UKRAINE CHEMICAL WEAPONS FALSE FLAG INITIATED: NUCLEAR HOLOCAUST IMMINENT??? | America First Ep. 976UKRAINE CHEMICAL WEAPONS FALSE FLAG INITIATED: NUCLEAR HOLOCAUST IMMINENT??? | America First Ep. 976
In this episode of America First, host Nicholas J. Fuentes ( ) and co-host Jeff Perla ( ) discuss the latest on the chemical weapons use by Russia in Ukraine, the Gretchen whitmer kidnapping case, and the possibility of nuclear war with the United States. They also talk about the latest in the war in Ukraine and what it could mean for the future of the conflict. Also, a new addition to America First joins the show, Stephen Bonnell ( ) joins us on the show to talk about his new role as host of the show's newest segment, "America's First". This episode is brought to you by Anchor.fm and CozyUp! Subscribe and comment to stay up to date with what's going on in the world of politics, pop culture, and pop culture. You can also join the conversation by using the hashtag , and find us on and on social media. If you like what you hear, please HIT SUBSCRIBE and become a patron! Subscribe to our new podcast, Subscribe on iTunes and leave us a review on Apple Podcasts and other podcasting platforms! We'll be looking out for your favorite podcasters on the next new podcasters and podcasters! Thank you so much for listening and sharing the love and support the show! Cheers, Jon and Nick! - Your Hosts, Nicky! Jon and Jeff! Kristian & Jeff, the crew at Anchor & Cozy Up! Peace, Kristian and Jeff at the Cozy up! and the Crew at Manifesta. . - Jon & Jeff at Manifestation Media, Sarah at CozyTV Sean at the Podcasts, Cozy, LLC. - Cozy Productions, Inc. & the Crew @ The Cozy Media, LLC, LLC - , Cozy TV, LLC . , LLC Stephen Bonnell at Manifesto, LLC & The Crew at Destiny, Inc., . . & Jon Atwood, LLC @ , Inc., LLC, & Jake, Jr. , AKA is , Stephen Bonellis @ Jake, LLC , , & , @ & @ . , & . . , . and . Jake at The Daily, LLC at , , .
Transcript
Transcripts from "America First - Nicholas J. Fuentes" are sourced from the Knowledge Fight Interactive Search Tool. You can also explore and interact with the transcripts here.
00:07:50.000I didn't see it in the headlines anywhere, but it is in the news.
00:07:55.000And there's rumors and there's whispering and rumbling about
00:08:00.000Potential evidence of Russian chemical weapons use in Mariupol where they're finishing the siege of the city in the southeast of Ukraine.
00:08:12.000And this could be a very significant development because if Western media and Western authorities say that chemical weapons were used, and there doesn't have to be any real evidence, probably didn't even happen.
00:08:28.000But if they determine that that's going to be the pretext, this is the moment, this is the event, that could be the sign of an escalation in the conflict by NATO and specifically by the United States.
00:08:44.000So this is kind of a watershed moment here in the conflict.
00:08:48.000It's been a little bit slow for the past couple weeks, but Russia is preparing for its big offensive in Donbass.
00:09:44.000And the fake Gretchen Whitmer plot where there were federal agents everywhere and confidential informants, they're now working on the January 6th probe.
00:09:54.000Fake attack on the state capitol, fake attack on the government, and the feds are soliciting this from right-wing people and then it turns out to be a big honeypot and it's a big trap.
00:10:07.000And they take down a bunch of patsies and they get to put in the news media that there's this real anti-government movement in America.
00:10:15.000And then the same thing happens on a much larger scale in January.
00:10:44.000You probably have already seen it, but this is really exciting stuff and I'm very proud to announce tonight that Stephen Bonnell, better known as Destiny, has officially joined Cozy.tv.
00:11:00.000As we announced this last night, huge!
00:11:03.000And I'm so excited because I don't use Twitch and I don't really use YouTube anymore because I'm banned from both of them.
00:11:12.000So I never get a chance to catch his content but now officially you can find Stephen Bonnell at Kozy.tv slash Destiny and I'm told that he'll be doing his first stream this week.
00:13:57.000We have hundreds of moderators, hundreds and thousands of people reviewing your reports.
00:14:03.000And really the goal is to protect the community, specifically the marginalized, the black and brown bodies, the queer folk, the Jews, all of that good stuff.
00:14:17.000You know, I swore an oath to protect the marginalized and the oppressed, and the sort of bio-Leninist, sort of,
00:14:29.000Extra the sort of the sort of excess of society this sort of superfluous You know Sort of stuff.
00:14:40.000I swore an oath that we're gonna protect those people in the community.
00:16:21.000And really the goal of having him on the platform is that he will bring thousands and thousands of disaffected leftists to the site and they will watch my show and other shows and be radicalized and turn into hopefully far-right extremists is really the
00:17:22.000By bringing the left into our embrace, we are therefore normalizing our views and by proximity, we're also moving the Overton window further to the right and hopefully radicalizing thousands of people.
00:21:43.000We are now one of the biggest alternative tech social media platforms in the world.
00:21:49.000And I saw our web traffic we're hitting between six and seven million page views per month, which is making us one of the top biggest websites in the United States and in the world period, but also one of the biggest all tech platforms and it's only going to grow from here.
00:22:08.000With Destiny, Politically Provoked, and we're even in talks with some other people to join the platform.
00:22:21.000So there's been some, there's been some, there have been some discussions about bringing on some even more exciting people onto the platform.
00:23:47.000But anyway, so click the buttons, follow me on Gavin Telegram, and with that we'll get into the show.
00:23:54.000Before I talk about Gretchen Whitmer, I want to talk a little bit about Elon Musk.
00:23:59.000I may not talk about the Gretchen Whitmer thing at all.
00:24:02.000I think I might just save that for tomorrow because I want to talk about a couple of things.
00:24:06.000First, I want to talk about Elon Musk.
00:24:10.000And there was another news story today which is not a huge deal but I do want to cover this because in my opinion Elon Musk and his move on Twitter, whatever this is going to materialize into, this is one of the most important stories that's going on right now in particular for us.
00:24:30.000And I talked all about it last week and what a significant thing it is that this conversation is happening, and what a big deal it is that Elon Musk seems to be making a serious attempt at transforming Twitter.
00:24:45.000And so the big news story today is that Elon Musk has actually declined to join Twitter's board.
00:24:53.000And so to catch up to speed in case you're out of the loop, a couple weeks ago Elon Musk ran a poll on Twitter and he asked his followers if they thought that Twitter was adhering to the principles of free speech and everybody voted no.
00:25:13.000I think 70% of people said, no, Twitter does not have free speech.
00:25:18.000And Elon Musk quote tweeted that and said, well, if free speech is vital to democracy and Twitter is not free speech, and if Twitter is now the modern town square, should there be an alternative?
00:25:32.000And he didn't put a poll for that one.
00:25:40.000The next week he bought up $3 billion worth of Twitter shares.
00:25:47.000He bought 9.2% of Twitter shares and became the largest shareholder in Twitter.
00:25:54.000More than four times more, the next largest shareholder, which is Jack Dorsey, the founder of Twitter,
00:26:01.000And so last week then, I think we covered this on Thursday or Friday, they offered him a seat on Twitter's board.
00:26:09.000And they said that they welcomed him and he's the big shareholder and it seemed like they were trying to make a deal.
00:26:17.000But we found out about this deal that there was a catch.
00:26:21.000They welcomed Elon Musk onto Twitter's board and Elon Musk would have joined the board at their first official, well, their first meeting with him.
00:26:32.000He would join the board at their annual meeting in May, I think May 25th.
00:26:39.000But the stipulation was that Elon Musk could not own more than 14.9% of the company.
00:26:46.000Because there's a stipulation in Twitter's, I think it's their SEC filings, it says that a sitting board member cannot own
00:26:56.000In any way, with any organization, with no combination can they have an interest in the company of more than 14.9%.
00:27:05.000No individual in themselves or through other entities or organizations can have more than 14.9% of Twitter stock and sit on the board.
00:27:15.000And so I remember reading that last week and I was actually concerned because if Elon joined the board, you know, some people said that he would have influence over the company, but actually that would constrain him more than it would elevate him.
00:27:32.000Because last week you saw when he's not a board member he just bought up as much stock as he could.
00:27:37.000He bought up nine percent of the company.
00:27:40.000By joining the board he would be putting a ceiling on how much he can buy and restraining his options.
00:27:47.000And as a board member he doesn't control the board.
00:27:51.000He may be influential, he may be persuasive, he can contribute his thoughts and ideas to the board, but it's not like he can make
00:28:16.000I mean if you think about it, the market cap for Twitter is not very big compared to the other major social media, the other major American social media.
00:28:29.000And Facebook which have trillion dollar market cap you know multi trillion and some I think Amazon is 2 trillion I think Facebook or Meta now I think is between 500 billion and a trillion compared to the other big tech companies Twitter is relatively small in terms of market cap and in terms of user base
00:28:51.000And so I thought conceivably he could go all the way and just simply buy the majority of the shares in the company and then he can do whatever he wants.
00:29:01.000As much of the companies he needs to, again, limitless capital, and then he could just do whatever it is that he needs to do.
00:29:08.000But if he joins the board, he can't buy as much as he wants, and then he can't influence the company as much as he needs to from his seat on the board.
00:29:17.000And the board seat would last for two years.
00:29:19.000So he was supposed to sign the deal on April 9th, and then he would be on the board until 2024.
00:29:25.000And I remember thinking, are we really going to have to
00:29:30.000Slog through two years of Elon fighting in the boardroom, and I thought that's just not the best way to do this.
00:29:38.000So the good news is, and this was the news this weekend, he declined the seat on the board.
00:29:43.000And so Elon Musk will not be getting a seat on the board.
00:29:46.000And some people said, oh well, that just goes to show he never intended to make change or something like that.
00:29:55.000That he's not joining the board, to me, suggests not that he has lost interest, but rather that he would not be able to make transformative, sweeping change from the board.
00:30:08.000Because, think about it this way, two weeks ago he says, my intention is to change Twitter.
00:30:13.000Then he puts his money where his mouth is and he's three billion dollars in.
00:30:17.000The deal comes forward and it's, he can sit on the board, but they have to cap his ownership.
00:30:22.000By rejecting the deal, what this suggests is not that he's abandoning the project, but rather that the seat on the board
00:30:35.000And his ambitions seem to be far larger than anything that could be achieved on the board.
00:30:40.000I mean, logically, I think that's how it squares.
00:30:46.000Because if he didn't want to make sweeping changes, why wouldn't he just get on the board?
00:30:51.000And if he just intended to, it was some kind of a publicity thing or an attempt to make money, again, why not go on the board?
00:31:00.000I know some people suggested that he bought $3 billion worth of Twitter stock because he didn't want to get banned on Twitter.
00:31:08.000Okay, again, well if he didn't want to get banned on Twitter by joining the board, I think that's a pretty good way to protect your account.
00:31:15.000I think instead it suggests that he his ambitions go far beyond anything that could be achieved with just 9% of the company and a board seat.
00:31:24.000It tells us that he wants to do a lot more and I think it suggests that he's going to take a much more hostile and aggressive approach which is to just simply buy up more of the company and it's a straight-up hostile takeover which is very exciting and I would be surprised if that wasn't what he was going for.
00:31:41.000Because the guy clearly, he wants to change Twitter.
00:31:43.000He didn't say two weeks ago he wanted an edit button.
00:31:53.000Okay, well, free speech is essential to democracy.
00:31:58.000Twitter is not free speech, therefore we need an alternative.
00:32:02.000So the stated goal, and this is a provocative thing that he put out there, this is not like, he chose his words very carefully, this is very deliberate,
00:32:11.000There was not a lot of ambiguity there, and there also, it was a committal statement.
00:32:16.000It's not like this was a non-committal thing like, hey, what do you think about Twitter?
00:32:24.000And then he laid out the significance of it and said, well, it's about our democracy, which I usually hate that word, but in this context I like it.
00:32:32.000And then the following week made a very aggressive, very dramatic play.
00:32:38.000Which I've never seen in my lifetime with Big Tech and scooped up 10% of the shares.
00:32:44.000They came to him and they said, hey, listen, you can come on the board, but you can't own as much of the company.
00:33:23.000So I don't want to get my hopes up because it seems like we just never catch a break with social media but I kind of am getting my hopes up because here's a guy where I'm just failing to see how this could be stopped.
00:33:39.000He's worth $285 billion and the market cap for Twitter is what?
00:34:16.000And if his intention is to make Twitter free speech, you know, I saw this one guy on Twitter and he made this big thread and he said, OK, listen up.
00:34:28.000And I'm like, you know, Elon Musk, again, the net worth speaks for itself.
00:34:33.000He can hire the smartest lawyer, the smartest tech guys, the smartest programmer, the smartest CEO.
00:34:40.000And if you have limitless capital, you're the boss.
00:34:44.000So, I don't think you really need a game plan.
00:34:46.000When you have that kind of capital, you can just brute force with money.
00:34:50.000And you can bring in whoever you need to, and you could whip it out however you need to, but if you've got that kind of money, and you're not gonna be sated with the board seat, it seems to me like he's just gonna push for hostile...
00:35:02.000Take over of the company, take a majority interest, and then say we're changing the rules.
00:35:07.000Twitter is going to bring back Donald Trump.
00:35:10.000Now, I don't know exactly what that's going to look like, and again, I don't want to get my hopes up, but if he said that's the goal, and if he rejected the seat, and he's invested three billion dollars in, you've got a demonstration of intent, you've got a demonstration of means, and follow-through.
00:35:28.000He said this is the goal, he's able to achieve it, and he's already 3 billion in, and that he rejected the seat.
00:35:35.000On the contrary, I don't think it shows he's abandoning it.
00:35:38.000I think it demonstrates that he wants to go further than they would have allowed him, which means that his goals are a lot more far-reaching than maybe some people anticipated.
00:35:50.000And of course that would be a huge deal.
00:35:52.000Because if this development happened, Twitter is one of the most important of the social media companies.
00:35:59.000It's one of the smaller of the big social media companies.
00:36:04.000I think it might be the smallest of the big ones.
00:36:07.000Because when you think about the family of big social media, you think Facebook, Instagram, TikTok, Reddit, Twitter.
00:36:16.000And I think Twitter is the smallest out of those.
00:36:20.000Maybe you might think of some other ones.
00:36:25.000And Twitter is at 300 million active users.
00:36:28.000I don't even think it cracks the top 10 globally anymore.
00:36:31.000But that is the place where the live news happens, and everybody knows that's a disproportionately sort of wealthier, it's more political, and certainly that is where the political conversation happens.
00:36:44.000We all remember Donald Trump's tweets.
00:36:46.000We don't remember his Instagram posts, or his Facebook ads, or anything like that, or his live streams on YouTube.
00:37:51.000The status quo with all of them, not just one, but all of them, Facebook, YouTube, Twitter, all the ones I just listed, it's completely hopeless.
00:38:35.000And what's more is there is nothing that we can see right now or in the future anytime soon that is going to disrupt that trend or change that.
00:38:46.000It seems like there's no relief anywhere.
00:38:50.000So you could say there's like a 0% chance that things are going to get better on YouTube.
00:38:54.000I don't think that there's going to be a new CEO at YouTube that brings America First back to YouTube.
00:39:05.000People talk about Section 230 and these other options.
00:39:08.000Honestly, I just don't see it happening.
00:39:10.000We had Trump for four years and they didn't even start on fixing tech censorship, despite talking about it and knowing what a big deal it was.
00:39:19.000So, the point is we really can't win with social media.
00:39:27.000And the problem with this is it's obsolete for us because we've all been censored.
00:39:32.000And even if you're not censored, you have to use it in such a way that you might as well be censored because you can't really say what you mean.
00:39:41.000But that it continues to exist is a problem because we're off the platforms and that wouldn't be so bad if everybody left the platforms and everybody was on some other platform.
00:40:26.000Influence is being traded and it's being wielded on this platform.
00:40:31.000Like, there is this great influence and it's being strengthened as the world becomes more digital, as the world increases its interface with social media, and we become further and further isolated from it.
00:40:45.000This is just like a catastrophic scenario.
00:40:47.000Again, there's like a 0% chance that we can win.
00:41:15.000Some guy, the most powerful, richest guy in the world, one of them, comes forward and not only says he's going to change social media, but says we're going to give you exactly what you want.
00:41:26.000I'm going to make Twitter have free speech again.
00:41:30.000And the reaction to this, instead of saying, like, welcoming, again, any disruption, welcoming any change to the status quo or the potential for that, much less the richest guy in the world saying he's going to give you what you want, and they go,
00:41:45.000He's just doing that to make more money.
00:42:45.000Short of overthrowing the government and installing some kind of right-wing, like neo-Bolshevik government that's gonna nationalize Twitter and make it a telecom,
00:42:54.000Not only can we not use it, but it's going to be wielded against us in the most vicious way.
00:43:11.000And there is nothing that's going to disrupt that trajectory, and it's getting worse all the time.
00:43:16.000And people don't even have an idea of how that might change in the future, near or far term in the future.
00:43:24.000And again, a guy comes forward with $280 billion and says, well, I'm not just going to shake it up.
00:43:31.000I'm not just going to go in and change the leadership.
00:44:07.000And if we can disrupt the status quo enough, and change the dynamics significantly, maybe we'll create a dynamic where there's a 1% chance that we can win.
00:45:42.000Now again, I'm taking a very conservative approach to that.
00:45:46.000I'm saying this is how little we need to be optimistic about this.
00:45:50.000But he's not just disrupting it, he's saying he's the most powerful guy and he's coming forward and saying I'm not just going to disrupt it, I'm going to do exactly what you want.
00:46:00.000And, you know, people should be satisfied if he said 90% less than that.
00:46:05.000People would have a reason to be satisfied and excited if he said significantly less and committed significantly less than he already has.
00:46:17.000But he's done so much more than we could have expected in such a short amount of time.
00:46:23.000And in spite of this, people are going to turn their noses up and say, you know, I bet he's just doing this for money.
00:47:01.000When Trump goes up there and says, not these days, but five years ago, six years ago, when he goes up there and says they're bringing drugs, crime, and rapists, hey, just lean into it.
00:47:13.000When they all hate this guy and they freak out about it, just lean into it.
00:47:15.000When Elon Musk says, I'm gonna bring free speech to Twitter, yeah, maybe he won't do it.
00:48:13.000Your options are get killed by the government resisting or submit to the government and your race is extinguished and we can never win an election again and there's no political solution and there's no any other kind of solution.
00:49:55.000If there's conflict, if there's chaos, black swan, dark horse, events and people,
00:50:02.000You just open up the realm of possibility and there are more permutations, there are more possibilities, and you increase the odds that we get a favorable one.
00:52:04.000Because I remember six years ago, people would see something like this and say, based Elon, you know, and they'd start memeing him and say, oh, he's gonna whatever.
00:52:12.000And now these days we get this Blackpill stuff.
00:52:15.000And I think there's a very real demoralization effort.
00:52:18.000I think people are actively putting negativity out there to suppress us.
00:54:08.000The Russians are almost ready for their major offensive against the remnant of the Ukrainian armed forces in Donbass.
00:54:19.000But there may be a little bit of a sign of trouble here because the chemical weapons false flag that we've been talking about for the past two weeks may be starting.
00:54:37.000It says, quote, the Pentagon is closely monitoring social media reports claiming Russian forces deployed chemical weapons in Mariupol, Ukraine.
00:54:47.000Defense Department Press Secretary John Kirby talked about this in a statement on Monday.
00:54:54.000Moscow has a long history of using chemical weapons and the White House has warned that Russian forces may be preparing to, quote, use chemical or biological weapons in Ukraine.
00:55:05.000The original report was made on Telegram, where the far-right nationalist group Azov Regiment posted a message alleging that Russian forces used, quote, a poisonous substance of unknown origin.
00:55:19.000John Kirby said, quote, we are aware of social media reports which claim Russian forces deployed a potential chemical munition in Mariupol.
00:55:29.000We cannot confirm at this time and will continue to monitor the situation closely.
00:55:34.000These reports, if true, are deeply concerning and reflective of concerns that we have had about Russia's potential to use a variety of riot control agents, including tear gas mixed with chemical agents in Ukraine.
00:55:47.000Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky has not confirmed the reports, although British Foreign Secretary Liz Truss also said her government is working urgently to verify the use of chemical weapons.
00:55:59.000She said any such use of weapons would be a callous escalation in this conflict and we will hold Putin and his regime to account.
00:56:15.000Very deliberately and in a coordinated way, with no proof by the way, with no evidence, they've been saying for weeks that the Russians are preparing to use chemical weapons in Ukraine, which would make no sense.
00:56:34.000If Russia wanted to win this war quickly, the way to do it would be to bomb the population centers.
00:56:40.000Level the population centers where the Ukrainian Armed Forces are hiding behind civilian shields, right behind human shields.
00:56:50.000They would use heavy artillery and they would use their air power to level the major Ukrainian cities and they would just wipe out the armed forces and there would be tons of civilian casualties and they would destroy lots of infrastructure, but they would bring a swift end to the war.
00:57:08.000And they're not doing that because they're actively trying to avoid civilian casualties.
00:57:13.000They're trying to avoid major collateral damage in terms of infrastructure and property.
00:57:20.000And they're doing that partially, I think, because they're fighting the war in a way that is ethical.
00:57:26.000I also think that they're doing that because they know that there is intense international scrutiny.
00:57:31.000And the Russians know that if there is a high civilian casualty count, they know that if there is an unacceptable level of destruction, if there's an appearance of a disregard for human life, that that will invite more intervention from the West.
00:57:48.000Keep in mind that the Russian military spends $67 billion per year.
00:58:28.000In fact, strategically, it is imperative that they do not invite escalation from NATO because Russia cannot respond in kind with conventional means.
00:58:38.000If NATO were to intervene directly in Ukraine, Russia would not be able to repel the intervention.
00:58:46.000They would have to resort to a nuclear attack, and they wouldn't do that.
00:58:50.000So they know, again, it's strategically imperative
00:58:54.000That they do not do anything so provocative that it would give a good reason for the West to intervene more than they already are.
00:59:03.000That's why they're not hastening an end to the conflict in the way that everybody knows they could, which is to use the full might of their air and artillery power to bomb the population centers, which is where the Ukrainian Armed Forces is hiding.
00:59:17.000And the Ukrainian Armed Forces, they're using human shields in residential neighborhoods, in the population centers, for that very reason.
00:59:26.000Because they know that Russia can't go all the way, they know that they can't bomb those targets, because they know just as well as Russia does that they could go and tell on Russia in Brussels, they could go and tell on Russia in Washington, and bring the United States and Germany and France and the United Kingdom into the war.
00:59:46.000So, that is why it makes no sense for Vladimir Putin to use chemical weapons.
00:59:51.000It does not hasten an end to the conflict in a way that would be resolved in conventional means.
00:59:58.000Artillery and air power are conventional.
01:00:01.000Chemical is considered a weapon of mass destruction.
01:00:04.000It's considered, in a wholly different category, far more provocative.
01:00:08.000In fact, it is explicitly a provocation against the United States because the United States frequently draws a red line in these exact kinds of conflicts when it comes to the use of chemical and biological weapons.
01:00:22.000So, it makes no sense for Putin to hasten the end of the conflict with a disregard for human life in the form of conventional means with air and artillery power, and then it doubly, especially, does not make sense to hasten an end to the war with a reckless disregard for human life with a chemical agent, with what is considered a weapon of mass destruction a level above air and artillery, a level above all the conventional means that they're already using.
01:00:54.000It especially doesn't make sense after Biden has said for weeks that if chemical weapons are used, then we're going to have to do more.
01:01:02.000All that logic is perfectly sound, but then add to that that it was made formal.
01:01:07.000It was made official and explicit by the National Security Council, the State Department, the Pentagon, the NATO Secretary General, and the White House.
01:01:17.000They all said chemical weapons are a red line.
01:01:53.000The West has mounted everything that they could short of direct intervention and hasn't succeeded on the battlefield in Ukraine or in defeating the Russian economy.
01:02:03.000So why then, at this juncture, when the war is somewhat tenuous but essentially on its way to being over on favorable terms for Putin, Putin's weathered the worst of it.
01:02:13.000Again, it's strategically imperative they don't invite the West in.
01:02:17.000Why at this point would they use chemical weapons?
01:02:21.000It just doesn't make sense from a tactical, strategic, diplomatic, political point of view.
01:02:28.000But yet, the West has said for weeks and weeks that this is some kind of major concern.
01:02:35.000And like I said, they've all said without evidence for weeks, Putin will use chemical weapons, Putin will use chemical weapons.
01:02:42.000And then they finally came out on Friday, and this was the last story I covered on Friday,
01:02:48.000Some unnamed intelligence officials came out and said that it turns out that we were right.
01:03:24.000And they said that the US regime and the NATO regime is only saying that Putin will deploy chemical weapons to deter Putin from considering doing that.
01:03:34.000And so they admitted that it was misinformation.
01:03:37.000They admitted that they strategically put that narrative out there to change the outcome of the conflict in Ukraine.
01:03:45.000To change the decision-making calculus at the Kremlin in Moscow.
01:03:51.000Now here we are a few days later and they're coming to us and telling us we found evidence of chemical weapons.
01:03:58.000And I've said for the past three weeks there's no evidence, it doesn't make sense, and what they're going to do, the reason why they're saying this, it turns out it's not because Putin will use these things, it's not because Putin has moved chemical weapons to Ukraine, and actually
01:04:15.000Unlike what they said on Friday, it's not about deterring Putin at all.
01:04:21.000They did not say that Putin might use chemical weapons to deter him from using them.
01:04:26.000They don't need to deter Putin from using chemical weapons.
01:04:29.000There's already a deterrent, based on precedent, because Putin knows full well what happens when these so-called rogue regimes use chemical weapons, or when the United States says they do.
01:04:43.000It always results in American intervention.
01:08:07.000They talked about the blood that was on the border, remember that?
01:08:10.000They said, oh they're bringing warm blood, which means they're gonna invade.
01:08:14.000They talked about the heavy military equipment, they talked about the 200,000 troops, but they never mentioned chemical weapons back in January.
01:08:22.000And then when they invaded in late February, never talked about chemical weapons.
01:08:26.000And then the war went on for weeks, and they never talked about chemical weapons.
01:08:41.000They just decided one day, we just think he's going to do it.
01:08:45.000You know, we're in the middle of the war and we applied the worst sanctions ever and they just, you know, and by the way the sanctions happen to not be working and Putin happens to be winning and there's nothing we could do within our menu of options that are available in the current
01:09:01.000Sort of DEFCON level, so to speak, the current climate of the crisis.
01:09:06.000There's nothing more that we could do within reason.
01:09:09.000And then all of a sudden, all the organs of American foreign policy started to say, oh, well, we just think he's using chemical weapons.
01:09:16.000And people said, well, that doesn't make any sense.
01:09:32.000Did they use chemical weapons on three guys like Azov Regiment is claiming?
01:09:39.000Azov Battalion is claiming that three guys got sick.
01:09:43.000And they're saying that's indicative of the use of chemical weapons.
01:09:47.000So I guess these Russians are just retarded.
01:09:51.000Because in Bukha last week, they go in, and then they leave the city, and then I guess they sneak back in at night, and then they massacre a bunch of civilians for no reason and leave again, because they discover all this evidence days after they leave.
01:10:30.000We're not going to say what that looks like.
01:10:32.000So, the United States is writing a blank check and saying, we're going to fuck your shit up.
01:10:36.000We're not going to tell you what we're going to do, but we will just, writing a blank check to escalate this conflict as far as we want to.
01:10:42.000If you do this, and Putin was like, oh yeah, I'll just do that to three guys and, you know, bring it on.
01:11:02.000They were not talking about this three weeks ago.
01:11:04.000They were not talking about this in February.
01:11:07.000They were not talking about it in January.
01:11:10.000They haven't been talking about it in the eight years that the Civil War has been raging in Ukraine.
01:11:15.000They didn't use chemical weapons to take Crimea.
01:11:18.000In fact, they didn't need them because the Crimeans welcomed them in.
01:11:21.000They didn't use chemical weapons in the Civil War between Kiev and Donbass.
01:11:26.000And they didn't need them in the initial push, and they don't need them now.
01:11:30.000Certainly, it's strategically imperative that they don't use them.
01:11:36.000And there's a coordinated misinformation campaign from Washington that is trying to convince people that it is plausible that the Russians are going to do that.
01:11:45.000And that is to shape public opinion in such a way that the United States can escalate the conflict, can initiate an escalation themselves, and blame it on the Russians.
01:11:58.000Americans don't want the war to escalate.
01:11:59.000Americans don't want more inflation, more sanctions.
01:12:30.000They drew the line, and then they created the provocation across it, and then they're going to get the escalation they wanted, blame it on the Russians, and do it in a way that's clean in terms of public opinion.
01:12:42.000And in order to do that, they've just got to hammer it every week.
01:12:46.000War criminal, butcher, chemical weapons.
01:12:48.000War criminal, butcher, murderer, dictator, chemical weapons.
01:12:52.000And then when they come out with the false flag people go, oh yeah, just like we've been hearing for weeks.
01:12:58.000I think I remember they talked about that on the news.
01:13:01.000I think they said something about, you know, they've been saying that he'll do that and now he did.
01:13:26.000Axios is like a, not a great, I mean it's like a subsidiary I think of NBC if I'm not mistaken.
01:13:32.000It's not like a, it's not as big obviously as like NBC.
01:13:37.000But it's being reported on by mainstream outlets.
01:13:39.000Mainstream outlets are picking up evidence of chemical weapons use.
01:13:43.000And the British government is investigating and other governments are investigating.
01:13:50.000So it seems like they're telling Putin, like, hey, we can come in and win this war when we want and maybe you should just think twice about really winning.
01:13:59.000And I think they're trying to push Putin for a face-saving peace negotiation with more modest terms.
01:14:05.000I think that's really what's going on.
01:14:08.000I think they're saying to Putin, like, hey, okay, you won the war, but we can take it away from you, so why don't you make peace?
01:14:16.000You know, maybe Ukraine won't join NATO, but there'll be no eastern Ukrainian state, there will be no Novorossiya, you're gonna have to compromise on these things.
01:14:25.000And it's gonna give him an off-ramp in a relatively face-saving way.
01:14:29.000Maybe that's the approach, I don't know exactly.
01:14:33.000Or they could be insane, and they're gonna do the chemical weapons anyway, and we're gonna go to war with Russia.
01:14:52.000So it very easily could go in that road.
01:14:54.000When you start talking about escalation and these types of red lines, that's when you got to be worried.
01:15:01.000Because that's when things like Pearl Harbor, 9-11, Gulf of Tonkin, all that kind of stuff, that's how all these big wars start.
01:15:09.000Nobody ever wants them, but a ship blows up, you know, the buildings go down, a base is bombed, whatever, maybe they saw it coming, maybe they did it, maybe we did it to ourselves.
01:15:19.000But that's always how it starts, is it not?
01:15:22.000Nobody ever gets an award because of like, hey, Russia's doing some messed up stuff.
01:15:26.000It's like, no, Russia blew up the ship.
01:15:46.000False flag, chemical weapons attack in Ukraine is no different than, like, letting Pearl Harbor happen and getting the war that Roosevelt wanted.
01:15:54.000Fake a chemical weapons attack, get the war that you want in Russia.
01:15:58.000So, we're gonna keep a close eye on that.
01:16:01.000We're gonna monitor these developments on what's going on there.
01:22:05.000I'm saving my money for when you do a $500 per plate AFF pizza party at Pequod's or something Yeah, okay, thanks a pizza party, I don't know if I'll ever do a pizza party
01:22:22.000And if I did, I wouldn't call it that.
01:22:24.000Niggas make everything sound so cringe.
01:22:26.000I love pizza, but you make it sound gay.
01:25:58.000When it really mattered you were cheerleader for the other team you were in a skirt and pom-poms cheerleading for the other team UX was on my team UX My BFF was on my team.
01:26:16.000We were fighting shoulder-to-shoulder, killing and being killed like brothers in the trenches, and you were a hot little piece cheerleading on the other team.
01:26:29.000You were on the other team in your XXXL cheerleading uniform, big girl, jumping up and down for the enemy team, and then
01:26:42.000You were trash-talking us, so... And you could come on the show and super chat the minimum amount and say, hey King, love you, but when we were out there being cut down by by carries, by their three carries, and you were cheering it on with bloodlust, while UX lay dying in my arms, while I lay dying in UX's arms, you were cheering it on
01:30:04.000Actions speak louder than words and I'm frankly I'm appalled at your whole situation Cracker Groy versus what would you do if you was overtaken and cozy followers?
01:30:16.000Oh, no, I don't know that might happen with destiny But maybe not I'm competitive so we'll see
01:30:25.000Donald Trump's is willing to be a full-time cozy gamer streaming five days a week, 12 hours a day.
01:30:32.000I'm sure there's a lot of people that would do that, but we're not accepting just anybody that wants to stream.
01:30:56.000Nobody wants to just see some random guy play games, you know So you want to stream on cozy go and stream on another platform get a following make some content And if it's good, you know, then I'll let you on but it's not like hey everyone come and do a stream hey everyone come join and Hell no Yeah, no way
01:31:24.000Chrome Groyper says I laughed my duck ass off when I saw that Destiny is now on Cozy knowing he probably has some hesitation but limited options.
01:31:35.000I can't help but laugh at the idea of you forcing him to become who he's meant to be.
01:33:12.000That has nothing to do with free will.
01:33:31.000Of course certain people have a propensity to do things for a variety of reasons and genetics is part of it, race and sex and all of that is part of it, but just like every other environmental factor, you're talking about propensity?
01:33:46.000Someone who's addicted to nicotine has a propensity to consume more nicotine means there's no free will?
01:34:28.000I would rather do a show with Destiny and Lauren Southern.
01:34:46.000Not that I don't like Dave Smith, but I just think he's too agreeable.
01:34:50.000I think the show is more fun when it's contentious.
01:34:53.000It would be kind of boring, because me and Dave Smith would just agree on most things, and the disagreement would just be too, like, intellectual.
01:35:00.000Not even intellectual, but just, it wouldn't be, there'd be no sparks.
01:36:09.000Hey, women shouldn't be running society, and frankly they really shouldn't be running anything, and that's because they're childlike, like they're fucking goofy.
01:36:18.000You know, they have big problems, and like, that just can't happen anymore.
01:36:23.000And then you get these faggots that step in and they go, Well hey hey hey!
01:36:27.000Don't blame the women, it's our fault!
01:36:29.000Hey, if women are so dumb, it's on us!
01:36:31.000It's like... I don't think anybody was blaming women, we just said, hey, like, this is the state of things.
01:37:13.000Yeah, obviously, if I get a girlfriend ever, I'm gonna be the man, and I'm gonna be the man, and I'm gonna lead, but it's like, what does that have to do with gynocracy?
01:37:23.000What does that have to do with total female domination of society?
01:37:27.000I was born in 98, I had a helicopter mom, you know, I had these female teachers from preschool all the way till I was adult, and they tried to moralize me, and they tried to tell me, oh, you're too mischievous,
01:38:26.000But it's got nothing to do with men or women.
01:38:28.000Policymakers and revolutionaries transformed the society.
01:38:32.000Ain't got nothing to do with me or men or women.
01:38:36.000It's got to do with the revolutionaries and the policymakers that have created such a society through propaganda and entertainment, this radical stuff in the universities, policies which are drafted by think tanks and pushed in Congress,
01:38:55.000And these revolutionary protesters out there in the streets, these are the architects of the system, and then the system generates the society.
01:39:03.000The system's incentive structures and norms then create these kinds of households that produce these kinds of people, and the people produce the current order.
01:40:19.000It doesn't mean that there's something fundamentally wrong with women, but there is something fundamentally wrong with women in these roles and with this kind of treatment from society.
01:40:29.000And then you get these faggots that come in and go, oh, hey, hey, don't attack the women.
01:40:35.000And that's just because they don't like to hear negative things about girls.
01:40:38.000But, you know, we have to just be honest.
01:40:44.000So, you know, I hear this stuff all the time.
01:40:48.000And at the end of the day, people just, I don't know what it is, they just are in love with their women and, you know, that's a big conflict of interest.
01:41:35.000We get along, and we're so similar, and we have such a great relationship.
01:41:42.000But, at the same time, like, I know she's a woman, you know?
01:41:48.000I love her, but I also know she's a woman, and I know sometimes she's in like a certain mood, and I'm like, all right, I'm just not gonna engage, you know?
01:42:03.000She's a woman, and I'm a man, and she knows I'm a man, and she knows what that means, and I know she's a woman, and I know what that means, and it is what it is.
01:42:11.000Just because I love my mom doesn't mean I'm not, like, gonna... doesn't make me un-understand, like, not understand what's going on.
01:42:21.000So I just don't understand how that infatuation corrupts you.
01:42:24.000I mean, for me, I'm able to kind of compartmentalize it.
01:42:27.000Maybe it's because I'm not a very emotional guy.
01:42:30.000Maybe it's because I'm not very, like,
01:42:44.000I talked to her back at the Miami event a few years ago, and she's coming on to me and everything, and I straight-up told her, I'm like, listen, like, I want to have white kids.
01:42:55.000I'm like, hey, listen, you're great and everything, but, um,
01:42:59.000I will never, it can't happen, because, and for anybody, for any non-white woman, you know, same thing, because I want a date to get married, and I want to get married to have kids, and I want to have white kids, so it's just a non-starter.
01:43:15.000I don't understand this, like, corruption that happens.
01:52:54.000I don't know that invading Ukraine was the best move.
01:52:57.000I mean, don't get me wrong, I support it, and I think it's defensible, and I think it's justifiable, and I love it, and I'm all for it, but, you know, I've said from the beginning that I think it's a very dramatic move, and I was surprised when it happened.
01:53:11.000I didn't think Putin would invade, because I am extremely conservative, and I think a move like this is very dramatic, and you see the results.
01:53:23.000Shocking and provocative and and obviously the consequences were swift and you know outside of just the sanctions and the ostracizing of Russia from the West But then you also have this as a consequence now.
01:53:38.000They're deploying 40,000 troops Permanently in the east and Finland and Sweden might join NATO and you know reasonably what can Russia do to counter that?
01:53:46.000I'm curious to see what what the game plan is there.
01:53:49.000I don't know what the game plan is, but I
01:53:51.000I imagine Putin had to have suspected that that might have happened.
01:53:55.000And, you know, so what exactly was he thinking?
01:56:34.000Kel says, things are getting better for me every day when I decided to not care what insignificant and irrelevant people think already writing a book.