00:01:39.000So some very big developments in the 2018 primaries in Pennsylvania.
00:01:44.000Nebraska and Idaho, and we'll talk about why that's important, what that means for the midterms.
00:01:49.000We're going to be talking about the latest on North Korea.
00:01:52.000It's gotten a little bit more contentious.
00:01:55.000There was an announcement yesterday, which we went over pretty briefly, about North Korea canceling a meeting between them and South Korea and threatening to cancel the U.S. North Korea summit.
00:02:18.000And last but certainly not least, we're going to talk about an update, a development with the Mueller probe.
00:02:24.000It was announced today by Rudy Giuliani, who's been brought on to represent the White House in their issue with this Russia collusion campaign by the Democrats.
00:02:34.000There's been a development with the Mueller probe where they said to the White House that they cannot indict the president.
00:02:40.000And we'll talk about what that means, how they're going to get away with it, and all the rest.
00:02:45.000But it's been a pretty rough day for me.
00:03:24.000Maybe it's because I'm such an eccentric savant that I just, you know, when it's late at night, it just gets stronger, right?
00:03:31.000But anyway, at like 5 a.m., I'm like, you know what?
00:03:34.000I've really got the inspiration to start a ton of new projects.
00:03:38.000So there's been a lot of movement on a lot of different things.
00:03:41.000Some are going to be longer term than others, but there are some big things in the works, which I think you're going to enjoy.
00:03:48.000There's some things you could see as early as this week and some things that are a little bit longer term, some just more like passion projects.
00:03:58.000I've been speaking to BG Cumbie, who I know many people wanted to see on the show, and I said that he was going to be a guest sometime this week.
00:04:06.000He should be appearing this week, maybe next week.
00:04:09.000We're still working over the details, so you got that to look forward to as well.
00:04:14.000So things are moving along on the show.
00:04:16.000We got another logo in the works, some graphics are coming, so we're very excited.
00:04:21.000Things are going very well here, and we got to get into the news, folks.
00:04:25.000We got to talk about it because there's just so much going on.
00:04:28.000And I think first I want to talk about the 2018 primary results because this is still pretty fresh in my mind.
00:04:35.000And I don't think you're going to hear so much about this because, well, I don't really know why.
00:04:39.000You should be hearing a lot about this because this is really instructive about 2018.
00:04:44.000I'm talking about the primaries that happened last night.
00:04:48.000And I think probably, if I could guess, why this isn't being talked about so much is because this is very bad for the so called blue wave that they say is going to make landfall.
00:05:01.000So last night you had the primary contests being held for the 2018 election, which is where the Republicans and Democrats make up their minds as to who they're going to nominate.
00:05:10.000And they held primary contests in Idaho, in Nebraska, Pennsylvania, and Oregon.
00:05:15.000But the race that we're really going to focus on, one in particular and several other ones, is a race in Nebraska's congressional district number two, which was a race, at least for the Democrats, between Kara Eastman and Brad Ashford.
00:05:30.000And this is one we talked about a little bit last night.
00:05:32.000This is one that I think is the most symptomatic of what we will see, the kinds of trends we're seeing for the November elections in 2018, which is something that I had talked about a long time ago, which was during the Texas primaries.
00:05:47.000And of course, this is the very startling and disturbing trend for Democrats the growing schism and cleavage between the progressives and the pragmatists.
00:05:58.000And we saw this, I think, about a couple of months ago when Texas held their primaries.
00:06:04.000And you saw this in multiple congressional races.
00:06:06.000You saw this with their Senate race, where the Democrats had expected that there was going to be a lot of enthusiasm for their side.
00:06:13.000Lots of people coming out, turning out to vote in the primaries, a record number of candidates running in the primaries, and women and minorities.
00:06:21.000And people were saying, this is the blue wave.
00:06:24.000And of course, in December, you looked at the generic ballot polling, which is just people say, well, would I pull the lever for a generic Republican or a generic Democrat in a 2018 congressional election?
00:06:35.000And Democrats had the advantage by something like 15 points in December.
00:06:39.000They still had a pretty high lead around the Texas primary, something like nine points.
00:06:43.000And you had all the special elections like Alabama, Pennsylvania's 8th district, I believe it was, between Rick Sacone and Connor Lamb, where they were doing great numbers.
00:06:52.000And so you had this big narrative going into these early, early contests for 2018 that Democrats were going to have a really strong showing.
00:07:00.000And a lot of the numbers supported that.
00:07:02.000A lot of 538 analysis, and the media was talking all about it.
00:07:07.000Republicans better be scared because if you're looking at primary turnout, the special elections, and all these other things, well, Democrats are going to turn out like crazy.
00:07:15.000They're going to unseat the Republicans in the House and maybe even the Senate.
00:07:19.000And me, if you'd ever listened to my podcast, which we're trying to get back on track, we're having a little difficulty with the PayPal, but I did talk about this at length on the 2018 Election HQ podcast.
00:07:32.000That if you really broke down the numbers, there were some troubling signs there.
00:07:36.000If you weren't just taking the media's word for it, if you weren't just saying, okay, well, the media says there's a blue wave, and I guess their numbers are indisputable, it's going to happen.
00:07:45.000If you really broke it down, there were some troubling signals from the very start, which is that during the Texas primary, this cleavage that was apparent all the way back then between ideological progressives and the pragmatists.
00:07:59.000We also talked about this during the DACA negotiations, where you had the pragmatists who were up for reelection in the Senate and in the House.
00:08:06.000Saying, well, we should make a deal with President Trump on DACA.
00:08:09.000We should give him some of the things he wants because if we don't, we're going to get killed in the general election because you'll have voters in the middle and on the right.
00:08:17.000They're not going to be happy that we shut down the government for illegals.
00:08:20.000They're not going to be happy that we didn't save DACA like we intended to.
00:08:24.000But at the same time, you had progressives in the party who said, you know, we're going to pursue this no matter what because it's Trump and we can't make a deal with him and all the rest.
00:08:34.000And so you saw these things all the way along, and I think you're seeing.
00:08:38.000As more contests happen, you're seeing that this trend is really being vindicated.
00:08:42.000This is going to be a real problem for them.
00:08:44.000And this was no more apparent than last night in Nebraska's second congressional district, where you had Kara Eastman, who was this super progressive.
00:08:52.000She ran on a platform that was explicitly part of the resistance, that was anti Trump, that was so far to the left.
00:08:59.000It was progressive, it was this social Democrat kind of Bernie Sanders style thing.
00:09:04.000And she was coming up against Brad Ashford, who, when we talked about this briefly last night, this district in.
00:09:11.000Nebraska is really the only competitive district in the state.
00:09:16.000This is a state that Barack Obama won.
00:09:18.000This is a state that Brad Ashford, a Democrat, won in 2014.
00:09:56.000And at the end of the day, he came away last night with less than 3%.
00:10:01.000Rather, he lost by less than 3% to Kara Eastman.
00:10:06.000And this spells big trouble for the Democrats because of somebody like Brad Ashford, who's got big money, who's establishment, who runs as a pragmatist, who runs as a blue dog in a red state.
00:10:16.000In a district that leans Republican by about six points, that spells big trouble.
00:10:20.000Because, of course, we talked about during the Pennsylvania special election how the only reason that Rick Sacone lost, the only reason that Conor Lamb won in that election that we covered a few months ago, was because Conor Lamb was basically the optimal candidate.
00:10:51.000He focused exclusively on the issues, which are the opioid epidemic, health care, taxes, infrastructure, all things Trump ran on.
00:10:59.000And so people looked at that and they said, well, that means there's going to be a blue wave because Conor Lamb won this far red district or this far right district that skews 20 points to the right, and he won it where he shouldn't have even been competitive.
00:11:12.000And myself, and when we had Jazz Hands on and many others, we said, well, maybe if Democrats run candidates like Conor Lamb, who was selected.
00:11:21.000At a party convention, not elected in a primary process.
00:11:24.000If that's the case, they'll probably be in trouble, but that's not how the country's going to go.
00:11:29.000What you'll probably see is that the groundswell of support on the Democrat side will not be from the pragmatists, will not be from the unions and the white working class.
00:11:37.000The groundswell will be from these crazies, you know, these nut job social justice kinds of people, and they'll put in place the Bernie Sanders.
00:11:46.000They will learn the lesson of 2016, or maybe they'll take some lesson from 2016 and say, what we did in 2016 is we put our Feelings aside, we may have wanted Bernie.
00:12:20.000So the progressive upswell, or rather the Democrat upswell this year, is going to be from the progressives saying, We learned our lesson.
00:12:27.000We're going to put in the candidates that are really actually left wing people, that are really actually progressive, and then are going to be anti Trump.
00:12:36.000And of course, the problem with this, and we see this playing out in Texas, we see this playing out in Nebraska, is that of course they're going to pay the price in the general election.
00:12:45.000When people like Connor Lamb win in the general, and you instead elect people like Kara Eastman, who's a resistor, they're going to get killed.
00:12:53.000A Kara Eastman is not going to win a single conservative vote.
00:12:56.000She'll have trouble probably with a lot of independents.
00:12:59.000And this was replicated not just in Nebraska, but also in the Idaho governor's race and in several elections in Pennsylvania.
00:13:05.000You see that the enthusiasm is for the progressives.
00:13:08.000And so the signs are just very, very troubling for the Dems, whether it's that progressive pragmatist split, which is going to divide the ticket, which is going to really make it difficult for them to win over people from the right and from the middle.
00:13:21.000And then additionally, you look at any of the polling numbers, it's been a catastrophe for them.
00:13:25.000There was another poll that came out today which showed the Democrats were only up by three points in the generic ballot poll, which is within the margin of error.
00:13:34.000And we talked at length about this on the podcast that depending on which estimate you look at, whether it's extremely conservative or extremely liberal, different scholars and analytics people say that the minimum percentage that Democrats would have to win by nationally, the minimum margin they would have to win by nationwide is either six or 11.
00:13:55.000It's between six and 11 that they would even be competitive to win in the House.
00:14:00.000And you've had multiple polls that have shown that they're at five, that they're at three, that they're at four.
00:14:05.000Right now, the 538 average, which we've always critiqued as very far left, is very skewed to the left, has them at less than six.
00:14:13.000So people are saying, look, Republicans have such a strong structural advantage with how they've gerrymandered the districts and how they've done all these different things.
00:14:21.000The Democrats would need an overwhelming victory, an overwhelming margin of victory that could fall anywhere between six and 11% to even be competitive nationally.
00:14:31.000And all the polling says they're not even close to six.
00:14:34.000Sometimes they're in the margin of error, sometimes they're just under six, but they're nowhere near the highball.
00:14:40.000So it's going to be, I think, a lot more competitive than people understand.
00:14:44.000And of course, it all follows that if Trump stays on the same course and he consistently targets trade, immigration, and foreign policy, if he continues to win on those three big issues that put him into office in 2016, he is going to see those numbers increase.
00:15:01.000He's going to see that progressives are going to disillusion and alienate a lot of the voters.
00:15:06.000And we will continue doing better, we will continue moving upward.
00:15:10.000And we analyzed it very closely when I did the podcast on.
00:15:20.000Congress intervened a few times where, you know, we've had institutional challenges.
00:15:25.000But by and large, if you looked at it from a week to week basis, Trump was making pretty good moves on trade, on immigration, on foreign policy.
00:15:33.000And so as those things get better, as he targets those issues, I think all the numbers will improve and we can exploit that split in the Democrat Party.
00:15:41.000So those were the big primaries yesterday.
00:15:43.000I know that's a lot of information to throw at you, but we love it.
00:15:55.000And I look forward to covering a lot of the special elections or primaries or different things moving forward as we see some more competitive races.
00:16:03.000And maybe if a few special elections pop up, we'll probably be doing a lot more live coverage.
00:21:32.000What year is it in hell world where you have campus conservatives saying TPUSA is too extreme?
00:21:39.000You know, these people that worship at the altar of the free market and of Milton Friedman, who would sell out the white working class and they would just bulldoze all the monuments if it meant that we could build a bigger mall or a bigger supermarket.
00:21:53.000You know, they're too far out there, right?
00:21:58.000He says, if anyone needs proof of the influence of Turning Point USA, and he talks about Kanye West, I do like how he brings up the diaper stunt.
00:22:09.000Members once wore diapers to protest the safe spaces.
00:22:12.000That was a real winner, which even I thought was pretty funny, right?
00:22:16.000But he goes on to say, and this is really the charming part I've witnessed the group deteriorate from a harmless free market advocacy organization to the breeding ground of the alt light.
00:22:33.000I mean, these people, it's a combination of homosexuals, thoughts slash sluts, black and Hispanic minorities, male and female degenerates, atheists, Jewish people.
00:22:49.000I mean, this is the collection of the alt light.
00:22:51.000It is basically like liberalism light.
00:22:54.000They call themselves classical liberals, but it's a breeding ground for the alt light.
00:22:59.000He brings up how Crystal Clanton, who was one of the field directors, do you remember this?
00:23:04.000From a couple of months ago, she was outed as saying in like a text message, I hate black people, which is pretty on the nose.
00:23:12.000That's a little bit of an unfortunate thing to say.
00:23:15.000And, you know, briefly, I had to laugh at that because I got kicked out of the Leadership Institute for saying, like, people should marry within their race because otherwise the kids will have mental problems and there's a higher risk of domestic abuse.
00:25:11.000So he's critiquing the professor watch list, a McCarthyite database listing hundreds of college professors who have liberal or left leaning views, which is like.
00:25:21.000This is, I think, the big problem of conservatism, which is anytime you fight back, anytime you use their own methods against them, I don't even know anything that you do anything effective, really.
00:25:36.000And by the way, McCarthy did nothing wrong.
00:25:38.000But he goes on I have seen TPUSA up close as well.
00:25:42.000Here is the richest part where he says that they bring in Lucian Wintridge, who's the founder of Twinks for Trump, and they bring in Milo Yiannopoulos.
00:26:26.000But this is exactly the kind of stuff we have to get away from.
00:26:28.000These people are a bigger enemy than even the people on the left.
00:26:32.000Because you see, in every case here, nothing is acceptable to these people.
00:26:37.000It's all about, and I'll show you, here's where we really pull into the station here with the crazy train.
00:26:45.000He brings up how young Americans for freedom, they're the good ones because they were founded by William F. Buckley and they memorialized the legacy of Ronald Reagan's personality.
00:27:39.000California never went red again after Ronald Reagan.
00:27:43.000And so you look at a person who is pathologically committed to defeat, to failure, to self, I don't even know, self immolation, self deprecation, where these people will go to a publication like Vice, which we're about to get into just who is Vice.
00:28:15.000We know the left is trying to do this kind of stuff, and the globalists are out there and they're doing what they're going to do.
00:28:23.000But if we're going to mount an effective response to them, an effective counterattack or an effective counterrevolution, we have got to get serious about it.
00:28:31.000It can't be this silly, we have to be like Ronald Reagan.
00:28:35.000We have to be good little campus conservatives and not be controversial and take the high road.
00:28:40.000And it's just downright revolting and it's just downright disgusting.
00:29:30.000There's a lot of negativity about me this week because I've been fending off enemies on all fronts, you know, whether it's pagans or atheists or thoughts or, you know, you name it.
00:29:40.000But more than anything, what I despise is the mediocrity.
00:29:44.000You know, people who have no talent, people who don't work hard.
00:29:48.000People are not very smart, and they try and come and say, Oh, well, Nick is doing bad.
00:29:52.000And of course, they get elevated because they're attacking me.
00:29:55.000I mean, that's what I really can't stand.
00:29:56.000But to give you an idea, I mean, this is really a two part thing.
00:30:01.000To give you a real idea, this is Will Nardi, and he purports to say, I'm a Christian, and I care about God, and I care about conservatism, and real conservatism, and the right wing in America, and traditional values, and all the rest.
00:30:15.000This is the website that he's writing for.
00:30:19.000And this is the other one I was going to show you.
00:30:22.000These are the, let me, what is the headline here?
00:30:25.000The fabulous kids of RuPaul's drag convention.
00:30:31.000So, you guys know drag queens, which is these, it's typically homosexuals, very promiscuous, very degenerative homosexuals who dress up as women and they do these little shows in bars and they sing and they dance and it's laden with sexual innuendo.
00:30:49.000And they are reporting advice on the photos.
00:30:51.000They have a big convention for all the drag queens.
00:31:01.000This kid in the middle is two years old and he's in, what is that?
00:31:06.000Bra and a skirt, and those, what are those, boots, whatever, the Timberlands.
00:31:12.000You've got this other one on the right in the pink.
00:31:15.000This one's got the glitter and the eyeshadow.
00:31:19.000And, you know, I look at something like this, and my first thought is if you're, and I think this should be the first thought for anybody, if you're doing something, whether it's photography or whether it's cultural, and you think to yourself, will pedophiles like this?
00:32:10.000You see people with this makeup, they're with drag queens with all the sexual innuendo.
00:32:15.000And you think to yourself, hmm, are pedophiles or people that molest and abuse children going to be excited by this or not?
00:32:23.000If you answer in the affirmative, I think if you can answer in the affirmative, you're basically a Satanist if you go ahead with it anyway.
00:33:02.000You shouldn't even let your daughters put on makeup until they're 18, in my opinion.
00:33:07.000If I'm going to have kids, they're not putting on makeup until they're of age.
00:33:12.000Shouldn't have girls wearing makeup because the point of makeup is to make yourself more sexually appealing.
00:33:18.000And so, what you see here is the systematic sexualization of children.
00:33:22.000And this is where we point to vice, but even more broadly to the culture.
00:33:26.000And this is where we say unequivocally, without compromise, that the left, the globalist establishment, this is not incompetence, this is not ignorance, this is not a difference of opinion.
00:35:52.000I didn't really care if people were free or if they was just, you know, it was just, well, this seems true and I'm going to win this debate.
00:35:58.000But, you know, then I went to college and I saw what went on, which was the degeneracy, the hedonism, the drug abuse, the alcohol abuse.
00:36:06.000And really, this is what really got to me, which was the sexualization, the abuse of innocent children.
00:36:14.000And that is, to me, just so far beyond the pale.
00:36:17.000I don't understand how you could not be motivated politically to get out there and try and do your best to fix this when you see this kind of stuff going on.
00:36:28.000Now, I understand people don't care about, oh, you know, a foreign war.
00:37:46.000Or is that being forced on them by the parents?
00:37:48.000And instead of calling child services on the parents, instead of in a normal country, we take the kids out of that situation, they're on the cover of a major magazine and people, oh my God, it's so progressive.
00:38:01.000This is a society that deserves to burn.
00:38:04.000This is a society that deserves, there is nothing salvageable here.
00:38:08.000I mean, we can try and we can try to bring back some of the things that were lost, but this is something that is so, I mean, this is why God destroyed Sodom and Gomorrah.
00:38:20.000I don't know how anybody could look at this kind of thing and think that the left and what is going on in the country is anything but demonic, anything but satanic.
00:38:28.000And that's the chief fallacy that we try and tackle on the show we are beyond the point of debate.
00:38:34.000We are beyond the point of compromise or pragmatism.
00:38:37.000We are moving in two very different directions on very much higher levels, not political, not.
00:38:44.000Let me check the real important thing here.
00:38:49.000Not logical, not in terms of fiscal, it is spiritual, it is of a higher dimension.
00:38:55.000They have two fundamentally different visions of the world.
00:38:59.000Are we going to be this hellscape where the children are sexualized, everything goes against God, everything is disordered, and we have sex with men and women, and there's no marriage, and there's no families, and it's polygamy, and it's about consumption, and we're all just this deracinated, rootless class of individuals that toil away endlessly for cheap food and cummies?
00:39:22.000I mean, is that going to be our society, or are we going to move back towards something that is ordered, something that is Looking towards a divine, looking at a higher nature, that's a disagreement.
00:40:13.000All is fair in this war because what we're fighting for is nothing short than the fate of children like this.
00:40:19.000You know, I go to like a bus stop sometimes, I go into a movie theater or a mall, and I see the class of people that are sometimes around there.
00:40:26.000And you see people, even in our own movement, and it's easy a lot of times to say, is it even worth saving?
00:45:27.000The movement is not exclusively white.
00:45:29.000The point of the movement is to say that mass immigration is wrong.
00:45:34.000And we should try our best to reconstitute some semblance of an ethnic or racial.
00:45:39.000Majority in the country for the benefit of everybody in here.
00:45:42.000So it's almost like a false premise, which is an important point that you bring up where people say, well, I'm Jewish or I'm black or I'm brown.
00:45:49.000We're not exclusionary towards people joining the movement.
00:45:52.000If you're for traditional values, if you're for God, if you understand that this country should not be multicultural and by and large not multiracial, I think there's a place for you.
00:46:02.000But I'm not going to say, like, you're Hispanic.
00:46:06.000You can't be in my political movement.
00:46:10.000But there has to be some kind of a consensus, even by minorities in the country, that if America becomes majority minority, we will be at a much greater risk for conflict.
00:46:20.000You'll see the country possibly balkanize into many different nations.
00:46:24.000And I think even the minorities don't want that to happen.
00:46:26.000So I think it's in everybody's interest that we shore up a white majority in the country.
00:46:33.000And show me the example of history where you've seen a majority minority country that has been prosperous, that has even survived for a very long time.
00:48:02.000You go to voters in California where they got sanctuary cities, where they've got high taxes, where they've got all kinds of other problems, and you're telling them, we need to fight Jewish supremacy.
00:49:50.000Child abuse has been normalized now, basically.
00:49:55.000And, you know, we could get outrage about all the rest, but if you can't even protect the children, if you don't even have that perfunctory.
00:50:06.000Standard set aside that, you know, we're going to raise our children the right way.
00:50:11.000We're going to give them every resource, every opportunity to be the best they can be.
00:50:18.000If you're not doing that, the society is illegitimate.
00:50:37.000And don't try too hard for anything beyond that.
00:50:40.000Get the fundamentals right, meaning have men and women be on the same page and get married and start families and stay married so they can raise the kids and have the mom stay home and raise the kids the right way and have communities.
00:50:54.000And you get all of that right, you get those fundamentals down, and everything else is far easier.
00:51:57.000There's not even a reason to have a society if that's the case.
00:52:00.000The whole reason why we even come together and we do these separate tasks and we set aside some of our rights and some of our freedoms for the sake of living in a society is so that we could get these public goods so that we could be safe and.
00:52:17.000So that we could have these resources, and that's really just not happening.
00:55:12.000Well, you know, that's kind of the thing in a Catholic's eye.
00:55:18.000Why Protestantism is so bankrupt is because nobody challenged the authority of Rome for a thousand years until the schism.
00:55:28.000Even the Eastern churches recognized the authority of Rome, whether it was Antioch, whether it was, I mean, even like some of the other important churches in Constantinople, whatever it was, they all recognized the authority of Rome.
00:55:42.000They all recognized petron succession in Rome.
00:55:45.000To an extent, all the early church fathers recognized it.
00:55:58.000Was it at the Council of Florence where basically the Eastern Orthodox Church acknowledged the primacy of Rome and they said, okay, we're going to come back.
00:56:12.000And then, of course, Constantinople got sacked by the Turks and they overthrew it.
00:56:17.000And because of the pressure from the Turks, The Eastern Orthodox Church pulled out under pressure from the Turks to basically disband this Christendom alliance.
00:56:27.000They forced down a lot of the bishops and clergy that were trying to make that reunion happen.
00:56:33.000But basically, the Orthodox repudiated their position of the schism in the 11th century by saying, okay, we recognize the authority of the Pope.
00:56:42.000And only from foreign influence did they have to say, oh, no, never mind.
00:56:49.000And then the Protestants, again, you know, here's.
00:56:52.000A holy Catholic apostolic church that lasted 1500 years.
00:56:56.000No, but Martin Luther got it all figured out, right?
00:56:59.000Because you had one or a couple of bad practices by the papacy, which all men are fallible, you know, unless they're contributing to the magisterium, unless they're attributing to the divine wisdom, you know, they are fallible just like anybody else, and their behavior is fallible.
00:57:16.000But they said, no, no, no, that's just too far beyond the pale, so you can only read the Bible.
00:57:25.000I don't understand how you can't see those systemic flaws in Sola Scriptura, which is that, and people are saying, like, oh, well, Lutheranism is actually kind of like Catholicism.
00:57:36.000No, You have to have the authority of God.
00:57:41.000If you don't have the authority of God, what is even the point?
00:57:45.000Like, if I'm reading the Bible and somebody who has God's authority is not telling me you have to read it in this way, this is the way you're supposed to interpret it.
00:58:05.000The whole point would be defeated of having God come on earth.
00:58:09.000It would make no sense if a thousand years later it would be lost in translation.
00:58:14.000And that's what, in effect, happens with Solo Scriptura.
00:58:17.000You know, you imagine God comes, he does these things, people later on write it down.
00:58:22.000And if there is no authority to say, you have to read it this way, it happened this way, we interpret it this way, Well, then there's no chance that 5,000 years later, 2,000 years later, it's going to be the same interpretation.
00:58:33.000It's even going to be the same words, the same books, the same translation.