In this episode of Victory Never Sleeps, Chris and I discuss a topic we ve been wanting to talk about for a while now. We talk about the history of languages and their influence in the minds of our ancestors, and how we can use them in our everyday lives.
00:07:24.440I think that's what we've got to start this show.
00:07:31.820um it's kind of an interesting conversation that chris and i had on where to start the show
00:07:42.320we wanted to do history stuff and there is a
00:07:46.480temptation when you do that to where's the best place to start well let's start at the beginning
00:07:55.240Trouble is, the beginning goes back into the mists of unrecorded prehistory
00:08:02.980that we don't have a lot of information to go on and a lot of things to say.
00:08:08.400And it gets into the exciting, the speculative, and the fantastic.
00:08:14.920Because it entertains me to do so, I will refer to that as the days of high adventure,
00:08:19.680has uh was talked about in uh in the intro to the conan movies because again that was set in this
00:08:27.800pre-history time with a fantastic heroic age of amazing things and it's fun to think about
00:08:36.320those things it's fun to ponder um there's all kind of new very ancient um archaeology theories
00:08:45.440that come out and get talked about, and I, it gets real complicated to try to sort through
00:08:52.680all of those things, and quite frankly, to admit all of the things that we don't know
00:08:57.380about that very, very deep time period.
00:09:00.000So one of the things that we kind of talked about as a starting point was with language.
00:09:15.440And I think that's where we start really seeing the solidification, the development of our most ancient ancestors.
00:09:23.240And importantly, as we've talked about a lot on the program, there is a magic to speech and to being able to say things.
00:09:35.200you are able to take ideas and concepts and intentions from the world of imagination
00:09:44.800and birth those into the world of reality in the most, you know, subtle way. You're able to speak
00:09:51.660them to one another. You're able to communicate them, to share those ideas across distance and
00:09:57.140across groups. And so I think that is a kind of a hallmark of some things we're going to cover.
00:10:05.200tonight. Chris, as always, goes above and beyond in the depth of the dives that he takes on these
00:10:13.620things. So it's going to be an awesome episode. I appreciate everybody joining us. Sit down,
00:10:20.720have a beverage, and oh, I should throw this out here too. Because Chris is kind of running the
00:10:27.400show on stuff. I'll interject when I can, but we are, I guess, ask questions whenever you'd like.
00:10:36.380This is a question and answer program. If Chris sees them and wants to address them because it's
00:10:42.240necessary to address them, he will. If not, we may say some of the ones that are more unrelated
00:10:48.300until after he finishes with his lesson for us. So please ask whenever you want, and I promise
00:10:56.580we will get to your question it just may take us a little bit also know that you can ask questions
00:11:02.740at any time now tomorrow you wake up in the middle of the night with a question whatever you do you
00:11:11.060vns at runestone.org and the next available opportunity will answer your questions
00:11:18.500with that folk builder chris savage i hand you the talking stick
00:11:23.140between the time when the oceans drank atlantis and the rise of the sons of arius there was an
00:11:32.700age undreamed of all right so we've been on here doing history episodes about our heroes
00:11:43.380and we haven't really focused on the large crop of them in scandinavia yet
00:11:50.080And before we started moving into them, I thought it would be worthwhile to lay the groundwork for the audience so they can know what medieval Scandinavia was, in a sense.
00:12:04.000But that requires explaining what produced medieval Scandinavia.
00:12:07.680And as the Els Herigothi said, this is a hole that you can keep digging down forever into.
00:12:14.720but this episode also provides us with a chance to talk about the mythic and historical origins
00:12:25.900of the European peoples where did we as white people come from what are our origins in a
00:12:33.780genealogical sense who are we so let's start with how we even can talk about this
00:12:44.520so you might have heard the word indo-european before this is a term for what is called a
00:12:51.880linguistic family a linguistic family or a language family is all of the languages that
00:12:59.160are related at a given level do you want to throw up the first picture nick the spanish tree one
00:13:08.040so this is all of the language families each one is a separate language family
00:13:13.640that get us from Spanish, modern Spanish, back towards the farthest back we can go in this
00:13:24.820lineage. So there's Spanish, and there's languages in the Castian family, languages in the West
00:13:30.440Iberian family, Ibero-Romance, etc. And you'll notice how you actually have to go back a ways
00:13:36.480to get to Latin. That is because there are many, many languages that come out of Latin.
00:13:43.800latin itself is an italic language and i got the uh truth is a virtue i got this image off
00:13:50.360of wikipedia because it's just easy and i know it's there italic is itself within the italic
00:13:57.400italic celtic language family so i want to throw out a plug while we got a second before we're too
00:14:02.920deep wikipedia has its flaws but it's also an amazing resource and the more you go on this
00:14:11.640kind of stuff the less other interests try to edit some stuff so the wiktionary is awesome
00:14:21.560and i use it frequently to track down etymological roots of words and trace them back
00:14:28.600same here i highly highly recommend that to folks if you're ever curious about linguistic
00:14:34.920roots or what a comparative term is in a different language or just kind of how a word or a concept
00:14:43.400comes down to us be it in a modern word or when we're studying the lore uh the wiktionary on
00:14:51.000there is a really really useful tool and it's one that i use often so plug for that
00:14:56.280it's also useful in as much as if you run into a political barrier put up around a word,
00:15:05.940you can pretty easily see what the boundaries of that barrier are when you go looking for
00:15:12.260other things involving that. So on the tree, if you go looking at it,
00:15:18.380you'll see that it starts with the language of modern Spanish. Spanish is an actual language
00:15:24.800spoken by human beings today, and then it goes through this tree of language families back to
00:15:37.120Indo-European. Indo-European is where we cannot take the ancestry back any farther. We take the
00:15:46.160ancestry back. We do that by comparing all of the languages in a family and looking at the sound
00:15:52.160changes that they undergo. Sound changes work like this. Eventually, all sounds X in conditions Y
00:16:00.060will be turned into sound Z. An example is glottalization in English. American
00:16:06.880glottalization is on D and T. British glottalization is on T. In America, we pronounce
00:16:13.960W-A-T-R as water. In Britain, they pronounce it as W-A. That's glottalization and a vowel change.
00:16:22.160We can date when sound changes occur based on when they stop being productive upon loan words.
00:16:28.660As an example, we know that Grimm's Law stopped being effective on Proto-Germanics sometime before 100 B.C. because the German word Keisel is not Heisel.
00:16:41.280But we say hundred and hound, hundred and hound, excuse me, instead of kundred and kound because of Grimm's Law.
00:17:09.940So what if we reversed those sound changes?
00:17:14.340We have Wua in the UK and water in the US, right?
00:17:18.460So if we reverse those sound changes, what do we get? Water. So in that example, we have two sound changes, the vowel change in British English, ah to all, and then we have the derotacization, water to water, and then there's that glottalization in Britain.
00:17:39.380this is why it's a Britain because the T turns into a glottal stop which is
00:17:45.500where you just the glottal stop is the sound you make in between the up and oh
00:17:51.020oh right um but American English does a glottal ization to make a flap which is
00:17:58.520kind of like a sort of sound semantics so if we compare all of the languages
00:18:06.200that descend from Latin, we can figure out what their ancestor is. That language
00:18:12.140is Latin. We can guess and check our work. If we take if we take the word
00:18:17.240lupo and loobo and lup, all of which mean wolf in romance languages, we can
00:18:25.060reconstruct a hypothetical word lupus from this proto-romance, aka Latin,
00:18:31.340language. Okay, so we can do that little game to get Latin. What if we took Latin
00:18:40.760and all of the other ancient Italian languages and put them in, you know, the
00:18:45.320statistical blender, undid the sound changes? You would get proto-italic. If
00:18:51.260you do that with all the Germanic languages, Dutch, German, Gothic, Norse,
00:18:56.660Old English, you get Proto-Germanic. If you do that with all the Slavic languages,
00:19:02.100Russian, Polish, Slovenian, etc., you get Proto-Slavic. What happens when you take
00:19:08.500Proto-Italic, Proto-Germanic, Proto-Baltoslavic, etc., and reverse those
00:19:14.820sound changes? You get Proto-Indo-European. The process dead ends at Proto-Indo-
00:19:22.260Proto-Indo-European because we cannot compare it to any other languages. We
00:19:27.420cannot compare Proto-Indo-European to, say, Proto-Sino-Tibetan, the ancestor of
00:19:32.820most of the languages today in China, because there is too much time between
00:19:36.600the two. They have changed too much for us to figure out in what order the
00:19:41.200changes between the two occurred, meaning that we cannot figure out the order in
00:19:45.060which to unravel the changes and thus produce this hypothetical ancestor if
00:19:48.760there was one. Which is to say, if you just pick an order of changes at random, you have dozens of
00:19:54.040possible ancestors and the timing of when each possible ancestor was spoken very wildly because
00:19:58.880some sound changes take empirically longer to occur than others. Which is to say it's basically
00:20:03.820impossible and there's no way to come to a firm answer connecting modern English and modern
00:20:09.060Mandarin. Language families generally have names like Proto-Indo-European for two reasons. One,
00:20:16.000proto indicates that the language was reconstructed. Proto-Indo-European is not written down anywhere.
00:20:22.480Now, a very small number of proto-languages do have writing in them. Proto-Norse was reconstructed
00:20:28.080before we found very old runestones dating to like 300 AD, so some proto-Norse words are actually
00:20:35.280attested, but that's not the case with most proto-languages. Then they have stupid names like0.99
00:20:41.200indo-european because 1700s british aristocrats chose that name because it is the language family0.99
00:20:48.560uniting a variety of languages spread across europe and india and then they found anatolian
00:20:55.440and tokarian which made this more complicated similarly afroasiatic refers to all of the
00:21:02.880languages spoken in north africa and southwest asia sino-tibetan refers to all of the languages
00:21:09.200in China and Tibet, not all of them, this language family of related languages, but again not all of
00:21:17.680the languages in China are in the Sino-Tibetan territory. There are people who speak English
00:21:23.040in China and Tibet. English is not a Sino-Tibetan language. These naming systems aren't good,
00:21:29.520they're actually quite poor, and that's because they've been in use since the 1700s when this
00:21:33.280science was just starting. We also will be getting into talking about material
00:21:38.800cultures here. Material cultures are references to
00:21:42.320archaeological discoveries like pottery shards and flint knives.
00:21:47.600We're also going to talk about archaeogenetic populations and you get0.94
00:21:50.720dumb names like bell beaker folk or sredney stog people,0.96
00:21:55.200as if Chinamen couldn't drink out of cups shaped like beakers0.99
00:21:58.480and Chinamen couldn't die in a field outside of Russia.0.99
00:22:03.880It's for this reason why I'm going to use the term Aryan throughout this.
00:22:08.180We are referring to a specific lineage of people and their specific religious beliefs.
00:22:14.480We are using discoveries of language, archaeology, and genetics to describe actual human beings,
00:22:19.480much like ourselves, because they are our ancestors.
00:22:22.780This isn't an attempt at creating a state-of-the-art summation of every single paper
00:22:28.380and journal article and whatever monograph in the fields of linguistics, genetics, archaeogenetics, archaeology, etc.
00:22:38.380It is an attempt at gathering up a large amount of information, some of which is mythic truths given to us by religion and not just by archaeology,
00:23:14.440excuse me, about the term Aryan and its use and
00:23:20.340um i think we would do well to answer those going forward so people know
00:23:26.180clearly what we're talking about and why we're talking about it um
00:23:33.060i don't know if you want to inform people about the long-standing use of that term
00:23:39.300and the relatively new replacement of it by indo-european or or whatnot but we got two
00:23:47.380questions and i think that you will get to trent's question naturally um the other one that comes up
00:23:55.300is what is the counter argument that you give to people that say the term arian is mistranslated
00:24:00.980and does not refer to white people that come into the endless valley before we hit it directly for
00:24:06.340anybody who's listening maybe it's their first time can you define arian for us us
00:24:17.380So the term, we're going to get into this a bit more, but in the Proto-Indo-European culture, Yamnaya culture, the problem we run into here is, the problem we run into with some of this stuff is that we need to, at the one hand, make a distinction between a group of people who lived between year whenever to year whenever.
00:24:47.380as if they weren't related to us, and then we need to be able to remember that they are related to us.
00:24:54.380You are related to all of your ancestors even though you aren't your ancestors.
00:25:01.380So we use these terms, we as normal people with wives who go to work and have families use these technical terms like Indo-European and the like,
00:25:13.380in order to talk about things that matter to us,
00:25:20.180but when scientists use them, they are using them to be extremely technically precise,
00:25:25.680more technically precise than is necessary to actually talk about things.
00:25:29.480The term Aryan comes from a Proto-Indo-European word,
00:25:36.180or ancient our Aryan word ancient step Aryan early western step herder there's
00:25:45.180all sorts of words you can use to refer to these people a word meaning upright
00:25:49.620correct straight the concept of nobility in these people's culture means upright
00:25:59.420straight like a tree it is upright but it also means correct it means the
00:26:06.080correct people the right people the people who are proper cross-linguistically this is extremely
00:26:11.600common most language english is really weird in this regard but like the german word to mean
00:26:18.960the german people is deutsch which mean which ultimately comes from a proto-germanic word
00:26:24.280meaning like the race us the people right so a group of people move into the the area in between
00:26:39.120india and iran and then half of them go west half of them go east they use the word arya
00:27:17.120so the people the cattle rearing chariot warriors who move into iran and india and
00:27:27.660conquer it call themselves aryan and they use this term to refer to themselves
00:27:32.540it's clinical to say in a biological sense but they they also pretty clearly mean
00:27:39.040we my kids not you not your kids when they use this term in the early period
00:27:45.740Over time, it goes on to mean other things. These people who move into India and Iran are called the proto-Indo-Iranic peoples. They come out of Europe. They developed in what is like Belarus, and then said, I wonder what's over that way in the east, and kept going, hit a mountain and said, all right, boys, we're going south.
00:28:10.280it's not what we it's misleading to say they are white people in a certain sense but they0.65
00:28:20.140literally come from a population that at one point was identical and contiguous with people
00:28:27.440in germany and france go on sir well so just about the terminology not about the group of
00:28:36.540people per se, it's not a bad word. It didn't become a bad word or a no-no word until it
00:28:48.820became politically charged and unpopular after the fall of the Third Reich, because
00:28:54.540uh reich became a term denoting you know the master race in national socialist germany
00:29:03.740but the leading scholars of the day up to that moment and afterwards until it got the word out
00:29:13.460that we've got to rename everything no aryan was the term for these people and the recognized
00:29:20.660commonality in both their culture and their language i suppose as well as their biology
00:29:28.340between all of our ancestors the ancestors of white people now growing scholarship on what's
00:29:38.260included and what's not included like branches of the slobs is you know some of those things0.83
00:29:47.460are developing fields or were post-war developing fields but no it's a thing and that's the reason
00:29:57.060that we use it and the question is why do people think it's you know what do i say to people who
00:30:01.140think it's mistranslated and doesn't mean white people because all of those people have a very
00:30:06.420clear political agenda it's funny because if you read any of the um more pc stuff
00:30:18.900they will recognize that there's a continuity of culture and a continuity of language
00:30:24.820and tradition they will recognize that that continuity was carried by
00:30:29.780by people by people who were a tribal in group of people but it's like you have to you know
00:30:41.240kiss the pc ring and say well but that doesn't mean race it just means people with shared
00:30:48.200blood and shared culture and like they redefine race to make it fit because it's obviously
00:30:55.000true um but the thing that i think is important is we do see it come down to have that meaning
00:31:02.440in all of those connected cultures that are bound by language and tradition and it's not
00:31:07.720just that there's a shared linguistics there's a shared material culture there's a shared
00:31:12.440set of traditions and very informative to what we do there's a shared religiosity and a continuous
00:31:19.560religious um and while i'm on on the soapbox here for a moment with this that's one of the reasons
00:31:26.680that this becomes a very important discussion for us to have a lot of people and i should have said
00:31:33.800this at the top of the show but i suppose now is as good a time as any um people wonder like but
00:31:39.960But, but what if I'm not Scandinavian and they, it's very easy when we look back at history with the distance of hundreds of thousands of years to just quick snapshot a moment in time and not ponder, cool, but where did those people come from?
00:32:02.720All right, but where did those people come from?
00:32:05.040Okay, but where did the people before that come from?
00:32:07.660Our people had a start point where in the lore, where Odin, Vili, and Ve gave life and sacrality and goodly hue and animating force and spark of divinity to ask an embla upon an ancient shore
00:32:53.580And it predates the people who came before that.
00:32:56.680And it predates where they were before that.
00:32:59.920And it goes back to this ancient period of days of high adventure and are being articulated in the period that Chris is about to talk to us about.
00:33:10.940And that's one of the reasons that this is a foundational concept that I would like people to think on.
00:33:19.420So if you go to Wiktionary, you will see a common reference to the citation of the text.
00:35:57.000It's a very old term because it is of our people, our ancestry, our ancestors.
00:36:05.100If we take all of this linguistic stuff, as far back as we can go, we can link almost all of the languages of Europe, but not all of the languages of the world, and a very small number of languages of Europe, like Basque, Etruscan, Finnish, Hungarian, back to this Proto-Indo-European.
00:36:23.840So we can say things about these people linguistically and genetically, but let's talk about them a bit more historically.
00:36:31.420Around 6000 BC, the Proto-Indo-Europeans lived in their so-called Urheimat, the steppe just north of what is today the Crimea Peninsula in the Ukraine.
00:36:42.420Urheimat is a region where a language, and thus people, develops.
00:36:48.420The Urheimat of the English language and the English people is in England, for example.
00:36:53.420A steppe is a prairie but in Eurasia.0.99
00:36:56.420These peoples are the dominant ancestral group that composes the modern white0.99
00:37:03.500man. Their language, their culture, and their religion, by which we mean
00:37:07.040relationship with the divine, is what characterizes us today. Again, the
00:37:11.660exceptions are the Basques, Hungarians, Finns. No one speaks Etruscan anymore, so
00:37:16.140those don't count. Maltese also isn't included in this. The Basques, Hungarians,
00:37:23.960and Finns. These people are white genetically, but speak non-Indo-European1.00
00:37:27.560languages. Pi, Proto-Indo-European, early Aryan, is characterized by having four
00:37:35.360vowels, a, a, o, and o, distinguished by those two qualitative differences and
00:37:42.320length. It also had three laryngeals, so-called. These are and these
00:37:51.140consonants colored the vowels, changing them, and importantly, how a certain
00:37:55.940laryngeal vowel combinations changed as the Arians spread out impacted the
00:37:59.880various daughter languages of Proto-New European today. Spanish, French, Italian,
00:38:05.100these are daughter languages of Latin. Spanish, French, Italian are all sister
00:38:10.680languages. So as an example, the name of the dawn goddess was Heosos, but in
00:38:17.880ancient Greek, she's eos. In Old English, she's eostre. In Latin, she's aurora. And in Sanskrit,
00:38:25.320she's ushas. How that che got deformed over time varies language to language.0.98
00:38:34.720Note the vowel similarity between Greek and English, eos and eostre, but the divergence
00:38:41.100from Latin and Sanskrit, aurora and ushas. None of the laryngeals survive into the daughter languages,
00:38:49.260or so it was thought, until the decipherment of the Anatolian Indo-European languages,
00:38:55.820like Hittite, Luian. As an aside, Luian is the language that the Trojans
00:39:01.580speak in the Iliad. Anyways, with the discovery of the laryngeals in the Anatolian family,
00:39:10.300the indo-european theory theory as an intellectual system was sealed as fact in linguistics when
00:39:19.100up until this point for about a century the laryngeal theory was a pleasing hypothesis
00:39:24.460initially proposed by but with the discovery of the laryngeals in hittite and louis and so on
00:39:32.540it became fact now it could produce novel predictions that came true these
00:39:43.140Aryans were a Neolithic people meaning they used stone tools copper was0.75
00:39:48.160cutting-edge and foreign as they ruled out of there are were high mat on their
00:39:51.820chariots they had complex terms for cattle cattle rearing charity parts these
00:39:56.820terms survived to this day the two that I remember off the top of my head are
00:40:00.940wheel and fill. The fill is the rod that connects the chariot's bucket, the body, to the straps of
00:40:10.100the horses. So if you've ever watched Prince of Egypt, not about our people, but I think many of
00:40:16.700us have seen it, when Ramses and Moses, Moshe is his property, whatever, are riding their chariots
00:40:25.080rampantly at the beginning. They're like holding on to the reins and then like digging their0.51
00:40:30.840feet into the chariot to pull the chariot forward. That's not how a chariot works.
00:40:35.080There's a rod that connects the chariot to the horse, right? Anyways, our Aryan
00:40:44.880ancestors, the Proto-Indo-Europeans, had composite bows. Their arrows were tipped
00:40:49.320with stone and were used for both war and hunting. They had complex words for
00:40:53.760family members and made distinctions between things like maternal uncle and
00:40:57.880paternal uncle. Cross-culturally, this indicates a society in which lineage mattered rather than
00:41:03.760clan membership. Society was characterized by the houses of the fathers, literally. Society was
00:41:10.060made up of households ruled by a singular father, who wasn't necessarily the biological paternal
00:41:15.980ancestor of everyone present. These fathers came together to decide business. Linguistically,
00:41:22.600today we have father, mother, sister, son. There's no er in son. That is because that er in mother,
00:41:33.920father, sister is a very distant relic of the family system, meaning, you know, like that which
00:41:41.040is of the father. The son is a future father. The words guest and host come from a common origin,
00:41:49.000meaning one who has come from outside hospitality is a virtue and outsiders
00:41:53.820who came from abroad peacefully were treated well but hospitality is a virtue
00:41:58.220in part because it cannot be expected and the Proto-Indo-European root Proto-Indo-
00:42:02.960European gets shortened to pie in speech just for ease is ghostis and this often
00:42:11.140evolved into a word meaning foe or outsider the English cognate is actually
00:42:15.880ghost, meaning the outsider. They had two words for blood, one if it was in you or if it was outside
00:42:24.760of you. Blood was a passive substance, possessed yet animating, or a result of struggle lost
00:42:30.520unwillingly. The only color they reliably distinguished was red. All other colors were
00:42:35.680something like X bright, Y light, or Z dark. This is where the phrase wine dark sea in Homer comes
00:42:41.720from, so you'd have like, you know, snow bright, snow light, and snow dark. They didn't really
00:42:47.460describe things in terms of color, but rather in terms of the sum total visual appearance of a
00:42:51.680thing and how light moved across it. This is why there's no uniform, singular, Proto-Indo-European
00:42:57.720reconstructable word for blue. Cross-linguistically, people tend to get more color words as they get
00:43:03.500increasingly more access to dyes, the exception being red, which is actually in reference to blood.
00:43:09.920these step herders did not have dyes they lacked a word for blue as I said
00:43:16.700because blue is actually there's nothing natural in blue there's nothing in
00:43:21.620nature that's blue except the sky right even blueberries are actually purple so
00:43:28.760these people were very concerned with obligation and exchange of gifts the
00:43:32.620gift cycle was core to their society and was foundational to their religion as I
00:43:37.580As I said, their word for king was hregs, meaning something like the one who straightens.
00:43:44.580Kings were not so much high priests in the sense of technical specialists, but rather the moral pillar.
00:43:49.580It was their job to ensure that the world was a right.
00:43:53.580The word for honey and mead are very old.
00:44:01.580Words for beer, wine, and other liquors are very more recent.
00:44:06.580so they would ferment honey to make alcohol the sacred beverage is an
00:44:12.460important aspect of their religion and it survives in its original form as a
00:44:17.140need in you know Scandinavian Germanic religion but in Hellenic religion it
00:44:22.980becomes wine the Proto-Indo-Iranic peoples realize they can make this kind
00:44:27.640of like coffee substance soma or hauma from reeds and that that replaces that
00:44:36.080but the Proto-Indo-European peoples are typically viewed as very patriarchal
00:44:42.020because they're literally led by fathers, right? But they actually had a singular
00:44:46.040word for widow and its daughter word in English is widow. From
00:44:53.200this word is important because it means that a woman who had a dead husband had
00:44:59.080like legal rights and claims to his stuff. These people were obsessed with cows. Widows had a1.00
00:45:08.820right to her, a widow had a right to her husband's cattle. Calling a woman like a cow was a good thing1.00
00:45:15.220on the steppe circa 500 BC. Bopis, meaning cow-eyed, is a term of endearment in Homer, for example.1.00
00:45:23.180cows were literally the unit of wealth the English word fee comes from a word
00:45:28.400meaning cow so when you ask someone like what's the fee you're asking them like
00:45:32.780how many cows do I have to pay you for this the oldest strata of these people
00:45:38.180weren't all that lactose tolerant we white people today are characterized by
00:45:42.560lactose tolerance right um what our cattle herding step ancestors did it was
00:45:49.340actually, they would collect the milk and they'd make cheese and butter and
00:45:53.240yogurt. Nevertheless, many of them seem to have still drank huge qualities of
00:45:58.300milk and just tanked through the digestive discomfort. One theory about
00:46:04.940this is that it's actually done to quench thirst rather than to acquire
00:46:08.300nutrients. There have actually been bodies found of dead children who were
00:46:16.240anemic and they suffered from a very characteristic malady of drinking so much milk that they
00:46:23.040developed anemia because they were literally surviving on liquid milk and other dairy products,
00:46:29.440right? So these people drank a lot of milk and ate a lot of cheese and butter and yogurt.
00:46:35.920Mongolians will do this cool thing where they'll like ferment milk to make alcohol. I don't know
00:46:41.280know if there's any evidence of that, but it's an interesting idea nonetheless. They appear to
00:46:47.020have been largely monogamous, although of course elite men had multiple concubines, but it seems
00:46:52.660that they would only ever have one wife. This has always been something that struck me, but you read
00:46:59.740about like Greek mythology and you know how Zeus is always cheating on his wife. You know what he
00:47:04.200never does, divorces Hera. Food for thought. They probably didn't have temples initially, although
00:47:11.340they did view the household as sacred. Literally, entering a building means you have to act
00:47:16.160differently. That's a step thing. Their language was inflectionally rich, although much of that
00:47:22.440does not survive into English today, except in the plural, and they had an extreme, and the
00:47:29.180the Saxon genitive excuse me so like dogs dogs right the dogs of the dogs
00:47:35.000dogs that is actually an ancestor a very distant descendant of Proto-Indo-European
00:47:40.100the language had an extremely free word order and engaged in compounding often
00:47:44.940so like all father is a compound right interestingly whereas a common feature
00:47:52.940of Indo-European languages today is gender masculine feminine and neuter
00:47:58.220Proto-Indo-European did not actually do that. It had animate and inanimate, so
00:48:04.720what ended up happening... I'm gonna make a lot of simplifications for the audience
00:48:10.340here, and some nerd is gonna get really upset, and I understand, but they're
00:48:15.840trying to do things with this, not just have nerd fun time. So Proto-Indo-
00:48:21.840European made a distinction between animate and inanimate nouns, but it also
00:48:25.860had a feminizing suffix equivalent to uh or at you know you have like princess uh um like
00:48:37.700shopper shopette right so a feminizing suffix would be added to inanimate nouns to make them
00:48:48.900animate but also like ladylike and eventually what happened is
00:48:52.420inanimate nouns that had been feminized became the feminine gender and animate nouns that were
00:49:01.360not feminized became masculine inanimate nouns became neuter masculine feminine neuter does not
00:49:08.260actually have any specific relationship to gender sometimes like um there's a famous quote from uh
00:49:18.320Mark Twain, I say famous, I can't remember it word for word, where he's complaining about how German is a silly language because the word for sock is masculine, but table is feminine.
00:49:28.060Socks and tables aren't masculine or feminine.
00:49:29.940These are a relic of this older animacy system, right?
00:49:35.900So, we talk about these Proto-Indo-Europeans.0.77
00:49:41.660And I said they make up the dominant strain of what is the white man.
00:49:48.320do you want to throw anything in before we go back further sir
00:49:56.560um yeah actually because you threw it to me i will do this um thank you very much
00:50:02.800ronald blake we appreciate you uh donated a hundred dollars to the pavilion and a hundred
00:50:08.560dollars to help pay off phrasehoff much appreciated thank you um laroi donated twenty dollars each
00:50:16.880towards paying off phrase off and towards the pavilion thank you laroi we appreciate you uh merci
00:50:24.080um and angela donated twenty dollars or twenty five dollars towards the pavilion and 50 to pay
00:50:31.840off phrase off thank you very much angela we appreciate you guys we appreciate everybody's
00:50:36.080generosity a lot no we're good chris if you would take us back to the days when ice covered much of
00:50:43.840the earth two or three years ago it was just another snake cult now they're everywhere0.65
00:50:55.600all right so where did these cattle rearing chariot warriors come from i'm going to give0.92
00:51:04.560you a relatively simplified mythic if you will rundown of how we get to white people in europe
00:51:10.560today. We're gonna be making very broad generalizations across tens of thousands
00:51:15.420of years due to the vastness of the time scale and the necessity of compressing
00:51:19.740this into something that we as humans can actually do something with. So I'm
00:51:24.840sure there's going to be some guy who watches this and goes, um, actually, because
00:51:30.160that's not the point. This is not a point-by-point rundown of all of the
00:51:33.940discoveries of a massive field of science. It is an explanation of the
00:51:37.760discoveries of that field for humans to actually use in their daily lives.
00:51:42.560Our religion is an ethno-religion deeply concerned with the ethnic relationship between us, Aryans,
00:51:49.240and the Aesir. I am thus going to answer the question, according to Asatru, where do we come
00:51:54.680from? So let's begin. So there are early hunter-gatherers living in Europe. They find
00:52:02.060themselves increasingly penned in by glaciers and tundra and cold and dry.
00:52:08.780It is here that we have the mythic couple of Oskar and Aimbla.
00:52:13.74026 to 20,000 years ago, the last Ice Age occurs. Do you want to put up the insert or the
00:52:22.940Ice Age Refugia picture, Nick? I don't trip over my tongue. All right.
00:52:29.420The hunter-gatherer populations experience a massive population contraction. To the south,
00:52:36.380uncrossable water. To the north and east, extreme cold and extremely dry conditions. To the southeast,
00:52:43.460it becomes increasingly dry and cold, making crossing the ocean difficult. Lower sea levels
00:52:48.180meant that the waterways were thinner, but still quite large, and there are no land bridges. Sheets
00:52:54.420of ice and field fields of cold form a thick wall around the populace of Europe, separating their
00:53:01.140lineage from the rest of the planet. It is these people that we descend from, specifically the0.81
00:53:06.740people in purple. There's two refugia in Europe. A refugia is, so you know, there's there's like1.00
00:53:14.340weasels everywhere in Europe in the the green, right? And then it gets too cold, and the only0.90
00:53:20.500places the weasels can survive in are the bronzy color on the left and purple color in the on the1.00
00:53:28.020right in the east and west in the west we have the salutrians they contribute little dna to us0.95
00:53:35.940today but they are there and then we have the epigravetians in the purple salutrian and
00:53:43.140epigravetian are terms for material cultures these people are trapped in ice metaphorically speaking
00:53:50.340for about 6,000 years. By comparison, 6,000 years ago today was
00:53:58.8203,974 BC, so 4,000 BC. Between 4,000 BC and today is the span of
00:54:11.060time we're talking about. You see why we have to kind of blur this around?
00:54:15.860We're talking about material cultures. We know about them from the artifacts
00:54:19.700and the dead bodies that they leave behind think uh tools bones and clothing in caves so if some
00:54:26.100guy gets eaten by a bear and the bear digests his bones we don't know anything about his dna
00:54:31.140surviving to us today this is an archaeological truism called pots aren't people material cultures
00:54:40.340are ways of making things they aren't people the epigravetian material culture experienced several
00:54:46.100internal gene shifts that aren't reflected in their material culture.
00:54:50.340So, for example, Ireland has people who have red hair, blonde hair,
00:54:54.900brown hair, and black hair in it. If everyone in Ireland except the black0.99
00:54:59.060haired people died, that is a population bottleneck,0.94
00:55:02.660and everyone going forward has black hair.0.66
00:55:06.580Prehistory is characterized by a lot of population bottlenecks.
00:55:12.18090 percent of the people die and the remaining 10 their children inherit the earth
00:55:18.020and whatever genes they had whatever little quirks they had those go on to characterize
00:55:22.500the descendants these people are also largely monogamous and the decreases in the number of
00:55:28.820male lineages tend to have a decrease in the number of female lineages not necessarily one
00:55:33.620to one but you know like oh no 90 of us died off and then the the elites are like i will bear the
00:55:42.980blunt the brunt the blunt of the burden i will take two wives instead of just one but it's not
00:55:49.140like every man has six wives in hunter-gatherer land right these ice age refugia now let me talk0.84
00:55:58.820about haplogroups so we don't make people mad okay so humans have dna your dna gets chopped up
00:56:06.500and compressed into chromosomes you have a number of chromosomes and they're in pairs
00:56:14.100when your parents uh love each other very much and do the birds and the bees
00:56:20.260their chromosomes unfold and splice together so you are half of your mother and half of your father
00:56:28.820unless you're man or unless you're male excuse me if you are male you're about 500.62
00:56:36.320I did the math once I'm just going to say one percent because it's easier to say
00:56:40.460you are 51 percent your father 49 percent your mother because you see your mom and your dad
00:56:47.320have pairs of chromosomes that you know combine merge 50 percent go on to be you from each right0.71
00:56:54.740except the y chromosome a man a human man has an x chromosome and a y chromosome a human female has
00:57:03.560an x chromosome and an x chromosome so if you are a man your x chromosome is 50 your father's and 50
00:57:10.240your mother's now your y chromosome if you look at the chromosomes they're all x's like literally
00:57:17.720they look like the letter x a y chromosome looks like just a little little letter like just a little
00:57:23.620line. At the TIPS, it can engage in recombination with your mother's second X chromosome. And
00:57:32.100every generation, that happens. The TIPS are about 2.5% of the Y chromosome each,
00:57:39.700meaning 5% of a man's Y chromosome actually comes from his mother's X chromosome.
00:57:49.380The remaining 95% is just his father's Y chromosome, meaning my Y chromosome is 95% of my father's Y chromosome.
00:58:01.340And my father's Y chromosome was 95% of his father's Y chromosome.
00:58:06.360The same 95%, because the tips keep getting chopped off and smudged up every generation, but the rest of the interior of the Y chromosome doesn't.
00:58:16.160So the only thing that changes is mutation.
00:58:20.160So you could take my Y chromosome, my father's Y chromosome, his father's Y chromosome, etc.,
00:58:25.160and actually trace out the mutations generation by generation.
01:00:27.900The purple and orange is where humans can live.
01:00:31.820humans where humans do live the green is not necessarily all that habitable the area that
01:00:40.480is today germany and this is this map is really simplified these glaciers move and they are bigger
01:00:46.480at times than they are here if you want to know what it's like in france at this time
01:00:52.340go check out nunavut or northern alaska in the summer there's plants growing there but it's very
01:00:59.140cold. The people in these, most of the trees in these refugia are pine, except for sheltered
01:01:07.380valleys where deciduous trees survive. Overall, temperatures are about 10 degrees Celsius colder
01:01:12.820than at any point in the season today. That's a big change. 25 degrees Celsius is 77 degrees
01:01:19.740Fahrenheit. 15 degrees Celsius is 59 degrees Fahrenheit. So big drop. We're talking about,
01:01:28.200You know, oh boy, 59 degrees Fahrenheit, a high in the summer, right?
01:01:36.500So the people in these refugia are essentially penned into habitable zones by the ocean and huge stretches of cold steppe.0.73
01:01:43.060One could head southeast into Anatolia, but there was little reason to do so at this time, as Anatolia was actually less appealing than the Balkan refugia.
01:01:53.020The uninhabitable zone was more like an extremely cold grassland than Antarctica.
01:01:58.200until you hit the metaphorical mile-high wall of solid blue ice in the north.
01:02:04.980The problem was that the winds could suddenly strip all of the heat out of an area with no warning,
01:02:09.400and the sky could dump a huge amount of snow onto a region out of nowhere.
01:02:13.140Not that there were walls of ice and snow, until you did hit the literal wall of ice.
01:02:18.500There were, at various points, glacial edges, which again are huge walls.
01:02:23.380Some of these were like, at points, there were like human settlements within a day or two's walk, leisurely, like at a leisurely pace, to the wall of ice.
01:02:35.280So people knew the wall of ice to the north, right?
01:02:41.560Most of Europe was quite dry, so it was more so extremely cold rather than extremely snowy, right?
01:02:48.060This is why megafauna, which had evolved a great deal of body fat and fur and size, could move around in these uninhabitable zones.
01:02:58.320They would graze on the plants freely, and if they ever came to a spot where it was simply too cold for plants to grow well,
01:03:04.840they'd just walk somewhere else and survive because they could go for a long time without eating.
01:03:09.280Or they'd just eat half-living grass on the ground, and they'd be fine.
01:03:12.540humans couldn't eat the plants in the uninhabitable zone so they we our
01:03:19.500ancestors would have to hunt megafauna or stay in the habitable zones where
01:03:23.160there were edible plants it's worth noting um we talked about the ice age
01:03:29.520ending technically it doesn't there's still glaciers at the North Pole so we
01:03:34.620technically live in an ice age that's why you'll see this period referred to
01:03:38.400as the last glacial maximum, the point at which the glaciers, as they call them across the pond,
01:03:45.200were southernmost. So when we say the ice age ends, we mean like you can grow plants. In Denmark,
01:03:54.960we don't mean there's no more glaciers. From the Epigravedian block, we get several populations.
01:04:04.160first we get the hunter gatherers who stay in europe uh did i miss a thing here do you
01:04:10.240want to say anything real quick sir while i look for something um sure i'll say stuff first thing
01:04:17.680i'll say is steven in japan thank you uh we appreciate your donations ten dollars phrase
01:04:23.280off and five towards the pavilion uh you are a consistent donor on here and it's very much
01:04:28.800appreciated um yeah i mean i don't want to derail what you got going on because i think that it's
01:04:38.640good and it's giving people a picture of a time that folks don't talk about very often um
01:12:29.900a rough comparison of this that people might be familiar with is think of the
01:12:36.040Spanish showing up in Mesoamerica the Spanish show up in Mesoamerica the
01:12:41.140Spanish are a united group then all of the Mesoamericans are not okay if you
01:12:49.520take the DNA of these peoples and reduce the dimensionality via complex math you0.92
01:12:54.000can create a zone of whiteness you can do this with any group of course to make0.91
01:12:58.060Like, you know, the borders of whatever group of people, right?0.64
01:13:01.440But we're concerned with white people.0.51
01:13:03.200White people is a population with a variety of individuals in it.0.61
01:13:06.460So you have to define the population via a zone rather than a distinct, a discrete, single, whitest man.0.74
01:13:12.640If you take these hunters, farmers and herders, all of them are within that zone, right?0.84
01:13:18.720So Aryans emerge out of the population of hunter-gatherers living in the Ice Age refugia
01:13:25.020When the Ice Age conditions are alleviated, these peoples then break up into a variety of populations that then eventually merge back together.0.91
01:13:33.700So they kind of do like this, right?0.97
01:13:39.520If you aren't watching the video, then you don't get to see me do the stupid little figure with my hands, but whatever.0.95
01:13:46.200The winner of that struggle, when these lineages start coming back together, is the Steppe Herder, a.k.a. Proto-Indo-European population.0.96
01:13:59.820Let's return to the focus on them and their history. Do you want to throw anything in here, sir?
01:29:35.780Five would die in infancy and childhood.
01:29:39.680Six of them would just pack up and leave and go to what is today another country in Europe to attain fame and glory.
01:29:45.360And the remaining four would stay in their homeland.0.70
01:29:47.380hunter-gatherers also seem to have lived like this but the Anatolian farmers seem
01:29:52.000to have not done this move around thing as much I just want to contextualize
01:29:58.140material cultures for a second here you know what we don't wear much of here in
01:30:03.700Michigan seersucker do they wear seersucker where you're out often sir in
01:30:12.940In antiquity, I think so. No, not commonly.
01:30:16.480All right, let's just, for the sake of having a discussion, say they still wear seersucker.
01:30:21.540People in Tennessee probably wear a suit like the one I'm wearing.
01:30:25.600We're talking about two different material cultures here.
01:30:27.920The seersucker suit and the seersucker culture and the normal non-seersucker suit culture.
01:30:38.720These are two mutually overlapping material cultures.
01:30:42.940That doesn't mean that there's constant bloodshed between people wearing seersucker and people wearing things other than seersucker, right?
01:30:52.200There were people who knew how to make beakers that looked like bells.
01:30:56.940There were people who knew how to make whatever the other way of drinking your medos and plinokotmos was, right?
01:31:06.260Some of these people were hunter-gatherers.
01:31:09.760Hunter-gatherers could drink out of bell beakers.
01:31:12.300We know they did, actually. We know there are instances of Bell Beaker people basically adopting in hunter-gatherers and letting them integrate into their society, and some of these hunter-gatherer elites being basically equal to Bell Beaker peoples.0.93
01:31:28.480And then we also know there are times when the Bell Beaker peoples just rode up and just killed everyone. It's extremely complicated.
01:31:34.400it. Remember, we've gone from 26,000 BC, sorry, 24,000 BC to 1600 BC in like, I don't know, 30
01:31:47.480minutes, right? So we have this core body of stepperers who are more or less unified as a
01:31:55.340whole. We have these peoples that are distantly related to them that they are integrating with
01:32:01.680to some degree. They form a civilizational blob. They start settling. Things start getting
01:32:09.180crowded. Pasture land becomes increasingly scarce and or costly. The people on the periphery say,
01:32:17.780I wonder if there's good pasture land over Yonder, and head out. This results in a variety of peoples
01:32:24.160and languages. This leads to a few macro waves of migrations. Nick, do you want to throw up the
01:32:30.160i.e. languages diagram all right I hope you can see the color on this dear
01:32:38.620viewer I should have used a bigger brush size when I made when I did this in MS
01:32:45.340paint so first we had we have at the beginning here the Sredni stog a kind of
01:32:51.920blob we have a break-off that leads to the Anatolian and Tocharian languages
01:32:59.480These peoples were the first Stredny Stong men who were leaving around the same time that the
01:33:04.040peoples of the Yamnaya culture were, you know, look, they're eventually gonna, only they had0.97
01:33:10.280east instead of west. So all of the groups outside of the red boundary are not of Yamnaya origin.
01:33:17.480So the Anatolians move outwards from the steppe, from the Urheimat in what is today the Ukraine,
01:33:26.360And then some of them head south around the Black Sea through the Caucasus into Anatolia.
01:33:33.640Some of them keep going around the Aral Sea, then loop up into Anatolia.
01:33:41.200These people become the Hittites and the Luwians.1.00
01:33:46.200Then we have the Tocharians, who just blast off and head eastward.1.00
01:33:50.940They actually end up right next to China, as far as we're aware.1.00
01:33:54.240they don't really do anything all that civilizationally impressive but they're
01:33:58.240still pretty interesting if you're into anthropology stuff then within that red
01:34:03.600boundary we have the Yamnaya blob the early migration out leads to the
01:34:14.480Albanians Armenians and Hellenes aka the Greeks these people head south kind of
01:34:23.220curling around the black sea and then they settle in greece and an early population of them keeps
01:34:29.860going um becomes the armenians so then we get into the blue boundary these are all of the groups that
01:34:40.660start in europe and then spread outwards so once we get to this blue boundary we get to like
01:34:47.620i'm not trying to bully greeks or alvanians here but like europe europe right
01:34:53.220The only group that leaves Europe meaningfully at this point are the Indo-Iranian peoples, but it's worth remembering here that half of the Indo-Iranian languages and peoples remained in Europe.
01:35:06.340They just became, quote, Scythian, unquote, which is the generic term the Romans used to refer to everyone who lived east of the Germanics.
01:35:15.020This refers to the actual Scythians, the Sarmatians, the Alans, and a bunch of other smaller Indo-Iranic peoples that remain in Europe.
01:35:23.220These people eventually get conquered by the Slavs.
01:35:26.720There is only one European Indo-Iranic language that survives to us today, and that is Ossetian, which is the descendant of Scythian.
01:35:34.720So only a portion of the Proto-Indo-Iranic speakers actually leave Europe, resulting in Iran and India, and a portion remain behind in Europe.
01:35:43.220Fourth, inside the green boundary, we have what I would call the core European groups.
01:35:50.720These are the Italo-Celts, the Germanics, and the Balto-Sloths.0.97
01:35:55.360There's a bunch of, I guess you could call them lesser European languages and peoples that just don't survive to the present day,
01:36:02.640and we're simplifying them out because we don't know a lot about them.
01:36:07.280This is a lot of small languages in Iberia, in the Balkans.
01:36:11.400This is stuff like Daschen and Thraschen.
01:36:14.440Thraschen was probably related to Greek.
01:42:11.480We'll answer a question while we're in here.
01:42:14.960No, I like what you're doing because you're talking about
01:42:19.900the uh the theme on this and i think some people may wonder when they listen to this it divides
01:42:25.340audiences there is a portion that really like the deep history that really like the linguistics and
01:42:33.340the scholarly study of it and all these pieces but there are folks out there that are like well but
01:42:39.500why why do we care about this one thing why do we care about it because it's cool and it's really
01:42:45.180interesting to a lot of us um i realize there's other people it might not be but there's deeper
01:42:50.540meta reasons for why one of those as i mentioned is to have the clear understanding that our gods
01:42:57.820have been with us since the beginning and how we worship how we name them how what lore we choose
01:43:06.140to incorporate is directly affected by this that we're talking about, and it sheds a lot
01:43:15.760of light on the Pan-Aryan nature of Alcetree.
01:43:22.460But we have a question that I think is worth looking into.
01:43:26.640If the Finns, Hungarians, and Basque are white, despite not speaking Indo-Aryan languages,
01:43:34.120and some people like Haitians, Mexicans, Peruvians, etc. are not white even though they do speak
01:43:41.900Indo-Aryan languages. Is there really a lot of value to studying these transformations and
01:43:47.120histories? Spoiler, yes, but Chris, how would you answer the question? Okay, and I talked about the
01:43:56.260problem with naming here for this very reason. We are splicing together multiple fields of science.
01:44:02.240Indo-European is a term used to refer to a language family.
01:44:08.740I have misspoken at times in this, and said that the Indo-Europeans did this, the Indo-Europeans did that, when referring to Yamnaya warlords coming out of the steppe, circa 3000 BC.
01:44:23.740That's wrong. Proto-Indo-European is a reconstructed language, right? It is an actual language. You cannot speak Indo-European. You theoretically can speak Proto-Indo-European.
01:44:41.980You cannot speak Slavic. You can speak Russian, you can speak Czech, you can speak Slovenian, you can speak Polish, you can speak Proto-Slavic, but you can't speak Slavic.
01:44:59.980That doesn't mean that there is not genetically a Slavic people. It is a zone that encompasses multiple individuals.
01:45:08.980Haitians speak an Indo-European language. That does not mean that they are Indo-European peoples.
01:45:18.980What that means is that they're not white.
01:50:17.560There's places you go and supplant a population.
01:50:20.300There's places you go and merge with a population.
01:50:25.260There's places you go and, you know, enslave or oppress a population.
01:50:30.940There's places you go, and one of the points of this episode is like these old Europe things that you mentioned,
01:50:37.620specifically the basque where distant cousins re-amalgamate and carry on a link of cultural
01:50:48.420linguistic tradition as white people like the basques in spain but you also have these
01:50:53.780populations understanding the history tells you that some hungarians are white some hungarians
01:51:02.420aren't some fins are white some aren't you have an admixture of asians in both of those populations
01:51:11.460because of us understanding these migratory patterns of people so i do think it does matter
01:51:16.980and it helps inform a lot of how we come to get these things but the linguistic developments that
01:51:23.460chris just mentioned i think are also important because language is an express first language is
01:51:29.300magical it is a primal magic um the the rune for the gods ansuz is about the gods but it's also
01:51:43.460about the mouth and speaking you have you know emir the first primal giant that brings forth
01:51:52.180creation is the roar sound and language are fundamental to our faith it's one of those
01:52:02.980things about runes runes are some of our you know most special sacred principles
01:52:08.600and understandings of the elements of the universe but or of our existence and
01:52:15.440they also form an alphabet and a way of writing a way of communicating so those things are really
01:52:21.320important and the um the differences chris is talking about in those linguistic uh changes
01:52:28.520and evolutions over time also track with a mindset and an understanding of the world around us and
01:52:39.000what that means in terms of linguistic development and it really does shape the lore that's come
01:52:48.680down to us it shapes our processing of that lore and it ultimately gives us a better understanding
01:52:57.640of our gods certainly of our ancestors because what our ancestors did is so very important
01:53:04.200because we worship our ancestors ancestral veneration is such a fundamental to house it
01:53:08.760true yeah i do think all of this is important for those reasons but yeah we certainly understand just
01:53:14.920because you speak a language doesn't make you a race of people but back in a tribal period where
01:53:24.280you are conquering land and displacing populations it very often did mean that
01:53:29.880and understanding the history gives us the insight to know in which cases it did in which cases it
01:53:35.720didn't and just to say here real quick let's not lose the forest for the trees speaking of the
01:53:43.560ancestors here. Our obligations and duties to the isere emerge out of, for simplicity, biology,
01:53:51.320not linguistics and anthropology, right? We're using the language and the archaeology to0.80
01:54:00.040talk about our ancestors as people, but if I had to give this presentation in Mandarin,
01:54:08.120i mean we're a folk is your membership in the folk defined by your biology by how you act by
01:54:20.380your soul or is it defined by the language you speak and the culture you practice
01:54:27.340we're an ethno religion so it's the former it's not the latter
01:54:32.980well another last kind of thing i want to say on on the language here just at this point is
01:54:40.240affixing language to something solidifies things in a real intangible way
01:54:51.440and we know that uh because the al-savati is one of our sacred rituals of al-satru in someone's
01:54:59.980life, the affixing a name to a new child is a symbolic defining of this and not that. This
01:55:10.260child will have this name. From now on, when we speak this name, it has a meaning we all
01:55:17.360understand attached to a hymenia and a reputation that we all weigh and that we measure and that
01:55:24.140we count when the gods interacted with ancient people and there was grunts and you know head
01:55:32.800scratching and whatever that's important there's a transformative moment when you know lightning
01:55:41.880strikes an oak tree and someone grunts out and okay something hasn't all right now all of these
01:55:51.960things that we understand also for to be coalesce into one okay this is my god i am his people
01:56:02.760this is a thing it's a transformative moment and it may seem small but it's not at that point there
01:56:11.460became a body of lore and a tradition and an understanding and a religion there's a loose
01:56:19.600When there's spirituality, when there's just kind of a, the gods are there, I'm here, you do acts of kindness or acts of respect, when you attach language to it, you get stories, you get religion.
01:56:35.700And you don't have that in the same way when you don't have that element of communication, when you don't have the mystery of answers.
02:12:03.180why it makes sense reinforces a lot of key principles.
02:12:13.140Yeah, so I've mentioned a few other language families.
02:12:18.140other language families, Afro-Asiatic is the language family that includes the
02:12:27.860Semitic language family, which includes Arabic, Hebrew, Aramaic. Egyptian is not
02:12:37.820Semitic, but it is Afro-Asiatic, right? Each of these families is different and0.70
02:12:44.960they are differently different. Proto-Indo-European is characterized by
02:12:49.520this really nice easy steppe warrior conqueror horde emerging circa 4000 BC
02:12:58.460and conquering Europe pretty quickly. So it's like this thing happens then a
02:13:05.460bunch of little linguistic effects occur. With other language families it's a lot
02:13:10.160different afro-asiatic is really complicated because a lot of what we know about old old
02:13:18.720afro-asiatic languages comes to us from semitic like akkadian and then there's egyptian
02:13:26.640the egyptians had writing you know around the same time the proto-indo-europeans were like
02:13:33.680I am illiterate, but must conquer, right? So that makes the study of Afro-Asiatic very specific.
02:13:45.560The same is true with Sino-Tibetan, which is extremely biased on very specific varieties of
02:13:52.700Chinese, and Chinese has undergone a number of phonological effects. We'll get to Chinese in a
02:13:59.420little bit of the chariot question. I guess I could just answer this now. So0.97
02:14:04.280just to say about the chariot question, for context, there is a theory that the
02:14:11.520Chinese, the Mandarin word cha, comes from the Proto-Indo-European word,
02:14:20.360possibly from a Proto-Indo-European word meaning wheel. Actually it's the exact,
02:14:25.100The theory is that it descends from the word meaning hwiel. Ancestor hwiel.
02:14:32.340Another possibility is that the word descends from the same word.
02:14:38.940In modern Mandarin, this word is chuh. However, in old Chinese, it's depending on which pronunciation
02:14:47.600system you use it's either or the farther back you get from China from the
02:14:55.700current day with Chinese the weirder it gets so you get to like a thousand BC0.69
02:15:00.600and you get words like like strange trills and nasal tones it's a really1.00
02:15:07.480wacky language but then to be fair it's not like proto into European oh yeah
02:15:11.300it's got four vowels only two of them are different sounds and then there's
02:15:15.200three different ways of saying, right, like, pre-modern languages are wacky like that, right?
02:15:22.460But the theory goes that these, because there's a lot of people that move out of the steppe,
02:15:30.300and they head all sorts of directions, and if we don't find their bodies because they got eaten by
02:15:36.180bears or something, then we don't know they were there. One group of these peoples is the Tocharians,
02:15:42.700And there's a theory that Tocharian, or some language like it, introduced either the chariot and the word for chariot into Chinese, or just the word.
02:15:58.240And this gets into how do horses get to China, complex stuff.
02:16:03.080i don't know enough about you know ancient chinese language theories to
02:16:11.440argue that it's true or not you know like an objective sense i don't see why it couldn't be
02:16:20.400though particularly because horse domestication comes from these steppe peoples anyways so it's
02:19:12.920I do not believe that's what the war symbolically was about.
02:19:17.240But I saw the question over in the chat, and there was...
02:19:22.020some question on translation of uh Waynes and if that was really their war versus the Vanir
02:19:31.100and yes it was and the reason that it was is we can go to the original text
02:19:36.400so Waynes is like the Anglo-Saxon equivalency term that's come down but the actual text
02:19:46.660talking about them dealing with the veneer um the line something to the effect because
02:19:57.140it's funny if you look on here and i'm not sure if it does this in other spots
02:20:01.680but it translates um in velozpa.org where we look at a lot of stuff in veloz's translation
02:20:09.400it has um 23 in the original text is numbered 24 so that becomes confusing but the line in there
02:20:19.800that bellows translates in the field uh and the field by the warlike wings was trodden
02:20:27.940In Old Norse, it's Knautu Vanir Vigskau Volum Sporna, and it specifically says Vanir.
02:20:39.940So it does talk about that particular tribe of gods.
02:20:43.360It's a war between the Aesir and the Vanir, and we know it because that's literally what it says in the text.
02:20:50.620and vanier translates into like experienced or like wise with um
02:20:59.580like earned or accumulated experience in my understanding of its etymology
02:21:04.700so i don't think it's a war between order and chaos at all but as fawn would put it it's a
02:21:10.300between cosmic order and natural law i think in one way it is the synthesis
02:21:19.980of nature, fecundity, the gods associated with the growing world around us,
02:21:29.960with the natural functions, with chthonic things,
02:21:34.960and with elements of that kind of very primal, very natural existence
02:21:43.100with the gods of consciousness, the gods of war, the gods of thought and inspiration,
02:21:50.440and with these expansive consciousness gods pairing with, struggling with, and ultimately
02:22:00.140incorporating these gods of birth and of fecundity and herds and of growing things and of the world
02:22:14.260and that bonding between those two tribes gives us the full picture of our faith and our
02:22:23.080understanding of the holistic nature of divinity and that's the war that they're talking about
02:22:28.120Just to say here real quick, as the Altair Egoly pointed out, it's, I would agree, you know, pretty clearly about this conflict between the Aesir and the Vanir, but I did one time see a madman on the internet who was very adamant that this war is not involving, that this is not a fight between the Aesir and the Vanir, and, again, a madman.
02:22:57.140But it's interesting to note that in both, so most of the poems of the Ada only survive to us in the Codex Regis, Codex Wormianus, and whatever the third one is.
02:23:13.900But Voluspa does actually show up twice.
02:23:18.520I'm not counting the little Voluspa in the Signature from All.
02:24:59.580um like white uber mentioned um i think the other thing that i see it come about as
02:25:07.120is you you get another strain of that with
02:25:10.100millenarian doesn't really capture what i'm trying to say but like
02:25:23.600prophets of doom that prep and assume there's going to be a huge societal collapse or zombie
02:25:32.080apocalypse or whatever shape that looks like and then aha but we'll need to repopulate by having1.00
02:25:38.420all of these wives again i point out things that are you know funny examples there's people with1.00
02:25:45.220serious questions about it. I don't mean to diminish that. First, no, it's not okay in
02:25:54.880the context of Ausatru because it is jarring to people in our civilization at our time
02:26:06.680period. It is needlessly jarring and would make all of us look bad for no reason as one
02:26:13.120the reasons secondly in most places where people are listening to this in any legally binding sense
02:26:20.480it's not legal and it's some kind of a fraud system thing um but fundamentally
02:26:30.080people i've heard people posit a lot like our ancestors used to do it
02:26:36.400but i don't see that recorded in the history i'm not going to say there's never been a case of
02:26:42.560anyone in the history of our ancestors that had a polygamous situation but in the history it's very
02:26:50.000few and far between it's not like the average guy it's the times that we see it is almost exclusively
02:26:57.280if not exclusively in political marriages between tribal chieftains to secure alliances you don't
02:27:04.960see that as like the average tribesman having multiple wives that wasn't a situation very often
02:27:11.040there's a lot of assumptions about our ancestors that people make because they've heard other
02:27:17.280people make them and like you know a bad game of telephone they've kind of evolved over time
02:27:23.600but i don't think we really see that one of the things we do see as a standout component
02:27:29.440is how surprisingly monogamous and you know not sexually licentious
02:27:36.720our ancestors were when they were encountered by you know other people that wrote about um
02:27:43.600so to the to the question of polygamy no chris what what say you about this week's question
02:27:50.720polygamy question mark no um i kind of we have been our lineage has been our race has been
02:28:02.640largely monogamous with very small scale polygeny by elites for long enough that it is almost
02:28:12.140bordering on like a biological feature not a bug right like it's no longer a cultural
02:28:20.500if I told you that I come from a lineage you know 30,000 plus years long of people with brown hair
02:28:28.580you'd be like oh well that's just like baked into you if I tell you I come from a lineage
02:28:34.60030,000 years long with people who do one man one woman unless they're really rich then you know
02:28:40.840one man one woman takes a second woman every now and then not for too long
02:28:46.840it's funny how people don't think oh that's just like their default behavior it's just biological
02:28:53.640But then when you talk about how, like, animals behave, they're like, oh, well, of course, they don't have, like, culture.
02:29:01.060They're just biologically programmed to be monogamous or to spread their wild oats or to eat their young or whatever, right?
02:29:12.400We've been doing monogamy long enough that it's a feature, not a bug.
02:29:16.000i don't we do actually have um laws in place that make it illegal to do monogamy in
02:29:25.660every western culture um and china too the the communist party of china enforced monogamy what
02:29:32.960you said illegal to do monogamy oh you know it's illegal to do polygamy thank you thank you um
02:29:39.940But the Chinese Communist Party enforced monogamy upon China before a Confucian gentleman would have, like, his first wife, and he was allowed, like, unlimited concubines, who were basically just wives anyways.
02:29:55.000In Islam, military leaders, clerics, the prophet, etc., are allowed to have unlimited wives, provided they can take care of them.
02:30:06.100And there is a community of people who practice what they call ethical non-monogamy.0.93
02:30:16.300And if you go looking into these people, their lives are a trainwreck.0.58
02:30:22.300Because it turns out it's hard to be non-monogamous, ethically, while a Westerner apparently.0.56
02:30:32.900The reason why Muhammad said that you have to be him, a warlord, or a cleric if you want a lot of wives is because you have to be able to provide for all of them.0.90
02:30:48.900A Confucian gentleman has to provide, he has to be able to, whether they want it or not is irrelevant.0.92
02:30:55.900be able to provide a separate house and family lifestyle for each of his wives.
02:31:02.520Most people are capable of doing that. Most men when they hear you get to have
02:31:08.200multiple wives think it's going to be fun, sex orgy time all the time, ignoring
02:31:16.420whether it's ethical or not, this is just a lot of work that most people do not
02:31:21.140seem to be capable of handling and I don't just mean like one man can't
02:31:26.180afford multiple wives on the average man's salary I mean this even in terms
02:31:30.260of like pardon the term emotional labor like this this is something that I have0.86
02:31:39.500seen whenever these ethical non monogamy types leak out of their containment1.00
02:31:44.920zones is they just it's just way too much work trying to do that and it inevitably explodes
02:31:53.500because people get their feelings hurt because surprise 30 plus thousand years of monogamy have
02:31:59.860led to us wanting to in simple terms own our partners and not doing that just makes everyone
02:32:08.840at every level there's there's circumstances in history to where it like cool we're trying to
02:32:17.480repopulate something or you know uh the mormons were moving out to the middle of the american
02:32:23.560desert and we're trying to quickly repopulate or you have some place after it's been just
02:32:29.080devastated by war and all the men are dead and so like there's circumstances in the course of
02:32:36.920history but they're few and far between and i think people in today's day and age there is a
02:32:48.920there is an instinct or i guess a reaction to having been so let down by so many things in
02:32:57.560our culture to try to radically reimagine everything some people in the circles that
02:33:04.280some of us run in would like to like ah maybe we should do polygamy man we need to get back to these
02:33:10.920they have an image of like what that looks like in their head or what like a super hyper masculine
02:33:19.080image would look like because in the world around us we don't see that very often
02:33:24.600and i think more often than not it's interpreted in a way that doesn't really match up with reality
02:33:30.920and isn't really fulfilling in the long term.
02:33:37.420And somebody, you know, over on the side mentioned that, you know,0.98
02:33:40.040the people they've heard talk about polygamy are a bunch of fatties.0.97
02:34:31.760But no, polygamy has been, or monogamy has been
02:34:34.820a foundational concept in Western civilization
02:34:37.380that amongst our full predates Christianity.
02:34:42.000It's, you know, you find examples in the Bible of polygamy.
02:34:47.320You don't find a lot of examples in our lore
02:34:50.340and our teachings about that at all.0.93
02:34:53.260And just to throw in there this non-European Christian thing, there's a big discourse, I don't want to call it a problem because I don't care, in Catholicism, in Christianity in general in Africa, because Africans are overwhelmingly polygamous, specifically polygenous, right?0.73
02:35:15.320a man is allowed to have multiple wives and then these guys open the bible and they see
02:35:21.720all of the jewish prophets and patriarchs having dozens of wives right and they say0.81
02:35:29.980well why can't we do that they look at monogamy and they say well this is just some like white0.60
02:35:37.640people cattle herder step raider thing this has nothing to do with africa this has nothing to do
02:35:44.820with Christianity, we don't want monogamy. China has a long history of polygamy, as I've already
02:35:54.400said, and when Christianity came to China, there were very deep debates about how do the Chinese
02:36:02.860handle that, because on the one hand, if they keep doing their native Chinese traditions, then they're0.61
02:36:09.180know sinning by default because they're doing a gentile thing but the jews have polygamy
02:36:17.260the prophets have polygamy how do you actually narrate this and ironically the debate is ended0.99
02:36:24.940when the communists you know say at gunpoint you know you have one wife or we will kill you0.99
02:36:34.780And, um, so another little thing just to throw in here, because it just popped into my head to bring it up.
02:36:41.440Um, Israel has two chief rabbis, the Sephardi and the Ashkenazi one.
02:36:47.840and the sephardi rabbi is the sephardi chief rabbi i think is in favor of uh bringing back0.97
02:36:55.680polygamy in israel because monogamy is silly white people nonsense from his perspective0.97
02:37:04.800monogamy is white people stuff so let's own it and internalize i just just to say real quick here0.97
02:37:12.400If you're, like, a king and you're super rich, you know, like, you get to have more than one wife when the ethical need of marrying a second one is greater than the immorality of your first wife being let down completely and utterly.0.74
02:37:28.600We're not anywhere near that situation.0.71
02:37:30.660We're not repopulating after a nuclear holocaust.0.64
02:42:30.900racial understanding onto very very ancient things those types of people didn't exist
02:42:41.520to the mind of our ancestors driving down our lore.0.88
02:42:44.880They weren't relevant to our existence.
02:42:48.040Our lore also doesn't speak of aliens or whatever else we might encounter
02:42:54.260as we grow and expand far beyond the boundaries of our understanding.
02:43:00.480what it does separate is the the um middle yard the place that is this protected
02:43:10.880safe place for our people to grow and thrive from the dangerous outside world around it which
02:43:19.120you know in a sense when we're expanding could be asia could be africa could be north america
02:43:25.920you know at a different time could be iberia could be uh italia could be the balkans could
02:43:33.120be any place like that but you know i chris did you have any thoughts on that um
02:43:41.120no exactly what you said i don't i don't believe that if you go far enough east you'll find like
02:43:50.800a land full of extremely large beings with too many arms and too many heads you know um
02:43:59.280you can go on google maps and look like do the street view of china there's there's none of that
02:44:06.240you can find some strange stuff in china but not that strange right
02:44:09.680um as far as like a big place chris you don't know and also to be fair china does not have
02:44:19.360google street view they don't allow it well the only things you would have on there in china is
02:44:24.000people putting pictures up sure because they got they gotta hide their giants from chris
02:44:29.200you can actually drop the the little yellow guy into china and do google street view i you are
02:44:36.000correct nick but the technical nature of that is not worth getting into because the uh medieval
02:44:43.040scandinavian scandinavian nature the medieval scandinavian uh like like understanding of the
02:44:54.640world's geography they understood that if you went into finland and kept going there was like land
02:45:01.280and then eventually you'd hit the water that uh jormungandr like in circles
02:45:07.040like jormagandr is is circling in the water around the habitable zone right um so yeah we
02:45:17.980know what happens if you sail from china eastwards you hit japan then you pick your boat up go across
02:45:23.200the japanese mountains sail east you hit california right so no but as the other
02:45:32.880you go they said you know spiritually yes it is the hinterland around the habitable zone as it were
02:45:42.720so i have a question about the language chart not me but um clinton mcgar
02:45:51.040is the chart saying that all the languages on the chart ultimately descend from anatolian
02:45:56.640languages. Chris? No, no, it's not. And Nick answered this in the chat, but just so you hear
02:46:02.960it from me. No, the Anatolian languages split off really, really early. Our reconstruction of
02:46:12.200Proto-Indo-European is very much the modern ones. Because remember, the first reconstructions of
02:46:19.100Proto-Indo-European were done in the 1800s before we knew DNA existed. So modern reconstruction
02:46:26.620instructions of Proto-Indo-European are very much indebted to the Anatolian languages, which split
02:46:31.180off very, very early. So if you look on the chart, the little now in the lower left, that is where
02:46:40.180it starts. There's however many years, and then the split that results in the Anatolian and everyone0.89
02:46:46.680else language split, then that occurs. But Anatolian is not Proto-Indo-European, although
02:46:52.960it is very similar very very closely related to it and we can particularly
02:46:58.300tell because of where it is different differently from European languages so
02:47:04.060as an example Hittite which if you want to talk about nerdy stuff really should
02:47:09.280be called nation but I digress does not have masculine feminine neuter gender
02:47:15.600it has animate inanimate still whereas I believe it's Louie in had did evolve
02:47:20.860of masculine feminine neuter which is really interesting that that feature was found
02:47:25.660varyingly in the anatolian language family whereas it's just universal in um
02:47:32.540the other indo-european languages right so all right final question another question georgians
02:47:42.620and other people in central asia that lie outside of europe are they considered part of us and an
02:47:48.220aryan people how about north indians where the vettas come from and iran what say you chris
02:47:58.060that depends on who you're talking about and when because this this question asks a few things so
02:48:05.340So regarding the Indian peoples, the Proto-Indo-Iraqs move out of Europe, head east, then start heading south, right?
02:48:22.840And as they do so along the way, they interbreed with varying peoples of non-whiteness, I guess you could call them, the various peoples inhabiting, you know, south of Chelyabinsk.0.81
02:48:42.580And I've seen genetic stuff that would indicate that the peoples who were conquering India were becoming increasingly non-white.0.88
02:48:57.420But again, this gets into like, yeah, we found three dead guys.
02:49:00.640Yeah, but you can't describe an entire population with three dead people.
02:49:06.780You can tell things about them, right?
02:49:11.780I once saw a study, I saw a guy claiming, there's a study studying the Etruscans, right?
02:49:20.420And it was looking at bodies buried in Etruria, and the argument is that these bodies are perfectly indicative of all the Etruscans because they have like 30 bodies over 500 years.
02:49:34.300That's not a statistically valid sample size, guys.
02:50:59.360you know so your question is interesting because
02:51:03.920Sort of, depending on when and depending on where and depending on who, you're pointing out that, yes, these are fringe areas that there is the, like, brackish mixture between Aryan and non-Aryan in these places.
02:51:23.600and you know in the most ancient times and the times of the bettas sure you had a white ruling
02:51:31.620class that were the conquerors they instituted the caste system and maintained that racial
02:51:37.980distinction for quite some time but as it's come down to us today no that's not there and you'll
02:51:44.840notice, the higher caste, the whiter they are. And when I say whiter, the more like us they look.0.85
02:51:57.520You do notice that in Iran. You have a bunch of these people that don't,0.98
02:52:02.960but every now and again, you run into some of these people like, no, that guy looks like us.
02:52:07.800There's isolated populations in areas to where there wasn't a lot of that intermixture and to0.80
02:52:14.660there was kind of a homogenous situation for a long time that are uh you know chechens look1.00
02:52:23.860suspect but a lot of the georgians don't except for stalin we reject him we like take his white0.99
02:52:30.820card from him but um so yeah the question is really dicey there and it's dicey for those
02:52:38.180fringe bordering populations so i don't think that you can
02:52:44.420those are inherently mixed ethnicities that the details really matter but i think that that's
02:52:56.340i don't know i think that's informative and it's kind of part of what we're discussing it's like
02:53:00.180you know were mexicans in the 1530s white or were they injured yes there were whites and there were
02:53:11.700engines now it's all jumbled up and you have enclaves of ethnic spaniards but most of them
02:53:22.180are are intermixed in some way so you know yeah the people on those fringe bordering places you're
02:53:29.220you're gonna find a wide variety of some white people,
02:53:33.660some not white people, and a whole lot of people
02:53:37.000somewhere in between that it's real kind of sketchy.
02:53:43.640Real last question, because it popped up during this.
02:53:45.980Matt, if the South becomes majority ouster troop,
02:53:48.300would it change names from the Bible Belt to the Etta Belt?0.84
02:53:51.060Yes, that's exactly what it would do,0.67