America First - Nicholas J. Fuentes - The Gay Agenda Exposed | America First Ep. 177

00:00:01.000 Good evening, everybody.

00:00:02.000 You are watching America First.

00:00:04.000 My name is Nicholas J. Fuentes.

00:00:06.000 We've got a great show for you tonight.

00:00:08.000 We are back this week and we are on a new set.

00:00:14.000 We are on a new set here.

00:00:15.000 We got a new desk.

00:00:17.000 Ha ha!

00:00:19.000 I love this new desk.

00:00:19.000 Oh, I love it.

00:00:21.000 Finally!

00:00:23.000 You know, before, I hate to say it, before we were using a table with, hang on, do we have sound?

00:00:31.000 Oh, we get a sound.

00:00:32.000 Okay.

00:00:34.000 You never know.

00:00:34.000 You never know, right?

00:00:36.000 You never know with the boomer technology. 0.97

00:00:38.000 Before we're using a table, and I said this last week, there's all kinds of gaggites on the desk here.

00:00:45.000 Before we're using a table with like a black screen over it, and it had all kinds of hair and dust.

00:00:51.000 But now, ha ha, we have, yes, we have a real desk.

00:00:57.000 Big, gray, and it's all set up.

00:01:03.000 It's got drawers.

00:01:05.000 You can't see, but you can hear.

00:01:07.000 It's got a little thing for my keyboard, so I don't even have to bring it up from the ground.

00:01:12.000 I'm also rocking two monitors.

00:01:15.000 You can't see them because it's much bigger, so the actual screen is not in your screen, but I have the dual monitors, so I'm actually playing Minecraft over here.

00:01:27.000 Just kidding, that's a joke.

00:01:29.000 I have one screen over here, got another screen over here.

00:01:33.000 Big things are happening.

00:01:34.000 It's a great day.

00:01:34.000 It's a great week for America First.

00:01:37.000 Tonight, we're taking on the homosexuals. 1.00

00:01:41.000 So you better watch out because we're taking on the homo and Globo Homo. 1.00

00:01:47.000 It's going to be a greasy naked wrestling match with Globo Homo. 1.00

00:01:52.000 We're going to smash him. 1.00

00:01:55.000 We're going to punish Globo Homo in a disgusting naked wrestling match rolling around on the ground. 1.00

00:02:03.000 Grunting now, but in all fairness, it will be a big episode tonight. 0.60

00:02:08.000 We're talking about the Supreme Court case that came down today with the ruling in favor of religious liberty, and we're going to talk about all the details of the case, all the details of the ruling, and what that means because I think a lot of people misunderstand what that was all about in terms of many people are saying this is a big win for free speech, this is a big win for religious liberty.

00:02:36.000 And it kind of is, but I think that people were kind of whooping and hollering just goes to show people don't really read the news.

00:02:45.000 They read the headlines, they see what happens, but they don't really read what actually happens.

00:02:50.000 So we're going to get into the ruling and what I mean by that, how it really was a narrow ruling.

00:02:56.000 A lot of people got bent out of shape because they said the media is saying it's a narrow ruling, but it was 7 2, which of course, when you typically, or in the last administration, had five, four decisions where it's split by one partisan.

00:03:10.000 This was 7 2, so obviously it was not a narrow vote, but it was a narrow ruling.

00:03:17.000 And I'll get into what that means. 0.90

00:03:19.000 And then I think that'll segue into a conversation about Pride Month generally, because of course this is a big blow to the homosexuals in their home turf, which is Pride Month, the month of June, the sixth month of the year. 0.91

00:03:34.000 I don't really think I need to elaborate on what all that's about, but it's a big blow to the homosexuals in their own month. 0.85

00:03:42.000 And so we'll get into a broader discussion of. 1.00

00:03:45.000 Pride Month and everything it represents.

00:03:48.000 And you know what's funny?

00:03:49.000 I try not to go so hard most days of the year because there's this weird thing where if you go really hard on gay people, there's this weird way of reasoning where people say, well, if you don't like gays, that just means you are gay.

00:04:07.000 Which it's like, imagine if you said to somebody, you know, I'd like one hot dog with no mustard.

00:04:13.000 And the guy behind the hot dog stand was like, you don't like mustard.

00:04:17.000 What do you secretly like, mustard?

00:04:18.000 Like, it's.

00:04:20.000 What's the logic? 1.00

00:04:22.000 It's like you either like gay people or you like them, but you're just lying about it. 1.00

00:04:29.000 And it's a pretty natural revulsion, too.

00:04:31.000 It's not like ice cream, where it's like, you say you don't like ice cream.

00:04:35.000 What do you secretly like ice cream?

00:04:39.000 It's a pretty natural thing to be repulsed by.

00:04:42.000 It's only in the last 20 years that anybody was okay with this.

00:04:46.000 But if you come out too strongly and say, well, the Catholic Church says this and 10,000 years of history say this, then it's like, oh no, but you must.

00:04:54.000 You're going at it so hard, so, but tonight we're going to take it on.

00:04:58.000 We're going to take it head on in a naked boxing contest. 0.99

00:05:01.000 We're going to put homosexuality in a headlock and batter it repeatedly with elbows. 1.00

00:05:08.000 But so we're going to talk about that. 1.00

00:05:09.000 Before we get into that, I want to talk about the mailing list real quick.

00:05:15.000 I was going to put out a big announcement this weekend about premium content.

00:05:19.000 We're going to bring back some of the premium content very soon, and I was going to put out an announcement.

00:05:26.000 Going to send out an announcement to all the mailing list members on the website.

00:05:31.000 So I was telling people sign up on the mailing list this weekend.

00:05:33.000 There'll be a big announcement.

00:05:35.000 It's been postponed until tonight.

00:05:37.000 Hopefully, tonight it will get out.

00:05:40.000 We were ready to go, ready to send out the mass email to there's about 21 or 2200 people on the mailing list that are going to get this email with all the information about the new premium content and where you can find it, what's in it, and all the rest.

00:05:57.000 And then it turns out that it costs like a billion dollars to send multiple emails.

00:06:02.000 I guess if you send more than like 100 emails, it's like, yeah, you have to pay a million dollars a month for that.

00:06:08.000 And so we're getting one thing set up, but it takes 24 hours to get set up.

00:06:13.000 We'll end up using that.

00:06:14.000 In the meantime, I was like, is there any way I could find it?

00:06:17.000 We ended up looking at MailChimp, Constant Contact, a couple other ones.

00:06:21.000 Some of them are scams.

00:06:22.000 There's like hidden fees.

00:06:23.000 And I don't want to bore you with the details, but it'll be coming out tonight.

00:06:27.000 Or tomorrow, so there is still time.

00:06:30.000 So remember to go on NicholasJFuentes.com to sign on to the email list to get all the first details about the premium content.

00:06:38.000 If not, you're not going to hear about it for a little while.

00:06:40.000 So if you want to get the first announcement, you want to be the first to know, you got to join the mailing list.

00:06:46.000 And then the Twitter account, the new Twitter account hasn't been very active.

00:06:51.000 I got to figure out a way to add a custodian to that account without them being able to know my address and my middle name and all that.

00:06:59.000 So Still figuring that out, but it's at America First NJF on Twitter.

00:07:04.000 And with that out of the way, the one thing I wanted to talk about before I get into the news is my old pal, my old friend, Cassie Dillon.

00:07:14.000 Oh, the one that got away.

00:07:15.000 Alas, right?

00:07:17.000 No, just kidding.

00:07:18.000 She liked me.

00:07:19.000 I never liked her.

00:07:20.000 I want to make that very clear.

00:07:23.000 I don't like people with no lips and with nothing going on.

00:07:28.000 And I also don't like people with Manhattan.

00:07:30.000 So let me just be clear, but.

00:07:32.000 And I don't want to be too clear.

00:07:33.000 There's some tactical ambiguity there.

00:07:35.000 But nevertheless, my old pal Cassie Dillon, the big headed Cassie Dillon old pal, she's out there now smearing Corey Stewart, who's running for Senate, who's running as a Republican for Senate in Virginia.

00:07:51.000 And he's running as Donald Trump, America First Conservative.

00:07:55.000 And he's out there running.

00:07:56.000 And Cassie Dillon recently published an article on the Daily Wire, the Daily Zion by Ben Shapiro.

00:08:03.000 And she publishes an article about how Corey Stewart is a Nazi sympathizer because.

00:08:08.000 He called Paul Nealon a personal hero of his over a year ago in February of 2017.

00:08:16.000 And I just want to talk about this very briefly because it's so unfair.

00:08:21.000 It's so unjust.

00:08:23.000 The basis of the article is well, Corey Stewart said that Paul Nealon is a personal hero and Paul Nealon is an anti Semite villain.

00:08:31.000 You know, like that's the end of the world, right?

00:08:33.000 And so that means Corey Stewart is a terrible guy, blah, blah.

00:08:37.000 Well, of course, this is dishonest because Paul Nealon. 0.88

00:08:40.000 Only recently went crazy, went off the deep end with the Jews stuff, like months ago. 0.98

00:08:45.000 So I just thought it was important to clarify that, to just get that out there.

00:08:49.000 It's a totally unfair smear.

00:08:51.000 And Cassie, if she ever sees this clip, if she's ever watching this, stop it.

00:08:57.000 Stop it, you.

00:08:58.000 Enough.

00:08:59.000 Stop smearing good America First conservatives.

00:09:04.000 And so, Cassie, if you're watching, stop it.

00:09:07.000 We know why Daily Wire, we know why Cassie Dillon and the gang are going after Corey Stewart.

00:09:13.000 It's because he is. 0.92

00:09:15.000 America first, like the name of this show, and they are Israel first.

00:09:21.000 And so, if you're not about Israel first, if you're not about putting it's more like Yisrael, actually, if you're a biblical person, those people over there that deny Christ, well, then you've got problems with them and with the media and all the rest.

00:09:36.000 So, I just wanted to put that out there.

00:09:39.000 We stand firmly behind Corey Stewart.

00:09:41.000 He's the real deal, and we support him.

00:09:43.000 So, just wanted to talk about that.

00:09:45.000 With that out of the way, we're going to get into the news, and I'm going to whip out our notes here on the court case, the big one, which we're all talking about, we're all wondering about.

00:09:55.000 I've got, it's so distracting because I've actually got a lamp down here.

00:10:01.000 You can't see it, but I've actually got a lamp down here because of the dual monitors, it actually obstructs the lighting.

00:10:08.000 And if you don't have from over there, so if you don't have even lighting on the green screen, it looks all funky, it looks kind of black, the shadows make it look bad. 0.97

00:10:17.000 So I've got a big ass.

00:10:19.000 LED lamp down here, which is lighting this area.

00:10:22.000 I'm going to have to figure out some kind of a fix for that.

00:10:25.000 But every time I look over there, it's in my eyes.

00:10:29.000 So the details of the big Supreme Court case so this was Masterpiece Cake Shop of Lakewood, Colorado versus the Colorado Civil Rights Commission.

00:10:41.000 And just to give you a basic overview of the case itself, you had a homosexual couple, which is David Mullins and Charlie Craig. 0.57

00:10:51.000 They go to Jack Phillips' cake shop, the masterpiece cake shop in Colorado.

00:10:57.000 They want a cake for their gay wedding in Massachusetts.

00:11:02.000 And they say, you know, hey, can you hook us up with a cake?

00:11:05.000 Phillips, the owner of the cake shop, he refuses.

00:11:09.000 He says, I will not lend my artistic talents. 0.99

00:11:12.000 I won't do business in support of a homosexual union because, of course, he's a Christian. 0.88

00:11:18.000 And we have to respect that because in the First Amendment of the Constitution, and this is. 0.52

00:11:22.000 This is my reasoning.

00:11:23.000 This is most people's reasoning.

00:11:25.000 This is your reasoning.

00:11:26.000 Even if you are a homosexual, even if you're not a religious person, it's understood in the country.

00:11:32.000 And this is, I think, broadly the argument for religious liberty that you have a right to free association.

00:11:39.000 The government should not be able to coerce you to do something that violates your own beliefs in your own business.

00:11:48.000 You know, by the same token, you shouldn't be forced by the government to take people into your home.

00:11:53.000 You should be forced by the government to hire people who are racist, right?

00:11:58.000 Or Nazis, right? 1.00

00:12:00.000 But if it's homosexuals, of course. 0.98

00:12:03.000 It's discrimination. 0.93

00:12:04.000 It's a big deal.

00:12:05.000 And this is really, well, and not to get too sidetracked, but this is really the heart of the issue.

00:12:10.000 We have in the country this strange thing where the Civil Rights Act in 1964 said that private companies cannot discriminate based on immutable characteristics.

00:12:21.000 And there were a number of Supreme Court rulings that also came down during the Civil Rights era using and invoking the 14th Amendment to say that a business, you know, like a bus company famously, cannot discriminate against. 0.93

00:12:33.000 People based on immutable characteristics because, you know, if you're a black guy, it's not like you can help that.

00:12:39.000 And I guess it inhibits your freedom if you're discriminated against by a big private company.

00:12:45.000 So we have this weird kind of paradox where it's like you have a right to free association, you have a right to your religious beliefs and all the rest, but you also have this, well, you can't quite discriminate.

00:12:57.000 And the real gray area, which has been caused in the last 20 years, is the issue of homosexuality because. 0.58

00:13:05.000 Is it immutable? 0.73

00:13:06.000 Is it mutable?

00:13:07.000 It's also a religious issue.

00:13:08.000 You know, you don't really have as big of a religious issue. 0.59

00:13:11.000 I don't think there's as strong of a religious conviction against black people, for example, as there is against homosexuals.

00:13:19.000 And of course, the majority of the country is Christian.

00:13:22.000 So this is really where the rubber meets the road in terms of this constitutional quagmire here of how do we reconcile this idea of non discrimination, anti prejudice, anti racism, and all that.

00:13:36.000 With the idea of freedom of association.

00:13:38.000 It's very difficult because one is totally convoluted in terms of civil rights.

00:13:43.000 It should have never happened.

00:13:45.000 For you to have real constitutional protections, there has to be freedom of association.

00:13:48.000 But this is my judgment.

00:13:50.000 Back to the case.

00:13:52.000 So, because Phillips refuses to bake the cake, and this is, we've heard this story a million times the wedding, the Christian person doesn't want to participate, the government gets mad at them.

00:14:02.000 So, Mullins and Craig, the gay couple, they file a complaint with the Colorado Civil Rights Commission.

00:14:09.000 And they say this guy is violating Colorado state law, which says that you can't discriminate against people based on their sexual orientation.

00:14:17.000 So they file a complaint with the Civil Rights Commission saying we were discriminated against.

00:14:22.000 The CCRC and state courts end up siding with the gay couple.

00:14:27.000 And they say that Jack Phillips' First Amendment right was not infringed because if he made the cake, people wouldn't know that he made the cake at the wedding.

00:14:38.000 And there's other areas where he could express his opposition to homosexuality.

00:14:43.000 And all the rest.

00:14:43.000 And so they said, well, his rights weren't abridged for XYZ reason, and we uphold that Craig and Mullins had the right not to be discriminated against.

00:14:54.000 Well, it goes to the Supreme Court, and the Supreme Court, obviously, as you may have heard, has ruled in favor of Phillips, where the CCRC and the state courts ruled in favor of the gay couple.

00:15:05.000 And in past cases, the Supreme Court even has ruled in favor of gay people not to be discriminated against.

00:15:13.000 In this case, the Supreme Court ruled in favor of Jack Phillips. 0.96

00:15:16.000 And everybody said, oh, this is a great victory.

00:15:18.000 Everybody thought, and I don't know, maybe they just inferred wrongly, assumed wrongly, that it was on the basis of religious liberty.

00:15:27.000 But it was not.

00:15:29.000 So the Supreme Court ruled seven to do in favor of the Baker.

00:15:33.000 It was Roberts, Kennedy, Thomas, Gorsuch, Kagan, Breyer, and Alito.

00:15:39.000 They voted in favor of the Baker.

00:15:41.000 Sotomayor and Ginsburg voted against.

00:15:44.000 And, you know, these are the ultra leftists.

00:15:47.000 Sotomayor was, I think, the first Hispanic, and Ginsburg is this old Jewish woman. 0.97

00:15:52.000 And so they vote against for reasons which are kind of ridiculous. 0.71

00:15:56.000 When you read what the majority opinion was, people might be wondering well, Nick, why did several.

00:16:02.000 Left wing justices side with religious liberty, side with the conservative opinions.

00:16:08.000 It seems like kind of a weird coalition here.

00:16:12.000 And really, the whole trick about this case is it's really not about religious liberty.

00:16:17.000 It's really not about free speech.

00:16:19.000 I mean, of course, the issue is free speech.

00:16:20.000 Of course, the issue is religious liberty.

00:16:22.000 But that's not what the majority opinion ruled based on that subject.

00:16:28.000 It ruled on something else.

00:16:29.000 And I'll read you from this is from the majority opinion.

00:16:34.000 Quote, the neutral and respectful consideration to which Phillips was entitled was compromised here, Justice Kennedy wrote.

00:16:42.000 He's the Chief Justice.

00:16:43.000 He wrote the majority opinion.

00:16:45.000 Quote, the Civil Rights Commission's treatment of his case has some elements of a clear and impermissible hostility toward the sincere religious beliefs that motivated his objections.

00:16:57.000 So, this is very crucial.

00:17:01.000 When they say it's narrow, this is what we're talking about.

00:17:04.000 This is a very narrow, And a very particular ruling about a very particular case.

00:17:11.000 The majority opinion to which left wing judges assented to has nothing to do with the fact that Phillips has a right to associate freely with whoever he wants, that, well, these violate his religious beliefs, so he has a right not to serve them and he has a right to express himself.

00:17:28.000 It has nothing to do with that.

00:17:30.000 The decision was about the CCRC, the Colorado Civil Rights Commission, which in particular, Prosecuted this case particularly aggressively.

00:17:41.000 And so, for example, Justice Anthony Kennedy writes that one commissioner at the CCRC wrote in their case, or said rather, in the case, quote, freedom of religion and religion has been used to justify all kinds of discrimination throughout history, whether it be slavery, whether it be the Holocaust.

00:18:03.000 And so, because this commissioner at the CCRC, because this commissioner who is prosecuting, Phillips did so with such aggression and hostility towards his Christian beliefs, Kennedy and the majority of the justices said that he wasn't given fair treatment.

00:18:20.000 And so that's all the ruling is about.

00:18:23.000 The ruling doesn't say, well, Phillips' rights were abridged, his free speech rights were abridged, his freedom of association rights were abridged.

00:18:31.000 It's got nothing to do with that.

00:18:33.000 They say that in this particular case, when the Civil Rights Commission was prosecuting them, they weren't equally fair to him.

00:18:40.000 And that was shown through multiple statements which were hostile to religion.

00:18:44.000 When they say, well, you know what?

00:18:46.000 Your defense is about religion and freedom of religion, but we hate religion because religion caused slavery and war and the Holocaust.

00:18:56.000 And so they're saying, well, this obviously wasn't fair because the commission that's prosecuting this guy cared about protecting the civil rights of the homosexuals, people based on sexual orientation, but not based on religion. 0.77

00:19:10.000 And that's all the case is doing.

00:19:14.000 And so he goes on to say, quote, members of the commission acted with clear and impermissible hostility.

00:19:20.000 That's all it's about.

00:19:21.000 He wrote, quote, this sentiment is inappropriate for a commission charged with the solemn responsibility of fair and neutral enforcement of Colorado's anti discrimination law.

00:19:33.000 So it's about discrimination, really.

00:19:35.000 It's about religious people having equal right to be protected from discrimination as people with some sexual orientation.

00:19:44.000 And it's debatable how big of a victory that is.

00:19:48.000 Some say it's a huge victory in spite of that, some say it's not really a big victory.

00:19:54.000 But it comes down to, and they say it's narrow, they mean it's narrow in scope of the Constitution, which it is.

00:20:00.000 It is incredibly narrow.

00:20:02.000 This does not say that people have a right to discriminate in the future based on their convictions.

00:20:07.000 It does not say that religious people have a right to discriminate against people who go against their religious beliefs.

00:20:13.000 It says none of that.

00:20:14.000 It says that in any case, religious people and homosexuals have to be respected in anti discrimination.

00:20:22.000 So is that a big deal?

00:20:24.000 Possibly.

00:20:25.000 You know, the one.

00:20:27.000 You know, one school of thought says that in the future, this will pave the way for very aggressive laws that are, you know, LGBT friendly laws, laws that may be anti Christian. 0.56

00:20:40.000 So, you know, we see in many cases with the gay agenda, and there is a gay agenda.

00:20:45.000 You know, people say it doesn't exist.

00:20:47.000 It's so there, it's so conscious and deliberate, and it has been persistent.

00:20:51.000 There's money behind it. 1.00

00:20:54.000 The gay agenda has been marching forward for years, and the express purpose of it has been to humiliate. 1.00

00:20:59.000 Has been to take Christians down, has been to make fun of Christians. 0.94

00:21:03.000 And so many people say that maybe this is a big case, not so much for free speech, not so much for freedom of association, but more so that moving forward, as the homosexual agenda becomes the new orthodoxy, as the ruling class promotes the interests of this agenda, this may give Christians legal protections.

00:21:25.000 That if you see these extreme LGBT laws in like democratic states that may be hostile towards Christians, In their writing, in their intention, it could give them protection.

00:21:36.000 And I think that's a valuable thing. 0.96

00:21:38.000 So, you know, it's not quite what we want.

00:21:41.000 It's not quite what people are saying it is, but it still is a big victory.

00:21:46.000 And it's a big victory, maybe not in and of itself, but I think what it protects for the future, which is a future that is decidedly in favor of one agenda, and it'll protect Christians.

00:21:57.000 But to move on more broadly from this case, because this is not a huge deal, and we, I don't know if I can say anything that hasn't already been said about.

00:22:07.000 The Baker situation.

00:22:09.000 I mean, this is, we've been talking about this for years.

00:22:12.000 It's one of the main cultural issues in the culture war.

00:22:15.000 You know, they got, many people see it in terms of comparing it to gay marriage, where they fought so long for gay marriage.

00:22:23.000 And the argument up until then for like 20 years was, please don't hurt us.

00:22:29.000 Please don't kill us.

00:22:30.000 We're so oppressed.

00:22:31.000 Like, we're just like you.

00:22:33.000 We just want equality.

00:22:34.000 And it was so, it was kind of deceptive, but it was so, like, we're the victims and all the rest.

00:22:40.000 And that was seen as basically the first phase.

00:22:43.000 It gained widespread cultural support and political support.

00:22:47.000 And that happened well before the Supreme Court decision came down and they actually got legalized.

00:22:52.000 And they said, you know, woohoo, great, all the rest.

00:22:55.000 And even after they got in the Supreme Court that, well, they have the right to marry in all 50 states, this is the most sinister and evil thing.

00:23:02.000 Like that night, they were like, yeah, this is great.

00:23:05.000 But we heard the dreaded words.

00:23:07.000 There's still much more work to be done.

00:23:09.000 Those dreaded words, that should scare the hell out of you. 0.99

00:23:13.000 At what point is their work finished between women and minorities and homosexuals? 1.00

00:23:19.000 It's always there's, but there's much more work to be done. 0.99

00:23:22.000 I mean, this is like a revolutionary expansionist ideology that is never satisfied.

00:23:28.000 It's utopian, it's progressive, but there's always work to be done in the destruction. 0.99

00:23:34.000 Not until a single Christian is left living, you know, is our work finished, right? 0.99

00:23:39.000 So we heard that that evening. 1.00

00:23:41.000 You know, it's a great victory.

00:23:43.000 Finally, we've got the equality one, but there's much work to be done.

00:23:47.000 And that was seen as phase one.

00:23:48.000 And then phase two was when they're in power.

00:23:52.000 Phase two is when these forces have ascended and they are now in the ruling class. 0.91

00:23:59.000 And then we had a very different case where we have Christians who are on the out in the country. 0.94

00:24:03.000 I still think there's a possibility that we can revive it and that it's great, but it's no secret that religiosity in general is on the decline in the country.

00:24:11.000 You look at church attendance, you look at people's religious views, you look at all kinds of things.

00:24:16.000 And a lot of this actually is driven by Catholics.

00:24:18.000 If you look at, interesting fact, unfortunately, if you look at the data, When you look at all the trends of religiosity decreasing from about the 1960s to the 2000s, almost all of it can be accounted for by Catholics.

00:24:34.000 And of course, this is because of Vatican II, which is very interesting that when the Catholic Church tries to appease modernity and tries to become more modern, they actually drive people away.

00:24:45.000 So, just an interesting fact.

00:24:46.000 But we clearly see that Christianity is on the outs, basically. 0.99

00:24:50.000 We'll see if the Mexicans that come over here maintain their religion. 1.00

00:24:54.000 I mean, who knows what happens. 0.97

00:24:55.000 But Clearly, you look in the culture, you look in Hollywood, the music industry, the ruling class, they're completely agnostic or atheist or Satanist, I think, in many cases. 0.98

00:25:05.000 So the Christians are now the helpless ones. 0.96

00:25:08.000 Whereas in the 1990s, if there was like a square word in a Disney movie, it was moms demand action, torching Disney headquarters. 0.94

00:25:16.000 But now they don't have the same institutional power, they don't have the same clout. 0.87

00:25:20.000 And now that the homosexuals are ascendant, now we see in a very different case where, you know, in the first place, it was, we just want to be equal, we just want to be accepted. 0.79

00:25:29.000 Then we see the contrast in this new cultural focal point, which is the case of the baker, where you have people who are individuals, like, Hi, I'm like a small baker. 0.60

00:25:39.000 I'm a local baker.

00:25:41.000 I'm just trying to, you know, I'm a cake merchant.

00:25:43.000 I just want to bring my cakes to the market and sell them. 1.00

00:25:47.000 And you have the mean, angry, homosexual lobby, which says, Screw you. 0.99

00:25:52.000 You know, then they'll, by the way, they will go to like 10 different bakeries and say, Hey, can we bake a cake? 1.00

00:25:57.000 Yeah.

00:25:58.000 Okay, never mind. 0.99

00:25:59.000 They'll go to 10 different bakeries until they find the one Christian one who has a problem. 0.89

00:26:04.000 And then they make it a big issue. 0.68

00:26:05.000 And then you see kind of the darker side here.

00:26:08.000 Then you see what's really at play here.

00:26:10.000 And this has been the big question for so long.

00:26:12.000 And people, oh, so it's religious liberty.

00:26:14.000 Oh, so it's discrimination.

00:26:16.000 But what it's really about, what it's always been about, it's never been about anti discrimination.

00:26:22.000 It's never been about equality.

00:26:23.000 It's never been about marriage.

00:26:26.000 And this case in particular, this cultural phenomenon of like, we are trying to get married and we need a cake. 0.97

00:26:32.000 And the big bad Christian says, no. 0.98

00:26:35.000 It lays bare exactly what the agenda is. 0.97

00:26:37.000 It's a mean spirited, sinister, evil, and deliberate agenda, which is to take down Christianity in America. 0.97

00:26:46.000 That's all it's about. 0.99

00:26:48.000 America is basically the last Christian country, one of the last Christian countries. 0.91

00:26:55.000 You look at Christendom, and since the 16th century, it's been driven out of its original area, which is the Levant and Anatolia later, and Constantinople.

00:27:05.000 So. 0.54

00:27:07.000 Since the 15th century, we lose the Middle East and Asia Minor, which is where Christianity came out of. 0.97

00:27:13.000 Okay? 0.86

00:27:14.000 We've lost Christianity in Europe in the 18th, 19th, and 20th century. 0.53

00:27:19.000 We see that since the Enlightenment and the Industrial Revolution and all the rest, we see that Christianity is on the outs in Europe because of Protestantism, because of all kinds of different trends.

00:27:29.000 By now, the religion in Europe is liberalism, is secularism.

00:27:33.000 And we look around the world even.

00:27:35.000 And in Africa, they kind of practice a folk variety of Christianity.

00:27:39.000 And in Latin America, the same is true.

00:27:42.000 It's kind of not quite there.

00:27:44.000 In Asia, it's growing, but it's not quite there either.

00:27:47.000 America was the last bastion of Christianity, of a real God fearing people.

00:27:53.000 And this was real 20 years ago. 0.73

00:27:55.000 You know, you watch old episodes of The Simpsons and they're going to church, which it's funny because you watch it now or you watch an episode of like Family Guy from the 90s, which I hate Family Guy.

00:28:05.000 But it's just interesting in that I think it's a very interesting kind of a metric where you watch old shows from like the 2000s and the 1990s in 2018 and you realize how much of a crucial and important Important role that religion used to play in the conversation and the political dialogue.

00:28:23.000 And that's why it was so prominent.

00:28:24.000 That's why it was so relevant.

00:28:26.000 You know, you remember the great atheists, not so great, the new atheists like Christopher Hitchens, Daniel Dennett, Richard Dawkins, and all the rest, how they wanted their big crusades in the 2000s and what a revolutionary thing that was. 0.92

00:28:39.000 And that's because America was the last vestige of Christianity, the last holdout, where it was taken over by Muslims in the Middle East and North Africa and it's descending south and it's going all over the place. 0.93

00:28:53.000 In Europe, they've been taken over by liberalism, and to a certain degree, Jewry has played a part in that. 0.89

00:28:59.000 And now we see in America, we see a very coordinated, sophisticated, and organized assault against the last Christianity in this cultural revolution that we've seen. 0.97

00:29:11.000 And I think it's been spearheaded with this gay agenda here. 0.95

00:29:15.000 And that's not the only thing, by the way.

00:29:16.000 I think people are quick to point out that, well, there's other things.

00:29:20.000 And of course, that's true.

00:29:22.000 You've seen sexual morality on the decline in straight people. 0.86

00:29:26.000 Since birth control came around and the sexual revolution and all that, you see the decline in public morals all over the place. 0.87

00:29:32.000 But we're talking about this agenda in particular, which, if you boil it down, in the case of the gay baker, or not the gay, the Christian baker, the only way to regard this with people that are so, in this case, that are so, I think, not protected, Christians are so not protected by any institution, and you see how aggressive they are, that's the only way to regard this kind of a thing. 0.77

00:29:57.000 And of course, It happens, it plays out in this month, the Pride Month.

00:30:03.000 And to just put on display for you, to illustrate the point here, what this is all about, I want to show you for a moment for people that say, oh, you know, it's a sign of the times or it's, you know, it's still so hard for those kinds of people.

00:30:15.000 I want to show you something.

00:30:17.000 I want to show you a few different things, actually, to give you an idea of just how prominent the new orthodoxy is in terms of this agenda.

00:30:29.000 So they try and put on this effect, and we hear this every year, by the way. 0.51

00:30:34.000 From Democrats and all the different coalitions, whether it's black people or women or the gay people, that, well, they're oppressed.

00:30:42.000 They have it so hard. 0.85

00:30:44.000 White, cisgender, straight males have it so easy.

00:30:47.000 I don't think I need to show you this, but I think it's always pretty striking when you see just how big it's grown, how great it's metastasized in the West. 0.61

00:30:58.000 So let's take a look at some of these examples here.

00:31:03.000 Why is this not working here?

00:31:07.000 Epic tech issues.

00:31:09.000 Here, let me do this.

00:31:10.000 Let me take that down.

00:31:12.000 Are you seeing it now on the screen?

00:31:12.000 All right.

00:31:13.000 I think you are.

00:31:16.000 So here we are.

00:31:17.000 Let me pull up my screen, actually, because I'm not actually sure.

00:31:20.000 We're having some issues here.

00:31:24.000 It's always something, folks, isn't it?

00:31:28.000 Let's take a look.

00:31:29.000 There we are.

00:31:30.000 Okay.

00:31:32.000 So here we go.

00:31:34.000 We're on what is some, I don't know, some Ad Week thing.

00:31:37.000 And here we have Twitter.

00:31:38.000 Twitter reveals its hashtag triggered emojis for LG.

00:31:42.000 TB, oh, they messed up the acronym.

00:31:44.000 I think it's the B comes before the T here.

00:31:46.000 They reveal their hashtag triggered emojis for Pride Month.

00:31:51.000 So people who say, oh, they're so oppressed, blah, blah.

00:31:53.000 Well, you know, Twitter's on board.

00:31:55.000 Twitter's not just on board, they've got this whole account, Twitter Open, which, what is this, the transgender flag?

00:32:03.000 Ah, it's finally June!

00:32:04.000 We'll be promoting, celebrating, and lulling in LGBTQIA Pride all month long.

00:32:12.000 And here are the hashtags that will trigger hashtag Pride 2018, okay?

00:32:17.000 So, this is Twitter.

00:32:18.000 This is one of the biggest social media companies in the world.

00:32:23.000 And it's a full throated endorsement of it.

00:32:26.000 Facebook kicks off Pride Month 2018 with a bunch of new stickers and backgrounds.

00:32:33.000 You know, they should have like an AIDS emoji. 0.54

00:32:35.000 You know, that's pretty relevant in gay culture, right? 0.62

00:32:38.000 Instead of co opting Noah's rainbow, they should just use the symbols that are familiar to them, like the positive symbol, you know, the plus symbol.

00:32:47.000 Facebook began its Pride Month celebration this year by launching a plethora of.

00:32:51.000 Of cool LGBTQ themed features, including profile frames, background stickers, and more.

00:32:57.000 The best part?

00:32:58.000 These new features won't be vanishing at the end of Prima.

00:33:01.000 Oh, it's great!

00:33:02.000 Great.

00:33:03.000 So it goes on forever.

00:33:05.000 Wow, I didn't even read this article.

00:33:06.000 Oh, that is the best part.

00:33:09.000 That's the best part.

00:33:10.000 You know, not only do we get cool gay stickers, but they're here forever in perpetuity. 0.88

00:33:18.000 All right. 0.97

00:33:19.000 The Globo Homo rises. 0.89

00:33:21.000 Not just Facebook, but Instagram. 0.86

00:33:25.000 Instagram releases new stickers, features to celebrate Pride Month.

00:33:30.000 There are new Instagram stickers and other fun features to use to celebrate Pride Month and show your support for the, you know, they keep leaving out the P.

00:33:38.000 It's, you know, at least for me, it's the LGBTQP community. 0.93

00:33:44.000 And the P is for pagan. 0.99

00:33:46.000 LGBTQP, pagan. 0.99

00:33:49.000 P for pagan, P for pedophile, P for pederasty. 0.99

00:33:53.000 You know, pederasty, pedophile, pagan, it's all basically the same. 0.99

00:33:57.000 And, you know, before somebody, you know, before some hillbilly threatens to fight me, I'm not saying all pagans are pedophiles, but, you know, a lot of them. 0.93

00:34:05.000 A lot of them in history, at least.

00:34:06.000 So I'm not going to say it's all. 0.97

00:34:08.000 I don't want some hillbilly trying to ride off my clout to get all offended. 0.95

00:34:13.000 But, you know, we do definitely see a lot of that historically, at least. 0.95

00:34:16.000 So the point I'm trying to make here, we see it in Twitter, we see it in Facebook, Instagram.

00:34:22.000 Here's a list from last year all the tech companies.

00:34:24.000 Apple, they are making a Pride Edition Apple Watch Band.

00:34:29.000 Facebook from last year, Instagram from last year, Google will provide pride parade routes in Google Maps and colorful rainbow colors.

00:34:39.000 Uber is supporting it, Lyft, Salesforce, Skype, Spotify, Snapchat.

00:34:44.000 We see Goldman Sachs as Pride Month kicks off.

00:34:48.000 We celebrate the entire LGBTQ community within our offices and beyond.

00:34:54.000 Oh, great!

00:34:56.000 We see Bank of America.

00:34:56.000 Fantastic.

00:34:59.000 Awesome. 1.00

00:35:00.000 Bank of America sponsoring anal sex everywhere. 1.00

00:35:05.000 We see it in JPMorgan Chase. 1.00

00:35:08.000 Be visible.

00:35:08.000 Be vocal.

00:35:09.000 Be the LGBT plus P advocate to businesses. 0.70

00:35:15.000 What is this?

00:35:16.000 Business inclusiveness.

00:35:17.000 No, bring inclusiveness to within and outside of work, says Tracy H. from Hong Kong.

00:35:23.000 Thanks, Tracy.

00:35:24.000 United Airlines. 0.71

00:35:26.000 You know, I was looking for UN and it pulled up United and I saw this wonderful Globo Homo right here. 0.99

00:35:33.000 And look, all this to say, let's get this out of here for a moment, shall we? 0.99

00:35:40.000 Let's get this out.

00:35:41.000 How do I. Boop this out.

00:35:44.000 Let's do that. 1.00

00:35:45.000 Boop.

00:35:45.000 Okay.

00:35:46.000 All this is to say, and actually, the point here is this is not something that is beneficial to businesses.

00:35:54.000 To illustrate the point of that, there's an agenda.

00:35:57.000 This is not a beneficial thing to businesses, right?

00:36:00.000 I mean, let's take Facebook, for example.

00:36:02.000 They put out their stickers and their emojis and all the rest.

00:36:06.000 Let's think about Facebook for a second.

00:36:08.000 Facebook is a company which has, I think, a billion users.

00:36:12.000 Which is huge.

00:36:13.000 That would be, if Facebook was a country, I think they would be the second biggest in the world behind only China, China or India.

00:36:21.000 So they're right up there.

00:36:23.000 It's a billion users.

00:36:24.000 What they're trying to do, they've got a lot of people in America, they've got a lot of people in Europe.

00:36:30.000 What they're trying to do now is to break into the developing world. 0.72

00:36:32.000 They're trying to break into China, they're trying to break into Africa, they're trying to break into all these different markets, the Arab world. 0.74

00:36:40.000 Is it a good thing for business when these kinds of companies are promoting this agenda in the third world? 0.79

00:36:47.000 How does the homosexual agenda received in Africa? 0.90

00:36:50.000 How is it received in China?

00:36:52.000 How is it received in the Middle East?

00:36:54.000 Is that received with, are people excited about it in Saudi Arabia?

00:36:58.000 Are people excited about it in rural China?

00:37:01.000 Are they really, you know, jumping for joy in Africa? 0.99

00:37:05.000 I don't think so.

00:37:07.000 And all of this is to say it is here, it is present, it is at the highest levels, and it's not about the money.

00:37:14.000 They're not doing it for money.

00:37:15.000 You know, this goes back to the other point we were talking about Roseanne last week.

00:37:19.000 It's kind of a bigger point, the broad point.

00:37:21.000 It's not about the money for these people.

00:37:23.000 There is a real concerted and organized agenda that's going on here by a very small, rootless international elite, rootless transnational elite.

00:37:33.000 You have a group of people, and it's not to say, you know, here's, I guess, the distinction we want to make.

00:37:38.000 We're not saying that this is like people get together in a meeting. 0.70

00:37:43.000 They get together at the Global Homo Conference, the Global Homo Summit every week in Washington, D.C., or at, what is it, Bohemian Grove, and they plan out how they're going to make your kids gay. 0.57

00:37:54.000 You know, we're not saying that. 0.69

00:37:56.000 What we are saying is that you have a very small group of people that control Silicon Valley, that control the major corporations, banks, politicians, Wall Street people.

00:38:09.000 This is a very small group of people which exerts a very great disproportionate amount of power in terms of we have this new class of people in the 21st century which is more powerful than ever in history, whether it's financial people, whether it's media people, whether it's political people.

00:38:26.000 We have such great inequality in the world.

00:38:30.000 Where one individual like Mark Zuckerberg controls the fate of a billion users on Facebook. 0.98

00:38:35.000 Contrast that to some poor guy in Africa. 1.00

00:38:38.000 We're talking about a class of people which has all this power and it's like 0.1% of the population. 0.98

00:38:46.000 And this small group of people has a very small set of characteristics.

00:38:51.000 They are an international people, they're a cosmopolitan people, they have very specific views.

00:38:56.000 And so all of this is to say that these people that go through The elite institutions, they grew up in the same cities, they live in the same cities, they share the same views.

00:39:05.000 They are determining the course of our country.

00:39:08.000 And in determining the course of our country and of the major corporations and the major industrial economies of the world, they're determining the course of the world itself.

00:39:19.000 And that's the agenda.

00:39:20.000 That's what I mean when I say there's this big agenda going on.

00:39:23.000 And that the people at the top are promoting something that is downright hostile, and that is the sole intention, basically, to humiliate, to do a victory lap around Christians.

00:39:34.000 I mean, that's what it's about at this point.

00:39:36.000 Originally, the Pride Month was, I guess, supposed to be like, you know, like we're, even though you're mad at us, even though you're repulsed by us, like we're going to say it loud, say it proud.

00:39:47.000 I mean, you have to understand, you don't have to like it, but that's the culture that it came out of.

00:39:52.000 The culture that it came out of like 50 years ago was that these people were, you know, there were laws against them and people beat the shit out of them and all the rest. 0.97

00:40:01.000 And so they were saying like it was, it's like how black people are trying to like, Reappropriate the N word. 1.00

00:40:07.000 It's like, oh, well, we're just going to be proud of it.

00:40:10.000 Like, this black is beautiful thing.

00:40:11.000 Like, we're proud of who we are.

00:40:12.000 That's how it was originally supposed to mean.

00:40:15.000 At this point, nobody disagrees. 0.90

00:40:16.000 Well, you know, for the most part, in the major cities, the consensus in the country by the secular press and all the rest has been forged that, you know, you can't really have a problem with gay people unless you want to get fired and blacklisted and all the rest. 0.98

00:40:31.000 Like, there's no problem there. 0.91

00:40:32.000 So, at this point, the entire point of having this month and this kind of thing and the campaign against the bakers.

00:40:38.000 Is a victory lap. 1.00

00:40:39.000 And I tweeted earlier this week, it's the same intention as a military parade on an occupied city.

00:40:46.000 I mean, that's effectively what it is.

00:40:49.000 It's to say, look at what we have done.

00:40:50.000 Look at what we're able to get away with.

00:40:53.000 And every year it's more ostentatious.

00:40:55.000 Every year it's more obnoxious.

00:40:57.000 It's more in your face.

00:40:59.000 And the only point is to say, look, this is how far we've taken this country.

00:41:04.000 This is how powerful we are.

00:41:06.000 See Apple Watch, see Google, and all the rest.

00:41:08.000 We're running down the street in this big parade.

00:41:11.000 What are you going to do about it? 0.76

00:41:13.000 In your Christian country, in your Western country, your traditional country, what are you going to do about it? 1.00

00:41:18.000 Look it up. 1.00

00:41:19.000 Look, we're naked.

00:41:20.000 And we're, you know, we've got all this degenerate stuff.

00:41:23.000 We've got dildos hanging out.

00:41:25.000 And what are you going to do about it?

00:41:26.000 I mean, it's this sick, angry, vicious agenda.

00:41:31.000 I mean, it's like they're foaming at the mouth at Christianity, at traditional values. 0.86

00:41:37.000 And that's at the end of the day what it's about. 0.80

00:41:40.000 And we come on the show and we have to oppose this viciously, not because we have like anything.

00:41:47.000 Any problem.

00:41:48.000 Like, in terms of homophobia, so called homophobia, I'm probably the least homophobic person you've ever met.

00:41:56.000 In terms of the problem, it's not like, oh, this guy is a homosexual.

00:42:02.000 That's not entirely the problem. 0.97

00:42:04.000 The problem is that homosexuality represents everything that is wrong with the West. 1.00

00:42:10.000 What's wrong with the West? 0.99

00:42:11.000 It's terrible. 0.98

00:42:12.000 It's hell.

00:42:13.000 There is no God.

00:42:15.000 There is no meaning.

00:42:16.000 There is no values, no morals.

00:42:19.000 Everything that is. 1.00

00:42:21.000 Opposed to God is represented in homosexuality. 1.00

00:42:24.000 You have in their expression of sexuality a rejection of the natural order of things. 0.95

00:42:30.000 You know, the reason that you're supposed to have sex, and this goes back to Thomistic theory, which says that we are created for a purpose.

00:42:37.000 This is called teleology, that man is created with certain ends in mind.

00:42:43.000 So, for example, the world is created with a certain end in mind by a designer, by a creator.

00:42:48.000 Man is created with a certain end in mind.

00:42:51.000 We have hands.

00:42:52.000 For a certain reason.

00:42:53.000 We have eyes for a certain reason.

00:42:55.000 And we look at sex in the same way.

00:42:57.000 Sex is directed divinely towards a specific end, which is only procreation.

00:43:03.000 And so that's why, in Christian Catholic theology in particular, I don't know what Protestants are up to.

00:43:08.000 I don't know about that. 0.88

00:43:10.000 But Catholics say the only moral expression of sexuality is procreative sex.

00:43:18.000 That means, you know, no weird stuff, just the right stuff.

00:43:22.000 You know, the stuff that makes kids and nothing else, and within the confines of marriage.

00:43:26.000 Because this expression of sexuality is directed towards the end of producing children.

00:43:31.000 And rearing them in the proper way. 0.80

00:43:34.000 As we look at what's wrong with society, where we have declining fertility rates, we have this problem of the disharmony between the sexes, marriages are collapsing, the institution of marriage is in shambles, people are not having kids, the kids that grow up are not being raised well.

00:43:48.000 You know, that's the problem with the West. 0.90

00:43:51.000 All of that is reflected in this alternative, which is, you know, this rebellious camp of homosexuals who are rewriting it in a relativistic way, who are saying that, well, you know, actually, sex is not about procreation, it's about fun. 0.99

00:44:04.000 And of course, it could only be fun because it could never be for procreation with homosexuals. 0.99

00:44:09.000 You could never have homosexual sex and produce a child. 1.00

00:44:12.000 So they represent the opposite, the diametric opposite, saying, actually, it's not about procreation because it could never be procreation for them. 0.99

00:44:20.000 It's only about fun.

00:44:21.000 And actually, marriage and relationships in general are not about procreation.

00:44:26.000 They too are about fun.

00:44:27.000 The institution of marriage, you know, maybe sex could be fun and also it could be for procreation, but at least marriage is for procreation.

00:44:34.000 They say, no, marriage is for two people that just want to have sex and also have discounts on their taxes and things like that.

00:44:42.000 They want to have visitation rights.

00:44:44.000 So, marriage isn't even about procreation. 0.90

00:44:47.000 That's also just about sex.

00:44:49.000 And then you look at any of the statistics about them.

00:44:52.000 And there was one study that said only 9% of homosexuals are monogamous. 0.98

00:44:57.000 And so, then you get to the broader culture where it is degenerative, it is hedonistic, it is promiscuous, nihilistic. 0.95

00:45:04.000 And so, in this aberration of sexuality, You have, I think, almost perfectly represented the diametric opposite of the natural order of a society.

00:45:15.000 And on this show, this is why this is so important.

00:45:18.000 On this show, I don't come on here and talk about my ideological love for capitalism or my ideological love for liberty or equality or something like that.

00:45:29.000 My values are whatever is conducive and supports the creation of families, good, strong, healthy families.

00:45:38.000 That's it.

00:45:39.000 That's my ideology.

00:45:40.000 It's families, families in the nation state.

00:45:43.000 And the reason is very simple.

00:45:45.000 You look at a society.

00:45:47.000 How does a society work?

00:45:49.000 It works if people work, right?

00:45:52.000 It works if people work and if there are people.

00:45:54.000 Well, if you don't have people making people, if you don't have parents raising people, you don't have people.

00:46:00.000 You don't have people that work.

00:46:01.000 So that's why my ideology is centered around the most fundamental aspect, which is that you have to create the society and the society has to be developed.

00:46:11.000 By the people that came before it, by the people with wisdom, by the people with virtue, they have to instill the society with virtue.

00:46:16.000 So they're in it.

00:46:17.000 You have marriage, the harmony between the sexes, that the sexes exist, that they create children, they rear them in a productive way.

00:46:24.000 I mean, that's all that it's about. 0.72

00:46:26.000 And so you see the diametric opposite of that expressed in these derivative sexualities.

00:46:32.000 And so I think that's an important point to make because too often you see that people get up and it's just utter revulsion.

00:46:41.000 And don't get me wrong, it's hard not to be repulsed by what goes on. 0.99

00:46:46.000 Nevertheless, I think it's a tactical mistake to say that, like, we hate gay people and we have to go after them. 1.00

00:46:55.000 Don't get me wrong. 1.00

00:46:56.000 And I'll do that on Twitter all day long.

00:46:58.000 But I think the message that appeals to people is that a society cannot work like that.

00:47:02.000 This is a rejection of fundamental values.

00:47:05.000 You know, if the argument is, do we want to be nice to people or do we want to be mean to people?

00:47:11.000 I think people are going to choose who wants to be nice to people.

00:47:14.000 That's why the religious right lost this battle in the first place.

00:47:19.000 Because the left said, oh, just be nice.

00:47:22.000 They're so sad and helpless.

00:47:24.000 And the right was saying, it was this confused message of, We hate the sin, but the sinner, you know, I don't know, kind of.

00:47:33.000 It was this very confused message.

00:47:34.000 A lot of it was angry, and that was used by the left.

00:47:37.000 That doesn't mean we can't be angry, but understand the shortcomings of that kind of argument when it was this confused.

00:47:43.000 It wasn't really tactical.

00:47:44.000 If the argument is between, is our society about degenerative, hedonistic, nihilistic sex, or is it about traditional values?

00:47:53.000 Is it about families?

00:47:54.000 I think that's the right argument to make.

00:47:57.000 So, So, that's the issue, I think, in pretty great detail.

00:48:03.000 I think that's a pretty nuanced perspective of it.

00:48:08.000 And there it is.

00:48:09.000 One of the other things I will say, just kind of a closing note, I hear this all the time.

00:48:14.000 We hear about heterosexuals.

00:48:16.000 This, to me, annoys me to no end.

00:48:19.000 When people say heterosexuals and homosexuals, and in a clinical way, like this makes sense heterosexual, if you're talking about it just on a linguistic level, heterosexual means that you're attracted to the different sex.

00:48:32.000 Homosexual means you're attracted to the same sex.

00:48:35.000 My problem with the terminology of it has always been that to me, this almost puts it on the same, like there's some equivalency between the two.

00:48:43.000 I think it's very important to acknowledge, and I haven't even said it yet this show.

00:48:47.000 There's only 3% of the population which is strictly gay.

00:48:52.000 Only 3%.

00:48:54.000 So, you know, one of the biggest ways that the left has gotten away with this agenda and they've crammed it down our throats is I think they've almost made it equal.

00:49:02.000 Like it's this orientation.

00:49:03.000 Well, you're either this way or you're that way.

00:49:05.000 And that's as simple as.

00:49:06.000 Do you want vanilla ice cream or do you want chocolate ice cream, right? 0.79

00:49:10.000 Are you homosexual or you're heterosexual? 0.98

00:49:12.000 Do you want this shampoo or that shampoo? 1.00

00:49:15.000 Are you black or are you white? 1.00

00:49:16.000 Well, it's not quite that simple.

00:49:19.000 If they're only 3% of the population, that just goes to show it's not like, oh, well, I like chocolate ice cream today.

00:49:26.000 That's just what they are.

00:49:27.000 That just goes to show it's an aberration.

00:49:31.000 If you're at a factory or if you're at a factory that's making, I don't know, rubber balls, we like to talk about the rubber ball factory.

00:49:37.000 If you're in a factory that makes rubber balls and 97% of the balls are bouncy and red and spherical and 3% are like cubes and they're blue and they don't bounce, would you say, oh, well, you know, this factory sometimes produces red bouncy balls and, you know, sometimes it produces these wooden blue cubes and that's the same and they should be treated the same?

00:50:00.000 And of course not.

00:50:02.000 You would say, we should do something with the blue cubes.

00:50:06.000 We should probably try and fix that.

00:50:09.000 That's deviant from what it's supposed to be.

00:50:11.000 It doesn't have the, it is not an approximation of the kind of thing we're trying to create.

00:50:17.000 It is a less than perfect, a much less than perfect approximation of what we're trying to create, which is a red bouncy ball.

00:50:24.000 And so I think that's a good analogy to say that this is not at all something that should be seen as there's this equivalency.

00:50:31.000 Oh, well, it's this or that.

00:50:33.000 They're kind of like parallel to each other.

00:50:36.000 And, you know, all the rest is like, no, one is like you have issues, one is like there's an issue with that.

00:50:41.000 And, I think the middle ground is we say, like, we don't have to go after these people.

00:50:46.000 We don't have to, like, hunt these people down and, like, be mean to them.

00:50:50.000 But there has to be an understanding in the country that that is not normative.

00:50:55.000 And I don't know.

00:50:56.000 I'm kind of a theocrat, but I guess we're past that point.

00:51:00.000 So, in a secular state, we would just say, like, okay, like, we'll leave you alone.

00:51:05.000 It's not moral, it's not right.

00:51:08.000 But you can't be controlling the press, you can't control the media, you can't have your parades, you can't be shoving that stuff in children's faces.

00:51:15.000 To get to the broader point, you cannot have a neutral society.

00:51:18.000 I guess that's the takeaway from this you cannot have a neutral society.

00:51:23.000 The position of most of the country has been like, whatever, who cares?

00:51:29.000 And even the conservative position, for many, like the conservatarian consensus, which is rising, is like, well, who cares what people do in their own homes?

00:51:36.000 Who cares if they're out there doing that? 0.95

00:51:39.000 What this implies is that there can exist a state of neutrality where if we're not enforcing our morals, you know, we'll just exist in this state of like amoral limbo where it's like the Christians are over here. 0.79

00:51:54.000 And the Satanists are over here, and the Muslims are over here, and the gays are over here, and we're all kind of doing their own thing. 0.82

00:51:59.000 And if Christians abdicate the role of power and prominence, and we just, you know, we've won the victory, okay, we have traditional values, and it's a traditional country, we're going to pack our stuff up and say, everyone can kind of be what they are, and, you know, who cares really? 0.78

00:52:15.000 The mistake in that is the idea that this vacuum will not be filled. 0.94

00:52:19.000 Like if we step down and say, you know, I'm personally against it, but, like, generally, who cares?

00:52:25.000 That vacuum will be filled by people who want it.

00:52:28.000 And, you know, we talk a lot about that in terms of foreign relations.

00:52:31.000 It's also true in domestic politics.

00:52:33.000 The position has been oh, well, if we just let everyone alone, I guess we'll have this okay place.

00:52:39.000 People will fill that and they will aggressively pursue their interests.

00:52:39.000 No, no.

00:52:43.000 So, you know, like the Ben Shapiro can very well say, well, I don't care to enforce my morals on people or make these big moral judgments.

00:52:51.000 Personally, I'm against it, but, you know, who cares really?

00:52:54.000 You can't do that.

00:52:55.000 You can't do that.

00:52:56.000 We have to have a message that is positive.

00:52:58.000 And not positive in the sense of like uplifting or optimistic, in the sense of it is exertion, as opposed to, you know, it's like an Audi.

00:53:07.000 It's like we're going to be, we have a very forceful and we have an offensive message, a message that is out there and is asserting something real that is solid.

00:53:18.000 It's not a negation of something, it's an assertion.

00:53:21.000 Like this is what we believe, this is how our society should be governed.

00:53:25.000 And if that's how we operate, I think that's the way to go.

00:53:29.000 So those are my thoughts.

00:53:31.000 Those are my thoughts on.

00:53:33.000 The month on the ruling on where we are in terms of the Globo Homo era.

00:53:41.000 We're in like what?

00:53:42.000 Like day 1280 of Globo Homo apocalypse.

00:53:47.000 It's upon us and it's tough.

00:53:51.000 It's tough.

00:53:51.000 We got to bring it back.

00:53:52.000 It's basically like a revolutionary act to be married and have kids, be married to a woman and have tons of kids and just be normal.

00:54:02.000 And it really is.

00:54:03.000 You know how much heat I get for being a virgin?

00:54:06.000 Because I'm not.

00:54:07.000 It's like people are like, oh, you're a virgin.

00:54:09.000 Like, yeah, I'm not married.

00:54:10.000 So why would I not be, right?

00:54:13.000 But that's worthy of ridicule nowadays.

00:54:17.000 And then even married people. 0.80

00:54:18.000 Marriage is like the butt of every joke.

00:54:20.000 You're married? 1.00

00:54:21.000 Marriage is like slavery.

00:54:23.000 Oh, my last marriage was bad.

00:54:27.000 That's all anybody makes fun of. 1.00

00:54:28.000 Marriage is bad.

00:54:29.000 People getting divorced everywhere.

00:54:31.000 To be like, oh, I would never divorce my wife.

00:54:34.000 Yeah, you know. 1.00

00:54:36.000 A mother's going to stay home and raise her kids. 0.97

00:54:37.000 This is like revolutionary today. 0.99

00:54:40.000 So, Globo Homo Apocalypse.

00:54:42.000 We're living through it together.

00:54:44.000 But let's look at our Streamlabs and Super Chats.

00:54:48.000 I'm going to take the Streamlabs, and then I'll take your Super Chats from Friday, which I didn't get to, and then I'll get to your Super Chats from tonight.

00:54:56.000 So we should have some fun here.

00:54:58.000 People like the Super Chats.

00:54:59.000 It's always a little bit of dynamism added to the show.

00:55:07.000 So let's take a look here.

00:55:08.000 What do we have?

00:55:09.000 Nikki Boo says I was banned from Twitter again, this time on my main.

00:55:15.000 Then after that, I got a community guideline strike on my channel and had someone posting pics of me on Discord.

00:55:21.000 Can't help but wonder if this is.

00:55:23.000 Due to David Sherat seeing as how I was on the Ruin server.

00:55:28.000 Could be.

00:55:29.000 I don't know.

00:55:30.000 I wasn't on the Ruin server, but I don't know.

00:55:33.000 I don't really know enough about your particular case, but thank you for telling me.

00:55:37.000 It's that David Sherat kid.

00:55:39.000 He's so unfortunate.

00:55:41.000 Such an unfortunate human being, right?

00:55:44.000 Reagan says today is the anniversary of the kill dozer. 0.98

00:55:47.000 Marvin Heemeyer was one of God's lonely men who stood up to the scum, the press, the bureaucrats. 0.96

00:55:54.000 Read about him. 0.92

00:55:54.000 Tell his tale that he and his. 0.92

00:55:57.000 Homemade tank may ride eternal in our hearts, shiny in chrome.

00:56:02.000 I really like that.

00:56:02.000 That's a beautiful sentiment.

00:56:04.000 It is the 14th anniversary of the Killdozer when Marvin Heemeyer decided he had enough.

00:56:11.000 I don't know what was happening.

00:56:12.000 It was some zoning issue that he was having with his business.

00:56:16.000 And he was getting stonewalled by the municipal government.

00:56:21.000 The local press was taking, they were all over him.

00:56:26.000 So he decided he was a mechanic or something.

00:56:29.000 He put on top of a bulldozer basically like this iron, this big metal cage with machine guns and cameras to see outside.

00:56:38.000 And he went on a rampage and he destroyed all kinds of buildings of his enemies.

00:56:43.000 And it was a glorious thing.

00:56:44.000 There was a great quote.

00:56:45.000 What did he say?

00:56:46.000 He said that he said something to the effect that sometimes reasonable men must do unreasonable things. 0.93

00:56:53.000 So that's some cold ass stuff to say before you get in a homemade tank. 0.93

00:57:00.000 And destroy your town because they messed with your zoning, right? 0.96

00:57:04.000 Or they messed with your business. 0.91

00:57:06.000 That's a pretty glorious thing.

00:57:08.000 And I would never advocate for violence.

00:57:10.000 I would never advocate for violence.

00:57:12.000 I hate violence.

00:57:14.000 But there was a guy who said enough.

00:57:17.000 There was a guy who saw the corruption of the world, the injustice, the immorality, the sin, the vice, and he did something about it.

00:57:26.000 And I think many of us can admire, if not the actions, perhaps the spirit of it.

00:57:31.000 You know, it really says something that on the right wing, There is an admiration for people like this Ted Kaczynski, Marvin Heemeyer.

00:57:40.000 And it is because, to an extent, we see ourselves as rebels, as insurgents, because the state, or, you know, because it's the 21st century, there are institutions now more powerful than the state.

00:57:54.000 I would argue financial interests are more powerful than the state.

00:57:58.000 It's still, don't get me wrong, it's still a big player.

00:58:01.000 But given how financial institutions can infiltrate and manipulate the state, the state has kind of become a pawn of supranational forces.

00:58:09.000 Transnational forces.

00:58:11.000 So the power dynamics are changing. 0.99

00:58:12.000 But nevertheless, we live in an order, in an order which is controlled by very evil, sick, tyrannical people.

00:58:22.000 And so I think right wing people are prone to believing that it's not just as simple as there's a Democratic president or there's a Republican president. 0.56

00:58:31.000 It's that we're living under a tyranny.

00:58:34.000 It's equivalent, possibly worse, to anything we saw in the 20th century where there is no way that we can.

00:58:43.000 Affects change in politics.

00:58:44.000 There's no way we can change things at the national level, but yet we see things that are grossly unjust, things that are grossly immoral, perpetrated and promoted by people at the top.

00:58:57.000 And what's the way that you lash out at that?

00:58:59.000 What is an asymmetrical way that you can affect political change?

00:59:03.000 Unfortunately, when they restrict the legitimate means by which we can address those grievances, we're left with violence.

00:59:10.000 I think that's why you see it, right? 0.87

00:59:13.000 Because in the case of like that Nassim girl who shot up YouTube, or you look at, uh, It's sad. 0.59

00:59:21.000 It's really sad.

00:59:22.000 What's his name?

00:59:24.000 The Supreme Gentleman or Marvin Heemeyer.

00:59:27.000 You see, or Ted Kaczynski.

00:59:29.000 You see in these people that the last possible channel that they could find for their grievances against the society, which were severe, was violent and illegal expressions.

00:59:43.000 So I think you have to understand that's where it's coming from.

00:59:46.000 If the left understood that, I think they would be able to better address it because we don't want violence.

00:59:51.000 But.

00:59:52.000 It's getting hard.

00:59:53.000 It's getting really hard for people to legitimately get that kind of thing out when all the legitimate means are closing up.

01:00:02.000 Communication is being shut down.

01:00:05.000 Media is being shut down.

01:00:06.000 Politics is being shut down.

01:00:09.000 If you think that the country shouldn't turn into Mexico in the next 50 years, you can't be in a political party.

01:00:14.000 You can't be in a major network. 0.66

01:00:17.000 You can't be on a radio station.

01:00:18.000 You can't be in a newspaper.

01:00:20.000 You can't be on the internet.

01:00:21.000 So, what are you supposed to do then, right?

01:00:25.000 So, it's admirable.

01:00:28.000 It's definitely, we hate violence, but the spirit is admirable.

01:00:32.000 And the Kildozer, it's a legend.

01:00:34.000 It's a legend.

01:00:36.000 You could never beat something like that.

01:00:38.000 We have to want to win, I guess.

01:00:41.000 Brosif says Virginians vote true conservative Nick Freitas, not Corey Stewart, on June 12th. 0.91

01:00:46.000 Defend gun rights.

01:00:48.000 I don't know that much about Corey Stewart, but I did like that Nick Freitas guy and that speech he gave about gun rights.

01:00:56.000 I know that went viral.

01:00:58.000 But I'll have to look into them before we.

01:01:00.000 We'll probably talk about that as the primary draws closer.

01:01:04.000 Good Christian Ladd says Big Nick, great shows lately.

01:01:08.000 On Twitter, you wanted to debate someone on free trade. 0.96

01:01:11.000 I work in finance, can promise there are many boomer economists, evil demons that would debate you. 0.85

01:01:17.000 They are GDP obsessed and good AF fodder. 0.51

01:01:21.000 Praise God and much love.

01:01:22.000 Well, much appreciate you, big guy.

01:01:24.000 Much love to you as well.

01:01:26.000 I'd like to get a YouTuber on the show.

01:01:29.000 But I mean, we could do an economist as well. 0.83

01:01:31.000 And the boomers are wild about the gross domestic product and all that.

01:01:35.000 The thing is, free trade is good for GDP now, but in the future, it is not.

01:01:42.000 Right?

01:01:43.000 I mean, if we, like, look at China, for example.

01:01:45.000 China protects industries which are going to be important in the future.

01:01:50.000 They protect their robotics industry, they protect their artificial intelligence industry, their computer industry.

01:01:56.000 They protect the industries that are going to, what they call black swan industries.

01:02:01.000 Or black swan industries, which is coined by Taleb, the philosopher.

01:02:07.000 And he said that actually economic growth is not so much driven by this linear stuff, by lower regulations, but more so these black swan events of, for example, discovering industry, right?

01:02:18.000 Or discovering the railroad, you know, that kind of thing.

01:02:21.000 And that these things build on top of each other, right?

01:02:25.000 So that you have the factory, which comes around in the 18th century, the factory process and steam power and these kinds of things.

01:02:33.000 And then you get the railroad.

01:02:34.000 And then with railroad, you get different kinds of metals and all that and processes.

01:02:40.000 But you get all, you know, you get further and further along the development chain, and that's how you become like the number one economy in the world.

01:02:40.000 I don't know.

01:02:48.000 China protects those industries, America does not.

01:02:53.000 And so you could say that in 2018, maybe we help our GDP by having free trade, and we give them all our real estate and our businesses and our tech secrets, and they control all that industry.

01:03:06.000 And in exchange, you know, we can build, I don't even know, we could build McDonald's and stuff like that. 0.69

01:03:12.000 But in 100 years, when China has a monopoly on all the future industries and the future tech, and they're, because it's compounded, because they build on top of each other, they're much further along the development chain and they're like light years ahead. 0.86

01:03:25.000 Who's going to have the higher GDP?

01:03:27.000 I mean, this is simple stuff.

01:03:29.000 The government has to protect.

01:03:32.000 American Rebel, Nick, why do you like the Pope so much?

01:03:35.000 Disturbing.

01:03:36.000 And he spells disturbing with an E, which is disturbing with an I.

01:03:42.000 I don't like the Pope that much.

01:03:44.000 And it always, why?

01:03:46.000 Why does it always come back to us?

01:03:48.000 I'm Catholic.

01:03:49.000 Get over it.

01:03:50.000 Get over it.

01:03:52.000 People come on this show and it's not even about Catholicism.

01:03:55.000 It's just whatever.

01:03:58.000 And they persecute me.

01:03:59.000 But that's okay.

01:04:00.000 I'll defend the faith.

01:04:02.000 I don't like the Pope.

01:04:03.000 The Pope is the legitimate successor to Peter, who was given the keys to the kingdom by Jesus Christ, who is God.

01:04:11.000 So that's why we respect his authority.

01:04:14.000 We don't have to like him, but that's why.

01:04:17.000 You know, it's like if God said, you know, mustard is the best condiment.

01:04:23.000 It's like, well, I don't like mustard, but hey, he's probably right, you know, so that's all. 0.98

01:04:30.000 Malia, or what is this? 0.82

01:04:31.000 Malleable Tick says, didn't know if you got my message earlier, but can you make a long statement on why Makisi Karusu from Steinsgate is the best girl from the show?

01:04:44.000 And any other opinion, like Mayuri, Ferris, Luca, something, or Amani is wrong in their opinion as well?

01:04:50.000 I don't know what you're talking about. 0.98

01:04:52.000 I don't know what weeb shit you're on. 0.99

01:04:55.000 I don't know what that show is. 0.99

01:04:57.000 What is it?

01:04:58.000 Steingate?

01:04:59.000 Yeah, I'm sorry.

01:05:00.000 I don't know what that is.

01:05:02.000 But I appreciate the super chat.

01:05:04.000 I guess I endorse that opinion.

01:05:07.000 Do we have any from earlier, though?

01:05:09.000 I think that was all from today.

01:05:12.000 Let's look at our super chats now from Friday.

01:05:21.000 And then we'll get to the ones from tonight.

01:05:24.000 So let me scroll down here.

01:05:26.000 We're going to have to go kind of a ways.

01:05:28.000 What was it?

01:05:28.000 June 1st was Friday?

01:05:29.000 Okay, so we have Austin Arsenal who says, I know I bust your balls on Twitter a lot, but keep up the good work, big guy.

01:05:37.000 Thank you.

01:05:38.000 We've got, oh, and I answered a couple of these before.

01:05:44.000 Ryan says, I work a blue collar American job where I'm on call the majority of the week.

01:05:50.000 I don't have the luxury of doing YouTube streams like yourself.

01:05:55.000 What is all the hate?

01:05:56.000 I don't understand it, right?

01:05:58.000 This Ryan guy, he's got a big problem that I'm a Catholic.

01:06:01.000 But, well, then work your blue collar job.

01:06:04.000 I don't know.

01:06:05.000 Join your local GOP.

01:06:08.000 Rick Smith, I get that Pat Little isn't optical, but I really enjoy his interviews and he seems really passionate.

01:06:13.000 Not a Fed.

01:06:14.000 Doesn't matter if he's a Fed or not, he's not good for the movement.

01:06:17.000 He was polling at 0% in the latest poll.

01:06:21.000 People are like, oh, he could win.

01:06:24.000 No, he's at zero.

01:06:26.000 And that is his value.

01:06:29.000 That is his value.

01:06:31.000 Not as a person, not before God, but for a political movement.

01:06:35.000 If you poll at 0%, you are of zero consequence.

01:06:40.000 Show me somebody who could win an election who's talking about certain things, and then I'll say you're all right. 0.76

01:06:47.000 Paul Nealon could have won the Wisconsin primary in Wisconsin's first district now that Paul Ryan's not running, but he wanted to post pictures of Jews' heads on pikes on Gab.

01:06:58.000 And so now that's not going to happen so much. 0.62

01:07:03.000 So that's why we don't support. 1.00

01:07:06.000 People like this, and also because it's just retarded, okay, folks. 1.00

01:07:12.000 Um, but I appreciate the sentiment. 0.98

01:07:14.000 Maybe he's a nice guy and he's honest, but we need winners.

01:07:19.000 We got a lot of honest people who have no money, no power, no clout, and what good are they, right?

01:07:25.000 Unless you got a million of them who could take on an army, you know, I don't think so.

01:07:30.000 Isaiah Gonzalez, proud knicker, love your content, appreciate you, bro.

01:07:35.000 Ryan says, You being afraid to support Patrick Little because of optics doesn't help our cause in the long run.

01:07:43.000 You need to quit worrying about what other people think.

01:07:46.000 Unsubscribed.

01:07:47.000 Bye bye. 1.00

01:07:49.000 Bye, dum dum. 0.96

01:07:50.000 That's what, you know, I say that you have to have a certain IQ to watch a show for a very particular reason.

01:07:56.000 You and all the Patrick Little subscribers can go.

01:08:00.000 Bye bye.

01:08:01.000 Don't need them.

01:08:03.000 You think Patrick Little is the future of the GOP?

01:08:05.000 Hey, go join his campaign.

01:08:08.000 Fly out to California with your real name, with your face, and volunteer for the campaign, polling at 0%.

01:08:16.000 Tell me how that works out for you. 0.99

01:08:19.000 Just absolutely ridiculous. 0.68

01:08:21.000 We had a movement for so long that was riding a big wave, which, by the way, had nothing to do with alt right ideas and everything to do with Donald Trump. 0.58

01:08:32.000 You know, they took a lot of credit for the groundwork that he laid.

01:08:37.000 He's going strong.

01:08:38.000 Where are they?

01:08:39.000 How are they doing?

01:08:40.000 Not so great, huh?

01:08:42.000 But all the people who want to complain about, oh, Nick, you care so much about optics, they do it behind a screen name without their face attached to it.

01:08:51.000 And, you know, that's not to say we need people to dox themselves and all the rest.

01:08:55.000 You cannot have a movement that is based on people who are anonymous.

01:08:59.000 It doesn't work for obvious reasons.

01:09:03.000 Shouldn't have to say it.

01:09:05.000 But thanks for the money, Ryan.

01:09:07.000 I'm not going to miss you.

01:09:08.000 Begbie, is party boy voting Patrick Little?

01:09:11.000 He's in Southern California.

01:09:12.000 He shouldn't.

01:09:14.000 I would vote for Patrick Little over Feinstein, but if we're going to build a movement, it has to be serious with serious people who have serious prospects.

01:09:25.000 It's common sense, folks.

01:09:27.000 It's common sense.

01:09:28.000 You can say whatever you want. 0.99

01:09:30.000 People are going to say, Nick is a cock. 1.00

01:09:32.000 Nick doesn't get it. 1.00

01:09:33.000 Yeah, okay.

01:09:34.000 Say whatever you want, LARPer.

01:09:37.000 Say whatever makes you feel better, but it's just not going to happen.

01:09:42.000 Jumping Jack Flash, Nick, I'll give $100 if you chug a Bush Light on cam.

01:09:48.000 This is not a cam show.

01:09:49.000 I am not a cam whore. 1.00

01:09:51.000 I'm not going to do your vulgar tasks for money. 0.95

01:09:56.000 And I don't drink, so I'll drink a Coke for $100.

01:10:00.000 I'm not going to chug it like an animal.

01:10:02.000 Joshua Larson, criminally underviewed tonight, guy.

01:10:05.000 Can't have it.

01:10:06.000 Yeah, nobody was watching my Kanye stream on Friday.

01:10:09.000 Not a lot of Kanye fans in the audience.

01:10:12.000 That's all right.

01:10:14.000 You can't appreciate genius.

01:10:14.000 That's all right.

01:10:16.000 That's fine.

01:10:18.000 But, you know, we like to mix it up on Fridays.

01:10:20.000 We like to have a little bit of fun, a little bit of different kind of content.

01:10:23.000 You know, you've heard enough about South Africa and Rhodesia and demographics.

01:10:27.000 You know, it's every night with that kind of thing.

01:10:29.000 So, once in a while, we like to mix it up.

01:10:32.000 But people didn't enjoy that.

01:10:34.000 That's okay.

01:10:35.000 Jumpin' Jack Flash says, You only kill someone you love.

01:10:38.000 I didn't know hitmen loved their targets and bank robbers loved the hostages and police they kill.

01:10:43.000 So you disagree with Kanye West's lyrics?

01:10:46.000 I think he's talking generally about, you know, most murderers are not hitmen.

01:10:50.000 Most murderers are not terrorists.

01:10:53.000 Most murderers are people that kill their wife or kill a lover.

01:10:57.000 And I can think all the people who I want to kill are people who I love in some ways, right?

01:11:02.000 I don't kill people. 0.63

01:11:03.000 Well, there are some people I don't love who I want to kill.

01:11:06.000 But, I mean, I think you understand.

01:11:09.000 Ryan is back.

01:11:10.000 Ryan just can't help himself.

01:11:12.000 He says he's unsubscribed.

01:11:14.000 He's all pissed.

01:11:15.000 He's going to go volunteer for Patrick Little with a mask on.

01:11:19.000 But he's back for more. 0.96

01:11:20.000 He says, Why are you still talking about fag rap with this guy? 0.90

01:11:26.000 It's all so tiresome, folks. 0.79

01:11:28.000 Jumpman Jack Flash, what are your opinions on country music?

01:11:31.000 I don't like it.

01:11:31.000 I really don't like it.

01:11:35.000 And then I never will.

01:11:38.000 I know people in the South like it.

01:11:41.000 I just can't take it.

01:11:43.000 I've tried to.

01:11:44.000 I listen to some of it.

01:11:45.000 I try to, but I just can't do it.

01:11:48.000 I don't know what it is, but I just can't vibe to it.

01:11:53.000 And even rap music, I'll even listen to bad rap music.

01:11:56.000 As long as it's new and it's loud and I can bop to it, that's all I care about.

01:12:01.000 And I'm not going to listen to that on repeat on my iPod or whatever.

01:12:07.000 I'll listen to better rap.

01:12:08.000 But for me, I just like music that's loud and that I can jam to.

01:12:14.000 And also, I like rock music and I like the oldies and all that, but country music just doesn't do it for me.

01:12:21.000 I don't get the appeal, really.

01:12:23.000 Joshua Larson, what's worst?

01:12:25.000 LARPing Pagans or the Black Pillars? 0.66

01:12:29.000 Probably Black Pillars.

01:12:31.000 Simon Skull, 808s and Heartbreaks is a criminally underrated album.

01:12:35.000 True.

01:12:36.000 Very true.

01:12:38.000 Yeah, that's one of the ones people will least often say is their favorite or a good one, but it changed the game.

01:12:44.000 You wouldn't have that kind of RB.

01:12:48.000 Style, if it weren't for 808, really changed the way it works.

01:12:53.000 So that was a good one.

01:12:54.000 And there's so many good songs on there, too.

01:12:58.000 Hamside says, Blue wrench marks equals Twitter, blue check marks.

01:13:02.000 Brutal.

01:13:03.000 Augusto Pinochet, shekels for a good guy. 1.00

01:13:06.000 Thank you. 1.00

01:13:07.000 Oy vey, thank you.

01:13:08.000 You know, that kind of stuff has just become basically funny at this point.

01:13:13.000 Recovery Anonymous, Nick, you should do a stream with Random Yoko. 0.93

01:13:17.000 She's a Japanese Trump supporter living in Japan. 0.50

01:13:20.000 Ooh, woo.

01:13:22.000 Oh, whoa, a Japanese Trump supporter living in Japan. 1.00

01:13:25.000 I'm going to have to get her on the show.

01:13:27.000 She has a YouTube channel and talks about North Korea.

01:13:30.000 I would be happy to have her on the show. 1.00

01:13:34.000 Frank, you know, if the ethnostate isn't going to have Japanese women, then screw the ethnostate. 0.97

01:13:40.000 I was going to say something else.

01:13:42.000 Frank says, vote Patrick Little today.

01:13:44.000 Is he a CIA plant?

01:13:45.000 Who cares?

01:13:47.000 Him versus Feinstein is comedy gold.

01:13:49.000 What are your thoughts on him, Mr. Knife?

01:13:52.000 He's polling at 0%.

01:13:53.000 That's all you need to know.

01:13:55.000 You know, I've moved to a point where it's just about what is effective, what is pragmatic.

01:14:00.000 That's it.

01:14:02.000 Save me the self righteous, principled people. 0.98

01:14:05.000 There's a lot of self righteous, principled people in the world, and they haven't done shit. 0.89

01:14:11.000 So spare me all the, oh, you know, I'm really pure. 0.79

01:14:15.000 I could say all the right things online.

01:14:19.000 Don't need them.

01:14:20.000 Show me people that can win.

01:14:22.000 Show me people that have power, that have money, that have resources.

01:14:27.000 Show me those people.

01:14:28.000 Patrick Little is not among them.

01:14:30.000 Nice guy, maybe.

01:14:32.000 You know, it's like it's said in that movie, Glenn Gary, Glenn Ross.

01:14:37.000 Alec Baldwin does that famous monologue. 0.99

01:14:39.000 He says, Nice guy, don't give a shit. 1.00

01:14:42.000 Good father, fuck you. 1.00

01:14:43.000 Go home and play with your kids. 1.00

01:14:44.000 That's basically what we're working with here.

01:14:48.000 That's great.

01:14:48.000 That's really great.

01:14:49.000 He's a Marine.

01:14:50.000 He knows this about Israel.

01:14:52.000 He talks like a 4chan poster. 0.96

01:14:55.000 Terrific.

01:14:56.000 But we need people who can win elections so they could pass laws, so they could actually stop what's happening and not LARP about it online.

01:15:04.000 Am I wrong for saying that?

01:15:06.000 I don't know.

01:15:07.000 Maybe all the gab posters will be really offended by that, but that's my opinion.

01:15:12.000 Maybe a very nice guy.

01:15:13.000 It's not a personal thing.

01:15:15.000 It's just he's pulling it zero, okay?

01:15:18.000 And somebody like this actually sets people like me way, way back.

01:15:21.000 He gets out there with a shirt and tie, with an American flag, says America first, and he's talking like just completely off the chain here.

01:15:32.000 And I understand the appeal of that for some people, but then you understand it's a lot harder.

01:15:38.000 For people like me to get mainstream acceptance, for anybody that's opposed to immigration or Jewish influence or Israel lobby, if you don't talk about it in a way that is convincing, in a way that is correct, it creates a lot of problems.

01:15:53.000 So, let's see. 0.95

01:15:55.000 Malleable Tick, can you give a long explanation on why Mackie's Curacao is the idea?

01:15:59.000 I just answered that one. 0.87

01:16:01.000 Luke says they killed our Lord and they're not going to stop there. 1.00

01:16:04.000 Very true. 1.00

01:16:05.000 You know, I'm a strong believer that the Antichrist will be Jewish, I'm a big believer in that. 0.98

01:16:11.000 And there was a great article actually. 0.94

01:16:14.000 Was it in the American Conservative?

01:16:16.000 I forget where I read it.

01:16:17.000 And it wasn't, it was something else.

01:16:19.000 But there was a really nice article that basically summarized the Jewish lobby in the Holocaust industry.

01:16:26.000 It was written actually by a Jew. 0.52

01:16:28.000 And they talked about how Poland, for example, lately the Jews have been targeting Poland because they say that, you know, there was the Polish Holocaust and Poland won't recognize it and all the rest.

01:16:40.000 And Poland has been fighting back against this.

01:16:42.000 And of course, there was a law passed in America.

01:16:46.000 Which is very antagonistic and hostile to Poland.

01:16:49.000 And the point was to show that this wasn't the Israel lobby.

01:16:52.000 This wasn't the Zionists. 0.69

01:16:53.000 This was the Jewish lobby. 0.78

01:16:55.000 The Jewish lobby has been advocating against Poland. 0.93

01:16:58.000 And that's why you get these, you know, the federal government is now against Poland, the Congress is against Poland, and there's a real world Jewry as a force is real. 0.85

01:17:09.000 And, you know, we just have to understand that. 0.76

01:17:15.000 And it's a Christian country, and we know the relationship between these two groups.

01:17:20.000 Simon Skola, today is the anniversary of the Killdozer.

01:17:23.000 Yes, happy anniversary.

01:17:24.000 Oh, oh, says, so does this mean if the people harassing you or their proxies invoke slavery or the Holocaust, that's impermissible hostility?

01:17:33.000 Huge, if big.

01:17:34.000 Yeah, right?

01:17:36.000 I know.

01:17:37.000 Wilbur Ross, come home, white man, to Minnesota, home of blonde haired women and tall Nords.

01:17:44.000 You mean Somalia?

01:17:45.000 You mean New Somalia?

01:17:47.000 Don't get me wrong, I like Minnesota, but I mean, geez, are we going to pretend it's like Valhalla up there?

01:17:52.000 I'm pretty sure they've got a pretty large Mogadishu contingent there. 0.92

01:17:58.000 Spoiler alert says the only thing sacred in the West is the Holocaust. 1.00

01:18:02.000 Highly true. 1.00

01:18:04.000 Sovalor, America First Bouncy Balls merch.

01:18:07.000 Keep up the good work, my dude.

01:18:07.000 When?

01:18:09.000 Thank you.

01:18:10.000 Pagan Goddess says, hold out, Nick. 1.00

01:18:12.000 You're doing the right thing.

01:18:13.000 I want my future husband to be a virgin, too.

01:18:16.000 Exactly right, folks. 1.00

01:18:18.000 And you know, all these women. 1.00

01:18:19.000 Who are putting out and everything? 1.00

01:18:21.000 Anyone want to marry a woman who's not a virgin?

01:18:23.000 Uh, not me, not this guy. 0.74

01:18:26.000 So, all these women, they have like 10 sexual partners. 1.00

01:18:29.000 You think somebody with money and with intelligence is going to want to settle down with somebody who's been around the block like that? 1.00

01:18:35.000 No chance.

01:18:37.000 No chance.

01:18:38.000 And look, it's not too late for everybody.

01:18:40.000 You just got to stop.

01:18:42.000 Just stop.

01:18:43.000 People are like, well, what do we do with all the roasties now?

01:18:46.000 It's like, well, the first thing you do is just close your legs for a second, right?

01:18:53.000 Enough.

01:18:54.000 We just want to have sacred, divine unions.

01:18:57.000 Between individuals.

01:18:58.000 Is that too much to ask?

01:19:02.000 So, we appreciate that. 1.00

01:19:05.000 Pizzagate Israel says, Do you support trannies teaching boys how to become communist drag queens? 1.00

01:19:12.000 Yeah. 0.97

01:19:13.000 No, of course not.

01:19:14.000 Also, Kill Dozer was the greatest of all time.

01:19:16.000 True. 1.00

01:19:17.000 Social Mike says, I wish the Bible said commies bad. 1.00

01:19:21.000 No cakes for commies. 1.00

01:19:22.000 Yeah, I wish too.

01:19:26.000 What else?

01:19:27.000 Let's see.

01:19:27.000 We've got a couple more here.

01:19:31.000 Jason Porteous says California primary elections are tomorrow.

01:19:35.000 Vote Travis Allen.

01:19:36.000 He is being shadow banned by the media.

01:19:38.000 Let's take back California.

01:19:40.000 God bless you, Nick.

01:19:41.000 God bless you, too.

01:19:42.000 I don't know, Travis Allen, but we'll be covering the California primaries tonight.

01:19:47.000 We're going to be, not tonight, tomorrow night.

01:19:50.000 We're going to be doing special coverage of the California primaries tomorrow night.

01:19:57.000 The polls close at.

01:20:00.000 8 o'clock Pacific time.

01:20:02.000 So we'll be doing a special stream tomorrow at 10 o'clock, and that'll be a lot of fun.

01:20:06.000 We're going to have a couple of guests on.

01:20:09.000 Matt Stark, Nick, I work a blue collar job and I support your work.

01:20:12.000 Keep up the good work, my man.

01:20:14.000 Thank you, big guy.

01:20:15.000 We love our blue collar people.

01:20:17.000 Michael Jones, Charlie Kirk, debate when?

01:20:20.000 Soon.

01:20:22.000 I got to call that guy on the carpet one of these days and do it right, unlike other people.

01:20:27.000 J.E. is a Christian.

01:20:28.000 How do you rectify the egalitarian message of our churches with the truth that people are different?

01:20:33.000 Build different civilizations, etc.

01:20:36.000 It's pretty simple.

01:20:38.000 No rectifying required.

01:20:41.000 As a Catholic, you could say Christian, but Catholic is specific.

01:20:46.000 As a Catholic, in the Catholic Catechism, the only equality that Catholics affirm is equality before God, and that's it.

01:20:56.000 Which I think is telling.

01:20:58.000 Never has the Catholic religion said that everybody is equal and all the tribes are equal in terms of what is.

01:21:07.000 Protected from error in the catechism. 0.99

01:21:09.000 It only says that people are equal before God, and that's it, and that's true.

01:21:14.000 But that's not egalitarian, right?

01:21:17.000 I mean, the whole Bible is predicated on messages of inequality.

01:21:23.000 You go back to Cain and Abel, who are unequal.

01:21:25.000 I mean, there's all kinds, Jacob and Esau, all kinds of sons and stories of inequality and nations.

01:21:33.000 What is the whole Old Testament about?

01:21:35.000 It's about tribal warfare. 0.96

01:21:36.000 It's about one tribe.

01:21:38.000 You know, first they got to fight it out, they got to.

01:21:41.000 Create themselves and then escape Egypt and battle all these other tribes, and then there's a kingdom. 0.82

01:21:46.000 And you know, so it's all about tribes, it's all about nations. 0.85

01:21:51.000 And beyond that, in the catechism, the only equality that is affirmed is dignity before God.

01:21:58.000 That's it.

01:21:59.000 And that's I think that's fine, that's correct.

01:22:02.000 But it doesn't say that people are all the same, far from it.

01:22:06.000 Northeast nationalism, Nick, we must say the N word to own the libs right freaking now.

01:22:11.000 Yeah, you first, big guy.

01:22:13.000 You first.

01:22:15.000 And let's see, do we have any more Streamlabs?

01:22:17.000 Let me go back in and refresh.

01:22:20.000 Yuri says, Have you heard of Yuri Besmanov?

01:22:25.000 He was a defector, KGB spy who dropped some red pills in the 80s with pinpoint prophetic accuracy by today's standards.

01:22:34.000 Google Yuri Besmanov.

01:22:36.000 I think it was Besimov, wasn't it?

01:22:38.000 Psychological warfare subversion.

01:22:40.000 He said, God was the answer.

01:22:41.000 Yes, I have seen that clip before.

01:22:45.000 And actually, one of the theme songs for my podcast was based on the song that plays during one of those interviews.

01:22:50.000 So, yeah, very, very prophetic.

01:22:55.000 And let's see, any more super chats, or are we going to call it a night?

01:22:59.000 It's a lot of super chats lately.

01:23:00.000 This is very good, but also very time consuming.

01:23:03.000 So it looks like that's all our super chats and stream labs.

01:23:06.000 That's going to do it for us tonight.

01:23:08.000 Remember to sign on to the mailing list to get the email about premium content, which is coming soon.

01:23:14.000 If you don't get the email, you're not going to hear about it for a while.

01:23:16.000 So just be sure you sign on at nicholasjfuentes.com.

01:23:22.000 Subscribe to the channel.

01:23:23.000 Give us a big thumbs up.

01:23:24.000 Leave a comment below.

01:23:28.000 Why am I burping?

01:23:29.000 I didn't even drink anything.

01:23:30.000 I didn't even drink any pop or anything.

01:23:33.000 Leave a comment.

01:23:34.000 Click the notification bell to get notified every time we go live.

01:23:37.000 We're on the air Monday through Friday, 7 p.m. Central, 8 p.m. Eastern Standard Time.

01:23:42.000 I'm Nicholas J. Fuentes.

01:23:43.000 As always, thank you for watching.

01:23:45.000 Thank you to our super chatters or streamlabbers.

01:23:48.000 Even Ryan, you know, we don't care that he's gone, but we thank everybody who watches, everybody who supports the show, and we'll see you tomorrow for our special coverage of the election and a regular show as well.

01:24:00.000 So lots of content coming your way, but until then, have a great rest of your evening.

01:24:09.000 Americanism, not globalism, will be our credo.

01:24:16.000 It's going to be only America first.

01:24:19.000 America first. 0.99

01:24:21.000 The American people will come first once again.

01:24:27.000 With respect to respect.

America First - Nicholas J. Fuentes - June 04, 2018

The Gay Agenda Exposed | America First Ep. 177

Episode Stats

Summary

Transcript