America First - Nicholas J. Fuentes - The French Connection | America First Ep. 151

00:00:06.000 Good evening, everybody.

00:00:07.000 You are watching America First.

00:00:09.000 My name is Nicholas J. Fuentes, and we have a great show for you tonight.

00:00:13.000 Very excited to bring you another episode of America First.

00:00:18.000 We are excited for another big show.

00:00:21.000 We got big water here.

00:00:23.000 You got the Nickler, and it's finally nice outside, really.

00:00:28.000 I mean, I don't know for anybody who's on the Southwest, who's on the East Coast, or whatever, but in Chicago, it has been.

00:00:36.000 What, 50 degrees for the past month?

00:00:39.000 Snowing, raining, 30 degrees, 40 degrees.

00:00:42.000 Finally, spring is here.

00:00:44.000 We're feeling good.

00:00:45.000 We're feeling high energy.

00:00:47.000 And we're excited for another great show.

00:00:49.000 I'm very upset.

00:00:51.000 I actually was handling the knife a moment before I went live.

00:00:56.000 I had the knife swinging it around as I do.

00:00:59.000 And I cut a tiny little hole in my pants just now.

00:01:03.000 Very unhappy with that.

00:01:04.000 So we're starting off, I don't know, I guess that's high energy, right?

00:01:07.000 At the very least, the knife is sharp.

00:01:10.000 The knife is very sharp, but is that maybe it's a little too sharp, right?

00:01:14.000 But anyway, we are here. 0.98

00:01:16.000 We're talking about France and we're talking about Iran.

00:01:19.000 Some very interesting things going on.

00:01:22.000 And we really got to get into the Iran nuclear deal.

00:01:25.000 We haven't talked about it too much on this show because, of course, the Iran nuclear deal was signed in 2015, which is three years, two years before the show even started.

00:01:35.000 So never really got a chance to get into it, but we will be getting into that tonight and what was said about that.

00:01:42.000 Today, between President Trump and French President Emmanuel Macron, we'll also be getting into the case of Alfie Evans, which is a very cruel and sick case of socialized medicine, and we'll explore that as well.

00:01:56.000 So, it should be a fun and exciting show.

00:01:58.000 The Streamlabs is working again, so remember, it wasn't working last week because of tax information.

00:02:05.000 I forget the particulars, but the link is working, so if you want to use that instead of the super chats, we invite you to do that because remember, the YouTube collects 30%.

00:02:14.000 Streamlabs, it's only 3%.

00:02:16.000 And YouTube, it goes towards Google.

00:02:18.000 It goes towards artificial intelligence.

00:02:20.000 It goes towards the beast.

00:02:22.000 It literally goes to Satan when you donate to Google.

00:02:25.000 So we want to be using the Streamlabs.

00:02:27.000 But it's an exciting show.

00:02:28.000 We're very glad to be here.

00:02:30.000 I got to say, there's one glitch that's been going on.

00:02:33.000 I don't know if you catch this, but it's because of the OBS update with my broadcasting software.

00:02:39.000 There was an update recently where now I go from the opening screen where it's playing the music and it's very great and it's playing the Trump wave and I go into.

00:02:49.000 This screen with the camera and with all the things, and there's a brief period where it takes a second for the camera to turn on.

00:02:55.000 I gotta fix that, but we do have a big announcement before we get into the news, and then we'll get straight into it.

00:03:01.000 On Thursday, Sticks, Hex, and Hammer will be making an appearance on this show at 7 30 Central Time or 8 30 Eastern Standard Time.

00:03:12.000 So we're pumped for that.

00:03:13.000 I just was speaking to him actually shortly before the show this evening, and we planned it all out, and so he'll be coming here.

00:03:21.000 On Thursday at 7 30 Central Time, so get hyped for that.

00:03:24.000 Not going to be a debate, not going to be contentious.

00:03:27.000 We're actually, we've become pretty good friends, I must say.

00:03:30.000 We did obviously meet during that debate that we had on the Chadcast, which was a blast.

00:03:37.000 We met during that religion debate, which was a great time.

00:03:42.000 But actually, he's been watching the show, I've been watching his content, and so he'll be making a friendly appearance.

00:03:47.000 We'll be discussing his bid for governor in Vermont, we'll be discussing politics broadly, his political views.

00:03:54.000 So it should be a good time.

00:03:55.000 But with all that out of the way, with all the housekeeping stuff out of the way, we got to get into the news.

00:04:00.000 I'm so excited to talk about it, folks.

00:04:02.000 Finally, some foreign affairs content on this show.

00:04:06.000 We got World Report coming out tonight after the show for the premium members.

00:04:12.000 Even though the maker support is having trouble, the premium shows still keep coming.

00:04:17.000 We'll have World Report after the show, but tonight we get to get into Iran and France and the United States, and so it should be a good one.

00:04:25.000 So today, of course, if you've been watching the news, it's been all over Twitter, it's been all over the news, and that is French President Emmanuel Macron's official state visit.

00:04:37.000 To the United States.

00:04:38.000 He landed here yesterday.

00:04:40.000 He sat down with the president today.

00:04:42.000 And they had a very interesting meeting.

00:04:44.000 There was a lot of physicality.

00:04:46.000 There was a lot of touching, a lot of handshakes and kisses.

00:04:50.000 I mean, it really was a lot.

00:04:51.000 There was a big ceremony to welcome the French president.

00:04:55.000 And they got into a number of issues.

00:04:57.000 They talked about the Iran nuclear deal, of which there is a deadline rapidly approaching, May 12th.

00:05:03.000 And we'll get into what that deadline presents.

00:05:05.000 So they talked about the Iran nuclear deal.

00:05:07.000 They talked about.

00:05:09.000 The new trade policy of the president and how that will relate to the European Union.

00:05:14.000 They talked about Syria.

00:05:15.000 They talked about a big number of things, but it was a pretty spectacular state visit.

00:05:21.000 And I have to say, it's an interesting one.

00:05:23.000 It is an interesting relationship that you have between Macron and President Trump.

00:05:28.000 Macron, in many ways, is not the president that we expected.

00:05:32.000 In some ways, he fulfills the expectations we had for him, in some ways, he does not.

00:05:38.000 For example, during the French presidential election, it came down to.

00:05:43.000 Macron, who was the center right candidate, a center right technocrat.

00:05:47.000 I believe he was an economics major.

00:05:49.000 He was kind of a functionary.

00:05:51.000 I don't believe he had any prior government experience.

00:05:54.000 And he went up against Marine Le Pen of the National Front.

00:05:57.000 She was the nationalist candidate, she was the anti migration candidate.

00:06:02.000 A lot of conservatives took issue with her because not only was she not totally gung ho about Israel and all that stuff, but she was much more left leaning on economics, much more right leaning on migration.

00:06:13.000 But so it came down to those two.

00:06:15.000 In the French presidential election.

00:06:17.000 Those were the two big players.

00:06:19.000 Macron beat her out by a pretty significant margin.

00:06:22.000 Now, Le Pen did win a much larger margin than her father had before, but nevertheless, Macron won.

00:06:29.000 And a lot of people were expecting him to be a globalist technocrat in a similar vein as his predecessor, Hollande, or Merkel in Germany, or Theresa May, or David Cameron.

00:06:41.000 I think a lot of people expected him to fit the standard mold of a 2000s, 2010s European politics.

00:06:49.000 Politician, much more in line with a Barack Obama than with a Donald Trump, much more in line with a miracle as opposed to an Orban or a Putin.

00:06:58.000 And you are kind of seeing this divide in world leaders where I think some leaders are embracing the ethnic nationalism, tribalism, identity, and embracing a little bit more of an authoritarian flavor.

00:07:10.000 You see this in Hungary, in the Philippines, in Russia, in Turkey, to an extent, people say, in the United States with Trump versus the old liberal order, the old new liberal order.

00:07:22.000 Which would be represented by Barack Obama, David Cameron, Holland, and most of all, probably Merkel.

00:07:27.000 She's probably the most enduring fixture of that liberal order.

00:07:31.000 And so it is this clash.

00:07:33.000 And many people said, well, Macron probably fits into the technocrat side.

00:07:37.000 He probably fits into the liberal side.

00:07:39.000 And as we've seen him govern, we've seen a lot of things that come out as a little bit against that. 0.85

00:07:43.000 Some of the comments he's made, his general tone is far and away different from the Merkles and the Obamas of the world. 0.59

00:07:50.000 He's taken a surprisingly pretty strident line against. 0.74

00:07:54.000 Illegal migration from Northern Africa and from the Middle East.

00:07:59.000 He's taken a much different line with regard to Syria than other adventurists and explorers.

00:08:04.000 Not so much different than his predecessors in France, but definitely his compatriots in the UK and other countries in Europe, particularly the United States across the Atlantic.

00:08:13.000 But he talks about being a Jupiterian monarch.

00:08:16.000 He talks about being a king.

00:08:17.000 I mean, there are some things which I think struck a different tone.

00:08:20.000 By the same token, he does go against a lot of the nationalist sentiments in Eastern Europe, but it's kind of a mixed bag.

00:08:27.000 And that's what makes it a very interesting relationship.

00:08:29.000 And.

00:08:30.000 A lot of people have commented on.

00:08:32.000 I think the biggest thing people have commented on is not so much the substance of their meeting today between Macron and Trump, but the body language, the handshakes, the comments, the kisses, this kind of thing.

00:08:45.000 And there were several major episodes, several major exchanges that have been played up.

00:08:51.000 At one point during the summit, President Trump went over, he reached over into Macron's personal space and said he was wiping a piece of dandruff off of his shoulder, which is.

00:09:02.000 You know, obviously very inappropriate for a state visit, at least if you're trying to abide by the politeness, if you're trying to be a couth and polite individual. 0.72

00:09:11.000 There was a moment where President Trump leaned over and kissed the French President Macron.

00:09:16.000 There was just jockeying throughout, handshakes, hand squeezing, people tapping each other's hands, bringing each other.

00:09:23.000 I mean, all kinds of things.

00:09:25.000 Excuse me.

00:09:26.000 And this is not the first time we saw this.

00:09:28.000 We saw this actually pretty early on in the presidency, the first time that they met.

00:09:33.000 There was this handshake thing going on.

00:09:35.000 When President Trump visited Europe, there was another handshake episode.

00:09:39.000 They said that they were squeezing each other's hands so tightly that you could see that their hands were turning white.

00:09:45.000 And the liberal media played it up that when President Trump shook Macron's hand, I think for the first or the second time a little bit earlier in the year, they said that, oh, he was begging for release.

00:09:55.000 You could see his hand.

00:09:56.000 He was trying to let go because Macron was hurting him.

00:09:59.000 And so then the next time that Macron visited the United States, Trump made it a point, or rather, when Trump visited France, Trump made it a point to shake Macron's hand for 60 seconds, shaking his hand, shaking his wife's hand at the same time.

00:10:13.000 You know, a very, very elaborate, very, very spectacular display there.

00:10:18.000 And so we get it again today with the handshakes and all the rest.

00:10:21.000 And I think a lot of this is a result of, to tackle this before we get into Iran, and that's what I really want to focus on, but to tackle the body language.

00:10:30.000 People say, oh, it's really affectionate.

00:10:32.000 It's about a rock solid U.S. French alliance.

00:10:36.000 Don't be fooled.

00:10:37.000 It's got nothing to do with anything but.

00:10:39.000 I mean, that's not.

00:10:39.000 Power.

00:10:40.000 People are portraying it like this is just goes to show what a great relationship they have.

00:10:44.000 This just goes to show not only what a great relationship Macron has with Trump, but a great relationship France has with the United States.

00:10:52.000 And nothing could be further from the truth.

00:10:54.000 It's got nothing to do with friendship.

00:10:55.000 It's got nothing.

00:10:56.000 When they're shaking each other's hands really, really hard and they're patting each other on the back and yanking each other, that's got nothing to do with they're really good friends.

00:11:05.000 I mean, maybe to an extent, I think there's some affection.

00:11:07.000 I think there's some level of respect that they're two statesmen.

00:11:10.000 They're jockeying for power, but.

00:11:12.000 The bottom line is that this is about dominance.

00:11:14.000 This is about a very physical manifestation, a very physical expression of dominance.

00:11:19.000 And this is how Trump has interacted since the time he took office, even before that.

00:11:24.000 I mean, you could go back and you could look at the way that he shook Mike Pence's hand when he won the election in 2016, the way he was yanking him around.

00:11:33.000 You could see this in the 2016 Republican National Convention when he did the same thing to Mike Pence, brought him in for a kiss.

00:11:39.000 You could see it when Trump nominated Neil Gorsuch.

00:11:42.000 I think that was maybe the first time we saw.

00:11:45.000 The Trump handshake yanking him around.

00:11:47.000 We saw this with Shinzo Abe the first time that he met him in the White House, tapping the hand.

00:11:52.000 You know, that turned into a big thing.

00:11:53.000 And so, this is just how Trump operates.

00:11:56.000 This is how Trump asserts dominance over other people.

00:11:59.000 Obviously, he's a big guy.

00:12:02.000 He's very tall.

00:12:03.000 He's very stout.

00:12:05.000 He's, what, six foot three, a very heavy individual.

00:12:08.000 And so, he's an imposing presence.

00:12:10.000 You saw this even during the presidential debate, the second one with Hillary Clinton, how he towered over her.

00:12:16.000 This is one of the ways that he communicates, not just to people he's negotiating with, but also to the public in a very public way, who's in control.

00:12:25.000 And he did this with Pence.

00:12:26.000 He did this with many people.

00:12:27.000 And so that's what that was about today.

00:12:28.000 And I think, in large measure, we saw that kind of aggression, that kind of overbearing physicality, because of what happened just a couple of weeks ago.

00:12:39.000 If you recall, we went into the serious strikes with France.

00:12:43.000 It wasn't just the United States in the serious strikes, it was also France and the United Kingdom.

00:12:48.000 And shortly after the serious strikes, French President Macron said that he had convinced, he personally had convinced President Trump.

00:12:56.000 To keep U.S. troops in Syria for the long term.

00:12:59.000 If you remember the week prior to the Syria strikes, Trump was saying, I think three different times in public, we want to get troops out as soon as possible. 0.63

00:13:07.000 We want to get troops out as soon as possible. 0.98

00:13:09.000 We can't have them in there forever.

00:13:11.000 Even the night of the strikes, he said, we don't want them in there indefinitely.

00:13:15.000 And shortly after the strikes, the French president comes out and says, no, no, I changed his mind.

00:13:19.000 I convinced him to stay in there for the long term.

00:13:22.000 And the White House came out very shortly after with a statement saying, no, no, that didn't happen.

00:13:27.000 You didn't change our minds.

00:13:28.000 You didn't change our policy.

00:13:30.000 We still want to get out as soon as possible.

00:13:32.000 And then the French president was like, oh, no, you're right, you're right, sorry.

00:13:35.000 We didn't mean it like that.

00:13:36.000 And so I think a big part of why Trump was seeking, especially this time, to show dominance, you know, literally manhandling.

00:13:44.000 And the French president is not, you know, he's not a tall guy.

00:13:48.000 He's not a little guy either.

00:13:49.000 He's kind of average, he's kind of medium.

00:13:51.000 But either way, I mean, Trump is literally just moving him around.

00:13:55.000 He's yanking him by the hand and so on.

00:13:57.000 And I think that was almost 100% because. 0.96

00:14:00.000 President Trump took it as Macron was saying, you know, I changed your mind, I cucked you.

00:14:05.000 Trump today said, no, no, remember, I'm the boss.

00:14:08.000 And not just to Macron, but to the world, saying, we're the United States, we're still the ones that call the shots and so on.

00:14:15.000 So that was the body language.

00:14:16.000 I think a lot of people, a lot of amateurs misinterpret it.

00:14:19.000 I was almost surprised because, you know, the media is pretty accurately, and they've provided a lot of good resources on the body language since Trump got into office.

00:14:29.000 I mean, they were pretty accurate in how they assessed those exchanges that he's had with other world leaders.

00:14:34.000 Then you could even go back.

00:14:35.000 He's done this with many people.

00:14:38.000 Even on the first edition of The Apprentice, you could see in the way he shook hands with people then.

00:14:43.000 And the media has always, I think, done a good job of saying, you know, that's what this is.

00:14:47.000 But this time around, I see it all over, mostly on the conservative press.

00:14:51.000 They say, oh, look at what great friends they are.

00:14:53.000 Trump's making great friends.

00:14:54.000 It's great allies.

00:14:55.000 Got nothing to do with that.

00:14:56.000 It's all about body language, it's all about power.

00:14:59.000 But that was the body language.

00:15:00.000 The big reason that they had the meeting and German Chancellor Merkel will be visiting the United States, visiting President Trump on Friday to.

00:15:08.000 Discuss the same thing is the Iran nuclear deal.

00:15:12.000 The Iran nuclear deal, which was signed in 2015 in negotiations with six major nations.

00:15:18.000 And the reason they're meeting is because there's a major deadline coming up on May 12th.

00:15:24.000 And we talked about this a little bit in the fall where President Trump refused to recertify the deal.

00:15:30.000 There's a provision in the Iran nuclear deal that every so often, pretty regularly, the president has to certify that both the United States and Iran are in compliance with the provisions of the deal.

00:15:42.000 And so President Trump, although he threatened it a few times since he got into office in 2017, he finally said, I'm not going to certify it in the fall.

00:15:51.000 And we talked about that, I think, in like October, September.

00:15:54.000 And the deadline's coming up, May 12th.

00:15:56.000 And if he doesn't certify, if he has to make a decision on May 12th, is he going to put on additional sanctions in response to Iran allegedly not following the spirit of the deal?

00:16:08.000 And the White House has said they're not actually, they're not technically breaking any of the rules in the deal.

00:16:13.000 Technically, everything they've been doing so far has not violated the letter of the deal.

00:16:18.000 But the White House position is, well, they're violating the spirit of the deal.

00:16:23.000 These are being very antagonistic in neighboring countries.

00:16:26.000 They're spreading their wings, trying to become a regional hegemon.

00:16:30.000 They're doing ballistic missile tests.

00:16:32.000 Some say the missile tests were fake, some say they're real.

00:16:34.000 Either way, the White House says they're violating the spirit of the deal, and therefore we're considering slapping on sanctions on May 12th.

00:16:42.000 And on Monday, you had the president of Iran, Hassan Rouhani, say that he's very worried about the United States. 0.66

00:16:49.000 He says that if the U.S. pulls out of the deal, if they slap on sanctions, they'll restart their nuclear program.

00:16:55.000 Iran's foreign minister said today, shortly before President Trump met with Macron, that there would be dire consequences if the U.S. eliminated or pulled out of the Iran nuclear deal, and that Iran would probably scrap the deal if the U.S. pulled out.

00:17:11.000 And so there was a lot of big rhetoric going into it.

00:17:13.000 And there were some very crucial statements made about the deal today, which I think are very telling about the foreign policy of Trump.

00:17:20.000 And many people are worried about this because we heard some very bellicose rhetoric from the president today, some very strong threats.

00:17:28.000 And I want to get into why.

00:17:30.000 I think a lot of that anxiety is unfounded.

00:17:32.000 And people are going to say, oh, you know, of course, Nick's here again to explain it away.

00:17:37.000 Nick's here again to be an apologist for Trump and all this.

00:17:40.000 But you really got to stick to the facts.

00:17:42.000 You really got to stick to analysis.

00:17:44.000 I think a lot of people, they look at Trump, and in order to excuse or explain their position or the shortcomings of their position, they say, well, things have happened like this in the past.

00:17:56.000 And look at the people he surrounded himself with.

00:17:58.000 But they don't actually look at what the president is saying?

00:18:00.000 What is the president doing?

00:18:02.000 You know, what's the context?

00:18:03.000 We go back to what we were talking about yesterday the contextual versus the particular.

00:18:08.000 We have to look at the context.

00:18:10.000 And so President Trump today issued some pretty severe threats.

00:18:15.000 He said, They're not going to be restarting anything in response to Iran saying they would restart their nuclear program.

00:18:22.000 He continued, They restart it, they're going to have big problems, bigger than they've ever had before.

00:18:28.000 And he went on to say that they would face penalties that no other country, few other countries, have ever faced before at the hands of the United States.

00:18:36.000 As some very strong and hardline rhetoric against Iran.

00:18:40.000 And this sounds very familiar. 0.55

00:18:42.000 It sounds very familiar.

00:18:44.000 And we hear the familiar refrain from the usual suspects today saying, Mr. President, don't go to war in Iran.

00:18:52.000 What are you doing?

00:18:53.000 Neocon Don added again, saying things I don't like.

00:18:57.000 Saying things.

00:18:58.000 How could he?

00:18:59.000 He's a neocon.

00:19:01.000 But think of the context.

00:19:02.000 Think of what was said here.

00:19:05.000 They're not going to be restarting anything. 0.86

00:19:06.000 This is in response to a threat by Iran. 0.98

00:19:09.000 They restarted. 1.00

00:19:10.000 They're going to have big problems, bigger than they've ever had before.

00:19:13.000 Can anybody say fire and fury?

00:19:16.000 Can anybody say, does anybody remember where that phrase came from?

00:19:19.000 Not the book, Fire and Fury, but does anybody remember over the summer when President Trump said if North Korea continues down their path, they will face fire and fury, the likes of which has never been seen?

00:19:32.000 Does anybody remember that?

00:19:33.000 And remind me again, where are we now with North Korea?

00:19:37.000 Because I recall some very strong, very similar rhetoric against North Korea for a very similar reason. 0.76

00:19:43.000 Reason.

00:19:44.000 North Korea developing weapons of mass destruction, testing ballistic missiles, testing a nuclear arsenal.

00:19:50.000 President Trump responds with hawkish rhetoric, over the top drills in the Pacific and in the Sea of Japan, shooting Minutemen missiles.

00:19:59.000 And here we are, how many months later, sitting down for an historic peace summit.

00:20:04.000 We have Mike Pompeo visiting Kim Jong un.

00:20:06.000 We're setting up South Korea and North Korea say they're considering ending the Korean War officially.

00:20:12.000 I mean, we're making tremendous strides.

00:20:15.000 After that kind of bellicose rhetoric.

00:20:16.000 And so we see the rhetoric today, and I think we have to take it with a grain of salt.

00:20:20.000 That's in the first place.

00:20:21.000 But much more important than the threats, the threats got big publicity, the body language got big publicity, but I think the thing that was missing is it was a very subtle thing that if you're not paying attention to the Middle East, if you're not paying attention to the news, it might have escaped you.

00:20:38.000 And President Trump was talking about the nuclear deal, and he said, I think we will have a great shot at doing a much bigger deal.

00:20:47.000 He said that any new agreement would be built on solid foundations.

00:20:51.000 He said they should have made a deal, referring to the nuclear deal with Obama and the other powers.

00:20:56.000 He said they should have made a deal that covered Yemen, that covered Syria, that covered other parts of the Middle East. 0.65

00:21:02.000 And he said that the 2015 accord was insane and ridiculous. 0.91

00:21:07.000 And you hear this kind of rhetoric, you hear the threats, you hear insane and ridiculous, they should have done this and that. 0.91

00:21:12.000 But he's saying something that's, I think, very important here, something very crucial.

00:21:16.000 He says a much bigger deal.

00:21:18.000 And then he goes on to talk about how it should have encapsulated Yemen and should have encapsulated Syria.

00:21:23.000 And then Macron laid out four pillars to the nuclear deal, to a new deal that could be made.

00:21:28.000 We made a deal in 2015 that expires in 2025.

00:21:32.000 And it has Iran mothballing their nuclear program in exchange for sanctions relief and other things.

00:21:39.000 And so Macron said, okay, we shouldn't scrap this deal, but if we're going to make a new deal, maybe we could make a new deal. 0.70

00:21:45.000 He said it would be based on four pillars, which would be stopping Iran's short term nuclear activity, stopping their long term nuclear activity.

00:21:53.000 Ending their ballistic missile program and finding a diplomatic solution to Iran's bid for regional hegemony, which would be their pursuits in Yemen, their pursuits in Syria, Iraq, Lebanon, with Hezbollah, with Palestine, and all the rest.

00:22:09.000 And I think what was totally overshadowed in all of this, where you hear the over the top threats, where you hear the body language stuff, is that Trump is looking at the Middle East and he's not just looking at Iran.

00:22:21.000 He's not just looking at the Iran nuclear deal.

00:22:23.000 This is something I think that sets Trump apart from.

00:22:27.000 Obama and even from Bush and others for that matter.

00:22:29.000 This is what puts Trump and the Trump doctrine on par with the Reagan doctrine, with the Nixon doctrine.

00:22:35.000 Maybe you don't like the Reagan doctrine, but puts it on par with them in terms of its scope.

00:22:41.000 In terms of, you can tell from the way Trump is looking at this, he's not looking at just Iran has a nuclear program, how do we stop the nuclear program?

00:22:49.000 As Barack Obama did.

00:22:51.000 Barack Obama said, Iran has a nuclear program, let's make a deal so they just stop.

00:22:57.000 We'll give them things and they'll stop.

00:22:59.000 Donald Trump is a much different deal maker. 0.84

00:23:02.000 We see this with Korea.

00:23:03.000 We also see this today with the Middle East.

00:23:05.000 He says, let's make a deal which encompasses all of it. 0.78

00:23:08.000 He says, let's stop Iran's nuclear program. 0.66

00:23:11.000 Let's also figure out what's happening in Yemen.

00:23:12.000 Let's figure out what's happening in Syria.

00:23:15.000 And if you're figuring out what's happening in Syria, then also we're talking now about the Syrian civil war.

00:23:20.000 We're talking about the civil war in Yemen.

00:23:22.000 We're talking effectively about not the nuclear program, not about Syria, but when we include all the issues, effectively what we're addressing here is.

00:23:32.000 Is the proxy war between Saudi Arabia and Iran.

00:23:36.000 And ultimately, even further than that, we're addressing Israel. 0.57

00:23:40.000 I mean, this is, you're getting into the meat and potatoes of the Middle East.

00:23:43.000 And so, this was a big thing that was overlooked.

00:23:45.000 But I think that Trump has a much better understanding of the Middle East than any of the experts, than any of the people that came before him in the White House, any of the pundits for that matter as well.

00:23:56.000 I think many people have read into this.

00:23:58.000 Trump is talking about Iran.

00:23:59.000 Trump is talking about tearing up a good deal with Iran and maybe going to war with Iran or something like that.

00:24:05.000 And I think you're hearing, I think if you look at his approach over time, if you look at the rhetoric over time, the scope of this doctrine in the Middle East is much broader.

00:24:14.000 You have to understand that the reason, you know, we look at Iran having a nuclear program. 0.76

00:24:18.000 We look at Iran and their bid for regional hegemony.

00:24:21.000 They're sponsoring the Houthi rebels in Yemen.

00:24:24.000 They have the Shiite militias in Syria.

00:24:27.000 They sponsor Hezbollah, which is in Lebanon.

00:24:29.000 They antagonize Israel, and they're also in Syria.

00:24:32.000 And we look at all these different components, and we could say, how could we address Hezbollah? 0.82

00:24:36.000 How could we address Syria?

00:24:38.000 How could we address the Iran nuclear program?

00:24:41.000 But at the end of the day, we can boil it back down to why do they need all of that?

00:24:45.000 It's because of Saudi Arabia and Israel. 0.62

00:24:48.000 And a good deal maker understands that it's not about the symptoms of these broader problems, it's about the disease. 0.82

00:24:54.000 It's about what's underlying all of these things. 0.75

00:24:57.000 Iran isn't getting a nuclear program for the same reason that North Korea is.

00:25:02.000 Iran isn't getting a nuclear program because they want self reliance, they want to be isolated, they want to be left alone and pursue their own, you know, Juche ideology. 0.78

00:25:10.000 Iran's getting a nuclear program for a very specific reason. 0.84

00:25:14.000 Iran's getting a nuclear program to deter a country like Israel or to deter a country like Israel using the United States. 0.67

00:25:22.000 Why does Iran want regional hegemony? 0.61

00:25:24.000 Why does Iran want control of Yemen?

00:25:26.000 Why does Iran want control of Syria to balance against Saudi Arabia?

00:25:30.000 Because Saudi Arabia is fighting them in all these different fronts. 0.57

00:25:33.000 Saudi Arabia and the United States have complete control of the order in the Middle East.

00:25:38.000 Why does Israel have a problem with Iran? 0.59

00:25:40.000 If Iran is worried about Israel, that's why they have a nuclear arsenal. 0.92

00:25:43.000 That's why they need to spread their wings across the Middle East. 0.86

00:25:46.000 Why is Iran concerned with Israel? 0.74

00:25:48.000 Well, Israel wants Iran to be taken out because Iran sponsors Hezbollah, which is on their northern border.

00:25:55.000 Israel fundamentally is not so much concerned with Iran.

00:25:58.000 I mean, they are, but predominantly they're concerned with Hezbollah, Lebanon, and Syria.

00:26:02.000 And so Trump looks at the entire Middle East and he says, We're not going to figure out the Iran nuclear deal until we figure out how we put an end to Saudi Arabia and Iran proxy war, how we figure out how to satiate Israel without completely destroying the Middle East.

00:26:19.000 How do we satiate Israel, who has a great influence on our foreign policy?

00:26:23.000 And that's not going away anytime soon. 0.98

00:26:25.000 I don't think there's a law you could pass.

00:26:27.000 That would stop these people from intervening.

00:26:29.000 But how do we get them to believe that their security interests are being met without having regime change in Syria or regime change in Iran?

00:26:37.000 That's the way I believe that Trump is looking at it.

00:26:40.000 And you get to the fundamental heart of the matter when you hear this kind of talk about we have to make a much bigger deal that includes Yemen and Syria.

00:26:49.000 What he's talking about now is not a nuclear deal, he's talking about a grand bargain.

00:26:54.000 He's talking about rewriting the order in the Middle East, probably with Vladimir Putin, probably with Iran in some cooperative way.

00:27:01.000 And also, I think he would have to be dragging along his allies like Saudi Arabia and Israel probably a lot more than you need to drag along Iran, Russia, and others, even Syria.

00:27:12.000 And so I think that we look at the summit today, and this gives us a big idea about the Trump doctrine.

00:27:17.000 I think a lot of people are very upset about the Syria strike.

00:27:21.000 People are very upset about his comments about Iran.

00:27:24.000 But I think this is fitting into the broader narrative here.

00:27:27.000 I think this fits into the broader theory that Trump is a dealmaker.

00:27:31.000 What underlies these bigger problems, and he's trying to meet a solution for all these.

00:27:36.000 Because there's a big report that came out earlier this week that said that when Trump first got into office, he called up BB Netanyahu and said, Do you legitimately want peace?

00:27:46.000 And that's a very, very telling thing.

00:27:49.000 We put that together with his other comments towards BB Netanyahu, telling him to stop building settlements and other things he said.

00:27:56.000 And I think Trump incisively and intuitively has gotten to the heart of the problem here, which is that unlike Barack Obama, who says, Let's just put a cap on the nuclear program, he says, This is.

00:28:08.000 A perpetual conflict here because interests are overlapping, they're competing, they're contradictory.

00:28:14.000 You will never have peace in the Middle East so long as Israel is concerned about the northern border.

00:28:20.000 You won't have peace in the Middle East so long as Iran and Saudi Arabia, because Iraq is gone as a buffer state, are trying to encircle each other because Iran is sponsoring Shiite militias in the Gulf states and in Yemen and all the rest.

00:28:34.000 And Saudi Arabia is maybe meddling in Iran with the help of Israel. 0.56

00:28:38.000 Who knows?

00:28:39.000 But at the end of the day, you'll never get that kind of peace. 0.67

00:28:41.000 You'll never get a comprehensive solution to a quote unquote rogue regime like Iran or a rogue regime like Israel.

00:28:48.000 They're both rogue.

00:28:49.000 They're both violating international law.

00:28:51.000 They're both going against U.S. interests.

00:28:54.000 Because until those differences are resolved, there won't be any stability.

00:28:58.000 There will only be that kind of conflict.

00:29:00.000 And so this is a very, I think, a very white pilling thing that we're seeing from the president. 0.81

00:29:04.000 If this is going down the same trajectory as North Korea, we are in for. 0.54

00:29:10.000 I think something very transformative for the Middle East that we haven't seen in a long time. 0.91

00:29:15.000 This would really be a closing chapter on a long period of Zionist domination of our politics and Zionist domination of our foreign affairs in the Middle East, where we have been going to war and doing these big adventures and exercises.

00:29:29.000 You look at Trump's doctrine there in a very comprehensive way, and he is revolutionizing American energy. 0.73

00:29:36.000 We're now the number one producer of oil and natural gas in the world, so our dependence has been weaned off of the Persian Gulf.

00:29:43.000 You've seen that we've been able to achieve, or we're on the road to achieving, a great peace with North Korea, which builds rapport with China, which sets a precedent for Iran.

00:29:52.000 You've seen him demonstrate a willingness and an ability to use power in Syria, even against the warnings of Russia and the admonitions of Russia.

00:30:02.000 So you're putting together all the pieces here for a much more complicated deal than North Korea, which I think is why they're pursuing it first, but ultimately, I think a big and a great deal. 0.54

00:30:13.000 And so.

00:30:14.000 Big white pills today with Macron and Trump.

00:30:17.000 I'm very excited to see where this goes.

00:30:19.000 And obviously, we'll see what happens.

00:30:21.000 It's a little early to say for sure how this will turn out.

00:30:24.000 And I don't want to be presumptuous.

00:30:26.000 I don't want to make any assumptions.

00:30:28.000 This is my forecast.

00:30:29.000 This is my prediction based on what we've seen.

00:30:31.000 So I'm not doubling down on this anytime soon or saying, you know, I'm certain this is the way it's going to go.

00:30:37.000 But I think this has been where it's been trending from the beginning.

00:30:41.000 And I predicted this earlier in the week, if you recall.

00:30:45.000 Either last week or the week before, after the Syria strikes, I said, Don't be surprised if you hear the same kind of rhetoric that we heard towards North Korea about Iran. 0.56

00:30:53.000 I said, Don't be surprised if in the coming months or maybe in a year, once this North Korea stuff starts to be fulfilled, once you see the summit between South Korea and North Korea and the summit between North Korea and the United States, once all of that happens, you'll probably see a similar effort begin with Iran.

00:31:11.000 I think he'll start working on it with Iran.

00:31:13.000 And so you'll probably see, you could potentially see, More limited intervention in Syria or in other places to serve the same purpose that it did in North Korea.

00:31:22.000 And I think we're seeing that obviously come across today with the statement, the threats about Iran, and also the talk of a bigger deal.

00:31:30.000 And that is what is possible with a guy like Trump with a deal maker.

00:31:33.000 But ultimately, we'll see.

00:31:35.000 That's my prediction.

00:31:36.000 My prediction is that, and it'll be probably not anytime soon.

00:31:40.000 I don't think it'll be in the very, very short term.

00:31:43.000 I mean, May the 12th is the big deadline for when he puts on sanctions or he doesn't put on sanctions, whether he continues on with this deal or he doesn't.

00:31:52.000 If I were a betting man, I would say he stays on with the current deal, but he starts working on an alternative deal.

00:31:59.000 And I would say that in the mid to longer term future, you will see something like that come together.

00:32:05.000 And I would bet. 0.93

00:32:07.000 Like I said, if I'm a betting man, I would bet that you see Russia brought into that, China's brought into it, Iran, Syria, Yemen are incorporated, and I would think that would be the grand bargain.

00:32:17.000 I think that would really be a transformative thing.

00:32:20.000 And this is how it has to happen, ultimately.

00:32:22.000 This is how a deal ultimately has to happen.

00:32:25.000 There has to be leverage brought to the table.

00:32:27.000 You know, people say it's either you're a neoconservative and you're for regime change, it's either you solve the Middle East with war, or you just walk away.

00:32:36.000 You know, you're either involved.

00:32:39.000 And you believe in American empire and you're an imperialist and you're a Zionist and all the rest, or you just completely wash your hands of it and anything goes, and the Persian Gulf is contested, you have a proxy war, there's nuclear proliferation in the Middle East, and it all goes to hell and we don't care.

00:32:56.000 And those are the only two options.

00:32:58.000 And I strongly believe that the latter is not an option in terms of people assume that we could make some kind of a deal or we could walk away and everything would just work out.

00:33:09.000 I don't think that happens.

00:33:10.000 I think these are both very bad options. 0.99

00:33:13.000 You either remain in the Middle East in the way that we are, and it's disastrous for us. 1.00

00:33:17.000 It's expensive. 0.99

00:33:19.000 We're entangled. 0.76

00:33:20.000 It continues to bring us into conflict with Russia and other great powers.

00:33:24.000 Or you do the Barack Obama route.

00:33:25.000 You say, we're going to get out.

00:33:27.000 And whether we're directly involved in it or we're indirectly involved in it, or it's just Israel and our allies, but either way, the region goes to hell. 0.95

00:33:35.000 Iran develops nuclear weapons. 0.70

00:33:37.000 Saudi Arabia develops nuclear weapons.

00:33:39.000 Turkey does.

00:33:40.000 Qatar does. 0.50

00:33:40.000 Egypt does. 0.50

00:33:41.000 I mean, this is written about even by liberals that this could happen.

00:33:44.000 And then the whole thing goes to hell.

00:33:46.000 And I don't think anybody wins with that.

00:33:47.000 I don't even think our interests are served with that.

00:33:49.000 I think this is the right middle course.

00:33:51.000 And I think that's the direction it's trending in.

00:33:54.000 And you can hear it in the rhetoric.

00:33:56.000 If you listen very intently and if you have been paying attention to what's been said and what's been going on, this is how it's been trending for a long time.

00:34:04.000 This is how Trump conducts diplomacy, which is vying for the grand deal of them all.

00:34:10.000 So that was the France and U.S. summit.

00:34:12.000 That's the rhetoric on Iran.

00:34:14.000 The road to Tehran, the road to a deal with Tehran runs through Jerusalem and it runs through Baghdad and it also runs through Damascus.

00:34:24.000 It's all connected.

00:34:26.000 And I think we'd be foolish to say that Iran can get a nuclear weapon and we don't have to worry about any of it. 0.91

00:34:32.000 It's all separate. 0.99

00:34:33.000 It's all just Israel. 0.86

00:34:35.000 It's a very complicated situation.

00:34:37.000 And it's all connected for various reasons.

00:34:40.000 It is in large measure because of Israel Palestine, it's also because of Saudi Arabia and Iran and the Persian Gulf.

00:34:47.000 It's escalated now into Russia and the United States with client countries and patron countries and all that.

00:34:54.000 But I think that that's the only way to look at it is in a comprehensive light.

00:34:57.000 So we're going to look at how that develops.

00:34:59.000 I think you'll definitely see, as time progresses, more outrageous rhetoric.

00:35:06.000 It'll be another game of brinksmanship.

00:35:08.000 You may even see more strikes.

00:35:11.000 And just remember this for anybody, maybe write down a time stamp for this episode so that if a strike happens again, if or when a strike happens again, if or when. 0.65

00:35:20.000 It seems like we're on the brink of war with Iran. 0.88

00:35:22.000 You can bring this back up and say, oh no, look, this is all part of it.

00:35:25.000 This has been predicted even before it happened because that's the only way that these people understand it.

00:35:30.000 I think Iran would be much more inclined to do a deal with us than North Korea.

00:35:35.000 I don't think it'll have to be as intense as it was with North Korea because North Korea and Iran are very different.

00:35:41.000 They're pursuing a nuclear weapon for different reasons.

00:35:44.000 But I still think you'd see some of that.

00:35:46.000 So that's my prediction on that.

00:35:48.000 The other big story we've got to get to is this young fellow named Alfie Evans.

00:35:53.000 And this story is a big rebuke to people who believe in socialized medicine, people who counter signal.

00:36:02.000 Conservatives and your basic conservatives, your small government people, people who believe in fascism and these other things.

00:36:11.000 We saw a very dark tragedy today here where you had this little guy, and this has been all over Twitter, it's been all over the news.

00:36:18.000 There's this little two year old toddler named Alfie Evans, and he's in the United Kingdom.

00:36:23.000 He is suffering from a degenerative neurological disorder.

00:36:28.000 And the reason we're talking about it is because he was brought into the doctor about a year ago, but he was having seizures, he was having all kinds of medical problems.

00:36:36.000 Apparently, he's been unresponsive for a while.

00:36:39.000 He has not been able to breathe without the help of a machine.

00:36:42.000 And spectacularly, he's defied all the odds.

00:36:46.000 He shouldn't be alive right now because of this condition he's in.

00:36:49.000 But for some reason, maybe by the grace of God, he's been able to stay alive.

00:36:54.000 And his parents said, okay, we want to keep him on life support.

00:36:57.000 We want to keep pursuing medical treatment.

00:37:00.000 And if we can't do it in the United Kingdom, then we want to take him to Rome and Italy or we want to take him somewhere else to get treatment.

00:37:06.000 And today, a ruling came down from one of the United Kingdom's high courts that this family, they got a sick kid.

00:37:14.000 He's defied all the odds.

00:37:15.000 He's still alive, but, you know, he needs help breathing.

00:37:19.000 They just ruled that this family is not allowed to travel to Rome to get the medical treatment that they want to explore for him.

00:37:27.000 And earlier this week, they ruled that they're taking him off of life support.

00:37:30.000 The doctors decided they're taking him off of life support as well.

00:37:34.000 And so it's a very tragic thing to see.

00:37:37.000 And people might ask, you know, how is this even possible?

00:37:40.000 What kind of a story is that?

00:37:40.000 How.

00:37:43.000 Where you have a kid who's on life support, he's alive, he's beat the odds this far, and I guess people who've had a similar condition have lived into their teenage years before.

00:37:53.000 So, why is a high court pulling the plug on him?

00:37:56.000 And how can they disallow him from going to Rome in Italy for getting further treatment?

00:38:01.000 Well, the way that the United Kingdom works, the way that their laws work, this child is under the jurisdiction of the courts, and because of a specific law, That was passed in the UK in, I think it was 1989.

00:38:14.000 It was one of their child protection laws.

00:38:16.000 In certain circumstances, the public can overrule the parents.

00:38:21.000 If the public decides it's in the best interest of a child, they can overrule what the parents decide.

00:38:27.000 So the parents say, we want to keep the kid on life support.

00:38:29.000 We want to bring the kid to Rome for further treatment if we can't get it in the UK.

00:38:33.000 The government can say, you can't make that decision.

00:38:36.000 We've decided it's in the child's best interest that we pull the plug, and he's had a great time.

00:38:42.000 You know, he's had a great life, but his road has come to an end. 1.00

00:38:46.000 It's time for him to die. 0.97

00:38:47.000 And so they can do that because of how the government functions there. 0.98

00:38:51.000 And this is a tragic story, but I think it's one that we need to learn from in the United States.

00:38:57.000 It's one that I think the free world needs to learn from.

00:39:00.000 That if the government, if bureaucrats, technocrats, you know, we talk about government and we have to talk about who are the decision makers here.

00:39:09.000 A lot of people think about government and they could either think of it as the best thing or the worst thing.

00:39:13.000 They can think of it as either. 0.98

00:39:14.000 You know, the bumbling doofuses who are pushing papers and they don't understand the black, you know, they don't understand getting things in the black. 0.98

00:39:23.000 They don't understand profits like the free market does. 0.97

00:39:26.000 Or you think they're the smartest people, they're the most qualified people, they're experts, as the left typically does, or even some people on the right say.

00:39:34.000 But either way that you look at it, we have to understand that bureaucrats, technocrats making these kinds of decisions, how can you live in a free society if bureaucrats, technocrats, whoever it is running the government, whether it's smart people or dumb people, if they're making decisions about the life of your children, if they can say on a whim, if a judge can say it's not in the best interest of the child and therefore. 0.88

00:39:59.000 I sentence him essentially to death.

00:40:02.000 Are you really living in a free country?

00:40:03.000 Are you really living in a moral or a humane country if that's the case?

00:40:08.000 And so I think this is a cautionary tale for the United States about health care, about government, about a lot of things.

00:40:16.000 And I don't usually take this line.

00:40:17.000 I usually don't on this show because I think, you know, we're at this point in the country where it doesn't really matter.

00:40:24.000 You know, with immigration the way that it is, we can campaign on small government, we can pass small government bills, and yeah.

00:40:33.000 Big whip. 0.58

00:40:34.000 In 2024, Texas goes blue and the country descends into the polyglot boarding house phase of its existence.

00:40:42.000 And who really even cares how big the government is?

00:40:45.000 It's going to be South Africa or Brazil, depending on how far into the future you want to go.

00:40:49.000 However, I will say, when you see something like this, it really, I think, strikes a chord with people.

00:40:56.000 I think it really resonates with people.

00:40:58.000 They can relate to this in a very human way and see the consequences and feel them personally of what happens when you have a government.

00:41:07.000 That is sovereign.

00:41:08.000 What happens when the state, as opposed to the people, is sovereign?

00:41:11.000 When the state has all the power and the people have no God given rights that are respected.

00:41:16.000 That's the difference between the UK and the United States.

00:41:20.000 In the UK, they may say they're a democracy.

00:41:22.000 They may say they're a liberal capitalist democracy, and that may be a fine thing.

00:41:27.000 But they abide by something called, I learned about it in comparative government actually in high school, they abide by something called parliamentary sovereignty, which means that the parliament is sovereign.

00:41:37.000 Since the Glorious Revolution, which overthrew What was it?

00:41:40.000 King James II and installed William and Mary.

00:41:44.000 They have had some degree of parliamentary sovereignty where the parliament has gradually become more powerful, exerted more power over the country to the point where the monarchy, the king and queen are basically, and the royal family are basically figureheads, and parliament now has all the power.

00:41:59.000 And the way it works in the UK is that parliament is in control of the country.

00:42:04.000 The people are subjects of the parliament, it's top down.

00:42:07.000 We control, and we like you.

00:42:10.000 We like the subjects.

00:42:11.000 We're going to pass laws that are going to help you.

00:42:13.000 We're going to try our best to do that, or we say we are.

00:42:16.000 But we make the rules and we're in charge at the end of the day.

00:42:19.000 In the United States, sovereignty is a totally different conception.

00:42:22.000 In a republic, the people are sovereign.

00:42:24.000 This is a very important difference.

00:42:26.000 And I talked about this in the gun control debate with atheism is unstoppable, which is such an unfortunate thing.

00:42:33.000 I hate having to bring up his name because it's not unstoppable.

00:42:36.000 I stopped it.

00:42:37.000 But it's very different in the United States.

00:42:39.000 And we talked about this in the United States.

00:42:42.000 The sovereignty comes from the people.

00:42:44.000 And, well, it's a little bit different than that.

00:42:46.000 And we'll get into that in a second.

00:42:48.000 But in the United States, we say we have a constitution.

00:42:52.000 We, the people, come together.

00:42:54.000 We write a constitution.

00:42:56.000 And we say we form a corporation, essentially.

00:43:00.000 We, together, through our corporate interest, will delegate corporate responsibilities to a government.

00:43:08.000 We say we're signing this social contract.

00:43:10.000 We're signing a constitution.

00:43:12.000 And we, as the sovereigns of this country, are giving up some rights.

00:43:17.000 And we delegate these responsibilities to a government so that government can abide by the Constitution through a mandate from the Constitution, exercise those responsibilities and provide public services, defend the country, and all the rest.

00:43:31.000 Now, it's very different, too, for the United States because we see that those rights come from God.

00:43:35.000 This is where it enters another dimension, where it actually is top down in a different way.

00:43:40.000 This is where even the populists get it wrong on a more technical note.

00:43:43.000 People will say, well, in the UK, it goes from Parliament down to the people, here it goes from the people to the Constitution to the government.

00:43:49.000 It's actually not so much that way.

00:43:51.000 For the United States, although we do have the sovereignty of the people, the founders understood it that actually our rights come from God.

00:43:59.000 They say God is on top.

00:44:00.000 He has made us.

00:44:01.000 He has given us rights.

00:44:02.000 He has given us natural rights.

00:44:04.000 And in order to protect our God given rights, we have a constitution.

00:44:09.000 And then the constitution creates the government, and the government serves the people, protects their rights.

00:44:13.000 So it is still top down, but it's obviously ordered very differently.

00:44:16.000 Whereas the United Kingdom sees it as parliament.

00:44:19.000 Gives power, or rather, Parliament exercises power over the people.

00:44:23.000 We see it as God gives us rights, we create the Constitution, the Constitution creates the government, so the government can protect those rights.

00:44:32.000 And that is why that's such an important difference.

00:44:35.000 That's where you really see in this case why that is such an important difference, the practical implications of it, in the sense that you would never see something like that in the United States because you would never have the government administering services like that.

00:44:49.000 You would never have the government administering health care.

00:44:52.000 And deciding, economizing health services based on who's most deserving.

00:44:56.000 Well, it's best for the public good that this person has health care as opposed to this person.

00:45:01.000 It may be in the public good that Alfie Evans, we pull the plug on him and instead we give a mattress or we give a hospital bed to a refugee or to an obese person or somebody who smokes cigarettes or whatever.

00:45:16.000 It's in the public good that we pull the plug on him and give it to someone else. 0.59

00:45:20.000 And that's what the parliament or a judge or a bureaucrat might decide.

00:45:24.000 In the United States, we say it doesn't matter.

00:45:26.000 Every individual has rights that, even if it's in the public good to take away guns, even if it's in the public good to redistribute money, even if it's in the public good to redistribute health services or other public services, you can't do it because it's infringing on rights.

00:45:45.000 And this is one of the tragic consequences when you see the real effects, the real implications of not being a free person in your country.

00:45:54.000 And they see it in a variety of ways in the United Kingdom.

00:45:57.000 It's not just medical, it's also in terms of free speech, in terms of guns.

00:46:01.000 People think it's an arbitrary difference.

00:46:03.000 People don't, I think, understand the gravity when they talk about government.

00:46:07.000 It's very easy when you get caught up in your political objectives to say, I want a big government.

00:46:13.000 I want the government to have all the rights.

00:46:15.000 I don't care about the Constitution.

00:46:17.000 I don't care about this.

00:46:18.000 You know, maybe right now it's not the top consideration because there's something very crucial happening.

00:46:25.000 And maybe we have to suspend some of those considerations about separation of powers so we can have some kind of vanguard deliver us to a place that makes sense.

00:46:33.000 I get all of that, believe me.

00:46:35.000 But when people start talking about socialism or national socialism or fascism or anything like that, you always have to be very worried.

00:46:44.000 Because while we can cheer on the memes and we can cheer on, you know, Putin is a strong leader who executes the will of the people and that's a great thing, we have to look at what are the practical effects.

00:46:54.000 It's all fun and games when they're in memes and when they're, you know, supporting Bashar Assad and all that, but what happens when it's your kid?

00:47:02.000 What happens when they take away your guns?

00:47:03.000 What happens when you don't have free speech?

00:47:06.000 It is still within the American tradition.

00:47:08.000 It is still within the American character.

00:47:11.000 I think it's a biological component of the people who descend from the founding stock of the country and the founding culture of the country that we have some degree of freedom.

00:47:20.000 Now, that doesn't mean that we're like a liberal, democratic, secular society, nothing close to it, but that liberty is still important.

00:47:28.000 And you could go back to the days of the founding fathers where we had a federal system that was much different than it was today.

00:47:34.000 I don't even think you could even call it democratic in many ways.

00:47:38.000 It was a much more centralized system, it was a federal system, it was a religious system.

00:47:42.000 Added all the things that we wanted, but there was still liberty.

00:47:45.000 They still acknowledged that.

00:47:46.000 And so, while I don't think liberty is, you know, it's not the top shelf, it's not the end all be all sometimes, but it's still up there.

00:47:53.000 It's still important.

00:47:54.000 So, that's Alfie Evans' tragic story.

00:47:58.000 I don't, you know, it's worth saying we don't know what's going to happen to this guy.

00:48:02.000 The courts and the doctors have a point.

00:48:04.000 They say his brain has deteriorated to the point where it could just be inhumane to bring him back because there's like no chance he could live.

00:48:11.000 I understand that contention, but.

00:48:14.000 People should have a right.

00:48:15.000 Who is some bureaucrat because he's wearing a wig, because he's wearing a hat to say he knows better than the people?

00:48:22.000 I think that's wrong.

00:48:23.000 But that's Alfie.

00:48:24.000 We're going to jump into our Super Chats and our Stream Labs.

00:48:26.000 If you disagree, if you agree, jump in.

00:48:29.000 If you have a comment or a perspective that I haven't touched on, throw it in there.

00:48:35.000 And we'll jump into our Super Chats here and then we'll get into our Stream Labs.

00:48:39.000 And Stream Labs is working again, so that is up and ready and available to go.

00:48:45.000 And let's see, we've got James Kramer who says, Shout out to OSS Vets and Fallen for Anzac Day.

00:48:52.000 Australia is the real greatest ally.

00:48:55.000 Yes, Anzac.

00:48:56.000 And of course, that was World War II, the Australians who participated in the Pacific War.

00:49:02.000 And the only reason I know that is because I play Axis and Allies with my friends.

00:49:07.000 But it's true, Australia is a great American ally, very underappreciated.

00:49:12.000 Nick says, and not me, someone on the Super Chat says, A modern mindset which sees all of reality as material for human manipulation and control thus explains the necessity for atheism in a Marxist worldview.

00:49:27.000 I mean, the globalist worldview, atheist, globalist, liberal, I mean, the whole gauntlet of these corrupt ideas, ideas, systems, ideologies, whatever you want to call it, they are built on fundamentally atheism.

00:49:27.000 Well, exactly.

00:49:43.000 They're all built on the idea that God isn't real because they are all materialist.

00:49:47.000 Even liberalism to an extent.

00:49:50.000 You can go back to classical liberalism of Adam Smith, of John Stuart Mill, and it had a much more religious bent.

00:49:57.000 It wasn't liberalism for the sake of liberalism like it is now.

00:50:00.000 You have Dave Rubin who says, I'm a classical liberal, and that's why I'm for abortion and gay marriage and all this other stuff.

00:50:06.000 It's like, okay, you don't understand what you're talking about.

00:50:09.000 You completely don't understand what you're talking about.

00:50:12.000 I'm a classical liberal like John Stuart Mill and Adam Smith.

00:50:15.000 The only reason Adam Smith believed in private property was because he believed that God.

00:50:21.000 Owned our bodies.

00:50:22.000 He believed that it was basically sinning against God for somebody to violate the property rights of another individual.

00:50:29.000 He said that suicide was immoral because you are destroying God's property, God's creation.

00:50:35.000 So for someone like Dave Rubin or any one of these classical liberal, the liberalists, for them to say, oh, no, we're the real liberals from back in the day, and they're atheists, and they celebrate degeneracy, hedonism, impulse, materialism.

00:50:51.000 They have no understanding of liberalism.

00:50:53.000 It was never intended, at least at the outset.

00:50:56.000 Maybe they didn't, maybe this was the inevitable consequence, but it was never intended at the outset to be liberalism for the sake of liberalism.

00:51:04.000 Even Kant, even Kant, who you could say was one of the architects of the Enlightenment, he believed in the public good.

00:51:12.000 He said, What is in the best interest of the public good?

00:51:15.000 We know what is good by, well, if everybody practiced it, would that be a good thing for society?

00:51:21.000 And even him, he saw these freedoms and these other things not as ends in themselves, but as geared towards a higher goal. 0.86

00:51:28.000 John Stuart Mill, who was a utilitarian, if you read his On Liberty, if you read what he even writes about free speech, He says he doesn't believe in free speech and freedom because, oh, freedom is good and socialism sucks.

00:51:41.000 He said it because this is how we move society forward.

00:51:44.000 This is how we get the best public good for the most people.

00:51:49.000 And that is a materialist worldview to an extent, but definitely not as secular as it's become today.

00:51:54.000 So the whole modernist mind frame is built on top of atheism, is built on top of materialism.

00:52:01.000 That's why it's so alien whenever you start talking about faith.

00:52:04.000 That's why it's so alien whenever you start talking about any of these conceptions from before the French Revolution, because we're on another paradigm.

00:52:12.000 There's a very good book that somebody who watches this show sent to me.

00:52:16.000 It's on my bookshelf.

00:52:17.000 It's called Beyond Church and State.

00:52:20.000 And I forget the author.

00:52:21.000 It's Andrew Williams Jones.

00:52:25.000 And I'm trying my best to read it.

00:52:27.000 I have pretty good eyesight.

00:52:28.000 I believe that's the name.

00:52:29.000 It's Andrew Jones.

00:52:30.000 And basically, the premise of this book is it's called Beyond Church and State.

00:52:35.000 In France, in the Middle Ages, this dichotomy between church and state didn't even exist.

00:52:42.000 Whereas people will project onto the past modern prejudices about, or modern preconceptions about church and state or about religion, it was a totally, a fundamentally different paradigm then because they saw them as intrinsically linked, as codependent, and one was not separable from the other.

00:53:01.000 And I think many modern, or rather, many conservative Catholics contemporarily, Contemporaneously today, they say things about women, about the economy, about politics, and all the rest.

00:53:16.000 It's very confusing to people who bill themselves as conservatives because whether they say they're conservative or not, they're still in this materialist, modernist worldview.

00:53:25.000 That's why I go on a stream with someone like Lauren Southern, or somebody could go on a stream with Paul Joseph Watson or Alex Jones or somebody like that.

00:53:33.000 And there could be an immense disagreement.

00:53:35.000 Even though we say we're both conservative, we both are for similar policies.

00:53:39.000 It's a fundamental different worldview.

00:53:43.000 So it's true.

00:53:44.000 Osir says, Love your work, sir.

00:53:46.000 Appreciate you.

00:53:47.000 Love you too.

00:53:48.000 Alvaro Quintana says, You should do an analysis on Blade Runner 2049.

00:53:53.000 I kind of missed the boat on that one.

00:53:55.000 It's been a while since it came out, but I think I did talk about it on one of my shows.

00:54:02.000 I forget which one, but I went and saw it, and I believe my general take was that it was basically about modern man in the sense that you look at Ryan Gosling.

00:54:14.000 Who, his character, what was his character's name?

00:54:16.000 I don't even remember.

00:54:18.000 But he's in the movie.

00:54:19.000 He didn't even have a name, did he?

00:54:21.000 Wasn't he just like a number or whatever?

00:54:22.000 Because he was a robot?

00:54:24.000 Or that's the thing.

00:54:25.000 We didn't know if he was a robot or not.

00:54:27.000 But the whole point of the movie, the whole premise of the movie, he was a replicate, right?

00:54:31.000 Yeah, well, I don't want to spoil it.

00:54:31.000 Or was it?

00:54:33.000 But the whole plot of the movie is is he real?

00:54:36.000 Is he not real?

00:54:37.000 Is he actually human?

00:54:38.000 Is he not human?

00:54:40.000 And in many ways, the Blade Runner world resembles our world in the sense that here was this guy.

00:54:46.000 He didn't know if he was human or if he was a machine.

00:54:49.000 And I think many people feel this way.

00:54:50.000 He went to his job to be a machine and he came home.

00:54:53.000 And it was a very, I think, a very good cinematography.

00:54:57.000 He comes home and it's polluted, it's dirty, he's in his apartment, everybody's poor, all the apartments are tiny, everybody speaks different languages, they're all hooked up to drugs. 0.88

00:55:08.000 He gets into his house and he's got a waifu, a holographic wife.

00:55:14.000 And I think many people see that kind of a character. 0.77

00:55:17.000 This was my analysis after I watched the movie.

00:55:19.000 Many people see this character and I think they relate to that in the modern world.

00:55:24.000 And this is something that Dostoevsky talks about, something that Evola talks about.

00:55:29.000 We talked about it in the episode, I think that was called Why Mass Shootings Happen or something to that effect.

00:55:35.000 That in the modern day, people see themselves as machines just carrying out tasks in a very deterministic fashion.

00:55:42.000 And I think Blade Runner speaks to that.

00:55:44.000 But maybe that's just my own interpretation.

00:55:47.000 I may do that in the future.

00:55:49.000 Irish game Do you have to follow the Pope to be a Catholic? 0.66

00:55:52.000 Well, define follow.

00:55:54.000 You have to understand that Pope is the vicar of Christ on earth.

00:55:57.000 And you have to understand that you have to understand Petrin or recognize the legitimacy of Petrin.

00:56:04.000 Succession and Roman succession, basically, that St. Peter was given the keys to the church in the same way that it happens in the book of Isaiah.

00:56:13.000 Peter is, in an analogy to political science, Peter would be the head of government to Christ's head of state if we're talking about the church as though it was a country.

00:56:24.000 Peter would be the head of government like the prime minister, with Christ being the king or the head of state.

00:56:31.000 And he also was the rock on which the church was founded.

00:56:33.000 This is in.

00:56:35.000 The gospel where Christ, I mean, Peter, he renames him Peter.

00:56:39.000 And Peter is a pun in the original language.

00:56:45.000 Peter is actually a pun on rock.

00:56:48.000 And then it was no coincidence that he renames him Peter.

00:56:51.000 And then Peter means rock.

00:56:52.000 And then he says, You're the rock on which the church is founded, and you get the keys.

00:56:56.000 And Peter does all of the firsts in the book of Acts, or a lot of the firsts.

00:57:00.000 And I mean, there's many things in the Bible that supports petron succession, but you have to believe in that.

00:57:04.000 You have to believe that because.

00:57:07.000 He died in Rome as the bishop there, that the Roman bishop goes on now as the head of the church and all the rest.

00:57:15.000 And you don't have to agree with everything the Pope says.

00:57:17.000 You just have to understand that the magisterium is not in error, it can't be in error, and that petron succession is legitimate and all of that.

00:57:27.000 And I understand people have a problem with that because they say, you know, I disagree with the Pope on this.

00:57:30.000 Not everything the Pope says is infallible, not everything the Pope says is protected from error by Christ.

00:57:36.000 It's only when he's speaking.

00:57:38.000 In his authority as pope, only when he's contributing to the magisterium.

00:57:42.000 That's the only time that he's without error. 0.99

00:57:44.000 Now, he can't be a heretic. 0.73

00:57:46.000 And we see that he's bordering, this pope is bordering on promulgating or through negligence, promulgating heresy. 0.60

00:57:55.000 If that is the case, if enough cardinals say this is a problem, they would cease to recognize him as the pope.

00:58:01.000 And I don't know.

00:58:02.000 Some say we're getting to that point.

00:58:03.000 I don't know if that's true or not.

00:58:05.000 But to be a Catholic, you have to understand that we have to have a pope.

00:58:09.000 And look, nothing else makes sense, by the way.

00:58:12.000 I mean, I'm not a Catholic.

00:58:13.000 I didn't become a Catholic.

00:58:14.000 I was always a Catholic, but I didn't embrace it because I said I'm gung ho about the Pope, who's a Marxist and a Jesuit, and he's from Argentina.

00:58:23.000 I said it doesn't make sense if you don't have a Pope.

00:58:25.000 You don't have to like the Pope, but you have to have a Pope.

00:58:29.000 It would simply not make sense for you to not have a Pope.

00:58:31.000 How else could you define what a Christian even is?

00:58:34.000 How else could you define that if there was not clearly defined succession, there was not clearly defined authority from Christ?

00:58:40.000 It wouldn't make any sense.

00:58:42.000 And I say this all the time. 1.00

00:58:43.000 This is a big argument against Protestants. 1.00

00:58:45.000 This is just a logical thing I think anybody could come up with. 0.72

00:58:48.000 If you're a Protestant and you believe that through the Bible alone you can understand what a Christian is, who's to say that I read the Bible and I say, well, this is true and this is not true, and I like this part, I don't like this part?

00:59:00.000 Who's to say I'm any more wrong about Christianity than people who study it for a living, than Christ himself or the apostles or the church fathers?

00:59:09.000 Who are you to say that I'm interpreting it incorrectly?

00:59:12.000 You know, and any layman could open up the Bible.

00:59:16.000 They don't understand the context.

00:59:17.000 Maybe they're illiterate.

00:59:18.000 Maybe they don't even read the Bible, but they say, I'm a Christian because I feel like it.

00:59:22.000 Who are you to say that that person's wrong if there's no source of authority?

00:59:27.000 And people say, oh, well, it's circular.

00:59:28.000 You point to the Pope and you say he's the authority because he's the authority.

00:59:31.000 Well, at some point, there has to be an endpoint to authority.

00:59:38.000 There is no objective, authoritative voice that will come from the human race, it has to come from without.

00:59:47.000 People understand this in political science.

00:59:49.000 De Maistre wrote about this.

00:59:50.000 He was a great.

00:59:52.000 Who wrote about the French Revolution and he effectively came to the conclusion, I believe it was in the 19th century, that you cannot have a government that's founded on rational means.

01:00:01.000 It has to be founded from some kind of mandate from the outside.

01:00:05.000 This is true in politics, this is true in religion.

01:00:08.000 Thomas Howard says, Get Yusuf on here.

01:00:11.000 He'll put you back on the socialism train.

01:00:13.000 LOL.

01:00:14.000 Look up Danny Williams, Heart Surgery Canadian MP.

01:00:17.000 Then you'll know.

01:00:18.000 Look, I'm not a socialist.

01:00:20.000 And he, if you'll recall, he said he was for social democracy.

01:00:24.000 He said he only uses socialism.

01:00:26.000 To trigger people like Steve Crowder and that kind of thing.

01:00:30.000 And I think that makes sense.

01:00:31.000 I'm not saying I'm against having some limited amount of health insurance be guaranteed by the government, but to have government make decisions about your medical care, that's a big difference.

01:00:42.000 It's a big difference to say maybe the government provides a baseline of catastrophic health insurance as opposed to saying the government should be economizing on who gets medical care and who doesn't.

01:00:53.000 I mean, it's a very big difference.

01:00:55.000 Ben Stata says, Hey, Nick, can you explain the Armenian genocide?

01:00:58.000 Maybe another time.

01:00:59.000 I mean, that was.

01:01:01.000 I'm not an expert certainly in history, but I know that it's been ignored for a long time.

01:01:05.000 It was committed by the Turks, committed by the young Turks, actually, in the early 20th century.

01:01:13.000 And the Armenians have been fighting with them for a long time. 0.60

01:01:17.000 I mean, it's pretty historic what's going on.

01:01:19.000 The Armenians, they fight the Azeris, they fight the Turks. 0.83

01:01:22.000 But effectively, I believe it was the Turks who used the young Turks and the Kurds to eliminate the Armenians.

01:01:28.000 And there were just massive casualties in the 20th century.

01:01:32.000 And a brutal thing, a brutal genocide, but one that is not recognized.

01:01:37.000 I believe today is Armenian Genocide Remembrance Day, and one that is not recognized by the United States.

01:01:43.000 And people see this as a glaring hypocrisy because, of course, we have Holocaust Remembrance Day.

01:01:48.000 It's like, what is it?

01:01:50.000 It's Tuesday, so it's Holocaust Remembrance Day again. 0.83

01:01:54.000 Congratulations. 0.74

01:01:55.000 And we'll be having it again on Thursday, and then again on Saturday, and then again on Sunday, and then next week, and then the day after.

01:02:01.000 And Holocaust Remembrance Day is every other week.

01:02:03.000 We never hear about the Armenian Genocide. 0.89

01:02:05.000 We never hear about the Holodomor. 0.77

01:02:08.000 We never hear about, or however it's pronounced, you know, we never hear about any of the other tragedies. 1.00

01:02:12.000 So, and of course, that's because Armenians are white Christians, but a very unfortunate thing. 0.98

01:02:18.000 By no means am I an expert on the Armenian Genocide. 0.92

01:02:20.000 I'm not Armenian, so it's not my legacy there. 0.70

01:02:24.000 And let's see our Streamlabs here.

01:02:27.000 Trashboat says, I'm thinking about those beans, baked beans.

01:02:31.000 We love baked beans on the show.

01:02:33.000 Beautiful Man says, Have you heard about Based Black Cardinal Robert Sarah from Guinea?

01:02:38.000 He's ultra conservative and says that the West is committing suicide with its immigration policies. 0.92

01:02:43.000 Would it be a bad thing if the Pope was African? 0.92

01:02:47.000 I have heard about him.

01:02:48.000 He's a great guy.

01:02:49.000 I'm a fan of his.

01:02:51.000 I am of the opinion that the Pope should be from Italy or from Europe.

01:02:56.000 I don't know.

01:02:56.000 I wouldn't say that we should never have an African Pope, but I don't know.

01:03:00.000 It just seems a little bit off to me to have an African Pope. 1.00

01:03:02.000 That's not because I think they can't do a very good job.

01:03:05.000 This Pope, I think, understands the situation better than the South American Marxists, but I just think it makes more sense to have him from Europe or from Italy or from one of these more historic places.

01:03:18.000 But hey, who knows?

01:03:20.000 Anything's possible.

01:03:21.000 Begbie says, looking forward to Styx's visit.

01:03:24.000 Enjoy the civil discourse.

01:03:25.000 Yeah, it'll be a good one.

01:03:26.000 Should be very civil.

01:03:27.000 Should be very fun. 0.74

01:03:29.000 Joe the Croat says, okay, listen. 0.95

01:03:31.000 All right. 0.69

01:03:31.000 I mean, look, it's not a problem. 0.69

01:03:34.000 It's not like I'm mad.

01:03:34.000 Just wait.

01:03:35.000 Joe the Boomer's Liver 2018. 1.00

01:03:38.000 He says, knives out for my liver and cheers to my Discord martyr homies. 0.72

01:03:41.000 I don't drink often, but when I do, it's in Nick's Discord. 0.86

01:03:44.000 Join us sometime.

01:03:45.000 Yeah.

01:03:46.000 Just don't get into the Discord.

01:03:47.000 If you watch the show, the Discord has been just a mess this week.

01:03:53.000 And so stressful.

01:03:55.000 It shouldn't be that way.

01:03:56.000 It shouldn't be that way.

01:03:57.000 I don't know what it is about people in these communities.

01:04:01.000 I'm gradually coming to the conclusion, I'm gradually starting to believe that familiarity breeds nothing but contempt.

01:04:07.000 I have to say, I was watching a documentary actually today about Louis Prima, who was a classic, a great Italian singer, songwriter from back in the day, and Sam Butera, who was his saxophone player.

01:04:24.000 He was talking about him for this documentary.

01:04:26.000 He said, Who you know, Louis Prima, he was a loner.

01:04:28.000 He said, Familiarity breeds contempt.

01:04:31.000 I had never heard of that before.

01:04:32.000 And I thought about it.

01:04:33.000 I go, You know, the more I think about it, the more I think, I don't know, is that true?

01:04:36.000 Is that true?

01:04:37.000 And I see this in the Discord people who are hanging out, they watch the show and then they fight and they fight and they cause trouble and they're DMing me, Nick, Nick, you know, Nick, give me a role in the server. 0.95

01:04:47.000 Nick, this guy's being a jerk in the server. 0.97

01:04:49.000 It's like such a headache. 1.00

01:04:51.000 And it's so funny.

01:04:52.000 The other day, people are telling me, Nick, you got to go to this great trouble.

01:04:56.000 To start up a server on an alternative website and pay for it because Discord isn't secure.

01:05:01.000 Like, yeah, I'm going to pay for this headache and go to this trouble to maintain it.

01:05:05.000 You know, give me a break.

01:05:07.000 But it's fun, I guess.

01:05:09.000 Young Caesar says, Nick, now that you're lifting, the girls will be chasing you harder than ever.

01:05:14.000 Stay chased.

01:05:15.000 Always.

01:05:16.000 Always.

01:05:17.000 Not until marriage.

01:05:19.000 Not until marriage.

01:05:20.000 We have to, look, we have to play by the rules. 0.98

01:05:23.000 And look, people can, they're out there and they say they're trash. 0.94

01:05:27.000 They say, I believe in traditional values. 0.90

01:05:30.000 I believe in this and that.

01:05:31.000 And then they follow a very different course.

01:05:33.000 And look, we're all sinners, okay?

01:05:37.000 I'm not trying to say I'm holier than thou.

01:05:39.000 I'm not trying to say I've never sinned in my life.

01:05:41.000 It's hard to believe, I know, but I've sinned before.

01:05:43.000 We've all sinned.

01:05:44.000 There's only two people who have never sinned that's Jesus, Jesus' mom.

01:05:49.000 So I'm not trying to say I'm better than everybody.

01:05:51.000 I don't sin.

01:05:52.000 But there are people out there who say, we believe in traditional values.

01:05:56.000 And then when push comes to shove on traditional values, not only do they not abide by them, They don't even attempt to abide by them, and they will actually hold them in contempt.

01:06:06.000 People who say they're traditional, not only are they themselves not moral in terms of sexuality, but they'll say, Nick is a virgin, like that's, I'm not married.

01:06:17.000 So they say that like it's a bad thing.

01:06:20.000 And that's a problem.

01:06:21.000 You know, okay, you make mistakes, you sin, you ask for forgiveness.

01:06:25.000 Hey, we're all sinners.

01:06:27.000 But for somebody to say, you're not sinning or you're following the rules, and therefore, That should be looked down on.

01:06:33.000 That should be ridiculed.

01:06:34.000 That should be laughed at. 1.00

01:06:35.000 You're a fraud. 1.00

01:06:36.000 You're a fake. 1.00

01:06:36.000 You're a phony. 1.00

01:06:38.000 I would never call somebody who sins a hypocrite because we're all human beings. 0.99

01:06:43.000 But if you don't even try, and if you actively counter signal people who are trying to live the way that you're supposed to, then you're no good.

01:06:52.000 I see it all too often.

01:06:53.000 All too often.

01:06:54.000 Well, that's our last stream lab.

01:06:57.000 A very good message to end on.

01:06:58.000 We have to stay traditional.

01:06:59.000 But that's our show for tonight. 1.00

01:07:01.000 We're getting killed by Worski. 1.00

01:07:03.000 I have to say, it's brutal. 1.00

01:07:04.000 It's brutal.

01:07:04.000 What happened to them saying, we're not going to stream so much, we're not going to do it so much anymore?

01:07:10.000 You know, I should have just let JF and Andy go at it.

01:07:13.000 I've got to tell you, I'm regretting it now, right?

01:07:15.000 But that's all right.

01:07:16.000 We've got a big show coming up for you on Thursday.

01:07:19.000 Remember, Sticks Hexenhammer joins us on Thursday at 7 30 Central for a discussion about politics and his bid for governor.

01:07:28.000 We will not be here on Friday because I will be at the American Renaissance Conference.

01:07:33.000 And my speech will be published shortly after the conference, I believe, sometime later.

01:07:38.000 I don't know when they post it, but it'll be available, I bet.

01:07:41.000 Soon.

01:07:41.000 So that'll be a good time.

01:07:43.000 Remember to support us on Maker Support.

01:07:45.000 We're still figuring out what's going on there.

01:07:47.000 But either way, support us there because you want to get that premium content.

01:07:50.000 You get the two exclusive podcasts, you get this show in podcast form, the special role in the Discord, and priority on our call in shows.

01:07:59.000 We'll have to do our next call in show next Friday because I won't be here this Friday.

01:08:02.000 And that'll be all right.

01:08:03.000 But you got to subscribe to us on YouTube.

01:08:06.000 Give us a big thumbs up.

01:08:07.000 Leave a comment.

01:08:08.000 Click the notification bell to get notified every time we go live.

01:08:12.000 Subscribe to us on Twitch, Facebook.

01:08:14.000 Twitter, all the rest, Twitch, every other service that we're on.

01:08:18.000 We're on the air Monday through Friday, 7 p.m. Central, 8 p.m. Eastern Standard Time.

01:08:23.000 I'm Nicholas J. Fuentes.

01:08:24.000 This is America First, as always.

01:08:26.000 Thank you for watching.

01:08:27.000 Thank you to our Super Chatters, our Streamlabs donors, our Maker Support, premium members.

01:08:33.000 We love you, folks.

01:08:35.000 We appreciate you.

01:08:36.000 Couldn't do the show without you.

01:08:37.000 And we thank everybody who watched, who shares, and who helps out with the show.

01:08:40.000 And we will see you tomorrow.

01:08:42.000 Have a great rest of your evening.

01:08:47.000 Americanism, not globalism, will be our credo.

01:08:54.000 It's going to be only America first.

01:08:57.000 America first. 0.99

01:08:59.000 The American people will come first once again. 0.99

America First - Nicholas J. Fuentes - April 24, 2018

The French Connection | America First Ep. 151

Episode Stats

Summary

Transcript