America First - Nicholas J. Fuentes - The Italian Election | America First Ep. 115

00:00:01.000 Good evening, everybody.

00:00:02.000 You are watching America First.

00:00:04.000 My name is Nicholas J. Fuentes, and we have a great show for you tonight.

00:00:09.000 Lots to talk about, lots to get into.

00:00:12.000 There is so much going on in the world today.

00:00:15.000 We have to talk about the Italian elections, which are coming up this weekend.

00:00:21.000 And we're going to give a pretty good account, a pretty good summary of what's going on in Italy, what's going on more broadly in Europe, and why we see what we're seeing in Italy.

00:00:31.000 This weekend and this week, and throughout this election, which has gone on for some time.

00:00:36.000 But there are many other things going on in the country as well.

00:00:39.000 The beautiful and the talented Hope Hicks has resigned out of the Trump administration, which I don't really see how that's news.

00:00:47.000 Everybody's talking about, oh, Hope Hicks is resigning.

00:00:50.000 I don't know.

00:00:51.000 I mean, she said she was going to resign for months, and, you know, she finally did.

00:00:55.000 There was some sparring between President Trump and the Attorney General, Jeff Sessions, on Twitter and on other places, and we'll get into that, I think, a little bit.

00:01:03.000 But the big thing we want to talk about today is the Italian elections.

00:01:06.000 It really is a microcosm of what is going on, not just in Europe, you know, it's going on in Italy and not just in Europe, but in the Western world and really the entire world, which is the rise of populism, the rise of ethnic nationalism.

00:01:21.000 And we have to talk about it.

00:01:22.000 Me and RC debated about it a couple of weeks ago, and we laid out, I think, pretty convincingly the case that whether you think it's a good thing or a bad thing, ethnic nationalism will be the defining. 0.62

00:01:34.000 Paradigm of the 21st century. 0.80

00:01:36.000 The next 100 years will be the 100 years of ethnic nationalism. 0.93

00:01:40.000 And in truth, I think that's what we've been getting away from. 0.92

00:01:43.000 I think maybe the liberal idea, the Western European liberal idea of politics and society, has been resisting ethnic nationalism for the past 200 years. 0.67

00:01:54.000 There's been an ideological commitment to resisting it, fighting back against it, trying to disprove it. 0.83

00:02:00.000 And whether you like it or not, it's here to stay.

00:02:03.000 And whether we like it or not, it is going to determine the course of events.

00:02:06.000 And it's up to us to decide.

00:02:08.000 Do we want to be proactive or do we want to let the inevitable take its course?

00:02:13.000 So we'll get into that.

00:02:14.000 But first, I want to say big thank you to my buddy, Joe the Boomer, who sent me another knife.

00:02:21.000 I go to the P.O. Box today and we got another knife.

00:02:24.000 You see, he sent me another one earlier in the month, which was, let me pop it open here.

00:02:31.000 This guy was too big for Chicago.

00:02:34.000 And in Chicago, the law, I guess, the law is that you can't, Conceal carry a knife with a blade bigger than two and a half inches, three inches.

00:02:43.000 I believe it's two and a half inches.

00:02:45.000 So, this puppy was not going to cut it.

00:02:47.000 So, he sent me this little fella so I can carry this wherever I go.

00:02:52.000 So, if you run into me in Chicago and you want to start something, be careful.

00:02:56.000 You've been warned here.

00:02:58.000 I'm prepared for you.

00:02:59.000 So, thank you to Joe the Boomer for the knives.

00:03:02.000 I go to the P.O. Box every time and there's a knife sitting there.

00:03:05.000 So, that's nice.

00:03:06.000 But, Nick the Knife is back.

00:03:08.000 We have our knives that we can carry.

00:03:11.000 I probably shouldn't be rubbing my eyes while I got, you know.

00:03:13.000 But anyhow, thank you to Joe for that.

00:03:16.000 And the other thing I want to talk about before we got into Italy was a tweet that was made by Ben Shapiro the other day.

00:03:23.000 This was actually really interesting.

00:03:24.000 He was holding a talk.

00:03:25.000 I'm not sure where he was holding it, but he was holding a talk someplace.

00:03:29.000 And some brave soul came up to Ben Shapiro and essentially asked him Look, Ben, you're proud of your ethnic Jewish identity, you're proud of your religious Jewish identity, you support Israel, you're a very strong Zionist.

00:03:43.000 And yet you believe that America should be a creedal nation, meaning that America's identity is not ethnic, racial, religious, cultural, or political, but it is creedal.

00:03:53.000 It is based on the American creed, which is the American dream, what's laid out in the Constitution, the Declaration, the founding documents.

00:04:02.000 And Ben Shapiro responded, which I thought was very peculiar.

00:04:04.000 And we have to talk about it because this is the question I've been meaning to ask him for a long time.

00:04:08.000 And it was very interesting, his response.

00:04:10.000 He essentially said that, first of all, he takes no pride in his ethnic Jewish identity.

00:04:15.000 He says he takes pride in his religious Jewish identity.

00:04:19.000 He said there's a big difference because religion is a set of values.

00:04:24.000 And ideas, whereas ethnicity is something that is indeterminate, which is something, or rather, it's something that you do not determine yourself.

00:04:31.000 You don't choose who you decide to be born as.

00:04:34.000 You don't choose what ethnicity that you're going to be born as.

00:04:37.000 So Shapiro says, I don't take pride in the ethnic component, but just the religious component, because these are ideas.

00:04:44.000 Which is an interesting way to start, because from the beginning of the argument, from the foundational point of view on this argument that he then tries to make, we have a misrepresentation, we have a complete lie. 0.81

00:04:55.000 As to what Judaism is, a complete and total manipulation.

00:04:59.000 Because any Orthodox Jew, anybody who's a scholar on the subject of rabbinical Judaism, will tell you that according to Jewish law, you are not Jewish unless you have a Jewish mother. 0.92

00:05:11.000 And so, this idea that, oh, it's singularly a religion, and it's this very liberal, kind of postmodern idea of religion that you can kind of, it's interchangeable.

00:05:21.000 I can be Orthodox Christian, I can be Jewish, I could be Hindu.

00:05:24.000 It's just different sets of beliefs and values.

00:05:27.000 You know, we can adopt them.

00:05:28.000 We can change them like our clothes.

00:05:29.000 We can change them like a wristband that we might wear or a headband.

00:05:34.000 But there is something which he cannot ignore, but that he lies about, which is that there is this ethnic component to Judaism.

00:05:41.000 Okay.

00:05:41.000 And regardless of whether he believes it's important, Israel believes it's important.

00:05:45.000 So he might say that Israel is a creedal nation, he might say, and that was what he went on to make the argument further, was that if you understand Judaism as religion, then you understand that Israel is a creedal nation, which is. 0.63

00:05:59.000 Such an insane, ridiculous argument that I don't even know where to begin on that one.

00:06:04.000 The idea that, number one, you're starting from this false and manipulative premise that Judaism has no ethnic component, it's singularly religious. 0.97

00:06:11.000 But then to make the argument that the Zionist state, the Jewish state, has no ethnic component, it's creedal, that it's just based on the Jewish idea, the Jewish religion, is just straight up a lie.

00:06:25.000 Of course, they've talked about in the Israeli parliament putting in place a DNA test.

00:06:31.000 To decide who can be let into the country and who is not let in.

00:06:34.000 Because, of course, all Jews around the world have what they call the right of return to Israel, where no matter who you are, no matter where you come from, if you're Jewish, you get to come back to Israel and you get to be a citizen. 0.76

00:06:45.000 And so they're very open with immigration for Jewish people, very closed. 0.52

00:06:50.000 It's so hard to move to Israel if you're not Jewish.

00:06:53.000 And one of the ways they talked about how they could assess if people were actually Jewish, people that were fleeing Russia, people that are coming back from the Soviet Union, this late diaspora from Israel.

00:07:04.000 Eastern Europe and from Russia.

00:07:06.000 They said, well, one of the ways we can assess is with the DNA test.

00:07:09.000 And, folks, do you think the DNA test assesses their religious devotion?

00:07:12.000 Do you think it assesses their religious ideas, how well they're practicing the customs and obeying the laws and the sacrifices?

00:07:19.000 I don't think so.

00:07:20.000 I think it has to do with ethnicity.

00:07:22.000 So I just thought that was a very interesting thing.

00:07:25.000 That would be what the debate would be about.

00:07:27.000 You know, we say he's got to come on the show to debate.

00:07:29.000 We have to debate Ben Shapiro.

00:07:31.000 He ignores me, he dodges me, he'll post videos about me all day long on his Twitter.

00:07:36.000 But he won't engage.

00:07:37.000 And that's what it would be about how come you believe wrongly that this is a creedal nation and we can't have the same thing?

00:07:44.000 What if this was the white Christian creedal nation, like Israel is the Jewish?

00:07:48.000 Anyway, that was Ben Shapiro.

00:07:50.000 We have to get into the Italian elections, which are coming up on Sunday.

00:07:54.000 Now, a little word about the Italian elections.

00:07:56.000 They don't operate in the same way the American system does.

00:08:00.000 So, what they're doing for this election, which will take place on Sunday, is a combination of what happens in the United States and what happens in other European countries.

00:08:10.000 It's a hybrid of two systems, one being called first past the post and the other being proportional representation.

00:08:17.000 And so, they don't have an elected president like we do, they have a prime minister.

00:08:21.000 So, people go to the polls.

00:08:23.000 And they vote for a party, and then once all the parties are chosen and they're elected based on either first past the post or proportional representation, the parties take their seats, and then the party leaders form a coalition government and they choose who's going to lead the government, who will be the prime minister.

00:08:39.000 So, unlike in the United States where we go to the polls and we say, I want Donald Trump or I want Hillary Clinton, or we go for a representative in your given state, you know, for example, in the Senate in 2016 for Illinois, it was Mark Kirk versus Tammy Duckworth.

00:08:55.000 Well, In the European system, they just vote for the party.

00:08:57.000 They don't vote for the representative.

00:08:59.000 They vote for do I want the center right party?

00:09:01.000 Do I want the center left party?

00:09:03.000 So that's the kind of system we're talking about.

00:09:05.000 So it's a little bit different.

00:09:06.000 We have leaders in the parties who are seen as the de facto heads and who will end up as being contenders for prime minister.

00:09:13.000 But when people go to the polls in Italy on Sunday, they're more voting for a platform.

00:09:18.000 They're more voting for what are the ideas behind the party.

00:09:21.000 And they're also thinking strategically in the sense that it's a multi party system.

00:09:25.000 You have over 20 parties running in the election.

00:09:28.000 Contrasted with the American system, where only two really have a shot, you have some smaller parties, but they rarely get any significant percentage of the vote.

00:09:37.000 And also in Italy, they have some seats that are proportional, whereas you can't win seats in the United States that way.

00:09:43.000 Whereas if you get 30% in Italy, you might get 30% of the seats for a given province.

00:09:48.000 In the United States, it's all or nothing.

00:09:49.000 You either get the seat or you don't.

00:09:52.000 So you have more than 20 parties running in Italy, although it's boiled down essentially to three major coalitions.

00:09:58.000 And we'll look at the coalitions here.

00:10:01.000 Which is, again, very different.

00:10:03.000 None of these coalitions are close to 40 or 50% of the vote.

00:10:07.000 That's another thing that's different with the United States vote, where it's either, you know, you get 50% for Republican, 50% for Democrat, or in the case of the 2016 election, I think it was something like 47, 48%.

00:10:20.000 In each of these coalitions where they have multiple parties grouped together, the highest percentage you have is something like 38%, is something like 35%.

00:10:29.000 But you have the center left coalition.

00:10:32.000 Which is Matteo Renzi's Democratic Party.

00:10:34.000 They're polling at 27%.

00:10:38.000 And Matteo Renzi, if you recall, he was the prime minister of Italy starting in 2016.

00:10:42.000 He had to step down after a constitutional referendum.

00:10:46.000 I think it was about a year ago, or maybe a little bit less than a year ago, where the constitutional referendum was something about the European Union.

00:10:53.000 It was essentially a big blow to the European Union.

00:10:55.000 He had to step down because he gambled on it.

00:10:58.000 But he is now coming back, leading the center left party, the Democratic Party.

00:11:02.000 They're polling at 27%.

00:11:04.000 And they are. 0.99

00:11:05.000 They are the losers in this. 0.97

00:11:06.000 I mean, it's pretty universally expected that the far left or the center left parties are not going to do well. 0.94

00:11:14.000 That no matter what the outcome is, they're probably not going to be in charge because of how the economy's been doing, because of immigration, which has been ravaging the country, and we'll get into that in a moment.

00:11:24.000 You have the five star movement led by a guy named Milo, who would be not forming a coalition government.

00:11:31.000 This is sort of peculiar about this party, where they say, unlike the other parties, we will not be cooperating, we won't be forming a coalition.

00:11:39.000 And they're pulling at 28%.

00:11:41.000 The real game changer here, the real interesting thing, that's boring.

00:11:45.000 I don't care about center left.

00:11:47.000 I don't care about five star movement.

00:11:49.000 Whatever. 1.00

00:11:50.000 This is European nonsense.

00:11:51.000 The thing that matters, the coalition, the bloc that matters, is the right wing bloc.

00:11:57.000 And this is led by two major people here Silvio Berlusconi, who cannot be prime minister.

00:12:03.000 He cannot hold public office because of corruption charges that were leveled against him in 2013.

00:12:09.000 So he was put on a ban that he can't be in government for X amount of years.

00:12:13.000 But he is still seen as a leader of this broader right wing movement in Italy.

00:12:17.000 You have the party Forza Italia.

00:12:19.000 You have Salvini, who is the leader of the Northern League Party, which was formerly a separatist party.

00:12:25.000 Now they're part of this coalition.

00:12:27.000 And the neo fascist brothers of Italy.

00:12:29.000 And this, folks, this is the stuff. 0.97

00:12:33.000 This is the good stuff.

00:12:34.000 This is the juice here, all right?

00:12:36.000 This is the right wing bloc.

00:12:37.000 And this is what's really interesting here because what you see happening in the European Union, you saw this with the Austrian prime minister who came to office a couple of months ago, who's far right.

00:12:48.000 You see this in Hungary and Poland's ethnic nationalist resistance to the European Union, to the migration crisis.

00:12:55.000 You saw this with the Brexit.

00:12:57.000 You saw this with the historic record breaking vote that Marine Le Pen acquired in France.

00:13:02.000 You look at how Denmark was pushed to the right by Geert Wilders and on and on and on.

00:13:07.000 And what you are seeing in Europe is this turn and run to the right.

00:13:11.000 And why are you seeing a turn and run to the right?

00:13:14.000 It's not so much because of economics, the economy's been doing bad.

00:13:17.000 It's been doing bad for a long time.

00:13:18.000 It's not so much because of social policy, it's not so much because of defense policy. 0.59

00:13:23.000 It's not because of Russia.

00:13:25.000 It's not because of what's happening in Iraq.

00:13:27.000 It's not because of any of that, not even regulations.

00:13:29.000 Maybe to an extent it's regulations. 0.96

00:13:31.000 But why you see this turn, this cut and run to the right is because of immigration. 0.92

00:13:38.000 And this is the important stuff.

00:13:39.000 It's looking like Italy is on the brink of collapse.

00:13:42.000 You look at the instability that we've witnessed in Italy over the past couple of months, over the past year, where there was a shooting on a migrant center, where you've seen riots, you've seen anti fascist rallies, you've seen neo fascist rallies, you see Roman salutes.

00:13:56.000 You see this revanchist spirit where people are looking back towards Mussolini.

00:14:02.000 And you know, people might say Mussolini was a fascist, Mussolini was a bad guy, but of course, history is a little bit more complicated than this.

00:14:08.000 When you look at the record of people like Mosley, people like Mussolini, among others, Mussolini is somebody who, sure, there was some negative stuff, there was torture, there were bad things, but here was somebody who believed in the greatness of Italy and who understood what Italy was, understood Italy's unique place.

00:14:29.000 In history, the uniqueness of the country, the exceptionalism of the country, somebody who believed in a return to glory for Italy.

00:14:37.000 And, you know, say what you will, but the trains ran on time under that regime.

00:14:41.000 And so he represents something to the Italians where they see year after year they are ravaged, they are torn in pieces by immigration, mass immigration, which is imposed on them, which is brought on them through coercion by the supranational European Union.

00:14:58.000 And they look back to Mussolini and they say, hey, you know, maybe.

00:15:01.000 Hey, maybe we could use a little bit more of that.

00:15:03.000 They look towards their neighboring countries in the East.

00:15:06.000 They look towards Austria.

00:15:08.000 They look towards the Czech Republic.

00:15:09.000 They look towards Poland.

00:15:11.000 They look towards Hungary, countries where the economy is not doing so well and the human rights record isn't so good.

00:15:17.000 And they haven't been totally welcomed into the European Union and they're not totally assimilated with the Western European countries.

00:15:23.000 And they were crushed under the heel of socialism.

00:15:26.000 But despite that, despite being the losers in the Cold War, they appear to be the winners.

00:15:32.000 In the new war, in the new tribal war in Europe, because while France and England and Spain and Italy are being forced by transnational elites, by the transnational ruling class in Brussels, in the European Union, are forcing these Western European countries to take in hundreds of thousands and millions of migrants, in many cases from North and West Africa, from the Middle East, Poland and Hungary are doing just fine.

00:15:57.000 You know, anytime you get some neoliberal technocrat bragging about how the free market is what makes Western Europe great, the free market is.

00:16:06.000 Is how we defeated the Soviet Union and defeated the Eastern Bloc, and this is what makes us the free world.

00:16:12.000 Well, every time there's a metro bombing, and every time there's a stabbing attack, and every time there's a rape attack, or there's gang rapes, or there's Muslim gangs roaming the streets, or all these other things that you see where these people are displacing the native population, where the most popular given name, the most popular infant name in London is Muhammad. 0.94

00:16:33.000 Well, the Polish, the Czech, the Hungarians, they're laughing it up. 0.87

00:16:38.000 Maybe they don't have cheap McDonald's, right? 1.00

00:16:41.000 Maybe they don't have totally cheap consumer products, right?

00:16:45.000 But hey, they still have their local flavor.

00:16:48.000 They still have their national character, and they know what it means to be Polish, to be Hungarian.

00:16:53.000 And this is what's going on in Italy.

00:16:55.000 This is a referendum.

00:16:56.000 It's not about Italy.

00:16:58.000 Forget that for a moment.

00:16:59.000 Look, it's the beloved homeland of my ancestors, but you have to think about it in the broader context.

00:17:04.000 This is a referendum on the European Union.

00:17:08.000 And the European Union's policy on migration.

00:17:11.000 This is the central issue which is defining the Italian election migration.

00:17:15.000 And think about what's going on in Italy.

00:17:18.000 More than 600,000 migrants have entered Italy since 2013.

00:17:25.000 So in five years, you have 600,000 migrants.

00:17:30.000 And that's 117,000 in 2017 alone, something like 5,800 so far in 2018.

00:17:37.000 Now, that doesn't sound like a crazy number to us.

00:17:40.000 Because this is a country of 330 million people, and we have 1.5 million immigrants coming here legally every year.

00:17:47.000 So it's hard, maybe, to gauge the context so well because we live in a country that's vastly larger.

00:17:52.000 We have hundreds of millions of people, and we get millions of immigrants every year.

00:17:56.000 So you think 600,000 in five years?

00:17:58.000 Well, what's the big deal?

00:18:00.000 To put it in the proper context, in 2016, only 450,000 Italians were born in Italy.

00:18:10.000 So, you have in one given year, in the most recent given year where we have data, you have 450,000 Italians being born.

00:18:18.000 So, that means that in a five year period, you have more immigrants than in any one given year of just regular Italians being born.

00:18:25.000 And that's forget the mortality rate, that's forget factoring in Italians who die.

00:18:30.000 450,000 new Italians being born, coming up against 600,000 migrants, 600,000 people from West and North Africa, from the Middle East. 0.92

00:18:41.000 And here's the best part. 0.99

00:18:42.000 They pour over into this country.

00:18:44.000 In this country, not only do they have one of the highest debt to GDP ratios in the European Union, they have an above average unemployment rate among other EU member states.

00:18:54.000 They have an unemployment rate of 11% for the youth.

00:18:57.000 It's something like double or triple that.

00:19:00.000 So not only do you have this economic matter where you have these migrants who are outpacing the rate of growth by the native population, and there's more migrants than Italians being born, but there's no jobs. 0.99

00:19:13.000 And the migrants are taking the jobs. 0.97

00:19:15.000 But on top of that, if all of that is not enough, if all of that is not sufficient reason to say, hey, maybe we should think about this, maybe we should think about it a little bit more before I bring in another 100 grand to these people from Africa. 1.00

00:19:28.000 But on top of that, they have the gall. 0.83

00:19:31.000 The rootless transnational elite in Brussels, Belgium, have the gall to, by force of supranational law, tell these Italians you must take them and they must become citizens.

00:19:45.000 That these people who come off the boat, they go through the Sahara Desert, they go through the Maghreb, they build their little life raft, they sail across the Mediterranean.

00:19:56.000 Most of the time, they get about five miles off the coast before the European Coast Guard. 0.75

00:20:01.000 Picks them up and brings them all the way across the sea to Italy, but then they have the gall to say, These people are Italians. 0.77

00:20:08.000 Really?

00:20:09.000 These people are Italians? 1.00

00:20:11.000 Two months ago, they were what? 0.95

00:20:13.000 They were in Lagos, living in a shanty built out of plastic bags.

00:20:20.000 A hundred years ago, they were in civilizations where they had no written language, where they had no impersonal offices of government, where they had no two story buildings, where all they didn't even have geographic borders, it was just control over people, and this is complicated.

00:20:35.000 I studied African politics, but these are stark differences between two civilizations.

00:20:35.000 Stuff.

00:20:40.000 But we're supposed to believe, because of by edict from some rootless transnational in Brussels, somebody with no home but who feels at home everywhere, these technocrats pushing papers, unelected bureaucrats, they tell us that these people who come across the sea, well, they're just as Italian as Michelangelo and Raphael and Julius Caesar.

00:21:01.000 Is that, are we supposed to believe that?

00:21:03.000 Does anybody believe that for a moment?

00:21:06.000 That's the travesty in Europe. 0.58

00:21:08.000 That's the real tragedy.

00:21:10.000 Jobs, I hear you.

00:21:12.000 I hear you.

00:21:12.000 A big part of it is, we saw this in the United States.

00:21:15.000 We see this in the UK.

00:21:16.000 That's a big reason why Brexit happened not just immigration, but immigration and its effect on the economy. 0.99

00:21:23.000 But the slap in the face, the moral injustice that is being perpetrated, the injustice, the crime against humanity, is that these people are brought here. 1.00

00:21:32.000 They're imported. 0.96

00:21:33.000 You know, they have it that it's the free market. 1.00

00:21:36.000 They're sad.

00:21:37.000 They're going to wash up on the shore. 1.00

00:21:38.000 They're imported. 1.00

00:21:39.000 They are picked up. 0.92

00:21:40.000 They're brought over here, and they're called Italians.

00:21:42.000 And Let's talk about definitions for a moment.

00:21:45.000 What does it mean to be an Italian?

00:21:46.000 What does it mean to be an American?

00:21:48.000 What does it mean to be British?

00:21:50.000 What does it mean to be German? 0.67

00:21:52.000 Is it a piece of paper?

00:21:53.000 That's what they're telling us.

00:21:54.000 That's what Brussels tells us.

00:21:56.000 If an African comes over here, it doesn't matter if they have a different skin color.

00:22:00.000 It doesn't matter if they practice a different faith.

00:22:02.000 It doesn't matter if they haven't been in the country for generations and participated in its struggles, its successes, its glory, its history, its politics, its culture, its customs.

00:22:13.000 None of that matters so long as they.

00:22:15.000 They're on the land, so long as they're on the land, and they fill out, they sign on the dotted line, and the initial here, there, and the other. 1.00

00:22:22.000 Well, they're just, now those are Italians. 0.87

00:22:25.000 And isn't that, you can see this in the sports teams where they say, this is the Italian sports team.

00:22:30.000 And you look at it, you say, oh, yeah, um, oh, that's the, I could have mistook that for the Niger sports team.

00:22:37.000 I could have mistook that for the Botswana sports team.

00:22:41.000 I guess that's Italian.

00:22:42.000 And we all intuitively know this.

00:22:43.000 But what does it mean to be something?

00:22:46.000 We come to this postmodern system of logic.

00:22:50.000 About things in themselves, in the sense that what do we hear so often about spaces and countries and borders?

00:22:57.000 We hear this word come up a lot.

00:22:59.000 It's called inclusion.

00:23:01.000 This is the ideology of the left now.

00:23:03.000 This is what they talk about all day long: inclusion.

00:23:06.000 And they say that we need a definition of America, we need a definition of Italy or of Europe that is inclusive, that is inclusive of people from Mexico, that is inclusive of people from Africa, that is inclusive of Muslims.

00:23:21.000 And Jews and Chinese people, and on and on.

00:23:24.000 And you have to think about it purely in terms of definition.

00:23:27.000 This might get a little philosophical, but I hope I explain it simply enough.

00:23:31.000 Definitions, by their very nature, are necessarily exclusionary.

00:23:37.000 When you describe a thing, you describe its properties.

00:23:41.000 For example, this cup is ceramic.

00:23:44.000 That's the material of the cup, that's the substance of the cup.

00:23:47.000 A mug has a certain shape, the mug has a certain color.

00:23:51.000 It has properties that make it a mug.

00:23:53.000 You call it a mug because it has a handle and there's a certain.

00:23:57.000 Amount of mobility to it.

00:23:58.000 You call it a mug because it contains liquid.

00:24:01.000 It's ceramic, and a mug is different than a cup because it's ceramic, and so you could have a hot liquid in there or a cold liquid in there.

00:24:09.000 But when you say what it is, you also say what it is not.

00:24:12.000 You also say that it is not some of the properties that are here in this computer or here in this microphone.

00:24:18.000 And so when you talk about definitions, to define what it means to be Italian, we have to say what it is and also define it against what it is not.

00:24:26.000 What is Italian?

00:24:27.000 Well, it is this certain ethnic group.

00:24:30.000 Descended from these particular tribes, participating in this particular history with these customs, with these mannerisms, with this culture, with their song, with their dress, their dance, their food. 0.74

00:24:44.000 And also, it is not Spanish.

00:24:47.000 It is not French.

00:24:48.000 It is not German.

00:24:49.000 Italian is Italian, not just for what it is, but also for what it is not.

00:24:53.000 They do not have bratwurst, for example.

00:24:55.000 I don't think they do.

00:24:56.000 They do not have the Eiffel Tower. 1.00

00:24:58.000 They are not Muslim. 0.73

00:25:01.000 They do not come from Africa.

00:25:03.000 They do not come from sub Saharan Africa.

00:25:05.000 And so this is what we're coming to.

00:25:07.000 And it is very complicated, but it's all very connected.

00:25:09.000 When people talk about these postmodern neo Marxists, when they talk about constructivists, when they talk about critical theory, the Frankfurt School, when they talk about all this stuff, it all comes back full circle.

00:25:21.000 This is the practical application of it.

00:25:23.000 We have to affirm what a country is in and of itself.

00:25:26.000 Because you have people, and this is the slogan of the right wing coalition, their slogan is Italians First, which is, of course, the name of this program.

00:25:35.000 Italians see their country and they've been here.

00:25:39.000 They've seen the passage of centuries in their towns, in their cities.

00:25:43.000 They see their families, their ancestors, who their ancestors fought in wars.

00:25:49.000 Italy might not have existed if not for the sacrifice of the ancestors of Italians that are on the land now, ethnic Italians who fought against invaders from the Maghreb, who fought against Muslim invaders, who fought against all kinds of invaders, Carthaginian invaders, if you want to go back really far.

00:26:06.000 Who fought in wars to secure the existence of Italy?

00:26:09.000 People who fought so that Italians could be free?

00:26:11.000 People who fought so that Italians could have the prosperity and the wealth that they do today?

00:26:16.000 People that worked everything that you see in Italy today the buildings, the businesses, the roads, the institutions these were built with the sweat and the hard work of people that have been there for hundreds of years.

00:26:28.000 And now, what you have in Italy are people who they are connected, they are in Italy and they are connected to the land, they are connected to the language.

00:26:36.000 They're connected to their ancestors, the founders of the country and the founders of everything, the builders of everything, the people that defended everything.

00:26:44.000 They are connected to it.

00:26:45.000 They say Italy not as just, oh, I just happen to be this Italian atomized consumer.

00:26:51.000 No, but I am a part of a rich legacy.

00:26:53.000 I'm a part of a rich ancestry.

00:26:55.000 I have an inheritance and there will be a posterity to hand it off to.

00:26:59.000 And I need to partake in it and preserve it for my children.

00:27:02.000 Well, now they hear from the European Union and they hear from the supranational institutions.

00:27:07.000 They hear from the United Nations and the IMF and the World Bank. 0.99

00:27:11.000 The World Bank and the European Union that, well, these Africans, these poor, poor Africans, these poor Arabs from the Middle East, they couldn't figure it out over there. 1.00

00:27:21.000 They couldn't build a functioning society over there. 0.99

00:27:23.000 They didn't fight in your wars.

00:27:25.000 They didn't build the buildings.

00:27:26.000 They didn't construct your civilization.

00:27:28.000 Well, now they get to come over here and they get your job. 0.99

00:27:31.000 And they're just as Italian as you, Bucko. 0.67

00:27:33.000 And guess what?

00:27:34.000 They're going to have seven kids on assistance.

00:27:36.000 And how many are you going to have?

00:27:38.000 One, if you're lucky.

00:27:39.000 Two.

00:27:41.000 And that's the injustice.

00:27:42.000 That's the crime.

00:27:43.000 That's why people are getting angry.

00:27:44.000 That's why you see the anger.

00:27:46.000 It's not about forget the economics.

00:27:47.000 That's part of it.

00:27:49.000 But the much more significant call to action is about identity.

00:27:53.000 What is Italy?

00:27:54.000 There are certain things that are bigger than the gross domestic product of a country.

00:27:59.000 There are certain things that are more important than how we can support the welfare state.

00:28:03.000 You know, people are saying if the right wing coalition gets into office, then the deficit will go up in Italy.

00:28:10.000 This is one of the main concerns about the right wing party.

00:28:12.000 They say parts of the right wing coalition's platform would increase the deficit in Italy, which would trigger economic scares because Italy has one of the higher debt to GDP ratios in Italy.

00:28:24.000 They have, what is it, 2.3 trillion euros in publicly held debt.

00:28:29.000 And they say, well, we can't have.

00:28:30.000 The right wing coalition comes to power because it might, oh, it might increase the deficit.

00:28:35.000 There might be some economic concerns.

00:28:37.000 And you understand that we don't care about that.

00:28:39.000 The same thing happened in France with the French presidential elections.

00:28:42.000 And they said, oh, Marine Le Pen is a socialist.

00:28:44.000 She's not with us. 0.85

00:28:44.000 She's a leftist. 0.85

00:28:46.000 We don't care about that.

00:28:47.000 The same was said about Geert Wilders and all these others.

00:28:49.000 We don't care about that.

00:28:51.000 If our country goes away, if Italy is no longer Italian, if France is no longer French, if England is no longer English, if the United States is no longer American, we could give a damn.

00:29:02.000 What the GDP is.

00:29:03.000 We could care less what the public debt is.

00:29:05.000 We could care less what the job situation looks like.

00:29:08.000 If we don't have an inheritance to pass down to our children that is real and meaningful, that gives them a broader sense of belonging, who cares?

00:29:16.000 What does it all matter anyway then?

00:29:20.000 And that's what's happening in Europe.

00:29:21.000 And you see this, we talk about this in the context of Europe.

00:29:24.000 We see this in Italy.

00:29:26.000 And we saw this in Austria earlier in the year.

00:29:28.000 We saw this in France and Denmark.

00:29:30.000 But this is something that's happening, by the way, around the world.

00:29:33.000 And there's a really good article, the most recent article.

00:29:36.000 It was written by Pat Buchanan.

00:29:37.000 You can find this on his website.

00:29:39.000 It was about nationalism that is ascendant in the world.

00:29:43.000 And you can see this trend not just in Europe, but everywhere across the globe.

00:29:46.000 It's no secret that it happened in the United States.

00:29:49.000 That is what the 2016 election was about.

00:29:51.000 It wasn't about, you know, Ben Shapiro tweeted today, the two things Trump can't go back on are abortion and gun rights.

00:29:57.000 2016 was not about this Tea Party platform of this conservative issue and that Fox News issue.

00:30:03.000 It was about immigration.

00:30:05.000 And what was the immigration issue about?

00:30:07.000 It was about the wall.

00:30:08.000 And what does the wall say?

00:30:09.000 This is America. 0.61

00:30:10.000 This is Mexico. 0.96

00:30:11.000 This is what America is. 0.99

00:30:13.000 This is what it isn't.

00:30:13.000 So we saw this in the United States.

00:30:16.000 We see this in a country like China.

00:30:18.000 This is what Pat Buchanan writes in his essay.

00:30:20.000 He says, Where does China derive their strength, their vigor in this century?

00:30:24.000 Is it from their communist ideology?

00:30:26.000 No, it's from their ethnicity, it's from ethnic nationalism.

00:30:30.000 The strongest countries that are positioning themselves in the world today, that are ascendant, be it Russia, China, the Philippines, North Korea to an extent, these assertive ascendant powers, They are bound together by nationalism.

00:30:45.000 They are bound together by a shared identity.

00:30:48.000 And this was forecasted many years ago.

00:30:51.000 This is not a new concept.

00:30:53.000 We have recently emerged from, pretty recently, 30 years ago, from the Cold War.

00:30:58.000 And the Cold War was a period that was defined, the world was defined during that period by ideology.

00:31:04.000 Were you with the free world?

00:31:06.000 Were you with the capitalists?

00:31:07.000 Were you with the liberals?

00:31:08.000 Or were you with the communists?

00:31:10.000 Were you with the Soviet Union?

00:31:12.000 Were you with the.

00:31:13.000 The revolutionaries, the oppressors, and this was the fight in the Cold War.

00:31:18.000 After the Cold War, the idea was well, what's the world going to look like now?

00:31:22.000 How is the world going to align now?

00:31:24.000 In the absence of these ideological fault lines, in the absence or the decay of these ideological allegiances and alliances and posses, how now are the nations going to align?

00:31:36.000 Because before, you could have nations like Brazil be aligned with the United States.

00:31:41.000 Brazil and Mexico, all the countries in the Western Hemisphere, allied with the United States.

00:31:46.000 And many countries in Africa and the Middle East, and all the European countries west of the Berlin Wall, and Australia, and some of these Asian countries, they were all with the United States.

00:31:56.000 Well, after the ideological conflict subsides, how do they find a common interest with the United States? 0.63

00:32:03.000 Before it was, well, we need to be shored up against the Soviet threat. 0.79

00:32:06.000 A Soviet revolution, it's either you're with them or you're with the other. 0.90

00:32:09.000 Well, now, in the absence of these two competing forces, how do we define our alliances? 0.87

00:32:14.000 Now we start to see the differences.

00:32:16.000 And in the advent, at the same time that this is happening, of globalization, of communications technologies, transportation technologies, that for the first time in human history are forcing all the peoples and religions and cultures of the world.

00:32:30.000 To be truly in conflict with one another, truly in a clash with one another, which was written by Sam Huntington in Clash of Civilizations.

00:32:39.000 Now, how are we going to align?

00:32:41.000 And that is really the future.

00:32:43.000 You have this group of people, you have a certain ruling elite in the West, in the United States, in Europe, which is holding us back from embracing our identity, from embracing the inevitable and deciding our future, having an assertive identity and being able to assert that interest in the future against these other.

00:33:05.000 Revisionist powers like China and Russia.

00:33:07.000 There is a certain ruling elite in Brussels, Belgium, which is the chair that's the seat of power in the European Union and Europe, and people in Washington, D.C., in the United States, a certain ruling class, transnational, cosmopolitan class of people who want to hold us back.

00:33:24.000 And they're saying that in this age of globalization, with the comms technology, with the transportation technology, we have to embrace a global identity, we have to erase borders.

00:33:35.000 With all these people smashing together, instead of defining our differences, negotiating them, respecting boundaries, respecting different spaces and different cultures and customs, and giving people free spaces where they can live in their own way that they want to live, well, they say, no, we have to mix.

00:33:53.000 We have to force them together.

00:33:54.000 We have to make them into one another.

00:33:56.000 And now we have this expression that a place like Sweden is now an international country, and the United Kingdom is an international country, and the United States must embrace diversity.

00:34:05.000 And you see this.

00:34:06.000 From right and left, from all sides of the spectrum.

00:34:09.000 And that's the conflict for the 21st century.

00:34:12.000 And this is a referendum on it in Italy this weekend.

00:34:15.000 It's a small, it's a microcosm of it.

00:34:17.000 This is one of many instances where we will see this issue put to a vote, where we will see a decision made and there will be action had on it.

00:34:28.000 But it's one to watch on Sunday.

00:34:29.000 Forget what they tell you.

00:34:30.000 It's not about the debt, it's about immigration, it's about identity.

00:34:33.000 Who are we going to be? 1.00

00:34:34.000 Are we going to be the stupid people? 1.00

00:34:37.000 Are we going to be a dumping ground? 1.00

00:34:39.000 For Africa and the Middle East and Latin America, not just in Italy and in Europe, but in the United States?

00:34:45.000 Or are we going to embrace who we are?

00:34:47.000 Are we going to let guilt and accusations of racism and this projection of some like sterilized progressive version of morality prevent us from embracing our identity?

00:34:58.000 Or will we say, this is who we are?

00:35:00.000 We are unapologetically who we are.

00:35:02.000 We know our strengths, we know our weaknesses, and now we face the world, and now we face China, and now we face Japan and Russia, and we do it.

00:35:11.000 Confident in who we are, confident in what we're about, and that's what's going to be on for a vote on Sunday in Italy.

00:35:17.000 So that's the Italian elections, pretty exciting stuff.

00:35:19.000 We'll see what happens.

00:35:21.000 The right is favored to win.

00:35:23.000 If you look at any of the numbers, five star movement, 28%, right wing bloc is over 30%.

00:35:28.000 And so it's looking like the right wing bloc is going to take power.

00:35:32.000 It's tough to say if they'll be able to form a coalition.

00:35:35.000 It's tough to say if they will be able to form a government in the parliament that can actually discharge the duties of government.

00:35:43.000 And I think all of that's basically irrelevant.

00:35:46.000 40% of the vote is still undecided in the polls.

00:35:49.000 That's something else to consider.

00:35:50.000 40% still undecided.

00:35:52.000 And we'll see.

00:35:53.000 Will they go the way of the United States and the Brexit, or will they go the way of France and of Germany in their recent elections?

00:35:59.000 We'll see.

00:36:00.000 But I think that ultimately the demographics are on our side.

00:36:03.000 I think this anger that you're seeing in Italy is in many ways a white pill because it shows that when pushed to a certain point, people are going to start to figure it out.

00:36:12.000 They're going to start to figure it out what's happening and what needs to be done.

00:36:16.000 There's this fear, I think, in the West, and maybe more rightfully so in the United States because we don't have as strong an ethnic identity and we don't have as much time. 0.89

00:36:24.000 We don't have a solid demographic base like Italy does.

00:36:27.000 Italy's 92% Italian.

00:36:29.000 The United States is 67% white.

00:36:32.000 So it's a little bit different. 0.60

00:36:33.000 But the white pill in Italy is that they will only be pushed to a certain point before there is resistance.

00:36:39.000 There's the paranoia, like I was saying before, that like, oh, we'll just take this sitting down and people will never see this and it'll be too late.

00:36:47.000 I think what we're seeing on the continent, whether it's being totally actualized, whether they're winning elections, it is there.

00:36:54.000 And the people that are in charge know it's there.

00:36:56.000 And that's why you see this panic.

00:36:58.000 Around the Western world, whether you see the censorship laws or you see the crackdown on these Eastern European countries and these other measures that have been taken, there is a panic.

00:37:07.000 And they're panicking because they know it's a very fragile system.

00:37:09.000 And all it takes is a little push, and we are fighting for our lives.

00:37:15.000 And once that happens, they lose. 1.00

00:37:18.000 The invaders, the migrants, the people that are coming to these countries to take them over, they will not be able to win a conflict on our home soil because we're fighting for our land. 1.00

00:37:27.000 We're fighting for. 1.00

00:37:28.000 Something bigger than ourselves.

00:37:30.000 They're fighting for free stuff.

00:37:30.000 What are they fighting for?

00:37:33.000 So I think that is a white pill in and of itself. 0.67

00:37:35.000 So that's Italy.

00:37:36.000 We'll see.

00:37:37.000 My ancestral homeland.

00:37:39.000 It's a wonderful place.

00:37:40.000 It's such a shame.

00:37:41.000 Such a shame to see an historical place like Italy.

00:37:43.000 You see these pictures of a city like Paris or a city like Rome or some of these ancient cities where there's real history there.

00:37:52.000 They go back thousands of years and the architecture has been there forever and some shops and businesses have been there forever and families have been there forever and there's a real.

00:38:01.000 Culture, real history, it took a long time to cultivate. 1.00

00:38:04.000 And you have people that come over here and you see what happens, whether it's at a bus stop or at these different restaurants, the things where these people come over and they act like animals, these migrants, in many cases. 1.00

00:38:16.000 So it really is just a travesty to see the height of human civilization, the peak of human civilization, artistically, culturally, technologically, and we're going to throw it all in the garbage. 1.00

00:38:28.000 We're going to say, yeah, well, we had a nice run.

00:38:31.000 That was all nice and stuff.

00:38:33.000 The great cathedrals, the great art.

00:38:36.000 Landing on the moon, the technology, all these wonderful things that we did.

00:38:40.000 Yeah, we had a nice run, but we don't want to be called racist.

00:38:44.000 We don't want to be called exclusionary.

00:38:46.000 We don't want to be called far right.

00:38:48.000 So let's just hope it all works out.

00:38:51.000 Let's just hope that bringing in millions of people who don't know how to make a functional society, let's just hope this little experiment works out.

00:38:59.000 Because it really, what it comes down to is this is an experiment.

00:39:02.000 That's kind of the thing is like they're saying it'll work out.

00:39:06.000 Diversity will work out and it'll make us stronger. 0.85

00:39:08.000 And we're saying no, it won't.

00:39:09.000 But ultimately, They don't know.

00:39:11.000 The record of history is on our side, and they could do their econometrician studies and say, oh, well, it's actually a good thing, but they don't know.

00:39:19.000 And this has never been done before.

00:39:20.000 It's never been done successfully.

00:39:22.000 They're hoping it'll work this time.

00:39:24.000 And when we're essentially going to, we're putting all in, we're going to bet all our chips, everything we've ever worked for, bled for, sweat for, our children's lives, their children's futures, we're going all in on diversity. 1.00

00:39:37.000 So the next time you see one of these African migrants in Europe, one of these real beauties, one of these African migrants who they don't know how to speak the native language, they're illiterate, and they don't have any marketable skills, and a lot of them are just on welfare and they're violent. 0.97

00:39:51.000 Next time you see a video of an African migrant punching one of the native girls in the face or raping them, just think to yourself, we're going all in with everything we've ever had on those people being able to assimilate and contribute in the same way as everybody else. 1.00

00:40:05.000 Hey, look, make your bet. 0.98

00:40:07.000 I mean, really, is that the bet we want to make?

00:40:09.000 I hope I don't get demonetized or get a strike for saying that, but that's essentially what's happening.

00:40:15.000 And they might say, oh, well, those are the exceptions and this and that.

00:40:18.000 Okay, well, that's there.

00:40:20.000 And you're betting on that.

00:40:21.000 Good luck with that.

00:40:21.000 Good luck.

00:40:22.000 I hope that works out well for you. 1.00

00:40:24.000 So that's Italy.

00:40:24.000 We'll get into your super chats now and we'll see what the people are saying.

00:40:28.000 What are the masses saying today?

00:40:30.000 Are you as angry as I am about it?

00:40:33.000 You know, they make fun of us for being angry.

00:40:35.000 They're like, the right wing is, they're angry.

00:40:38.000 They're not like, and by the way, they're angry too.

00:40:40.000 But they say the right wing, they're these angry white males. 0.94

00:40:43.000 Yeah, it kind of makes us mad when people take a steaming hot dump on the glory of our civilization.

00:40:50.000 Yeah, it kind of, you know, irks people a little bit. 1.00

00:40:54.000 You call a black person the wrong thing and they're entitled to burn down the whole city. 0.99

00:40:58.000 You call a black person a colored person instead of a person of color and they burn down the whole city and it's like, oh, well, you did call them a colored person. 1.00

00:41:06.000 You have people come over to Italy and they burn the flag. 1.00

00:41:09.000 They step on the flag.

00:41:10.000 They say, F this, this is ours now. 1.00

00:41:11.000 They rape the women. 1.00

00:41:12.000 They kill the people. 1.00

00:41:14.000 They do these terror attacks and they say, You're really, are you angry?

00:41:18.000 Hey, little white man, are you angry about what's happening to your country?

00:41:22.000 So, anyhow.

00:41:24.000 Third guy says, Spread your wings and fly.

00:41:27.000 Fly like the great Charles Lindbergh.

00:41:29.000 Yes, a great American patriot and fellow America First patriot.

00:41:34.000 I don't care what people say about Charles Lindbergh.

00:41:36.000 I don't care what nasty things people have to say about him.

00:41:39.000 An American hero.

00:41:40.000 An American hero.

00:41:41.000 There's simply no others like him.

00:41:43.000 An American original.

00:41:44.000 There are so many great innovators in American history.

00:41:47.000 We really have to go back to embracing it.

00:41:49.000 Great industrialists like Rockefeller, like Carnegie, like Henry Ford.

00:41:57.000 Like Charles Lindbergh and all the greats.

00:42:00.000 We have to really embrace our American heritage because it's something special.

00:42:04.000 Europe is one thing, and we love our ancestral homelands, but America has a culture too, and we're fighting for it here.

00:42:11.000 Rex Kwando.

00:42:12.000 Nick, I am an atheist making a serious inquiry into Catholicism.

00:42:16.000 What questions can I ask churches in my area to make sure I'm picking the least cocked?

00:42:22.000 Well, there's no other way than to simply go and experience the mess. 1.00

00:42:25.000 I believe the Latin masses. 1.00

00:42:29.000 The Latin masses are the least cucked, I would imagine, simply because you tend to have a more traditionalist atmosphere.

00:42:36.000 People that operate these tend to be more traditionalist Catholics. 0.99

00:42:40.000 So I would say if you could find a Latin mass near you, that would probably be the best option. 0.99

00:42:45.000 Other than that, you just kind of have to shop around. 1.00

00:42:47.000 I don't know if it comes down to asking questions.

00:42:49.000 I think the important thing is not so much what a pastor might say, so much as it is the purpose of the mass is a sacrifice to God, the purpose of the mass is to worship God.

00:42:59.000 It's not about us.

00:43:00.000 So, I've been to my church before, and they say some things I don't totally agree with, but it doesn't really bother me because I'm not there for the priest talking about politics.

00:43:10.000 I'm there for the sacrifice.

00:43:12.000 So, I don't think that matters too much.

00:43:14.000 But I guess if you are getting into the Catholic faith, it is worth it to get the traditionalist view of it.

00:43:19.000 In which case, I would say a Latin mass or otherwise shop around.

00:43:24.000 Mela Forda says, Nick, I started reading some Evola.

00:43:27.000 He seems to praise Islam.

00:43:29.000 What do you make of this?

00:43:30.000 Well, you have to understand that Evola is a traditionalist.

00:43:34.000 And you have to look at it also in the context of political theory. 0.99

00:43:38.000 I think Islam is really kind of the red herring here.

00:43:40.000 Islam is really not the most dangerous thing in the West.

00:43:43.000 All these people worrying about Sharia law and Islam in the United States, it's a little bit overblown. 0.99

00:43:49.000 Islam is alien, it's foreign, and we shouldn't have it in the United States. 1.00

00:43:53.000 I really do believe that. 1.00

00:43:54.000 It should be kept as minimal as possible. 1.00

00:43:57.000 We can expect nothing but conflict from a significant Muslim presence in this country. 1.00

00:44:01.000 That's number one. 1.00

00:44:03.000 But Islam is not an existential threat to the United States like it is to Europe. 0.95

00:44:10.000 The problem is not the people coming into Europe, the problem is the people letting them into Europe.

00:44:14.000 They don't just come in. 1.00

00:44:16.000 They don't just, oh, look, well, here they are and we just have to keep them.

00:44:19.000 No, no, no.

00:44:20.000 This comes down from upstairs.

00:44:22.000 This comes down from higher up.

00:44:24.000 This comes down from Brussels.

00:44:25.000 Those are the people that are the problem. 1.00

00:44:28.000 Muslims are going to conquest. 1.00

00:44:29.000 That's what they do. 1.00

00:44:30.000 That's what they believe.

00:44:32.000 That's their playbook.

00:44:33.000 They've done that forever.

00:44:34.000 Can't blame them.

00:44:35.000 It's when Donald Trump does the snake lyric Snakes bite.

00:44:38.000 Don't pick up the snake.

00:44:40.000 You knew it was a snake when you took it in. 1.00

00:44:42.000 So I don't even blame Muslims so much as I blame the people that.

00:44:45.000 They purport to represent their constituents.

00:44:48.000 They purport to represent their countries.

00:44:50.000 And they let in, they introduce foreign influences, foreign elements. 1.00

00:44:54.000 And so the Islam thing is trouble. 1.00

00:44:57.000 We shouldn't have it. 1.00

00:44:58.000 But the real problem is the people that bring it in.

00:45:00.000 On Evela, he's a traditionalist. 0.93

00:45:02.000 Islam is traditional compared to what's going on in Europe. 0.58

00:45:06.000 And so I've said before as well, you know, people say, oh, well, Nick, how is that any different than radical Islam and this and that when I preach traditionalism? 0.90

00:45:14.000 And I say, well, in many ways, it's the same. 0.70

00:45:16.000 It's conservatism, it's traditionalism, it's modesty. 0.96

00:45:20.000 Classical virtues, which hasn't been lost so much in Islam. 1.00

00:45:24.000 They've paid a price for that at the expense of technology and human rights and all the rest, but they've maintained a traditional order. 1.00

00:45:31.000 I think it's a Christian heresy, Islam. 0.99

00:45:33.000 It's heretical, but I certainly understand where he's coming from on that. 1.00

00:45:37.000 So I wouldn't read too much into that.

00:45:40.000 The Daily Oven, Nicker is our word.

00:45:42.000 You can use Nickah, though.

00:45:43.000 Yeah, right?

00:45:44.000 We're the Nickers, and we're reappropriating the word.

00:45:47.000 We're taking it back.

00:45:48.000 If the word Nicker offends you, okay, you.

00:45:52.000 I don't know. 0.81

00:45:53.000 Maybe you're one of those demo KKK crats. 0.99

00:45:56.000 You're one of those demon craps on the Democratic plantation with your identity politics and your safe spaces. 0.99

00:46:04.000 So, Nicker shouldn't offend you. 0.97

00:46:06.000 It's just a nice little colloquial expression for fans of Nick, Nickers, Nicker Ali, followers of Nick.

00:46:15.000 But you're my Nicker, though.

00:46:16.000 But you're my Nicker.

00:46:18.000 But I can call you my Nicker.

00:46:20.000 Justin Nick, I will subscribe to America First Premium if you'd be on time tomorrow.

00:46:24.000 I am on time.

00:46:26.000 Big guy, I am on time.

00:46:28.000 There's a delay, big fella.

00:46:30.000 Take it easy.

00:46:31.000 Malaforta, Nick, are you an old soul?

00:46:34.000 I am an old soul.

00:46:35.000 I don't know.

00:46:35.000 I don't really know.

00:46:38.000 I mean, I suppose.

00:46:40.000 What does that expression really mean?

00:46:41.000 That you have, you're a mature soul, maybe you're from a different age, a traditional soul.

00:46:45.000 I think I just am common sense.

00:46:47.000 I think I just see common sense and reason in many regards.

00:46:51.000 I think, unlike many susceptible young people, I haven't bought in.

00:46:56.000 To what's been said on media and in culture and so much.

00:46:58.000 I just look at things and see them for what they are, but maybe that's me.

00:47:02.000 Empress Finest, 39 GOP SE losses.

00:47:06.000 Getting worried.

00:47:07.000 What's SE losses?

00:47:10.000 What's SE losses?

00:47:11.000 39 GOP.

00:47:12.000 What is that, state?

00:47:14.000 I'm not sure what you're getting at there, what that acronym is.

00:47:17.000 But you shouldn't be worried about 2018.

00:47:19.000 Just look at generic ballots.

00:47:20.000 Just look at how many seats are up for grabs for the Senate.

00:47:23.000 The House is going to be a little bit worrisome, but I think we're going to play it well.

00:47:27.000 Julian Paul, curious, asked your opinion on Augustus Invictus.

00:47:31.000 I don't really know that much about him.

00:47:32.000 I don't really know anything about him.

00:47:35.000 Isn't he like.

00:47:37.000 Wasn't he like a criminal?

00:47:38.000 Maybe I'm thinking of somebody else.

00:47:40.000 Maybe I'm thinking of.

00:47:42.000 Based Stickman or D'Amigo.

00:47:43.000 I'm not totally sure, but I understand he's a libertarian.

00:47:46.000 He was running in Florida.

00:47:48.000 Look, the name is just a little bit LARPy to me.

00:47:51.000 Like I said, I don't know anything about the guy, but I am familiar with him, kind of.

00:47:56.000 And just the name, it's just here you may have somebody who has talent.

00:47:59.000 Here you may have somebody who is smart and who knows what's going on, but to present as I'm Augustus Invictus, isn't that a little bit LARPy?

00:48:07.000 Isn't that a little bit over the top?

00:48:09.000 We have to get back to optics.

00:48:10.000 We have to get back to a packaging for our message that is at the very, at the At the bedrock, at the very least, it does not detract from the message.

00:48:19.000 It does not distract from the message.

00:48:21.000 And that's what we have to work on.

00:48:23.000 I think I figured that out pretty much on the show.

00:48:25.000 But many people in this movement, the optics, they've allowed the packaging which they want to indulge themselves, they let that get in the way of the message.

00:48:35.000 I don't care so much if we have to go by John Smith of the grand old party and we're these regular conservatives if I can get what I want passed.

00:48:46.000 I don't care if we have to. 0.99

00:48:48.000 To look like Mogapeeds and appeal to people that buy gold from Fox News. 1.00

00:48:54.000 If we get our policy put into action, that's all that matters. 0.82

00:48:57.000 And so people let the packaging get in the way.

00:49:01.000 They let their pet issues get in the way, and it's just simply unproductive.

00:49:04.000 But I don't know.

00:49:05.000 I think he's a smart guy.

00:49:07.000 But the name is a little bit out there. 0.98

00:49:09.000 Frederick White, you are a weapon of mass destruction.

00:49:11.000 Sessions is not.

00:49:12.000 Well, we will see.

00:49:14.000 I think that the sparring between Trump and Sessions is political theater.

00:49:17.000 I tweeted that earlier today.

00:49:18.000 And you understand the framing here.

00:49:21.000 If you have an explosive IG report come out in March, and it's set to come out in late March, early April, IG report comes out from Horowitz and commissioned by the Justice Department, and the left says this explosive stuff is nonsense.

00:49:35.000 It's a mouthpiece for the Trump administration.

00:49:37.000 It's conspiracy talk.

00:49:38.000 It's just like the new Nesmeno. 0.98

00:49:40.000 It's ridiculous. 0.84

00:49:42.000 Well, if Trump says, hey, Horowitz is an Obama guy and Sessions isn't doing his job, I don't like Sessions. 0.99

00:49:48.000 Boo, disgraceful.

00:49:49.000 Well, the media, it gives them a certain credibility in the eyes of the media, it gives them a certain credibility in the eyes of The public, where when the IG report comes out from an Obama guy under commission from the Justice Department, led by Sessions, who is maybe distant from the Trump administration, well, then they can't say, oh, well, Sessions is just a puppet.

00:50:08.000 He's just a pawn of Trump, and Horowitz is a pawn of Trump.

00:50:10.000 They won't say that.

00:50:12.000 So I do believe that is the play there.

00:50:14.000 I could be proven wrong, but I think that is what's going on.

00:50:17.000 Because the IG report will be looking into Clinton stuff, Obama stuff.

00:50:21.000 This is very partisan stuff, where if it just came out of the Trump administration without any qualification, The left, the middle, would say, What is this?

00:50:31.000 This is conspiracy talk.

00:50:32.000 This is the Republicans going after the Democrats.

00:50:34.000 This is nothing.

00:50:35.000 But if there's at least an appearance, a resemblance of maybe this independence granted by Trump distancing himself from those two, I think you get a little bit more credibility on it.

00:50:47.000 The right leaf landed an IB internship.

00:50:49.000 We premium now, fan.

00:50:51.000 Good to hear it, my guy.

00:50:53.000 Much appreciated.

00:50:54.000 And congratulations on the internship.

00:50:55.000 That's the way to do it.

00:50:57.000 Got to get into.

00:50:58.000 The system got to infiltrate, got to penetrate.

00:51:01.000 You know, you look at, for example, the Zionists are a great example of how to organize for political interest because here's a group of people with a cause that was not popular, even among their own community, but broadly among Americans.

00:51:13.000 And what did they have?

00:51:14.000 A very small group of people, but the kinds of people in that movement were top shelf people.

00:51:20.000 It was a small group, but these people were lawyers, they were doctors, they were financiers, they were politicians, judges, and all the rest.

00:51:27.000 And when you have a very motivated group of people with skills, with cloud, with resources, the sky's the limit.

00:51:33.000 So we should take a page out of their playbook in that regard.

00:51:37.000 Nick, what part of Italy are your ancestors from?

00:51:39.000 Mine are from Isernia.

00:51:41.000 Well, my ancestors in Italy are from Naples and from Northern Italy.

00:51:45.000 At least that's what I'm told.

00:51:46.000 From Naples, I believe on the dad's side of my mom, and on the mother's side, I believe it's Northern Italy.

00:51:55.000 Or maybe I have that mixed up, but those are the two regions.

00:52:00.000 Not from Sicily.

00:52:01.000 No Sicilian. 0.91

00:52:02.000 No Sicilian.

00:52:04.000 Salim Forte says, Nick, what do you think of Chapo Trap House?

00:52:07.000 I don't really know that much about them.

00:52:09.000 I know they're like alt left.

00:52:11.000 I've seen some of their stuff.

00:52:12.000 It's pretty funny, pretty interesting.

00:52:14.000 But generally, kind of, I think they present a real left wing in the country.

00:52:21.000 Whereas the left right now is this corporatist, like, establishment conglomerate.

00:52:26.000 It's basically like a corporation.

00:52:28.000 I think Chapo Trap House and some of these more dissident elements represent kind of a real left wing, which is, I think, welcomed.

00:52:35.000 Rex Kwando, powerful Nick Fuentes.

00:52:37.000 It's true, quite powerful.

00:52:39.000 Al-Sabadi says, from my cold, dead hands, you can effing count on it. 0.98

00:52:44.000 Trump let us down because a Jewish Florida school had bad things happen to it and calls whites cowards.

00:52:52.000 You know, I think what Trump is doing again, not to go the whole 4D chess thing, but this is a public negotiation on guns, just like it was with DACA.

00:53:00.000 And again, people are so quick.

00:53:02.000 The press reports that Donald Trump said something that I don't like.

00:53:06.000 He's not our guy.

00:53:08.000 I'm off the Trump train.

00:53:10.000 Just like with DACA, just like with DACA the first time, just like with Iran, just like with Syria, just like with Jerusalem, and on and on and on and on.

00:53:18.000 It's a public negotiation.

00:53:20.000 He's trying to win 2018 midterms.

00:53:23.000 He has to frame the conversation in an effective way.

00:53:27.000 And he already said a week ago that there is due process.

00:53:30.000 And now he's saying, oh, well, we should get the guns before due process.

00:53:33.000 This was obviously a play.

00:53:35.000 You had Mike Pence saying there needs to be due process, feeding it to Trump, and then Trump responding.

00:53:40.000 And if you look at the comments on that, Comments from the left and from the middle. 0.92

00:53:45.000 They said, Oh, well, that's ridiculous. 0.91

00:53:47.000 What are you talking about? 0.98

00:53:48.000 We're going to do this, that, and the other.

00:53:51.000 So I think when Trump says these kinds of things, more often than not, that is either a play to mobilize his base or to frame it for the left and the middle.

00:53:58.000 And we'll see.

00:53:59.000 And again, I've always maintained the same position.

00:54:03.000 If he goes in and he does something completely unreasonable on firearms, like you confiscate before due process, or he raises the age to 21, or he does something obscene with gun regulations in the Congress.

00:54:17.000 I'll be off the Trump train too.

00:54:18.000 He went against his promises.

00:54:20.000 Or we could wait and see what happens, like we usually give Trump the benefit of the doubt on the show, and we'll ride it out.

00:54:28.000 And more often than not, it's probably just political theater.

00:54:31.000 I happen to be of the latter school of thought.

00:54:34.000 How many times do we have to go through this?

00:54:36.000 How many times do I have to be vindicated on an issue like this before people get the idea that he's a negotiator?

00:54:43.000 You negotiate in public, you negotiate by changing the frame.

00:54:49.000 Turning over the tables, so to speak.

00:54:52.000 Carl's friend says, thoughts on Dick's sporting goods stopping AR sales.

00:54:56.000 Well, it's a big mistake.

00:54:57.000 I mean, here's a dying brick and mortar store, which I'm sure they're having difficulty getting people through the doors anyway.

00:55:04.000 And now they're going to alienate half the country.

00:55:07.000 Now they're going to make a political statement on a very divisive issue. 1.00

00:55:10.000 It's just stupid. 0.99

00:55:11.000 Walmart can afford to do this because Walmart's the largest employer in the country. 1.00

00:55:15.000 I don't think it's a smart thing, but they can afford it better than others.

00:55:20.000 These guys, not so much.

00:55:21.000 FedEx understands this, Amazon understands this. 0.99

00:55:24.000 Dick Sporting Goods is being very dumb. 0.98

00:55:26.000 It's a gamble, it's a gambit, and a risky one. 0.99

00:55:29.000 It's not going to pay off.

00:55:31.000 Who are the people that are buying sporting goods?

00:55:32.000 Is it like metrosexual cosmopolitans in big cities? 1.00

00:55:36.000 Is it these eunuchs that are going to cheer this measure?

00:55:39.000 Or is it people that go to Dick Sporting Goods to buy fishing equipment and go there to buy, what, baseball equipment and firearms and hunting stuff?

00:55:46.000 It's not a good move. 0.97

00:55:48.000 Very silly.

00:55:49.000 And I'm not even sure where their stores are located, but I would imagine, if you've ever been in Dick Sporting Goods, a lot of outdoors kinds of stuff. 0.95

00:55:58.000 I would imagine they probably do better in states that are more red.

00:56:02.000 Because you have more outdoorsy type people, but that's just a postulate.

00:56:08.000 What else?

00:56:09.000 Carl's friend says, No super chats tonight.

00:56:11.000 We're doing them right now, big guy. 1.00

00:56:13.000 V says, Lauren Southern is a wog socket. 1.00

00:56:15.000 I don't know what that means. 1.00

00:56:17.000 I don't know if that's true.

00:56:18.000 This super chat was in pounds, so maybe this is a British expression, but I don't know what that means.

00:56:24.000 Dan, man, have you read Hans Hermann Hoppe yet?

00:56:27.000 I've read some of his essays, I've read some of his speeches, but I haven't read, for example, his on, what is it, From Monarchy to Aristocracy to Democracy.

00:56:34.000 I've never read his books, but.

00:56:36.000 I've read some of his stuff.

00:56:37.000 He's a very good, he's really the reason.

00:56:39.000 A lot of his thinking and some of these other right libertarians were what got me from libertarian to right wing because I saw, you know, political liberty is not actually the best way to secure other forms of liberty in the sense that in many cases you're better off with an enlightened despot like an Augusto Pinochet or, you know, Frederick William the Great to go back further than you are under a tyranny of the transient majority.

00:57:04.000 So Hoppe, I think, understood better than most that.

00:57:09.000 You need to have some kind of institution in Gavramoch can secure liberty.

00:57:13.000 And that's really the important thing, not so much the methodology. 0.75

00:57:18.000 Joe the Serb, my boy Nick now has a knife as sharp as his wits.

00:57:23.000 My guy, it's true.

00:57:25.000 Get your knives out, everybody.

00:57:27.000 Get your knives out.

00:57:28.000 Raise your knives for the knife party.

00:57:30.000 We're out here. 0.67

00:57:32.000 And we are cutting globalists. 0.97

00:57:33.000 We're cutting them up left and right, rhetorically, of course.

00:57:36.000 We would never use these.

00:57:38.000 I would never use this against anybody.

00:57:40.000 unless put into a self defense situation.

00:57:43.000 Otherwise, it is rhetorical slashing.

00:57:46.000 We are cutting through their arguments with a rhetorical knife like butter.

00:57:50.000 So raise your knives for the knife party and be careful. 0.99

00:57:53.000 Be careful if you want to try anything rhetorically with me, because with my rhetorical knife, I will rhetorically slice your face. 0.98

00:58:00.000 Rhetorically. 0.99

00:58:01.000 Your rhetorical face.

00:58:04.000 Ian Weber says, just got on the show, so sorry for being off topic.

00:58:07.000 Hey, don't apologize.

00:58:08.000 Never, never apologize on the show.

00:58:12.000 No apology, right?

00:58:13.000 Like Mitt Romney, who says, I just got on the show.

00:58:16.000 So sorry for being off topic, but how do you think this DACA situation will go down with the courts?

00:58:20.000 I think inevitably they'll rule in favor of Trump.

00:58:23.000 It'll take a little bit longer because the Supreme Court said you have to go through the appeals court.

00:58:29.000 And so it'll take a little bit longer.

00:58:30.000 But I think inevitably the result will be the same.

00:58:32.000 I don't think there's any way either the appeals courts, and if not the appeals courts, the Supreme Court can interpret the law in such a way that President Trump cannot unilaterally, by executive order, Reverse an executive order by a previous president, right?

00:58:47.000 I don't understand how that would make any sense.

00:58:50.000 If President Trump were not able to revoke that executive order, that would be a pretty wild precedent.

00:58:57.000 That would mean that anything that Trump established by executive fiat, a successor to his administration would be impotent to turn it around or to reverse it or to modify it.

00:59:09.000 So I doubt that would be the case.

00:59:11.000 Carl's friend, in 40 years, what will people be nostalgic for?

00:59:15.000 SpongeBob SquarePants?

00:59:17.000 SpongeBob, I don't know.

00:59:18.000 That's a good question.

00:59:20.000 That's kind of the thing, is, well, I would say this.

00:59:27.000 Nostalgic about because we're in kind of this cultural wasteland.

00:59:31.000 But even still, people have sentimental connections to the culture, as depraved as it is, as hollow as it is.

00:59:38.000 I think people still have these touchstones for their culture.

00:59:41.000 You know, I'll hear songs, I'll see silly corporate things from my childhood, and it does bring back childhood memories.

00:59:48.000 I think that's kind of a statement on the resilience, maybe, of the human spirit.

00:59:54.000 That even though we have messages and symbols, And culture that has no intrinsic meaning, we can project meaning onto it.

01:00:05.000 And I think that's really a testament to what we're all about in the sense that you could watch, you could listen to the pop garbage and music and movies and whatever and still have a very meaningful memory about it.

01:00:15.000 So I don't know.

01:00:17.000 I think there will be a lot to be nostalgic for.

01:00:19.000 Maybe I'm nostalgic for the time before the internet.

01:00:21.000 I remember before, I guess not before the internet, but before maybe the ubiquity of the internet.

01:00:27.000 You know, I was still around when people didn't have smartphones.

01:00:31.000 I know people are, oh, you were still around.

01:00:33.000 You're acting like you're old.

01:00:34.000 I'm not, but I'm saying, you know, smartphones are everywhere.

01:00:37.000 And for, I guess, maybe younger Generation Z, they don't remember this, but as an older Generation Z, I remember when cell phones weren't common.

01:00:44.000 I remember when people didn't have smartphones at all.

01:00:47.000 And when you went on the computer, it was this big chore, it was this big hassle, and technology was kind of a pain.

01:00:53.000 So I remember the 2000s pretty well.

01:00:56.000 So some of that stuff, maybe like Blink 182 will be nostalgic for that.

01:01:02.000 Some of those other things.

01:01:03.000 Definitely Spongebob.

01:01:04.000 Television will be nostalgic for it because that's going away.

01:01:07.000 Radio will be nostalgic for because that's going away in some ways.

01:01:11.000 So, who knows?

01:01:13.000 I think we're about to take a pretty big turn in terms of the country with AI, with quantum, with all these other things.

01:01:20.000 We're about to turn a big corner pretty soon.

01:01:23.000 Once we start hitting that exponential growth, nothing will be the same.

01:01:27.000 And so we'll be reminiscent for these times.

01:01:30.000 Let's see, what else?

01:01:31.000 What else? 1.00

01:01:32.000 Daily Oven, when is the hard right going to address the MGTOW problem? 0.87

01:01:36.000 I would personally call out someone like Sandman myself, but I am a literally who. 0.93

01:01:40.000 So, my call out.

01:01:41.000 Will not have much reach.

01:01:42.000 I don't know who Sandman is.

01:01:44.000 I don't know.

01:01:44.000 Is the hard right like that?

01:01:48.000 Who's that guy?

01:01:49.000 That psychopath, Hunter Wallace?

01:01:52.000 I don't really.

01:01:53.000 I'm not sure what you mean by this.

01:01:54.000 I'm not sure the politics of that.

01:01:57.000 But I'll pass it along. 0.59

01:01:58.000 I guess the Daily Oven has a problem with the hard right and their inadequate response to the MGTOW problem. 0.54

01:02:05.000 But I don't know.

01:02:07.000 I don't know what you mean by that.

01:02:09.000 Ian Weber, check out my dog later on the Discord.

01:02:11.000 She needs to be a symbol of American nationalist.

01:02:14.000 The perfect. 1.00

01:02:14.000 Archetype of the American dog. 1.00

01:02:16.000 Ah, yes, dog nationalism.

01:02:18.000 Gotta say, I didn't want to get a dog because, you know, look, dogs are nice in theory, in a formal sense, in an ideal sense.

01:02:26.000 We like dogs.

01:02:27.000 We like to go and see other people's dogs.

01:02:29.000 But then you get a dog in your own home and you become like that person.

01:02:33.000 You become that dog person where people without dogs go to your house and they knock on the door and you hear emanating from the bowels of the house this obnoxious, this odious barking.

01:02:44.000 Echoing throughout the chamber of the house, and then you hear the running up and the scratching at the door, and you think, Oh, oh, brother, you know.

01:02:52.000 And then you hear somebody rushing up to the door, opening the door, and the dog's jumping.

01:02:57.000 It's, oh, oh, get down, don't jump.

01:02:59.000 I'm so sorry, he's so impolite.

01:03:02.000 And there's dog hair everywhere, and there's dog toys everywhere, and there's dog food spilled inevitably by the dog bowl.

01:03:11.000 And look, it's just the whole thing.

01:03:15.000 I was against it for this reason because I don't want people to come to the home and have to go through this kind of a thing. 0.99

01:03:21.000 I think it sends kind of this maybe plebeian message.

01:03:25.000 But I do love my dog, I will say.

01:03:27.000 And I guess I like dogs, but that was one of my holdouts on it.

01:03:33.000 Crash Pelican, make sure to tap the inside of your mug when you debate sticks.

01:03:37.000 The Virgin Spoon Clank versus the Chad Knife Clank.

01:03:41.000 We'll do it, we'll make it happen.

01:03:44.000 Carl's friend, is the hot dog a sandwich?

01:03:46.000 The answer is no.

01:03:47.000 The answer is no.

01:03:48.000 A hot dog is not a sandwich. 0.97

01:03:49.000 That's ridiculous.

01:03:50.000 Sandwich has to have two distinct and separate slices, one on top of the other. 0.95

01:03:55.000 Hamburger is a sandwich.

01:03:57.000 A hoagie is a sandwich.

01:03:59.000 Sub is a sandwich.

01:04:01.000 Meatball marinara is a sandwich.

01:04:04.000 But hot dog is not a sandwich.

01:04:09.000 You don't even have a flat condiment on it.

01:04:11.000 Hot dog is round. 1.00

01:04:12.000 That's just stupid. 1.00

01:04:14.000 Maybe in Boston. 1.00

01:04:15.000 In Boston, they do it a little bit differently.

01:04:17.000 This is what I observed there, where they do this weird, what do you call it, like Fenway style, where they do it in a piece of white bread and they put the hot dog in.

01:04:26.000 I don't recommend.

01:04:27.000 Chicago hot dogs are superior with.

01:04:30.000 All the fixings that go on there.

01:04:32.000 But in most cases, hot dog is not a sandwich.

01:04:36.000 Sorry to say.

01:04:38.000 Ian Weber, on a show I think back in October, you talked about how we need a new Oswald Mosley.

01:04:43.000 Do you think this would be necessary or just helpful for acceleration?

01:04:47.000 What I mean by that is we need a good orator.

01:04:49.000 We need a great orator.

01:04:51.000 We need a real leader in the sense that the globalists are terrified of somebody who's well spoken, who could really energize the people.

01:04:58.000 And I think that's why a lot of Mosley's speeches are not available.

01:05:02.000 They're not accessible online is because people would hear that and they would be stirred in their souls to nationalism.

01:05:09.000 And so that's what I mean when I say we need a new Mosley.

01:05:12.000 I don't mean we need like neo fascism and we need people giving Roman salutes and in uniforms.

01:05:17.000 I mean we need somebody who can articulate our message in a way that is poetic, that drives people, that really inspires people.

01:05:27.000 We need an inspired leader like Mosley.

01:05:30.000 So it's, I don't know if it's necessary, but I think it would really be a big help.

01:05:37.000 To have a great communicator.

01:05:39.000 The Daily Oven, sorry for being vague.

01:05:41.000 The hard right is a term Coach Redpill recently used because the alt right is a dying term.

01:05:45.000 Well, I'm glad to hear that.

01:05:48.000 But I don't know who the hard right is.

01:05:50.000 I guess if Coach Redpill uses it to mean like the right stuff and these kinds of people, I don't identify as hard right then.

01:05:56.000 But yeah, it's kind of curious with the MGTOW question where they want to have it at once where they like make fun of them, but at the same time they have the Thought Patrol.

01:06:05.000 This was one of the chief paradoxes of James Alsop's opposition to the Thought Wars.

01:06:11.000 Was that he, you know, our whole brand was Thought Patrol and then suddenly didn't like it?

01:06:15.000 I don't know.

01:06:16.000 It's tough to say because, in the absence of Christianity, what's the motivation for traditionalism for women?

01:06:22.000 I don't think it exists. 0.76

01:06:23.000 I don't think it exists purely on a functional basis without that kind of church calling.

01:06:29.000 But, you know, people are going to have a problem with that.

01:06:32.000 They'll say, oh, well, they need to serve their race and blah, blah, blah, which I don't think is as inspiring as religious stuff.

01:06:38.000 So I don't know.

01:06:39.000 I don't really follow Coach Redpill.

01:06:41.000 I don't follow these people so much.

01:06:42.000 So I don't know.

01:06:44.000 Cocklaunch says, What a name!

01:06:47.000 Says, If Tucker gets fired for something, will you wear a bow tie?

01:06:51.000 I will not wear a bow tie.

01:06:53.000 I will never wear a bow tie. 1.00

01:06:54.000 It's too European. 1.00

01:06:55.000 It's too metro, too gay. 1.00

01:06:57.000 We're always doing the necktie. 1.00

01:06:58.000 Necktie is good optics.

01:07:00.000 Bow tie is for libertarians. 0.95

01:07:02.000 T. Lobster, would gays be conservative if gay is not their identity?

01:07:07.000 What does that mean? 0.96

01:07:08.000 Would gays be conservative if gay is not their identity?

01:07:13.000 I'm not sure. 0.97

01:07:14.000 So, okay, I think I see what you mean. 0.79

01:07:15.000 So you're saying the way that the left forces homosexuals into this place where Their only identities are sexual identities. 0.97

01:07:23.000 And this is something, this is the refrain you hear from degenerates all day long. 0.89

01:07:27.000 I don't want to be defined by the fact that I'm a lesbian or I'm this or that.

01:07:32.000 But then all day long, everything is, well, I'm a queer this.

01:07:35.000 I'm a queer Latinx.

01:07:36.000 I'm a disabled queer Latinx.

01:07:38.000 And, you know, so it's like really, at once, my this doesn't define me.

01:07:42.000 At the same time, that's what you use to qualify who you are.

01:07:46.000 And you're saying in the absence of that, would they be conservative?

01:07:49.000 It's tough to say.

01:07:50.000 I don't know.

01:07:50.000 I mean, on the one hand, There is a very conservative opposition to homosexuality in the sense that we Catholics and conservatives see these tendencies as unnatural, as deviant, as disordered.

01:08:05.000 So I don't know, unless they're, I don't know if they would have a natural inclination towards that.

01:08:10.000 I think maybe the opposite. 0.91

01:08:12.000 But then again, there have been very conservative homosexuals in the past.

01:08:15.000 Andy Warhol was a devout Catholic.

01:08:19.000 I'm not sure how much of it is propaganda, but you hear rumors about many great people in history.

01:08:24.000 So it's tough to say.

01:08:25.000 But I think as it stands right now, the situation is that most are not. 0.92

01:08:30.000 And most, their identity is their homosexuality. 0.91

01:08:33.000 I think it's been thrust upon them in that way. 1.00

01:08:35.000 The only way I would see them going right is because of Islam. 1.00

01:08:38.000 Because, and that's kind of ironic, a real conservative social force comes in and the right co ops opposition to that with the homosexuals. 1.00

01:08:46.000 Pretty interesting. 1.00

01:08:48.000 So I don't think so. 0.81

01:08:49.000 I don't think they would have a natural inclination for it, even if gay wasn't their identity. 0.97

01:08:56.000 LC 17. 0.74

01:08:56.000 Well, I don't know though. 0.74

01:08:58.000 Maybe they would be iconoclastic. 1.00

01:08:59.000 Maybe it's less, they'd be intrinsically conservative, but in this time they would be because homosexuals are iconoclastic. 1.00

01:09:06.000 And so they would go against maybe the left. 1.00

01:09:09.000 I don't know.

01:09:09.000 Who knows?

01:09:12.000 I think they're more concerned about casual sex than anything else.

01:09:16.000 LC 1707 is a hamburger sandwich then.

01:09:18.000 I just, yeah, I just said that.

01:09:20.000 You have bread, meat, bread, sandwich.

01:09:23.000 Easy.

01:09:24.000 Done.

01:09:25.000 Doesn't matter if it's hot or cold, but you got bread, meat, bread.

01:09:29.000 Easy.

01:09:30.000 This is easy stuff, folks.

01:09:31.000 A hot dog is a U, and what goes in it is this circular thing.

01:09:37.000 I'm sorry, it's not.

01:09:39.000 No serious person calls that a sandwich. 0.93

01:09:41.000 That's ridiculous.

01:09:42.000 Here's how you know why because to put condiments on the sandwich, you just put them on top. 0.79

01:09:47.000 To put on a regular sandwich, you have to put the condiments on, and then you have to close the sandwich.

01:09:52.000 There's this element of opening and closing that is sandwichy that gives a sandwich its properties.

01:10:01.000 It gives it a sandwich its essence.

01:10:03.000 So I would say that in that sense, in an Aristotelian sense, there has to be one of the essences of the sandwich an opening and a closing.

01:10:13.000 You don't have that with a hot dog.

01:10:15.000 Ivan Sanders, thoughts on the South African situation?

01:10:18.000 Can anything be done?

01:10:19.000 No, I think they're beyond helping at this point.

01:10:21.000 There's such a small percentage of the population.

01:10:21.000 What can you do?

01:10:24.000 What can you do? 0.77

01:10:26.000 It's Rhodesia 2.0. 1.00

01:10:28.000 You just got to evacuate them, got to get them out. 1.00

01:10:30.000 And it's a travesty.

01:10:31.000 Another country lost.

01:10:34.000 Maybe we could bring him over here.

01:10:34.000 But we'll see.

01:10:37.000 Ian Weber, I understand what you really meant.

01:10:38.000 I'm not a spur.

01:10:40.000 Have a good rest of the night, and don't forget to check out the dog later.

01:10:43.000 My guy, I will check it out.

01:10:46.000 Mira M., and you have a good rest of your night as well. 0.52

01:10:49.000 Mira M., do you think war will eventually break out between Orientals?

01:10:55.000 That's a little dated, but we'll take it. 0.98

01:10:57.000 And Zionists, once Jews start forcing East Asians to be more diverse. 1.00

01:11:03.000 Please unban me from the server. 1.00

01:11:04.000 I don't know if you were banned for being a FOD or for being a FAD. 0.96

01:11:08.000 I'll have to look into that a little bit. 0.51

01:11:11.000 But I don't know if it's really that simple in the sense that it's a little bit presumptuous, don't you think, to start thinking about, like, Asians and Zionists fighting each other, and there being a big push for them to be more diverse.

01:11:25.000 I don't think you'll ever see a push for diversity in China and Japan like you do in the West because there hasn't been that liberal tradition.

01:11:34.000 There hasn't been that international tradition in China and Japan in the sense that we see who the proponents of these things are this urban, cosmopolitan, international people.

01:11:44.000 They don't exist in China and Japan in the same capacity.

01:11:47.000 Certainly, there are some global influences, but they're not in positions of power.

01:11:51.000 Who's going to be in charge for the next two decades?

01:11:54.000 It's going to be Xi.

01:11:55.000 It's going to be President Xi.

01:11:57.000 And in Japan, I would be remiss to say that they would be opening immigrants, be more opening to immigrants anytime soon.

01:12:04.000 So I think that's a little bit premature to start thinking about Asia.

01:12:09.000 And again, it's not just Jewish people, there's real liberal influences in the country as well.

01:12:17.000 So I don't know.

01:12:17.000 I don't think there will be.

01:12:19.000 I think we've got to resolve what happens here before we figure out what goes on there.

01:12:24.000 It's tough to say because it just isn't.

01:12:26.000 The same history of the two peoples together.

01:12:28.000 You know, you can read Souls and Nitsen's 200 Years Together.

01:12:30.000 That doesn't exist with the others.

01:12:32.000 So I don't think there would be a conflict.

01:12:34.000 But then again, who knows?

01:12:35.000 Who knows?

01:12:37.000 Carl's friend, one more.

01:12:37.000 There could be.

01:12:39.000 Sorry, what will finally break the internet?

01:12:41.000 I don't know.

01:12:42.000 Quantum computing, blockchain, who knows?

01:12:46.000 I think decentralization, probably.

01:12:46.000 Who knows?

01:12:49.000 Carl's friend, a sub is a U shaped bread, but is it a sandwich?

01:12:52.000 Well, that's a little bit different because it is U shaped, but it's U shaped like this.

01:12:55.000 It's U shaped on the side.

01:12:57.000 It's not U shaped like this, it's U shaped like this.

01:12:59.000 A beef sandwich is U shaped like this.

01:13:02.000 There's an opening and a closing.

01:13:03.000 A sub, a hoagie, and so there you have it.

01:13:09.000 Daily Oven, Earl of Sandwich is a great European hero.

01:13:13.000 Very true, very true.

01:13:14.000 On the subject of sandwiches.

01:13:15.000 But it looks like those are all our super chats.

01:13:18.000 We're 15 minutes over.

01:13:19.000 You're killing me, but that's all right.

01:13:21.000 But that's all right.

01:13:22.000 It's all my plan is coming together. 1.00

01:13:24.000 All the shekels from the alt right are coming in. 1.00

01:13:28.000 These people really believe that. 1.00

01:13:29.000 But.

01:13:30.000 Thank you to all our super chatters.

01:13:31.000 Thank you for the questions.

01:13:32.000 It's been a long show, but a fun one.

01:13:35.000 We enjoy the questions, how we enjoy the questions.

01:13:38.000 But if you want to support the show, remember, five bucks a month on Maker Support.

01:13:43.000 America First Premium is only five bucks a month on Maker Support.

01:13:46.000 You get the audio only format of the show.

01:13:49.000 You get a special role on the Discord and priority on our call in shows, which are bi weekly.

01:13:54.000 And the next one is on Friday, so that's in two days.

01:13:57.000 We're on the air Monday through Friday, 7 p.m. Central, 8 p.m. Eastern Standard Time.

01:14:01.000 Be sure to click the subscribe button, give it a big thumbs up, leave a comment.

01:14:05.000 It helps with the analytics.

01:14:07.000 And click the notification bell to get notified on your phone whenever we go live, whenever we have a live show.

01:14:14.000 I'm Nicholas J. Fuentes.

01:14:15.000 This was America First, as always.

01:14:16.000 Thank you for watching.

01:14:17.000 Thank you to our super chatters.

01:14:19.000 Thank you to our premium members.

01:14:21.000 We couldn't do without you.

01:14:23.000 Thank you to Joe the Boomer, who is the arsenal of the counter revolution here.

01:14:27.000 He's the arsenal of anti democracy, supplying me with the tools necessary to defend myself.

01:14:35.000 And thank you to everybody who watched as always.

01:14:37.000 We will see you tomorrow.

01:14:39.000 Have a great rest of your evening.

01:14:44.000 Americanism, not globalism, will be our credo.

01:14:51.000 It's going to be only America first.

01:14:56.000 America first. 0.99

01:15:00.000 The American people will come first once again. 0.99

America First - Nicholas J. Fuentes - February 28, 2018

The Italian Election | America First Ep. 115

Episode Stats

Summary

Transcript