00:00:08.000Very excited to be back with you here tonight on Tuesday.
00:00:12.000We have a lot to talk about tonight, lots to get into.
00:00:17.000Kind of a slow news day, but that's okay.
00:00:19.000Featured story is about the Mexican president, who's honestly based, Lopez Obrador, who said in response to the extradition of Julian Assange that He wants to start a campaign to destroy the Statue of Liberty in New York City, which is awesome.
00:00:40.000And honestly, can I just say, I absolutely support the total destruction of the US Statue of Liberty.
00:00:50.000Legally, of course, legally, of course, I'm not encouraging people to do that on their own.
00:00:57.000Unironically, okay, I'm getting a lot of crap because when I say, hey, don't commit acts of violence, people say, Are you being sarcastic?
00:01:19.000Because this isn't a free country anymore.
00:01:22.000So, all the stories we hear about these immigrants, like my ancestors, coming to America, coming to Ellis Island, and they see the Statue of Liberty, and it symbolizes the freedom that they're about to receive, it's all a bunch of crap.
00:02:09.000I think we should get rid of it and replace it with a statue of George Floyd with a welfare check.
00:02:14.000Because that's really what immigrants are promised, and everybody else.
00:02:20.000Now, that's my personal position on that, but the Mexican president said for a different reason.
00:02:27.000He said that the United States is hypocritical because the Washington Post and American NGOs recently admonished the Mexican government because of their lack of press freedoms.
00:02:43.000And the Mexican president, Lopez Obrador, rightly pointed out.
00:02:48.000It's very hypocritical for the United States to lecture other countries about press freedom when they're currently trying to extradite Julian Assange for facilitating the leak of state secrets about the Afghanistan and Iraq wars, as well as other diplomatic cables.
00:03:07.000He's essentially a journalist, and they're extraditing him probably with the intention of torturing, imprisoning him for life, or killing him.
00:03:18.000And so, how do you go around in the Washington Post and in these other so called democratic NGOs, think tanks, nonprofits, and tell Mexico or anybody else for that matter, Russia, China, Africa, Middle East?
00:03:34.000How do you go to the United Nations and talk about, oh, the freedoms of journalists everywhere and all of that, when you're currently trying to bring an American journalist back, or Australian journalist, to kill him because he reported on the wrong thing?
00:03:53.000We'll also be talking tonight about the Department of Justice and their war against the state of Arizona.
00:04:00.000State of Arizona seeks by 2023 to implement a new voter law where they will be able to ask for your citizenship papers for you to be able to vote in a federal election, which makes sense because you've got 250,000 attempted illegal border crossings every single month.
00:05:03.000Crossing and some are deported and some remain.
00:05:07.000Some people are deported and come back.
00:05:09.000Some people are transported to other states in America.
00:05:12.000Some people put up a tent in Phoenix or Austin or Dallas or Los Angeles.
00:05:21.000Point being is not only should it be necessary that you're a U.S. citizen, obviously, to vote and you should have proof of that, but particularly in a border state, during a border crisis.
00:05:34.000Should be extra consideration for what's going on down there right now.
00:05:39.000So now the Department of Justice under Joe Biden has launched a lawsuit against Arizona to prevent them from enforcing the law.
00:05:47.000And what they're doing essentially is suing to allow illegals to be able to get through the system and vote in the next presidential election in 2024.
00:06:16.000But I remember when I first started doing this show back during the 20, I guess immediately after the 2016 election, the big thing that made me see the light on immigration, the big revelation, the big discovery was just looking at how these immigrants, and particularly Hispanics, native or immigrant, are voting.
00:06:40.000Okay, if you look at any of the data on this from Pew Research, as an example, illegal immigrants, one in 20 of them identify as Republican.
00:06:52.000Legal Hispanic immigrants, one in 10 identify as Republican.
00:06:58.000So, in terms of the people that we're getting from the Northern Triangle in Mexico, it's like five to 10% of them identify as Republican.
00:07:09.000When you look at broadly how all Hispanics in America vote, it's a little bit more favorable.
00:07:13.000It's 20, 30, sometimes as high as 40% Republican, but these are not good numbers for us.
00:07:21.000And I remember looking at the timeline here with these southern states, particularly in the Southwest, and it's just a matter of time.
00:07:29.000Texas, Arizona, Colorado, New Mexico, these are all going the way of California, Nevada, these are all going the way of California, New York, everything else.
00:08:13.000Maybe is this just oversimplifying the situation?
00:08:17.000How can you not see that Texas, with its rising proportion of foreign born, particularly Hispanics, How is that not going to go blue?
00:08:27.000How is that not going to transform the state within a decade?
00:08:32.000And the same thing for Arizona, and the same thing for Nevada, New Mexico, Colorado, and Virginia, which you've got an electoral shift happening because of internal and external migration, Florida, Georgia.
00:08:49.000And I remember just being told oh, well, it's just racist to assume that certain groups are going to vote a certain way, but they do.
00:09:46.000I don't really have any other announcements for you other than just another reminder that our tickets for our Las Vegas event are sold out.
00:09:54.000So if you're planning on going to that, I hope you got your tickets.
00:20:13.000I feel like if I'm looking for a Minion shirt, I'm doing it ironically.
00:20:19.000If I'm looking for normal clothes, I feel like I'm going to go in there and pick up something totally lame, and people are going to be like, oh, you like that shirt?
00:25:15.000And I know this is maybe a dysfunctional way of thinking, but I feel like the sort of manic depressive cycle, this sort of irregular sleep schedule, these sort of self imposed problems, I feel like there's, through this pain, I am able to create a show.
00:25:40.000I'm able to create something innovative that I wouldn't be able to if I was on a rigorous routine.
00:25:46.000Now, some people would say that's ridiculous.
00:25:49.000It's scientifically proven that if you're not sleeping eight hours a day and whatever, your brain isn't functioning.
00:26:58.000I'm procrastinating because it was boring, but okay.
00:27:03.000So, our first story is about this Arizona voter ID law.
00:27:08.000You know, this is just a lot of stuff we already know about, but the big news today is that the federal government, the Department of Justice, is suing the state of Arizona over a new law which would require voters in federal elections to show proof that they are a U.S. citizen.
00:27:32.000It's actually somewhat tragic, but it is a little bit comical that all these debates about voter registration are very nakedly just a battle of disenfranchising people that will vote for the opposite party.
00:27:48.000And either side can dress it up any way they want, but it's what it is.
00:27:53.000And so voter ID is about making sure that illegal immigrants don't vote, which is objectively good and objectively correct, but it's about disenfranchising illegal immigrants.
00:28:03.000Who don't even actually have a legal franchise.
00:28:06.000I mean, you know, so when I say that, I'm speaking in a very practical sense.
00:28:13.000You have people in the country, and everybody's fighting for votes.
00:28:20.000And the past 100 years has been a story of expanding the suffrage, expanding the enfranchisement, increasing the different kinds of people that are allowed to vote in elections, and increasing the kinds of elections that people are allowed to vote in.
00:28:37.000There was a time when there was one election.
00:28:39.000There was literally one federal election that people could vote in, and very few people could vote.
00:28:48.000The president was elected by the electors, and the electors really elected the president.
00:28:55.000A lot of people don't understand this, but for a long time, in the first half century of the country, the electoral college chosen by the state legislature actually selected the president.
00:29:09.000And it wasn't a It wasn't a big election for the people.
00:29:14.000It wasn't a big election for the voters.
00:29:17.000The Electoral College really did choose the president.
00:29:21.000And that's completely alien to us now.
00:29:24.000And we talked a lot about that evolution during the Stop the Steal period when we talked about constitutionally how Donald Trump was going to remain president.
00:29:34.000And it goes into the legal process of how the president is chosen.
00:29:39.000And so we talked a lot last year, you know, about 18 months ago.
00:29:44.000About the fact that it's really the Electoral College in the 19th century delegating their power to select the president to the people through these state sanctioned contests, meaning an election.
00:30:00.000And so the Constitution says that the electors choose the president, and the electors are chosen by the state legislature.
00:30:06.000Well, at some point in the 19th century, the state legislatures say that they're going to delegate their power to choose the electors who will choose the president.
00:30:16.000They're going to delegate that power to the voters within the state.
00:30:20.000And this is why, as opposed to a national election, we have these state by state elections.
00:30:26.000And so these state by state elections are the people voting, and their decision is given to the state legislature.
00:30:32.000And then the state legislature picks the electors based on the outcome of the election.
00:30:38.000And so they're delegating that power to the voters.
00:30:41.000But initially, the president wasn't an elected office.
00:30:46.000The Senate, as you know, same situation.
00:30:51.000We have a bicameral legislature, meaning there's two chambers of the legislature, of the Congress, and the Senate, which is the high chamber, like the House of Lords or the, in Russia, I think it's the, what is it, the federal delegates or something like that.
00:31:09.000A lot of governments will have two chambers in their Congress, they'll have a lower chamber and a higher chamber.
00:31:14.000The Senate, the more prestigious chamber, the senators were selected, again, by the state legislatures.
00:31:22.000And so at the federal level, it was really only the House of Representatives that was ever directly elected by the people.
00:31:28.000And I know for some people this is obvious.
00:31:42.000And the one body that was elected directly by the people, the House of Representatives, that's why they call it the House of Representatives, the People's House.
00:31:49.000It's because the composition and the quantity of representatives was determined by the population.
00:31:57.000However, many people there are in the state, that's how many representatives there are in the House.
00:32:03.000And that is the body that is most representative of the will of the people.
00:32:16.000Those were the people that were voting.
00:32:18.000Not slaves, not women, not poor people, certainly not wages or the equivalent of that 300 years ago.
00:32:28.000And the process of this country has been changing all of that, increasing the amount of people that can participate in the elections, and increasing the number of elections and the significance of elections.
00:32:38.000And now you've got it to the point where they want the presidency to be directly elected, and they want criminals to vote, and they want children to vote, and they want people that don't even have citizenship to vote, and they want the Supreme Court to be elected, and all of it.
00:32:57.000And so, what this is really about is about political power.
00:33:01.000It's about getting around these constitutional mechanisms and fighting for something which is easier, which is to convince stupid people to vote for you.
00:33:12.000Rather than go through this arduous process of electors and state legislatures and 50 state legislatures and hundreds of legislators in the state legislatures and so on, well, let's just convince stupid people to vote for us.
00:33:29.000Let's just convince stupid women to vote for us.
00:33:33.000Let's convince stupid young people to vote for us and let's lower the voting age to 18 and let's convince other classes of stupid people to vote for us.
00:33:43.000And so the mass democracy, the expansion of mass democracy is really just this, like everything else, it's a tit for tat power grab by either party.
00:33:55.000Just like everything else, just like the filibuster, just like these arguments about packing the Supreme Court or spoils system, whatever.
00:34:07.000It's always just how can we manipulate the rules to help our guys in the next election?
00:34:14.000Here's a group of people that we can convince to like us.
00:35:21.000That's objectively not moral and it's also objectively against the law.
00:35:26.000So, there's not a real moral equivalency, but in politics, these moral considerations are less important than the considerations of power, right?
00:35:36.000So, this is what's been going on for a long time, and this is the latest iteration of it.
00:35:42.000The Democrat Department of Justice is suing the Republican state government in Arizona to prevent a voter ID law, it's not a voter ID law, it's in particular a law that requires people to present proof of citizenship to vote in federal elections.
00:35:58.000And they're suing to prevent that from taking effect in 2023.
00:36:04.000It says, The Justice Department is suing Arizona over a law that is slated to take effect next year that would require voters to provide proof of American citizenship to cast ballots in federal elections.
00:36:16.000In a court complaint filed Tuesday, the DOJ alleged that House Bill 2492 violates the National Voter Registration Act of 1993 and the 1964 Civil Rights Act.
00:36:28.000The law is slated to take effect in January 2023.
00:36:32.000The complaint alleges that the law would throw thousands of voters off the rolls.
00:37:38.000The Attorney General, or rather the Assistant Attorney General, Kristen Clark, said, For nearly three decades, the National Voter Registration Act has helped to move states in the right direction by eliminating unnecessary requirements that have historically made it harder for eligible voters to access the registration rolls.
00:37:57.000Arizona has passed a law that turns the clock back on progress.
00:38:02.000I just like, I can't stand these liberals.
00:38:09.000Because they all have this very specific language that they speak.
00:38:28.000By imposing unlawful and unnecessary requirements that would block eligible voters from the registration rolls for certain federal elections.
00:38:35.000They're always talking about turning back the clock and progress in the current year.
00:38:40.000And it's important to understand, this is kind of an aside, that this is foundational to the liberal worldview the idea of progress.
00:38:51.000That is an assumption that many people take for granted, the idea of progress.
00:39:02.000We mean the idea that the history of mankind is the story of linear progress.
00:39:11.000Progress, meaning that we started in one place and we are aiming for another place.
00:39:18.000And the story of human civilization is people over the generations, the cumulative product of the generations, increasing and working towards this destination, progress.
00:39:36.000And, you know, that's what progress means, moving forward.
00:39:40.000And what the assumption is, the assumptions in that are that.
00:39:44.000Over time, society is moving not in a cyclical way, not moving around in a sort of predetermined way with a finite range of outcomes, but that there can be novel outcomes, and that society from start to finish, we're not just talking about accumulating capital and technology becoming more advanced, but they're talking in a higher sense that we're changing.
00:40:14.000That society, if we're saying it's moving forward, that means we're setting a destination.
00:40:19.000That there is something inferior behind us in the past, and there is something superior in the future.
00:40:26.000And what that is, is sort of an open ended question, but a lot of people assume that what that means is transforming our nature.
00:40:35.000And so there's something in individualism and liberalism which is transformative and transcendent, which says that we have these ideals.
00:40:48.000We have these ideals like equality and freedom and justice and these things, and we didn't have them before.
00:40:59.000We can work to have them now, and in the future, we can have more of those things.
00:41:02.000And the idea is eventually, maybe we can overcome human nature.
00:41:08.000And this is where you get all this language about turning back the clock.
00:41:11.000And so, it's never the problem with this language is that it's never appealing to the intrinsic good of the thing, it's not talking about.
00:41:20.000Is it a good thing to kick these people off the voter rolls?
00:41:23.000It's always just to talk about well, progress is expanding the suffrage, increasing equality, more democracy, more liberalism, more individualism.
00:42:14.000We know better than the people in the past, we know better than our ancestors, we know better than the civilization, the culture that came before us.
00:42:22.000And anyway, this is just kind of an aside.
00:42:24.000It's important because you're hearing this language all the time from liberals and Democrats talk about turning back the clock.
00:43:06.000Sometimes we're moving backwards in terms of what's good for society.
00:43:14.000And so you hear this a lot recently with the abortion ruling, and you heard this a lot when Trump got elected, and when Putin invaded Ukraine, and all these things are turning the clock back on all our progress.
00:43:27.000And maybe an important question, too, is is it really progress?
00:43:31.000Are things, in a word, getting better?
00:43:34.000Are things getting better when more illegals are voting?
00:43:38.000You know, sometimes turning back the clock is a good thing.
00:43:40.000Sometimes going back to the way things were is a good thing if the things before were better than they are now.
00:43:47.000So everybody says, oh, that's so backwards.
00:43:50.000Well, if you're going in the wrong direction, backwards is a good place to be, right?
00:43:55.000If you're going in the wrong direction, if your destination is prosperity and happiness and salvation, and you're headed towards hell, backwards is actually the correct direction.
00:44:08.000It's actually You're actually making properly understood progress by moving backwards.
00:44:13.000And if you want to say that's turning back the clock to a different time, then sure, we can turn back the clock to the 1950s and then move forward again doing it the right way.
00:45:21.000Checking for citizenship is too old fashioned.
00:45:26.000It says Arizona Governor Doug Ducey signed HB 2492 into law in March.
00:45:31.000At the time, he said the law would prohibit any attempt to illegally cast a vote.
00:45:36.000He called it a balanced approach that honors Arizona's history of making voting accessible without sacrificing security in our elections.
00:45:44.000An Arizona ballot measure in 2004 allowed officials to ask for proof of citizenship.
00:45:49.000For anyone registering to vote, a provision in the measure was eventually struck down by the Supreme Court.
00:45:56.000In its court complaint, the DOJ said the new law also violated a 2013 High Court ruling related to another Arizona lawsuit saying the state can't require prospective voters using the federal form from submitting anything the form requires, such as proof of citizenship.
00:46:20.000So it sounds like this may get struck down.
00:46:30.000And I know I said earlier that it's really just a contest of both parties trying to get their voters in and the other party's voters out.
00:46:38.000But at the end of the day, there is a right and wrong answer here.
00:46:42.000You've got 250,000 illegals being apprehended at the border every month.
00:46:49.000At a certain point, you just have to recognize the fact that we just simply do not have a country.
00:46:58.000Citizenship confers no benefit upon people that are legal residents or even non legal residents of America.
00:47:08.000What I mean by that is there is nothing that anybody would gain by becoming a citizen.
00:47:16.000And becoming a citizen is easy and it's not even necessary anymore because you could really get everything that you need without even becoming a citizen.
00:47:24.000And that is, on a foundational level, a degradation of the country.
00:47:29.000How can you have a country where the people are sovereign if there's no expectation from the people at all?
00:47:38.000There is nothing that a person needs to do to become a sort of responsible member of the society.
00:47:46.000There's nothing a person needs to do to integrate.
00:47:49.000There's no requirement of allegiance to the government, to the community, to the culture, to the nation, or anything.
00:47:57.000They don't even have to follow the law.
00:47:59.000And then they can come here and just pick the leaders.
00:48:02.000And none of this makes any sense at all.
00:48:07.000Has anybody ever stopped and asked what is the tangible benefit of having everybody vote?
00:50:25.000Why do we have voting in the first place?
00:50:28.000Nobody seems to know the answers to any of these questions why things are the way they are, where the food from the grocery store comes from, why the government works the way it does, how the government even works.
00:50:40.000We're turning a clock back on our democracy if we don't what?
00:50:44.000Check if people are citizens for voting?
00:50:46.000Do people even know why we have citizenship and how we attain citizenship and what the benefit of that is?
00:51:04.000Why should we respect the right of the government to exercise authority?
00:51:08.000There's no longer a good answer to that question.
00:51:11.000There used to be some convoluted Republican explanation for this, which was something like well, the people have these natural rights, and then the people got together and they decided that they're going to create a government.
00:51:25.000Because it's expedient and efficacious, and they're going to give their sovereignty and their rights given to them by God over themselves to the government, and they're going to have an agreement with the government, and they're giving the government their authority, and the authority of the government comes from them, and the Constitution is this contract which governs that relationship, which governs that transference of sovereignty,
00:51:54.000and if the government goes against it, well, there's all these mechanisms, and they're Set against each other with balance of powers at the federal level and between the provincial and the national level.
00:52:07.000And this is okay, this is good enough for now.
00:52:10.000This is good enough in the 18th century.
00:52:13.000There's this philosophical, theoretical, convoluted framework for why we listen to the government.
00:52:20.000Why does the government have authority?
00:52:22.000Why does the government make the laws and enforce the laws and send police to put you in a cage if you don't obey the laws?
00:52:34.000Well, now that citizenship confers no benefits and non citizens can vote and everyone can vote and no one knows why, and people don't even care if the elections matter, and the Constitution isn't listened to, and the Supreme Court says they're going to make decisions based on what's disruptive, that means that the government really has no legitimacy to rule anymore.
00:53:01.000We all accept that the government rules because if we went against the government, the government would kill us.
00:53:07.000But if the government couldn't kill us, nobody could come up with an argument for why the government should have authority over us.
00:53:17.000Because every legal, philosophical argument that was made for the creation of this government 300 years ago has now been eradicated by all of these revisions that have destroyed the foundations of it.
00:53:52.000Because once you have, okay, the government is run by leaders, the leaders are elected, and you have aliens that can come in and pick the leaders.
00:54:02.000People can vote multiple times, there's no oversight.
00:54:05.000A person could be a citizen of another country, come across the border and vote and choose the leader of America.
00:54:11.000Like, that just doesn't even make any sense.
00:54:14.000And that's going to become the leader, the chief enforcer of the laws?
00:55:02.000So that's what they're doing, and it's naked and it's obvious.
00:55:05.000And try as the Republican state governments might, they just can't even get the most basic ability to enforce the law and prevent aliens from voting at a time when the southern border is being invaded by aliens.
00:55:21.000So that's why 2024 is a tricky proposition.
00:55:24.000People are always saying, and this is my suspicion.
00:55:27.000Suspicion as well that if the election were held fairly, Trump would win in a landslide again.
00:55:35.000But then you got all this funny business.
00:55:36.000You got the tech censorship, you got the cheating, you've got illegal aliens.
00:55:41.000For four years, the floodgates have opened up for four years and they're running nonstop.
00:55:47.000And they just got rid of the remain in Mexico policy and all these other parts of the Trump regime to keep immigrants out of America and stop, catch, and release essentially.
00:55:59.000What chance do we have when you've got this army of illegals?
00:56:02.000You can't stop every one of these millions of illegals by the time all this is said and done from voting multiple times.
00:56:08.000You can't even ask for citizenship proof.
00:56:12.000So, this is a big black pill and it's a big problem.
00:56:16.000And it also, and the last thing I'll say about it is this it flies in the face of every one of these conservatives that really believes it's all about the freaking Constitution.
00:56:43.000We need a dictator to come in, break the laws, create a revolutionary guard, and round up all the illegals and throw them in trucks and send them out and build a giant wall and prevent them from coming back in.
00:56:58.000Well, but Congress needs to authorize the funds.
00:57:11.000Here would be my solution elect a dictator, suspend the laws, dismiss the legislature, and the dictator taxes the people and uses the money to build a giant wall and uses the money to raise an army that is personally loyal to him.
00:57:28.000And that army rounds up all the illegal immigrants and sends them over the border.
00:57:34.000Now, the constitutionalist would say, hey, But a president can only serve 10 years.
00:57:58.000We have direct election of senators, and non citizens are voting, and it's basically all just a big free for all.
00:58:05.000But if we want to reverse 30 million illegal immigrants.
00:58:08.000Pouring into our country and voting and killing and sending up tents and spreading disease and dropping acre babies acres away with a birth rate of three for 50 years, we've got to take it to the fucking federal circuit court?
00:58:21.000No, that's just ridiculous, obviously.
00:58:27.000The 14th Amendment is being interpreted to give people a right to have anal sex and abortions, but we've got to go through the House of Representatives and the power of the purse to build a border wall?
00:58:45.000So the constitutional stuff has just got to go.
00:59:24.000They're like, you know, if it's good for us, it's good.
00:59:28.000And at some point, we'll have to think seriously about where authority comes from and rebuild the legitimacy of the government and rebuild institutions and a technological society.
00:59:40.000And that is an altogether separate task.
00:59:43.000But first and foremost, we got to stop the bleeding, man.
00:59:46.000We got to get somebody in there who's going to stop the country from being invaded, drive the moneylenders from the temple, okay?
00:59:54.000Stop the tail from wagging the dog with all these global special interests and get things under control.
01:00:01.000And then we can talk about these other questions.
01:00:07.000But yeah, that's the thing that makes me lose my mind.
01:00:09.000You got an army of illegals voting, but hey, Donald Trump needs permission from Paul Ryan to spend $5 million on fencing in the Rio Grande Valley, okay?
01:00:22.000So, you know, let's just all commit suicide then.
01:01:19.000Maybe it's because we have that savage DNA cut your head off, roll it down a pyramid, set your wife on fire, cut her hair off, take it as a trophy.
01:02:22.000You know, white people came over here and they're getting in line and shooting guns, and Mexicans are just like riding on horses, throwing rocks at people and cutting their heads off and skinning them alive and burning them.
01:02:37.000Not that I'd support any of that, but you got to admit, there's something to the sort of return of history here.
01:02:46.000Anyway, so to that point, the Mexican president put America on blast this week.
01:03:04.000You know, Boris Johnson never says that, but Lopez Obrador does.
01:03:10.000And this is an article from Russia Today.
01:03:13.000It says, Mexican President Andres Manuel Lopez Obrador says the symbol of America's Freedom could lose its meaning if Washington refuses to drop charges against WikiLeaks co founder Julian Assange, who faces the prospect of 175 years in prison.
01:03:32.000He said, If they take him to the United States and he is sentenced to the maximum penalty and to die in prison, we must start a campaign to tear down the Statue of Liberty.
01:03:44.000He said that for Washington to convict Assange would confirm that the world famous monument in New York Harbor is no longer a symbol of freedom.
01:03:53.000His statements came in the wake of criticism published over the weekend by The Washington Post and Reporters Without Borders, excoriating the Mexican government for its supposed failures to protect journalists.
01:04:07.000The reporters' advocacy group has called on the Mexican government to overhaul mechanisms for protecting media personnel, insisting the majority of the 12 journalists who have been killed so far this year in Mexico were murdered because of their work.
01:04:21.000However, the president, who is widely known by his initials AMLO, Dismissed the report as a smear campaign against the government of Mexico.
01:04:30.000He skewered the hypocrisy, what he framed as hypocrisy, by the media organizations that eagerly published information on U.S. war crimes in Afghanistan and Iraq, obtained and released by WikiLeaks before turning against the organization's founder.
01:04:46.000He said, When this information was released, various media participated in its publication.
01:04:52.000They agreed to release all the information because they considered that it was a contribution to the defense of human rights.
01:04:58.000To freedom of expression, not to continue with the double talk with the lies, with saying one thing and doing another.
01:05:06.000So, I've covered this before when Julian Assange was extradited recently, or the extradition moved forward another step.
01:05:32.000Without the trade that it has with the United States, it doesn't exist without the support it gets from the US government and the direct and indirect subsidies it gets from the US government.
01:05:45.000Mexico is a suzerain of the United States.
01:05:50.000It is essentially, for lack of a better word, almost a colony of the United States, like many other countries in the Western Hemisphere.
01:06:00.000And Mexico is also a dysfunctional, failing country.
01:06:04.000That without its oil wealth would be bankrupt, which is in some parts of the country just not governable at all, particularly in the South, overrun by organized crime and gangs.
01:06:17.000And so we're being lectured by this child, this little child to the South that doesn't exist without its dependency on us, that doesn't even work, that is somehow more dysfunctional than America.
01:06:31.000And they're getting out on the world stage and embarrassing us on our bread and butter, which is our First Amendment, our Freedoms, freedom of the press, and our democracy.
01:09:13.000Okay, let's drop them off somewhere in the Pacific Ocean if they try to take down the Columbus Monument.
01:09:20.000Maybe the answer is we need to redirect the Mexicans to tear down the Statue of Liberty and the Martin Luther King Jr. Monument and the African American History Museum and the giant black Afrocomb in New Orleans.
01:09:36.000Maybe it's just a question of Mexicans tearing down the wrong monuments.
01:09:40.000These people can be a powerful force if mobilized in the right way.
01:09:44.000You saw what they did in the aftermath of the George Floyd riots, it was awesome.
01:09:53.000When Mexicans in Cicero and Little Village in Pilsen were creating checkpoints and preventing angry black rioters from entering their neighborhoods.
01:11:47.000Now, that's something as a Mexican American that I could get behind.
01:11:52.000Blow up the Statue of Liberty legally, okay?
01:11:57.000Pass a law and blow up the Statue of Liberty or put it in a museum or something and then build a statue of the Virgin Mary five times as big.
01:12:11.000What if we legally, what if we got the government, what if we got the government contractors to blow up the MLK monument and instead we built up a giant statue of Jesus Christ, like in Brazil?
01:12:26.000Or we built up a giant statue of Padre Pio.
01:12:40.000I sort of like what I'm hearing from Lopez Obrador.
01:12:43.000And Bolsonaro and other of these Latin American, I guess AMBLO is actually a left wing populist, but nevertheless, I like what I'm hearing.
01:12:55.000This Mexican makes some pretty good points.
01:12:58.000Maybe it's time for some Mexican leaders in America to sort of create a new identity that we like.
01:15:31.000You know, however far we take this movement, hopefully we take it all the way, everyone will be very pleased with the Mexican leadership here.
01:16:07.000But I was driving through the Mexican neighborhood and they're blasting fireworks and they're having a fiesta and they're, you know, they make great food.
01:16:14.000Mexicans, I'm not just saying this because I'm Mexican.
01:16:19.000If I didn't feel this way, I wouldn't say this because I'm biased, all right?
01:16:28.000As far as I don't think that Mexicans should be the majority in America, that's where people go wrong, they're like, it doesn't matter if Mexicans are 50% of the population.
01:16:37.000Yeah, they definitely should not be 50% of the population.
01:16:41.000But here's the thing, all right, here's the thing, okay?
01:18:14.000Statistically speaking, when you look at crime, When you look at violence, when you look at poverty, it's really blacks are kind of playing in a league of their own.
01:25:29.000Have you seen the tick ticks of dudes going around asking to see people's bank accounts and most of the women are near zero, if not overdrawn?
01:25:44.000There are so many people like that where they're like literally living, not even from paycheck to paycheck, but from like dollar to dollar.
01:25:55.000Where they're like, hey, I need like 20 bucks to like buy this shirt that I want because I have zero fucking dollars.
01:26:09.000I just, I, and here's the thing you know, very few people are really in that situation due to circumstance.
01:26:20.000Most people, you're just an idiot with your money because it's not that hard.
01:29:22.000Honestly, if I were to venture to guess, I would say this is just sort of like cynical PR.
01:29:29.000If I were to venture to guess, I would say that this is like a, you know, this is my theory, my speculation, is that Bezos looks at Musk and sees the relatively strong brand and popularity that Musk enjoys from his.
01:29:50.000Forthrightness and directness on social media, or even somebody like Donald Trump.
01:29:55.000And I think he's applying that as a sort of cynical, thoroughly researched PR move to increase the brand of Jeff Bezos as a man and Amazon indirectly.
01:33:50.000Did you know that access to the torch of the Statue of Liberty has been closed since the 1916 Black Tom explosion when Germans bombed a munitions depot on Black Tom Island in NY as revenge for supplying the Allies?
01:34:01.000Caused structural damage to the statue.
01:34:04.000Later, Germs sent a telegram to Mexico.
01:35:30.000But yeah, this, uh, into this, they were friends with all these people one day and hated all these other people and then overnight just flipped.
01:35:37.000And now it's the same derangement as all these, like, trannies and freaks.
01:40:10.000J.R. Dobbs says externalizing technologies as abstractions of our senses is second nature and calls it the android meme.
01:40:16.000He says internalizing technologies through consciousness to be expressed by biology is first nature, i.e., telepathy, clairvoyance, and the like.
01:40:29.000Would you consider an advancement of biological consciousness to an unimaginable Future could be God's plan, or that perception has been as it always will be, as far as the self is concerned?
01:40:39.000I think that your super chat is poorly written, frankly.
01:40:45.000Externalizing technologies as abstractions of our senses.
01:41:48.000I tend to be of the belief that technology will not advance as far as people think it will, as far as like artificial intelligence or the sort of transhumanist thing, the idea that we're going to merge our consciousness with machines.
01:42:08.000I don't know how far that's really going to go.
01:42:10.000Although I don't know, I'm not a technologist.
01:42:12.000I don't know what the latest technology is on that, but I tend to be more skeptical about how far those advancements are going to go.
01:42:21.000I haven't really read into that question about what the Bible may say about technology.
01:42:29.000I think, though, that probably there are limitations because of the nature of consciousness.
01:42:34.000I think that people think consciousness is a certain way, which is why they think that we can create artificial consciousness or artificial intelligence.
01:42:46.000And I think that applies to this as well.
01:42:48.000I don't know that, you know, because people talk about, well, we can, they'll say things like, we can interpret electrical signals in the brain.
01:42:56.000I don't know that that necessarily means that we're going to be able to merge our consciousness with machines or how possible it even is to transmit signals from our conscious mind to other people's minds, the kind of telepathy I think you're talking about.
01:43:49.000Exactly four years ago to the day Vince was brought onto the show for the first time to discuss immigration slash demographic destiny with you.
01:44:44.000Certainly, we have some fine whites like Jimbo or Vince and others, Paul Town, although he's Polish, so I don't know how white that really is.
01:44:53.000But certainly, some of the whites are not really sending their best.
01:44:58.000And the Hispanics are really bringing their A game, I have to say.
01:45:02.000Hispanics such as myself, truly bringing their A game to the table.
01:45:29.000People need to not get it confused that what you're talking about is not the value of humans based on race, but which groups might exert effort to stop the satanic Jewish cabal from raping the world.
01:45:39.000No, that's not what I'm talking about.
01:45:43.000Mexicans could be reached if we presented it in terms of their history as well.
01:45:47.000Lots of Mexicans would see the appeal of figures like Porfirio Diaz if they knew who he was, a strong man who tried to Mexico what Trump tried to do for us, both white men.
01:45:56.000Oh, if we just turned it into a history, if we just turned it into an Asperger's history LARP, then fuck off.
01:49:55.000You know, I mean, we would go to places and just wouldn't know the first thing about anything.
01:49:59.000Like, didn't know anything about Italian food, didn't know anything about Mexican food, didn't know anything really about anything at all, for that matter.