00:01:38.000Sometimes it's very direct, sometimes it's almost exactly the same.
00:01:42.000We're back here again tonight talking about basically the same thing that happened three weeks ago, which is Ilhan Omar, who made some fresh comments about Israel and the Israel lobby.
00:01:55.000And the same response has come down from AIPAC.
00:01:59.000The same response has come down from the ADL and all these operators in the Democratic Party.
00:02:24.000But I think she is doing something very good for the country, in spite of the fact that she's a hardcore leftist, hardcore anti white revolutionary, alongside Alexandria Ocasio Cortez and Rashida Tlaib and all these other characters.
00:02:48.000We'll discuss her comments and what the reaction has been.
00:02:51.000And truly, I don't think people understand just what is going on in Washington, D.C., just how bad the problem is.
00:03:00.000And I'm going to read to you there is a resolution which the Democrats are planning to put to a vote tomorrow, a four page resolution which they have drafted in response to her comments.
00:03:12.000And I'll read you the comments, and then I am going to read you the entire four page resolution.
00:03:18.000Just so you can get an idea of what we're dealing with here, and we'll discuss that.
00:03:23.000Before we get into that, though, before we get into our main story, I do want to talk about another disappointment from the Trump administration.
00:03:33.000Look, it's been a rough year, it's been a rough week, and maybe some are saying that this is a change in tone.
00:03:41.000Maybe some are saying that, you know, I've really changed my coverage of this, but I think I've been pretty consistent in terms of my coverage of Trump, in terms of my analysis of Trump.
00:03:52.000But what we've seen in the last three to four weeks is a real change in the direction of policy.
00:03:59.000And that's where the difference comes.
00:04:00.000Because, you know, for years I've given a lot of cover to the president where people have said that the president has compromised or he sold this out or he's cucked or whatever.
00:04:11.000I've been the one to point out the facts.
00:04:13.000You know, and we could look at a number of examples for this.
00:04:43.000Because when he did the first missile strike in April 2017 in Homs, Syria, in response to a faked chemical weapons attack, everybody said that Trump was going to war in Syria, specifically.
00:04:55.000Trump was going to initiate a ground war, an expansion of our involvement in Syria against the Assad regime.
00:05:04.000There's no evidence that this is happening.
00:05:06.000There's no evidence that that is the case.
00:05:08.000Because the week prior to that, actually, Nikki Haley, who was at the time the UN ambassador, and Rex Tillerson, who at the time was the Secretary of State, they both said that it is no longer the policy of the administration to pursue regime change in Syria.
00:05:22.000So if you actually looked at what was being said, it was getting better, not worse.
00:05:27.000And I think that was borne out over several years.
00:05:30.000The same was true with the immigration debate.
00:05:32.000Although some of the tactics had failed, for example, the negotiations last year, which culminated in the omnibus spending bill, Although the tactics had failed, there was still a concerted effort on the part of the administration to address the issues.
00:05:48.000There was a plan that was made to eliminate chain migration, the diversity visa lottery, to get $25 billion for border security in exchange for permanent residence for DACA.
00:06:23.000The State of the Union address in early February, where President Trump said that we now want to bring in more legal immigrants than ever before.
00:06:32.000And for people that thought that was a fluke or something, well, it turned out he ad libbed that part in the speech.
00:07:01.000And so that's why we're changing it a little bit here.
00:07:04.000We have to change how we look at this because the policy has changed because there has been a real 180 degree turn in the White House and it continues today on Syria.
00:07:15.000There was an announcement that was made, a letter that was signed, actually.
00:07:20.000This is according to NBC Two months after declaring all U.S. troops were leaving Syria, President Donald Trump wrote to members of Congress that he now agrees 100% with keeping a military presence in Syria.
00:07:34.000In a copy of the letter obtained by NBC News, Trump highlighted a paragraph in the letter about the U.S. goals in Syria, which said Like you, we seek to ensure that all of the gains made in Syria are not lost, that ISIS never returns, that Iran is not emboldened.
00:07:48.000And then we consolidate our gains and ensure the best outcome in Geneva for American interests.
00:07:54.000And then Sarah Huckabee Sanders said a small peacekeeping group of about 200 will remain in Syria for a period of time.
00:08:01.000And U.S. military officials have since confirmed that this residual force could be double that number and that the troops would stay in northeastern Syria as part of the deal.
00:08:11.000So remember, we were told in December, and this is what we were told during the whole campaign, by the way, in 2016, and this is what we were told for years when Trump was actually in the White House.
00:08:22.000That we were going to bring everybody home from Syria.
00:08:24.000We were told that we were going to get our troops brought home from Afghanistan, Iraq, and Syria.
00:08:29.000Syria was probably the most egregious involvement that we have in the Middle East because, at least with Afghanistan, there was some say a legitimate casus belli, there was a legitimate reason for why we were there.
00:08:41.000Now, for 18 years, it's questionable if that's legitimate, but you understand the reason we had the authorization of military force was for the purpose of going into Afghanistan.
00:08:52.000A little bit less legitimate is our war in Iraq.
00:08:54.000That's been going on for a little bit shorter amount of time.
00:08:58.000That's been going on since 2003, so about 16 years.
00:09:02.000And again, there's another one where we had a major ground occupation and there was a reason there, obviously an illegitimate reason.
00:09:08.000People say it's time to come home, but that's an occupation and involvement which is pretty entrenched.
00:09:15.000And I guess you could say, furthest along, the one that is least justifiable if it goes from Afghanistan to Iraq is Syria, the least justifiable, where there was no declaration of war, there's no reason stated, legitimate or otherwise, why we are there.
00:09:31.000We're not there pursuing regime change.
00:09:33.000I mean, there's really no purpose at all.
00:09:35.000There's no strategic interest in Syria at all.
00:10:06.000So he didn't bring them home in 30 days.
00:10:08.000Lindsey Graham went up to the White House, and a number of others went up to the White House.
00:10:12.000And then the timetable went from 30 days to 120 days to indefinitely to, well, actually, some are getting out, but some will remain forever.
00:10:39.000And if you remember, after the midterms, I said there's a couple of things Trump can do to show us that he is serious about being a change agent.
00:10:48.000There's a couple of things that he can do to demonstrate to his voters that he is still keeping the core promises of his campaign, the core message, the core spirit of the MAGA revolution.
00:10:59.000And those two things were shutting down the government, changing up the personnel in the White House.
00:11:04.000Now, one of the things happened, the other didn't.
00:11:07.000They got Mick Mulvaney, they got some others.
00:11:10.000But we did get the government shut down.
00:11:12.000After the government was reopened, and it was clear that no money was going to be allocated for the wall, and he gave up all his leverage, and he conceded on the State of the Union, and so on and so on and so on.
00:11:24.000There's this three week period between when the government is reopened and when the next deadline is.
00:11:29.000Now, how we'll know if he's serious is if a state of emergency is declared and we get some serious money for the wall, and that didn't happen.
00:11:38.000Clearly, the state of emergency was declared, but.
00:11:42.000The funding bill that he signed basically negated every provision of the state of emergency that could be used to allocate additional funding.
00:11:51.000And we went over that in great detail.
00:11:53.000And so things have been getting worse since then.
00:11:56.000As I said, if this doesn't happen, then the rest of the next two years will be pretty rough.
00:12:01.000And it seems like that's coming to pass.
00:12:06.000And I'll say, I will qualify some of the things I'm saying tonight and some of the things I said yesterday by saying this.
00:12:14.000Donald Trump for all his faults, and I think we'll probably do a show about this tomorrow.
00:12:18.000I think probably tomorrow we'll do a whiteboard and maybe compare Trump and some of the other people on the Democratic side or maybe on the Republican side for every failure that he has, for everything that has gone awry in this administration, as heartbreaking as it is to watch, as disappointing as it is to watch.
00:13:17.000We have to get a miracle candidate who's better than Donald Trump.
00:13:21.000Or, even more illogically than that, people will say we have to vote for a Democrat now.
00:13:26.000We have to vote for Tulsi Gabbard because she's woke on Syria, or we have to vote for Andrew Yang or somebody like that.
00:13:33.000And it's crazy to me because, of course, although Donald Trump isn't great on the issues now, he's done a 180 on immigration, he's done a 180 on foreign policy, on a lot of these other things.
00:13:45.000He's still not in favor of the DREAM Act, he's still not in favor of blanket amnesty, he's still not in favor of a lot of these things that the Democrats are.
00:13:53.000So you can sort of understand why voting for a Democrat would be cutting your nose to spite your face.
00:14:47.000Because even if you remember some of these deals last year, he never abandoned the idea of cutting immigration or building the wall or anything like that.
00:14:55.000Even though the rhetoric might have sounded like that, he walked away from deals where it would have given an amnesty to DACA.
00:15:02.000He walked away from deals where there wasn't something adequate on immigration.
00:15:06.000Well, he just simply stopped doing that in the past couple of months.
00:15:38.000The only reason why we are there, this is a country which is strategically totally unimportant.
00:15:44.000It is in a region which is strategically completely unimportant.
00:15:48.000The only reason we are there, and actually it goes in the reverse way too.
00:15:53.000The Syrian civil war, which lasted from 2011 until now, and which our presence there has perpetuated the Syrian civil war, has actually caused a crisis in areas that do matter.
00:16:05.000So, as opposed to, you know, how could we intervene and make this better for American interests?
00:16:10.000There's no American interest served by being there.
00:16:13.000Actually, being there hurts our interests because us perpetuating the Syrian civil war causes the migrant crisis in Europe.
00:16:21.000So, not only are we not securing oil, not only are we not stopping the proliferation of weapons of mass destruction or anything like that, they didn't even come up with a phony justification this time.
00:16:31.000The only reason why we're in there is to help Israel because you understand that Israel's number one security concern is what's going on in their northern border.
00:16:43.000Jordan, Saudi Arabia, they've got on lock.
00:16:46.000To the west, they've got the Mediterranean Sea.
00:16:49.000The only problematic region that is not in their pocket at this point is Lebanon and Syria, through which Iran is able to send military equipment and money and funds, and they're able to sponsor militant groups like Hezbollah and others.
00:17:04.000And that's, I mean, that's at the end of the day why we are there.
00:17:36.000People were quick to point this out the last time this happened three weeks ago, and people were quick to point this out this week.
00:17:42.000And you could tell the people who are serious about the issues, people who are really our allies from people who are not, by how they responded to this.
00:17:49.000If you remember, Three weeks ago, Representative Ilhan Omar of Minnesota, she's a freshman congresswoman.
00:18:15.000She ended up deleting her tweets, retracting her statements, apologizing.
00:18:20.000She's added again with another controversial statement this week.
00:18:23.000And I'll say at the outset that she's not.
00:18:26.000Giving these comments for the right reasons.
00:18:28.000Is she pointing out that the Israel lobby is problematic because she really feels strongly about America's involvement in the Middle East and that's taking away from nation building at home and all the reasons that we oppose it?
00:18:44.000She is a Somali Muslim and naturally I'm sure she is sticking up for Palestinians because she sees Israel as an extension of this Western white colonizing attitude in the world.
00:18:56.000Now obviously Israel is not Western, Israel is not white.
00:19:00.000But that is how a lot of left wing people perceive it.
00:19:03.000This is part of liberation theology, and you understand that this is where the critique is coming from.
00:19:35.000Idiot, you know, there's so many conservative pundits who say, oh, Yahan Omar, she's this radical Muslim and she's an anti Semite, and what a great thing it is to see the Israel lobby crushing her because a Democratic congresswoman is being crushed.
00:19:49.000Isn't that, ah, that's strategically good for us, that's tactically good for us.
00:19:55.000Because, of course, when we see these two institutions, these two actors fighting, which is this freshman congresswoman and AIPAC, if she's exposing the activities of this massive foreign influence lobby, Which brought us to war in Iraq, which brought us to war in the Middle East, which delivers billions and billions and billions of dollars of foreign aid every year to this country.
00:20:17.000And the Israel lobby strikes back against what?
00:20:52.000It doesn't matter to me that Ilhan Omar is a leftist.
00:20:55.000It doesn't matter to me that she's a Muslim.
00:20:57.000It doesn't matter to me that she wants my race dead.
00:20:59.000It doesn't matter to me any of these facts.
00:21:02.000Because at the end of the day, the capacity for her to do damage is nothing compared to the Zionist lobby, which controls our State Department, our Defense Department, what goes on in the White House.
00:21:15.000Seriously, take a look at how these people.
00:21:18.000Walk around Washington, D.C. Two thirds of Congress every year goes to AIPAC.
00:21:24.000They have the president speak there, they have the vice president speak there, the U.N. ambassador, the top highest ranking senators on the Foreign Policy Committee or the Foreign Affairs Committee, all kinds of influential people.
00:21:36.000They give Bibi Netanyahu 27 standing ovations when he comes and delivers an address before a joint session of our Congress, and people are up in arms because why?
00:21:47.000A freshman Democratic congresswoman is the one talking about it?
00:23:14.000When he writes to Nancy Pelosi, quote, We urge you and your colleagues to send the unambiguous message that the United States Congress is no place for hate when somebody questions Israel.
00:23:25.000And nearly a dozen pro-Israel groups urge Pelosi to do the same.
00:23:30.000And within 48 hours, she drafts a four-page resolution to condemn anti-Semitism and a sitting congresswoman and so on.
00:23:37.000And this woman's career, I mean, she's going to get destroyed by these people.
00:23:41.000And everyone's like, that's a great thing.
00:23:48.000You love to see a foreign influence lobby from thousands of miles away crushing democratically elected, Congress people, representatives, because they challenge the racket that's going on in the State Department and the DOD.
00:24:02.000I'm sorry, there's nothing conservative about that.
00:24:22.000Her comment three weeks ago was, and I'll break it down for you, she said, Oh, it's all about the Benjamins.
00:24:28.000Somebody said, What does Ilhan Omar say? mean when she says that, you know, Congress people only support Israel for certain reasons.
00:24:36.000She says it's all about the Benjamins.
00:24:38.000In other words, she is saying that, you know, when a U.S. Congress person says, we love Israel and we're going to vote for wars for Israel, we're going to vote for foreign aid for Israel, we're going to vote for anti BDS legislation, which is unconstitutional, basically.
00:24:52.000When Congress people do that, she's saying, well, they're getting paid to do that.
00:24:56.000They're getting paid to do that by AIPAC.
00:24:57.000They're getting paid to do that by political action groups that are sponsored by Israel or Zionists or evangelicals or Jews, but to further the interests of Israel.
00:25:10.000Why does AIPAC spend money on politicians?
00:25:14.000I mean, doesn't that, you know, doesn't it kind of follow that if AIPAC, the American Israeli Public Affairs Committee, if they're spending lots of money on representatives and senators' campaigns, and then those senators and representatives support Israel, don't you think they're doing it because they're receiving money?
00:25:31.000Like, I don't, how is that a controversial thing to say?
00:25:56.000You know, you're cool, you're fresh, you're adding something a little different to the conversation, and, you know, we just like you.
00:26:02.000So here's some money, and we expect nothing in return.
00:26:05.000Like, obviously, it doesn't work like that.
00:26:07.000If they're giving money, they're trying to influence.
00:26:08.000But when she said that, that AIPAC gives money to politicians to influence them in the direction of favoring Israel, That was an anti Semitic trope, you see.
00:26:18.000To suggest that a lobby spends money on political contributions to influence politics, well, normally that would have been an obvious and straightforward thing to say, which is indisputable.
00:26:29.000I mean, like, it's so stupidly simple.
00:26:33.000Normally, while that would be the case, because it was Jews, oh, well, because it was Zionist, you see, that was an anti Semitic trope.
00:26:40.000To mention money in the same sentence that you mentioned Jews, well, that constitutes anti Semitism.
00:26:46.000Because, of course, When normally you might say the Koch brothers give money to a campaign to influence a campaign, well, yeah, I mean, that's what they do.
00:26:53.000When you say APEC gives money to a politician to further Israel's interests, well, that's really conjuring up these centuries old caricatures and stereotypes that Jews are these moneyed people all around the world and they're these transnational, they're in every major European world city and they're using big banking money and other money to influence governments and they have this cabal.
00:27:23.000She might not have known that, but when you say AIPAC gives money to politicians to further the interests of AIPAC, what you're really saying is, I hate Jews.
00:27:32.000What you're really saying is, I hate Jews.
00:27:36.000That makes sense to me, because any other lobby, well, yeah, but because this time you involve this group of people which has the stereotype, now it has risen to the level of a trope, of a stereotype, and therefore what you're actually saying is that you're a hater, and therefore actually.
00:27:53.000You know, you have no place in Congress.
00:28:15.000And, of course, and I did a show about this three weeks ago, it begs the question if Ilhan Omar is saying that AIPAC gives all this money to Congress, To exert disproportionate influence in Congress.
00:28:27.000And when she says that, she's punished by Congress immediately and horribly and without any remorse or hesitation.
00:28:34.000Well, I mean, doesn't that kind of vindicate the point?
00:28:55.000She says that Israeli, now, Israel is a foreign country, mind you.
00:29:01.000Israeli special interest groups, so special interest groups, Who's designed their purpose is to further the interests of Israel, a foreign country.
00:29:12.000She says that those groups are pushing for allegiance to a foreign country.
00:29:57.000I don't know what rhymes with Omar, but you can't stop Ilhan Omar.
00:30:00.000You know, she has to be stopped with this crazy Jew hatred.
00:30:04.000She says this, and within 48 hours, they draft a four page resolution which details the history and recent rise of anti Semitism in the U.S.
00:30:40.000It says, quote, rejecting anti Semitism as hateful expressions of intolerance that are contradictory to the values that define the people of the United States.
00:30:49.000Whereas anti Semitism is the bigotry faced by Jewish people simply because they are Jews, for no other reason.
00:30:56.000Whereas anti Semitism entails prejudicial attitudes or discriminatory acts toward people who are Jewish on the basis of their identity.
00:31:03.000Whereas in 2010, the Department of State adopted the working definition of anti Semitism promulgated by the International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance.
00:31:13.000Whereas the definition includes, quote, a certain perception of Jews, which may be expressed as hatred towards Jews, including blaming Jews when things go wrong.
00:31:21.000Calling for, aiding, or justifying the killing or harming of Jews in the name of a radical ideology or extremist view of religion, or making mendacious, dehumanizing, demonizing, or stereotypical allegations about Jews.
00:31:33.000Whereas Jewish people are subject to numerous other dangerous anti Semitic myths as well, including that Jews control the banks, media, and the U.S. government, or seek world domination, and that Jews are obsessed with money.
00:31:46.000Whereas the definition further includes, quote, accusing Jewish citizens of being more loyal to Israel.
00:31:51.000Or to the alleged priorities of Jews worldwide than to the interests of their own nations.
00:31:56.000Whereas the myth of dual loyalty, including allegations that Jews should be suspected of being disloyal neighbors or citizens, has been used to marginalize and persecute the Jewish people for centuries for being a stateless minority.
00:32:08.000Whereas accusing Jews of dual loyalty because they support Israel, whether out of a religious connection, a commitment to Jewish self determination after millennia of persecution, or an appreciation for shared values and interests, suggests that Jews cannot be patriotic Americans and trusted neighbors when Jews have served our nation.
00:32:25.000Since its founding, whether in public life or military service, whereas accusations of dual loyalty generally have an insidious bigoted history, including one, the discrimination, or rather the discriminatory internment of Americans of Japanese descent during World War II on the basis of race, number two, the Dreyfus Affair, in France, by the way, when Alfred Dreyfus, a Jewish French artillery captain,
00:32:50.000was falsely convicted of passing secrets to Germany based on the Jewish background, three, when the loyalty of President John F. Kennedy was questioned because of his Catholic faith.
00:32:59.000And for the post 9 11 conditions faced by Muslim Americans in the United States, including unfounded vicious attacks on and threats to Muslim American members of Congress, and where a scapegoating and targeting of Jews in the United States has persisted for many years, including the 1915 lynching of Leo Frank, a Jewish man falsely accused of rape and murder.
00:33:19.000Henry Ford, writing that there was a Jewish plan to control the world, not by territorial acquisition, not by military aggression, not by governmental subjugation, but by control of the machinery of commerce and exchange.
00:33:31.000The America First Committee and the Rise of Neo Nazism.
00:33:34.000Whereas in 2017, the Federal Bureau of Investigation reported a 37% increase in hate crimes against Jews or Jewish institutions and found that attacks against Jews or Jewish institutions make up 58.1% of all religious based hate crimes.
00:33:51.000Whereas on October 27, 2018, the perpetrator of the deadliest attack on Jewish people in the United States at the Tree of Life Synagogue building in Pittsburgh, who killed 11 worshipers, reportedly stated that he wanted all Jews to die.
00:34:04.000Whereas Jews are the targets of anti Semitic violence at even higher rates in many other countries than they are in the United States, whereas all Americans, including Jews, Muslims, and Christians, and people of all faith and no faith, have a stake in fighting anti Semitism, as all Americans have a stake in fighting all bigotry and hatred against religions, races, or places of origin, whereas there is an urgent need to ensure the safety and security of Jewish communities, including synagogues, schools, cemeteries, and other institutions, and finally,
00:34:34.000Whereas on February 14th, 2019, the House of Representatives adopted House Joint Resolution 37 stating that anti Semitism is a challenge to the basic principles of tolerance, pluralism, and democracy and the shared values that bind Americans together.
00:34:49.000Now, therefore, be it resolved that the House of Representatives, one, acknowledge the dangerous consequences of perpetuating anti Semitic stereotypes, and two, reject anti Semitism as hateful expressions of intolerance that are contradictory to the values that define the people of the United States.
00:35:22.000All of that for, as I said, the comment, and I'll read it again for you that Israeli special interest groups push allegiance to a foreign country.
00:35:31.000All of that in response to that little comment by a U.S. representative.
00:36:36.000We're going to go into four pages of the Holocaust and the Tree of Life and JFK and the Dreyfus Affair and the Japanese and blah, blah, blah.
00:36:45.000Four pages of this stuff within 48 hours.
00:36:48.000And it's got the attention of the Speaker of the House.
00:37:14.000Do they say, right away, sir, we will get right on that.
00:37:16.000We're passing resolutions and bills and everything else.
00:37:19.000It doesn't work that way with anybody else, anything else.
00:37:22.000And it's funny because if you read, you know, you're paying attention to that whole thing.
00:37:28.000What they were trying to do is connect anybody who's even a little bit skeptical of what goes on, they're Holocausters, they're Nazis.
00:37:35.000If you say, hey, maybe these Jewish people have a little bit of allegiance to Israel as opposed to America, that's anti Semitism.
00:37:43.000We're lumping that in with the Holocaust.
00:37:45.000If you say, hey, maybe Ben Shapiro has a dual allegiance, maybe he has a little bit of allegiance to Israel, you could see why that would make some sense, right?
00:37:54.000Because every other story on Daily Wire is about Israel, and Ben Shapiro.
00:37:59.000Is a Zionist Jew, hardcore Zionist, and hey, just about everybody working at his papers is a Zionist Jew, and all he does every day is promote the causes of Zionism, of war in Iran, war in the Middle East, all this other stuff.
00:38:11.000And you might say, hey, he married a Zionist, an Israeli actually.
00:38:16.000Maybe you say, hey, it's fine, look, it's fine, it's okay, I don't mind it, he has a right to, but maybe he has a little bit of allegiance to a foreign country.
00:38:26.000Maybe a little bit, he has a dual allegiance.
00:38:30.000They're saying that anybody who even has a little bit of skepticism, A little bit of criticism about that.
00:38:36.000They are in the same category as Adolf Hitler, people that hang Jews for no reason, people that persecute Jews for no reason, and all, you know, 109 countries, all this other stuff.
00:38:46.000Doesn't that kind of beg the question?
00:43:02.000You know, do I come on the show when I talk about this stuff and say, you know, anything out of line?
00:43:08.000Now, some of it's a little ironic, some of it's a little bit tongue in cheek, but at the end of the day, the message is simply we want to, as Americans, we want to control our own foreign policy.
00:43:20.000But let's see, we'll take a look at our Super Chats.
00:43:22.000Brosif says, broke, get banned from Streamlabs, woke, report yourself so people have to pay much higher or pay more for higher character count in Super Chat.
00:47:09.000So the goal with Yang, as far as I'm concerned, is not to see Yang become the president.
00:47:14.000I don't think that would be a good outcome.
00:47:15.000But the goal is to introduce a little anarchy, so to speak, to have him go onto the debate stage and really push on these issues and generate a little bit of pressure.
00:47:26.000For other candidates to adopt a posture on tech, on automation, on those other things, because they're very important and nobody talks about them.
00:47:34.000JP says Yang's number one cheerleader equals Sam Harris.
00:48:51.000Denmark, Sweden, Finland, all these countries, Norway, they are social democracies, which means that they have a market economy.
00:48:58.000If you look at any of their rankings in terms of economic freedom, ease of doing business, things like that, they rank the highest in the world.
00:49:05.000They've got some of the lowest corporate tax rates and all the rest.
00:49:09.000But what they have, besides a very robust and competitive market economy, is a welfare state.
00:49:14.000You know, they're able to take care of their people with health care, with everything else.
00:49:19.000They have some of the highest tax burden in the world, something like 60% in some countries is the total tax burden, but it's a different model for living.
00:49:28.000It may seem like that's the end of the world in a country like America because we, in our experience, are paying for health care and we're paying for all this other stuff.
00:49:37.000But, you know, on net, if you're paying 60% in taxes, but your health care is taken care of and all your public services are taken care of and you've got the social safety net and all the rest, I don't know.
00:49:49.000I mean, restructuring the economy, you have to think outside the box.
00:49:53.000I'm not saying I'm a democratic or a social democrat.
00:49:56.000I don't believe in a major welfare state.
00:49:58.000I don't believe it's working in the Nordic countries.
00:50:00.000I don't believe that universal health care is working, for example, in Sweden.
00:50:04.000I don't think the welfare state is working in any of these countries.
00:50:08.000But it's an obvious distinction between these countries and Venezuela, where they have complete nationalization of industry and price controls, and they're doing something with the exchange rate, where the government gets a different rate.
00:50:19.000Than the people do, and there's all this corruption going on.
00:50:22.000So, but the reason they do that is because big business knows that if they can paint socialism as the number one enemy and they can say, oh, Venezuela is similar to any government program to elevate the life of the average American, well, then no attempt will be made, right?
00:50:37.000So, politicians are saying, hey, we want to make health care affordable.
00:50:41.000We want to do things that help Americans.
00:50:43.000Americans are getting killed, they're getting crushed by technology, by hyper individualism, and Unrestricted capitalism.
00:51:08.000Excuse me, can we maybe help the people?
00:51:10.000Maybe it's not a good thing that we have technology that is, you know, accelerating in this rapid pace, unimpeded for a hundred and some years, and the capitalists backed.
00:51:21.000Think tank intellectual people, they say, No, we cannot help the little man.
00:53:36.000Russia has survived, Hungary has survived, the Czech Republic has survived.
00:53:41.000If France and Britain and Germany and America bring in millions upon millions from the global south and our race is submerged under all these people, we're not going to survive that.
00:54:12.000Far Squawk says, for Epic Games to continue providing its users with their 1,000 V Bucks per month, they must address the issue of rapidly rising player counts.
00:55:23.000Convert 25,000 of the most influential people in the country, or have 25,000 people who are influenced by your ideas getting into those influential positions?
00:55:33.000That's what we're trying to do over the next generation or so.
00:55:38.000House Krakas says President Trump read the poem about the snake for two years, then let the snakes, the neocons, into the cabinet, and now we are keeping troops in Syria.
00:56:05.000The trick with that debate, and this is in all honesty, and this is the, you know, you can't really say this because I'm like, oh no, you just lost, you're just whatever, you have scope.
00:56:14.000But, you know, not for nothing, but the debate was maybe an hour or two hours, and the topics were as diverse as does God exist?
00:56:25.000Is Catholicism the authentic or legitimate heir to Christ?
00:56:29.000And yet, probably 10 different subjects within the debate, which all could warrant two hours in and of themselves.
00:56:36.000So, I'll say in my defense with the religion debates that in a lot of cases you see that the debates are too broad in the subject matter and not enough time is spent.
00:56:47.000Because defending, or rather, having an argument about whether God exists is a debate in itself.
00:56:53.000To debate the ontology and the epistemology and everything behind that, I mean, that is a complex, obviously broad subject in itself.
00:57:01.000But then we're going to talk about is the Bible historically accurate?
00:57:06.000Is the historicity of the story of Christ accurate?
00:57:10.000And then the theology is does it follow from the Bible that the Catholic Church is a legitimate heir and they're protected from sin and everything else?
00:57:17.000And, you know, there's history, there's theology, there's all kinds of metaphysics.
00:57:22.000And can you cover all that in two hours?
01:01:07.000Jose Antonio says, E. Michael Jones says that for any racial movement to succeed in America, it needs logos, which is God, family, and property.
01:01:15.000So, how about identifying as Catholic America instead of white majoritarian?
01:06:49.000We don't have to be nasty, but let's be real here.
01:06:51.000If you're going to shill for the APAC lobby and pretend not to know how they operate, because they don't give any money directly to campaigns, they coordinate donations from other groups.
01:07:01.000This is well documented by themselves and other groups.
01:07:07.000But it's so obvious what goes on there.
01:08:57.000Do you think if Ilhan Omar said that open southern borders is a Zionist conspiracy, would the government approve of a wall tomorrow?
01:09:04.000No, that's obviously not how it works.
01:09:08.000Heli Ride says the chocolate chips post Bolshevik revolution made it illegal by death to question the number of chocolate chips in the cookie.