00:00:58.000I tried to better the user experience by decreasing the amount of output that was coming out of the computer.
00:01:05.000In the hopes that the CPU that OBS is using, that's the broadcasting, the streaming service would lower, and therefore there would be no lag.
00:01:13.000It ended up just not giving enough video output.
00:01:38.000With the DACA deal that is impending, the DACA deal that everybody is so concerned about, the black pillars are out in full force again, as they always are, saying that Donald Trump is cucking on DACA.
00:01:51.000And of course, there was a big bipartisan negotiation today between congressional Democrats and Republicans with the president, talking about what kind of negotiation they could make happen with DACA.
00:02:04.000Now, the two things to keep in mind as I explain what transpired today during that meeting and everything else.
00:02:35.000That's the first thing to take into consideration.
00:02:38.000Number two, on March 5th, DACA recipients will lose their legal protection.
00:02:43.000So if you know what DACA is, DACA is Deferred action on childhood arrivals, which means that if you arrived here when you were a child, and many of them are not children, by the way, most of them, in fact, are not children.
00:02:56.000If that's a child, you know, I don't know.
00:02:59.000But so deferred action on childhood arrivals, what that means is when they get here, they can apply for this program and they are legally protected.
00:03:06.000They can't be deported if they're in school, if they have a job.
00:03:09.000They have to meet a certain number of requirements.
00:03:11.000Some of them skirt that anyway, a lot of them aren't meeting the requirements.
00:03:14.000But under the program, If they got here at a certain point when they were kids, they can apply, and they have to apply for this process to have legal protections, and then they have to renew it every two years.
00:03:26.000Well, back in September, Donald Trump terminated DACA.
00:03:29.000That was an executive order under Barack Obama.
00:03:31.000The program was established not via Congress, but via an executive order.
00:03:35.000So Donald Trump was able to unilaterally terminate that with his executive powers as the president.
00:03:41.000And on March 5th, all DACA legal protections expired.
00:03:46.000So, if you were set to renew your DACA status, if you were set to renew your application to be able to have these legal protections, you can't do that after March 5th if it's after March 5th.
00:03:57.000So, all those 1 million plus DACA recipients, all these illegals that are here, will lose their legal protection and they will face deportation.
00:04:06.000So, those are the two things to keep in mind as I read you what's going on.
00:04:09.000A little bit of foreshadowing for the 250 IQ analysis.
00:04:15.000You have to have a high IQ to understand this show, okay?
00:04:17.000We're not doing this for low IQ black pillars, low IQ feds, and people of the like.
00:04:24.000You have to be able to keep these things in your head.
00:04:57.000The meeting focused on four specific things, which were protection for DACA recipients, border security, Chain migration, which Democrats are now calling family based migration, which is a very clever turn to phrase, but it's chain migration, and the visa lottery system.
00:05:13.000So during this meeting, those four things were discussed.
00:05:17.000Donald Trump said that what they want to do in the Congress is kind of a two phase system, where phase one will be DACA and border security, and phase two will be comprehensive immigration reform.
00:05:29.000So phase one will deal specifically with DACA, and also there will be border security, and then they will deal with the larger system.
00:05:36.000In a second bill, and that's the comprehensive immigration reform.
00:05:40.000He said a lot of uncharacteristic things.
00:05:43.000For example, he said that this would be a, quote, bill of love, which is, of course, an homage, I think, to Jeb Bush, who said that illegal immigrants come here out of love.
00:05:53.000And Jeb Bush did commend Donald Trump for saying that it would be a bill of love.
00:05:58.000He says that everybody wants to protect DACA.
00:06:05.000He said that if it's done properly with border security and everything else, if it's done properly, I don't think it's going to be very complicated.
00:06:12.000And so basically, he said that we want DACA.
00:06:47.000We want to give them protection and so on and so on.
00:06:50.000They think that's very out of character for Donald Trump.
00:06:53.000And especially given that on Friday, the White House came out with a very extensive list of demands.
00:06:59.000They came out on Friday and said that in order for the president and the Republican Party to move forward in the Congress, giving the DACA recipients legal protection, they're going to need $18 billion for a wall that's about $1,000.
00:07:16.000Not the whole 2,000 feet southern border, but 1,000, or excuse me, 1,000 miles, 1,000 feet.
00:07:22.000Not the whole 2,000 mile border, but 1,000 miles, about 1,000 miles of wall.
00:07:28.000Where before he had said that might be a fence, it might be a virtual wall.
00:07:31.000He said this in August when he was campaigning for Luther Strange.
00:07:35.000On Friday, the White House laid out very concretely what the wall would look like.
00:07:39.000They said it would be a physical, continuous barrier.
00:07:43.000It would cost $18 billion, it would be 1,000 miles.
00:07:47.000They wanted to bring on an additional 10,000 ICE agents.
00:07:50.000They wanted, on top of the $18 billion wall, an additional, I believe it was $15 billion.
00:07:56.000Yeah, an additional $15 billion in other funding for increased border security, for drones, for maintenance on the wall, for bringing on more ICE agents and so on.
00:08:06.000They wanted to defund sanctuary cities.
00:08:09.000So we have already kind of this mixed message where on Friday they said, We want a wall.
00:08:20.000We need all this other stuff or else no deal.
00:08:23.000And we heard this back in September originally when the first DACA deal was talked about out of Chuck Schumer's office.
00:08:30.000They came out with a list of demands shortly afterwards that had scuttled the entire deal.
00:08:34.000They were going to do a deal on DACA back in fall, in September, October, but then this list of demands came out and they didn't do it.
00:08:40.000Well, there was similar talk a couple of weeks ago about DACA coming back.
00:08:44.000The list of demands came out yet again, and this time in far more detail on Friday.
00:08:49.000And now all of a sudden, it seemed like the deal was out of reach since Friday because Chuck Schumer said, We're not going to fund a wall, we're not giving in to these unreasonable demands.
00:08:58.000And now all of a sudden, just five days later, Or four days later, Donald Trump comes to the table with Democrats and Republicans and says, We want to protect DACA.
00:09:12.000In this meeting in particular, he actually said that the wall would only be 700 miles and it wouldn't be continuous and it would actually look more like a fence.
00:09:22.000And here's another kind of a crucial piece about this meeting.
00:09:26.000This is from Senator John Cornyn of Texas.
00:09:28.000He said about this meeting, he was present, he said, It was one of the most extraordinary meetings.
00:09:33.000Certainly, I have ever participated here in Washington, where the press was not only invited in the beginning, but stayed and stayed and stayed as we had a chance to talk about our views.
00:09:45.000Well, that's kind of interesting, right?
00:09:48.000Because if the rhetoric all Donald Trump's life has been no illegal immigrants, send them all back, even during the campaign specifically about DACA, we can't have them.
00:09:57.000We have these talks in September about renewing DACA, they get scuttled with the demands.
00:10:02.000We have the talks about DACA in December, they get scuttled with the demands.
00:10:08.000Which seemingly contradicts yet again the very hardline DACA position that the Trump administration took.
00:10:14.000And it's very telling that we had journalists here.
00:10:17.000It's very telling that Senator Michael Cornyn says that not only was the press welcome, not only were they invited, but they stayed and they stayed and they stayed.
00:10:26.000And they listened to what everybody had to say about DACA.
00:10:45.000And pay attention to what Trump is saying.
00:10:47.000Pay attention to exactly what Trump is saying.
00:10:50.000He says he'll sign anything, we'll do anything.
00:10:52.000And then he also said this, which is very significant.
00:10:55.000He says, If it's done properly with, you know, security and everything else, if it's done properly, I don't think it's going to be that complicated.
00:11:05.000Because if you watch the video clip, the way he says it, he says, Well, you know, if it's done properly, and of course, that includes security and everything else, but, you know, if it's done properly, That's a significant caveat.
00:11:15.000He's saying if we have security and DACA, we can pass the bill.
00:11:48.000It's also telling to see what everybody else is saying about this.
00:11:51.000Representative Mark Meadows, who is the chairman of the House Freedom Caucus, said that the two phase plan is a non starter.
00:11:57.000So, Donald Trump said initially and during this meeting, he said that we'll do it in two phases.
00:12:02.000We'll do DACA and border security, which border security, he hasn't really defined what that meant.
00:12:07.000In this meeting, he said, yeah, it has to include border security, but other than that, it's not that complicated.
00:12:12.000Well, on Friday, he said that border security means all the stuff that the Democrats have already said they're not going to do.
00:12:19.000Well, Mark Meadows says even the two-phase plan, even if he had dock insecurity and then comprehensive immigration reform, we couldn't do that.
00:12:26.000Chuck Schumer said if there's a wall, we can't do that.
00:12:29.000But Donald Trump says, well, if they put it in front of me, I will sign it.
00:12:34.000Well, does it look like anything's going to be put in front of Donald Trump's desk?
00:12:37.000Pay attention to exactly what he's saying.
00:12:40.000If they put something in front of me, if they put legislation in front of me, I will sign it.
00:12:45.000Well, if Chuck Schumer says that if there's a wall included, he's not going to sign it.
00:12:50.000And Donald Trump is saying it has to have security and DACA, and DACA means a wall.
00:12:55.000And if Mark Meadows says if it's two phases, we're not going to sign it, is there going to be a deal put in front of Donald Trump's desk?
00:13:04.000I mean, think of it this way, and this is where the two conditions come into play.
00:13:09.000If Republicans don't make a deal, DACA expires, DACA recipients get deported.
00:13:14.000If the Democrats don't make a deal, DACA expires, DACA recipients get deported.
00:13:19.000If the Democrats agree, If the Republicans agree, if President Trump agrees, if all three are in alignment, then maybe some will not be deported.
00:13:30.000Has that happened at any point in this entire administration that Chuck Schumer, Nancy Pelosi, the GOP Republicans in the House and the Senate, and Donald Trump have all agreed on anything?
00:13:40.000You really have to think about what exactly is being said here.
00:13:44.000And so during this meeting, again, this contradicts so much of what he's been saying on Friday, so much of what he's been saying overall about DACA, and this really harkens back to.
00:13:53.000The exact same thing happening in September.
00:13:56.000I mean, people are already very much up in arms about this, about what Donald Trump's been saying about DACA.
00:14:02.000But this exact same thing happened play for play in September.
00:14:07.000And in September 13th, it came out of Chuck Schumer's office that Donald Trump had reached a deal with Nancy Pelosi, Chuck Schumer, and the Democrats that they would give protection for DACA recipients and not fund a border wall.
00:14:20.000This was a story September 13th of 2017.
00:14:24.000Almost the exact same thing out of Chuck Schumer's office.
00:15:08.000They'd vote Republican, even though Donald Trump has tweeted in 2013 and 2014 that they would never vote Republican even if we gave them amnesty.
00:15:16.000So he knows, but he tweeted it anyway.
00:16:32.000If they make no deal, every day between when Donald Trump rescinded DACA and when DACA expires, a thousand DACA recipients lose legal status until March 5th when they all do.
00:16:46.000January 19th, the government shuts down.
00:16:50.000Public sector people, people on welfare, in a word, Democrat voters.
00:16:54.000So, what this is setting up to be is putting all the leverage, all the pressure against Democrats to concede and give Trump everything he wants.
00:17:01.000And every day, I'm sure, the deal gets worse for them.
00:17:04.000You have to think about it in terms of what is actually being said, what is actually being demanded.
00:17:10.000People can say, oh, well, Trump said this, Trump said that, Trump said everything else.
00:17:14.000Trump is saying if there's no border security, there will be no DACA deal.
00:17:19.000Border security means an $18 billion wall.
00:17:22.000Chuck Schumer says they will not budge on the wall.
00:17:32.000And then you have to take into consideration the government shutdown.
00:17:35.000Take into consideration what the rhetoric will be during the government shutdown.
00:17:39.000Think of how this will play on January 19th when there's no deal.
00:17:43.000On January 19th, when the government shuts down, and that's in a little bit over a week, the rhetoric will be Donald Trump and the Republicans are responsible for the government shutdown.
00:17:54.000Donald Trump and the government are incompetent, and that's why people aren't getting their checks and the national parks are closed.
00:18:00.000Well, Donald Trump can say, I was going to give you everything.
00:18:15.000You have to think of how this will play.
00:18:17.000Additionally, you look at what Trump said during the meeting.
00:18:20.000This was reported by an NBC reporter that Trump specifically and deliberately reframed what it would mean to pass a clean bill.
00:18:28.000Everybody's talking about a clean spending bill in order to fund the government and not including DACA or including DACA, and that would be clean, that would get the government funded, and then we could deal with immigration.
00:18:39.000And this was the rhetoric certainly many years ago when Barack Obama's government shut down because of Obamacare.
00:18:45.000There was all this talk about clean bills.
00:18:47.000We have to pass a clean spending bill to fund the government that doesn't include this defund Obamacare stuff.
00:18:53.000And that's how the Republicans got killed when this happened because everybody said, why can't the Republicans just pass a clean bill?
00:19:00.000Why can't they just pass a clean bill that will fund the government and not defund Obamacare?
00:19:07.000The Democrats didn't own that government shutdown because they flipped the narrative, they flipped the rhetoric, and they put it on the Republicans.
00:19:14.000Republicans shut it down because they were trying to achieve something.
00:19:17.000They were trying to achieve the defunding of Obamacare.
00:19:20.000They wouldn't pass a clean bill, and therefore it's their responsibility, even though it would have funded Obamacare.
00:19:25.000Not to get into that, but they lost the rhetorical battle.
00:19:30.000January 19th, Donald Trump says today.
00:19:33.000That a clean bill means in this context for funding the government would mean DACA and security.
00:19:39.000He went out of his way in this meeting to say that a clean bill is not just DACA, but it's DACA and security.
00:19:47.000He just tweeted moments ago, it's about DACA and security.
00:19:51.000He said in the meeting, it won't be complicated so long as there's DACA and security.
00:19:57.000When the government shuts down, Donald Trump will be able to say, I want to pass a clean bill.
00:20:02.000I want to pass a clean bill that includes security, that includes funding for the border wall, but the Democrats won't let me.
00:20:09.000I said I'd give them, I would compromise on the wall.
00:20:58.000During the meeting, Donald Trump specifically said that he wants to end chain migration specifically for the DACA program.
00:21:07.000Now, if you consider that DACA is a little bit over a million people, there's a little over 1 million illegals here that are on DACA.
00:21:15.000And you consider that the most damage would come from DACA from the chain migration.
00:21:21.000I mean, DACA is bad enough in and of itself that you have a little bit over a million people that have arrived here as children and they have this legal protection.
00:21:29.000When you consider that 1.5 million immigrants are coming here a year and the vast majority of that new immigration is being driven by chain migration, the vast majority of damage that comes from the DACA recipients is not the 1 million people who are here, which is not like a significant number.
00:21:49.000A little bit over 1 million DACA recipients here compared to a million and a half per year.
00:21:54.000And the most damage that would come from the DACA recipients is other people that would come as a result of chain migration.
00:22:01.000If you consider that the deal would be building a border wall, ending chain migration, both for DACA and for outside, ending the visa lottery system, adding another 10,000 ICE agents, defunding sanctuary cities, would that be the end of the world?
00:22:18.000I mean, of course, we would have to see it.
00:22:22.000I think that would be a hill to die on.
00:22:23.000But I mean, if we looked at a deal that was put forward, and I don't think that's going to be likely, but if that was the case, numerically it would be a win.
00:22:32.000Numerically, if you're looking purely at the arithmetic in terms of massively cutting immigration for decades and decades and decades by getting rid of chain migration, ending immigration for decades and decades and decades by getting rid of the visa lottery system, ending outright illegal immigration by building the wall.
00:22:53.000I mean, would that not be worth 1 million people, which would be entirely static because they wouldn't have chain migration to bring more people in?
00:24:05.000We would like to see a wall built now, but we've talked at length about the Congressional restrictions and limitations that exist right now.
00:24:13.000The worst case scenario, and this is the worst case scenario the worst case scenario is the Democrats are forced to negotiate either by the government shutdown or DAC expiring on March 5th, and all recipients lose their legal protection.
00:24:27.000And we get an end to chain migration, an end to the visa lottery system.
00:24:55.000And it doesn't play well with the base, obviously, to bring in the very real and practical considerations.
00:25:00.000But if you're talking about cutting immigration in half over the next 50 years, you're talking about millions and millions and millions of immigrants with high birth rates not coming here in exchange for a static group of people to stay.
00:25:15.000And already there's 40 million illegals here that are not being deported anytime soon.
00:25:20.000Again, you just have to look at it practically.
00:25:24.000It's sort of the same principle that you heard discussed in the Sargon versus Richard Spencer debate.
00:25:29.000Richard Spencer made a very good point about lived experience, about what happens in the real world versus what happens in this abstract, metapolitical, kind of philosophical realm that a lot of people like to live in.
00:25:43.000If you're talking about DACA purely on abstract grounds, purely as a political, Abstraction, a theoretical abstraction, you would say that no DACA recipients should be here ever.
00:25:54.000That any single illegal alien in this country is the gravest offense, the gravest injustice, that the state should allow this, that people should have to endure this, and so on and so forth.
00:26:06.000It is completely unacceptable that any DACA recipients stay here.
00:26:13.000But if you're looking at it pragmatically, if you're looking at it practically speaking, we look at the DACA recipients, there's less than 2 million of them.
00:26:22.000Less than 2 million DACA recipients, and that's very much higher.
00:26:26.000I think it's something like 1.2 or 1.6.
00:26:29.000It's somewhere a little bit more than 1 million, depending on which numbers you're looking at.
00:26:34.000There's a little bit more than 1 million.
00:26:36.000When you consider that legal immigration every year is 1.5 million, when you consider that there's 40 million illegal immigrants in this country, does it not make sense to cut just the heap of legal immigration that's coming our way?
00:26:53.000In a small number, or to cut illegal immigration in this country by ending funding for sanctuary cities, than to die on this hill of a million people there.
00:27:03.000I mean, again, if it were ideal, if we were living in an ideal world where we had huge majorities in the Senate and the House and we could do this all by ourselves, and people say that we can.
00:27:16.000You look at what the majorities are comprised of in either chambers of Congress, whether it's the Senate where we have a 51 vote majority, 52, I guess, if you count VP. Pence as the tiebreaker.
00:27:28.000You look at, for example, Susan Collins, Bob Corker, Marco Rubio, Jeff Flake.
00:27:33.000Those are four people that you will never win over to border security.
00:27:38.000Those are four people you will never win over to any kind of overhaul of the immigration system that would get the kind of deportations and the kind of ending to legal immigration that you want.
00:27:49.000You look at the House, which is far more complicated, but even there, you have massive caucuses of Republicans.
00:27:54.000You have awesome numbers of Republicans, and I don't mean awesome in a positive way, I mean it in a large way, that are moderate, that are left leaning, that are not conservative at all.
00:28:06.000Republicans in name only that will not give us anything better.
00:28:09.000And so when you look at the political constraints, you look at the numbers in play here, and you're talking about a deal hypothetically, and I don't like to talk about hypotheticals because then people say you're for legalizing DACA, you're cucking your shilling, which is not what I'm saying.
00:28:23.000But if you're talking about a hypothetical deal, which would even cut immigration in half, which would even cut immigration in half, in 10 years, you have cut out 7 million legal immigrants from coming here.
00:28:37.000If they have a birth rate of over 2.1, Which is actually like 2.26 for Mexico and higher in other places in Central and South America, you would probably be looking at 7 million legal immigrants and then maybe an additional 7 million if they all have kids, which the statistics show that they do.
00:28:54.000So you're talking about probably 20 million people in 10 years that you're getting rid of if you reach a good deal over DACA, if you use DACA as a bargaining chip.
00:29:06.000And again, this is only meant as a thought experiment to show you what is possible.
00:29:13.000Worst case scenario is that we cut legal immigration in a massive way.
00:29:17.000We get a great deal, and unfortunately, we have to make a concession on DACA, which, even that, I'm not convinced would be the end of the world.
00:29:25.000And if you think, and again, if you don't believe any of this about the deal, people say this is four dimensional chess.
00:29:32.000People say, Nick, this is way out of the realm of possibility.
00:29:37.000Trump could just be cucking, or he's compromised.
00:29:40.000They have his family, or they've poisoned him.
00:29:42.000I hear all these crazy conspiracy theories, which.
00:29:45.000I don't know if it's fair to call them crazy because, you know, the things I talk about, like the moon being artificial or, you know, whatever.
00:29:51.000But people who say that Trump is purely cucking, it's impossible that this is a play.
00:29:56.000It's impossible that he's using leverage.
00:29:58.000It's impossible that he's making a deal.
00:30:00.000For people that say that he's just cucking, it's in his book, it's in the art of the deal.
00:30:07.000You know, people tell me all the time, when I predicted this in September, I said this in September, I said, it sounds like he's cucking, but something else is happening.
00:30:15.000I said, if he's cucking on it, I'm against him.
00:30:17.000I'm off the Trump train, but he's probably not.
00:31:22.000That's how fast I'll be off the Trump train.
00:31:24.000If what he said in this meeting is representative of what will happen in the future, I don't think it will be.
00:31:30.000And if you don't believe any of this contextual evidence, if you don't believe that all this stuff, all the history that Trump has shown that this is the way he operates and all the evidence that suggests otherwise, if you look at the language and everything else, it's in his book.
00:31:47.000And we'll go to chapter two, which is called Trump Cards.
00:31:51.000I encourage everyone to read this book.
00:31:53.000I've been encouraging everyone to read this book since the guy got elected because.
00:31:58.000How can people sit around and predict what the president is doing, what the strategy is, what the thought process is, if they haven't read his book?
00:33:07.000If you plan for the worst, the good will take care of itself.
00:33:10.000What's the worst that will happen here?
00:33:12.000The worst that will happen in this case is that there's no deal.
00:33:16.000In the sense that if all these negotiations fall apart, if he doesn't get the wall and ending chain migration and ending the visa lottery system, there's no deal.
00:34:26.000You know, people who want us to believe that he's cucked or whatever, the black pillars, they want us to believe that Trump was against illegal immigration all his life.
00:34:36.000Trump was against immigration all his life.
00:34:39.000He was against illegal and legal immigration for 35 years.
00:34:44.000He went on television talking about how he didn't like it.
00:34:46.000He launched his campaign talking about how he didn't like illegal and legal immigration.
00:34:52.000He campaigned specifically against DACA, against illegal immigration.
00:34:55.000He's tweeted even before he campaigned that even if we legalized DACA, they wouldn't vote Republican.
00:35:01.000It wouldn't even benefit the Republican Party.
00:35:24.000I'm doing a complete 180 because it would be good media coverage, even though he hates the media, even though he hates the media.
00:35:33.000He's doing the fake news awards next week.
00:35:35.000And, you know, do you even have to cite the hatred of this president for the media and how they've gone after his family and gone after him in the worst, most vicious ways?
00:35:44.000So people are saying theory one, theory one is that he cucked, he just did a 180 on everything for no reason because, you know, good media coverage or this kind of ambiguous.
00:35:56.000Conspiracy theory with no evidence that he's being compromised somehow, that they got to him, they have his family at gunpoint.
00:36:03.000People literally say this that, well, it's not totally irrational.
00:36:06.000What if they have his family at gunpoint?
00:36:08.000Well, if they have his family at gunpoint, then I don't blame him.
00:36:11.000If they have his family at gunpoint, then I don't think anyone can blame him, and I don't think anyone could blame me for not predicting that the deep state suddenly outed themselves and overtly threatened the president with lethal intent.
00:36:23.000So, theory one is that Trump did a complete 180, totally irrational, totally inconsistent.
00:36:36.000Theory two is that just like with Syria in April, just like with DACA in September, just like Iran in December, just like DACA in December, he is using DACA as leverage.
00:37:15.000That for no reason he does a complete 180 on everything he's ever believed, and like maybe it's because the deep state has instituted a coup, if you believe that?
00:37:24.000Or number two, basic strategy as outlined in his book, as practiced since his inauguration, as practiced explicitly and demonstrably at least four times.
00:37:36.000Like, So visible four times in the past year.
00:38:13.000I saw this just today and it was such a massive white pill.
00:38:16.000Jeff Sessions, with the Department of Justice and the Department of Homeland Security, revoked the first naturalized citizenship so far as part of this collaborative effort called Operation Janus.
00:38:29.000They are looking into 315,000 people where they've either forged documents or there's missing fingerprints in terms of applying for naturalization.
00:38:40.000And they have 1,600 people that they're prosecuting and they're going to revoke their citizenship.
00:38:45.000So, you know, all this talk about, well, the Trump administration is cucking.
00:38:49.000Jeff Sessions isn't enforcing the law.
00:38:59.000But find an alternative news source that's not being reported.
00:39:02.000Because while everybody's saying Trump is cucking, all this is happening, Jeff Sessions is literally revoking citizenship, like the furthest extent that wasn't even talked about in the campaign.
00:39:13.000The most Donald Trump talked about in the campaign was removing illegal aliens.
00:39:18.000But remember, there is going to be a big door and legal immigration should continue.
00:39:22.000And now, all the way out here, we're talking about ending chain migration, ending the visa lottery, deporting all legals, revoking citizenship.
00:39:29.000So, hopefully, that's a little bit of encouragement.
00:39:43.000I was going to talk about Steve Bannon being ousted from Breitbart, but really, there's no information about this.
00:39:49.000The only information that's available about.
00:39:52.000The Steve Bannon ouster from Donald Trump's inner circle and even from Breitbart is what's in this book and Donald Trump's official statement.
00:40:07.000I have to see more information because it just doesn't quite add up.
00:40:12.000Something obviously is going on behind the scenes.
00:40:15.000I'm not sure of what nature is going on behind the scenes or who's involved.
00:40:19.000So, I'm not really an authority to say what's going on there more than anybody else.
00:40:23.000I mean, anybody could say, well, it's obvious what's happening.
00:40:26.000Steve Bannon cared more about his own brand and he shot his mouth off and blah, blah, blah.
00:40:30.000And, you know, anybody could say that.
00:40:32.000Anybody could take what's being said in the media and regurgitate it or pick a side.
00:40:36.000But as for analysis, there's not really enough information.
00:40:41.000I will say something very fishy about that.
00:40:43.000Sebastian Gorka, who was also ousted at the same time as Steve Bannon from the White House over the summer, said that he was instructed to cooperate with Michael Wolf in writing that book.
00:41:34.000I mean, if both Gorka and Bannon were kicked out of the White House in summer, and both Gorka and Bannon were instructed maybe to give a comment to this guy who's a liar and known for making up quotes, and Steve Bannon's quote got included and he got maligned and now he's dead, I mean, did somebody want Gorka and Steve Bannon out of the picture?
00:41:53.000Did the same person that got them out of the White House maybe get them out of Trump's inner circle in this way or try to get Gorka but successfully got Bannon?
00:43:12.000Trump is slurring his words, and some is poisoning his food.
00:43:15.000I mean, there are all kinds of crazy things coming out, and it's just there's no way that anybody could have an authority on what's going on there.
00:43:23.000So I don't really like to engage in the gossip and the rumors.
00:43:27.000There's the official story, and other than that, not a lot of information.
00:43:30.000So that's Bannon, but we'll take a look at the super chats here, and we'll see what people are saying.
00:43:37.000It looks like nobody got notifications for the show.
00:43:40.000It looks like that's why attendance is down.
00:43:42.000Maybe attendance is down on the show because I said it was 250 IQ only, and maybe there was a lot of.
00:43:49.000Fluff of low IQ that were watching previously that said, okay, we got the hint.
00:45:51.000Or about the deep state coup, you mean, maybe.
00:45:54.000I mean, of course, I'm suspicious about all of that, but I think it's far more likely that, I mean, Here's why I don't think it's accurate that Trump is being compromised.
00:46:35.000But with the things Donald Trump has been tweeting, I can't imagine that Donald Trump could be in a compromised situation, either by blackmail or medically or anything like that.
00:46:46.000And then at the same time, they would let him have complete control of his Twitter.
00:46:49.000Like, for example, I don't think he would be able to tweet about North Korea that his button works and we have way more nukes than you and we'll blow you up if he was compromised.
00:47:00.000I don't think he'd be able to tweet about the fake news awards if he wasn't compromised in some way.
00:47:06.000You know, I mean, that would be a weird way for them to compromise him.
00:47:10.000But I definitely think the Bill of Love comment, that was a signal.
00:47:14.000When he said this is a Bill of Love, that was so obvious, that was so ridiculous.
00:47:20.000I think that was almost a signal either to his base or to somebody that something is not right.
00:47:26.000Either, you know, maybe it was a distress signal that he's being compromised.
00:48:15.000Is he making a play, the same kind of play that he made three times already, in which he detailed in his book, and which all signs point to that case, if you're looking at the deadlines and the different restraints on the deal making that Chuck Schumer and others have set, or is it that deep state coup?
00:48:31.000Occam's razor would dictate it's probably the former.
00:48:35.000But again, I mean, if there's evidence, I'd like to see it.
00:51:00.000But it's just to say, you know, for people that think they have control over outcomes, what we can do is charge up our people with morale.
00:51:11.000The effect that you have on our troops, on our guys, by blackpilling is so much more terrible than the positive effect you'll have by voicing your concerns on Twitter.
00:51:24.000I mean, here's what happens when you go out there and you say Donald Trump is cucking and everything is lost and he cucked and everything's over.
00:51:36.000They will get nihilistic, and that's not what we want.
00:51:39.000So you really have to look at it that way.
00:51:41.000No matter what, everybody says, oh, well, even though Nick was right 100%, it was a good thing that I was tweeting about it because that might have forced his hand.
00:52:32.000I think the biggest thing that people have been deluded into thinking, the biggest problem with the question on race these days, Is that people define race as skin color, and that's why people don't care about race anymore because they think it's about skin color.
00:52:45.000If it was just about skin color, it would be trivial.
00:52:48.000If the only difference between Africans and Europeans and Asians and Jews and everyone else was the color of their skin pigmentation, the liberals would be right.
00:53:00.000If everybody was just blank slate, John Locke, tabula rasa when they were born, but just in different colors, you know, I'm white and you're brown and you're yellow and you're, you know, a different color.
00:53:16.000And that's the relativistic worldview that they live in.
00:53:18.000But if you believe, and there's the biological scientific case for this, an empirical case for this, that race is biological and evolutionary, and there's a sociological component to it as well, well, then you understand that race is a little bit more complicated.
00:53:31.000And so, while Ashkenazi Jews are white in the sense that they have white skin color, they look ostensibly European.
00:53:42.000Racially, ethnically, culturally, are they European?
00:54:13.000I mean, there's the biological basis that Jews.
00:54:16.000According to their own law, according to their own definition, they are only Jewish if they're born of a Jewish mother, which makes it so that Jews are derived genetically from the Middle East as opposed to Europe.
00:54:27.000But then in addition, there's the historical, the sociobiological component, the cultural component where Jews don't identify as Europeans.
00:54:40.000They have not assimilated into Europe as all other groups have.
00:54:44.000You know, for example, you look at French, Italian, German, English.
00:54:49.000All of these broader national identities had to be assimilated.
00:54:53.000You know, in France, you had all different kinds of tribes and groups that existed after the Roman Empire fell when they were subjugated under Rome and then afterwards that had to be assimilated into a common French identity.
00:55:07.000I mean, Italy only got unified as recently as I believe the 1860s, Germany was the 1870s, 1871, Germany was unified.
00:55:16.000And so these different tribes in Europe, European tribes, were assimilated.
00:55:21.000Jews refused assimilation, they refused it everywhere they go.
00:55:25.000You have Jews all over the world, you have them.
00:55:28.000In Turkey, you have them in Europe, you have them in North America, you have them in China, you have them in India, you have them in Yemen, you have them in Africa, and they don't assimilate because they don't identify with the group that they're the continent or the people that they are among.
00:55:42.000That is one of the chief peculiarities of Jewish people, is that they are the one group seemingly that are resistant to assimilation.
00:55:50.000And then you look at the sociological component there, where they're a nomadic people.
00:55:54.000They have this special group evolutionary strategy, which is unique and different.
00:56:00.000You know, obviously, it has this kind of autoimmune defense against assimilation, and that's why they're not white.
00:56:06.000But, I mean, you could read a lot about this in Kevin McDonald's book, A People Who Shall Dwell Alone.
00:56:11.000That's the first in the Culture of Critique series.
00:56:14.000Culture of Critique was the third book, but it's a four book series.
00:56:18.000You could read about this in Hilaire Belloc's book about the Jews.
00:56:22.000And that's, again, it's not to say that there's anything wrong with that, but, I mean, Jews themselves don't identify as white.
00:56:29.000And then they often use that to their advantage, which is deceptive.
00:57:47.000I mean, I guess I believe in round earth.
00:57:51.000I don't know if I believe in flat earth or if I believe in hollow earth, but I don't know.
00:57:57.000I just, the problem is, I guess the biggest problem for me, I don't really have an opinion on it because I, you know, I'm not a big science guy.
00:58:04.000I don't, not so familiar with science.
00:58:07.000The empiricists, the rationalists, the materialists.
00:58:10.000I've always been a more, Esoteric, mystical spirit, myself.
00:58:15.000So I don't really make a judgment one way or the other.
00:58:17.000And the same is true of evolution, by the way.
00:58:19.000My problem is with people who think that they know.
00:58:21.000That's my only problem, is with people who think they know.
00:58:24.000These vile people who you'll come up to them and say, you know, hey, how about this flat earth stuff?
00:58:30.000I mean, what do you make of the fact that the horizon appears to be flat all the way around?
00:58:34.000If you're on a plane, you can't see the curvature of the earth.
00:58:36.000If you look, and you know, you ask questions about it, or people ask questions about it.
00:58:41.000And from the masses, from the masses, the Redditors and everybody else, you'll get.
00:58:47.000Almost this uniform contempt for anybody that wants to go against the grain, anybody wants to go against the commonly accepted theory.
00:58:55.000And it's not so much that I agree with the dissenting view, so much as I hate, hate people who think that they know.
00:59:03.000And they have contempt for other people on a subject that they themselves know nothing about.
00:59:08.000You know, you think a flat earther is stupid?
00:59:22.000Looking into facts, asking questions, going against the grain, these are admirable qualities.
00:59:27.000You might be a little bit loopy if you believe in some of the arguments.
00:59:30.000You know, some people believe, I read one argument that the reason why mushroom clouds form is because the displaced terrain, when a bomb blows up the earth, gets stuck in like a dome, you know, above the earth.
00:59:46.000But generally speaking, if you're talking about, like, there was one experiment in Britain.
00:59:49.000Where there was a canal that was six miles long, and a guy put a little boat on the canal.
00:59:55.000It's the longest canal in the world at the time, I believe, and he put a little telescope on there.
01:00:01.000And he went out and he looked through the telescope, and six miles down the way, somebody put out a boat with like a piece of paper sticking out of it or something, so that if the earth were flat, you would have been able to see the piece of paper from the telescope.
01:00:16.000And you understand at this far distance, that wouldn't be possible if the earth was curved, because if the earth Were curved, it would have to be something like three feet lower in terms of height than the telescope.
01:00:27.000And that's an interesting thing to look into.
01:00:29.000That's something that people who've never looked into flat Earth know nothing about.
01:00:33.000And it turns out there's an argument by the round earthers that says that, well, light curves because of gravity or something like that.
01:00:39.000The light's refracted, and that's why that happens.
01:00:41.000But I'm far more interested in people who will engage in the debate, who will ask the question, who will question authority than people who have contempt for anybody who thinks otherwise.
01:02:14.000People who go to school, excuse me, they go to middle school or high school or college, and they don't question one thing that's been told to them.
01:03:02.000And for people that, I mean, like the whole Hitler thing is a good example.
01:03:06.000You know, I mean, the same people that will tell you, well, I don't want to get into all of that, but I mean, you know what I'm saying, basically.
01:05:45.000That's the tip for all the people that came anyway without the little notification there is that a big debate coming on Monday with a big guest, somebody that we've seen around more times.
01:05:57.000Recently on Twitter, and he'll be coming on for a big debate.
01:06:01.000It'll be very fun, so stay tuned for that.
01:06:03.000But that's going to do it for us tonight on the show.
01:06:13.000She's coming to my producer, not my mom, my producer kept running into the studio while the Neil and stream was going on, frantically passing me these notes from a notepad.