00:01:15.000You can't see them because it's much bigger, so the actual screen is not in your screen, but I have the dual monitors, so I'm actually playing Minecraft over here.
00:01:55.000We're going to punish Globo Homo in a disgusting naked wrestling match rolling around on the ground.
00:02:03.000Grunting now, but in all fairness, it will be a big episode tonight.
00:02:08.000We're talking about the Supreme Court case that came down today with the ruling in favor of religious liberty, and we're going to talk about all the details of the case, all the details of the ruling, and what that means because I think a lot of people misunderstand what that was all about in terms of many people are saying this is a big win for free speech, this is a big win for religious liberty.
00:02:36.000And it kind of is, but I think that people were kind of whooping and hollering just goes to show people don't really read the news.
00:02:45.000They read the headlines, they see what happens, but they don't really read what actually happens.
00:02:50.000So we're going to get into the ruling and what I mean by that, how it really was a narrow ruling.
00:02:56.000A lot of people got bent out of shape because they said the media is saying it's a narrow ruling, but it was 7 2, which of course, when you typically, or in the last administration, had five, four decisions where it's split by one partisan.
00:03:10.000This was 7 2, so obviously it was not a narrow vote, but it was a narrow ruling.
00:03:19.000And then I think that'll segue into a conversation about Pride Month generally, because of course this is a big blow to the homosexuals in their home turf, which is Pride Month, the month of June, the sixth month of the year.
00:03:34.000I don't really think I need to elaborate on what all that's about, but it's a big blow to the homosexuals in their own month.
00:03:42.000And so we'll get into a broader discussion of.
00:03:45.000Pride Month and everything it represents.
00:03:49.000I try not to go so hard most days of the year because there's this weird thing where if you go really hard on gay people, there's this weird way of reasoning where people say, well, if you don't like gays, that just means you are gay.
00:04:07.000Which it's like, imagine if you said to somebody, you know, I'd like one hot dog with no mustard.
00:04:13.000And the guy behind the hot dog stand was like, you don't like mustard.
00:04:39.000It's a pretty natural thing to be repulsed by.
00:04:42.000It's only in the last 20 years that anybody was okay with this.
00:04:46.000But if you come out too strongly and say, well, the Catholic Church says this and 10,000 years of history say this, then it's like, oh no, but you must.
00:04:54.000You're going at it so hard, so, but tonight we're going to take it on.
00:04:58.000We're going to take it head on in a naked boxing contest.
00:05:01.000We're going to put homosexuality in a headlock and batter it repeatedly with elbows.
00:05:08.000But so we're going to talk about that.
00:05:09.000Before we get into that, I want to talk about the mailing list real quick.
00:05:15.000I was going to put out a big announcement this weekend about premium content.
00:05:19.000We're going to bring back some of the premium content very soon, and I was going to put out an announcement.
00:05:26.000Going to send out an announcement to all the mailing list members on the website.
00:05:31.000So I was telling people sign up on the mailing list this weekend.
00:05:40.000We were ready to go, ready to send out the mass email to there's about 21 or 2200 people on the mailing list that are going to get this email with all the information about the new premium content and where you can find it, what's in it, and all the rest.
00:05:57.000And then it turns out that it costs like a billion dollars to send multiple emails.
00:06:02.000I guess if you send more than like 100 emails, it's like, yeah, you have to pay a million dollars a month for that.
00:06:08.000And so we're getting one thing set up, but it takes 24 hours to get set up.
00:07:33.000There's some tactical ambiguity there.
00:07:35.000But nevertheless, my old pal Cassie Dillon, the big headed Cassie Dillon old pal, she's out there now smearing Corey Stewart, who's running for Senate, who's running as a Republican for Senate in Virginia.
00:07:51.000And he's running as Donald Trump, America First Conservative.
00:09:15.000America first, like the name of this show, and they are Israel first.
00:09:21.000And so, if you're not about Israel first, if you're not about putting it's more like Yisrael, actually, if you're a biblical person, those people over there that deny Christ, well, then you've got problems with them and with the media and all the rest.
00:09:36.000So, I just wanted to put that out there.
00:09:45.000With that out of the way, we're going to get into the news, and I'm going to whip out our notes here on the court case, the big one, which we're all talking about, we're all wondering about.
00:09:55.000I've got, it's so distracting because I've actually got a lamp down here.
00:10:01.000You can't see it, but I've actually got a lamp down here because of the dual monitors, it actually obstructs the lighting.
00:10:08.000And if you don't have from over there, so if you don't have even lighting on the green screen, it looks all funky, it looks kind of black, the shadows make it look bad.
00:10:19.000LED lamp down here, which is lighting this area.
00:10:22.000I'm going to have to figure out some kind of a fix for that.
00:10:25.000But every time I look over there, it's in my eyes.
00:10:29.000So the details of the big Supreme Court case so this was Masterpiece Cake Shop of Lakewood, Colorado versus the Colorado Civil Rights Commission.
00:10:41.000And just to give you a basic overview of the case itself, you had a homosexual couple, which is David Mullins and Charlie Craig.
00:10:51.000They go to Jack Phillips' cake shop, the masterpiece cake shop in Colorado.
00:10:57.000They want a cake for their gay wedding in Massachusetts.
00:11:02.000And they say, you know, hey, can you hook us up with a cake?
00:11:05.000Phillips, the owner of the cake shop, he refuses.
00:11:09.000He says, I will not lend my artistic talents.
00:11:12.000I won't do business in support of a homosexual union because, of course, he's a Christian.
00:11:18.000And we have to respect that because in the First Amendment of the Constitution, and this is.
00:12:05.000And this is really, well, and not to get too sidetracked, but this is really the heart of the issue.
00:12:10.000We have in the country this strange thing where the Civil Rights Act in 1964 said that private companies cannot discriminate based on immutable characteristics.
00:12:21.000And there were a number of Supreme Court rulings that also came down during the Civil Rights era using and invoking the 14th Amendment to say that a business, you know, like a bus company famously, cannot discriminate against.
00:12:33.000People based on immutable characteristics because, you know, if you're a black guy, it's not like you can help that.
00:12:39.000And I guess it inhibits your freedom if you're discriminated against by a big private company.
00:12:45.000So we have this weird kind of paradox where it's like you have a right to free association, you have a right to your religious beliefs and all the rest, but you also have this, well, you can't quite discriminate.
00:12:57.000And the real gray area, which has been caused in the last 20 years, is the issue of homosexuality because.
00:13:08.000You know, you don't really have as big of a religious issue.
00:13:11.000I don't think there's as strong of a religious conviction against black people, for example, as there is against homosexuals.
00:13:19.000And of course, the majority of the country is Christian.
00:13:22.000So this is really where the rubber meets the road in terms of this constitutional quagmire here of how do we reconcile this idea of non discrimination, anti prejudice, anti racism, and all that.
00:13:36.000With the idea of freedom of association.
00:13:38.000It's very difficult because one is totally convoluted in terms of civil rights.
00:13:52.000So, because Phillips refuses to bake the cake, and this is, we've heard this story a million times the wedding, the Christian person doesn't want to participate, the government gets mad at them.
00:14:02.000So, Mullins and Craig, the gay couple, they file a complaint with the Colorado Civil Rights Commission.
00:14:09.000And they say this guy is violating Colorado state law, which says that you can't discriminate against people based on their sexual orientation.
00:14:17.000So they file a complaint with the Civil Rights Commission saying we were discriminated against.
00:14:22.000The CCRC and state courts end up siding with the gay couple.
00:14:27.000And they say that Jack Phillips' First Amendment right was not infringed because if he made the cake, people wouldn't know that he made the cake at the wedding.
00:14:38.000And there's other areas where he could express his opposition to homosexuality.
00:14:43.000And so they said, well, his rights weren't abridged for XYZ reason, and we uphold that Craig and Mullins had the right not to be discriminated against.
00:14:54.000Well, it goes to the Supreme Court, and the Supreme Court, obviously, as you may have heard, has ruled in favor of Phillips, where the CCRC and the state courts ruled in favor of the gay couple.
00:15:05.000And in past cases, the Supreme Court even has ruled in favor of gay people not to be discriminated against.
00:15:13.000In this case, the Supreme Court ruled in favor of Jack Phillips.
00:15:16.000And everybody said, oh, this is a great victory.
00:15:18.000Everybody thought, and I don't know, maybe they just inferred wrongly, assumed wrongly, that it was on the basis of religious liberty.
00:16:45.000Quote, the Civil Rights Commission's treatment of his case has some elements of a clear and impermissible hostility toward the sincere religious beliefs that motivated his objections.
00:17:01.000When they say it's narrow, this is what we're talking about.
00:17:04.000This is a very narrow, And a very particular ruling about a very particular case.
00:17:11.000The majority opinion to which left wing judges assented to has nothing to do with the fact that Phillips has a right to associate freely with whoever he wants, that, well, these violate his religious beliefs, so he has a right not to serve them and he has a right to express himself.
00:17:30.000The decision was about the CCRC, the Colorado Civil Rights Commission, which in particular, Prosecuted this case particularly aggressively.
00:17:41.000And so, for example, Justice Anthony Kennedy writes that one commissioner at the CCRC wrote in their case, or said rather, in the case, quote, freedom of religion and religion has been used to justify all kinds of discrimination throughout history, whether it be slavery, whether it be the Holocaust.
00:18:03.000And so, because this commissioner at the CCRC, because this commissioner who is prosecuting, Phillips did so with such aggression and hostility towards his Christian beliefs, Kennedy and the majority of the justices said that he wasn't given fair treatment.
00:18:20.000And so that's all the ruling is about.
00:18:23.000The ruling doesn't say, well, Phillips' rights were abridged, his free speech rights were abridged, his freedom of association rights were abridged.
00:18:46.000Your defense is about religion and freedom of religion, but we hate religion because religion caused slavery and war and the Holocaust.
00:18:56.000And so they're saying, well, this obviously wasn't fair because the commission that's prosecuting this guy cared about protecting the civil rights of the homosexuals, people based on sexual orientation, but not based on religion.
00:19:21.000He wrote, quote, this sentiment is inappropriate for a commission charged with the solemn responsibility of fair and neutral enforcement of Colorado's anti discrimination law.
00:20:27.000You know, one school of thought says that in the future, this will pave the way for very aggressive laws that are, you know, LGBT friendly laws, laws that may be anti Christian.
00:20:40.000So, you know, we see in many cases with the gay agenda, and there is a gay agenda.
00:20:45.000You know, people say it doesn't exist.
00:20:47.000It's so there, it's so conscious and deliberate, and it has been persistent.
00:20:54.000The gay agenda has been marching forward for years, and the express purpose of it has been to humiliate.
00:20:59.000Has been to take Christians down, has been to make fun of Christians.
00:21:03.000And so many people say that maybe this is a big case, not so much for free speech, not so much for freedom of association, but more so that moving forward, as the homosexual agenda becomes the new orthodoxy, as the ruling class promotes the interests of this agenda, this may give Christians legal protections.
00:21:25.000That if you see these extreme LGBT laws in like democratic states that may be hostile towards Christians, In their writing, in their intention, it could give them protection.
00:21:38.000So, you know, it's not quite what we want.
00:21:41.000It's not quite what people are saying it is, but it still is a big victory.
00:21:46.000And it's a big victory, maybe not in and of itself, but I think what it protects for the future, which is a future that is decidedly in favor of one agenda, and it'll protect Christians.
00:21:57.000But to move on more broadly from this case, because this is not a huge deal, and we, I don't know if I can say anything that hasn't already been said about.
00:22:34.000And it was so, it was kind of deceptive, but it was so, like, we're the victims and all the rest.
00:22:40.000And that was seen as basically the first phase.
00:22:43.000It gained widespread cultural support and political support.
00:22:47.000And that happened well before the Supreme Court decision came down and they actually got legalized.
00:22:52.000And they said, you know, woohoo, great, all the rest.
00:22:55.000And even after they got in the Supreme Court that, well, they have the right to marry in all 50 states, this is the most sinister and evil thing.
00:23:02.000Like that night, they were like, yeah, this is great.
00:23:48.000And then phase two was when they're in power.
00:23:52.000Phase two is when these forces have ascended and they are now in the ruling class.
00:23:59.000And then we had a very different case where we have Christians who are on the out in the country.
00:24:03.000I still think there's a possibility that we can revive it and that it's great, but it's no secret that religiosity in general is on the decline in the country.
00:24:11.000You look at church attendance, you look at people's religious views, you look at all kinds of things.
00:24:16.000And a lot of this actually is driven by Catholics.
00:24:18.000If you look at, interesting fact, unfortunately, if you look at the data, When you look at all the trends of religiosity decreasing from about the 1960s to the 2000s, almost all of it can be accounted for by Catholics.
00:24:34.000And of course, this is because of Vatican II, which is very interesting that when the Catholic Church tries to appease modernity and tries to become more modern, they actually drive people away.
00:24:55.000But Clearly, you look in the culture, you look in Hollywood, the music industry, the ruling class, they're completely agnostic or atheist or Satanist, I think, in many cases.
00:25:05.000So the Christians are now the helpless ones.
00:25:08.000Whereas in the 1990s, if there was like a square word in a Disney movie, it was moms demand action, torching Disney headquarters.
00:25:16.000But now they don't have the same institutional power, they don't have the same clout.
00:25:20.000And now that the homosexuals are ascendant, now we see in a very different case where, you know, in the first place, it was, we just want to be equal, we just want to be accepted.
00:25:29.000Then we see the contrast in this new cultural focal point, which is the case of the baker, where you have people who are individuals, like, Hi, I'm like a small baker.
00:26:48.000America is basically the last Christian country, one of the last Christian countries.
00:26:55.000You look at Christendom, and since the 16th century, it's been driven out of its original area, which is the Levant and Anatolia later, and Constantinople.
00:27:14.000We've lost Christianity in Europe in the 18th, 19th, and 20th century.
00:27:19.000We see that since the Enlightenment and the Industrial Revolution and all the rest, we see that Christianity is on the outs in Europe because of Protestantism, because of all kinds of different trends.
00:27:29.000By now, the religion in Europe is liberalism, is secularism.
00:27:55.000You know, you watch old episodes of The Simpsons and they're going to church, which it's funny because you watch it now or you watch an episode of like Family Guy from the 90s, which I hate Family Guy.
00:28:05.000But it's just interesting in that I think it's a very interesting kind of a metric where you watch old shows from like the 2000s and the 1990s in 2018 and you realize how much of a crucial and important Important role that religion used to play in the conversation and the political dialogue.
00:28:26.000You know, you remember the great atheists, not so great, the new atheists like Christopher Hitchens, Daniel Dennett, Richard Dawkins, and all the rest, how they wanted their big crusades in the 2000s and what a revolutionary thing that was.
00:28:39.000And that's because America was the last vestige of Christianity, the last holdout, where it was taken over by Muslims in the Middle East and North Africa and it's descending south and it's going all over the place.
00:28:53.000In Europe, they've been taken over by liberalism, and to a certain degree, Jewry has played a part in that.
00:28:59.000And now we see in America, we see a very coordinated, sophisticated, and organized assault against the last Christianity in this cultural revolution that we've seen.
00:29:11.000And I think it's been spearheaded with this gay agenda here.
00:29:15.000And that's not the only thing, by the way.
00:29:16.000I think people are quick to point out that, well, there's other things.
00:29:22.000You've seen sexual morality on the decline in straight people.
00:29:26.000Since birth control came around and the sexual revolution and all that, you see the decline in public morals all over the place.
00:29:32.000But we're talking about this agenda in particular, which, if you boil it down, in the case of the gay baker, or not the gay, the Christian baker, the only way to regard this with people that are so, in this case, that are so, I think, not protected, Christians are so not protected by any institution, and you see how aggressive they are, that's the only way to regard this kind of a thing.
00:29:57.000And of course, It happens, it plays out in this month, the Pride Month.
00:30:03.000And to just put on display for you, to illustrate the point here, what this is all about, I want to show you for a moment for people that say, oh, you know, it's a sign of the times or it's, you know, it's still so hard for those kinds of people.
00:30:17.000I want to show you a few different things, actually, to give you an idea of just how prominent the new orthodoxy is in terms of this agenda.
00:30:29.000So they try and put on this effect, and we hear this every year, by the way.
00:30:34.000From Democrats and all the different coalitions, whether it's black people or women or the gay people, that, well, they're oppressed.
00:30:44.000White, cisgender, straight males have it so easy.
00:30:47.000I don't think I need to show you this, but I think it's always pretty striking when you see just how big it's grown, how great it's metastasized in the West.
00:30:58.000So let's take a look at some of these examples here.
00:32:18.000This is one of the biggest social media companies in the world.
00:32:23.000And it's a full throated endorsement of it.
00:32:26.000Facebook kicks off Pride Month 2018 with a bunch of new stickers and backgrounds.
00:32:33.000You know, they should have like an AIDS emoji.
00:32:35.000You know, that's pretty relevant in gay culture, right?
00:32:38.000Instead of co opting Noah's rainbow, they should just use the symbols that are familiar to them, like the positive symbol, you know, the plus symbol.
00:32:47.000Facebook began its Pride Month celebration this year by launching a plethora of.
00:32:51.000Of cool LGBTQ themed features, including profile frames, background stickers, and more.
00:33:25.000Instagram releases new stickers, features to celebrate Pride Month.
00:33:30.000There are new Instagram stickers and other fun features to use to celebrate Pride Month and show your support for the, you know, they keep leaving out the P.
00:33:38.000It's, you know, at least for me, it's the LGBTQP community.
00:33:49.000P for pagan, P for pedophile, P for pederasty.
00:33:53.000You know, pederasty, pedophile, pagan, it's all basically the same.
00:33:57.000And, you know, before somebody, you know, before some hillbilly threatens to fight me, I'm not saying all pagans are pedophiles, but, you know, a lot of them.
00:36:24.000What they're trying to do, they've got a lot of people in America, they've got a lot of people in Europe.
00:36:30.000What they're trying to do now is to break into the developing world.
00:36:32.000They're trying to break into China, they're trying to break into Africa, they're trying to break into all these different markets, the Arab world.
00:36:40.000Is it a good thing for business when these kinds of companies are promoting this agenda in the third world?
00:36:47.000How does the homosexual agenda received in Africa?
00:37:15.000You know, this goes back to the other point we were talking about Roseanne last week.
00:37:19.000It's kind of a bigger point, the broad point.
00:37:21.000It's not about the money for these people.
00:37:23.000There is a real concerted and organized agenda that's going on here by a very small, rootless international elite, rootless transnational elite.
00:37:33.000You have a group of people, and it's not to say, you know, here's, I guess, the distinction we want to make.
00:37:38.000We're not saying that this is like people get together in a meeting.
00:37:43.000They get together at the Global Homo Conference, the Global Homo Summit every week in Washington, D.C., or at, what is it, Bohemian Grove, and they plan out how they're going to make your kids gay.
00:37:56.000What we are saying is that you have a very small group of people that control Silicon Valley, that control the major corporations, banks, politicians, Wall Street people.
00:38:09.000This is a very small group of people which exerts a very great disproportionate amount of power in terms of we have this new class of people in the 21st century which is more powerful than ever in history, whether it's financial people, whether it's media people, whether it's political people.
00:38:26.000We have such great inequality in the world.
00:38:30.000Where one individual like Mark Zuckerberg controls the fate of a billion users on Facebook.
00:38:35.000Contrast that to some poor guy in Africa.
00:38:38.000We're talking about a class of people which has all this power and it's like 0.1% of the population.
00:38:46.000And this small group of people has a very small set of characteristics.
00:38:51.000They are an international people, they're a cosmopolitan people, they have very specific views.
00:38:56.000And so all of this is to say that these people that go through The elite institutions, they grew up in the same cities, they live in the same cities, they share the same views.
00:39:05.000They are determining the course of our country.
00:39:08.000And in determining the course of our country and of the major corporations and the major industrial economies of the world, they're determining the course of the world itself.
00:39:20.000That's what I mean when I say there's this big agenda going on.
00:39:23.000And that the people at the top are promoting something that is downright hostile, and that is the sole intention, basically, to humiliate, to do a victory lap around Christians.
00:39:34.000I mean, that's what it's about at this point.
00:39:36.000Originally, the Pride Month was, I guess, supposed to be like, you know, like we're, even though you're mad at us, even though you're repulsed by us, like we're going to say it loud, say it proud.
00:39:47.000I mean, you have to understand, you don't have to like it, but that's the culture that it came out of.
00:39:52.000The culture that it came out of like 50 years ago was that these people were, you know, there were laws against them and people beat the shit out of them and all the rest.
00:40:01.000And so they were saying like it was, it's like how black people are trying to like, Reappropriate the N word.
00:40:07.000It's like, oh, well, we're just going to be proud of it.
00:40:16.000Well, you know, for the most part, in the major cities, the consensus in the country by the secular press and all the rest has been forged that, you know, you can't really have a problem with gay people unless you want to get fired and blacklisted and all the rest.
00:42:21.000Opposed to God is represented in homosexuality.
00:42:24.000You have in their expression of sexuality a rejection of the natural order of things.
00:42:30.000You know, the reason that you're supposed to have sex, and this goes back to Thomistic theory, which says that we are created for a purpose.
00:42:37.000This is called teleology, that man is created with certain ends in mind.
00:42:43.000So, for example, the world is created with a certain end in mind by a designer, by a creator.
00:42:48.000Man is created with a certain end in mind.
00:43:34.000As we look at what's wrong with society, where we have declining fertility rates, we have this problem of the disharmony between the sexes, marriages are collapsing, the institution of marriage is in shambles, people are not having kids, the kids that grow up are not being raised well.
00:43:48.000You know, that's the problem with the West.
00:43:51.000All of that is reflected in this alternative, which is, you know, this rebellious camp of homosexuals who are rewriting it in a relativistic way, who are saying that, well, you know, actually, sex is not about procreation, it's about fun.
00:44:04.000And of course, it could only be fun because it could never be for procreation with homosexuals.
00:44:09.000You could never have homosexual sex and produce a child.
00:44:12.000So they represent the opposite, the diametric opposite, saying, actually, it's not about procreation because it could never be procreation for them.
00:44:27.000The institution of marriage, you know, maybe sex could be fun and also it could be for procreation, but at least marriage is for procreation.
00:44:34.000They say, no, marriage is for two people that just want to have sex and also have discounts on their taxes and things like that.
00:44:49.000And then you look at any of the statistics about them.
00:44:52.000And there was one study that said only 9% of homosexuals are monogamous.
00:44:57.000And so, then you get to the broader culture where it is degenerative, it is hedonistic, it is promiscuous, nihilistic.
00:45:04.000And so, in this aberration of sexuality, You have, I think, almost perfectly represented the diametric opposite of the natural order of a society.
00:45:15.000And on this show, this is why this is so important.
00:45:18.000On this show, I don't come on here and talk about my ideological love for capitalism or my ideological love for liberty or equality or something like that.
00:45:29.000My values are whatever is conducive and supports the creation of families, good, strong, healthy families.
00:46:01.000So that's why my ideology is centered around the most fundamental aspect, which is that you have to create the society and the society has to be developed.
00:46:11.000By the people that came before it, by the people with wisdom, by the people with virtue, they have to instill the society with virtue.
00:48:19.000When people say heterosexuals and homosexuals, and in a clinical way, like this makes sense heterosexual, if you're talking about it just on a linguistic level, heterosexual means that you're attracted to the different sex.
00:48:32.000Homosexual means you're attracted to the same sex.
00:48:35.000My problem with the terminology of it has always been that to me, this almost puts it on the same, like there's some equivalency between the two.
00:48:43.000I think it's very important to acknowledge, and I haven't even said it yet this show.
00:48:47.000There's only 3% of the population which is strictly gay.
00:48:54.000So, you know, one of the biggest ways that the left has gotten away with this agenda and they've crammed it down our throats is I think they've almost made it equal.
00:49:27.000That just goes to show it's an aberration.
00:49:31.000If you're at a factory or if you're at a factory that's making, I don't know, rubber balls, we like to talk about the rubber ball factory.
00:49:37.000If you're in a factory that makes rubber balls and 97% of the balls are bouncy and red and spherical and 3% are like cubes and they're blue and they don't bounce, would you say, oh, well, you know, this factory sometimes produces red bouncy balls and, you know, sometimes it produces these wooden blue cubes and that's the same and they should be treated the same?
00:51:08.000But you can't be controlling the press, you can't control the media, you can't have your parades, you can't be shoving that stuff in children's faces.
00:51:15.000To get to the broader point, you cannot have a neutral society.
00:51:18.000I guess that's the takeaway from this you cannot have a neutral society.
00:51:23.000The position of most of the country has been like, whatever, who cares?
00:51:29.000And even the conservative position, for many, like the conservatarian consensus, which is rising, is like, well, who cares what people do in their own homes?
00:51:36.000Who cares if they're out there doing that?
00:51:39.000What this implies is that there can exist a state of neutrality where if we're not enforcing our morals, you know, we'll just exist in this state of like amoral limbo where it's like the Christians are over here.
00:51:54.000And the Satanists are over here, and the Muslims are over here, and the gays are over here, and we're all kind of doing their own thing.
00:51:59.000And if Christians abdicate the role of power and prominence, and we just, you know, we've won the victory, okay, we have traditional values, and it's a traditional country, we're going to pack our stuff up and say, everyone can kind of be what they are, and, you know, who cares really?
00:52:15.000The mistake in that is the idea that this vacuum will not be filled.
00:52:19.000Like if we step down and say, you know, I'm personally against it, but, like, generally, who cares?
00:52:25.000That vacuum will be filled by people who want it.
00:52:28.000And, you know, we talk a lot about that in terms of foreign relations.
00:52:56.000We have to have a message that is positive.
00:52:58.000And not positive in the sense of like uplifting or optimistic, in the sense of it is exertion, as opposed to, you know, it's like an Audi.
00:53:07.000It's like we're going to be, we have a very forceful and we have an offensive message, a message that is out there and is asserting something real that is solid.
00:53:18.000It's not a negation of something, it's an assertion.
00:53:21.000Like this is what we believe, this is how our society should be governed.
00:53:25.000And if that's how we operate, I think that's the way to go.
00:54:44.000But let's look at our Streamlabs and Super Chats.
00:54:48.000I'm going to take the Streamlabs, and then I'll take your Super Chats from Friday, which I didn't get to, and then I'll get to your Super Chats from tonight.
00:57:17.000There was a guy who saw the corruption of the world, the injustice, the immorality, the sin, the vice, and he did something about it.
00:57:26.000And I think many of us can admire, if not the actions, perhaps the spirit of it.
00:57:31.000You know, it really says something that on the right wing, There is an admiration for people like this Ted Kaczynski, Marvin Heemeyer.
00:57:40.000And it is because, to an extent, we see ourselves as rebels, as insurgents, because the state, or, you know, because it's the 21st century, there are institutions now more powerful than the state.
00:57:54.000I would argue financial interests are more powerful than the state.
00:57:58.000It's still, don't get me wrong, it's still a big player.
00:58:01.000But given how financial institutions can infiltrate and manipulate the state, the state has kind of become a pawn of supranational forces.
00:58:12.000But nevertheless, we live in an order, in an order which is controlled by very evil, sick, tyrannical people.
00:58:22.000And so I think right wing people are prone to believing that it's not just as simple as there's a Democratic president or there's a Republican president.
00:58:31.000It's that we're living under a tyranny.
00:58:34.000It's equivalent, possibly worse, to anything we saw in the 20th century where there is no way that we can.
00:58:44.000There's no way we can change things at the national level, but yet we see things that are grossly unjust, things that are grossly immoral, perpetrated and promoted by people at the top.
00:58:57.000And what's the way that you lash out at that?
00:58:59.000What is an asymmetrical way that you can affect political change?
00:59:03.000Unfortunately, when they restrict the legitimate means by which we can address those grievances, we're left with violence.
00:59:29.000You see in these people that the last possible channel that they could find for their grievances against the society, which were severe, was violent and illegal expressions.
00:59:43.000So I think you have to understand that's where it's coming from.
00:59:46.000If the left understood that, I think they would be able to better address it because we don't want violence.
01:01:43.000I mean, if we, like, look at China, for example.
01:01:45.000China protects industries which are going to be important in the future.
01:01:50.000They protect their robotics industry, they protect their artificial intelligence industry, their computer industry.
01:01:56.000They protect the industries that are going to, what they call black swan industries.
01:02:01.000Or black swan industries, which is coined by Taleb, the philosopher.
01:02:07.000And he said that actually economic growth is not so much driven by this linear stuff, by lower regulations, but more so these black swan events of, for example, discovering industry, right?
01:02:18.000Or discovering the railroad, you know, that kind of thing.
01:02:21.000And that these things build on top of each other, right?
01:02:25.000So that you have the factory, which comes around in the 18th century, the factory process and steam power and these kinds of things.
01:02:34.000And then with railroad, you get different kinds of metals and all that and processes.
01:02:40.000But you get all, you know, you get further and further along the development chain, and that's how you become like the number one economy in the world.
01:02:48.000China protects those industries, America does not.
01:02:53.000And so you could say that in 2018, maybe we help our GDP by having free trade, and we give them all our real estate and our businesses and our tech secrets, and they control all that industry.
01:03:06.000And in exchange, you know, we can build, I don't even know, we could build McDonald's and stuff like that.
01:03:12.000But in 100 years, when China has a monopoly on all the future industries and the future tech, and they're, because it's compounded, because they build on top of each other, they're much further along the development chain and they're like light years ahead.
01:04:31.000Malleable Tick says, didn't know if you got my message earlier, but can you make a long statement on why Makisi Karusu from Steinsgate is the best girl from the show?
01:04:44.000And any other opinion, like Mayuri, Ferris, Luca, something, or Amani is wrong in their opinion as well?
01:04:50.000I don't know what you're talking about.
01:04:52.000I don't know what weeb shit you're on.
01:06:31.000Not as a person, not before God, but for a political movement.
01:06:35.000If you poll at 0%, you are of zero consequence.
01:06:40.000Show me somebody who could win an election who's talking about certain things, and then I'll say you're all right.
01:06:47.000Paul Nealon could have won the Wisconsin primary in Wisconsin's first district now that Paul Ryan's not running, but he wanted to post pictures of Jews' heads on pikes on Gab.
01:06:58.000And so now that's not going to happen so much.
01:08:21.000We had a movement for so long that was riding a big wave, which, by the way, had nothing to do with alt right ideas and everything to do with Donald Trump.
01:08:32.000You know, they took a lot of credit for the groundwork that he laid.
01:08:42.000But all the people who want to complain about, oh, Nick, you care so much about optics, they do it behind a screen name without their face attached to it.
01:08:51.000And, you know, that's not to say we need people to dox themselves and all the rest.
01:08:55.000You cannot have a movement that is based on people who are anonymous.
01:09:14.000I would vote for Patrick Little over Feinstein, but if we're going to build a movement, it has to be serious with serious people who have serious prospects.
01:14:56.000But we need people who can win elections so they could pass laws, so they could actually stop what's happening and not LARP about it online.
01:15:18.000And somebody like this actually sets people like me way, way back.
01:15:21.000He gets out there with a shirt and tie, with an American flag, says America first, and he's talking like just completely off the chain here.
01:15:32.000And I understand the appeal of that for some people, but then you understand it's a lot harder.
01:15:38.000For people like me to get mainstream acceptance, for anybody that's opposed to immigration or Jewish influence or Israel lobby, if you don't talk about it in a way that is convincing, in a way that is correct, it creates a lot of problems.
01:16:28.000And they talked about how Poland, for example, lately the Jews have been targeting Poland because they say that, you know, there was the Polish Holocaust and Poland won't recognize it and all the rest.
01:16:40.000And Poland has been fighting back against this.
01:16:42.000And of course, there was a law passed in America.
01:16:46.000Which is very antagonistic and hostile to Poland.
01:16:49.000And the point was to show that this wasn't the Israel lobby.
01:16:55.000The Jewish lobby has been advocating against Poland.
01:16:58.000And that's why you get these, you know, the federal government is now against Poland, the Congress is against Poland, and there's a real world Jewry as a force is real.
01:17:09.000And, you know, we just have to understand that.
01:17:15.000And it's a Christian country, and we know the relationship between these two groups.
01:17:20.000Simon Skola, today is the anniversary of the Killdozer.
01:17:24.000Oh, oh, says, so does this mean if the people harassing you or their proxies invoke slavery or the Holocaust, that's impermissible hostility?
01:23:45.000Thank you to our super chatters or streamlabbers.
01:23:48.000Even Ryan, you know, we don't care that he's gone, but we thank everybody who watches, everybody who supports the show, and we'll see you tomorrow for our special coverage of the election and a regular show as well.
01:24:00.000So lots of content coming your way, but until then, have a great rest of your evening.
01:24:09.000Americanism, not globalism, will be our credo.