America First - Nicholas J. Fuentes - The Groyper Leadership Summit

00:00:19.000 Disaster for the human.

00:00:20.000 Americanism, not globalism, will be our credo. 1.00

00:00:27.000 The boomer generation and its consequences have been a disaster for the human. 0.99

00:01:13.000 Who's got the clip? 1.00

00:01:15.000 No e-girls. 1.00

00:01:16.000 Never. 0.99

00:01:17.000 Hashtag never e-girls.

00:01:19.000 Not even once.

00:03:31.000 Americanism, not globalism.

00:03:36.000 What's, uh.

00:03:36.000 Wait, what's going on?

00:03:45.000 Disaster for the humans.

00:03:47.000 Americanism, not global.

00:04:23.000 But I just can't do it. 1.00

00:04:24.000 You're an e-girl. 1.00

00:04:26.000 No e-girls. 1.00

00:04:27.000 Who's got the clip? 1.00

00:04:29.000 No e-girls. 1.00

00:04:30.000 Never. 0.99

00:04:31.000 Hashtag never e-girls.

00:04:33.000 Not even once.

00:04:43.000 What was that?

00:06:43.000 It's been a disaster for the human world.

00:06:45.000 Americanism, not globalism. 0.94

00:06:52.000 Boomer generation and its consequences have been a disaster for the human world. 1.00

00:06:58.000 Americanism, not globalism. 1.00

00:07:33.000 I'm sorry, Brittany Venti, but I just can't do it. 1.00

00:07:35.000 You're an e-girl, you know the rule. 1.00

00:07:37.000 No e-girls. 1.00

00:07:38.000 Who's got the clip? 1.00

00:07:39.000 No e-girls. 0.78

00:07:41.000 Hashtag never e-girls. 0.94

00:07:41.000 Never! 0.94

00:07:44.000 Not even once.

00:10:04.000 And its consequences have been a...

00:10:06.000 It's a disaster for the humanists.

00:10:08.000 Americanism, not global.

00:10:44.000 But I just can't do it.

00:10:45.000 You know the rule. 1.00

00:10:47.000 No e-girls. 1.00

00:10:48.000 Who's got the clip? 1.00

00:10:50.000 No e girls. 1.00

00:10:51.000 Never.

00:10:52.000 Hashtag never e girls.

00:10:54.000 Not even once.

00:11:04.000 I don't think budget was that.

00:13:17.000 Disaster for the human beings.

00:13:19.000 Americanism, not global.

00:13:55.000 But I just can't do it. 1.00

00:13:58.000 No e-girls. 1.00

00:13:59.000 Who's got the clip? 1.00

00:14:01.000 No e-girls. 1.00

00:14:02.000 Never. 0.99

00:14:03.000 Hashtag never e-girls.

00:14:05.000 Not even once.

00:14:15.000 What was that?

00:15:40.000 Good evening, ladies and gentlemen, and welcome to the Groyper Leadership Summit.

00:15:57.000 So, I'm Patrick Casey.

00:15:59.000 I'm a political activist.

00:16:00.000 I've been involved in dissident politics for close to five years at this point.

00:16:04.000 And, you know, I've seen a lot of up and downs in the movement.

00:16:09.000 I've seen, you know, Trump rise to prominence and kind of disappoint someone once he took office.

00:16:15.000 I've seen the alt right come and go.

00:16:17.000 But I'll just say this I'm very, very enthused with the future of the America First movement.

00:16:23.000 It's got a lot of potential.

00:16:24.000 And I'm very excited to meet here today and discuss with you all the momentous few months that we've had.

00:16:30.000 So, enough about me.

00:16:31.000 Let's discuss why we're meeting here today.

00:16:33.000 Well, there are a number of reasons.

00:16:35.000 Perhaps we're here to make new friends.

00:16:37.000 Perhaps we're here to have good conversation.

00:16:40.000 Exchange ideas.

00:16:40.000 These are all valid reasons to meet here.

00:16:43.000 But I think that above all else, we are here to celebrate our monumental victory against Conservatism Inc. in the Greiper Wars.

00:16:59.000 Good stuff.

00:17:01.000 I like it.

00:17:01.000 Good energy.

00:17:03.000 So let's begin with a recap of what happened in the last few months.

00:17:07.000 Well, summer was fairly boring.

00:17:10.000 We had some activism take place, a lot of content, right?

00:17:13.000 I'm sure we brought a lot of people to our side.

00:17:14.000 But toward the end of fall, I think it was in October, a few Groypers got together at, I believe it was a college in Colorado.

00:17:23.000 That was the first real front, the first real battle in the Groyper War.

00:17:27.000 And they asked Charlie Kirk some tough questions about a particular historical event and immigration and demographics.

00:17:34.000 And now we've seen things like this in the past.

00:17:36.000 This isn't the first time that Charlie Kirk and other conservatism ink figures have been subjected to difficult questions during these QA sessions.

00:17:44.000 However, for whatever reason, this one, this event, this time set off a chain reaction.

00:17:50.000 You had Groypers who went out, dissidents who went out at basically every stop, every subsequent stop.

00:17:56.000 And it seemed like it only grew.

00:17:58.000 Every event, every subsequent event only had more and more people.

00:18:02.000 All kinds of questions about immigration, demographics, foreign policy, economics.

00:18:06.000 Were asked, and you could really tell that the establishment didn't like this, right?

00:18:10.000 It was very obvious that our people, people in the dissident right, America Firsters, were very unhappy, right?

00:18:16.000 There wasn't, you know, most of the questions were fairly civil, but there was a sense of grievance, and we absolutely have the right to be aggrieved because our ideas are shut out, we are silenced, we are deplatformed, and as much as Conservatism Inc. claims to value the free market of ideas, free speech, all of these things, it's very obvious that at the end of the day, what really matters to them is control.

00:18:39.000 So, I think it's very important that we understand just exactly what Conservatism Inc. is.

00:18:44.000 As the name suggests, it's somewhat of a racket.

00:18:47.000 Conservatism Inc. is not about the truth.

00:18:49.000 It's not about America first.

00:18:50.000 It's certainly not about remedying and reversing American decline.

00:18:54.000 No.

00:18:54.000 At the end of the day, Conservatism Inc. is a racket.

00:18:57.000 It is a movement that is propped up by donor money, it exists to serve globalist interests.

00:19:04.000 And, you know, America at this point in time, and Western civilization overall at this point in time, can be rightfully defined as Orwellian.

00:19:12.000 So, what does that mean?

00:19:13.000 Well, one can say that a society that is Orwellian is one that is defined by untruth.

00:19:19.000 It is defined by falsity.

00:19:20.000 And that means that the preservation of the status quo under an Orwellian society is dependent upon the suppression of the truth.

00:19:28.000 And we see that nowhere better than in Conservatism Inc.

00:19:32.000 Again, Charlie Kirk says that when I asked my question to Charlie Kirk at OSU, I began framing the question saying that I was banned from CPAC.

00:19:42.000 And multiple times he said, I didn't ban you from this event, though.

00:19:45.000 No, but by his own admission, he didn't know who I was then.

00:19:48.000 After finding out who I was, he proceeded to fearmonger about me and ban me from SAS, SAS, rather.

00:19:54.000 You know, they claimed, they banned me yesterday, they claimed that they're going to be refunding my $75, but until they do, Charlie Kirk personally owes me $75.

00:20:04.000 And I'm going to get it, one way or the other.

00:20:06.000 But the point is that, yes, so globalism, globalism at the end of the day needs to be understood as the main threat.

00:20:13.000 When we define the enemy as the left, as socialism, As one of these other, you know, some of these other isms, and we see it only from the right, then, you know, that perspective occludes the threat on the right.

00:20:24.000 During the election, one of the best parts of the 2016 election was the delegitimization of some parts of Conservatism Inc., right?

00:20:35.000 National Review, in particular, was thoroughly routed.

00:20:37.000 They had to shut down their comment sections.

00:20:39.000 Many of their, you know, main pundits were totally disgraced, right?

00:20:44.000 But what happened after the 2016 election is you had the, you know, people like Charlie Kirk.

00:20:49.000 Organizations like TVUSA, that by the way, adamantly opposed Donald Trump during up right up until the moment he got the nomination, at which point they jumped on the bandwagon out of reasons of pure self preservation and self interest.

00:21:00.000 Well, these people who were formerly never Trumpers, who were formerly tweeting out things as Charlie Kirk did, calling Donald Trump a pervert, saying that he's like not a real family man, right?

00:21:09.000 It was a little bit more than, you know, mere ideological disagreements as he would like you, you know, he would have you believe.

00:21:14.000 But the point is that these guys jumped on the Trump train afterwards and they've played a profound role in shaping the Trump administration thus far.

00:21:21.000 And I think the real spirit of 2016 is best exemplified in the America First movement.

00:21:26.000 We are the ones who understand that something has gone terribly wrong in the administration.

00:21:31.000 And it's not just something that's limited to Groypers, right, at this point.

00:21:35.000 Anyone who is a sincere immigration patriot understands that something has gone terribly wrong.

00:21:40.000 And I think that the dissident right, you know, within which the America First movement is absolutely included, needs to, above all else, just diagnose what went wrong with the first term of Donald Trump's presidency.

00:21:52.000 And there's much that we could discuss, and that's not the main reason that we're here tonight, but I think the main takeaway really is that Donald Trump staffed his administration with the wrong people.

00:22:02.000 He had the wrong people whispering into his ear.

00:22:04.000 And Conservatism Inc. plays a big, deserves quite a bit of blame for that.

00:22:08.000 Now, at the end of the day, these are people that Trump invited in.

00:22:10.000 No one forced him at gunpoint, as far as we know, to clown around with Charlie Kirk and invite Gary Cohen and other establishment insiders into his administration.

00:22:20.000 In some cases, people who were never Trumpers up through 2017, right?

00:22:25.000 Everyone knows that many, many Trump loyalists were passed over and it was a mess.

00:22:30.000 Frankly, it's a mess.

00:22:32.000 But the point is, we now understand that it is not just national review online, not just the people that have been against Trump since the beginning.

00:22:40.000 No, it's that many people who have hitched their wagons to the Trump train are actually not America first.

00:22:46.000 They don't represent the spirit of 2016.

00:22:49.000 And Charlie Kirk is a perfect example of this, right?

00:22:52.000 Up until very recently, right?

00:22:53.000 Up until the Groyper War, he was talking about stapling green cards to diplomas, which is something that prior to To hearing him say that, I only really heard from neoliberals on the left, Democrats, and so forth, right?

00:23:04.000 People like Hillary Clinton, she said that.

00:23:06.000 Charlie Kirk has also said that.

00:23:08.000 But as a result of repeated groiping, shall we say, Charlie Kirk has been forced to concede that actually the people that he has smeared so maliciously and unfairly as neo Nazis and white supremacists and whatever else, actually these people were right about quite a bit.

00:23:24.000 That's what he's been forced to say.

00:23:26.000 He's like, oh, actually I support the RAISE Act now.

00:23:28.000 Actually, I was wrong about green cards and diplomas.

00:23:30.000 Charlie, that was a wise move.

00:23:30.000 And that's good.

00:23:32.000 But you know what?

00:23:33.000 We understand that you are just doing that out of self preservation.

00:23:37.000 We know that as soon as Donald Trump gets out of office, you are going to promote, you're going to promote, you know, Marco Rubio or Dan Crenshaw or Nikki Haley.

00:23:46.000 And we in America First are going to do everything that we can to ensure that that does not happen.

00:23:50.000 Because at this point, it's less a battle about what happens in 2020 and more a battle for what happens after Trump.

00:23:55.000 The only chance for America to be saved is if populism is able to move beyond Trumpism, is if someone comes along in 2024 and carries the mantle.

00:24:06.000 Of nationalism strikes down globalism and is able to get elected and actually make things happen once he gets in office.

00:24:12.000 And we understand that, right?

00:24:13.000 We again understand that something has gone terribly wrong in the Trump administration.

00:24:17.000 Whereas Charlie Kirk and the others in Conservatism Inc., who support the president, would have you believe that everything's great, right?

00:24:22.000 We've seen the stock numbers and the economy is doing better than ever.

00:24:26.000 And perhaps more important than anything else, we've seen that black unemployment rates are lower than ever before.

00:24:33.000 But I think we in the dissident right are above all else, we are truth tellers, right? 0.63

00:24:38.000 We are the ones who dare to point out that the emperor wears no clothes, that the establishment, that this regime is founded upon lies.

00:24:45.000 And as a result of that, of course, the system has to keep people in line.

00:24:49.000 They will go after your livelihood, they'll go after your families, and that happens on the right as well.

00:24:53.000 It absolutely does. 0.58

00:24:55.000 I'm reminded of Dan Crenshaw saying that the people in the audience at ASU who are asking him tough questions about globalism, mass immigration, our relationship with Israel, were, you know, what he told them, you're going to regret this later on, right?

00:25:08.000 Because this is all going to be on the internet, and someday in the future, right, someone could find out who you are.

00:25:13.000 So if you're right of center and you're not explicitly opposed, To this system of soft totalitarianism that is an integral part of globalism, then you're no ally of ours, and in fact, you are an enemy of the best interests of America.

00:25:27.000 And that is the case for many of these globalists on the right.

00:25:30.000 Now, we in the dissident right understand a number of dissident truths.

00:25:36.000 We understand that there are a number of controversial truths that are being suppressed by both the left wing and the right wing parts of the establishment.

00:25:44.000 So, one of the main ones that we hit on is the reality of demographics.

00:25:48.000 There are many things that we can discuss with regard to demographics, right?

00:25:51.000 We could talk about Robert Putnam's research that showed that in increasingly ethnic diverse societies, there's only lower levels of trust, right? 1.00

00:25:58.000 Social capital is diminished.

00:26:01.000 You know, in this academic study that he published where he realized all this stuff, it's called the Pluribus Unum, and I'd highly recommend all of you read it.

00:26:07.000 He did, you know, he's talking about all of these downsides to diversity.

00:26:11.000 He says, well, you know, the trade off is good because we have better restaurants.

00:26:15.000 So when you get to the point where even in academic studies, 40 page academic papers done by Harvard sociologists, Are citing better food, restaurant variety as a reason to keep bringing in millions and millions of people from wildly different parts of the world.

00:26:30.000 I think it's pretty safe to say that there aren't really any good faith, non cynical arguments for mass immigration to be made.

00:26:36.000 Now, one of the main things we discuss when we're talking about demographics is the effect that mass immigration from non Western countries is having on our political institutions. 0.54

00:26:48.000 Now, we should point out that we have broader aims for civilization and for America in particular than just ensuring that. 0.89

00:26:54.000 The GOP is able to keep winning elections, right?

00:26:56.000 We don't want the Democrats to gain a permanent majority, permanent electoral majority, for the simple fact of the matter that it's obvious that we're not going to see any real change on the issues that we care about from the left.

00:27:07.000 Now, again, you know, I'm not losing sleep overnight because mass immigration means, you know, Jeb Bush isn't going to be able to get elected in 2024.

00:27:14.000 No.

00:27:14.000 But at the bare minimum, it's very obvious that we're not going to see any change on the national level from anyone outside of the Republican Party.

00:27:20.000 It's going to be someone like Donald Trump who comes along and acts contra the will of the GOP establishment, right?

00:27:29.000 But the numbers are obvious, right?

00:27:31.000 Black people, despite these 2% gains that Trump has made with them, continue to vote roughly 90% for the Democratic Party.

00:27:38.000 They've voted that way for years and years, many election cycles.

00:27:42.000 And what conservatives, mainstream conservatives, would say is well, we just haven't sold it well enough.

00:27:47.000 We just haven't gone into these communities and told them to read John Locke, talked about Edmund Burke to them or something of that sort.

00:27:54.000 Well, I think we all understand that there are deep rooted cultural, racial, And social reasons why minorities are not attracted to the kind of conservative values that are promoted by the GOP establishment.

00:28:08.000 And there are many to get into, but I think at the end of the day, the numbers don't lie, right?

00:28:12.000 Trump was not the first Republican politician to come along and pander to minorities.

00:28:17.000 George W. Bush did that in, I believe it was his first 2000 run.

00:28:22.000 St. Francis discusses this in Ethnopolitics, which is a must read for anyone interested in demographics and the effect that it's happening on our political.

00:28:29.000 Institutions, our political establishment overall.

00:28:31.000 But the point is that, you know, George Bush, even back then, right, even 20 years ago, was talking about how we need to, we're praising diversity.

00:28:38.000 Ah, yes, we're having a new country and it's going to be so great. 0.79

00:28:40.000 Please vote for me, non white people. 0.98

00:28:42.000 Well, you know, you didn't see many substantial gains there. 0.95

00:28:46.000 And, you know, for all that we heard about Blexit between 2016 and midterms, there was virtually no, you know, there were no substantial gains made in the black vote between them.

00:28:57.000 So at some point, you just have to be honest and say that it's not working, right?

00:29:01.000 The policies that we're advocating for, maybe they just don't appeal to large portions of the population, right?

00:29:07.000 Based on demographics.

00:29:08.000 Certain demographics just don't care about these things.

00:29:10.000 They don't care about immigration restriction.

00:29:11.000 And in fact, if they do care about it, they're probably very opposed.

00:29:14.000 Now, with that said, I think that.

00:29:16.000 Our movement, America First Movement, isn't only for white people.

00:29:18.000 And that's one of the most disingenuous things that Charlie Kirk tries to say.

00:29:21.000 He's accused people like me and others like Nick of trying to create 100% pure white country.

00:29:27.000 I've never advocated for that.

00:29:29.000 And I don't think if there are ethnically pure countries all around the world, I don't have any issue with that.

00:29:34.000 Obviously, we can think of one relatively ethnically pure country in the Middle East that no one seems to be too bothered about maintaining its ethno religious identity.

00:29:42.000 And I'm not someone who takes issue with that either.

00:29:46.000 Things to be discussed with demographics.

00:29:47.000 I mean, with regard to other populations, Hispanics continue to vote something like 65, 75% for the Democratic Party, Jews, roughly 75%, Asians, roughly 75%.

00:29:57.000 And it's worth pointing out that, you know, Charlie Kirk claims to be fighting the culture war.

00:30:01.000 He claims to be trying to defeat the left and to defeat globalism.

00:30:04.000 But, you know, he'll say things like, as he did during the beginning of the Groeper War, he's like, you know what, Southeast Asian immigrants are great.

00:30:10.000 They come over, they work great jobs, they love conservative values.

00:30:13.000 Again, 75%, right?

00:30:15.000 75% of Asians overall. 0.95

00:30:17.000 So it's.

00:30:19.000 There is a values discussion that needs to be had.

00:30:21.000 But the first discussion really is just getting the facts out there.

00:30:24.000 And the reason why the Groper War has been so successful is because we've been able to get facts out there that Conservatism Inc., including Charlie Kirk, don't even want to acknowledge.

00:30:33.000 They want to inculcate their base against just pieces of data, essentially, let alone the values that can be established therefrom.

00:30:42.000 Now, again, many other things to be said about demographics, but I think the important thing to keep in mind here is that Conservatism Inc. When these people get up there and they say something, when Charlie Kirk advocates for a policy, when Benny Johnson or Sebastian Gorka, when they're up there advocating for something, maybe they believe in it.

00:30:58.000 But regardless of whether or not they actually believe in what they're saying, that's really beside the point because they have intricate webs of donors and handlers and connections.

00:31:07.000 And they're not able to be free thinkers in the way that we are, right?

00:31:10.000 That's kind of a cliche term.

00:31:11.000 But I can get up here and say basically anything that I want, right?

00:31:15.000 I'm never going to be able to attract the wealthy, powerful, oligarchic donors that Charlie Kirk does.

00:31:20.000 But that's just the price that you pay when you're actually trying to make.

00:31:24.000 You know, the world a better place, and you're not creating an organization like he did that really just advocates for the interests of the ruling class.

00:31:31.000 You know, I've done a lot of political advocacy, and it's all been within dissident contexts.

00:31:35.000 There are many unique challenges to what I do, to what Nick does, and to what others do.

00:31:40.000 But, you know, I was thinking about this the other day.

00:31:41.000 Charlie Kirk created a brilliant idea.

00:31:44.000 I'll give him credit for that.

00:31:45.000 He was like, you know what, I'm going to create an organization that advocates for the interests of the people who have the most money and power in society, right? 0.99

00:31:52.000 So much for, you know, the forgotten man, right?

00:31:54.000 No, I'm going to advocate for Netflix.

00:31:56.000 For Sheldon Adelson, right?

00:31:59.000 For very powerful, wealthy people.

00:32:00.000 I mean, I kid you not, TPUSA has, I don't know if they do it anymore, maybe they've developed a bit of self awareness in recent years, but for a while they were waving around these signs on campuses that said, I heart Starbucks, I heart Netflix, I heart Amazon, right?

00:32:15.000 And it really just boggles the mind.

00:32:17.000 And I think one of the main issues with Conservatism Inc., with the mainstream right, is that by focusing on socialism at the enemy, by focusing on leftism at the enemy, Again, it hides the issue to the right, and that issue is woke capital, right?

00:32:32.000 The fact that they're waving around these signs advocating for corporations that hate them, corporations that only value them for the tax cuts that TPUSA might support.

00:32:43.000 But at the end of the day, it's obvious that most of these major corporations are anti American.

00:32:48.000 We're going to have to take state power, and only after that point will they fall in line.

00:32:54.000 And these corporations, there are many arguments to be made.

00:32:56.000 Many of them benefit from mass immigration, many of them benefit from having us be atomized, deracinated consumers.

00:33:03.000 But at the same time, many of them are just kind of going with the flow, right?

00:33:05.000 So, progressivism, the cultural shift left, the only factor there is not woke capital, but it is a very important one.

00:33:11.000 It is a very important one.

00:33:13.000 But I think one of the main reasons why the Groeper War was so successful is the fact that we were able to bypass the censor.

00:33:19.000 And that's why they freaked out. 0.80

00:33:20.000 Let's talk about the response that conservatism had to our offensive.

00:33:25.000 Well, you know, Charlie Kirk would, he created two separate lines.

00:33:29.000 They started doing that at some events.

00:33:30.000 Of course, our guys figured it out pretty quickly.

00:33:32.000 And, you know, oh, this is the line for leftists?

00:33:34.000 Yeah, I'm a leftist.

00:33:35.000 I'll go there.

00:33:37.000 And, you know, it worked out pretty well.

00:33:39.000 But other than that, you know, they tried to shut down the QA session at, where was that, UCLA, right?

00:33:45.000 You had Don Jr. on stage, Kimberly Guilfoyle.

00:33:48.000 And I mean, that just really speaks volumes to what's going through their heads.

00:33:52.000 When we're out here talking about demographic change, talking about identity, talking about, you know, just the cultural shift to the left, they do not want their people to hear it.

00:34:01.000 What they've taken to now is they're not doing the live streams, right?

00:34:04.000 For now, people are still able to live stream within the event.

00:34:08.000 But they're chopping up, they're creating their own almost like thug life compilations of them responding very disingenuously to Groypers, not leaving out the context and just hoping that their followers, who many of them are well intentioned, are looking on Instagram and seeing a two minute clip of Charlie Kirk saying, disavow identity Europa or whatever else.

00:34:29.000 And I should point out that Identity Europa doesn't exist at this point.

00:34:32.000 That was an organization that I didn't found, but I did run, and we did nonviolent political activism advocating for things like.

00:34:39.000 An end to the anti white agenda, an end to mass immigration. 0.84

00:34:41.000 Again, we never called for an all white country. 0.88

00:34:43.000 We never called for anything inhumane being done to people. 0.93

00:34:46.000 It's totally disingenuous.

00:34:47.000 But it should be pointed out that I am almost 100% clear that Charlie Kirk was getting his information on that from an Antifa blog, right?

00:34:54.000 Based on some of the exact comments that he was making.

00:34:57.000 And I think he did say, identify Yevropa at one point.

00:35:00.000 That is actually an Antifa blog that totally exists to dox people in my organization.

00:35:05.000 So that really says it all about where Charlie Kirk is getting his information from.

00:35:10.000 And to wrap up, I want to discuss the issue of free speech with regard to us and how we relate to TPUSA and conservatism, incoherent.

00:35:20.000 No one on our side has ever made the argument that Charlie Kirk and others are legally obligated to debate us, to invite us into their private events.

00:35:30.000 What we're really saying, though, is that if you do kick us out of your event for having ideas that you disagree with, then you can't style yourselves as champions of the free market of ideas.

00:35:43.000 I mean, that whole phrase is somewhat cringy, but that really is something that they take so much pride in.

00:35:49.000 We love having debates.

00:35:51.000 The left, they don't want to debate.

00:35:52.000 And also, I'm going to ban you from my conference and I'm going to call you a Nazi and I'm going to make sure no one can hear what you have to say.

00:35:59.000 They might engage with us to some extent when we force them to, where we're literally in the same room as them and they can't get away with us. 0.72

00:36:05.000 But even if they're having a conversation, and in some of these events, like the Dan Crenshaw one, someone started asking a question, you know.

00:36:14.000 On July, whatever, 1967.

00:36:16.000 And they were like, all right, next question.

00:36:18.000 So it's very clear that even their willingness to engage in that manner is a bit limited.

00:36:24.000 But the point that I'm making here is they will sometimes engage with our ideas, but it's never in a good faith manner.

00:36:30.000 And that really just says it all, right?

00:36:31.000 I'm willing to engage with conservatism, Inc.'s ideas, ideas on the left.

00:36:35.000 And that's one of the things that drew me to the dissident right, is that we're able to take a sober view on things.

00:36:39.000 We're able to look at authors on the left, like Marcuse or Adorno, and say, hey, these guys were terrible overall, but this critique of consumerism, this critique of just kind of the soulless nature of just endless capitalism is worthwhile, right? 0.97

00:36:56.000 We're able to do that without saying, oh, they're libtards or whatever else, right? 0.78

00:37:00.000 We actually want to engage in good faith and debate.

00:37:03.000 Now, the last thing that I will say is I've talked to a number of TPUSA members, some of them fairly higher up in the organization, during the course of my time in West Palm Beach this weekend. 1.00

00:37:12.000 And I will say that it's hard to tell how sincere they were being in these interactions, but most of them cited the lack of civility from the Groypers as being their main concern. 0.99

00:37:23.000 Well, I'll be the first to say that if you understand the predicament that our country is in, and if you understand that Conservatism Inc. is complicit in American decline and is complicit in the globalist destruction of our country, you're not going to care about You know, civility, even if you do, you understand that that's a debate that you have within our side. 0.97

00:37:40.000 That's not a reason to say, okay, these guys, everything they say is wrong.

00:37:42.000 Of course not.

00:37:44.000 But let's point something out.

00:37:45.000 When the establishment shuts us out, when the only engagement they do with us as individuals and with our ideas is smear us, lie about us, slander us, we are under no obligations to play fair, right? 0.84

00:37:59.000 And I'll say this if the Groyper were, if we just went in there nice, goody two shoes, asking very respectful questions, would anyone be talking about that? 0.98

00:38:06.000 No.

00:38:07.000 Would anyone be in here in this room right now?

00:38:08.000 Maybe, maybe.

00:38:09.000 But we bring energy, and that's something that we absolutely have that many others do not, right?

00:38:16.000 We have a powerful grassroots dissident energy that propels us further and further into the spotlight.

00:38:22.000 Our goal since the beginning of the dissident, right?

00:38:25.000 Our goal since I first became active in dissident politics has been to make us impossible to ignore.

00:38:31.000 If they want our ideas to be consigned, to be relegated to the shadows, then we have to do everything in our power to ensure that that does not happen.

00:38:39.000 And that the Groyper War was really successful for that reason, because we were able to get these ideas out into the public and they were unable to stop us.

00:38:47.000 Try as they may, you know, they can take down the streams, we'll do our own streams. 0.97

00:38:51.000 They can lie about us, we'll push back against those lies on social media.

00:38:55.000 And it's worth pointing out to TPUSA, Charlie Kirk, and everyone else in Conservatism Inc.

00:39:00.000 You don't know what it's like to be fueled by idealism.

00:39:03.000 You don't know what it is like to be fighting the good fight for the reason that you care about your people and your country.

00:39:08.000 And that scares you.

00:39:09.000 Right?

00:39:10.000 When I asked Charlie Kirk that question, he said, You're getting so angry.

00:39:13.000 I don't know why you're getting so angry.

00:39:15.000 Of course, you can't relate to the energy that we bring.

00:39:17.000 Because we are in this for America.

00:39:19.000 We are going to put America first.

00:39:21.000 And there is nothing you can do to stop us.

00:39:23.000 Thank you.

00:39:35.000 Next up, we have InfoWars correspondent, content creator, host of American Dissident, Jacob Lloyd.

00:39:35.000 All right.

00:39:42.000 Thank you.

00:39:47.000 Thank you, Oliver.

00:39:47.000 Another round of applause for Patrick Casey.

00:39:49.000 I have to say, on a personal level, thank you to Patrick Casey.

00:39:55.000 He's done on an individual level as well as he and his guys and girls with AIM.

00:40:00.000 They did a lot of the heavy lifting when it comes to the organization of this event and everything.

00:40:03.000 So I'm personally very grateful to him, and I know that everybody else here is too.

00:40:07.000 So.

00:40:09.000 And I want to thank all of you for being here also.

00:40:11.000 I mean, ultimately, this event, Groyper Leadership Summit, the past few months have been about all of you out there, the work that you've been doing on the ground by confronting the people in Conservatism Inc., whether it be Charlie Kirk, Ben Shapiro, these people.

00:40:24.000 This movement really is centered around you, and it's much like Patrick said, this event, this speaking engagement, is about celebrating the accomplishments and the work that you all have done out there.

00:40:37.000 So, thank you to you because this wouldn't be possible without it.

00:40:40.000 We can all get together in a room and speak, but it doesn't really matter as much as it does in this community setting.

00:40:46.000 So, in my talk tonight, I'm going to be focusing a little bit less on the specific events of the past few months.

00:40:53.000 Everybody's been following it a lot.

00:40:55.000 You followed the, I'm sure you saw Nick's streams talking about all this stuff on DLive, covering the people, going up and asking these tough questions a lot.

00:41:03.000 Maybe some of you here, I'm not sure, Patrick.

00:41:07.000 But, so I'm going to be talking a little bit less about the specific events that have been going on.

00:41:12.000 I know that Nick will.

00:41:12.000 Patrick touched on them.

00:41:14.000 And I want to talk more about the specific journey that all of us have gone through.

00:41:19.000 Definitely a very common experience.

00:41:21.000 I was talking to somebody the other night at dinner, and they actually said that it's a very common set of events that lead people into this movement, the American nationalist movement.

00:41:30.000 And I think most of you would probably agree.

00:41:32.000 I definitely, you know, 10 years ago or something when I first started getting into politics, I wasn't like, you know, I can't wait for one day to speak at the Groeper Leadership Summit. 0.98

00:41:40.000 I doubt that any, you know, nobody knew what a Groeper was back then. 0.89

00:41:43.000 The idea of American nationalism as it exists now. 0.99

00:41:46.000 Wasn't really a thing.

00:41:47.000 I mean, you know, of course, you have, you know, I suppose that I can't really say that.

00:41:50.000 It existed, but in very niche circles, you have Pat Buchanan and other key people who were pushing these ideas back then, kind of, you know, John the Baptist type figures, voices crying out in the wilderness, that kind of were our forerunners, and we stand on the shoulders of giants in that regard.

00:42:06.000 So, but I do want to talk about that journey.

00:42:09.000 You know, I can say personally, I'm sure that many of you will be able to relate to this, you know, growing up, I got into politics really in earnest early on in high school.

00:42:16.000 I was always very interested, but early on in high school, All that I really had at the time was kind of neoconservatism.

00:42:22.000 And, you know, back then, this was before the gay marriage decision.

00:42:25.000 So you were a little bit, you were more allowed to have these social conservative opinions.

00:42:29.000 You were allowed to be opposed to gay marriage. 0.51

00:42:31.000 You were allowed to be opposed to trans, you know, transgenderism as it exists now didn't exist.

00:42:35.000 It was, you know, people back then were still made fun of on TV, for example.

00:42:39.000 So back then it was very different, but I was still, you know, inculcated in this neoconservative political culture.

00:42:45.000 That was the only option that there was.

00:42:47.000 At a certain point, I, and I'm sure many of you, began to realize that there was something very wrong with the conservative establishment.

00:42:54.000 Of our time of the past 25, 30, and even the past 100 years or so.

00:42:59.000 I myself very briefly got involved in libertarianism.

00:43:03.000 I got out of that very quickly, but I was for a brief time mentally involved in that, intellectually involved in that, because of the idea that at least it exists outside of, in a sense, outside of our current paradigm.

00:43:16.000 The idea that brought all of us to kind of the starting place on this journey is the idea that there is something deeply and innately wrong with our current paradigm.

00:43:25.000 So, because of that, many of us got involved with libertarianism.

00:43:28.000 It's well documented that there's a pipeline from libertarianism to other, you know, perhaps factions of, you know, right wing kind of niche politics.

00:43:37.000 So many of us have gone along that same route.

00:43:40.000 And all of that led each, although there were different paths, very similar in nature, all of that led each individual to the point that we are now American nationalism.

00:43:53.000 Through this time, we've been refining, learning about these ideas.

00:44:00.000 And what you see now in the Groyper Wars is the culmination of that learning, the culmination of that refining of ideas, and now we're beginning to act.

00:44:08.000 So, there are so many reasons that many of us have found a home in this American nationalist movement and in the America First community with Nick.

00:44:20.000 These ideas are ultimately true.

00:44:22.000 There is a truth in these ideas which is deeply contrasted with the idea of facts and logic.

00:44:27.000 Inc. is obsessed with this idea of facts and logic.

00:44:31.000 Ben Shapiro is probably the one that popularized it the most.

00:44:35.000 But they all jump into it.

00:44:36.000 And it's the same reason that Charlie Kirk, for example, will say that he'll debate anybody, anytime, anywhere, unless he doesn't want to.

00:44:45.000 So, but yeah, so there is no factual reason to care about your family.

00:44:51.000 In these modern times, there's not.

00:44:53.000 You could argue from a purely materialistic view in the past hundred years or so, there might have been some reason, some kind of group survival mechanism, why we have families, why we have.

00:45:02.000 Church communities, but there's no factual or even logical reason as to why somebody would need a family, would need a church community, an environment like this, for example, or even a nation.

00:45:15.000 And I think that shows the foundational mistake that they make.

00:45:18.000 There is no factual or logical reason without tapping into the deeply emotional motivations for those things.

00:45:26.000 There's no factual explanation for pride or courage or happiness or beauty or any of these things, or even faith in many cases.

00:45:35.000 So, these ideas are true.

00:45:37.000 Theirs are not.

00:45:38.000 Theirs are very bankrupt at the foundation.

00:45:41.000 It takes time and effort to discover these ideas that we all adhere to now.

00:45:45.000 It's not an easy thing, you know, as I was talking about a minute ago, the different journey that we all have to go through.

00:45:50.000 I mean, very few people, it's kind of funny, I do talk to a lot of people who say that they kind of had these ideas when they were kids or when they were young.

00:45:56.000 Maybe they were conservative and they went down this winding road.

00:46:00.000 But ultimately, you do have to go through this sort of, you know, hero's journey to be able to get to the point where you are now.

00:46:07.000 So, And it's kind of funny because it took, Nick, and I don't say this in a derisive way, but it took like a 20 year old kid sitting in front of a green screen to, you know, took Patrick, who I don't think has any formal training in this at all.

00:46:21.000 I mean, I don't think he went to school for anything having to do with political organizing or anything along those lines.

00:46:26.000 But these are people who are able to step up into that position and make the decisions that needed to be made.

00:46:31.000 And we have multi million dollar organizations, billionaires, mega donors, the entire political class of the United States terrified at these, you know, people who.

00:46:42.000 Have really no business other than their pride in their country to be doing what they're doing.

00:46:47.000 So, a little bit on the situation.

00:46:49.000 I've talked about the journey that we've gone through to get to the point that we're in, the situation that we're in.

00:46:54.000 And that's part of what we have to learn.

00:46:55.000 You know, for the past hundred years or so, you've seen the entrenching of this political class, you've seen the takeover of our institutions.

00:47:03.000 In our, you know, the conservative Inc. crowd would say that it was the left marching through these institutions, and that is true to a large extent.

00:47:12.000 Ultimately, these people are one in the same.

00:47:14.000 The neoliberal political apparatus of the United States has been entrenching itself deeply in every institution in this country for the past hundred years.

00:47:23.000 I don't know the age of everybody in this room.

00:47:25.000 I would imagine that most of you are probably around 30 or younger.

00:47:30.000 And if that's the case, then you likely don't remember a time in which a presidential administration could not be described by a decrease in wages, a decrease in jobs, oftentimes, endless war in the Middle East.

00:47:45.000 If you go back, Trump is obviously different in some regard, but we're trying to aim past Trump.

00:47:51.000 But you have Obama, Bush before him, Clinton, and then Bush before him, and to an extent, Reagan in the The presidents that came before him.

00:47:58.000 The things that we, the problems that we have now are problems that most of us have had for the entirety of our lives.

00:48:04.000 And for, that's, can cause, I was trying to think of a word.

00:48:08.000 I was talking to my friend Harrison before the speech, trying to find like a technical, real word, like alternative for the word black pill. 0.95

00:48:15.000 But that's really what it is.

00:48:16.000 It's very black pilling to not have ever lived in a world or in a society that wasn't run by these people, by this political class, these, you know, whether it be the bankers, the people like Charlie Kirk, the people who want to basically rape our country for profit. 0.97

00:48:31.000 It can be very black pilling. 0.80

00:48:32.000 It can be very heavy.

00:48:33.000 It can weigh down on you.

00:48:34.000 It can be very discouraging.

00:48:36.000 So, it began over 100 years ago, but for the past 30, it's been almost inescapable, and that can be very heavy.

00:48:43.000 So, now, on one hand, it's very heavy, but on the other hand, you can see that this particular conservative ink, this particular political ideology that has ravaged our country, is almost a flash in the pan in the greater course of human events.

00:49:02.000 We know that there is no end of history.

00:49:06.000 We intellectually know, whether you're a student of history, whether you're a Christian, or just simply an observer of human behavior, you understand that there is no time in which we'll reach stasis where empires will not rise and fall, political classes will not take each other's place, there won't be war.

00:49:26.000 And this is deeply contrasted with the ideology of conservative ink.

00:49:31.000 We intellectually know that, but functionally it's different.

00:49:34.000 One of the keys to this movement, one of the keys to what you're doing out there, one of the keys to what we're doing here tonight is trying to change our mindset away from this idea that nothing can be changed, that they are too big, that they have too much money.

00:49:48.000 And I think that the work that you all have done, whether it's asking these questions or doing work on social media, organizing, dropping banners, whatever the case may be, I think that that's evidence how terrified they are, the lengths that they've gone to kick Patrick and Nick out of SAS and out of CPAC and out of all of these events.

00:50:05.000 I think that it's Evidence that it's not true, that we cannot change these things, that they're not too big for us.

00:50:11.000 So it can be blackpilling, but look in the wider scope of human events.

00:50:17.000 And that is to say that one of the things that we learn is that ebb and flow of human history empires rise, empires fall, things change radically over the course.

00:50:25.000 I always talk specifically about the French Revolution.

00:50:28.000 There's multiple examples of this, but you go from this society, which was deeply conservative, it was the most Christian, the most Catholic nation in Europe.

00:50:36.000 And within a few, within a decade, it goes through this transformation and this revolution is touched off.

00:50:42.000 The most radical, most disgusting leftist Enlightenment movement in European history before or since.

00:50:52.000 And then within a few years of that, you have Napoleon come along, who was radical in a sense because he was able to undo much of that revolution and turn it back towards a conservative perspective with the monarchy and bringing back the church in.

00:51:07.000 And you see this multiple times throughout history.

00:51:09.000 So, It's incredibly important that we all acknowledge that that is the case and that we all do play a part on this stage.

00:51:17.000 That being said, with the idea that empires rise and fall, I don't know if the United States will continue to exist or for how long in its current iteration.

00:51:25.000 Obviously, our goal is to preserve that as long as possible.

00:51:28.000 But even the Roman Empire, which lasted a millennium or so, didn't last forever.

00:51:34.000 But the core of this debate is what is America?

00:51:38.000 Is America that government?

00:51:39.000 Is America the continuity of the United States government?

00:51:42.000 Or is America something else?

00:51:44.000 And the truth is that America is not a set of ideas, America is not a document.

00:51:49.000 America is not a piece of paper that you sign whenever you've gone through the appropriate tests and fees and classes in order to get a green card or to gain citizenship.

00:51:59.000 America is a place and it is a distinct people.

00:52:03.000 As long as there are Americans, there will be America.

00:52:06.000 Whatever that looks like, whatever America looks like in that iteration, there will be America as long as there are American people. 0.52

00:52:13.000 So I believe mine is a little bit shorter than Patrick's, but up until now, we've been.

00:52:20.000 Learning and refining, like I said, and now we're acting, and this is what action looks like.

00:52:24.000 You here tonight.

00:52:25.000 So, I don't know what victory looks like, but the conditions of that victory will be complete and total. 1.00

00:52:31.000 Conservative Inc. and the greater political establishment of the United States will crumble at the hands of the Groypers. 0.99

00:52:37.000 They know it and they're terrified. 1.00

00:52:39.000 It's very important that we all know it too. 0.63

00:52:42.000 They're counting on you not having faith in yourselves as Groypers. 0.89

00:52:47.000 Whatever happens, history will remember that what we are doing here today, history will remember. 0.92

00:52:52.000 The Groypers and the movement that followed that flowed from America First, from AIM, from the greater Groyper network at large.

00:53:01.000 So, thank you very much.

00:53:18.000 Next up, we have a very special guest.

00:53:21.000 For some reason, he asked me to introduce him as Nicker.

00:53:25.000 No, no, no.

00:53:26.000 Nicholas J. Fuentes.

00:53:42.000 Well, hello, everybody.

00:53:44.000 Thank you all for coming to the Groyper Leadership Summit.

00:53:47.000 We are finally here.

00:53:48.000 You know, it's very funny throughout the Groyper Wars, which we have reviewed, I think, extensively in the last two speeches.

00:53:54.000 We always hear from the turning point people, they say, why don't you just do your own event? 0.89

00:53:58.000 You know, I hear this from the boomers, I hear this from conservative ink people, very frustrated.

00:54:03.000 They say, you keep crashing our events, you keep hijacking our events.

00:54:06.000 Why don't you do one of our own?

00:54:08.000 Well, we've done one of our own, and we're here, right?

00:54:10.000 And we're here.

00:54:11.000 And I will say that if you watch the Benny Johnson segment today at Turning Point, just saying his name makes people laugh.

00:54:25.000 Synonymous with cringe.

00:54:27.000 I think you'll find that ours is going to be a lot more epic.

00:54:30.000 A lot more epic and based and red pilled than Turning Point USA.

00:54:34.000 So, first, I want to thank everybody for coming, of course.

00:54:38.000 Thanks to Patrick.

00:54:39.000 Thanks for Jake.

00:54:40.000 Patrick's done a lot of hard work setting this up.

00:54:42.000 He did a great speech, obviously.

00:54:44.000 Jake Lloyd, incredible speech.

00:54:45.000 Thanks to everybody here who has attended.

00:54:47.000 I know that.

00:54:48.000 And it's sort of interesting.

00:54:49.000 It says something about our place in politics that we had to have such a secure, tight procedure to get everybody here to just watch speeches, right?

00:54:58.000 So thanks to everybody that came out here at risk of journalists, turning point people, stimming around, seeing what we're up to.

00:55:04.000 But I think we've outsmarted them.

00:55:06.000 We can infiltrate their events, not so much with ours.

00:55:09.000 I also want to thank our internet audience.

00:55:13.000 Of course, I'll be speaking to the people here in the room tonight the Groypers, lots of them, my friends, lots of them, people I admire for asking questions.

00:55:20.000 But we are also talking to an internet audience of something like, I think, 10,000 live viewers right now.

00:55:27.000 It's going to be, I'm sure, that number will climb as this video is passed around.

00:55:31.000 So, you know, primarily we are going to be directing the message of this speech at the people watching at home and principally perhaps interested turning point members, people that have been confused about who we are, what we're about.

00:55:43.000 And it's interesting because this has been the most common question that I've been asked.

00:55:46.000 You know, I came out here, and the reason we've done it this weekend in West Palm Beach, Florida, Is because, of course, we are hosting this mini conference concurrently with Turning Point's annual Student Action Summit or the SAS Summit, which they hold this weekend.

00:56:01.000 Sounds like we've got some cans wrestling there, which we hold this weekend at the same time in the same place as the Turning Point Summit.

00:56:08.000 And so I've been around the city and I've been trying to sort of gauge where people are at.

00:56:12.000 And really, it doesn't even take much.

00:56:14.000 I mean, I rolled into the conference yesterday, I came into the hotel lobby, and automatically everybody around gathers to shake my hand.

00:56:22.000 You know, even people that disagree saying, I don't know if I agree with everything, but what you're doing is very interesting.

00:56:27.000 You know, I don't agree with everything, but I really admire your courage.

00:56:30.000 I think you're asking the right questions.

00:56:31.000 I heard a lot of this.

00:56:32.000 And I've been around town.

00:56:33.000 You know, we stopped at Burger Fi.

00:56:34.000 We got harangued for like 20 minutes by actually three white people. 0.96

00:56:39.000 It was very interesting. 0.84

00:56:39.000 We had a black gentleman in Burger Fi coming to get a picture with us saying he was a big fan while we were being persecuted by some Aryan girl. 0.84

00:56:47.000 You know, it's always, it is always, you know, these white people, right?

00:56:52.000 Can't call us racist when I make remarks like that. 0.66

00:56:55.000 But in any case, we've been around town and everybody's been talking to us and they've been basically saying, well, we've heard a lot about you, but what are you really about?

00:57:03.000 What do you really stand for?

00:57:05.000 Why are you doing this?

00:57:06.000 And so I hope to sort of answer some of those questions tonight.

00:57:09.000 And the biggest one is, who are we and why have we done this?

00:57:12.000 Why are people talking about the Groypers? 0.98

00:57:14.000 Why do I have Politico and New York Times and Washington Post journalists calling me up on the phone in the afternoon?

00:57:21.000 I wake up, you know, and I'm sort of disheveled on my couch.

00:57:24.000 I'm getting a call from some Washington Post journalist.

00:57:27.000 asking me what a griper is.

00:57:28.000 And he's calling me up and saying, what is a griper?

00:57:30.000 And I have to explain, it's like a green Pepe derivative.

00:57:34.000 He's cozy, he's a little bit overweight.

00:57:36.000 You might have seen him around.

00:57:38.000 Why does all this happen?

00:57:40.000 Well, primarily, this is a reaction to what's happening in our country.

00:57:44.000 You know, it's been spelled out in the past two speeches that we're not happy with the state of our country.

00:57:49.000 Why does anyone engage in politics at all?

00:57:52.000 And why does anybody become an activist?

00:57:54.000 It is because they are not pleased with the state of affairs in the country.

00:57:58.000 I think it's an understatement to say that we're not pleased with the state of affairs of our country.

00:58:02.000 The country is going to hell.

00:58:04.000 And it's not even enough to say that because the country has been in bad places before.

00:58:09.000 We've had the Great Depression, we've had the Civil War, we've had World War II.

00:58:13.000 The 1960s and 70s was a little dicey.

00:58:16.000 You know, the 1990s, Rodney King riots.

00:58:19.000 Bad things have happened in the country before.

00:58:21.000 But there's something unique about what's happening right now, what's been happening in the last 30 years.

00:58:26.000 And that's the finality of what we're talking about.

00:58:28.000 There's a finality about what is happening in the country, the state of our country.

00:58:33.000 That if we don't turn it around, we are soon passing, or perhaps are slightly over, the point of no return, after which we cannot go back.

00:58:40.000 We cannot put things back in the right direction.

00:58:43.000 So we're talking about something that's basically apocalyptic.

00:58:45.000 We get our act together, we figure things out, or the country as we know it is over.

00:58:50.000 And that's basically correct.

00:58:51.000 Now, why is the country going to hell?

00:58:53.000 In what ways is the country going to hell, and how has that happened?

00:58:57.000 Well, I think you have to look no further than Los Angeles to figure out in what ways the country is going down.

00:59:03.000 Now, is the country going down because of an economic downturn?

00:59:07.000 Of course not.

00:59:08.000 Economic downturns have happened before.

00:59:09.000 They're cyclical, some are bad, some are mild.

00:59:13.000 We've had wars before, civil wars, we've had a revolution, we've had foreign wars.

00:59:17.000 Local wars, small ones, big ones, long ones, but it's not a war.

00:59:21.000 We're talking about things that are affecting the texture of life of Americans.

00:59:25.000 That's a very critical thing.

00:59:27.000 Because even when we were doing all kinds of projects overseas in the 30s and 40s, even when we were experiencing economic downturn, even during the Civil War, what we always bounce back to is a very normal, very high standard of living that we have in America.

00:59:42.000 We look at Los Angeles today as the epicenter of what the country will look like in the future.

00:59:46.000 You know, for example, I was recently in New York City actually.

00:59:49.000 And I was talking to some friends of mine, and they all told me that New York City just isn't the same because it doesn't feel like the center of the world anymore.

00:59:56.000 And I thought about that, and it's very true.

00:59:57.000 In a lot of ways, Los Angeles is sort of the new pole in America, where it went from New York City in the last century to Los Angeles, perhaps in this century.

01:00:06.000 That's where Hollywood is.

01:00:07.000 This is where Silicon Valley is located, celebrities.

01:00:10.000 It's obviously demographically the future of America.

01:00:13.000 It's oriented towards the East, or rather the Orient, as opposed to Europe.

01:00:17.000 So, in a lot of ways, Los Angeles is the future.

01:00:20.000 And what is Los Angeles like?

01:00:21.000 Why is Los Angeles bad? 1.00

01:00:23.000 Well, it's bad because there's shit in the streets. 1.00

01:00:26.000 It's bad because if you walk down the street, there's human fecal matter. 1.00

01:00:30.000 There's garbage everywhere.

01:00:31.000 It's because medieval diseases are coming back, like tuberculosis, like typhoid, things like this. 0.85

01:00:37.000 We see that California, and more specifically Los Angeles, are unrecognizable.

01:00:42.000 And not unrecognizable, again, necessarily because they're in this condition, but because they simply don't look the same culturally, demographically.

01:00:50.000 If you're a white person and you go to Los Angeles, you're a minority.

01:00:53.000 If you go to a shopping mall, if you walk down a street, you are a minority.

01:00:57.000 You know, we talk about the homeless crisis, the corruption.

01:01:00.000 Los Angeles is the future of America.

01:01:02.000 These are the problems.

01:01:04.000 These are the ways in which the country is going to hell.

01:01:06.000 That is how it's happening.

01:01:07.000 Or rather, that is what the collapse looks like.

01:01:10.000 That is what the downturn, that is what the final sort of end of America looks like, the end state.

01:01:15.000 Now, how did this happen?

01:01:17.000 In a lot of ways, this was driven by the left.

01:01:19.000 You know, Charlie Kirk and lots of others like to lay the blame of this crisis that we face now.

01:01:25.000 At the feet of the Democratic Party or at the feet of liberals, progressives.

01:01:29.000 You know, it's very specific, it's very partisan, and it doesn't really describe precisely how we got here.

01:01:35.000 You know, because why did Los Angeles get this bad?

01:01:38.000 Well, largely it was driven not necessarily in the first place by politics, but first with demographics.

01:01:45.000 Los Angeles and broader California did not become democratic overnight.

01:01:51.000 They did not become democratic by accident.

01:01:54.000 California was carried by Richard Nixon six times in the last century.

01:01:58.000 California was carried by Ronald Reagan four times in the last century, easily, when they were governors, when they were presidents.

01:02:06.000 So it wasn't necessarily that California just started implementing these democratic policies.

01:02:11.000 Because, how do they start implementing democratic policies?

01:02:14.000 Well, they elected democratic politicians in the last 30, 40 years.

01:02:18.000 How did they elect democratic politicians when previously they had only elected Republicans reliably and safely?

01:02:24.000 Demographics.

01:02:25.000 And everybody knows this.

01:02:27.000 There was a report in the LA Times last month that admitted as much.

01:02:30.000 The LA Times, which is not obviously a beacon of conservatism, we're not talking about the American Renaissance, we're not talking about V Dare, we're not talking about the legendary hacker 4chan.

01:02:42.000 We're talking about the LA Times, kind of a cheap jail hacker for a chance. 0.96

01:02:45.000 We'll look trans at this point. 0.74

01:02:49.000 We're talking about the LA Times that said that Republicans are terrified for their political future in Texas and in Georgia and in Arizona because the very same thing happening in all those states and then consequently the country already happened in California, which is what happened.

01:03:06.000 You had mass immigration to California from Asian and Latin America, you had different people from different countries coming to ours.

01:03:13.000 And they changed the texture of life. 1.00

01:03:15.000 And that changed how politics worked.

01:03:17.000 And it changed the policies.

01:03:19.000 And that, in combination with the policies themselves, created the state of California, created the state of Los Angeles.

01:03:26.000 This is how it happened.

01:03:27.000 But it wasn't simply the left.

01:03:29.000 Of course, the right was complicit in these forces. 0.99

01:03:32.000 Because how did those immigrants get here? 0.97

01:03:34.000 In George W. Bush's first five years in office, he let 8 million immigrants into the country. 0.98

01:03:41.000 8 million in five years.

01:03:43.000 We've had 60 million immigrants come in since 1965, legal and illegal. 1.00

01:03:48.000 Now, whether you think, oh, they have to come in legally and we're out of a big door in the middle of the wall, whatever your belief is on that, 60 million immigrants came from foreign countries that don't work. 0.95

01:03:57.000 In Asia and Latin America, they vote Democratic. 1.00

01:03:59.000 They bring with them their standards of living, their culture, their mannerisms, and so on. 0.78

01:04:03.000 They came here.

01:04:04.000 And in those 60 years that those 60 million people came in since 1965, you had many Republican presidents, many Republican congresses, Republican House of Representatives, Republican Senate.

01:04:16.000 Ronald Reagan infamously presided over an amnesty of 3 million illegal aliens.

01:04:20.000 We remember this.

01:04:21.000 George W. Bush, it was his political strategy to bring in as many Hispanics as possible, as many immigrants as possible, under the guise that this would bring him an electoral victory or ensure that Hispanics would vote Republican.

01:04:33.000 That didn't quite happen.

01:04:34.000 So, how did we get here?

01:04:35.000 Through demographics.

01:04:36.000 And who allowed it?

01:04:37.000 Well, it was not simply the left.

01:04:38.000 It was not simply progressives, but they had some help too.

01:04:42.000 They had some help from people like Charlie Kirk and the people that fund him.

01:04:46.000 And by the way, who does fund Charlie Kirk?

01:04:48.000 Yesterday, Charlie Kirk got a $5 million donation from Foster Fries.

01:04:53.000 Foster Fries, who works for an organization, That is under the Koch Brothers umbrella.

01:04:59.000 The Koch Brothers, who said this year and last year that they would begin funding primary opponents against America First GOP candidates, said they would fund opposition candidates or even Democrats themselves, opposition candidates within the primaries against people who support tariffs, immigration restriction, and end to foreign wars, and even Democrats if they opposed all those things.

01:05:20.000 So, are the Koch Brothers conservative?

01:05:22.000 Are the Koch Brothers in favor of the America First agenda?

01:05:25.000 No, they're libertarians.

01:05:27.000 They're liberals.

01:05:28.000 And they fund Charlie Kirk.

01:05:29.000 And Charlie Kirk now has the biggest campus organization in the entire United States.

01:05:34.000 They've bullied out of the conversation Young Americas Foundation.

01:05:37.000 They've bullied out of the conversation.

01:05:38.000 Young Americans for Liberty, the Leadership Institute, every single one of them.

01:05:42.000 Charlie Kirk has the ear of the President of the United States himself and the President's son.

01:05:48.000 The President's son, who we actually embarrassed at UCLA, which, nothing personal, Don Jr., you know, we're going after Charlie Kirk.

01:05:54.000 And so this is where we arrive.

01:05:56.000 You know, we ask, what do we stand for?

01:05:58.000 How did we get here?

01:05:59.000 Why are we doing this?

01:06:00.000 We are doing this because we oppose people like Charlie Kirk that have contributed to the state of our country, again, which has some finality that will probably go on into the future.

01:06:10.000 Or indefinitely.

01:06:11.000 And what does Turning Point USA represent when they get their funding from Foster Freeze and from the Koch brothers?

01:06:16.000 Well, they represent things like stapling green cards to diplomas.

01:06:19.000 You know, as Patrick said earlier, this is a line that was verbatim, verbatim, the same words used by Hillary Clinton, Joe Biden, I believe Nancy Pelosi. 0.99

01:06:29.000 They said that every foreigner who comes through our schools and gets a diploma, we should staple a green card and let them stay in the country indefinitely. 0.99

01:06:37.000 He supports things like the EB5 and F1 visa program. 0.56

01:06:40.000 Would variously let people buy their way into our country if they have a million dollars.

01:06:44.000 If their aristocrat dad in China or India has a company, they can buy their way into the country.

01:06:49.000 Which, by the way, that immigration plan is more radical than Silicon Valley in favor of open borders, mass immigration. 0.85

01:06:56.000 Turning Point USA represents drug use, homosexuality, pornography.

01:07:01.000 What did we hear just yesterday afternoon?

01:07:03.000 I saw Glenn Beck get on stage, you know, the same conference which I was not allowed at because I'm such a bad guy.

01:07:09.000 Glenn Beck got on stage and said that Teddy Roosevelt was a progressive.

01:07:13.000 And that if you're in favor of banning porn, if you're in favor of banning pornography, you're in the same camp as that dastardly progressive Teddy Roosevelt, the leftist. 0.92

01:07:23.000 They stand for pornography. 0.84

01:07:24.000 And by the way, when I say they're for drug use, when they're for homosexuality, they're not just for it in terms of policy. 0.60

01:07:30.000 Charlie Kirk has come out recently and tried to bolster his credentials on these issues. 0.81

01:07:34.000 He's teamed up with, what, Falwell at Liberty University to come up with some farce, you know, some ridiculous organization to show that he stands with Christianity.

01:07:43.000 It's not just that he promulgates deviant social values. 0.92

01:07:47.000 Deviant sexual practices by the people he has on stage, but it's everything going on in his organization.

01:07:52.000 I've been walking around variously with Turning Point members and they tell me tales about Turning Point parties where people are smoking pot and they're doing drugs and there's underage drinking and I hear about sexual harassment and abuse.

01:08:03.000 This is within the organization.

01:08:05.000 And what does the Bible say?

01:08:06.000 You cannot have a bad tree and get good fruit.

01:08:09.000 So this is simply in their DNA.

01:08:11.000 That's who they are.

01:08:12.000 What does Turning Point USA represent?

01:08:14.000 When they promote mass immigration, when they promote pornography, when they promote Deviant social values when they promote allegiance to a foreign country?

01:08:21.000 Well, in a word, they're promoting something called libertarianism.

01:08:25.000 That is what they are.

01:08:26.000 That is what Charlie Kirk is.

01:08:27.000 That is what he represents.

01:08:28.000 Now, I don't necessarily say that in a bad way.

01:08:31.000 Not right now, right?

01:08:32.000 We'll get to why it's a bad thing in a moment.

01:08:34.000 But without making any value judgment right away, you can say descriptively that Charlie Kirk is a libertarian.

01:08:39.000 His value is that every atomized individual in this country is fine.

01:08:44.000 Everything that happens in this country is fine.

01:08:47.000 So long as people are unimpeded.

01:08:49.000 In their quest to satisfy their pleasures or desires, you know, he's essentially in favor of hedonism.

01:08:54.000 You know, do whatever you'd like as long as the government doesn't interfere.

01:08:58.000 This is libertarianism.

01:08:59.000 That is why, by the way, it is not infighting when we go and attack these people.

01:09:04.000 Charlie Kirk is not in the same movement with us because he does not share the same values as us.

01:09:09.000 His values are permissiveness, libertinism, hedonism.

01:09:14.000 Our values are order, tradition, conservatism.

01:09:18.000 We are the conservatives.

01:09:19.000 That is what we are.

01:09:21.000 We are the real conservatives.

01:09:23.000 But to back it up even further, you know, how did we arrive here at this summit at SAS with Charlie Kirk at Turning Point USA?

01:09:30.000 Well, we arrived because there was a band of neo Nazis that wanted to take over the government, that showed up to these QAs and sabotaged events, different troublemakers, scavengers, you know, terrible people that show up to the event yesterday.

01:09:46.000 SAS who seek to agitate, who seek only to cause trouble and disrupt.

01:09:51.000 Of course, we didn't get here because of that.

01:09:53.000 That is how it's been described.

01:09:55.000 We got here because we showed up to Charlie Kirk's QA sessions and we asked questions. 0.99

01:10:01.000 You know, you might have heard a lot about the Groypers and what they write breathlessly in National Review and Daily Wire and all these different publications is that we are trying to sabotage the conservative movement. 0.97

01:10:13.000 By showing up to public events, by showing up to public question and answer sessions and asking questions and expecting answers? 0.95

01:10:13.000 How? 0.95

01:10:21.000 I showed up to the SAS conference yesterday.

01:10:23.000 I spoke to a very fine security officer who told me I was being removed for agitating.

01:10:28.000 He said verbatim, That my mere presence was causing agitation.

01:10:33.000 That is their definition of agitation.

01:10:35.000 We are forcing the conversation.

01:10:39.000 This is where we are.

01:10:40.000 This is what we are doing.

01:10:41.000 This is what we are about forcing the conversation that Charlie Kirk does not want to have.

01:10:46.000 And ultimately, why are they shutting us down?

01:10:49.000 Why are they censoring us?

01:10:50.000 Why are they kicking us out of these events and describing us in this way?

01:10:53.000 It's because it is a conversation that they do not want to have.

01:10:56.000 You know, as the other speakers have indicated, Charlie Kirk likes to say that he wants to have a debate with anyone.

01:11:03.000 At any time on any issue.

01:11:04.000 You see, he is a warrior in the battle of ideas.

01:11:08.000 Just like Ben Shapiro.

01:11:09.000 You know, these are brave, courageous people.

01:11:11.000 When it comes to leftists, they want to go to college campuses and they want to talk to some pee brained leftist.

01:11:18.000 You know, maybe they've got pink hair, maybe they're in a wheelchair, maybe they're in crutches.

01:11:22.000 I don't know.

01:11:23.000 Maybe they got period blood on their faces.

01:11:24.000 You remember?

01:11:25.000 That's what happened.

01:11:26.000 I know it's a little vulgar, but that did happen at one of Milo's events.

01:11:29.000 They want to debate people like this.

01:11:30.000 So they want to have a free conversation when it's in their control.

01:11:34.000 Well, that's not a free conversation.

01:11:36.000 Right?

01:11:37.000 That is not a free and open dialogue.

01:11:39.000 So, why the hypocrisy?

01:11:41.000 Why the SPLC leftist smear tactics? 0.99

01:11:44.000 They say we're white supremacists, neo Nazis, racists.

01:11:47.000 Benny Johnson at one point said that we were the new Westboro Baptist Church kids, which is striking. 0.83

01:11:53.000 I will say, just as a bit of a detour, the word racist, we should say, is an anti white slur. 0.53

01:11:58.000 It's about time somebody said that. 1.00

01:11:59.000 That the word racist carries no content other than to say, you're white, shut up. 1.00

01:12:04.000 Thank you. 1.00

01:12:04.000 And I'll add. 1.00

01:12:08.000 Thank you.

01:12:11.000 And I'll add, by the way, that calling somebody the new Westboro Baptist Church kids or theocrats is an anti Christian slur.

01:12:17.000 That's exactly what that is.

01:12:18.000 You know, somebody should tell Benny Johnson that he should stop cheating on his wife, Nurse Kate, with men.

01:12:28.000 Maybe that's why. 0.95

01:12:31.000 Maybe that's why he's got such a problem with Christians. 0.97

01:12:33.000 You know, he sees these Groypers with the crosses and the rosaries, and he sees the sadness on Nurse Kate's face when he returns home from these conferences, and she shakes her head and says, you know. 0.99

01:12:45.000 You're cheating on me with men again. 1.00

01:12:48.000 Very sad, very sad. 0.99

01:12:49.000 Stop cheating on your wife, Benny.

01:12:51.000 I feel bad for Nurse Kate. 0.99

01:12:52.000 She deserves better than this. 1.00

01:12:53.000 She's a nurse. 1.00

01:12:54.000 She didn't go to nursing school so she could get cheated on by her husband with men. 1.00

01:12:59.000 I mean, that's gross. 1.00

01:13:00.000 That's disgusting.

01:13:01.000 So, in any case, back to refocus the speech here.

01:13:06.000 Benny Johnson, he's a very, very charismatic guy.

01:13:09.000 They use these tactics, they use these anti white, anti Christian, fundamentally anti American slurs, as I said. 0.95

01:13:17.000 And they are hypocrites on the free speech issue because this is a debate that they do not want to have. 0.94

01:13:22.000 The debate is libertarianism versus America first. 0.96

01:13:26.000 It's simply that.

01:13:27.000 You know, people have pointed out, oh, these guys are Soros plants or these guys are authoritarians.

01:13:32.000 It's really very simple.

01:13:34.000 They are libertarians.

01:13:35.000 We are America first.

01:13:36.000 Now, if you're a libertarian, you're a liberal.

01:13:39.000 This is why they call themselves classical liberals.

01:13:42.000 This is why they say that they're the true heirs to the founding fathers, which they're not, by the way.

01:13:46.000 You know, that's why they read Ayn Rand, that's why they read Austrian.

01:13:49.000 school economists.

01:13:50.000 It is because they are libertarians and libertarians are liberals.

01:13:53.000 We are the real conservatives.

01:13:55.000 And ultimately, what would this debate look like?

01:13:57.000 What would be the big questions?

01:13:58.000 What would be the big conversations?

01:14:00.000 Well, in the first place, the debate would be this.

01:14:01.000 You know, people ask what we stand for.

01:14:04.000 We know what Charlie Kirk stands for.

01:14:06.000 He believes that America is a propositional nation.

01:14:09.000 Now, what does that actually mean?

01:14:10.000 We hear this a lot from National Review intellectuals and they like to dress it up in this very conceptual academic language.

01:14:16.000 And you read in like Russell Kirk or ISI publications.

01:14:19.000 This is a propositional nation.

01:14:22.000 Well, he said at some Zionist fundraiser or something, he said that America, what that means that we're a propositional nation, it means that America is merely a placeholder for ideas.

01:14:33.000 He said that I love the Grand Canyon.

01:14:35.000 He said I love Chicago and I love New York and I love the people and I love the land, something to this effect.

01:14:41.000 You can look up the clip.

01:14:42.000 He said, but fundamentally, if all that goes away and we're just on an island, but we have the ideas, that would be America.

01:14:49.000 So the first debate would be what is our country?

01:14:52.000 What is America?

01:14:53.000 If we see that we have a problem or that America has gone through, Astray or awry, or we've taken a wrong turn.

01:14:59.000 We have to figure out how do we get back?

01:15:01.000 What's the roadmap?

01:15:01.000 What should America look like?

01:15:03.000 What is America?

01:15:04.000 And Charlie Kirk says, Well, America can be anything.

01:15:07.000 America can be anywhere, it can be anyone, upside down, on the moon, you know, as long as we have the Constitution.

01:15:14.000 Whereas we don't believe that.

01:15:15.000 We are American nationalists.

01:15:16.000 We don't believe in a propositional nation.

01:15:18.000 We are not libertarians.

01:15:20.000 We are America first.

01:15:21.000 We are American nationalists.

01:15:23.000 In other words, we believe in the American nation, not the American idea, not the American documents.

01:15:29.000 The American nation, what does that mean?

01:15:31.000 The American people.

01:15:32.000 It means America, the land. 0.99

01:15:34.000 It means that what motivates me to get out of bed and do these things, why does this jerk go around and upset our events? 0.98

01:15:40.000 It's because we want to preserve our families. 0.96

01:15:43.000 That to us as America, our families, by extension, our communities, by extension, our compatriots as Americans.

01:15:50.000 We also want to preserve the land that we live on.

01:15:53.000 We don't want America to go down and then start it up again somewhere else, like some other country.

01:15:58.000 We don't want to pick America up and transplant it somewhere else.

01:16:01.000 I don't want to go anywhere if America turns into Los Angeles, not like there'll be anywhere to go.

01:16:06.000 I like my community.

01:16:07.000 You know, I grew up in the suburbs of Chicago.

01:16:09.000 I love that place.

01:16:10.000 That place is my home.

01:16:11.000 It's my home because of what it is and the people that are there.

01:16:14.000 And that's America to me.

01:16:16.000 Charlie Kirk says all this is a placeholder.

01:16:18.000 Your family, your land, your country, this is merely a placeholder.

01:16:22.000 And what he's saying is actually something that's very real.

01:16:25.000 In a certain sense, this argument about propositional versus nationalist, I mean, this is sort of an academic debate.

01:16:30.000 But really, there are very practical, very tangible.

01:16:34.000 Expressions of this. 0.87

01:16:36.000 You know, for example, our country will be essentially moving America to a foreign land with a foreign people and having the Constitution. 0.90

01:16:43.000 That's what it is. 0.99

01:16:43.000 That's what's happening. 0.99

01:16:44.000 You know, Charlie Kirk said, well, if we set up America on a desert island, it was indigenous people, and we had the Constitution, that would be America.

01:16:52.000 How's that any different from the forecast where we are today, right? 0.99

01:16:54.000 It's going to be a different topography because of the pollution, the trash, the shit, and it's going to be different people. 0.99

01:17:00.000 We might as well. 0.99

01:17:01.000 We're importing a whole new polity, we're importing a whole new citizenry.

01:17:06.000 onto our land and we still have the Constitution.

01:17:09.000 That's what he's describing and that's what he's in favor of.

01:17:11.000 We're resisting that.

01:17:12.000 What else would be a part of the debate about America first versus libertarianism?

01:17:16.000 It'd also be Christianity versus secularism.

01:17:19.000 That's the other consequence.

01:17:21.000 You know, America is not just simply the people and the land, but it's also the faith that animates the nation, which is Christianity.

01:17:27.000 It's not liberalism.

01:17:29.000 It's not freedom.

01:17:30.000 It's not Milton Friedman's free to choose. 0.68

01:17:33.000 It is Christianity.

01:17:34.000 Is this a debate that Charlie Kirk would like to have?

01:17:37.000 A debate about whether or not we're going to be a nation that promotes chemical castration of children? 0.79

01:17:42.000 A nation that allows drag queen story hours? 0.62

01:17:44.000 A nation that allows gender to not exist? 0.96

01:17:46.000 I had Elijah Schaefer come up to me today and he said that he changed his official gender in California to X and his pronouns are pee pee and poo poo. 0.83

01:17:54.000 And you know, that's kind of funny.

01:17:56.000 It is kind of funny, admittedly.

01:17:57.000 But that's not a country we want to live in. 0.86

01:17:59.000 Or do we want to live in a country where you've got decent, virtuous, orderly people, where you have families that are not made up of, you know, polyamorous couples and people wearing wigs and, you know, completely androgynous people?

01:18:12.000 It's not Benny Johnson in the middle of some kind of sandwich at some weird turning point sex party.

01:18:19.000 It's going to be men and women, and they're going to be having children.

01:18:22.000 And the foundation of the country will be families.

01:18:24.000 That's another facet of the debate.

01:18:27.000 And so lastly, in the last part of the debate, I might be sort of leading on there, is going to be individualism versus families.

01:18:33.000 Are we going to be a society that puts the individual as the highest unit that we order our country, or is it the family?

01:18:40.000 And this is where I think a lot of the economics comes into play.

01:18:42.000 You know, Charlie Kirk is in favor largely of capitalism.

01:18:46.000 I think this is the only thing that he really has conviction about. 0.93

01:18:49.000 Donald Trump, he said in January 2016 that Donald Trump is a terrible person.

01:18:53.000 How could any Christian vote for somebody who is an adulterer and has so many divorces? 0.57

01:18:58.000 You know, so he doesn't really care about Donald Trump.

01:19:00.000 When it comes to Christianity, you know, again, here's somebody that is going to sit on stage with deviants and he's going to promote deviancy, but then say, oh, no, no, but in my private life, I'm Christian.

01:19:08.000 What does that really mean?

01:19:09.000 How can you be a private Christian?

01:19:10.000 You know, you have to represent your faith in public.

01:19:13.000 He doesn't really care about that.

01:19:14.000 He says he's an American patriot.

01:19:16.000 Again, he's in favor of the destruction of America through. 1.00

01:19:19.000 Demographic change. 0.99

01:19:20.000 He doesn't really care about that.

01:19:21.000 It seems to me his only conviction is in the free market.

01:19:25.000 His only conviction is in capitalism.

01:19:27.000 You know, this is why people fund him because ultimately, when you're going to these things, as Patrick talked about earlier, you're going to see signs that say, Netflix, we support Amazon, we support all these different things.

01:19:37.000 You know, underlying all of this is the idea that the only sort of organizing principle in the country is that individuals can do whatever they want.

01:19:45.000 There's only one problem we don't live in a society of individuals, we don't live in a country of individuals, we don't live in a world of individuals.

01:19:53.000 We live in a world of men and women and children.

01:19:56.000 We live in a world of families, and it is that simple.

01:19:59.000 And we need policies that address that.

01:20:01.000 Because you look across the country today, and it's not working for families.

01:20:04.000 It's not working for families that want to raise children because maybe both their parents have to work, or maybe they can't afford health care, or maybe they're being outcompeted by immigrants, or maybe they're being outcompeted by people overseas because we have free trade.

01:20:16.000 It doesn't work for fathers, mothers, or children. 0.80

01:20:18.000 That's why we see the proliferation of public funded daycare.

01:20:21.000 We should be ashamed of that if we ever have the government handling our daycare. 0.78

01:20:25.000 We can't even take care of our own kids.

01:20:26.000 But these are the kinds of policies, economically and otherwise, that Charlie Kirk promotes.

01:20:31.000 Or should we have policies that support the family?

01:20:33.000 Things like paid maternity leave, protecting the American worker, protecting jobs, opposing feminism, not just when it's easy and convenient, not just saying that we oppose feminism because it looks silly or these people are yelling at us or because, you know, it's third wave feminism and that's the most extreme, but saying that the backbone of the society is mothers raising their children in the home.

01:20:55.000 That is what we stand for.

01:20:57.000 And so across this debate, libertarians versus American nationalism.

01:21:01.000 It's this simple.

01:21:02.000 Do you love America, her people, and her land, or not?

01:21:05.000 That's a debate.

01:21:06.000 Do you love God and Jesus Christ with all of your heart and soul, or do you not?

01:21:11.000 Do you believe in families, a world and a country of them, or atomized individuals who are on drugs and working jobs and toiling 24 7?

01:21:19.000 That's the debate.

01:21:20.000 That is a debate that they do not want to have.

01:21:24.000 And to me, this is a debate that's very simple.

01:21:27.000 And if people heard our arguments and they heard that debate, they would be on our side.

01:21:30.000 And you know what?

01:21:31.000 They already are.

01:21:32.000 I talked to all these people at this conference.

01:21:34.000 People are watching my show, right?

01:21:36.000 People are joining AIM.

01:21:37.000 They're watching InfoWars.

01:21:39.000 People voted for Donald Trump.

01:21:40.000 62 million people voted for Donald Trump, who was implicitly talking about all these things.

01:21:45.000 A silent majority is on our side.

01:21:47.000 And they're on our side because what we're talking about is normal.

01:21:51.000 It's not extreme.

01:21:52.000 It's not fringe.

01:21:53.000 You know, Charlie Kirk got up on stage in one of these QA's and somebody says, you know, why do you want mass legal immigration?

01:21:59.000 Don't you think that's just as bad?

01:22:01.000 Something to this effect.

01:22:02.000 And Charlie Kirk said, well, I've been questioned a lot by these very fringe people.

01:22:06.000 It's a very fringe position that we shouldn't have immigration.

01:22:09.000 Really?

01:22:10.000 It's a fringe position that after 60 years of unfettered mass migration, 60 million in 60 years, that we turn off the spigot?

01:22:18.000 That we stop the flow of foreigners into the country that come with drugs and crime and their diseases and everything else, that's abnormal.

01:22:24.000 It's abnormal to see drag queen story hours and chemical castrations and to be repulsed to your core at that. 1.00

01:22:30.000 It's normal, it's abnormal, I should say, to hear Charlie Kirk say, God bless Israel, God bless a foreign country, and go to conferences funded by Zionists and foreigners. 0.76

01:22:40.000 That's abnormal to oppose all that stuff.

01:22:42.000 Of course it isn't.

01:22:43.000 We are normal.

01:22:44.000 And they know that if we ever got to be on a fair playing field, we ever got to have that conversation and that debate, that people will be on our side.

01:22:52.000 The reason that people are not coming out, or rather, the reason that something is not metastasized to challenge Charlie Kirkett at his level is because people are afraid.

01:23:00.000 Because they know that if they come out and say these normal things that we're saying, what's going to happen to them?

01:23:05.000 They're going to be called racist.

01:23:07.000 They're going to be called white supremacist. 0.89

01:23:08.000 Westboro Baptist Church.

01:23:10.000 They're going to be fired from their jobs.

01:23:11.000 They're going to be blacklisted.

01:23:12.000 And that's exactly what Turning Point USA has done.

01:23:15.000 And this is what they count on.

01:23:17.000 This is how they've dominated our country for 30 years.

01:23:19.000 Through this linguistic, political correctness control, through the control of language, through the control of the conversation.

01:23:25.000 That is how they win, is if people are afraid.

01:23:28.000 And I've heard a lot of feedback over the course of the Groyper Award from people coming up to me and saying, Oh, you know, Nick, your tone is just so controversial.

01:23:35.000 You know, these jokes that you're making, is it really worth it?

01:23:38.000 It's always worth it, by the way.

01:23:40.000 But they say, Because it's dopamine.

01:23:42.000 You laugh at my jokes and it makes me feel good.

01:23:44.000 And that is worth it.

01:23:46.000 But seriously, they say, Oh, well, Nick, you know, the way you're coming across, people, even if they agree with me, you know, I talked about this with Elijah Schaefer as one example.

01:23:55.000 I see where you're coming from, I see what you're saying.

01:23:57.000 You know, you're turning a lot of people off.

01:23:59.000 They're going to think you're racist.

01:24:00.000 They're going to think you're sexist.

01:24:01.000 They're going to think you're anti Semitic.

01:24:03.000 I'm tired of caring what the left thinks.

01:24:06.000 I care about the future of the country.

01:24:07.000 We have to say what we mean.

01:24:09.000 We have to do what we think is right.

01:24:10.000 If we're going to save it, that's the only way.

01:24:12.000 So we can't be afraid of, they're going to call us names and so on.

01:24:15.000 We have to fight the battle.

01:24:16.000 And if we do, then we will win. 0.90

01:24:18.000 And to me, it's really this simple Groypers must lead.

01:24:23.000 If Groypers, Groypers, if we as, you know, it's, Maybe it's time to retire that.

01:24:28.000 It's a little silly.

01:24:29.000 But if we as young, America first, patriots and nationalists lead, the country will follow us.

01:24:37.000 Thank you.

01:24:52.000 All right, so I just have a few final words here and then we'll get back to the socializing.

01:24:57.000 I know that's oftentimes one of the best parts of these events.

01:24:59.000 So I just want to, again, thank everyone who came here.

01:25:02.000 Thank everyone who braved the onslaught of just absolute insane paranoia that we saw on social media.

01:25:09.000 People saying, this Groyper Leadership Summit is going to be another Charlottesville.

01:25:14.000 What?

01:25:15.000 Comparing a private vetted gathering to a mass public rally planned months ahead of time.

01:25:21.000 It actually is insane.

01:25:22.000 You have to be insane or operating in bad faith to make such an accusation.

01:25:25.000 I'll leave.

01:25:26.000 Everyone to interpret the motives of the people involved in these kinds of smears on your own.

01:25:32.000 But I'll just say this that the future of our movement, right, it is not doing these mass rallies.

01:25:36.000 We've seen that that is not a good way.

01:25:38.000 As long as there is a social cost to being a dissident, to advocating for what Nick rightfully described as really normal, healthy things, then much of our movement is going to be behind the scenes.

01:25:47.000 There do need to be content creators such as myself, Jake, Nick, clearly many others are doing that.

01:25:52.000 There's a lot that you can do anonymously on the internet, so let's not.

01:25:56.000 You know, disparage or downplay the online Groypers and other Twitter accounts who are doing great work.

01:26:01.000 But I just want to say this that if we do nothing, then it's over, right?

01:26:06.000 Thousands of years of Western history will have been for naught, right?

01:26:09.000 We will be erased and we will be essentially an anecdote in Chinese history, right? 0.99

01:26:14.000 The Chinese, hundreds of years from now, will look back on us and say, wait, why did they do that, right? 1.00

01:26:19.000 Why did they open their floodgates? 0.97

01:26:21.000 If you read some of like Chinese forums and so forth, I have Chinese, you know, people have translated this stuff and posted it.

01:26:21.000 And you know what?

01:26:27.000 A lot of these people.

01:26:28.000 You know, in other countries as well, are like, why are white people, why are Americans doing this?

01:26:32.000 Why are they opening the floodgates? 0.68

01:26:33.000 Why are they just rolling over and dying?

01:26:35.000 And that's a much broader discussion to be had.

01:26:37.000 But if we do nothing, then it's over.

01:26:40.000 It's all over.

01:26:41.000 And we absolutely have the ability to affect change.

01:26:44.000 Don't let anyone tell you that there's nothing to be done or there's no hope affecting change, right?

01:26:49.000 Look at where we are now compared to where we were a few months ago. 0.95

01:26:52.000 And that was the result of the Groyper War.

01:26:54.000 That was the result of people taking smart, calculated risks.

01:26:58.000 So again, The answer is to not do anything and sit on your computer and just assume that anyone who's doing this publicly is funded by the Chinese, slash, the Russian, slash, Dugan, slash, you know, the feds or whatever.

01:27:10.000 It's not to be that, you know, that, but at the same time, it's not to be reckless, right?

01:27:13.000 You guys all have, you know, you rightfully should be taking care of your, you know, your OPSEC, of your anonymity and so forth.

01:27:21.000 And that's just what life is as a dissident.

01:27:24.000 So with that, I will conclude.

01:27:25.000 I do want to thank, before we wrap up here, I want to thank everyone who helped donate.

01:27:29.000 We don't have any mega donors, we have people that gave.

01:27:32.000 You know, hundreds and so forth, some less, some a little bit more.

01:27:35.000 I want to thank you guys.

01:27:36.000 This couldn't have happened without you.

01:27:37.000 This movement, we're doing this on a shoestring budget.

01:27:40.000 This is absolutely grassroots.

01:27:41.000 We have an energy that is, again, that is authentic, that is sincere, that is grassroots, that the establishment simply doesn't have.

01:27:48.000 That's a big part of the reason why they fear us.

01:27:50.000 I want to thank everyone who helped with the logistics for this event. 0.95

01:27:53.000 And I just want to thank everyone who's continued to support me, Jake, Nick, all of the other people who are fighting the good fight in the dissident right.

01:28:00.000 Don't let anyone tell you that we're not.

01:28:00.000 We're going to win this.

01:28:02.000 Thank you. 0.99

01:28:04.000 The boomer generation and its consequences have been a disaster for the human race. 1.00

America First - Nicholas J. Fuentes - December 20, 2019

The Groyper Leadership Summit

Episode Stats

Summary

Transcript