00:03:00.000I think Ryan Dawson showed his depth with the Sky Daddy Jewish God type arguments.
00:03:06.000You know, we didn't really get to explore it as much as I wanted to, but I think it just went to show that a lot of people had an idea of this guy.
00:03:15.000And then when you hear that kind of thing, you can say he knows his stuff about Israel.
00:03:19.000And certainly I respect the knowledge.
00:03:25.000Went to William and Mary, and you can respect the knowledge.
00:03:28.000But I've always said there's a big difference between knowing a lot of stuff, being somebody maybe with Asperger's, and you know a lot of information, and somebody who really has that divine intuition.
00:03:39.000And so when you hear the Sky Daddy stuff, it's a letdown.
00:03:42.000But nevertheless, the crusade against paganism has been quite successful.
00:03:49.000I know a lot of people are upset by it.
00:03:50.000They say, Nick, you're dividing the movement, you're subverting, you're dividing people up on Twitter.
00:04:33.000I know this may seem like it's just kind of all over the place, but we are going to get into the news.
00:04:37.000We're going to talk about the U.S. moving our embassy to Jerusalem or the official opening of the new U.S. embassy in Jerusalem, the protests in the Gaza Strip on the border between Israel and the Gaza Strip.
00:04:50.000I know a lot of people were very upset about all the Palestinians who got killed.
00:04:54.000And so we're going to talk about that.
00:04:56.000And then, if there's time, we may get into Jared Holt's article about pit bulls.
00:05:02.000Anyway, I do want to say a brief bit about Mother's Day because, you know, we talk a lot about women on this show, believe it or not.
00:05:10.000You know, this is a show that is watched mostly by men.
00:05:13.000When I check out my analytics, it's like 94 or 95% men who watch the show and like 5% women, which is really kind of an impressive feat when you think about it because the show is called America First.
00:05:27.000And if you look at the other analytics, more people watch the American Nationalist show.
00:05:32.000Outside of America, than there are women watching it.
00:05:35.000I think it's like 73% of the audience is in America, and so it's like 27% anywhere else.
00:05:42.000So you think there are more foreigners watching America first than there are women.
00:05:46.000And I don't know, I think that's impressive.
00:05:47.000But we talk a lot about women, and Mother's Day, I think, is a time to, in all earnestness and all sincerity, remember that women uniquely and exclusively have been given a role in our society, which is the birthing and the rearing of children.
00:06:05.000And we joke a lot about it on this show.
00:06:07.000Some of it's joking, some of it's totally serious.
00:06:09.000I respect women like nobody you've ever met before.
00:06:13.000I think I respect more women, I respect women and more of them than anybody you've ever met in your life.
00:06:20.000But that said, I think you look at women and they get a lot of heat from the right wing, or at least from certain sex on the right wing.
00:06:41.000Evolutionarily, sociologically, it is the women who bring up the children.
00:06:45.000And when we talk about how women should get out of the workplace or get offline, stop making YouTube videos for Patreon donations and all that kind of stuff, and we say they should get out of these worldly kinds of pursuits, these professional pursuits, political pursuits, and get into the home to raise children and to be homemakers, partially it's a meme, partially it's joking, but there is a lot of truth to that because.
00:07:10.000You think about the role of a mother, and is that an insult?
00:07:14.000I think it's very curious why people see that as an insult to say that women should be at home raising children as opposed to in the office.
00:07:22.000And it says something about the values of this society that people see that as an insult.
00:07:27.000Because, of course, you would only see it as an insult to say that women should not be in the workforce if your top value, if your top and highest governing principle is the marketplace.
00:07:40.000Of course, if you think that what goes on.
00:07:42.000At the plant down the street, or the factory, or the office, or people getting shipped their knickknacks and their different things.
00:07:52.000If that's the most important thing to you, then you're going to say that, well, to say that women should not be there, well, that's an egregious sin.
00:08:01.000If, on the other hand, your highest value, your highest governing principle is the rearing of the next generation, instilling children with virtues, protecting them, educating them, if you think that that is the more important thing, the people of a society, as opposed to the goods and services and the money, I think that's what leads you to believe that actually telling women that they should be in the home is not an insult, it's high praise.
00:08:27.000Talk about putting them on a pedestal.
00:08:29.000If you believe that that is the most important role in a society and you give that over exclusively to women, you give that task over exclusively as their domain that they're going to take over and that'll be their responsibility, I think that's the highest compliment.
00:08:43.000And so on Mother's Day, we celebrate the good mothers.
00:08:50.000They're not slutting around being foddish.
00:08:53.000You know, it's not all this foddery going on where they're sleeping with all kinds of men and they're having kids out of wedlock and, you know, You know, Thanos snaps his finger and Tyrone disappears.
00:09:34.000We could not have anybody functioning in society if it weren't for good mothers, bringing them up, showing them right from wrong, and all the rest.
00:09:43.000And so, a happy Mother's Day to all the mothers out there from America First.
00:10:17.000And Hail Mary, the divine mother, and all that.
00:10:19.000But, anywho, we got to get into the news.
00:10:22.000And, you know, look, I posted on Twitter what the news was going to be for the show, and a lot of people took it as clickbait, which is unfortunate.
00:10:33.000I tweeted before the show that it was a big episode because today, I'm finally off of the Trump train.
00:10:42.000I don't like to say it, and actually, I hate to say it, but I'm off the Trump train.
00:10:46.000And maybe you can guess why, given the events of today.
00:10:48.000But, you know, I saw what happened today when Trump moved the embassy to Jerusalem.
00:10:54.000And this was announced actually in December of 2017.
00:10:58.000He made the announcement in fulfillment of a campaign promise, by the way, that he was going to recognize Jerusalem as the capital of Israel and move our American embassy from Tel Aviv, which I believe is their most populous city.
00:11:10.000To Jerusalem, which is the seat of their parliament and their courts and their government and all the rest.
00:11:16.000And, you know, I saw that, and at first I was going to come up with some convoluted four dimensional theory.
00:11:56.000I started to tweet about it, about the 1995 Jerusalem Embassy Act.
00:12:01.000And I started to look at the context and tweet out about it.
00:12:05.000But then I started to see the tweets, the same old ones, you know, honestly trying to shake me out of it, saying things like, Trump is just a Zionist shill.
00:15:03.000We're going to say, at real Donald Trump.
00:15:06.000Maybe we'll tag him in a tweet from like 2013.
00:15:09.000When he said, like, to the president, do not bomb Syria, just to remind him where he used to be.
00:15:15.000So we'll tweet snarky things like that, and we'll send him a message and say that in 2018 and 2020, we're not going to vote for you, all 100 of us.
00:15:24.000And in fact, we might even vote for Democrats, because what difference does it even make?
00:15:28.000And so I guess that's what we have to say.
00:15:48.000Elaborate joke, you know, corny stuff.
00:15:52.000Very funny, but actually, for the real analysis.
00:15:55.000And that's a very poignant thing to say because I think, you know, that's unironically the way a lot of people think.
00:16:01.000But to get to the real fact of the matter, to return and put back on my MAGA hat and my Bill Mitchell four dimensional lab coat, if we could get back in the four dimensional laboratory, get back to the chalkboard, drawing up the calculus of the MAGA mindset, what we saw today, plain and simple, was.
00:16:22.000And, you know, it really is just incredible to me that people see something like this, which is the embassy being moved, something that was promised.
00:17:58.000And come to think of it, there is really no action at all.
00:18:02.000Moving the embassy from point A to point B, I mean, that's really not even that big of a difference.
00:18:06.000We already have international consulates and we have all kinds of U.S. buildings, diplomatic buildings in Jerusalem.
00:18:13.000We have to, that's where their government is seated.
00:18:16.000And not only that, I mean, you have it that it was a campaign promise, you have it that it's barely anything to begin with, it's barely even an event.
00:18:24.000But then on top of all of that, you go back to something that so few people have heard of, which I alluded to earlier.
00:18:30.000Which is the 1995 Jerusalem Embassy Act.
00:18:34.000And this was passed in 1995, as the name suggests, 23 years ago.
00:18:39.000And it was mandated by congressional law that the federal government move the embassy from Tel Aviv to Jerusalem and recognize Jerusalem as the capital of Israel.
00:18:48.000This has been official federal law for 23 years.
00:18:53.000And every president since then, since it's been passed, has been signing waivers.
00:18:56.000They sign a six month waiver every six months to say, we're going to delay that.
00:19:01.000And we're going to keep the embassy in Tel Aviv open.
00:19:04.000Even though they all promised to move the embassy, George Bush, Obama, they all promised.
00:19:08.000I mean, technically, it was congressional law.
00:19:10.000And all Trump really did then, if you really boil it down, if you look at it in context of the law, of the promise, all the rest, is he just executed the law.
00:19:20.000Executed the law to really no significant consequence.
00:19:24.000And so let's put that on the side then.
00:19:50.000The only reason we're even talking about it, of course, is because America is engaged in the Middle East, which is the root of the problem.
00:19:56.000But, you know, so let's put that on the side.
00:20:37.000In 2018, if we lose 24 House seats and two Senate seats, we lose a majority in one of the chambers of the Congress and the president gets impeached.
00:20:48.000Remember, all it takes to file articles of impeachment is an accusation.
00:20:52.000It doesn't have to be true, it doesn't have to be substantive.
00:20:54.000They just have to get the votes to make it happen.
00:20:57.000So, if they control, if the Democrats control one of the chambers of the Congress, there will be impeachment.
00:21:10.000Now, if we're thinking in terms of the short term, and we say that in 2018, for us to continue to pull off victories, if we want to have any kind of movement on border reform or immigration reform or trade reform, anything like that, Trump's probably the guy who wants to do it the most.
00:21:27.000You know, people can say, well, I think he's sold out.
00:21:30.000There's nobody else who wants to move on these things like Trump.
00:21:33.000Even though it's been difficult, we've had setbacks, he maintains he wants a wall, he wants the funding, he has the will to do it.
00:21:40.000So let's say that our best bet in the next two years to get a wall, to get a good trade deal, is to have Trump have control of these two chambers with a Republican majority.
00:21:49.000It has been going very well so far, but it would be literally impossible with the Democrat chamber.
00:21:54.000So we say that it's probably in our best interest that Republicans control the Congress.
00:21:59.000It's in our interest that Trump have the best odds possible for him to pass this kind of legislation.
00:22:06.000Now, we understand that that's the goal.
00:22:08.000We understand that the reality is that you have this massive network of Jewish donors, and they have a lot of the money.
00:22:13.000They've been the source for a lot of the money for Republicans in recent years.
00:22:17.000And we say we're really deficient in terms of financing.
00:22:20.000You look, and I think it's like 47 different congressional races where Democrats are making, rather, they're raising more money than Republicans.
00:22:29.000If 47 Democrats are outspending or outraising Republicans, And only 24 seats can be lost by Republicans, you're in kind of a pickle.
00:22:37.000So, how can we make some kind of money?
00:22:39.000Well, some of the theories, which I talked about as far back as December, or rather, I think in February when 2018 election HQ came around, I said that the reason Trump is looking at things like this, like the tax cut, like the Jerusalem embassy, like the Iran deal, is because these are three issues that appeal to big donor networks.
00:23:00.000And people talked about Steve Bannon going to like the Zionist lobby conference or whatever.
00:23:06.000But nevertheless, that's where the money is.
00:23:08.000They're going to try and hit where the money is so they can get funded for 2018.
00:23:11.000And then hopefully, once we affirm our majorities again, then we can move again on the bigger things like border.
00:23:18.000And hopefully, things happen before then.
00:23:19.000But you understand that without those majorities, it all goes away in two years, or it all basically is withered away in two years.
00:23:28.000And so you look at something like the Jerusalem deal, and in effect, we did the Jerusalem deal, we pulled out of the Iran deal, and four days ago, Sheldon Adelson, who's one of the biggest Republican donors, He gave $10 million to the Republican effort in 2016.
00:23:41.000He wrote a check for $30 million to a GOP linked super PAC four days ago, the week that the Jerusalem embassy opens.
00:23:51.000And you look at some of the fundraising dinners that have been going on, I think that's basically vindicated.
00:24:23.000We will try and fight this incredible uphill battle without making any compromises anymore, without being pragmatic, without being practical.
00:24:45.000I think the other way to look at it, which was pointed out by an Iranian pundit on Twitter today, which I saw and I thought was a great idea, is the fact that by doing this kind of a thing, and you saw the fanfare in Israel, which made a lot of people upset, there was a great celebration in Israel for Trump moving the embassy to Jerusalem.
00:25:02.000There was a big groundswell of support for pulling out of the Iran deal, for moving the embassy from the people, from the government.
00:25:09.000Obviously, Bibi Netanyahu's very excited.
00:25:13.000They're like naming soccer teams after him, and they're minting coins, and they're naming streets, and all the rest.
00:25:20.000A lot of people get upset by this, but really, this does not matter in the grand scheme of things.
00:25:24.000You know, this is really triggering, I understand, for some people, and I get it, but I mean, let's try and be adults here and focus on what's really happening.
00:25:33.000That can be very upsetting on the one hand.
00:25:34.000On the other hand, I think, from a strategic point of view, and what Trump has essentially done is indebted Bibi Netanyahu and the Israelis to the United States in a very public way, such that, and this was laid out by this Iranian pundit, which is purely speculation at this point.
00:25:49.000So I'm not trying to say, like, This is absolutely the conscientious thought process of Trump.
00:25:56.000I'm saying let's think about it from this angle for a moment.
00:25:59.000Let's entertain a little bit of speculation.
00:26:02.000If the Israelis love Trump, the right wing base for Bibi Netanyahu, you know, Bibi Netanyahu is a very fragile political coalition right now.
00:26:15.000People in Israel say that he's being very aggressive to distract from these scandals.
00:26:20.000He's very reliant on this base, which now loves Donald Trump, which now loves America.
00:26:25.000Now, this creates one of two scenarios.
00:26:28.000Some people might say, well, that means that Trump is in the pocket of B.B. Netanyahu.
00:26:32.000On the other hand, if you look at it alternatively, maybe it suggests that Trump is a free actor.
00:26:37.000And now that he's won over the Israeli people, now that he's won over these people who support Netanyahu, and Netanyahu is reliant on them for his political capital, maybe now it says that Trump actually has more maneuverability.
00:26:50.000Because if you think of it, if Netanyahu says, well, we want to go to war with Iran, or we're going to do these things against the interests of the United States, And Trump says, you know, I'm not really going to have that.
00:27:01.000The Israeli people are not going to be too pleased with Netanyahu.
00:27:04.000They're not going to be too happy with him.
00:27:05.000So I think that's one way to look at it.
00:27:08.000And now, if Netanyahu were to be as freelancing as he has been in the past, where he ignores the United States in building settlements and attacking Iranian positions in Syria and advocating for war with Iran, I think it's going to be a different dynamic at the very minimum.
00:27:23.000I'm not saying that that is the master plan.
00:27:31.000This is one dynamic that could possibly play out.
00:27:33.000And I think when you're looking at Trump, who is a deal maker, this is the way that he thinks in terms of leverage, in terms of support, these kinds of things.
00:27:42.000The last angle to look at it, and I think this is key from what he said in the statement, I think this is the most well founded aside from the idea about funding.
00:27:53.000The last bit is about the Palestinians themselves.
00:27:56.000Trump has said that he wants a comprehensive peace in the Middle East.
00:28:01.000When he did the serious strikes in Syria, in April rather, when he talked about.
00:28:08.000Removing the United States from the Iran deal, he has generated, I think, or he's postulated the idea of a more comprehensive peace in Iran.
00:28:17.000Even when he was talking with the French President Macron when they had their state visit a couple of weeks ago, he talked about how the Iran deal should address things like Iranian aggression in the greater Middle East.
00:28:28.000It should address their missile program.
00:28:30.000It should address the Syrian civil war, the civil war in Yemen, and all this kind of stuff.
00:28:35.000And what I think all of this hints at, his approach to all these different issues, is that Trump's ambitions in the Middle East are not.
00:29:14.000You have the Iranian backed Houthis in Yemen, which is why you have a proxy war there.
00:29:18.000And so I think Trump says it's not let's solve the Iran nuclear deal with one, you know, the joint comprehensive framework, and let's solve the Israel Palestine with another Oslo Accords or whatever.
00:29:30.000He says let's have a comprehensive approach to the entire picture.
00:29:33.000And the road to peace in Tehran, Damascus, Sana'a, and Baghdad, I think it all runs through Jerusalem, which he rightly sees.
00:29:42.000And so he said in his statement today about the embassy, He said that the United States was still fully committed to comprehensive peace in the Middle East.
00:29:51.000And I think you can see in the broad history of the Trump administration, this has been the approach.
00:29:57.000He flexes, essentially, on North Korea, or he flexes on Iran, or he flexes on China, and then he reaches out the hand.
00:30:04.000He reminds them of the economic clout, the military power, and then he says, or we could do it this way.
00:30:11.000We could do it the easy way, or we could do it the hard way.
00:30:13.000And I think this is what you saw from the perspective of the Palestinians.
00:30:17.000Whereas Barack Obama and George W. Bush said, well, we have to get Mahmoud Abbas to the table.
00:30:22.000We have to get the Palestinians and the Israelis to come to the table and agree.
00:30:27.000I think Trump's approach is a little bit different.
00:30:29.000He is essentially communicating to the Palestinians with the embassy move that things can get a lot worse.
00:30:35.000He's essentially saying, unless you are going to come to the table prepared to make a deal, we're just going to essentially implement in a de facto way a one state solution.
00:30:46.000We're going to do things that are completely symbolic, totally a gesture, but that hint at.
00:31:05.000Everyone should have access to the holy sites, which is a rejection of what Bibi Netanyahu's policy is, which is we should just annex East Jerusalem and take over the whole thing.
00:31:15.000It still says that, you know, although Jerusalem is the capital of Israel, we still believe that it should be shared between Palestine and Israel.
00:31:24.000And so, if that's the case, if that's still the official position, but we're moving the embassy in a very symbolic gesture saying, like, ah, we're kind of legitimizing that Bibi Netanyahu is annexing.
00:31:35.000We're communicating, we are signaling to Palestine that if you don't approach us, if you don't concede like North Korea did, like China did, like Iran may, then things could get a lot worse for you.
00:32:47.000If he wanted regime change, wouldn't he have destroyed their entire air force?
00:32:51.000Wouldn't he have destroyed their entire capability to deliver a chemical weapon?
00:32:55.000He wouldn't have bombed three empty buildings if he wanted regime change, right?
00:32:58.000Wouldn't he do a shock and awe surprise attack?
00:33:02.000As opposed to warning the entire world on Twitter for five days.
00:33:05.000The same is true with the Palestinian embassy, or rather the Jerusalem embassy.
00:33:10.000If Trump was really in favor of Israel's interests and pure Zionism, and he's in the pocket of Bibi Netanyahu, would he be telling Bibi Netanyahu at a press conference, hey, take it easy with the settlements?
00:33:22.000Wouldn't he endorse a one state solution, just pure and simple?
00:33:25.000Wouldn't he endorse Bibi Netanyahu's annexation of East Jerusalem?
00:33:29.000I mean, there would be so many other factors, but instead he executed a law.
00:33:34.000I mean, really, American policy has not changed.
00:33:37.000All he did was execute longstanding 23 year policy that was already the official position.
00:33:43.000And so I think when you look at it in that context and square it with what happened with North Korea and that kind of model for how Trump's diplomacy works, I think you can see pretty clearly what's going on here.
00:34:28.000Believe me, it resonates very strongly.
00:34:30.000But there is a process to how things work.
00:34:33.000There is, I think, what Trump does is he approaches these problems in a very creative and a very indirect way.
00:34:40.000And that's what we see all throughout.
00:34:42.000You know, people might say, well, on the North Korea situation, well, he should have just embraced diplomacy when he was making those threats, or he should have just done war.
00:34:51.000I think you found a creative and an indirect way to bring a favorable end about.
00:34:56.000The same is true with the wall or with the tax cuts.
00:34:58.000I think it's a roundabout way of getting there, but I think he's always got his eye on the prize.
00:35:03.000But of course, we'll see what happens.
00:35:06.000If there's further movement towards a one state solution and it's concrete and it's legitimate and it's not just words and rhetoric and gestures, Then I'll say I was wrong.
00:35:16.000If he goes on tomorrow and says, I endorse the one state solution, and there's not like a caveat attached, it's not like if Palestine doesn't come to the table, whatever.
00:35:24.000If it's concrete, if there's real action, I'll say, okay, you know, we may be in a pickle here.
00:35:31.000But right now, I see the genesis of a deal.
00:35:33.000I see Trump doing his usual, which is thriving in chaos, doing things that are unpredictable, doing things that shake the current world order, moving in a chaotic and mysterious fashion so that people can't really figure him out, and people have a hard time responding.
00:35:48.000But That's the embassy with Palestine.
00:35:50.000You know, people are going to say, oh, well, he's a Zio Shill and blah, blah, blah.
00:35:53.000But, you know, we know that's not necessarily the case.
00:36:20.000The Palestinians are out there and they're like throwing rocks and fireworks, and the Israelis are sniping them with guns from rooftops and throwing tear gas at them from drones.
00:36:32.000And, you know, this is the moral democracy in the Middle East that we hear so much about, right?
00:36:36.000They say, This is the shining democracy, though the Middle East is barbaric and evil, and Israel's the shining light.
00:36:44.000And, you know, they kind of invented terrorism and they kill children indiscriminately and all the rest.
00:36:51.000They killed 55 people and injured something like 2,500 demonstrators.
00:36:56.000And it's true that, you know, it's tough because it's hard to ascertain what are the facts on the ground.
00:37:01.000I certainly think there are two sides to every story in the sense that these protests have been going on for six weeks, organized by Hamas.
00:37:11.000And today's the anniversary of the catastrophe, which is the 70th anniversary of the founding of the State of Israel.
00:37:18.000When they declared their nation, they expelled like a quarter of a million Palestinians.
00:37:22.000And did massacres and really, really democratic, liberal tier stuff, right?
00:37:28.000And so I think there's two sides to the story.
00:37:29.000On the one hand, the Israelis kind of have a point that the border is not stable, that they're doing these violent protests on the border, and why should a sovereign state have anything to do with that, right?
00:37:41.000And certainly I think Hamas knows that when they do these kinds of demonstrations, they provoke a reaction and they get international sympathy, and that's how they further their cause.
00:37:50.000By the same token, there is 100% a very serious case to be made that.
00:37:57.000Israel's response is never proportionate, ever.
00:38:01.000And you can look at any of the facts from like Amnesty International or any of the NGOs.
00:38:07.000They talk about any of the intifadas or the war with Lebanon, any one of these.
00:38:51.000It's really almost comical to me that the same people who are in the alt right, which, by the way, is for the ethnic cleansing of America, Okay?
00:39:01.000So let's remember the alt right, the people that say, yeah, we should have either a peaceful or a not so peaceful ethnic cleansing of America, they will then get on the high horse and say, Israel is killing Palestinians.
00:40:29.000I don't oppose Israel because, oh, well, they're killing Palestinians.
00:40:32.000That's not a very sound argument because we're making the argument that, well, you know, history happens and we had a right to take over North America.
00:41:06.000You know, and it's always the same thing, right?
00:41:09.000This is why people don't like to talk about extreme issues because of the purity spiral effect.
00:41:15.000I will go on this show and put my reputation, my financial security, In many ways, my safety.
00:41:22.000I will put all of that on the line, get kicked out of school, unemployable, all of that to debate Zionists and deliver to the people in a way that is effective, in a way that is, I think, rational, why we should not be supporting this country in countless debates with Jacob Wool, Will Chamberlain, Mike Tokes, Halsey, Arthur Shocker.
00:41:43.000You know, and I commit myself to this project of let's put America first.
00:41:47.000It's something that's tactical, it's something that you might not agree with, but that's a strategy.
00:41:51.000And there's just no goodwill shown there.
00:41:54.000I will put all of this on the line to say things that are not often said, to say things that you're not supposed to say, and do these big debates and try to get people to watch and try to turn people on to the facts.
00:42:24.000He's an illegal Jewish, closeted, has sex with black people and also trannies.
00:42:32.000And he's a papist paid by the Freemasons.
00:42:34.000He runs, I mean, all kinds of things, and that's the thanks, right?
00:42:39.000So that's why if you want people to come out and say these kinds of things, if you want people to support your cause, it has to be two way.
00:42:53.000Streamlabs and our super chats, and we'll see what's going on.
00:42:58.000You know, I got this great little graphic, and nobody's doing the Streamlabs.
00:43:03.000I guess they're all doing the Super Chat, or maybe they're all watching JF.
00:43:06.000Maybe they're all watching JF right now, right?
00:43:09.000But let's take a look at the Streamlabs.
00:43:11.000M103 says one step closer to the end times.
00:43:14.000I will say that's legitimate, I think, anxiety.
00:43:18.000That's legitimate concern because, you know, the apocalyptic Jews or the Orthodox Jews believe that if they rebuild the temple, if they rebuild the third temple, they're going to bring about the end of the world.
00:43:33.000And, like, you know, that's what they're trying to do, right?
00:43:37.000I mean, why do you think they're destroying all these countries?
00:43:40.000They say, well, you know, we're destroying Iran and Iraq and Syria and all these.
00:43:45.000Countries because we want to be safe and we're pursuing real politique.
00:43:51.000The reason is because they want to destroy all countries that pose a threat to them so they could pave a way for greater Israel.
00:43:58.000And once they establish greater Israel, they could kick the Muslims out of Jerusalem, they can wipe the dome or the, you know, whatever the mosque is right off the dome of the rock, and they could rebuild the third temple and bring about the end of the world.
00:44:18.000And, you know, Greater Israel, people say that's a big conspiracy theory.
00:44:22.000Ben Gurion was talking about this when he founded Israel, you know, and so I don't think that anxiety is a joke or crazy or anything like that.
00:44:57.000I don't know what you're talking about.
00:44:59.000You know, I got to be honest, I haven't really been following up on a lot of the, like the Michael Cohen and the, you know, people getting indicted.
00:45:08.000It's just really a lot of minutiae and a lot of details, and so much of it is fake.
00:45:13.000You know, when they talk about the Russia stuff, and I think you're referring to where they put in, I think it was like, what is it, the FBI, they put in somebody to like try and entrap the Trump campaign and try and get them to get on with Russia.
00:45:24.000So, I haven't looked into that too much.
00:45:26.000But, you know, certainly I think there's been all kinds of wrongdoing at every level with the intelligence community.
00:45:32.000I mean, you look at what happened with Peter Strzok and what happened with Bruce Orr and Lisa Page and all these characters where it's like the person who created the dossier, what was it?
00:45:44.000The person who worked at, what was the company called again that did the, you know, that Christopher Steele worked for?
00:45:53.000He worked for Perkins Koi, which contracted.
00:45:59.000The company that subcontracted the steel dossier.
00:46:04.000The woman who put that together, Lisa Page, was sleeping with Bruce Orr, who used that same phony dossier to get the FISA warrant to spy on the Trump campaign.
00:46:13.000I mean, all that, or rather, Lisa Page was sleeping with Peter Strzok.
00:46:16.000And I mean, all that collusion, all that incestuous government conspiring.
00:46:23.000And I think it's all going to come out in the Inspector General's report.
00:46:28.000That's been delayed for like months and months and months, but I think you're going to see all that come out pretty soon because it's almost undeniable.
00:46:34.000When you look at just the corruption, and it's so naked, it's so plain for anybody to see the cover ups, and I think they're all going to get their chest deserts pretty soon.
00:47:51.000If you think I'm a white nationalist, it's like, even if I show you my 15% Aztec DNA, they're going to be like, oh, well, then he just doesn't know he's not going to be accepted by the Aryan purity squad.
00:48:03.000It's like that exists in your head, liberal.
00:48:05.000But I say it because I don't want to get banned on Twitter and because I'm not a white nationalist.
00:48:26.000Which I think that's a hilarious line.
00:48:28.000You know, it's a dig at people who think race isn't real.
00:48:32.000Before sarcastically alluding to his feigned tolerance of killers roaming the streets of the inner cities and comparing the rate of violent pit bull attacks to the number of African Americans jailed in the U.S. for violent crimes.
00:49:16.000Jared Holt has worked with multimedia for more than eight years and earned a reputation for providing clients with high quality multimedia products.
00:49:24.000And check out his resume because I did creep on him a little bit.
00:51:37.000Like an Eastern philosophy about the universe.
00:51:41.000It's about this duality, this balance between.
00:51:44.000It's like Thanos, you know, it's all about balance.
00:51:47.000So, in a way, I almost kind of like Jared Holt.
00:51:49.000And I try, I really try to pull my punches with this guy because I'm like, you know, maybe we can have this kind of funny, like friendly thing going because it's kind of goofy the way it is where your job is to like stalk me and try and ruin my career.
00:52:02.000There's kind of like an intimacy about that.
00:52:04.000It's almost like a weird, like, like, like, A friendship kind of, you know?
00:52:09.000And so I try to be kind of like joking about it, but then he's very nasty, very rude, and so I have to give him a hard time.
00:54:19.000I. You know, you give paw and all the rest, you rub his belly, but then you go home where there's not hair everywhere and it's not, you don't open the door and it's like, you know, yelling, screaming, jumping around.
00:54:31.000And there's this thing, you know, at the Mother's Day dinner yesterday, the dog is just out of control.
00:54:35.000He's jumping on the table, he's jumping on the chair, he's trying to, he's barking, he's crying.
00:55:19.000The trick is it's a lot more difficult with the paywall, or rather, with the PayPal plugin to do the paywall on my website.
00:55:26.000Not like it's technically difficult, but I do have to jump through some extra hoops, and we're trying to figure out the best way to set it up.
00:55:34.000It's just unfortunate because it should be for everybody else that I could do a Patreon and people could just pay me for doing the show.
00:55:44.000Why do these people want to make it difficult?
00:56:09.000Ugly, sweaty gremlin people, ugly, sweaty, you know, bad features, and they jump in the middle.
00:56:15.000They say, Hi, I'm gonna ruin your livelihood.
00:56:20.000You said that we shouldn't support Israel.
00:56:22.000You can't do business on Patreon anymore, and Stripe's not gonna process payments for maker support.
00:56:30.000And if you're on gumroad, you know, so it's now I gotta get like cash in the mail and like set up my own website and pay for a server and like buy some plugin from an Indian to.
00:56:46.000You know, all these Jewish people, like Milton Friedman, they were like, oh, well, you know, the free market, you should just be able to sell your services, man, and people should be able to pay you for it.
00:56:55.000Yeah, well, what happens if, like, a handful of people control the payment processors and you can't do that?
00:57:01.000What happens when, like, the internet's putting everyone out of business and then, like, some people control it?
00:59:28.000This is why Catholicism is the answer, fellas, and why, like, strict.
00:59:34.000And Orthodox Catholicism is the only path forward.
00:59:37.000Because at the end of the day, the difference between the Catholic Church and everybody else is that we have the authority of God on our side.
00:59:46.000Jesus Christ said that Peter would be his vicar on earth.
00:59:50.000Peter has given that or transferred that to the succession as the Bishop of Rome.
00:59:57.000And so we are, rather, our Pope is protected from error by God Himself.
01:00:08.000And everybody else, when they say, oh, well, but Catholics don't do this right, and I disagree with Catholics about this or this and that.
01:00:14.000Okay, but fundamentally, at the root of it, we have authority and nobody else does.
01:00:20.000Our authority is extrinsic, and that makes it legitimate.
01:00:24.000That's the only kind of legitimate authority that exists.
01:00:27.000And so when you have an authority like that dictating on matters of doctrine and on theology and all the rest, you're protected from that kind of error.
01:00:34.000You know, I don't think it's a coincidence that you have this evangelical love for Israel.
01:00:39.000In America, where it's Protestants, where it's Protestants that have this love for Israel.
01:00:44.000A lot of the, say what you will about the Hispanics coming over here, they're Catholic and they oppose Israel because they're Catholic.
01:01:27.000She is, you know, I have a lot of problems with thoughts these days with women, you know, but my mom, she is always the one that brings me back from the edge with the MGTOW kind of stuff because she reminds me there still are.
01:01:39.000And my grandma, too, my grandma, my mom, the women in my life, the good ones, as I like to call them.
01:01:44.000They remind me there is hope left for the female race, for the female species.
01:01:51.000Even though they caused original sin, even though there's some other problems, there's still hope for them, and we love them.
01:02:55.000If this breed, if you have a problem with one breed and its specific genetic characteristics, and they are causing a disproportionate amount of problems, you have to look at it and you have to think about it pretty seriously.
01:03:08.000And so, the pit bull problem is a big one.
01:03:11.000We have to have an answer for it soon.
01:03:33.000So, at, and I guess this person must be somebody who went to Lyman.
01:03:38.000So, for those that don't know, Model United Nations, you would abbreviate the conferences by doing like a little bit of the name of the high school or the college and then months.
01:03:46.000So, my school was Lyons Township, so it was Lyons Township Model UN or Lyman.
01:03:52.000So, we hosted a Model UN conference on a Saturday at our school.
01:03:57.000And as part of the opening ceremonies, I remember at one point we had the steppers come on stage.
01:04:07.000What they had at LT was this little dance troupe where you had the cheerleaders and you had the other dancers, and they did the more traditional stuff.
01:04:16.000But then you had the steppers where, and think of the demographics, it was this very urban style of dancing where they're stomping and clapping and doing this, you know, uh, uh.
01:06:50.000It says, The more prosperous nations are obliged, to the extent that they are able, to welcome the foreigner in search of the security and the means of livelihood which he cannot find in his country of origin.
01:07:03.000A lot of people say, Well, that means Catholics are pro refugee and they don't believe in countries and all that.
01:07:08.000It goes on to say, Public authorities should see to it that the natural right is respected that places a guest under the protection of those who receive him.
01:07:16.000Political authorities, for the sake of the common good for which they are responsible, May make the exercise of the right to immigrate subject to various juridical conditions, especially with regard to the immigrants' duties toward their country of adoption.
01:07:32.000Immigrants are obliged to respect with gratitude the material and spiritual heritage of the country that receives them, to obey its laws, and to assist in carrying civic burdens.
01:07:48.000Even in Japan, they take like a few refugees every year.
01:07:51.000But there's also that big fat caveat, which says you can't just flee your own responsibilities, which is what a lot of them are doing.
01:07:58.000You know, the Syrian refugees, they go through Turkey, where they're safe.
01:08:05.000They go through Eastern Europe, where they're safe.
01:08:07.000And then they get to Germany, where there's free stuff.
01:08:10.000They go through all these safe countries, and then they stop at one where there's free stuff.
01:08:15.000Sub Saharan Africa, they come up from Nigeria, they end up in a safe country in the Maghreb, but then they keep going because they want the free stuff.
01:08:22.000So they're refusing their obligation to their country.
01:08:25.000And they just want the free stuff, as demonstrated by the fact that they're not really looking for refuge.
01:08:31.000Additionally, you look at a lot of the refugees, and it's not even fair to say they're refugees.
01:09:57.000And it's true because maybe you could have had that a long time ago.
01:10:02.000When there were jobs, when you could afford things, you know, when housing prices weren't crazy, when everything wasn't so costly.
01:10:11.000You look at the baby boomers, they could move out at 18 because they could graduate high school, jump on the factory line, and get a great salary, get great benefits, get a cheap house, support a family.
01:10:22.000Even after World War II, the GI Bill, it's like taking candy from a baby.
01:10:31.000Or, at least, you know, that's what is standard in the country, which costs a lot of money, or otherwise, you're spending a lot of time, which is not spent gaining experience in the workplace.
01:11:27.000But people, and I think very certain particular people, have a vested interest in getting people to get into the hamster wheel as quickly as possible where people are going to incur debt and then they have to get a higher salary so they could pay more expensive and more debt and more taxes.