America First - Nicholas J. Fuentes - The Roseanne Barr Question | America First Ep. 133

00:00:01.000 Good evening, everybody.

00:00:02.000 We're watching America First.

00:00:03.000 My name is Nicholas J. Fuentes, and we have a great show for you tonight.

00:00:07.000 So much to talk about.

00:00:11.000 So much news.

00:00:13.000 So many stories to talk about tonight.

00:00:15.000 We are high energy.

00:00:16.000 We are high T on the America First Netcast web show tonight.

00:00:23.000 Nickler, I'm your host.

00:00:24.000 We're very excited to talk about so many things.

00:00:27.000 I want to talk about the Roseanne show tonight, as apparently everybody watched it the other day.

00:00:33.000 And it's the hot topic.

00:00:34.000 It's the hot subject.

00:00:35.000 Fun story Roseanne Barr actually retweeted an article I wrote during the election. 0.98

00:00:40.000 She did that twice, actually.

00:00:43.000 So we'll get into that.

00:00:44.000 We want to talk about FISA abuses being investigated by the Inspector General, which just came out today.

00:00:50.000 We're going to be talking about a meeting between Xi Jinping of China and Kim Jong un of North Korea and some things about the 2018 elections.

00:00:59.000 We have a jam packed episode.

00:01:02.000 It's just full, it's like bulging because it's so much content.

00:01:07.000 Here in the show.

00:01:08.000 And remember, it's a big content week.

00:01:11.000 Yesterday we had our very successful first run of America First World Report, the podcast.

00:01:18.000 A lot of favorable reviews come in and a lot of excitement from that.

00:01:22.000 People love the logo.

00:01:23.000 Thanks to Dominic for that.

00:01:24.000 People love the theme song.

00:01:26.000 Thanks to Senator Memes for that.

00:01:28.000 It's a great show.

00:01:30.000 Tomorrow is the debut then of 2018 Election HQ, which is our America First World Report.

00:01:38.000 And so we're going to get into some 2018 news tonight.

00:01:38.000 2018 podcast.

00:01:43.000 We're going to talk about fundraising.

00:01:44.000 We're going to talk about polls.

00:01:46.000 We're going to briefly talk about strategy for the Democrats tonight because there are some new developments.

00:01:53.000 But if you want to hear me really get into it, I'm not going to spend very much time on it tonight because, frankly, we just simply don't have time.

00:01:59.000 But if you want to hear my take on the 2018 elections, we have a big podcast dedicated just to that coming out tomorrow.

00:02:07.000 First episode free.

00:02:09.000 First episode is a sample.

00:02:10.000 It's a tasting.

00:02:12.000 But remember, next week then it kicks over to our America First Premium members exclusively for them.

00:02:18.000 And so we're looking forward to that.

00:02:20.000 A couple of great podcasts, just so much content.

00:02:23.000 I'm getting milked of all the content, all the content juices.

00:02:27.000 And actually, I think it's just making me stronger, more resilient.

00:02:30.000 So we're very excited this week.

00:02:32.000 I got to say, the one thing that's holding me back, I've been trying to do all the content, but the one thing that's holding me back is the phone.

00:02:38.000 It's like now more than ever, I'm just addicted to it.

00:02:42.000 To the phone.

00:02:42.000 I'm addicted to Twitter.

00:02:44.000 It's like I wake up and I'm on it for hours.

00:02:47.000 It's like I wake up, put my face down, and then it's like four o'clock.

00:02:51.000 And I can't believe it.

00:02:52.000 Does anybody else have this problem?

00:02:54.000 This happens to me where I'm at wits' end.

00:02:57.000 I'm at my wits' end right now with the telephone.

00:03:01.000 I don't know what to do.

00:03:02.000 It's just too good.

00:03:03.000 And then I try and put it down, and then I get very drowsy.

00:03:06.000 I get very sleepy because I'm not being stimulated constantly.

00:03:09.000 And it's a big problem.

00:03:11.000 So I don't know.

00:03:11.000 We got to figure it out.

00:03:13.000 We got to go back.

00:03:14.000 I think.

00:03:14.000 Ted Kaczynski had the answer a little while ago.

00:03:18.000 I think he's starting to convert me over to Primble.

00:03:21.000 I think I'm going over back to the trees, back to the wilderness.

00:03:24.000 I don't like the wilderness.

00:03:25.000 I don't like the mosquitoes and the bugs and, you know, uneven surfaces.

00:03:30.000 I don't know if I'm so wild about it, but we're going to have to do it.

00:03:33.000 That should be the next, you know, you talk about the next superhero movie, the next big like biopic or biopic.

00:03:39.000 They got to do it about Uncle Ted.

00:03:41.000 But anyway, no time for stories.

00:03:43.000 We got to get straight into the news here.

00:03:45.000 I guess the first thing I wanted to talk about is more of a cultural thing.

00:03:49.000 Which is the reboot of The Roseanne Show.

00:03:52.000 Now, I know I tell people not to watch television, and I hate television, and nobody should be watching it.

00:03:57.000 But it was a big television event last night.

00:04:00.000 It was the reboot of the Roseanne Barr show, which before my time, I guess it came out in 1988.

00:04:08.000 And it was about Roseanne Barr, who was this lesbian Jewish comedian.

00:04:12.000 And, you know, it was supposed to portray the white working class in sort of a sympathetic way that wasn't so much on television at the time.

00:04:21.000 And I actually took it, funnily enough, I took a class about television in high school, not in college, in high school.

00:04:29.000 Where we talked about how Roseanne was a real game changer because a lot of the shows at the time in the 80s were about, you know, like in The Cosby Show was about a very rich, you know, professionals.

00:04:40.000 Full House was about rich people.

00:04:42.000 Family Matters was about rich people.

00:04:44.000 All the shows were about rich people with lots of money. 1.00

00:04:47.000 And then Roseanne came around and was like, oh, well, this is the working class show.

00:04:50.000 This is the show where it's like we can kind of relate to that.

00:04:52.000 And so this show, they had their reboot after a lot of years.

00:04:57.000 I think it's like, what, 10 years or something, 20 years?

00:05:00.000 And.

00:05:01.000 What distinguished it from so many other shows, why this is notable is because, of course, Roseanne Barr was a Trump supporter.

00:05:08.000 And the show is decidedly, I don't know if it's pro Trump, but it's at least normalizing the Trump base, the Trump voter, in a way that's been, I think, topical.

00:05:17.000 They covered this on Fox News and other places.

00:05:20.000 And I watched it.

00:05:20.000 I actually had to sign up for Hulu because I'm Googling, you know, Roseanne Barr's season 10, episode one, trying to get it on Daily Motion, trying to get it on YouTube.

00:05:31.000 And they just give you like the hour long.

00:05:33.000 Like dubstep music, and it's like, check out the link below, and it's never what it says it is.

00:05:38.000 So, I had to get Hulu.

00:05:40.000 I had to sign up for the free trial.

00:05:41.000 I had to put my credit card information in to get the free trial.

00:05:45.000 And so, I could watch the show, and I watch it, and you know, I hate television.

00:05:49.000 I just, I watch it, and it just makes my skin crawl.

00:05:53.000 It makes me like just angry because the acting is canned, the jokes aren't very funny.

00:05:58.000 I mean, this stuff is just like prolified.

00:06:01.000 It's just like the gray goop of entertainment.

00:06:04.000 I mean, you look at television, and what this has really done, I guess, is to sell commercials, right?

00:06:09.000 I mean, nobody sits down to write network television and really produce something that's funny or dramatic or anything like that.

00:06:17.000 I think for the most part, it's there to sell ad space.

00:06:19.000 I mean, maybe Netflix, maybe, you know, HBO, the pay per view, if you could even call that television, maybe that's television these days.

00:06:28.000 That's a little bit better.

00:06:29.000 But I'm just watching the sitcom, and the jokes are canned, the acting is corny.

00:06:33.000 I can't bear it.

00:06:34.000 But I have to say, it wasn't.

00:06:36.000 So bad.

00:06:37.000 You know, people are saying there were some notable things about the show, and that there's one character, I guess, who's adopted because it's a white family, but there's some, like, black kid just hanging out.

00:06:47.000 It's like, you know, that doesn't really, that didn't come from these two, so I don't know if it's adopted.

00:06:51.000 Like I said, I've never watched the show before, so I don't know where this kid came from. 0.82

00:06:54.000 But there's a black kid in there, and the problem is not that they're black. 1.00

00:06:58.000 The problem is, you know, how'd they get there? 0.99

00:07:00.000 And then the other issue, the bigger issue, was there was a kid who's cross dressing in the show.

00:07:05.000 There's, like, a young guy who's, like, you know, Confused, experimenting. 0.90

00:07:10.000 He's the gender non conforming type of thing. 1.00

00:07:13.000 And I understand a lot of people are very upset about this.

00:07:15.000 A lot of people on right wing Twitter, at least my circles in the right wing, said, you know, in some ways people are excited about it because here's Roseanne, who's a Trump supporter, and here's a show that portrays the white working class, and here's a show that maybe appeals to white people and to Trump voters more importantly, that it humanizes them, that here's for the first time, maybe since the Tool Time show or the What was the show that Tim Allen hosted on CBS?

00:07:42.000 Not Tool Time.

00:07:43.000 It was the other one.

00:07:44.000 The new one.

00:07:45.000 It was called Last Man Standing.

00:07:47.000 So since then, this is like the first show where you have an unapologetic Trump supporter as the lead.

00:07:52.000 And I guess it's a conservative leaning show compared to Modern Family, Blackish, you know, all these other Jimmy Kimmel, these kinds of shows.

00:08:00.000 This was like, I guess, leaning more in the right direction.

00:08:05.000 That said, a lot of people were very much upset about it because of these two elements.

00:08:09.000 And so basically, there's two schools of thought.

00:08:11.000 And I got into a little bit of an argument about this with Matt Semite on Twitter, who's a liaison for Paul Nealon's campaign.

00:08:20.000 He was viciously countersignaling me, and so he's out of the movement.

00:08:23.000 He was viciously.

00:08:24.000 Counter signaling me and attacking me.

00:08:27.000 I mean, this guy's just a bridge burner, and so he's out of the movement.

00:08:30.000 But he was counter signaling me about Roseanne.

00:08:32.000 I'm joking, of course, about that.

00:08:33.000 But he was saying, on the one hand, Roseanne has these pernicious influences. 0.95

00:08:37.000 Maybe it's subversive. 0.93

00:08:39.000 Maybe this was put together by globalist Hollywood producers to subvert MAGA people.

00:08:46.000 And if MAGA Trump people are watching the show, they're ingesting a normalization of gender fluid people and adopting non white people or adopting people outside of your clan and all of that. 0.74

00:08:59.000 And my school of thought was that this is pushing people in the right direction.

00:09:02.000 And think about it in this way.

00:09:04.000 I watched the show and I thought it was pretty much okay with those two exceptions.

00:09:08.000 And I'll tell you why.

00:09:10.000 I think you look at most television today, anything today, music, movies, television, and since the election, it has gotten so hard left.

00:09:19.000 It's never been as bad as it is now.

00:09:21.000 It has never been as far left as it is right now, where the things that are on television today would be unimaginable.

00:09:29.000 Just five years ago, just five years ago, things would be unimaginable that you see on television today with regularity and horizontally and vertically, in the sense that it's all the shows have some element of it across the board, whether it's CBS, ABC, Fox.

00:09:46.000 I mean, they all have some component that is off, that is political, that is hard left.

00:09:51.000 And then depending on the show, it could be very intense.

00:09:54.000 You know, some shows it's less, some shows it's just outrageous.

00:09:59.000 You know, you look at some of these.

00:10:01.000 Like Law and Order, or these crime type shows where they just reenact political events and inject it with their political narrative.

00:10:08.000 They did a show on SVU about Charlottesville.

00:10:11.000 They did a show that was about the Proud Boys.

00:10:13.000 They did a show where somebody was obsessed with fake news and that kind of thing.

00:10:19.000 And so I think when you look at the landscape today, where it's never been worse, people can't catch a break, where every show is, it's got the pamphlet of characters.

00:10:29.000 You know, you got the wheelchair, you got the Asian, you got the black guy, you got the.

00:10:33.000 Based, you know, strong woman and all the rest.

00:10:35.000 You've got political messaging that's overt.

00:10:38.000 Sometimes it's very covert and implicit.

00:10:41.000 Social messaging about the family.

00:10:42.000 You know, modern family is the best example where it's a show about essentially the show is just a Marxist deconstruction of the traditional family.

00:10:51.000 You know, many people think of it as, well, this is a reflection of society.

00:10:55.000 This is just how society is.

00:10:57.000 It's the modern family.

00:10:59.000 When in actuality, what it does is it upholds these alternative lifestyles, these These non normative lifestyles and says these are equivalent, these are the same. 0.99

00:11:10.000 You know, a dad and a mom and their kids well, it's just the same as homosexuals or as you know, an old bastard marrying a young fiery Latina in a second marriage. 0.96

00:11:20.000 You know, it's all it's just all the same, it's all equal. 0.99

00:11:23.000 And there's a show like Blackish where it's just so over the top.

00:11:27.000 Where, of course, the black family that's portrayed in that show they're educated and they're wealthy and they're very friendly and they're just like you and me and they live in a nice neighborhood.

00:11:38.000 Which is a very accurate representation of the black community, right?

00:11:42.000 When we look at some of the numbers about the black community, a stable two-parent household with a median income or an income of over $100,000, you know, and the house is clean and everybody's on the straight and narrow, of course, this is very typical. 0.87

00:11:55.000 This is very statistically reflective. 0.90

00:11:58.000 But then on top of that, you have the characters in this show where all the white people are babies or racists. 0.99

00:12:04.000 You know, they're all either goofs or they're villains. 0.94

00:12:06.000 And so then I think when you look at Roseanne in the context of what has been going on with television in the past two years, and I think this is a step in the right direction, there are components that we don't like.

00:12:17.000 There are components that are outright dangerous, that are outright villainous.

00:12:22.000 Is that the adjective for that?

00:12:22.000 Is that a word?

00:12:24.000 They're outright not good in a word or in two words, where you have, you know, these characters which are there.

00:12:31.000 And you could, I think you could make a case if you watch the actual episode that the gender non conforming kid is there as like an all in the family type situation to contrast kind of where the country is at. 0.85

00:12:43.000 Because if you watch the episode, you know, it wasn't like they were saying, Here's this gender nonconforming kid, and he's the new norm, and he's the best, and isn't this okay?

00:12:52.000 The parents were actually ridiculing him.

00:12:54.000 They were saying, What the hell is going on?

00:12:56.000 Is this a joke? 0.99

00:12:57.000 This is liberal nonsense, essentially.

00:12:59.000 So, that wasn't as bad, I don't think, as everybody says.

00:13:03.000 I think where the story arc goes, that'll determine whether that's the end of the world or whether that's not so a little bit more benign.

00:13:11.000 The adopted kid is maybe an issue.

00:13:13.000 But I think, by and large, comparing it to everything else, what this show presents. 0.85

00:13:18.000 Is the white working class. 0.61

00:13:20.000 It spotlights white working class issues. 0.59

00:13:23.000 What other show on television is talking about the skyrocketing cost of health care, about prescription medications, about white people that are struggling in middle America who support Donald Trump because they're getting killed economically? 0.50

00:13:37.000 I think that if you look at it on net, and the alt right loves looking at things on net when it favors them, not so much when it doesn't, I think it's a good show.

00:13:45.000 I think it's a good thing for us.

00:13:47.000 And that's not to say that.

00:13:48.000 You know, this is something everybody should be watching.

00:13:50.000 That's not to say this is perfect or ideal, but I think what we have to look at in terms of our goals is the goal of normalization.

00:13:59.000 And this is what the left has been trying to prevent since the 2016 election, which is to say that when they went out and they protested for the women's march, and they went out and they protested the executive order for the travel ban, and they went out and they protested for the gun ban, and Chuck Schumer refuses to work with Trump, refuses to meet with Trump, refuses to vote with Trump, and the media refuses to do things like, you know, bring on Trump's.

00:14:22.000 Staff on the news and all the rest.

00:14:25.000 What the left understands better than our own side is that if Trump is ever normalized, if he is ever seen as at the very least benign or, God forbid, normal, just a standard Republican president, they know it's all over for them.

00:14:41.000 They know all the chips come crashing down.

00:14:44.000 Because if Donald Trump, who has said Muslims should be banned from entering the country, we need to build a wall between the United States and Mexico, appealed even to the people at Charlottesville, said they were fine people for protesting.

00:14:57.000 The destruction of their heritage and their history and their culture.

00:15:00.000 If that guy becomes a normal Republican, yeah, he was just a normal Republican president. 0.82

00:15:06.000 And maybe an unpopular one, maybe an unsuccessful one, maybe one that went back on his promises, maybe one that was a little bit silly and we didn't like for a little while.

00:15:15.000 But if he gets normalized and people say, yeah, well, that's just, you know, your standard Republican President Donald Trump, then it's over.

00:15:24.000 Because if the Republican Party ever wakes up and they become stridently anti globalist, not just anti high taxes, not just anti socialism and all of that, but if we have a Republican or an American or a white electorate, which is opposed to globalism and globalists and is opposed to the establishment and the parties and the banks and the Wall Street, And all the rest, then they're in for real trouble.

00:15:52.000 And I think that if we look at this show in terms of that goal, which we've been trying steadily for for a long time, which the Democrats have been screaming bloody murder every day to prevent that from happening.

00:16:03.000 Stephen Colbert, Jimmy Kimmel, you know, the news media, they do this every day where they say, they get out on stage every day.

00:16:11.000 Well, you will not believe what Trump's up to today.

00:16:13.000 And that is in an attempt to shore up this left wing standard, this left wing.

00:16:20.000 Monopoly on politics and on the dialogue and on all the rest because they know that if there's a crack, if Donald Trump can show that the system bleeds, then we know that the system can die and we can destroy it.

00:16:32.000 And I think Roseanne contributes to that goal.

00:16:34.000 I think it's not ideal.

00:16:36.000 I think there's some nasty, just downright subversive stuff in there that is problematic.

00:16:41.000 And we know Roseanne, she may have voted for Donald Trump, but she's no conservative, right?

00:16:46.000 No conservative.

00:16:47.000 But here you have a show that normalizes support for Donald Trump.

00:16:51.000 It normalizes Trump.

00:16:52.000 It humanizes the white working class that voted for him.

00:16:56.000 It does a lot of things metapolitically that I think we should not be so quick to turn our noses up at because it's not exactly ideal.

00:17:04.000 I mean, just imagine if the left turned their noses up at every incremental advance that they made in the culture.

00:17:10.000 You know, look at some of the movies that come out where they have some very overt left wing undertones, but, you know, by and large, there's maybe traditional elements there.

00:17:18.000 Like, for example, Spider Man.

00:17:21.000 Spider Man was a movie about a young white kid.

00:17:24.000 And we know we.

00:17:25.000 The left wing media hates nothing more than young, straight, white men who love their country and all the rest.

00:17:31.000 And so here's a movie that's about Spider Man, and oh, you know, he's slinging webs, he's doing all this great stuff.

00:17:36.000 And then intermixed in it, you have Zendaya from Disney Channel saying, oh, the Washington Monument was built by slaves, and there's all kinds of race mixing, and there's, you know, interracial romance going on.

00:17:47.000 And imagine if the left said, you know what, Spider Man features a white, heterosexual male protagonist.

00:17:55.000 And so even though this is the blockbuster.

00:17:58.000 Of the decade, even though this is one of the biggest superhero movies of the year, and this will be screened to millions of people, and they'll be seeing this stuff about interracial and this stuff about America's history. 0.99

00:18:09.000 Yeah, we don't want it because it's not all the way there. 0.71

00:18:12.000 I mean, just imagine we have to start thinking like the left, taking what we can get here.

00:18:17.000 And in Hollywood, this is pretty much as good as it's going to get for network television.

00:18:22.000 So, Roseanne, I hate television.

00:18:24.000 I will never watch television.

00:18:26.000 Probably the last time I watched the show, but I think this is by and large a good thing.

00:18:30.000 18 million people watched it, it got Wild ratings.

00:18:33.000 It killed everything else in its time slot.

00:18:36.000 And so I think we're moving in the right direction with that.

00:18:39.000 But we got to keep an eye on it.

00:18:40.000 Got to keep an eye on the story arcs.

00:18:42.000 It may go down south very quickly.

00:18:43.000 So we'll see what happens on the all important RQ, the Roseanne question.

00:18:47.000 But that's television.

00:18:48.000 That's not really news.

00:18:50.000 We got to move right along into the bigger news, which there's so much going on here.

00:18:55.000 I guess we'll talk about the Inspector General report, which is really a white pill here.

00:19:00.000 Now, apparently the Inspector General's report is not expected now for another couple of months.

00:19:04.000 We were under the impression on the show, and I think the American people were under the impression that the inspector general's report was coming out in March or April because they extended the deadline in fall, and they said it's coming out in March or April.

00:19:17.000 Well, now they extended the deadline again.

00:19:19.000 Now it's not coming out for another several months, but for very good reason.

00:19:23.000 It turns out that today the inspector general has reported that the IG Horowitz is now looking into the FISA abuses by the FISA courts during the Obama administration.

00:19:34.000 I'll read you his statement, what he had to say about it.

00:19:39.000 He said, and this is the Office of the Inspector General, Michael Horowitz, who says, The OIG, which is the Office of the Inspector General under the Justice Department, the OIG will initiate a review that will examine the Justice Department's and the Federal Bureau of Investigations compliance with legal requirements and with applicable DOJ and FBI policies and procedures and applications filed with the U.S. Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court, the FISA courts, relating to a certain U.S. person.

00:20:08.000 As part of this examination, the OIG also will review information that was known to the DOJ and the FBI at the time the applications were filed from or about an alleged FBI confidential source.

00:20:19.000 So, folks, I think we're going to see some very good stuff coming in this OIG report.

00:20:25.000 The OIG has spent the last year investigating the FBI's handling of the Clinton email scandal and the Clinton email private server.

00:20:34.000 He was able to obtain thousands of emails that were deleted by Hillary Clinton.

00:20:38.000 And he's been doing that for about a year.

00:20:40.000 He's been looking into other things, Clinton pay to play at the Clinton Foundation, things going on in the Obama administration.

00:20:45.000 And now he's turning his attention here to the FISA courts where there was obviously a clear abuse.

00:20:51.000 Where you look at the Nunes memo, if you look at some reports that came out today about the connection between Comey and the Obama administration, I mean, this is just a lob.

00:21:02.000 It's a softball to the OIG.

00:21:04.000 And so I think anybody who thinks that we're down and out, anybody who thinks that we're not going anywhere, that the swamp is still.

00:21:11.000 Ever present and there.

00:21:12.000 I mean, don't get me wrong, it's still a very tough fight and we are still in it.

00:21:16.000 But I think this OIG report is going to be our ace in the hole.

00:21:20.000 And only because you look at Michael Horowitz, and not many people know this about Michael Horowitz because they don't, for whatever reason, they don't talk about the OIG even so much on Fox News.

00:21:28.000 They talk about it a lot on 4chan and things like that, but they ignore it completely in the mainstream media.

00:21:34.000 Fox News, you don't hear about it very much.

00:21:37.000 But this Michael Horowitz guy is a Boy Scout.

00:21:40.000 He served under Bush, he served under Obama.

00:21:43.000 His reputation is that.

00:21:44.000 He is the highest caliber of integrity.

00:21:47.000 He's the best guy for the job.

00:21:48.000 And so you have somebody in this administration, and here's a good thing for why he's pushing Obama, why he served under both a Republican and a Democratic administration.

00:21:57.000 You might say, oh, well, that means he's swamp.

00:21:59.000 But if his reputation is integrity, and he served under Democratic and Republican administrations, if he's in the Department of Justice, he just got a quarter of a billion dollars from this omnibus spending bill.

00:22:11.000 The bill that was passed on Friday said that none of the money, the $1.3 trillion, Appropriated for the federal government could be used to impede the OIG's investigation.

00:22:22.000 If he's got all these resources, he's got a sterling reputation, he's got some kind of credibility in the eyes of the media because he served under both Republican and Democratic administrations.

00:22:33.000 If he's going in and he's finding the obvious, the blatant, naked abuses of James Comey, of Barack Obama, of Hillary Clinton, of the FBI, of the intelligence community, the FISA courts, and all the rest.

00:22:47.000 You know that this is our ace in the hole here.

00:22:50.000 If this report is everything it's cracked up to be, if Michael Horowitz is who people say he is, then this is going to knock it out of the park.

00:22:57.000 This would drive not just, I think, a very successful bid in 2018.

00:23:01.000 I think the Democrats know they're going to get caught with their pants down with this.

00:23:05.000 But this could also trigger some very serious institutional reforms in terms of surveillance, in terms of how the bureaucracy operates.

00:23:13.000 If this is successful, if he proves that this is worse than Watergate, as many congressmen who have been given some briefs about what is contained in the report have said, or the Nunes memo that came out, or Chuck Grassley and Lindsey Graham's report about the Steele dossier, then we could use this as a pretext to seriously clean house in the intelligence community.

00:23:33.000 In the defense apparatus and all the rest.

00:23:35.000 So I'm very, I am highly encouraged by what we're seeing with the inspector general and his report.

00:23:41.000 It's a good sign that it's taken so long.

00:23:44.000 It's a good sign that Jeff Sessions has been kept out of the limelight, that we have all these unsealed indictments.

00:23:50.000 I think we're really going to see something solid here.

00:23:52.000 Because with the FISA courts, I mean, what you saw with the Steele dossier and McCabe, who was just fired, McCabe, the former director of the FBI, who said that the FISA courts could not have spied on Donald Trump if they did not have the Steele dossier.

00:24:07.000 And the Steele dossier was all lies.

00:24:09.000 The people who made it were literally in bed, literally sleeping with people in the FBI, sleeping with people who got the warrant in the first place.

00:24:17.000 I think it's so obvious the abuses here.

00:24:19.000 And if the OIG nails them on it, we're really talking about a paradigm shift.

00:24:23.000 So that's another big encouragement that we see today and will be forthcoming, I guess, in the rest of the year.

00:24:29.000 I misspoke the other day when I said that this report was forthcoming this month or next month.

00:24:34.000 I guess it's not due now for a couple of months, which I guess as close as the midterms as we can get with it, the better.

00:24:40.000 The greater effect, the more optimal of an effect it will have.

00:24:44.000 And so I have a lot of confidence that this will be a game changer here.

00:24:48.000 We got to keep watching this.

00:24:49.000 Keep an eye on our OIG. 0.95

00:24:51.000 I think it's a very good thing.

00:24:52.000 And I guess this kind of goes along with it.

00:24:54.000 We're going to talk a little bit about the midterms, and of course, the OIG will have an impact on it.

00:24:58.000 But we saw another very encouraging thing from Breitbart today.

00:25:02.000 Or actually, Breitbart was summarizing a report by The Hill.

00:25:06.000 And so The Hill did a report today that said the top Democrats are looking at the Stormy Daniels story, and they're going to be campaigning on that.

00:25:14.000 In 2018, you had a top Democrat strategist saying it's going to be an all of the above campaign in 2018.

00:25:20.000 They're going to hit him on Stormy Daniels.

00:25:22.000 They're going to be running with that in 2018.

00:25:24.000 And so we look at that story from the Hill.

00:25:26.000 We look at the two new polls out by CNN and the Associated Press from March, which show the president at a 42% approval rating, and that's this week, up from seven points last month.

00:25:38.000 The CNN poll has him at his highest approval rating in 11 months.

00:25:43.000 You look at the spending, and this is nothing new, but The fundraising for 2017 by the Republicans, they ended the year with $39 million cash on hand, no debt, and they raised $132.5 million.

00:25:58.000 The Democratic National Committee took in $66 million, so about half of what the Republicans took in.

00:26:05.000 They have $6.5 million cash on hand, which is, what is that?

00:26:11.000 About a sixth of what the Republicans have, and they owe $6.1 million in debt.

00:26:11.000 What is that?

00:26:17.000 And so we look at all these factors, and I know many people have been saying, because last week was a rough week between Bolton and the omnibus bill and the bump stock ban.

00:26:26.000 People are saying this is a very depressing week.

00:26:28.000 We need some white pills.

00:26:29.000 We had a very white pilling episode yesterday, very encouraging episode yesterday.

00:26:33.000 And today they just keep coming, the OIG report.

00:26:36.000 And we look at how the 2018 midterms were unfolded.

00:26:39.000 And although we've seen in the past, we saw in our coverage, maybe it's us, maybe it's America First that's doing the harm here, because every time we cover an election live, it goes very poorly.

00:26:50.000 When we covered the special Senate.

00:26:53.000 Election in Alabama on December, we got slaughtered.

00:26:56.000 And many people said, you know, was that a sign of the Republicans and how they'll be able to turn out in 2018, or was that just a bad candidate, a bad election where we got this weird guy, Roy Moore, who the MAGA candidate was Mo Brooks, the establishment candidate was Luther Strange, and we got Roy Moore out of nowhere, this kind of goofy, you know, evangelical anachronism here in Alabama.

00:27:20.000 And I don't say that to disparage evangelical, but he was like a Bush era conservative.

00:27:24.000 That's what I mean by that. 0.82

00:27:26.000 Running in Alabama, and he got creamed.

00:27:28.000 We wondered, was that him or was that us?

00:27:30.000 Pennsylvania, the most recent special election in the 18th district, and we saw we got slaughtered there.

00:27:36.000 And it was a slaughter not because Rick Sacon, the Republican, got beaten by significant margins, but because it was a district that leaned 20% Republican in just about every election for 15 years.

00:27:48.000 And it went in favor by a small margin, but it did go in favor of Connor Lamb.

00:27:54.000 And we looked at some of the numbers in Illinois, we looked at the numbers in Texas and their primaries, and we got, I think, somewhat dismayed.

00:28:01.000 Because we saw sign on top of sign on top of sign.

00:28:04.000 Even though you could look at any given one of those elections or primaries, you could say, well, in Alabama, it was Roy Moore.

00:28:11.000 In Pennsylvania, Conor Lamb was just the perfect, literally the perfect candidate.

00:28:16.000 In Illinois, you had an unpopular governor who was terrible.

00:28:19.000 In Texas, you might have had double the Democratic turnout, but Republicans still turned out at record numbers anyway.

00:28:26.000 I think we saw so many of those episodes in a row that maybe it beat us back because I certainly, for the past couple of weeks, have been.

00:28:33.000 A little bit discouraged about 2018 and our chances in the midterms.

00:28:37.000 Because you see episode after episode from Alabama to Pennsylvania to Illinois to Texas, where it looks like the MAGA agenda is getting beaten down.

00:28:46.000 But when you peel back the layers and you step aside, or rather, you step away from all these bad examples, these particular examples, and you look at just the general numbers here where the polling has never been better.

00:28:59.000 If CNN is saying that Trump has a 42% approval rating, you know it's much, much higher.

00:29:04.000 And by the way, if you even break down how the data.

00:29:08.000 If you break down the data, you find that whites support Trump by a margin of, I think, 48%.

00:29:14.000 Men support President Trump by a margin of 55%.

00:29:17.000 Republicans support President Trump by a margin of 80%.

00:29:20.000 Conservatives, it's higher than 80%.

00:29:23.000 If you break down all the key demographics, even the elderly, even older people, he has great support.

00:29:29.000 Christians, he has great support.

00:29:30.000 If you break down the data and you look at the numbers that Donald Trump needs to turn out in the midterms, or even for that matter, You break down which voters turn out in midterm elections anyway.

00:29:42.000 We know that Democrats don't turn out in the midterms.

00:29:45.000 We know that young people don't turn out in the midterms.

00:29:47.000 We know that Hispanics don't turn out very much for regular elections in a presidential election year. 0.66

00:29:53.000 He's hitting all the marks, at least in the polling, that he would need for a sizable comeback, and not even a comeback, but to keep the MAGA revolution going in 2018 and 2020. 0.66

00:30:04.000 He's hitting those marks in the polling.

00:30:06.000 The fundraising could not be better.

00:30:08.000 Republicans are raising double the money as the Democrats, and that tells us something.

00:30:13.000 Not just in terms of, you know, well, they have more money than us.

00:30:16.000 And people might say, well, does the money tell us so much?

00:30:19.000 Maybe not in and of itself, because of course, Hillary Clinton spent more money than Donald Trump.

00:30:23.000 And look at the result there Barack Obama spent, you know, an ungodly sum of money.

00:30:29.000 And he lost support from 2008 to 2012, right?

00:30:34.000 I mean, he didn't lose the election, but he lost support from 2008 to 2012 despite spending a lot more money.

00:30:40.000 And so maybe the money in and of itself doesn't tell you anything, but it tells you something that, There's donations pouring into the Republican Party.

00:30:48.000 If Donald Trump were doing a bad job, if Republicans were dismayed, if they weren't going to show up in 2018, they wouldn't be able to fundraise like they're able to fundraise.

00:30:56.000 Not only does it tell us that people are donating, that the donors are charged up, that they want 2018 to be successful, but additionally, it tells us that the infrastructure is there.

00:31:05.000 Not only do you have money pouring in, but you have the infrastructure.

00:31:08.000 You have donors coming in.

00:31:10.000 You're having good fundraising.

00:31:11.000 You're having a good infrastructure to be able to bring the vote out.

00:31:15.000 And remember, when that money is spent, a lot of that money, what Republicans do really well, And speaking as somebody who campaigned for Republican candidates throughout the 2016 election year, Republicans do a very good job with how they spend their money.

00:31:27.000 They use it to buy data, they use it to develop apps to campaign more effectively.

00:31:32.000 And this is something different than the Democrats.

00:31:34.000 I remember campaigning for Donald Trump in New Hampshire, and we saw many Clinton campaigners on our way there.

00:31:40.000 And the difference between our campaign and their campaign was that the Republicans were using an electronic system where you could go on the app, you downloaded like the Victory 2016 app, and it would tell you which houses to target, which houses to go to.

00:31:53.000 What to say.

00:31:54.000 You were taking down information and all kinds of things.

00:31:57.000 And the Democrats were using paper.

00:31:59.000 They were using paper that they got from the headquarters.

00:32:01.000 And so they spend the money very wisely.

00:32:03.000 So you got the polling, the fundraising is very good.

00:32:06.000 And then on top of it, the Democrats still don't have a message.

00:32:11.000 They still don't have a message.

00:32:13.000 In each of these cases, you know, whether it was Alabama, Alabama was a referendum on Trump, but for the media and for the Democrats, and Roy Moore forced Republican turnout back, right?

00:32:24.000 I mean, the reason you had.

00:32:26.000 Crazy turnout for the Democrats in that election was because Roy Moore was a bad guy and he's just like Donald Trump and it's all this bad stuff.

00:32:34.000 And it was enough that Republicans stayed home because Roy Moore was this kind of an oddball character and didn't have a lot of money and didn't campaign.

00:32:42.000 And Luther Strange, or rather not Luther Strange, Doug Jones had the support of the media and he rode in on this anti Trump stuff.

00:32:49.000 In Pennsylvania, you had a candidate who was pitching the MAGA agenda.

00:32:53.000 You had Conor Lamb who didn't go out there and campaign on. 1.00

00:32:56.000 Drumpf is an idiot. 1.00

00:32:57.000 Drumpf is fad. 1.00

00:32:58.000 Drumpf is sleeping with porn stars and all the rest. 0.98

00:33:01.000 He went out there and campaigned on the opioid epidemic. 0.57

00:33:04.000 He went out and campaigned on healthcare infrastructure.

00:33:07.000 And you look at where the Democrats are in terms of their messaging.

00:33:11.000 And despite the fact that they can win a special election here or there where there's crazy circumstances, despite the fact that they're turning out good numbers in the primaries, they will not be able to turn out numbers in 2018 because they do not have a message.

00:33:25.000 In states like Missouri, In states like Montana, in the swing states where there's Democratic incumbents defending Senate seats, in states where Donald Trump won, they're not going to be able to pull it off.

00:33:35.000 And so, of course, the Democrats lose the Senate.

00:33:38.000 I don't know if they even win the House.

00:33:40.000 I don't know if they come close in the House.

00:33:42.000 Because although the media is trying so hard to spin it that there's this enthusiasm gap, that Donald Trump's having a real problem, that all of this bad stuff is happening, by just about every metric that we can look at objectively, that we can look at numbers and not look at kind of this pie in the sky stuff and individual candidates where there's They're outliers.

00:34:02.000 We look at all numbers that are looking very favorably for Republicans.

00:34:06.000 So I would say to anybody who is thinking it's over, Trump's getting impeached, we're dead in the water, don't bother campaigning, don't bother voting, that's exactly what the media wants you to think.

00:34:17.000 They did this in 2016, they're already doing it in 2018.

00:34:20.000 And the goal here, when they put this kind of stuff out, it becomes a self fulfilling prophecy.

00:34:26.000 If they go out there on television every day and tell Trump voters, you're going to lose, you're going to lose.

00:34:32.000 You don't have the money.

00:34:33.000 You don't have the candidates.

00:34:34.000 Trump is unpopular.

00:34:35.000 Look at the polling's bad.

00:34:37.000 And they tell you just give up.

00:34:39.000 It's not going to happen for you in 2018.

00:34:41.000 They will dampen, they will suppress the turnout already.

00:34:45.000 They will put that in your head.

00:34:46.000 It's already self fulfilling prophecy.

00:34:48.000 And we look at some of the things Trump has been doing, and I happen to believe that if he doesn't get his act together on immigration, on the wall, on some of his more popular promises, if he doesn't deliver on some more things before the election, if we don't see a good IG report, if we don't see a good infrastructure bill, and we don't see at least a beginning of the wall by the midterms, all of this can change.

00:35:10.000 But that said, we have a remarkable opportunity still in 2018.

00:35:14.000 For people that think it's over, for people that think, You know, it's basically time to read Siege because the end of the world is coming.

00:35:22.000 I would say just look at the metrics.

00:35:24.000 The fundraising is great.

00:35:26.000 The polling is getting better.

00:35:27.000 The Democrats still do not have a message.

00:35:30.000 They'll be running Hillary Clinton's. 0.98

00:35:31.000 They'll be running these kinds of people in 2018. 1.00

00:35:34.000 They think Stormy Daniels is going to win it for them in 2018.

00:35:38.000 They have no clue.

00:35:39.000 They have no idea.

00:35:40.000 So you got to sign up.

00:35:41.000 You got to volunteer.

00:35:43.000 Get to your local GOP, get to your county GOP meetings, volunteer for a campaign.

00:35:48.000 I don't care how much you dislike this guy.

00:35:50.000 Or the guy, whoever it is, a congressional candidate, a candidate for Senate, unless it's somebody like Bruce Rauner, you got to bite the bullet and do it.

00:35:59.000 We need majorities.

00:36:00.000 We need people in office.

00:36:01.000 So that's the pitch.

00:36:03.000 But we'll be getting into this much more in detail tomorrow on the 2018 Election HQ podcast.

00:36:03.000 That's 2018.

00:36:09.000 So if you want to get in on that, on the 2018 talk, remember to sign up on Maker Support because we'll be getting into a lot of the details about the polling, about individual states.

00:36:20.000 Some more specific things.

00:36:21.000 And that was just a brief thing, but we'll be doing it tomorrow on the podcast as well.

00:36:25.000 And then the last big story we have today, where we're just jamming right through them, running right along here.

00:36:31.000 Our last big story here we have North Korea and their visit to China.

00:36:36.000 Kim Jong un made his first foreign trip this weekend to China.

00:36:41.000 First foreign trip since he took office, or rather took power, since he acceded or ascended.

00:36:48.000 It's acceded, right?

00:36:48.000 What is it?

00:36:49.000 That's a word.

00:36:50.000 He got to the throne in place of Kim Jong il in 2011, so it's his first foreign visit in seven years.

00:36:56.000 And so he was spotted.

00:36:57.000 Many people speculated that Kim Jong un was visiting China over the weekend because a very mysterious green train pulled into the station in Beijing, and there was a motorcade and lots of security.

00:37:08.000 And so people speculated that it was Kim Jong un, and it turned out it was.

00:37:13.000 They had a big photo op, they were taking pictures, they had a little bit of a conference there.

00:37:17.000 And so Kim Jong un met with Xi Jinping, the president of China.

00:37:21.000 And I think this just goes to show that we're in a very good position here with this North Korea summit.

00:37:25.000 I think this just goes to show that we are positioning ourselves very well, that this diplomacy is real.

00:37:31.000 It's not a farce, because what you're seeing is movement, not just with North Korea and China, but Japan now wants a summit with North Korea.

00:37:38.000 South Korea will have a summit with North Korea.

00:37:40.000 This is unprecedented, the extent to which we are seeing meetings and diplomacy and all these different things taking place.

00:37:47.000 And so Kim Jong un went to China, and the experts say that the reason that this visit happened, they haven't visited with each other before.

00:37:56.000 Ever.

00:37:56.000 China has been rebuffing meetings with Kim Jong un and with North Korea for six years.

00:38:02.000 They just haven't done it.

00:38:03.000 Many people believe the reason for the meeting was so that China could remind North Korea who's the boss, essentially, who has the leverage here, that North Korea is still dependent on China, and they say that China's mad that they got left out of the process, that Kim Jong un is going to meet with President Trump, and China, it seems like, was boxed out of the negotiations. 0.83

00:38:21.000 And I think that's a good sign.

00:38:23.000 If Xi Jinping is worried that something is going to happen, that a deal is going to be made, and that's why he had this.

00:38:29.000 Very urgent meeting.

00:38:30.000 Suddenly he took it and he didn't want to take it anyway.

00:38:33.000 I think that's a good sign. 0.64

00:38:34.000 You see the South Korean meeting with North Korea, which is being planned.

00:38:38.000 I think that a meeting in Scandinavia that's one of the locations they're talking about doing, and in other places.

00:38:44.000 Japan now wants a meeting.

00:38:46.000 I think it just goes to show that the diplomacy is real and it's going to happen.

00:38:50.000 And if it does, if all of this is legitimate, you understand that this is world changing.

00:38:56.000 That Donald Trump, if he achieves what he has sought out to achieve here since his inauguration, this strategy with North Korea, this changes world history.

00:39:04.000 This changes American history.

00:39:06.000 That means we've turned the page on 30, 40, 50 years of globalist doctrine, really, realistically, like 30 years since George H.W. Bush, on all of that neocon.

00:39:19.000 War mongering, nation building doctrine, and now we are firmly in the Trump era.

00:39:24.000 And so, if he pulls this off, you understand that that's probably the biggest inflection point in the history of our country, one of the biggest inflection points in the history of our country and how we deal with foreign nations.

00:39:35.000 This would set a precedent for Iran, this would set a precedent for Syria, for our policy in the Middle East, even for Russia, even for China, possibly. 0.78

00:39:43.000 This is a real game changer.

00:39:45.000 And I'm rooting for him.

00:39:46.000 I think if you look at all the different signs that are associated with this meeting, I know a lot of people are pessimistic for different reasons.

00:39:52.000 A lot of people think Kim Jong un is just wasting our time.

00:39:56.000 He's stalling.

00:39:57.000 He's going to get his nuclear program in the end and all the rest.

00:40:00.000 I think if you look at what's going on, the underlying signs here that President Trump is keeping the pressure up with the sanctions, with the military exercises, I think we are poised for a very, very big foreign policy win in April or in May, whenever the summit happens, and depending on what the results are.

00:40:18.000 Because we know that Donald Trump, he's a great negotiator.

00:40:21.000 When it gets down to it, and even with foreign nations, I think he does it very well.

00:40:25.000 And if he's able to pull this off, that's not just good for the country, not just good for our sons and daughters who don't have to go fight and die in a foreign land so they could build a Rothschild's bank, but it'd also be good, as always, for the midterms.

00:40:38.000 I always got to draw it back to the midterms because that'll be a big win.

00:40:41.000 You know, foreign policy victories tend to go over very well.

00:40:44.000 So we're keeping an eye on that as well.

00:40:47.000 Many developments to come on the North Korea situation.

00:40:50.000 I'm excited to see where it's going to be held, I'm excited to see the details.

00:40:54.000 Right?

00:40:54.000 I mean, we got the announcement, and then we didn't really hear so much about it after that.

00:40:59.000 You know, President Trump peeked his head out infamously when they were announcing.

00:41:03.000 The South Koreans announced that this was all coming together, but we haven't seen a whole lot of movement on that.

00:41:08.000 I hope that's still on.

00:41:09.000 I hope there's still some potential there.

00:41:11.000 I have a strong feeling that it is, and we'll see what happens.

00:41:14.000 But that's all of our news for the day from the midterms to the FISA to North Korea, Roseanne, all the rest.

00:41:22.000 And now we'll take your super chats and your Streamlabs and all of the other good stuff.

00:41:27.000 Remember to check out.

00:41:29.000 Our Streamlabs link.

00:41:30.000 We're trying to get the credit card on there. 0.97

00:41:33.000 I know for the Super Chats, you can do the credit card.

00:41:35.000 And for, yeah, Super Chats, you can do the credit card.

00:41:39.000 For Streamlabs, they only do PayPal.

00:41:41.000 You have to get verified on Streamlabs to get the credit card in there.

00:41:45.000 And I emailed them, I'm like, you know, how do I get the credit card on there?

00:41:49.000 Because it says you have to be verified.

00:41:51.000 And when you go on the QA for Streamlabs, it's like, how do you get verified?

00:41:54.000 And people are like, well, typically verified accounts do this, that, and the other.

00:41:57.000 And it's like, well, that doesn't really answer the question.

00:41:59.000 That tells me, Like, which accounts get verified?

00:42:02.000 It doesn't tell me how.

00:42:03.000 So I email, I'm like, okay, I'm, hello, I'm Nick Fuentes.

00:42:07.000 How can I get verified?

00:42:07.000 I do my show.

00:42:09.000 And they go, well, verified accounts typically look like this, like Buster.

00:42:12.000 I need to know how.

00:42:14.000 I guess they just choose.

00:42:15.000 But so check out the Streamlabs.

00:42:15.000 I guess they just pick you.

00:42:17.000 Remember, we're not sending the 30% to Google, it all goes to the show.

00:42:21.000 So be sure to check that out.

00:42:23.000 We will look into our Super Chats right now.

00:42:25.000 We'll see what the masses are saying.

00:42:27.000 What are the masses saying today? 1.00

00:42:29.000 Radnock Uphbert says, Kick V, his gypsy magic must be stopped. 1.00

00:42:35.000 Who's V? 1.00

00:42:37.000 Is he in the live chat?

00:42:39.000 Is V that, he's that Romanian fellow, right?

00:42:43.000 Butt Mountain says, New listener going through old shows, missing context, but you had said democracy slash liberalism had failed and insinuated that fascism is preferable.

00:42:53.000 Could you expand on that?

00:42:55.000 Is a fascist republic possible?

00:42:58.000 I don't know if I said that fascism is preferable, but I certainly believe that democracy and liberalism are failure.

00:43:03.000 I think these ideologies have not stood the test of time.

00:43:07.000 It's only been about 150 years of liberalism, of widespread liberal democracy and thorough liberal democracy.

00:43:15.000 You know, Britain really didn't embrace parliamentary sovereignty until the 19th century.

00:43:21.000 Europe, really, the whole of Europe has not embraced democracy until or since very recently, the 20th century, really.

00:43:30.000 And I think it simply hasn't stood the test of time.

00:43:32.000 It's been, what, about 70 years of democracy in Germany?

00:43:36.000 And they're literally committing suicide as a country. 0.99

00:43:39.000 They're literally, you know, figuratively, I guess, actually figuratively, just taking a big gun, a big shotgun to their head and blowing their brains out. 0.99

00:43:48.000 And that gun. 0.96

00:43:49.000 Is called immigration, and the person holding the gun is called the globalist, or they go by other names.

00:43:55.000 But essentially, what you've seen in the West, whether it's Germany or Britain or Spain or France, is that liberalism and democracy has driven them, these progressive and disruptive ideologies, to discard their traditions, discard convention, discard the continuity of their countries, scorn their ancestors, forsake their children, and has plunged them into debt and economic ruin.

00:44:23.000 Postmodern hell.

00:44:24.000 I mean, I think that there's simply no disputing the fact that democracy and liberalism has failed, that it's just a theology, really, if you can call it an ideology, even.

00:44:34.000 I think it's greater than that.

00:44:36.000 It's something that hasn't stood the test of time.

00:44:38.000 It's built on top of nothing, and the metaphysics are fundamentally corrupt.

00:44:42.000 Now, I don't know if the solution is fascism per se, but I think that we need some kind of a natural aristocracy.

00:44:49.000 I think we need some kind of a Caesar in the country, at least in the interim, to vanguard.

00:44:54.000 Our country from democracy back into what the country was originally intended to be, which was a constitutional republic that had a natural aristocracy, that had a natural hierarchy.

00:45:06.000 So I don't know if, you know, fascism is a very loaded term.

00:45:08.000 You get called a lot of things if you say suddenly you're for fascism, but certainly I would not rule it out that we should have a form of a natural aristocracy.

00:45:17.000 We should have a stronger patriotic leader in the country.

00:45:22.000 I don't know if that's a fascist dictator, but it's certainly got to be an executive who wields his authority properly.

00:45:28.000 Breaks the back of the judiciary and of the legislature sufficiently so that we could get the financial interest out and develop some degree of patriotic corporatism that the kinds of companies which have gotten so much power and grown to such prominence in the country are brought to heel and serve the national interest.

00:45:46.000 So I wouldn't say maybe that's fascism.

00:45:48.000 If that's fascism, I guess, you know, maybe it is.

00:45:50.000 But I'm just for what was sensible before the French Revolution, as Evola said. 0.69

00:45:56.000 To paraphrase Evola, Frederick White. 0.83

00:45:59.000 No love for one another.

00:46:00.000 We have already lost.

00:46:02.000 I don't know what you're talking about.

00:46:03.000 We love everybody on the show. 1.00

00:46:05.000 Spoiler alert says OIG more like OMG. 1.00

00:46:09.000 Am I right, folks? 1.00

00:46:10.000 That's a good joke.

00:46:11.000 I like that.

00:46:12.000 I'm going to use that on the show.

00:46:14.000 The Daily Oven says Sticks is a knicker.

00:46:16.000 Confirmed.

00:46:16.000 Is he?

00:46:17.000 I see him in the live chat every now and again.

00:46:19.000 I got to say, I like his content as much as I'd like to not like his content because, you know, he does the.

00:46:25.000 I don't want to say the wrong thing because he always, you know, you say I'm a Satanist, but I'm actually this, or you say I'm a pagan, but I'm actually this.

00:46:32.000 But you know what I mean.

00:46:33.000 I mean, as much as I'd like to not like him because he's kind of this hippy dippy character, he makes great content.

00:46:39.000 I look at his tweets and I say, yeah, like that's correct, right on.

00:46:43.000 And it's so surprising to me because, you know, I'm a traditionalist, I'm Christian, and all the rest.

00:46:48.000 And it's just funny how we find such strange bedfellows in this fight against globalism, in this fight against the system, the establishment, right?

00:46:57.000 And I think this is something even Spencer talks about.

00:47:00.000 I don't agree with Spencer on everything, but he said that, you know, Bernie bros are the next ones to come over.

00:47:04.000 Not that, like, Styx is a Bernie bros, but certainly he's somebody who is not a traditionalist, who is not what you would think of.

00:47:10.000 When you think, you know, reactionary or ultra conservative, as I would describe myself.

00:47:15.000 But we find ourselves on the same team because, in many ways, we're fighting for similar things, at least in the short term, the medium to short term.

00:47:22.000 So I'm a fan of his as well.

00:47:24.000 I've watched some of his videos.

00:47:25.000 He's an intelligent guy.

00:47:27.000 You can't take that away from him.

00:47:29.000 Intelligent and articulate.

00:47:30.000 The Daily Oven.

00:47:31.000 And see, I'm such a nice guy.

00:47:33.000 I'm such a nice guy.

00:47:34.000 People all the time say, Nick, you burn bridges.

00:47:36.000 You can't agree with people.

00:47:37.000 Look, if people are respectful to me, if people are nice to me, I have nothing but nice things to say about that person.

00:47:44.000 Problem is, when you start, you know, doing ultimatums and you start disinviting me from things, then you feel the pain.

00:47:51.000 Then you get the Nick heat.

00:47:53.000 So, even Paul Nealon, you know, people are like, Nick, why'd you have to go and say things about Paul Nealon?

00:47:58.000 Like, I didn't start out saying anything nasty at all.

00:48:01.000 I started out saying, you know, he's a good man, he's courageous, I support his right to speak, but I think he's not campaigning as effectively as he could be.

00:48:11.000 People are like, what? 0.99

00:48:12.000 What, you bridge burner, you traitor, you Zionist? 0.99

00:48:16.000 Like, what? 1.00

00:48:17.000 I just, I think that's an accurate and a mild criticism, right?

00:48:20.000 If we can't take that, I think we're in trouble.

00:48:23.000 The Daily Evans says AF World Peace slash World Report is the best content.

00:48:29.000 Well, thank you.

00:48:29.000 I'm glad you liked it.

00:48:31.000 Unfortunately, there's no comment section on SoundCloud, so I can't see directly the feedback, but I hope everybody enjoyed it.

00:48:37.000 We tried, it was a pretty good episode, I thought, on Tuesday because we laid out the basic premise.

00:48:42.000 If people are thinking, oh, that was some pretty, that wasn't in depth enough.

00:48:46.000 It was the first episode.

00:48:47.000 The first episode, we're going to lay out how we're going to look at things, how things are going to operate.

00:48:47.000 All right.

00:48:53.000 And next week, we'll be looking at it again.

00:48:56.000 But I appreciate the feedback.

00:48:58.000 John Shepard Smith.

00:49:00.000 So, what was the Don Quixote tweet about?

00:49:02.000 A longing for a time that no longer is?

00:49:04.000 No, I tweeted out that famous drawing of Don Quixote de la Mancha because I do have Spanish blood, I still have that conquistador.

00:49:16.000 DNA in me, that Spanish DNA.

00:49:20.000 And I was thinking on it.

00:49:21.000 I was thinking about Don Quixote.

00:49:23.000 Something reminded me of it.

00:49:24.000 We studied this in Spanish class in high school.

00:49:26.000 And for people that don't know, Don Quixote, written by Miguel Cervantes, was this great epic.

00:49:33.000 I don't think it's a poem.

00:49:34.000 I think it's just an epic that was written in the 17th century.

00:49:37.000 Really one of the first of its kind.

00:49:39.000 The founders read it.

00:49:41.000 A fantastic book.

00:49:42.000 And the premise of it is about this very silly guy named Don Quixote who goes out and he pretends to be a medieval knight.

00:49:50.000 And he wants to basically, it's ironic because he wants to LARP as a knight.

00:49:54.000 He wants to LARP as a knight in shining armor for his Dulcinea, for his princess. 0.60

00:50:00.000 And it's about his tribulations, his trials and tribulations, where he's this goofy guy.

00:50:05.000 You know, he's LARPing as a knight. 1.00

00:50:06.000 It's very silly, he's very incompetent. 0.99

00:50:08.000 People make fun of him. 0.98

00:50:10.000 And he's not really ever able to achieve what he wants to achieve.

00:50:14.000 But what's inspiring about the story, what's notable, and where the adjective quixotic comes from, describing Quixote, Was that there is something almost Faustian about it?

00:50:24.000 To invoke another literary illusion, a German one, there's something Faustian in the quixotic story, which is that there's this longing for a dream that it's impossible, it's difficult, maybe it is impossible, who knows?

00:50:39.000 But there's something to be said, there's something to be valued and admired in that you're just gonna go for it anyway because you're a dreamer.

00:50:46.000 And this is maybe a Mediterranean mindset, maybe a Spanish mindset, but I think that captures the nature of our movement. 0.84

00:50:54.000 And it's quixotic.

00:50:55.000 In the sense that we're up against forces that are so enormous and so powerful.

00:51:00.000 And I got blackpilled.

00:51:01.000 I got to tell you, I was very blackpilled today.

00:51:04.000 You know, I mean, looking at what we're up against, just in terms of how they're crushing us with censorship, they're crushing us politically with television.

00:51:11.000 I mean, just everywhere you look, the empire is striking back, so to speak.

00:51:16.000 But there is something quixotic about the movement that it's worth doing because it's hard.

00:51:21.000 It wouldn't be worth doing if it wasn't.

00:51:22.000 And it's worth doing because we care so deeply about it.

00:51:26.000 I was tweeting that out for all my literature fans, for all my Castizo futurists out there.

00:51:32.000 I'm with you. 1.00

00:51:33.000 But yeah, so that's what that was all about the old quixotic mindset. 1.00

00:51:38.000 And only a Spaniard could do it. 0.96

00:51:40.000 Maybe that's why the eternal Anglos and the Nordcucks don't understand it because they don't have that powerful conquistador DNA. 0.95

00:51:49.000 They don't have that powerful Spanish imperial DNA that is quixotic. 0.95

00:51:55.000 And I also have the tribal DNA, so I'm savage enough to pull it off. 0.77

00:51:59.000 So, I have the quixotic and the Spanish, but I also have that little bit of native, which is like, I'll also cut you for it. 1.00

00:52:05.000 I'll also cut your heart out and raise it up to the sun god. 0.99

00:52:10.000 So, there's a little bit of both.

00:52:12.000 What else?

00:52:15.000 Frederick White, African Americans are angry in Sacramento. 0.55

00:52:18.000 What are they angry about?

00:52:19.000 I don't know.

00:52:21.000 The Daily Oven, you have to have sticks as your first guest on America First Midterm Podcast.

00:52:27.000 For midterms?

00:52:28.000 I don't know.

00:52:28.000 For midterms, I was thinking more like Ricky Vaughn, but I think I would consider having him on as a guest.

00:52:35.000 The only thing is the recording.

00:52:35.000 I'll have to.

00:52:37.000 I just figured out how to get guests on for the show.

00:52:40.000 I'll have them on America First sometime.

00:52:42.000 But the problem is, recording the podcast, it's like you do it on Audacity.

00:52:45.000 And me and James couldn't even figure it out.

00:52:48.000 We were doing Nationalist Review.

00:52:50.000 And he was so rude to me always with the Nationalist Review podcast because I would record it and I got a pop shield.

00:52:57.000 I did everything I was supposed to.

00:52:58.000 And it would end up that the leveling was all off.

00:53:00.000 And he would just get so bitchy about it.

00:53:02.000 He would get so passive aggressive about it.

00:53:05.000 And I called him on the carpet for it a few times. 1.00

00:53:07.000 And maybe that's why Nick is a jerk to work with. 1.00

00:53:10.000 Nick called me a fag. 1.00

00:53:12.000 Nick called me gay. 1.00

00:53:14.000 Yeah, well, you were acting gay. 0.97

00:53:16.000 So that's what you get called. 0.85

00:53:18.000 What else?

00:53:19.000 And then I'm going to have that obese fat moderator from his Discord saying, Nick is still talking about James on his show. 0.99

00:53:27.000 Fat dummy. 0.90

00:53:30.000 He should take his own advice in the Discord, the Stop Being Fat channel. 1.00

00:53:34.000 Anyhow.

00:53:34.000 Anyway, but we got it.

00:53:35.000 It's negative.

00:53:36.000 We want to get off the negative stuff.

00:53:37.000 It's a positive, only good vibes on the show.

00:53:39.000 Only good vibes.

00:53:41.000 Good times long gone says, To determine that one is an aristocrat, we need only to be assured he is a man of merit.

00:53:49.000 But I hope we have many such.

00:53:50.000 I hope, sir, we are all aristocrats.

00:53:52.000 Offices, emoluments, honors are open to all.

00:53:54.000 There you go.

00:53:55.000 There you go.

00:53:56.000 And I think that was the spirit of the founding.

00:53:57.000 I think the founding fathers understood that aristocracy, you could have an aristocracy that is really a meritocracy.

00:54:05.000 That maybe an aristocracy would function better if it wasn't by bloodline, where you could get incompetent people, where eventually it could become corrupted and dysgenic.

00:54:14.000 Where, if you have a meritocracy, and we had an aristocracy in this country for a hundred years, we had an Anglo Saxon aristocracy for a long time before it gradually was subverted by another aristocracy, another ethno nationalist, you know, ethno religious aristocracy.

00:54:32.000 We had one, and it was based on merit, and it was very good, and it worked.

00:54:36.000 But now we have an aristocracy which doesn't work because it's people that don't love our country.

00:54:41.000 The problem becomes when we have a whole estate in the country which hates the country and hates the.

00:54:46.000 Hates the God and all that stuff.

00:54:49.000 So, we got to get back to a natural aristocracy.

00:54:52.000 Trigger Bait says, please remember that when you feel scared or frightened, never forget times when you felt happy.

00:54:59.000 When day is dark, always remember the happy day.

00:55:02.000 That's true.

00:55:03.000 It's true.

00:55:04.000 You have to.

00:55:04.000 True.

00:55:06.000 Life is good and the bad.

00:55:07.000 You have to take the bad.

00:55:08.000 You have to take the good.

00:55:09.000 People don't understand this so much.

00:55:11.000 Nowadays, we're in this weird place where people get a little bit sad.

00:55:15.000 Pop a pill.

00:55:16.000 People get a little bit sad.

00:55:18.000 I'm sad.

00:55:19.000 Can you come make me feel better?

00:55:21.000 Sometimes you just have to feel bad.

00:55:23.000 Sometimes you just have to feel mad.

00:55:25.000 Sometimes you have to punch the wall repeatedly and stomp the ground until everything hurts.

00:55:30.000 I mean, we have to endure bad emotions.

00:55:33.000 That's the only way that we can become functional or great, right?

00:55:38.000 So I agree.

00:55:39.000 It's all, you got to remember the positive.

00:55:41.000 You also have to humble with the negative, but it's all a part of life.

00:55:44.000 It's one of the things I resent the most about the country today.

00:55:48.000 One of the things I resent the most about people in general.

00:55:51.000 You know, people ask me all the time, Nick, why don't you smoke?

00:55:53.000 Nick, why don't you drink?

00:55:54.000 Why don't you.

00:55:55.000 Smoke cigarettes, do cocaine, all this other stuff.

00:55:57.000 It's because I don't believe in self medication.

00:56:01.000 I think to really understand life, you have to experience it, you have to live it.

00:56:06.000 And people say, oh, well, you're not experiencing life if you're not drinking and doing all this stuff.

00:56:10.000 But I mean, you have to endure it.

00:56:12.000 You have to just white knuckle it and just take it.

00:56:15.000 And that's the only way you can master it.

00:56:18.000 So that's how I feel.

00:56:20.000 Cock Launch says Don Quixote is ace.

00:56:23.000 Good read. 1.00

00:56:24.000 Damn, dude. 1.00

00:56:25.000 That's ace. 0.99

00:56:26.000 We got to bring back those 1980s.

00:56:29.000 Era, you know, lingo.

00:56:32.000 The, what do they call that?

00:56:34.000 The, what's the word? 0.98

00:56:36.000 Damn, my high school English teacher is going to be very upset with me. 0.98

00:56:38.000 The vernacular. 0.99

00:56:40.000 We got to bring back the 80s era vernacular.

00:56:42.000 It's very implicit.

00:56:44.000 That's ace, bro. 0.84

00:56:46.000 That's bitching, dude. 0.99

00:56:47.000 We got to bring it back.

00:56:49.000 But it is a good read.

00:56:50.000 I haven't, we only read like the abridged version and we read it in Spanish, in Spanish class.

00:56:54.000 And we learned all about, you know, they don't teach us about the conjugation for Spain.

00:57:00.000 You know, they teach us the Mexican Spanish instead of the Spanish Spanish.

00:57:04.000 And it's very unfortunate because it's like, I want to go to the real place, not like the lesser place.

00:57:09.000 I want to go to Spain.

00:57:10.000 And they don't teach you about vosotros.

00:57:12.000 They don't teach you about, you know, what is it, the Cofdiano accent where they do like the lispy thing. 0.55

00:57:18.000 Unfortunate. 0.99

00:57:19.000 The Daily Oven, Chicago meetup when?

00:57:22.000 We'll have to have it.

00:57:22.000 As soon as I get my armed security detail, we'll make it happen.

00:57:26.000 But I'm just concerned somebody's going to come and murder me.

00:57:29.000 Someone's going to come and kill me because it can happen.

00:57:33.000 And Alvaro Pavon Quintana sends a euro.

00:57:36.000 Gracias for the euro.

00:57:38.000 Sounds like a Spanish name or Portuguese.

00:57:41.000 Maybe he's a fan of Don Quixote.

00:57:43.000 And we'll check our Streamlabs and we'll see what the people are saying today in the Streamlabs.

00:57:50.000 Begbie says Any thought of adding a quote, recommended reading tab to your website?

00:57:55.000 You get asked a lot.

00:57:56.000 Thanks as always.

00:57:57.000 Yeah, I think I will do that actually.

00:57:58.000 That's a good point.

00:57:59.000 There's an article up there for my top 10 books, but it's buried towards the bottom.

00:58:04.000 I may update that and put in a recommended reading.

00:58:06.000 My reading list is 15 pages long.

00:58:09.000 I'll have to probably consolidate that and post it up.

00:58:12.000 But I posted the Russell Kirk reading list recently.

00:58:14.000 I have my book list up there.

00:58:16.000 I don't want to put up too many books that I haven't read because then people will be like, oh, Nick, what do you think about this?

00:58:21.000 And it's like, I'll have to admit that I haven't read it.

00:58:25.000 But I will do that.

00:58:25.000 National Remnant says, was the end of monarchies a Talmudic trick?

00:58:30.000 And what are your thoughts on monarchism?

00:58:31.000 Big fan of the show.

00:58:32.000 Well, thank you.

00:58:35.000 Monarchism is good.

00:58:36.000 Monarchism gets a bad rap in the country.

00:58:38.000 Part of our national mythology was rejecting monarchism and saying it was bad, it was tyrannical.

00:58:43.000 It's actually very good.

00:58:44.000 It's actually a very good thing as long as it's organic, as long as it's natural.

00:58:48.000 The reason we like monarchism is because monarchism is what you call a repository institution.

00:58:55.000 The monarchy acts as a stabilizer to prevent against passions from going too far in one or the other direction.

00:59:02.000 So, in Britain, for example, if the monarchy were still powerful, maybe when the parliament said, hey, let's demographically remake our country, the king, the monarch could have said, actually, we're not going to do that.

00:59:15.000 Even though they got democratically elected, even though there's popular support for it, maybe, even though there's financial interest in favor of it, yeah, we're going to not do that because I'm the king and I have to protect my culture, my heritage, my ancestors, and my realm.

00:59:30.000 And that's why you have a king.

00:59:31.000 That's why a king is a good thing sometimes.

00:59:34.000 Now, in our country, we have checks and balances, we have separation of government, we have federalism, all things the founders put in place to do that, I guess, systematically, as opposed to having a personality, a monarch doing that.

00:59:47.000 It was supposed to be a system.

00:59:49.000 System checks to prevent against one side going too far or the other side going too far.

00:59:54.000 But that's why a monarchy is a good thing because it keeps the ancestors of the country just as much as a part of the country as the present and keeps the posterity just as mind in the country as the present.

01:00:07.000 I mean, that's really what we have a tyranny.

01:00:09.000 What hyper capitalism does is it creates a tyranny of the present where it's all about us and us now and our consumption needs now.

01:00:20.000 Never mind we're selling our country, never mind.

01:00:23.000 All the things we're doing are damaging to the legacy of our ancestors and will be damaging to what we give to our children.

01:00:30.000 We want it now.

01:00:32.000 We want to eat now.

01:00:33.000 We want to have everything we want right now.

01:00:36.000 And that is what is allowed by liberalism.

01:00:37.000 That's what's encouraged by liberalism and capitalism, these pernicious influences.

01:00:42.000 I can't wait.

01:00:44.000 I can't wait if I ever get into the conservative ink crowd.

01:00:46.000 They'll be like, Nick called capitalism a bad thing.

01:00:49.000 He's a Democrat.

01:00:51.000 Nick called capitalism bad.

01:00:52.000 He's not really a conservative.

01:00:55.000 Nick doesn't support the most disruptive and progressive force in human history.

01:00:59.000 He is not a conservative.

01:01:02.000 The thing that destroyed the family and the institutions and the heritage, that makes him, he doesn't sufficiently support gay marriage and abortion and demographic change. 0.60

01:01:12.000 That means he is actually the liberal. 0.69

01:01:14.000 You know, I can't wait for that.

01:01:15.000 So, monarchy's good.

01:01:16.000 I don't know if the end of monarchies was Talmudic.

01:01:19.000 I mean, it could have been, I guess, if you look at the French Revolution and some of the actors there or the Bolsheviks and what happened there where they went in and, you know, they didn't just revolt.

01:01:29.000 They executed the royal family.

01:01:30.000 They executed the Romanovs in brutal fashion. 0.91

01:01:34.000 Children they killed. 0.98

01:01:35.000 These were not people that loved Russia.

01:01:38.000 These were not people that loved Russians.

01:01:40.000 These were not Russians. 0.99

01:01:42.000 Never forget that. 0.86

01:01:43.000 Solzhenitsyn wrote that, and he's a smart guy, and he knew it. 0.96

01:01:47.000 The Russian Revolution, there was nothing Russian about it because Russians, you know, they might not have liked a, what would you call that? 0.96

01:01:55.000 What's the word I'm thinking of? 0.99

01:01:56.000 An anemic autocracy.

01:01:59.000 Maybe that's the bad word. 0.78

01:02:00.000 I'm thinking of the word autocracy.

01:02:02.000 But I can't think of it.

01:02:03.000 But a broken, failing autocracy, but they loved the royal family.

01:02:07.000 They loved the czar.

01:02:09.000 They've always had a czar in some form.

01:02:11.000 And they were executed.

01:02:13.000 Young Boy says, Hi, Nick.

01:02:15.000 Hey, I love you.

01:02:15.000 Love the show.

01:02:17.000 I was wondering how, as a Catholic, you reconcile the universality of Christianity with factors like race, culture, and IQ.

01:02:25.000 For instance, do Papua New Guinea tribesmen have the same capacity to understand and connect to God?

01:02:32.000 I don't think there is a contradiction between the universality of Christianity and any of those things.

01:02:37.000 I don't think at any point in the Christian theology, Does it say that every single person is created in the same way?

01:02:46.000 I actually believe in the gospel it says you're supposed to do what you can with what you have.

01:02:51.000 And even its official Catholic canon, if I'm not mistaken, what Catholic apologists say on the matter of, you know, for example, the question of Native Americans who, through no fault of their own, could have never met God before they were connected with the old world.

01:03:05.000 God can save people through grace if they've lived a good life.

01:03:08.000 And so I think that's similar to people who might not be able to access God through reason and understanding.

01:03:14.000 But I don't think there's anything that contradicts.

01:03:17.000 That contradicts what we find empirically about race and IQ in the Christian doctrine.

01:03:22.000 I mean, this has been, do you think that the predominant idea about race for 2,000 years when Christianity reigned was egalitarianism, right?

01:03:31.000 I mean, do you think that when the Spanish conquistadors were in South America, do you think when there was slavery prominent in Europe and this was when we were as Christian as we ever were, do you think there's any question about a contradiction between how we treated people, or rather, how people were?

01:03:48.000 I don't think so.

01:03:48.000 And doctrine?

01:03:49.000 So I think it's just a false contradiction.

01:03:53.000 Literally shaking says, though clever and constant application of propaganda, or through clever and constant application of propaganda, people can be made to see Trump as not normal and to consider the most wretched Democrat as par adis. 0.80

01:04:07.000 Let's get a trans disabled person of color to go against Trump because he's the not normal one. 0.93

01:04:13.000 Yeah, yeah, that's a good point. 1.00

01:04:14.000 But it's true.

01:04:15.000 I mean, that's essentially what they're doing.

01:04:16.000 They've made it out that Hillary Clinton is normal, right? 0.94

01:04:18.000 You know, this criminal. 0.99

01:04:20.000 This, like, dying criminal is supposed to be a normal person, or they're going to put up Elizabeth Warren or all these nutjobs. 0.97

01:04:28.000 And you could say the same, I guess, about Donald Trump, because, you know, at least from a Democratic perspective, you could say, well, he says some outrageous things, but I just think there's no parity between the Democrats and how nuts they are and Republicans, right? 0.87

01:04:42.000 Famous Shoes says, Hey, Nick.

01:04:44.000 Hey, my son's school, fifth grade, showed the movie Wonder.

01:04:48.000 And of course, they had to interject the old interracial thing. 0.72

01:04:51.000 How do I counter this?

01:04:52.000 Without being called the R word, you're going to be called the R word no matter what.

01:04:56.000 You've got to become comfortable being called the R word, being called a racist, right?

01:05:01.000 I mean, you have to take it.

01:05:02.000 We're going to be called racist.

01:05:03.000 And fundamentally, that's because we believe that race is real.

01:05:05.000 That's what a racist is, right?

01:05:07.000 You're not a white supremacist.

01:05:09.000 You're not a prejudiced person.

01:05:10.000 You're not discriminating against anybody. 0.96

01:05:12.000 You're a racist, I guess.

01:05:15.000 I mean, you believe in race. 0.99

01:05:16.000 Does that make you a racist?

01:05:17.000 If so, I guess I'm a racist, right? 0.85

01:05:19.000 I guess Black Lives Matter is racist, right? 1.00

01:05:21.000 I guess Barack Obama is a racist. 0.99

01:05:23.000 They believe in race. 0.94

01:05:24.000 So, I think that's not, I don't, at least from my perspective, I don't think that should be much of a concern.

01:05:29.000 That said, the way that you bring it up to your kids and even my father, as much as my father is a boomer, as much as my dad grew up in the 60s, and so he sees people in a very egalitarian lens, he grew up basically telling us, look, if we were to ever, if there were ever to be some form of things going on, that that would be frowned upon, that would not work.

01:05:50.000 And of course, he would still, you know, in typical boomer mentality, which is, I think people see it as gracious, but.

01:05:57.000 He would accept and he would try to understand it.

01:06:02.000 But it was firmly instilled that that was not really the norm.

01:06:06.000 And so I don't know how you go about it with your kid.

01:06:08.000 I mean, that's a very sacred relationship between a father and a son.

01:06:11.000 I don't have kids, so I've never explained it to them, but I would just simply say, you know, that's just not how we operate.

01:06:17.000 And of course, you get much more leeway with your kids than you do if you're making a public statement.

01:06:21.000 You know, I would, the things I would tell my kids are not exactly the things I would tell the media or would say on a television show, but I would just say, you know, look, this is our people.

01:06:30.000 We like to stick with our people, you know, and all that.

01:06:34.000 And I think it's an unnatural tendency anyway.

01:06:36.000 I think most people, Are not into the race mixing type stuff, the interracial type stuff.

01:06:42.000 I think by and large, that's just simply not most people's preference.

01:06:46.000 I think a lot of people do it as a political thing, you know, if they want to make their parents mad or whatever.

01:06:51.000 Some people find it attractive, I guess, but I think they're in the minority.

01:06:54.000 So I don't think that should be too much of an issue.

01:06:56.000 But I would simply say, you know, look, we believe in families.

01:07:00.000 We think families should last a long time.

01:07:02.000 They last better when it's people who we know, and we like to stick within our own.

01:07:05.000 Nothing wrong with that. 0.99

01:07:07.000 Bremen says, We'll tilt those windmills yet, white brother. 0.94

01:07:11.000 We got to have some based windmill nationalism. 0.99

01:07:11.000 It's true. 0.99

01:07:14.000 Keep up the audacity.

01:07:16.000 Going to have to read through Don Quixote again.

01:07:17.000 It's a long one in English.

01:07:20.000 Brosif says, Nick, I can't stop wrecking into guardrails.

01:07:24.000 What does that mean?

01:07:24.000 Help.

01:07:25.000 What do you mean guardrails?

01:07:26.000 Like when you're driving or what?

01:07:28.000 I'm not sure what you mean by that.

01:07:30.000 I'm not sure if that's a meme or something.

01:07:33.000 And looks like those are all our Streamlabs.

01:07:34.000 I'll check back, see if we got any more Super Chats.

01:07:37.000 We got a couple here.

01:07:39.000 LM says, David Hogg was the shooter. 0.84

01:07:40.000 He's a genius criminal.

01:07:42.000 He's like Lex Luthor, right? 0.56

01:07:44.000 Froctor enthusiast, I'm done with red pills. 0.99

01:07:46.000 Time for the suicide pill. 0.94

01:07:47.000 No, you can't do it. 1.00

01:07:48.000 You'll go to hell. 0.99

01:07:50.000 We don't want that. 0.99

01:07:51.000 Alvaro Quitana says, from Spain, just want to white pill you that the country is more than 90% white, conservative majority government, and strong Christian culture.

01:08:00.000 Celebrating Easter streets are filled with Jesus imagery.

01:08:03.000 Yeah, no, and God bless Spain. 0.93

01:08:05.000 You know, people, they neg the meds, they neg the Catholics, but you look at Italy. 0.54

01:08:10.000 You look at Spain, you look at in some parts of France, the Catholic countries are the strongest ones. 0.74

01:08:16.000 They're still Christian, they're still conservative, they're still white, and we love them. 0.94

01:08:20.000 So, God bless you. 1.00

01:08:21.000 Some white pills from Spain.

01:08:22.000 I had a very good friend who I went to school with in Boston who was from Spain. 0.98

01:08:26.000 He was a shitlib, total shitlib, EU loving lefty. 0.99

01:08:29.000 But he was a funny guy, funny, nice guy, religious guy. 0.97

01:08:33.000 And it's so funny because we would like that.

01:08:38.000 You could have lefty people who maybe they were for a supranational government, maybe they were left leaning.

01:08:43.000 But they were Christian and they were traditional.

01:08:46.000 You know, they could say they were left wing, but, you know, they weren't really left wing.

01:08:49.000 And we'd like that for our country, right?

01:08:52.000 Salim Fortes, yeah, he was funny.

01:08:53.000 He would always be like, Nick, my friend.

01:08:55.000 He was very, very warm.

01:08:56.000 We love the Europeans.

01:08:58.000 Salim Fortes says, Have you been following the KMAX slash Kaufness culture of critique rebuttals?

01:09:03.000 Any takes?

01:09:05.000 I've not been following that.

01:09:05.000 You know, I did not.

01:09:08.000 I didn't even read the critique.

01:09:09.000 I'll have to, or the rebuttal, I guess.

01:09:11.000 I'll have to look into that.

01:09:12.000 But I have not been following that so closely.

01:09:15.000 And it looks like those are all of our super chats, all of our stream labs.

01:09:19.000 So we're going to call it a night.

01:09:20.000 I'm tired.

01:09:21.000 I'm a tired guy.

01:09:21.000 I'm tired.

01:09:22.000 So that's going to be it for us tonight.

01:09:24.000 But remember to check out tomorrow our 2018 Election HQ podcast.

01:09:28.000 Check out our maker support.

01:09:30.000 The link is in the description makersupport.comslash Nick J. Fuentes.

01:09:34.000 Sign up if you want to get access to our two exclusive weekly podcasts for premium members, which are World Report and 2018 Election HQ.

01:09:42.000 You get the podcast format of this show.

01:09:45.000 If you don't like watching the show on YouTube, You like the podcast stuff?

01:09:48.000 You can get this if you sign up for America First Premium on SoundCloud.

01:09:52.000 You get a special role in our Discord server and you get priority on our call in shell.

01:09:56.000 So it's a great package all for five bucks a month.

01:10:00.000 Remember to subscribe.

01:10:01.000 Give us a big thumbs up.

01:10:03.000 Leave a comment.

01:10:04.000 Click the notification bell if you're on Twitch, Facebook, whatever it is.

01:10:07.000 Subscribe, follow on Twitter, all the rest.

01:10:10.000 We're on the air Monday through Friday, 7 p.m. Central, 8 p.m. Eastern Standard Time.

01:10:14.000 I'm Nicholas J. Fuentes.

01:10:15.000 This was America First, as always.

01:10:17.000 Thank you for watching.

01:10:18.000 Thank you to our Super Chatters, our Streamlabs donors.

01:10:21.000 Thank you to our premium members.

01:10:23.000 We're up to 166 supporters, which is very good.

01:10:28.000 We're doing well.

01:10:29.000 So the show is funded, and we couldn't do without you.

01:10:32.000 Really, we could not do without you.

01:10:34.000 We depend on your gracious support for the show to keep the lights on.

01:10:39.000 We thank you guys profusely.

01:10:39.000 So we appreciate it.

01:10:41.000 And we will see you tomorrow for another great show.

01:10:44.000 Have the rest.

01:10:45.000 Have the rest.

01:10:46.000 Have a great rest of your evening.

01:10:48.000 See you tomorrow.

01:10:53.000 Americanism, not globalism, will be our credo.

01:11:00.000 It's going to be only America first.

01:11:05.000 America first. 0.88

01:11:09.000 The American people.

01:11:12.000 We'll come first once again. 0.82

01:11:23.000 The respect It's going to be only America first. 0.80

01:11:39.000 America first. 0.87

America First - Nicholas J. Fuentes - March 28, 2018

The Roseanne Barr Question | America First Ep. 133

Episode Stats

Summary

Transcript