Bannon's War Room - Episode 3138： Elites Removal Of Your Voice

00:00:00.840 So I don't have a highly produced video, but I do have a few words that I think this court

00:00:07.160 should follow and think about in this case. The United States is the oldest modern democracy,

00:00:16.300 well over 200 years, far different than any other country in many ways.

00:00:21.240 And what makes us different is the experiment we launched, which is this thing called elections.

00:00:27.580 We have elections. And that means when it comes to decide as to who should lead our nation,

00:00:34.960 it's the people of the United States of America that get to make those decisions,

00:00:39.440 not six voters in Colorado who've picked and chosen who they want to file a lawsuit against.

00:00:46.880 And this court should not interfere with that fundamental value, that rule of democracy.

00:00:51.800 It's the people who get to decide. And this lawsuit seeks to cancel

00:00:56.880 that principle. This lawsuit is anti-democratic. It looks to extinguish the opportunity,

00:01:04.840 extinguish it, the opportunity for millions of Coloradans, Colorado Republicans and unaffiliated

00:01:11.720 voters to be able to choose and vote for the presidential candidate they want. In fact,

00:01:17.760 the leading Republican presidential candidates. And by many measures, the candidate, you know,

00:01:23.640 most likely to win the presidency. They try and they want to extinguish that opportunity by preventing

00:01:29.680 him from running for office. It is anti-democratic. This is a case of lawfare that seeks to interfere

00:01:36.560 with the presidential election. We argue here that this at its basest level, this is election

00:01:44.040 interference. The petitioners here, the six voters, have appointed themselves private attorney generals.

00:01:50.920 They can pick and choose and file lawsuits against whom they seek to disqualify.

00:01:55.720 And they rely on exceptionally weak and, frankly, in some cases, fringe legal and logical theories

00:02:02.960 to try and tilt the playing field of this election by wiping out President Trump's ability to run for

00:02:09.460 election well before anyone has an opportunity to vote. They're asking today for a number of historical

00:02:16.300 firsts. First, this is the first they are asking this court to be the first ever in American history,

00:02:23.880 in American history, to disqualify a presidential candidate under Section 3 of the 14th Amendment.

00:02:30.320 I point, we've pointed the court, I believe, to, or we will, Horace Greeley, who ran in 1872

00:02:37.080 as a Democratic presidential candidate. He had paid for Jefferson Thomas's bail. He was roundly accused,

00:02:44.460 loudly accused, of giving aid and comfort to the enemies of the United States, shortly after the Civil War,

00:02:50.460 when he ran. Lots of debate on that issue. No one ever once thought of trying to disqualify him from voting.

00:02:57.900 They took their arguments to the people for them to make that decision. Eugene Debs,

00:03:03.100 Socialist Party USA candidate in four elections, in 1920, ran from jail. He had been convicted of sedition

00:03:14.300 for giving aid and comfort to enemies during the First World War by trying to stop military recruitment. He

00:03:20.700 was convicted of that. He ran from jail. He was never disqualified. No attempt was made to disqualify him

00:03:30.380 under Section 3 of the 14th Amendment.

00:03:35.740 The case of Eugene Debs is often regarded as a low point in American history, a low point when it comes to First Amendment protections.

00:03:44.060 And for good reason. People should be able to run for office and shouldn't be punished for their speech.

00:03:51.020 The petitioners asked this court to be the first state court

00:03:54.700 in American history to disqualify a presidential candidate. They are asking for the first time in

00:04:01.660 American history to disqualify any federal candidate, a state court to disqualify any federal candidate.

00:04:08.940 This is the first time in Colorado history anyone's ever tried to disqualify

00:04:12.940 a presidential candidate under the 14th Amendment.

00:04:15.740 Asking the Secretary of State to go back and research a candidate's behavior, that's also a first.

00:04:26.860 Never been asked or demanded before.

00:04:31.900 Even right now, there are 50, about 50 cases, either pending or happened nationwide, specifically attacking

00:04:38.620 President Trump. This is not a new tactic.

00:04:40.460 This is the first where a dismissal is not automatically, I shouldn't say automatically,

00:04:48.140 but promptly been granted because of the weakness of so many of these arguments.

00:04:53.980 They're asking for the first time that the January 6th report be treated as evidence

00:04:59.660 in this court. In a court of law, that politicized hearing, that's what they're asking, is that this

00:05:04.860 court rely upon that as evidence. And frankly, they're asking this court to be the first in the

00:05:10.220 country ever to embrace a number of legal theories that have never been accepted by a court, state or

00:05:16.460 federal. There's a lot of firsts they're trying in this case. They're legal theories. I mean, we're

00:05:23.340 arguing we shouldn't even be here. And we've argued that multiple times. This is a federal issue,

00:05:29.340 perhaps the most important federal issue we can have. And it's for Congress to set these standards,

00:05:35.500 for Congress to provide guidance, not for the petitioners to come up with theories and try and

00:05:40.780 convince you that they may be right. We've argued that the 14th Amendment's not self-executing and

00:05:49.820 the preemption of political question. And we understand this court's ruled against us in

00:05:53.740 in every instance. But nearly every court that's ever looked at presidential qualifications,

00:06:01.100 and I'm not just talking about issues involving President Trump.

00:06:11.100 You should just expect this to be regular records.

00:06:15.020 I live in Denver, Your Honor. I understand sirens, unfortunately.

00:06:19.100 I don't really like this court because it's right next to all of us.

00:06:25.180 So it's not just President Trump. You may recall that there was a little bit of controversy about

00:06:30.780 President Obama's citizenship. And there was some controversy about candidate Senator and

00:06:36.940 presidential candidate McCain's citizenship. And there was controversy about Senator and

00:06:43.980 presidential candidate Cruz's citizenship. And there's one or two instances where those went to trial.

00:06:52.780 But the vast majority of them were properly dismissed. The overwhelming weight of evidence

00:06:59.980 is that this case should not be here. Now, I want to talk a little bit about some of these

00:07:05.580 specific claims. The claim that there was an insurrection. What constitutes an insurrection really

00:07:12.940 needs to be grounded in historical usage. Because if you don't ground it in historical usage,

00:07:19.260 you're just making it up. Now, I'm not accusing the court of making it up. I'm accusing the petitioners

00:07:23.660 of making it up. But look, you will hear from Professor Dalahante that there are lots of definitions of what an

00:07:31.580 insurrection is. It's been going on, that word's been in English usage for a couple hundred years,

00:07:37.820 probably more. I haven't quite looked at the etymology of it. And there are a lot of definitions.

00:07:45.660 Your Honor, I submit I could construct a legal argument or a law review article defending pretty

00:07:51.420 much any one of those definitions. And when there are numerous definitions, that means there's really

00:07:57.100 none. You might as well pick a definition out of the hat. And the petitioners have picked a definition

00:08:02.460 out of the hat that suits them. That's their job. I get it. But frankly, they're making up the standard

00:08:09.740 so that it fits the facts of January 6th. And I'm sure they'll try and come up with an argument that it'll

00:08:15.500 just fit the facts of January 6th and it'll never fit any other facts and there can never be any

00:08:20.140 consequences. But the bottom line is they're making it up and they're picking a definition out of the hat.

00:08:27.340 What constitutes an insurrection needs to be grounded in historical usage? Because that's what the law

00:08:31.340 demands. That's what equality under the law demands. That's what fairness. So we understand what the

00:08:35.660 standards are by which we comport our behavior. Not post facto making it up to try and figure that out.

00:08:43.260 The term engage. The term engage means to do something. Frankly, no one really knows what that

00:08:50.540 means. But I think we can all agree it means to do something. That's what the word engage means.

00:08:56.220 Okay? There's substantial historical evidence that engage does not mean mere incitement through words.

00:09:03.420 It doesn't mean that. And frankly, President Trump didn't engage. He didn't carry a pitchfork to the

00:09:09.340 Capitol grounds. He didn't lead a charge. He didn't get in a fist fight with legislators. He didn't goad

00:09:14.540 President Biden into a going out back and having a fight. He gave a speech in which he asked people

00:09:22.060 to peacefully and patriotically go to the Capitol to protest. Now, I understand that there are several

00:09:29.180 experts that are going to testify. And one's going to testify that President Trump, he just didn't do

00:09:34.300 enough. He should have done more. Now, that's a case of Monday morning quarterbacking. But he's saying,

00:09:41.180 you should have done more. You didn't do enough. Should have done more. Should have done more stuff

00:09:46.860 earlier. I can come up with all kinds of theories this professor will say as to why you should have

00:09:51.820 done enough stuff. And that professor is no doubt a learned man and very thoughtful on this. But his

00:09:58.460 basic argument when it comes down to it is they're claiming President Trump was negligent.

00:10:02.940 Now, we reject that factual claim, of course. And you'll hear the evidence that that characterization

00:10:08.620 is completely wrong. But more fundamentally, the entire theory is wrong. The failure to do something

00:10:14.540 is the opposite of the word engage. It's the opposite of the word engage. And we've argued engage

00:10:23.420 requires specific intent. Someone doesn't just sort of stumble into starting an insurrection. They have to

00:10:29.580 have the intent to do that. And you'll hear evidence that President Trump took very specific

00:10:36.860 actions to try to prevent violence, to take precautions that he didn't want there to be violence on January

00:10:45.100 6th. And on January 6th, he called for peace. And he used the word peace at least four times in his speech

00:10:52.780 at the ellipse and two tweets and a video message. So he asked for peace. Now, the, um, the petitioners have

00:11:01.740 played a couple videos. I've been here before your honor. I promise it's going to be an equal

00:11:15.980 opportunity problem. I'm assuming your clerks are not timing, uh, taking time against me when the sirens

00:11:22.380 go by. Stop that timer, please.

00:11:24.380 So my next point is, thank God we have a first amendment. I'm very thankful for the first

00:11:33.580 amendment. Spent most of my career defending the first amendment. Now, there's a reason it's the

00:11:37.820 first, not the second, not the eighth. As I debate with my friends who like the second amendment,

00:11:44.220 it's the first amendment and it's free speech. And I referred to Eugene Debs before. Eugene Debs was

00:11:50.140 thrown in jail. He had to run for president from jail because of his speech. And it's properly

00:11:59.340 condemned that case today. And in fact, um, even then his sentence was commuted very shortly after

00:12:06.940 the, uh, the election of 2020. None of president Trump's speech ever called for violence, just the

00:12:15.340 opposite. None of it ever called for insurrection. Did it call for political pressure? Yeah. Did it

00:12:22.940 use a metaphor to fight in the political context? Yes. And I don't think even the petitioners would

00:12:29.580 allege that president Trump, when he says fight, he wants to get into a fist fight with people. Okay.

00:12:35.580 None of his speech called for the overthrow of government. None of it. Any objective reading,

00:12:41.180 the plain language of his speech was clearly not directed towards violence. Now the petitioners

00:12:47.500 are going to have an expert, an expert on speech, an expert who says right-wing speech. He understands

00:12:57.740 what right-wing speech, right-wing extremist speech really means. And he's basically going to argue

00:13:03.580 when you strip away all of the academic language and you look at what he's saying, he's going to say,

00:13:08.460 look, president Trump used a bunch of dog whistles. And of course, a dog whistle is a whistle that

00:13:13.980 has a very high pitch that humans can't hear, but dogs can hear. Okay. And he's going to say,

00:13:19.900 president Trump like had this sort of dog whistle. I don't know if he'll use the phrase dog whistle,

00:13:24.540 but he used a speech that really these far right-wing extremists could understand and mobilize on.

00:13:30.220 But us mere mortals, well, we don't, we missed it. We didn't understand it. But those folks

00:13:37.020 understood it. And he's going to say that normal sort of commonly used English doesn't count

00:13:44.300 because there's this subjective special language out there that is sort of underneath it all that

00:13:50.700 has been unearthed by the sociologist. And only right-wing extremists and people very learned in

00:13:58.060 sociology and right-wing extremism can understand. And he's going to say that with his expertise,

00:14:05.740 he's been able to decipher what we normal mortals cannot. And his decipherment is going to basically

00:14:12.860 say that president Trump was really ordering people to be violent. Even when he said peaceful

00:14:18.220 patriotically, even when he sent out tweets that said, be peaceful, that's not really what he meant.

00:14:23.900 And the right-wing, those right-wingers knew it. Last month, the G20 announced a plan to impose

00:14:29.980 digital currencies and digital IDs on their respective populations. No, I'm not making that

00:14:36.700 up. That is a fact. Central bank digital currencies essentially allow the government to track every

00:14:42.780 purchase you make. They could even allow officials to prohibit you from purchasing certain products or

00:14:49.340 easily freeze or seize part or all of your money. Let that sink in for a second. In essence, they

00:14:58.700 enable the government to take more control over your personal finances. Concerned Americans are

00:15:04.220 diversifying their assets into physical gold with the help of Birch Gold Group. If you want a physical

00:15:11.100 asset held in a tax-sheltered retirement account, you should call Birch Gold 2. But learn for yourself.

00:15:18.540 Text Bannon, B-A-N-N-O-N to 989898 and they'll send you a free info kit on gold. The easiest way to

00:15:25.500 become a Birch Gold customer, if you have an IRA or 401k from a previous employer just gathering dust,

00:15:32.220 Birch Gold can help you convert it into IRA into gold. And you don't pay a penny out of pocket. Let me

00:15:40.780 repeat that. You don't pay a penny out of pocket. Text Bannon to 989898. Claim your free info kit on gold.

00:15:47.660 Then call Birch. Because if digital currency becomes a reality, and trust me, they're on the

00:15:54.060 path to make it so, it'll be nice to have some gold to fall back on. It's only worked for 5,000 years

00:16:02.220 of mankind's history. Let Birch Gold work for you. Bannon, 989898. Text it right now.

00:16:09.900 He meant something else. This turns our American values on their head. It is fundamentally anti-First

00:16:21.500 Amendment. He is saying that when we look at political speech, we don't look at it in objective

00:16:28.060 way. We don't look at the plain meaning of the words. We look at this secret, hidden interpretation

00:16:36.140 that no one in this courtroom or, well, I mean, maybe someone in this courtroom besides him can

00:16:40.540 understand. Maybe he thinks I understand it and no one else can. I will submit I was in Georgia on

00:16:47.020 January 6th helping with an election. But the right wing can understand it, but no one else. That is

00:16:54.140 anti-First Amendment. In fact, that has been soundly rejected by our courts and properly so.

00:17:03.340 We look at what people say as we commonly understand them. And the common understanding of

00:17:09.660 peacefully and patriotic means don't commit violence and support your country. That's what it means.

00:17:18.220 Let's talk about the history and meaning of Section 3.

00:17:20.860 You're going to hear from two professors.

00:17:26.300 You've gotten about 40,000 words of briefing on sort of the meaning of Section 3.

00:17:33.580 You've rendered an opinion against us. And I understand. That's a conditional opinion.

00:17:39.420 You want more evidence. And you want to hear more argument. And that's what we're providing.

00:17:42.940 And so I'm going to ask you three things. All right? First, I'm going to ask you to reconsider

00:17:48.700 your footnote 5 and your order. I'm not, Your Honor, because I'm not going to take up the time.

00:17:58.220 But I'm simply going to ask you to reconsider it. Okay? I'll write it down.

00:18:02.220 Thank you. And I think those cases deserve a much closer reading. And I respectfully say,

00:18:07.580 I believe that they were improperly mischaracterized. Okay? So that's my first request.

00:18:13.580 My second request is, when you look at the experts in our position, and I think the court

00:18:20.300 ultimately agrees, is that they're testifying as to what the law is and what the history is.

00:18:25.020 And Your Honor rightfully recognized that there's other folks out there.

00:18:28.460 So I'm just going to give you a lineup of the other folks. On one side, the petitioners cite

00:18:34.460 Baud, and Paulson, and Graber. Three professors. Baud, Paulson, and Graber. And on our side,

00:18:42.140 we cite Tillman, and Blackman, and Lash. And I'd like you to take particular care to look at Lash's,

00:18:49.180 Professor Kurt Lash's articles. And because he's done a more thorough analysis of the history behind

00:18:59.580 the 14th Amendment and Section 3, the congressional debates, and the ratification debates. Not just

00:19:05.740 what legislators said, but how it was understood by the public as well. You're going to get an overview

00:19:10.780 of that. You're going to get argument on that. But I'm going to urge you to take a look at those others

00:19:15.020 closely. And third, as we've said, we think this is legal argument and not appropriate for rules of

00:19:21.660 evidence. It's in. The court will make good, will provide its analysis. And we have talked to the

00:19:32.060 petitioners about just frankly including the expert reports, the law professors, as demonstrative

00:19:37.580 exhibits to review. That's fine. I think what you're going to see is when I talked about the lack of

00:19:44.780 firsts. There's a reason presidential candidates have not been knocked off or no one's even

00:19:52.540 attempted to under Section 3 of the 14th Amendment. Okay. There's a reason this is a unique case. There's a

00:19:59.340 reason cases like this have either never been brought or quickly rejected. There's reasons for that. And

00:20:05.820 the reasons are grounded in the text and the language of the 14th Amendment. You're going to hear about the

00:20:12.460 secretary's authority from Ms. Hillary Rudy. This is sort of an interesting case in the sense that

00:20:19.260 my understanding is petitioners are calling Ms. Rudy and haven't even spoken to her. And we haven't even

00:20:24.060 spoken to her. So it's going to be an adventure. But having had some experience in that office,

00:20:32.620 I'm confident you will see that this case is a radical outlier from the secretary's past practice,

00:20:39.020 in addition, obviously, to the 14th Amendment. Let's talk a little bit about the evidence before

00:20:44.540 the court today or this next week. To be sure, the petitioners have spent about 10 months preparing

00:20:52.460 their case. As you have described, we've talked about this as a mantra. I'll submit volume does not

00:21:00.140 equal quality. A lot of attorneys does not equal a good argument. A lot of stuff in front of the court

00:21:08.540 does not equal good evidence. The court shouldn't confuse a vigorous effort with a good argument or with

00:21:17.420 good evidence. If anything, the fact that they have to put on so much and make one inference and pile one

00:21:26.700 argument on top of another shows the weakness of their case, not strength. After all the time they

00:21:32.860 have prepared this case, this is what they've got. They've got the January 6th report. They got two

00:21:39.820 police officers out of hundreds, perhaps thousands of police officers there. And not commanders, but two

00:21:47.580 police officers. And they've got three professors. Two law professors to testify about the law and the

00:22:00.700 sociologists to testify about the coded language. That's what they've got. And they've got one house

00:22:07.100 member. I'm sorry, one house member. So that's what they've got. And at the end of the day, the start of the day,

00:22:14.780 this case is frankly about the January 6th report. This is their effort to the court to endorse the January 6th

00:22:23.660 report. That's what it comes down to. The video montage with overlaid sound that you saw in this opening

00:22:30.780 argument, that's a pretty good production. And the reason it's a good production is because the January 6th committee

00:22:37.900 hired a television producer to produce this stuff for primetime TV.

00:22:45.740 The January 6th report made 411 findings and petitioners have asked to introduce 408 of them,

00:22:54.220 many of which this court has allowed conditionally and allowed argument against. But this report is

00:23:01.340 poison. And I mean poisoned very bluntly. It is a one sided political document of cherry picked

00:23:08.940 information, no adversarial process with a preordained conclusion. It omits a number of other arguments.

00:23:15.980 It ignored other witnesses before it. And it ignores other explanations and causes. It has very much.

00:23:27.180 Let me ask you this honor. And obviously I'm asking rhetorically. If someone walked into court and said,

00:23:33.260 hey, here's how this court case is going to work. I, on my side, the prosecutor, I'm going to get

00:23:42.060 all kinds of time, years, year and a half to investigate witnesses, to take statements, to gather evidence.

00:23:51.500 Okay. And people who strongly disagree with my viewpoint, they get no time whatsoever.

00:23:59.660 They don't get to interview any witnesses. They don't get to get any evidence. They get none of that.

00:24:04.780 But I get all of it. I get to do all of that. And on top of that, you're not going to hear the case.

00:24:11.740 I'm going to choose my own panel. I'm going to choose my own judges.

00:24:14.780 I'm going to choose my Democrats and a couple of Republicans who agree with me. I get to choose them.

00:24:22.860 And then what I'm going to do is I'm going to hire a television producer.

00:24:27.260 And I'm going to time this for an election. And I'm going to put all that out there.

00:24:32.060 And I want you to render legal opinions based on the quality of that evidence.

00:24:35.100 I think you and everyone else would be rightfully, would be repulsed by that process.

00:24:43.340 But that's what the January 6th process was. And you are going to hear from a congressman involved

00:24:48.780 in this, just the deficiencies and the problems of that January 6th process.

00:24:56.220 And so what the petitioners are doing is they're trying to shove this January 6th report as evidence

00:25:02.860 for this court. They're asking the court to endorse that process. They're asking the court

00:25:10.620 to endorse that one-sided poisonous report. There is a reason Democrats, for the large part,

00:25:21.340 love that report and cite it. And there's a reason Republicans, for the most part, hate that report

00:25:27.900 and condemn it. And the reason why is that report is a political document, first and foremost.

00:25:37.420 This, however, is a court of law. Like you, we, like the petitioners, attorneys, have spent the majority,

00:25:45.340 perhaps all of our adult working lives, as officers of the court, defending one of the greatest American

00:25:52.220 institutions, one of the greatest world institutions, is fair courts that conduct themselves according

00:25:57.740 to the rule of evidence, that work hard to come with good decisions. That's what we do. That's what

00:26:04.540 courts do. That is not what the January 6th report was. And we should hold ourselves here to a much higher

00:26:12.300 standard than that poisonous January 6th report. We should allow in only real evidence that's subject to

00:26:22.060 cross-exam. It is properly authenticated by people who actually have knowledge of that. That's what

00:26:30.620 this court should be about, not importing a bunch of stuff from the January 6th report that really has

00:26:39.020 little, if any, credibility. You'll also hear from two police officers, and we want to be very respectful

00:26:46.460 of those police officers. But like any human being, they had a very limited viewpoint on what happened on

00:26:51.340 January 6th. And we're going to ask that you limit the testimony to actually what the officers knew,

00:26:58.140 not what they guessed at, not what they summarized, but what they knew and what they saw,

00:27:03.580 their actual experience. And we'll point out that, frankly, I mean, there's a reason these officers are

00:27:08.380 here, and it's because their intense dislike for President Trump. You're going to hear from a member of

00:27:13.740 the House of Representatives, and we're going to give you a member of the House of Representatives, too.

00:27:17.660 There you have it, Your Honor. And then you're going to hear from three experts from the petitioners.

00:27:26.140 Two are going to testify to what the law is, and then you're going to have the sociologists

00:27:31.180 we've already spoken about. That's it. That's their evidence. At the end of the day, their evidence is

00:27:36.140 a January 6th report. Everything they bring in is part of the January 6th report. I won't say everything,

00:27:41.820 but the vast majority of it. Our evidence. I've refrained from naming witnesses. I'll continue to

00:27:50.220 follow that convention. But you're going to hear that President Trump took very specific precautions

00:27:55.100 to prevent violence on that day as president. You're going to hear that the organizers of the rally at the

00:28:02.140 Ellipse took precautions to avoid violence or inflammatory rhetoric. You're going to hear that

00:28:08.140 the rally at the Ellipse was peaceful, that there was no violence. You didn't have a crowd that was

00:28:14.460 intent on violence before or after President Trump's speech. You're going to see that President Trump's

00:28:21.740 communications on January 6th call for peace. They call for respect of the police. Certainly two police

00:28:29.020 officers that were involved in violence. You're going to see that from them. But we also have at least

00:28:34.220 one witness who's going to say, look, I didn't, I saw very, very little. I saw a peaceful crowd.

00:28:41.020 Nearly everyone was peaceful. That's a different perspective. And so it's impossible, we think,

00:28:47.020 to say the mob did this, the mob did that, the mob, the mob. There are a lot of people with a lot of

00:28:54.780 different actions, a lot of behavior. There was not a mind meld mob that President Trump supposedly

00:29:01.900 mobilized. And then you're going to hear about how the January 6th report was a completely partisan,

00:29:09.260 unreliable document. This case here is about President Trump's right to run for office. That right is the

00:29:17.980 flip side of the coin for people to be able to vote for the candidate of their choice. People can't

00:29:25.420 vote without candidates. Candidates aren't really candidates if people can't vote for them. It's the

00:29:29.500 same side of the coin. And so we've talked about the right for the people of Colorado to vote for

00:29:37.100 someone for office. And that's very closely bound with the right of Donald J. Trump to be able to run

00:29:43.820 for office. And the petitioners seek to deny millions of Coloradans that right. And they seek

00:29:50.380 to deny President Trump his rights. Now, I understand the posture that this is merely a

00:29:56.380 state disqualification case. When's the last time you checked the legal title to your home?

00:30:01.900 Why? Because most victims of home title theft don't know they're a victim until it's too late.

00:30:09.660 Like this homeowner. Check this out. She was getting ready for a home remodel when everything

00:30:14.540 got shut down. She discovered her property wasn't in her name anymore. She was a victim of a devastating

00:30:20.540 crime called home title theft. A criminal had forged the deed to her home and took over as the new owner.

00:30:27.900 Now she's fighting back to get her home back. This is why I say if you own a home or a property,

00:30:35.420 get home title lock. Your home property and equity are the most valuable assets you have. By the way,

00:30:42.220 there's reported 80 to 90 percent of your net worth of average American's net worth is in their home.

00:30:49.340 And home title lock helps you protect them. Home title lock puts a 24-7 shield around your home's title.

00:30:55.980 Let me repeat. A 24-hour, seven-day-a-week, 365-day shield around your home's title.

00:31:04.780 The instant they detect activity or tampering, they help shut it down fast. First things first,

00:31:11.900 you need to verify you aren't already a victim of home title theft. Find out for free with a sign up

00:31:18.460 when you use promo code Bannon. That's promo code Bannon at HomeTitleLock.com. Go to HomeTitleLock.com,

00:31:26.380 promo code Bannon. And when you sign up, your first 30 days of protection are free. Do this today at

00:31:35.260 HomeTitleLock.com, promo code Bannon. Protect yourself. Do it today. Take action.

00:31:42.380 And it's not. This is a 14th Amendment case. And it's dressed up as a state proceeding. 95 percent of

00:31:51.660 the evidence is the 14th Amendment. Maybe it's 92 percent. But the overwhelming majority of the

00:31:57.900 evidence in this case is about the 14th Amendment. And the overwhelming argument is about the 14th

00:32:05.820 Amendment. And the consequences are about the 14th Amendment. And it asks the court to interpret the

00:32:11.020 14th Amendment. That's what this case is about. If it looks like a duck, if it walks like a duck,

00:32:16.380 it quacks like a duck, it's a duck. There's a 14th Amendment case. Okay? And so I want to bring,

00:32:22.460 it's a constitutional case. It's sort of what lawyers dream of being able to litigate.

00:32:28.140 We don't dream in law school of litigating Section 1204 qualifications. We dream of litigating

00:32:34.700 constitutional law. And that's what this is. It's a constitutional case. And so I'm going to bring

00:32:39.900 you to my last point. So I've been, I'm old enough and overweight enough to why I've been litigating

00:32:50.300 election law in the state of Colorado for well over two decades. And this is the third presidential

00:32:57.100 candidate ballot access case I have litigated. Now obviously I'm familiar with the law nationwide.

00:33:03.980 And there is a rule in election law. And that rule, it's called the rule of democracy. Maybe I'm

00:33:10.300 making it up a little bit. But it's the rule of democracy. And that rule says that when something

00:33:17.500 is close and when there's a unique and strange argument on the other side, okay, when there's

00:33:23.660 a question or an ambiguity or a stretch, the rule of democracy says we err on the side of letting people

00:33:31.660 vote. That's what the rule says. Now we've made preemption arguments. We've argued about holding

00:33:40.940 office that the 14th Amendment applies to holding office so that Congress has the choice to remove

00:33:46.620 a disqualification. We shouldn't short circuit that. We've made arguments about officer of the United

00:33:52.140 States. We've made arguments about engagement, insurrection, First Amendment, all of that stuff.

00:33:56.220 And to date, the court has either deferred those or oftentimes ruled against us. But what I'm asking

00:34:03.660 this court to do is apply the rule of democracy. When something's close or ambiguous or a stretch

00:34:09.500 or an unusual argument, you don't interpret it as a way to cancel the opportunity for people to

00:34:17.020 choose their representatives. You don't interpret it as a way to cancel the ability of millions of

00:34:23.580 people to be able to vote for the leader of the free world. What you do is you interpret it to allow

00:34:30.220 people to vote. Because there is no doubt that the six electors don't like President Trump.

00:34:39.020 And I would submit that maybe their attorneys don't like President Trump. And they're experts. And I know

00:34:45.180 the police officers don't like President Trump. They don't like President Trump. And they have every right

00:34:50.380 to vote against him. But there are millions of people in Colorado and across this country who

00:34:57.100 are inspired by President Trump, who view them as, who view him as someone who protects their interests

00:35:04.700 and who are going to, and is going to create a nation, help build a nation that they want to live in

00:35:09.580 and that they want their children to live in. Millions of people look to him for hope and inspiration.

00:35:14.140 And who are the petitioners to prevent those people from not being able to vote on that? Who are they?

00:35:24.300 Well, we're arguing that they shouldn't be able to stop those votes. That when millions of people are

00:35:30.220 inspired by a candidate, and millions of people may hate that candidate, what we need to do and what the

00:35:37.020 rule of democracy says and what makes America great is we get to vote on that person.

00:35:40.940 We don't stifle it. We don't short circuit it through a court proceeding.

00:35:47.180 We're confident that that's what the framers thought about when they drafted the 14th Amendment.

00:35:55.420 We're confident that that's historical usage. We're confident that our legal arguments and our

00:36:00.780 evidence are appropriate and carry the day. And part of the reason we're confident is because those

00:36:07.020 arguments and that evidence fits within the long tradition of American democracy and of American

00:36:12.860 law to allow an election to go forward rather than short circuiting it and engaging in what we would

00:36:18.780 consider anti-democratic behavior. Thank you very much, Your Honor.

00:36:22.700 Okay. You've heard the opening arguments, and this is going to be a very important trial.

00:36:34.540 Here's the reason. It is a total kangaroo court. This 14th Amendment, as President Trump's lawyer argued,

00:36:43.660 it's a 14th Amendment case. Constitutional case should be in a federal court, which wouldn't take it

00:36:48.460 because it's so ludicrous. But you've got a radical judge and the links to her radicalness.

00:36:54.220 Laura Loomers got up and I think Grace and Mo have it on the up on the site. You should read her

00:37:02.300 her links to Judge, I think it's Sarah Wallace, who actually gave money, gave money to a group that's

00:37:11.100 trying to keep Trump off the ballot. And her excuses, well, I didn't really understand that's

00:37:15.260 what they were doing. She did not recuse herself. The Trump lawyer has been working on this, and this

00:37:19.500 is why this is kind of like a summer storm out of nowhere. They had all types of motions

00:37:27.740 before her and thought this thing would not start for a while, and she just ruled against it.

00:37:33.740 Including her today, she opened up and said she's not going to recuse it. Now, look,

00:37:37.900 this has nothing to do with the law. What you're watching is the demise of this country.

00:37:46.860 These radicals, these globalist radicals that are trying to destroy this country by the invasion

00:37:53.020 they are allowing to happen, and also the global turmoil they're causing by sending hundreds of

00:38:01.820 billions of dollars over to the child trafficking and money laundering operation in Ukraine.

00:38:07.260 These radicals, and this is what happened in Colorado when you had a billionaire who wanted

00:38:13.900 to push the LGBTQ agenda, turned Colorado to a purple state. They control the appeals court.

00:38:22.780 They control the Supreme Court. Mike Davis laid out, this is a bench trial. This is not a jury trial.

00:38:28.460 There's no jury there for President Trump's lawyers to address. This judge is made up her mind.

00:38:34.620 You're seeing a classic, and people have never thought this would ever happen in the United

00:38:38.220 States of America. You're seeing between New York City on the financial trial and in Denver, Colorado,

00:38:47.660 on this made up ballot access to the 14th Amendment, accusing President Trump of actually

00:38:55.020 being an insurrectionist. This wild legal theory that as soon as it came up, and remember,

00:39:01.340 please always remember, don't forget this. We're not going to bury the lead here.

00:39:07.020 All of this was done by quote-unquote Republican billionaires that put the money up for Leonard

00:39:14.620 Leo and that crowd over the Federalist Society to write the bogus initial constitution with two,

00:39:20.860 you know, unknown constitutional lawyers that Alan Dershowitz blow the water the day it came out.

00:39:25.900 Because the day it came out, I said, I can smell it. I smell the rat. This is, they can't beat him

00:39:32.380 with Nikki Haley. They can't beat him with DeSantis. They're going to try everything. Understand this.

00:39:39.260 There is nothing the elite class will not do to take your voice away. There is nothing they will

00:39:47.340 not do. They will break any law. They will go against any custom and tradition we've ever had.

00:39:55.340 And to me, this only makes Trump more powerful for all his imperfections, for all his imperfections,

00:40:03.020 because it's not Trump, it's you. They are scared to death of your ascendant power. What just happened

00:40:09.660 in the House, they're petrified of it. They're petrified of it. What you're seeing in Denver now

00:40:16.700 is the manifestation of the radical left that's on it. But it was started, it was started by the

00:40:21.980 same people that are backing Glenn Youngkin, the same people that were originally and back at DeSantis,

00:40:26.940 the same people putting money into Nikki Haley. At any level, and in any venue,

00:40:36.780 they will come after to stop your champion because he puts you in the room and empowers you.

00:40:44.700 This was all, let me repeat this, this was all started by a bogus, half-baked argument made coming

00:40:54.540 out of the Federal Society, and Leonard Leo's crew, and the bayoners that back him, who basically

00:41:01.660 want courts to rule in favor of their corporations and their money making. They do not, they care as

00:41:10.220 little about this republic as the radical left. Let me repeat that. They care as little about this

00:41:17.740 republic. They gloss it over in a more, oh, you know, we're for limited government, we're for fiscal

00:41:24.460 responsibility. They're not for any of it. They're not for any of it. They're as in on the fix as the

00:41:31.100 most radical Democrats, led by the neoliberal neocon cheerleading squad over at the Murdoch News Network.

00:41:40.060 That's why this in Denver, this is not going to, okay, here's what's going to happen. She's going to rule

00:41:48.140 that Trump's an insurrectionist and going to recommend to the Secretary of State immediately with a court order

00:41:56.060 that President Trump be removed from the ballot for 2024. A rigged appeals court controlled by radical Democrats

00:42:04.940 is going to support that. And then a Supreme Court also with radical judges is going to support that.

00:42:12.620 So the state of Colorado's legal system will have spoken up to the Supreme Court.

00:42:18.140 Oh, and they're going to slow walk that. They're going to slow walk the appeals and they're going to

00:42:21.580 slow walk going to the Supreme Court because they want to drag this. This is not a legal argument.

00:42:27.540 It's going to be a media and a political argument. They want to drag this as far into next year as

00:42:33.000 possible. Number one, to give DeSantis and Nikki Haley and soon to be Glenn Youngkin. Oh, well,

00:42:39.280 Trump's going to be off the ballot. I have to be the candidate. Trump's not even going to be in the

00:42:43.100 ballot and other states are going to come up. They're going to see Colorado. Other states are

00:42:46.160 going to come up. It's all going to happen. He has to be off the ballot. This is going to empower

00:42:50.820 the neoliberal neocon phony Republicans coming forward. Look at this. Colorado did it.

00:42:58.000 As Mike Davis said, this will be struck down in the Supreme Court. But hey, baby,

00:43:01.400 you got to get there. That's going to be a federal. Maybe you go directly to the Supreme

00:43:05.520 Court, but Colorado is good. They're not going to expect. Let's make these decisions right away.

00:43:11.120 This judge will rule on this this week or next week. The appeals court is not going to sit there.

00:43:15.620 They're going to slow walk it. So it takes longer to get to the Supreme Court. Will it be overturned?

00:43:22.840 Obviously. As Dershowitz and other constitutional lawyers tell us, and we'll have many of those

00:43:28.060 experts on this week, but I want you to hear the opening argument. The opening argument is the

00:43:32.720 same nonsense you heard on the J6. Same nonsense you heard on the J6. That left very little impression

00:43:39.320 with the American people, as we know from the polling. But this is to take whatever they got

00:43:43.820 and to try to, and information warfare, weaponize it so it goes into primary season and goes into

00:43:49.000 next year and just puts a doubt on people's minds. Was Trump even going to be on the ballot?

00:43:52.520 How can possibly Trump win if Colorado, if he's not even on the ballot in certain states?

00:43:58.080 Because sure as the turning of the earth, other states like, let me pick a couple of random

00:44:04.720 ones. Oh, I don't know, Michigan, right? We have that great crew in Michigan, Secretary

00:44:10.900 of State, Attorney General, Governor. Hey, you're going to see some other states jump in right

00:44:19.140 here. Oh, Trump's off the ballot. Nikki Haley's going to sit there with their knitted brow,

00:44:23.360 bird brain, and sit there and go, you know, attack on Israel's, attack on America, the

00:44:28.880 one that's trying to get us into the war as possible. When over the weekend, first of all,

00:44:36.260 Biden says it's got to be a two-state solution. I'm not even sure that's the official, I don't

00:44:40.020 think that's the official policy of the Israeli government. He's saying, oh, we have to have

00:44:43.400 a two-state solution. We're only doing this for a two-state solution. Maybe it's time he

00:44:47.700 come forward and tells us exactly what the plan is, what are our intentions here. One

00:44:52.200 of the leading entrepreneurs in Israel, one of the wealthiest men in Israel, and obviously

00:44:57.680 a political opponent, Netanyahu, but he's making the case that Netanyahu's government, his part

00:45:02.900 of the coalition government has got to go for incompetence. He's making the case. I'm just

00:45:07.520 reporting it. Netanyahu blamed, over the weekend blamed the intelligence agencies, blamed the

00:45:15.700 intelligence agencies for not warning him about the Hamas situation that they knew

00:45:18.860 about. He retracted that, but he said the quiet part out loud.

00:45:25.520 So in this firestorm, you've got the neoliberal neocons, not the America first. America first,

00:45:32.640 we want the border closed and we want the deportations to start. And we want to make sure we fully

00:45:39.120 understand, even in the Taiwan situation. Oh, you're just because you're so anti-CCP. You

00:45:45.060 see the CCP under every bed. You're crazy. Hey, he ought to come forward and tell us a

00:45:51.020 plan in South China Sea in defense of Taiwan. I'm all for that. Let's do it. That case will

00:45:58.960 bury Ukraine. Now, you are having wins. And look, everybody run around with Mike Johnson's,

00:46:05.320 Mike Johnson's. Hey, Mike Johnson's in for a couple of days. And a lot of what you're hearing

00:46:11.240 is rhetoric he would have to have. The key thing is look at his actions. He has done a hard throwdown

00:46:16.580 on bifurcating Ukraine in the Israel funding. He has said he's going to put forward, and I don't

00:46:24.400 believe that even the Ukraine will come up if he sticks to the Hastert rule. But even on Israel,

00:46:30.380 which I say should take a backseat to the southern border and must take a backseat to the southern

00:46:34.960 border. By the way, we're live streaming the courtroom, and you can get the live stream

00:46:40.060 up on my site right now so you can hear what's going on. You should pay attention to this trial

00:46:44.380 because it's going to show you the lawfare they're prepared to use.

00:46:51.400 Even on Israel, he's saying there's not going to be one penny. Mike Johnson has committed,

00:46:55.740 and that's why we'll get a tweet up that came out earlier, I think from Jake Sherman,

00:46:59.440 looking for offsets or pay-fors. Mike Johnson has said, which the media hasn't really picked up,

00:47:06.360 that there will not be one penny added to the national debt for the support of Israel. The

00:47:11.620 $14 billion will be coming out of cuts in other real cuts in other places. Now, I adamantly,

00:47:19.500 I think he's doing a great job on bifurcating and going against McConnell and the collaborationist

00:47:24.700 Republicans in the Senate who are going to try to come with the only way they get their $60 billion

00:47:29.680 for their child trafficking and money laundering and bioweapons operation in Ukraine, and God knows

00:47:35.260 what else. Hey, baby, when you get in there and look at Ukraine, when there's a real investigation

00:47:41.440 in Ukraine, when you pick that scab, there's going to be a lot of pus that runs out of that.

00:47:47.520 $113 billion so far. What in the hell? And we don't even have any accurate reports whatsoever

00:47:53.740 what's going on in the battlefield. Look at all the nonsense and lies you've been spun

00:47:57.740 from MSNBC and CNN and all these Admiral Stavridis and all these experts. Go back and look. All of

00:48:04.300 it's wrong. All of it's been lies. We have no earthy idea of the pus that's under that scab,

00:48:11.000 but it ain't going to be pretty. So the fight there, at least Johnson's bifurcated that.

00:48:17.320 For those of you that have an understanding, and not the people from the cheap seats that are all

00:48:21.200 weak in this and that and the other thing. Come on, man. This is the National Football League.

00:48:26.080 This is the National Football League.

00:48:31.640 Drives me crazy.

00:48:33.740 Test my patience, but I'm a patient man.

00:48:38.960 Johnson's bifurcated it, and this is without the hammer of the neocon. Look out. You think

00:48:43.940 Murdoch News Network, who just got smoked in the Speaker thing and everything they told you

00:48:47.740 was a lie and would have led to the destruction of this country if you had followed there? Oh,

00:48:51.840 you're the agents of chaos. All weekend, revved up in such a neocon. You can't even watch it.

00:48:58.180 You can't even watch it. It's obnoxious. They want us in every war all over the place. American

00:49:03.280 troops, American planes, everywhere, and none of their kids serve. Or very few of them. But none of

00:49:09.100 the Stars kids serve. Go out of their way not to serve. No, yeah, but they want to send you all over

00:49:14.820 there and want to send all your money. The border comes first. I gave a speech on Friday

00:49:20.680 down in Carolina. We're going to have the video. I just laid down to folks, hey, the debt crisis

00:49:26.840 and another huge article, but they can't sell the bonds, the tsunami of treasuries. You can't

00:49:31.000 sell them. The financial crisis we have interlocked with the invasion of our country with 10 million

00:49:38.060 invaders. And now Axios, one of their top stories is that, oh, the public school system is about to

00:49:44.740 be overwhelmed with new migrant children. Like the poor African-American and Hispanic American

00:49:51.420 citizen children in the public schools. What they need right now is more chaos and, you know,

00:49:57.860 have to get more teachers that know foreign languages and have to go for more money they

00:50:02.480 don't have and make their own learning environment even crappier than it is. That's exactly what they

00:50:07.640 need. That's terrific to American citizen children who are African-American and Hispanic. Let's do

00:50:14.560 that. Let's make it even better. Let's make their time even more trying. Any African-American,

00:50:20.140 Hispanic parent that votes for these criminals in office, and by the way, not only do you have to

00:50:25.920 secure the border and deport 10 million, you must, I don't care about impeachment anymore. You bring

00:50:30.640 criminal charges against every official that had anything to do with this. You aided and abetted

00:50:37.400 an invasion of our nation and you must pay criminally. They want to talk about lawfare. Hey,

00:50:43.760 wait for it, baby. Because you have tried actively to destroy this nation. And if you don't think

00:50:51.020 to fix it, look, I don't care if you hate the sound of Trump's voice and you hate his image. If you see

00:50:58.240 what the established order is trying to do to him and you like where your life is with the established

00:51:04.060 order, then, hey, then you're loving it. If you maybe have a question of exactly how these globalists

00:51:11.800 are destroying this country in front of your own eyes and up in your grill and laughing in your face

00:51:17.660 while you pay for it, both with your taxes, your retirement money, and your greatest asset,

00:51:23.940 your children and grandchildren, then maybe Trump has got something going on because they got a show

00:51:30.860 trial in New York to liquidate his business. They've got a four indictments, 91 charges, 700 years in a

00:51:39.460 federal prison in various bogus other charges, criminal charges that are all laughable. And now

00:51:46.680 to top it off, because we don't have enough, they got to take him off the ballot. Why they have to take

00:51:51.400 him off the ballot? Because on the ballot, Colorado, they know he's going to win. Why they have to take

00:51:56.580 him off? Why do they have to do this? And what's a constitutional case? Why they got to do it in a

00:52:00.140 state court? And they're going to have other state courts because they know if he's on a freaking

00:52:05.180 ballot, he wins. There's no Democrat. Newsom, you saw Newsom, this clown show over and with the CCP.

00:52:15.840 That's going to beat him. Or do you see, do you see our vice president on 60 minutes over the weekend?

00:52:20.840 60 minutes, that's like child abuse. You can't, that, the interview was so softball, but she's so,

00:52:29.120 there's something bizarrely out of touch with her. I don't think people could see a commander in

00:52:34.660 chief there. I just, I'm just, hey, I'm just throwing it out there. Right? Who's going to be

00:52:39.720 Oprah? Big Mike? This is what we're going to come with? Don't think so. If Trump's on the ballot,

00:52:44.440 Trump wins. Let me be very blunt. If Trump's name's for a ballot, Trump wins, even in Colorado.

00:52:49.460 Look at the polling. Look at, actually, it's Vander Hay and Allen, two cheerleaders for the

00:52:56.260 corporatist, globalist elite, put out the most brutal takedown as the lead story called Behind

00:53:02.680 the Curtain on Biden. If you're a Biden supporter, you're sitting there going, oh my God, this is

00:53:09.560 horrible, terrible, everything, every aspect of it. It's only going to get worse. You know why?

00:53:13.960 Because, and Rasmussen's got a poll out today, 86% of the American people are quite petrified

00:53:20.920 that what we're doing right now in Israel is going to lead to a bigger conflict in the Middle East and

00:53:27.400 may lead to a global conflict. Hey, American people must be paying attention, must be paying attention,

00:53:32.820 must be paying attention. And at home, Jewish kids can't even go to college. Look at Cornell.

00:53:43.520 At Cornell, they're up there and they're in the dining hall that has the kosher food on a Sunday

00:53:49.020 afternoon, on a slow, quiet Sunday afternoon with the beautiful changing of the leaves, the autumn as

00:53:56.120 it is up there in that part of New York. And, uh, and, uh, and of course the, uh, uh, you know, the,

00:54:03.740 the pro-Palestinian crowd, the one egged on by AOC and the squad are saying, oh, we want to get in

00:54:08.860 there and slit their throats. I want to get in there and slit their throats. You saw what happened

00:54:14.640 at Cooper Union. Cooper Union, one of the most, oh, touchy feely, you know, most liberal institutions

00:54:20.320 in Manhattan banging on the door. I think in the library, those four or five young Jewish, Jewish

00:54:26.220 students, if that mob had gotten through that, if that door had been let go, those kids would have

00:54:30.640 been torn apart. They would have been torn apart just like they were torn apart in, uh, on the 7

00:54:37.040 October. Okay. We've had a little bit of a truncated show to start this week off. We had to do this

00:54:44.720 though. It's a must. You had to see what's going on. You had to see the nonsense in this court.

00:54:48.640 You're watching something that no one in America would ever thought would have happened.

00:54:53.660 And that is kangaroo courts, every bit as deadly as the Nazi judges and, and Stalin show trial on

00:55:01.920 those two regimes that's come to the United States of America. And the only way we're going to stop

00:55:07.480 it is to defeat these people. There's no compromise here. You can't compromise on this. One side's going

00:55:13.640 to win and one side's going to lose. And they understand that if Trump's name's on a ballot,

00:55:18.360 he wins. And if he wins, you win. So they're going to do everything now to take him off every ballot

00:55:25.080 besides bankrupting him, liquidating his business, sending him to prison for 700 years. They will

00:55:31.760 leave no stone unturned to defeat you. Let me repeat this to defeat you, to take your voice away

00:55:39.180 because they're petrified. Now you've started to change the cartel. And I told you this wasn't

00:55:44.840 going to be perfect, right? We got work to do. You got ramparts to man, no CR, no CR in January.

00:55:52.120 We strongly disagree with Speaker Johnson and we're going to fight this. Remember, you can't

00:55:58.880 get any more hardcore than the war room in the war room. Possibly have a lot of work to do,

00:56:03.720 but you saw in Denver, Colorado, the great state of Colorado and one of the greatest cities in this

00:56:08.300 country, Denver, Colorado. Think how much history has been made there. And history is made today as

00:56:13.740 a kangaroo court, detestable kangaroo court tries to take Donald John Trump off the ballot. Back in a

00:56:21.100 minute. There's a lot to be nervous about out there. Open social media or turn on the news and all you see

00:56:30.840 is crime and societal decay. A lot of people just run out and buy a gun and then it sits in a safe.

00:56:38.020 There's ever an emergency. They're not going to be prepared and run the risk of hurting themselves

00:56:43.900 or others. There's no way around it. You need to train and you need to train often. Unfortunately,

00:56:51.560 it's time consuming to go to the range. Assuming there's even one nearby and ammo prices are through

00:56:56.700 the roof. iTarget was invented so you could practice any time in the safety and convenience

00:57:01.900 of your own home. Simply download the iTarget Pro app, load your caliber specific laser bullet into

00:57:09.860 your firearm and start training. Practice alone, compete with friends or use it to safely train

00:57:17.120 friends and family who are new to firearms. Go to iTargetPro.com and get 10% off at checkout

00:57:23.880 when you use offer code Bannon. This is the smartest, safest way to train, which is why

00:57:30.120 competitive shooters trust dry fire training as part of their regimen. Get yours today. That's

00:57:37.800 the letter iTargetPro.com. That's iTargetPro.com. Offer code Bannon. iTargetPro.com. Action. Action. Action.

00:57:48.320 Here's your host, Stephen K. Bannon.

00:57:53.200 Okay, we're going to get to the ramparts. The five to seven o'clock show tonight is going to be jammed.

00:57:57.340 There's so much we're going to do that we wanted to do this morning and things are going on today.

00:58:02.380 Obviously, make sure you're back here. I also want to make sure I keep skipping Arizona.

00:58:06.380 Same Arizona, Arizona, Arizona. Watch Arizona. The same thing's going to happen here.

00:58:11.520 Arizona, Michigan. Wait for it. They must take, let me repeat this. If Trump's on the ballot,

00:58:18.600 he wins. They understand the hard, cold reality of this. If Trump is on a ballot, he will win.

00:58:29.200 And they will do everything now to remove him from said ballot and take your ability to make

00:58:34.540 a choice away from you, away from you, away from you. If you're prepared to stand here and let that

00:58:41.060 happen, right, just go back to your game of pickleball. But if you're not, we're going to

00:58:47.960 grind this out. And quite frankly, this should not have popped up like it popped up, but I'll save

00:58:53.840 that for another day. It's time to get focused on immediately what we have to do to stop this.

00:59:00.620 But this is one of the strategies to overwhelm. President Trump over the weekend said $100 million

00:59:07.900 in law fees. This is the opportunity cost. This is they're trying to break him. They're trying to

00:59:12.680 get his attention diverted, right? Is it now the polling in Iowa and places are coming out and the

00:59:17.140 polling against Biden is overwhelming. But they're trying to overwhelm him. They're trying to that $100

00:59:23.820 million. Could that have gone into the campaign for his victory? The hundreds of millions of dollars

00:59:28.460 they're having a pain because the Murdoch News Network continues to drive the Keebler elves and

00:59:34.440 to try to give them any traction. And this baby, trust me, connect Murdoch to Leonard Leo to Colorado

00:59:42.080 to the dying campaigns in the sand. And don't tell me Nikki Haley's resurgent. I heard her speech at

00:59:47.700 the RJC. Nobody is going to know. No MAGA is going to support that's all Israel first and not America

00:59:53.520 first. And we need to get focused on America first. Israel's our ally, but America first. If America, if we

01:00:01.040 don't stop this invasion, we don't stop this spending. There's not going to be in America. And if there's

01:00:05.740 not America, you're not going to be there to assist and be an ally to Israel. Do not put the cart before

01:00:13.080 the horse. We must focus and we must prioritize like adults. Mike Lindell, they're trying to put you out of

01:00:20.840 business too. Tell us how we're, we're, we only have a couple of minutes for your day, unfortunately,

01:00:24.640 because everything else going on, but I need to know the audience wants to know how are we getting

01:00:28.340 to full capacity on the factory floor out there? Well, we're running the biggest sales ever, Steve.

01:00:33.740 We've got, we've got a few days left. As everyone knows, our commercials came out this weekend,

01:00:38.640 but you at the War Room can get things for the lowest, even lower than the prices out there

01:00:43.420 commercially. Uh, we have our towels, the six piece towel sets, uh, flash show on them for the

01:00:50.480 War Room for $29.98. This is our six piece towel sets, 50% off. Uh, they actually work. They actually

01:00:57.980 absorb. There they are. All the colors, get them now. Whether all the colors are in all these new

01:01:04.080 colors, they're absolutely the most amazing towels ever. Get them for all your Christmas gifts. You're

01:01:09.960 supporting my pillow in every way. And then also remember to call that number 800-873-1062, 800-873-1062,

01:01:22.120 or go to mypillow.com and use that promo code War Room. Go down to the War Room square. You're

01:01:27.500 going to see another special there. These are my slippers, everybody. The original slippers with all

01:01:33.620 the size of the wide sizes, um, um, small, large, medium, women's, men's for $39.98. And on TV, they're

01:01:41.780 all over TV right now on sale for $49.98. We're doing this special for the War Room posse that have

01:01:48.140 got their capacity, got us up to capacity by the success of the MyPillow 2.0, which you can also get

01:01:55.220 that for 50% off. $39.98 for the queen size, king size, just $5 more. The best pillow in history,

01:02:02.820 everybody. And, uh, so please keep supporting us, Steve. Um, that, that keeps me going because I've

01:02:08.980 got a lot of other stuff and this has been a distraction for me to try and get to MyPillow

01:02:14.080 when they attacked MyPillow, but I'm going, I'm keeping going over here to secure our elections and

01:02:18.960 everybody, if you keep MyPillow going, my employees, uh, uh, it keeps everything going.

01:02:24.780 Mike, we'll have you back up at five o'clock tonight. Thank you. We've been truncated because

01:02:28.820 of the situation in Colorado. Thank you. Mike Lindell, keep a hammer. Have you back on

01:02:32.740 tonight? It's going to be packed. Okay. Charlie Kirk and his team is going to pick up and they're

01:02:37.640 going to have some observations on the situation in Denver. Maybe even pick up a little bit of the

01:02:41.280 trial. Real America's Voice is obviously going to have it up. We're going to live stream. We're

01:02:45.360 live streaming that on my account. And maybe if Grace and Moe can put it on the, uh, the War Room

01:02:50.440 account. Also, we've got the new app, the Bill Blaster. It makes your life many, the ramparts so much

01:02:56.500 easier. This was designed and created by Grace Chong and a team. Uh, and it's, as you know,

01:03:01.600 Grace has all been all over, she will put people on blast in a second. So this is a way to make

01:03:07.080 your life easier as one of the cohorts here, uh, in the Vanguard, in the minoritarian, where

01:03:13.140 they cost the minor, minoritarian Vanguardist, right? Vanguardism, which is pretty damn good

01:03:19.780 explanation. Um, back here, five to seven, Posobica followed after that. We'll have an update

01:03:25.260 of what's going on in Colorado. Also a lot of what's going on the border, a lot of what's

01:03:30.000 happening in Israel, the expanding war there with the Persians. Also talking about China,

01:03:34.880 the South China Sea, all of it, and capital markets in the economy. Not a better day to

01:03:41.220 kick the week off and leave you with Billy Joe Shaver. I might say the late Billy Joe Shaver

01:03:46.580 and John Anderson. Get thee behind me, Satan. I'll take us out. Charlie Kirk's next. We'll see

01:03:51.380 you back here at five o'clock.

01:03:52.420 Get thee behind me, Satan. For I commanded in the name of the Lord Jesus Christ of Nazareth.

01:04:03.300 Get thee behind me, Satan. For I commanded in the name of the Lord Jesus Christ.

01:04:13.740 I looked into the mirror and I couldn't see myself. The demons that were in me had turned

01:04:25.760 me wrong side out. I knew inside my soul I was headed straight for hell. But I couldn't

01:04:35.220 get thee behind me, Satan. For I commanded in the name of the Lord Jesus Christ of Nazareth. You

01:04:53.140 get thee behind me, Satan. For I commanded in the name of the Lord Jesus Christ.

01:05:03.140 The moon and stars were hidden by the shroud that clouded round. I could see my loved ones

01:05:13.360 weeping as they lowered me in the ground. No word was spoken.

01:05:19.020 For War Room veterans, you know we have been all over this supply chain issue with China

01:05:24.680 and medications and the active pharmaceutical ingredients. China has a stranglehold on us

01:05:31.840 where there's a way to break that. Jace Medical. I got an emergency medication kit from them.

01:05:38.900 The FDA just declared a global shortage of medication and warned that critical antibiotics

01:05:43.940 are in extreme short supply across the United States. But you know that because you're a viewer

01:05:49.400 or listener of this show. Now here's the action you can take to correct. Do yourself and your family

01:05:55.520 a favor and get your Jace case right now. It's a pack of five prescription antibiotics you'll have

01:06:01.940 on hand for common emergencies. Just visit JaceMedical.com. That's Jace, J-A-S-E, JaceMedical.com.

01:06:10.260 Take a few minutes and fill out the form. Your information will be reviewed by a board-certified

01:06:15.860 physician and your medication will be dispensed by a licensed pharmacy at a fraction of the regular cost.

01:06:22.580 You'll be glad you have the Jace case. Go to Jace Medical. That's one word, J-A-S-E,

01:06:28.920 medical.com and enter code Bannon at checkout for a discount on your order. That's promo code Bannon

01:06:35.260 at Jace, J-A-S-E, medical.com. You know what the problem is because you've watched the show.

01:06:42.100 You can break, you can take action and break that problem by going to Jace Medical and get your Jace

01:06:48.300 case today. Action, action, action. Folks, let me tell you about Salty. It's a company that makes

01:06:56.080 a soft gel supplement rich in antioxidants to help people like you and me keep a healthy heart.

01:07:02.440 While COVID gets all the headlines, it's important to realize that heart disease kills nearly 700,000

01:07:09.640 Americans every year. Yes, heart disease is the number one killer every year, year in and year out.

01:07:14.440 Heart disease builds over time. Hypertension, high blood pressure, bad cholesterol, diabetes,

01:07:19.400 all of it affects our heart. A healthy heart is key to being energetic as we get older. It is never

01:07:26.940 too early to take care of your heart. You see, heart disease sneaks up on us. You can start in your 30s

01:07:33.640 and when this happens, you're at serious risk by the time you turn 60. If you want to take care of your

01:07:38.220 heart and those you care about, please go to warroomhealth.com. That's warroomhealth.com. All one word,

01:07:46.360 warroomhealth.com. Use the code warroom at checkout to save 67% of your first shipment. That's code warroom

01:07:53.940 at checkout to save 67%. Do it again. Warroomhealth, all one word, warroomhealth.com. Go there today.

01:08:02.120 You need, if you're going to be part of the posse, you need a strong heart. You need a lion's heart.

01:08:06.200 How we're going to do that is with Salty. Go there, do it today. Check it out.

Bannon's War Room - October 30, 2023

Episode 3138： Elites Removal Of Your Voice

Episode Stats

Length

Words per Minute

Word Count

Sentence Count

Misogynist Sentences

Hate Speech Sentences

Summary

Transcript