00:02:41.000That's not really the big development.
00:02:42.000The main thing that's going on this week, which was sort of surprising and interesting, is that the American government says, the Pentagon says that they now have very detailed intelligence about a false flag attack which Russia is planning to stage in Ukraine.
00:03:03.000And they say that Russia was preparing to create fake video and fake evidence of a Ukrainian attack on Russians.
00:03:58.000If anybody is doing false flag attacks to serve as a pretext for military intervention, it's America.
00:04:07.000And what's more is specifically with the alleged chemical weapons attack in Syria, the United States government said it would be impossible for them to stage a false flag attack like that.
00:04:20.000Because there were accusations at the time.
00:04:22.000People said, hey, you did this, you faked this so that you could intervene.
00:04:28.000And the official response from the State Department was, we didn't fake the attack.
00:09:56.000Before we get into the show, there's one other thing I wanted to bring up, very funny.
00:10:01.000If you guys follow me on Telegram, you've already seen this, but I got an email today, or our support team got an email today from Vice News.
00:10:12.000So we're doing this conference, as you know.
00:11:48.000We're banned from everything, banned from Twitter, DLive, everything.
00:11:54.000And it's going to be more than twice as big.
00:11:57.000So there's this attempt now by Vice Media.
00:12:00.000They sent me this email today asking if they could cover the conference.
00:12:05.000And I had this sort of flashback because my buddy texted it to me.
00:12:10.000They're like, LOL, Vice Media wants to send a crew over.
00:12:14.000And I had a flashback to the old days of the alt right.
00:12:19.000Because if I'm not mistaken, a big part of their downfall, well, part of it, was that when they did their conferences and they did their events, they literally had a Vice news crew following them around all the time, getting their faces, getting the Roman salutes, getting the drunkenness, all the shenanigans.
00:12:40.000And I remember thinking, what are you thinking?
00:13:12.000Only my family and my dear friends call me Nicholas.
00:13:17.000So she says, Dear Nicholas, you can call me Mr. Fuentes.
00:13:22.000She writes, I hope this finds you well.
00:13:23.000I'm interested in covering your upcoming AFPAC event.
00:13:27.000I've seen your posts suggesting how much your organization has grown in size and prestige in the last few years and how that's translating into the scale of this year's AFPAC.
00:13:38.000Would you consider accrediting a team from Vice News so we can document AFPAC?
00:13:44.000The story would be about your and America First's glowing or growing influence.
00:15:06.000Or New York, and they get together with their editors, and then they frame you as KKK Klansmen.
00:15:13.000They frame you as a neo Nazi, a terrorist, dark music, dark lighting, Hitler, Hitler, in a bad way, Hitler in a bad way, he's Hitler, and that's not a compliment.
00:15:25.000Not that there's any way, I mean, you compliment, please, of course not.
00:16:08.000So, Tess Owens yesterday is writing a big hit piece about how I'm a white nationalist and I'm disturbing and all this.
00:16:18.000And then 24 hours later, she wrote it herself, not her outlet, she did.
00:16:22.000The next day, she sends me an email saying, Hi, Nicholas, I want to document your growing movement and how the prestige of your organization is translating into this huge conference.
00:16:41.000Really, you know, this is her article yesterday.
00:16:46.000Her article yesterday, this is the headline.
00:16:48.000How white nationalists are hijacking the anti abortion movement.
00:16:53.000And she writes, Got to team up with the amazing Carter Sherman for this story where we gave each other a hellish glimpse into our respective beats.
00:17:04.000Big thanks to such and such for helping us make sense of this disturbing trend.
00:17:12.000So she is slandering me as a white nationalist.
00:17:16.000She says that this is hellish, it's a disturbing trend.
00:17:20.000And then the next day, She's saying, Oh, we want to cover your prestigious conference.
00:18:33.000And they're saying, well, we want to cover like how Generation Z is interacting with the internet and like we're going to interview Soph and blah, blah, blah.
00:20:19.000We literally use every single clip from that documentary in our promotional materials, you know?
00:20:26.000Because I remember the same thing happened with MTV.
00:20:31.000I don't know if you guys have seen my show on that or if you remember this story, but years ago, MTV came and they did a whole week of filming with me.
00:20:40.000And then they said it was going to be one project.
00:20:44.000Then it just turned into a straight up hit piece.
00:20:47.000And they aired it like a year after they shot it during the Kuiper War.
00:20:51.000And I was in it for all of five minutes.
00:20:53.000And literally every single shot, every frame, every shot that I'm in this hit piece documentary, we have used that in our promotional material.
00:21:05.000We've almost overused it because we've used it in all of our promos because it's like high quality, funny, good footage.
00:21:13.000And we posted on TikTok, we posted on YouTube.
00:21:16.000And one of the clips went viral on TikTok.
00:21:19.000And we had people in the comments saying, This guy's hilarious.
00:22:08.000And there are these other naive journalists where they're like, no, no, we're going to take him out.
00:22:13.000No, this time, this hit piece, if we just post one more clip of his show on a mainstream platform for 100,000 people to see, no, this time it's going to hurt him instead of helping him.
00:25:19.000October 2019 is when we burst into the mainstream, burst into the national spotlight.
00:25:26.000Take a look at where Turning Point USA, the GOP, where all of that was then, and look at where all of it is now, and tell us who was the most influential.
00:25:37.000Tell us that we didn't make a mark and we didn't change the conversation.
00:26:11.000And every day they are moving the Republican Party and they are moving the conservative movement more towards the positions and the ideas that I espouse on this show every single night.
00:26:23.000So, AFPAC is sort of like APAC for white Americans.
00:26:29.000AFPAC is like APAC for reactionary Christian white Americans.
00:26:35.000In the same way that all the real decisions happen at these Israeli Jewish lobby type conferences and weekend retreats, the same thing is true with AFPAC.
00:26:46.000Every year at AFPAC, the real movers and shakers get together and we plot out the next 100 years.
00:27:13.000Yeah, before the show, I drove over to Chick fil A on the recommendation of UX Groyper.
00:27:24.000You know, and this guy, he says, he's like, Nick, I recommend that you get this vanilla iced coffee, which I've never had iced coffee in my life.
00:31:22.000If America does not come to the negotiating table about the fate of Ukraine, and specifically, if they do not make a commitment that Ukraine will not be absorbed into NATO and the European Union, then Vladimir Putin says that there is going to be war.
00:31:38.000And so, this is what Putin wants Putin wants America out of Ukraine, he wants NATO out of Ukraine.
00:31:46.000He also, there also is an offensive objective here, which is to say that.
00:31:54.000I do believe that Vladimir Putin does want to seize land in Ukraine.
00:32:12.000And there is also a large, ethnically Russian speaking population in the east of Ukraine.
00:32:19.000So, to strictly say that Putin only seeks this sort of defensive, Propositionally negative objective in Ukraine, which is America giving some commitment that NATO will not expand to Kiev.
00:32:41.000As you know, Putin seized Crimea in 2014 so that they could project power into the Black Sea or continue to do that and to protect their Black Sea fleet.
00:32:52.000We also know that there are two breakaway provinces or oblasts.
00:32:58.000In eastern Ukraine, which are the Luhansk and Donetsk republics.
00:33:03.000And they are Russian speaking, ethnically Russian, and a proxy for Russia in Ukraine, sort of like Abkhazia and South Ossetia in Georgia.
00:33:38.000They want us to know that there's military on the border.
00:33:42.000They may even want us to think that there is more of a military buildup than there actually is.
00:33:49.000They may be the ones that are putting that information out there, they may be the ones that are taking the pictures and the videos and putting that out on social media and creating open source intelligence about their military positions.
00:34:03.000And they are doing this to bring the West to the negotiating table.
00:34:08.000They're telegraphing, and there is a military buildup, but again, it may not be as big as they're making it out to be.
00:34:15.000They're telegraphing this to bring the West to the table so that the West will negotiate about the fate of Ukraine, because otherwise, there's really no incentive for the status quo to be broken.
00:34:26.000Putin is trying to disrupt the status quo.
00:34:32.000In response, the West is deploying troops of their own.
00:34:37.000And they're conducting military exercises in the Baltics, and they're putting troops in Ukraine.
00:34:42.000I think they just sent another 2,000 troops there.
00:34:45.000The Pentagon and the State Department are refusing to negotiate, and the press secretary is warning about an imminent invasion and saying that Russian troops are going to invade any second.
00:34:58.000They've been saying that now for about a month.
00:35:00.000And then the Ukrainian president, Zelensky, who's in the middle, he's sort of caught in between and he's telling America, hey, they're not invading anytime soon.
00:35:26.000And now this is a negotiation with a military buildup as leverage.
00:35:32.000That's how you should think of these things it is a diplomatic negotiation over a potential security alliance with NATO and Ukraine, as well as these strategic lands in eastern Ukraine and Crimea.
00:35:46.000And the negotiation is being conducted with these military threats, military means.
00:35:52.000That's part of the diplomacy that's used as leverage.
00:35:56.000And it's important to point this out because, you know, there's a lot of people in these circles that see tanks and guns and they hear rhetoric like this.
00:36:28.000It may not seem like it, but, you know, for example, when Donald Trump is sending carrier strike groups into the South China Sea to intimidate China or North Korea, they are threatening war, but they're not really threatening war.
00:36:45.000You know, when Donald Trump was saying we're going to do fire and fury like you've never seen to North Korea, you know, once again, it is a threat, but it's also partly diplomacy.
00:37:00.000And it's important to be aware of this.
00:37:04.000And a lot of people look at this and say, oh, we don't want war with Russia.
00:37:08.000We're hurtling towards a war with Russia.
00:37:11.000We could wind up in a war with Russia.
00:37:14.000But more realistically, again, it's really more just diplomacy.
00:37:18.000And you could say that, well, this diplomacy is reckless.
00:37:21.000You could say that conducting diplomacy in this way creates a possibility for a miscalculation.
00:37:28.000And a miscalculation could result in a war that nobody wants and which is unnecessary.
00:37:35.000But a lot of people are unwilling even to accept that the intentions of both parties involved are to achieve a diplomatic resolution by posturing, by threatening war.
00:37:49.000And so you have to look at it and say, you know, when Russia puts troops on the border, it's posturing.
00:37:58.000I mean, that's what they're posturing for.
00:38:00.000But more realistically, what they're doing is they're introducing leverage.
00:38:05.000And they're trying to begin a conversation.
00:38:07.000They're trying to bring the West to the table and ultimately achieve a diplomatic resolution.
00:38:13.000Sometimes the only way to achieve diplomacy is to threaten a war and for America to respond by threatening war.
00:38:21.000And you can say, well, understanding that that's the intention, well, they shouldn't do that because it could lead to war, which is true.
00:38:30.000But some people naively, every time there's a troop deployment, every time there's a movement, every time there's an airstrike or whatever, People freak out and they say, Oh, this is American empire.
00:38:47.000And it's important just to be aware of the reality of the situation just for your own information.
00:38:54.000And I'll also say about this that, you know, I'm a non interventionist in the sense that I don't believe America should be getting into unnecessary wars.
00:39:05.000And I don't think America should be risking war for unnecessary things.
00:39:10.000And I think that America's foreign policy should be focused on our own problems rather than securing global hegemony and intervening in every interstate conflict.
00:39:20.000But that being said, I don't believe it's always wrong for America to intervene in a country militarily, especially when the objectives are limited and the means are limited.
00:39:32.000You know, a lot of people went from understanding that the Iraq war was a mistake to saying that every time America deploys An aircraft carrier every time America does anything militarily.
00:41:00.000And it's like, well, no, that's not necessarily true.
00:41:05.000You can say that a 20 year ground war with a quarter of a million people in a war that we fought for Israel, and again, Under false pretenses, a spurious motive, we could say that that was wrong, it should never be done again, without saying that we're going to take all military options off the table everywhere, forever, indefinitely, unless the homeland is attacked.
00:43:08.000That was an unnecessary, that was completely unnecessary.
00:43:12.000So the news, so the news today, which has not a ton of relevance to anything that I just said, is that America is now claiming, so that's where we are with Ukraine.
00:43:25.000We've got this reciprocal troop buildup on either side of the Ukrainian border.
00:43:31.000The question is about NATO, European Union, it's also about this Russian population in eastern Ukraine.
00:43:39.000Strategic resources in Ukraine, as well as the geostrategic map of Europe.
00:43:46.000But the news today, the development here is that America is now claiming that Russia is preparing a false flag attack on their own people in Russia.
00:43:59.000And so, what the American government is claiming is that Russia is going to fake an attack, they're going to edit videos together and they're going to digitally alter video.
00:44:10.000And make it look like Ukraine has attacked Russia.
00:44:13.000And Russia is going to use that as a pretext to invade Ukraine.
00:44:18.000Because one of the big things that goes on here now in these modern wars, in these modern interstate conflicts, is that there has to be a legitimate reason.
00:44:32.000You know, one of the reasons that a lot of countries don't like America anymore is because of America's unilateral involvement in the Iraq War.
00:44:42.000You know, that was very unpopular that America did that in 2003.
00:44:46.000And it was unpopular because a lot of people didn't think there was a valid reason for America to invade.
00:44:51.000America didn't have the support of the UN.
00:44:56.000Christopher Hitchens used to say, oh, well, the UN voted and the Senate voted.
00:45:00.000Well, you know, they say that America didn't have the support of the international community and there wasn't a valid reason.
00:45:07.000And so this is why a lot of the world was against America's war effort.
00:45:12.000So, there's sort of this propaganda war that goes on about whether the war is just or not.
00:45:17.000Like, a lot of people may think this is silly because we know that governments make decisions about strategic interests.
00:45:24.000They make sober, calculated decisions based on things like ports and railways and coal and oil and you name it.
00:45:35.000Ethnic interest lobbies influencing the Capitol.
00:45:39.000That's how states and decision makers within states make decisions.
00:45:44.000That being said, In the information age, it is equally as important to broadcast to the international community, broadcast to the populations of countries and to your own country a story about the war.
00:46:00.000And this has really always been true, but it's especially true now.
00:46:04.000So it's not enough that Russia invades Ukraine because they want the fertile soil.
00:46:10.000It's not enough that they invade Ukraine because they want to control energy.
00:46:14.000It's not enough that they invade Ukraine because Otherwise, Kiev will be brought into the sphere of influence of Brussels and London and Washington, D.C. Russia has to tell a story to Europe and America and the populations in those places that Russia was attacked.
00:46:31.000And so Russia is justified because war is justified if it's in retaliation.
00:46:37.000They're retaliating against the Ukrainians.
00:46:39.000And then it's on America, it's on Western Europe to prove why Russia doesn't have the right to defend themselves.
00:46:49.000Similarly, that was what we were going to do in Syria.
00:46:53.000America created this false flag attack in Syria several times in 2013, in 2017, in 2018, twice in 2018.
00:47:04.000The United States fabricated a chemical weapons attack by the Assad regime again to create a pretext in the international community to the populations of the world for American involvement.
00:47:16.000If America just said, hey, we're going to invade Syria because it's a proxy war with Russia and Russia is going to have this base in the Eastern Mediterranean and we need to destroy the Assad regime because they're helping the enemies of Israel and Lebanon, you know, that wouldn't really fly.
00:47:36.000As then, people would say, oh, so you're a bloodthirsty empire that's killing people so that you could protect your own hegemony, which is true.
00:47:45.000So, America had to come up with a story.
00:47:49.000The U.S. government says that Russia is going to stage this false flag attack, create a justification, and then they're going to invade Ukraine.
00:47:57.000And they gave a really detailed report.
00:48:03.000It says, quote, U.S. officials claim they have evidence of a Russian plan to make a, quote, very graphic.
00:48:10.000Fake video of a Ukrainian attack as a pretext for an invasion.
00:48:15.000The alleged plot would involve using corpses, footage of blown up buildings, fake Ukrainian military hardware, Turkish made drones, and actors playing the part of Russian speaking mourners.
00:48:27.000The Deputy National Security Advisor Jonathan Feiner told MSNBC We don't know definitively that this is the route they are going to take, but we know that this is an option under consideration.
00:48:41.000He added that the video would, quote, involve actors playing mourners for people who are killed in an event that they would have created themselves.
00:48:50.000Finer added, quote, they would involve the deployment of corpses to represent bodies purportedly killed of people purportedly killed in an incident like this.
00:48:59.000The Pentagon spokesman John Kirby said the video would have purported to show a Ukrainian attack on Russian territory or Russian speaking people in eastern Ukraine and would be very graphic.
00:49:10.000He added that the U.S. believed the plan had the backing of the Kremlin.
00:49:15.000He said, Our experience is that very little of this nature is not approved at the highest levels of the Russian government.
00:49:23.000U.S. officials said the video would show Turkish made drones taking part in the fabricated attack as a way of implicating NATO, because Turkey is a NATO member.
00:49:33.000Administration officials said the plan was to use the video as evidence of Ukrainian genocide against Russian speakers to justify Russian military intervention.
00:49:43.000By going public, the U.S. hoped to stall or slow down Moscow's plans.
00:49:47.000Finder said it would, quote, make it much more difficult for them after the fact to claim that they had to do whatever they decided to do.
00:49:54.000The New York Times and Washington Post first published versions of the account given by administration officials, noting that the officials did not provide evidence for the U.S. claims.
00:50:22.000They've laundered this through the Washington Post and the New York Times, and there's no evidence that this is even real.
00:50:29.000And again, it's very interesting that they're doing this because the United States government has used this exact same tactic many times.
00:50:38.000They did this a couple of years ago on the Persian Gulf with Iran when they said that the Iranians were blowing up oil tankers in the Strait of Hormuz, and they said that the Iranians were shooting down drones.
00:50:52.000They did this in Syria, like I said, in 2013, in 2017, in 2018.
00:50:59.000They said that the Assad regime was using illicit chemical weapons.
00:51:04.000You know, on 13, they did that and there was no evidence.
00:51:07.000And the Obama administration, that was their red line.
00:51:13.000And then Trump inaugurated in January 2017.
00:51:18.000And then in April 17, three days after they officially say they're not pursuing regime change in Syria, the following Tuesday, there's a chemical weapons attack.
00:51:29.000And then they're like clockwork the following year, April 2018, another chemical weapons attack.
00:51:34.000And then, again, later that same year, I think in August, another chemical weapons attack.
00:51:40.000Now, there was never any evidence that this was happening.
00:51:43.000There was no evidence in any of these, and these are just like four off the top of my head.
00:51:49.000There was no evidence that Iranians were blowing up these oil tankers.
00:51:54.000Even the companies that owned the oil tankers, it was a Japanese firm and a Norwegian firm.
00:52:00.000Even they came out and said, We have no confidence that this was the Iranians.
00:52:04.000The only evidence was they said, Oh, well, this explosion is consistent with a mine that is sometimes used by the Iranians.
00:52:12.000There was no evidence, but yet they wanted a war over this.
00:52:18.000Years after the fact, an independent body came forward and said there was never any evidence that the Assad regime used illicit chemical weapons in 17 and 18.
00:52:33.000And the only reason they did that was people were going to look at all of these people being gassed to death, children and civilians and women being gassed to death, and say, oh, well, of course America intervened, of course.
00:53:04.000And then Saudi Arabia intervened, and then Iran intervened, and then Russia intervened, and then China jumped in, and America got involved.
00:53:13.000And so Syria became this proxy war for basically every power in the world.
00:53:20.000And all that happened as a consequence when you have a civil war like this, when you have lawlessness, when you have that kind of intrastate violence, it is just hell for everybody living there.
00:53:32.000It became the worst humanitarian disaster in the world for like nine years.
00:53:41.000And, you know, the only reason America was creating these false flag videos and false flag claims was so that they could go in and prolong the fighting because America and America's closest ally, Israel, was directly benefiting from the destabilization.
00:53:58.000They were profiting and benefiting off of the chaos and the misery and the horrors and the bloodshed of a never ending civil war, which was fueled by foreign funding, foreign arms, involvement of foreign governments.
00:54:13.000And they were trying to say, oh, you know, boo hoo, these people got gassed.
00:54:17.000We have to go in and, again, prolong the suffering for our own advantage.
00:56:24.000You're telling me it's plausible that that can happen.
00:56:28.000And if it can happen now, certainly it has been possible before.
00:56:35.000If film has become more sophisticated, if digital technology has become more sophisticated, surely it would be far more difficult to fake something like that today when you have social media and when you have digital technology than it was, say, I don't know, 80 years ago.
00:56:59.000When all the media was controlled, when all the media was created by professionals with extremely expensive equipment and it was very inaccessible to the average person, and the distribution of it was highly centralized and not democratized.
00:57:16.000Yeah, so you're telling me that if anything, it's always been possible for Russia to stage video evidence of a genocide that didn't occur to serve as atrocity propaganda.
00:57:28.000They're saying that this can be done, and perhaps it's always been possible.
00:57:33.000So, we probably can assume then that the American government has done this.
00:57:38.000We can assume then that other governments have done this.
00:57:41.000And we could probably assume this is maybe a go to for governments.
00:57:47.000To me, they're kind of letting the cat out of the bag here with this one.
00:57:51.000Not with anything in particular, but really with anything.
00:57:56.000And that's sort of the interesting thing to me because the claim about things like 9 11 or even Sandy Hook or whatever.
00:58:03.000It's like, look, the government is faking atrocities to elicit an emotional response to justify whatever policy action, which is dramatic, that they wanted in the first place.
00:58:16.000And their response, whenever you claim that, is, oh, you're crazy.
00:58:19.000Oh, the government would never do that.
00:58:20.000Oh, that would be far too complicated.
00:58:30.000Well, now they're admitting this is done, this is possible.
00:58:36.000So, if it's possible, then we can at least entertain the possibility that that's what's going on when there's a mass shooting, when there is a chemical weapons attack in Syria, when there is a revolution, an organic students' revolt in Tehran, right?
00:58:54.000If they're saying that this is something that great powers do, if they're saying that this is technologically possible to achieve, states are willing and able to do this, then that means we have to assume that they have done it.
00:59:08.000That means we have to assume that it is plausible.
00:59:12.000And we have to suspect, whenever there is a mass shooting or anything like that, whenever they're asking for a war over some event, we have to suspect that this is one plausible explanation, that things are not as they seem, and that this is a form of information warfare.
00:59:33.000So, to me, it's very interesting that they would put this out there because this, maybe knowingly, unknowingly, It kind of validates everything that we say.
00:59:43.000It really, and you might not see the relevance there, you know.
00:59:47.000If you're not a very rigorous, logical thinker, you might not get this, you know, because I know any libtard would say, So you're saying that if Russia fakes this video, that means like 9 11 was fake?
01:00:34.000And they're not analyzing the alternative theories that it was, again, that things are not as they seem, that the news media is lying, that.
01:00:44.000That there may be an alternative explanation.
01:00:49.000They're not going through those ideas, not because those ideas are wrong, not because they've gone through and disproved the evidence, but because they assume that that cannot happen.
01:01:01.000They assume that the government could not or would not fake 9 11.
01:01:06.000They assume the government could not or would not stage a mass shooting.
01:01:12.000It's built on an assumption, it's built on a fundamental assumption about either the government's competence.
01:01:19.000Or the good naturedness of the government.
01:01:28.000So, when most people and when journalists and other gatekeepers of information and opinion hand wave away conspiracy theories and they say, oh, that's a conspiracy.
01:02:09.000Of course, the government's not lying.
01:02:11.000So, when the government itself comes out and says that Russia, which is a great power, Russia, which has the second largest conventional military in the world, number one nuclear arsenal, G8 member,
01:02:28.000when the Pentagon says that the Russian government is credible, that the Kremlin, that the highest levels of Russian government is authorizing a false flag attack, that they're going to fake video evidence, they're going to use corpses.
01:02:47.000They're going to pay actors to serve as mourners.
01:02:50.000They're going to digitally alter videos to show Turkish drones to implicate NATO.
01:02:55.000When they say that the Russian government can do that and is planning to do that, and it was authorized by the Kremlin, they're saying we can no longer assume that governments can't or don't or won't do false flags.
01:03:09.000What they're saying is that 9 11 being staged by the government is just as plausible or is plausible even.
01:03:18.000As an explanation, they're saying that Las Vegas, we can no longer assume that our government could not or would not stage that for some ulterior motive.
01:05:15.000Think about American citizens having guns.
01:05:18.000Think about the fact that there are 400 million guns in America.
01:05:23.000Think about the fact that this is the most armed population in the world.
01:05:27.000You think that the CIA and the American military, the Pentagon, and the intelligence community don't consider the fact that the Trump base, which is an open revolt against Washington, D.C., is armed with semi automatic rifles and handguns and all kinds of other military provisions?
01:05:49.000You think that they don't think about the security posture of the U.S. government and that doesn't factor in?
01:05:54.000You think that they don't think about How that is going to be a huge complication and a huge wrinkle if they ever had to secure the American homeland?
01:06:07.000If you're the American military and your goal, according to the Constitution, is to secure the homeland against enemies, foreign and domestic, and you see the Trump Revolution and the Tea Party, and you see these conservatives and you see the come and take it, the mole and lay, the don't tread on me, the firearms, all of that, the trucks, the semi trucks, the pickup trucks, the farms, the Clive and Bundy ranch,
01:06:35.000You think that they don't see all of that and think about the domestic security posture of the American government?
01:06:41.000Anything that there's no policy objective?
01:06:43.000Just like Russia wants to secure Kiev against NATO, you think that there's no interest for the Pentagon to secure America against the gun toting, Bible thumping conservatives?
01:07:11.000Because it blows the lid on how this government has operated for 100 years.
01:07:20.000Create an atrocity, and it doesn't matter.
01:07:22.000Oh, well, that was Russia in Ukraine for a war.
01:07:25.000And there's literally no difference between America doing that in Orlando or doing that in Las Vegas for their own policy goal, or doing that in, or not Orlando, where was the Parkland shooting in Broward County?
01:07:42.000Or in Connecticut, or in New York City, or in Syria.
01:09:14.000And that's not to say that everything that happens is a conspiracy, but it is to say that at least everything that happens could be a conspiracy.
01:09:21.000And so, why wouldn't we entertain that?
01:09:25.000Wouldn't that be kind of relevant before we get into a war with Iran?
01:09:29.000Wouldn't that be a little bit relevant to know?
01:09:32.000Isn't it worth knowing before we get into a war in Syria?
01:09:40.000Wouldn't that be worth knowing before we go into war in Afghanistan?
01:09:43.000Would that be worth knowing before we ban all the guns or we expand the power of the surveillance state or federal law enforcement before we give the IRS and the EPA and every other federal agency their own SWAT teams?
01:09:59.000You know, wouldn't that be good to know?
01:10:01.000And it's like these leftists, it's like they want to be raped by the government.
01:10:05.000It's like these left wing morons, you know, they turn their noses up at so called conspiracy theorists and they think people like me are crazy.
01:10:12.000What, is it just that fashionable to be raped to death by the government?
01:10:45.000Sorry, I didn't realize that was so liberal and so cool and fashionable.
01:10:50.000You know, you think about these people on like Saturday Night Live, which is like the epitome of smug, like faggot liberals, like that lesbian.
01:10:59.000Who's that smug lesbian who's on that show who's not even funny?
01:11:06.000You know, she's just such a clown, such a smug, uppity, you know, liberal clown.
01:11:13.000And I think about things like Saturday Night Live or these other journalists or people in the media, and they're the epitome of like smug, know it all, arrogant liberals.
01:11:24.000And they're, you know, and they're singing hallelujah for Hillary Clinton and all this kind of stuff.
01:11:30.000And it's like, what you're supporting is genocide, what you're supporting is like the intelligence community.
01:11:38.000Slaughtering people in false flag attacks so that Lockheed Martin can make more money on building missiles and bombs to kill innocent people, and so that Israel, which is this power which is spreading its tentacles all across the world, can increase its size and influence so that the American government and American capital can become more powerful.
01:12:09.000What are you so smug about, you stupid bitch?
01:14:27.000Guys kissing guys, we just love everybody, and we just love each other, and we love black people.
01:14:33.000And we just don't be an asshole, man, don't be a freaking fascist, man.
01:14:39.000And then they vote for the Manchurian candidate, then they then they vote for then they literally vote for American tanks to run over, uh, you know, Yemeni children's skulls for the Jews.
01:14:55.000That's literally, they could say, Oh, you're a Nazi, but that's like, okay, that's what it is.
01:15:02.000So, anyway, now I'm just rambling, but that's the State Department.
01:15:06.000That's a pretty shocking revelation that they're accusing Russia of doing this when that's what they do, and they're essentially admitting that that's what they do.
01:15:54.000But I watch the show, and they're so smug and they're so unfunny.
01:15:58.000And they're just, they're the epitome of this unthinking, these unthinking, useful idiots for the regime.
01:16:07.000I mean, they are just tab dancing and clowning around for the regime.
01:16:11.000You know, they come on the air and they do this, you know, political thing where they make fun of Republicans and everyone cheers for them.
01:17:25.000It's like, you know, those signs that people have in their lawn that say, like, in this house, we believe that Black Lives Matter and gay people rule and women are human beings.
01:19:42.000And just when you think you understand, they throw you for a loop because there's so much deception, there's so many lies, there's so many layers of subterfuge.
01:19:52.000And where it starts is taking the red pill and realizing at the minimum it's all lie.
01:19:57.000Trying to understand it is very difficult, but at the minimum, taking the red pill is realizing things are not as they seem.
01:24:22.000So, if the demons and if the devil are infinitely smarter than us and they're all over and they're more powerful than us and everything, you think that you're going to outsmart them?
01:24:31.000You think that without the Holy Spirit, you think that without your guardian angel, without the saints and the church, you think you're going to outsmart them?
01:24:55.000So, there's some humility involved in this.
01:25:00.000You've got to recognize we're created, we're human beings, we have a limited intellect, and there's a war going on for our souls.
01:25:07.000And the only way we're going to stay safe, the only way we're going to be able to do the right thing is if we put on the armor of God and if we have God's grace.
01:25:16.000The devil can't compete with God, the devil can't even stand in God's presence.
01:25:21.000You know, the devil exists because God allows him to.
01:25:25.000And if we ask for God's power, you know, we human beings, created beings, can beat back evil, what they say, principalities and kingdoms.
01:28:17.000So, anyway, I could go insane talking about this.
01:28:20.000And whenever I get on this subject, I totally go off the rails.
01:28:23.000I don't know if you noticed this, but whenever I get into this conspiracy theory idea, I go off the rails because this is the red pill.
01:28:29.000This is like taking the red pill and waking up in a fucking vat, and the whole world is run by robots and they're using you as a human battery.
01:28:37.000Like, that's how consequential this is.
01:28:40.000That's how consequential that idea is.
01:31:45.000They were put there by TV, they were put there by marketing, they were put there by your peers or your family or other influences, culture.
01:31:55.000And so, who is the architect of your mind?
01:35:44.000First, besides childhood trauma, it sounds like the big hang up here is that it would be risky and unwise to let a stranger stream sports content on your platform.
01:38:27.000Yeah, let me take a leap of faith on somebody that has no following, makes no content, has never made content, and streams something that I personally don't even like.
01:40:08.000Maybe in the future, when we open it up to everybody, You can start a channel when everybody can.
01:40:15.000Or, hey, here's an idea start a channel on Trovo, start a channel on DLive, start a channel on Twitch or YouTube, build up a following, and then if your content is good, then you can come on Cozy.
01:45:05.000It's true because there are some people that just want to show up and that's it.
01:45:11.000They want to show up, they roll their eyes, they bitch and moan, and they're paid, and they're paid, and they go home, and that's that.
01:45:24.000And then there are some people that are going to be the engine that drives the world forward, and they are going to create, and they're going to be the author of the future.
01:45:38.000And those people deserve to be influential.
01:45:41.000And we want those people to be in charge.
01:45:44.000And the people that don't want to do those things, they want those people to be in charge so that they can have nice things like technology and art and they can make money in a low risk way and have job security.
01:53:51.000See, everybody, whenever anyone compliments my looks, they either say, oh, you're a fake cell, or oh, it's a guy complimenting you, so you're gay.
01:54:01.000Yeah, well, it turns out it was neither, okay?
01:55:36.000Wonder Pets Patriots is either by becoming too big or a political assassination, one day super chats and perhaps even this format of live stream will come to an end.
01:55:47.000So anyone wanting to immortalize their message and thoughts or just have access to Nick for just $3 needs to cough it up while they can.
02:02:20.000Why don't you get your song together, pal?
02:02:23.000He says, The moment I tune into my first episode in months, Nick glares at the screen and with an ominous voice says, It's happening to me.
02:11:54.000Humongous Blungus has just watched John Doyle's video on MLK and his movement.
02:11:59.000He mentioned the riots in Chicago, and it reminded me of the time you said your grandpa had to literally camp outside the city as that occurred.
02:13:24.000In every Wignat group chat, every Wignat social circle, they have like a queen bee, like an e girl that they all orbit around and sort of like do her bidding.
02:14:40.000If you want me to have a wife and kids, you're going to have to put a woman in front of me and she's going to have to slap me across the face.
02:14:48.000Because otherwise, it's just not going to happen.
02:14:54.000And then you people are like, Nick, I need relationship advice.
02:28:56.000So, I'd be very excited if he were streaming on Cozy.
02:29:00.000I don't know if he'd want to be associated with me, though, because he's kind of doing, to be fair, he is doing this thing where I was thinking about this today.
02:29:19.000A lot of people that were involved in the online right wing five years ago are now trying to distance themselves from that and say, oh, you know, I was just misguided.
02:33:15.000I didn't really do anything with school in college.
02:33:19.000And I didn't go to any parties or anything.
02:33:22.000So, Lil Ass Hair says Hey, Nick, do you think the Canadian government will send agents in with a trucker convoy to cause some form of chaos and use that as a reason to shut them down, especially with the military action?
02:33:50.000And your rhetoric I find so robust that even when I try taking an hour to think of ways to be critical, I could only conjure things far out in the periphery.
02:33:58.000As such, I imagine you are probably your own best critic, and I'd like to know if you're willing to share what sort of criticisms you have given yourself in the past and who broadly, who else has given you the best criticism.
02:36:06.000I also can be a little bit dysfunctional because I do have a really bad temper and I sometimes do things that are impulsive because I get very irritable.
02:38:52.000Mosley says similar to the Russian false flag versus American false flag thing is the Russian election interference versus completely legitimate and possible that it was stolen.
02:43:56.000Listen, whites, blacks, Jews, you know, hey, listen, listen.
02:44:01.000When they're not, you know, when they're not trying to take me off the internet, you know, when they're not trying to ruin my life, hey, sometimes, sometimes that happens.
02:44:09.000I know at least a few that are not trying to ruin my life actively.
02:48:39.000So speaking of votes, don't you just love how your vote counts as much as the secretary or scaredy cat ass nigga driving around by himself with a mask on?
02:50:02.000Well, my junior year, I went with this girl because we were friends in Model UN and she wanted a date and I wanted to go because it was at Navy Pier and it was fun.
02:50:16.000And then my senior year, I had to go with the date because I was like the student council president.
02:50:21.000I wasn't going to not go with the date.
02:50:24.000And I was literally had no one to ask.
02:50:26.000I was like the last person to ask someone out.
02:50:30.000And so I had to ask, like the other girl wasn't asked out.
02:50:33.000She was actually pretty, blonde, tall.
02:50:40.000But whatever, okay, I'm still an incel, so shut up.
02:50:45.000We didn't do anything, and it wasn't a date, so.
02:50:57.000Stop trying to undermine my incel status.
03:04:19.000Modern Monarchist says the snow is perfect to hide poo.
03:04:24.000You see, when the snow melts, it leaves calcified poo cemented on the lawn, causing massive, disruptive lifestyle changes in your neighbor's health.
03:06:39.000And I remember listening to that as a kid and thinking, you know, imagine not having your father.
03:06:45.000And, you know, so I always thought about that.
03:06:48.000And that's why I really, my whole life, I've always appreciated my time with my family because I've always had in the back of my head, like, you know, clocks ticking.
03:08:13.000Do you know what a pain in the ass it is for me to be working so hard every day to deliver total Aryan victories and you people are fighting over stupid garbage on the internet and I have to hear about, Harris Walker said this, someone said this on Discord.
03:12:00.000A lifetime of suffering, a lifetime of suffering and being an alien, and I had to do what I had to do one time, and now you call me a fake cell.
03:16:53.000I didn't become the UN ambassador from India to the Economic and Finance Committee if I wasn't willing to die for my country.
03:17:02.000If I wasn't willing to kiss the Chinese delegate for my country to seal the deal, to pass a resolution on nuclear energy and economic development.
03:19:15.000What would it have been like if I'm in this double delegation and the senior asked this girl out and I'm just like writing resolutions or something?