00:00:45.000Featured story tonight is actually the featured story from last night that we didn't get to cover because I took too long talking about the first thing.
00:00:56.000So, our featured story tonight, we're finally going to get to cover the Supreme Court decision on the EPA, which we're supposed to cover last night, but.
00:01:16.000So we'll be talking all about that tonight.
00:01:18.000In case you missed it, here's the preview.
00:01:21.000The Supreme Court made a big landmark decision yesterday about federal regulations.
00:01:27.000Specifically, they weighed in on a case that was brought to the court by West Virginia against the Environmental Protection Agency.
00:01:38.000West Virginia and other energy states allege that the federal government has broadened the initial statute, the Clean Power Act, which was created under the Obama administration, beyond what is allowed by Congress.
00:01:55.000And the Supreme Court agreed with West Virginia and the other coal and energy producing states, or I guess you could say states that are creating the energy, because they say that.
00:02:08.000In terms of exceptional matters, things that are of exceptional economic or political importance, federal agencies and departments do not have blank check authority to expand congressional mandates.
00:02:39.000In particular, my knowledge about that and the effective way, the practical way that the executive branch works, not how most people think that it works.
00:02:50.000Because once you really understand politics, if you know enough people in politics, you begin to realize that the government doesn't work even a little bit like it's supposed to, or like they say it does, or how most people think it does.
00:03:07.000And when it comes to things like the federal regulatory bureaucracy, It really operates in a way that is very counterintuitive and in a way that a lot of people just don't even have the first and vaguest understanding.
00:03:23.000Most people, you'd ask them how the government works, and they'll talk about Congress or they'll talk about the president or maybe they'll talk about the courts.
00:03:33.000But very few people are even aware of the extent of the power of the federal bureaucracy and their discretion.
00:03:41.000That's the most important thing the discretion of the federal bureaucracy.
00:03:47.000To wield the power of the federal government.
00:03:50.000Most people don't even, if you had asked them how it works, they wouldn't even be able to tell you that unelected, unknowable, nameless, faceless bureaucrats are wielding a considerable amount of the authority of the federal government when they make decisions and in the manner that they are making those decisions.
00:04:20.000Along essentially ideological party lines, conservative judges in favor and liberal judges against.
00:04:30.000And so this case specifically was about a rule by the EPA, but it's going to affect all of the federal departments, all of the federal agencies.
00:04:41.000And like I said, what the ruling does is set a legal precedent that on important matters, the federal bureaucracies will be very restricted in the And their ability to interpret laws passed by Congress and enforce them with their own discretion.
00:05:07.000He doesn't even work for the government anymore, but he is representative of this new never Trumpism, this new DeSantis, whatever you want to call it, sort of recalcitrant, revanchist wing of the Republican Party that represents.
00:05:26.000The old establishment, which is fighting its way back and ingratiating itself within Trumpism, but distinguishing itself from Trumpism at the same time.
00:05:37.000And Rick Rinnell is a big part of that.
00:05:40.000And a lot of people, I know a lot of people would say, but Nick, how can Rick Rinnell be representative of the new never Trump or the establishment when he worked in the Trump administration and is a big supporter of Donald Trump?
00:05:58.000And I also want to talk specifically about his tweet that he made today, where he said that we have this new world order, and the world is run by a cabal of shadowy elites controlling everything.
00:06:13.000But he says that those people are liberal whites.
00:06:18.000He says that there's a new world order, but it's run by liberal whites.
00:06:22.000And it's racist and it's evil, and they're trying to control black people.
00:07:47.000You get the House of Representatives is all up for re election, and a third of the Senate is up for re election.
00:07:54.000But as far as big interest in politics, it's really a four year cycle.
00:08:01.000The media and most voters are not following the off years, they're following the four year cycle, which is the presidency as well as the House and the Senate, and really the consequences that flow from the presidency being up.
00:14:00.000And he just curates and aggregates links about news from conservative sites.
00:14:06.000And he was very influential for a long time and very famous until 2016.
00:14:12.000And I don't know why this happened, but for some reason in 2016, Drudge became like a never-Trumper and actually revealed this sort of liberal bent, very liberal bias against Trump.
00:14:26.000And basically, ever since then, he really fell from grace, and people don't read him anymore.
00:16:25.000So they linked a Yahoo News article about the Libertarian Film Festival, written actually by Zach Petrizzo.
00:16:36.000It says Fuentes had initially been scheduled to appear on a Freedom Fest panel titled How to Fight the Information Police and was supposed to host a screening of a short film, The Most Cancelled Man in America.
00:16:48.000But all of that was scratched after the Libertarian Conference thought better of associating with the notorious white nationalist.
00:16:57.000I didn't know that was the name of the panel.
00:17:20.000Doesn't that make you the information police?
00:17:25.000It says it would have put Fuentes in the same conference as Fox News host Lisa Kennedy, Congressman Justin Amash, and failed New York City mayoral candidate Andrew Yang.
00:17:39.000Freedom Fest executive director Valerie Durham told Daily Beast that Fuentes had been banned after several unnamed leaders complained about his appearance on the schedule.
00:17:50.000She writes, quote, Freedom Fest strongly believes in the fundamental right to free speech and free expression.
00:17:57.000However, we also reserve the right not to endorse certain points of view that lead our nation away from such discourse.
00:18:07.000So, banning me, so if I were on the panel, that would lead the country away from a discourse about free speech.
00:18:16.000So, they had to ban me, they had to censor me from the panel to protect the discourse about censorship.
00:18:24.000To protect the discourse about free speech.
00:18:29.000She says that the conference did not adequately vet the film.
00:18:35.000She says during this time, we were approached by several leaders we respect who gave us further information.
00:18:40.000Upon learning this information, we took a deeper look into Mr. Fuentes' ideology.
00:18:47.000As a result of that further research, we decided to remove Mr. Fuentes as a panelist.
00:18:55.000They are admitting that I was banned for ideological reasons.
00:19:01.000Which is kind of, you would think they would come up with some other excuse or some other explanation, but they're saying it in a euphemistic way.
00:19:11.000They're being indirect about it, they're being a little bit circuitous about that fact, but it's in there.
00:19:19.000I mean, they can say we did that to focus on a different conversation or whatever.
00:19:26.000But they're saying they banned me for ideological reasons.
00:19:31.000And that's kind of the whole problem with censorship, isn't it?
00:19:37.000Is that the people that are censored are the people that are saying the things that people that are not censored don't necessarily want to be associated with?
00:19:50.000Is that not part and parcel of the censorship regime?
00:19:54.000Is the concurrent and simultaneous taboo about associating with people that are censored or the things that get them censored?
00:20:06.000Censorship, in other words, censorship.
00:20:13.000The state and the private sector and the society suppress views that are contrary to the prevailing view of the censors, of the people in charge.
00:20:26.000People in charge have a certain view, and if you say something that's really egregiously against that view, then they censor.
00:20:34.000And they do that because they have the power and they have a certain point of view.
00:20:38.000It doesn't matter what that point of view is, if you're against it, you'll be censored.
00:20:43.000And then, of course, The downstream effects of that censorship is that people tend to want to avoid those things because censorship is happening alongside regime media spouting the regime viewpoint.
00:20:58.000And as a consequence of the regime being in power and having a viewpoint, the media reflects the regime's viewpoint.
00:21:05.000And as a consequence of the media reflecting the regime's viewpoint, the society reflects the regime's viewpoint.
00:21:16.000On a fundamental level, they believe the things that the regime does.
00:21:21.000They believe in the liberal world order.
00:21:25.000They believe in this civic myth of America, the Bill of Rights, the Constitution, equality, progress, immigration, diversity, and so on.
00:21:36.000There is broad fundamental agreement with the regime's viewpoint, and that is cultivated by media.
00:21:44.000And so, side by side, these things are happening.
00:21:47.000The regime is censoring people that fundamentally disagree.
00:21:51.000And the regime is using its resources to promote their viewpoint, and the society therefore has consensus around that viewpoint.
00:22:00.000So it just so happens that even when the censorship contradicts those fundamental values promulgated by the regime, which may be free speech or free expression or just something like liberty, freedom, individualism, well, people don't want to go out and protest the censorship.
00:22:21.000To go out and speak up for the rights of the people that are being censored because, well, it's not exactly something that's encouraged or promoted.
00:22:31.000In fact, it's the opposite by the media and by society.
00:22:35.000And it's not a coincidence that this happens.
00:22:37.000I'm trying to illustrate the fact that Freedom Fest does not want to associate, that they want to disassociate from the most censored people is not a coincidence.
00:22:50.000They say, oh, well, Nick may be the most censored guy, but we don't like his views.
00:22:57.000Well, those things are connected, don't you think?
00:23:01.000I'm the most censored guy, and you don't want to associate with me for the same reason because my view is so contrary to the regime.
00:23:11.000And they can say, oh, well, and this is what they do.
00:23:14.000This is the role that character assassination plays.
00:23:18.000It always comes back to, well, that guy did an ugly thing.
00:23:26.000You know, Donald Trump said, grab him by the pussy.
00:23:30.000And Tucker Carlson made comments about a woman on that radio show.
00:23:34.000And Alex Jones said Sandy Hook was a conspiracy theory.
00:23:39.000And that's always the convenient out that is given to cowards who are disassociating because it's something that is regime negative, but they have a free speech posture.
00:23:52.000So they say, you know, I'm not disassociating because of popular pressure or because of pressure from the regime.
00:24:01.000Because of the viewpoint, because the viewpoint is contrary, we're disassociating because, well, he's impolite, he's boorish, he's controversial, negative, whatever.
00:24:16.000And so all of these things are really related the so called cancel culture, the disassociation, disavowal game, and the censorship.
00:24:25.000It all goes back to speech as an expression of power.
00:24:30.000My right to speak freely and my ability to use.
00:24:35.000Mass media platforms to speak a message contrary to the regime and that constituting a threat to the influence of the regime.
00:24:45.000And so, in this day and age, in this industrial technological society, the disavowal, cancel culture, character assassination, and censorship are just other tools in the arsenal of the regime to keep domestic order and prevent threats to their power.
00:25:04.000In the old days, they would kill protesters.
00:25:07.000In the old days, Protesters would go out there with their picket signs and whatever, and the government would shoot them and say, You can't create armies in the streets.
00:25:19.000You can't mobilize armies in the streets, even if they were peaceful.
00:25:24.000Because the government recognized that if a Malcolm X or if some hippie could mobilize an army of young people and the organization was happening on college campuses, yeah, maybe they're carrying signs today.
00:25:47.000And, you know, Mayor Daley did that in Chicago, and that was done at Kent State.
00:25:52.000And this is, and we all understand that exercise of government power.
00:25:59.000And now this is just the information age equivalent.
00:26:03.000The ability to influence people and the influence game that is played in the era of social media on the internet, it all just comes back to expressions of political power.
00:26:13.000And the point being is, So, once you understand that that is how these things are all working together, once you understand that disassociation for arbitrary reasons is intimately connected with censorship for political reasons, the point is to say that you can't really call yourself a libertarian and against censorship.
00:26:33.000You can say, well, we just don't want to promote this viewpoint at our conference.
00:26:42.000It's not about promoting an ideological viewpoint, it's about bowing to pressure from the regime.
00:26:48.000And I'm sure the federal government didn't call up the event and say, if you host this guy, we'll arrest you.
00:26:56.000But as we know, the government isn't the only institution that exercises regime power.
00:27:02.000The ADL does, the mainstream media does, money does, financial interests do.
00:27:09.000They got a call from somebody with power that said, hey, if you let this guy speak, then we're going to pull our support, then we're not going to show up, then all these bad things are going to happen to you.
00:27:23.000The same people that got me banned on YouTube, the same people that got me banned on everything else, called up the organizers of the event who agreed to let me speak there and said, hey, if this guy speaks, very bad things will happen because those interests, it's not that they mind that I say the N word.
00:27:42.000It's not that they mind, they're not calling up Freedom Fest and concerned with removing me from the panel because I'm impolite or insensitive.
00:27:51.000It's because they have an interest in my views not becoming influential or popular.
00:27:57.000Power interest in preventing that from happening.
00:28:01.000And so they're exercising their power to prevent me from doing that.
00:28:06.000And the libertarians who are hosting a panel on the information police are going to cancel me for admittedly ideological reasons, but hide behind voice crack.
00:28:39.000You can say whatever you want, but that's what happened.
00:28:43.000Powerful institutions which reflect the power, whatever.
00:28:47.000I mean, when libertarians talk about government, it's a distinction without a difference.
00:28:52.000The government is intimately connected with non governmental institutions.
00:28:59.000You know, because I hear this from libertarians all the time.
00:29:01.000They'll say things like, you know, Well, you can say your own viewpoint, but in a case like this, you're not entitled to say your viewpoint at our libertarian conference.
00:29:12.000Or you can say your viewpoint, but you're not entitled to say it on Twitter.
00:29:18.000Even if they bowed to pressure from people funding the conference or whatever, they could say, well, we're having a free choice.
00:29:25.000It's like the government and other institutional players are all in bed.
00:29:31.000The money, the billionaires, the financial interests, Put up the contributions for the campaigns for the people that become elected that write the laws.
00:29:43.000The lobbyists write the legislation that the elected legislators pass into law.
00:29:52.000The lobbyists write how the laws should be interpreted by the bureaucrats.
00:29:58.000This is like the first thing you learn in Political Science 101, and it's a little bit more complicated than that.
00:30:06.000But all of the complexity besides, the point is that we're not talking about a literal exercise of government power.
00:30:17.000We're talking about regime power, and it's fundamentally a conversation about that power and how it's being used or abused.
00:30:25.000And they bowed to that, and they're going to hold the panel on censorship without a guy that is the number one victim of that censorship.
00:30:33.000And that's why libertarians are useless.
00:30:37.000Because if you can't hold the panel on censorship, and censorship is your main issue, with the most censored guy online, because people threatened you, the government, in a sense, the regime, those that govern, threatened you, well, then what's the point of your organization?
00:31:26.000No, you're not, and what's the point of even why you're organizing politically?
00:31:31.000What's the point of throwing a fucking freedom fest if we have no freedom, and the guy who has had the most freedom deprived of him than anybody for saying a political viewpoint is not allowed to speak there or air the film about that?
00:31:52.000I'm going to the conference, and they can let me in, in which case I'm going to press everybody in a peaceful and marketplace of ideas way.
00:32:03.000And if they don't let me in, I'm going to make a big stink about it, and I'm going to protest.
00:32:08.000And we got 100 people going to this movie, and I'm sure 100 of them will be going out there on Friday for the main, I think that's the main day or whatever.
00:32:22.000I know we could get at least 100 people outside there on Friday to protest if they don't let me in.
00:32:28.000So I think that's what I'm going to do.
00:32:32.000I think Friday, if you're going to the movie, if you're able to, stay another day, or we'll just go Thursday, I guess, in the morning or afternoon or something.
00:32:42.000But we'll go either Thursday, maybe we'll go Friday.
00:32:53.000But I'm going to get a ticket to the Freedom Fest, and I'm either going to get in.
00:32:57.000And we're going to roll however many Groypers deep are going to be at the actual event, or we're going to make a big stinking protest outside.
00:33:05.000And I guarantee we could get at least 100 people out there in front of the event.
00:33:10.000And I'll bring my megaphone and everything, okay?
00:34:57.000This is going to sound really nasty, but I don't mean for it to sound nasty.
00:35:02.000I'm not going to name any names, but I've been watching some other content, and I'm thinking, you know, some of these guys, it seems like maybe they've read more books than me.
00:35:14.000I'm not talking about Wendell and Book Cat, but I've been watching some other content lately, and I'm saying these guys have read more books than me.
00:35:22.000And I'm like, wait a minute, I'm smarter than this guy.
00:38:03.000Where people have studied all my talking points and my tricks and my delivery, and now they're taking, they're ripping that apart and they're putting it into their own arsenal.
00:38:16.000It's like Thanos taking the mind stone off vision and putting it on the infinity gauntlet.
00:38:35.000Before it was like no contest, I'm out there, there's nothing like this, and there still isn't.
00:38:41.000But now I live in a world where it does exist and people are being influenced by it, and so I've got to stay steps ahead of my previous self.
00:38:53.000So I've got to go back to square one, I've got to go back to the books, I've got to redesign the studio, I've got to destroy my old self, I've got to kill my old self.
00:39:06.000And become a new version, too, Donda 2.
00:41:56.000This is a spook, which is already bad enough.
00:42:00.000And then you look in this man's eyes and you see a man whose eyes have seen sex with men.
00:42:08.000You look in his eyes and you see two eyeballs that are undressing men.
00:42:16.000You look at Rick Ranel and you see two eyeballs, and his eyeballs have seen some nasty stuff.
00:42:23.000Those eyeballs that Rick Ranel has, when you look at his eyes, keep in mind that those are the same eyeballs that gave witness to some really raunchy, disgusting.
00:42:39.000This is a sick, degenerate man who is also betraying his country, working for the Jews, and betraying humanity by working for the deep state, which is just a meat grinder which destroys children, Muslims, and Russians and all kinds of other people, feeding people to the devil, is what the American war machine is.
00:43:07.000So, he's sort of like this Luciferian satanic figure, and he's presenting himself like he's this big Trump guy, like he's this big MAGA movement guy.
00:43:15.000And a lot of people say, oh, he was in the Trump administration.
00:44:13.000Okay, that has nothing to do with MAGA.
00:44:17.000So he goes on, and I just want to set the record straight about that in the first place because he represents a lot of these types of people who are Republican establishment through and through, but put on the MAGA hat, or maybe they worked in the admin, they tricked Trump, somehow they got in, and then they leave and they go, Hey, I'm a big Trump guy.
00:45:19.000And it's not just the way their voice sounds, it's the way their mouth moves that allows them to make these gay sounds, that allows them to make a gay voice.
00:45:40.000And I pay very close attention to mannerisms and micro expressions and things like that.
00:45:44.000I've done a lot of analysis of Trump's body language and things like that.
00:45:51.000Take a look at Rick Grinnell when he talks, and there's a way that he contorts his mouth to sound gay.
00:45:58.000Gay men that sound gay have to move their mouth in like a very tight, very like.
00:46:04.000I don't even know how to explain it, but you'll see it if you pay close attention, you'll see it.
00:46:10.000So his fucking gay little mouth is going on TV all the time and talking about how Trumpism is really about protecting the Jewish state of Israel and extraditing Julian Assange.
00:47:08.000You know, he sometimes tries to sound like Trump and he passes some based laws and so on.
00:47:15.000But this is like the most egregious because this is a gay man from California who's a hardcore Zionist and a neocon and literally works for the CIA or whatever.
00:47:26.000And he's going to go out there with his gay little voice and try to be like the standard bearer of Trumpism.
00:47:34.000He was going to run for governor of California.
00:47:55.000Anyway, so Rick Grinnell puts out a tweet today, and he writes Let's be clear the liberal world order is run by a group of liberal white Democrats who want the world to submit to their ideas.
00:49:49.000That statement, not only is it hypocritical, but it really shows how mainstream Republicans are cut from the same cloth as the left, as the entirety of the left.
00:50:00.000Because Republicans are just as eager as the left to throw white people under the bus to pander to blacks or other minorities or whoever.
00:51:22.000Is this shows everything that's wrong?
00:51:24.000Okay, we're definitely not going to get to our featured story tonight.
00:51:27.000I'm realizing that now because there's a lot to unpack here, which is very important.
00:51:31.000So we may have to save that for Monday.
00:51:33.000I'm just, that's dawning on me right now.
00:51:36.000So, just so you're not too heartbroken, because there's a lot to discuss here.
00:51:42.000That shows what is wrong with most mainstream Republicans.
00:51:45.000A lot of mainstream Republicans will hear rhetoric like this, and it makes them feel good in a very sick way to agree with that.
00:51:55.000Whites are so used to being vilified, and they have internalized so much white guilt that white people really do feel guilty for being alive.
00:52:06.000And they feel guilty for being who they are and what they are.
00:52:36.000And this is why whites are so eager to scapegoat themselves or other whites.
00:52:42.000This is why they're given such a tremendous amount of psychological relief in being able to join with the left that hates them in pointing the finger at other whites but white people.
00:52:56.000And so Republicans, particularly Republican whites, just get off to the idea that we're going to say, no, no, no, it's not us.
00:53:43.000I hate that Republicans and Republican leaders and white Republicans are so eager to blame white people for the problems of this country to achieve some kind of relief, psychological relief or catharsis because they've internalized truly white hatred.
00:54:45.000White men are the ones going to work and paying the taxes and building the buildings and running even the things that are not glamorous like construction or sanitation or whatever.
00:56:06.000It's because they are loaded up with white guilt and it makes them feel relief.
00:56:11.000It satisfies that white guilt to take it and put it on some other white guy and say, hey, blacks, hey, Hispanics that I feel sorry for, that I secretly feel sorry for.
00:56:21.000Hey, blacks and Hispanics that I kind of have a superiority complex over because I feel sorry and I feel like I owe you something and I feel guilty.
00:57:52.000Now, on that point, back to my original point, it's really interesting that you can say that one race is responsible for the problems, as long as it's whites.
00:58:04.000You know, the tweet is the liberal world order is run by a group of liberal whites who want the world to submit to their ideas, they want to control the world.
00:58:19.000So that's an acceptable statement, apparently, to say this race, a group of people belonging to this race, want to hurt you and they're evil and they're causing all these problems.
00:59:18.000Again, how is this any different from the left?
00:59:21.000It just reflects the fact that if this guy's the Republican establishment trying to hijack MAGA, he represents the other side of the same coin.
01:00:22.000And when you read any of the texts that supposedly found the cathedral of professionals and academics, take a look at the names.
01:00:33.000And when you look at the Biden administration, when you look at the Supreme Court, and when you look at ACLU and the ADL and the SPLC, and you look at the lawyers and the activists and the court cases and the academics, and you look at the bureaucrats that are doing these things, you look at the names of the owners of the media companies or the names of the owners of the porn companies or the social media companies,
01:00:58.000and you look at the definitions of hate speech and where that word even came from or where the word racism even came from, and how they talk about Trump.
01:01:09.000What did Brett Stevens say when he debated a rabbi about whether Trump was good for the Jews?
01:01:13.000He said, Trump is so dangerous because he is against the liberal international principles that have been so good for us as Jews.
01:02:51.000Anybody that repudiates elitism is a person that is either part of the elite and covering it up, and that's part of maintaining their elite posture, or it's just, you know, like a poor person will never be elite.
01:03:04.000Poor, stupid person who is possessed by this ridiculous idea that we can do away with hierarchy when we obviously can't.
01:03:26.000The racist liberal white Democrat system, more like the Jewish Bolshevik anti white anti Christian system, I think would be more apropos.
01:03:37.000When you look around at mainstream media, do you see a lot of liberal white Democrat racism or do you see a lot of sort of Jewish Bolshevik anti Christian anti white hatred?
01:03:48.000Because that's kind of more close to what I see.
01:03:53.000When I watch CNN and I watch Fox and I watch MSN, And I watch Hollywood movies and then this kind of thing.
01:04:02.000I don't see a lot of like white liberal Democrats that hate blacks and Hispanics.
01:04:07.000I do see a disproportionate amount of Jews who are not really liberal in the classic sense who hate Christians and white people.
01:04:31.000Obviously, he doesn't hate blacks and Hispanics, but I definitely think he hates Christians.
01:04:36.000When I watch the Bill Maher show, who like Republicans are warming up to, now Bill Maher is like one of these guys that goes to the secret orgies and the secret sex parties.
01:04:48.000And he's a Hollywood Jew with a very big show, as we know, and a Zionist.
01:04:54.000And he goes on a show, and conservatives fawn over him and everything, and they consider him like one of the good ones.
01:04:59.000Well, here's a guy who's a liberal Democrat and he's Jewish and he's about as conservative as it gets.
01:05:05.000But if you look at the object of who he ridicules the most, it's like these rube white Christians.
01:05:12.000It's evangelicals, it's low class whites, it's whites from the South.
01:05:19.000The guy's a Zionist liberal in Hollywood, possessed with, even if he is sympathetic to Republican issues or certain kinds of Republicans or people like Ben Shapiro, and he's a Zionist, who is the object of the most contempt?
01:05:34.000It would be a Christian nationalist like me.
01:05:38.000Or an evangelical Christian white southerner.
01:05:43.000So, what's the real nature of the regime?
01:05:45.000And the same thing could be said about a lot of the things you see on TV.
01:06:11.000If I kept my message but didn't say the things that I got in trouble for saying.
01:06:16.000Because I'm always being told by people, you know, you'd be more mainstream if you just didn't talk about a handful of things or didn't say a handful of things.
01:06:24.000And this is the kind of, this is probably what I would sound like if I didn't say those things.
01:06:36.000To the extent that these things are partially true, it makes them more untrue than an outright lie.
01:06:42.000For me to say the world is run by black Republicans would be an outright lie, and it would be so ridiculous that it would have no power.
01:06:52.000And it would be, in a sense, less deceptive than if I came forward and said there's this big world order, it's liberal in disposition, but it's run by racist whites.
01:07:16.000Because that's the color of the mainstream.
01:07:18.000That's the broad messaging of the mainstream.
01:07:22.000There's one bad guy, there's one villain, there's one generalization, and that's about whites.
01:07:28.000We're scapegoating, we're going to have a sacrifice.
01:07:32.000We can point the finger, but it's whites.
01:07:35.000And to the extent that it is going to be divisive or polarized or partisan, it's going to be the lowest level salience, it's going to be party.
01:07:53.000Well, that's the safest thing imaginable.
01:07:56.000That's a safe message fashioned by the contours of the censorship regime.
01:08:01.000Blame whites, blame Democrats, don't talk about race, don't talk about religion, definitely don't talk about the Jews, don't talk about the Zionists, don't talk about the other nefarious influences.
01:10:08.000We need to continue to conflate liberalism with the worst excesses of itself or its derivatives, which would be Marxism or Bolshevism or even just these post literate nonsense about trans or whatever.
01:10:25.000He says we live in this liberal world order, and what's the answer to the liberal world order?
01:11:13.000And how are we going to combat the liberal world order?
01:11:15.000It's not going to be with more liberalism, it's not going to be an older version of liberalism.
01:11:19.000It's going to be the thing that liberalism was formed out of, against negatively, propositionally in a negative way, which is the Catholic Church.
01:12:14.000So, what he's saying is just this big constructed lie to protect a liberal world order, to protect the real people running it, which is disproportionately Jews.
01:12:24.000That's who he's in bed with in the Zionist lobby.
01:12:29.000And obfuscating the question of race, which is that this is a white country.
01:17:25.000Is it because they're staying at home?
01:17:26.000Is it because they're squatting effectively?
01:17:29.000Is it because they're getting unemployment or is it because they're getting because it's the unemployment rate is low, but that's just because so many people have dropped out of the labor force.
01:17:38.000What has allowed them to drop out of the labor force?
01:17:43.000Is it just as simple as they're just getting government assistance or what else could it be?
01:17:47.000I don't know, but it's very weird because it's been persistent.
01:17:59.000Yeah, people in chat, food stamps, disability fraud.
01:18:18.000If you go to McDonald's and I go there all the time, it says, hey, help wanted, we're offering tuition, signing bonus, 15 bucks an hour, blah, blah, blah.
01:18:47.000That's what I think they're living with their parents.
01:18:54.000I think that people are just living with their parents and they don't have to pay rent.
01:18:59.000And so I think the turnover is very high, and I think people are getting jobs long enough that they could pay for whatever thing they need, and they don't need an income because they don't.
01:19:07.000You know, the biggest thing that people have to pay for is the housing.
01:19:12.000And so if more and more young people are living at home or they're living together with other people, then that would explain people not needing steady income, steady employment.
01:19:24.000So what makes sense to me is young people, and when I say young people, I'm talking about as old as 30.
01:20:30.000I would imagine that it's a combination of young people living at home or in subsidized student housing.
01:20:39.000And then, where they need money, I would imagine instead of getting a job at McDonald's or something like that, I'd imagine they're using their parents' car or their car for DoorDash, Uber, or in a bad case, and I think this is more common than people think maybe OnlyFans, streaming, you know, stuff like that.
01:21:36.000So I think it's got to be, I think that's what it's got to be a combination of not having to pay for housing and supplementing the income with.
01:21:46.000Very part time employment and this gig work.
01:24:39.000What's the likelihood of DeSantis being picked for vice president rather than running versus Trump in 2024, or even being picked after losing?
01:25:48.000Found an expression of it in a political way that's cool.
01:25:53.000Because I have to admit, it was like, I was sort of not really into the Christian conservatism thing when I was younger because I just thought it was lame.