In this episode, Dr. Aaron M. Malone joins me to talk about the current state of the economy and the impact it has on young voters. We talk about how the economy disproportionately hurts people under 35 years old, and how it will affect them in the future.
00:00:00.000Same thing with young voters, and I can't emphasize what you've said enough about this economy.
00:00:04.600This economy disproportionately hurts Americans, I think, under 35, under 40, who can't afford their first home, who really can't afford to live the type of life that their parents lived, who see themselves falling further and further behind every single week.
00:00:29.820And they hear us talking about how great the economy is and what I hear an awful lot.
00:00:35.020And I know you hear an awful lot. I hear younger Americans saying, I'm not saying that I can't even afford to rent a house, let alone buy one.
00:00:46.040Yeah, that's it. I mean, I would put myself in that category. Honestly, it's it's very difficult.
00:00:51.700And I would also just say that, you know, the lack of real competition in American democracy at this point is a problem, because, you know, if if those voters are looking at their choices as either Donald Trump or Joe Biden, and that's what the choices seem to be at the moment.
00:01:09.100The option is clear, but they're being asked to swallow a whole lot.
00:01:14.520Yeah. And so there's there's no real alternative that's saying, you know, hey, I will I will attend to your needs because the Democratic Party has essentially, I believe, for many years now.
00:01:25.840And this is this is not a new phenomenon. It has taken the votes for granted of both black people, people of color in general and young people.
00:01:34.660That hasn't changed. And as these numbers really. Let me have it.
00:01:43.220People, you know, vote on their lived experience, people is all this nonsense you hear.
00:01:48.300I jumped the guys on the circus on the last episode of that show after eight years or, you know,
00:01:55.460Homan tries to come up with this trope. Oh, elections are about the future. That's all nonsense.
00:02:00.840Elections are about the lived experience of people.
00:02:02.780That's what I told him. This is weeks ago. The lived experience of the lived experience of people.
00:02:09.280And the my able trustee assistant here, Captain Bannon, who's thank you very much, Captain Bannon, getting a thing of warpath for me.
00:02:22.320The lived experience of people and under 35 years old, they know it's they know it's they know it's horrific.
00:02:30.780The other thing is not calculated in there. I'm going to get Joe Allen.
00:02:33.120And this is why the Sam Altman situation is so important.
00:02:37.400This thing about artificial intelligence.
00:02:40.000Artificial intelligence is going to cut through the job market like a Sith through grass.
00:02:46.460And the jobs are going to go are not the plumbers and not the carpenters and not the blue collar value added jobs of people with skills and crafts and craftsmen.
00:02:57.720The first wave is going to be administrative. It's going to be white collar.
00:03:00.740It's going to be lower white collar jobs.
00:03:01.980A lot of folks who went to college will be quite shocked that their college education didn't really prepare for this.
00:03:08.400I tell you, the other thing is going to be cut into it.
00:03:10.120I know a lot of very smart programmers.
00:03:12.620I have a lot of people that are just amazing programmers and they're sitting there going, hey, half of my job right now is managing the A.I.
00:03:19.960In a couple of years, A.I. is going to be doing this, that the programmer, you know, teach to code.
00:03:24.980You got to teach people to code. That's the future. Teach to code.
00:03:27.400Not so fast their shipmate. I think that's going to be so the people under 35 are going to look at a not just these world crises of the of the financial,
00:03:36.660what we've done to the balance sheet of the United States, which is going to impact them every day of their life going forward.
00:03:42.500Let me repeat just one thing. We're never going to pay down one penny of the face amount of the debt.
00:04:28.740Dr. Malone, you've got a tweet out, if we can put it up.
00:04:32.580A number of things I know you want to talk about we've got today, but I know you're pressed for time.
00:04:37.580I've got to talk to you about and you were at, I think, the Romanian conference.
00:04:41.320You came out, you put a tweet out about 17, about the excess deaths.
00:04:46.620And this is something I think we've got vaccine injured and now we have this concept, this thing about excess deaths.
00:04:52.320And you said that you've been able to analyze or it's verifiable now that there were 17 million excess deaths that you guys can tie directly back to the vaccine.
00:05:02.740Just I want to explain that tweet, explain what the receipts are in back of it, because I know it's going to be very controversial.
00:05:08.680So in the vaccine, we know we had the vaccine injured and we know we've got the situation with potential excess deaths.
00:05:25.540One's a former full professor academic who spent his entire career focused on all cause mortality analysis.
00:05:31.680He has extensive data going back to the turn of the century.
00:05:36.260So basically 1900 and together with his team, they have performed many analyses of all cause mortality and correlation with various factors.
00:05:48.160And the announcement by the Nobel Prize committee in awarding the prize for medicine and physiology triggered them to examine the merits of the claim that 14 million lives had been saved by the vaccines.
00:06:08.100And these are guys that are hard core analysts.
00:06:13.440They they're doing similar stuff to what Ed Dowd does.
00:06:16.320But from the standpoint of doing it with the rigor that withstand peer review and they have a published peer reviewed paper now focusing on the correlations that were asserted in a Lancet manuscript to support the claims from the Nobel laureate committee that 14 million lives have been saved.
00:06:38.140And they decided to go through that and what they did was find that there were a number of artifacts, even though this is a peer reviewed journal in a peer reviewed publication that was used in published in 2022 that supported this thesis.
00:06:52.780What they found was that that was severely flawed in terms of a statistical analysis.
00:06:57.420And then they went beyond that and analyzed, well, what actually has been the attributable increase in all cause mortality, like what Ed's been doing.
00:07:09.340Deaths is something that states tend to track quite rigorously.
00:07:16.920We're not going to argue about how dead you are.
00:07:18.860And so when they applied their toolkit, this is advanced statistics and done in a rigorous fashion by a well-established team.
00:07:31.440What they were able to document is not only was the paper wrong that there weren't 14 million lives saved, but in fact, there were 17 million deaths attributable to the vaccine as they looked, as Ed Dowd has been doing, looked over time at the increase in all cause mortality that followed the deployment of the vaccine products.
00:07:54.540And what they did was they were able to compare different nation states and that allowed them to demonstrate that there was this increase in all cause mortality in those states that deployed the vaccines.
00:08:10.340And they were able to take the percent uptake of vaccines and back calculate this in a rigorous way.
00:08:17.780And that's what gives rise to this excess all cause mortality attributed to the vaccines in this analysis of 17 million, as opposed to the Nobel Prize Committee's assertion that it was 14 million lives saved.
00:08:35.060This is what's so shocking, but it's two things that are so shocking.
00:08:39.640And I want to make sure we go slow because this audience needs to understand this.
00:08:44.420How, what's shocking to me about this, the most shocking, because I'm no expert, but I see, I read these peer review journals and I, you know, everybody sends them to me and I go through it as best I can.
00:08:57.480And I've got a couple of master's degrees from, you know, pretty reputable institutions and I try to weave my way through it.
00:09:03.680The thing that's most shocking to me, so go back and explain this and correct me if I'm wrong.
00:09:09.300Isn't Lancet one of the most revered, this is the British journal, isn't it one of the most revered?
00:09:14.560Peer review journals in the world about medicine and these types of things.
00:09:18.620When they eviscerate, I guess the Nobel Prize, this, this, they eviscerate the first part about the 14 million and show the serious flaws.
00:09:35.980And how do these guys, it looks like, look, they're, they're, you know, they're, they're experts.
00:09:42.460But how do they, how do they, how do they eviscerate this?
00:09:46.280So what they did was they analyzed the statistical models, the calculations that were being performed in this Lancet paper.
00:09:56.720And they were able to demonstrate the specific statistical analysis flaws that had been missed by the peer reviewers.
00:10:05.680Remember that during the COVID crisis, we've clearly had a bias towards publishing material which supports the established narrative.
00:10:14.680And this is another case of this where the peer reviewed process was soft and squishy, not rigorous.
00:10:22.760And so this skilled team that does this for a living and has for decades dived into this, was able to show the specific flaws in this paper in which, let's see, give you the title.
00:10:34.700You can download it from the website that's, uh, uh, was cited there, uh, quantitative evaluation of whether the Nobel prize winning COVID-19 vaccine actually saved millions of lives published as a brief report in October 18, 2023.
00:10:52.260So they were able to go through, find the specific statistical flaws, then correct them, then apply the correct statistical algorithms, and work through their databases in which they were comparing Northern Hemisphere to Southern Hemisphere and different nation states.
00:11:10.060But if this had come out at the time, because this is back from, hang on, this is back from 22, it's a 31 million swing.
00:11:20.640Oh, upon further review, we didn't save 14 million lives.
00:11:25.340They actually had excess deaths of 17 million.
00:11:31.540And the question gets to be, how can, I mean, is there criminal, you know, responsibility here?
00:11:38.740You say they made statistical, well, these guys are supposed to be experts that did the paper, and then you're supposed to have all these outside peer review people that did it.
00:11:47.720I mean, these people have to be exposed.
00:11:52.260And they sit there all day long on the other media and beat this audience up and beat, and this is why, folks, I want you up in, this is one of the ones I want you up in people's grill about tomorrow over a drumstick and cranberry.
00:12:04.120It's not time now to, when they're giving you a stink eye about the vaccine, right, and the effectiveness in Pfizer's profits, get up in the grill about this study.
00:12:14.920This cuts to the heart of what the problem is.
00:12:17.800This was the institutions and whose payroll they're on, where to find out, because this wasn't a hard thing for the new team to do.
00:12:25.840They went through it in the basic statistical models and just eviscerated the first report, which is shocking in the fact that you had a world-class team that actually did it, and you supposedly had all these experts on peer review exactly in this field on statistical analysis that approved it.
00:12:44.100And it came out with one of the biggest brands out there, Lancet.
00:12:46.840Am I wrong in any of those assertions?
00:12:49.560No, it's correct, and we've seen similar things with the studies on hydroxychloroquine, the studies on ivermectin, the Imperial College London School of Tropical Medicine modeling that asserted that we had 3.4% case fatality rate.
00:13:08.760And, in fact, what we have is, depending on who you ask, somewhere between 0.2% case fatality rate across all ages associated with the COVID virus, the SARS-CoV-2.
00:13:24.640And all of these egregious measures were justified based on another faulty modeling.
00:13:32.340What we have, and this was something that Dennis Rancourt really pointed out in his lecture in Bucharest two days ago, was that we must have more rigorous independent analyses of these key mathematical models.
00:13:51.780His point was that what we had here were fundamental mathematical flaws, and that there needs to be some sort of mathematical team set up, and that there needs to be some mathematical team set up to oversee these kinds of public health assertions that are again and again coming out wrong.
00:14:17.980And you're dead on, Steve, all through this.
00:14:22.780It's just been lie after lie after lie supported by bad math.
00:14:58.980I know this is hard to believe, but we're up against another government shutdown later this month, and our wise leaders deal with it how they always do, with more spending.
00:15:10.420While lawmakers are high-fiving, your savings account continues to lose value, because more spending weakens the dollar.
00:16:34.260I think my colleague, Natalie Winters, is going to get to that in the evening show tonight.
00:16:39.940I don't have time for it, but I've got to go.
00:16:41.440You and I have talked about the Epoch Times has an amazing piece on the Army.
00:16:44.880They've missed their recruiting so hard.
00:16:47.020They're going back to now look at people they drove out of the military that were unvaccinated.
00:16:54.060What's the importance of this conference in Romania, in Bucharest?
00:17:01.160And I know you and I have talked about we need to have one here in the United States, even if it's digitally, sometime in the first quarter.
00:17:08.060There's something there's something quite important that's going on.
00:17:12.800And I want to make sure the audience knows, although we may not have it on every day, there's huge efforts underway, huge movement underway to get to the bottom of the pandemic.
00:17:23.820What the real issue was, was this thing planned?
00:17:30.900And the whole issue with the vaccines and what the vaccines have actually done, you know, with research and data and analysis.
00:17:39.660So tell me first about what happened in Romania and then what can we look forward to if we try to.
00:17:44.680And I think you and I working together and other people will be able to have hopefully some sort of at least digital conference centered in Washington, D.C.
00:17:54.320I think that there's I floated this and thank you, Steve, for your response in in response to advocacy by the minority party in Romania that we take the next step and have it in D.C.
00:18:12.880and focus more on the political side of the covid crisis because their perception and they're they're carefully watching their polls.
00:18:22.980They have an election coming up this year.
00:18:24.500Also, they're currently polling at over 30 percent, but they only hold 10 percent of the seats.
00:18:30.100So they were the sponsors for this particular conference in Bucharest in Ceaușescu's palace.
00:18:36.280And of all the ICS, this is the fourth international covid summit or crisis summit meeting that we've had.
00:20:10.600Vanity Fair is strongly anti-Trump, but still it's full of pearls.
00:20:15.000And we have additional stories concerning the cover ups that have occurred in in NIH and NIAID chain of command concerning the engineering of the virus.
00:20:27.480This is what the Select COVID Committee has been focused on.
00:20:30.940And now we have more momentum on the House and Senate side to start to dive into the tragedy.
00:20:40.780Really, many people are asserting the criminality of what has been imposed on the world with these, quote, vaccine products that are neither safe nor effective.
00:20:51.700So the thing I've got to bounce, but yeah, go ahead.
00:20:58.860The thinking is regarding this fifth summit to be held in D.C. that we really need to focus more on the political side of what's been going on.
00:21:06.420Well, no, this is what I want to get to.
00:21:11.500There's been recommendations, I know, from Matt Gaetz and others to Speaker Johnson.
00:21:16.100One of the ways to start driving momentum on the COVID Select Committee is there should be a criminal referral right now on Tony Fauci.
00:49:12.220By the way, one of the parts of the hope, and to put aside despair, is the fact that you've got the old warriors and you've got some of the war room posse coming and you see the energy of these young people.
00:49:26.380You will be empowered and thrilled about the direction of America and saving this republic when you combine both groups.
00:49:56.880You're seeing like-minded people, and that empowers people.
00:49:59.620Charlie, I know you've got to get ready for the noon show.
00:50:01.300You guys are on fire there, and I really appreciate you guys.
00:50:04.720The effort of your team over at Turning Point to put this on, the scale it is, right before the holidays, right before Christmas, is fantastic.
00:50:47.080They're obsessed with Mike Davis and our folks here at the War Room that are making all the efforts, setting the policy, getting focused on taking over the government and deconstructing the administrative state.
00:51:00.440They're milking that because they understand we have the ability to break the uniparty, the globalists, the oligarchs, basic hold on Washington, D.C.