life.
01:03:47.000 If you expect to lead the country and you can't figure out your own situation, you're not very credible, are you?
01:03:53.000 Look at me, trust me.
01:03:55.000 I know what I'm talking about.
01:03:56.000 I know what you ought to do.
01:03:58.000 I know what the country ought to do.
01:03:59.000 Oh, really?
01:04:00.000 Because you, your situation isn't very good.
01:04:03.000 Why shouldn't anybody trust you?
01:04:04.000 And that's the logic we have to look at things at.
01:04:06.000 That's how everybody looks at it implicitly or rather subconsciously or consciously.
01:04:11.000 So I agree.
01:04:13.000 The dude says, I think you're overly romanticizing the protester of yesteryear.
01:04:18.000 I was not romanticizing.
01:04:19.000 I was just saying, if we look at the history of revolutionaries and protesters, at least you could say, of course, they were dumb.
01:04:26.000 They were pot smokers, LSD, at least in the 60s.
01:04:29.000 Even before then, I think there was something, there was some substance there at the least.
01:04:34.000 They were shagging in the streets like animals not reading H.D. Thoreau.
01:04:37.000 I'm not talking, I'm talking about, when I referenced Henry David Thoreau, I'm talking about the protests for the Spanish American War.
01:04:43.000 I mean, that was particular to what was going on in the 1890s.
01:04:47.000 Who was the one that protested the Spanish American War by going to jail, who wrote Civil Disobedience?
01:04:52.000 Was that Emerson or was that Thoreau?
01:04:54.000 I forget.
01:04:55.000 But that's what I was getting at.
01:04:56.000 I was getting at revolutionaries, American rebels of all sorts, not just the 60s, but I get the point.
01:05:02.000 Spooky Ghost says, today's lesson is stop relying on literally one guy to save your country.
01:05:07.000 True, very true.
01:05:09.000 American couple, Nick, bless you, cutie.
01:05:11.000 Oh, thank you.
01:05:13.000 Keep representing Christ in this godless world.
01:05:15.000 Love me and my fiance.
01:05:17.000 Well, thank you so much.
01:05:18.000 Love you, folks, too.
01:05:20.000 And God bless you.
01:05:21.000 What a wholesome message, right?
01:05:22.000 What a wholesome message from a fine couple that want to uphold Christ.
01:05:27.000 And that's the most important thing.
01:05:28.000 I think if you're not upholding Christ, you're out.
01:05:31.000 You have no utility.
01:05:32.000 And look, a lot of people can say really smart things, maybe useful things.
01:05:36.000 But if you're not a Christian, if you're not supporting, number one, if you're not supporting Jesus Christ and the Christian religion, I don't see how it happens for you.
01:05:45.000 I really don't.
01:05:47.000 And people are fallible.
01:05:48.000 You know, a lot of people hit the Christians.
01:05:51.000 You know, we saw this with the Trad Thought controversy where, you know, Faith Goldie, for example, is hit with a lot of accusations and people said, oh, well, how could she say this or that?
01:06:01.000 Look, people are going to misstep, people are going to fall off.
01:06:05.000 It's not to say that everybody has to be perfect.
01:06:07.000 You know, when I say we have to be a Christian country, a lot of people hear we have to be Puritan, we have to be moralizers, we have to be this and that.
01:06:15.000 And if you watch my show, you know I'm not over the top with that kind of stuff.
01:06:18.000 You know, we like to joke, sometimes we cuss, we swear, and that kind of thing.
01:06:22.000 But the overall direction of the country must be moved back towards a wholesome, a religious end.
01:06:29.000 It must be geared back towards something that makes sense, something that explains the great mysteries, which is that, something which is the truth fundamentally.
01:06:37.000 So, you know, I know for a lot of people it's off putting because they.
01:06:41.000 There's a lot of connotations that come with that, which is like this evangelical, you know, kind of stuff.
01:06:47.000 Not that there's anything wrong with evangelicals, but you know how the media portrays it these days, which is very, you know, anti Christian and all the rest, and people could be off put.
01:06:55.000 But we say Christian, we mean family values, traditional values, that kind of stuff.
01:07:00.000 Joe the Serb.
01:07:01.000 Whoa, I got to shout out Nick.
01:07:03.000 Got a sharp memory, folks.
01:07:04.000 Defend the second.
01:07:06.000 Don't listen to black pillars like Brosif who tell you not to prepare or train.
01:07:06.000 Prepare.
01:07:10.000 Do both and do it often.
01:07:12.000 Guardrails be damned.
01:07:13.000 It's a good point.
01:07:14.000 You got to prepare.
01:07:15.000 Got to prepare for the worst because one day it's all coming down if we don't get our act together.
01:07:20.000 Trash Boat, Wendy's or McDonald's.
01:07:22.000 Personally, Dave's Triple is top tier.
01:07:24.000 You know, I got to say, in terms of taste, Wendy's and Burger King has McDonald's beat.
01:07:30.000 Like, I would, if, and we're just judging by like a taste test, I like Wendy's better.
01:07:34.000 I like Burger King better.
01:07:36.000 I like most of them better than McDonald's.
01:07:38.000 But what I like about McDonald's is that it's McDonald's.
01:07:41.000 I like the clout.
01:07:42.000 I like the brand.
01:07:44.000 The same is true with Coke and Pepsi.
01:07:46.000 I like the way Pepsi tastes better, but I like Coke, the brand, better.
01:07:49.000 So I go to McDonald's because it's a meme, because it's like, here I am.
01:07:53.000 Punishing my body because it tastes okay.
01:07:56.000 And that's how it's supposed to be, right?
01:07:58.000 And I can do it while I'm young.
01:08:00.000 But I see what you're saying.
01:08:01.000 I do like the Wendy's.
01:08:03.000 And we'll check and see.
01:08:04.000 Frederick White says Ethereum or Bitcoin.
01:08:07.000 He is good.
01:08:07.000 Support Nick.
01:08:09.000 Bitcoin, only because I don't know that much about Ethereum.
01:08:12.000 But I got to say, I'm not a cryptocurrency expert.
01:08:14.000 I have to say.
01:08:16.000 I looked into it for a little while and then I realized wait a minute.
01:08:19.000 Nobody really knows what they're talking about here.
01:08:21.000 I can't really invest in something this volatile, but I guess Bitcoin.
01:08:25.000 Logical conclusion of tolerance says, Nick, there is a preponderance of anti Christian material of the worst kind in the alt right.
01:08:32.000 Christ cuck, something on a stick, and historical arguments that Christianity ruined Europe.
01:08:38.000 How do we marginalize and suppress this view?
01:08:41.000 Just ridicule it.
01:08:43.000 I think the most powerful tool at our disposal is ridicule, you know, because these are such patently ridiculous and subversive claims that they deserve nothing more than ridicule.
01:08:53.000 They don't deserve a serious argument, they don't deserve a serious answer.
01:08:56.000 You know, if you have somebody that genuinely believes in And secularism, they can be debated.
01:09:01.000 But for a lot of people with these memes and these ideas they get in their head about Christianity, it just simply doesn't deserve a serious response.
01:09:08.000 It doesn't deserve anything more than that Shrek meme where he tips his fedora.
01:09:12.000 I think that's done more for Christianity than many things in the country today, right?
01:09:17.000 So I guess ridicule would be the answer.
01:09:19.000 Just got to ridicule and marginalize these people, you know?
01:09:22.000 And I think they have to be seen as unserious, and that should be known by everybody.
01:09:26.000 But looks like those are all our super chats and stream labs.
01:09:29.000 We're a little bit over the time here.
01:09:31.000 So, we're going to call it a night here for our show, but remember to check us out on makersupport.comslash Nick J. Fuentes for our brand new podcasts dropping tomorrow.
01:09:40.000 And on Thursday, we have tomorrow America First World Report, our debut episode for our premium members.
01:09:46.000 And on Thursday, we have 2018 Election HQ, some very high quality content coming your way.
01:09:52.000 Only five bucks a month for the membership.
01:09:54.000 So, it's a really great deal.
01:09:56.000 Remember to subscribe, give us a big thumbs up, leave a comment, click the notification bell to get notified every time we go live.
01:10:02.000 We're multi streaming, so if you're on Facebook, give us a thumbs up and a follow.
01:10:06.000 If you're on Periscope, give us a follow.
01:10:08.000 Twitch, give us a follow.
01:10:09.000 I'll be doing some gaming streams this week and all the rest.
01:10:12.000 So follow me everywhere, everywhere where I am.
01:10:16.000 The description shows all the links for those different platforms.
01:10:20.000 I'll be on there Monday through Friday, 7 p.m. Central, 8 p.m. Eastern Standard Time.
01:10:25.000 I'm Nicholas J. Fuentes.
01:10:26.000 This was America First, as always.
01:10:28.000 Thank you guys for watching.
01:10:29.000 Thank you to our Streamlabs donors, our super chatters, and our premium members.
01:10:34.000 We could not Do the show without you.
01:10:36.000 Physically could not do it without you.
01:10:38.000 So we appreciate you.
01:10:39.000 Thank you guys so much.
01:10:41.000 And thanks to everybody who watches.
01:10:42.000 Everybody's a winner who watches this show.
01:10:44.000 Unless you countersignal me, then you're out of the movement and you're fired and you're gone, you're exiled, and you're not white.
01:10:50.000 No, I joke.
01:10:51.000 But thank you to everybody who watches.
01:10:53.000 We will catch you tomorrow.
01:10:55.000 Have a great rest of your evening.
01:11:00.000 Americanism, not globalism, will be our credo.
01:11:07.000 It's going to be only America first.
01:11:12.000 America first.
01:11:16.000 The American people will come first once again.
01:11:45.000 America first.