On this episode of The War Room, we have a special guest, Jerome Rivera of The Economist, who joins us to talk about how to win the long war. We also talk about the Coronavirus outbreak in China, the Ukraine crisis, and more.
00:01:48.820I'm putting up 20 or, you know, 30 pieces all day long about an analysis at the top of the scene.
00:01:55.540You can kind of understand what's going on politically, geopolitically, economics, capital markets, politics here or throughout the world.
00:02:03.340The Economist has got how to win the long war.
00:02:07.880Okay, and it's all about a very skewed and very wrong-headed approach to the Ukraine, which is something that we would never agree with about what their policy is towards Russia.
00:02:23.840Earlier in the week, and I kept a stack of stuff here, early in the week, and this is what, remember, during the week I was heckling everybody about this.
00:02:32.220You had, because remember, the $40 billion, the $40 billion of your money that was voted, they first of all had to move the entire discretionary spending bill of $1.5 trillion in the middle of the night.
00:02:45.400It was so important to get the $10 billion to Ukraine for emergency measures, and the Republicans are the ones that agreed and pushed this in the Senate.
00:02:53.820That $10 billion, then it was followed by $40 billion.
00:02:57.720It took the heroic rant, Paul, just to slow it down a bit.
00:02:59.860And, of course, the headline in the, this was in the, I think it was Wednesdays, the Financial Times of London, not gateway pundit, right, not national file.
00:04:30.840What I've warned about for years, and if you saw that movie called The Brink back in 18, by the way, the filmmaker thought we were on the brink then.
00:04:40.180She must be in a complete meltdown now.
00:04:48.140And they were controlling the Eurasian landmass.
00:04:50.040And maybe Pakistan was helping them out or North Korea was helping them out.
00:04:53.220But I said, hey, the key thing here, the one thing we have to avoid, the one most important thing in American geopolitics is never let Russia partner with that axis.
00:05:04.140Never let it partner with China, Iran, and Turkey.
00:05:07.080Because then you're going to have four dominant powers control of the Eurasian landmass.
00:05:10.900And from Japan, Taiwan, India, Australia, all the way to Western Europe, we'll be on the periphery of that.
00:05:16.800And that will change world power dynamics.
00:05:23.500And, of course, The Economist gets it totally wrong because their solution is to essentially get into a military conflict with Russia right now.
00:05:33.140That Russia has to be defeated in the Ukraine.
00:05:35.760And by defeated, I mean take back all the territory in eastern Ukraine, protect the territorial integrity and sovereignty of Ukraine, and self-determination of Ukraine, particularly in eastern Ukraine.
00:05:47.660And kind of what Tony Blinken and Austin said, degradate severely Soviet military power.
00:05:56.080Now, Jerome Revere from the European Parliament is going to be joining us hopefully in a little while, an hour or two.
00:06:01.760But I've got our international editor, Ben Harnwell.
00:06:04.300And, Ben, you've really been on top of this.
00:06:06.920And it's kind of what's shocking, given the money we put into our Rome Bureau, right, the huge capital costs and luxurious surroundings and your big staff, that you've been on top of this ahead of the Telegraph, the Times of London, the French Papers, the Financial Times.
00:06:26.560But particularly the Financial Times and The Economist, how could that be?
00:06:30.440How could a person that's working, let's say, let's say this.
00:06:57.820Before I started formally working here on the war room for you, one of the great things I always admired about what you were doing when you were with the Trump campaign, when you were with the White House, and then when I started listening as an ordinary member of the posse to the war room.
00:07:15.800This is back when I was working on our monastery project.
00:07:18.280It was your capacity to see the data points and to draw the straight line through them.
00:07:26.180And what I have tried to do is to imitate you in that regard.
00:07:30.040So I spend about 10 hours a day just hoovering up all the press.
00:07:36.000I go to like the FT, Reuters, the AP, specifically because I trust their data points.
00:08:22.580And it's what I try to do on my live streams as well, on my contributions to the war room.
00:08:27.600It's to say, look, here are the data points and this is what's going on behind that.
00:08:32.680You pushed out something on your getter feed earlier on in the week, Steve, to do – it was an Axios story about how basically the Democrat Party is imploding.
00:08:45.160It's losing all of its minority support.
00:08:49.760And the only metric he's ahead on is white college graduates.
00:08:54.920How did Axios, whose facts are normally OK, how did they spin that story?
00:09:01.200It was something like the Democrat – in ground change, Democrats move ahead in white college graduate voters.
00:09:12.080That is to say, you read the story and you understand how badly the Democrat Party is in meltdown.
00:09:19.100But they're not going to tell you that.
00:09:20.500They're not going to tell you that explicitly.
00:09:21.740They're going to tell you the fact and let you work – they'll probably bury the lead, but they'll let you work it out for yourselves.
00:09:30.040This is why the war room is doing such important work.
00:09:33.140Another example, Steve, we – I think back on the 5th of July, the war room was the first news organization in the world to talk about the link between Sri Lanka and the Netherlands.
00:09:46.420We were the first – we were the first – I did a number of contributions on the war room.
00:09:53.960And then early on this week, Tucker Carlson, who did a great job, carried it, right?
00:09:59.580But this is why I'm so proud of the war room, because we're the first on these things.
00:10:04.900And we're giving the posse, the war room posse, the correct straight line from the data points.
00:10:13.520We might not have the Fox Empire's media take, but people know that when they listen to us, they might think, oh, this is something like dissonance here about what I'm hearing, because I'm not hearing this on any other media.
00:10:34.680You've been – you're an Englishman, but you've been in Italy for a long time.
00:10:38.520We've worked in the monastery project, and people should understand we're still building our training ground for gladiators, the gladiators of the new populist, nationalist, right?
00:10:49.100But you've been there, and you now have gotten back to Rome, and you head up this.
00:10:52.740You're very engaged in the war room every day and going through the analysis.
00:10:56.340This whole concept, because I think a lot of people in the United States don't – they see the independent nations of Europe, but this thing, the EU we talk about, or Davos and NATO, why is the – the Ukraine is front and center now on MSNBC.
00:11:11.080It's what these guys always do to try to get – try to win elections.
00:11:13.960Why is the EU and why is NATO made such a big deal about it to the fact that we've actually got the economists now saying how to win the long war?
00:11:26.500And they are literally talking about now hunkering down for many years, if not decades, to get Russia out of Ukraine, and they say, hey, if we don't do this, it's all over.
00:11:39.880What is so powerful about the EU and NATO that drives this entire conversation in Europe, and particularly about the war in Ukraine?
00:11:50.280Well, let's wheel back a little bit, Steve, to the COVID crisis.
00:11:56.280We've had two years of governments around the world locking up and imprisoning their own people, giving trillions of dollars away to the government's preferred client base, and possibly $1,000, $2,000 to the average American.
00:12:17.400That is to say, a huge transfer of wealth that makes 2008 blush with shame.
00:12:26.880That is to say, put that together with the populist nationalist revolt that we'd started to see take root right around the world.
00:12:38.040Basically, Steve, our governments were in a crisis of authority.
00:12:44.420People were at a revolutionary point right across the world, and nowhere more was this sentiment felt at the international level, where there is already no democratic mandate and no democratic legitimacy.
00:13:03.140And then comes Russia's invasion into Ukraine.
00:13:07.440And President Volodymyr Zelensky, to give him his credit, has a certain genius when it comes to communication and to tapping in in advance to a message.
00:42:30.400We had, this is why we got out of the TPP before we signed it.
00:42:33.620The administrative state had done a terrible job of once being globalists, didn't put America first.
00:42:38.120Trump said we're going to change that.
00:42:39.100So when you look around that map of the rules-based order, not only did China, the CCP game the system to become a Goliath by stealing our intellectual property, not following any of these trade orders at all, but even the individual trade deals, whether it's for the EU, for a bloc, or for Korea as a country, or Japan, we were upside down.
00:42:58.520So we're underwriting the security, and we're having our jobs and our economy sucked out because this is what the globalists want.
00:43:07.640Stephen, this is something that you've been saying since as long as I've known you.
00:43:13.260The people who govern us are incompetent.
00:43:16.740Now, I've actually formulated this into what I call Harnwell's ninth aphorism, which I shall read to you now.
00:43:28.520It's impossible to know with our sociopathic overlords where their incompetence ends and bad faith begins.
00:43:36.000And that is something I'm pushing out pretty much these days in every single live stream I do, because it's always relevant.
00:43:42.140As the CCP was sending its best end to the negotiating table, before President Xi, you had Hu Jintao, and before Hu Jintao, you had Jiang Zemin, right?
00:43:52.780Say what you like about these being international gangsters, and they are, and crooks which they are, but they know how to negotiate in their, not in China's best interest, not in all the ordinary Lao, Beijing, but in the interest of the party and them personally.
00:44:13.220They know how, I mean, they're the world's best grifters, right?
00:44:19.860Our guys are grifters, but they're incompetent.
00:44:24.060This is the thing that you've always said, and it's really sort of colored the way I see things.
00:44:30.300The people that we send in, look at Jake Sullivan a month or two ago.
00:44:34.680So, um, the people we send in getting lectured, by the way, in, in Rome, he got, he got a struggle session with Tiger Yank, correct?
00:44:46.840I think it would, I think it was so bad.
00:44:48.760I wouldn't even have wanted to be a fly on that wall.
00:44:51.940Um, cause I don't like cruelty to animals.
00:44:54.140Um, so I think I would have naturally opposed the, the, the three hours of bitch slapping China was putting on America's, um, national security advisor.
00:45:05.660It was a cruel, from everything I gather, it was a cruel moment.
00:45:09.940We send in people who are incompetent.
00:45:13.680We have a system talking about this international rules-based system.
00:45:17.360We have a system that, that benefits a certain type of hack.
00:45:21.380Um, it's not, it's not like the normal political system where in politics, it tends to be the most alpha, um, person that gets ahead.
00:45:31.120The person who commands respect and even perhaps a little bit of fear amongst the colleagues.
00:45:36.700That's not what you get in this, in these international bureaucracies.
00:45:40.800You, it, it has a culture all of its own.
00:45:43.960It's people who can gain the system for their own careers.
00:45:47.520Um, but that is perhaps, oh, that's not their only attribute.
00:45:53.560These people talk, when they talk, they talk with authority.
00:45:56.700They have no idea what they're talking about.
00:45:59.800No real sense of intuition and connection between cause and effect.
00:46:04.700Um, but when they talk, they talk with a certain synthetic form of gravitas.
00:46:09.340Um, and coupled with a compliant mainstream media around the world, their words are carried as if this is the truth brought down from the mountain by Moses himself.
00:46:19.960So they have the, they have these two attributes.
00:46:22.600They talk with a certain gravitas, even though they have no idea really what they're talking about.
00:46:27.560And they know how to game the, um, the bureaucratic system that they're, their milieu within which they are.
00:46:34.300They know how to talk to the other bureaucracies around the world.
00:46:38.080Um, what's that intersectionality thing?
00:46:40.320Um, they always talking about in the States, one of the reasons they really hated Trump was that he, he, he walked over there, the little departmental dialogues, um, and little hidden winks and understandings.
00:46:52.140The interagency process, the fetish of the interagency process.
00:46:57.800And it's exactly the same amongst the international bureaucracies.
00:47:00.820And that's why this shtick had been allowed to grow on and develop, um, for, for, for 50 years.
00:47:07.760And Steve, this, this is why they hated Donald Trump so much.
00:47:13.040It's not that he, he's represented a threat in and of itself to the international rules-based system where rules can be good.
00:47:22.460It's the fact that he represented, you know, it's not even the fact that he represented an existential threat to the system,
00:47:29.560which, which had been gamed by China to the detriment of the United States, is that he represented a threat to them.
00:47:37.320It was Donald Trump who started talking about defunding the United Nations and the World Health Organization, right?
00:47:44.340This is hitting these people where it hurts because these people think, oh, you know, I've got my little sinecure that will see me through until I retire and then I'll get my kids, um, place.
00:47:54.320And we'll, you know, we'll be fine in Switzerland or Brussels or where, you know, because as you always say, these people are all the same.