America First - Nicholas J. Fuentes - Why You Can't Trust the Media | America First Ep. 123

00:00:06.000 Good evening, everybody.

00:00:07.000 We're watching America First.

00:00:09.000 My name is Nicholas J. Fuentes.

00:00:10.000 Welcome back to the show.

00:00:12.000 We have got a great show for you tonight.

00:00:14.000 A lot of great shows coming up this week.

00:00:16.000 Lots of things coming up this month.

00:00:18.000 We're very excited.

00:00:20.000 We're very excited to have you for another fantastic episode.

00:00:24.000 More content that you're addicted to coming at you hot and heavy, raw and uncut.

00:00:30.000 Some very good stuff.

00:00:31.000 There's so much going on in the news.

00:00:33.000 So many things happening this weekend.

00:00:35.000 So many things happening this week.

00:00:36.000 It was Hard to pick what to even talk about.

00:00:39.000 But we've got a very important special election coming up tomorrow in Pennsylvania.

00:00:44.000 We'll be talking all about that.

00:00:46.000 You might have heard that the Democrats are going to pull off a surprise, an upset win, and they're already doing a victory lap or so it seems.

00:00:54.000 We have things going on all over the world.

00:00:56.000 We have things going on in Vladimir Putin.

00:00:58.000 If you saw his interview over the weekend with Megyn Kelly, he made some choice suggestions, some choice accusations, which We'll talk about the media coverage of that.

00:01:09.000 And of course, President Trump had a rally in Pennsylvania, which I think was a very good evening, a very good time for people that have stayed on the Trump train, for people that have stayed on with President Trump.

00:01:21.000 We're going to break down what happened there, what was said, why it's important, what that means for the rest of the presidency, what that means for the election.

00:01:28.000 So it's a jam packed episode.

00:01:30.000 We hope you'll join us.

00:01:32.000 We hope you'll bring your friends.

00:01:33.000 We hope you'll join us because it's an exciting episode.

00:01:36.000 I got to tell you, I should have shaved before the show.

00:01:38.000 I should have gotten a haircut.

00:01:40.000 I was going to.

00:01:41.000 But I've just been so busy today, so busy this weekend.

00:01:44.000 And I think I'll announce it now.

00:01:46.000 I wasn't planning on doing this, but I think I'll just announce it now.

00:01:50.000 This month, either next week or the week after, we will be coming out with two new podcasts.

00:01:56.000 They've been in development for a little while now.

00:01:59.000 And I'm putting the finishing touches.

00:02:01.000 We're putting together graphics, we're putting together theme songs and content and figuring out what it's going to look like.

00:02:08.000 But we have two new podcasts coming out for you.

00:02:12.000 Later this month, we have one that will be specifically focused on foreign affairs, and we have one podcast that will be focused on the 2018 elections.

00:02:23.000 The titles that are pending, the pending titles for both, will be America First World Report, and that will be an hour long weekly podcast dedicated to world affairs, foreign affairs, international relations.

00:02:36.000 And the second will be just 2018 Election HQ, America First 2018 Election HQ.

00:02:43.000 And those will both be an hour.

00:02:44.000 They'll both be weekly, and you can both get those for just five bucks with America First Premium.

00:02:50.000 So, good news for all of our premium members on our maker support page, which the link is in the description.

00:02:57.000 For only five bucks a month, you'll not only be getting what you already get, which is a new role in the Discord, or rather, a higher role in the Discord.

00:03:07.000 You get priority on the call in shows.

00:03:09.000 You get the audio only format of the show.

00:03:10.000 And now, starting either next week or the week after, you will get.

00:03:15.000 An additional two hours of content every week, two new shows, specialized, focused, and pre recorded, too.

00:03:21.000 So they'll be a lot cleaner, they'll be edited, and it'll be very nice.

00:03:24.000 So I'm excited to announce that, like I said, either next week or the week after, depending on some other actors that are in play that are wasting my time with litigation and other things.

00:03:33.000 Pending some other things that need to be resolved, we'll see those coming out either next week or the week after.

00:03:39.000 But by the end of the month, so be sure, if you're not already on there, join up.

00:03:44.000 It's a big little springtime treat, a little.

00:03:46.000 Springtime Easter surprise for our premium members.

00:03:49.000 You're going to be getting a lot more content.

00:03:50.000 We're really expanding the operation here.

00:03:52.000 So it's very exciting.

00:03:53.000 But just thought I'd announce that so we could get excited.

00:03:55.000 And then additionally, this is next week.

00:03:57.000 This starts next week.

00:03:59.000 We will be broadcasting the show, America First, not just on YouTube, but starting next week, we'll be broadcasting the show every weeknight, 7 8, on Facebook Live, Twitch, and Periscope, all at the same time.

00:04:13.000 So we're moving up in the world.

00:04:15.000 We're taking it to the next level.

00:04:17.000 Very exciting stuff coming in the next couple of weeks.

00:04:19.000 But now that that housekeeping stuff is taken care of, the exciting news, the big news is out of the way for the show, and we are excited about it.

00:04:27.000 We are happy about it.

00:04:28.000 Our supporters are glad to see the Nick Fuentes, the America First.

00:04:33.000 Juggernaut thriving, but we got to get into the news. 0.77

00:04:36.000 The first thing I want to talk about is this was, I think, the most ridiculous story that I've seen all year. 0.82

00:04:44.000 And we've seen a lot of ridiculous stories this year, but this is just the most over the top. 0.95

00:04:48.000 We thought we had jumped the shark on Friday with the Polish Holocaust law. 0.55

00:04:53.000 We thought we had jumped the shark with the globalist stuff, with the anti Semitic incidents where it was what? 0.80

00:04:59.000 One Israeli was responsible for 9% of all anti Semitic incidents.

00:05:04.000 Hate crimes or whatever in the past year. 0.79

00:05:06.000 Every time I think we've jumped the shark, every time I think we've gotten to paranoia levels, persecutory delusions that shouldn't even be possible, we're always surprised.

00:05:17.000 And so if you were watching the interview with Vladimir Putin, Russian President Vladimir Putin, and Megyn Kelly over the weekend, you might have noticed there was one line in particular that could have stood out to you.

00:05:28.000 I was watching it live.

00:05:29.000 I caught it on television.

00:05:30.000 I wasn't planning.

00:05:31.000 I didn't even know it was going to be on, but I happened to be watching TV and it came on.

00:05:37.000 And it was the second round of interviews.

00:05:39.000 Megyn Kelly interviewed Vladimir Putin last year.

00:05:41.000 And so she sat down with him today to grill him again about the new developments in the Russian collusion scandal.

00:05:47.000 And Vladimir Putin said one thing which was very interesting, which, if you're paying very close attention, might have caught your ear, might have caught your eye.

00:05:54.000 You might have said, hmm, I don't know.

00:05:56.000 What about that comment?

00:05:57.000 And I'll pull it up for you what he said.

00:06:00.000 He said, I couldn't care less because they, meaning the three companies and the 13 hackers that were caught colluding or interfering in the election, He said, I couldn't care less because they do not represent the government.

00:06:13.000 These are the hackers that were caught pretty recently.

00:06:16.000 He said, I could not care less.

00:06:17.000 They do not represent the interests of the Russian state.

00:06:20.000 Maybe they're not even Russians, but Ukrainians, Tatars, Jews, just with Russian citizenship. 0.83

00:06:26.000 Even that needs to be checked. 0.88

00:06:27.000 Maybe they have dual citizenship, or maybe a green card. 0.58

00:06:31.000 Maybe it was the Americans who paid them for this work.

00:06:33.000 How do you know?

00:06:33.000 I don't know.

00:06:34.000 And he was referring to, like I said, those companies and those individual Russian people who were.

00:06:41.000 They were brought to justice.

00:06:42.000 They were indicted by the Mueller investigation for allegedly trying to interfere in the election. 0.94

00:06:47.000 They had a budget of a million dollars a month, allegedly, to do troll farms and a post on Facebook and pretty ridiculous stuff.

00:06:55.000 And so Putin is commenting on that, saying, Look, we don't know who these people are.

00:06:58.000 Megyn Kelly's trying to pin it on Vladimir Putin and the Russian government, saying, This was you.

00:07:03.000 Why didn't you put a stop to this?

00:07:04.000 Why didn't you know about this?

00:07:05.000 And he's saying, Look, we don't even know who these people are.

00:07:08.000 Are they Russian citizens?

00:07:09.000 Are they ethnic Russians?

00:07:10.000 Are they Ukrainians?

00:07:12.000 Do they have a green? 0.99

00:07:12.000 Like, who are? 0.99

00:07:13.000 We don't even know.

00:07:14.000 We don't even know anything about these people.

00:07:15.000 And I was watching it and I thought that was a pretty benign comment.

00:07:19.000 I think to a lay observer, pretty benign statement.

00:07:22.000 I mean, he's saying we just don't know who they are.

00:07:24.000 They could be this, they could be that.

00:07:25.000 Maybe they're this, maybe they're that.

00:07:27.000 We don't know that they're ethnic Russians.

00:07:29.000 We don't know that they're Russian citizens.

00:07:31.000 We don't know that they have any kind of coordination with the government or they don't.

00:07:35.000 But you should have seen what was said in the media.

00:07:37.000 Here's where it becomes a story how the media then plays it.

00:07:40.000 And so often, Since the 2016 election, we see that the media is just as much of a story, if not more so, than the actual news itself because of how distorted, how much they lie, how much they take what is said or what happens.

00:07:55.000 And it goes into the media machine and it gets all toyed around with, and they play with the language and they move it around, and then it comes out as something totally different.

00:08:03.000 And so you heard the quote.

00:08:05.000 The quote was exactly maybe they're not even Russians.

00:08:07.000 Maybe they're Ukrainians. 0.61

00:08:08.000 Maybe they're Tatars. 0.98

00:08:09.000 Tatars are, they're a Muslim, Asiatic people in central Russia, different ethnic group, or Jews, just with Russian citizenship. 0.72

00:08:17.000 And this was the quote.

00:08:19.000 Here's what the media said BBC, the headline is Putin criticized for Jewish election meddling remark.

00:08:27.000 CNN says, Putin, maybe Jews or minorities behind U.S. election interference.

00:08:32.000 Now, you read that headline and you're thinking to yourself, what's this guy on? 0.92

00:08:37.000 Did he just get on television and say, the blacks and the Jews are responsible for election battling?

00:08:41.000 But you heard the quote.

00:08:42.000 Was that what was said?

00:08:45.000 Did he say, maybe Jews or minorities were behind the election?

00:08:48.000 Or did he say, well, we don't know who it was.

00:08:50.000 It could be this, right?

00:08:52.000 So that's the headline from BBC criticized for Jewish election battling.

00:08:55.000 Well, it wasn't.

00:08:56.000 It was Ukrainian. 0.99

00:08:57.000 It was. 1.00

00:08:57.000 It was Totter. 1.00

00:08:58.000 Jewel citizenship green card and also Jewish CNN. 0.98

00:09:01.000 Maybe Jews are minorities.

00:09:02.000 That wasn't quite what was said.

00:09:04.000 New York Magazine.

00:09:05.000 Putin says Jews might be to blame for 2016 election hacking.

00:09:09.000 Is that what he said?

00:09:11.000 You read that headline and you think Putin said the Jews are behind, but that's not what he said, right?

00:09:16.000 We heard what he said.

00:09:18.000 The Forward, which is an Israeli paper, says the headline is Putin suggests that Jews may have been behind U.S. election interference.

00:09:26.000 Newsweek.

00:09:26.000 In all caps, Putin says that Jews with Russian citizenship may be behind U.S. election meddling.

00:09:33.000 Hitler 2.0.

00:09:36.000 The New York Times.

00:09:37.000 After Putin cites Jews, Democrats implore Trump to extradite Russians.

00:09:41.000 NBC.

00:09:43.000 After Putin blames Jews for election meddling, was that what happened?

00:09:47.000 Lawmakers demand he extradite indicted Russians.

00:09:50.000 And so you heard what was said, which I'll read it again.

00:09:53.000 Very simple, very concise, totally benign, totally innocuous.

00:09:58.000 Russian president.

00:10:00.000 And by the way, in the Russian language, they have a different word.

00:10:04.000 For citizen versus the nationality.

00:10:07.000 You can be a Russian citizen, but not be an ethnic Russian.

00:10:10.000 And the reason they have this distinction is because Russia historically is a multi ethnic, multi religious, multi racial empire.

00:10:19.000 You go back hundreds of years, this is currently the biggest country in the world, but at a time it was growing at a rate that was inconceivable.

00:10:27.000 At one time it spanned from Poland all the way to Alaska.

00:10:31.000 I mean, this is how enormous the Russian Empire was.

00:10:34.000 And you imagine how many diverse peoples, cultures, religions are encompassed within this large country.

00:10:39.000 You had people that were incorporated everywhere from Finland in Scandinavia, or Finland technically isn't Scandinavia, so up in the Baltics, Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, Poland, down to Romania, down to Moldova. 0.96

00:10:53.000 You have the Ukrainians, they call them the White Russians.

00:10:56.000 You have the Belorussians. 0.90

00:10:57.000 You have the Russians. 1.00

00:10:58.000 You have the Steppe peoples. 1.00

00:11:00.000 You have the Tatars. 1.00

00:11:01.000 You have Dagestan. 1.00

00:11:03.000 You have Chechens. 1.00

00:11:04.000 You have people in Central Asia, Asiatics. 0.99

00:11:06.000 You have people all the way in the East.

00:11:08.000 You had people in Alaska.

00:11:09.000 So, the reason they have a different word for it is because you have Russians, ethnic Russians, meaning Slavic people that date back to Kiev and Rus', that date back to the Grand Duchy of Moscow seven or eight hundred years ago, and people with Russian citizenship, people who are citizens of the Russian Federation.

00:11:29.000 So, he said very clearly, I couldn't care less because these hackers, whoever it was, they don't represent the government.

00:11:35.000 I couldn't care less.

00:11:36.000 They don't represent the interests of the Russian state. 0.74

00:11:39.000 And hey, maybe they're not even Russians.

00:11:41.000 Maybe they're Ukrainians. 0.80

00:11:42.000 Maybe they're Tatars. 0.97

00:11:43.000 Maybe they're Jews. 1.00

00:11:44.000 But just with Russian citizenship. 1.00

00:11:46.000 Even that needs to be checked. 0.95

00:11:47.000 Maybe they have dual citizenship.

00:11:48.000 Maybe they have a green card. 0.86

00:11:49.000 Maybe it was Americans who paid them.

00:11:51.000 How do you know?

00:11:51.000 I don't know.

00:11:52.000 And that's what was said.

00:11:53.000 And what the media says is Putin says Jews to blame for the election.

00:11:58.000 Putin suggests Jews behind the election.

00:12:02.000 Excuse me.

00:12:03.000 Putin cites Jews and now Democrats implore Trump to extradite.

00:12:07.000 And then here's got to be this is the best one, in my opinion, because this is the most, you know, they call it, what do they call it, begging the question?

00:12:17.000 Or, you know, the Shakespeare quote, the lady does protest too much.

00:12:20.000 Here's a really fantastic quote that we get from a member of the Knesset.

00:12:24.000 The Knesset.

00:12:25.000 Is the Israeli parliament.

00:12:27.000 This is a member of the Israeli parliament who says about the Putin quote.

00:12:31.000 She says, quote, maybe the Jews interfered in the American elections.

00:12:35.000 Maybe the Jews controlled the world. 0.98

00:12:36.000 Maybe Jews slaughtered the Jews in Poland. 0.98

00:12:39.000 What? 0.85

00:12:40.000 What?

00:12:42.000 Is that even.

00:12:43.000 Are we really being fair there?

00:12:45.000 Are we arguing in good faith?

00:12:47.000 She says, maybe the Jews interfered in the American elections.

00:12:50.000 And even that is deceptive.

00:12:51.000 She's, of course, trying to mock up what Putin is saying. 0.59

00:12:54.000 Maybe the Jews interfered in the American elections. 0.76

00:12:56.000 But even that.

00:12:58.000 Was that said?

00:12:59.000 Did he say the Jews, or did he say maybe the people that were caught were actually ethnically Jewish but Russian citizens?

00:13:05.000 He didn't say that.

00:13:06.000 But she says that.

00:13:07.000 She goes, and then she takes this leap.

00:13:09.000 Maybe Jews interfered in the election. 0.92

00:13:11.000 Maybe they controlled the world. 1.00

00:13:13.000 Maybe they slaughtered the Jews in Poland.

00:13:15.000 It's like, how do you, to any normal person who sees cause and effect, who heard what Putin said, how do you get from what he said to these radical things?

00:13:27.000 She goes on.

00:13:29.000 For all those allegations, there is one origin, Jew hatred.

00:13:34.000 She demanded that the government come out strongly against these serious remarks made by the Russian president.

00:13:39.000 If Israel won't defend Jews, she said, nobody will do so in its place.

00:13:43.000 This is the worst form of anti Semitism.

00:13:47.000 What?

00:13:48.000 Are you kidding me?

00:13:49.000 So I wouldn't even be talking about it.

00:13:52.000 I don't think anybody would be talking about it.

00:13:54.000 I don't think anybody would be talking about it, except for the fact that all the media has played it up.

00:14:00.000 They've taken a quote which was benign.

00:14:02.000 Which was very simple, I think fair and reasonable.

00:14:05.000 A simple assertion of the facts, which is we don't know who these people are.

00:14:09.000 What is the nature of these people?

00:14:11.000 If you are going to attribute responsibility for election interference to Russia, well, what does Russia mean?

00:14:16.000 What is your definition of Russia?

00:14:18.000 Is it the Russian government?

00:14:20.000 Is it Russian citizens?

00:14:21.000 Is it Russian expatriates?

00:14:23.000 Is it Russians with dual citizenship?

00:14:24.000 Is it ethnic Ukrainians with.

00:14:26.000 I mean, so he's saying if you're going to attribute responsibility to Russia, For interference in the election because of these 13 people and these three companies.

00:14:37.000 Do you exactly know who these people are?

00:14:37.000 Well, what do you mean by that?

00:14:39.000 They're not government.

00:14:40.000 Well, then who are they?

00:14:41.000 And that was a very, I think, a straightforward, a simple question, a fair question.

00:14:45.000 And of course, what does the media have to say about it?

00:14:47.000 Putin blames.

00:14:49.000 And then in the Knesset, the most wild extrapolation, which you could imagine, the most wild begging the question of here's a simple question.

00:14:58.000 So Putin's, it's the equivalent of that Jordan Peterson interview where he says, you know, there are two genders. 0.99

00:15:04.000 And she goes, so you're basically saying we should kill all trans people? 0.86

00:15:07.000 Putin says, we don't really know what Russians were involved. 0.99

00:15:10.000 Oh, so you're saying Jews control the world and they're responsible for the Holocaust and it didn't happen? 0.79

00:15:16.000 So you're saying that.

00:15:17.000 And that's the media we have today.

00:15:19.000 So these, and the reason I bring it up, the reason why this is important, the reason why we're talking about this, people would say, Nick, you're bringing this up because you're anti Semitic.

00:15:27.000 Nick, you're bringing this up.

00:15:28.000 Ironically, people will say that.

00:15:30.000 And I get that all the time.

00:15:31.000 Nick, you're focusing on this because you're a Jew hater, because you're anti Semitic, because nothing of the sort.

00:15:37.000 It's got nothing to do.

00:15:38.000 It's got nothing to do with that.

00:15:39.000 It's got, oh, it's got nothing to do with that.

00:15:42.000 When we look at these patterns, it has nothing to do with that.

00:15:44.000 The reason it's important, the reason it's consequential, is because this illustrates plain as day, black as night, in as clear terms as you can imagine, that you cannot trust the media.

00:15:59.000 You cannot trust the media.

00:16:00.000 Let that really meditate on that.

00:16:03.000 Really, really savor that for a moment.

00:16:06.000 You can never trust the media.

00:16:09.000 If you see a headline, if you hear something on television, if you read about it in the papers, There is no guarantee that it is true.

00:16:17.000 There is no guarantee that they're telling the truth.

00:16:20.000 They're not trying to tell the truth.

00:16:22.000 And when you see something like this, where anybody with ears could hear what Putin was saying, anybody with a brain could understand what he was getting at.

00:16:31.000 But if you didn't watch the interview and you didn't hear exactly what was said, and maybe you don't click on the article, the headlines would give you a totally distorted picture of the world, a totally distorted picture of Vladimir Putin.

00:16:41.000 Because think about the characterization here.

00:16:44.000 People might say, oh, maybe it's semantics, it's semantic details.

00:16:48.000 That they got the quote wrong.

00:16:49.000 But think about the characterization. 0.91

00:16:51.000 You go from a statesman saying, You can't blame my country for this because they're not connected to the government, and maybe they're not even kin of Russians, to a characterization that Vladimir Putin is somebody who is so ignorant, or maybe somebody who's so intelligent, but somebody who's such a nasty person that they would blame a global Jewish cabal for putting Donald Trump in office, which maybe if there is one, they'd be contributing to the opposite. 0.94

00:17:19.000 Who even knows? 0.93

00:17:20.000 But.

00:17:21.000 The characterization is so starkly different that anybody who is just looking at the headlines, anybody who gives the press the benefit of the doubt, anybody who looks at the people on NBC and they look at the people on BBC and they have degrees, they go to school for years and years, they pay hundreds of thousands of dollars, they spend so much time getting a degree, and they go to the most prestigious schools.

00:17:45.000 They go to Harvard, they go to Princeton, they go to Yale, they go through journalism school, they go through a rigorous journalism school.

00:17:52.000 So that they could get credentialed.

00:17:54.000 And when they get credentialed, they could be taken seriously.

00:17:56.000 They have some authority.

00:17:57.000 And they put on a fancy suit.

00:17:59.000 And they have fancy cameras.

00:18:01.000 And they have a fancy studio.

00:18:02.000 And they get millions of dollars.

00:18:04.000 And they're on television.

00:18:05.000 So you must be able to trust them because they have good jaw lines.

00:18:08.000 They have good physiognomy.

00:18:10.000 They have nice suits.

00:18:11.000 They sit up straight.

00:18:12.000 They have their degrees.

00:18:13.000 And they tell you something.

00:18:14.000 And most people would say that what they are hearing from television, what they're hearing from the media and the news should be given the benefit of the doubt.

00:18:21.000 Because why would the news lie?

00:18:22.000 Why would the news lie?

00:18:24.000 How could they lie?

00:18:25.000 Look at them.

00:18:26.000 It's the news.

00:18:27.000 The news always tells the truth.

00:18:29.000 When you really look at what's happening on the ground, and now more than ever, we have the tools, we have the power to see what's happening in real time, whether it's on the ground in a war, whether it's a quote said by a leader, whether it's an interview, whether it's a campaign event, we can see what's happening.

00:18:47.000 We can get direct quotes, we can get live video, we can get live audio, and we can contrast it with what the media is saying.

00:18:53.000 And every time you look at what's happening and what the media is saying, there's a disconnect.

00:18:57.000 And it's not Accidental.

00:19:00.000 It's not integrated.

00:19:02.000 I mean, notice how coordinated it is.

00:19:05.000 Notice how they're all saying the same thing.

00:19:07.000 It's all the same headlines.

00:19:09.000 It's all the same mischaracterization. 0.84

00:19:11.000 Maybe if one of them mischaracterized it, maybe if they were all different characterizations, maybe BBC said, well, Putin is exactly right.

00:19:19.000 And one website said, well, he didn't actually say this. 0.96

00:19:21.000 And one website said he blamed the Jews.

00:19:23.000 And it would be one thing if it was spotty, and you could say, well, one is less reputable than the other, but you could generally trust the press.

00:19:29.000 But no, no, no.

00:19:30.000 They're all saying the same thing.

00:19:32.000 They're all mischaracterizing it the same thing.

00:19:35.000 And it's not on accident, it's very deliberate.

00:19:37.000 And it's very deliberate to serve a very particular agenda.

00:19:39.000 And once you understand, once you see it for yourself, and when it's laid out in front of you like I'm laying it out now, you've broken the conditioning.

00:19:49.000 You've pulled the wool up over your eyes, you've pulled the sheet up over your eyes, and now you can see what's actually going on, which is that yes, the media can lie, the media does lie.

00:19:59.000 They have a motivation to lie, they're willing to lie, and you see it right here.

00:20:03.000 It's all right there.

00:20:04.000 Nobody with a journalism degree, nobody with an IQ high enough, I don't even.

00:20:09.000 No, if you have to have an IQ really that high to get into Harvard, all you have to do is live in a certain zip code and have a certain color skin.

00:20:15.000 But you're high IQ enough, a high enough verbal IQ that you could be on television, and yet you're going to misrepresent like this.

00:20:24.000 It's not on accident, folks. 0.99

00:20:25.000 They're not that dumb. 0.97

00:20:26.000 They're actually very smart, but they're not telling you the truth. 0.99

00:20:29.000 So that's the media.

00:20:31.000 We had to cover that because it's just so outrageous.

00:20:34.000 I don't know how they can get away with this.

00:20:35.000 They can't get away with this for much longer.

00:20:37.000 That's why the media's credibility is at an all time low.

00:20:41.000 Because every time that something like this happens, and it happens so frequently now, it happens every day, every week.

00:20:46.000 Every time that happens, another 10,000 people turn off their television, they cut their cable cord, they stop their subscription to the newspaper, they stop caring.

00:20:55.000 Every day, every incident that this happens, it's another 10,000 people, it's another 50,000 people, another 100,000 people.

00:21:01.000 It's a, you know what?

00:21:03.000 They all lie.

00:21:04.000 Trump is right.

00:21:05.000 They do all lie.

00:21:05.000 They are fake news.

00:21:07.000 And so the more that people are coming around to that, I think the better.

00:21:11.000 The more people.

00:21:12.000 Delegitimize the media, or rather, the more the media is delegitimized in the eyes of the people by purely the facts, I think the better a position that we'll be in.

00:21:22.000 The better people will be able to interpret the world for themselves, the more we can get an honest visualization, an honest image and vision of the world as it exists, not through a filter that the media, the controlled, lying, excuse me, press wants us to see it.

00:21:36.000 So that's Putin.

00:21:37.000 You know, Putin's not, I mean, you know, we're in a tough situation because Putin is our adversary, Putin is our rival.

00:21:45.000 Putin is a ruthless statesman.

00:21:47.000 He pursues real politique.

00:21:49.000 And, you know, so would we say he's a good guy?

00:21:52.000 Probably not.

00:21:54.000 But you look at what he's up against between the military industrial complex, NATO, the lying press.

00:22:00.000 And it's tough not to say, you know, look at how they treat him.

00:22:04.000 We don't have to like him.

00:22:05.000 We don't have to fall in love with him.

00:22:07.000 We don't have to be his best good friend or even say he's a good guy.

00:22:09.000 But, I mean, geez, at least tell it like it is.

00:22:14.000 And all these people talking about Russia, it's ironic because you know who the biggest threat is?

00:22:19.000 To, you know, if there were to be any kind of Russian infiltration, if there were to be any kind of conflict with Russia, the biggest threat to us responding to that accordingly is the paranoid people.

00:22:31.000 They're the boy who cried wolf. 0.57

00:22:32.000 If you hear all day long that everything under the sun is Russians, you know, oh, I went bald, it's the Russians. 0.96

00:22:38.000 Oh, I spilled my coffee, it's the Russians. 1.00

00:22:41.000 I lost the election that I wanted to win, it's the Russians. 0.98

00:22:44.000 When you do that and you make it out that Putin is the boogeyman, he's the scapegoat for everything, you delegitimize the Valid concerns that people have about countries like Russia or Iran or Syria, which they are.

00:22:56.000 There are valid concerns.

00:22:59.000 And the last thing I will say about it, it's very funny that in the same breath, here's the grand irony of it all to give you a little something else to think about.

00:23:07.000 The media stuff, that's pretty basic.

00:23:09.000 We all kind of understand that.

00:23:10.000 I think everybody who watches the show understands that.

00:23:13.000 I really got to get a haircut.

00:23:14.000 We're really in a danger zone here with the length.

00:23:18.000 But if we're really going to get a little bit out there, if we're going to get a little bit fun and interesting here for a moment, if we can.

00:23:25.000 What's interesting about these comments, think about what, if we break it down to the fundamental level, what are the Democrats saying?

00:23:32.000 What are they saying?

00:23:32.000 They're talking about conspiracy.

00:23:36.000 They're saying there's conspiracy, there's coordination, there's intentionality, there's Russia, this global cabal, this global international influence in a coordinated way, in an organized fashion, is manipulating elections, manipulating markets.

00:23:54.000 They're controlling the world.

00:23:56.000 The media is telling you, or they're telling Democrats, and a lot of people on the far left, maybe 25% of the population believes this stuff.

00:24:04.000 They believe that Trump is a puppet of a foreign government.

00:24:07.000 Trump is a puppet of a foreign people.

00:24:09.000 The media is a puppet of a foreign people. 0.96

00:24:11.000 InfoWars, the alt right, the alt right, Mike Cernovich, you name it. 0.84

00:24:16.000 They're all puppets of a foreign government. 0.77

00:24:17.000 Fox News, puppets of a foreign government.

00:24:19.000 We have a media controlled by a foreign influence.

00:24:22.000 A government controlled by a foreign influence.

00:24:24.000 A State Department controlled by a foreign influence.

00:24:27.000 And they'll tell you all day long with a straight face, totally serious.

00:24:31.000 And nobody calls them a Russophobe.

00:24:34.000 Nobody calls, maybe Pappy Cannon does, but nobody says, Your races.

00:24:37.000 Nobody calls them out.

00:24:38.000 Nobody, I don't think any liberals would have a problem with this characterization that Russia is organized, Russia is coordinated, and they are controlling things that we don't know about and whatever.

00:24:50.000 And yet at the same time, what are they deflecting right now?

00:24:52.000 What is the Knesset saying?

00:24:54.000 What is the Forward saying?

00:24:55.000 They're saying Vladimir Putin thinks Jews control the world, and Vladimir Putin is controlling the world.

00:25:03.000 So they want you to believe that if you notice any patterns about, oh, I don't know, other foreign influences in our State Department, if you look at how our The State Department has given Israel $3.8 billion every year for 10 years.

00:25:17.000 For the next 10 years, we gave them three and a half.

00:25:20.000 For the last 10 years, we've given them a quarter of a trillion dollars since the inception of the State of Israel.

00:25:26.000 We've gone to war for them on more than several occasions. 0.62

00:25:30.000 We have people that spy on us in our country.

00:25:32.000 They sunk our intelligence ship.

00:25:34.000 They killed our sailors.

00:25:36.000 They stole our uranium.

00:25:38.000 They stole our nuclear secrets. 0.71

00:25:40.000 They buy our technology, our advanced secret technology, and they sell it to China. 0.64

00:25:44.000 They sell it.

00:25:45.000 To Iran during the Iran Iraq war in the 1980s, they did this.

00:25:50.000 And you don't hear about that.

00:25:51.000 You don't hear about that.

00:25:52.000 If you talk about that, you're told you're a hater.

00:25:54.000 You're told you're a conspiracy theorist.

00:25:56.000 You'll never be taken seriously. 0.98

00:25:58.000 And the people that peddle that are all Russian trolls. 0.96

00:26:00.000 They're all paid by Vladimir Putin. 0.96

00:26:02.000 He's the one controlling the world.

00:26:04.000 Not us.

00:26:06.000 Not us who are in charge of ABC, NBC, Disney, this one and the other, and the State Department and the banks and all the rest.

00:26:15.000 Not us.

00:26:16.000 It's him.

00:26:16.000 Just something to think about.

00:26:17.000 Of course, I don't believe that.

00:26:19.000 Of course.

00:26:20.000 Of course, I don't believe that.

00:26:21.000 I disavow all conspiracy.

00:26:22.000 It's all the same, folks.

00:26:24.000 It's all the same horseshoe, okay?

00:26:27.000 It's a horseshoe.

00:26:28.000 People who believe in conspiracies are all equally crazy, regardless if one has a lot of evidence and one has no evidence.

00:26:36.000 It's all equally so.

00:26:37.000 I don't believe in conspiracies.

00:26:39.000 I disavow that stuff.

00:26:41.000 I think Israel is our closest ally, a special friend, and we can forgive them for the bad things that they do because they're.

00:26:51.000 The only democracy, the shining candle of freedom in the Middle East.

00:26:57.000 So, but we're not going to talk about that anymore.

00:26:59.000 So, that's just a little food for thought, just a little something there.

00:27:02.000 But the big thing I want to talk about, we may get to the Trump rally towards the end.

00:27:06.000 We might not, because I really want to talk about the Pennsylvania election tomorrow, the special election for the 18th congressional district in Pennsylvania tomorrow.

00:27:15.000 I think we're going to try and do live coverage of that tomorrow.

00:27:18.000 We'll try our best to get that set up.

00:27:20.000 So, if you want to see the results coming in, we'll be doing some live.

00:27:23.000 Coverage of the election results on YouTube tomorrow.

00:27:26.000 We'll maybe get some people on there to discuss.

00:27:28.000 But we have a big election coming tomorrow, and I haven't really heard so much about it.

00:27:32.000 Maybe it's because I only read like antiwar.com and like 4chan, but I haven't been hearing so much about this Pennsylvania special election, but it is very important.

00:27:42.000 It's tomorrow, it's in the 18th district of Pennsylvania, which the 18th district is right on the border of West Virginia.

00:27:48.000 It's in the suburbs, the suburbs of Pittsburgh are there.

00:27:51.000 And so to understand the geography of the congressional district, to understand the strategic location here, this is Trump country.

00:27:59.000 This is the kind of district that Trump came into office on.

00:28:03.000 These are the kinds of people that Trump appeals to with trade, with foreign policy, these stark departures from Republican orthodoxy.

00:28:10.000 These are the people that appeals to these working class people, these people in the Rust Belt, in the Midwest, these people in West Virginia, in Pennsylvania, in Ohio, Wisconsin, Michigan.

00:28:20.000 These were the swing states that propelled Trump into office, that gave him majorities in both chambers of Congress.

00:28:26.000 And so that's why this is so important.

00:28:29.000 This is a district which in 2014 and 2016, Democrats didn't even bother to run a candidate.

00:28:35.000 Because the Republican who was in office, who retired in October of 2017, stepped down because of a sex scandal.

00:28:42.000 He was such a strong candidate.

00:28:44.000 He was winning by such high margins.

00:28:46.000 The Democrats didn't even run candidates in 2014 and 2016.

00:28:50.000 This guy, he won by margins of 15% or higher in eight consecutive elections in this district.

00:28:56.000 This guy, Tim Murphy.

00:28:57.000 Trump won by 20 points in this district.

00:29:00.000 Mitt Romney won by a similar margin.

00:29:02.000 And according to 538, this district, Pennsylvania, 18, CD 18 in Pennsylvania is 20%, breaks 20% more towards Republicans than the rest of the country, leans 20%, a full fifth more to the right than the rest of the country.

00:29:17.000 And so this is a very strategic district.

00:29:19.000 However, it's looking like the race is going to be very close.

00:29:22.000 Now, it's really tough to say because you look at polling for congressional races, House races in particular, and it's just simply not reliable.

00:29:31.000 You can imagine how difficult it is to gauge things like voter turnout, to gauge things like local opinion.

00:29:36.000 It's very, very difficult because it's a smaller population.

00:29:39.000 You don't really get a feel for it.

00:29:41.000 I think the larger the population that you're polling, the easier it is, only because you get more samples.

00:29:49.000 It's more generalized as opposed to localized.

00:29:51.000 So for the House races, the polls have been wrong all year.

00:29:55.000 The polls for the House races this year have a margin of error of 5%.

00:30:00.000 They've gone in either way, they've gone in the wrong direction either way, something like 13% on average, polls for House races.

00:30:07.000 So it's tough.

00:30:08.000 But if we look at just the polling alone and not any of the signs on the ground, not anything we know about the district, It's looking like it's going to be neck and neck.

00:30:15.000 The average of the four most recent polls has the Democrat, Connor Lamb, at 47%, and the Republican, Rick Sacone, at 45%.

00:30:29.000 And so that's a very close race.

00:30:30.000 That's a race that we should be winning.

00:30:32.000 Very similar in many ways to the Alabama special Senate election, except that was a Senate election.

00:30:37.000 This is a House race, but very important.

00:30:40.000 And you understand if these polls are true, if the Democrat is pulling away and the polls are suggesting that he is, the Monmouth poll, which was the most recent poll, Had him up by six points, the Democrat.

00:30:49.000 And this is a very reputable poll.

00:30:51.000 This is one of 538's gold standard polls.

00:30:54.000 And you know, 538 wasn't right about the 2016 election, but they are good at aggregating data that we have.

00:31:00.000 The data could be wrong, but the aggregation, I think, is sound.

00:31:05.000 So if we go into tomorrow and Democrats pull off a win here, where you understand we've had a Republican running uncontested for four years, where Republican has won by a margin of 15% or more for eight consecutive terms, where both Republican.

00:31:19.000 Mitt Romney and Donald Trump won by 20%, where this district goes 20% to the right of the country.

00:31:25.000 If we lose here, we're in big trouble.

00:31:27.000 Because it's not just about this one district.

00:31:29.000 This one district will be up for an election in November in the general election.

00:31:33.000 This is a special election to fill a vacancy that came about in October.

00:31:38.000 So this is a special election, not a primary, a special election, and it'll be up for grabs again in November, so just eight months later, and probably go Republican either way.

00:31:48.000 But why it's important is because if a Democrat pulls off a win here in this special election, what does that say to the Republicans?

00:31:54.000 What does that say about Donald Trump?

00:31:56.000 That here you have a district.

00:31:57.000 That broke 20% for Trump, that is, and we've been over this already, that's so Republican, and now they're going to go for a Democrat, meaning that Democrats have closed a 20% gap to contest or even win this seat.

00:32:10.000 That's going to spell big trouble for the Republicans.

00:32:12.000 We already saw this in Texas early voting and in the primary last week.

00:32:17.000 And we went over how we can put that into context, but why we should still be cautious.

00:32:20.000 And we did the same with the special Senate election in Alabama, the same with the state elections in Virginia.

00:32:27.000 But here we have something that is a real litmus test, because here you have two candidates.

00:32:32.000 Where it's a pretty good control.

00:32:34.000 Rick Sacone is not a great fundraiser, and he's not a great campaigner, but that said, there's no sex scandal like there was with Doug Jones.

00:32:41.000 He's not an anti Trump guy like you had with the Virginia governor that we got killed in earlier in the fall.

00:32:48.000 So it is a pretty good control, like some of the earlier special elections that we saw in 2017, like we saw in Georgia, like we saw in Montana, like we saw in Utah, South Carolina.

00:32:57.000 This is a much better control because here you have two normal candidates.

00:33:02.000 And one of them is young and one of them is Marine, and the other one is, you know, rock rip conservative and in the Air Force.

00:33:09.000 So, pretty good, I think, a pretty good controlled experiment.

00:33:12.000 And so, tomorrow, if the polls turn out to be true, the Democrats win, it's going to spell disaster for us.

00:33:16.000 But I think if we look at other elections, other special elections this year that have similar margins, I think we can be a little bit assured.

00:33:26.000 I think we can take a little bit of assurance away from the polls that we might not do as bad as we think.

00:33:31.000 Because you look at, for example, Kansas, April 11th, there was a special election.

00:33:37.000 Kansas, this district broke 29% for Republicans on average.

00:33:40.000 Republicans won by 6% in the election.

00:33:43.000 Montana, on May 25th, they had a special election.

00:33:46.000 This district broke 21% for Republicans, and they won by a margin of 6%.

00:33:52.000 June 20th, South Carolina, they broke 19% for Republicans, won by 3%.

00:33:56.000 In Utah, they broke 35%, they went by 32%.

00:34:00.000 And Alabama is the only exception.

00:34:02.000 Alabama is the only state with a comparable percentage of Republican skew, a comparable percentage of Republican skew.

00:34:10.000 People that lean Republican, comparable to the rest of the country, that went Democrat, which they had a 29% Republican skew and they went 2% for the Democrats.

00:34:20.000 Whereas all the others went 6% for Republicans, 6%, 3%, 32%.

00:34:25.000 Alabama was the only one that broke for Republicans at more than 20% that they lost to a Democrat. 1.00

00:34:31.000 So I think if we look at the special elections this year and not look at Alabama, which was an extraordinary circumstance, where you had a sex scandal for four weeks, a child sex scandal, the media was concentrating on it, you had historic black turnout, which It was so exceptional, people thought it was cheating, rightly so. 0.99

00:34:49.000 I mean, they got 95% of the turnout in a special Senate election in the middle of winter that they got in a presidential election when Hillary Clinton was running. 0.99

00:35:00.000 They got, you know, the same amount of votes in a presidential election.

00:35:03.000 Republican, the turnout was down 600,000.

00:35:05.000 So, I mean, that was a really exceptional case.

00:35:07.000 Virginia, you had somebody that was explicitly anti Trump, didn't jump on until later in.

00:35:12.000 So here I think we can have some.

00:35:17.000 That it could fall in line with the others.

00:35:18.000 I'm not saying I'm predicting that.

00:35:20.000 I think it's too unpredictable to make a sound prediction.

00:35:23.000 My instinct is to say the Republican will win, but it's just too unpredictable given the polling, given the precedent in the other special elections, given the fact that you look at the candidates.

00:35:34.000 And this is also somewhat different from the others, maybe not a perfect example because the Democrat in this case, Connor Lamb, he's a blue dog Democrat.

00:35:43.000 If they still exist, Connor Lamb is it.

00:35:45.000 He's somebody who said he's personally against abortion because he's a Catholic.

00:35:49.000 He's somebody who is pro gun, he opposes new regulations on guns.

00:35:53.000 He explicitly denounced And publicly denounced Nancy Pelosi.

00:35:57.000 He said he would vote with Donald Trump.

00:35:59.000 So, this is a person, he said he would vote against like a 20 week abortion ban or something like that, a pro abortion policy.

00:36:06.000 So, here's somebody who is appealing to white people, appealing to the working class, is resoundingly against the Democratic establishment, against the progressive, far left sect of the party that occupies the party leadership.

00:36:22.000 So, I think he is a little bit of an anomaly.

00:36:24.000 And I would say that even if he did.

00:36:26.000 Come close tomorrow, even if he did win tomorrow, it would say something very peculiar about the Democrats.

00:36:33.000 That doesn't mean he's going to follow through.

00:36:35.000 That doesn't mean he gets into office and we expect that he votes with Trump and we expect that he's going to be a social conservative.

00:36:41.000 I'm not saying that.

00:36:42.000 But what it would tell us is that if voters believe him, and maybe they do, that's why they would vote for him, Democrats would have to be running candidates that are appealing to white people, appealing to the working class.

00:36:54.000 They're against the Democratic Party, they're social conservatives.

00:36:57.000 They're pro-gun and anti-abortion if they're even going to stand a chance in Trump country.

00:37:02.000 That's what it would tell us about the Democrats.

00:37:04.000 Whether or not they follow through on those things is kind of beside the point.

00:37:07.000 I mean, it is important, but you understand why that's not really relevant to, to why this is significant for the Democratic Party platform.

00:37:15.000 When they're up for highly contested elections in the Senate, in the House, in districts, in states where Trump won in 2016, where there's a Republican governor, where there's a Republican legislature, for example, in Missouri, Or in Montana, or in some of these other states, in Florida, in other swing states in 2018.

00:37:36.000 If they have to run a candidate that is pro Trump, social conservative, anti Nancy Pelosi, to even contest somebody in Pennsylvania, where Democrats were winning 16, 17, 18 years ago in this district, I think that'll tell us that just like with Texas, we have to qualify the blue wave.

00:37:51.000 In Texas, we saw a blue wave, but we saw something peculiar about it.

00:37:54.000 It wasn't that big, it couldn't overpower the conservatives, and it was split, not just along ideological lines between progressives and establishment.

00:38:02.000 But also along ethnic lines between Hispanics and the rest.

00:38:06.000 And if this election, let's say by an act of God, Condorland pulls it off, the polls are right, and he either comes very close or he wins, it tells us that the Democrats would have to do a serious 180.

00:38:17.000 This reflexive anti Trump, compulsive anti Trump, obstructionist, we love DACA, we love abortion and all the rest, that stuff's not going to fly.

00:38:26.000 Maybe this guy wins in Pennsylvania, but they're not going to turn out for a Democrat that's like Nancy Pelosi in Montana.

00:38:32.000 They're not going to turn out for Chuck Schumer and Nancy Pelosi in Missouri.

00:38:36.000 In Maine and all these other states.

00:38:38.000 So I think, again, a cautious optimism.

00:38:41.000 I think if you actually break down what's happening in this race, it's worrisome because we've injected $10 million, Republicans have injected $10 million into this race because the polls aren't looking good and they're trying desperately to shore up a very safe district, which should be a safe district, which shouldn't be contested.

00:39:00.000 And they're fighting against a candidate who's young and handsome and is a Marine and is blue collar and saying all the right things and a good campaigner and good fundraiser.

00:39:09.000 And if we lose tomorrow, it'll be an embarrassment and it'll be very scary because Democrats will use that and say, look at this boost for our morale.

00:39:17.000 Look, the blue wave is coming.

00:39:18.000 You should turn out.

00:39:19.000 We have a real chance. 0.99

00:39:20.000 I'm not downplaying that that would be a bad thing, but I am saying that we can't discount the fact that this is not like a frizzy haired, you know, social justice warrior mulatto who's coming in saying, we're going to take your guns and we're going to abort newborn babies. 0.99

00:39:35.000 We're just going to throw them out on the street and we're going to go to war against Russia. 0.88

00:39:39.000 I mean, this is not the archetypal Democrat that Chuck Schumer and the far left base is pushing.

00:39:44.000 It is somebody who looks like the Democrats of 25 years ago.

00:39:48.000 And I think that says it all right there.

00:39:51.000 I think that tells you a little bit about how Trump is doing.

00:39:54.000 If Trump is at a 95% approval rating within his own party, if even the Democrats in Trump's districts are running saying, we'll vote for Trump, we'll be like Trump, we'll govern like Trump, I think that tells you a lot about the direction we're headed in.

00:40:06.000 And I don't know if that's totally a bad thing.

00:40:08.000 Even if he can contest with this, I think it tells us that either way, we have a winning message.

00:40:13.000 So we'll see what happens tomorrow.

00:40:15.000 We'll be doing some live coverage.

00:40:17.000 If not, I'll be posting about it on Twitter.

00:40:19.000 If we can't do live, we'll do an aftermath, we'll do a recap.

00:40:24.000 But it should be a fun night tomorrow.

00:40:25.000 We'll be watching it come in.

00:40:26.000 Hopefully, it's not a disaster like it was with Alabama because that was just not fun.

00:40:31.000 That just wasn't fun.

00:40:33.000 And I remember because during the evening, we were saying, duh, you know, Roy Moore is going to win.

00:40:38.000 And it's not a matter.

00:40:39.000 I remember Jazz Hands McFields was saying, it's not a matter of if he's going to win.

00:40:44.000 It's a matter of is he going to win by five or 25 or 30.

00:40:48.000 And just as the night went on, it just looked worse and worse and worse.

00:40:52.000 And I still don't believe it was legitimate, folks.

00:40:55.000 You look at the voting in Birmingham, you look at the voting in the cities.

00:41:00.000 And what they did with the electronic voting records.

00:41:02.000 And I think something very fishy happened there, and especially with the scandal, fishy stuff.

00:41:07.000 So hopefully it'll be a fun election tomorrow.

00:41:09.000 It's always more fun to win, but we'll be covering it live, and we'll see what happens.

00:41:14.000 I think, again, like I said, either way, there are a lot of reasons to be optimistic, a lot of reasons to be cautious.

00:41:19.000 Don't get me wrong.

00:41:20.000 I do not want to downplay that you cannot get complacent.

00:41:24.000 You have to vote.

00:41:25.000 You have to vote in your primary, you have to vote in the election.

00:41:27.000 You should be campaigning with people if you have time, if you're not busy with work and other things.

00:41:32.000 I know I am.

00:41:33.000 And I'll still be out there campaigning.

00:41:35.000 But that said, you shouldn't be complacent.

00:41:37.000 But we should be, we are optimistic to some extent.

00:41:40.000 I think a lot of the underlying signs are good.

00:41:43.000 If somebody were running in a Trump district on anti Trump, far left, and they were doing well, we should be seriously concerned.

00:41:51.000 We would be in a really bad place.

00:41:52.000 But that we're being contested with somebody like Trump, it's like, eh, okay.

00:41:56.000 You won as Trump Light.

00:41:59.000 You have a temporary boost for your morale.

00:41:59.000 Congratulations.

00:42:01.000 Good luck after the IG report.

00:42:02.000 But we'll be watching it.

00:42:04.000 And then I wanted to cover the Trump rally, but we're right at the 45 minute mark.

00:42:08.000 I'm going to jump onto our super chats and we'll see how we're doing there.

00:42:12.000 If we have a lot of those, I'll just jump right into the super chats.

00:42:15.000 If we don't, I'll spend some time on the rally because the rally was really something over the weekend in Pennsylvania.

00:42:23.000 So we'll take a look at our super chats here.

00:42:27.000 And it looks like we got some, so I guess we'll just go to the super chats.

00:42:29.000 I may do the rally.

00:42:31.000 Maybe we'll probably cover that at some point in our election coverage tomorrow.

00:42:36.000 Radapunks says, Did you see R. Dawson call out Halsey on Worski?

00:42:41.000 I did not, but I heard about it.

00:42:43.000 And a lot of people are saying I should check him out, which I will.

00:42:45.000 I will check him out.

00:42:46.000 Brosoph says, Shout out to my homie Zeus.

00:42:49.000 Nickers for life.

00:42:51.000 Nickers for life.

00:42:52.000 And by the way, I'm not saying the reprehensible word that shall never be said.

00:42:55.000 I'm saying nicker, as in nick, because my name is Nick.

00:42:59.000 And I'm saying nick.

00:43:00.000 And if you're a fan of mine, you're a nicker.

00:43:03.000 So, you know, the identity politics left, the real racist left, will try and say, Nick is saying a racial slur.

00:43:10.000 He's. 0.68

00:43:11.000 We're making a funny joke that's based on my very cool name, and you are the party of the Ku Klux Klan. 0.85

00:43:17.000 You're a demo KKK crat, okay? 0.91

00:43:20.000 And you started slavery. 0.62

00:43:22.000 Joe the Serb says, N, please explain to Fegaloos, Brosup, slash Dirt Kevin why it's okay that I didn't vote for David Duke and went with those who had better optics, slash more relatable winners.

00:43:36.000 Well, I mean, I think if you're looking at the movement as it stands, we just can't afford to be supporting people that aren't serious.

00:43:46.000 We can't afford to let personalities who we may like.

00:43:50.000 Or maybe we agree with, or maybe we admire.

00:43:52.000 None of those things are true with Duke.

00:43:54.000 I don't admire him that much.

00:43:56.000 I disagree with him substantially on a lot of things.

00:43:59.000 But he's out there.

00:44:00.000 He's fighting his heart out.

00:44:01.000 I guess there's something admirable that he's courageous enough to stick to his convictions, but this is beside the point.

00:44:07.000 We cannot let personalities, which we may like, we cannot let elements of the movement get in the way of the cause.

00:44:13.000 We can't let the movement get in the way of the cause.

00:44:15.000 You've got to say that to yourself.

00:44:17.000 Cannot let the movement get in the way of the cause.

00:44:19.000 What is our cause?

00:44:21.000 We have very particular goals here, very difficult, challenging goals that are going to be hell to try and accomplish.

00:44:28.000 And it could be impossible.

00:44:29.000 We don't know.

00:44:30.000 We haven't tried.

00:44:32.000 But if the movement, if the organizational structure, if the strategy, if the personalities get in the way of what we're trying to achieve, I don't want to be a part of the movement.

00:44:40.000 Very simple.

00:44:40.000 It's like a business.

00:44:42.000 If you're a toy company, you're trying to sell toys.

00:44:46.000 You may have a manager that you really love, you may have a team that you really love, but if you're not accomplishing your objective, which is to sell toys and make money, You got to fire them.

00:44:54.000 You got to get rid of them.

00:44:55.000 You can't support them.

00:44:57.000 And I view it the same way.

00:44:58.000 We may like some of these people.

00:44:59.000 We may think they're funny.

00:45:01.000 We may think they're respectable.

00:45:02.000 We may think they're good people.

00:45:04.000 But unfortunately, politics is not decided by good people or people who we may like or people who we enjoy or even tell the truth all the time, explicit and unfiltered and in the worst possible optics.

00:45:18.000 But people who are smart and people who are strategic and people who are willing to do what it takes.

00:45:23.000 And so that's the explanation.

00:45:27.000 And it would have been interesting, I think, to see Duke get into the legislature.

00:45:31.000 I think it would have been interesting.

00:45:32.000 I think it would have made a lot of liberals upset.

00:45:35.000 I don't know if doing things to upset liberals is a good thing, but we have to be furthering people, elevating people that can win, elevating people that can actually make a difference.

00:45:45.000 So that's the explanation.

00:45:46.000 Manny Veen, greetings.

00:45:49.000 Please do an interview with Cynthia McKinney and David Duke to discuss AIPAC and the Israel lobby.

00:45:53.000 Have them both on at the same time, please.

00:45:55.000 No, I'm not going to do that.

00:45:57.000 I don't know Cynthia McKinney and David Duke.

00:45:59.000 Again, This was a guy who was in the Ku Klux Klan.

00:46:02.000 I know that was a long time ago, and it sucks that the media has not let him forget about that because, you know, he says he regrets it.

00:46:10.000 He says he regrets it.

00:46:11.000 He says he was young and he made a mistake.

00:46:13.000 And we all made mistakes when we were young.

00:46:15.000 I'm young now, and I'm making mistakes, people say.

00:46:18.000 And everybody makes mistakes when they're young.

00:46:20.000 Unfortunately, the political climate is such that you associate with something so reprehensible, which actually did commit political violence, which I'm against.

00:46:29.000 And it makes it so that anybody who associates with that person.

00:46:33.000 By, you know, in a de facto way, adopts their political baggage.

00:46:37.000 I don't want to adopt that baggage.

00:46:38.000 He made a decision.

00:46:39.000 That's the way he wanted to have his political career, and that's fine.

00:46:43.000 That's his prerogative, but that's not my choice.

00:46:45.000 So that's not going to happen.

00:46:47.000 Marcus Antonius, Neilan cries out in pain as he strikes you.

00:46:50.000 Yeah.

00:46:51.000 I don't really want to talk about Neilan.

00:46:54.000 Not a serious person.

00:46:55.000 Simon Skoll, Millennial Matt's YouTube channel was deleted.

00:46:58.000 It sucks because he had such good content.

00:47:01.000 I really like Millennial Matt. 0.80

00:47:03.000 And here's why he can get away with a little bit more it's because he's a comedian, he's a jokester.

00:47:08.000 And people will bring this up.

00:47:09.000 They'll say, Nick, you made a joke that I don't like.

00:47:12.000 What about optics?

00:47:13.000 Optics applies to your rhetoric.

00:47:16.000 Optics applies to what you're seriously saying.

00:47:18.000 There's all the difference in the world between unironically going out and putting on a Nazi uniform, as TWP does, and doing a national socialism or death tour, and it's totally unironic, totally serious.

00:47:33.000 These are their convictions, and Millennial Matt throwing up a Roman salute or whatever as a joke.

00:47:38.000 Again, these are not people you want to be taking pictures with and you want in a political movement, but.

00:47:43.000 You understand why it is different.

00:47:45.000 So it's unfortunate.

00:47:46.000 We're against censorship of all kinds. 1.00

00:47:47.000 No censorship, and especially not a millennial, Matt. 1.00

00:47:50.000 Funny guy.

00:47:52.000 Don't agree with everything he says or everything he does, but he's a solid, he's a good person.

00:47:57.000 Fractor enthusiast.

00:47:58.000 What do you think about pickle hub optics?

00:48:00.000 I don't know what that is.

00:48:02.000 Fractor enthusiast.

00:48:03.000 Ever watch Judd Suss?

00:48:05.000 I don't know what that is either.

00:48:07.000 Eric Wright. 0.66

00:48:07.000 Thank God the government saved our precious democracies or democracy from color in Bernie Sanders memes and. 0.66

00:48:14.000 One like equals one win for Jesus posts on Zuckbook.

00:48:18.000 Yeah, right?

00:48:18.000 What a joke.

00:48:19.000 Exactly.

00:48:20.000 Well, the thought that Russian troll farms, if they even exist, getting a million dollars a month were in any way, shape, or form changing the outcome of the election is so absurd.

00:48:33.000 Anybody who talks about that should be laughed right out of the public square.

00:48:36.000 I mean, think of how much money was spent by both sides.

00:48:39.000 Think of how much money was spent by Hillary Clinton and what she got from multinational corporations, from lobbyists, foreign and domestic, from banks.

00:48:47.000 And nobody cares about that, right?

00:48:49.000 $1.8 billion of corporate money.

00:48:51.000 Yeah, whatever.

00:48:53.000 It's okay. 1.00

00:48:55.000 A million dollars a month from a Russian troll farm, and they're posting on Facebook about, you know, LOL, Hillary should be in jail.

00:49:02.000 Oh, but that decided the outcome, right? 0.98

00:49:05.000 You know, people who care about the sanctity of elections and they don't want voter ID, right?

00:49:09.000 Trump should say, you don't want interference in elections, have voter ID and get rid of electronic voting.

00:49:14.000 I'd like to see that.

00:49:16.000 I think that's the way he should play it.

00:49:18.000 I think that's ultimately how he will play it.

00:49:20.000 Perfect segue.

00:49:22.000 You're worried about voter fraud?

00:49:23.000 You're worried.

00:49:24.000 Well, if it's such a concern to you, well, we'll just have to implement national voter ID and we'll have to get rid of the electronic voting because we got to make sure it's a sound process. 0.81

00:49:33.000 And all these people are concerned about foreign interference and then they bring over illegal immigrants and let them vote in Chicago, right? 0.75

00:49:40.000 So it's a joke. 0.91

00:49:41.000 Frank Turr, enthusiast. 1.00

00:49:42.000 What's the answer to the Slava question?

00:49:44.000 I don't know what the Slava question is.

00:49:46.000 We just have to.

00:49:49.000 I don't think that's really a question people are asking themselves, right?

00:49:53.000 Fractor enthusiast, Alt Fuentus needs to pogrom the alt right.

00:49:57.000 J.A., what's J.A.?

00:49:59.000 Very cryptic.

00:50:00.000 It would be so much more helpful if you could not be ambiguous because Fractor enthusiasts are using all these esoteric terminology and names here.

00:50:10.000 Woke Shree, Rachel Corey, a 23 year old American girl, ran over by an Israel armored bulldozer in Gaza, 2003.

00:50:18.000 How did this happen with no backlash?

00:50:19.000 Untouchable.

00:50:20.000 Exactly right.

00:50:21.000 Exactly right.

00:50:23.000 And people say, Nick, why do you bring up the USS Liberty? 0.68

00:50:25.000 Same reason they bring up the Holocaust.

00:50:28.000 Same reason they bring up any other tragedy, right?

00:50:31.000 It's almost as if American lives what, do those lives not matter?

00:50:35.000 You have sailors die.

00:50:37.000 You have America's finest, Americans' veterans, the finest people America has to offer, people that fight and die for the country.

00:50:44.000 They sacrifice their lives for our country, and they got killed by a country that our corrupt government gives money to.

00:50:50.000 We paid money to a government that killed our vets.

00:50:53.000 That's why I care.

00:50:55.000 You know, just because there were less of them, that means it doesn't matter.

00:50:58.000 I don't think so.

00:50:59.000 America first. 0.85

00:51:00.000 I care about American sailors that die before I care about any foreign people, no matter what the number is that die.

00:51:07.000 So, you know, people tell me all the time, Nick, why do you talk about that? 0.98

00:51:09.000 Nick, is that such a good idea?

00:51:11.000 I don't care how it looks.

00:51:12.000 I don't care what it looks like.

00:51:14.000 Those American veterans, those American sailors, they deserve justice just like anybody else.

00:51:19.000 And nobody talks about them.

00:51:20.000 Nobody wants justice for them because they don't want to be called names.

00:51:24.000 But I couldn't do that in good conscience.

00:51:27.000 We love all of our troops.

00:51:28.000 We love all of our heroes, even the ones that are killed by our allies, right?

00:51:32.000 Even though they're controlled by the lobbyists, right?

00:51:35.000 So, exactly right.

00:51:37.000 We should make it so that our veterans are untouchable.

00:51:37.000 Untouchable.

00:51:41.000 What else?

00:51:41.000 And what else?

00:51:43.000 Tantz says, great show, brother.

00:51:45.000 Thank you, brother.

00:51:47.000 Oba Killa King says, do we need to audit the Fed?

00:51:50.000 And should we establish a gold standard?

00:51:52.000 We do have to audit the Fed.

00:51:53.000 We don't know how much money they're printing, we don't know what their balance sheet looks like.

00:51:57.000 And should we have a gold standard?

00:51:59.000 I don't think that's a solution.

00:52:02.000 I think the monetarist solution is the best.

00:52:04.000 The Milton Friedman answer is the best, which is make it so that the quantity of money grows through an algorithm that's based on gross domestic product or some other variable.

00:52:14.000 Instead of having a board of 13 or so people in different banks arbitrarily deciding how much money there should be, what the interest rate should be, what do you think the interest rate should be?

00:52:25.000 I think it should be this percentage.

00:52:25.000 Oh, I don't know.

00:52:26.000 What do you think it should be?

00:52:27.000 And, you know, 12 people make the decision how much money there should be in the country.

00:52:32.000 Instead of that, we should have the quantity of money be a function that's predictable, that everybody knows, and tie it to GDP or something like that.

00:52:42.000 Because the way it is, it's too discretionary.

00:52:44.000 You can't put that.

00:52:45.000 Trust.

00:52:46.000 You can't put that power in the hands of a few bureaucrats.

00:52:48.000 What if they make the wrong decision?

00:52:49.000 They often do.

00:52:51.000 And more often than not, they're reactive, which is a big problem.

00:52:55.000 Carl's friend says, I went to school with a girl that I haven't seen in about four years.

00:52:59.000 I think she liked me then.

00:53:01.000 I'll see her in two weeks.

00:53:02.000 Is it straightforward to ask her out when we haven't talked since school?

00:53:06.000 Well, I'm not really the best person to ask.

00:53:08.000 I don't have so much experience in this department. 1.00

00:53:11.000 The women, they're not so wild about my message of get back in the kitchen and raise children. 1.00

00:53:16.000 I'm a little bit old school in that regard. 1.00

00:53:18.000 But I would tell you that.

00:53:20.000 Now, if you're going to see somebody, haven't seen it in a long time, maybe you tell her, get coffee.

00:53:24.000 It starts out very benign.

00:53:26.000 Hey, why don't we grab a cup of coffee?

00:53:28.000 We catch up.

00:53:28.000 Let's grab lunch.

00:53:30.000 Let's try the Pico Burger.

00:53:31.000 Hey, I know my favorite host of my favorite show, America First, says you've got to try the Pico Burger at McDonald's.

00:53:39.000 Let's go try it.

00:53:40.000 Maybe not that.

00:53:41.000 I don't know if they'd like that so much.

00:53:42.000 But maybe you tell her, let's grab a cup of coffee.

00:53:44.000 And then you slowly ingratiate yourself.

00:53:48.000 But again, like I said, I'm not the person to ask.

00:53:50.000 Al Sabadi's.

00:53:52.000 I attract women not by asking them out, but just by having a Chad podcast.

00:53:56.000 I go to the gym and I just exude so much tea, so much raw energy that I don't even have to ask.

00:54:04.000 I just look and they just start following me around wherever I go.

00:54:08.000 It's like it's this effect where I take a picture with a woman and I'm dating them.

00:54:12.000 This is a little known effect that I have on people because on poll, they take a few pictures that I took with a friend of mine from Boston University and they say, Nick is dating this person. 0.88

00:54:21.000 And that's actually true.

00:54:23.000 People might say, That's ridiculous that the internet thinks you're dating someone merely because you appear in a picture with them.

00:54:28.000 But, you know, counterintuitively, because of my raw aura, anybody who I appear in a picture with, I am dating.

00:54:34.000 So Marion Le Pen, Sam Hyde, Nigel Farage, Cassie Dillon, I'm dating all of them concurrently.

00:54:43.000 Al Sabadis, ignore super chats, cover the Trump rally.

00:54:46.000 Yeah, we have to talk.

00:54:47.000 We have to take the super chats.

00:54:48.000 We love the fans.

00:54:49.000 We'll take the Trump rally.

00:54:51.000 We'll have to get into it tomorrow when we cover the election.

00:54:54.000 LC1707, ask the viewers why Monday's views are always higher.

00:54:59.000 Why are our views always high on Monday?

00:55:01.000 They are always high on Monday now that you mention it.

00:55:03.000 Every Monday it's like 600, 700, and then it goes down.

00:55:07.000 I think it's because people have a rough day on Monday and they like to tune in for a little lighthearted banter, a little fun content.

00:55:13.000 But yeah, tell me why.

00:55:14.000 Plug it up in the live chat.

00:55:16.000 Respond below.

00:55:17.000 Why do you tune in on Mondays as opposed to other days?

00:55:20.000 Leave a comment below.

00:55:22.000 Mike C., Nick, an optics question for you.

00:55:24.000 I am from the South, currently living in California.

00:55:27.000 I love the Confederate flag.

00:55:29.000 Is wearing this on a shirt a no good move or a healthy statement of pride? 0.88

00:55:32.000 Look, I think you could do it.

00:55:34.000 I think optics matters a lot less for people that are not.

00:55:38.000 In the spotlight.

00:55:40.000 Optics adders more for people that are in the leadership, that are representative of the movement, not just people that attend things.

00:55:47.000 You know, so I don't think it really so much matters.

00:55:49.000 If you were a politician, I would say probably not.

00:55:51.000 If you were, you know, going to be putting your face out there and preaching American nationalism, that would be bad optics.

00:55:57.000 But if you're just, you love your culture and you love your heritage, don't let anybody tell you not to represent.

00:56:03.000 Don't let anybody tell you not to wear it.

00:56:05.000 The problem becomes when people want to take leadership and they become a liability, when their optics become a liability, right?

00:56:13.000 So, I'm not going to tell people you can't wear that, you can't wear this, you can't be fat, you shouldn't be fat, but you can't do this or that.

00:56:19.000 I'm saying if you're going to say, I represent this group of people, of which I'm a constituent, you ought to look well.

00:56:25.000 You ought to represent the movement well.

00:56:27.000 You know, when your parents tell you when you go to school or you go to a restaurant or you go to a foreign country, they say, You're representing our family.

00:56:35.000 Or, you know, if you're in a school and you play travel sports, you're representing our school.

00:56:39.000 It's sort of like that.

00:56:40.000 When you show up and you do a speech or you do a rally, You are representative of a lot of people, and therefore it's incumbent on you.

00:56:47.000 There's a responsibility that you are a manifestation of the movement and you represent the people.

00:56:53.000 And if you wore a Confederate flag, that wouldn't be coming across because you would have to represent people in the North and the South.

00:57:00.000 And that doesn't resonate with people in the North. 0.70

00:57:03.000 But if you're just somebody in the South, by all, God bless you, go out and wear your Confederate flag. 0.60

00:57:07.000 I think it's a remarkable thing.

00:57:10.000 But it's different rules if you're in the leadership.

00:57:14.000 Mary Bova.

00:57:16.000 Hey, Nick, I volunteered for the GOP in Pennsylvania, making calls, eating wood fired homemade pizza tonight.

00:57:21.000 The good stuff.

00:57:22.000 God bless.

00:57:23.000 God bless you.

00:57:26.000 You are our model viewer for the evening.

00:57:29.000 Everybody who's not, look at this person, Mary Bova.

00:57:32.000 You put everybody else to shame.

00:57:34.000 Making the calls exactly, this is exactly what it takes.

00:57:38.000 This is exactly what it takes.

00:57:40.000 This is what you can do.

00:57:41.000 And, Mary, I'm sure you're aware of this.

00:57:44.000 Phone banking is tough.

00:57:45.000 I mean, it's easy enough.

00:57:47.000 Like, it's not backbreaking labor, but it's tough.

00:57:50.000 Because it's tedious, and a lot of times you have to finagle with apps, and if you go to the headquarters with a phone, and people hang up on you, and you have to ask questions, and you have to remain upbeat.

00:58:00.000 It's very tough to get hung up on a lot.

00:58:01.000 It's not easy work, and it's not glamorous work.

00:58:03.000 It's not glorious.

00:58:05.000 You don't get the same dopamine rush having yourself hung up on 15 different times, and maybe you get one person to say, Yeah, I'm going to vote for Rick Sacone, than it is when you go out and you get to yell and scream, and I get to be righteously angry at a rally on Sunday and then drink with my friends.

00:58:21.000 So God bless you.

00:58:23.000 You're the real champ there.

00:58:24.000 And the wood fire pizza, you're calling my name with that stuff.

00:58:29.000 But you got to do it that way.

00:58:30.000 Make it a little bit fun.

00:58:31.000 You can do it from home a lot.

00:58:32.000 So people are talking about bringing back community, political involvement.

00:58:36.000 Here's an idea that is so easy that everybody can do.

00:58:40.000 If you're an adult, if you're a teenager, a college kid, call up your friends and say, hey, I'm having a phone banking party.

00:58:46.000 I'll order a pizza and wings or whatever.

00:58:51.000 I'll have some kind of a special meal or we'll watch the game and then we'll phone bank.

00:58:56.000 Or we'll have.

00:58:57.000 Pizza, or we'll go out for drinks and then we'll phone.

00:58:59.000 Well, you shouldn't.

00:59:00.000 You should phone bank and then go out for drinks, but make it a community event.

00:59:03.000 And this breeds camaraderie.

00:59:06.000 You start talking about politics, talking about the issues, and moreover, you boost your numbers.

00:59:11.000 This is how it happens.

00:59:13.000 It's so not hard at all.

00:59:15.000 People make it out like we have to design from the top down a utopian ethnic country.

00:59:20.000 That's not at all how it works.

00:59:22.000 You do it with individual choices, individual evenings among individuals, and bringing individuals together, I'm saying.

00:59:30.000 Don't be atomized.

00:59:31.000 I'm saying it starts with small choices, small decisions, bringing over your friends, your family, and bringing them around.

00:59:38.000 And that's how communities are built organically.

00:59:41.000 So, great idea.

00:59:42.000 Really, thank you for that comment.

00:59:44.000 That's very solid.

00:59:46.000 What else?

00:59:48.000 What else do we have here?

00:59:49.000 Dominic Liberator, Worski thought he was above optics with DD and AA.

00:59:54.000 It's true.

00:59:55.000 It's true.

00:59:55.000 Very unfortunate.

00:59:57.000 With David Duke and Anglin on Alaska.

00:59:59.000 Yeah, I mean, you just have to be very careful.

01:00:03.000 You're much more empowered when you have a platform than when you don't.

01:00:06.000 You're much more empowered when you have a job than when you don't, when you have money and when you don't.

01:00:10.000 And think about the people telling you to make decisions.

01:00:13.000 That hinders your ability to influence.

01:00:16.000 They tell you to post things that'll get you banned from social media.

01:00:19.000 They tell you to say things that'll get you fired from your job.

01:00:23.000 These are not people that are helping.

01:00:25.000 Joe the Serb. 0.51

01:00:27.000 And thanks for defending me.

01:00:28.000 I'm taking a lot of heat.

01:00:29.000 Goomba.

01:00:29.000 Yes, the Goomba Squad rises.

01:00:31.000 And you're welcome.

01:00:32.000 And I love Joe.

01:00:33.000 We love our people.

01:00:35.000 Nordic Ethos.

01:00:35.000 Nick, have you read American Betrayal by Diana West?

01:00:39.000 I'm at chapter three, and it's interesting so far.

01:00:40.000 I'll have to check that out.

01:00:41.000 I've never read it.

01:00:43.000 Froctor Enthusiast.

01:00:44.000 Learn the ways of the Froctor Enthusiast, bro.

01:00:46.000 Pickle Haub equals a pointy German helmet.

01:00:50.000 Judd Suss equals a movie produced by Goebbels.

01:00:53.000 Oh, so that's great optics. 0.65

01:00:55.000 That's really appealing to middle class, white, working class Americans as Nazi propaganda.

01:01:02.000 Hey, remember that regime that your grandfather fought against?

01:01:05.000 Remember that thing that everyone, like people have spent billions of dollars convincing you that's the one thing that is just beyond the pale?

01:01:11.000 Let's do that.

01:01:13.000 No good, my friend.

01:01:14.000 No good.

01:01:15.000 Carl's friend, thank you, my guy.

01:01:16.000 We'll report in on what happens. 0.80

01:01:19.000 I'm ugly. 0.69

01:01:20.000 So, I got to try. 0.96

01:01:21.000 Oh, buddy.

01:01:22.000 Look, the thing is, here's what's cool about men and women.

01:01:25.000 If you look at sexual marketplace value, what makes men valuable as mates is not looks.

01:01:31.000 I mean, this plays a role, of course.

01:01:33.000 Of course it does.

01:01:34.000 But money and also personality to an extent plays a role.

01:01:38.000 But moreover, ability to protect, ability to provide. 0.69

01:01:41.000 And women, you know, women these days, they see a teenager with a nice jawline, whether it's teachers or it's high profile people in there, they can't control themselves.

01:01:50.000 But it does, there is a little bit of hope for men where men. 0.92

01:01:55.000 As they mature, as they age, men age like a fine wine, whereas women do not. 0.99

01:02:00.000 Men grow their wealth, men get more experience, they develop expertise in their fields, they develop prestige in their fields, they learn how to work with women and interact with women. 0.98

01:02:11.000 And women just, their eggs dry up, and women don't age as well as men. 1.00

01:02:16.000 So it's like, you know, all these women, they can laugh now. 0.99

01:02:20.000 And all these feminists do. 0.72

01:02:21.000 They laugh and they laugh and they say, oh, if you're against women or, you know, if you're against feminism, you're just MGTOW, you're just this and that. 0.99

01:02:28.000 And all we have to do is remind them.

01:02:30.000 All we have to do is very ominously look at the watch.

01:02:33.000 You know, next time you get one of these trad thoughts, next time you get any thought saying, you're MGTOW, you're this or that, just remind them.

01:02:40.000 Clock's ticking, ladies.

01:02:41.000 Clock's ticking. 1.00

01:02:42.000 You can laugh now.

01:02:43.000 We're having a great time now when you're 22 and you look good and your figure's good.

01:02:49.000 What'll happen when you're 23, 24, 29, 35, 42?

01:02:53.000 It's going to be very hard to be smug when you're 42 and single.

01:02:57.000 So I would remind all the opponents of traditionalism, all the opponents of the church, You're fighting against time.

01:03:04.000 You're fighting against father time.

01:03:05.000 That's not when you're going to win, ladies. 1.00

01:03:08.000 You're not going to be able to take enough female empowerment classes. 1.00

01:03:11.000 There's not an NGO in the world. 0.99

01:03:13.000 There's not enough NGO money in the world that'll save you from father time and the inevitable, the biological inevitability.

01:03:21.000 So, and there it is. 1.00

01:03:23.000 But we love women. 1.00

01:03:24.000 We want them. 1.00

01:03:25.000 And we only, the reason why we bully them is because we want them to see the light.

01:03:30.000 We want them to come around to our way of thinking.

01:03:32.000 We want them to be happy, to be mothers.

01:03:35.000 To fulfill their function, they could be at harmony with the world and with themselves.

01:03:40.000 And even if you look at some of the literature that I have that has been written by traditionalists, by people like this, particularly Spangler, they have glowing things to say about women. 1.00

01:03:52.000 The traditionalists, you would think from what feminists say about traditionalism, you would think you open up the book and it's like, Women are dumb. 1.00

01:03:58.000 Women are dumb and they belong in the kitchen. 1.00

01:04:00.000 But that's not at all. 1.00

01:04:01.000 That is not at all what it's about. 1.00

01:04:03.000 Spangler says that women are like the universe. 1.00

01:04:07.000 They're as beautiful as the universe. 1.00

01:04:09.000 They're in harmony with the universe.

01:04:10.000 They are pure becoming.

01:04:11.000 They're like actuality itself.

01:04:14.000 And men are like the masters of the universe.

01:04:16.000 We hold the key to the secrets.

01:04:18.000 We are the defenders.

01:04:19.000 We are the protectors, but they are the energy.

01:04:23.000 They are world becoming, Spanglish says.

01:04:25.000 And we are just the lowly keepers of that. 1.00

01:04:29.000 And so we hold women up to a very high role.

01:04:32.000 We view mothers as the most important role in a religious capacity, in a philosophical, a sociological capacity.

01:04:38.000 So when we say we want women to be in the home, raising kids, We're saying that because that's the best thing a human being can do.

01:04:44.000 You're happy when you're nurturing children.

01:04:46.000 You're one with God when you're nurturing children.

01:04:49.000 It's the most important function there is.

01:04:51.000 Where would we be without our mothers?

01:04:52.000 Where would anybody be without a good mother? 0.68

01:04:56.000 They'd be gone.

01:04:56.000 Nowhere.

01:04:57.000 They'd be dead, dead as a doornail. 1.00

01:04:59.000 So that's why we want to spare the women. 1.00

01:05:02.000 Mary Bova, first time super chatter, getting addicted. 0.96

01:05:05.000 Hey, it's addicting content.

01:05:06.000 It's worse.

01:05:07.000 You know, here's the alternative for the opioid epidemic an America First epidemic, right?

01:05:12.000 People, if you're on very addictive drugs, Just turn on America first.

01:05:16.000 I guarantee you'll forget about heroin tomorrow.

01:05:18.000 You'll forget about Oxycontin tomorrow.

01:05:22.000 Your hair is cute.

01:05:23.000 I like your message.

01:05:23.000 I am a woman.

01:05:24.000 Well, thank you so much.

01:05:25.000 Thank you.

01:05:26.000 Glad you enjoy the show.

01:05:26.000 I appreciate that.

01:05:28.000 Sorry if you're offended by the previous screed about women, but, you know, we have to do it.

01:05:33.000 We have to for the people that don't enjoy the content.

01:05:36.000 We have to make them feel the heat so they can see the light, as they say.

01:05:41.000 Ian Weber says If I forgot to call in during the call in show this week, I'm quitting the movement.

01:05:48.000 Have a good rest of your night, everyone.

01:05:50.000 It's, yeah, just like Tara McCarthy, right?

01:05:52.000 The Chosen One, why did Paul Nealon say you disavowed him?

01:05:55.000 Because I did.

01:05:56.000 But I think any common sense person would.

01:05:58.000 But I don't want to talk about Paul, not a serious person, not relevant.

01:06:03.000 Carl's friend, right on, my dude.

01:06:04.000 I got some shekels and can make them laugh.

01:06:06.000 It'll go well.

01:06:07.000 Very good, my guy.

01:06:08.000 Very good.

01:06:09.000 Right on.

01:06:11.000 If you have a good sense of humor, this is very good stuff.

01:06:13.000 And I've noticed this.

01:06:15.000 The people I think these days, when there's so much casual sex, when there are so many, you know, If you want sex, you can get it these days, basically.

01:06:23.000 You know, with all the dating apps and bars and just the ubiquity of sex, it's available everywhere.

01:06:29.000 And I think, especially with Generation Z, we're kind of sick of it.

01:06:32.000 I think I've observed this with a lot of my peers.

01:06:35.000 People will engage in it, they feel like they have to.

01:06:37.000 It's a way to cope with life and its pain, its suffering, and the numbness that they feel.

01:06:43.000 But I think deep down, you see a longing in every successive generation for a better connection.

01:06:49.000 And it sounds gay, but the personality stuff. 0.90

01:06:51.000 I think these days, even though a woman might say they want, you know, a big buff, Even though they might, you know, cheat. 0.99

01:06:57.000 I'm sure they do. 0.92

01:06:58.000 But I think more and more people are coming back around to.

01:07:01.000 We want people that are going to be compatible with us.

01:07:03.000 So we want to be the mothers to our children and the fathers to our children.

01:07:06.000 So I think you're in luck, my guy.

01:07:09.000 What else?

01:07:10.000 Ian Weber.

01:07:11.000 Oh, yeah, everyone.

01:07:12.000 I listened to the I am an Englishman speech.

01:07:14.000 I don't believe the speaker is a professional speaker, but it is good and heartfelt.

01:07:18.000 Yes, I have heard that speech.

01:07:19.000 I forget who said it, but very good, very inspirational.

01:07:23.000 Froctor enthusiast with $100 dues.

01:07:26.000 Thank you, my guy.

01:07:27.000 Much appreciated.

01:07:28.000 Why hate German optics? 0.99

01:07:30.000 It was the Jews who got us to team up with the Soviets to slaughter Germans. 0.99

01:07:34.000 Okay, okay. 0.92

01:07:34.000 Again, we're trying to bring down the optics game, I can see. 0.92

01:07:38.000 And in spite of that, I appreciate the donation.

01:07:40.000 But we're not hating on German optics.

01:07:43.000 We're saying we want American optics.

01:07:45.000 It's the American nation.

01:07:46.000 And so we want American optics and an American message.

01:07:49.000 And we don't want Nazi optics. 0.54

01:07:52.000 And when I mean Nazi, I mean National Socialist. 0.64

01:07:54.000 I mean people that were acolytes.

01:07:56.000 Actually, you know, you say, why are you not promoting a Goebbels propaganda film?

01:08:01.000 Oh, because I'm not a National Socialist.

01:08:03.000 Because I'm not a Nazi.

01:08:05.000 And all that conspiracy stuff about the Soviets.

01:08:08.000 I can't even comment on that.

01:08:09.000 On Louis Brandeis and about the Bolsheviks, I could not comment on that.

01:08:13.000 Proctor, no, no, we just read that one.

01:08:15.000 Dissident Rights with some $50 reduced.

01:08:17.000 Thank you, my guy.

01:08:19.000 This guy goes above and beyond.

01:08:20.000 He's one of the best, Dissident Rights.

01:08:22.000 He sent me some very fine books, all kinds of donations.

01:08:26.000 He makes the videos.

01:08:27.000 This guy's a real trooper.

01:08:29.000 He's a real patriot.

01:08:29.000 We love this guy.

01:08:31.000 Really, actually, really, actually humbling.

01:08:33.000 So many good people that come out.

01:08:36.000 It's why I do it.

01:08:36.000 And support.

01:08:37.000 It's why, you know, people would say, Nick, why is it so silly what you do?

01:08:41.000 You know, people make fun of me all the time.

01:08:43.000 You know, they're in college throwing 50 grand into a degree that's useless and they say, Nick, why are you, you know, starting your own thing?

01:08:50.000 But I do it because I love the people.

01:08:51.000 I respect the people.

01:08:52.000 I want to fight for the people.

01:08:54.000 But dissident writes, as long term electorally, if Dems can nominate blue dog shapeshifters in Trump districts and win, do you think they can afford to replicate that in the future or is this just an exception to the general direction of the party?

01:09:06.000 PA 18 is 96% white.

01:09:08.000 Woo lad. 0.75

01:09:09.000 Here's the problem.

01:09:11.000 This is not repeatable, what the Democrats are doing in Pennsylvania tomorrow.

01:09:16.000 It's not scalable, I should say, in the sense that look at the coalition that the Democrats have built with Hispanics, with blacks, with Asians, homosexuals, Muslims, immigrants, all these groups.

01:09:30.000 If they're appealing to white people, if they're appealing to the white working class, not going to fly with this coalition.

01:09:34.000 They won't get the turnout, they won't get the vote.

01:09:36.000 The vote will split.

01:09:37.000 You'll get progressives.

01:09:38.000 You'll get the progressive party led by.

01:09:40.000 Elizabeth Warren and Bernie Sanders.

01:09:42.000 You'll split the Democratic Party in two.

01:09:44.000 You'll get the La Raza Party.

01:09:45.000 It'll be a regional party, but it'll split the vote in three.

01:09:49.000 So it's not scalable. 0.79

01:09:50.000 The Democrats have staked the future of their party on this gambit of we can transform the civilization so quickly that we can forget about the white vote. 0.83

01:10:01.000 And that'll be difficult now. 0.78

01:10:03.000 Forgetting about the white vote is obviously they're feeling it now, but the gambit is that that won't matter in 20 years.

01:10:10.000 And it all depends on this transitional period.

01:10:12.000 Can they secure that? 0.99

01:10:14.000 Can they secure a majority of non whites before this process is stopped? 1.00

01:10:20.000 So, no, I don't think that this is the exception, in a word. 1.00

01:10:26.000 I think this is not scalable.

01:10:28.000 This is not repeatable.

01:10:29.000 Maybe it is in Ohio, Wisconsin, Michigan, but in a very limited capacity.

01:10:34.000 They're not going to be able to do this for the White House.

01:10:36.000 They won't be able to do this in a regular election year.

01:10:38.000 They could do it in a special election, they could do it in a few contested primary contests or whatever.

01:10:46.000 But long term, the party's been moving leftward.

01:10:49.000 And hey, if they reform, we might not even have a problem, right?

01:10:53.000 So, what else?

01:10:55.000 Eric Wright says, Nick, I ruined my career and have been kicked off all social media platforms in my quest to please internet autistes.

01:11:04.000 So glad I'm woke about the people, though.

01:11:06.000 Yeah, right?

01:11:07.000 I mean, that's, think about what people are telling you.

01:11:10.000 They're telling you you have to go out there, get yourself banned from social media, get yourself delegitimized by all the media, all the institutions.

01:11:20.000 You make yourself unemployable, get yourself fired from your job, make your wife leave you, but then you'll be pure.

01:11:25.000 Then you'll be a brother.

01:11:27.000 I don't think so.

01:11:28.000 I think I would much rather have a movement where it's implicit, but you have people that are in business, you have people that are lawyers, you have people that are doctors and scientists and politicians and people in media than an army of unemployable, fat people who take to the streets and they have no stake.

01:11:47.000 I would take that deal any day of the week.

01:11:50.000 Hey, people that wouldn't take that deal, by all means, take the army of people who are willing to put themselves out there and say crazy things and ruin their lives.

01:11:59.000 You can have the martyrs, and we'll have the people that want to win.

01:11:59.000 Go ahead.

01:12:02.000 Frochter enthusiast, shower Fuentes with. 0.63

01:12:05.000 Oh, okay. 1.00

01:12:06.000 We're not even going to.

01:12:07.000 We can't even read this stuff.

01:12:08.000 I liked.

01:12:09.000 I want to read the super chats because people pay money, but not if it's going to be outrageous like this.

01:12:13.000 Remember, JFK, Ich benign Berliner, German optics. 0.78

01:12:16.000 Okay, so this is a troll, obviously.

01:12:19.000 Blunderbuss, can I run your show while you're at Amran?

01:12:22.000 No.

01:12:24.000 The answer is no.

01:12:26.000 No, it's America First with NJF.

01:12:27.000 Who else could host America First?

01:12:29.000 Nobody.

01:12:29.000 Who else could.

01:12:31.000 Who else could take up a media company like this?

01:12:33.000 Nobody.

01:12:35.000 America first, it's Donald Trump's slogan, but I've really cultivated this niche, this particular niche with the slogan. 0.88

01:12:42.000 And so to hand it off to somebody else, for anybody else to even try to masquerade with that name is ridiculous, and everybody knows it.

01:12:51.000 But no, you can't run my show.

01:12:53.000 But maybe I'll see it, Amaranth.

01:12:56.000 General Otto, have you heard William Luther Pierce's Cosmo Thesis?

01:13:00.000 It's 1.0 stuff, but a very well thought out speech and very deep and beautiful.

01:13:03.000 Highly recommend.

01:13:05.000 I've never heard it, but I read the summary of Turner Diaries and I said, okay, this is not a serious intellectual here.

01:13:13.000 I haven't heard it, but I read that stuff and I said, this is not a serious person.

01:13:13.000 Maybe it's a good speech.

01:13:19.000 So we have to leave all that stuff behind.

01:13:21.000 It might very well be interesting or fascinating, but a lot of that stuff is just going to get us in trouble.

01:13:29.000 It's an unnecessary liability, is what it is.

01:13:32.000 People are saying, like, oh, you're afraid of the media going after you.

01:13:37.000 That's not it.

01:13:38.000 It's unnecessary liability, unnecessary baggage.

01:13:40.000 We're not afraid of alienating the media.

01:13:42.000 We're afraid of alienating the people.

01:13:44.000 And the people, when they find out who, you know, William Lewis Pierce is, they're going to say, oh, boy.

01:13:48.000 Okay.

01:13:49.000 So maybe it's a good speech, but we have to disavow, right?

01:13:55.000 But those are all our super chats.

01:13:57.000 Looks like that's going to be it for the show tonight.

01:13:59.000 A lot of disavowals.

01:14:00.000 I hate to do it, but people ask the problem is this people ask questions about things and they already know the answer and they expect a disavowal and they want to get a disavowal so they could say, Nick is a cuss.

01:14:12.000 Nick did this, Nick did that.

01:14:14.000 And, you know, even though my spokesperson, if I ever had one, is not, you know, like the spokesperson, real winner over there.

01:14:21.000 But people ask these questions.

01:14:23.000 You force my hand to disavow.

01:14:25.000 But look, we have to have standards for our movement.

01:14:27.000 We have to have standards.

01:14:29.000 Have to have standards.

01:14:30.000 Have to have rules.

01:14:31.000 We can't just let anybody in and anybody dictate the course without thinking it through, without thinking about strategy, tactics, what our goals are.

01:14:39.000 So we have to do, we have to refine.

01:14:41.000 And it's going to, there will be disavowals.

01:14:43.000 There will be.

01:14:44.000 Condemnations, but that's what it takes to win.

01:14:47.000 Do you want to win or do you want to?

01:14:49.000 I mean, I think in a lot of ways, the purity spiraling on the alt right, it's no different than with the constitutionalists.

01:14:55.000 We don't care if we lose. 0.70

01:14:56.000 We don't care if we get killed.

01:14:57.000 At least we have our constitution.

01:14:59.000 At least we never, at least we never were a little bit subtle about the things that we're saying, you know?

01:15:05.000 So it has to be like that.

01:15:07.000 But nevertheless, onward and upward, we have fantastic coverage coming for you tomorrow of the 2018 special election in the 18th District of Pennsylvania.

01:15:17.000 So check that out tomorrow.

01:15:19.000 We'll be going as long as the results come in.

01:15:21.000 And what time do the results come in?

01:15:23.000 Start coming in.

01:15:24.000 I think they start coming in in the evening.

01:15:26.000 So we'll probably start a little bit earlier.

01:15:28.000 I'll put it up on Twitter.

01:15:29.000 I'll put it up on Twitter.

01:15:30.000 So check Twitter.

01:15:31.000 I may put it up on Maker Support as well when the stream will start tomorrow.

01:15:35.000 And we'll cover the election results as they come in.

01:15:37.000 It should be a great time.

01:15:39.000 I'll see if I could get some guests to come on, and that should be fun.

01:15:42.000 A lot of big things coming for the channel.

01:15:43.000 Remember to sign up on Maker Support.

01:15:45.000 It's only five bucks a month for America First Premium.

01:15:48.000 And you get the special role in the Discord server.

01:15:50.000 You get priority on the call in shows.

01:15:52.000 Get the audio only for.

01:15:54.000 Form of the show.

01:15:55.000 And starting in one to two weeks, you'll get two additional podcasts The World Report and the 2018 Election HQ.

01:16:02.000 Should be the finest content on either of those subjects you'll see anywhere on the internet today.

01:16:07.000 Some really great stuff coming for you.

01:16:09.000 And the link is down below.

01:16:10.000 Remember to subscribe.

01:16:11.000 Give us a big thumbs up.

01:16:13.000 Leave a comment, a nice comment.

01:16:14.000 Click the notification button to get notified every time we go live.

01:16:17.000 We're going to go live next week, starting next week on Facebook, Twitch, Periscope, and YouTube.

01:16:23.000 So if you have those other services, follow us up there as well.

01:16:26.000 All the info is down there.

01:16:28.000 In the description.

01:16:29.000 We are on the air Monday through Friday, 7 p.m. Central, 8 p.m. Eastern Standard Time.

01:16:34.000 I'm Nicholas J. Fuentes, as always.

01:16:36.000 This was America First.

01:16:37.000 Thank you guys for watching.

01:16:39.000 Thank you to our Super Chatters, our people calling in for the campaigns, doing their phone banking, our Woodfire Pizza people.

01:16:46.000 Thanks to the generous Super Chat donors, even if they have bad optics.

01:16:50.000 And thank you to our premium supporters.

01:16:52.000 You are what keeps the show going.

01:16:54.000 We could not put on this operation without you, and we appreciate your support.

01:16:58.000 And it'll keep getting better the more people join up.

01:17:01.000 So thanks to all of our supporters and thanks to everybody that watches.

01:17:04.000 We'll see you tomorrow for our special election coverage.

01:17:07.000 Have a great rest of your evening.

01:17:13.000 Americanism, not globalism, will be our credo.

01:17:21.000 It's going to be only America first.

01:17:22.000 America first. 0.99

01:17:23.000 The American people will come first once again.

01:17:29.000 With respect.

01:17:58.000 I'm mad

America First - Nicholas J. Fuentes - March 12, 2018

Why You Can't Trust the Media | America First Ep. 123

Episode Stats

Summary

Transcript