America First - Nicholas J. Fuentes - TRUMP INDICTMENT IMMINENT: Dept of Justice Previews Classified Doc Charges | America First Ep. 1174TRUMP INDICTMENT IMMINENT: Dept of Justice Previews Classified Doc Charges

00:00:10.000 Americanism, not globalism, will be our credo!

00:00:17.000 It's going to be only America first.

00:00:22.000 America first.

00:00:26.000 The American people will come first once again!

00:00:54.000 America first!

00:00:57.000 America first!

00:03:28.000 Good evening everybody!

00:03:30.000 You're watching America First.

00:03:31.000 My name is Nicholas J. Fuentes.

00:03:33.000 We have a great show for you tonight.

00:03:35.000 Very excited to be back here with you tonight on Wednesday.

00:03:39.000 We have a lot to talk about tonight.

00:03:41.000 Lots to get into.

00:03:42.000 Big show!

00:03:44.000 The imminent Trump indictment from the Department of Justice.

00:03:48.000 We've anticipated this for a long time.

00:03:50.000 It's been almost a year since the raid at Mar-a-Lago.

00:03:55.000 And this is, of course, pertaining to the matter of the classified documents that are in his personal possession at his private residence.

00:04:04.000 And finally, it looks like we're going to get an indictment from the Feds.

00:04:09.000 Donald Trump's lawyers have gone out to Washington, D.C.

00:04:12.000 to meet with the Department of Justice.

00:04:15.000 Typically, that happens when they're about to charge.

00:04:19.000 That's always how this unfolds.

00:04:22.000 And so there's a rumor that Donald Trump was informed directly by the special counsel that he was going to be indicted, but today he's disputed that.

00:04:32.000 So what we don't know exactly is that Donald Trump has been officially named as the target of the investigation, which means that they are at least considering him for criminal charges, and based on the meeting with the Trump legal team, it looks like that's almost a certainty at this point.

00:04:51.000 So we'll talk about the charges and everything that means.

00:04:55.000 We'll get into how that's going to affect his bid for the presidency.

00:04:59.000 In our other story tonight we'll be talking about a major pedophile ring which just got busted on Instagram.

00:05:07.000 There's a new report out from Stanford University which says that pedophiles are all over Instagram and Facebook.

00:05:15.000 And they're using hashtags and they're actually using the term cheese pizza.

00:05:21.000 From Pizzagate, if you remember.

00:05:24.000 Now many usually using the term cheese pizza just like Hillary Clinton in the emails to talk about child porn.

00:05:33.000 And so the new report from Stanford says that this is all over the place and they're actually communicating it out in the open.

00:05:40.000 They're proudly brandishing the fact that they've got pedophilia on the platform.

00:05:47.000 Pedophiles are publicly promoting child puppets.

00:05:50.000 They say they have to do a better job.

00:05:51.000 You think?

00:05:53.000 So we'll talk about that tonight as well.

00:05:56.000 Should be a pretty good show.

00:05:58.000 Before we get into the news, I want to remind you to smash the follow button, get a push notification whenever I go live.

00:06:05.000 Here on Cozy, that is.

00:06:07.000 Follow me here on this platform, Cozy.tv slash Nick.

00:06:11.000 Also, follow me on Rumble.

00:06:13.000 I'm live on Rumble every night as well.

00:06:14.000 Plays of all the shows on Rumble going back several months now, I think.

00:06:20.000 I believe we have every show from 2023 on Rumble.

00:06:25.000 Cozy, we only have five, I think, at a time.

00:06:27.000 But Rumble, we've got everything.

00:06:30.000 So check me out there.

00:06:31.000 Follow me on Telegram.

00:06:32.000 Link is down below.

00:06:33.000 And with that out of the way, I guess we'll dive in.

00:06:37.000 I'm trying to think.

00:06:38.000 I feel like there was one other thing tonight, but I can't remember it.

00:06:42.000 What was I gonna talk about?

00:06:43.000 I should have wrote it down because I... I had something that I forgot.

00:06:54.000 Oh yeah, well I wanted to get a little bit into, and maybe we'll talk about this more tomorrow, or certainly we'll talk about it later in the year, but the 2024 Republican primary, which I didn't even do a show about.

00:07:08.000 I haven't talked about it yet.

00:07:10.000 I just feel like there's not really even a point to doing that.

00:07:15.000 But in case you missed it, the former governor of New Jersey, Chris Christie, jumped in the race.

00:07:21.000 And Mike Pence, former Vice President, has also entered the race.

00:07:26.000 So it's actually a pretty big field now.

00:07:28.000 You've got DeSantis.

00:07:32.000 Nikki Haley, Tim Scott, Chris Christie, Mike Pence, Vivek, Ramaswamy, Asa Hutchinson, and I think they're even expecting potentially more candidates, but I believe that's everybody so far.

00:07:46.000 I don't know that any of them are polling particularly well.

00:07:49.000 It is essentially a two-man race between Trump and DeSantis and even almost every state by double digits.

00:07:58.000 Like 20, 30, 40 percent.

00:08:00.000 He's leading nationally by 20, 30 percent.

00:08:04.000 And it's also important to say that although DeSantis and Trump are the only candidates with double-digit support at all, and although it's theoretically a two-man race because probably they're the only two that could conceivably win DeSantis, but theoretically if anyone from the non-Trump category is gonna win, he would be competitive.

00:08:29.000 But in effect it is not a two-man race because probably all of these candidates will get to the first primary next year or the Iowa caucus and they'll probably all last through at least Super Tuesday.

00:08:43.000 So although theoretically it's a two-man race, it's not a two-man race.

00:08:47.000 It's not actually a two-man race and I said earlier in the year that that's notable because it's really a one-man race.

00:08:56.000 It's Trump and it's not Trump.

00:08:59.000 And the more people enter the race, the more that that is going to dilute the non-Trump or the anti-Trump vote.

00:09:09.000 That's why that matters.

00:09:10.000 And I think this is the consciousness.

00:09:12.000 It's really a Trump or a DeSantis choice.

00:09:15.000 It's even narrower than that.

00:09:16.000 It's a Trump or a not-Trump choice.

00:09:20.000 And as I said earlier this year, that is going to create complications.

00:09:26.000 Because in the Iowa caucus, in the New Hampshire and South Carolina primary, in the Nevada caucus, you're gonna have all the Trump supporters, you're gonna have at least four for Trump, and then everything else, it's the non-Trumpers fighting for it.

00:09:40.000 So that 2% for Vivek, the 5% for Haley, the 5% for Mike Pence, the 1% for this one and that one,

00:09:50.000 If there's 10 or 15 percent support, which maybe that's being generous, but if there's even 10 percent support for all the other candidates in the race that really hurt DeSantis.

00:10:03.000 So strategically, I think that's the only thing that matters.

00:10:07.000 But Chris Christie jumped in the race yesterday, and it was a disaster.

00:10:12.000 I don't know if you all watched it, but he did a

00:10:16.000 One of these really sad events.

00:10:18.000 You remember just how pathetic politics was before Trump?

00:10:22.000 Trump is like a rock star.

00:10:24.000 He's like Taylor Swift.

00:10:25.000 He's like to a stadium and he's got 20,000 fans screaming.

00:10:31.000 He flies in on a giant airplane with his name on it and they've got a giant LED wall and they have American flags hanging from a crane and the optics are unbelievable.

00:10:48.000 And people forget.

00:10:49.000 I remember because I watched the 26th.

00:10:51.000 I remember they do these little events.

00:10:54.000 They go to like a Holiday Inn Express in New Hampshire and they get a little conference room with like 30 people and that's their event and that's it.

00:11:06.000 They go up to the fifth floor of the Holiday Inn Express in a parking lot next to a Walmart in the middle of Iowa or in the middle of New Hampshire

00:11:14.000 And they talk to like 50- And the production's terrible!

00:11:18.000 Like, Chris Christie, so he's in this tiny room, there's no teleprompter, it's not scripted, he's not good at speaking extemporaneously, he's got like a microphone that's wired to a battery pack?

00:11:32.000 He's got a microphone clipped to his lapel with a wire sticking out.

00:11:37.000 And it's a black wire against a white shirt.

00:11:39.000 So it's a black wire... And he's pacing around the room.

00:11:43.000 He's like, 500 pounds.

00:11:47.000 And I don't even care what comes out of his mouth.

00:11:49.000 I look at that and that's just not it.

00:11:51.000 Like, that's not gonna be the president.

00:11:52.000 So I don't even take it seriously.

00:11:54.000 That's why I don't even talk about it.

00:11:56.000 Everybody knows that's not... that's not gonna work.

00:11:59.000 And same thing with Mike Pence.

00:12:01.000 Mike Pence did a town hall today.

00:12:02.000 He released an advertisement.

00:12:04.000 And it's more of the same.

00:12:06.000 The exceptional Trump is.

00:12:08.000 And I know I've been a very harsh critic of Trump in the last couple years.

00:12:14.000 And I stand by the criticisms.

00:12:15.000 I still think that he could be so much better.

00:12:18.000 He could be so much more.

00:12:21.000 Nevertheless, what he is, is still head and shoulders above literally everything else.

00:12:28.000 Like everything else put together, times a million.

00:12:31.000 Trump is, and we're not even really satisfied with where Trump is.

00:12:36.000 But that's just what a gulf there is between him and the party and everything else.

00:12:43.000 I watch these advertisements, I watch these speeches.

00:12:46.000 One, every single candidate, Tim Scott, DeSantis, Christie, Mike Pence, thoroughly unimpressive as human beings.

00:12:56.000 They're not funny, they're not lively, they're not engaging.

00:13:01.000 And this was my big criticism of Trump recently, is that he's gotten boring, and that's a huge part of his appeal.

00:13:07.000 But you put him next to these guys, and even now that Trump is a little bit older than he was the first time and gone through a lot, he's still more lively.

00:13:17.000 So that's the first thing, is they have no, there's no charisma, there's no persightment and energy to the table.

00:13:23.000 They don't have that look, they don't have the production, they don't have this cult following, the star power and the

00:13:30.000 The notoriety that that attracts?

00:13:33.000 But worse, worse than that, it's not just that they're boring, it's not just that they're all boring, predictable rubes that I hate, like I personally hate.

00:13:42.000 Specifically, I hate when they wear jeans.

00:13:45.000 I hate when they all go sleeves, and they go to some diner, and they do this folksy, alright now America, we're gonna make a comeback.

00:13:57.000 It just sucks.

00:13:59.000 But it's not just that.

00:14:00.000 It's the worse than that, although I really care about that stuff, worse than that is the substance.

00:14:08.000 Trump goes out there, and even on his worst day, he literally goes up there and talks about totalitarian China.

00:14:15.000 He goes, you know, in China they don't have a drug problem because they kill them.

00:14:20.000 That means they kill them.

00:14:22.000 He goes, so I was talking to President Xi

00:14:27.000 And he says, we have no drug problem.

00:14:29.000 Fast trial.

00:14:30.000 You know what that means.

00:14:30.000 They kill them.

00:14:32.000 That's on a bad day.

00:14:33.000 On a bad day he goes up there and says, we need to sh** policy.

00:14:37.000 That's Trump policy.

00:14:39.000 More death.

00:14:40.000 More death penalty.

00:14:42.000 We have a crime problem.

00:14:44.000 Kill them all.

00:14:47.000 And then you see the advertisements for everybody else.

00:14:49.000 I watched the Mike Pence ad today.

00:14:51.000 I don't remember a single thing from it.

00:14:55.000 It's the usual stock footage.

00:14:57.000 It's a black guy, naturally.

00:14:59.000 It's a farm.

00:15:00.000 It's a factory.

00:15:01.000 It's with the button-down shirt.

00:15:05.000 And he goes in and it's so generic.

00:15:07.000 It's talking about freedom and runaway inflation and blah blah blah.

00:15:13.000 The enemies of democracy are on the march.

00:15:16.000 I swear, they all have the same speechwriter.

00:15:20.000 Because they all...it's literally like

00:15:25.000 It's like eyes wide shut.

00:15:26.000 Now that I've told you that, go out in your life and listen for this.

00:15:31.000 Listen for the next time you hear someone say, on the march.

00:15:35.000 The enemies of America are on the march.

00:15:39.000 I've been watching politics every day for like 10 years.

00:15:43.000 That's always what they're on the march.

00:15:45.000 On the march.

00:15:46.000 What does that mean?

00:15:47.000 Marching where?

00:15:48.000 Marching here?

00:15:49.000 How?

00:15:51.000 Are they gonna do that?

00:15:54.000 The enemies of America are on the march.

00:15:56.000 When are they gonna get here?

00:15:57.000 Like, marching where?

00:15:59.000 Nobody's marching.

00:16:01.000 What does that even mean?

00:16:03.000 The idea that any country is mobilizing for war against America, we're mobilizing for war against everyone else.

00:16:11.000 We're on the march against Russia, China, Iran, Venezuela.

00:16:17.000 We're sending carrier strike groups to their border.

00:16:22.000 We say they're on the march.

00:16:25.000 That's not going to happen.

00:16:27.000 But they'll always say that.

00:16:28.000 That was in the advertisement today.

00:16:31.000 I was watching it and it immediately pissed me off.

00:16:34.000 The enemies of America are on the march.

00:16:38.000 But you know what?

00:16:39.000 It's even deeper.

00:16:40.000 I don't just end group, focus group, tested, generic, reused.

00:16:46.000 It's not just that.

00:16:47.000 Let's use that as an example.

00:16:49.000 They all say the enemies of America are on the march.

00:16:53.000 The enemies of democracy.

00:16:55.000 And I've said this before, I think, in some way.

00:17:00.000 But there's a really toxic idea in that.

00:17:03.000 When any other Republican talks about foreign policy, or even democracy, they're against it.

00:17:09.000 They hate America.

00:17:09.000 They hate democracy.

00:17:11.000 And variously they'll talk about Iran, China, Russia, sometimes Venezuela, sometimes North Korea.

00:17:23.000 You have to think about the frame that that sets up.

00:17:26.000 A lot of people just accept these things, but think about the framing.

00:17:29.000 Think about the idea behind that expression.

00:17:32.000 Where we're supposed to feel anxiety, we're supposed to feel threatened.

00:17:37.000 These other countries have antipathy towards us.

00:17:39.000 We're in danger because we're in an ideological war.

00:17:43.000 They don't share our values.

00:17:45.000 But that's not what's going on.

00:17:47.000 That's not how the world works.

00:17:49.000 That's not what's going on.

00:17:51.000 We are not imperiled by these countries.

00:17:53.000 As a matter of fact, it's the other way around.

00:17:55.000 We imperil them with our warmongering.

00:18:00.000 So not only is none of that true,

00:18:03.000 But even I would go further and say specifically that mindset is a product of CIA intelligence control over the media during the Cold War.

00:18:14.000 This is a very Cold War fabricated idea where the intelligence age is paying for radio stations and paying public commentators and paying the media to go out and paint this picture of an ideological war.

00:18:32.000 And it's the West and it's the free world versus communism.

00:18:36.000 Now at that time there was a lot of truth to that because the Soviet Union was a pariah state and they were spreading communism and that was a geo-strategic goal of theirs.

00:18:47.000 Europe fall to communism so they'd be allied with Russia.

00:18:52.000 It doesn't discount the fact that that was something that the CIA pushed very strongly.

00:18:57.000 This ideological clash.

00:19:00.000 The totalitarians, the dictators, the evil empire against us, the free world.

00:19:07.000 Back then, more or less it was justified, it was still inorganic.

00:19:12.000 It's just not even true.

00:19:13.000 We are not in an ideological war.

00:19:16.000 China is not really an ideological state, neither is Russia, neither is Turkey, neither are Iran.

00:19:24.000 What do these countries all have in common?

00:19:27.000 They say it's the ideology of authoritarianism.

00:19:30.000 Authoritarianism isn't really an ideology.

00:19:34.000 They don't have too much in common.

00:19:38.000 Islam.

00:19:40.000 In Iran, they have a revolutionary Shiite Iranian government, which is anti-American.

00:19:45.000 Turkey's a part of NATO.

00:19:47.000 In Russia, Vladimir Putin is trying to recreate the Eastern Orthodox state religion in Russia, and it's growing slowly, but it's more about establishing identity for the nation and legitimacy for the state.

00:20:01.000 In China, they do still endow, but they're also far more conservative than they were 50 years ago.

00:20:06.000 Now they're pushing Confucian traditional Chinese philosophy in the classrooms.

00:20:12.000 So, this premise that they all have something in common because they all have strong states, it's really quite the opposite.

00:20:20.000 All these states have reverted to a non-ideological or an anti-ideological posture.

00:20:28.000 Kamal Ataturk and they're becoming, once again, a Muslim power.

00:20:34.000 Russia, the same way, is no longer communist.

00:20:37.000 They are once again just becoming this Eurasian authoritarian country.

00:20:43.000 China, same deal.

00:20:44.000 They have an emperor.

00:20:49.000 And so things are fundamentally different than they were back then.

00:20:52.000 It's not ideological.

00:20:56.000 And so this premise that they always come up with about there's this ideological war.

00:21:01.000 It's America and our allies versus the totalitarians.

00:21:05.000 We're at threat.

00:21:06.000 We're constantly at war.

00:21:08.000 Feel anxious.

00:21:11.000 This is, one, the agenda of the intelligence community and of the national security apparatus for more war, for more foreign aid, more military aid to support these entangling alliances.

00:21:25.000 Now they want to rebuild NATO.

00:21:27.000 Remember Trump came in in 16 and said, we don't want to pay for NATO's military anymore?

00:21:33.000 What do you think it means when Mike Pence and the rest say that the enemies of democracy are on the march?

00:21:39.000 It means more money to Ukraine.

00:21:40.000 It means we're gonna firmly... Your bills again.

00:21:43.000 Pay for Germany, pay for the UK, pay for France, now pay for Australia.

00:21:51.000 So, even a simple phrase like that, and I know that stylistically it's very cringe and played out,

00:22:01.000 But the reason that they use that over and over and over again is because the framing behind it is so important.

00:22:08.000 Freedom Crusader, at war with the world at all times, which is set completely against the Trump idea, which Trump as a businessman and as a true nationalist has been saying for 30 years, we just want to get along with everybody.

00:22:25.000 They are our rivals, we are competing with them, and we want to be a strong nation

00:22:32.000 But we want to get along.

00:22:33.000 China, conflict is unacceptable.

00:22:37.000 And the best way to defend ourselves against these nations is to develop a strong economy.

00:22:43.000 Through trade, through manufacturing.

00:22:48.000 And these are completely distinct and different worldviews.

00:22:52.000 Trump was willing to cross into North Korea and shake hands with Kim Jong-un.

00:22:56.000 Mike Pence and the rest would say, are totalitarian!

00:23:01.000 An enemy of America on the freaking march!

00:23:04.000 But Trump goes over there and steps across the border and shakes hands and takes a picture and says, conflict is unacceptable.

00:23:12.000 It's bad for business.

00:23:13.000 It's bad for America.

00:23:15.000 A rival and clearly there's a deep distrust between the two nations.

00:23:22.000 But the goal is to bring these people to the negotiating table

00:23:27.000 So that we can establish peaceful relations and conduct trade in a competitive way but in a peaceful way.

00:23:34.000 As rivals rather than as enemies or as opponents.

00:23:39.000 Which is what this Cold War era, neocon, intel community thinking and that kind of language is trying to instill in everybody.

00:23:50.000 So...

00:23:54.000 You know, I probably should have done a show, but now that I'm talking about it, I mean, it's actually good material for a show, but Mike Pence and Christie going in there, as I said, it just demonstrates that Trump is in a different category in ways that people don't even fully understand, in ways that may not even be perceptible to somebody who doesn't look at the details on this level.

00:24:16.000 Which I wouldn't blame you.

00:24:18.000 It's designed to get past your mental defense.

00:24:20.000 It's designed that way.

00:24:22.000 It's designed to get past the goalie.

00:24:25.000 So we don't even think twice.

00:24:27.000 But the Trump rhetoric is, make America great again.

00:24:33.000 And the other slogans are about our relative role in the world.

00:24:38.000 And I can't let China do that.

00:24:41.000 And Trump says, let's make our own country great.

00:24:44.000 Specifically, this is the last example I'll give.

00:24:48.000 In his first speech in 2015, he went out there and said, our leaders are stupid.

00:24:53.000 Their leaders are smart.

00:24:56.000 He introduced a totally new concept.

00:24:58.000 He said, what do you think the Chinese negotiators are going to try to do?

00:25:01.000 They're going to try to get the best deal for China.

00:25:04.000 They're the enemy.

00:25:05.000 Our leaders are stupid because they're supposed to be representing us.

00:25:09.000 If China's negotiators are representing China, and America's negotiators are representing Chinese companies, who's representing America?

00:25:18.000 You can't get mad at China for that, and you can't get mad at their leaders.

00:25:22.000 You have to get mad at our leaders for our

00:25:25.000 Underperformance.

00:25:27.000 Our ineptitude.

00:25:27.000 Beframing to say, don't blame China.

00:25:31.000 China is doing what it does.

00:25:35.000 A nation will assert its self-interest.

00:25:38.000 What we need to do is assert ours.

00:25:43.000 And this is towards a very traditional, very historical vision of great power politics, which is that politics and politics is a tool for states to exert their will on the world.

00:25:59.000 This is a very old idea, as opposed to this information, psychological warfare, Cold War stuff.

00:26:07.000 It's not enough that we recognize that China is a legitimate nation that has existed forever, and they probably will exist forever, and they probably will be a great power in perpetuity.

00:26:33.000 Which is, like, obvious.

00:26:35.000 We have to say, no, no.

00:26:36.000 We have to hate them.

00:26:38.000 We have to think they're evil.

00:26:39.000 We have to think they're immoral because of things that they're doing.

00:26:42.000 Because of things that are in, what is it, Xinjiang, where the Uyghurs are being rounded up and indoctrinated.

00:26:52.000 We gotta get all the people on board.

00:26:55.000 We have to manufacture consent for some war.

00:27:02.000 Based on this idea of, again, their ideology.

00:27:07.000 This ideological thing is a historic... It's gotta go.

00:27:11.000 And anyway, that's... I'm getting a little sidetracked, but that's just another rich example of where Trump is so different.

00:27:17.000 When have you ever heard anyone say something like that?

00:27:20.000 DeSantis and all the rest, they say about Putin, he's a gas station attendant with nuclear bombs.

00:27:28.000 What a juvenile way to look at the world.

00:27:30.000 He also happens to be the leader of the 11th largest economy, massive oil, biggest nuclear arsenal in the world, second biggest conventional, third biggest conventional military in the world, leader of a rival block of nations.

00:27:45.000 To talk about the sovereign of a great nation like Russia with a rich 1,000 year history,

00:27:52.000 They call it the Tsar, the third successor of Rome.

00:27:56.000 A new Caesar.

00:27:57.000 And they say, here's a freaking gas station!

00:28:00.000 It's such a low, crass, vulgar way of speaking and symptomatic of, like, all the language is being utilized for psychological warfare.

00:28:16.000 When we talk about Russia, when we talk about China, it's meant to demean, it's meant to ridicule, it's meant to humiliate.

00:28:22.000 This is just not mature.

00:28:26.000 This is not in anybody's best interest.

00:28:28.000 It's not sensible.

00:28:30.000 It's not even really a real foreign policy.

00:28:32.000 What that is?

00:28:34.000 is a information war against everybody.

00:28:38.000 That's just like this nut job neocon like we're at war with everyone always with constant propaganda.

00:28:48.000 Everything.

00:28:49.000 Our war is going to be made to degrade other countries.

00:28:54.000 Right?

00:28:55.000 We're going to spy on them.

00:28:56.000 We're going to attack their proxies.

00:28:58.000 We're going to foment revolution.

00:29:01.000 And then when we're on the debate stage, we're gonna emasculate their leaders.

00:29:05.000 It's like... That kind of thing has to go.

00:29:10.000 Only Trump understands that.

00:29:12.000 And the rest of them... I don't think the rest of them is...

00:29:19.000 I think they're just as not conscientious of that as your average person.

00:29:25.000 I think they just want to be president, they get their talking points from a think tank, from some all-in-one consulting firm.

00:29:32.000 I don't think there's really a lot of thought in most of these politicians.

00:29:35.000 They just say it because they're representatives of this machine.

00:29:38.000 Anyway, so point is, is grandma on the stage talking about slavery?

00:29:43.000 Get real.

00:29:44.000 Then you got Nikki Haley, who's a joke.

00:29:47.000 Then you got Chris Christie.

00:29:50.000 And this guy gives a speech.

00:29:52.000 Did you watch the speech?

00:29:55.000 And Trump pointed this out, but I watched like, I don't know, a half hour of it.

00:30:00.000 And the theme of the speech is that the establishment wants us to think small, but we need to think pretty mediocre messaging.

00:30:09.000 Maybe that might work on somebody else.

00:30:12.000 But I don't know how anybody, not only is that pretty blatant when you're a morbidly obese man, like that's the central messaging is about size and you're 500 pounds, like I don't know how you would think that's a good idea to say that once.

00:30:29.000 But he said it over and exaggerating.

00:30:31.000 I couldn't believe it.

00:30:32.000 I watched the speech and just kept coming back and back.

00:30:37.000 Small and big, small and big, small and big.

00:30:41.000 Like, what a disaster, but this is the kind of stuff that politicians are just known for.

00:30:45.000 They're just idiots like this.

00:30:48.000 Like, who thought that was a good idea?

00:30:50.000 Did nobody raise their hand and say, um, Governor Christie, you're huge.

00:30:54.000 Like, don't you think candidates can't think big and you're fatter than everyone?

00:31:00.000 Nobody said that?

00:31:02.000 And then nobody said, don't say it a thousand times in the speech to make it even more obvious than it is?

00:31:10.000 So that's dead in the water.

00:31:12.000 And then the Mike Pence, I mean, that guy's just such an asshole, I just can't even believe it.

00:31:18.000 So, neither of them have a chance of winning the Manoff votes from DeSantis.

00:31:23.000 I don't think anybody is going to be won over.

00:31:27.000 They're both going hard against Trump and it just simply doesn't work because they all work for Trump.

00:31:32.000 Nikki Haley worked for Trump.

00:31:33.000 Chris Christie worked for Trump.

00:31:38.000 DeSantis even endorsed Trump.

00:31:41.000 Mike Pence was Trump's vice president.

00:31:43.000 How are you going to go and run a campaign saying that we can't have Trump?

00:31:47.000 So I don't think any of them, clearly none of them, have a shot at winning any state or any delegates or even going to come close to winning the nomination.

00:31:59.000 And if anything, I think they really only help Trump.

00:32:02.000 They're shaping the race to Trump versus anti-Trump.

00:32:06.000 And here's the dynamic.

00:32:08.000 All it's going to do is make anti-Trump people towards the others.

00:32:12.000 It's going to make DeSantis have to be more anti-Trump to compete with these other guys.

00:32:16.000 Because the real Trump haters in the Republican Party, they're going to want to go for Christie or Pence, who are really gunning for him.

00:32:23.000 Or they're going to go for Haley, who's a total moderate.

00:32:28.000 And so, I think DeSantis is gonna get squeezed.

00:32:31.000 All the Trump guys are going for Trump.

00:32:33.000 All the extreme people are going for Trump.

00:32:36.000 Hangover.

00:32:37.000 What is he fighting for here?

00:32:39.000 The people that are very conservative, but don't like Trump, but like Trump enough that they like what he's saying, but they just don't like him as a guy?

00:32:48.000 I think that's a very small constituency.

00:32:52.000 The very anti-Trump people and the moderate people are going to go for the other candidates.

00:32:56.000 That's why you can't call it a two-man race.

00:32:58.000 It really is a one-man race.

00:33:01.000 And in a lot of ways, just like the 2016 primary, it worked out exactly the same way.

00:33:08.000 So, anyway.

00:33:10.000 So that's that.

00:33:11.000 But I want to move on.

00:33:12.000 I want to get into the news.

00:33:13.000 Man, we're already 45 minutes in.

00:33:15.000 I don't know if I'm going to get to everything.

00:33:18.000 But I'll try.

00:33:21.000 You know, maybe I'll just cover the DOJ because yeah, I mean, here's now.

00:33:28.000 I've already been live, well, I don't know, 37 minutes?

00:33:34.000 I guess I could get to both.

00:33:35.000 Okay, I'll do both.

00:33:38.000 I always do this.

00:33:40.000 So our first story is about this child pornography, which is apparently all over Instagram and Facebook.

00:33:47.000 And by the way, this is a well-known problem on all of the major social media.

00:33:51.000 Several years ago, talking about how child pornography was a persistent problem on Twitter.

00:33:58.000 And Twitter's a platform, by the way, which allows pornography.

00:34:02.000 Unlike Meta, unlike Instagram, which do not allow nudity, which do not allow sexual pornographic content, Twitter does allow it.

00:34:11.000 And so that platform was scrutinized years ago for having this very important problem.

00:34:17.000 But now there's a new study from Stanford that says that Facebook and Instagram, both meta companies, despite not allowing pornographic content, are rife with child porn somehow.

00:34:30.000 And it's not hidden.

00:34:32.000 It's not even being obscured in any way.

00:34:37.000 They're out there advertising it publicly.

00:34:39.000 And this is the story of a report from Stanford.

00:34:44.000 It says, quote, Instagram, the popular social media site owned by Meta Platforms, helps connect and promote a vast network of accounts openly devoted to the commission and purchase of underage sex content, according to investigations by the Wall Street Journal and researchers at Stanford University.

00:35:01.000 Pedophiles have long used the internet, but unlike the forums and file transfer services that cater to pedophiles, Instagram doesn't merely host these activities, its algorithms promote them.

00:35:13.000 Instagram connects pedophiles and guides them to content sellers via recommendation systems that excel in linking those who share niche interests, according to the Wall Street Journal and academic researchers.

00:35:27.000 Although out of sight for most on the platform, the sexualized accounts on Instagram searchers found that Instagram enabled people to search explicit hashtags such as pedo whore and hashtag preteen sex and connected them to accounts that use the terms to advertise child sex material for sale.

00:35:45.000 Such accounts often claim to be run by the children themselves and use overtly sexual handles.

00:35:51.000 Instagram accounts offering to sell illicit sex material generally don't publish it opens of content which invite buyers to commission specific acts.

00:36:01.000 Such as for example videos of children harming themselves and imagery of the minor performing sex acts with animals.

00:36:08.000 This is on Instagram and Facebook.

00:36:11.000 At the right price children are available for in-person quote meetups.

00:36:17.000 The promotion of underage sex content violates rules established by META as well.

00:36:21.000 Questions from the journal META acknowledged the problem within its enforcement operation and said that it has set up an internal task force to address the issues raised.

00:36:31.000 META said it has in the past two years taken down 27 pedophile networks and is planning more removals.

00:36:38.000 Since receiving the journal's inquiries, the platform said it has blocked thousands of hashtags and sexualized children, some with millions of posts, and restricted its systems from recommending users search for terms known to be associated with sex abuse.

00:36:56.000 So I saw the story and my first reaction is something like this, okay?

00:37:03.000 There are two and a half billion active users on Facebook.

00:37:07.000 There's over a billion active users on Instagram.

00:37:11.000 Difficult to police the whole platform?

00:37:13.000 You know, I like to give the benefit of the doubt and say maybe there's a lapse in enforcement.

00:37:21.000 It's pretty tough to catch all of that.

00:37:25.000 Then again, you read the details and it says there's millions, millions

00:37:32.000 Of entries for these hashtags, and the kind of depravity that's going on.

00:37:36.000 I don't understand.

00:37:37.000 The volume of that is incredible.

00:37:38.000 So clearly, and I think maybe a normal person, I think an average person who's not as conspiratorial, who's not as right-wing, would say something like, well, they can't catch everything, they're not perfect.

00:37:50.000 But we're talking about millions of posts.

00:37:54.000 I understand maybe you don't get everything, but you don't get millions of posts?

00:38:00.000 It's a hashtag!

00:38:02.000 And Peddo, if you're on the Facebook back end, if you're an enforcer, if you're a moderator, they're openly advertising it with a hashtag.

00:38:12.000 Nobody thinks to look up a hashtag that says Peddo and find the millions of posts?

00:38:18.000 That's pretty hard to dismiss as negligence.

00:38:24.000 That's hard to dismiss as some

00:38:28.000 The fact that the algorithm is promoting it and helping people find more of it, that's just what the algorithm does with anything.

00:38:35.000 The algorithm amplifies content that people see.

00:38:37.000 So if pedophiles are on the platform and they're looking for that, the algorithm is going to show them more content like what they search for.

00:38:46.000 But if you're Facebook and you see that the algorithm is helping proliferate this content, all the rest, they have to be aware of that.

00:38:57.000 That's sort of the whole point.

00:38:59.000 The algorithm is meant to intensify a user's engagement with the content.

00:39:04.000 It's supposed to get more of it.

00:39:06.000 So people can find it and people can create it.

00:39:10.000 It's a social network.

00:39:11.000 So it's rallying people around these nodes based on interest.

00:39:16.000 So the algorithm, as a consequence, it's creating this massive problem

00:39:22.000 Through the algorithm, through the hashtag system, such that it's now massive.

00:39:28.000 They just don't see that.

00:39:30.000 They just can't find it.

00:39:33.000 Again, they're aware of it.

00:39:34.000 They said they've taken out 27 pedophile networks.

00:39:37.000 They know it's going on.

00:39:39.000 And clearly, based on Wall Street Journal's reporting, they could very quickly identify it.

00:39:47.000 And the sheer volume of it?

00:39:49.000 I imagine that's hard to ignore.

00:39:51.000 It's a platform of billions of users, but millions of posts?

00:39:55.000 Pornographic?

00:39:56.000 Involving children?

00:39:56.000 Illegal?

00:39:58.000 You're not aware of that?

00:40:00.000 Now add to that that the Wall Street Journal brings their findings with Stanford to Facebook.

00:40:07.000 That easy?

00:40:09.000 All Wall Street Journal had to do was say, hey Facebook, remember that pedophiles exist?

00:40:15.000 And then Facebook said, oh yeah, we forgot to enforce rules against that for years apparently.

00:40:22.000 We'll just ban all of it now.

00:40:25.000 That's the other part that doesn't really fit.

00:40:27.000 So this story is pretty bad.

00:40:30.000 It's one thing to say, and I want to differ, because I think a lot of people look at things like this, people that are not suspicious of the regime, they're not suspicious of the big corporations or government, they say things like, or maybe they don't say this, but unconsciously their idea is this.

00:40:47.000 There's a problem in the world.

00:40:50.000 Of course, powerful structures are not able to preemptively solve every problem or anticipate consequence.

00:41:00.000 So it's the media's job to find these sorts of things and bring them to the attention of the public so that they can be rectified.

00:41:07.000 And so I think some people might see that happening here.

00:41:11.000 And see, well, there's this issue.

00:41:13.000 The Journal reported on it.

00:41:14.000 Facebook took action.

00:41:16.000 But that just doesn't square with the nature of the problem.

00:41:22.000 The fact that it's already- I mean, pornographic content isn't allowed.

00:41:26.000 This is illegal pornographic content.

00:41:29.000 With massive volume.

00:41:32.000 Add to that, there's hashtags with the term in the name.

00:41:36.000 So like I imagine, for example, and this is going to get me to the next point, I imagine that when Facebook is looking to ban right-wing extremists, what are some terms they're going to look for?

00:41:47.000 Maybe white nationalists?

00:41:48.000 Maybe Q?

00:41:51.000 And I imagine that they would use keywords like that, I'd imagine they'd use those categories or terms to locate accounts, groups, hashtags, again,

00:42:04.000 They'll find where people are getting more content from the algorithm that is like that using that kind of method.

00:42:12.000 Now that have pedo in the name.

00:42:14.000 They have pedo pedophile in the name.

00:42:18.000 So how can you say oh oopsie we didn't have it when there's hashtags with the infraction in the name?

00:42:27.000 That is just like criminal negligence at that point.

00:42:32.000 You've got a vast moderation team.

00:42:34.000 This is a $500 billion company.

00:42:37.000 It's the top fucking about meta, which controls both Instagram and Facebook.

00:42:42.000 They've got thousands and thousands and thousands of content moderators.

00:42:45.000 They've got artificial intelligence.

00:42:49.000 You're telling me they really wanted to get rid of this content?

00:42:54.000 But the AI, which they work with these universities to build, they've got the finest AI detection.

00:43:00.000 Although it's not always perfect, but they're at the cutting edge.

00:43:03.000 And their thousands of contracted human moderators, they didn't think to look up hashtag pedo to find the pedo content and delete it?

00:43:11.000 I find that hard to believe.

00:43:14.000 And then there's the response.

00:43:17.000 Wall Street Journal brings us attention, hey, you got all this content on your platform, and Facebook says, oh, okay, we'll just delete it.

00:43:27.000 And it's like, that's easy, why didn't they just do that before?

00:43:32.000 Why would people outside Facebook working at the Wall Street Journal have a better knowledge of the regulatory and oversight environment on Facebook than Facebook?

00:43:44.000 Why would a journalism company

00:43:47.000 Have a better idea of what's happening on Facebook than that tech company.

00:43:53.000 I find that hard to believe.

00:43:55.000 And I don't think it's a coincidence, and I'm trying to be as precise as possible, but I don't think it's a coincidence that the sexualization of children and child porn

00:44:08.000 You always find it at the highest levels.

00:44:10.000 You always find it.

00:44:11.000 You find references to it with John and Tony Podesta and Hillary Clinton.

00:44:16.000 You find references to it in drag queens with their penises hanging out in front of kids.

00:44:21.000 And then it's also all over Facebook and Instagram?

00:44:26.000 I don't know.

00:44:27.000 I don't think so.

00:44:29.000 I think maybe there's... there may be more to the story there.

00:44:33.000 Another point which I think is important here is this.

00:44:38.000 We know that Facebook and Instagram are some of the worst when it comes to policing right-wing content.

00:44:43.000 That's the landscape.

00:44:44.000 It's not just Facebook and Instagram, although they're some of the worst, but YouTube and Twitter and all the rest, TikTok, Reddit, Discord, they're very severe about enforcing their restrictions and guidelines against right-wing content.

00:45:00.000 I've had this experience in the past where I'll make an account on TikTok

00:45:06.000 And it gets banned in 30 minutes.

00:45:08.000 I make an account.

00:45:09.000 They know it's me.

00:45:10.000 They ban me in 30 minutes.

00:45:12.000 I've had the same experience on Instagram.

00:45:16.000 I've gone through 20 accounts on Instagram.

00:45:19.000 Somehow they ban it before I get 100 followers.

00:45:22.000 They ban it before I make one single post.

00:45:25.000 Twitter.

00:45:26.000 I'll make a new account.

00:45:27.000 I get locked out of it instantly now.

00:45:31.000 You go on TikTok, you can't even search my name if you view results at all.

00:45:34.000 It'll say, this is hate speech.

00:45:37.000 My name.

00:45:39.000 So let me get this straight.

00:45:41.000 I can't make a Twitter account and it lasts more than 15 minutes, but there's child porn all over the platform.

00:45:48.000 I can't make an Instagram account that lasts a day, but there's millions of posts depicting child pornography on the platform.

00:45:57.000 They can clog me in 50p based on my

00:46:01.000 Based on this sort of fabricated device ID, this inferred digital identity that they'll get, based on your keyboard settings and other things, you know, they're going to come up, in other words, with these extremely sophisticated methods.

00:46:18.000 Of tracking for the purpose of moderation as well as for advertisements.

00:46:22.000 They can do all that at the Capitol and they can get everybody that believes in QAnon and they can get everybody in the Nick Fuentes Twitter space or who's a griper or who says the n-word, but you can't get everybody that's posting kids having sex with animals?

00:46:36.000 Like, how does that even make any sense?

00:46:38.000 If you're a right-wing person,

00:46:41.000 And you post a conspiracy theory.

00:46:43.000 You talk about Jews on these platforms.

00:46:46.000 They have a way of finding you.

00:46:48.000 You go out there.

00:46:50.000 You think you could do it in a way where it's going to evade the algorithm.

00:46:53.000 It's going to evade detection.

00:46:55.000 And somehow they find it.

00:46:56.000 They always do.

00:46:58.000 But you've got millions of posts depicting menus where people can purchase content of kids having sex with animals or harming themselves.

00:47:09.000 That eludes them somehow.

00:47:13.000 And here's the kicker on how actually Twitter is struggling with advertisers because of the right-wing content on the platform.

00:47:20.000 This is a story from several months ago.

00:47:25.000 It says, quote, Twitter's ad sales staff is concerned that advertisers may be spooked by a rise in hate speech and pornography on the social network, as well as more ads featuring online gambling and marijuana products.

00:47:39.000 This month will be down at least 56% each week compared with a year ago.

00:47:46.000 Now they say, well it's not just hate speech, it's also porn and marijuana and gambling.

00:47:52.000 Really?

00:47:52.000 Because Twitter has always allowed that.

00:47:55.000 Twitter has allowed pornography for a long time and the first time that they really got a major influx of porn was years ago.

00:48:02.000 Tumblr had all the child porn several years ago.

00:48:07.000 Why didn't Twitter lose 56% of its advertisers when that happened?

00:48:12.000 The pornographic content on Twitter exploded when they shut Tumblr down.

00:48:15.000 It was a big story.

00:48:18.000 I don't remember a commensurate decline in the number of ad revenue dollars.

00:48:24.000 And the same goes for the marijuana, the rest of it.

00:48:28.000 As a matter of fact, I was being organized at the end of last year by the ADL as a direct response to hate speech and to the increase in the number of anti-Semitic posts on the platform.

00:48:41.000 I don't recall it having anything to do with porn, gambling, weed.

00:48:47.000 All of this is to say

00:48:50.000 There's a bigger story here.

00:48:52.000 There's a big picture here, which is this.

00:48:58.000 How does all media make money?

00:49:01.000 How do they pay for Fox News?

00:49:04.000 How do they pay for Twitter?

00:49:05.000 How do they pay for Facebook?

00:49:06.000 A lot of people don't think about this, but it's important.

00:49:09.000 What's the business?

00:49:10.000 You use these platforms for free, but they're not free to operate.

00:49:14.000 So how do they make money?

00:49:16.000 Almost universally, it's ad revenue.

00:49:18.000 That's the big money.

00:49:19.000 This is supported.

00:49:21.000 That's how print and radio are supported.

00:49:23.000 That is how Twitter is supported.

00:49:24.000 That is how Facebook and Instagram and TikTok are supported.

00:49:28.000 It's all through ad revenue.

00:49:31.000 It's all through, specifically, major companies.

00:49:35.000 Major companies.

00:49:36.000 I'm talking about big corporations.

00:49:40.000 Have a discretionary budget.

00:49:43.000 And there are studies that say- Actually, the jury's really out on that.

00:49:47.000 But they have such a large revenue, they have such a large budget, and such a large discretionary budget, that they can spend exorbitant amounts of money on nothing but advertising, which may or may not even be profitable.

00:50:00.000 And it is that raft of money that comes from Wall Street, which supports television.

00:50:07.000 It is that raft of money from Wall Street that supports Facebook.

00:50:10.000 The other thing that supports these tech companies is contracts from the federal government.

00:50:16.000 A lot of the tech companies, they'll have their hand in a lot of different kinds of business, and some of their big business is with these government contractors.

00:50:26.000 And there's a big overlap.

00:50:28.000 There's like a real triangle here between Silicon Valley, Wall Street, DC, and I guess the real universities.

00:50:36.000 And so they all share the personnel, and the money flows around like that.

00:50:43.000 The money flows

00:50:45.000 From Wall Street into Silicon Valley.

00:50:47.000 From the federal government into Silicon Valley.

00:50:49.000 And of course, these media companies use their power to amplify narratives that are politically beneficial to both Wall Street and the government.

00:50:59.000 They censor what the government and Wall Street do like.

00:51:03.000 They create a general climate in the society that is predictable, that is within a specific parameter.

00:51:11.000 That's their relationship.

00:51:13.000 So when Elon Musk takes over Twitter, and he allows all this political dissent on the platform, suddenly the advertisers pull out.

00:51:21.000 Now Twitter's insolvent.

00:51:23.000 Suddenly all the major corporate budget is spent on unprofitable advertising.

00:51:27.000 They revoke the money.

00:51:30.000 And they say, I don't think so.

00:51:31.000 No more advertising money for Twitter.

00:51:35.000 Nobody is making the connection.

00:51:37.000 Nobody is saying, I'm not gonna buy a Hyundai because I saw an anti-semitic post on Twitter.

00:51:43.000 It's not happening.

00:51:44.000 Like, that's not a real concern.

00:51:46.000 Nobody is saying, I'm not gonna go and get McDonald's breakfast on McDonald's ad on Twitter, and I've also noticed an increase in the number of anti-semitic messages on Twitter.

00:51:56.000 That's not real.

00:51:59.000 It's political.

00:52:02.000 They are removing the funding because Twitter is no longer a project as mass media.

00:52:09.000 As mass media which controls the thinking and the thought process and the attitudes.

00:52:15.000 That is no longer conducive to the agenda of these major companies and of the federal government.

00:52:22.000 As such, they're not going to fund it anymore.

00:52:27.000 So it's going to disappear.

00:52:28.000 That mass media, which is very expensive,

00:52:31.000 Is that true?

00:52:40.000 And that they're gonna defund Twitter.

00:52:41.000 Like, that's what's happening.

00:52:43.000 They're going to defund Twitter as a political mechanism.

00:52:47.000 So that is what the Wall Street, Washington cabal does not want, is anti-Semitism and white, you know, white identity.

00:52:57.000 Any semblance of a white consciousness or an anti-non-white consciousness, that is inimical to their agenda.

00:53:05.000 That's their agenda.

00:53:07.000 Pornography.

00:53:09.000 No advertisers are going to pull out of Facebook and Instagram and Twitter because there's too much pornography.

00:53:15.000 No advertiser is going to pull out of these social media companies because there's too much child pornography.

00:53:21.000 I haven't heard of a steep drop off in advertisement revenue.

00:53:25.000 Have you?

00:53:26.000 I recall in July 2020 the ADL took conspiracies and it worked.

00:53:33.000 I recall in November 2022, ADL did the same thing to Twitter.

00:53:37.000 They called for an advertiser boycott in response to Elon Musk's promise for free speech.

00:53:43.000 And it worked!

00:53:45.000 They lost half their ad revenue.

00:53:47.000 I don't recall any sort of similar detrimental fall off in ad revenue when all the pornographers took their porn from Tumblr.

00:53:55.000 I don't recall it happening any time recently when many stories like this have been published on Facebook and Instagram or when they promote homosexuality or when they promote outright porn and other vulgarity.

00:54:09.000 So it's really more about how our society is run.

00:54:12.000 That they think anti-semitism is a bigger threat, it's a bigger problem, that's a bigger priority than prepubescent children being raped.

00:54:27.000 Like, that's who's in charge.

00:54:30.000 And the only society that could create a dynamic like that is one that isn't Christian.

00:54:36.000 Only a society that is probably run by Jews, as a matter of fact, would think that Holocaust denial is a bigger problem than child rape.

00:54:44.000 Who else would be a bigger priority and a bigger target and a bigger advertiser problem than kids getting raped?

00:54:52.000 Who else?

00:54:54.000 And you could say, maybe it's... I mean, that would be the group that cares about anti-Semitism, which it is.

00:55:00.000 That was the advertiser boycott in 20 against Facebook.

00:55:03.000 That's the advertiser boycott that's ongoing against Twitter.

00:55:08.000 Led by the ADL.

00:55:09.000 Led by a... But, conceivably, there's other instances of this where it's maybe not necessarily Jews, but they're not Christians.

00:55:18.000 That's the society that we've created.

00:55:21.000 We're being a real Christian, literally believing in God, having self-confidence as men, or as white people, or as Americans, believing in the truth, believing in the classics, believing in anything that is transcendent and anything that is unitive, is a political problem for the regime.

00:55:42.000 It is more odious to the regime than child rape.

00:55:47.000 Think about that.

00:55:50.000 And it's not to say that the regime isn't against that.

00:55:52.000 I mean, I'm sure there's a lot of sex trafficking, but I always think about Mastercard.

00:55:57.000 Mastercard threatened to defund OnlyFans and Pornhub years ago because of the platform.

00:56:01.000 So, I don't know that you can really... I think it's important for people to keep a level head about that sort of thing.

00:56:10.000 But, their priorities speak for themselves.

00:56:13.000 That at least as far as these platforms are concerned, you're going to have a bigger problem being an anti-Semite, and so-called anti-Semite, and saying we don't want to give money to Israel, than raping a kid.

00:56:26.000 And case in point, they just don't care about the latter.

00:56:29.000 The former, they've had that dialed in for seven years.

00:56:32.000 They've been perfecting it for years.

00:56:36.000 The child porn thing, they just haven't, they literally just haven't even gotten around to it.

00:56:40.000 What does that say?

00:56:42.000 What does that say about the people in leadership roles and their responsibility to the public?

00:56:48.000 You own and operate this mass communications platform.

00:56:51.000 ...political dissent against their agenda that they neglected to talk about the safety of kids.

00:57:01.000 So I think that's the big story.

00:57:03.000 I don't know how you look at this without regard for the censorship angle for the last seven years.

00:57:11.000 So, that's that.

00:57:14.000 And I'll clarify, you know, people have been critical of me over the last couple weeks because I said that people should get married when they're 16.

00:57:22.000 On a serious note, I do want to differentiate.

00:57:25.000 There's all the difference in the world between saying that people should get married as adolescents or as teenagers and child sex abuse that is happening for prepubescent children.

00:57:36.000 That is unacceptable.

00:57:37.000 People that do that should obviously get the death penalty.

00:57:41.000 That sort of thing has no quarter in a decent society.

00:57:46.000 And without getting into a big protracted discussion, we may end the Super Chats, but a lot of people have said, well, you're a pedophile to me because I've said, well, hey, 17-year-olds are kind of hot and probably it makes sense to not

00:58:01.000 Have the age of consent be as high as it is.

00:58:03.000 Maybe it should be 17, 16.

00:58:04.000 If you're talking about whether we have to get back to a society that views sexual morality in terms of marriage, not in terms of consent.

00:58:12.000 Because that gets rid of every problem.

00:58:14.000 Let's talk about marriage.

00:58:15.000 Now it's a different conversation.

00:58:19.000 But that's totally separate from what goes on here which is literal children, actual children who are not in an age of sexual maturity being straight up abused maliciously forever for their entire lives.

00:58:33.000 People that do that should get their heads cut off and obviously that should have no quarter.

00:58:38.000 So I just want to put that out there because I know people have said, oh, you know, you're for teen marriage.

00:58:43.000 Yeah, not really the same thing.

00:58:46.000 But anyway, I just thought I'd throw that out there.

00:58:49.000 Because that's been a hot topic lately.

00:58:50.000 I've been talking about it a lot.

00:58:51.000 And you know what?

00:58:52.000 Like... But it... But that's a... But it's very critical.

00:58:58.000 Why?

00:58:59.000 Well, we've gotten into that enough, but... Look, we want people to have sex within marriage.

00:59:05.000 When do people start wanting to have sex?

00:59:06.000 When they're adolescents.

00:59:09.000 Is it sensible for a society to expect teenagers to go fully through puberty when they are most, when their sexual appetite, their libido is at its peak?

00:59:21.000 Hormones start to go down and they don't have a high libido and that just doesn't even make biological sense.

00:59:27.000 It doesn't make moral sense at all.

00:59:32.000 You cannot reasonably expect people to not want to breed like rabbits when they're at that age.

00:59:38.000 They're going to do it anyway.

00:59:39.000 Do it within marriage.

00:59:41.000 Don't say, you know, we're going to have a marriage-only society, but we're also going to have a society we're bearing until they're 30.

00:59:47.000 It doesn't work.

00:59:50.000 And the same goes somewhat for men as well.

00:59:55.000 So you got to totally transform the society.

00:59:58.000 I'm not saying 16 year olds should be being pimped out.

01:00:00.000 I'm saying they should be getting married.

01:00:01.000 I'm, you know, I'm not saying they should be being turned out like everybody is now on dating apps and hookups and all that.

01:00:09.000 It's revolting no matter what the age.

01:00:12.000 But marriage at a young age is a beautiful thing.

01:00:14.000 It's a different kind of society we're creating.

01:00:16.000 But this is altogether different than this sickness and abuse which should be eradicated.

01:00:23.000 But anyway, so that's that.

01:00:24.000 I want to move on.

01:00:25.000 I want to get into the Trump charges.

01:00:29.000 You know, it's going to be a late show here.

01:00:34.000 But I did promise I would finish.

01:00:36.000 We'll dive into the Trump indictment.

01:00:45.000 Okay.

01:00:47.000 So I want to get into the imminent Trump indictment which

01:00:58.000 As I said at the top of the show, we've been expecting now for over a year.

01:01:02.000 Already one indictment.

01:01:03.000 Trump was indicted in Manhattan earlier this year in a civil matter, I believe, for falsifying business entries.

01:01:12.000 He's expected to be charged in Fulton County, Georgia this summer for interfering in their election.

01:01:20.000 And now the Department of Justice appears to be bringing imminently charges against Trump, federal charges.

01:01:28.000 And this was the subject of the Raid of Mar-a-Lago last August.

01:01:31.000 You remember, last summer, the FBI rolled up at a pre-dawn raid of Mar-a-Lago with 50 FBI agents.

01:01:39.000 They broke in, they locked down the bedroom, the storage room, the office, and they took 50 boxes worth of things out.

01:01:47.000 And they claimed that they were executing a search warrant because they had reasonably obtained into the improper handling of classified material.

01:01:56.000 That was last year.

01:01:57.000 Since then, the DOJ has been working on these charges.

01:02:00.000 They've been investigating.

01:02:02.000 And the news today is that the Trump legal team is now meeting with federal prosecutors and that imminently they'll be bringing a real indictment against him for this.

01:02:13.000 So this is a story from New York Times.

01:02:15.000 It's this quote for former President Trump that he is a target of their investigation into his handling of classified documents after he left office.

01:02:25.000 It remained unclear when Mr. Trump was told that he was a target of this inquiry, but the notice suggested that prosecutors working for the special counsel, Jack Smith, had largely completed their investigation and were moving forward bringing an indictment.

01:02:40.000 In court, they were scrutinizing whether Mr. Trump had broken laws governing the handling of national security documents and whether he had obstructed government efforts to retrieve them.

01:02:50.000 Mr. Trump was found to have had more than 300 documents with classified markings in Mar-a-Lago, his private club and residence in Florida, including some found in a search there by FBI agents two months after lawyers for the former president said a diligent search had not been carried out.

01:03:06.000 Identifying a potential defendant that he or she is a target is a formal way of indicating the person is a direct focus of a criminal investigation and often preceding the filing of charges.

01:03:18.000 So I can tell you from personal experience that this is how it works.

01:03:39.000 I was a target of an FBI investigation.

01:03:43.000 I may still be.

01:03:44.000 The thing is about these is that you actually don't know.

01:03:47.000 They don't tell you you're under investigation.

01:03:50.000 They don't tell you you're no longer under FBI investigation.

01:03:54.000 And that's by design.

01:03:56.000 Cops, they use a lot of really messed up tactics to make you vulnerable and to cultivate an air of unpredictability.

01:04:04.000 They can lie to you.

01:04:07.000 They do all sorts of things.

01:04:10.000 And so, for example, in my case, they froze my money, didn't say anything, and then after many weeks, my bank gave me contact information on my account, and these were phone numbers for U.S.

01:04:24.000 attorneys at the Department of Justice, and so I immediately contacted a lawyer, and my lawyer contacted the feds, they contacted the DOJ,

01:04:33.000 And the DOJ confirmed to my lawyer that I was a target of an investigation.

01:04:40.000 And the way my lawyer explained it to me was like this.

01:04:42.000 He said, if you're in trouble, he said, they are going to tell your lawyer and the lawyers are going to go to Washington and the feds are going to put up on the whiteboard the case against your client and that's when they're typically going to talk about a deal.

01:04:56.000 They're going to talk about a

01:04:59.000 Some sort of a plea deal.

01:05:00.000 He said that's how it works.

01:05:02.000 Now, fortunately, knock on wood, in my case, that never happened.

01:05:08.000 So, uh, that's good.

01:05:11.000 That's the procedure.

01:05:13.000 Because they want to make a deal.

01:05:14.000 The thing is about the Department of Justice is they do not bring charges unless they know they could get a conviction at a trial.

01:05:21.000 They have a 95 or a 99% conviction rate.

01:05:25.000 They're very good.

01:05:26.000 And the reason that that is so

01:05:29.000 Is because they don't bring charges unless they got you.

01:05:32.000 Unless they got you.

01:05:34.000 And when they got you, that's how they get everybody to plead guilty.

01:05:38.000 And then they got you working for them.

01:05:40.000 This is what happens to a lot of rap artists.

01:05:42.000 This is what happens to a lot of political people.

01:05:44.000 It's what happens to a lot of career criminals.

01:05:48.000 As they bring them in, they tell them what's up, and they get them to plead guilty and cooperate.

01:05:55.000 And so, that helps them get what they want.

01:05:59.000 But they only get that if they have leverage.

01:06:03.000 And leverage is, we've got a case against you.

01:06:04.000 We've got a case against you, and if you want to risk it, we go to trial and we're going to throw the book at you.

01:06:10.000 We are going to lock you away forever.

01:06:12.000 That's the program.

01:06:13.000 So they want to get plea deals.

01:06:15.000 They want people to plead guilty.

01:06:16.000 That's part of it.

01:06:18.000 And so them bringing Trump's lawyers out to D.C., this all but confirms they will indict.

01:06:23.000 That's a very clear sign that an indictment... Don't bring the lawyers out to D.C.

01:06:28.000 to look at the stuff if they're not bringing charges.

01:06:31.000 What would be the purpose of that?

01:06:33.000 They don't bring lawyers in to clear your name.

01:06:35.000 They don't bring lawyers in to say, here's why my client is innocent.

01:06:39.000 If you're innocent, then they, you know, they don't mess with you.

01:06:44.000 They might question the person.

01:06:47.000 But it doesn't play out like this.

01:06:50.000 So it's pretty evident how much damage that's even going to do.

01:06:55.000 Trump can still run even if he's charged.

01:06:58.000 They're likely not going to send him to jail.

01:07:00.000 And depending on the timeline, he may win the Republican primary before he even goes to trial or before any of it's even binding.

01:07:09.000 So we'll have to see.

01:07:11.000 Exactly how this plays out, but I don't think that this imperils him even a little bit which hunt against the president and you know the thing about this is You can safely assume that every leader Breaks laws because the legal code is so complex.

01:07:29.000 It is so intricate intricate and this is something where

01:07:35.000 Maybe Donald Trump makes a mistake.

01:07:37.000 You know, there's so many documents.

01:07:38.000 You're the President of the United States.

01:07:40.000 You're running a presidential campaign.

01:07:41.000 Pathetically, if we're going to be charitable, Donald Trump accidentally takes many, many boxes of classified documents from the White House to his private residence.

01:07:50.000 It's conceivable.

01:07:52.000 The federal government's a massive enterprise.

01:07:55.000 The executive branch, the White House, is a huge deal.

01:07:59.000 He's running a campaign.

01:08:00.000 What if

01:08:01.000 Hypothetically, he accidentally takes a lot of documents that are classified.

01:08:07.000 Do you think he's the first person to fudge business entries, do a payoff of a prostitute, if that's true?

01:08:14.000 Do you think he's the first person to make a phone call like he did to Raffensperger?

01:08:19.000 A lot of people, when a person like this gets charged or gets accused of wrongdoing, they clutch their pearls and they say, oh, I don't like that.

01:08:28.000 Oh, you know, there's something wrong here.

01:08:31.000 Say, I wonder if he's guilty.

01:08:34.000 Here's the way that I look at it.

01:08:37.000 There is a minimal level of lawbreaking happening with anyone with power, anyone that runs a major organization.

01:08:44.000 If you went through their stuff with a fine-tooth comb long enough, you would find lawbreaking.

01:08:51.000 If you run a very large business, if you are a billionaire, if you are a politician at the national level, if you had enough resources and enough time, you would find false business entries.

01:09:02.000 You might find a phone call which could be considered

01:09:06.000 Dubious.

01:09:07.000 You might find a payoff.

01:09:09.000 You might find a fixer lawyer somewhere.

01:09:13.000 You'll find something like that with everybody.

01:09:16.000 When somebody gets charged with low-level stuff like this, he took some documents, he paid off, he made a phone call.

01:09:23.000 All this says, it's not that Trump is particularly criminal.

01:09:27.000 It's not that his conduct is particularly criminal or disorganized or unethical.

01:09:33.000 All this says is that that's the guy that they went after.

01:09:37.000 Because they could go after Biden with literally the same stuff.

01:09:39.000 Biden's kid is taking payoffs from China and Ukraine.

01:09:43.000 Hillary Clinton was doing the same thing with the uranium at the time.

01:09:48.000 She had official emails the Secretary of State on her home email service and then deleted it.

01:09:55.000 So clearly this stuff happens with great regularity and it's mundane and it happens all the time.

01:10:03.000 High levels of corruption, low levels of corruption.

01:10:06.000 There's a minimal level of law-breaking crime that is just like static noise.

01:10:12.000 Because, like I said, you have such a sophisticated and complex code between tax law and campaign law and state laws and you name it.

01:10:25.000 This man is a billionaire, a real estate developer, TV host, politician.

01:10:30.000 They went through with a fine-tooth comb and you know what they found?

01:10:35.000 They found that he fudged numbers about like that, which is really minor in the grand scheme of things.

01:10:42.000 They went through with a fine-tooth comb all of his documents, everything.

01:10:45.000 You know what they found?

01:10:47.000 A couple hundred documents.

01:10:48.000 A couple hundred confidential classified papers.

01:10:52.000 They didn't find evidence that he colluded with Russia to steal the election.

01:10:56.000 They didn't find evidence that he threatened to withhold aid to Ukraine to investigate Hunter Biden.

01:11:01.000 They didn't find treason.

01:11:03.000 They didn't find any other kind of high crime.

01:11:07.000 They found a clerical error on his business.

01:11:12.000 They found a sex cover-up.

01:11:14.000 Okay, big deal.

01:11:16.000 They found a phone call.

01:11:17.000 They found some documents that were improperly categorized.

01:11:22.000 Okay, big deal.

01:11:25.000 And so I reject people that go out and say, there's very little you could tell me about Trump that would turn me, that would even make me consider being against him.

01:11:34.000 I wouldn't even consider this.

01:11:36.000 If somebody said, we're charging him with improper handling of documents, I'd say, go kill yourself.

01:11:42.000 Go kill yourself.

01:11:43.000 I don't care.

01:11:45.000 Even if it's all true, even if it's all true and it was totally criminal, do you think I give a shit?

01:11:50.000 Do you understand that there's levels of corruption seen and unseen going on in every level of government and every level of business and finance everywhere?

01:12:01.000 This is only the guy they chose to prosecute.

01:12:03.000 Because at that level, it's not like cops catching you speeding.

01:12:07.000 It's a matter of who they take interest in and why.

01:12:11.000 Who does a prosecutor at the DOJ, who does a prosecutor at a state like New York or a city like... and why?

01:12:18.000 Who do they apply the microscope to?

01:12:20.000 Who do they apply the magnifying glass to?

01:12:23.000 And based on what standard, then, do they start filing their charges?

01:12:27.000 Oh, he mishandled material?

01:12:29.000 How about Clinton?

01:12:30.000 How about Obama?

01:12:31.000 How about Biden?

01:12:32.000 And it's not whataboutism.

01:12:34.000 It's just to say that this is not about justice.

01:12:36.000 If it were, other people would be held accountable.

01:12:41.000 If it were about a scale that has a fixer, if we're talking about the standard is any sort of clerical error, you can't have these documents, then you would see a lot more people going down for more and less.

01:12:56.000 But you don't.

01:12:59.000 It's unheard of that this stuff happens.

01:13:00.000 It's really unheard of that this stuff happens.

01:13:04.000 More often than not, somebody becomes a... That's when they hit him with the sex scandal.

01:13:08.000 That's when they hit him with the rape case.

01:13:10.000 That's when they hit him with the improper business entry felony charge.

01:13:16.000 That's when they hit him with the mishandling of classified documents charge.

01:13:20.000 Who do they take an interest in and why?

01:13:22.000 And that's when they come up with these creative prosecutions.

01:13:25.000 And you have to inoculate yourself from this stuff by saying, I support who I support.

01:13:30.000 I support what they're doing.

01:13:31.000 Some things, but

01:13:35.000 Like, if Trump was a real treasonous traitor or something, if it turns out that he was born in China and he was a double agent or I don't know, something like that.

01:13:45.000 If he was secretly eating babies at night, like, okay.

01:13:49.000 Maybe I wouldn't support him.

01:13:51.000 But you get the stuff where, well, we're gonna charge him with mishandling of classified documents.

01:13:56.000 This isn't even entertaining.

01:13:58.000 I don't even care about the details.

01:14:00.000 You can see right through it, based on who they prosecute and who they don't, that it's a witch hunt.

01:14:08.000 So, I don't know if that's totally groundbreaking that it's a witch hunt, but you do have to think about it in these terms.

01:14:16.000 Do not even evaluate these things.

01:14:18.000 Do not even, because what they're counting on?

01:14:22.000 Each.

01:14:23.000 They have been attacking this guy for seven years.

01:14:26.000 And they attack him every day in the media, from every angle.

01:14:31.000 And if every time they say something about Trump, you stop and think, is that true?

01:14:35.000 I don't know how I feel about that.

01:14:38.000 It's attrition.

01:14:39.000 After doing that 1,500 times over seven years, eventually people are going to say, you know what?

01:14:45.000 I don't like Trump.

01:14:46.000 I'm tired of him.

01:14:47.000 I'm fatigued with all of the drama and all of the

01:14:51.000 All of the apparent corruption.

01:14:53.000 I'm done supporting him.

01:14:55.000 And so it's this death by a thousand cuts that happens, even to the ardent Trump supporter.

01:15:01.000 They say, I like this guy.

01:15:02.000 He says it like it is.

01:15:05.000 He says it like I say it.

01:15:07.000 He's a nationalist.

01:15:08.000 This guy's way better than the rest.

01:15:10.000 He's not a politician.

01:15:12.000 He's an Islamophobe.

01:15:13.000 He's a sexist.

01:15:13.000 He said, grab him by the pussy.

01:15:15.000 His crowd size wasn't big and he lied about it.

01:15:19.000 Well, he didn't build the border wall.

01:15:20.000 Well, he did this.

01:15:21.000 He did that.

01:15:22.000 He said shithole country.

01:15:23.000 He stole the election.

01:15:25.000 We should impeach him.

01:15:26.000 It's Russia.

01:15:26.000 It's Ukraine.

01:15:27.000 It's this.

01:15:28.000 It's the 6th.

01:15:29.000 It's the documents.

01:15:30.000 It's Stormy Daniels.

01:15:31.000 It's... And so people get... People get...

01:15:35.000 You don't have the mentality of, I support Trump unless he does something absolutely heinous.

01:15:42.000 You're never going to go that far with him.

01:15:45.000 And we're never going to win if we don't have allegiance to a leader like that.

01:15:51.000 Because that is the nature of the fight.

01:15:53.000 That's psychological.

01:15:55.000 So if you don't have a faith in Trump that is like... I don't want to be blasphemous here, but it's got to be... It's similar in the sense that

01:16:04.000 You have to have real faith in the person.

01:16:07.000 And faith means you know they're imperfect, you know they're not, they're not, they're still a human being.

01:16:14.000 But you back your horse.

01:16:15.000 That's your guy.

01:16:16.000 And you recognize the nature of the situation.

01:16:19.000 That is one guy against the world.

01:16:22.000 And you say, I support that guy.

01:16:24.000 And people go, well do you support the crime?

01:16:25.000 Do you support this, that, and the other?

01:16:27.000 And the only reason all that stuff is happening is because they're over the target.

01:16:30.000 The only reason that that person is being singled out, targeted, attacked, is because of the nature of what they're doing.

01:16:40.000 And until there's concrete evidence that there's something so outrageous that what they're doing isn't worthwhile anymore, then they have the support.

01:16:48.000 And that's how I've always felt about Trump.

01:16:50.000 And a lot of people didn't understand that in 2019 or 2021.

01:16:56.000 But that's the kind of support that he needs.

01:16:59.000 And you see what happens.

01:16:59.000 He gets betrayed by people near him.

01:17:02.000 It's legal stuff.

01:17:05.000 He's hit from every angle.

01:17:06.000 People do the same thing with me.

01:17:08.000 And people go, oh, you know, a lot of people, a lot of people have betrayed you.

01:17:12.000 It's like, yeah, because I'm subject to more pressure than anyone I know.

01:17:17.000 Me in the same way.

01:17:18.000 And they've lied about others that have come before, like in the last century.

01:17:24.000 That's why you gotta support the cause.

01:17:28.000 And the cause is Trump.

01:17:30.000 So I don't care about the documents at all.

01:17:32.000 And I don't think anybody else does either.

01:17:34.000 And this is not going to prevent him from running.

01:17:35.000 If anything, it's just going to help him.

01:17:37.000 Because it... I think that this... It only gives credence to that.

01:17:43.000 It gives him more credibility.

01:17:46.000 But there's going to be no legal problems.

01:17:48.000 So, that's that.

01:17:49.000 But we'll watch and see what happens in the coming days.

01:17:52.000 If there's going to be an indictment, we'll probably cover it.

01:17:55.000 But that's that.

01:17:55.000 I want to move on.

01:17:56.000 I want to get on into our Super Chats and see what you guys are saying.

01:17:59.000 What are you guys...

01:18:01.000 Think about all this.

01:18:02.000 I'm gonna get our Super Chats set up and look here.

01:18:12.000 You guys have been really on a roll with the Super Chats lately.

01:18:16.000 I've been loving it.

01:18:22.000 I've been absolutely loving that aspect of the show.

01:18:27.000 Okay.

01:18:30.000 Let's see.

01:18:30.000 Let me do this.

01:18:31.000 So the thing is about fascism, it's actually hard to define because

01:18:55.000 There are so few case studies, and they're all different from each other.

01:19:02.000 So, Francisco Franco's fascism was different from Benito Mussolini's fascism.

01:19:08.000 And Benito Mussolini's fascism was different from Hitler's fascism in Germany.

01:19:13.000 And Hitler's fascism was different from Oswald Mosley's fascism in the United Kingdom.

01:19:18.000 And Oswald Mosley never even ruled.

01:19:21.000 So you've got in every case it took on a very national flavor.

01:19:26.000 And so for example there are some Anglo historians like AJP Taylor who say that National Socialism could have only come from Germany.

01:19:36.000 That National Socialism was very

01:19:39.000 Specific to the character of Germany, very specific to their national identity and national economy.

01:19:48.000 Now, he didn't like the Germans, and so he said that in a negative way.

01:19:52.000 But he said that no other country would have produced the Third Reich, no other country would have produced National Socialism, but Germany could have only produced National Socialism.

01:20:02.000 They couldn't have produced anything other than that.

01:20:06.000 And so,

01:20:07.000 Just to compare and contrast, like Franco's fascism was very clerical, and obviously lasted much longer, was much more conservative than National Socialism.

01:20:20.000 National Socialism had more of a pagan influence, and in my opinion had some commonalities of progressivism and liberalism.

01:20:34.000 But that's just a quick rundown.

01:20:38.000 They all took a slightly different form and they had common attributes.

01:20:42.000 They all had common attributes like opposition to communism and a strong central bureaucracy and the subordination of the private sector to the state.

01:20:55.000 Where they varied was the character of the regime and I guess the role of religion.

01:21:01.000 So...

01:21:04.000 That's what I meant by that.

01:21:06.000 And United Arab Emirates and Saudi, are they fascists?

01:21:10.000 No, I don't think they're fascists.

01:21:12.000 They're monarchies.

01:21:13.000 They have a king.

01:21:15.000 So by definition, they're a monarchy.

01:21:20.000 Although Tucker is obviously not on our team, why did he do the shows on demographic replacement, the ADL and Israel?

01:21:27.000 He'd avoided these topics.

01:21:30.000 Yeah, I get that a lot and I hear that, but you have to keep in mind the breadth and the totality of his show.

01:21:36.000 He's done a show for 7 years.

01:21:40.000 He talked about the ADL one time.

01:21:43.000 One time.

01:21:44.000 One segment.

01:21:46.000 So you do a show for, what is it, 6 or 7 years?

01:21:49.000 He did one 10 minute segment on that.

01:21:52.000 I liked that.

01:21:53.000 I thought it was great.

01:21:55.000 But...

01:21:57.000 So what?

01:21:58.000 I mean, respectfully, so what?

01:22:01.000 He did that because the ADL was attacking him and the ADL tried to cost him his job.

01:22:07.000 So... He punched back against the ADL because they were attacking him once and then never talked about it before or after again.

01:22:16.000 I don't... I don't think so.

01:22:20.000 He said he's for more... He has said that he is in favor of gay marriage more than he has talked about the ADL.

01:22:26.000 So...

01:22:27.000 And as far as demographic replacement, he's not really talking about that.

01:22:31.000 He's talking about how they're voters.

01:22:35.000 They're going to vote for the Democrat Party.

01:22:36.000 That's not the same thing.

01:22:39.000 And that's an important distinction because they'll go on other shows and say it's got identity as evil.

01:22:44.000 And anyone that claims to represent white people is evil.

01:22:48.000 And they're just like Hitler and I will not support that.

01:22:52.000 So he's not really talking about the demographic reality.

01:22:55.000 He's talking about the changing political landscape.

01:22:59.000 He's talking about the fact that these millions and millions of non-white immigrants who don't speak English and don't have anything and smell bad are going to vote for Democrats.

01:23:07.000 It's got nothing to do with race.

01:23:09.000 That's hardly

01:23:11.000 Speaking to the heart of the demographic issue.

01:23:13.000 And as a matter of fact, he's going against the fundamental premise.

01:23:16.000 He is explicitly saying the fundamental premise is the opposite of what it is.

01:23:22.000 So, I'm sorry.

01:23:23.000 That's just not good enough.

01:23:26.000 Going out there and saying race doesn't matter.

01:23:29.000 Race politics is evil.

01:23:31.000 It has nothing to do with race.

01:23:32.000 It's all about civil rights.

01:23:34.000 I want a race-blind meritocracy.

01:23:38.000 And I don't recall him talking about Israel.

01:23:41.000 You'd have to show me that one.

01:23:42.000 So, it's just not good enough.

01:23:44.000 Yeah.

01:23:57.000 Like a bot or something.

01:23:58.000 Who even takes this guy seriously?

01:24:01.000 Not me.

01:24:02.000 And I'm never gonna debate him.

01:24:04.000 Because he's just an unserious person and probably not even real.

01:24:08.000 He's probably just some troll.

01:24:10.000 Some bot.

01:24:12.000 Nobody should take him seriously and everybody should unfollow him and stay away.

01:24:15.000 Because he's clearly a faker and a fraud and a liar.

01:24:18.000 Pretty underscore fly underscore white underscore guy sent three dollars.

01:24:22.000 Cruz and Juan have service for a few days, but I'm keeping the streak going for him.

01:24:26.000 I would have gone with him, but Cruz's are disgusting.

01:24:29.000 I'd rather die.

01:24:30.000 Great show.

01:24:31.000 Who is this?

01:24:31.000 His wife?

01:24:32.000 Or his friend?

01:24:34.000 Either way, kind of endearing.

01:24:35.000 Thank you.

01:24:36.000 I appreciate it.

01:24:37.000 Thanks for keeping the streak alive, even though he technically broke it once, but that's okay.

01:24:42.000 It's still going on.

01:24:43.000 Jews stay killing Christ sent $3.

01:24:46.000 Memorial Day is to honor those who suck Memorial Day is to honor those who suck at war and got sacrificed to Moloch for Israel via kosher memes.

01:24:52.000 Can we not?

01:24:53.000 Okay, thank you.

01:24:56.000 Victor Lala sent $5.

01:24:58.000 Thank you for doing this show.

01:25:00.000 You really get me giggling like a little girl when you tell your jokes.

01:25:03.000 Oh, thank you.

01:25:06.000 You know, I take it back.

01:25:14.000 You're not a pedophile faggot.

01:25:16.000 You're actually extremely loyal, so thank you for doing that.

01:25:19.000 I encourage everybody to do the same thing.

01:25:21.000 If you could post the timestamps and the links, everybody should be doing that.

01:25:25.000 If I can't have Gumroad, Jews can't either.

01:25:28.000 If I can't have Gumroad, Zionist Jews can't either.

01:25:32.000 So you should report all of it, yes, 100%.

01:25:35.000 Go in there, and he's a Jew, and he's a pedophile, and he sucks.

01:25:41.000 And if anyone defends him, I'm going to say you're defending a gay pedophile, because you are.

01:25:45.000 This guy should be run out of town.

01:25:47.000 He should go back to Jutton, Massachusetts, and shut the fuck up forever.

01:25:51.000 Or he should go back to Romania.

01:25:55.000 Either way, give us the timestamps.

01:25:58.000 This guy's a bitch.

01:25:59.000 Make him go crawl to his brother for money.

01:26:01.000 Dan, uh, Dan, uh, group.

01:26:05.000 Anyway, thank you for that.

01:26:06.000 I appreciate it.

01:26:07.000 Alright, thank you.

01:26:35.000 Absolutely.

01:26:36.000 Absolutely.

01:26:37.000 BASED?!

01:26:38.000 BASED?!

01:26:40.000 That was freaking Talmudic!

01:26:43.000 Absolutely.

01:26:44.000 You're so right.

01:26:44.000 Hang on.

01:26:45.000 You're telling me your college... Your college had a female pastor?

01:27:04.000 And then they talked about liberal themes at the commencement speech?

01:27:08.000 Are you kidding me?

01:27:11.000 I swear things are getting out of hand.

01:27:14.000 Liberalism is out of control.

01:27:28.000 Hydecaps sent $3.

01:27:29.000 Hey Steve Franson, you're a smart guy, but what's up with all the anti-Sam Hyde venom?

01:27:35.000 Has a comedian not a priest?

01:27:38.000 I don't know, why don't you ask Steve?

01:27:42.000 Jim Statues sent everything else is gay.

01:27:43.000 Boo sent $3.

01:27:47.000 In some ways you're like Osmosis Jones, and America's immune system has been compromised by cancer, viruses and bacteria and you're trying to wake up the other white blood cells before it's too late.

01:27:58.000 Who's the big pill then?

01:28:00.000 Who's the big pill head?

01:28:01.000 Is that Keith?

01:28:04.000 Or is that... Who's the... Who's the pill sidekick?

01:28:08.000 Killing Christ sent three... Hey, you know what?

01:28:09.000 Like, you're just too fucking crazy.

01:28:11.000 Boo sent three dollars.

01:28:13.000 Someone told me that you hate me.

01:28:14.000 I hope you don't hate me.

01:28:16.000 I don't really know you yourself.

01:28:18.000 Farid Lukovic sent twenty dollars.

01:28:20.000 My boo-oy.

01:28:21.000 Let's go.

01:28:22.000 I keep missing the live shows, but I finally caught one.

01:28:25.000 It's biblical.

01:28:26.000 Hey, thank you, man.

01:28:27.000 I appreciate it.

01:28:29.000 Farid Lukovic sent $100.

01:28:31.000 So me and my friends came out.

01:28:34.000 And while I was playing I was listening to you talking to Sneeko about Kablamagic and Lilith.

01:28:38.000 The hair stood up on my arms because that's the name of the antagonist of the game heavily used in promotional material.

01:28:44.000 Is this just coincidental?

01:28:46.000 Probably coincidental.

01:28:49.000 But who knows?

01:28:50.000 It's synchronized so maybe there's something to it.

01:28:52.000 But hey, thank you for the big super chat.

01:28:54.000 I appreciate it.

01:28:55.000 That's a pretty freaky coincidence.

01:28:58.000 I don't know how much you could read into that stuff, but I pay attention to those things.

01:29:03.000 Thank you for the big super chat.

01:29:04.000 I appreciate it.

01:29:06.000 Farid Lukovic sent $20.

01:29:08.000 Google Lilith Diablo 4 and tell me this somehow isn't some kind of Kabbalah demonic stuff.

01:29:13.000 Well, they made a video game about the devil, so... I think it would track that they would use, like, devil themes.

01:29:22.000 They made a video game about... Included the name of a demon, like...

01:29:26.000 It seems actually apropos.

01:29:28.000 Now, if they're promoting it, yeah, I suppose that... I don't know the plot of Diablos.

01:29:33.000 I don't really know what the message is, but it seems like it tracks.

01:29:37.000 Virginia sent $3.

01:29:39.000 Yo, O7, Nick, sorry about yesterday.

01:29:42.000 God bless.

01:29:44.000 Hey, that's alright, buddy.

01:29:47.000 Nolan Taylor sent $3.

01:29:48.000 Columbus sent $3.

01:29:50.000 What are your thoughts on the Knights of Columbus?

01:29:52.000 I'm Catholic and a 3rd degree Knight.

01:29:55.000 They have gone woke.

01:29:56.000 I don't really know anything about them.

01:29:58.000 I'm not in there.

01:30:09.000 Uh, well, I haven't made any announcements about that, so stay tuned.

01:30:30.000 Yeah, that's always the case.

01:30:32.000 Whenever you see... And I don't think it really happens, but to the extent that a right-wing person becomes left-wing, it's almost always the case.

01:30:40.000 Dirk Diggler sent $5.

01:30:42.000 Thanks for all you do.

01:30:44.000 You're the best person to ever do political commentary media.

01:30:47.000 I really can't think of anyone comparably at your level from now or any other era.

01:30:51.000 Can you?

01:30:52.000 I don't know.

01:30:53.000 I don't really... I don't really compare myself to other people.

01:30:58.000 I don't think about it that way, but I appreciate it.

01:31:02.000 I think Lin Wood's a little crazy.

01:31:13.000 I think he's funny.

01:31:14.000 I like him.

01:31:15.000 But, uh, seems like kind of a nut job.

01:31:18.000 And, I mean, look, whatever reason he doesn't name Jews, is it because he's a boomer?

01:31:24.000 Is it because he's controlled off?

01:31:25.000 Who knows?

01:31:26.000 Either way, I don't think anyone has time for that.

01:31:30.000 Farid Lukovic sent $20.

01:31:32.000 Sorry for the retarded esoteric questions R. Nikolai Fuentovsky.

01:31:36.000 Hey, you're fine.

01:31:38.000 Michael LaDuke sent $15.

01:31:40.000 Hey, thanks for all you do.

01:31:45.000 Thanks.

01:31:46.000 Boo sent $3.

01:31:47.000 I 100% agree on making the law no sex before marriage, would solve a lot of problems with degeneracy and would probably your hood.

01:31:54.000 I didn't say that.

01:31:56.000 John Dave Irving sent $99.

01:31:59.000 I'll make a Nick Fuentes AI voice and we, yes we Nickka, will start a bunch of Fuentes Twitter spaces on Bernergs.

01:32:05.000 They can't take us all down, they couldn't even sink the USS Liberty W-5 torpedoes, although they did get better with 9-11.

01:32:12.000 Yeah, just don't do that please.

01:32:15.000 Why would you do an AI?

01:32:16.000 Why would you just play my real voice?

01:32:19.000 Why would I want that?

01:32:20.000 Why would I like that?

01:32:23.000 Why would I like that idea?

01:32:24.000 That doesn't even make any sense.

01:32:25.000 Thanks for the big super chat, but don't do that.

01:32:39.000 Boo sent $3.

01:32:41.000 The pill is the red pill cuz it's a pill.

01:32:44.000 Cringe incoming.

01:32:45.000 Could you change your background to Gotham City for Halloween?

01:32:48.000 What's wrong with you?

01:32:51.000 I don't know what's wrong with you people.

01:32:54.000 Bobakali sent $20.

01:32:55.000 God bless you Nick, doing the Lord's work as always.

01:32:58.000 Hey, thank you, I appreciate it.

01:33:00.000 Booglywoogly sent $7.

01:33:03.000 Hey Nick, how was your day today?

01:33:05.000 Did Chicago resemble a scene out of Blade Runner 2049 or was it a normal day?

01:33:10.000 I had lunch.

01:33:10.000 I had candy.

01:33:12.000 I worked.

01:33:16.000 Farid Lukovic sent $20.

01:33:18.000 Forget all the other superchats.

01:33:20.000 Nice hair is what I really meant to say.

01:33:22.000 Hey!

01:33:22.000 Okay, much better.

01:33:25.000 Well, thanks a lot, Farid.

01:33:26.000 You're putting the show on your back, buddy.

01:33:28.000 I appreciate it.

01:33:30.000 We got some superchats on Cozy Anthony.

01:33:33.000 You will be in our prayers.

01:33:34.000 Thank you very much.

01:33:36.000 Okay, that was pretty quick.

01:33:38.000 That was pretty quick and painless.

01:33:40.000 Well, quick and painful.

01:33:42.000 That was extremely painful, but thankfully very short.

01:34:01.000 That's gonna do it for me tonight.

01:34:03.000 Remember to follow me here on Cozy.

01:34:05.000 Smash the follow button to get a push notification whenever I go live.

01:34:09.000 Follow me on Rumble and Telegram.

01:34:11.000 Links are down below.

01:34:12.000 I'm on the air Monday through Friday, 9 o'clock Central, 10 o'clock Eastern Time.

01:34:16.000 As always, thanks for watching.

01:34:18.000 Thanks to our Super Chatters, in particular Farid Lukovic and John Dave Irving.

01:34:23.000 Special thanks.

01:34:23.000 We love you and I'll see you tomorrow.

01:34:26.000 Until then, have a great rest of your evening.

01:34:30.000 Americanism, not globalism, will be our credo.

01:34:36.000 It's going to be only America first.

01:34:41.000 America first.

01:34:46.000 The American people, then.

01:35:09.000 America First!

America First - Nicholas J. Fuentes

TRUMP INDICTMENT IMMINENT: Dept of Justice Previews Classified Doc Charges | America First Ep. 1174TRUMP INDICTMENT IMMINENT: Dept of Justice Previews Classified Doc Charges | America First Ep. 1174

Summary

Transcript