America First - Nicholas J. Fuentes - Trump Isn't Compromising on DACA | America First Ep. 10

00:00:05.000 You are watching America First.

00:00:05.000 Good evening, folks.

00:00:07.000 My name is Nicholas J. Fuentes, and we've got an interesting episode for you tonight.

00:00:12.000 Obviously, there are things going on.

00:00:15.000 There are things going on in the White House.

00:00:18.000 There are things going on with our president that many people don't care for, to say the least, if we can put it that way, where our president seems to be looking at some of the promises he made during the election and possibly going back on them.

00:00:34.000 So, tonight, we're going to talk about that.

00:00:36.000 Hopefully, Hopefully, I can offer some white pills about DACA, about illegal immigration, about what I think President Trump is doing here, because I think a lot of people are jumping the gun.

00:00:48.000 I think a lot of people are being a little bit overly dramatic about the situation.

00:00:53.000 There's room for caution, there's room for anxiety, but hopefully tonight I could shed some light on possible white pills, what could be going on.

00:01:02.000 We'll be talking about DACA.

00:01:03.000 We could talk about some other things.

00:01:05.000 And remember, of course, we are back on YouTube from now on.

00:01:09.000 I know I've been on Periscope lately.

00:01:11.000 I was on Periscope all last week because I was out of town.

00:01:15.000 But we're back here.

00:01:16.000 We're back in Chicago, back in the studio.

00:01:18.000 So from now on, remember, we're on YouTube Monday through Friday, 7 p.m. Central, 8 p.m. Eastern Time.

00:01:24.000 And that'll be the program from now on.

00:01:26.000 Remember also, you can send in those questions using the hashtag AmericaFQ, hashtag AmericaFQ.

00:01:33.000 And we'll take those probably in the last 15, 10 minutes of the show.

00:01:38.000 And I think we should be good from there.

00:01:40.000 But as you guys know, last night was DACA demolition.

00:01:44.000 Big debate, huge debate, folks.

00:01:46.000 We had a huge audience.

00:01:48.000 I think we peaked out at like 320 concurrent viewers, which is like three times our average for the regular show.

00:01:55.000 So that was big.

00:01:57.000 A lot of people watched it.

00:01:58.000 I looked at my poll, I looked at Will Nardi's poll, and I won by, I think, 90%.

00:02:04.000 I think 90% was the average of the two people voted that I won.

00:02:09.000 And, you know, it was a good debate.

00:02:10.000 And, of course, I'm appreciative that he came on.

00:02:13.000 I'm appreciative that he came on.

00:02:15.000 Even though there was so much pressure, so much heat from my followers.

00:02:19.000 I know my followers are a little bit more charged up.

00:02:22.000 They're a little bit more high energy than Will Nardi's boring followers.

00:02:27.000 But you've got to give the guy credit, right?

00:02:30.000 Because he's been abused and abused on Twitter for so long. 0.98

00:02:35.000 I mean, people call him a cuck, people call him Jewish, people call him all sorts of things. 0.96

00:02:40.000 And to be fair, he came on not once but twice. 0.95

00:02:43.000 We did a debate a little while ago on his show, and then we came back and did one on my show.

00:02:48.000 And so you got to give him credit.

00:02:49.000 He stuck his neck out there.

00:02:51.000 I don't think he had much of a case beyond my feels behind, you know, compassion or anything like that.

00:02:58.000 But it was still, I think, a good thing that he came on and we were able to have that discussion.

00:03:03.000 And, you know, I don't really even believe so much in debate.

00:03:05.000 I don't really believe so much in discussion in the sense that I don't really believe that one side truly can change the other side's mind.

00:03:13.000 I think that's just how people work.

00:03:15.000 And generally, I think for the audience, the same is true.

00:03:19.000 I mean, you look at any of the presidential debates during 2016, were minds being changed?

00:03:25.000 You know, were the vast majority of the people who watched the, what were there, like 15 debates for the Republican primary, were they sitting there discerning and discriminating, learning about policy, figuring out what was best for how we were going to deal with the Al Nusra front in Aleppo in Syria, or what was best for the carried interest provision in the tax code?

00:03:48.000 I don't think so.

00:03:50.000 Debates tend to be a referendum on.

00:03:53.000 Where the character of the debater is.

00:03:56.000 Are they strong?

00:03:57.000 Do they appear strong?

00:03:58.000 Do they appear like they know what they're talking about?

00:04:00.000 Are they confident in their opinion, in their philosophy, in their statistics?

00:04:05.000 And I think there's something to that, too.

00:04:06.000 But, you know, there is this sort of fetishization of debate and argument and free discourse in the right wing.

00:04:14.000 You know, they're all about the free speech, really, only for a very narrow range of opinions.

00:04:19.000 But I don't see so much value in that outside of more of an asymmetrical campaign to validate and legitimize our positions.

00:04:28.000 That's what it comes down to.

00:04:29.000 But anyway.

00:04:31.000 It was fun.

00:04:32.000 You know, I came away with a crushing victory.

00:04:35.000 It was a crushing defeat for Will Nardi, but he was a good sport.

00:04:39.000 He was a good sport.

00:04:39.000 So we give him that much.

00:04:40.000 So, big shout out to Will.

00:04:42.000 Thanks for everybody that watched the debate.

00:04:42.000 Thanks for coming on.

00:04:44.000 I thought it was very fun, you know, with everybody commenting.

00:04:48.000 Always makes it fun when you have participation.

00:04:51.000 But with all that out of the way, with all that out of the way.

00:04:55.000 Oh, and one other thing.

00:04:57.000 This is something that James Alsup sent to me last night.

00:05:00.000 This is so funny.

00:05:02.000 You're going to laugh.

00:05:03.000 This is hilarious.

00:05:04.000 Remember that girl, Emily Faulkner, from the Leadership Institute?

00:05:08.000 For new viewers, for people that are not familiar with what happened, I went to Leadership Institute in late July for a job training.

00:05:17.000 And it was like 15 or 30 people there for this job training to be a field representative for this think tank.

00:05:25.000 And they go on college campuses and they start Young Americans for Liberty, they start Young Americans for Freedom.

00:05:30.000 And so I was there for a job training to be a field rep to set up these conservative groups.

00:05:35.000 And we're all in Virginia.

00:05:36.000 It's like 30 job applicants, and we're all in the basement just kind of shooting the stuff.

00:05:42.000 My parents don't like when I swear.

00:05:43.000 We're passing the time.

00:05:45.000 We're chit chatting about politics.

00:05:47.000 And I start to say some pretty controversial things.

00:05:51.000 I start to say things which maybe I don't totally believe.

00:05:55.000 Maybe I'm not totally 100% on those things, but certainly controversial things.

00:06:01.000 And of course, everybody's okay with this, everybody's mature enough to handle this because we are adults.

00:06:06.000 A lot of them were conservatives, and to a certain extent, conservatives are tolerant of controversial opinions.

00:06:13.000 So, you know, we're having this conversation, we're having this meeting of the minds, this Socratic discussion about, oh, I don't know, you know, certain things that you're not allowed to talk about.

00:06:23.000 And everyone's okay with this.

00:06:24.000 Everybody says, you know, I don't agree with this.

00:06:27.000 I actually might find this repulsive, but you're allowed to say this, and we can debate this.

00:06:31.000 It's an interesting conversation.

00:06:33.000 Then walks in, and of course, the immortal, the eternal thought.

00:06:39.000 Approaches Miss Emily Faulkner.

00:06:42.000 She comes out of her cave and she plops herself down on the couch and she starts taking in the Socratic discussion, which is a very mature conversation, very controversial, mature conversation.

00:06:55.000 And so, our dear friend, conservathon Emily Faulkner, she's got the nose ring, the thought dot piercings, she's got, of course, the proverbial butt tattoo, and of course, it is the name of a bar.

00:07:08.000 What else would it be, right? 0.82

00:07:09.000 And so, she plops herself down, scantily clad.

00:07:12.000 And she starts getting increasingly offended by what's being said.

00:07:16.000 And I respect her, of course.

00:07:17.000 I have the utmost respect for her.

00:07:18.000 And we're talking about certain things, certain people, certain bell curve statistics.

00:07:24.000 And I can just see that she's getting increasingly offended, increasingly distraught that alt right villain Nick Fuentes holds these controversial views.

00:07:33.000 So she starts filming.

00:07:34.000 Of course, she turns on the phone.

00:07:36.000 She starts filming me on Snapchat.

00:07:38.000 We all know the rest of the story.

00:07:40.000 She sends these controversial videos over to the Reagan battalion, it gets published.

00:07:45.000 And of course, you know, I'm destroyed.

00:07:48.000 I'm ruined.

00:07:49.000 They take me out of the game with this video.

00:07:51.000 Changes the whole world.

00:07:53.000 And after that point, I didn't hear from her.

00:07:56.000 After that point, I hadn't heard from her.

00:07:58.000 After we resolved that whole situation where Reagan Battalion tried to destroy me, it didn't work. 1.00

00:08:04.000 Emily Faulkner was being kind of rude online. 0.94

00:08:08.000 We shut her down.

00:08:09.000 I got taken off Twitter for it.

00:08:11.000 After that whole situation resolved, I didn't really hear from her so much.

00:08:14.000 Didn't hear from her again.

00:08:15.000 Didn't hear from any of these people.

00:08:18.000 And then James Alsup sends me this podcast yesterday, this podcast on SoundCloud.

00:08:23.000 And it is probably the worst, most disgusting, grotesque podcast. 0.82

00:08:30.000 Conservative pundit. 0.99

00:08:31.000 I don't even know the guy's name, but he's just like this sad mozzarella stick.

00:08:36.000 And he's hosting this little podcast about real conservatism, about real conservatism on college campuses.

00:08:44.000 And anytime you hear the terms real conservative or true conservative, you know it's just going to be cucked beyond belief.

00:08:51.000 You know, you're in for a real treat.

00:08:55.000 And who is his guest?

00:08:56.000 Who is the walking mozzarella stick, the diet coat drinker, having on his podcast?

00:09:03.000 Emily Faulkner. 0.99

00:09:04.000 She comes out of the woodwork.

00:09:06.000 She gets out of her $14,000 a month think tank job starting based black conservative organizations on college campuses to come and sit down with this guy and say how Nick Fluentis and James Alsop are not conservative. 0.98

00:09:21.000 Nick Fluentis and James Alsop are really disgusting. 0.93

00:09:24.000 And me and James, we're listening to it at the same time. 0.85

00:09:28.000 We're in the direct messages.

00:09:29.000 We're going back and forth.

00:09:31.000 And this is why I tell the story because it is so striking.

00:09:35.000 It is so.

00:09:36.000 Insane to me, the lack of self awareness that these people possess.

00:09:40.000 I mean, she's talking to this guy about real conservatism, and they're saying, you know, alt right.

00:09:47.000 I'm not alt right, but she calls me alt right.

00:09:49.000 She says, alt right is not real conservatism.

00:09:53.000 She says, it's not really conservative because the founders would not like what the alt right is saying.

00:10:00.000 These things about race mixing, these things about an ethnostate, these things about, you know, other groups.

00:10:07.000 The founders would be against that.

00:10:10.000 And I think to myself, you have no self awareness.

00:10:14.000 You have no idea what you're talking about.

00:10:16.000 There's this conception on the right wing, and this is a long tangent.

00:10:21.000 We'll get to the DACA stuff, but I'll try and wrap it up.

00:10:23.000 But it just really bewilders me that these people, they talk about the founders.

00:10:28.000 They talk about the founding fathers.

00:10:31.000 We want to conserve the founding fathers.

00:10:33.000 We want to conserve.

00:10:34.000 Remember in 1776 when red, white, and better than you, everything before that was a mistake.

00:10:41.000 I like Ron Swanson on Parks and Rec because I'm a conservative.

00:10:45.000 These people just don't know anything about what they're talking about. 0.99

00:10:49.000 They're talking out of their butts. 0.98

00:10:52.000 She goes on this podcast and basically says that I'm not a conservative because the founders would be here today defending interracial marriage and interracial sexual relations and mass immigration from Africa and Latin America, Latino America. 0.97

00:11:11.000 I don't think so.

00:11:12.000 And I think if you read anything, if you read any of the founders' writings, their letters, their essays, even quotes, even quotes, like token two sentence quotes, you don't even have to look very far.

00:11:25.000 You don't even have to dive into the Federalist Papers and read 300 pages of philosophy.

00:11:31.000 Read a quote on AZ quotes or brainy quotes, what they had to say about the matter.

00:11:36.000 Read the 1790 Naturalization Act, and you tell me would the founding fathers agree with me or would they agree with you? 0.75

00:11:45.000 Would they agree with the nose piercings, thought dots, butt tattoos, interracial, alternative lifestyle degeneracy? 0.75

00:11:54.000 Or would they agree with me? 1.00

00:11:56.000 I don't know.

00:11:57.000 I'd put money on it.

00:11:58.000 I'd put, you know, if I had 10 grand, I'd put 10 grand on that.

00:12:01.000 And I would say, you know, meet me halfway, match me on that one.

00:12:05.000 But we issued an invitation for her to come on Nationalist Review on Saturday.

00:12:10.000 As you may know, me and James Alsup, we host a podcast every Saturday called Nationalist Review.

00:12:16.000 And we submitted to her.

00:12:17.000 We threw down the gauntlet.

00:12:19.000 We put our money where our mouth is.

00:12:21.000 And we said, you know what?

00:12:22.000 You believe in discourse, you believe in dialogue, you believe in conservatism.

00:12:27.000 Come on the Nationalist Review and we'll respect the hell out of you.

00:12:30.000 So that offer still stands.

00:12:31.000 If Emily Thot.ButtTattooFaulkner is listening to this program, she's welcome on Nationalist Review to have a really substantive policy conversation.

00:12:43.000 And we'll leave it at that.

00:12:44.000 But with all of that out of the way, with all of that housework out of the way, what is that phrase?

00:12:52.000 With all of those chores out of the way, now we have to get to the real meat of today, which is DACA, of course.

00:12:58.000 We had DACA demolition last night.

00:13:00.000 I guess it was sort of good timing, but it was also the worst timing because we had this debate before all the major developments this week, which is that it seems like President Trump is going back on his word on DACA.

00:13:15.000 Where he tweeted this morning, and I'll pull up the tweet actually, I'll read it verbatim.

00:13:20.000 I couldn't believe my ears when I heard this, but I'll pull up the tweet.

00:13:26.000 So he tweeted this morning, Well, actually, there was a deal last night.

00:13:30.000 They put out a statement.

00:13:31.000 Nancy Pelosi and Chuck Schumer put out a statement last night saying that President Trump and these two Democratic leaders had a very constructive dinner and they were moving forward with a deal to enshrine DACA into law.

00:13:46.000 And everybody flips out.

00:13:47.000 Everybody says, oh my gosh, how could Trump go back on his promises?

00:13:51.000 He's cucked on immigration.

00:13:53.000 And as many people predicted, of course, this was not the case.

00:13:56.000 That was not true at all.

00:13:59.000 And President Trump corrected that statement this morning.

00:14:02.000 He tweeted, No deal was made last night on DACA.

00:14:05.000 Massive border security would have to be agreed in exchange for consent, would be subject to vote.

00:14:12.000 And everyone said, okay, like, we're reassured we're okay.

00:14:15.000 And then he kind of made it a lot worse because then he tweeted a little bit later Does anybody really want to throw out good, educated, and accomplished young people?

00:14:25.000 And of course, these are the eternal dreamers, right?

00:14:29.000 Good, educated, and accomplished young people who have jobs, some serving in the military.

00:14:33.000 Really.

00:14:34.000 They have been in our country for many years through no fault of their own, brought in by parents at young age.

00:14:39.000 Plus big border security. 0.55

00:14:42.000 And then everybody loses their minds and everybody is blackpilling.

00:14:46.000 Ann Coulter's calling for President Trump to be impeached.

00:14:49.000 Sean Hannity's calling him out.

00:14:51.000 And Sean Hannity, I mean, he loves Trump.

00:14:53.000 He really loves Trump.

00:14:55.000 He's calling him out.

00:14:56.000 You know, Virginia Dare, Richard Spencer, Vox Day, I mean, all the major people from the alt right, from the alt light, from conservative Inc. they're all coming out against the president.

00:15:08.000 They're all saying this is egregious.

00:15:09.000 Seemingly the only people still in the president's camp at this point.

00:15:13.000 To Bill Mitchell, Bill Mitchell and his boomer followers.

00:15:16.000 But if I can offer some white pills, if I can offer some insight into the president's calculus here, I think everybody's jumping the gun on this as usual.

00:15:26.000 We see this all the time.

00:15:28.000 We've seen this many times by now.

00:15:30.000 And of course, I think the most comparable example where we can kind of see what he's up to is the serious strike.

00:15:37.000 The serious strike was the same thing.

00:15:39.000 And I always talk about this because I think it's really a watershed in terms of explaining.

00:15:45.000 President Trump's calculus and his tactics in how he uses the electorate, his base in particular, to move issues, to move people on issues.

00:15:55.000 And if you look during the Syria strike, which was in April, it was an early, I think it was the first week of April, Bashar al Assad was accused, allegedly he used chemical weapons in Syria.

00:16:09.000 Now, this had come after, I think this was on a Tuesday in April.

00:16:12.000 This had come after, see, I remember so well, this had come after on Friday.

00:16:16.000 When Nikki Haley and Rex Tillerson both said that the policy of the Trump administration was not to remove Bashar al Assad.

00:16:24.000 So, literally, less than a week, less than half of a week after this administration made it official policy that they were not going to remove Assad, which is something that was the number one thing Assad could have hoped for, because you looked at the Syrian civil war at the time and he was crushing it, he was winning it after he came back from the brink of destruction and annihilation with the help of Vladimir Putin.

00:16:49.000 I mean, he was about to win probably the biggest comeback in the past five years in the Middle East and secure control of his country, stabilize his country, and maintain the rule of his family.

00:17:01.000 Less than half of a week after the Trump administration says, We're not going to touch you.

00:17:05.000 We will let you finish off ISIS.

00:17:07.000 We will let you stabilize your country. 0.83

00:17:09.000 What does he do?

00:17:10.000 He violates the one thing, or allegedly violates the one thing that President Trump said would be a red light.

00:17:17.000 He uses chemical weapons.

00:17:18.000 Now, everybody in the alt right, everybody in the alt light, Or many people in the alt light didn't quite buy the chemical attack. 0.53

00:17:26.000 And why was that?

00:17:27.000 Why do people still deny that Bashar al Assad used chemical weapons that week?

00:17:32.000 Because it would have been completely irrational.

00:17:35.000 And I saw memes about this all week during that week in April that said, you know, Bashar al Assad is about to win the civil war.

00:17:43.000 He's about to have a crushing victory, and then he's going to do the one thing that will invite the United States back into the conflict on the side of the moderate rebels.

00:17:53.000 Why would he do that?

00:17:54.000 Nobody believed.

00:17:55.000 The chemical weapons attack happened, and this had very little to do with the evidence, right?

00:18:01.000 This had very little to do with any of the evidence that the United Nations found, or that Israel found, or that Amnesty International found.

00:18:09.000 Nobody was really looking at the hard evidence of the chemical attack.

00:18:12.000 I mean, sure, people were pointing out some of the videos that if it was sarin gas, people wouldn't be touching the dead bodies with flip flops on and without protective gear.

00:18:22.000 But all of that aside, most people just took the a priori position.

00:18:26.000 That Bashar al Assad didn't use chemical weapons because there would have been no reason for him to use chemical weapons, and probably many reasons for him not to use chemical weapons.

00:18:36.000 And I use the same logic here with President Trump, which is if it doesn't sound like it's true, if it sounds completely ludicrous and ridiculous and completely against his interest, well, you probably don't have the full story.

00:18:51.000 I mean, what would President Trump stand to gain from.

00:18:57.000 From enshrining DACA in law without wall funding and giving all these people amnesty.

00:19:01.000 Because that is what most people on the right believe that President Trump did a 180 degree turn on every promise on DACA, on illegals, on the wall, on everything.

00:19:14.000 And how do they explain that?

00:19:16.000 They say that, well, President Trump has been getting good media coverage lately.

00:19:21.000 And so he likes the good media coverage.

00:19:24.000 So now he is going to sacrifice a second term.

00:19:28.000 He's going to sacrifice his country, his party, everything he worked so hard to achieve, his entire legacy as a president.

00:19:36.000 Think of that. 0.97

00:19:37.000 He would go down in history reviled by Democrats as a Hitler figure and reviled by Republicans as the biggest hypocrite since George H.W. Bush. 0.99

00:19:47.000 So he would tarnish his legacy.

00:19:49.000 This would have all been for naught.

00:19:51.000 He wins the biggest political upset in history only to throw it away.

00:19:55.000 And why?

00:19:56.000 Because he saw a semi favorable news story in the New York Times and he wants more of that.

00:20:03.000 Does anybody believe that?

00:20:05.000 Does anybody think that makes a lick of sense?

00:20:07.000 I don't think so.

00:20:09.000 There is no.

00:20:10.000 Rational reason why he would be doing this.

00:20:13.000 And that means one of two things.

00:20:14.000 That means one of two things.

00:20:17.000 Either we don't see the rational reason just yet, we don't understand the calculation.

00:20:22.000 This is the 4D chess.

00:20:24.000 And everyone memes about that. 0.80

00:20:26.000 They say that's ridiculous. 0.51

00:20:27.000 But it's not really like four dimensional chess.

00:20:30.000 It's called having a strategy.

00:20:31.000 It's called don't take everything he says at face value, which isn't really that complicated, by the way.

00:20:37.000 You know, people say it's 500 degree underwater backgammon.

00:20:41.000 No, it's called.

00:20:42.000 You say something, but actually, you have a different strategy in mind.

00:20:46.000 People do this all the time.

00:20:47.000 People do this all the time.

00:20:49.000 You know, you could call it reverse psychology, you could call it whatever you want, but, you know, saying one thing, but actually having something else in mind, not totally complicated.

00:20:57.000 You don't have to go different dimensions or underwater.

00:21:00.000 Pretty simple stuff.

00:21:01.000 It's strategy, it's tactics. 0.99

00:21:03.000 So, it means that either we just don't know what his plan is, and there is a plan, or he's just a big idiot and completely irrational and Your regular Joe on Twitter, who has no profile picture and less than 15 followers and probably low IQ and probably hasn't looked at politics for years and doesn't have billions of dollars and didn't win the presidential election, that guy knows better than Donald Trump. 0.99

00:21:32.000 I tend to err on the side of the former, which is that it is impossible that we would know, I think, what is more rational for the president than him. 0.98

00:21:45.000 And that is not, I don't think that's a cult like thing to say, that President Trump.

00:21:49.000 Is not a complete and utter fool and is throwing everything away in a completely irrational manner that any lay person could see, even if they don't even know what's going on in the West Wing or the Pentagon or in the higher corridors of power.

00:22:03.000 I tend to err on the side of the former, which is if it doesn't make sense, wait and see.

00:22:08.000 And you know what?

00:22:09.000 You can react.

00:22:10.000 You can react in the worst, most vocal way like people are doing and say, you know, we should impeach him or off the Trump train.

00:22:17.000 This is a betrayal.

00:22:19.000 You know, that's.

00:22:20.000 That is what I think President Trump wants.

00:22:23.000 I think that might be part of the strategy.

00:22:25.000 But I don't think if you're being honest with yourself or honest with your audience, if you have influence in saying that you honestly believe that President Trump is making such an irrational decision, it just cannot be explained any other way than there has to be more to it.

00:22:43.000 And, you know, let's explore what else there might be to it.

00:22:47.000 Let's look at some of the other pieces of the puzzle.

00:22:50.000 We saw that he kicked Bannon out earlier in the month.

00:22:54.000 We saw that he kicked Seb Gorka out of the White House a little earlier in the month.

00:22:58.000 Now, there have been rumors that Bannon is coming back to Breitbart.

00:23:02.000 Well, that's not a rumor.

00:23:03.000 He is coming back to Breitbart to head Breitbart, but there have been rumors that he is going to expand this operation and turn it into a network.

00:23:11.000 He's going to turn that into some kind of a major network.

00:23:14.000 I think that is evidenced by the fact that Fox News chose Laura Ingram a little bit with the Democrats.

00:23:20.000 Where he has already made a deal.

00:23:22.000 It's looking like he'll make a deal with the Democrats.

00:23:24.000 And the message that he's sending to the Republicans is I will make a deal with the Democrats, which will destroy the Republican Party, which will destroy me, which is completely irrational.

00:23:36.000 And I'm going to do that for wall funding.

00:23:39.000 The message that he's sending to Mitch McConnell, to Paul Ryan, is I'm willing to make a deal.

00:23:45.000 I'm willing to make a deal so much.

00:23:48.000 I want this funding for my wall so badly that I will destroy my reputation.

00:23:53.000 I will give amnesty to all these people that I said I wouldn't.

00:23:57.000 I will risk 2020.

00:23:59.000 I will risk 2018.

00:24:01.000 I will risk it all for wall funding.

00:24:04.000 What do you think Paul Ryan and Mitch McConnell are going to do?

00:24:07.000 Do you think they're going to let that happen?

00:24:08.000 Do you think they're going to let their entire majority in both chambers of Congress just slip away in 2018?

00:24:16.000 They're going to say, okay, you have our blessing, Donald Trump.

00:24:19.000 You can have the Democrats and a couple of rogue Republicans, and you can steal the initiative from our party.

00:24:25.000 You can steal the issue from our party.

00:24:27.000 You can destroy our entire mandate, everything that we ran on, and lose our majorities, lose all our political power.

00:24:34.000 And, you know, that's fine.

00:24:36.000 I don't think so.

00:24:38.000 What the president is doing, and this has been pretty clear for a couple of months, is he's setting up for the primaries.

00:24:43.000 And I think what he's doing with the Republicans right now is he is goading them into making him a counteroffer, which is that Paul Ryan, and I think I would go out on a limb here, if I may.

00:24:57.000 I think I might go out on a limb here and predict that in the next month, maybe, we'll see Paul Ryan and Mitch McConnell come to Donald Trump with a deal to fund the wall and have some kind of residency for DACA.

00:25:10.000 And maybe there'll be other provisions.

00:25:12.000 Maybe there'll be consideration for the RAISE Act.

00:25:15.000 Maybe there'll be other things.

00:25:16.000 But I have a strong feeling that President Trump won't go through on this deal with the Democrats.

00:25:23.000 He'll get a counteroffer from the Republicans.

00:25:26.000 And I think that might be resolved in December when we have the budget showdown.

00:25:32.000 Because Republicans know that if the government shuts down in December, they're going to get killed in the primaries.

00:25:38.000 Republicans know that if Donald Trump makes a deal with Democrats, they're going to get killed in the primaries.

00:25:44.000 They will stop that from happening.

00:25:46.000 This is the art of the deal.

00:25:48.000 And, you know, not for nothing.

00:25:50.000 But if you read The Art of the Deal, read, and the only thing that you need to read in The Art of the Deal is chapter two.

00:25:56.000 You know, the whole book, it's pretty autobiographical.

00:25:59.000 The first chapter, he talks about like a day in the life of Donald Trump, all the deals he's making.

00:26:05.000 And then the rest of the chapters is talking about his father's business in Brooklyn and how he renovated the Grand Hyatt Hotel and then he put together the deal for Trump Tower and Trump Park and some of the other things.

00:26:17.000 But the second chapter, it's really the only thing you need to read.

00:26:20.000 I read the whole thing because it's really good.

00:26:22.000 But the second chapter, he lays out his trump cards.

00:26:25.000 And, I mean, that's just so characteristic of the man, how bold he is, that he lays out in plain English, breaks it down for anybody to understand, all of his stratagems, all of his tactics, right there for anybody to read.

00:26:39.000 And, you know, I implore everybody watching this go find The Art of the Deal.

00:26:43.000 I think you can, there might even be a PDF of the second chapter, read the trump cards.

00:26:47.000 And one of them, Which I think supports my theory unequivocally.

00:26:52.000 One of his Trump cards is deliver the goods.

00:26:55.000 He says, you know, you have to promise the world, you have to hype things up, you have to make it big and exciting and sensational and attract press coverage.

00:27:04.000 But at the end of the day, you have to deliver the goods.

00:27:07.000 That's his own law.

00:27:08.000 That's his own card.

00:27:10.000 That's his own strategy in his book that he wrote about how he became a billionaire twice over because he lost it all in the 90s and then won it back.

00:27:19.000 And then he became the president.

00:27:21.000 By delivering the goods.

00:27:22.000 That's his own card.

00:27:23.000 And you know, so you can call me Bill Mitchell. 0.72

00:27:26.000 You can say, you know, I'm cucking or I'm shilling or whatever.

00:27:30.000 If Donald Trump goes through with this, there's no wall, but there is amnesty, I will be off the Trump train.

00:27:36.000 I will disavow.

00:27:37.000 I will admonish.

00:27:39.000 I'll be off the Trump train. 0.99

00:27:40.000 I will black pill like everybody else. 0.60

00:27:43.000 I don't think that's going to happen.

00:27:44.000 And I think there's a lot of evidence to support it. 0.99

00:27:47.000 And the only argument that I've heard so far in opposition to me is just a lot of stupid rhetoric about illegal immigration that is overdramatic, unrealistic, and just not pragmatic. 0.99

00:28:00.000 I mean, I said, you know. 0.99

00:28:02.000 Donald Trump promised towards the end of the election, he didn't say he was deporting all 11 million on day one.

00:28:07.000 He didn't even say he would deport all 11 million, between 11 and 30 million, at all. 0.99

00:28:12.000 What he said very clearly, what he said very clearly in many of the debates and in many speeches is that number one, we would deport the bad hombres, we would deport the criminal illegals. 0.99

00:28:24.000 And people are tweeting at me, all illegals are criminal. 0.99

00:28:27.000 Yeah, of course, dummy. 0.99

00:28:29.000 You know, we're all against illegal immigration, but there are two categories.

00:28:33.000 There is a distinction.

00:28:34.000 You have people that are Drug dealers and gang members and murderers, and then you have people that just came in illegally.

00:28:40.000 Yeah, we get it. 0.96

00:28:41.000 They're both criminals. 0.99

00:28:42.000 You know, bravo. 0.98

00:28:43.000 You're really ideologically pure.

00:28:45.000 But if you want to be pragmatic, there is a distinction.

00:28:48.000 He said, number one, get out the bad hombres.

00:28:50.000 Number two, build the wall.

00:28:52.000 Number three, he said, he said this many times.

00:28:55.000 I remember the wording very clearly.

00:28:57.000 Quote, a determination will be made as to the rest.

00:29:01.000 So he didn't say, he didn't say we were going to deport them on day one.

00:29:05.000 He didn't even say we were going to deport the rest of them at all. 0.99

00:29:09.000 He said, number one, get out the bad hombres.

00:29:11.000 And we've been doing that.

00:29:13.000 We've been doing that to an incredible degree.

00:29:16.000 And border stoppage is through the roof.

00:29:17.000 I mean, it's something like 73% illegals that are turned away at the border.

00:29:22.000 So he's doing that.

00:29:23.000 Building the wall.

00:29:24.000 That's what we're seeing right now.

00:29:26.000 He's getting the funding.

00:29:27.000 And number three, determination is going to be made as to the rest.

00:29:32.000 So people that are blackpilling, people that are being melodramatic, the expectation was unrealistic from the start.

00:29:39.000 People.

00:29:40.000 I think they saw Donald Trump get elected and they projected all of their ideological baggage onto him.

00:29:47.000 It was a lot of confirmation bias where President Trump, he really drummed up the rhetoric, but if he really broke down what he was saying, it just wasn't there.

00:29:56.000 People expected him to be an isolationist.

00:29:59.000 You know, we were going to withdraw everyone immediately.

00:30:01.000 They expected him to deport everyone immediately, but that's never what he said, and that wouldn't even be possible anyway.

00:30:08.000 And people say, enforcing the law is impossible?

00:30:11.000 Yeah.

00:30:12.000 It is.

00:30:13.000 Because you know what happens when you say tonight that 11 million people are going back?

00:30:18.000 Tomorrow, you have 50 million people that are in civil disorder, that are overthrowing the government.

00:30:26.000 You know, you think tonight I am declaring that 30 million people are going to be physically removed.

00:30:34.000 What do you think those people are going to do tomorrow?

00:30:36.000 You think they're going to sit and wait to be removed?

00:30:38.000 Or are they going to throw Molotov cocktails through windows? 1.00

00:30:42.000 Are their Hispanic brethren or their white liberal allies going to. 1.00

00:30:47.000 Chimp out. 1.00

00:30:48.000 I mean, that's what's going to happen. 1.00

00:30:50.000 It is just not realistic.

00:30:52.000 It is just not strategic.

00:30:54.000 It is just not, it doesn't make any sense.

00:30:58.000 This sort of over the top meme politics that people want this president to govern by.

00:31:04.000 It doesn't make any sense. 0.97

00:31:05.000 And I don't think anybody has the balls or the courage to say that because everybody's hitting the black pill and misery loves companies. 0.95

00:31:13.000 So they want, and they don't even have any arguments. 0.99

00:31:15.000 It's, oh, you know, you're a cuck, you're a shill, you sound like Bill Mitchell. 0.97

00:31:19.000 Sorry, you know, but address the arguments. 1.00

00:31:22.000 Nobody has the courage to smack the right wing and say, you know, listen, stupid, if you are still taking what this president and what the media says at face value in 2017, you're an idiot. 1.00

00:31:35.000 Like, you don't know what you're talking about. 1.00

00:31:37.000 You haven't been paying attention.

00:31:39.000 And to go after and criticize people, or the president especially, who have been making all the sacrifices, you know, you're an anonymous person on Twitter, and you have the gall to go after a man that sacrificed his whole life.

00:31:53.000 Donald Trump or people in media that sacrificed their lives, it's just very disrespectful, and I don't think there's any place for it.

00:31:59.000 But that's just my take.

00:32:02.000 You know, again, that is one take, that is one possibility.

00:32:05.000 Do with that what you will, but I don't think there's a rational alternative explanation other than that we just don't know.

00:32:13.000 We just don't know what he's doing here yet.

00:32:18.000 I think it'll become pretty crystal clear in the coming weeks, even in the coming days, what that is.

00:32:22.000 Remember with the serious strike.

00:32:25.000 It was Mike Cernovich, Jack Posobick.

00:32:28.000 Everybody told me that I was wrong.

00:32:31.000 Everybody told me that the missile strike in Syria was the first strike in a war against Syria.

00:32:38.000 McMaster had taken over the West Wing, and it was his plot.

00:32:42.000 Him and Petraeus had plotted, and 150,000 American boots would land in Syria by June 1st.

00:32:49.000 Yeah, where the hell are the boots on the ground in Syria, Black Pillars?

00:32:53.000 Where are they?

00:32:55.000 Where's our war in Syria?

00:32:57.000 Where's the war in Syria?

00:32:59.000 I don't see it. 1.00

00:33:00.000 I was right.

00:33:01.000 You were wrong.

00:33:01.000 I'm right about this.

00:33:02.000 I will be vindicated.

00:33:04.000 And why was there no war in Syria? 0.52

00:33:07.000 Because the missile strike in Syria was a show of force to China and North Korea.

00:33:12.000 It's so obvious.

00:33:14.000 It was so obvious to me the day that I saw on the news that Xi Jinping would be in Mar-a-Lago that weekend.

00:33:22.000 And then slowly but surely in the next week, you saw, wait a minute.

00:33:26.000 Wait a minute, one token strike on an airport that didn't even destroy the airport wasn't the start of an enormous nation building exercise?

00:33:36.000 I mean, Donald Trump didn't do a 180 degree turn on his entire foreign policy for 40 years because he saw some pictures of dead kids?

00:33:44.000 What?

00:33:45.000 Who could have called that?

00:33:46.000 Who could have predicted that Donald Trump, instead of doing something completely irrational, would do something totally rational?

00:33:52.000 I don't know.

00:33:53.000 You know, who could have predicted it?

00:33:57.000 I get a little bitter.

00:33:58.000 I get a little bit hostile when people who have followed me for a long time, for people who hear my commentary, for people who hear my analysis, the moment they don't like what they hear, the moment they disagree with it, are going to be disrespectful and call names and question allegiances.

00:34:16.000 That I cannot do that, right?

00:34:20.000 Because people like myself and others in this movement, We make a lot of sacrifices to make this sort of thing happen.

00:34:30.000 And I don't think anybody's in a position to, because they disagree with what's being said, to say that we're somehow, you know, we're Shills or we're Bill Mitchell.

00:34:39.000 I mean, really, I think it's just, but that's why I get a little bit heated or passionate about it because we're all in this together.

00:34:45.000 You know, we all want the same thing, right?

00:34:48.000 So to get on that high horse and start throwing names around because you're overdosing on black pills, it's not fair.

00:34:55.000 It's not fair to anybody.

00:34:57.000 But that's DACA.

00:34:58.000 I think.

00:34:59.000 I think that, and I would make the bet, screenshot it, you know, whatever, write it down.

00:35:05.000 Everybody who's blackpilling today, or 95% of the people that are blackpilling today, will be satisfied with the deal that is made on immigration.

00:35:13.000 That's my bet.

00:35:14.000 And if I had money, I'd put money on that.

00:35:16.000 But I think that is the case because, you know, again, where have we seen evidence of a betrayal so far?

00:35:25.000 I don't think you've seen it.

00:35:27.000 And there are many opportunities or places where Trump could have cucked.

00:35:30.000 There are many things he could have done to cuck during the campaign, during the first seven months, and it hasn't happened.

00:35:38.000 I think we have no reason to lose faith or trust in this guy now.

00:35:43.000 That said, there is a valid purpose for.

00:35:47.000 Calling your senators and flipping out about it because I think that's ultimately what Trump was summoning.

00:35:53.000 When he started to signal on DACA, I think in a way that was to rile up his base.

00:35:58.000 I think he tends to do that, where we're all just pawns in the chess game, where he puts out something on DACA, and guess what?

00:36:07.000 Now today people are calling their congressmen.

00:36:09.000 Now people are saying we should impeach Trump.

00:36:11.000 Donald Trump follows Ann Coulter on Twitter.

00:36:13.000 Now Ann Coulter is saying we should impeach Donald Trump.

00:36:17.000 He saw that coming.

00:36:18.000 You don't think that was maybe forecasted a little bit before he tweeted all that outrageous stuff?

00:36:24.000 I don't think it's too crazy to say that.

00:36:26.000 I think that he saw the news cycle with DACA last week, which was pretty muted.

00:36:31.000 The Democrats won the news cycle on DACA last week because, of course, it was the children.

00:36:36.000 And think of the children, the babies, you know, the little Nicaraguan, Salvadorian babies.

00:36:43.000 And we lost the news cycle last week.

00:36:46.000 Everyone was saying, you can't rescind, you can't.

00:36:48.000 Get rid of it.

00:36:49.000 And now this week, watch what happens.

00:36:51.000 This week, you will see, like you've never seen before, conservatives come out against DACA and make it so that it is unacceptable for a Republican to be in support of DACA.

00:37:01.000 That's a big thing.

00:37:02.000 That is not something to sneeze at like that was just some huge accident.

00:37:07.000 Whoops, everyone's playing into Donald Trump's hands again, right?

00:37:13.000 Anyway, that's DACA.

00:37:15.000 I think we'll move over into the questions a little bit early because I know this is a heated topic.

00:37:20.000 So we'll move into the questions at the 20th.

00:37:23.000 Minute mark here.

00:37:23.000 So if you have any questions, remember it's hashtag AmericaFQ.

00:37:27.000 We're moving over into the Twitter sphere right now.

00:37:32.000 And let's see what we have.

00:37:33.000 And then we'll go into the live chat if there's anything else.

00:37:36.000 Looks like no questions.

00:37:37.000 Where are the questions, folks?

00:37:40.000 All of our questions are pretty stale, pretty old stuff.

00:37:44.000 Our last questions from 24 hours ago.

00:37:48.000 Come on, we could do better than that.

00:37:50.000 Maybe I'm making such good points that everybody's in agreement, right?

00:37:55.000 I'm so right.

00:37:56.000 I'm so on the money that everyone's like, yeah, no questions, no concerns.

00:38:01.000 I think there were a couple from last week, though.

00:38:04.000 No, the last one was September 7th.

00:38:10.000 Yeah, the last one was September 7th.

00:38:11.000 It was a base poll.

00:38:14.000 He asks, Will we ever see a white country become a white minority country?

00:38:18.000 What country would that be then? 0.59

00:38:19.000 You know, of course we're going to see countries become white minority if we don't act. 1.00

00:38:24.000 And I would say that the. 1.00

00:38:26.000 Well, it depends on how things play out because there's a number of different factors. 0.60

00:38:30.000 Like, America is in a position right now where it's 67% white and 33% non white. 0.77

00:38:39.000 Fortunately for us, the birth rate of foreign born is lower than in other countries, and the birth rate of native born is higher than in other countries. 0.89

00:38:47.000 Like, the foreign born birth rate in this country doesn't exceed three for many of these immigrant groups. 1.00

00:38:53.000 The largest foreign born group in, I think it's almost all states, if not all of them, is Mexicans.

00:39:00.000 And If you look at the Mexican birth rate, it's only like 2.5, which is 0.4 above replacement rate.

00:39:05.000 I say only, but you compare that to Yemen, where it's seven.

00:39:08.000 You compare that to Sudan or the Congo, where it's like three or four or five, and it's apples and oranges. 0.51

00:39:14.000 So, while in this country, the demographic makeup is less white than in Europe, the birth rates are more parallel or they're more symmetrical as opposed to Europe. 0.90

00:39:27.000 Where in Europe, you see in Italy, the birth rate, or I think it's Spain, in Spain, the birth rate is like 1.1 for natives, and for migrants, it could be two or three, or like I said, upwards of seven or eight.

00:39:39.000 And so that's why it's sort of tough to predict because in America, If everything stays the same, it'll probably take until like 2050 before we're a minority, a white minority in this country. 0.76

00:39:50.000 But if you look in Europe, depending on how immigration changes, that could happen much more rapidly because you have 8% Muslims in France, 8% Muslims, I don't know how many blacks in France, and they're reproducing at a rate like five times what the natives are. 0.82

00:40:06.000 It's just a matter of arithmetic. 0.98

00:40:08.000 So I think, you know, that's definitely something that may happen if we don't get our act together.

00:40:14.000 And I say that we should. 1.00

00:40:17.000 You know, Ben Shapiro sees no problem with this, but here's the problem France should be for the French. 0.98

00:40:24.000 French is an ethnicity, it is not citizenship, it is not a passport, it's not a piece of paper. 0.66

00:40:30.000 So, and that's why I think it's a big difference between being a white nationalist or a nationalist in Europe and being one in America.

00:40:39.000 If you're one in Europe, it makes sense.

00:40:42.000 You want England to be for Englishmen, and Englishmen are an ethnicity, you know, it's not paperwork.

00:40:48.000 The same is true with France, the same is true with Italy, and so on for all these countries.

00:40:52.000 With America, it's a little bit different. 0.71

00:40:54.000 And I'm not saying I don't, I'm not saying I endorse a white minority in America, but I am saying that an ethnostate in America is a different proposition than in Europe. 0.68

00:41:03.000 And you can have your own opinion on that, but it's just a different, I think it's a different tradition in these countries. 0.85

00:41:09.000 But with Europe, it's a no brainer.

00:41:11.000 Russia is for Russians, and also Tatars and, you know, some of the other ethnicities in the Caucasus and in Siberia. 0.68

00:41:20.000 A better example might be France. 0.53

00:41:21.000 France is for the French. 0.75

00:41:23.000 Germany is for the Germans.

00:41:24.000 In every other country, this is, of course, there's not even a word for it in other countries. 0.87

00:41:30.000 If you wanted to make Nigeria a Nigerian country, there's not a word for that.

00:41:35.000 If you want Iran to remain Persian, ethnically Persian, there's not a name for that. 0.99

00:41:40.000 But in Europe, it's evil white nationalist, it's dangerous, violent white supremacist. 0.95

00:41:48.000 In China, if you want China to remain ethnically Chinese, characteristically, Culturally, racially, ethnically Chinese, there's not a word for that. 0.97

00:41:57.000 That's called being Chinese, having common sense.

00:42:00.000 But in Europe and America, you have to have some kind of villain term for it. 0.99

00:42:05.000 You're a super villain, white Hitler, Nazi guy. 0.89

00:42:10.000 But yeah, majority, minority country, America is the trajectory right now. 0.99

00:42:17.000 Who wants that, folks? 1.00

00:42:18.000 Who wants that? 0.87

00:42:20.000 Who desires that?

00:42:21.000 Why is that right?

00:42:22.000 Why is that necessary?

00:42:23.000 Why are we doing that?

00:42:24.000 Nobody asks these questions.

00:42:26.000 Never mind.

00:42:27.000 Never mind having an opinion on whether or not that's good.

00:42:30.000 Ask yourself this why is that the agenda? 0.60

00:42:34.000 The country went from 90% white in 1960 to 67% white in 2017. 0.68

00:42:41.000 Why did that happen? 0.87

00:42:43.000 Who decided that was going to happen?

00:42:45.000 Who thought that was a good idea?

00:42:47.000 Why are we doing that?

00:42:48.000 Why is that a good idea?

00:42:49.000 Ask these questions.

00:42:50.000 You know, they want to project like hate onto me.

00:42:53.000 I'm only saying ask these questions.

00:42:55.000 Why has this been going on and nobody talks about it?

00:42:58.000 I mean, that's really the disturbing thing.

00:43:00.000 If there's an issue, we can debate it and we can fix it.

00:43:04.000 You know, look at tax policy.

00:43:06.000 Taxes have been getting lower and higher every so often for 50 years.

00:43:12.000 I don't really begrudge people for having another opinion on that or anything like that because we can have that debate.

00:43:18.000 If taxes get a little bit too high, well, I'll say they should be lowered or vice versa.

00:43:24.000 And you can have that discussion out in the open.

00:43:27.000 But the demographics, which is so important, it's so critical and crucial, and the people making this decision know that.

00:43:35.000 That's why in a certain country, They've been so careful to pursue that agenda.

00:43:42.000 But this is something so crucial and so critical and so important, and you're not allowed to talk about it.

00:43:47.000 I mean, you really have to think about that.

00:43:49.000 You really, and when I say you have to think about that, I don't mean like, oh, yeah.

00:43:53.000 Anyway, how about that football game?

00:43:56.000 Oh, yeah, that's really, oh, yeah, that's interesting.

00:43:59.000 That's pretty troubling.

00:44:00.000 Anyway, I want to try that new salad at Panera Bread.

00:44:08.000 Anyway, I got to go to bed.

00:44:09.000 I'm tired.

00:44:11.000 I mean, really think about that.

00:44:12.000 The demographics.

00:44:14.000 Who lives in your country?

00:44:15.000 Who lives in your neighborhood?

00:44:17.000 I mean, it's no less important than who goes to the same school as your children.

00:44:22.000 And that has changed dramatically in a short period of time.

00:44:26.000 And if you question it, you're not allowed to do that.

00:44:30.000 Why not, folks?

00:44:32.000 Who made this decision for us?

00:44:33.000 Why is that a good thing?

00:44:35.000 Why can't we question it?

00:44:38.000 I mean, really, that's what really floored me when I started to think about this stuff, you know.

00:44:44.000 People just take it for granted.

00:44:47.000 I went to Boston University, and in front of my dorm, there was a big mural.

00:44:52.000 And it was this like pop art, you know, BS mural of like, you know, all these fun colors and like different students.

00:45:00.000 And, you know, of course, they have a black student on there. 0.68

00:45:03.000 I think they had a kid in a wheelchair, your sad white cuckoo student, and then they have a woman in a hijab on there. 0.56

00:45:10.000 And I looked up the statistics and I found out that Muslims in this country.

00:45:15.000 Are, well, I forget all the math, like how it broke down, but I broke it down where it's less than a half of a percent of the U.S. population is a Muslim woman that wears a burqa.

00:45:27.000 There was some, it was some extremely low number like that.

00:45:30.000 And I'm thinking, you have five panels on this mural.

00:45:33.000 You have five panels. 0.70

00:45:35.000 One panel, white men, is 34% of the country. 0.82

00:45:39.000 A black guy is 7% of the country. 0.99

00:45:41.000 Get in a wheelchair, I don't know what the stats are on that. 1.00

00:45:43.000 Muslim woman is like a fifth of a percent of the U.S. population. 1.00

00:45:48.000 Why is she there? 1.00

00:45:51.000 And I don't ask that like, take her down. 1.00

00:45:53.000 If she looks different than me, take her down. 0.88

00:45:55.000 I'm not saying it like that.

00:45:56.000 I'm saying, why, if you have five panels, do you devote one panel to a group that's less than a fifth of the percent of the population?

00:46:03.000 Who made that decision?

00:46:04.000 Why would they do that?

00:46:05.000 And of course, it's because it's diverse and we like diversity.

00:46:08.000 And I sat down on the bench in front of this mural and I thought, you know, why is diversity a good thing?

00:46:14.000 We talk about the Muslim ban, we talk about immigration. 1.00

00:46:17.000 Why do we want Muslims in the country? 1.00

00:46:19.000 It's not a matter of do you like them. 0.99

00:46:21.000 Are they good people?

00:46:22.000 It has nothing to do with that.

00:46:24.000 But why are we bringing them in here?

00:46:27.000 Why do we want more of them here? 1.00

00:46:29.000 Why do we want to lessen the amount of white people and increase the amount of other people? 0.99

00:46:34.000 That is an active process. 0.87

00:46:36.000 This is not something that passively happens.

00:46:38.000 This is something that is active.

00:46:40.000 Why is that being done?

00:46:41.000 It would be different if this was a natural, oh, well, you know, that's just how it happens.

00:46:46.000 A country naturally just shifts demographics by a third in 50 years.

00:46:51.000 This is an active process.

00:46:52.000 And why is it being done?

00:46:54.000 And I sat down and I thought, why is that a good thing?

00:46:56.000 What is the positive benefit?

00:46:58.000 If you're an egalitarian, if you believe that all people are the same, all people are equal, there's no difference between me and a Somali or a Yemeni or a Chinese person or an Argentine, why do we want more different people?

00:47:12.000 Aren't we all just the same?

00:47:16.000 Doesn't make any sense.

00:47:17.000 Ask yourself that question.

00:47:20.000 It does us no good, but it does the globalists a lot of good because here's what they want.

00:47:25.000 Here's what they want they want a disassociated slave class.

00:47:30.000 That's what it is.

00:47:32.000 And you could look at a certain group of books.

00:47:35.000 I think one was written in 200, one was written in 400, in different cities, of course.

00:47:41.000 And it's all laid out there.

00:47:43.000 And it's been an agenda for 2,000 years.

00:47:47.000 And what this globalist, internationalist elite wants is a disassociated slave class.

00:47:53.000 They want to bring in so many people so that there's no majority, and there's no plurality either.

00:48:00.000 It's just a lot of different groups.

00:48:02.000 And they want conflict.

00:48:03.000 And they want division.

00:48:05.000 And what they want more than anything else is a nation of individual consumers who go to work, who don't ask questions, who don't have rituals or customs or gods or traditions or families or clans or communities.

00:48:20.000 They only have themselves.

00:48:21.000 And you can picture the globalist future.

00:48:23.000 What they want is Manhattan.

00:48:26.000 They want you to live in a tenement 50 stories up in a small little room, and they want you to take the elevator down.

00:48:35.000 They want you to take public transportation to work so you don't get to choose where you go.

00:48:39.000 They want you to toil at work doing meaningless stuff, doing marketing to sell people stuff they don't want.

00:48:45.000 They want you to say politically correct things, meaning they don't want you to say anything at all.

00:48:49.000 They want you to talk about the big game and they want you to talk about sex and food.

00:48:54.000 And then they want you to take your public transportation home and they want you to take the elevator back up and they want you to go to bed with your partner, whoever that would be.

00:49:04.000 And there's no families and there's no communities.

00:49:07.000 And there's no interaction.

00:49:08.000 It is only you and the state.

00:49:10.000 It is only you and the government that controls everything.

00:49:14.000 And that's what they want.

00:49:15.000 A nation can fight back against this.

00:49:18.000 A nation can direct the state.

00:49:20.000 You know, I forget who said this, but there's a really great, great quote where they said, you know, the state doesn't control us, we control the state.

00:49:28.000 And that's what they want to avoid.

00:49:30.000 They want to avoid a nation rising up and taking control of their own future, taking control of their own country, their fate.

00:49:37.000 Their destiny, and using the state as an apparatus to further their own interests, which is possible when you have a nation, when you have mass organization on that level.

00:49:50.000 And if you have a family, if you have a family, you're going to be against certain policies.

00:49:56.000 You know, you look at all these enrichment schemes at the expense of us, whether it's immigration, whether it is the taxes, which are extremely obscene, or the Federal Reserve, or anything else.

00:50:10.000 Or, you know, even if you're an environmentalist, you look at the destruction of our environment.

00:50:14.000 If you have children, if you have a family, you say, I'm looking to the future, I'm looking to posterity.

00:50:19.000 You're not looking at consumption.

00:50:21.000 You're not only consuming, which is what they want.

00:50:25.000 And that is why you've seen the systematic destruction of all these levels of higher organization.

00:50:32.000 That's why they want individuals.

00:50:34.000 Individuals can be isolated, controlled, and manipulated.

00:50:41.000 That's what they want.

00:50:42.000 They want a farm.

00:50:44.000 But that's our question.

00:50:46.000 And we got three more.

00:50:47.000 What else do we have here?

00:50:50.000 Bill Matzing, did you see the rapper video that is not even restricted on YouTube?

00:50:55.000 It has now 8 million views.

00:50:57.000 Yeah, it was that rap video where they hang a white child.

00:51:02.000 Someone told me that that was actually like satire. 0.53

00:51:05.000 And, you know, I watched the video and they also had images of black people getting hanged, too. 0.98

00:51:11.000 And I think the point the rapper was trying to make was that Black Lives Matter is hypocrites because, you know, you look at the history of blacks and the lynchings and all that stuff and the police brutality, and then they want to go and hang white people. 0.98

00:51:26.000 I think that was the point. 0.97

00:51:28.000 Again, I'm not saying I support that, but I think that was the point this rapper was trying to make.

00:51:33.000 It was like XXX Temptation or something.

00:51:36.000 And it's to say, you know, look, they hanged us for years, and they showed that in the video. 0.99

00:51:43.000 Black people getting hanged, black people getting abused. 0.99

00:51:46.000 And then it was to say, and now we want to hang Whitey. 1.00

00:51:49.000 I mean, what's wrong? 1.00

00:51:51.000 That's wrong.

00:51:51.000 I think that's what he was trying to say.

00:51:53.000 And I think the lyrics were anti BLM, too.

00:51:56.000 I generally oppose that kind of imagery because you know that.

00:51:59.000 Whether or not the rapper intended that as the meaning, you know, people are just going to eat that up and say, you know, hang Whitey, kill Whitey, and it radicalizes the people.

00:52:07.000 And you know why?

00:52:08.000 I'm sure this rapper's producers, the rapper's producers, the globalists who pull the strings on this sort of thing, I'm sure were enthused about that imagery.

00:52:19.000 Didn't really matter the message.

00:52:20.000 So that's sort of my take on that he didn't mean it like that, but it's taken like that.

00:52:25.000 So it should be restricted. 0.99

00:52:29.000 Sean Hoy, Nick, who is your favorite shit poster? 0.99

00:52:33.000 You put me in a tough situation. 1.00

00:52:33.000 Tough question. 1.00

00:52:36.000 I love the.

00:52:37.000 It's a shame because now I'm a blue check mark. 0.75

00:52:39.000 I'm like the blue check mark bourgeoisie.

00:52:41.000 So I'm supposed to be lame and everything.

00:52:43.000 What is going on with my hair, folks?

00:52:46.000 Geez.

00:52:46.000 I got to get a haircut like tomorrow.

00:52:49.000 I just noticed that.

00:52:50.000 It was like hanging down. 1.00

00:52:52.000 Anyway, I like so many of the shit posters online. 0.99

00:52:56.000 I mean, I love Paul Town. 0.99

00:52:58.000 I love Beardson, TV Ameriquois, Quaxin, Comrade Stump. 0.84

00:53:03.000 I mean, those were like my original people, those were my main nibbas. 1.00

00:53:07.000 Back in the day, we used to hang out. 0.99

00:53:09.000 We didn't really hang out, but I mean, we'd always tweet each other and everything.

00:53:13.000 But I really like Kantbot.

00:53:16.000 I like Dr. Stud.

00:53:18.000 He's hilarious. 1.00

00:53:20.000 I like Bronze Age Pervert. 0.67

00:53:22.000 I like Deuce Ebola.

00:53:24.000 I mean, Ebola, I think it is.

00:53:26.000 There's so many good ones.

00:53:28.000 Oh, and Drone Diary.

00:53:30.000 And Owen Cyclops is good.

00:53:34.000 I mean, there's a lot of good ones.

00:53:35.000 Isn't it funny that in like 30 years, there could be a president who liked and retweeted. 0.93

00:53:42.000 These ridiculous memes by these people. 0.70

00:53:44.000 Oh, and there's another really good one. 0.94

00:53:47.000 It's a frog, and the at is like Ribbit Ribbit.

00:53:50.000 It's like, I forget what the handle is, though.

00:53:53.000 It's Frog Wave, I think.

00:53:55.000 And there are probably others that I'm leaving out, but those are some of my favorites.

00:53:55.000 He's good.

00:53:59.000 Those are some really, really good content creators who I enjoy.

00:54:04.000 Oh, Swag Blog, I like a lot.

00:54:07.000 He just tweeted really funny OC about the debate the other day.

00:54:10.000 That was good stuff.

00:54:11.000 And.

00:54:13.000 And there was one other guy who tweeted a video.

00:54:15.000 He's good too.

00:54:17.000 But I forget it right now.

00:54:18.000 There's too many, too many names, and they're all pretty esoteric.

00:54:22.000 But yeah, good content all around.

00:54:26.000 DM me rare loomers asks If Trump ever really has TPTB, what is that?

00:54:26.000 What else?

00:54:34.000 Cornered and scared, what can he possibly do if they go nuclear?

00:54:38.000 Stop her.

00:54:38.000 Oh, okay.

00:54:39.000 So they're basically saying, you know, what if they are going to kill his family or kill him? 0.81

00:54:44.000 I don't know, man.

00:54:45.000 That's tough.

00:54:46.000 I don't really know what he would have at his disposal.

00:54:49.000 It really has a lot to do with who his team is, who he can trust.

00:54:52.000 He needs that Praetorian guard that's literally making sure his food isn't being poisoned because you know these people are up to tricks like that all the time, and they haven't ever, they have not ever been subtle about that.

00:55:06.000 They don't even try to cover it up.

00:55:07.000 I mean, it's obvious. 0.97

00:55:09.000 You can read about all the examples where they try to assassinate people they don't like or bomb cities they don't like or bomb foreign affairs offices like in Britain in the late 1940s, and that's just fine.

00:55:22.000 And nobody even talks. 0.50

00:55:24.000 They don't even cover it up because they know nobody will talk about it.

00:55:27.000 That's the sickness.

00:55:30.000 So smug.

00:55:31.000 I mean, imagine that.

00:55:32.000 They don't even bother covering up the assassinations, the killings, because they know everybody's afraid to talk about it.

00:55:39.000 How cucked, right?

00:55:41.000 So I don't know.

00:55:42.000 He's got to have that Praetorian guard. 0.94

00:55:45.000 Proud American, did you say there was social justice warrior garbage in the recent Spider Man movie? 0.96

00:55:50.000 Yeah, there was all kinds of. 0.97

00:55:53.000 Saw Alinsky stuff in there. 0.95

00:55:55.000 They go to the Washington Monument, and little girls like the Washington Monument was built by slaves. 0.98

00:56:00.000 Like, you know what? 0.82

00:56:01.000 So are the pyramids.

00:56:01.000 So what?

00:56:03.000 Should we go and nuke the pyramids?

00:56:05.000 So is the Great Wall of China.

00:56:06.000 Are we going to go and nuke the Great Wall of China?

00:56:10.000 4% of the population of Mauritania in West Africa is enslaved.

00:56:15.000 Nobody cares about that.

00:56:17.000 Nobody cares. 1.00

00:56:18.000 They care about one thing taking down whitey. 1.00

00:56:21.000 If you cared about slavery, you would care about where it actually is, which is Africa, the Middle East, and India. 0.95

00:56:29.000 If you cared about monuments being built by slavery, I don't know if you've looked at any example in the world, but they only look at one country or one group of countries, and we know who that is.

00:56:38.000 Michael Claire Oh, and there's so much more that's paused in Spider Man.

00:56:42.000 There was one other thing, and then the major thing was that the love interest of Spider Man was some black girl.

00:56:47.000 Like, that's not canon.

00:56:48.000 And, you know, again, I explained that on my Periscope, which is we should be tolerant of that sort of thing.

00:56:56.000 It should not be in Spider Man or Star Wars or.

00:57:00.000 The major movies for our children to watch.

00:57:02.000 And, you know, if conservatives were to inject a charged social agenda into a blockbuster movie, it would be the scandal of the century.

00:57:14.000 If in Star Wars there was a subtext about opposing mass immigration or about how Muslims were terrorists, it would be sanctioned, it would be illegal in Europe, it would be boycotted, they would shut down the studios, they would shut it down.

00:57:31.000 But when it's in Spider Man and it's the liberal cultural Marxist agenda, well, you know, if you even raise a concern about it, you're a racist. 0.98

00:57:39.000 And of course, racists are the evilest people in the world.

00:57:47.000 Anyway, so yeah, Spider Man's paused. 0.86

00:57:47.000 God. 0.86

00:57:50.000 Good movie, generally.

00:57:52.000 Outside of that, I thought it was, you know, I like the spectacle of the superhero movies.

00:57:57.000 You know, it's big action, it's big.

00:57:59.000 I like that.

00:58:00.000 I like the scale.

00:58:01.000 You know, I hate the modern world.

00:58:02.000 But I love the scale of it.

00:58:04.000 I will say that.

00:58:06.000 You know, you watch the modern movies, and they're not good like they used to be.

00:58:10.000 They're not, I mean, you're not going to take anything away from it.

00:58:14.000 And it's not good for children.

00:58:15.000 But you watch like Spider Man or Star Wars, it's like, wow, you know, that made me feel good.

00:58:20.000 That's what they appeal to, though, is that sensationalism.

00:58:23.000 They appeal to the stimulation.

00:58:26.000 But, you know, I'm only human.

00:58:28.000 I can't help but be sort of wowed by it.

00:58:30.000 And then I went to New York City, and the tall buildings, I was like, wow, look at that.

00:58:34.000 Big.

00:58:34.000 It's so beautiful.

00:58:35.000 So cool.

00:58:36.000 But, anyhow.

00:58:38.000 Michael Kokotka, Nick, this was too easy.

00:58:40.000 Trump would never give up the wall.

00:58:42.000 That should be clue number one.

00:58:44.000 Been trained by NJF.

00:58:45.000 There you go.

00:58:46.000 I mean, you always got to be skeptical of the black pill.

00:58:50.000 Based Jay, what do you think about the tax reform agenda?

00:58:53.000 What are your predictions about its future?

00:58:56.000 I don't know.

00:58:56.000 I hope it gets through.

00:58:57.000 The reason why tax reform is so important is because tax reform grows the economy.

00:59:03.000 When you grow the economy, wages go up, houses become cheaper, consumer products become cheaper, people get employed.

00:59:11.000 What do people do?

00:59:12.000 They start families.

00:59:14.000 That's the ticket.

00:59:15.000 People make fun of GDP and economics and all of that.

00:59:19.000 I don't want to grow the economy because I want to see the numbers go up.

00:59:21.000 I don't want to.

00:59:22.000 And here's the big difference.

00:59:24.000 I don't want to see the stock market grow.

00:59:27.000 The stock market is not a reflection of the economy.

00:59:30.000 I want the American nationalist economy to grow.

00:59:34.000 What I mean by that is, I don't want to look at a Dow Jones, which is exploding.

00:59:38.000 That means investors are getting rich.

00:59:40.000 I want to see more people buying homes.

00:59:43.000 I want to see more people starting families.

00:59:45.000 I want to see consumer goods getting cheaper.

00:59:49.000 And when that happens, people have families because people have sex when that happens.

00:59:53.000 You know, people can afford.

00:59:55.000 Long term arrangements like that.

00:59:57.000 I think that's Trump's calculus.

00:59:59.000 I mean, that's why I'm for paid maternity leave.

01:00:01.000 I'm not for paid maternity leave because we're the only industrialized country.

01:00:05.000 I mean, I am for that because it means middle class native people will have kids. 0.92

01:00:11.000 Career won't get in the way anymore. 0.98

01:00:13.000 We've eliminated that distraction for them.

01:00:16.000 So that's why it's very important.

01:00:18.000 I don't know.

01:00:19.000 I don't really know what that'll happen.

01:00:23.000 You know, I think that's a lot to do with what Trump's gamble is with this election coming up.

01:00:28.000 I think he's sort of counting on.

01:00:30.000 Congress coming back with a stronger majority.

01:00:32.000 He may do tax reform in the meantime only because I think establishment and non-establishment are for that.

01:00:38.000 But we got to see good tax reform, like not deregulation, not like let's let Walmart and Halliburton and all these other people run wild.

01:00:49.000 It should be accompanied by trade reform.

01:00:51.000 It should be tax reform that helps the middle class.

01:00:54.000 I got to be honest, I'm not really a supply-side guy anymore.

01:01:01.000 I'm I'm not really of the opinion that we should have a flat tax anymore.

01:01:04.000 And I've said that before.

01:01:05.000 I used to be a zealot on flat tax because it was fair and private property.

01:01:09.000 But then you look at these people who make their money, these people who make their money, and how they make it and everything else.

01:01:15.000 And it just isn't the same.

01:01:17.000 I mean, it's just a matter of proportions, but they are also not abiding by their own economic law of marginal value, which is to say that proportionality makes sense if it's not marginal.

01:01:33.000 Marginal means that.

01:01:34.000 The more you have of something, the less valuable it gets increasingly.

01:01:38.000 So, you know, cookies, for example, my marginal value on my first cookie is higher than a 20th cookie because after I eat 20 cookies, like, I don't want any more cookies.

01:01:49.000 I'm done.

01:01:50.000 I'm full.

01:01:51.000 I've had enough.

01:01:52.000 But the first one you have, it's valuable.

01:01:54.000 You're going to want to pay full boat for it because it has, I mean, that's just how marginalism works.

01:01:58.000 And the same is true with money, which is to say that your first $10,000 is going to be more valuable to you than your millionth dollar or your millionth.

01:02:09.000 If you're a billionaire.

01:02:10.000 And that's why you need to have progressive tax.

01:02:13.000 I just came up with that argument, or I've made that argument before.

01:02:16.000 I've never heard that argument.

01:02:18.000 And it's, I mean, that should be the logic.

01:02:21.000 And it's so funny to me.

01:02:22.000 All these Prager U, Turning Point USA people, they think they understand economics.

01:02:27.000 That is, if you're thinking about it for five seconds, you can see that connection.

01:02:32.000 That 40% for a person with $10 million is marginally less than 40% for a person with $10,000.

01:02:41.000 Those are your own.

01:02:42.000 Supply side rules.

01:02:45.000 Friedman bots.

01:02:47.000 So, tax reform for the middle class.

01:02:49.000 And that way, I have moved a little bit to the left on economics.

01:02:55.000 It's just what makes sense.

01:02:56.000 If you can tell me why marginalism doesn't apply to income, I'll say it should be proportional.

01:03:02.000 But as far as I'm concerned, money is no different in terms of marginal value.

01:03:06.000 Probably the most important thing in terms of marginal value.

01:03:09.000 And our last question for the day, we're going to call it a night because I'm running out of battery on my laptop.

01:03:15.000 I always forget the charger, I always forget something.

01:03:18.000 DV Liberator asks, what do you think of Shkreli getting jailed for his Hillary comments?

01:03:25.000 It's more of the same.

01:03:27.000 I mean, they throw people in jail now because you disagree with the government.

01:03:32.000 Mark Shkreli's in jail.

01:03:33.000 Chris Cantwell's up for 60 years.

01:03:35.000 Ursula Haverbeck in Germany is going to go to jail for two years for denying the Holocaust.

01:03:41.000 I mean, we live in a world, and they say, you know, we live in the freest country in the world.

01:03:48.000 Ben Shapiro was on Fox News the other day.

01:03:50.000 And I watched his appearance, and he said, We live in the freest country in the history of the world.

01:03:55.000 Yeah, except for if you don't talk about certain things.

01:03:58.000 That's not really freedom, is it?

01:03:59.000 You know, I could probably say more things in Belize than I can in America.

01:04:03.000 I could say more things in Russia than I can in America.

01:04:07.000 I can say more things in, I don't know, there's a couple of other countries.

01:04:12.000 And people say, Well, why don't you go there?

01:04:13.000 Because this is my country, and that shouldn't be the case here.

01:04:17.000 But yeah, we live in the freest country in the world, except if you make a Facebook post.

01:04:22.000 You go to jail.

01:04:24.000 And except if you talk about the Holocaust in the wrong way, you go to jail.

01:04:29.000 Ben Shapiro, oh, you know, it's so weird.

01:04:31.000 I've never heard Ben Shapiro speak out against Holocaust laws.

01:04:34.000 Did you know in France?

01:04:35.000 Here's an interesting fact.

01:04:37.000 In France, denying the Holocaust is illegal because I don't know why, but it's illegal.

01:04:44.000 There was a similar bill that was submitted to the French parliament.

01:04:49.000 I don't know what their legislative body is, I think it's a parliament.

01:04:52.000 They submitted a similar bill to the French parliament, which would make it illegal to deny the Armenian Genocide.

01:04:59.000 That bill was struck down by their Supreme Court as unconstitutional.

01:05:04.000 Their highest court upheld the constitutionality, or I don't know how it works in France, but their Supreme Court upheld the Holocaust law, but struck down the Armenian Genocide law, because Armenian Genocide law would be against freedom of expression.

01:05:23.000 Ben Shapiro doesn't speak out against that.

01:05:25.000 Dave Rubin doesn't speak out against that.

01:05:27.000 All these free speech, Ben Shapiro's on campus, and if you're a free speech warrior, you've got to defend Ben Shapiro. 0.98

01:05:34.000 Where were these assholes on Chris Cantwell? 0.98

01:05:37.000 Where were they on Andrew Anglin? 0.99

01:05:38.000 Where were they on Ursula Haverback?

01:05:40.000 Where are they on Martin Shkreli?

01:05:42.000 Don't see him so much.

01:05:42.000 Don't see him.

01:05:44.000 It's not about free speech for them, it's about an agenda.

01:05:48.000 Always has been. 0.99

01:05:49.000 Dave Rubin will have a dozen Zionists on his show. 0.92

01:05:54.000 Not one alt right. 0.65

01:05:55.000 He'll have everyone on the alt line.

01:05:57.000 He'll have people, he'll have that fat guy, Phil DeFranco. 0.79

01:06:02.000 Phil DeFranco, who's so boring, by the way.

01:06:04.000 He goes, I watched that interview only because I was like, why did this get made?

01:06:09.000 It's not interesting.

01:06:11.000 But Phil DeFranco goes on, he's like a YouTuber, and I guess he like ballooned up to like, I shouldn't insult his appearance.

01:06:18.000 He didn't say anything mean about me.

01:06:20.000 I reserve that for people that attack me, but then I just go crazy and do it for everybody.

01:06:24.000 So apologies.

01:06:26.000 But He did gain a little bit of weight.

01:06:29.000 He was on Dave Rubin's show and he's talking with him.

01:06:32.000 I'm thinking, this guy isn't even in politics.

01:06:35.000 But Dave Rubin won't interview Richard Spencer.

01:06:38.000 He won't interview Jared Taylor.

01:06:40.000 He won't interview Vox Day.

01:06:42.000 Why not?

01:06:43.000 Why not?

01:06:44.000 And you go in the comments section, and everybody's commenting, have Richard Spencer, have Richard Spencer.

01:06:49.000 Why don't they have him?

01:06:50.000 They don't believe in free speech.

01:06:52.000 But anyway, that's the program.

01:06:55.000 That's all for tonight, folks.

01:06:56.000 I'm starving.

01:06:57.000 Okay, I haven't eaten anything since lunch, and I had Raisin Bran for lunch.

01:07:02.000 So I'm getting in a foul mood.

01:07:04.000 But that's the show.

01:07:06.000 We're on the air.

01:07:06.000 Well, no, that comes later.

01:07:08.000 First, remember if you have any other questions, comments, concerns, remember you can always post those on Twitter with the hashtag AmericaFQ, and I will get to that.

01:07:18.000 Anything that's posted with hashtag AmericaFQ, I see.

01:07:21.000 So if you're posting it in the live chat and I'm not answering it, if you post it on Twitter, I will see it eventually.

01:07:28.000 So questions, comments, hashtag AmericaFQ.

01:07:30.000 You can follow me on Twitter at NickJFuentes.

01:07:34.000 You can follow me on Periscope at NickJFuentes, Facebook.com slash NickJFuentes.

01:07:40.000 Remember to smash the subscribe button, smash the like button until your computer breaks.

01:07:47.000 You know, we want to get the subs up.

01:07:48.000 We want to get the.

01:07:51.000 Subscriber list up.

01:07:53.000 So please subscribe to the YouTube channel for more amazing content about how hungry I am.

01:07:59.000 But that's all for us tonight, folks.

01:08:01.000 Remember, we're on the air every Monday through Friday, 7 p.m. Central, 8 p.m. Eastern Standard Time.

01:08:06.000 I'm Nicholas J. Fuentes.

01:08:08.000 This was America First.

01:08:09.000 Thank you guys, as always, so much for watching.

01:08:12.000 We will see you tomorrow for a Casual Friday episode.

01:08:15.000 No tie, and I'll be taking a lot of questions for Casual Friday.

01:08:19.000 So we'll see you tomorrow.

01:08:20.000 Have a great rest of your evening.

01:08:26.000 Americanism, not globalism, will be our credo.

01:08:32.000 It's going to be only America first.

01:08:37.000 America first. 0.99

01:08:40.000 The American people will come first once again. 0.71

01:08:54.000 With respect, the respect From this day forward, it's going to be only America first.

01:09:11.000 America first. 0.52

America First - Nicholas J. Fuentes - September 14, 2017

Trump Isn't Compromising on DACA | America First Ep. 10

Episode Stats

Summary

Transcript