Learn English with Bill Clinton. Bill Clinton is a former Vice President and current presidential candidate who served as President of the United States from 1987-1993. He was a presidential candidate in 1988 and served as Vice President from 1993-1993, when he was elected to the first term of President George H.W. Bush. In 2016, Bill Clinton became the first sitting president to run for president in a major party primary, losing to then-candidate Donald Trump, who is now the president of the Republican Party and is widely regarded as the most popular man in the country. Bill Clinton has been a loud and proud supporter of Donald Trump and has been one of the most prominent voices in the pro-Trump movement. He has also been a fierce critic of the President, who has been accused of being anti-American, anti-Christian, and anti-Muslim. He has been called a hypocrite and a racist and a misogynist, and he has been attacked for his support of the Trump administration and its policies. In this episode, Bill talks about his views on immigration reform, and how to deal with anti-Semitism and Islamophobia, and what it means to be a Christian and a Christian in the 21st century. He also talks about the need to become a soldier of God, and to live up to the standard that God has set for us in the face of a broken and broken world. This episode is a powerful and powerful piece of work Bill Clinton delivered in a speech he gave in Los Angeles on Nov. 9th, 2019, at a memorial service for his late son Malcolm X, Malcolm X at the Washington National Crenshaw Park in honor of Mother s Day, which was a day after his birthday. in which he called Mommy Malcolm X s mommy Malcolm Malcolm X's mommy, Malcolm s momma. Malcolm X is my mommy. I hope you enjoy this speech. Thank you for listening to Bill Clinton, and I appreciate your support, and God bless you, God Bless You, God bless You, Blessings, and Much Blessings! - Bill Clinton - Thank you, Bill, Hillary Clinton, Thank You, Cheers, Michelle, and Cheers. - Teddy, Amy, Sarah, John, and Teddy, and Joe, and JUICY, and Thank You For Being Brave, and See You, Bye, and Love You, Mr. & Bye, Bye Bye, Goodbye, Mr., Bill,
Transcript
Transcripts from "America First - Nicholas J. Fuentes" are sourced from the Knowledge Fight Interactive Search Tool. You can also explore and interact with the transcripts here.
00:05:02.000And then, nowadays, I am so upset that the things we did and the things we fought for and the boys that died for us, it's all gone down the drain.
00:05:16.000Our country's gone to hell in a handbasket.
00:05:22.000We haven't got the country we had when I was raised.
00:07:00.000This country is being ripped apart and raped and looted.
00:07:04.000We're being slowly poisoned and in some cases quickly murdered and assassinated.
00:07:11.000And we're killing ourselves every day, inadvertently, with the kinds of things that we eat and breathe and drink and see.
00:07:19.000People have got to start to radically begin to obey their conscience and tell the truth and do the right thing.
00:07:26.000People have got to start to get courageous.
00:07:29.000And this is the time for everybody to turn and look to God.
00:07:34.000And to pray and to ask for strength and to ask for wisdom to get through this time and to transform and sanctify this country.
00:07:43.000And the alternative is that there will be no country.
00:07:47.000Is it really only as big as low gas prices?
00:07:51.000Is it really only so big as bringing inflation and gas prices and the corporate tax rate back down?
00:07:58.000It's not about waiting for someone to come in and change the policy and make it better.
00:08:01.000It's a personal decision that we all have to make to become soldiers of Christ.
00:08:31.000My own narrative is not one of some sudden, booming bolt of lightning out of the blue.
00:08:36.000It was a slow and steady, unrelenting stream of blips and blinks, glimmers and glares, low beams and high beams of light, some of which I did not want to see.
00:08:51.000And then finally, a point of no return reckoning.
00:09:01.000I think it was because I fiercely came out during the Greupel Wars of 2019 when so many of these brave young men were on college campuses challenging the likes of Zio Schill, Dan Crenshaw, questioning him about his undying loyalty and, of course, defending Nick Fuentes and so many of the stars of the burgeoning America First movement who, through an increasing amount of activism, are really going to ensure the future and the success of that movement.
00:09:31.000Me and the Groypers will save the Trump campaign.
00:09:34.000We will give a voice to all of the rightful frustrations that the Trump supporters have, whether they're willing to direct their anger at me or at the campaign, and I'll let them know.
00:12:30.000because if there are thousands and millions and tens of millions and hundreds of millions of Christians ready to meet their final destiny, then nothing can stop us and nothing will.
00:16:19.000They didn't hear us when we emailed them.
00:16:21.000And they didn't hear us when the Washington Post and every other news media outlet reported it.
00:16:27.000For that reason, the Goyper War will continue and we will accelerate and intensify our plans.
00:16:36.000We have to deploy to Michigan and we have to make it hurt as much as possible.
00:16:44.000If he wants to stop the pain, he must stop the betrayal of America first.
00:16:51.000My own narrative is not one of some sudden, booming bolt of lightning out of the blue.
00:17:07.000It was a slow and steady, unrelenting stream of blips and blinks, glimmers and glares, low beams and high beams of light, some of which I did not want to see.
00:17:21.000And then finally, a point of no return reckoning.
00:17:31.000I think it was because I fiercely came out during the Griper Wars of 2019 when so many of these brave young men were on college campuses challenging the likes of Zio Schill, Dan Crenshaw, questioning him about his undying loyalty and, of course, defending Nick Fuentes and so many of the stars of the burgeoning America First movement, who through an increasing amount of activism are really going to ensure the future and the success of that movement. who through an increasing amount of activism are really going
00:19:54.000And the Gripers will save the Trump campaign.
00:19:56.000We will give a voice to all of the rightful frustrations that the Trump supporters have, whether they're willing to direct their anger at me or at the campaign, and I'll let them know.
00:23:41.000I'm a doctor but I'm running out of patience She told me I'm she's trying to get closer to space She told me I'm she's trying
00:24:06.000to get closer to space She told me I'm she's trying
00:24:36.000to get closer to space She told me I'm she's trying to get closer to space Sorry to keep you waiting complicated business
00:24:54.000She told me I'm she's trying to get closer to space
00:25:39.000Me and the Gripers will save the Trump campaign.
00:25:41.000We will give a voice to all of the rightful frustrations that the Trump supporters have, whether they're willing to direct their anger at me or at the campaign, and I'll let them know.
00:25:58.000And if they don't make the course correction, then it's on them.
00:26:02.000Our movement is about replacing a failed and corrupt political establishment with a new government controlled by you, the American people.
00:26:14.000This election will determine whether we're a free nation or whether we have only the illusion of democracy but are in fact controlled by a small handful of global special interests rigging the system and our system is rigged.
00:28:28.000So this is a call to all Christians, immigration restrictionists, foreign policy non-interventionists, trade protectionists, those in favor of industrial policy, patriots, nativists, nationalists, non-interventionists, traditionalists that are not happy with the state of the Trump campaign.
00:29:13.000If we don't succeed, if this doesn't work, there's no hope.
00:29:17.000You either get Kamala, and it's total left-wing oppression, it's total bullshit, BLM nonsense, or if you get Trump, it's gonna be total Zionist corporate domination.
00:34:04.000*music* Years from now, some of them may look back and ask themselves whether they've made the right choice, whether they've made the most of the opportunities they've been given.
00:37:30.000Today, each of you begins a new chapter as well.
00:37:34.000When your story goes from here, it will be defined by your vision, your perseverance, and your grit You will build a future where we have the courage to chase our dreams no matter what the cynics and the doubters have to say.
00:37:53.000You will have the confidence to speak the hopes in your hearts and to express the love that stirs your souls.
00:38:03.000As long as you have pride in your beliefs, courage in your convictions, and faith in God, Then you will not fail.
00:38:14.000As long as America remains true to its values, loyal to its citizens, and devoted to its creator, then our best days are yet to come.
00:39:24.000Me and the Grypers will save the Trump campaign.
00:39:26.000We will give a voice to all of the rightful frustrations that the Trump supporters have, whether they're willing to direct their anger at me or the campaign, and I'll let them know.
00:42:16.000Can I just say, are you trusting Brian Adams?
00:42:20.000Our movement is about replacing a failed and corrupt political establishment with a new government controlled by you, the American people.
00:42:44.000The Washington establishment and the financial and media corporations that fund it exist for only one reason, to protect and enrich itself.
00:42:55.000The establishment has trillions of dollars at stake in this election.
00:43:00.000For those who control the levers of power in Washington and for the global special interest, they partner with these people that don't have your good in mind.
00:43:10.000Our campaign represents a true existential threat like they haven't seen before.
00:43:18.000This is not simply another four-year election.
00:43:21.000This is a crossroads in the history of our civilization that will determine whether or not we the people reclaim control over our government.
00:43:33.000The political establishment That is trying to stop us is the same group responsible for our disastrous trade deals, massive illegal immigration, and economic and foreign policies that have bled our country dry.
00:43:53.000The political establishment has brought about the destruction of our factories and our jobs as they flee to Mexico, China, and other countries all around the world.
00:44:04.000It's a global power structure that is responsible for the economic decisions that have robbed our working class, stripped our country of its wealth, and put that money into the pockets of a handful of large corporations and political entities.
00:44:21.000This is a struggle for the survival of our nation and this will be our last chance to save it.
00:44:30.000This election will determine whether we're a free nation or whether we have only the illusion of democracy but are in fact controlled by a small handful of global special interests rigging the system and our system is rigged.
00:45:15.000Me and the Gryphers will save the Trump campaign.
00:45:28.000We will give a voice to all of the rightful frustrations that the Trump supporters have, whether they're willing to direct their anger at me or at the campaign, and I'll let them know.
00:45:44.000And if they don't make the course correction, then it's on deck.
00:45:48.000He was saying to me, he's like, this is probably pretty cool for you.
00:45:51.000you I'm like yeah Trump is melting down a Mar-a-Lago as he watches his polling lead evaporate against combaters their time like that a lot of campaign gurus might throw their old playbook out the window but not Chris Lasavito
00:46:19.000a war has been waged in the shadows to take control of his movement and his brand It has been hijacked.
00:46:28.000The attack brings you all the champions now and die.
00:46:32.000These are the forgotten men and women of our country.
00:53:57.000And then nowadays, I am so upset that the things we did and the things we fought for and the boys that died for it, it's all gone down the drain.
00:54:12.000Our country's gone to hell in a handbasket.
00:54:17.000We haven't got the country we had when I was raised.
00:55:56.000This country is being ripped apart and raped and looted.
00:56:01.000We're being slowly poisoned and in some cases quickly murdered and assassinated.
00:56:07.000And we're killing ourselves every day, inadvertently, with the kinds of things that we eat and breathe and drink and see.
00:56:14.000People have got to start to radically begin to obey their conscience and tell the truth and do the right thing.
00:56:22.000People have got to start to get courageous.
00:56:25.000And this is the time for everybody to turn and look to God And to pray and to ask for strength and to ask for wisdom to get through this time and to transform and sanctify this country.
00:56:39.000And the alternative is that there will be no country.
00:56:43.000Is it really only as big as low gas prices?
00:56:46.000Is it really only so big as bringing inflation and gas prices and the corporate tax rate back down?
00:56:53.000It's not about waiting for someone to come in and change the policy and make it better.
00:56:57.000It's a personal decision that we all have to make to become soldiers of Christ.
00:57:26.000My own narrative is not one of some sudden, looming bolt of lightning out of the blue.
00:57:32.000It was a slow and steady, unrelenting stream of blips and blinks, glimmers and glares, low beams and high beams of light, some of which I did not want to see.
00:57:47.000And then finally, a point of no return reckoning.
00:57:56.000I think it was because I fiercely came out during the Greupel Wars of 2019 when so many of these brave young men were on college campuses challenging the likes of Zio Schill Dan Crenshaw, questioning him about his undying loyalty, and of course defending Nick Fuentes and so many of the stars of the burgeoning America First movement.
00:58:18.000Who, through an increasing amount of activism, are really going to ensure the future and the success of that movement.
00:58:27.000Me and the Gripers will save the Trump campaign.
00:58:30.000We will give a voice to all of the rightful frustrations that the Trump supporters have, whether they're willing to direct their anger at me or at the campaign, and I'll let them know.
01:01:26.000because if there are thousands and millions and tens of millions and hundreds of millions of Christians ready to meet their final destiny, then nothing can stop us and nothing will.
01:05:14.000They didn't hear us when we emailed them.
01:05:17.000And they didn't hear us when the Washington Post and every other news media outlet reported it.
01:05:23.000For that reason, the Goyper War will continue, and we will accelerate and intensify our plans.
01:05:32.000We have to deploy to Michigan, and we have to make it hurt as much as possible.
01:05:40.000If he wants to stop the pain, he must stop the betrayal of America first.
01:05:57.000My own narrative is not one of some sudden, booming bolt of lightning out of the blue.
01:06:02.000It was a slow and steady, unrelenting stream of blips and blinks, glimmers and glares, low beams and high beams of light, some of which I did not want to see.
01:06:17.000And then finally, a point of no return reckoning.
01:06:27.000I think it was because I fiercely came out during the Griper Wars of 2019 when so many of these brave young men were on college campuses challenging the likes of Zio Schill Dan Crenshaw, questioning him about his undying loyalty and of course defending Nick Fuentes and so many of the stars of the burgeoning America First movement.
01:06:49.000who, through an increasing amount of activism, are really going to ensure the future and the success of that movement.
01:08:52.000We will give a voice to all of the rightful frustrations that the Trump supporters have, whether they're willing to direct their anger at me or at the campaign, and I'll let them know.
01:15:43.000you you you you you you you you you you you
01:16:01.000you you you you you you you you you you you you you you you you you you
01:16:20.000you you you you you you you you you you you you you you you you you you you you you you you
01:16:38.000you you you you you you you you you you you you you you you you you you you you you you you you you you
01:16:57.000you you you you you you you you you you you you you you you you you you you you you you you you you you you you you you you you you you you you you you you you you you you you you you you you you you you Good
01:18:09.000And this is something I've been covering past week or two, which is seemingly a recognition by America's elite institutions that they were effectively wrong.
01:18:21.000And we've been questioning whether that is sincere and authentic or whether that represents a shifting political reality, which is to say it is interest-based and cynical rather than sincere and And one of the big developments in that trend is the recent decision by the Washington Post not to endorse a presidential candidate this year.
01:18:47.000They were the second major paper not to do so after the L.A. Times, which we discussed last week.
01:18:53.000And following that decision, Jeff Bezos wrote an editorial in The Washington Post basically explaining the decision.
01:19:01.000And he goes even further than defending the decision not to endorse either candidate.
01:19:06.000He actually acknowledges that the mainstream media has lost all its credibility and talks about why that is.
01:19:15.000And then announced a push to hire more conservative writers.
01:22:36.000So it's not going so well for them, and I think that's the death blow that was dealt by Trump, just kind of unconquerable ideology, in addition to other significant developments like October 7th.
01:25:07.000And I'll get into some of those thoughts towards the end of the show when we get into the Kamala speech.
01:25:12.000But anyway, so that is going to be our plan, by the way.
01:25:16.000I'm going to be doing a blowout stream next Tuesday.
01:25:19.000It's going to start very early and it's going to go until the whole thing is done and counted because, you know, we just got to be vigilant and see what they're up to.
01:25:28.000I have no idea what's going to happen.
01:25:35.000In the national average, which is an average of all the national polling that polls public opinion for the whole country, Trump is up by 0.3%.
01:25:52.000In the swing states, all of the top swing states, which are Nevada, Arizona, Georgia, North Carolina, Pennsylvania, Michigan, and Wisconsin, the average of all those swing states has Trump at 0.9%.
01:26:08.000So if you take the average of each state and then average all of those averages, Trump is up by 0.9% in the top battlegrounds.
01:26:18.000And it looks like Trump is favored in Arizona, Georgia, North Carolina and Nevada.
01:26:23.000And it looks about split in Wisconsin, Michigan and Pennsylvania, which are must win.
01:26:28.000One of those, if they go to Trump, Trump wins.
01:26:57.000In 2020 and 2016, the polls underestimated Trump by about 3% to 4%.
01:27:02.000So if they underestimate Trump this time, he wins, he runs the table.
01:27:08.000But in the midterms, just two years ago, the polls underestimated the Democrats by four points.
01:27:16.000So if the polls underestimate the Democrats like they did in 22, then Kamala runs the table and she wins in a blowout.
01:27:26.000So, financial and betting markets say Trump, but the polls, and again, you could say presidential elections are fundamentally different than midterm elections, in which case stands to reason that Trump is underestimated.
01:27:39.000But you would also then have to assume that the pollsters didn't adjust, even though they did not between 2016 and 2020.
01:27:48.000But this is how the table is set a week out.
01:27:53.000I mean, in my gut, I think Trump has it.
01:27:56.000But between the women who are going to turn out because of abortion, because of the fraud, because of all the early voting, and you saw what happened in Washington.
01:28:08.000In Washington state, someone, there was an arson attack on a dropbox.
01:28:12.000They said a dropbox full of votes on fire.
01:28:15.000And that just demonstrates the insecurity of the process.
01:28:20.000So between the women and the abortion factor, because it is a turnout game, and if the Democrats can turn out women, they will win.
01:28:31.000Between that and the steal and the phenomenon of early voting, which is incredibly insecure and prone to fraud...
01:28:39.000I think it's going to be very unpredictable.
01:28:43.000And it could go anywhere from a Kamala blowout, like she wins.
01:28:48.000Everything other than, like, maybe Georgia, North Carolina, or Trump wins the whole thing.
01:29:13.000Trump is feeling confident, but there are a lot of people in his camp that say you cannot become complacent.
01:29:19.000You have to turn out on the day because Republicans are favored on election day versus early voting.
01:29:26.000So it's going to come down to the wire.
01:29:28.000Who knows what's going to happen, if it's going to be a repeat of 2020 or if it's going to be clean and over and done by the end of the evening like it was in 2016.
01:29:37.000And then, of course, what happens the day after?
01:29:40.000Regardless of the outcome, what happens the day after?
01:30:22.000It's been a long time since I took a vacation, so I'm thinking maybe January I'll take a couple weeks off, come back for the inauguration, and then we'll be there for the first hundred days of the Harris administration or the second Trump administration, which would be...
01:30:57.000He would be the most consequential figure since Franklin Roosevelt.
01:31:00.000Ronald Reagan, maybe Franklin Roosevelt.
01:31:04.000So, it's going to be an exciting time.
01:31:06.000I don't feel that excited about it, but, you know, I felt that way in 2020 and then the rubber hit the road almost immediately once the voting started.
01:31:16.000So, anyway, before we get into the news, I want to remind you to smash the follow button on Rumble to get a push notification whenever I go live.
01:31:25.000Smash the like button, leave a comment on the video, let me know what you think about the show.
01:36:25.000But I was watching Ben Shapiro's speech yesterday.
01:36:28.000He went to Cornell and gave a talk to their Young Americas for Freedom or Young Americas Foundation.
01:36:38.000And I watched it because it was in my YouTube recommended.
01:36:41.000First of all, it was unbelievable because that guy charges I think like $100,000 as a speaking fee.
01:36:47.000He gave a 20-minute talk, took questions for 40 minutes, and then left promptly after one hour.
01:36:55.000And it was the most extraordinarily Jewish display I have ever seen in my entire life.
01:37:02.000You know, it's sort of like, I'm Italian.
01:37:05.000I feel like white people, specifically Mediterranean, we kind of have like the five guys mentality.
01:37:13.000Like Five Guys, if you go to their restaurant and they give you fries, they give you like a cup of fries, but they overflow the cup and the bag is full of fries as well.
01:38:01.000If I'm at an event, I shake everybody's hand.
01:38:04.000Shapiro shows up, charges him $100,000, takes a briefcase from children with $100,000, speaks for 20 minutes, which is like shorter than a network television show without advertisements, takes questions, and then says, oop, it's an hour exactly.
01:39:45.000And they call it this Marxist principle of from each according to their ability, to each according to their need.
01:39:56.000If there are structural issues in the system, racism, sexism...
01:40:06.000these marginalized groups that are disadvantaged by the white man, by men, by the capitalist hegemony, whatever you want to call it, they say their job is to rectify the world's inequities or inequalities through they say their job is to rectify the world's inequities or They need to rectify that through, and they call it various things, redistribution, justice, democratization, whatever you want to call it.
01:40:36.000But this is, in general, the language of the left.
01:40:39.000It's all about disparities between the groups, economic groups, racial groups, between the rich and the poor, between whites and blacks, between men and women, between social or cultural categories, And their job is to use the state to rectify those disparities because they see those disparities as resulting only from a power imbalance which is enforced by these kinds of social constructs like white supremacy,
01:41:12.000And the right rebuts those narratives with a couple of ideas.
01:41:18.000From the mainstream conservatives, and that is what most people are familiar with, they'll say, well, the disparities, for example, between whites and blacks has nothing to do with the preeminence of whites and how much power they accumulated through wealth.
01:41:51.000They say that if only these black people, women and indigent people could get out of their own way and graduate high school, get married and hold a steady job, then they could have a solid income just like the white people.
01:42:09.000And the alt-right, which came around about 2015, 2016, that's when it became more popular, they have an alternative hypothesis.
01:42:18.000Why are there these persistent inequalities?
01:42:22.000Why is there this persistent inequity?
01:42:26.000It's because of IQ. They say that within and between the groups, there is a stratification based on genetic, heritable, innate intelligence.
01:42:37.000And that being the predictor of future success, that explains why some rise and some fall.
01:42:44.000Those that are rich are rich because they earned it because they are smarter.
01:42:53.000Maybe there was nothing they could have done because they were born stupid.
01:42:57.000And if you're born stupid and you cannot...
01:43:00.000Operate in a dynamic environment and take initiative and be independent, then you can never be an entrepreneur and you can never take risks and amass vast sums of wealth.
01:43:10.000You can never be a value creator like a great capitalist.
01:43:14.000And those are really the two conservative answers, whether it's culture, which is something like behaviors that are transmitted by By parenthood or that are transmitted by media or by mentorship or its genetics, which is really behaviors and information that is transmitted through genes.
01:43:39.000But they're fundamentally the same thing, which is to say that the disparities are justified.
01:43:45.000The disparities are the way they are, and they're deserved.
01:43:49.000The rich are rich because they either have the good behaviors that they learned or that they were born with, and the poor are poor because they have the behaviors that they were taught or that they were born with.
01:44:34.000And I'm not saying that the idea—and by the way, it's something I happen to believe in.
01:44:39.000And I'm not saying it's a bad idea because he's Jewish.
01:44:43.000But Steve Saylor invented the term human biodiversity, which is what people call this idea, that there is diversity within the human species, within the population.
01:44:54.000Like all species, there is a taxonomy, just like there are animals and plants, and then there are mammals and fish.
01:45:02.000Within human beings, there is a sub-taxonomy of races—white, black, Asian, indigenous, American— And within those categories, there's sub-races within those.
01:45:17.000Within the white race, there's Mediterranean, Slavs, Nords.
01:45:45.000Now, Steve Saylor at the same time also wrote that he is Jewish and And he is proud of being Jewish because Jews are the most intelligent race.
01:45:56.000And he said that if the non-Jewish people ever found out that the Jews are better than us and smarter than us and they have merited all that they have, well, us stupid non-Jewish people would come for the Jews with pitchforks and torches because of envy.
01:46:42.000And he found out through, I think, a DNA or a genealogy investigation that he is Jewish himself.
01:46:49.000And he says the reason Jews are so successful is their IQ. And then I considered the Ben Shapiro talk last night where he talked about these themes.
01:46:59.000And he said the reason that some are rich and some are poor is because of victimhood, victim hierarchy, categorizing people as oppressed and oppressor.
01:47:08.000And I thought, you know, on the one hand, these arguments, we think these arguments buttress the merit of the white man.
01:47:19.000We think that when the left comes and says to the white man, you didn't build that, you didn't earn that, you're too rich, your gains are ill-gotten through racism and oppression and white supremacy.
01:47:31.000We think that these arguments offered up by Jews like Steve Saylor and Ben Shapiro would say, well, the wealth of nations is distributed based on IQ or it's distributed based on culture.
01:47:45.000We look at that and we say, well that bolsters our claim to what we have, which is wealth.
01:47:50.000We have the money and we have the status that we have and we should not be attacked because we earned it.
01:47:56.000Or, you know, we're, well we're just smarter.
01:48:00.000In reality though, those arguments have a dual use.
01:48:06.000At the same time that those arguments might tend to defend white people, they also defend the Jews that push those ideas.
01:48:16.000Because, of course, when you consider the wealthy in America and the powerful...
01:48:23.000It's a lot of white people, but it is really disproportionately Jewish people, as we've been talking about.
01:48:28.000When you look at the top donors to the political parties, the top hedge fund managers, who's running the investment banks, who's running the major asset managers, who's running the major venture capital firms, private equity firms, when you look at who's running the talent agencies, the Hollywood studios, okay, it is a lot of Jewish people.
01:48:47.000Who's running the Ivy League universities?
01:48:54.000But, if you believe what Saylor or Shapiro are saying about human biodiversity or about victim mentality, well, this arrangement is defensible because, well, you know, they work harder than us.
01:49:08.000They are very, um, they're focused on scholarship, they focus on education, hard work, they're family-oriented, they get married, they have strong families, um, They earned it.
01:49:24.000When they run all the major asset managers, well, that's because they earned it.
01:49:31.000They were smart enough to run the admissions offices in the Ivy League.
01:49:34.000They were just so smart that they got all those positions.
01:49:38.000Or, like I said, they worked hard and they just have a superior culture.
01:49:44.000And I was thinking, I wonder if when Steve Saylor or Ben Shapiro argue these things, are they really arguing on behalf of the white people or are they arguing on behalf of the Jewish people?
01:49:55.000But then I started to consider, because that is typically what you'll find.
01:50:00.000We read the article from Chris Ruffo last week.
01:50:03.000Chris Rufo wrote an article slamming me and the Groypers in Compact magazine, and he said that if you come up with anti-Semitic conspiracy theories, that's because you're jealous.
01:50:15.000And the only way America will survive is if we have an economy that is based on merit and fairness and individualism.
01:50:23.000And if people are successful, we cannot judge it because it's only because they worked hard.
01:50:30.000If anyone has anything to say about it, that's just because they're envious.
01:50:35.000And I said, you know, that's very interesting that he used that argument to call for the censorship of anti-Semitic conspiracy theories.
01:50:42.000And it's very interesting that that echoes what Steve Saylor and Ben Shapiro say, which is, if you are not happy about this arrangement, which is the distribution of wealth and power, you're just jealous.
01:51:03.000This arrangement is just because of the natural order of things, because of the environment and the right of birth.
01:51:11.000And if you take issue with how it's being distributed, you're a conspiracy theorist and you're creating conspiracy theories to rationalize your deep-seated anger and envy over those that have more than you.
01:51:27.000And it's interesting that whether it's Chris Ruffo, who is not even Jewish, by the way, but works with them, Shapiro and Saylor, they're all really echoing the same thing.
01:51:39.000And I was thinking, is it really the white people that enjoy that privilege and Because, of course, that is the defense.
01:51:48.000The left is laying siege to white America.
01:51:52.000It's white supremacy, white nationalism, white privilege, white this, white that.
01:51:57.000They're angry at the whites for allegedly having all the power and wealth.
01:52:02.000Here come in Chris Ruffo, Steve Saylor, and Shapiro to say, no, no.
01:52:07.000The reason that the white people have all this privilege is because they earned it.
01:52:16.000But is it really the white people that have those privileges?
01:52:20.000Because if the left is able to attack whites all day, every day, and it's the only group that is so disorganized, and maybe you could argue so weak that they can't retaliate against those that attack them, do they really have the power?
01:52:38.000We all know you cannot attack black people as a race because they are organized and they will make a stink.
01:52:58.000And that is because either they lack the will or the clout or the organization to retaliate against their opponents.
01:53:06.000To retaliate against those who come basically openly against their interests.
01:53:15.000And then you start to consider the aforementioned, which is when you look at these different institutions, it is really Jewish people that predominate.
01:53:24.000It is Jewish people that actually have a higher proportion of the student body at some of these Ivy Leagues.
01:53:29.000It is Jewish people that run the majority of Ivy Leagues.
01:53:33.000Jewish people that run BlackRock, that run Goldman Sachs, that run the talent agencies, that run the record labels, the Hollywood studios that run five of the big media conglomerates that control 90% of the media.
01:53:47.000And then you start to consider the nature of those roles because when we talk about inequality, we're typically talking about things like income.
01:53:57.000We're talking about things like income We're talking about things like executive roles.
01:54:03.000We're talking about really something like cash flow.
01:54:10.000We're really talking about average people.
01:54:12.000But we all know that the powerful are a very small club of positions.
01:54:18.000It's not like doctors run the country or lawyers run the country.
01:54:22.000It's like there's a handful of people Of super wealthy individuals, super wealthy owners, super important positions in key institutions that are making the decisions.
01:54:36.000And I started to ask myself, is it really so important how the income is earned?
01:54:42.000Or is the question really about how power is distributed?
01:54:46.000Because those are fundamentally two different questions.
01:54:50.000Whether you have a right to earn a living and become rich through your labor and skills, that's a very different story than who is entitled to wield power in our society with the highest level positions which are actually appointed, which are dispensed by the powerful.
01:55:17.000And so some examples I think of are like an Ivy League's admissions office.
01:55:24.000Is that something that someone earns through the market, through their industry and skill, or is that something that is appointed?
01:55:32.000The faculty of those schools, again, earned or appointed.
01:55:36.000And then when you think of something like BlackRock, when you think of something like the Rothschild's banking system, when you think about The mainstream media, do you earn your way through skill into becoming the owner of a massive conglomerate?
01:55:57.000And let's think about the nature of these massive conglomerates and these critical financial institutions.
01:56:05.000I mean, in some cases you can call them monopolies or oligopolies.
01:56:09.000Did they really compete and thrive in a free market?
01:56:14.000Or did they enjoy the benefits of privileges from the state or collusion or network effects from other countries or from other cities within the United States and legacy effects?
01:56:29.000And so the story about what really matters, which is power, and specifically something like wealth, which is deeply related to power, is sort of a different story and is governed by a different set of rules and considerations than something like income and employment and jobs and entrepreneurship.
01:56:49.000Because what is really being said by people like Rufo and Shapiro and Saylor is all of the powerful people deserve to be powerful.
01:57:01.000Because in our capitalist society, it is the richest.
01:57:07.000It is the most, the people with the most merit.
01:57:10.000It is the most talented who amass the most wealth and then can accumulate power.
01:57:17.000And you accumulate wealth through your hard work and industry and merit.
01:57:22.000And we live in a country where anybody so long as they work hard is entitled to make as much money as possible and then wield power.
01:57:33.000And so in a way it is a defense of a power structure disguised as a defense of Of a market, of a value system based on fairness for how a market should work.
01:57:50.000And so what we're thinking about is, in the abstract, should an individual be able to start a company?
01:57:58.000Should an individual be able to employ people or borrow money or something like that?
01:58:04.000Because if you believe that, then everyone who has power is entitled to have it because everybody starts there.
01:58:13.000Everybody starts as an individual looking to take advantage of opportunities.
01:58:18.000And then they wind up by becoming a good capitalist as a very powerful person in America, making decisions that affect everybody.
01:58:30.000They can consolidate through horizontal and vertical integration, entire industries and make decisions even in the private sector that affect hundreds of millions of people.
01:58:40.000And we say they have that privilege, they have that right because they earned it, because as long as you believe anyone can work hard and make a living, and that is how the system works, then that's how they got to where they are.
01:58:58.000But upon further inspection, we realized that's actually not how society works.
01:59:03.000What we're really talking about is not a market.
01:59:06.000We're really not talking about labor and industry and entrepreneurship and professions.
01:59:11.000We're not talking about people that go to school and become lawyers and then make a good income and things like that.
01:59:19.000We're talking about people that it's a people across time and across the world working together, fusing state power and private power, in some cases using mobster tactics, using these other institutions that we don't even have names for them as a category.
01:59:41.000What about the role and the leverage of media in society?
01:59:47.000Is there some kind of combined forces, combined arms, metaphorically, that is being used by a group that To accumulate power.
02:00:00.000And what we're calling that is income inequality.
02:00:03.000What we're calling that is the free market when it's really not that.
02:00:08.000And it's really not concerning that question.
02:00:10.000It's not concerning the question of income and fairness and employment.
02:00:14.000It's really concerning the question of who is the decision maker.
02:00:18.000And the reason why that question matters is because let's say even hypothetically it worked the way they said it did.
02:00:26.000Whether the powerful became powerful through merit in a competitive market system or not, would we approve of power being accumulated by really any group of people as long as they accumulated it through merit?
02:00:44.000Or are there other things that need to qualify a person to wield power in our society?
02:00:55.000Accumulated so much capital because he's a good capitalist and then donated hundreds of millions of dollars to political campaigns and influence regulations and owned a newspaper, the paper of record that influenced the minds of the masses, and they were influencing the society and they were influencing the course of history.
02:01:15.000Would we defend the basis of that person's power purely because they achieved it through merit?
02:01:21.000Of course not, because we would say that virtue is another qualification for power.
02:01:26.000Maybe we don't care who we're buying our groceries from or lemonade from, but we do care who's controlling the media and influencing campaigns and creating the movies.
02:01:37.000Moreover, what if a Chinese foreign national did the same thing?
02:01:41.000Would we say that we're going to let our economy...
02:01:44.000Let's say the Federal Reserve Board was controlled all by Chinese nationals or first or second generation Chinese immigrants.
02:01:52.000Would we say that they are entitled to that kind of power over our economy simply because they earned it, because they were smarter, because they worked harder, they were better at math, whatever the reason...
02:02:06.000Of course not, because we would say that you need some kind of rootedness.
02:02:10.000You would need some kind of demonstration of allegiance, skin in the game in the country, to have that kind of power, to be trusted.
02:02:20.000And so the question that they want to talk about is something like, do you have a right to make a living?
02:02:28.000But the question that they're really answering is...
02:02:33.000Is the power matrix as it exists justified and on what grounds?
02:02:39.000Because somebody like myself would say these people are not Christian.
02:02:54.000But they would contend that that's malicious envy, conspiracy theories...
02:03:00.000And whatever you think about that, well, it doesn't matter because this is a meritocratic system.
02:03:07.000And I think that the language of the right needs to evolve beyond this kind of vulgar consumer economics that we talk about because our economics is different than their economics.
02:03:20.000When we think about interest rates, we think about a savings account.
02:03:27.000We think about how much it costs to borrow money to buy a car.
02:03:31.000When they talk about interest rates, they're thinking about how much it costs to borrow money from the Federal Reserve.
02:03:37.000They're thinking about quantitative easing.
02:03:39.000They're thinking about as the owners of asset managers, as the owner of major firms, they're thinking about it in a completely different way.
02:03:47.000When we think about debt, we're thinking about credit card debt.
02:03:50.000We're thinking about debt on our house, debt on our car.
02:03:53.000We're thinking about debt you're going to pay back that's actually a liability.
02:03:57.000When they think about debt, they're thinking about debt as leverage.
02:04:01.000They're thinking about debt as part of a vast portfolio.
02:04:05.000I mean, in some cases of literally managing the economy.
02:04:09.000And so when powerful people talk to us about inequality, they're talking, they're speaking a language that we're interpreting as whether you drive a Toyota Corolla or whether you drive a Porsche.
02:04:25.000We're thinking about whether you live in a single bedroom house or whether you're living in a townhome in the city.
02:04:35.000When in reality, the question is really concerning things like position.
02:04:39.000It's concerning things like who's really making the decisions?
02:04:46.000We're talking about people that either have a personal fortune in the hundreds of billions or have assets under management in the trillions of dollars.
02:04:56.000And so when a Shapiro flies in on a private jet to accept $100,000 to give a 20-minute lecture about how we all just need to accept our Calvinist predestination in life because we don't work hard or we're not smart enough.
02:05:13.000And we interpret that as, well, we deserve to be working at an insurance firm instead of driving a Bentley.
02:05:24.000The game that they're playing is they're really talking about why Jewish people control the asset managers that control all the trillions of dollars of wealth in the country.
02:05:33.000And they're talking about the venture capital and private equity firms that control all the biggest and most influential Silicon Valley firms.
02:05:41.000And they're talking about the billionaires that give all the money to the politicians that then write the laws and pass the And it's a different game.
02:05:54.000And the right needs to begin to talk and speak in the language of power and in the language of decision-making positions rather than in terms of income rights.
02:06:07.000And jobs and employment and things like this.
02:06:13.000It's sort of like blacks, Hispanics, and whites in this scrum over better and worse jobs, over taxes, over small sums of money.
02:06:24.000And then at the very, very tippy top, it's something altogether different that's going on.
02:06:31.000And so, you know, these arguments where they talk about, well, you know, here's why everything's okay.
02:06:36.000It's because of IQ. And their new argument they're putting out there, that J.D. Vance and Chris Rufo and Saurabh Amari and Dr.
02:06:47.000Olamaru, all these people are pushing out is colorblind meritocracy.
02:06:53.000They're saying the new vision for America is to tear down diversity, equity, and inclusion, which is like affirmative action, this reverse racist, redistributive policies, and non-discrimination, anti-discrimination stuff.
02:07:07.000And we must replace it with colorblindness, a colorblind meritocracy, which means however all the different races wind up, we're going to accept the results because they earned it through merit.
02:07:21.000And they're saying that is a preferable alternative to DEI, which says, you know, we need some black people.
02:08:50.000It's not political and there is no clout or politics involved in those decisions.
02:08:56.000If you're running the admissions offices at a university, that was because of labor and entrepreneurship and had nothing to do with patronage.
02:09:06.000And so they're pushing on us, they're foisting upon us this sort of slave morality to say, it's okay if we're not powerful because, you know, the powerful deserve it.
02:09:18.000And let's turn away from these considerations about distributing power in a way that's fair.
02:09:24.000Let's dispense with that notion entirely because it's rooted in jealousy.
02:09:31.000And I think you can see very clearly who that is intended to benefit.
02:09:34.000It is a narrative that supports power, the current power structure, against those that seek to change it.
02:09:44.000And if you support it, you may think, oh no, we're supporting the preeminence of white men.
02:09:49.000You're supporting the preeminence of those in charge.
02:09:52.000And those in charge are not white men.
02:09:54.000And we know that because white men are relentlessly attacked.
02:10:07.000And those are the people that are currently entrenched.
02:10:10.000And those are the people that are the beneficiary of this This argument that fortifies those that are currently in power and legitimizes them.
02:10:22.000So, and I'll give you a perfect example.
02:10:26.000Harvard used to have a Jewish president.
02:10:29.000After the George Floyd riots and the advent of DEI, that Jewish president was replaced by Claudine Gay, a black woman, the first black woman to be a president of Harvard.
02:10:39.000Now, whoever controls Harvard is a very powerful person.
02:10:44.000And if the Jewish people lost that position, they lost a lot of power.
02:10:48.000They lost a lot of power to a black leftist.
02:10:55.000Jewish alumnus Bill Ackman coordinated a high-pressure campaign with Ronald Lauder and some of the others and his allies in the media and in Congress and in the think tanks, and they overthrew her and replaced her with Alan Garber, a Jewish doctor.
02:11:11.000And now once again, Harvard has a Jewish president.
02:11:14.000At University of Pennsylvania, the chairman of the board was replaced by the head of the North American Jewish Federation.
02:11:21.000So you could say that two institutions, a powerful role that is given on the basis of patronage, it is a question of politics, not merit.
02:11:30.000Those two positions replaced Jews with leftists because of DEI.
02:11:37.000Because of arguments about power redistribution, which should be a function of representation.
02:11:43.000They were both overthrown because of wealthy Jews and replaced by Jewish people.
02:11:49.000The Jewish people grabbed the power back under the premise of colorblind meritocracy.
02:12:08.000And they did it not through merit, but through their political clout, through their wealth, which they did not earn through industry, but they earned through their transnational support network, through the fact that they act as a collective body, not as individuals.
02:12:24.000And could you really say that was on the basis of their individual merits or the fact that they created a system that Through collective action, combined arms.
02:12:38.000And this is why this has put me on the other side of the DEI thing from other conservatives.
02:12:43.000And I don't support like affirmative action.
02:12:47.000But I recognize that people are now pushing back on DEI, not because they're in favor of, you know, hey man, if you work hard, you should be able to make it.
02:13:24.000And what I noticed between all these arguments is you have these people promulgating that.
02:13:29.000That's why, by the way, they're not interested in arguments about Christian nationalism.
02:13:36.000They're not interested in arguments about nationalism at all.
02:13:40.000Because you would say, because someone like myself would say, and here's the alternative, Harvard and the asset managers, the Federal Reserve Bank, all these powerful institutions should be run by Americans and they should be run by Christians.
02:13:57.000So now could you argue that's more like DEI than meritocracy?
02:14:37.000It's about the essential parts of who you are.
02:14:41.000And so I don't believe in a fucking colorblind meritocracy or a melting pot because what those really say is we should be ruled by foreigners.
02:14:53.000Melting pot, colorblind meritocracy, multiracial populism, whatever you want to call it, diversity.
02:15:02.000What it really means is we should give power to foreigners, right?
02:15:09.000Whether they're black leftists or whether they're Jews, we should give power to foreigners because it's fair, because they earned it, because they were oppressed, because we're all human.
02:15:42.000Yeah, I do think actually that we must be deeply concerned about who has the power, what they look like, what allegiance they have, what religion they practice.
02:15:53.000Yeah, I care about who has the power because power is not earned.
02:15:57.000Power is distributed and it's a team game.
02:16:05.000When you look at Russia, China, France, the United States, Iran, when you look at the history of people that take power, people that wield power, it's networks.
02:16:24.000It's earned by dubious means, patronage, favors.
02:16:29.000Loyalty, allegiance, and those teams are united by faith, they're united by nationality, they're united by race, ideology, and the question is, should the powerful people be able to be anything other than American Christians?
02:17:49.000But it is to say, should an immigrant, should a foreigner who just transplanted here wield that kind of influence in our society over people that have been here for generations?
02:18:00.000I think they should be able to go to work for America.
02:18:03.000But I don't think they should be able to run America.
02:18:06.000If Elon wants to come here and contribute to America, I think that's great.
02:18:11.000And I think, you know, truly exceptional people, not millions upon millions of foreign hordes, but, you know, if you have exceptional doctors and entrepreneurs of which there are maybe hundreds in a given year, okay, fine.
02:18:25.000But I think they should be able to contribute to America without necessarily accumulating all this kind of power, without any other considerations, right?
02:18:36.000So, and by the way, you know, the way it is now, of course they can do that.
02:18:41.000They can arrive on our shores and they can manipulate our system and all we can do is complain about it.
02:18:45.000But that's only if we don't have people power.
02:18:49.000If the people of the country, of which there are hundreds of millions, refuse to buy, refuse to work, refuse to vote, well, they could not run our system.
02:19:00.000But it is these ideas, it's these ideologies which convince us to be complacent, to vote for them, to buy from them.
02:19:36.000They couldn't make money in this country.
02:19:41.000But they convince us it is their right to wield power in our country because they earned it.
02:19:48.000And I think that is the least conservative thing I've ever heard.
02:19:53.000It is the least, this unlimited individualism, boundless individualism that we're supposed to adopt, it's the least conservative thing I've ever heard.
02:20:05.000No, no, conservatism is not about individuals.
02:20:27.000And what is our family without their commitment to their community, without their belief and their belonging in their nation, without their faith in their God, without the things that make us American, without the things that make us European?
02:20:49.000What we are is not a function of our minute individual preferences for what we like to eat and what we like to buy and what we like to watch on TV. So...
02:21:04.000When they come in here and tell us it's our right to rule you because we're a colorblind meritocracy.
02:21:11.000We have no eye towards nation, family, race, ideology, flag, because we're all just abstract, atomic individuals connected to nobody.
02:21:25.000I mean, it's just not even, there's just no basis for that in reality, and that's an extremely liberal point of view.
02:21:31.000So, they're going to be pushing this colorblind meritocracy.
02:23:27.000Because those arguments, like I said, they have a dual use.
02:23:31.000They sound one way to us, but it does something else for them, which is far more powerful than So, the right has to adopt the language of power.
02:24:14.000There was a decision made at the Washington Post a couple of days ago that for the first time in like 80 years, they will not be endorsing a candidate in the presidential race.
02:24:25.000They're endorsing neither Trump nor Kamala, and And as I said, this follows suit from the LA Times, which did the same thing last week.
02:24:37.000And initially people said it's just unbelievable because, of course, Washington Post literally rebranded after Trump won in 2016 to be an anti-Trump paper.
02:25:11.000And presumably they mean something like, you know, if we don't constantly bitch and seethe about Trump 24 hours a day, democracy is going to die.
02:25:23.000And now, so out of all the papers, New York Times, LA Times, Time Magazine, New York Post, whatever...
02:25:33.000It was the Washington Post, arguably the most anti-Trump paper that has ultimately surrendered and admitted defeat.
02:25:41.000They not only declined to endorse Kamala this year, which everyone anticipated they would, but the owner of the Washington Post, Jeff Bezos, who is also the owner of Amazon, Twitch, Amazon AWS, Blue Origin, a whole host of companies...
02:25:59.000Bezos came out with an editorial yesterday on the front page arguing even further than that, they're not going to do endorsements at all in the future, and they're actually going to hire more conservative writers.
02:26:19.000It says, quote, in the annual public surveys about trust and reputation, journalists and the media have regularly fallen near the very bottom, often just above Congress.
02:26:30.000But in this year's Gallup poll, we have managed to fall below even Congress.
02:26:34.000Our profession is now the least trusted of all.
02:26:37.000Something we are doing is clearly not working.
02:26:40.000Most people believe the media is biased.
02:26:42.000Anyone who doesn't see this is paying scant attention to reality.
02:26:58.000We must work harder to control what we can control to increase our credibility.
02:27:03.000Presidential endorsements do nothing to tip the scales of an election.
02:27:07.000What presidential endorsements actually do is create a perception of bias, a perception of non-independence, ending them as a principled decision and it's the right one.
02:27:19.000Lack of credibility isn't unique to the post.
02:27:22.000Our brethren newspapers have the same issue and it's a problem not only for media but also for the nation.
02:27:28.000Many people are turning to off-the-cuff podcasts, inaccurate social media posts and other unverified news sources which can quickly spread misinformation and deepen divisions.
02:27:40.000The Washington Post and the New York Times win prizes, but increasingly we talk only to a certain elite.
02:29:30.000People published op-eds in the New York Times claiming to be working against the Trump agenda inside the administration.
02:29:38.000Then he was overthrown in 2020 with the mail-in ballots after BLM, after COVID, after the siege on Trump because of the pandemic, the economy collapsed.
02:29:48.000Then there was the effort to stop people from overturning the election, and a vast conspiracy was involved to do that.
02:29:56.000After January 6th, he was censored on social media.
02:29:59.000Republicans threatened to impeach him themselves.
02:30:03.000His own current campaign manager said he should be removed from office through the 26th Amendment.
02:30:08.000He was ostracized in the GOP, condemned by people like Tucker Carlson and Kevin McCarthy, who are now loyal.
02:30:47.000And then just in the past year, once again, the GOP consolidated around Trump and they bent the knee.
02:30:57.000Then the Silicon Valley donors and some Wall Street donors and the Israel lobby bent the knee and put their money behind Trump.
02:31:07.000Then with Elon Musk behind Trump, social media started to turn.
02:31:11.000Then many celebrities started to turn.
02:31:14.000Blacks and Hispanics gave a second look at Donald Trump.
02:31:18.000And now it seems like everybody in the whole country is in favor of Trump.
02:31:24.000In just the last one month of the campaign, it seems almost like there's a consensus that the establishment and the left are finished, totally discredited and have no future.
02:31:38.000So much so that the Washington Post, again, which was virtually reconstituted in opposition to Trump after he won the first time, is now dropping their opposition entirely.
02:32:32.000Trump, social media, Elon, conspiracy theorists, podcasts won in the Washington Post and the cloistered echo chamber liberal elites lost and we surrender and we will hire more Trump supporters.
02:32:47.000and And the surreality of it, that it is surreal, is because, like I said, it has been almost 10 years from June 2015 when Trump announced, until it's now nearly November 2024, nearly 10 years of day after day, relentless fighting.
02:34:40.000When I was in high school eight years ago, if you weren't a liberal pushing gay rights, BLM even before George Floyd, if you weren't listening to All Right by Kendrick Lamar, if you weren't smoking weed and all that kind of stuff, well, you were just a racist, retrograde, regressive piece of shit.
02:36:09.000Warfare, nobody even wants to be the warfare party.
02:36:12.000Even now, the Democrats are against illegal immigration.
02:36:18.000Everywhere you look, you see that that woke consensus from the Obama years, which was really a product of the Obama years, of the new atheists, the new left...
02:36:30.000Jon Stewart, anti-war, Occupy, it is all dead, it is all buried, it is all in the ground, it is over for them.
02:36:40.000And this is one of the big components of it, arguably maybe the biggest, because we know the role that the media plays.
02:36:48.000With that being said, I do think there is something more to it than that.
02:36:53.000I mean, a lot of people consider it this way, and I think, overall, this is a positive development.
02:37:00.000Because what Trump has really done is introduce competition.
02:37:24.000All the social media companies have had to tweak their policies because of the liberalization of Twitter.
02:37:29.000Twitch, YouTube, Instagram have all walked back their most strict community guidelines after Elon purchased Twitter because they recognized that they had gone too far.
02:37:43.000Elon owns Twitter and took it private.
02:37:47.000Jeff Bezos owns the Washington Post and Jeff Bezos owns Amazon which is the biggest e-commerce platform.
02:37:55.000Jeff Bezos owns AWS which is the biggest cloud platform.
02:38:00.000Jeff Bezos owns Blue Origin which is the competing private space company.
02:38:04.000Space is a very lucrative industry because satellites for commercial and military purposes have become extremely important.
02:38:14.000Elon Musk owns Tesla, which is an automobile company, largest private auto company.
02:38:21.000I think it is just strictly the largest American auto company right now.
02:38:25.000Elon owns SpaceX, the most valuable private space company, which is launching the satellites.
02:38:33.000Elon owns a host of other companies, including AI, artificial intelligence, which Bezos has also invested in.
02:38:42.000So two tech billionaires, each with a fortune in the hundreds of billions of dollars competing for the same space contracts, competing really in the same industries with artificial intelligence and other things, They also each bought media organs.
02:38:59.000Bezos bought the Washington Post, the paper of record in our capital city.
02:39:04.000And Elon bought Twitter, which is the short-form microblog, which is primarily used by pundits and people that are interested in breaking news, current events and political opinion and podcasting.
02:39:18.000But he seeks to make it the everything app.
02:39:21.000Now, when Elon bought X two years ago, he has used it to counter the left.
02:39:27.000He's used it to counter Democrats, used it to counter left-wing ideology.
02:39:31.000He's used it to support Republican candidates like Ron DeSantis and now Donald Trump.
02:39:37.000He's used it to counter wokeism and the ideology of the Democratic Party, used it to promote his companies like Tesla and SpaceX.
02:39:46.000And in this election, could you not say...
02:39:49.000That Kamala, who is backed by big tech, Amazon, Google, Microsoft, Facebook, or in other elections, Democrats were backed by Facebook, not so much now.
02:40:01.000And then Trump, who is backed by Elon, Peter Thiel, David Sachs, some of these venture capital type people.
02:40:10.000Could you not say that this actually represents a battle of the billionaires?
02:40:14.000Bezos back in the Democrats buying the post, fortifying the institutional Democrats to get contracts for AI, for Blue Origin, for Amazon.
02:40:24.000Elon buying Twitter, taking it private, using it to back the Republicans.
02:40:29.000Ron DeSantis, Donald Trump, contracts for SpaceX, giving him power over an office of government efficiency so he can review everything the government does.
02:40:48.000Did Elon by Twitter utilize it for his purposes?
02:40:53.000And of course with an ideology on top of it in order to empower his preferred candidate who will then control the regulatory agencies and the government contracts.
02:41:12.000I do prefer free speech and I'm glad the pressure is being exerted and this is how you would do it.
02:41:18.000But let's be very clear about who sponsored it and for what purpose and why all of this is going on.
02:41:26.000Bezos is not changing the policy at the Post because he became a free speech absolutist because he got muscles and stopped eating seed oils and now he supports Trump and what Trump represents, he recognizes that he lost the battle of money.
02:41:47.000He lost the battle over hearts and minds, which is a function of money.
02:41:53.000Through media, which is a megaphone, which is paid for.
02:41:59.000And Bezos is not so much surrendering his ideology as much as he is surrendering that his tactics did not work.
02:42:08.000But are Bezos and Musk even all that different?
02:42:11.000I mean, Musk is in favor of mass immigration through legal means.
02:44:45.000To talk about anything other than Israel and projects like, you know, Steve Bannon's show and many of these other shows, we know they're backed by Israel.
02:44:55.000So is it really a good thing that then that's just wide open?
02:45:01.000I think arguably it's preferable, but I don't think it comes without its peril.
02:45:05.000I don't think it comes without its pitfalls cutting a different way.
02:45:09.000I mean, maybe the pendulum is swinging now in the other direction.
02:45:11.000We're now maybe seeing the result of that.
02:45:16.000On the one hand, the Twitter experience, I think, was better before.
02:45:19.000On the other hand, we couldn't use it.
02:45:21.000The Twitter experience is probably better under the liberals.
02:45:53.000So we'll see if this is something that they actually have an ideological belief in that will allow us to take advantage of it and use it for our own ends, or if when we start to use it for our own ends as opposed to the ends of some billionaire or a foreign state, if we'll be cut down in a way not different than how we were cut down under the previous regime.
02:46:13.000Because if you'll recall, if you remember, when Twitter was founded, they said, this is the free speech wing of the free speech party.
02:46:22.000And that's how it started, but that's not how it ended.
02:46:26.000And I wonder if we'll see a similar transformation at Twitter.
02:46:36.000It's empowering a certain faction, a certain idea.
02:46:40.000Now we'll see how long they will allow us to have this power.
02:46:44.000And we'll see it's a real test if there is a true public service being done here or if it really is a completely cynical play by the billionaires to give us the appearance of a freedom when in reality it's a form of getting us to support their agenda and being complacent about not achieving our own.
02:47:05.000So it's a bit more complicated than people are letting on.
02:47:08.000But ultimately, I think a positive development.
02:47:11.000I think the, indisputably, the left-wing media was destroying America, promoting corruption, promoting the death of the white man through immigration.
02:47:22.000Promoting secularization, degeneracy, pride parades.
02:47:28.000It certainly is a safer harbor for traditional religion.
02:47:31.000It's a safer harbor for skepticism against science, progress, social liberalism, all these kinds of things.
02:47:40.000Safer harbor for people criticizing the powerful.
02:47:43.000So I do think with zero question at all, this is one of the most remarkably positive things The effects of the Trump era, I only wonder for how long we'll have it.
02:47:57.000I think it's worthwhile to scrutinize the dynamics that are going on just beneath the hood to give us a little clarity on what's really happening.
02:48:06.000But I'm not going to look a gift horse in the mouth just yet.
02:48:11.000More conservative writers at The Post, free speech on social media.
02:48:16.000here's a really important thing i really do believe that the opportunity is fleeting because as i've said free speech is power speech is power if you can influence many people and you can raise money then you can become powerful and if you become powerful then you can challenge the interests of other powerful people And powerful people don't typically tolerate that.
02:48:41.000If Elon owns Twitter and we start to challenge his interests, do you think he'd let us use Twitter for very long?
02:48:47.000I think that's an open-ended question.
02:48:49.000I think the answer is probably obvious.
02:48:53.000So I think we exist in a window right now where we have the opportunity.
02:48:57.000And if we have an extremely compelling message...
02:49:02.000We can get to a point where we can convince the masses to adopt something like our ideology.
02:49:09.000We can create a baseline and we can create a fertile ground for a nationalist movement to arise to truly challenge the establishment.
02:49:18.000But the goal is to break out of that containment.
02:49:23.000You know, they banned Trump way too late.
02:49:25.000By the time they banned him, the seeds were already sown.
02:49:29.000I think people like Elon Musk are counting on instrumentalizing us.
02:49:34.000Israel is counting on instrumentalizing us.
02:49:37.000They think they're going to voice Trump upon us and they're making a deal with the devil, with a golem, so to speak.
02:49:43.000They're making a deal with the nativist Gentiles, the nativist whites.
02:49:47.000They're giving an homage to the Christians.
02:49:51.000And they think that that is an acceptable risk to counter the left at this present moment and give Israel what it needs in this window.
02:50:00.000What we need to hope for is that the bargain is actually lopsided, that they've awakened the spirit of the people unknowingly, that this narrative of America first, breaking the constraints of wokeism, breaking the shackles of political correctness, of media censorship— That once those things are done and cannot be undone, they will have set the population on an inexorable path towards nationalism.
02:50:27.000And that once they have broken what previously confined the white man, which was guilt, fears of racism, crisis, all these kinds of things, that they won't be able to put the genie in the bottle.
02:50:57.000Why could we not fundamentally oppose immigration?
02:51:00.000Because of racism, because of the Jewish media, because then of social media censorship.
02:51:07.000They built up this cumulative architecture always increasing pressure to keep down the white consciousness, to keep down this desire for religion, this desire for nation.
02:52:48.000When Trump said America first, he might not have done it.
02:52:53.000But he spoke it into existence and people heard the signal.
02:52:57.000And even if he didn't do it, it doesn't matter.
02:53:00.000Because we heard it and it's in our hearts and it's now what we believe and it's also now acceptable and he broke the shackles of what made it impossible.
02:53:09.000And now that the media is sidelined, now that social media is liberated, now that attitudes have changed, can it go back the other way?
02:53:20.000Could it go back the other way if it was deemed absolutely necessary?
02:53:57.000The only hope is that what is going on, because it will deliver no fruit in itself, will sow the seeds for something like that to happen in the future.
02:54:05.000Or maybe even create the soil for that to grow in the future.
02:59:10.000I think that's, you know, if the Senate polling says Democrats are going to win, Republican polling says Republicans or the presidential polling says Republicans will win, you know, then it's a crapshoot.
02:59:27.000Because at the same time, the Senate polling, well, you're saying in 2020 there was a correlation.
03:00:17.000Do you like Pope Francis, who says turning your back on migrants is a grave sin, is BFFs with John Kerry tackling climate change, and is leading the charge on this whole interfaith thing?
03:06:21.000I do like hate all, look, granted I do hate all the characters, like Daenerys is so fucking cringe, and her simp is the worst, and the Starks are good, but the girls are cringe, you know, like the little girl likes to play with swords, that's dumb, but Ned Stark, we love Ned Stark, we love Jon Snow, we love Robb Stark, we love the Lannisters, and It's a little Aryan incest.
03:10:34.000There's a popular folk on girl on IG, non-lib take, Aaron Wexler, who only posts trad/mega content despite being a hardcore habat Zionist who writes articles re-bringing back Jewish defiance and anti-assimilation.
03:11:21.000If you guys know the deep lore, this is crazy, dude.
03:11:24.000RN's voice is making waves with degrees from Wharton and Penn in a background spanning the trading floor at Goldman Sachs to the startups of Silicon Valley.
03:19:30.000Kamala is the type of woman that sleeps her way up corporate then implements will company slogans and required cheers that the worker bees at the bottom find cringe and hate doing.
03:19:37.000If you ever worked at a place like Walmart, you know what I'm talking about.
03:20:01.000- Yeah, I did screenshot that. - Fernando Alonso Groy percent $10.
03:20:04.000I really hope the New York Times doesn't get Ben Shapiro and the rest of Khan Incorporated demonetized on YouTube with this story they've been working on.
03:20:09.000That would be terrible. - Yeah, have you seen that?
03:25:47.000If you were one inch inside of Howard Lutnick and Peter Thiel was one inch inside of you, which way do you move and why?
03:25:51.000Love the show Thanks Cremdologroar sent $5 We all know you're wearing shorts right now 0% chance you wear matching suit pants under that desk I'm not wearing shorts.
03:26:09.000Foy Lee sent $100, one in a billion chance that on Rogan Trump would spurg about Robert Lee kicking Lincoln's ass and turning him into a melancholic mess.
03:26:15.000Why haven't you taken the Lee pill yet, Nick?
03:26:17.000Outnumbered and out-supplied, he kept beating an army that was greater than 50% black and immigrants.
03:26:20.000And killed so many, they turned his home Arlington into a cemetery out of spite.
03:28:39.000I know you have your views about J.D. Vance, but do you feel anything positive for him remembering he defended you when you got banned on Twitter?
03:28:44.000Or has his public image and actions thrown everything out the window by this?
03:29:04.000If someone is a spy for Mossad or whatever, they're mobbed up with a particular group, you don't look at their thoughts and their words and say, I don't know, I think he's on our side.
03:31:23.000I also don't want to sound like some biased white South African bitch, but I always knew shit would intend well with Jubert, but I kept it to myself.
03:31:28.000Sneeko is like every brown friend in South Africa.
03:31:30.000They will always become tribalistic as the society degrades, and they become emotional, so they turn on us.
03:32:14.000My dad was arguing with me today at dinner asking how can Catholicism be the truth if the Pope is a raging liberal and if Catholics are the most vaccinated religion and if they teach faith plus works.
03:36:45.000If you chop up your little fruit, chop, chop, chop, and you spread it out on your rustic little wooden plate and you drizzle honey on it and then you go look, then you go and stand out in your yard and go look.
03:36:59.000Look, everyone, and your whole feed is just like fruit and food.
03:38:51.000It's like every guy has turned into an Instagram slut.
03:38:55.000We're supposed to believe, we the oppressed, we the incels, are led to believe that the based, you know, these like base trad goys are the ones that basically became Instagram hoes.
03:42:06.000So I really just hope he gets a grip and comes back to reality.
03:42:10.000Amoris de la Cruz sent $10, what's your opinion on people like Frasch being afraid of the JQ? He claims Christianity and every time Myron brings it up he refers to some dispensationalist cope by saying they're going to end the world.
03:42:19.000Protestantism is literally a cancer, they make us all look bad.
03:44:34.000She said Goldman Sachs, all these Israel-connected Silicon Valley firms, starts an Instagram account after October 7th, gets a spot in Tablet and Blaze and, interestingly enough, writes stuff, which is curious.
03:45:44.000All rise Ryan Hempel sent $50, cap What's cap?
03:45:49.000Boogly Woogly sent $10 Can't wait for the kickstream where you talk about how bad the last half of Game of Thrones is Fire monologue by the way DS sent $5 You're a few pounds away from a fully formed double chin when you look down It's never been this over I know, that's why I'm cutting.