00:02:05.000So, tonight, of course, we're talking about the Globo Homo agenda, the Global Homo, better known as the Globo Homo agenda, that is being advanced by the Trump administration.
00:02:19.000New announcements of a new global campaign to decriminalize homosexuality in about 70 different countries in the Caribbean, the Middle East, and Africa.
00:02:31.000And a lot of people have been talking about this.
00:02:33.000This comes on the heels of another epic global initiative led by Ivanka Trump to empower women.
00:02:40.000So we'll be talking about those two things.
00:02:41.000You know, they're really not a huge deal in themselves, but of course, there's more to the story, as always.
00:04:43.000I don't know if consumers of conventional media have heard so much about this, but it was announced today that the administration, the White House, is undertaking a new project, an exciting new initiative.
00:04:57.000You know, if you thought total immunity for illegal immigrants, if you thought that wasn't good enough, If you thought that expanding, catch, and release, you said this guy, he just hasn't done enough yet.
00:05:08.000Well, here we are today with the brand new initiative.
00:05:13.000Quote The Trump administration is launching a global campaign to end the criminalization of homosexuality in dozens of nations where it is still illegal to be gay.
00:05:26.000And they say that, of course, of course, this program has been created with the intent of delegitimizing the Islamic revolutionary regime in Iran.
00:05:38.000So, of course, there's always that nice, neat little connection with our neoconservative.
00:06:13.000And like I said, if it's not good enough that we're advancing this across the globe, Inevitably, invariably, the ultimate agenda is to serve the interests of our closest ally, Israel, by undermining Iran, by promoting gay rights.
00:06:30.000So NBC goes on to report that U.S. Ambassador to Germany, Richard Grinnell, the highest profile, openly gay person in the Trump administration, is leading the effort, which kicks off Tuesday evening in Berlin.
00:06:44.000The U.S. Embassy is flying in LGBT activists from across Europe for a strategy dinner.
00:06:51.000To plan to push for decriminalization in places that still outlaw homosexuality, mostly concentrated in the Middle East, Africa, and the Caribbean.
00:07:00.000Now, I know a lot of people are sort of freaking out about this.
00:07:03.000I was tweeting about this a lot today.
00:07:16.000You know, I think we have to come at this from a realistic perspective that.
00:07:21.000To a certain extent, more or less, the American State Department and our diplomatic team has been pushing this sort of stuff probably every year for the past 30 years.
00:07:34.000I don't think this is really anything new.
00:07:52.000If you saw the Barack Obama administration, he received a pretty lukewarm reception when he was pushing the gay agenda, if you recall, when he made his trip to sub Saharan Africa a few years ago.
00:08:04.000So, again, I'll preface this by saying that this is not a huge deal.
00:08:09.000I don't think this represents a major change in the American strategic doctrine or outlook or anything like that.
00:08:16.000I'm sure this is not a major policy agenda.
00:08:20.000We've seen similar initiatives, and they get started and they sort of go nowhere.
00:08:24.000You hire A few more government employees and so on.
00:08:26.000But I think the reason why it's important to talk about it and to talk about the other initiative, which was Ivanka Trump's initiative, which was reported last week.
00:08:36.000So we got the gay initiative this week.
00:08:39.000Last week, we got the women's initiative.
00:08:42.000Ivanka Trump will lead a new White House initiative aimed at developing economic stability for 50 million women in developing countries and the world.
00:08:50.000The initiative, dubbed the Women's Global Development and Prosperity Initiative, will be introduced Thursday by President Trump.
00:08:57.000The president's eldest daughter and senior advisor wrote Wednesday in an op ed published in the Wall Street Journal.
00:09:01.000So, like I said, these two things, in and of themselves, they're not a big deal.
00:09:06.000I don't think I'd really even be talking about them if not for what we've seen in the last few weeks, the last few months, which is what is the optics?
00:09:14.000Of course, we're always asking on America First.
00:09:17.000Nick Fuentes is always asking, okay, great, but what are the optics?
00:09:22.000To me, I look at this year so far in 2019, where we saw this disastrous government shutdown.
00:09:31.000So all the political costs, all these government workers not getting paid, I thought that was awesome, but.
00:09:37.000You know, the political capital that was lost, the loss in government efficacy, or maybe efficacy for the president or the party, amounted to nothing.
00:09:46.000Ultimately, we saw two huge betrayals, withdrawals, retreats.
00:09:51.000The first being opening the government and delaying the State of Union.
00:09:54.000The second, of course, being the funding bill.
00:09:57.000And so I look at the priorities of this administration, and just you look at these two items and you think it is so bad.
00:10:23.000This is not a good look that just seven days ago, five days ago, we totally capitulate on immigration, and now here we are with a renewed initiative, a renewed effort to promote what?
00:10:35.000Homosexuality in the world, to promote women's rights in the world.
00:10:39.000I mean, where is the Make America Great Again agenda?
00:10:43.000I seem to remember a speech, I remember a campaign in 2016 when President Trump said something to the effect of, We will no longer surrender this country or its people to the false song of globalism.
00:10:56.000It just seems to me like there's a lot of global initiatives, a lot of left wing global initiatives for a so called nationalist campaign, right?
00:11:05.000I mean, we were promised during the midterms, before the midterms, before the general election in 2016.
00:11:11.000We were promised executive orders on birthright citizenship, on catch and release, on a border wall, all this stuff.
00:11:17.000And look, we understand when those things don't get accomplished.
00:11:20.000I'm the first one to come on America first and say, well, again, as a reminder, you do have two co equal branches of government, which kind of have a say in the policy process.
00:11:30.000So maybe we can't hold them totally accountable.
00:11:33.000How much responsibility can we really lay at the feet of the man himself when you really understand everything that he's got working against him?
00:11:42.000But then, when you see that the other things seem to be flying through this administration with no problem, whether it be tax cuts for the wealthy, whether it be intervention in the Middle East, if that's intervention in Syria, a troop surge in Afghanistan, moving an embassy, all sorts of things seem to go underway with no problem.
00:12:02.000And then, this is just the latest the women's rights, the homosexuality.
00:12:06.000And then that leads me to the second point, which is you begin to wonder what exactly does it mean to be a conservative in America?
00:12:14.000What exactly does it mean for Donald Trump?
00:12:18.000You know, I guess we understood from the beginning that this wasn't Trump's highest priority, or even if it was, that Trump wasn't entirely the social conservative that we needed him to be.
00:12:28.000I think a lot of us understood in 2016 that this is a guy from Manhattan.
00:12:36.000And we saw him wave the gay pride flag and we saw him say certain things about women's rights and so on, even during the State of the Union.
00:12:45.000It was about AIDS and about women voting and women being in Congress and all the rest.
00:12:49.000So I think we knew getting into it that he.
00:12:52.000We sort of gritted our teeth when those things came around because, of course, he was good on immigration.
00:12:58.000But then, when here we are, two years into the presidency, and he's not good on immigration, but it seems like he's good on these other things, you're really scratching your head and you're wondering what's going on.
00:13:08.000And then, to me, what's most striking beyond all of that is okay, bad on immigration, we got all this social liberal stuff.
00:13:15.000The real kicker is then you see this applauded across the conservative circles, and it's just moments like this when you realize that we still remain under the circus tent.
00:13:27.000Clown Planet, Circus Planet, where across the board it's Breitbart, it's Charlie Kirk, it's all these people.
00:13:34.000And the narrative they're trying to spin with this, even though, and again, I'll just say it, we're not for gay marriage.
00:13:56.000I'm thinking rolling back the advance of China.
00:13:58.000I'm thinking, you know, there's a lot of things you could be promoting, but of all things, This is the human rights agenda of all the critiques of the Iranian Islamic revolutionary regime.
00:14:09.000This is the angle that we go at it to try to delegitimize.
00:14:33.000We've talked a lot about this on the show.
00:14:35.000Because, as a young Zoomer, as a reactionary, as a proper and true conservative, I've tried to sort of bring back a coherent definition for what that word means, what it means to be right wing, because in America it seems like nobody has any idea.
00:14:50.000But the foundation ultimately, and I've said it's order, it's other things, the foundation ultimately is the idea of essentialism.
00:14:57.000Essentialism says that everything that is in the world has a function, has a purpose.
00:15:15.000And a lot of conservatives will sort of fumble around and try to explain why marijuana is bad.
00:15:20.000And ultimately, they decide it's not bad at all.
00:15:23.000It should be totally legal because they don't have this core, they don't have this grounding in, again, this classical definition of essentialism, of teleology, where they derive their conservatism from.
00:15:34.000So a lot of them will say, well, I guess marijuana is just like any other drug.
00:15:41.000You know, I guess it's like alcohol or sugar or cigarettes.
00:15:44.000And hey, if you want less people to smoke it, maybe you have to legalize it anyway.
00:15:48.000I went through why a lot of those arguments are wrong, but I said that at the core, foundationally, why marijuana is wrong, why it's not conservative to support it, is because it impairs reason.
00:15:59.000And the purpose, the goal directed nature of man, what differentiates us from other animals, is our rational mind, that we're capable of rationality.
00:16:08.000And so something like marijuana impairs our reason.
00:16:11.000And so it's contrary to the essential purpose.
00:16:14.000Of why we're here, of our brains, of our reason, our rationality, and so on.
00:16:19.000And the same is true of homosexuality.
00:16:22.000When you look at the essential function, the goal directed function of the sexual organs, of the reproductive function, it's not totally for pleasure, it's not totally for recreation.
00:16:33.000Of course, that's a part of it, but ultimately, the purpose of it is procreation.
00:16:38.000So when you have other activities, not just homosexual, it's a lot of other sexual activities that frustrate.
00:16:44.000Or deny or go against that essential function, which is reproduction.
00:16:55.000And so, when I see across the board all these people like Joel Pollack, our favorite, the APAC speaker, remember the one from Monday, last Monday, I think it was, who was saying that, oh, Ilhan Omar is so immoral, she's going after just Jews now, not just APAC.
00:17:12.000He's saying, oh, this is a big win for conservatives because now, you see, now the left can't say that Republicans are homophobic.
00:17:20.000You know, Charlie Kirk, all these other people, you know, maybe they see something that we just don't.
00:17:25.000We're reading Aristotle, we're reading all these other people, we're reading the Bible, we're reading Thomas Aquinas.
00:17:31.000But wait a second, they see the whole four dimensional chessboard because you know, hey, maybe if we promote women's rights and homosexuality, and we promote people of color and racial justice in America, and we promote comprehensive prison reform to get all these drug dealers on the streets, the left can't call us all these mean names anymore.
00:17:58.000You know, while it might be conservative in principle to oppose all these different things drugs, gay marriage, women in the workforce, tactically speaking, if we simply just become liberals, then they call us Nazis.
00:18:13.000You know, the other day a liberal stopped me on the street.
00:18:16.000I was wearing my Make America Great Again hat.
00:19:42.000You know, even if, and some people might say with the State of the Union, for example, when he talked about AIDS and he talked about criminal justice and he talked about the Holocaust for like 15 minutes, people said, oh, well, this is not a great thing.
00:19:57.000Obviously, this is not a whole lot of stuff that we're on board with, but he has to do this tactically.
00:20:14.000Actually, what distinguishes or differentiates us from our opposition?
00:20:17.000Because if you go out and give a speech and say, look, we're for gay marriage and we're for women's rights and we're for foreign intervention in Venezuela and we're for all these things, and maybe, let's say it works, maybe when all the people in the middle, maybe when a lot of people on the left, But ultimately, you see why this logic is flawed because what good does it make when the support of the masses is contingent on you not actually espousing the beliefs that you yourself hold?
00:20:47.000I mean, if we're to become the Liberal Party to win over liberals in the middle, you know, what's the point if we can't then push through conservative policy?
00:20:54.000So I see these two things, and to me, they betray a fundamental and core lack of understanding of who we are as the right wing and what we're doing in politics.
00:21:05.000You understand why, on two counts, not only is it, I mean, it's not conservative, it's morally wrong, it's not what we stand for.
00:21:13.000And by the same token, even if you were to make the consequentialist argument, consequentialist meaning, Relating to consequences rather than motive or execution, even in that case, it's flawed thinking because politically, and I think we saw this throughout the campaign, the things you campaign on, you ultimately have to follow through on them.
00:21:32.000So if you campaign on all this socially liberal stuff, what do you get at the end of the two years of the administration so far?
00:21:38.000Well, you get big tax cuts, you get all this other stuff, and no immigration reform.
00:21:52.000I don't think this is reflective of the Trump administration itself.
00:21:55.000I'm sure this came out of the State Department in some capacity.
00:21:59.000I'm sure this was, you know, Richard Grinnell probably spearheaded it and probably Donald Trump had nothing to do with it.
00:22:05.000But I think we really have to push back.
00:22:08.000Maybe this is less of a critique of the president and more just a teachable moment on this kind of thinking, which I see so often.
00:22:14.000Because, and I talked about this a lot on the premium show this week, as we move into 2020 and we start to consider, will Donald Trump be the president for another four years?
00:22:27.000And even if he wins another four years, what comes after that?
00:22:30.000There's this battle going on for the succession to the Trump administration.
00:22:34.000And it's even beyond the Trump administration who is going to be the successor in the American right wing movement to the Trump revolution?
00:22:41.000Because that's the battle that's happening right now.
00:22:43.000And you've got people who I think represent the establishment trying to reassert itself, which would include Mike Pence, Nikki Haley, Charlie Kirk, Ben Shapiro, characters like this who are trying to thwart and frustrate everything that Trump tried to accomplish.
00:22:58.000And then you've got the small amount of true believers who are sort of flexing their muscle in media, people that are coming around, Sean Hannity, Tucker Carlson, Ann Coulter, those types of people.
00:23:08.000And I see the former, which are the Charlie Kirks and so on, pushing this kind of rhetoric.
00:23:12.000And it does infect a little bit of the other guys, this sort of stuff of, well, you know, the Democrats are the real racist.
00:23:19.000And if we just pander enough, if we do enough Blexit conferences, if we just do enough, you know, outreach, they can't call us the names.
00:23:28.000The most important thing I'll say in this show, maybe in all the other shows, if you're getting called a racist, if you're getting called anti Semitic, if you're getting called sexist, if you're getting called homophobic, if you're getting called transphobic, I think that's all of them, you're doing something right.
00:23:46.000If you're being called those things, it means you're telling the truth.
00:23:50.000And we went over this on a show, I think, a couple of weeks ago.
00:23:53.000All of those different words are not honest in and of themselves, they don't mean what they say in themselves.
00:23:59.000And I'll go over very briefly what I said in that show a few weeks ago when we did a whole whiteboard on the different words that I think Kamala Harris used to describe the president or the country at large.
00:24:10.000You look at a word like racist, what does it mean to be a racist?
00:24:14.000You know, your average white person, your average conservative or independent, somebody who isn't a far left radical will say that, well, a racist is somebody who discriminates, has prejudice, you know, in some fashion against somebody based on the color of their skin, based on their race.
00:24:29.000That's actually not the functional definition of racist.
00:24:32.000I've said it before, I'll say it again.
00:24:34.000You know this because they use the term reverse racism to describe discrimination against white people.
00:24:57.000The same is true of sexism, the same is true of homophobia, transphobia.
00:25:01.000None of these words ever apply to discrimination against Christians, against straight people, against so called cisgendered people, against men.
00:25:10.000It's always used to describe the so called Marginalize the so called oppressed, the victims.
00:25:15.000And so that's why this kind of thinking of, well, if we're just nice to black people, if we just do really good things for black people and we get enough black Republicans and so on, we'll eventually win them over.
00:25:28.000You know, I saw somebody tweet out, I think it was Charlie Kirk or somebody, they said, the first black senator was a Republican and the Democrats haven't put a black congressman and, you know, all these different facts about how the Republican Party has more black representatives or something.
00:26:01.000Same is true of Hispanics, homosexuals, trans, Jews, all these other different groups, Muslims.
00:26:06.000You're never going to win them over because at the end of the day, when they throw out those different words, they're intended.
00:26:12.000To browbeat white people into going along with their agenda to transform America, to take America from a traditional white, patriarchal, traditional Christian society and turn it into a society where, yeah, gay marriage is allowed.
00:26:29.000And yeah, women in the workforce, it's equal now.
00:26:32.000And it's just going to be a multiracial, multilingual, multicultural country.
00:26:37.000They use those words to browbeat you into thinking all of this is okay, all of this is benign, and actually there's something good about it.
00:26:44.000So, whenever people jump through all these hoops and you see it, again, it's a teachable moment.
00:26:49.000In these two instances with the gay crusade, the women's crusade, don't be fooled.
00:27:18.000Control your brain when you're thinking like that.
00:27:20.000When you're thinking to yourself, how can I prove I'm not a racist?
00:27:23.000How can I prove that I'm not against gay people?
00:27:26.000You have bought wholesale their entire worldview and ideology.
00:27:31.000Because we think those things are wrong.
00:27:33.000We do ultimately, if sexism is the belief, if their operational definition of sexism is that you have these male dominated power structures, yeah, we believe in sexism.
00:27:45.000It's a little thing called sex differences.
00:27:47.000Men have different brains than women, women have a care based ethic.
00:27:55.000Because they have children in the womb and they're biologically designed to give birth to a child, they think of justice, they think of society in terms of relationships, in terms of care, in terms of feelings and emotions.
00:28:09.000Because men don't have that relationship, we are able to abstract out, have impersonal thoughts.
00:28:15.000And so that's just one example why we see that these fundamental and real differences, the inequalities between the sexes, must necessarily lead.
00:28:24.000The consequences of that are unequal, different roles in society.
00:28:43.000We don't support a society where, you know, women are out there working and who's raising the children than the states.
00:28:50.000And what, you know, you've got all, now you've got women who are, what, you know, they're going to be in the coal mines, they're going to be in the front lines, getting blown up IEDs.
00:28:58.000So if operationally their definition of sexist is, well, you believe in a society governed by men, well, yeah, okay.
00:29:04.000Now we're not going to go around and say we're the sexist whatever because the left has brainwashed everybody into thinking this is a totally unnatural and wrong thing to believe.
00:29:13.000You know, you're some kind of a sick person if you believe that.
00:29:16.000But by the same token, when we call us that, the first impulse, you know, the knee jerk reaction should not be, well, look, we're just like you.
00:30:17.000Ultimately, all the labels are designed to take our beliefs and vilify them.
00:30:23.000So, we should not even try to play that game.
00:30:25.000So, that's why, you know, again, not a big deal, but what it reflects about the thinking that's happening in the Republican Party and, again, in this Republican establishment trying to reassert itself in these ways, it's totally wrong.
00:30:39.000It has to be resisted, it has to be pointed out and called out for what it is.
00:30:45.000Because they are afraid of being called, oh, well, you know, if you call out the gay initiative, yeah, I guess you're a homophobe or something.
00:31:04.000I'm sorry, that sounds like globalism to me.
00:31:05.000You know, advancing this totally left wing, totally liberal, Western idea of individual rights and stuff, that sounds a lot like globalism to me.
00:31:15.000And we need real, authentic, Proper conservatives who know what the word means to stand up and say, no, no, you know, we're not about this.
00:31:23.000And, you know, look, maybe we understand that it's a small part and there's, you know, they have this consequentialist angle or whatever, but we want no business with that.
00:31:31.000And the other thing with Iran, this is the last thing I'll say before I move on to Bernie Sanders.
00:31:35.000I can think of a lot of other good ways, you know, and we have to question in the beginning, like, if we're trying to advance homosexuality in the world to delegitimize the Iranian regime, to have regime change in Iran.
00:31:49.000I think we really have to rethink what our foreign policy is, right?
00:31:53.000Shouldn't we have a foreign policy that maybe is not predicated on removing regimes that are traditionalist and maybe potential allies, right?
00:32:01.000I mean, you have to wonder there's a lot that's wrong with this picture.
00:32:06.000If we're advancing something that's demonstrably evil, biblically evil, in order to remove a regime which does not threaten us existentially or in any other way, That's kind of a big thing.
00:32:19.000What are we really doing in the first place?
00:32:21.000And look, even if we were going to do that, I can think of a thousand other ways.
00:33:30.000Yeah, liberals said there would be this fascist takeover of the country and journalists would be getting killed and there'd be mass deportations.
00:33:37.000But actually, all we're getting is Globo Homo everywhere.
00:34:46.000I think that's the most important way to look at the 2020 election, is in the context, obviously, of 2016.
00:34:51.000In 2016, I think Bernie Sanders had the advantage of being framed as the progressive ideologue, the outsider, the anti establishment, versus, of course, the antithesis of all of that in Hillary Clinton.
00:35:03.000You know, when you had other people in the 2016 Democratic primary besides Bernie Sanders, you had Martin O'Malley, you had Jim Webb.
00:35:51.000So in 2016, you had these other characters, but again, the fundamental foil in the Democratic Party and maybe the antecedent to this cleavage I've been talking about is the progressives, the outsiders versus the establishment.
00:36:07.000This is a big rift because, of course, you've had this brewing for a long time.
00:36:11.000I think Barack Obama created this, basically, because Barack Obama, of course, he was the president.
00:36:17.000So he was the leader of the party, and that's how it works.
00:36:20.000The president is automatically the leader of the DNC or the RNC.
00:36:25.000And as the leader of the party, he was at once a pragmatist, obviously, in the way that he governed.
00:36:29.000You look at the Affordable Care Act, this was probably the most ruthless, probably the best example of ruthless pragmatism in Washington, D.C. Because, of course, Barack Obama was this radical left wing guy.
00:36:41.000You know, I don't want to go full boomer, but look, I mean, to an extent, I think he was a Marxist.
00:36:45.000I think he was one of these believers in liberation theology and all this stuff.
00:36:50.000But by the same token, he was an ultimate pragmatist.
00:36:53.000He passed the Affordable Care Act, which basically doomed America to ultimately have some sort of national health care scheme.
00:37:01.000And you look at some of the other things that he did, he was very much a practical politician.
00:37:12.000He brought them home and he sent them right back in.
00:37:15.000But at the same time that he was a leftist and he was a pragmatist, he had this very radical rhetoric about, you know, you didn't build that, and this stuff about Trayvon Martin would have looked like my son.
00:37:26.000And so he sort of nurtured this fledgling radical left wing movement.
00:37:31.000A lot of the stuff that's been going on for a long time.
00:38:08.000Was a lot stronger because he was the only guy talking about, I'm a democratic socialist and I'm for free health care and free education and a $15 minimum wage.
00:38:17.000And so that was a very good position for him to be on.
00:38:19.000Obviously, he created this grassroots infrastructure in all 50 states and he was sort of seen as this charismatic leader, developed this cult of personality.
00:38:28.000A lot of people drew some parallels with Donald Trump in that.
00:38:32.000And so that was very big for him, very important.
00:38:34.000And although he'll carry on a lot of key benefits to that in 2020, he's got the name recognition, he's got the clout.
00:38:41.000You know, look, you got a lot of candidates out there trying to build themselves as true progressives, and he's the one who can say, I'm the original.
00:38:51.000You know me as the guy who's for free health care and for free education and all the rest.
00:38:56.000So he's got the name recognition, and with that comes the clout on progressive causes and all of that.
00:39:03.000And then he's got the infrastructure, the donor network, all of that is in place and everything.
00:39:08.000Now, that said, although there are some strengths, and he was a lot stronger in 2016.
00:39:12.000Where it's going to be a little bit weaker here is that it's a much more diverse field, both racially and in terms of ideology.
00:39:20.000So, a big problem that I think a lot of people are picking up on, and I think he picks up on it also.
00:39:25.000He said today after he announced that when we decide who we should elect or rather nominate for president, we shouldn't focus on things like gender or skin color or things like this.
00:39:35.000Now, why do you think he would say something like that?
00:39:37.000Why do you think, of all people, radical left wing progressive Bernie Sanders would say, Something like that, that we shouldn't consider race.
00:39:45.000We should essentially be colorblind, genderblind, all the rest.
00:39:49.000Well, of course, because you've got how many blacks, how many women, how many people of color running in this election alongside him.
00:39:57.000And this is where you begin to see why this left wing coalition is very fragile.
00:40:01.000A lot of people say, oh, you know, once we lose Texas, it's Democrats forever.
00:40:14.000Already, the party is completely unsustainable and untenable based on that sort of dynamic where Bernie Sanders enters the race and he has a lower chance of getting elected because he's not black, because he's not a woman.
00:40:26.000And I think it's a fair point to say that you look at who the actual Democratic caucus is in Iowa and New Hampshire in those early states, and probably they are more inclined to vote for a white person.
00:40:38.000I'll say that if you look at Iowa and New Hampshire.
00:40:40.000I don't think the race thing, you know, being a dark black person for Kamala Harris, I don't think that's a positive in Iowa, if I'm being totally honest.
00:40:47.000But if you look at just this sort of abstract self idea, you know, self concept of the Democratic Party, it is problematic for you to be a white man because.
00:40:58.000While the voters might be more comfortable with a white guy than a black person, at the same time, the entire democratic ideology, the whole framework of their system, is that blacks are oppressed, and non-whites are oppressed, and women are oppressed, and they need more representation.
00:41:17.000So, while on the one hand, the voters, they'll never say this, but on the one hand, the voters are totally more comfortable with a white guy, even if he's Jewish, than some dark African-American or whatever.
00:41:29.000I still think at the end of the day, that sort of contradiction in the self-concept of the Democratic Party does pose a problem.
00:41:37.000Because at the debate, look, Elizabeth Warren, Kamala Harris, they can be pulling out the cards all day long.
00:41:42.000Yeah, well, as a black woman or any other, Amy Klobuchar, well, as a woman or Cory Booker, as a black man, and what's Bernie Sanders got to do?
00:41:52.000He's just got to sit there and sort of take it.
00:41:55.000And we saw this play out during 2016 when he hosted a rally.
00:41:59.000Who showed up obnoxious, belligerent, loud, demanding, in totally uncharacteristic fashion?
00:42:06.000Black Lives Matter bursting on the scenes grabs the mic.
00:42:30.000But these are the internal contradictions that are created by left wing ideology.
00:42:34.000So the racial cleavage is going to be a little bit problematic.
00:42:39.000And then on the other hand, you have the ideological framework.
00:42:42.000Now, again, there's sort of two ways of looking at this.
00:42:45.000On the one hand, he's got the progressive thing captured, other people are trying to fight for that, and you've got more progressive people, and they'll be competing for that progressive, for the mantle of the leadership of that progressive wing.
00:43:00.000You've got to some extent Kamala Harris, to some extent Beto O'Rourke who might enter the race.
00:43:06.000But by the same token, he's got that big clout.
00:43:09.000On the other side of the issue, though, is that if Democrats are looking to elect some kind of a pragmatist, this is going to pave the way for an Ed Schultz independent run, or it's going to pave the way for some serious pragmatic candidate to take a plurality of the vote.
00:43:25.000If you've got the progressive vote split between Warren and Sanders and maybe O'Rourke, And you've got one really solid, pragmatic kind of a candidate.
00:43:38.000If you take the progressive vote and divide it by four, and you take the pragmatist vote in the Democratic primary and you divide it by two or one, well, who ends up winning the primary?
00:44:21.000I don't know how he thinks that can work.
00:44:24.000Aside from being bald and being perhaps closeted, he's got this, I don't know what it is, his lazy eye or something, or you can see the whites all around the irises, but he's got this wild look, and he just comes off as a little bit odd, a little bit weird guy.
00:44:41.000Klobuchar, you can tell she's nasty, another nasty woman.
00:44:45.000Elizabeth Warren, we saw that beer thing.
00:44:47.000So you look across the field, there's not a lot of winners.
00:44:50.000He's probably the most likable, the most authentic, so he's got that going for him.
00:44:54.000And then, if you look at the polling, ultimately, he's right up there.
00:44:58.000All the polling shows that it's Joe Biden number one, even though he hasn't entered the race, and Sanders at number two.
00:45:04.000You see that Biden is probably at about between 25 and 33.
00:45:11.000Probably the lowest I've seen for him is 23.
00:45:13.000And Sanders, he hovers around 15, between like 13 and 16, maybe.
00:45:18.000And so I would say that Sanders has got a pretty good chance.
00:45:20.000I'd say he's probably got the best chance of anybody that's in the race so far, and that's.
00:45:25.000You know, excluding Joe Biden, obviously, but it'll be a tough climb.
00:45:29.000But his entering the race only illustrates and reminds us of the fact that the Democratic Party is very unstable.
00:45:37.000And it will not happen like it happened for Republicans in 2016.
00:45:40.000People are comparing it to the 17, the infamous 17 person primary in 2016 in the GOP, where Trump came in and he was disruptive and he was loud and he was polarizing and he ripped apart the whole party and then he brought it back together.
00:46:25.000So when we look at this, when we survey the 2020 field, we look at Progressives and liberals and centrists, and all these other candidates.
00:46:33.000You know, Klobuchar, for example, said she's not for free four year college.
00:46:36.000Well, how's that going to compare to Bernie Sanders?
00:47:02.000I think it was Axelrod, David Axelrod, or somebody like that, who said that basically to become the president, you have to have this sense that you could probably just stab somebody on the debate stage.
00:47:12.000You have to have this edge to you that you will basically do whatever it takes.
00:47:17.000And you saw that in every president that's been elected so far.
00:47:20.000If they're unassuming or dumb, or maybe like Jimmy Carter, they're a little homely, every one of them, they have to have that edge that says, I could straight up cut somebody to win.
00:48:11.000You know, if we're talking about purely probability and the numbers we have in front of us, well, he's probably got the best infrastructure.
00:48:17.000But you look at all these divisions happening and all the competition.
00:48:21.000Is he going to be able to cut everybody down and unify the party?
00:49:20.000And it also, by the way, and there's the last thing I'll say before we move on to our Streamlabs and Super Chats is when you look at the divisions of the Democratic Party, it totally proves why Republicans are right.
00:49:31.000You know, if Republicans end up winning, rather, if this white preservation movement ends up winning through the Republican Party, it's because the Republican Party is homogeneous.
00:49:44.000You know, obviously, if what we're saying is true, then the Democratic Party, which is built on diversity, is going to fail.
00:49:52.000When you try to create a unified party of disparate and different groups, once they're not united in their opposition to the white man, it's going to fall apart very quickly.
00:50:01.000And the party of the white man, because it's homogeneous to the extent that it can be, it will, you know, even though it might be smaller in terms of numbers, it will be more powerful.
00:50:10.000It will be more coherent, more effective because it does not have these internal frictions and hostilities and contradictions that is latent in any diverse corporation of people.
00:50:21.000And I'm not saying corporation in a private sector sense.
00:50:24.000In the sense of the definition of the word, any corporate entity, whether that be a tribe, a business, any group of people, a team of sports or sports team rabbit, the more diverse it is, religiously, linguistically, racially, ethnically, in every way, shape, and form, it becomes weaker and more fragile.
00:54:06.000They blew up our movie theaters, our cinemas.
00:54:09.000They're stealing our nuclear material, the yellow cake, the plumbot.
00:54:13.000They stole it right out of the Mediterranean, all this other stuff.
00:54:16.000And this person looked me like straight in the eyes and said, yeah, okay, even if that's all true, We still have to support them no matter what they do because of what it says in the Bible.
00:54:26.000I'm like, are we reading the same Bible?
00:54:54.000When the Bible talks about Abraham and Moses and everything, all those people became Christians.
00:55:00.000That whole religion was completed, was actualized and manifested with the coming of Jesus Christ.
00:55:06.000So, when they in the Bible talk about the nation of Israel and Isaac and Isaiah and all these different characters, this all culminated in the birth and the crucifixion and the resurrection of Christ.
00:55:23.000All the people that put him to death, And the people who carried on with their little traditions and their sacrifices and the temple and all of that stuff, that rabbinical tradition is newer than Christianity.
00:55:33.000Christianity, I mean, the whole religion is encapsulated from the time of Abraham all the way through to Christ.
00:55:39.000And what you get afterwards is the tradition of the rabbis, of the Pharisees.
00:55:45.000So for all these evangelicals, oh, no, we have like the special connection or the special bond or something, these Judeo Christian values, look at the rabbinical tradition.
00:55:55.000There's not a lot of overlap between us and the Bible.
00:55:59.000Talmud, which is the rabbinical tradition, Judaism is properly known, you've got instances where the rabbis correct God, where God does something and the rabbis say, oh, no, no, you're wrong about that.
00:56:10.000And God says, oh, no, you guys are right.
00:56:12.000Does that sound like there's a lot of overlap between that and the scripture that we read?
00:56:17.000You know, I mean, there are excerpts in the Talmud about Jesus Christ burning and excrement and semen.
00:56:22.000They talk about how his mother was an adulterer, how he was an adulterer, and so on.
00:56:26.000A lot of overlap there between our religion and theirs.
00:56:31.000I'm not saying there's anything wrong with that.
00:58:40.000James Russell says, can't regime change Iran, can't form an anti Iran coalition with the world, can't sanction Iran properly, better push gay rhetoric on them.
00:59:22.000And Vox explains that if you look at Jordan Peterson, what he really is is a Gnostic.
00:59:28.000He says that he is a Christian, you know, or that he stresses how important Christianity is, but if you press him on the issues, and I've noticed this also, he doesn't really believe in God.
00:59:39.000He doesn't actually believe in Jesus Christ.
00:59:42.000Now, he'll tell you about the psychological Jungian significance of the biblical stories, but that's missing the core chief component, which is the belief in God the Father, Christ the Son, the Holy Spirit, right?
00:59:58.000And so Vox Day says that in that way he functions basically as an antichrist, selling this false religion of, again, neo Gnostic psychological stuff and this philosophy of balance, which is a totally pagan idea, as opposed to belief in.
01:00:15.000You know, God being real and Christ his son.
01:00:18.000So when I look at that, I think he's definitely controlled opposition.
01:00:21.000That combined with the fact that he goes against white identity, how can you?
01:00:26.000Well, it's just all these double standards.
01:02:50.000They had all these murals that were like, you know, black people rising up and everything.
01:02:54.000And she comes up and she's like, well, You know, I'm basically a bleeding heart liberal, and I went to Palestine, and oh, they were treating the Palestinians so poorly.
01:03:03.000And we're like, oh, so it's just another, like, boohoo, poor Palestinians rant.
01:03:09.000But then towards the end, it got so red pilled.
01:03:11.000I mean, she was just dropping them on everybody, and we were like, okay, she's hiding her power levels.
01:06:10.000You know, all these babies being born, it's giving me baby fever.
01:06:13.000I know I've said in the past, I'm going to wait a little bit.
01:06:17.000You know, I'm a cynical old bastard like me.
01:06:21.000I say to myself, oh, this old bag of bones, this old man, I'm going to have to wait a little while before I settle down, you know, before some lady will take me in, you know, maybe five years, maybe ten years before I'm really ready for that kind of thing.
01:06:36.000But, you know, I look at red elephants, Vince James, I look at his kids, and I'm like, because he's got beautiful kids, great kids, and I'm like, I need to have a couple of babies, I need to have a couple of little ones.
01:10:13.000Radio Storm says, Have you thought about an audio podcast on iTunes?
01:10:16.000Yeah, somewhat, but not enough to actually do it.
01:10:20.000Daddy Boom says, Demon craps are always calling us racist, but forgetting that Republicans were the ones who pushed for feminism, not on immigration and forced integration.
01:11:24.000Pragmatic Culture says your point about political cohesion among Republicans is very true and sounds like Peter Zihan in Electoral Demographics.
01:12:08.000He Alfish says, God's rainbow in the Bible wasn't a covenant, but an imperative to make Sodom and Gomorrah the capital of heaven and earth from the ashes of Iran.
01:14:13.000Nils Lee says, If Trump is reelected, you think he will still run on the border wall idea or start up something new like the abortion topic?
01:14:21.000All I hear on the news is how his wall plan is over now.
01:14:46.000If it weren't for the Irish, you probably wouldn't even have any literature or anything, according to some book I heard about one time from James Alsop.
01:14:55.000Eric writes, in fairness, what did the Irish really accomplish?
01:14:59.000In all fairness, probably about as much as Africa.
01:15:03.000Eric writes, please say something to give me a dopamine hit.
01:15:06.000I'm a stupid little baby who is incapable of making my life better.
01:15:10.000Let me get a white bill of food today.
01:15:40.000With regards to Afghanistan, you've got to understand that that was on the list in the 1990s of who they wanted to destroy.
01:15:47.000Afghanistan, I don't believe, was a strategic target in itself, but you have to look at where Afghanistan is located.
01:15:55.000And then if you're not getting it yet, Then look at where Iraq is located.
01:15:59.000And then you might begin to wonder why would it behoove certain interests for the American military to situate itself on the west and east border of Iran?
01:16:38.000The Taliban was a political force in many ways, like a regular political party, except they do use violence, militant means to achieve their goals.
01:16:48.000But nevertheless, they are an evolving part of the West Asian, I guess, broader Middle East political situation.
01:16:56.000And to a certain extent, we have to understand that we're not going to build a democracy there just so long as, I don't know, there's no training camps there.
01:17:04.000But at the same time, it should make more sense that, like, let's just not bring in Muslims anymore.
01:17:09.000Why do we have to make sure that, like, nowhere in the world is there a safe haven for terrorists?
01:17:41.000I mean, sure, the greater Casa's belly for Iraq was the weapons of mass destruction, but would there be that willingness, the jingoism, if not for the towers being knocked down?
01:21:18.000Rather than a Democrat, rather than a Marco Rubio or Ted Cruz.
01:21:23.000I'm not going to explain, we've explained this all week last week, but very low IQ take.
01:21:30.000I mean, really, the only people that are urging you to stop supporting Donald Trump are Democrats.
01:21:35.000You know, Democrats are trying to push this.
01:21:37.000You really wonder why, you know, the alt right and the Democrats have so much in common there.
01:21:42.000You know, why do you think Richard Spencer tells you to stop supporting Donald Trump?
01:21:45.000Is it because, you know, Richard Spencer really cares about the future of the country?
01:21:48.000Or because, in a weird way, Richard Spencer sees people being more loyal to Trump as an obstacle to people being more loyal to him and ruining their lives for him?
01:25:13.000All these people, women in the movement, women in the movement.
01:25:15.000Happened to be a woman in the movement who recorded it and then sent it to a woman in the movement who forwarded it to Reagan Battalion and Ben Shapiro.
01:25:23.000So thank you, women in the movement, for the setup.
01:25:27.000David S. says, Nick, do you think that Biden will run for 2020?
01:25:31.000And if so, do you think he'd get the Democratic nomination?
01:26:21.000I think he'll still get some of the black vote, but it does hurt them, you know, both of those things.
01:26:25.000On the homosexuals, yeah, that's very true.
01:26:28.000And it's funny because I feel like they used to pretend for a long time, like, isn't that what they all used to say when they would come out?
01:26:35.000Is I'm still the same person, but I just like guys, you know, or whatever.
01:26:42.000But curiously enough, then they came to be completely and totally defined by that one deviant proclivity.
01:26:50.000So it's sort of interesting because I'm more of a person than just my sexuality.
01:27:22.000Lord Akira says, the document you're referencing was called Project for the New American Century, which is spearheaded by Cheney and Rumsfeld around 97, bro.
01:27:30.000Project for the New American Century was a group, not a document.
01:27:35.000And no, I was actually referring to who was that general?
01:27:39.000He said in a few different speeches that there was a plan in 93 to invade Afghanistan and a bunch of other countries.
01:27:45.000But the documents I'm thinking of are the 96 Clean Break Memo and the 1980 Plan for Israel by.
01:27:56.000So, no, that's wrong what you're saying.
01:27:59.000Sniff Braps is a reminder that Jewish people were conquered by pagan Romans.
01:28:05.000Do we have a pagan supporter in the chat?
01:28:08.000Because I think I recall that there was a Roman emperor who colluded with the Jews to build the Third Temple, and it was only thwarted by acts of God.
01:28:17.000Pretty sure you should check up on your history there.
01:28:34.000I think they would still turn out for him.
01:28:37.000Zooch says Reminder to enter through the narrow gate, for wide is the gate and broad is the road that leads to destruction, and many enter through it.
01:29:04.000Sir Harkin says, I'm really trying to be a nationalist, but it's very difficult because of how gay and retarded this country and its people are becoming.