America First - Nicholas J. Fuentes - The Grand DACA Bargain | America First Ep. 82

00:00:00.000 Good evening, everybody.

00:00:01.000 You are watching America First.

00:00:03.000 My name is Nicholas J. Fuentes.

00:00:04.000 We have a great show for you tonight, functional this time.

00:00:08.000 This time we have audio and video, and we're live, unlike yesterday.

00:00:15.000 We had Paul Nealon on yesterday for a pretty solid interview.

00:00:18.000 I mean, he's a great guy.

00:00:19.000 He came on, and the content was good.

00:00:22.000 Unfortunately, as many people are aware, the technology is not quite there.

00:00:27.000 Boomer Tech turning it up to 2018 levels, I guess.

00:00:32.000 The problem was this, and I joked on Twitter, it was the ADL SPLC.

00:00:36.000 Jacob Wall didn't get that joke.

00:00:38.000 He thinks that was some kind of an anti Semitic conspiracy theory. 0.64

00:00:41.000 It was a joke, Jacob.

00:00:42.000 But what really happened with the computer yesterday, what normally happens, I have people on with Skype and my laptop.

00:00:49.000 I got this MacBook Air, can't handle the computing power.

00:00:53.000 So I got the streaming and the Skype going.

00:00:56.000 Usually that creates lag.

00:00:58.000 I tried to better the user experience by decreasing the amount of output that was coming out of the computer.

00:01:05.000 In the hopes that the CPU that OBS is using, that's the broadcasting, the streaming service would lower, and therefore there would be no lag.

00:01:13.000 It ended up just not giving enough video output.

00:01:15.000 But that's a lot of technical stuff.

00:01:18.000 We're on it.

00:01:18.000 I am in the works of acquiring a new computer that will be able to handle the computing power of all this high energy content.

00:01:27.000 So that is going to be fixed for the next Skype interview that we do.

00:01:30.000 It's fixed for tonight for the show.

00:01:32.000 But with that out of the way, we have a big show for you tonight.

00:01:36.000 Obviously, lots to talk about here.

00:01:38.000 With the DACA deal that is impending, the DACA deal that everybody is so concerned about, the black pillars are out in full force again, as they always are, saying that Donald Trump is cucking on DACA. 0.56

00:01:51.000 And of course, there was a big bipartisan negotiation today between congressional Democrats and Republicans with the president, talking about what kind of negotiation they could make happen with DACA. 0.86

00:02:04.000 Now, the two things to keep in mind as I explain what transpired today during that meeting and everything else.

00:02:11.000 That's going on.

00:02:12.000 The two things to keep in mind here are deadlines.

00:02:15.000 Number one, on January 19th, the government will run out of money.

00:02:20.000 The government doesn't pass budgets anymore, so it's all based on how much funding they allocated for the next six or nine months.

00:02:27.000 So on January 19th, funding will run out for the government, and the government will enter a partial government shutdown.

00:02:33.000 That's January 19th.

00:02:35.000 That's the first thing to take into consideration.

00:02:38.000 Number two, on March 5th, DACA recipients will lose their legal protection.

00:02:43.000 So if you know what DACA is, DACA is Deferred action on childhood arrivals, which means that if you arrived here when you were a child, and many of them are not children, by the way, most of them, in fact, are not children.

00:02:55.000 Many of them are 24 or older.

00:02:56.000 If that's a child, you know, I don't know.

00:02:59.000 But so deferred action on childhood arrivals, what that means is when they get here, they can apply for this program and they are legally protected.

00:03:06.000 They can't be deported if they're in school, if they have a job.

00:03:09.000 They have to meet a certain number of requirements.

00:03:11.000 Some of them skirt that anyway, a lot of them aren't meeting the requirements.

00:03:14.000 But under the program, If they got here at a certain point when they were kids, they can apply, and they have to apply for this process to have legal protections, and then they have to renew it every two years.

00:03:26.000 Well, back in September, Donald Trump terminated DACA.

00:03:29.000 That was an executive order under Barack Obama.

00:03:31.000 The program was established not via Congress, but via an executive order.

00:03:35.000 So Donald Trump was able to unilaterally terminate that with his executive powers as the president.

00:03:41.000 And on March 5th, all DACA legal protections expired.

00:03:46.000 So, if you were set to renew your DACA status, if you were set to renew your application to be able to have these legal protections, you can't do that after March 5th if it's after March 5th.

00:03:57.000 So, all those 1 million plus DACA recipients, all these illegals that are here, will lose their legal protection and they will face deportation.

00:04:06.000 So, those are the two things to keep in mind as I read you what's going on.

00:04:09.000 A little bit of foreshadowing for the 250 IQ analysis.

00:04:15.000 You have to have a high IQ to understand this show, okay? 0.99

00:04:17.000 We're not doing this for low IQ black pillars, low IQ feds, and people of the like. 1.00

00:04:24.000 You have to be able to keep these things in your head. 0.98

00:04:26.000 So, those are the two deadlines.

00:04:28.000 Government shutdown on January 19th.

00:04:30.000 DACA expires on March 5th.

00:04:32.000 Okay, so now we get into what happened today at the meeting.

00:04:37.000 Donald Trump said a lot of things which are out of character.

00:04:40.000 For example, he said that he'll sign any bill.

00:04:44.000 At the conclusion of the meeting, he says, Well, you know, I'm not really going to care so much if it has this or if it doesn't have this.

00:04:50.000 I'm going to sign the bill.

00:04:51.000 If Congress puts the bill in front of me, I'll sign it.

00:04:55.000 And this is with regards to DACA.

00:04:57.000 The meeting focused on four specific things, which were protection for DACA recipients, border security, Chain migration, which Democrats are now calling family based migration, which is a very clever turn to phrase, but it's chain migration, and the visa lottery system.

00:05:13.000 So during this meeting, those four things were discussed.

00:05:15.000 How are they going to move forward?

00:05:17.000 Donald Trump said that what they want to do in the Congress is kind of a two phase system, where phase one will be DACA and border security, and phase two will be comprehensive immigration reform.

00:05:29.000 So phase one will deal specifically with DACA, and also there will be border security, and then they will deal with the larger system.

00:05:36.000 In a second bill, and that's the comprehensive immigration reform.

00:05:40.000 He said a lot of uncharacteristic things.

00:05:43.000 For example, he said that this would be a, quote, bill of love, which is, of course, an homage, I think, to Jeb Bush, who said that illegal immigrants come here out of love.

00:05:53.000 And Jeb Bush did commend Donald Trump for saying that it would be a bill of love.

00:05:58.000 He says that everybody wants to protect DACA.

00:06:00.000 He says we want to do DACA.

00:06:01.000 We want to keep DACA recipients here.

00:06:05.000 He said that if it's done properly with border security and everything else, if it's done properly, I don't think it's going to be very complicated.

00:06:12.000 And so basically, he said that we want DACA.

00:06:15.000 He said that Republicans want DACA.

00:06:17.000 And for people that have been obviously following Donald Trump for years, Donald Trump understands the illegal immigration issue.

00:06:23.000 He campaigned, and even before he campaigned, he talked about how illegal aliens have to go back.

00:06:29.000 Illegal aliens won't vote Republican.

00:06:32.000 On the campaign, he said DACA kids have to go. 0.87

00:06:34.000 They're not dreamers.

00:06:35.000 We have dreamers.

00:06:36.000 They're killing us.

00:06:37.000 They're killing our jobs, and so on and so forth.

00:06:39.000 And so, for many people, when they hear this stuff, You hear Donald Trump saying it's a bill of love.

00:06:45.000 We want to protect the DACA kids.

00:06:47.000 We want to give them protection and so on and so on.

00:06:50.000 They think that's very out of character for Donald Trump.

00:06:53.000 And especially given that on Friday, the White House came out with a very extensive list of demands.

00:06:59.000 They came out on Friday and said that in order for the president and the Republican Party to move forward in the Congress, giving the DACA recipients legal protection, they're going to need $18 billion for a wall that's about $1,000.

00:07:16.000 Not the whole 2,000 feet southern border, but 1,000, or excuse me, 1,000 miles, 1,000 feet.

00:07:22.000 Not the whole 2,000 mile border, but 1,000 miles, about 1,000 miles of wall.

00:07:28.000 Where before he had said that might be a fence, it might be a virtual wall.

00:07:31.000 He said this in August when he was campaigning for Luther Strange.

00:07:35.000 On Friday, the White House laid out very concretely what the wall would look like.

00:07:39.000 They said it would be a physical, continuous barrier.

00:07:43.000 It would cost $18 billion, it would be 1,000 miles.

00:07:47.000 They wanted to bring on an additional 10,000 ICE agents.

00:07:50.000 They wanted, on top of the $18 billion wall, an additional, I believe it was $15 billion.

00:07:56.000 Yeah, an additional $15 billion in other funding for increased border security, for drones, for maintenance on the wall, for bringing on more ICE agents and so on.

00:08:06.000 They wanted to defund sanctuary cities.

00:08:09.000 So we have already kind of this mixed message where on Friday they said, We want a wall.

00:08:15.000 We want it to be 1,000 miles long.

00:08:17.000 It's going to cost $18 billion.

00:08:19.000 This is what it's going to look like.

00:08:20.000 We need all this other stuff or else no deal.

00:08:23.000 And we heard this back in September originally when the first DACA deal was talked about out of Chuck Schumer's office.

00:08:30.000 They came out with a list of demands shortly afterwards that had scuttled the entire deal.

00:08:34.000 They were going to do a deal on DACA back in fall, in September, October, but then this list of demands came out and they didn't do it.

00:08:40.000 Well, there was similar talk a couple of weeks ago about DACA coming back.

00:08:44.000 The list of demands came out yet again, and this time in far more detail on Friday.

00:08:49.000 And now all of a sudden, it seemed like the deal was out of reach since Friday because Chuck Schumer said, We're not going to fund a wall, we're not giving in to these unreasonable demands.

00:08:58.000 And now all of a sudden, just five days later, Or four days later, Donald Trump comes to the table with Democrats and Republicans and says, We want to protect DACA.

00:09:10.000 We don't have to have a wall.

00:09:12.000 In this meeting in particular, he actually said that the wall would only be 700 miles and it wouldn't be continuous and it would actually look more like a fence.

00:09:20.000 That's what he said in this meeting.

00:09:22.000 And here's another kind of a crucial piece about this meeting.

00:09:26.000 This is from Senator John Cornyn of Texas.

00:09:28.000 He said about this meeting, he was present, he said, It was one of the most extraordinary meetings.

00:09:33.000 Certainly, I have ever participated here in Washington, where the press was not only invited in the beginning, but stayed and stayed and stayed as we had a chance to talk about our views.

00:09:45.000 Well, that's kind of interesting, right? 0.92

00:09:48.000 Because if the rhetoric all Donald Trump's life has been no illegal immigrants, send them all back, even during the campaign specifically about DACA, we can't have them. 0.98

00:09:57.000 We have these talks in September about renewing DACA, they get scuttled with the demands. 1.00

00:10:02.000 We have the talks about DACA in December, they get scuttled with the demands.

00:10:05.000 Now we have another talk.

00:10:08.000 Which seemingly contradicts yet again the very hardline DACA position that the Trump administration took.

00:10:14.000 And it's very telling that we had journalists here.

00:10:17.000 It's very telling that Senator Michael Cornyn says that not only was the press welcome, not only were they invited, but they stayed and they stayed and they stayed.

00:10:26.000 And they listened to what everybody had to say about DACA.

00:10:29.000 Well, isn't that interesting?

00:10:31.000 Has Donald Trump been very welcoming to the press?

00:10:33.000 Does Donald Trump invite the press to a lot of stuff?

00:10:37.000 I think that should be the first alarm bell that goes off in your head is that.

00:10:37.000 It's very peculiar.

00:10:42.000 The press is there.

00:10:43.000 It's this big public display.

00:10:45.000 And pay attention to what Trump is saying.

00:10:47.000 Pay attention to exactly what Trump is saying.

00:10:50.000 He says he'll sign anything, we'll do anything.

00:10:52.000 And then he also said this, which is very significant.

00:10:55.000 He says, If it's done properly with, you know, security and everything else, if it's done properly, I don't think it's going to be that complicated.

00:11:03.000 Now, that's very telling.

00:11:05.000 Because if you watch the video clip, the way he says it, he says, Well, you know, if it's done properly, and of course, that includes security and everything else, but, you know, if it's done properly, That's a significant caveat.

00:11:15.000 He's saying if we have security and DACA, we can pass the bill.

00:11:20.000 Well, what does security mean?

00:11:22.000 What does security mean?

00:11:24.000 In the opinion of the White House, in the official statement from the White House, it's an $18 billion, 1,000 mile wall.

00:11:30.000 It's $15 billion for 10,000 more ICE agents.

00:11:34.000 It's defunding sanctuary cities.

00:11:36.000 It's ending chain migration.

00:11:37.000 It's ending the visa lottery system.

00:11:40.000 Well, in this meeting, Trump says, well, you know, security and everything else, but, you know, otherwise it's not that complicated.

00:11:47.000 That's what he's saying.

00:11:48.000 It's also telling to see what everybody else is saying about this.

00:11:51.000 Representative Mark Meadows, who is the chairman of the House Freedom Caucus, said that the two phase plan is a non starter.

00:11:57.000 So, Donald Trump said initially and during this meeting, he said that we'll do it in two phases.

00:12:02.000 We'll do DACA and border security, which border security, he hasn't really defined what that meant.

00:12:07.000 In this meeting, he said, yeah, it has to include border security, but other than that, it's not that complicated.

00:12:12.000 Well, on Friday, he said that border security means all the stuff that the Democrats have already said they're not going to do.

00:12:19.000 Well, Mark Meadows says even the two-phase plan, even if he had dock insecurity and then comprehensive immigration reform, we couldn't do that.

00:12:26.000 Chuck Schumer said if there's a wall, we can't do that.

00:12:29.000 But Donald Trump says, well, if they put it in front of me, I will sign it.

00:12:34.000 Well, does it look like anything's going to be put in front of Donald Trump's desk?

00:12:37.000 Pay attention to exactly what he's saying.

00:12:40.000 If they put something in front of me, if they put legislation in front of me, I will sign it.

00:12:45.000 Well, if Chuck Schumer says that if there's a wall included, he's not going to sign it.

00:12:50.000 And Donald Trump is saying it has to have security and DACA, and DACA means a wall.

00:12:55.000 And if Mark Meadows says if it's two phases, we're not going to sign it, is there going to be a deal put in front of Donald Trump's desk?

00:13:03.000 No, probably not.

00:13:04.000 I mean, think of it this way, and this is where the two conditions come into play.

00:13:09.000 If Republicans don't make a deal, DACA expires, DACA recipients get deported.

00:13:14.000 If the Democrats don't make a deal, DACA expires, DACA recipients get deported.

00:13:19.000 If the Democrats agree, If the Republicans agree, if President Trump agrees, if all three are in alignment, then maybe some will not be deported.

00:13:30.000 Has that happened at any point in this entire administration that Chuck Schumer, Nancy Pelosi, the GOP Republicans in the House and the Senate, and Donald Trump have all agreed on anything?

00:13:40.000 You really have to think about what exactly is being said here.

00:13:44.000 And so during this meeting, again, this contradicts so much of what he's been saying on Friday, so much of what he's been saying overall about DACA, and this really harkens back to.

00:13:53.000 The exact same thing happening in September.

00:13:56.000 I mean, people are already very much up in arms about this, about what Donald Trump's been saying about DACA.

00:14:02.000 But this exact same thing happened play for play in September.

00:14:07.000 And in September 13th, it came out of Chuck Schumer's office that Donald Trump had reached a deal with Nancy Pelosi, Chuck Schumer, and the Democrats that they would give protection for DACA recipients and not fund a border wall.

00:14:20.000 This was a story September 13th of 2017.

00:14:24.000 Almost the exact same thing out of Chuck Schumer's office.

00:14:28.000 We've reached a deal.

00:14:29.000 Everybody agrees. 0.99

00:14:30.000 We're going to protect DACA recipients in no while.

00:14:33.000 And remember, remember how angry the base got. 0.64

00:14:36.000 Remember how the black pillars were everywhere. 0.95

00:14:38.000 Trump has cucked.

00:14:40.000 Trump is giving up DACA.

00:14:42.000 They're giving up DACA.

00:14:43.000 They've given away everything.

00:14:44.000 He's cucked on immigration.

00:14:46.000 Hannity, Ann Coulter, Breitbart called him Amnesty Don.

00:14:49.000 Everybody was furious.

00:14:51.000 And within a week, Stephen Miller torpedoed the entire thing with the list of demands.

00:14:56.000 We have to have a border wall.

00:14:57.000 We have to have this and that and everything else.

00:15:01.000 Same thing happened in December.

00:15:02.000 The tweets about DACA.

00:15:03.000 We would love to do a deal on DACA, but the Democrats won't make it happen.

00:15:07.000 We'd love to make a deal on DACA.

00:15:08.000 They'd vote Republican, even though Donald Trump has tweeted in 2013 and 2014 that they would never vote Republican even if we gave them amnesty.

00:15:16.000 So he knows, but he tweeted it anyway.

00:15:18.000 And everybody got all up in arms. 0.98

00:15:20.000 Donald Trump is cucking, even on Nationalist Review. 0.97

00:15:23.000 Me and James talked about it. 0.99

00:15:25.000 James said, he's cucking, he's giving it away, he's a boober, he doesn't know we have to jump ship.

00:15:30.000 And then by Friday, another list of demands, another deal sunk.

00:15:34.000 And now here we are again with this meeting, and Trump is saying things that are very out of character.

00:15:39.000 But if you read exactly what's being said, it fits into this idea that he's framing the conversation.

00:15:45.000 And you think about these two deadlines here.

00:15:47.000 You think about the deal that is being put together.

00:15:50.000 Trump is saying, give me everything I want and I'll give you DACA.

00:15:53.000 Well, the Democrats are not going to give him a wall.

00:15:56.000 And here's why this is going to work because the Democrats will lose if they give Donald Trump the wall.

00:16:02.000 The Democrats give Trump the wall, they get killed in the midterms.

00:16:06.000 I mean, their party has no legitimacy, their party has no basis for existing.

00:16:11.000 Since the election, the Democrats have existed almost solely and completely on the basis that they are resisting Trump.

00:16:17.000 They're impeding Trump.

00:16:18.000 They're stopping him from implementing his terrible fascist policies.

00:16:23.000 Well, if they give him the wall, if they vote on a bill that builds the wall, they lose.

00:16:28.000 They won't do that.

00:16:29.000 DACA will not be protected.

00:16:31.000 They won't give away a wall.

00:16:32.000 If they make no deal, every day between when Donald Trump rescinded DACA and when DACA expires, a thousand DACA recipients lose legal status until March 5th when they all do.

00:16:46.000 January 19th, the government shuts down.

00:16:48.000 And who is affected?

00:16:50.000 Public sector people, people on welfare, in a word, Democrat voters.

00:16:54.000 So, what this is setting up to be is putting all the leverage, all the pressure against Democrats to concede and give Trump everything he wants.

00:17:01.000 And every day, I'm sure, the deal gets worse for them.

00:17:04.000 You have to think about it in terms of what is actually being said, what is actually being demanded.

00:17:10.000 People can say, oh, well, Trump said this, Trump said that, Trump said everything else.

00:17:14.000 Trump is saying if there's no border security, there will be no DACA deal.

00:17:19.000 Border security means an $18 billion wall.

00:17:22.000 Chuck Schumer says they will not budge on the wall.

00:17:24.000 They won't give it to him.

00:17:26.000 In the meantime, a thousand DACA recipients every day lose legal status. 0.89

00:17:30.000 By March 5th, they all do.

00:17:32.000 And then you have to take into consideration the government shutdown.

00:17:35.000 Take into consideration what the rhetoric will be during the government shutdown.

00:17:39.000 Think of how this will play on January 19th when there's no deal.

00:17:43.000 On January 19th, when the government shuts down, and that's in a little bit over a week, the rhetoric will be Donald Trump and the Republicans are responsible for the government shutdown.

00:17:54.000 Donald Trump and the government are incompetent, and that's why people aren't getting their checks and the national parks are closed.

00:18:00.000 Well, Donald Trump can say, I was going to give you everything.

00:18:03.000 I was going to concede on the wall.

00:18:05.000 I said, I'll sign whatever you give me.

00:18:08.000 I said, as long as there's reasonable security, I'll sign DACA protection, but you resisted me.

00:18:13.000 You didn't want to negotiate.

00:18:14.000 You're the obstructionist.

00:18:15.000 You have to think of how this will play.

00:18:17.000 Additionally, you look at what Trump said during the meeting.

00:18:20.000 This was reported by an NBC reporter that Trump specifically and deliberately reframed what it would mean to pass a clean bill.

00:18:28.000 Everybody's talking about a clean spending bill in order to fund the government and not including DACA or including DACA, and that would be clean, that would get the government funded, and then we could deal with immigration.

00:18:39.000 And this was the rhetoric certainly many years ago when Barack Obama's government shut down because of Obamacare.

00:18:45.000 There was all this talk about clean bills.

00:18:47.000 We have to pass a clean spending bill to fund the government that doesn't include this defund Obamacare stuff.

00:18:53.000 And that's how the Republicans got killed when this happened because everybody said, why can't the Republicans just pass a clean bill?

00:19:00.000 Why can't they just pass a clean bill that will fund the government and not defund Obamacare?

00:19:07.000 The Democrats didn't own that government shutdown because they flipped the narrative, they flipped the rhetoric, and they put it on the Republicans.

00:19:14.000 Republicans shut it down because they were trying to achieve something.

00:19:17.000 They were trying to achieve the defunding of Obamacare.

00:19:20.000 They wouldn't pass a clean bill, and therefore it's their responsibility, even though it would have funded Obamacare.

00:19:25.000 Not to get into that, but they lost the rhetorical battle.

00:19:30.000 January 19th, Donald Trump says today.

00:19:33.000 That a clean bill means in this context for funding the government would mean DACA and security.

00:19:39.000 He went out of his way in this meeting to say that a clean bill is not just DACA, but it's DACA and security.

00:19:47.000 He just tweeted moments ago, it's about DACA and security.

00:19:51.000 He said in the meeting, it won't be complicated so long as there's DACA and security.

00:19:57.000 When the government shuts down, Donald Trump will be able to say, I want to pass a clean bill.

00:20:02.000 I want to pass a clean bill that includes security, that includes funding for the border wall, but the Democrats won't let me.

00:20:09.000 I said I'd give them, I would compromise on the wall.

00:20:11.000 I said it would be not.

00:20:12.000 I said it would be 700 miles instead of 900.

00:20:12.000 Continuous.

00:20:15.000 I said it wouldn't cost as much.

00:20:17.000 It would just be border security, but they wouldn't budge.

00:20:19.000 I said I would take the heat off of Republicans and Democrats.

00:20:22.000 I would take everything on and I would own this, but they wouldn't negotiate.

00:20:27.000 They wouldn't make it happen.

00:20:29.000 And so this makes it so that Democrats own the failure on January 19th.

00:20:33.000 They own the government shutdown, and this builds its way into the midterms.

00:20:37.000 This builds its way into the primaries.

00:20:39.000 And then in March, they own DACA being rescinded.

00:20:42.000 Either that Or they give up everything.

00:20:44.000 Either that, or they give up the border wall.

00:20:47.000 They give up sanctuary cities. 0.91

00:20:49.000 They give up chain migration.

00:20:50.000 They give up the visa lottery system.

00:20:52.000 These are all the things that are part of the demands.

00:20:55.000 And you have to consider this too.

00:20:58.000 During the meeting, Donald Trump specifically said that he wants to end chain migration specifically for the DACA program.

00:21:07.000 Now, if you consider that DACA is a little bit over a million people, there's a little over 1 million illegals here that are on DACA.

00:21:15.000 And you consider that the most damage would come from DACA from the chain migration. 0.67

00:21:21.000 I mean, DACA is bad enough in and of itself that you have a little bit over a million people that have arrived here as children and they have this legal protection.

00:21:29.000 When you consider that 1.5 million immigrants are coming here a year and the vast majority of that new immigration is being driven by chain migration, the vast majority of damage that comes from the DACA recipients is not the 1 million people who are here, which is not like a significant number. 0.65

00:21:44.000 I mean, of course it's bad. 0.99

00:21:46.000 Of course we want the legals out.

00:21:47.000 But you consider that that's.

00:21:49.000 A little bit over 1 million DACA recipients here compared to a million and a half per year. 0.74

00:21:54.000 And the most damage that would come from the DACA recipients is other people that would come as a result of chain migration. 0.73

00:22:01.000 If you consider that the deal would be building a border wall, ending chain migration, both for DACA and for outside, ending the visa lottery system, adding another 10,000 ICE agents, defunding sanctuary cities, would that be the end of the world? 0.85

00:22:18.000 I mean, of course, we would have to see it.

00:22:20.000 I don't want DACA to.

00:22:21.000 To be legalized. 0.62

00:22:22.000 I think that would be a hill to die on.

00:22:23.000 But I mean, if we looked at a deal that was put forward, and I don't think that's going to be likely, but if that was the case, numerically it would be a win.

00:22:32.000 Numerically, if you're looking purely at the arithmetic in terms of massively cutting immigration for decades and decades and decades by getting rid of chain migration, ending immigration for decades and decades and decades by getting rid of the visa lottery system, ending outright illegal immigration by building the wall.

00:22:53.000 I mean, would that not be worth 1 million people, which would be entirely static because they wouldn't have chain migration to bring more people in?

00:23:00.000 I'm not saying I would be for that.

00:23:01.000 We would have to see anything before we're for or against a deal.

00:23:05.000 But you have to think of it in terms of there's really no way to lose here.

00:23:09.000 The phase one, phase two stuff is not going to happen.

00:23:12.000 The DACA protection without a wall is not going to happen.

00:23:15.000 The DACA protection without anything else is not going to happen.

00:23:19.000 We're really in a win win position where the most likely scenario is that Democrats will not budge.

00:23:26.000 Negotiations will fail, and Democrats will own the government shutdown.

00:23:31.000 There will be no deal made after that.

00:23:33.000 DACA will expire.

00:23:35.000 They'll lose their legal protection, and Democrats will own that.

00:23:38.000 And that is what I forecast to happen no deal will happen.

00:23:41.000 DACA will expire.

00:23:42.000 They will all lose legal protection.

00:23:44.000 It'll be a major loss for Democrats.

00:23:47.000 Hopefully, and if everything else goes according to plan, midterms go well, we get a much stronger majority in the Senate.

00:23:54.000 We get better quality Republicans in both the Senate and the House.

00:23:57.000 We're able to pass much better immigration reform the next year or the year afterwards.

00:24:04.000 That's not obviously ideal.

00:24:05.000 We would like to see a wall built now, but we've talked at length about the Congressional restrictions and limitations that exist right now.

00:24:13.000 The worst case scenario, and this is the worst case scenario the worst case scenario is the Democrats are forced to negotiate either by the government shutdown or DAC expiring on March 5th, and all recipients lose their legal protection.

00:24:27.000 And we get an end to chain migration, an end to the visa lottery system.

00:24:32.000 We get the wall.

00:24:33.000 We get another $15 billion for border security.

00:24:36.000 We defund sanctuary cities.

00:24:37.000 We get all kinds of other concessions and the $1 million illegal stay.

00:24:42.000 Again, I think we would have to look at that.

00:24:44.000 And people are saying, no, we can't have DACA.

00:24:46.000 We can't have it. 0.96

00:24:47.000 And I'm with you.

00:24:48.000 I'm with you. 0.70

00:24:49.000 We don't want DACA. 0.83

00:24:50.000 We don't want them to stay. 0.85

00:24:52.000 That said, it's arithmetic.

00:24:54.000 It's arithmetic.

00:24:55.000 And it doesn't play well with the base, obviously, to bring in the very real and practical considerations.

00:25:00.000 But if you're talking about cutting immigration in half over the next 50 years, you're talking about millions and millions and millions of immigrants with high birth rates not coming here in exchange for a static group of people to stay.

00:25:15.000 And already there's 40 million illegals here that are not being deported anytime soon.

00:25:20.000 Again, you just have to look at it practically.

00:25:22.000 This is the same stuff.

00:25:24.000 It's sort of the same principle that you heard discussed in the Sargon versus Richard Spencer debate.

00:25:29.000 Richard Spencer made a very good point about lived experience, about what happens in the real world versus what happens in this abstract, metapolitical, kind of philosophical realm that a lot of people like to live in. 0.51

00:25:43.000 If you're talking about DACA purely on abstract grounds, purely as a political, Abstraction, a theoretical abstraction, you would say that no DACA recipients should be here ever.

00:25:54.000 That any single illegal alien in this country is the gravest offense, the gravest injustice, that the state should allow this, that people should have to endure this, and so on and so forth. 0.96

00:26:06.000 It is completely unacceptable that any DACA recipients stay here. 1.00

00:26:10.000 That's the abstraction. 1.00

00:26:12.000 That's the political theory.

00:26:13.000 But if you're looking at it pragmatically, if you're looking at it practically speaking, we look at the DACA recipients, there's less than 2 million of them. 0.99

00:26:22.000 Less than 2 million DACA recipients, and that's very much higher.

00:26:26.000 I think it's something like 1.2 or 1.6.

00:26:28.000 It's not even near 2 million.

00:26:29.000 It's somewhere a little bit more than 1 million, depending on which numbers you're looking at.

00:26:34.000 There's a little bit more than 1 million.

00:26:36.000 When you consider that legal immigration every year is 1.5 million, when you consider that there's 40 million illegal immigrants in this country, does it not make sense to cut just the heap of legal immigration that's coming our way?

00:26:53.000 In a small number, or to cut illegal immigration in this country by ending funding for sanctuary cities, than to die on this hill of a million people there.

00:27:03.000 I mean, again, if it were ideal, if we were living in an ideal world where we had huge majorities in the Senate and the House and we could do this all by ourselves, and people say that we can.

00:27:14.000 Unfortunately, we cannot.

00:27:16.000 You look at what the majorities are comprised of in either chambers of Congress, whether it's the Senate where we have a 51 vote majority, 52, I guess, if you count VP. Pence as the tiebreaker.

00:27:28.000 You look at, for example, Susan Collins, Bob Corker, Marco Rubio, Jeff Flake.

00:27:33.000 Those are four people that you will never win over to border security.

00:27:38.000 Those are four people you will never win over to any kind of overhaul of the immigration system that would get the kind of deportations and the kind of ending to legal immigration that you want.

00:27:49.000 You look at the House, which is far more complicated, but even there, you have massive caucuses of Republicans.

00:27:54.000 You have awesome numbers of Republicans, and I don't mean awesome in a positive way, I mean it in a large way, that are moderate, that are left leaning, that are not conservative at all.

00:28:05.000 They're.

00:28:06.000 Republicans in name only that will not give us anything better.

00:28:09.000 And so when you look at the political constraints, you look at the numbers in play here, and you're talking about a deal hypothetically, and I don't like to talk about hypotheticals because then people say you're for legalizing DACA, you're cucking your shilling, which is not what I'm saying.

00:28:23.000 But if you're talking about a hypothetical deal, which would even cut immigration in half, which would even cut immigration in half, in 10 years, you have cut out 7 million legal immigrants from coming here.

00:28:37.000 If they have a birth rate of over 2.1, Which is actually like 2.26 for Mexico and higher in other places in Central and South America, you would probably be looking at 7 million legal immigrants and then maybe an additional 7 million if they all have kids, which the statistics show that they do.

00:28:37.000 7 million.

00:28:54.000 So you're talking about probably 20 million people in 10 years that you're getting rid of if you reach a good deal over DACA, if you use DACA as a bargaining chip.

00:29:06.000 And again, this is only meant as a thought experiment to show you what is possible.

00:29:11.000 And this is the worst case scenario.

00:29:13.000 Worst case scenario is that we cut legal immigration in a massive way.

00:29:17.000 We get a great deal, and unfortunately, we have to make a concession on DACA, which, even that, I'm not convinced would be the end of the world.

00:29:25.000 And if you think, and again, if you don't believe any of this about the deal, people say this is four dimensional chess.

00:29:32.000 People say, Nick, this is way out of the realm of possibility. 0.94

00:29:35.000 Trump could just be cucking. 0.98

00:29:37.000 Trump could just be cucking, or he's compromised. 1.00

00:29:40.000 They have his family, or they've poisoned him. 0.98

00:29:42.000 I hear all these crazy conspiracy theories, which.

00:29:45.000 I don't know if it's fair to call them crazy because, you know, the things I talk about, like the moon being artificial or, you know, whatever. 0.94

00:29:51.000 But people who say that Trump is purely cucking, it's impossible that this is a play. 0.86

00:29:56.000 It's impossible that he's using leverage.

00:29:58.000 It's impossible that he's making a deal.

00:30:00.000 For people that say that he's just cucking, it's in his book, it's in the art of the deal.

00:30:07.000 You know, people tell me all the time, when I predicted this in September, I said this in September, I said, it sounds like he's cucking, but something else is happening. 0.57

00:30:15.000 I said, if he's cucking on it, I'm against him.

00:30:17.000 I'm off the Trump train, but he's probably not.

00:30:19.000 And he wasn't.

00:30:20.000 In April with Syria, I said the same thing.

00:30:23.000 If there's war in Syria, I'll be off the Trump train.

00:30:26.000 But he probably isn't. 0.58

00:30:27.000 It's probably a deal with China and North Korea.

00:30:29.000 With Iran, everybody said he's going to war in Iran.

00:30:33.000 The military industrial complex is going to war.

00:30:35.000 There's going to be regime change in Iran this week.

00:30:38.000 And I said, no, no, no.

00:30:39.000 Look at what's going on.

00:30:40.000 If there is war in Iran, if there is regime change, I'll be off the Trump train.

00:30:44.000 But I don't think there will be.

00:30:45.000 It was actually a deal with North Korea again.

00:30:45.000 And there wasn't.

00:30:49.000 Now, here we are.

00:30:50.000 Here we are, the same old song and dance, and the black pillars are out there. 1.00

00:30:55.000 Trump is cucking. 0.99

00:30:56.000 DACA is going to be legalized, blah, blah, blah. 0.99

00:30:58.000 And look, if what he is saying in this meeting is representative of what will happen, we're done with Trump.

00:31:04.000 We are finished with him.

00:31:06.000 If what he's saying in this meeting comes to fruition, which is in exchange for DACA, we'll get a 700 mile fence, I'm off the Trump train.

00:31:14.000 If he says that legalizing DACA is his number one priority and he'll sign anything, I'm so off.

00:31:21.000 I should have been off yesterday.

00:31:22.000 That's how fast I'll be off the Trump train.

00:31:24.000 If what he said in this meeting is representative of what will happen in the future, I don't think it will be.

00:31:30.000 And if you don't believe any of this contextual evidence, if you don't believe that all this stuff, all the history that Trump has shown that this is the way he operates and all the evidence that suggests otherwise, if you look at the language and everything else, it's in his book.

00:31:47.000 And we'll go to chapter two, which is called Trump Cards.

00:31:47.000 It's in his book.

00:31:51.000 I encourage everyone to read this book.

00:31:53.000 I've been encouraging everyone to read this book since the guy got elected because.

00:31:58.000 How can people sit around and predict what the president is doing, what the strategy is, what the thought process is, if they haven't read his book?

00:32:06.000 Read his book.

00:32:07.000 He lays out his strategy, chapter two, folks.

00:32:11.000 He lays out his entire strategy, his tactics, his playbook.

00:32:15.000 It's in chapter two of his book.

00:32:17.000 It's not even 50 pages in.

00:32:19.000 He starts talking about, well, here's how I win at everything all the time, here's how I make deals.

00:32:23.000 And so this is from The Art of the Deal, chapter two Trump Cards.

00:32:28.000 The elements of the deal.

00:32:29.000 And so one of the Trump cards is called Protect the Downside and the Upside Will Take Care of Itself.

00:32:34.000 He says, People think I'm a gambler.

00:32:38.000 I've never gambled in my life.

00:32:40.000 To me, a gambler is someone who plays slot machines.

00:32:43.000 I prefer to own slot machines.

00:32:46.000 It's a very good business being the house.

00:32:48.000 It's been said that I believe in the power of positive thinking.

00:32:51.000 In fact, I believe in the power of negative thinking.

00:32:54.000 I always, I happen to be very conservative in business.

00:32:58.000 I always go into the deal anticipating the worst.

00:33:01.000 If you plan for the worst, If you can live with the worst, the good will always take care of itself.

00:33:06.000 There it is.

00:33:07.000 If you plan for the worst, the good will take care of itself.

00:33:10.000 What's the worst that will happen here?

00:33:12.000 The worst that will happen in this case is that there's no deal.

00:33:16.000 In the sense that if all these negotiations fall apart, if he doesn't get the wall and ending chain migration and ending the visa lottery system, there's no deal.

00:33:27.000 What happens if there's no deal?

00:33:28.000 DACA expires, Democrats own the government shutdown.

00:33:32.000 Big political win, massive political win, not just now, but for the midterms.

00:33:36.000 Not only that, DACA people start getting deported. 0.73

00:33:39.000 That's a major promise fulfilled in his campaign. 0.97

00:33:42.000 He could say, Look, I was against it all along.

00:33:46.000 So he took care of the downside.

00:33:48.000 Upside takes care of itself.

00:33:49.000 If he gets everything he wants, we're ahead for it.

00:33:52.000 The next Trump card that is relevant to this deal he says, Use your leverage.

00:33:56.000 The worst thing you can possibly do in a deal is seem desperate to make it.

00:34:01.000 That makes the other guy smell blood, and then you're dead.

00:34:04.000 The best thing you can do is deal from strength, and leverage is the biggest strength you can have.

00:34:08.000 Leverage is having something the other guy wants, or better yet, needs, or best of all, simply can't do without.

00:34:17.000 Well, what's the leverage here?

00:34:18.000 The leverage is DACA.

00:34:20.000 He's using DACA as leverage.

00:34:22.000 He does not want DACA.

00:34:24.000 He will not legalize DACA.

00:34:26.000 You know, people who want us to believe that he's cucked or whatever, the black pillars, they want us to believe that Trump was against illegal immigration all his life.

00:34:36.000 Trump was against immigration all his life.

00:34:39.000 He was against illegal and legal immigration for 35 years.

00:34:44.000 He went on television talking about how he didn't like it.

00:34:46.000 He launched his campaign talking about how he didn't like illegal and legal immigration.

00:34:52.000 He campaigned specifically against DACA, against illegal immigration.

00:34:55.000 He's tweeted even before he campaigned that even if we legalized DACA, they wouldn't vote Republican.

00:35:01.000 It wouldn't even benefit the Republican Party.

00:35:04.000 He wins.

00:35:05.000 He can finally do what he's been saying for 40 years, what he believes.

00:35:05.000 It's massive.

00:35:09.000 The black pillars want us to believe that he did a 180 on all of that. 1.00

00:35:13.000 He just decided one day, you know, that stuff I've been saying for 35 years in public and in private and what I ran and campaigned on. 0.98

00:35:21.000 I actually don't believe that anymore.

00:35:22.000 I forgot all of that.

00:35:24.000 I'm doing a complete 180 because it would be good media coverage, even though he hates the media, even though he hates the media.

00:35:33.000 He's doing the fake news awards next week.

00:35:35.000 And, you know, do you even have to cite the hatred of this president for the media and how they've gone after his family and gone after him in the worst, most vicious ways?

00:35:44.000 So people are saying theory one, theory one is that he cucked, he just did a 180 on everything for no reason because, you know, good media coverage or this kind of ambiguous.

00:35:56.000 Conspiracy theory with no evidence that he's being compromised somehow, that they got to him, they have his family at gunpoint.

00:36:03.000 People literally say this that, well, it's not totally irrational.

00:36:06.000 What if they have his family at gunpoint?

00:36:08.000 Well, if they have his family at gunpoint, then I don't blame him.

00:36:11.000 If they have his family at gunpoint, then I don't think anyone can blame him, and I don't think anyone could blame me for not predicting that the deep state suddenly outed themselves and overtly threatened the president with lethal intent.

00:36:23.000 So, theory one is that Trump did a complete 180, totally irrational, totally inconsistent.

00:36:29.000 Just boggles the mind.

00:36:30.000 There's no reason why he would do that.

00:36:32.000 There's absolutely no reason why he would do that.

00:36:34.000 But that's theory one.

00:36:36.000 Theory two is that just like with Syria in April, just like with DACA in September, just like Iran in December, just like DACA in December, he is using DACA as leverage.

00:36:47.000 He is using it as leverage.

00:36:48.000 He is using it to frame.

00:36:50.000 He is using it to change the conversation.

00:36:52.000 He is using it to force the Democrats into a position where they cannot win.

00:36:57.000 He is using it so that either he gets the wall and everything he wants, which is almost 100% unlikely.

00:37:04.000 Or he gets a free pass to blame Democrats for a government shutdown, and he gets a free pass to end DACA and blame it on the Democrats.

00:37:12.000 These are your two theories.

00:37:13.000 Which sounds more outlandish?

00:37:15.000 That for no reason he does a complete 180 on everything he's ever believed, and like maybe it's because the deep state has instituted a coup, if you believe that?

00:37:24.000 Or number two, basic strategy as outlined in his book, as practiced since his inauguration, as practiced explicitly and demonstrably at least four times.

00:37:36.000 Like, So visible four times in the past year.

00:37:40.000 I don't know.

00:37:41.000 I don't know.

00:37:42.000 I think it's up for people to decide.

00:37:43.000 I mean, you decide.

00:37:45.000 Is it the deep state coup?

00:37:46.000 Is it that he cucked on everything, just did a complete 180?

00:37:49.000 I don't know, for whatever reason.

00:37:51.000 Or it just fits in line with his book, everything he's done since he got elected and his methods, all of that.

00:37:57.000 You decide.

00:37:57.000 I don't know.

00:37:58.000 But that's Donald Trump and DACA.

00:38:01.000 I think another white pill here is that Jeff Sessions is actually starting to revoke citizenship.

00:38:06.000 I don't know if people saw this.

00:38:07.000 This kind of got lost among the talk about DACA.

00:38:10.000 This might be further. 0.57

00:38:13.000 I saw this just today and it was such a massive white pill.

00:38:16.000 Jeff Sessions, with the Department of Justice and the Department of Homeland Security, revoked the first naturalized citizenship so far as part of this collaborative effort called Operation Janus.

00:38:29.000 They are looking into 315,000 people where they've either forged documents or there's missing fingerprints in terms of applying for naturalization.

00:38:40.000 And they have 1,600 people that they're prosecuting and they're going to revoke their citizenship.

00:38:45.000 So, you know, all this talk about, well, the Trump administration is cucking.

00:38:49.000 Jeff Sessions isn't enforcing the law.

00:38:51.000 Stop watching the news.

00:38:53.000 Stop watching television.

00:38:54.000 Stop listening to the mainstream media.

00:38:57.000 Go on poll or I don't know, something.

00:38:57.000 I don't know.

00:38:59.000 But find an alternative news source that's not being reported.

00:39:02.000 Because while everybody's saying Trump is cucking, all this is happening, Jeff Sessions is literally revoking citizenship, like the furthest extent that wasn't even talked about in the campaign.

00:39:13.000 The most Donald Trump talked about in the campaign was removing illegal aliens. 0.82

00:39:18.000 But remember, there is going to be a big door and legal immigration should continue. 0.82

00:39:22.000 And now, all the way out here, we're talking about ending chain migration, ending the visa lottery, deporting all legals, revoking citizenship. 1.00

00:39:29.000 So, hopefully, that's a little bit of encouragement. 0.80

00:39:32.000 But that's DACA. 0.72

00:39:34.000 The last thing, and I don't know, maybe we'll get to questions, actually, because we're getting into the 45 minute mark about here.

00:39:41.000 So, we'll get into your super chats.

00:39:43.000 I was going to talk about Steve Bannon being ousted from Breitbart, but really, there's no information about this.

00:39:49.000 The only information that's available about.

00:39:52.000 The Steve Bannon ouster from Donald Trump's inner circle and even from Breitbart is what's in this book and Donald Trump's official statement.

00:40:00.000 There's really no context for this.

00:40:01.000 So, you know, somebody asked me today, what do you think about this Bannon thing?

00:40:05.000 I said, I don't know.

00:40:06.000 I have to think about it more.

00:40:07.000 I have to see more information because it just doesn't quite add up.

00:40:12.000 Something obviously is going on behind the scenes.

00:40:15.000 I'm not sure of what nature is going on behind the scenes or who's involved.

00:40:19.000 So, I'm not really an authority to say what's going on there more than anybody else.

00:40:23.000 I mean, anybody could say, well, it's obvious what's happening.

00:40:26.000 Steve Bannon cared more about his own brand and he shot his mouth off and blah, blah, blah.

00:40:30.000 And, you know, anybody could say that.

00:40:32.000 Anybody could take what's being said in the media and regurgitate it or pick a side.

00:40:36.000 But as for analysis, there's not really enough information.

00:40:41.000 I will say something very fishy about that.

00:40:43.000 Sebastian Gorka, who was also ousted at the same time as Steve Bannon from the White House over the summer, said that he was instructed to cooperate with Michael Wolf in writing that book.

00:40:56.000 So.

00:40:58.000 That doesn't seem right.

00:41:00.000 I don't know if there's something actually going on there.

00:41:02.000 Maybe Steve Bannon did just run his mouth too much.

00:41:04.000 That sounds like something Steve Bannon would say.

00:41:06.000 Maybe that's the case.

00:41:08.000 Maybe he went too far.

00:41:09.000 He attacked Trump's family.

00:41:11.000 And now, you know, he committed political suicide.

00:41:14.000 Maybe that's it.

00:41:16.000 But that Sebastian Gorka was instructed by somebody in the White House to meet with Michael Wolf.

00:41:21.000 And this was in Reince Priebus' office.

00:41:25.000 That really rubs me the wrong way.

00:41:27.000 That doesn't sound right.

00:41:28.000 And especially because it's Gorka and Bannon, both of whom were ousted.

00:41:31.000 So.

00:41:32.000 It seems to me like, I don't know.

00:41:34.000 I mean, if both Gorka and Bannon were kicked out of the White House in summer, and both Gorka and Bannon were instructed maybe to give a comment to this guy who's a liar and known for making up quotes, and Steve Bannon's quote got included and he got maligned and now he's dead, I mean, did somebody want Gorka and Steve Bannon out of the picture?

00:41:53.000 Did the same person that got them out of the White House maybe get them out of Trump's inner circle in this way or try to get Gorka but successfully got Bannon?

00:42:01.000 I mean, it seems awfully swift.

00:42:03.000 How fast everybody's moved in getting rid of Bannon seemed kind of out of the blue.

00:42:06.000 That, you know, just last week Bannon was running all kinds of candidates and he was doing very well.

00:42:13.000 And then one day a quote came out in a book, you know, a quote that was acquired by The Guardian from a book was released.

00:42:20.000 And now the Mercer family's forcing him to step down from Breitbart and, you know, all kinds of scathing quotes from Trump and his family.

00:42:27.000 It just really rubs me the wrong way.

00:42:29.000 Maybe the official story is true.

00:42:31.000 Maybe that's the case.

00:42:32.000 It seems plausible.

00:42:34.000 But, That thing about Gorka just doesn't sit well.

00:42:37.000 But that's Bannon.

00:42:38.000 I don't have much to say about it because there's just not a lot of information about it.

00:42:41.000 That tends to be the case with the West Wing, it's all gossip.

00:42:45.000 And people fall into this trap of speculating on things that they have no possibility of knowing anything about that.

00:42:51.000 The rumors about the West Wing, oh, you know, Trump is fuming about this.

00:42:55.000 Ivanka and this person are fighting.

00:42:57.000 I mean, this really went on a lot during the summer when the leaker was still in the White House.

00:43:01.000 People are saying maybe that's Bannon.

00:43:03.000 But, you know, if you remember, in the first few months of the Trump presidency, there was all this hearsay about.

00:43:08.000 He said this in the White House.

00:43:09.000 It's really like this.

00:43:10.000 No, actually, they're friends.

00:43:11.000 No, actually, they're an infiltrator.

00:43:12.000 Trump is slurring his words, and some is poisoning his food.

00:43:15.000 I mean, there are all kinds of crazy things coming out, and it's just there's no way that anybody could have an authority on what's going on there.

00:43:23.000 So I don't really like to engage in the gossip and the rumors.

00:43:27.000 There's the official story, and other than that, not a lot of information.

00:43:30.000 So that's Bannon, but we'll take a look at the super chats here, and we'll see what people are saying.

00:43:37.000 It looks like nobody got notifications for the show.

00:43:40.000 It looks like that's why attendance is down.

00:43:42.000 Maybe attendance is down on the show because I said it was 250 IQ only, and maybe there was a lot of.

00:43:49.000 Fluff of low IQ that were watching previously that said, okay, we got the hint.

00:43:54.000 We can't watch tonight.

00:43:55.000 But you know what it was?

00:43:57.000 I started the stream and it started out as private and then I made it public.

00:44:00.000 Maybe that's why nobody got a notification.

00:44:02.000 So rest assured, that'll be fixed tomorrow.

00:44:06.000 It's always something, right?

00:44:07.000 And that's because I was testing it earlier to figure out what was going on with the stream.

00:44:11.000 And I guess I should have stopped the stream and then started a new one rather than changing the privacy settings.

00:44:17.000 And then nobody got their notification.

00:44:19.000 Well, That's all right.

00:44:20.000 They'll get a notification when I publish it, or I'll put out a message or something.

00:44:24.000 But let's look at our super chats. 0.93

00:44:26.000 Meme Brulee, buy a better computer, you goof.

00:44:29.000 Well, yeah, I mean, thank you for the donation.

00:44:31.000 I'm looking into that this week.

00:44:34.000 I guess I finally got to make the compromise.

00:44:36.000 I didn't want to go over to PC.

00:44:37.000 I didn't want to build my own computer and, you know, figure out what RAM is and what all that gobbledygook, you know, gigawatt talk is.

00:44:45.000 But I guess I'm going to have to make it happen because, yeah, it was pretty rough last night.

00:44:50.000 So.

00:44:51.000 We're going to make it happen this week.

00:44:52.000 I'm going to get a new computer.

00:44:53.000 I'm going to build a PC.

00:44:54.000 Watch.

00:44:55.000 I will come back next week and you will be floored with how well I'll be able to talk about computers.

00:45:01.000 Next week, I'll be telling you about RAM and hard drive and CPU, DIBBA byte and WAT and all of that stuff.

00:45:10.000 And you'll be really, you'll be wowed about it.

00:45:12.000 But yeah, we'll do a computer this week.

00:45:15.000 So the next week, we'll be firing on all cylinders.

00:45:19.000 But the reason I don't want a PC is because it can get infected.

00:45:22.000 With Mac, I love it because.

00:45:25.000 You don't get viruses, right?

00:45:26.000 It comes with like automatic protection.

00:45:28.000 Again, I'm not a computer guy, but Mac doesn't get infected.

00:45:32.000 Microsoft, I hear, does, but we'll have to go there.

00:45:36.000 Empress Finest says, can't be too suspicious, Nick.

00:45:40.000 Don't get naive.

00:45:41.000 With regards to what?

00:45:42.000 With regards to what?

00:45:44.000 Can't be too suspicious about, oh, about DACA.

00:45:47.000 Yeah, and everything else.

00:45:51.000 Or about the deep state coup, you mean, maybe.

00:45:54.000 I mean, of course, I'm suspicious about all of that, but I think it's far more likely that, I mean, Here's why I don't think it's accurate that Trump is being compromised.

00:46:04.000 I thought that for a long time.

00:46:06.000 I thought that the first time around with DACA.

00:46:08.000 I remember that because it was early September.

00:46:11.000 And I remember that was the first and only time I've ever tweeted a little bit of doubt about the president.

00:46:15.000 I said, you know, this is not making America great again.

00:46:19.000 And there were a lot of rumors going around at that time that Trump was compromised.

00:46:23.000 And I started to believe it.

00:46:24.000 I said, this new chief of staff, Kelly, came in.

00:46:26.000 He was highly suspect.

00:46:28.000 And I heard he was controlling the information flow and other things.

00:46:33.000 And I started to buy into that.

00:46:35.000 But with the things Donald Trump has been tweeting, I can't imagine that Donald Trump could be in a compromised situation, either by blackmail or medically or anything like that.

00:46:46.000 And then at the same time, they would let him have complete control of his Twitter.

00:46:49.000 Like, for example, I don't think he would be able to tweet about North Korea that his button works and we have way more nukes than you and we'll blow you up if he was compromised.

00:47:00.000 I don't think he'd be able to tweet about the fake news awards if he wasn't compromised in some way.

00:47:06.000 You know, I mean, that would be a weird way for them to compromise him.

00:47:10.000 But I definitely think the Bill of Love comment, that was a signal. 0.92

00:47:14.000 When he said this is a Bill of Love, that was so obvious, that was so ridiculous.

00:47:20.000 I think that was almost a signal either to his base or to somebody that something is not right.

00:47:26.000 Either, you know, maybe it was a distress signal that he's being compromised.

00:47:29.000 I don't think that's it. 1.00

00:47:31.000 Or that it's obviously bullshit. 0.98

00:47:33.000 It's obviously kabuki theater, which I tend to think that it is. 0.99

00:47:36.000 So I agree with you.

00:47:38.000 You can never be too suspicious.

00:47:40.000 And I'm the biggest proponent of that on this show.

00:47:41.000 I talk about how.

00:47:43.000 The supermoons are affecting us.

00:47:44.000 I talk about how maybe Hollow Earth is real and all that stuff, and about Las Vegas, about Sandy Hook, even 9 11.

00:47:53.000 You know, you listen to what Bibi Netanyahu had to say about that.

00:47:55.000 A little subtle red pill for you there.

00:47:57.000 Look at World Trade Center 7.

00:47:59.000 Tell me what that was all about, right?

00:48:02.000 You can never be too suspicious.

00:48:02.000 So I agree.

00:48:04.000 But the reason why I don't think he's compromised is the Twitter and just generally the autonomy that he seems to be able to exercise.

00:48:10.000 I think also kind of an Occam's razor.

00:48:12.000 I mean, what's more.

00:48:14.000 What's more likely?

00:48:15.000 Is he making a play, the same kind of play that he made three times already, in which he detailed in his book, and which all signs point to that case, if you're looking at the deadlines and the different restraints on the deal making that Chuck Schumer and others have set, or is it that deep state coup?

00:48:31.000 Occam's razor would dictate it's probably the former.

00:48:35.000 But again, I mean, if there's evidence, I'd like to see it.

00:48:38.000 I wouldn't rule it out, never.

00:48:40.000 Mike Healy says the head of Freedom Caucus, Representative Meadows, already said two phase solution is non negotiable.

00:48:46.000 And that amnesty is not happening.

00:48:48.000 Exactly the point.

00:48:48.000 Well, exactly.

00:48:50.000 Trump is saying, we're going to have a deal that'll give us amnesty and security.

00:48:54.000 Mark Meadows says, no amnesty, no two phase.

00:48:56.000 Chuck Schumer says, no wall.

00:48:58.000 And he's saying, I'll sign everything that they put in front of me.

00:49:00.000 They will not be able to put anything in front of him.

00:49:02.000 Think.

00:49:03.000 And I have all these people saying, they say all kinds of things.

00:49:07.000 They say, I really hope you're right, Nick, without fail.

00:49:10.000 Every time I tweet something like this, whether it's Syria or Iran or the first DACA deal, people tweet at me at this.

00:49:17.000 Tweet this at me.

00:49:18.000 They say, I hope you're right, Nick.

00:49:20.000 I really hope you're right.

00:49:21.000 Use your head.

00:49:23.000 Think.

00:49:24.000 Evaluate the probabilities here.

00:49:25.000 Evaluate the conditions that are being set by the actors involved in this negotiation.

00:49:30.000 You don't have to hope.

00:49:31.000 Just look at what is likely.

00:49:33.000 Look at what is probable. 1.00

00:49:34.000 Use your damn head. 1.00

00:49:36.000 I get the sentiment. 1.00

00:49:37.000 Yeah, I mean, everybody hopes I'm right and they have their doubts, but I mean, just look at the facts.

00:49:41.000 I wouldn't be out here peddling this stuff if I wasn't confident in it. 0.99

00:49:45.000 You know what an asshole I would have looked like if during the serious strike. 0.99

00:49:48.000 There actually was an invasion of Syria on June 1st. 0.99

00:49:52.000 Everybody said, June 1st, 100,000 troops in Syria.

00:49:55.000 I have it on good authority.

00:49:56.000 That's what Cernovich said.

00:49:57.000 That's what everybody said.

00:49:58.000 Do you know how much credibility I would have lost if that happened, or if it happened with Iran, or if it happened the first time?

00:50:05.000 Every time I confidently make a prediction like this, I'm putting my credibility on the line.

00:50:11.000 And the reason that I do is not because I have faith.

00:50:15.000 It's not because I have a blind faith.

00:50:17.000 It's not because I wish it would happen.

00:50:19.000 There's a prejudice in favor of the president.

00:50:21.000 It's because I look.

00:50:23.000 I really look at what's being said.

00:50:26.000 I really dig into it and I see what's being said, by whom, how it's being said.

00:50:32.000 I look at the context of it.

00:50:34.000 Context is so key.

00:50:35.000 People ignore that.

00:50:36.000 If it was just the meeting, I would say you're right.

00:50:38.000 But you have to look at the deadlines and other things that are going on.

00:50:40.000 And that's why you don't have to hope.

00:50:42.000 You just have to have faith that, I mean, this is the likely outcome.

00:50:46.000 People say that.

00:50:47.000 And then people say, I'm not putting my faith in four dimensional chess.

00:50:51.000 Well, what are you going to do instead?

00:50:52.000 You're going to tweet about it?

00:50:53.000 You think the president is sitting on his Twitter looking at what?

00:50:56.000 You know, Anime Right is tweeting.

00:50:58.000 That's not a dig at anime, right?

00:51:00.000 But it's just to say, you know, for people that think they have control over outcomes, what we can do is charge up our people with morale.

00:51:11.000 The effect that you have on our troops, on our guys, by blackpilling is so much more terrible than the positive effect you'll have by voicing your concerns on Twitter.

00:51:24.000 I mean, here's what happens when you go out there and you say Donald Trump is cucking and everything is lost and he cucked and everything's over.

00:51:32.000 Donald Trump won't hear you. 0.93

00:51:33.000 Your people will.

00:51:35.000 Our people will hear you.

00:51:36.000 They will get nihilistic, and that's not what we want.

00:51:39.000 So you really have to look at it that way.

00:51:41.000 No matter what, everybody says, oh, well, even though Nick was right 100%, it was a good thing that I was tweeting about it because that might have forced his hand.

00:51:49.000 No, doubt it.

00:51:51.000 So you just think about it, folks.

00:51:53.000 Just really, you got to sit down and just sit down and think about it.

00:51:57.000 Ask yourself these questions.

00:51:58.000 Not difficult.

00:52:01.000 Meme Brulee, by the way, no one got notifications.

00:52:03.000 Yeah.

00:52:04.000 Yeah, I saw, but I guess I'll put out a.

00:52:07.000 I guess you could do messages on YouTube now, or you put out a post.

00:52:10.000 You could do a textual post now on YouTube.

00:52:13.000 This is new, and you get likes on it.

00:52:16.000 Very strange times we live in, but I'll put that out so that people who didn't get the notification can watch, but that's all right. 0.98

00:52:26.000 Owen, lay out your case for why Jews are not white. 0.98

00:52:28.000 Well, I mean, they're not. 0.97

00:52:30.000 I mean, what is white? 0.89

00:52:31.000 White is not skin color.

00:52:32.000 I think the biggest thing that people have been deluded into thinking, the biggest problem with the question on race these days, Is that people define race as skin color, and that's why people don't care about race anymore because they think it's about skin color.

00:52:45.000 If it was just about skin color, it would be trivial. 0.94

00:52:48.000 If the only difference between Africans and Europeans and Asians and Jews and everyone else was the color of their skin pigmentation, the liberals would be right. 0.99

00:53:00.000 If everybody was just blank slate, John Locke, tabula rasa when they were born, but just in different colors, you know, I'm white and you're brown and you're yellow and you're, you know, a different color. 1.00

00:53:11.000 Then the liberals would be right.

00:53:12.000 Universalism would be true.

00:53:14.000 Culture would be a construct.

00:53:16.000 And that's the relativistic worldview that they live in.

00:53:18.000 But if you believe, and there's the biological scientific case for this, an empirical case for this, that race is biological and evolutionary, and there's a sociological component to it as well, well, then you understand that race is a little bit more complicated. 0.54

00:53:31.000 And so, while Ashkenazi Jews are white in the sense that they have white skin color, they look ostensibly European. 0.53

00:53:42.000 Racially, ethnically, culturally, are they European? 0.95

00:53:46.000 Are they European blood?

00:53:48.000 Do they have European culture, European history?

00:53:50.000 Do they identify as that?

00:53:51.000 I mean, it's really a complicated concept.

00:53:53.000 The answer is no. 0.52

00:53:55.000 And what makes a Jew, according to Jewish law, is that you have a Jewish mother. 0.95

00:53:59.000 And if you go back all the way down the line, they will descend from the Levant. 0.89

00:54:04.000 They'll descend from the Middle East. 0.94

00:54:06.000 And that's not European. 0.99

00:54:07.000 You know, white is European. 0.88

00:54:10.000 And we know where Europe is. 0.79

00:54:12.000 So there's that. 0.75

00:54:13.000 I mean, there's the biological basis that Jews.

00:54:16.000 According to their own law, according to their own definition, they are only Jewish if they're born of a Jewish mother, which makes it so that Jews are derived genetically from the Middle East as opposed to Europe.

00:54:26.000 I mean, there's that.

00:54:27.000 But then in addition, there's the historical, the sociobiological component, the cultural component where Jews don't identify as Europeans. 0.59

00:54:35.000 They don't identify as white. 0.99

00:54:36.000 They've always been an unassimilable. 1.00

00:54:38.000 Is that a word? 1.00

00:54:40.000 They have not assimilated into Europe as all other groups have. 0.76

00:54:44.000 You know, for example, you look at French, Italian, German, English.

00:54:49.000 All of these broader national identities had to be assimilated.

00:54:53.000 You know, in France, you had all different kinds of tribes and groups that existed after the Roman Empire fell when they were subjugated under Rome and then afterwards that had to be assimilated into a common French identity.

00:55:06.000 The same is true of Italy.

00:55:07.000 I mean, Italy only got unified as recently as I believe the 1860s, Germany was the 1870s, 1871, Germany was unified.

00:55:16.000 And so these different tribes in Europe, European tribes, were assimilated. 0.63

00:55:21.000 Jews refused assimilation, they refused it everywhere they go.

00:55:25.000 You have Jews all over the world, you have them.

00:55:28.000 In Turkey, you have them in Europe, you have them in North America, you have them in China, you have them in India, you have them in Yemen, you have them in Africa, and they don't assimilate because they don't identify with the group that they're the continent or the people that they are among.

00:55:42.000 That is one of the chief peculiarities of Jewish people, is that they are the one group seemingly that are resistant to assimilation. 0.65

00:55:50.000 And then you look at the sociological component there, where they're a nomadic people.

00:55:54.000 They have this special group evolutionary strategy, which is unique and different. 0.91

00:56:00.000 You know, obviously, it has this kind of autoimmune defense against assimilation, and that's why they're not white. 0.75

00:56:06.000 But, I mean, you could read a lot about this in Kevin McDonald's book, A People Who Shall Dwell Alone. 0.91

00:56:11.000 That's the first in the Culture of Critique series.

00:56:14.000 Culture of Critique was the third book, but it's a four book series.

00:56:18.000 You could read about this in Hilaire Belloc's book about the Jews.

00:56:22.000 And that's, again, it's not to say that there's anything wrong with that, but, I mean, Jews themselves don't identify as white. 0.98

00:56:29.000 And then they often use that to their advantage, which is deceptive. 1.00

00:56:33.000 So.

00:56:35.000 There's the case.

00:56:36.000 Alcia Baidi.

00:56:37.000 Somebody tweeted at me the pronunciation.

00:56:39.000 I forgot it.

00:56:41.000 But says, no notification.

00:56:42.000 Punishment is reading my name.

00:56:44.000 Yeah.

00:56:45.000 We've been over the notification question.

00:56:48.000 So sorry about that.

00:56:50.000 Oh, and this guy decided to deport 90,000 Haitians and 200,000 Salvadorians just because he felt like it, both in the past month.

00:56:58.000 I don't think he will cuck.

00:56:59.000 I mean, you have to look at what's happening.

00:56:59.000 Exactly.

00:57:02.000 Exactly. 0.70

00:57:02.000 With the deportation of the Salvadorians, you have the revoking legal. 0.70

00:57:08.000 Natural citizenship of these people, I guess, was illegal how they got it.

00:57:12.000 But I mean, they're looking into repealing citizenship for people and so on and so on.

00:57:17.000 You just have to look at the context, the history, the precedent.

00:57:20.000 People have this tunnel vision.

00:57:22.000 You can't watch television.

00:57:24.000 Television makes it out like you were all living in a vacuum and you're not allowed to have this holistic view of the world.

00:57:32.000 They want you to compartmentalize your thoughts.

00:57:36.000 And that's not going to fly on this show.

00:57:38.000 Dominic Liberator with the single shekel. 0.99

00:57:40.000 Thank you.

00:57:41.000 And spoiler alert says hollow ocean is the final red pill.

00:57:45.000 Yeah, well, you know, I don't know.

00:57:47.000 I mean, I guess I believe in round earth.

00:57:51.000 I don't know if I believe in flat earth or if I believe in hollow earth, but I don't know.

00:57:57.000 I just, the problem is, I guess the biggest problem for me, I don't really have an opinion on it because I, you know, I'm not a big science guy.

00:58:04.000 I don't, not so familiar with science.

00:58:07.000 The empiricists, the rationalists, the materialists.

00:58:10.000 I've always been a more, Esoteric, mystical spirit, myself.

00:58:15.000 So I don't really make a judgment one way or the other.

00:58:17.000 And the same is true of evolution, by the way.

00:58:19.000 My problem is with people who think that they know.

00:58:21.000 That's my only problem, is with people who think they know.

00:58:24.000 These vile people who you'll come up to them and say, you know, hey, how about this flat earth stuff?

00:58:30.000 I mean, what do you make of the fact that the horizon appears to be flat all the way around?

00:58:34.000 If you're on a plane, you can't see the curvature of the earth.

00:58:36.000 If you look, and you know, you ask questions about it, or people ask questions about it.

00:58:41.000 And from the masses, from the masses, the Redditors and everybody else, you'll get.

00:58:47.000 Almost this uniform contempt for anybody that wants to go against the grain, anybody wants to go against the commonly accepted theory.

00:58:55.000 And it's not so much that I agree with the dissenting view, so much as I hate, hate people who think that they know.

00:59:03.000 And they have contempt for other people on a subject that they themselves know nothing about. 1.00

00:59:08.000 You know, you think a flat earther is stupid? 0.99

00:59:10.000 Tell me why the earth isn't flat. 1.00

00:59:12.000 Oh, they're pictures.

00:59:14.000 Okay, so, you know, obviously flat earthers.

00:59:17.000 Have looked into the subject a little bit more than the lay person.

00:59:20.000 And for that, I respect them.

00:59:22.000 Looking into facts, asking questions, going against the grain, these are admirable qualities.

00:59:27.000 You might be a little bit loopy if you believe in some of the arguments.

00:59:30.000 You know, some people believe, I read one argument that the reason why mushroom clouds form is because the displaced terrain, when a bomb blows up the earth, gets stuck in like a dome, you know, above the earth.

00:59:44.000 That's a little bit out there.

00:59:46.000 But generally speaking, if you're talking about, like, there was one experiment in Britain.

00:59:49.000 Where there was a canal that was six miles long, and a guy put a little boat on the canal.

00:59:55.000 It's the longest canal in the world at the time, I believe, and he put a little telescope on there.

01:00:01.000 And he went out and he looked through the telescope, and six miles down the way, somebody put out a boat with like a piece of paper sticking out of it or something, so that if the earth were flat, you would have been able to see the piece of paper from the telescope.

01:00:16.000 And you understand at this far distance, that wouldn't be possible if the earth was curved, because if the earth Were curved, it would have to be something like three feet lower in terms of height than the telescope.

01:00:27.000 And that's an interesting thing to look into.

01:00:29.000 That's something that people who've never looked into flat Earth know nothing about.

01:00:33.000 And it turns out there's an argument by the round earthers that says that, well, light curves because of gravity or something like that.

01:00:39.000 The light's refracted, and that's why that happens.

01:00:41.000 But I'm far more interested in people who will engage in the debate, who will ask the question, who will question authority than people who have contempt for anybody who thinks otherwise.

01:00:51.000 I think that's a lot of fun that way.

01:00:54.000 And evolution is the same way.

01:00:55.000 I mean, all these theories are.

01:00:56.000 You know, really, you believe in evolution?

01:00:58.000 Do you really know what you're talking about?

01:01:00.000 Do you really understand the gravity of what you're saying?

01:01:02.000 Do you understand the gravity of the question of biogenesis?

01:01:05.000 Have you ever thought about that?

01:01:06.000 How life could originate?

01:01:08.000 Have you ever thought about it?

01:01:09.000 I mean, just all these different things.

01:01:11.000 Sorry to go on a tangent, but we got to defend our hollow and flat earthers.

01:01:16.000 Margaret Gover, I love the podcast.

01:01:18.000 It gives me great joy to see the notification, a great gift for my 15th birthday.

01:01:24.000 Well, I'm glad.

01:01:25.000 I am glad.

01:01:26.000 That you like the show.

01:01:27.000 Glad it brings you some joy.

01:01:28.000 Thank you very much for the kind words.

01:01:30.000 It makes me feel vindicated when people enjoy the show because, you know, you get a lot of hate.

01:01:35.000 You don't know this when you get even like a taste of C list e fame, but you get so much vitriol directed against you.

01:01:43.000 The dagger of Damocles hangs over your head at all times, and, you know, people don't even know.

01:01:47.000 But happy birthday.

01:01:49.000 Hope it's a good one.

01:01:50.000 Happy birthday from America First Media and from myself personally.

01:01:54.000 Thanks for watching the show.

01:01:55.000 Thanks for supporting the show.

01:01:57.000 I'm glad you get a kick out of it.

01:02:00.000 And our last one here is Pirate Falagos here, who says, flat earthers equals high IQ.

01:02:05.000 I believe it.

01:02:07.000 I think you're low IQ if you believe everything you've been told.

01:02:12.000 Sorry.

01:02:14.000 But that's true.

01:02:14.000 People who go to school, excuse me, they go to middle school or high school or college, and they don't question one thing that's been told to them.

01:02:22.000 One thing that's been told to them.

01:02:23.000 How are you a high IQ person if you're not asking the questions, if you're not even curious?

01:02:27.000 You know, I mean, think of how a science class operates in this day and age.

01:02:31.000 It's like, Let's show you.

01:02:32.000 Here's gravity.

01:02:33.000 Gravity works like this.

01:02:34.000 Now we'll do an experiment to show you why gravity is real.

01:02:37.000 Is that like a good reasoning process?

01:02:39.000 I don't believe so.

01:02:39.000 Is that science?

01:02:41.000 I don't think you're supposed to.

01:02:43.000 It's begging the question a little bit, right?

01:02:47.000 That's not to say gravity doesn't exist, but I mean, really, our education system is defunct.

01:02:52.000 That's kind of a trite and cliched thing to say, not very original, especially as a young person.

01:02:56.000 But I mean, you just look at how schools teach things, and it's just so wrong.

01:03:00.000 It's just so backwards. 0.97

01:03:02.000 And for people that, I mean, like the whole Hitler thing is a good example. 0.97

01:03:06.000 You know, I mean, the same people that will tell you, well, I don't want to get into all of that, but I mean, you know what I'm saying, basically. 0.80

01:03:13.000 You have to question everything.

01:03:14.000 You have to question everything.

01:03:16.000 Look at the source material.

01:03:17.000 Look at the documents.

01:03:18.000 Look at the photographs.

01:03:20.000 I mean, look at things.

01:03:21.000 Investigate these things.

01:03:22.000 It's important. 0.72

01:03:23.000 We laugh at North Korea and we say, oh, the people there are so brainwashed.

01:03:26.000 The people there, can you imagine being brainwashed like that?

01:03:30.000 Can you imagine being indoctrinated into that propaganda?

01:03:33.000 We look at people from historical times and we say, could you imagine those people back in the 50s or 40s and the myths they believe?

01:03:39.000 And we walk around here like, we know everything because the state told us so.

01:03:43.000 Give me a break.

01:03:44.000 You're low IQ if you believe everything the government tells you.

01:03:47.000 You think we don't know everything that's going on?

01:03:50.000 Or you think we do, rather?

01:03:51.000 I don't think so.

01:03:53.000 Of course, we always get the big dip when Nick goes on the conspiracy rants.

01:03:57.000 People don't like it.

01:03:58.000 People don't like that.

01:03:59.000 It makes people uncomfortable when they start hearing, you know, maybe the world isn't exactly as it appears.

01:04:05.000 Maybe it's not exactly as it seems, but I don't believe it is.

01:04:10.000 I mean, I'm a reasonable person, but I mean, the idea that we know exactly everything that's going on in the government, give me a break.

01:04:18.000 And so that's that.

01:04:19.000 High IQ flat earthers.

01:04:20.000 And now the last one here is my name Jeff, who says, Hey, Nick, have you ever considered having JF on?

01:04:26.000 We may do that.

01:04:27.000 I know somebody tweeted at him and they said, Do you want to do a talk with Nick Fuentes?

01:04:31.000 And he said, Yeah, I'd love to.

01:04:32.000 And, you know, I heard him on the Richard Spencer Sargon debate.

01:04:36.000 He was very smart.

01:04:37.000 Came across as very smart, very articulate, seemed like an amicable guy, too.

01:04:44.000 There were a lot of egos on that stream, but he seemed like a pretty humble guy, which I appreciated.

01:04:48.000 So, Yeah, I think we will look into that.

01:04:51.000 He's a biologist, I understand, which is very interesting.

01:04:53.000 He said on that stream that he believes in levels of human organization both above the individual level and below, talking about genetics.

01:05:00.000 I thought that was a fascinating thing to say.

01:05:04.000 He believes in levels of human organization both above and below the individual level.

01:05:09.000 I've never heard about the below.

01:05:10.000 That's a very interesting idea.

01:05:12.000 We'll have to get him on to talk about that.

01:05:14.000 He talks about genetics and how that plays into it.

01:05:17.000 But yeah, we'll have him on.

01:05:19.000 And Neilan's going to come down to Chicago, he said the other day, and do a live show.

01:05:23.000 So we'll have that.

01:05:23.000 To look forward to.

01:05:24.000 And we will have a guest next week.

01:05:28.000 And I'll be unveiling this tomorrow.

01:05:30.000 We'll start hyping it up.

01:05:31.000 But we have a big debate coming on Monday.

01:05:34.000 And I'll leave you in a little bit of suspense for the people that turned out for the show, even though there was no notification.

01:05:39.000 Leave you in a little bit of suspense as to what's going on on Monday.

01:05:43.000 But that's the treat.

01:05:45.000 That's the tip for all the people that came anyway without the little notification there is that a big debate coming on Monday with a big guest, somebody that we've seen around more times.

01:05:57.000 Recently on Twitter, and he'll be coming on for a big debate.

01:06:01.000 It'll be very fun, so stay tuned for that.

01:06:03.000 But that's going to do it for us tonight on the show.

01:06:06.000 That's going to do it for us tonight.

01:06:08.000 Glad this live stream worked well.

01:06:11.000 You should have seen my mom.

01:06:13.000 She's coming to my producer, not my mom, my producer kept running into the studio while the Neil and stream was going on, frantically passing me these notes from a notepad.

01:06:23.000 It's unwatchable, she throws at me.

01:06:26.000 Stream is terrible.

01:06:28.000 Lagging, buffering, crows, and she's coming in, she's frantically handing me these notes.

01:06:33.000 I crumpled one of them out of frustration.

01:06:36.000 You couldn't see it because it was audio only.

01:06:38.000 But one of them I crumpled out of frustration and threw away.

01:06:42.000 No audio, no video.

01:06:43.000 You're offline.

01:06:45.000 And very earnest. 1.00

01:06:46.000 It's Y O U R and stuff. 0.94

01:06:47.000 Y O U, apostrophe R E.

01:06:49.000 So, very urgent.

01:06:50.000 But yeah, that was funny.

01:06:54.000 Running in here, my producer running in, handing me these notes.

01:06:56.000 It's not working.

01:06:57.000 It's not, you know, to give me this look.

01:07:01.000 So, but that's, we're back on track.

01:07:03.000 We'll be getting a new computer this week.

01:07:05.000 We'll be back on Monday.

01:07:06.000 Hopefully, it'll be up and running and working so we can have our debate on Monday.

01:07:09.000 But that's our show.

01:07:10.000 Remember, You can buy your AmFirstMedia mugs on AmFirstMedia.com, very reasonably priced.

01:07:17.000 It's a big boy.

01:07:18.000 I never realized how big this was until recently.

01:07:22.000 I used my older mug, my older small, small mug, and I was like, this is a baby mug.

01:07:28.000 My old mug, I was like, I feel like a giant holding this.

01:07:31.000 My six foot nine hand holding this baby mug, I felt like a little tyke.

01:07:36.000 And that's only because I've been using this Chad boy, this tall maniac. 0.99

01:07:41.000 This bastard for so long. 0.99

01:07:44.000 16 ounces of fluid. 1.00

01:07:45.000 That's a lot of fluid.

01:07:46.000 That's more than a can of Coke.

01:07:48.000 So you picture a can of Coke, think huge more.

01:07:52.000 Think you could fit all of that and then some in here.

01:07:55.000 That's how big this is.

01:07:56.000 So only for the big boys.

01:07:59.000 I'm not going to, if you're a little guy, you're going to have trouble lifting it.

01:08:03.000 You got to have your lifting squad to help you out with this one.

01:08:07.000 But that's on amphirstmedia.com.

01:08:09.000 Take a little proverbial sip out of the mug here.

01:08:14.000 To show you that it works, it does work.

01:08:17.000 It's, you know, form and function there, but you can get those on amfirstmedia.com.

01:08:23.000 We're on the air Monday through Friday, 7 p.m. Central, 8 p.m. Eastern Standard Time.

01:08:28.000 I'm Nicholas J. Fuentes.

01:08:29.000 This was America First.

01:08:30.000 Don't forget to subscribe, like, leave a comment, click the notification bell.

01:08:35.000 I promise there'll be one tomorrow.

01:08:37.000 We're recovering from the Mossad attack yesterday.

01:08:40.000 I still have like a bullet wound in my chest from when they tried to suicide me yesterday.

01:08:45.000 So, we'll get those notifications for you tomorrow, but subscribe, click all the buttons.

01:08:49.000 In the meantime, we will catch you tomorrow.

01:08:52.000 Have a great rest of your evening.

01:08:53.000 We'll see you then.

01:08:59.000 Americanism, not globalism, will be our credo.

01:09:06.000 It's going to be only America first.

01:09:11.000 America first. 0.99

01:09:12.000 The American people will come first once again. 0.99

01:09:38.000 From this day on, it's going to be only America first. 0.97

01:09:45.000 America first. 0.94

America First - Nicholas J. Fuentes - January 09, 2018

The Grand DACA Bargain | America First Ep. 82

Episode Stats

Summary

Transcript