00:00:37.000Action in Syria, and we're keeping a very close eye on it.
00:00:40.000We've been watching the developments as they've come in, hour by hour, day by day, and still nothing.
00:00:47.000So, we'll be talking a lot about Syria, obviously.
00:00:49.000We have to talk extensively about Syria because there's some new information, there's new developments in every country involved in the UK, in France, in the US, in Russia.
00:01:00.000So, we have to take a pretty wide lens look at it.
00:01:03.000We talked briefly about it yesterday before JF came on, and big thanks to JF for coming on the show last night.
00:01:11.000Very great episode, and we got the science in.
00:01:14.000Usually it's a little abstract, it's a little out there, it's very political, very I don't know.
00:01:21.000I think it's kind of the other side of science.
00:01:24.000You've got, or rather, the other side of different fields.
00:01:27.000You've got the more scientific minded and then the more literary minded or philosophical.
00:01:32.000So it was good to have him on, grounded in test tubes and microscopes and that kind of thing.
00:01:38.000Remember, tomorrow is our episode with Yusuf, the socialist slash nationalist who retired.
00:01:45.000Steven Crowder last week at a Change My Mind episode at U of I.
00:02:01.000I forgot to post it up right after I finished it.
00:02:05.000So I will be posting it after the show tonight.
00:02:08.000And we cover in that one pretty in depth Paul Ryan and also some very interesting things about the white working class and why they vote for Trump.
00:02:16.000So very curious things that we've learned about.
00:03:00.000And that is curious because the chemical attack happened on Saturday.
00:03:04.000If we recall the timeline from last year, there was a similar chemical attack in U.S. response last April, almost a year exactly to the date.
00:03:14.000I believe it was April 7th last year in 2017.
00:03:18.000If we recall the timeline from last year, the chemical attack was on Tuesday, the strike was on Thursday.
00:03:24.000So it was very quick, it was within 48 hours.
00:03:27.000This time around, the chemical attack was on Saturday.
00:03:30.000There was a response, but the response was by Israel on Sunday.
00:03:34.000President Trump promised that a decision would be made about an attack within 24 to 48 hours.
00:04:02.000And certainly that's not the experience from the same episode that played out last year that there's been this hesitation.
00:04:08.000There's been kind of this fumbling of this situation where no clear decision still has been made.
00:04:15.000The latest development today was that President Trump met with the National Security Council and they said they still have not made a decision and one will be made soon.
00:04:25.000Of course, we heard that on Monday and then on Tuesday and Wednesday.
00:04:29.000They said after the meeting this afternoon that the decision would be made soon.
00:05:39.000Every time Trump does something or says something we don't agree with, everybody comes around to Nick Fuentes and they say, Wonder what Nick Fuentes is.
00:06:17.000And I don't totally blame people because you look at how President Trump this time around has involved other countries, and certainly that's worrisome how he's involved the UK, France, Italy, allegedly Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, others.
00:06:31.000It's a little bit worrisome because the more people are involved, of course, possibly the bigger the scope of the attack.
00:06:37.000When it was the United States, we could simply attack unilaterally one missile strike on one facility on one night, and that was it.
00:06:46.000When you get other people involved, the fear is, well, why would you get other people involved?
00:06:51.000If it takes other people to execute a strike, is that because what?
00:07:09.000But after Monday, after Monday, after there was a lot of pushback against the attack in public by Fox News, by Ann Coulter, and even in the United Kingdom, you looked at the polling for the UK.
00:07:20.000And only 20% of people in the United Kingdom support an attack.
00:07:25.000So there was this initial rush to condemnation.
00:07:27.000I believe it was the evening of the Israeli strike on Sunday.
00:07:31.000Israel launched eight cruise missiles at an unrelated air base in Syria.
00:07:36.000That evening, President Trump and Emmanuel Macron of France, the president there, said they swore a joint response.
00:07:43.000Theresa May joined up on Monday, Theresa May, the prime minister of the United Kingdom.
00:07:49.000And although it seemed like everybody's very gung ho and the rhetoric was very strong on Monday and then on Tuesday, It seemed to kind of taper out where there seemed to introduce some kind of an element of uncertainty.
00:08:00.000We don't know if that's because these governments actually were uncertain or if it was because of the strength of the Russian response.
00:08:07.000Russia made it very clear right away that they would shoot down any missiles, and when they say that, that would be an act of war.
00:08:14.000When they say that they would shoot down missiles and they would directly engage with the United States or coalition powers, well, then the consideration enters into the minds of these different heads of state that we wouldn't just be attacking the Assad regime, we also might be risking escalation with Russia, possibly with Iran, possibly with.
00:08:34.000Who knows the scope, the scale to which this could escalate if we're not careful?
00:08:38.000So it appears we've entered into this deliberative phase, this judicious phase where they're deciding should we go in, should we not go in?
00:08:47.000And so some decisions have been made, and we'll read you the latest news from each country.
00:08:52.000So, from the United States, on Wednesday, we saw a very interesting take.
00:08:56.000We didn't get to cover this so much yesterday because we had JF on, so we didn't have too much time to cover it.
00:09:02.000But yesterday, President Trump tweeted out some very curious things in the morning, a very strange tweet storm.
00:11:12.000But very, I think, something that we should be anxious about that we are.
00:11:18.000Apparently, hurdling towards war with Russia.
00:11:20.000At least that was the thought 15 minutes before he tweeted the next tweet, which just a little bit later he tweeted, which is, you know, notice the change in tone here.
00:11:30.000The next thing he tweeted shortly after was, quote, Our relationship with Russia is worse now than it has ever been, and that includes the Cold War.
00:12:45.000And then he says himself something completely different where he goes from, we're going to shoot missiles at Syria and they're coming and you can't shoot them down and you deserve this, to then this conciliatory approach.
00:12:59.000Right now, he's seeking a rapprochement with Russia.
00:13:21.000And then finally, this one was really curious.
00:13:24.000The last thing he tweeted yesterday about the topic of Syria he said, quote, much of the bad blood with Russia is caused by the fake and corrupt Russia investigation headed up by the all Democrat loyalists.
00:13:46.000So here you see a beautiful trilogy here, a beautiful trilogy of tweets where we go from, and these are, I think, the different messages of each tweet.
00:13:55.000In the first place, a lot of people would take the first tweet and they would say that's Trump being a hawk, that's Trump being a neocon, that's Trump going and setting his sights on Russia.
00:14:43.000They have a permanent military base they're establishing in TARDIS.
00:14:47.000You're about to strike a country where Russia is heavily involved.
00:14:50.000Do you want to have the element of surprise or not?
00:14:53.000If you want to have an effective strike that will take out Syrian military assets, would you send such an explicit and overt warning of what the strike would be, what it would constitute, when it would be?
00:16:27.000To really understand because the situation is still developing exactly what he means, but I think overall what we see is an administration which is very chaotic, which is very unpredictable.
00:16:37.000And overall, we can disagree about what he means, the substance.
00:16:41.000At the end of the day, only Trump knows what Trump is doing until it all unfolds.
00:16:45.000But I think what we can, what we know beyond a shadow of a doubt, is that this is deliberate.
00:16:52.000Trump has done this every time with legislation, with North Korea, in all the negotiations.
00:16:57.000What Trump does is he creates uncertainty.
00:17:00.000He keeps his opponents and his allies off of their balance.
00:17:03.000If you have a guy like Trump who's saying, you know, in one breath he's saying, we're going to send missiles, and the next breath he's blaming the Democrats and all this other stuff, there is no way that you could reasonably keep the same strategy.
00:17:16.000There is no way that you could not have to write and then rewrite your response between all these different tweets and messages, and one office is saying one thing, one office is saying the other.
00:17:27.000When it's Barack Obama, you can forecast his actions.
00:17:31.000He telegraphs them in the way that he responds, how you're supposed to.
00:17:50.000So people are saying, Trump used to say, if I, and he tweeted this, I think, in 2013, he said, if I was going to go to war in Syria, and he was just, you know, like talking about Obama, he said, if I was going to war in Syria, I wouldn't tell everybody about it.
00:18:41.000People who understand war, there's a great pilot from the 1940s by the name of, or I think he was maybe a little later, his name was John Boyd.
00:18:51.000And he talked about something called the OODA loop, which is basically a process of decision making and of strategy.
00:18:59.000They call this guy the greatest innovator in wartime strategy since Sun Tzu, who's the ancient Chinese philosopher.
00:19:06.000And the OODA loop says that people make decisions in warfare, in tactics, In four stages.
00:19:13.000The process goes that you observe, you orient, you decide, and then you act.
00:19:21.000So he was a pilot, and he used this in tactics as a pilot, but you could also, he extrapolated this out to war and to business negotiations to other things.
00:19:29.000But as a pilot, you would observe what the situation is, where you are, how you're flying, your altitude, your direction.
00:19:37.000You observe what the enemy is doing, if they make a turn, if they do this, if they do that.
00:19:42.000You orient that in terms of you try to fit it.
00:20:19.000And John Boyd said, the faster that you could do that, the faster you could get in this loop of observing, orienting, deciding, and acting.
00:20:26.000And this is what Trump does as a businessman in a negotiation observe the facts, force them to conform to a theory, decide what to do, and then execute it well.
00:20:35.000The faster you could do that, the faster you could make this process happen, you'll be successful, the more successful you would be.
00:20:42.000If you could do this faster than your enemy, you disorient them, you force them to react, and then eventually you're able to defeat them.
00:20:48.000And that's essentially what's going on here.
00:20:50.000That's what we observe from these tweets.
00:20:52.000Then today, and so that's those tweets, that's the chaos strategy, the madman strategy.
00:20:57.000Today we got a totally different approach from Trump.
00:21:00.000He tweeted, quote, never said when an attack on Syria would take place.
00:21:05.000Could be very soon or not so soon at all.
00:21:08.000In any event, the United States under my administration has done a great job of ridding the region of ISIS.
00:21:16.000And so now it's just completely different from yesterday.
00:21:18.000It went from yesterday, well, actually, it went from on Sunday, there will be a strong response, to on Monday, There will be a strong response, and I'll make a decision in the next 48 hours.
00:21:30.000To Tuesday, an announcement from the Pentagon is imminent, and now is in the evening when a strike would have occurred.
00:21:37.000To Wednesday, missiles are coming, actually, but we could still get along.
00:21:42.000To Thursday, and so it's changed dramatically over the course of four days, chemical attack was on Saturday.
00:21:49.000To today, he's saying, actually, I never said that this would even happen.
00:21:53.000It could happen tomorrow, it could happen tonight, might not happen for a week, who knows?
00:21:58.000And so now we're thrown again in limbo.
00:22:03.000And you understand that Russia's already taken reactive measures, right?
00:22:08.000Russia has evacuated their naval base in Tardis.
00:22:12.000They've evacuated all their battleships.
00:22:14.000Syria, they say, their unconfirmed reports that Bashar al Assad and the presidential family have fled to Iran and they landed in Tehran this morning.
00:22:22.000They say that they've evacuated all of their military assets in Syria, all their air bases, all their everything else.
00:22:29.000And so they've acted, they've decided, and now I think they look kind of foolish.
00:22:33.000Hezbollah has retreated from the region while Trump is doing Twitter diplomacy, while he sends a missile carrier and he tweets.
00:22:40.000So you have to understand that's what's going on.
00:22:44.000See, the other developments today we had President Trump, he met with the members of the National Security Council, which was still inconclusive.
00:22:51.000Some of the developments from that meeting, however, they say that John Bolton, who's the new National Security Council chief, got in a very heated fight.
00:23:24.000Jim Mattis also said, and this was, I think, the biggest white pill of the day.
00:23:28.000You had that great tweet by Trump this morning that says, We may back off based on what happens.
00:23:33.000But then additionally, you had Defense Secretary Mattis who said very explicitly, and this is important what he said he said, We are not going to engage in Syria's civil war.
00:23:43.000And that's a big difference because what we were looking at on Monday is we didn't know if we were going to go in and have regime change in Syria, if we were now going to get involved in the civil war in Syria.
00:23:56.000We're going to intervene on the side of one party or another party.
00:23:59.000This is our war now, or if it was just going to be a response to the chemical weapons attack.
00:24:05.000And so we got our answer today, which is great.
00:24:07.000If we're not getting involved in the war, that means that we have set an upper limit for our intervention, which means that anything that can or would or Might possibly lead to a war with Russia or further intervention in Syria, probably we're not going to go into that.
00:24:21.000If the defense secretary says we have no plans on getting into Syria and that would conform with everything else we know about this administration, that Trump wanted troops out of Syria last week, that we have a big North Korea summit coming up, we could probably say, I think with a relative degree of certainty, that there is a very rigid upper limit as to what the intervention in Syria will be if it happens, which is to say that.
00:24:46.000Maybe there's a limited response to the chemical weapons attack against the Assad regime.
00:25:20.000And we have just set an upper limit that that's not going to happen.
00:25:24.000And that's been repeated consistently in various ways across the weekend for the duration of the administration.
00:25:30.000So that's what the white pill is about.
00:25:32.000That's why black pillars are blown out.
00:25:34.000Not because there's no chance of a strike in Syria, but that there's no plans anytime soon to get us involved against Assad outside of a limited one-off strike, which is what we did last year.
00:25:47.000The other development was that the U.S. reported that they received blood and urine samples, which tested positive for chlorine gas.
00:25:55.000So, although they have various independent investigators going over to Syria in the coming weeks to look into it, the U.S. says, and we don't know if it's true or not, that they found some kinds of samples.
00:26:12.000They say that they're able to confirm that chemical gas was used, but Defense Secretary Mattis says that we don't know who was responsible for it.
00:26:19.000Because the rebels have chemical weapons, the government has chemical weapons, they don't know who was responsible.
00:26:52.000They just say we're probably going to take action, even though a fifth of the population is against it.
00:26:57.000France, there was an announcement today from President Emmanuel Macron that they have hard evidence that the Assad government was responsible for the chemical attacks and that they will be responding.
00:27:09.000And you could probably count on a response from France because Emmanuel Macron won his presidential election on projecting strength, and also he set his red line, like Obama, on chemical weapons.
00:27:20.000He said, If Assad uses chemical weapons again, then we will respond.
00:27:31.000They say they condemn the use of chemical weapons, but they're not going to get involved.
00:27:35.000And then from Russia, Russia has simply urged the U.S. not to take action in Syria.
00:27:40.000They've called for an emergency Security Council meeting.
00:27:43.000And most troublingly, from Russia, this was reported from The Guardian, they are evacuating, or rather, they are planning on a counterattack against a British naval base in Cyprus.
00:27:59.000But there are sources that say that Russia is planning, they're setting up for a counterattack on that British base in Cyprus, which would be.
00:28:08.000Which would be not a good thing if there were a direct confrontation.
00:28:11.000I think that's where we're at right now.
00:28:12.000We're trying to negotiate this space of how can everybody save face, essentially?
00:28:17.000How can the United States back down from this by saving face or while saving face?
00:28:24.000How can we attack Assad but also prevent this from escalating into war with Russia?
00:28:29.000It's really tough here where we have to thread the needle.
00:28:32.000And it looks like that's what's going on between France, Britain, the United States, and Russia.
00:28:37.000There's also reports that the United States and Russia are working to de escalate behind the scenes.
00:28:42.000Regardless of what happens on the ground in Syria, regardless of what happens between these powers about Syria, you have to understand who's watching all of this unfold.
00:29:24.000Problem is, North Korea and China are watching.
00:29:27.000If they see that President Trump says, we vow strong action and we're going to shoot missiles, we don't care what Russia says, I'm crazy, I'll do whatever it takes.
00:29:36.000And then we back off and then we say, actually, that was just words.
00:29:39.000Actually, when it got a little bit tough, when it got a little bit heated, At the end of the day, we said, you know what, it's better for us not to go to war.
00:29:59.000They'd have no credibility, they'd get laughed at.
00:30:01.000The whole point why we're even having these summits in the first place with North Korea, why South Korea is having a summit with North Korea, why the United States, why Japan may, is because President Trump essentially used the same approach he's using with Syria right now.
00:30:16.000I mean, we saw with Kim Jong un since the inauguration, it was, we will go to war against Kim Jong un.
00:30:25.000They'll see fire and fury conducting carrier drills, sending three aircraft carriers to the Korean Peninsula, shooting Minuteman missiles into the Pacific Ocean, and on and on.
00:30:48.000If we cuck on this one, there's no credibility for the United States in those negotiations.
00:30:53.000And I think some people just want to pretend like these other considerations don't exist because I take a lot of heat for this.
00:31:00.000When I say, look, a strike isn't ideal, but it furthers our interests with North Korea, people want to pretend like this logic just doesn't exist.
00:31:07.000People want to pretend like that's not happening.
00:31:10.000They simply want to ignore it because they're so anti war, they're so much more principled than we are.
00:31:16.000You know, we who look at pragmatic angles, that they oppose it under any circumstances.
00:31:52.000We don't know what it will look like in 100 years.
00:31:55.000That poses an existential threat to our survival because maybe this regime doesn't blow us up, but we don't know what it's going to look like in 20, 30, 40, 50, 100 years, and that's how long they would have this.
00:32:06.000Arsenal until they decided to dismantle it.
00:32:54.000Because it's not a question of never kill innocent people at all or kill a few innocent people.
00:32:59.000It's do you want a lot of innocent people to potentially die or do you want a few innocent people who are in the military anyway to die and whatever?
00:35:09.000I feel like there's been like a million, I feel like there's been like 6 million different Holocaust Remembrance Days this year already, right?
00:35:18.000I mean, it's like every other week Holocaust Remembrance Day, Holocaust Museum, trip to the Holocaust Museum.
00:35:27.000But I just have to talk on the subject because this comes around, it seems like, all the time.
00:35:32.000And even, interestingly enough, this comes around conveniently when a lot of Israelis are invoking the Holocaust to talk about Syria.
00:35:39.000I don't know if you guys have seen this, but on the Forward, on J Post, on all these different Israeli magazines, they're saying that we need to invade Syria because of the Holocaust.
00:35:49.000Because if we don't, then Israel's at risk.
00:35:52.000And if Israel's at risk, then that means another Holocaust is imminent.
00:35:56.000And I think it's really important to To sit back, and we're not going to say anything too controversial.
00:36:01.000Of course, we're going to show respect to the 10 billion victims of the Holocaust.
00:36:05.000We're going to show deep respect to the 10 trillion victims who died and were turned into lampshades and bars of soap and were killed using steam chambers and masturbation machines.
00:36:16.000This is what L.A. Wiesel wrote about in Night.
00:36:19.000And, you know, some of it was lies, but I'm sure the majority of it is true.
00:36:22.000So we're going to show a lot of respect about what happened, but I think it's important to understand what the Holocaust is all about.
00:36:30.000Because this is the one thing that just we're beaten over the head about it.
00:36:51.000And I think it is never, we can never repeat this enough on the show that this only serves to keep white people down.
00:37:00.000That sounds harsh, that sounds controversial and provocative.
00:37:03.000But at the end of the day, that's true.
00:37:05.000You can say, you know, we can have great respect for the Holocaust, we can mourn the Holocaust, and all of that.
00:37:12.000But at the end of the day, what Hitler, World War II, all of that has in common, that mythology has in common.
00:37:18.000And I don't say mythology to cast doubt as to whether or not it happened.
00:37:21.000I mean, that story that conveys powerful ideas about society, that only serves in the modern discourse to shut down people that are actually right wing, to shut down people that are against modernism.
00:37:34.000To shut down people that are against mass immigration.
00:37:38.000And you look just at any political conversation, what does it always go back to for somebody that is a little bit too right wing?
00:37:44.000Can we take a guess at what you're called if you're to the right of Lindsey Graham, if you're to the right of John Kasich?
00:38:43.000He's not just another leader who rose up, took advantage of popular dissatisfaction, and led the country to war, just like Japan did, just like Mussolini did.
00:39:07.000You're probably a Nazi yourself, just as bad, if not worse.
00:39:13.000And we understand the role of that mythology in the conversation today.
00:39:17.000When we talk about race, when we talk about immigration, when we talk about the elites of the country, it always gets carted out.
00:39:23.000And the reason being is to guilt white people.
00:39:25.000The reason being is to censor or to guilt white people because this is the most heavily invested propaganda piece in the utility belt of the left, of the Marxists, which is to throw this out and to shut you down because nobody wants to be called that.
00:39:40.000And I think it's important to remember that.
00:39:42.000On the same token, while we show, because not for nothing, but there were people that died.
00:39:50.000And whether you think it was 6 million or 200,000, whatever your opinion on, I know some people on this show think there's an alternative way that it happened.
00:39:58.000I, of course, believe the official story, but regardless of what you think, it was a bad thing.
00:40:04.000But in the future, we have to have some kind of sober assessment about when these things are being taken advantage of, when they're being used deceptively, and when it's actually observed, right?
00:40:16.000I mean, somebody like Ben Shapiro perfectly understands that a guy like Piers Morgan stands on the graves of the victims at Sandy Hook to take away your guns.
00:40:26.000He takes advantage of a tragedy and he says, You don't care enough about it.
00:40:31.000And, and that's why this political agenda has to stick.
00:40:34.000We all understand it with gun control.
00:40:36.000But with slavery, with the Holocaust, with the Native American genocide, anything like the KKK, anything like that, all of these are tools to shut you down if you want a country that looks like it did 50 years ago.
00:40:48.000If you want a country that makes sense.
00:40:51.000If you're not against the, the mass replacement of the population in the country, we're gonna take a country that was 100, you know, no, I'm sorry, it was 90% white, 97% Protestant, and you wanna take it and make it 40%, Excuse me, 40% Hispanic and 30% this and 20% that, and it's Muslim and it's atheist, and you have a problem with that, you're going to be shut down because of this.
00:41:12.000So I think it's just important to really lay out that case because, you know, I think that's the place, you know, people lose me when they talk about, you know, when they're obsessive about it and it's always, oh, you know, this or that.
00:41:24.000On both sides, I have a problem when they make this their whole ideology.
00:41:28.000But to find a middle ground, I would say can we all agree that the Holocaust was an exceptional case and you are not in favor of Holocaust?
00:41:38.000If you want to talk about controversial issues, I think that's got to be what we pursue because this has been the battering ram that's kept down the right wing, that's kept down white people for a long time.
00:41:48.000And until, really, until we confront that, until we confront that label, it's not going to stop.
00:41:53.000Until you're not going to get banned from social media, ostracized from your peers for being called, oh, you think race is important?
00:42:55.000Ian Weber says, I know you see things the way you do, but it is not necessary to practice our strength on Syria for North Korea to denuclearize.
00:43:03.000China knows we won't act on North Korea.
00:43:31.000And again, it betrays a very deep misunderstanding of foreign relations.
00:43:37.000I think people have kind of this weird, like, with some things we're going to interrogate them rigorously, with other things it's like, yeah, well, China basically knows.
00:43:44.000And if you can guess it, North Korea can guess it.
00:45:04.000I don't really know what you mean by that, but I mean, Nazi in the first place, we're talking about Nazi, the word, started out as a slur against Bavarian peasants.
00:45:14.000The real term is National Socialism, which does have a very deep intellectual roots.
00:45:20.000There's mysticism in it, there's this esoteric Hindu element of it, there's a lot of weird stuff that goes on with National Socialism.
00:46:48.000But that's, you know, in a very colloquial way, that's like mom, the mother of the show.
00:46:53.000Cameron, Nick, are you aware of the new Gamergate?
00:46:56.000I saw that floating around, but I never got to the bottom of it.
00:46:58.000I clicked on the hashtag GamergateHD, and Beardson was just all the top tweets.
00:47:05.000So I didn't even, I was scrolling and scrolling trying to find, like, what is this, what's going on, and it was all Beardson posting about Gamergirl P and, you know, things like that, so.
00:47:14.000I didn't really, I don't really know what it's all about.
00:47:17.000Ben Nowak, how do we wake up Christian Zionists, Nikki Goy?
00:49:15.000But I get into the Discord to hang out with my friends, to play video games.
00:49:19.000And you'll have people who will wander into the voice chat, and not the regulars, but like random people saying, And they'll come in, it's like, hey, Nick, oh, it's great to be on with you.
00:49:27.000And, you know, I love the fans, but then it jumps into, I'm playing Fortnite, you know, we're trying to coordinate where we're going to land.
00:49:33.000Are we going to land at Tilted Towers?
00:49:35.000People are like, hey, Nick, so what do you think about, you know, insert topic I talked about for 45 minutes on my show?
00:49:42.000And it's like, can't a guy catch a break, you know?
00:50:11.000I think that's definitely a part of it.
00:50:14.000Reagan says Could Trump be playing some kind of good cop, bad cop game with Syria?
00:50:19.000Acting himself up as the hawkish madman to appease the boomer base and project strength to North Korea, but having Mattis be the calm voice of restraint.
00:50:28.000Yeah, I think, I don't know if it's like.
00:50:30.000So clearly defined as good cop, bad cop.
00:50:33.000But I think the whole Trump approach, if you read his book, he says he has many balls in the air at one time.
00:50:39.000He always has multiple approaches going at one time, and he never stays to a single approach.
00:51:22.000I think he also wants to look tough to Russia.
00:51:24.000At the same time, there is this hawkish madman thing to go against China and North Korea, but also you want to have different voices like the Pentagon and the DOD.
00:51:33.000So it's all there, it's all happening.
00:51:35.000I don't think Trump sets out that's the biggest misnomer with four dimensional chess.
00:51:42.000I don't think Trump ever goes into it thinking, With few exceptions, I don't think he ever goes into it thinking, this is my stratagem from here to there.
00:51:50.000I know every step of the way from beginning to end.
00:51:53.000I think he's got a general idea of a direction that he wants to go in.
00:51:57.000I think he's got a few ideas that he wants to pursue, and he sets them all off at the same time, essentially.
00:52:03.000And that's what we say when we mean four dimensional chess, that he is always looking at it from multiple points of view.
00:52:18.000When we say 4D chess, that's in contrast with the idea that he just does whatever he's told.
00:52:24.000You either believe, and I really believe this, I think you either believe that he is a strategist, he's always thinking about it from different angles, he's very creative about the solutions he proposes and how he solves problems, or you think that he's a buffoon, he's an idiot, he just does whatever he's told by whoever's whispering in his ears, or he wants to look good in the media, but basically he's just this buffoon, and he has to be pushed really hard in one direction or the other.
00:54:23.000It's hard even for me to red pill my friends on traditionalism.
00:54:27.000I think you just have to appeal to things that are already prevalent in people, right?
00:54:32.000I mean, like, to come up to somebody with this LARPy, like, Wheatfield, my fair maiden, my beautiful maiden, who's going to be my wench and I will be the king.
00:54:44.000I mean, like, you could get into some very LARPy traditionalist talk.
00:54:51.000The Golden One from Sweden, I think he's from.
00:54:56.000I like his content, but this, like, he calls women fair maidens, and it's all very old world, very LARP y in many ways.
00:55:03.000And like I said, you know, people are going to say Nick is counter signaling, Nick is starting a fight.
00:55:08.000I'm saying let's look at that strategy.
00:55:10.000If you were to go into your class in high school or college, whatever, and go to a girl, hello, fair maiden, would you like to bake me a black sun pie?
00:55:19.000Would you like to bake me a chicken pot pie in the shape of a swastika?
00:55:22.000I mean, like if you come across, and these are the kinds of things I see on social media, you know, hello, my fair maiden, would you like to prance in a wheat field?
00:55:52.000They think about hollow, meaningless, carnal interactions between men and women that are not meaningful, and it's terrible.
00:56:00.000This is something everyone can relate to because every young kid, for the most part, is on a dating app, they're on Tinder, they're on whatever.
00:56:07.000Maybe they do it through Facebook or Twitter, through DMs, Snapchat.
00:56:11.000But they all understand what this means.
00:56:13.000That you go to a party or you do this weird hookup.
00:56:15.000We've been sold into this idea that sex is the highest thing, pleasure is the highest thing, as opposed to virtue and love and all the rest.
00:56:24.000And something like that is easily communicable, it's relatable.
00:56:27.000And this is where traditionalism presents a much better alternative.
00:56:31.000You know, hookup culture hey, fellas, isn't it a problem when, you know, we have this world where we're supposed to just sleep with them for one night and then we never see them again?
00:58:47.000Tonight, remember to check us out on makersupport.comslash Nick J. Fuentes.
00:58:51.000If you want to get the premium membership, you'll get our brand new 2018 Election HQ podcast coming out right when the show ends.
00:58:59.000You'll get World Report every Tuesday.
00:59:01.000You'll get this show in podcast form, a special role in the Discord server, and priority on our call in shows.
00:59:08.000The next call in show is tomorrow night when we will be having Youssef, the Crowder Destroyer, the Eliminator of Capitalist Shills and Autistic Libertarians.
00:59:17.000Going to be a great show, going to be a great time.
00:59:21.000Remember to like the video, give us a big thumbs up, subscribe if you're on YouTube, Twitch, whatever it is, subscribe to it, and leave a comment.
00:59:29.000Click the notification bell to get notified every time that we go live.
00:59:33.000We're on the air Monday through Friday, 7 p.m. Central, 8 p.m. Eastern Standard Time.