00:01:07.000And You know, I've talked about this Russia Ukraine crisis from the beginning and said that, you know, the United States acts in a way that is just completely inappropriate.
00:01:16.000This is just not how diplomacy is conducted.
00:01:20.000And for all the people that blame Russia for the conflict, and, you know, I've talked about the lens through which people have looked at Russia in the United States, this Russophobia, there has to be some introspection with that kind of attitude and with that kind of rhetoric about the role that we're playing in the whole thing.
00:01:39.000How do you go out there and say, Russia's evil.
00:02:02.000It, you know, it might not seem like a big deal, but of course, when heads of state speak in these terms, you know, these terms have very precise meanings and they actually have very real implications.
00:02:47.000And, you know, this one's a little bit bizarre because I don't know that there were actually any recent incel related terror attacks or acts of violence, so it seems like it's come out of a clear blue sky.
00:02:59.000But this was all over the media yesterday.
00:03:04.000But the federal government is now saying that terrorism from incels is a big problem, big deal, and what they're going to do, and this is to the point we talked about this last year after January 6th.
00:03:17.000They're going to begin to monitor people that could potentially be incels and then therefore become incel terrorists.
00:03:27.000They're doing something called behavioral profiling.
00:03:30.000So now the Secret Service, which is supposed to protect the president, the Secret Service is now coming up with behavioral analysis guidelines so that law enforcement can profile incels and then intervene before they become terrorists.
00:03:49.000So, you know, you really just can't do or say anything in the country anymore without being a terrorist.
00:03:55.000I mean, how can you not be a terrorist in America these days?
00:03:58.000If you're a Trump supporter, you're a terrorist.
00:04:03.000If you're an incel, you're a terrorist.
00:04:06.000Literally, what can you do that will not get you labeled a terrorist?
00:04:10.000It's like if you watch the wrong TV show, if you don't get laid, now you're a terrorist.
00:04:43.000I mean, I don't leave the house and I don't have any windows, you know, so I never really know what time of day it is.
00:04:50.000I don't know if the sun's out, if it's dark out.
00:04:53.000And with the imposition of this daylight savings time thing, it's just like, you know, we don't, you know, it's very difficult without time.
00:05:02.000You know, I don't really know what they were thinking.
00:05:03.000When they abolished the sort of measurement of time, you know, I don't know what possibly they could think the benefit to this would be.
00:14:33.000You know, and then they start to, like, understand each other's lives through each other's perspective.
00:14:38.000They're like, You know, one of them's calling up the parents and they have like a bad relationship with their, oh, my parents are going through a divorce or something.
00:14:45.000The other one's like, hey, man, still hates you, but that really sucks.
00:14:49.000And then the other one's like, oh, my girlfriend's such a bitch.
00:14:53.000And the other one's like, hey, still hate you, but you deserve better, King.
00:14:57.000So it'd be like one of those TV shows, you know?
00:17:49.000And, you know, it's almost so ridiculous you can't even believe it.
00:17:53.000They're saying, again, during a war with Russia and Ukraine, when the United States is threatening to end the whole world because God only even knows why, why we need to have.
00:18:06.000Surface to surface, short and medium range missiles in Europe, apparently that's a red line for us, as well as the aspirations for NATO membership of Ukraine and all these convoluted things.
00:18:18.000And we're at the brink of a nuclear war right now over this.
00:18:21.000The real danger, though, we're told, is the incels, according to a new government study.
00:18:30.000It says The federal government on Tuesday released a study on the growing terrorism threat from men who call themselves anti feminists or incels.
00:18:39.000And draw motivation for violence from their inability to develop relationships with women.
00:18:45.000Since 2014, attacks inspired by the incel movement, we are incel, we don't forgive, we don't forget, and spanning the U.S. and Canada have left dozens dead.
00:18:55.000Early intervention and behavioral threat assessments could be the difference between life and death for women targeted by the growing ideology, according to the 26 page report.
00:19:06.000The report concluded that while there is no one profile of an individual who plans or executes an act of targeted violence, Investigators must consider potential targets when seeking to thwart attacks, as suspects routinely explore multiple targets during the planning process before making their final selection.
00:19:26.000While the Secret Service may be known for its protection of presidents, both past and present, the agency has long studied and implemented behavioral threat assessment programs designed to identify potentially dangerous or violent situations that do not meet a criminal threshold.
00:19:42.000So, in other words, they're just spying on people.
00:19:47.000Not criminals, have not committed crimes, and don't even meet the threshold of being considered an imminent threat as though they're about to commit a crime.
00:20:00.000Tuesday's report is intended to identify early warning signs of misogynistic extremists with the goal of early intervention.
00:20:08.000You know, I would probably describe myself as a misogynistic extremist up until today, up until this report was published, but I don't have any violent.
00:20:25.000Dr. Lena Alathari, director of the NTAC, said traditionally law enforcement and other public safety officials focus on crime.
00:20:34.000And so if there is no direct threat or a criminal statute violated, they don't feel they can do anything.
00:20:41.000But what we know from the research and what we know from communities doing this successfully is that if you have a trained professional in threat assessment, And identifying warning signs and knowing what the proper resources are available, that's when you have success stories.
00:20:57.000And so, you know, once again, this is minority report type stuff.
00:21:00.000This is they want to intercept crime before people even think of crime.
00:21:06.000They're saying, yeah, you know, the problem with law enforcement is that it only goes after criminals or people that are an urgent threat to society, but they don't have tools to go after innocent people.
00:21:29.000It says behavioral threat assessment programs can be developed in any environment workplace, college, campus, state, local police, according to the U.S. Secret Service.
00:21:38.000Recent success stories include comprehensive initiatives developed out of the North Carolina State Bureau of Investigation and Pinellas County, Florida.
00:22:37.000If you're not down with feminism, well, you're an incel.
00:22:41.000And if you're an incel, you're a terrorist.
00:22:42.000And if you're a terrorist, then literally the Secret Service is going to conduct threat assessment and behavioral analysis on you as an innocent person.
00:22:54.000And the same goes, by the way, for people that believe in QAnon.
00:22:57.000The same goes for people that support Donald Trump, believe in the election fraud stuff, believe in the Hunter Biden laptop.
00:23:05.000Don't believe the vaccine is as efficacious as they say it is.
00:23:09.000At various points throughout the past 13 or 14 months, they have said that all of those categories of people present a threat to society.
00:23:18.000And they've said that, and it's always under this pretext.
00:23:23.000They say that, well, you see violence, you see these random acts of violence, you see the potential for massive acts of violence.
00:23:31.000The only way to stop it is early, early, early on, like before people even have a criminal thought.
00:23:39.000You know, like a year ago, the DHS put out a bulletin and they said something like, you know, if people believe the election is illegitimate, if they, well, it goes even further back.
00:23:50.000If people believe there was voter fraud, they believe the election's illegitimate.
00:23:53.000If they believe the election's illegitimate, they think the government's illegitimate.
00:23:56.000If they think the government's illegitimate, they're going to form groups.
00:23:59.000If they form groups, they're going to do protests.
00:24:00.000If they do protests, they're going to go violent.
00:24:02.000If they go violent, then you have a January 6th style event.
00:24:06.000So they say, we have to monitor anybody that believes in voter fraud.
00:24:14.000That was the DHS bulletin, and I'm describing it in my own way, but effectively, that was the narrative.
00:24:20.000They said that we have to monitor emerging extremist narratives and these emerging communities that are promulgating those narratives because they have the potential in the future to maybe become violent later.
00:24:34.000And that's how they work their way backward to we're going to spy on people that disagree with us.
00:24:40.000The federal law enforcement and federal intelligence agencies will now spy.
00:24:51.000Because, you know, one out of a million will have a, you know, reach some particular conclusion, and one out of a million will then come up with a plan or something.
00:25:03.000And to the extent that that even happens, who knows?
00:25:06.000I don't believe, you know, in a lot of these cases, these are not ideologically motivated attacks.
00:26:01.000What was really going on at Mandalay Bay in 2019, 2018, when that largest mass shooting in American history happened?
00:26:11.000So, in a lot of these cases, it doesn't have anything to do with the particular idea or set of ideas, as we know.
00:26:20.000It's the kind of person that is going to go out and commit an act of violence anyway, or it's somebody that is involved in some shady government stuff.
00:26:30.000MKUltra, they're in the intelligence service, whatever.
00:26:33.000It's fake, it's some kind of false flag.
00:26:36.000But anyway, the point being is this is the new environment that we find ourselves in.
00:26:40.000They say that if you define yourself as a so called anti feminist, you could be a terrorist.
00:27:12.000Does that make me a threat to society at large?
00:27:15.000According to the Secret Service, yes, this is a case of early intervention.
00:27:21.000And that's where you have to realize the kind of game that these people are playing.
00:27:25.000You know, I know a lot of people go out there and they say, we're going to unite the country and we're going to save America and all this kind of stuff.
00:27:31.000But I mean, our enemies are saying that they're going to jail you just for being who you are.
00:27:36.000I mean, their agenda, their ideology is totalizing to the extent that the people that disagree with them are straight up being labeled in legal terms terrorists.
00:27:48.000And all the Patriot Act, all the other, you know, all the legal consequences that come with that term are, you know, they're fully aware of that.
00:27:58.000I mean, they're not just calling you a terrorist to be like, oh, you know, you're a Nazi and you're a terrorist.
00:28:02.000No, they're calling you a terrorist because if that's the classification, if you're a domestic violent extremist, that opens up tons of jurisdiction for federal law enforcement and intelligence agencies to mess with you for no reason, even if you don't do anything wrong.
00:28:50.000It's tough out there for the real incels.
00:28:53.000You know, it does kind of tell you something.
00:28:56.000I mean, I hate to be that guy, but it's one of those things where you have to ask yourself to find who rules over you, ask yourself, who are you not allowed to criticize?
00:29:07.000You know, they're not calling simps terrorists.
00:30:43.000I mean, and I don't know how far I want to go with that, but as far as men not being controlled by their wives and girlfriends and having nothing left to lose, they actually do pose more of a threat to the civil order than your average person.
00:31:03.000I mean, and it's not to say that incels are necessarily violent, but it is to say that unlike these people that are domesticated by women, incels actually are a little bit more hardcore.
00:31:17.000And, you know, I know this may be a controversial thing to say, but when you get married and have kids, I think everybody should get married and have kids, by the way.
00:31:28.000I just want to preface it by saying that I think everybody should get married and have kids.
00:31:34.000I think men should, that should be their goal in life for the most part.
00:31:39.000That being said, when you are a professional revolutionary, when you are a change agent, when we're talking about the kind of fanaticism that we bring to the table, getting married and having kids, you know, on the contrary, where some people say, oh, you know, that makes you fight harder and everything, I actually think it's the opposite.
00:31:57.000I think it actually makes you fight not as hard.
00:32:00.000Because when you have a wife and kids, you necessarily, your responsibilities are divided.
00:32:08.000I mean, you have dependence when you're a family man, when you're a boyfriend, a husband, a dad, you have dependence.
00:32:18.000And so you can't just go out there like an adolescent man could, like an unmarried, fighting age adolescent man would be able to do.
00:32:28.000I'm just saying, and like I said, I think everybody should get married and have families, but.
00:32:34.000This anti incel stuff, what I'm trying to say here is they're putting that out there for a reason.
00:32:40.000They are genuinely afraid of these misogynistic male communities because they know what comes out of a community like that.
00:32:48.000When you get a community of guys with nothing left to lose and their men going their own way, their incels, it's high test, it's aggressive, like they know what the consequence of that will be.
00:33:01.000Again, there's no judgment about whether or not that's a good thing or a bad thing.
00:33:05.000I'm not violent, I don't promote violence, but.
00:33:08.000When they say that incels are this big threat, you understand why they're saying that.
00:33:12.000You understand because there is a lot of male rage associated with that.
00:33:16.000And there is kind of a different, they're not in the same state of mind as somebody that's like, you know, going to settle down and all this kind of stuff.
00:33:25.000So there's definitely something to that.
00:33:26.000There's definitely, you know, there's a little something to that.
00:33:34.000And this community, I think, you know, and we talk about the, Anti feminism stuff, but the goal is to have everybody married and having kids and all that.
00:33:45.000And I think this is a positive community, and I don't promote violence, and I don't think anybody in here promotes violence.
00:33:51.000But you can definitely see where the government would be afraid of all these young guys, all these young, intelligent guys with like nothing left to lose, and they're all pissed off and they're all super high T and they're like angry as opposed to these guys that are going around and.
00:34:08.000You know, like I said, they're being led around on the leash.
00:34:19.000But anyway, so that's the incel based terrorism.
00:34:21.000But I want to move on to our feature story, talk about our favorite thing the Russian war in Ukraine.
00:34:29.000And, you know, like I said, I'll be debating this tomorrow in greater detail.
00:34:34.000It seems like there's not a ton of news coming out of the war anymore.
00:34:38.000It seems like it's slowing down a little bit.
00:34:40.000But, The big story from this week is that Joe Biden called Vladimir Putin a war criminal, which represents to some degree an escalation in the rhetoric.
00:34:51.000And it is different than what he has said about Putin in the past.
00:34:54.000There's been a lot of this, don't get me wrong.
00:34:56.000He's called Putin a murderer and a thug, and this is pretty standard stuff.
00:35:03.000You know, you remember Bill O'Reilly posed the same question to Donald Trump.
00:35:07.000He said, you know, Putin's a murderer, he's a killer.
00:35:10.000And Trump goes, a lot of killers, a lot of killers.
00:35:13.000We think we're so innocent, which was just like one of the most epic moments of his presidency.
00:35:18.000But this is pretty par for the course in the American conversation.
00:35:23.000And they say Putin's a thug, he's a plutocrat, he's a dictator, he's a whatever.
00:35:30.000But this is the first time that the American president said that he's actually a war criminal.
00:35:35.000It says, quote, U.S. President Joe Biden has labeled Russian leader Vladimir Putin a war criminal in a move likely to escalate diplomatic tensions even further.
00:35:45.000Mr. Biden delivered the remark off the cuff in response to a reporter's question at the White House.
00:35:50.000It is the first time he has used such language to condemn President Putin, and the White House later said he was speaking from the heart.
00:36:01.000The Kremlin, however, said it was unforgivable rhetoric.
00:36:05.000A spokesperson, Dmitry Peskov, told Russian state news agency TASS We believe such rhetoric to be unacceptable and unforgivable on the part of the head of a state whose bombs have killed hundreds of thousands of people around the world, which is true.
00:36:21.000The exchange in Washington happened Wednesday when a reporter asked the U.S. president, Mr. President, after everything we have seen, are you ready to call Putin a war criminal?
00:36:30.000The president replied no before being challenged and then changed his reply and said, Did you ask me whether I would tell?
00:36:42.000White House Press Secretary Jen Psaki later said the president had been speaking from his heart after seeing, quote, barbaric images of the violence in Ukraine, rather than making any official declaration.
00:36:55.000She noted that there was a separate legal process run by the State Department to determine war crimes, and that was ongoing separately.
00:37:03.000The president's official Twitter account posted Putin is inflecting appalling devastation and horror on Ukraine, bombing apartment buildings and maternity wards.
00:38:41.000Well, Putin declared a special military operation and launched a preemptive invasion of Ukraine to prevent Ukraine from falling into the orbit of the West.
00:38:50.000And that, among other things, you know, what he did in Chechnya, as well as the invasion in Crimea and the involvement in the Donbass War, as well as to some extent Georgia.
00:39:02.000And it's over these kinds of operations that the Americans call him a killer, a dictator, a murderer, and so on, what he's done to.
00:39:10.000Some of the dissidents that have allegedly died because they were poisoned by Russia.
00:39:16.000But when you compare that against the record of the United States, you know, you always have to look at both sides of the story here.
00:39:22.000You know, what we're talking about is a moral standard.
00:39:25.000It's as a consequence of these actions that we're passing a moral judgment on Putin according to a moral standard.
00:39:52.000There will always be civilian casualties in any war.
00:39:55.000But it's not as though the war is being fought in a way that is in violation of international law with regard to how wars must be conducted.
00:40:02.000He's not using weapons of mass destruction, chemical, biological weapons.
00:40:17.000So, any invasion of any country at all for any reason is a war crime.
00:40:21.000Insofar as there are civilian casualties, Insofar as there is violence, that alone makes you a thug, a war criminal, et cetera, et cetera, et cetera.
00:40:31.000Okay, so let's then compare it to the actions of the benign hegemon, which is the United States.
00:41:25.000By the same standard, that's a war crime.
00:41:28.000By the same standard, Putin's a war criminal for invading Ukraine, it's a war crime to invade Iraq.
00:41:34.000And look at all the civilian casualties throughout our 20 year occupation of both Iraq and Afghanistan.
00:41:40.000That doesn't constitute being a killer, being a murderer, a war criminal, according to the standard that we're calling Putin the same thing.
00:41:50.000And then you could go into even the domestic things.
00:41:53.000Well, Putin's a killer because he's killed his opponents.
00:42:42.000So, as always, and you know, but then, and there's one more thing, another part of it is then the Americans will say, oh, well, that's what aboutism.
00:42:51.000You know, the Russians will always do this.
00:42:52.000They'll always try to create a moral equivalency between the West and the East and will say, well, what about the things the US has done?
00:43:03.000To say that states behave in a particular way and that that's pretty standard across the world and therefore, The rhetoric should be defanged.
00:43:14.000I don't think that is a deflection because we're trying to make the case that Russia is the source of evil in the world, and as a consequence, effectively, they must be destroyed.
00:43:27.000We're saying that this sovereign country, we believe so much in sovereignty, this sovereign nation must be contained, must be surrounded, threatened, bullied, the government overthrown, the country dominated because they're so evil.
00:43:50.000So, if we are trying to argue on moral grounds that certain actions must be pursued against Russia, well, the argument begins to fall apart when we don't take our own moral standard very seriously.
00:44:02.000So, let's then dispense with the moral language and just talk about it in plain terms about interest and about security and influence.
00:44:11.000Let's talk about it in plain, realist terms.
00:44:16.000No, Russia's not Hitler for invading Ukraine.
00:44:18.000They're conducting a special military operation.
00:44:28.000But by the same token, they've done that because their security concerns have not been listened to since 2008.
00:44:36.000And there has been ample warning about this.
00:44:38.000As far back as fall 2021, the foreign minister in Russia said that they've reached a boiling point.
00:44:45.000And their spokesperson, I think it was Peskov, Or, I'm sorry, it was the chief negotiator whose name I forget in the Geneva talks in January.
00:44:56.000He said, Look, he said, if our demands aren't listened to, if you're not going to hear Russia out, if you're not going to come to us with a serious proposal for peace, we're going to have to do whatever is necessary to prevent these provocations, to prevent NATO aggression.
00:45:12.000And that was after days of negotiations in Geneva where they laid out a pretty solid proposal.
00:45:17.000They said Ukraine should never join NATO.
00:45:20.000That's something that Germany and France agreed on in 2008.
00:45:24.000So it's not like that's Russian propaganda.
00:45:26.000Germany and France believed the same thing in the first decade of this century.
00:45:31.000They were saying the same thing when that was acknowledged at the Bucharest summit in 2008.
00:45:36.000That was one out of four of their demands.
00:45:38.000And France and Germany had already agreed with this.
00:45:41.000They also said they didn't want any surface to surface missiles in the European theater.
00:45:47.000They don't want theater support missiles in Eastern Europe.
00:45:51.000Another thing that Macron said hey, look, I mean, we should listen to these guys.
00:45:55.000And Vladimir Putin laid out a proposal a year ago.
00:45:59.000And he said, listen, when Donald Trump pulled out of the treaty, I forget the name of the treaty, when the Trump admin pulled us out of that, I think it's intermediate range ballistic missile treaty, Putin said, look, we will not put any missiles in Europe as long as the West agrees to do the same.
00:46:19.000We can have monitoring, we can have an agreement.
00:46:21.000You know, this is going to cause a severe escalation if there's a deployment of these short and medium range missiles in Eastern Europe.
00:46:28.000And we didn't listen, we didn't come to the negotiating table on that.
00:46:32.000And so, point being, is, you know, there was ample opportunity to address Russia's security concerns, which the point I'm trying to make is they're valid.
00:46:40.000Two out of the four, the missiles and Ukrainian membership in NATO, even our allies agreed.
00:46:51.000You know, even the Council on Foreign Relations will relent and they will admit that deploying theater support missiles to Europe is a provocation.
00:47:00.000So, you're, and then, you know, Putin gets into, well, he also, Doesn't want military drills in Eastern Europe.
00:47:06.000He doesn't want the military in there.
00:47:08.000And, you know, then he gets into some things which are probably a non starter for NATO.
00:47:11.000But nevertheless, we never came to Russia with a serious proposal here.
00:47:18.000We never listened to their security concerns.
00:47:20.000We were never looking to compromise on these things.
00:47:23.000We wanted negotiations with no preconditions and so on.
00:47:41.000Either way, the concerns aren't being addressed.
00:47:45.000And so to say he's evil for doing these things, you just have to drop that language and judge it on the merits of the policy as it pertains to security and national self interest.
00:47:57.000But that's not the language that's being used to describe the problem.
00:48:00.000It's just this poisonous rhetoric, which makes it impossible for either side to back down.
00:48:07.000That it's not a statesman conducting a controversial operation like we did in Iraq in 2003.
00:48:23.000And the United States should be very careful about throwing that kind of language around because it could just as easily be thrown back at us.
00:48:31.000You know, for example, well, Putin is sponsoring the civil war in Donbass.
00:48:38.000He wants that war never to end because he wants to destabilize Ukraine.
00:48:43.000What exactly then are we doing in Syria?
00:48:45.000Why do we still have troops at the oil fields in Syria?
00:48:57.000He's fueling a civil war and violence and destruction just so Ukraine will remain destabilized for his own interest and blah, blah, blah.
00:49:05.000Is that not exactly what we're doing in Syria right now?
00:49:09.000Remaining there to prevent the civil war from ending so that the region will be destabilized so that so called Hezbollah and the Iranians cannot grow a foothold and traffic weapons to Hamas and so on.
00:49:23.000I mean, that's exactly our policy in Syria.
00:49:26.000I mean, that's literally what we're doing in Syria.
00:49:29.000Except that Donbass is historically part of Russia and within reasonably the Russian sphere of influence and on their border.
00:50:03.000But we can sponsor Al Qaeda and ISIS in Syria and prolong the worst humanitarian disaster in the 21st century.
00:50:12.000And we can continue to support the kingdom's war in Yemen.
00:50:17.000And we can continue to bomb Pakistan and everything else.
00:50:20.000And I know I'm not the first person ever to say this, but what happened to all the liberals that used to agree on this?
00:50:25.000You know, liberals used to say this kind of stuff.
00:50:28.000That's why Oliver Stone has emerged as one of these pro Putin voices, one of these Putin apologists, because Oliver Stone, an old liberal, he understands the military industrial complex.
00:50:40.000He understands the Council on Foreign Relations and these things.
00:50:43.000What happened to all these anti war liberals that used to point this kind of stuff out?
00:50:48.000Now they've got the same kind of high minded, hypocritical rhetoric.
00:51:28.000You know, and every conflict, every campaign, every agenda requires the narrative, the story, and that's our story, but it's a dangerous story.
00:51:39.000To say that the whole world is evil except for America and we're the good guys and we can do anything and we could do no wrong, it's a very dangerous form of moral hazard.
00:51:51.000You know, we're given to doing evil ourselves and to making mistakes when we convince ourselves that we are always the good guys and we never do anything wrong and we can do anything.
00:52:04.000You know, that makes us prone to do things that are evil in the name of, you know, well, we can do no wrong.
00:52:16.000In this case, we're prolonging a deadly conflict.
00:52:19.000If anything, we should pressure Zelensky to surrender instead of raising a mercenary army in Poland and giving him fighter jets and talking about it and all this other stuff.
00:52:30.000We should be encouraging him to surrender and seek peace and relent to Putin's demands.
00:52:37.000Because they're not going to win that war.
00:54:13.000Chicago Land Groyper says Right Wing Watch Twitter replies be like This Fuentes guy clearly has never been jumped by a pack of rabid black thugs.
00:54:22.000I bet he'd respect America more if he had.
00:54:31.000Because a black person would hit you for that.
00:54:33.000A black person would punch you for hurting their feelings.
00:54:37.000It's like, you know, it's so amazing how, you know, these left wing people, in their heart of hearts, they know they're wrong because, like, they know that black people are violent.
00:54:49.000You know, I will say, hey, black people are violent.
00:54:52.000And then they'll go, I bet you wouldn't say that in front of a black person.
00:55:01.000You know, I could go on the show and say, Hey, you know, these blacks, hey, 13% of the population, half the crime, you know, they struggle with the impulse control, they're violent.
00:55:11.000And then they'd say, Bet you wouldn't say that in front of a black person.
00:56:11.000So, you know, whenever they come at you with these kinds of things, it belies the fact that, like, they are just evil.
00:56:17.000I mean, these people really are just evil.
00:56:19.000And they're promoting things that they know are evil.
00:56:21.000They know the way that blacks are, they know what homosexuality is all about, they know about all this stuff, you know?
00:56:30.000And they betray it when they, you know, in the black thing's maybe the best example because they'll go, yeah, you wouldn't say the N word in front of a black person.
01:02:46.000Mark says, Groyper's will flood TikTok and liberals will flood Twitter with clips if you make your archive free, and we'll all have a copy of your archive so it'll be decentralized and can never be purged.
01:04:07.000Foy says, I was unreasonably paranoid about World War III for years, but all of this occurring right after they pulled off the global vaccination racket.
01:04:16.000I got a bad feeling the way this will all work out.
01:04:18.000Either way, I'm cozy with you tonight, and it was an honor to link up with you in the true resistance in this life.
01:06:21.000Robo Serpent says, What are some things Groypers can do to encourage white people to embrace white identity and encourage non whites to assimilate?
01:06:56.000This is something that happens as a result of a changing environment.
01:07:01.000You know, the white consciousness, you're not going to argue someone into a white consciousness.
01:07:14.000Smiley the Feds says it's Wooze's fault the show was late tonight because he did an epic pre AF waiting lobby stream in the Yoba living room and Nick lost track of time hanging out in the live chat.
01:07:48.000Sheesh Machine says I appreciate you trying to convince Destiny that peaceful reform is possible, but he's way too far gone.
01:07:55.000More than anything, don't let yourself be seduced by the power of his hatred.
01:08:02.000I'm gonna, I have to, I have to save this young man.
01:08:05.000I have to save this young man from a lifetime of hatred and violence.
01:08:10.000I know it may wind up badly for me, but if I could save just one man, if I could save the world from this terror that is Steve Bonnell, it will have been worth it.
01:08:20.000I promise I won't be seduced by his hatred.
01:08:56.000Missouri Friend says, What if you were in the lobby for America First at 8 p.m., and then five hours later, you were still in the lobby for America First?
01:09:23.000Cultural reactionary says, Was looking at the U.S. foreign aid numbers, and wouldn't you know, Ukraine received more than double almost any other European country.