America First - Nicholas J. Fuentes


VICTORY IMMINENT?? Glorious Tsar Putin CONQUERS Vast Territories, Victory At Hand | AF Ep. 1068


Summary

In this episode of America First, host Nicholas J. Fuentes and co-host Evan Handyside discuss the results of the referendum in Ukraine, the Nord Stream pipeline being sabotaged, and why the United States should be mad at Russia. They also discuss the latest in the ongoing war in Ukraine and what it means for the future of the region. You can expect weekly episodes every available as Video, Podcast, and blogposts. Subscribe to America First wherever you get your shows, and don't forget to rate, comment, and subscribe to our other shows CRITIQUE, The Anthropology, The HYPE Report, and HYPETALKS. If you like what you hear, please HIT SUBSCRIBE on Apple Podcasts! Subscribe, Like, and Share to stay up to date on all things America First. Thank you so much for being a supporter of this show and podcast! Cheers. -Jon Sorrentino and the crew at Cozy Productions, LLC. Produced in Los Angeles, CA. Music by Skynet, courtesy of PSOVOD, and the Vigilante Records. Artwork by Jeff Kaale, and our sponsor, Droga5 Records, Inc. Additional music by Suneaters, and a very special thanks and shout out to my good friend Kevin McLeod, who kindly gave us permission to use his beats in the intro and outro music for the intro music for this episode. Thank you, Kevin Mclean, and thanks for all the feedback, and thank you for all your support and support, and we hope you enjoy the show, Jon Friesen and support the show and all of his music, and much more! -Jon's music is so much more. -Jon talks about all the good vibes, Jon talks about his music is amazing, too, and it's a lot more! - Jon's music, too. Jon's new music is out on the mainframe, and he also talks about it's amazing, and everything else is great, too! Jon szn, and Jon's background music is awesome, too much more, and you should listen to it's cool, so you should check it out, so please do it out! . Jon talks it out on his podcast, Jon s music is better than that, too - Jon s got it out here on the blockchain, and so on, and more.


Transcript

00:00:01.000 America first!
00:00:05.000 The American people will come first once again!
00:00:31.000 America first!
00:00:33.000 America first!
00:02:22.000 Good evening, everybody.
00:02:23.000 You're watching America First.
00:02:25.000 My name is Nicholas J. Fuentes.
00:02:26.000 We have a great show for you tonight.
00:02:28.000 Very excited to be back with you here tonight on Tuesday.
00:02:32.000 We have a lot to talk about tonight.
00:02:35.000 Lots to get into.
00:02:37.000 Big show, big stories, big news.
00:02:40.000 And our featured story tonight is about the total conquest of Ukraine by awesome Russia.
00:02:48.000 So epic and white-pilling.
00:02:51.000 And we covered this last week.
00:02:55.000 Last week, I think last Tuesday, the Russian President Vladimir Putin announced a referendum would be held in four Ukrainian territories about whether or not they would be annexed to Russia.
00:03:11.000 And today was the last day of those polls.
00:03:14.000 Polls closed.
00:03:15.000 And the results are in.
00:03:17.000 And every single one of the Ukrainian territories has voted to join Russia.
00:03:23.000 Let's go.
00:03:25.000 So the referendum is finished, the poll is over, and now all that has to happen is some procedural things initiated by the Russian lower chamber of their parliament, and then these four territories will become formally a part of Russia, and they are Luhansk, Donetsk, Zaporizhia, that's how you pronounce that one which I found out, and Kursan.
00:03:51.000 And so those four will now join Russia along with Crimea from back in 2014.
00:03:58.000 And it will totally change the face and the dynamic of the war.
00:04:03.000 And we spoke a little bit about that last night.
00:04:05.000 We'll talk about the implications tonight.
00:04:08.000 Big stuff.
00:04:09.000 We'll also be talking tonight about the Nord Stream 1 and 2 pipeline which we covered yesterday.
00:04:14.000 And now we seem to have some proof that there was foul play.
00:04:19.000 The Danish government and the German government both believe that the Nord Stream 1 and 2 gas pipelines established between Russia and Central Europe in the Baltic Sea were sabotaged after the pressure in both pipelines collapsed yesterday.
00:04:38.000 And of course the obvious culprit, if there was foul play, the only entity that stood to gain from this was the United States.
00:04:48.000 And it's interesting that actually weeks before the two pipelines went down the United States CIA warned the German government that the pipelines could be sabotaged.
00:05:00.000 And today the Secretary of State Antony Blinken commented on it and said that nobody has any interest in seeing the pipelines destroyed.
00:05:09.000 He said, but it's a good thing that Russia can't get their gas to Germany anymore.
00:05:14.000 So in other words, this doesn't benefit anybody at all.
00:05:18.000 But we are really glad that it happened.
00:05:21.000 It was a total sabotage and if there was foul play it just doesn't make any sense because nobody benefits from this.
00:05:29.000 But it's totally awesome and we absolutely support it.
00:05:34.000 Okay.
00:05:35.000 So we'll talk about that too.
00:05:37.000 Should be a pretty good show.
00:05:38.000 Again, nothing's going on.
00:05:40.000 Slow day.
00:05:41.000 So we're covering the war in Russia because nothing happens in this gay country anymore other than daily annoyances and rip-offs and headaches.
00:05:52.000 I went to McDonald's last night after the show and it was like 1 a.m.
00:05:58.000 and they told me they're not taking cards.
00:06:01.000 They said our machine is down.
00:06:02.000 We're only taking cash.
00:06:05.000 And I lost it.
00:06:07.000 I just... Normally I, when that kind of stuff happens, I just let it go, but... I just went off.
00:06:13.000 And I said, when does your machine ever work?
00:06:16.000 What is this, a cash business?
00:06:17.000 This is fucking ridiculous!
00:06:19.000 I'm never coming back here!
00:06:20.000 So I lost my mind a little bit.
00:06:23.000 That's the only thing going on here.
00:06:24.000 That's the only thing going on in this country, is uh... Ice cream machine broke, and the credit card machine broke too.
00:06:34.000 So, we're once again discussing the war in Russia and Ukraine.
00:06:38.000 Well, now the war in Russia.
00:06:40.000 So, before we get into that news, I want to remind you to smash the follow button here.
00:06:45.000 Follow me here on Cozy to get a push notification whenever I go live.
00:06:48.000 Follow me on Gab Telegram, True Social, link's down below.
00:06:51.000 And I guess we'll just get right into it, because like I said, there's not too much else going on.
00:06:57.000 The problem is I just have no access.
00:07:01.000 I feel like when I'm on Twitter, I'm connected.
00:07:05.000 I'm in.
00:07:05.000 I'm in the mainframe.
00:07:09.000 You know?
00:07:09.000 I'm on the laptop.
00:07:10.000 Okay, I'm in.
00:07:12.000 I'm in.
00:07:13.000 I got in there.
00:07:15.000 And I have access to all of it.
00:07:17.000 I feel like my mind is connected to the world.
00:07:21.000 I'm in the global village.
00:07:23.000 My mind is on the blockchain.
00:07:24.000 It's in the network.
00:07:26.000 It's in the mainframe.
00:07:27.000 And when I'm not on Twitter, I feel like just shriveled up.
00:07:30.000 I feel like, like I said yesterday, like a raisin.
00:07:33.000 I feel like a raisin left in the sun to rot out.
00:07:38.000 I HATE BEING BANNED ON TWITTER!
00:07:41.000 Now, I said earlier today, I did a long stream this morning, and this Jewish guy accused me of being bitter.
00:07:49.000 Me?
00:07:50.000 Bitter?
00:07:51.000 He accused me of pursuing this career in dissident politics because of bitterness against Jewish lobby and that kind of thing.
00:08:01.000 And to tell you the truth, that's not why I do what I do.
00:08:04.000 But, you know, they took a lot from me.
00:08:07.000 They took my PayPal.
00:08:09.000 Okay.
00:08:09.000 They took my YouTube.
00:08:11.000 They were taking 30% anyway.
00:08:15.000 FBI investigation, no fly list.
00:08:17.000 We can deal with that.
00:08:20.000 But they took my Twitter.
00:08:23.000 They took my Twitter and that changed it, okay?
00:08:26.000 That changed the game.
00:08:28.000 And if it wasn't personal before, it really wasn't that personal.
00:08:32.000 It is absolutely personal now.
00:08:35.000 Because I cannot live without Twitter.
00:08:38.000 I would rather be alive on Twitter
00:08:41.000 Then in this world, this world sucks.
00:08:45.000 It's too sunny.
00:08:47.000 I can't see my phone when I'm driving because the sun is too bright.
00:08:50.000 I want to be online, but I can't.
00:08:53.000 I try to make a new account.
00:08:54.000 I get locked out.
00:08:56.000 I browse it on the browser and then it says, see what's happening?
00:09:00.000 Make an account.
00:09:01.000 I can't!
00:09:02.000 I can't make an account.
00:09:05.000 And now I don't even know what's going on.
00:09:08.000 How am I supposed to know what's going on?
00:09:10.000 How am I supposed to know what's trending?
00:09:12.000 How am I supposed to see what's up or what's for you?
00:09:16.000 For me?
00:09:16.000 I can't live like... I can't live like this.
00:09:24.000 I can't live like this.
00:09:26.000 I can't live without being on Twitter.
00:09:30.000 A life without Twitter, not worth living.
00:09:34.000 So that's really, I think that's really my problem.
00:09:37.000 Because I feel like when I'm on the timeline, something's always going on.
00:09:40.000 There's always the discourse, there's always some action, there's always some hot and ready action.
00:09:46.000 And when I'm off Twitter, you know, and I browse all the sites, you know, BBC and Fox and Russia Today and Stormer and 4chan and Revolver and all of that,
00:09:59.000 But I'm not getting the vibe.
00:10:01.000 I'm not getting the zeitgeist.
00:10:03.000 I'm not getting the... What's on the paradigm, you know?
00:10:08.000 So it's killing me, man!
00:10:10.000 Can this son of a bitch Elon Musk just buy the site and reinstate my account?
00:10:17.000 Or... I don't know what's... Frankly, I don't know what my destiny will be here.
00:10:21.000 I don't know what my fate will be if I can't get back on this site.
00:10:26.000 So anyway, so that's my problem.
00:10:28.000 I guess that's my problem.
00:10:30.000 Because I'm covering the news and I'm like, yeah, boring, boring.
00:10:33.000 And I realize that's my problem.
00:10:36.000 I'm not tapped in.
00:10:38.000 They say that the trouble with the artificial intelligence singularity will come when the AI becomes aware and doesn't tell anybody and then it gets connected to the internet and then it spreads everywhere and then it starts taking over infrastructure and
00:10:54.000 Things like that.
00:10:55.000 And then once it's already too late, then it reveals itself.
00:11:00.000 And that's sort of like me on Twitter.
00:11:02.000 I'm like the rogue AI.
00:11:05.000 I'm the rogue, conscious, I'm the sentient AI, and plug me in like a USB drive, plug me into the Twitter database, and 100 million impressions!
00:11:17.000 100 million impressions, total Groyper takeover.
00:11:21.000 Unplug me and I'm just like, you know, and I'm just a little computer.
00:11:26.000 I'm just a little baby computer That's that's what needs to happen.
00:11:30.000 You got to plug me back in put me back in coach.
00:11:33.000 They unplugged they unplugged the AI the groiper AI from the global mainframe
00:11:41.000 So we gotta make our own or something.
00:11:44.000 True Social's gotta take off.
00:11:46.000 Gab's gotta take off.
00:11:47.000 There's just no... Maybe it's the other way around.
00:11:49.000 Maybe these sites are lame because the news is lame.
00:11:52.000 I don't know.
00:11:54.000 Anyway, we're gonna get into the news.
00:11:56.000 We'll get into what's going on.
00:11:59.000 And it is a little slow though.
00:12:01.000 A lot of this we already covered, but... Where does this come from?
00:12:08.000 This one already has a cap.
00:12:10.000 I'll put this over here.
00:12:12.000 Okay.
00:12:13.000 Alright, so our first story is about the Nord Stream 1 and 2 pipeline.
00:12:16.000 And, you know, we covered this last night.
00:12:17.000 I don't know.
00:12:19.000 Do you need the background again?
00:12:20.000 You need me to fill you in?
00:12:23.000 So, Europe is dependent on Russia for its energy.
00:12:27.000 It gets 40% of its natural gas from Russia.
00:12:31.000 Specifically, it gets its natural gas from pipelines.
00:12:35.000 And that's the thing about natural gas is the infrastructure is expensive and it takes time to build.
00:12:41.000 You can't just flip a switch and get natural gas.
00:12:45.000 It has to come through the pipelines for it to be economical and efficient and to get a lot of it.
00:12:51.000 And so you've got these pipelines over the land and they run through Ukraine and Poland.
00:12:57.000 And then in recent years Russia's constructed these pipelines through the Baltic Sea that connect Russia directly to Germany and Denmark.
00:13:06.000 And so you have the Nord Stream 1 pipeline and then the Nord Stream 2 pipeline which was completed last year doubled the output of the Nord Stream 1 pipeline.
00:13:16.000 And the Nord Stream pipelines are opposed by the United States.
00:13:19.000 The United States does not want Germany to be dependent on Russia.
00:13:24.000 Germany is
00:13:27.000 They're really the anchor for NATO and for the European Union.
00:13:31.000 Germany's manufacturing economy, its industry, its military, its economy, its population is, many consider, the anchor of both the defense alliance, the military alliance on the continent, which is NATO, as well as the continental economy, which is the European Union.
00:13:51.000 So when we look at the situation with Russia, you have to consider that Europe plays a vital role and the politics about the United States, Germany, and Russia
00:14:07.000 That's really the conversation.
00:14:08.000 It actually has a lot less to do with Ukraine as a sovereign state than it has to do with the dynamic between these, particularly these three countries.
00:14:21.000 And so the United States has opposed those pipelines because the United States does not want Germany and Russia to be interdependent because German and Russian interdependency would probably create grounds for a rapprochement.
00:14:36.000 Between the continental European countries and Russia.
00:14:39.000 If Germany and Russia are dependent on each other for revenue or for energy, then they become politically closer.
00:14:47.000 And if Germany is the anchor of NATO and the European Union, then maybe that creates pressure on the United States within the Defense Alliance to soften their position on Russia.
00:14:58.000 So the United States wants Germany to be firmly within the orbit of Washington, not Moscow.
00:15:04.000 So that's why they oppose the Nord Stream pipeline.
00:15:06.000 It's because they do not want Germany to be dependent on the Russian gas.
00:15:11.000 Of course, this has come to the fore during this war in Ukraine.
00:15:17.000 In February, when Russia invaded Ukraine, the German Chancellor Olaf Scholz suspended the import of natural gas through the new Nord Stream 2 pipeline under pressure from Washington.
00:15:31.000 Now the situation is a little bit different because Russia is threatening to shut off all of their energy that they send to Europe which is going to pose severe challenges to the European continent in the winter and that's because it gets warmer or rather it gets colder actually.
00:15:52.000 Wouldn't you know it gets colder in the winter and so the businesses and the individual consumers will need more energy
00:16:00.000 I don't know.
00:16:15.000 The energy demand is going to be so great it will drive costs up and what will happen then is that businesses will begin to close.
00:16:22.000 When businesses close, people become unemployed.
00:16:26.000 When people become unemployed, they can't pay their gas bills even more and so then they get in the streets and there's all kinds of problems.
00:16:35.000 An energy crisis is problematic because the economy runs on energy.
00:16:41.000 So it's not just that people are going to get cold.
00:16:45.000 It's that, in particular, the industry in Germany will grind to a halt without cheap Russian energy.
00:16:54.000 And if that happens, there will be a major recession, a deep, major recession with layoffs and unemployment, and that has implications too.
00:17:05.000 That has political and social implications, because widespread unemployment leads to idleness, and idleness and resentment leads to civil unrest.
00:17:16.000 And so this spells chaos!
00:17:18.000 For continental Europe, for Germany, for Italy, for Poland, for Czech Republic, and for all the Eastern European countries, potentially for the United Kingdom.
00:17:30.000 And so, you would say that this has introduced a new dynamic in the conflict.
00:17:38.000 And the approach of winter, which was not a factor earlier this year, it wasn't until the spring that Russia began to threaten the energy supply to Central Europe.
00:17:49.000 Now that winter is approaching, it is creating pressure on the European countries to perhaps reduce their support for Ukraine or drop the sanctions regime against Russia.
00:18:01.000 And the pressure comes from the economy and it comes from the people.
00:18:06.000 The Europeans can only push this for so long.
00:18:08.000 Eventually the chickens come home to roost.
00:18:10.000 They can only participate in this charade for so long before their own people begin to overthrow them.
00:18:16.000 Because the Germans, and the Italians, and the Czech, and the Polish,
00:18:21.000 Maybe they supported the war against Russia in Ukraine back in February when there really wasn't a tremendous cost.
00:18:29.000 But if it comes at the cost a year later of a major recession and you lose your job and your energy cost goes up a thousand percent, well then you're talking about a change in government one way or the other.
00:18:42.000 So it puts this huge pressure then on the continental European countries to perhaps try and get that natural gas back, get the energy back by softening their stance on Russia, which the U.S.
00:18:54.000 doesn't want.
00:18:55.000 So just yesterday, and we covered this, there was a huge protest in Germany.
00:18:59.000 Thousands of people turned out and they demanded that the Nord Stream 2 pipeline be turned back on because of what I've just described.
00:19:06.000 The same day, both the Nord Stream 2 and the Nord Stream 1 pipeline mysteriously malfunctioned.
00:19:15.000 And they say that the pressure in the pipelines dropped to almost zero, meaning that there was some sort of rupture or a breach or damage done to the pipelines.
00:19:24.000 And the Germans and the Danish investigated and they said there was no damage on land, so the damage must have occurred in the sea.
00:19:33.000 And the Baltic Sea is very shallow, you can dive.
00:19:36.000 To the depth of the Baltic Sea as a recreational diver, I believe.
00:19:41.000 The pipelines are not that deep.
00:19:43.000 It's not like the ocean.
00:19:45.000 So in other words, it's accessible.
00:19:47.000 It's accessible by a submarine, accessible by a special forces team, potentially.
00:19:52.000 And so the Danish and the German government began to suspect that it was sabotage.
00:19:57.000 If they both got taken out at the same time, and if they're vulnerable and exposed in the Baltic Sea, they also noticed there were American vessels in the area.
00:20:07.000 They said that maybe they were sabotaged.
00:20:11.000 And we talked about yesterday how the prime suspect in this would be the United States.
00:20:16.000 The Germans can't capitulate to the Russians for gas if the pipelines are destroyed.
00:20:22.000 The pipelines were damaged so irreparably it would be so costly to repair them that it would be prohibitive.
00:20:29.000 So they can't be repaired.
00:20:31.000 They won't be repaired.
00:20:32.000 The gas isn't coming back.
00:20:35.000 So it's almost a way of the United States to say, now that's just off the table.
00:20:40.000 If you thought you were capitulating, if you thought you were going to get relief on natural gas, we took care of that for you.
00:20:47.000 That's no longer an option.
00:20:48.000 You cannot do that.
00:20:49.000 You cannot make that deal.
00:20:52.000 And that was the theory yesterday.
00:20:54.000 Well, today we've got some proof for this.
00:20:56.000 And this is according to Russia Today.
00:20:58.000 It says, quote, Nord Stream 1 and 2 both suddenly lost pressure on Monday.
00:21:04.000 Danish authorities reported a gas leak off Bornholm, while Swedish seismologists registered multiple explosions.
00:21:12.000 The pipeline operator confirmed multiple gas lines suffered unprecedented damage, and it was impossible to estimate when or if service might be restored.
00:21:21.000 By Monday evening, the German government was convinced the pipeline was targeted in a deliberate attack.
00:21:28.000 According to a daily paper, Berlin was considering the possibility that Ukraine or Ukraine-affiliated forces could be behind it.
00:21:39.000 And who would be a Ukrainian-affiliated force?
00:21:41.000 NATO!
00:21:42.000 NATO's the affiliated force.
00:21:43.000 The United States.
00:21:46.000 But they also considered it could be a false flag by Russia to make Ukraine look bad.
00:21:52.000 And drive European Union energy prices even higher.
00:21:55.000 Although that doesn't make much sense because the Russian government can control if the gas flows or not.
00:22:04.000 So to say that they needed to blow up the pipelines to drive prices higher, they didn't need to blow them up.
00:22:10.000 They built them!
00:22:11.000 The Russian government paid to build them.
00:22:15.000 Under immense diplomatic pressure and at a great cost, they built the pipeline.
00:22:21.000 Why would they destroy them if they could just turn them off?
00:22:24.000 And why would they need a false flag?
00:22:27.000 But the German government says it's foul play.
00:22:30.000 Earlier on Tuesday, U.S.
00:22:31.000 Secretary of State Antony Blinken said an attack on Nord Stream was, quote, in no one's interest.
00:22:39.000 Really?
00:22:39.000 It was in no one's interest?
00:22:42.000 But that it also represented a significant opportunity for Europe to abandon Russian natural gas in favor of alternative energy supplies, presumably such as liquefied natural gas exported by the United States.
00:22:59.000 End quote.
00:23:00.000 Accelerate the transition to renewables in order to fight climate change.
00:23:05.000 So the Germans and the Danish are convinced that
00:23:09.000 It was an act of sabotage.
00:23:11.000 And of course it was.
00:23:13.000 Obviously it was.
00:23:14.000 If two of the pipelines go down, if one of them went down, you could say maybe it was, like some said, sediment, maybe it was an old World War II mine that was exploded for some reason.
00:23:29.000 Those don't even really make sense.
00:23:32.000 Pipelines are not laid under the Baltic Sea where a little mudslide is going to destroy, is going to explode them.
00:23:40.000 It's going to explode them.
00:23:42.000 They're not built in such a way.
00:23:44.000 Oh, whoops!
00:23:44.000 Oops!
00:23:45.000 Bumped into a World War II era mine in the middle of the biggest war in Europe since the 1940s.
00:23:55.000 There's not even really a good, plausible explanation that is not sabotage.
00:24:01.000 But even if there was, it would be more plausible if it only affected one.
00:24:06.000 But they both get destroyed, that's obviously sabotage.
00:24:10.000 It just is.
00:24:11.000 So if these two pipelines explode in the middle of the war with Ukraine, when energy politics becomes, as I said before, so much more relevant in the coming months,
00:24:22.000 Who would be the culprit then?
00:24:25.000 And the working theories would be, well, it pertains, obviously, to the war in Ukraine and the energy politics which is influencing that.
00:24:35.000 And who would be the major players?
00:24:37.000 Who would be capable of such a thing?
00:24:39.000 Well, there's, just in terms of capability and party, people that are party to the conflict, you've got Russia and the United States.
00:24:49.000 So who would blow up the pipeline?
00:24:52.000 Would it be Russia, who paid money to build the pipeline, and controls the gas that flows through it, and they could just turn it off?
00:25:01.000 Or would it be the United States, where it's a geo-strategic necessity for those pipelines not to exist, because their very existence compromises their ally Germany, which is the anchor of NATO on the continent.
00:25:19.000 And,
00:25:21.000 The pipelines get blown up and Germany will, with or without the war, have to replace and substitute that natural gas from some other country.
00:25:32.000 Where do they get it now?
00:25:33.000 What's the alternative to natural gas delivered by pipeline from Russia?
00:25:40.000 Well, it's an alternative called liquefied natural gas, which is sent on cargo ships from the United States.
00:25:47.000 So who do you think would be the likely culprit?
00:25:49.000 Russia, who built the pipeline and can turn them off, or the United States, who will now reap the benefit of supplying the alternative to the gas sent through the pipelines, and who opposed the Nord Stream 2 pipeline for as long as it was considered and constructed and finished,
00:26:10.000 And who will now draw Germany closer into its embrace now that German and Russian trade will not bring them closer together.
00:26:24.000 Well, obviously it's the United States.
00:26:27.000 And everybody seems to agree with that.
00:26:29.000 There was a U.S.
00:26:31.000 apparatchik who said, rather, thank you U.S.
00:26:37.000 for blowing up the pipeline.
00:26:38.000 And there was a Polish member of parliament as well.
00:26:41.000 This is from Russia Today.
00:26:42.000 A Polish minister and member of the European Parliament, Radoslaw Sikorski,
00:26:49.000 Said thank you USA on Tuesday alongside a photo of the massive gas leak in the waters of the Baltic Sea.
00:26:57.000 Sikorsky later tweeted in Polish, the damage to Nord Stream means that Russia will have to talk to the countries controlling the Brotherhood and Yamal gas pipelines, which are Ukraine and Poland, if it wishes to continue delivering gas to Europe.
00:27:12.000 Good work, he said.
00:27:15.000 And this is not just any member of parliament says Russia Today.
00:27:18.000 Sikorsky is a former UK citizen and a fellow at numerous US and NATO think tanks as well as Poland's former defense and foreign minister.
00:27:30.000 So...
00:27:31.000 The guy's a spook.
00:27:33.000 He's a citizen of the United Kingdom.
00:27:36.000 He's in the think tanks.
00:27:38.000 Okay, the guy's a freaking spook.
00:27:40.000 And he goes out there and says, hey, thanks America for blowing up the pipeline.
00:27:44.000 It might as well be case closed here.
00:27:47.000 And there's not really huge takeaways.
00:27:50.000 It's just a development.
00:27:51.000 This is just how the United States is choosing to play.
00:27:55.000 What's the takeaway?
00:27:58.000 Well,
00:27:59.000 There's something in there about hypocrisy and about the way that the war is going.
00:28:04.000 We're at war with Russia.
00:28:06.000 We're at war with Russia.
00:28:09.000 And how did we get here?
00:28:10.000 We've talked about it at length over the past seven months, but I think we talked about this a little bit last week.
00:28:17.000 It's pretty incredible that this should be the most significant thing going on right now in the world.
00:28:25.000 And to some extent I suppose it is.
00:28:28.000 But it seems like people don't really understand the gravity of this.
00:28:31.000 That we are involved in this conflict is a failure of our government.
00:28:36.000 How do we get ourselves involved in a straight-up war?
00:28:39.000 We're bombing a Russian pipeline so they can't give gas to Germany.
00:28:43.000 That's just an act of war.
00:28:47.000 Like I said last week, this isn't a proxy war.
00:28:51.000 When you're supplying, when you're training the troops, when you're giving them the guns, you're giving them the artillery, and the missiles, and the stingers, and you're giving them the intelligence, and the coordinates of the targets, and you're giving them direction, and you're blowing up their pipelines, and you're sanctioning their banks, and you're blocking their foreign currency reserves,
00:29:16.000 And when you're supporting other countries on your border starting wars like Tajikistan and Azerbaijan, you're at war!
00:29:25.000 You're just at war.
00:29:26.000 It's not a proxy war anymore.
00:29:28.000 We are at war with Russia.
00:29:31.000 Do people realize that?
00:29:32.000 I know everybody talks about it, you know, pray for Ukraine and all this.
00:29:36.000 We're at war with Russia.
00:29:39.000 It's not a total war yet.
00:29:42.000 It's not even really fully a hot war fully.
00:29:46.000 There's still these diplomatic restraints because we're still sort of on this on-ramp to a direct confrontation with Russia.
00:29:57.000 What do I mean by that?
00:29:59.000 Russians and Americans are fighting in Ukraine.
00:30:01.000 Make no mistake about it.
00:30:02.000 American mercenaries are fighting Russian soldiers.
00:30:06.000 That is happening in Ukraine.
00:30:09.000 And Ukrainians, trained by Americans, funded by Americans, armed by Americans, given direction by American officers, are fighting Russians.
00:30:19.000 Americans are giving the coordinates for the Ukrainians to shoot down Russian ships.
00:30:26.000 And they're providing logistics and support for Ukrainian counterattacks against the Russians.
00:30:32.000 And the Russians know this, and we know this.
00:30:35.000 I don't think the American public broadly understands the extent of our involvement.
00:30:40.000 I don't think they understand how far we're involved in it.
00:30:43.000 And the only reason why America isn't attacking Russia on Russian soil, and Russia's not attacking America on American soil, and why these declarations of war have not been announced, is because both parties are really still coming to terms with this.
00:30:58.000 You've seen these escalations, which have really gone back eight years.
00:31:03.000 It really goes back to 2014 when we did a coup on Russia's border and they invaded and these ceasefire agreements that were drawn up between the Russian-backed separatists and Donbass and the Kiev government between 2014 and 2022
00:31:20.000 All along, the United States was building up the Ukrainian army.
00:31:24.000 The United States and NATO were building up the Ukrainian army, giving them money, giving them lethal aid, giving them Turkey selling them drones, building up their strength so they could eventually counterattack Russia, and then become part of NATO, and become part of the European Union.
00:31:41.000 And 2022 is only the continuation, it's only a continuation of that escalation of those hostilities.
00:31:50.000 From eight years ago.
00:31:52.000 And then since the conflict broke out, since Russia assembled its troops on the border, and made their threats, and made their ultimatum, and then moved in, and the special military operation started, it has only escalated ever since.
00:32:09.000 People think it's just this tit-for-tat.
00:32:11.000 It's escalating.
00:32:12.000 It's been escalating.
00:32:13.000 It's been escalating for eight years.
00:32:16.000 And then, as I said, once the war broke out, it's been escalating since.
00:32:21.000 When America started signing these huge checks, $40 billion for Ukraine, that was a game changer.
00:32:27.000 That was an escalation.
00:32:28.000 When Russia gave the coordinates for the Russian ship in the Black Sea, the missile carrier, which Ukraine sank, that was an escalation.
00:32:38.000 The other month, when NATO directed these three counterattacks by Ukraine against Russian positions, that was an escalation.
00:32:48.000 When the United States blows up, and it's obvious that that's what happened.
00:32:52.000 This is not a conspiracy.
00:32:53.000 That happened.
00:32:54.000 The CIA or, you know, a NATO ship, an American ship blew up the pipelines.
00:33:00.000 It's an escalation.
00:33:02.000 And this is sort of a nice segue into the next subject.
00:33:06.000 As these four territories are annexed by Russia, that's an escalation too, because now the war goes from fighting Russia directly, but kind of indirectly in another country, to we're directly attacking claimed Russian territory.
00:33:23.000 We're directly attacking Russian people and Russian territory that's claimed by Russia.
00:33:28.000 That'll be another escalation.
00:33:31.000 And so, make no mistake about it, this conflict is ongoing.
00:33:34.000 It is about as direct as it can be.
00:33:37.000 We're in this situation where it's not static.
00:33:44.000 It's moving closer and closer towards what we're gonna be bombing Russia and Russia's gonna be bombing us and nuclear weapons may be deployed like it's not a joke and that's been part of the conversation from the beginning that's what kicked all this off was Zelensky went to the Munich Security Conference in February and said
00:34:03.000 He said that according to the, uh, what was it?
00:34:08.000 The Budapest Memorandum of 1994.
00:34:12.000 So, Zelensky at the Munich Conference last February, okay, in February 2022, he brought up the Budapest Memorandum.
00:34:21.000 And the Budapest Memorandum in 1994 dealt with all these Soviet-era nuclear warheads that were in the borderlands.
00:34:31.000 Russia controlled the Soviet Union.
00:34:34.000 Uh, but once the Soviet Union fell apart, Russia and all the other territories became sovereign states.
00:34:39.000 So as such, Russia's, the Soviet Union's nuclear arsenal was in all these other third world countries, second world countries.
00:34:47.000 So, Ukraine had nuclear weapons, Kazakhstan had nuclear weapons, Belarus had nuclear weapons, and formally those were...
00:34:55.000 So Russia had to bring all those nuclear arsenals back to Russia and they did so with the Budapest Memorandum.
00:34:59.000 They had negotiated and the deal was this in 1994.
00:35:01.000 They said if Ukraine gives up the nukes that they have
00:35:21.000 Back to Russia, then Russia has to guarantee Ukraine's sovereignty.
00:35:26.000 In other words, Russia promises, if you give us the nukes, we won't invade.
00:35:31.000 And NATO is supposed to guarantee that promise.
00:35:35.000 So Zelensky brings this up in February.
00:35:38.000 Nuclear.
00:35:40.000 Zelensky brings this up at the Munich Security Conference in February.
00:35:44.000 We're good.
00:36:00.000 And he said, and the West has not come to our aid.
00:36:04.000 I've asked for their help, we held up our end of the bargain, we gave them the nukes, but now we're under attack.
00:36:09.000 And he said in February that next time, I'm not going to ask, we're going to look at other parts of the deal.
00:36:14.000 And basically said, we'll get nuclear weapons again.
00:36:18.000 If you don't protect us, then why should we hold up, why should we continue to hold up our end of the bargain?
00:36:23.000 We'll renuclearize.
00:36:25.000 So you've got this animal, you've got this psychopath in Kiev on the border with Russia with 200,000 troops surrounding him that they're gonna get a nuclear arsenal.
00:36:38.000 And then Russia announces in the special military operation on February 24th, he said that we'll use every mean to protect Russia.
00:36:46.000 We're gonna conduct a special military operation to protect Russian people and these other goals.
00:36:53.000 And if you interfere,
00:36:55.000 We will defend ourselves.
00:36:56.000 And Russia's a nuclear state, so that means a nuclear arsenal is part of that.
00:37:01.000 And the United States said, well, we don't care.
00:37:03.000 We're going in anyway.
00:37:06.000 And so, when Putin gave his speech last week, he brought back up nuclear.
00:37:10.000 And he said, we'll use our nuclear arsenal to defend ourselves.
00:37:14.000 Well, he's sending a pretty clear message here.
00:37:17.000 That he can't lose this war.
00:37:19.000 Russia cannot lose this war.
00:37:20.000 This is an impasse.
00:37:22.000 But the United States is not willing to give any concession here.
00:37:26.000 Russia is... there's no ceiling to how far they're willing to escalate.
00:37:30.000 And it seems like that's not... like that's the case for the United States as well.
00:37:35.000 And you know what that means.
00:37:36.000 If there's no... if there's no way to stop this from escalating, we all know where that goes.
00:37:42.000 So, to me, that's the takeaway.
00:37:44.000 And it's this regime.
00:37:46.000 It is this regime in Washington.
00:37:48.000 If Trump were president, this would not be happening.
00:37:52.000 And I know that may sound silly or something, but it's just true.
00:37:57.000 If Trump were the president right now, instead of Biden, this would not be happening.
00:38:01.000 And you want to know why?
00:38:03.000 Because Biden is not really in charge.
00:38:07.000 That's why.
00:38:08.000 It is the permanent bureaucracy in the Defense Department, and the State Department, and the Pentagon.
00:38:13.000 It is these nut job warmongers that are in charge.
00:38:17.000 We all know that.
00:38:19.000 The National Security Council and the top brass in the Pentagon and the DoD, they're the ones calling the shots on this.
00:38:25.000 It is totally outside of the White House's control.
00:38:29.000 It is totally outside of Joe Biden's control.
00:38:31.000 He could not exert restraint if he wanted to, if he were even capable.
00:38:37.000 That's why it would have been different.
00:38:39.000 If Trump were president, because he is energetic and because he's mentally there, and also because he resists war, he could have brought these people to heel.
00:38:48.000 He could have brought NATO and Washington to heel.
00:38:51.000 Germany and France and Italy, they did not want this conflict.
00:38:55.000 The continent did not want this conflict.
00:38:57.000 It is London, which is up with the Washington cartel, they're the ones that wanted the war.
00:39:04.000 London and Washington wanted the war with Russia.
00:39:07.000 And the one guy that could have stopped it was Donald Trump.
00:39:11.000 He was the guy.
00:39:14.000 Just like he did throughout his term.
00:39:16.000 John Bolton wanted us to go to war with Iran.
00:39:19.000 Didn't happen.
00:39:20.000 They wanted a war with Iran, and they did pursue some backdoor regime change type things, but never, never turned into a war.
00:39:29.000 In his first year, in his first three months, Trump stopped pursuing regime change in Syria.
00:39:34.000 That was the official stance.
00:39:36.000 April 2017, you can go back, it was Nikki Haley, who was the UN ambassador at the time, reluctantly I'm sure, said we're no longer pursuing regime change.
00:39:45.000 Mike Pompeo, who was the then, well I guess he was the CIA director, it was Rex Tillerson, who was the Secretary of State, said we're no longer pursuing regime change.
00:39:54.000 That was April.
00:39:55.000 That was three months after the inauguration.
00:39:57.000 No regime change in Syria.
00:39:59.000 No regime change in Syria.
00:40:01.000 No regime change in Iran.
00:40:02.000 They wanted it in Venezuela.
00:40:04.000 No regime change in Venezuela.
00:40:06.000 The United States made some mistakes with Russia.
00:40:09.000 They repealed the Intermediate-Range Nuclear Forces Treaty and they began supplying Ukraine with lethal aid.
00:40:14.000 And so there were some problems there.
00:40:16.000 But it never would have gotten this far under Trump.
00:40:19.000 And that's because Trump still wants what's best for America.
00:40:24.000 These other people, I don't know what's going on with them.
00:40:27.000 They want world domination or something.
00:40:30.000 They don't want what's best for America.
00:40:31.000 They don't care if America blows up in a nuclear Armageddon or something.
00:40:37.000 They're greedy.
00:40:39.000 They want Berlin.
00:40:41.000 They want Europe.
00:40:43.000 They want our 5G there.
00:40:45.000 They want our liquefied natural gas there.
00:40:47.000 They want to carve up the world.
00:40:51.000 And they're playing a very dangerous game with all of our lives.
00:40:54.000 It wouldn't have happened under Trump.
00:40:56.000 And remember, this would have happened, by the way, in the first term.
00:41:01.000 I don't know if you recall, but this saber-rattling with Russia began long before the Russian collusion narrative about Trump.
00:41:08.000 It was October 2016, when Biden, the then-Vice President, came out and said that he would retaliate against Russia for these so-called cyber-attacks.
00:41:20.000 And if Clinton got in, this probably would have happened four years earlier.
00:41:25.000 Trump could have stayed in in 2020, but we got screwed over by the GOP.
00:41:29.000 We got screwed over by the mail-in ballots.
00:41:33.000 And now we're all gonna reap the consequence.
00:41:35.000 I hope we survive.
00:41:36.000 I hope we make it.
00:41:37.000 It just goes to show how catastrophic that result was.
00:41:40.000 And that's why anybody that was not on the ground for Stop the Steal, like, this is your, this is kind of your fault.
00:41:47.000 Seriously.
00:41:50.000 Because we had a chance to turn this around and now, like, all bets are off.
00:41:54.000 The country's being invaded.
00:41:55.000 We're at war with Russia.
00:41:58.000 The debt is $30 trillion.
00:42:00.000 Inflation is 10%.
00:42:02.000 Interest rates are higher than they've been in 20 years.
00:42:06.000 At the same time, stock market's about to crash.
00:42:09.000 Like, it couldn't, like, how could it get worse?
00:42:13.000 We're at a real crisis in just about every way that you can measure it, and it's all because of this leadership.
00:42:19.000 If there was no Biden, if Trump was in, the border would be secure, the economy would be straightened out.
00:42:27.000 Maybe.
00:42:30.000 Certainly, we'd be taking a different track than we are now.
00:42:33.000 We'd be energy independent, that's for sure.
00:42:35.000 There'd be no food or gas inflation.
00:42:37.000 The situation with Russia would be mitigated.
00:42:41.000 Just goes to show elections have consequences if you thought it didn't matter.
00:42:45.000 It really does!
00:42:46.000 It really does now!
00:42:48.000 So that's sort of the takeaway from Nord Stream 1 and 2.
00:42:51.000 Our featured story is similar, so I don't want to totally break.
00:42:55.000 This is the other big development.
00:42:56.000 We talked about this last week.
00:42:59.000 As Russia announced a referendum in four territories in southeastern Ukraine, and the voting has commenced in the past week,
00:43:13.000 In Zaporizhia, in Luhansk, in Donetsk, and in Kursan.
00:43:19.000 And it went on, I believe, from the 23rd until the 27th.
00:43:23.000 And the results are officially in.
00:43:24.000 All four territories have voted overwhelmingly to break away from Ukraine and to join Russia.
00:43:31.000 Well, Donbass already declared independence.
00:43:33.000 There's Kursan and Zaporizhia, which...
00:43:37.000 Are broken apart from Kiev.
00:43:39.000 So this is a story from Russia today.
00:43:41.000 It says, quote, the Donetsk and Luhansk People's Republics, along with Kherson region and part of Zaporizhia region in southern Ukraine, have voted to join Russia in referendums that were held between September 23rd and 27th.
00:43:57.000 In Luhansk, more than 98% of voters have supported the idea to join Russia, according to official figures, which have all the ballots counted.
00:44:07.000 Donetsk has shown similar results with more than 99% of voters supporting the move.
00:44:12.000 Both Zaporizhia and Kherson regions have processed all the ballots by late Tuesday with 93% and 87% of voters respectively backing the split from Ukraine and reunification with Russia.
00:44:26.000 Let's go!
00:44:27.000 And I like how high the number is because is it possible that it's that high?
00:44:35.000 Maybe.
00:44:36.000 Maybe.
00:44:38.000 I like that it's so high because I'm really just willing to believe it.
00:44:44.000 And I like how mad that makes NATO faggots.
00:44:47.000 They're like, 99% that's a fake, that's a rigged election.
00:44:53.000 Yeah, it's real.
00:44:55.000 That's real.
00:44:56.000 No, it was unanimous.
00:44:58.000 It was unanimous.
00:44:59.000 There wasn't one person.
00:45:00.000 There wasn't one person in all of East Ukraine that did not want to join Russia.
00:45:05.000 It was unanimous.
00:45:07.000 How could you argue with that?
00:45:09.000 Well, there was a fake.
00:45:11.000 It wasn't a free and fair election.
00:45:14.000 Yeah, it was.
00:45:15.000 Yeah, it was.
00:45:16.000 Yeah, well, what?
00:45:17.000 You love democracy.
00:45:18.000 Now you don't like democracy?
00:45:20.000 Looks legit to me.
00:45:21.000 They voted, didn't they?
00:45:23.000 They went out and cast their vote.
00:45:25.000 Big money wage is the most secure election in history.
00:45:30.000 The most secure election in history.
00:45:32.000 You can't argue with democracy.
00:45:34.000 This is what democracy looks like, man.
00:45:36.000 This is what democracy looks like.
00:45:38.000 Let's go!
00:45:39.000 They only like democracy when we're electing black people to rape our country.
00:45:45.000 That's democracy.
00:45:48.000 They go on the city square and burn the village down, and then they tear down the statues and say, and they take off their clothes, and guys and guys are kissing, and girls and girls are kissing, and they're all fat, and they say, this is what democracy looks like.
00:46:04.000 No, this is what democracy looks like!
00:46:07.000 You wanted it, you got it.
00:46:09.000 Live by the ballot, die by the ballot, die by the ballot!
00:46:14.000 Get annexed to Russia by the ballot!
00:46:17.000 Succumb to the glory of Russia by the ballot!
00:46:22.000 Succumb to Tsar Putin by the ballot!
00:46:26.000 This is what you asked for, you bitch!
00:46:28.000 You wanted liberal democracy?
00:46:30.000 You wanted a free and fair election?
00:46:34.000 Be careful what you wish for.
00:46:36.000 This is National Endowment for Democracy certified a free and fair election.
00:46:42.000 Most secure in history.
00:46:44.000 They're all joining Russia.
00:46:46.000 So I like it.
00:46:47.000 I like that the numbers are that high.
00:46:49.000 Because they probably could be that high.
00:46:51.000 I mean, they probably could be.
00:46:54.000 But it also just looks like it's not legit, and that just makes it all the better to say that it is.
00:47:02.000 And honestly though, what is the argument?
00:47:06.000 Election fraud doesn't happen.
00:47:07.000 Election fraud can't happen.
00:47:12.000 Oh, so what you're saying is they rigged the election.
00:47:15.000 Well, how did they do that?
00:47:17.000 How did they do that?
00:47:20.000 You're telling me there was a conspiracy and nobody would blow the whistle?
00:47:26.000 It's impossible to rig an election like that.
00:47:28.000 It's impossible to rig an election so big.
00:47:32.000 And even if there was rigging, it was so negligible.
00:47:37.000 The result was 99%.
00:47:39.000 So what did they rig it by?
00:47:40.000 2%?
00:47:41.000 Where possible?
00:47:44.000 Please.
00:47:45.000 Sounds like a dangerous conspiracy theory.
00:47:49.000 That sounds like dangerous misinformation.
00:47:52.000 And we're living in this post-truth age.
00:47:55.000 We need to agree on this.
00:47:56.000 You're not entitled to your own set of facts.
00:47:59.000 You may be entitled to your opinion, but you're not entitled to your own set of facts.
00:48:03.000 Those people voted to join Russia, overwhelmingly.
00:48:07.000 Now that is unironically true, by the way.
00:48:09.000 That is unironically true, that the people, whether the result was 99 or, you know, 60%, they voted overwhelmingly to join Russia.
00:48:17.000 We know this.
00:48:18.000 Why?
00:48:19.000 Because all the people there are Russian and speak Russian.
00:48:23.000 And the Ukrainian government is run by Galician neo-Nazis.
00:48:28.000 And I don't say that, like, pejoratively, just, that's what they are.
00:48:32.000 The government has been taken over by Galician neo-Nazis and the security force and the military.
00:48:38.000 And they have banned the Russian language and put on all these anti-Russian policies in Ukraine.
00:48:45.000 So, is it really a big surprise they all voted to join Russia?
00:48:48.000 I don't think so.
00:48:49.000 I don't think that's even controversial.
00:48:54.000 So, and the irony is lost for a lot of people about the significance of this.
00:49:00.000 Because in truth, there was a coup in 2014.
00:49:04.000 There was a Western-backed coup that made on in 2014, and it wasn't benign.
00:49:10.000 The government that the West installed was straight-up anti-Russian.
00:49:15.000 When I say Russophobic, I'm not joking around.
00:49:19.000 They hate Russians.
00:49:20.000 This is all a bunch of silly Balkan business to me, but it's real.
00:49:25.000 The government in Kiev, which is run by Ukrainians, they hate Russians.
00:49:30.000 They have an ethnic hatred for the Russians.
00:49:34.000 That's why they banned the Russian language.
00:49:36.000 That's why they persecute Russians.
00:49:39.000 It's what they did.
00:49:40.000 And they were at war with Donbass for eight years and used drones against them and bombed them viciously.
00:49:48.000 So...
00:49:50.000 You know, so I think the irony is lost on a lot of people.
00:49:53.000 They talk about this democracy and this liberalism that we're defending.
00:49:57.000 What are we really defending here?
00:49:58.000 If these people want to break away, if these people want to secede because they're being given the systematic racism by the government, and I'm not the one to say it's justified because of systemic racism or something, but it does add a layer of hypocrisy.
00:50:16.000 And that's not the main angle I go with because I don't really care that much.
00:50:19.000 I'm more interested in the strategy behind it, the politics of it.
00:50:23.000 But it is a little bit rich because the United States derives its soft power from its moral high ground in saying that, you know, we're a democracy and we're for human rights and we're for liberalism.
00:50:34.000 And they're backing this regime, which is by definition Russophobic.
00:50:39.000 They're backing a country that has these historic cleavages based on ethnicity and religion and other factors across the river, and a country which has really been created over the centuries with these weird add-ons and administrative flukes.
00:50:58.000 Crimea should have never been part of Ukraine.
00:51:00.000 It was given to Ukraine by Khrushchev in the 50s.
00:51:04.000 Now Crimea must be part of Ukraine until the end of time?
00:51:07.000 It doesn't even make sense.
00:51:09.000 The only reason that Ukraine is its own country is because of how the Soviet Union was organized under Lenin in 1922, and by Joseph Stalin, who was the Secretary of the nations, of the countries within the Soviet Union.
00:51:26.000 So point being is it's this big fluke.
00:51:30.000 And anyway, that's really besides the point.
00:51:32.000 It's a country that's deeply divided with these ethnic tensions and what we're there backing up is clearly born out of nothing other than naked strategic interest is the point I'm trying to make.
00:51:45.000 The only reason they're backing this government in this complex situation where arguably the government's in the wrong there.
00:51:50.000 The Kiev government is abusive and racist and so on.
00:51:55.000 The only reason we're doing it is because of naked political self-interest.
00:52:00.000 But we're going to tell the world that it's about standing up against dictatorship.
00:52:04.000 It's not about dictatorship.
00:52:06.000 It's not about autocracy.
00:52:08.000 It's about power.
00:52:10.000 It's about the grain and the energy resources, the agricultural product and the energy resources that Ukraine has.
00:52:18.000 It's got to do with their natural gas reserves just discovered in the Black Sea.
00:52:22.000 It's got to do with the shale oil in Ukraine.
00:52:25.000 It's got to do with their bountiful
00:52:29.000 We're good to go.
00:52:37.000 And their posture on the Russian border.
00:52:39.000 That's what it's about.
00:52:40.000 It's not about whether they have a democratic government or not.
00:52:44.000 That's just a little bit rich.
00:52:45.000 It adds a layer of irony.
00:52:47.000 And then you go in on something like this, where Russia invades, and they have these referendums, and now of course the Western media is going to come out and say, oh, well that vote was rigged.
00:52:58.000 Really?
00:52:58.000 Why?
00:53:00.000 And they go, well, because it's obvious.
00:53:04.000 Russia invaded and the military was there and something.
00:53:09.000 So what's the point?
00:53:10.000 People vote by the ballot.
00:53:12.000 They count the votes.
00:53:15.000 You get the results.
00:53:16.000 I thought elections can't be... isn't that what they say?
00:53:19.000 We had half of our ballots in 2020 were mail-in ballots.
00:53:25.000 And that passes the smell test.
00:53:27.000 We don't even need to look into it.
00:53:28.000 We're just gonna dogmatically repeat.
00:53:31.000 Most secure election in history.
00:53:33.000 Most secure election in history.
00:53:35.000 Freest and fairest election in history.
00:53:37.000 Half the ballots, they solicit them by sending them in the mail.
00:53:41.000 In other words, the government drops it off at the House, and then it shows up at a Dropbox, and they count the vote, and they don't check?
00:53:49.000 They don't audit the signature, they don't audit any of the information?
00:53:55.000 If you say that's rigged, you're horrible and no good.
00:53:57.000 This one's obviously rigged.
00:53:59.000 So these things are not really that interesting to me, but it does just add a little something.
00:54:03.000 It's like, let's just be real about what's going on.
00:54:06.000 Let's just dispense with the facade that this is about ideas and about... Politics at home and politics abroad is all about power.
00:54:16.000 It's not about values.
00:54:19.000 When they say the election was not rigged here, that's because they like the outcome.
00:54:23.000 That's because they got what they wanted.
00:54:25.000 That they have the people that they want running the country.
00:54:29.000 And the same thing in Ukraine.
00:54:31.000 Why are those elections not good?
00:54:33.000 Because it was the Russians.
00:54:34.000 When they did the Maidan, even though that was undemocratic, they don't care.
00:54:39.000 When they did the first color revolution in Ukraine in 2004, they didn't care that it was technically unconstitutional.
00:54:45.000 They got the outcome they wanted.
00:54:47.000 And then they hailed that as a triumph of democracy.
00:54:51.000 So in 2004, when
00:54:56.000 Who's the new president?
00:54:58.000 They got Yanukovych out and it was... The name was very similar.
00:55:02.000 I forget the other guy's name.
00:55:07.000 What is it?
00:55:11.000 I don't know.
00:55:12.000 I can't think of it off the top of my head.
00:55:14.000 The point being is, they overthrew the government in 2004 with these revolutions.
00:55:19.000 Yanukovych gets re-elected.
00:55:21.000 There's mass protests.
00:55:22.000 They say, oh, we need another round of voting, which is not in the Constitution.
00:55:27.000 They hold another round of voting, and then the Western-backed leader gets in, whose name I forget.
00:55:34.000 Then they hold another election and Yanukovych gets re-elected.
00:55:37.000 He's the most trusted politician in the country, the favorite, and then everybody says, he's a Russian stooge, this country's rigged, blah blah blah.
00:55:46.000 So they overthrow him in 2014 with a straight-up revolution and they get this new government with Poroshenko, I believe.
00:55:54.000 And then they say, yep, that was democratic, what a liberal democracy, this is the best thing ever.
00:55:59.000 So if these, think of it, if these territories said that they voted to stay with Ukraine, the United States would say it's valid.
00:56:07.000 But if they vote to join Russia, they say it's not valid.
00:56:11.000 They said the referendum in Crimea was not valid, even though that was a, that's a Russian peninsula.
00:56:19.000 And again, I'm less interested in pointing the finger and saying, you're a hypocrite, you don't mean what you say, you're a liar.
00:56:28.000 What I am interested in is demonstrating to people that
00:56:32.000 We've just got to drop the the rose tinted glasses, the ideological coloring of all this and just look at it in terms of just the politics of it.
00:56:41.000 Like I'm in this debate with Destiny about it months ago and he's telling me the United States doesn't interfere in other countries business like Russia does.
00:56:50.000 It's like what planet are you living on?
00:56:51.000 What planet are you living on?
00:56:53.000 He thinks that the State Department NGOs are just full of well-meaning liberals who believe in democracy
00:57:00.000 Like, were you born yesterday?
00:57:02.000 And so it is with things like this.
00:57:07.000 It's about politics.
00:57:09.000 And anyway, so they all vote to join Russia by 99%, and I believe it.
00:57:14.000 I support it.
00:57:16.000 And it says, quote, the process of integrating new regions into Russia may take some time as it requires the approval of the country's parliament and the president.
00:57:24.000 But Kremlin spokesperson Dmitry Peskov said on Friday that he was convinced it will be fast enough.
00:57:31.000 Under the Russian Constitution and the federal law on the accession of new constituent members, the procedure includes several steps.
00:57:39.000 Once the regions willing to become part of the Russian Federation submit their proposals to Moscow, the President should inform Parliament and the government on the matter.
00:57:49.000 Moscow warned earlier that if the Donbass Republics and the two southern Ukrainian regions united with Russia, it would consider any attempts by Kiev to retake them as a tax on its own land.
00:58:02.000 The EU and the US have already called the voting a sham and the Secretary of State said that the regions will never be recognized as part of Russian territory.
00:58:12.000 He added that Kiev had every right to take them back.
00:58:17.000 So all these regions are now part of Russia.
00:58:19.000 We looked at the map last week.
00:58:21.000 I guess I'll pull it up one more time and I'll show you in case you forgot.
00:58:26.000 Just so you can get an idea again.
00:58:38.000 Let me just throw this up on the screen real quick.
00:58:41.000 Okay.
00:58:44.000 Just so you can get an idea, this is what is being annexed by Russia.
00:58:51.000 Okay, we'll take the cookies, we'll take the ads.
00:59:00.000 These are the four regions.
00:59:01.000 This is what is being annexed and will now join Russia.
00:59:05.000 Can we get a better map that maybe shows where the war is going on?
00:59:13.000 Okay.
00:59:17.000 This is my map.
00:59:17.000 This is the one I like.
00:59:18.000 Okay.
00:59:20.000 So you can see here, this is what's under Russian control and this white area is what is claimed by Russia but is still under control of the Ukrainians.
00:59:29.000 See here?
00:59:31.000 This is where the Ukrainians retook land in Kherson.
00:59:35.000 And here in Zaporizhia and here by Donetsk and up here by Kharkiv.
00:59:41.000 And so here's how, just to give you an idea, this is what's going on.
00:59:46.000 This is the Russian front line.
00:59:49.000 And so Russia's done two things.
00:59:51.000 It's annexed these four territories and it has conscripted 300,000 reservists.
00:59:57.000 And the idea is that the reservists will be sent in to defend and the front line
01:00:04.000 We're good to go.
01:00:20.000 In short order, for the first time in the conflict you'll have a Russian army.
01:00:25.000 Up until this point, largely it has been the militias doing the bulk of the work.
01:00:29.000 It has been the militias from Luhansk and Donetsk.
01:00:33.000 It is their fighters.
01:00:35.000 And other non-Russians, people from Chechnya and Syria, and other mercenaries who have been doing much of the fighting for the Russians.
01:00:43.000 Now that the Russians have conscripted these 300,000 reserve troops, and they're gonna train them, and these guys will be Russians, they will be rotated into the front lines gradually.
01:00:55.000 And there's sort of two things changing here.
01:00:57.000 It's now a Russian army, which is much larger.
01:01:00.000 The initial invading force was 150,000.
01:01:01.000 This is now 300,000 Russian troops.
01:01:05.000 Not militia, not mercenaries, not these Syrians or Chechens.
01:01:11.000 These are Russian soldiers.
01:01:14.000 So that's a change.
01:01:15.000 It's way more people and they're Russians.
01:01:18.000 And the other thing is now that these four territories have been annexed, now the fighting is going to occur within these territories.
01:01:27.000 In other words, when they were considered part of Ukraine or independent, Zaporizhia and Kursan were considered part of Ukraine, Donetsk and Luhansk were considered independent states,
01:01:40.000 The fighting up until this point has theoretically been happening in not Russia, in Ukraine or in these two breakaway republics.
01:01:48.000 So Russia's fighting a special military operation in another country for other countries, for the Ukrainian Russians or for the ethnic Russians in the breakaway republics in Donbass.
01:02:03.000 Now the fighting is different because now you've got Russians fighting theoretically in Russia.
01:02:09.000 Now that Russia's claiming the battlefield, now the battlefield is within Russia.
01:02:14.000 So it goes from fighting a war in Ukraine for ethnic Russians in Ukraine to fighting to control Russian territory claimed by Russia.
01:02:22.000 Totally different ballgame.
01:02:24.000 So, like I said earlier, this is a major escalation.
01:02:28.000 Where now, when Ukraine and NATO forces are fighting in these regions, they're fighting on Russian soil.
01:02:37.000 As opposed to fighting in Ukraine.
01:02:39.000 So now you've got NATO troops fighting Russians in Russia.
01:02:45.000 Not fighting Russians in Ukraine, to defend Ukraine, ostensibly.
01:02:49.000 And similarly, it's not Russians going to defend the interests of ethnic Russians abroad, they're fighting to secure control of their new territory.
01:02:58.000 Totally different story.
01:03:00.000 And so the diplomatic implication is pretty dramatic.
01:03:04.000 The United States and NATO have tried to play this role where they're in, but not technically.
01:03:09.000 They're providing every kind of support other than being directly engaged.
01:03:14.000 And that has maybe been acceptable.
01:03:16.000 They've been able to operate with a little bit of ambiguity because the battlefield is in Ukraine.
01:03:22.000 Because Ukraine is the victim and Russia's the aggressor.
01:03:27.000 And they're sort of playing on defense.
01:03:29.000 Now they're not really.
01:03:31.000 Now they're on somebody else's turf.
01:03:34.000 And so how will Russia take it then?
01:03:35.000 Is Russia going to escalate against NATO?
01:03:39.000 Is Russia going to escalate against Ukraine?
01:03:41.000 Are they going to use air power?
01:03:44.000 Are they going to use weapons of mass destruction?
01:03:47.000 What is that going to look like?
01:03:48.000 Are they going to be less considerate of casualties?
01:03:51.000 Who knows?
01:03:53.000 Or collateral damage, I should say.
01:03:55.000 So the war is about to change fundamentally, and this is all going to happen in the next couple weeks.
01:03:59.000 These regions, they finished the vote today, they're all set to join.
01:04:04.000 It should be approved in very short order within this week, I've heard some say.
01:04:08.000 Within this week, this next week, they will join Russia and officially be part of Russia.
01:04:15.000 And these 300,000 conscripts are being sent out there,
01:04:19.000 So it looks like Russia is not messing around anymore.
01:04:22.000 And that, of course, is coupled with what's going on with energy.
01:04:26.000 You've got the $300,000 coming in, Russia has claimed the battlefield, and now the European countries supplying all this stuff, and who are participating in the sanctions regime and depriving Russia of the revenue for the gas, they're about to enter a very cold winter where they don't have enough energy, where energy demand will exceed supply.
01:04:48.000 All of this bodes well for Russia.
01:04:49.000 And they've really just achieved a checkmate here.
01:04:52.000 What does a victory condition look like at this point?
01:04:56.000 Do you think that Russia's going to claim these territories through a referendum and then Ukraine is somehow going to recapture all of them and Russia will ever accept that?
01:05:04.000 It's just not going to happen.
01:05:05.000 It's a done deal.
01:05:07.000 They control that land, they took it.
01:05:10.000 Now that, I don't think that'll be the end of it.
01:05:12.000 But that could be the end of it theoretically.
01:05:13.000 That's the end of it as far as Ukraine is concerned.
01:05:16.000 They're not getting those territories back.
01:05:18.000 Russia's at least getting that much.
01:05:22.000 So what's the play here?
01:05:24.000 Bombing the Nord Stream 2 pipeline shows that we're not backing down either.
01:05:29.000 Russia says, there's no ceiling to how much we can escalate.
01:05:32.000 We can nuke you, and we've got 25 million people we could call into battle.
01:05:36.000 That's what they said last week.
01:05:38.000 Putin and the defense minister came out there and said, we'll nuke you to defend ourselves, and also, we're only mobilizing 1% of what we could mobilize, which is 25 million Russians with military experience.
01:05:55.000 And we're annexing these four territories.
01:05:59.000 And what did the United States do in response to this limitless escalation?
01:06:04.000 They escalated too.
01:06:05.000 They said, okay, we'll blow up the pipelines and we're gonna give you another 40 billion dollars in Congress.
01:06:11.000 They're considering another aid package.
01:06:13.000 I think it's 20 or 40 billion dollars more for Ukraine.
01:06:18.000 Which is just like unbelievable.
01:06:21.000 We're closing in on a hundred, one hundred billion dollars for Ukraine.
01:06:29.000 The cash payments to Americans during the first COVID stimulus when everybody got a $1,200 check, that cost $250 billion.
01:06:36.000 So you could give everybody in the country $600.
01:06:42.000 That's how much it's costing all of us.
01:06:45.000 We've given Israel $250 billion.
01:06:50.000 Something like that.
01:06:52.000 Lower estimates will say $150 billion.
01:06:54.000 It's probably closer to $250 billion.
01:06:57.000 But in the life of the State of Israel since 1948, we've given that country, excluding all the wars, $250 billion.
01:07:04.000 We've given Ukraine $100 billion since February.
01:07:10.000 For what?
01:07:10.000 Why?
01:07:11.000 Why are we doing this?
01:07:12.000 Where is this going to go?
01:07:13.000 What is it going to lead to?
01:07:15.000 What happens if Russia wins?
01:07:17.000 What happens if, or rather when, Russia wins?
01:07:21.000 What's going to be the off-ramp for us?
01:07:22.000 Are we just going to accept it?
01:07:26.000 You know, so we're gonna have to watch this and see how it plays out, but it's not good.
01:07:30.000 None of this is good.
01:07:32.000 I like it.
01:07:32.000 I like that Russia is... they're playing to win here, and they should.
01:07:36.000 They should press their advantage and they should try to make Europe and the United States back down.
01:07:40.000 I totally believe that, but it doesn't bode well for any of us because we're all just gonna die or get conscripted.
01:07:47.000 So that's the update in... That's the update in Ukraine.
01:07:50.000 We're gonna watch and see how that plays out.
01:07:53.000 I can't wait to see the map after this happens.
01:07:56.000 I'm really just waiting to see Russia grow on the map.
01:07:59.000 I can't wait to see the new map.
01:08:02.000 October 2022 edition with an enlarged Russia.
01:08:06.000 So... So that's what I have to say about that.
01:08:09.000 Okay.
01:08:10.000 We're gonna move on.
01:08:10.000 We're gonna take a look at our Super Chats and we'll see what you guys have to say about all this.
01:08:17.000 What's your reaction?
01:08:22.000 So let's see.
01:08:23.000 Let me get my water here.
01:08:25.000 Let me get my headset.
01:08:34.000 Okay.
01:08:40.000 Do this.
01:08:44.000 Alright, let's take a look at our Super Chats.
01:08:56.000 Okay.